essay about expectation in teacher

Essay on Expectation In Teacher

Students are often asked to write an essay on Expectation In Teacher in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Expectation In Teacher

Teachers as guides.

Teachers are like guides. They show us the path to knowledge and help us grow. We expect them to know a lot and to share this with us in a way we can understand. Good teachers explain things clearly and make learning interesting.

Patience in Teaching

We also hope teachers will be patient. Not everyone learns at the same speed. Some students need extra time to understand. Teachers should not get upset if we ask many questions or if we take longer to learn something new.

Encouragement and Support

Another important expectation is encouragement. When teachers cheer us on, we feel more confident. We want our teachers to believe in us and support our dreams. This helps us to try our best and reach our goals.

Fairness in Class

Lastly, we expect fairness. Teachers should treat all students the same way. No one should feel left out or favored. When teachers are fair, everyone in class feels safe and respected, which is very important for learning.

250 Words Essay on Expectation In Teacher

Teachers and what we expect from them.

Teachers are important people in our lives. They help us learn new things and grow as individuals. When we think about teachers, there are certain things we expect from them to help us do better in school and life.

Knowledge and Skills

Firstly, we expect teachers to know a lot about the subjects they teach. They should be able to answer our questions and explain things in a way that is easy for us to understand. Teachers should also have good skills in teaching. This means they can make lessons interesting and help everyone, no matter if some students find the work easy or hard.

Patience and Support

We also hope that teachers will be patient. Sometimes, it takes a while for us to understand new information or skills. A good teacher doesn’t get upset or give up on us. They keep explaining and trying different ways to help us learn. Teachers should also support us, not just in school work but also when we have other problems. They can give us advice or just listen when we need someone to talk to.

Fairness and Respect

Another thing we expect is fairness. Teachers should treat all students the same and not have favorites. They should give everyone equal chances to answer questions and participate in class activities. We also look for respect from our teachers. They should speak to us politely and listen to our opinions, even if they are different from theirs.

In conclusion, we have many expectations from our teachers. We want them to be knowledgeable, skilled, patient, supportive, fair, and respectful. These qualities help us learn better and feel good about going to school.

500 Words Essay on Expectation In Teacher

What we expect from our teachers.

Teachers play a very big role in our lives. They are not just people who teach us math, science, or English, but they also help us become better people. When we talk about what we expect from our teachers, we mean the things we think they should do or be like.

Firstly, we expect teachers to know a lot about the subjects they teach. They should be able to answer our questions and explain things in a way that makes sense to us. It’s important that they know how to make hard topics easy to understand. We also hope they can show us different ways to solve problems, especially when we’re stuck.

Patience and Understanding

Secondly, teachers should be patient. Sometimes, we might take longer to understand something, and it’s nice when a teacher doesn’t get upset or give up on us. They should understand that everyone learns at their own pace and in their own way. A good teacher tries to figure out how each student learns best and helps them in that way.

We also expect our teachers to encourage us. When we do well, they should tell us that they’re proud. And when we’re having a tough time, they should help us keep going. Teachers should believe in us and push us to do our best, even when we doubt ourselves. They should be there to support us, not just in schoolwork, but also when we have problems that might not be about school at all.

Another important thing is fairness. We expect teachers to treat everyone the same way. No student should get special treatment, and no one should feel left out or picked on. When a teacher is fair, it helps us trust them and feel safe in the classroom.

Setting a Good Example

Lastly, we look up to our teachers and often copy what they do. So, we expect them to act in a way that is good for us to follow. They should be honest, kind, and hardworking because they are role models for us. When a teacher shows good behavior, it encourages us to be good too.

In conclusion, we have many expectations of our teachers because they have an important job. They are supposed to give us knowledge, understand our different learning styles, encourage us, treat everyone fairly, and be good examples for us to follow. When teachers meet these expectations, they help us not only learn school subjects but also important life lessons. It’s a big responsibility, but great teachers can make a huge difference in our lives.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:

Essay on Expectations From Parents
Essay on Expectations In Class
Essay on Experience In Senior High School

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Happy studying!

Classroom Q&A

With larry ferlazzo.

In this EdWeek blog, an experiment in knowledge-gathering, Ferlazzo will address readers’ questions on classroom management, ELL instruction, lesson planning, and other issues facing teachers. Send your questions to [email protected]. Read more from this blog.

Teacher Expectations Play a Big Role in the Classroom. Here’s How

(This is the first post in a two-part series.)

The new question of the week is:

What is the role of teacher expectations in instruction?

I’m not sure that we talk enough about the importance of teacher expectations in the classroom and hope that this two-part series might spark some conversation.

You might also be interested in The Best Resources for Learning About the Importance of Teacher Expectations .

Today, Nancy Frey, Ph.D., Douglas Fisher, Ph.D., and Whitney Emke share their responses.

Expectations Are “Everything”

Nancy Frey, Ph.D., is a professor in educational leadership at San Diego State and a teacher leader at Health Sciences High and Middle College. Her published titles include Visible Learning in Literacy , T his Is Balanced Literacy , Removing Labels , and Rebound .

Douglas Fisher, Ph.D., is a professor of educational leadership at San Diego State University and a teacher leader at Health Sciences High. He has published numerous articles on teaching and learning as well as books such as The Teacher Clarity Playbook , PLC+ , Visible Learning for Literacy , Comprehension: The Skill, Will, and Thrill of Reading , How Tutoring Works , and most recently, How Learning Works :

In a word, everything .

The evidence of the impact of teacher expectations on student learning is both broad and deep. Hattie analyzed 613 studies on teacher expectations as part of the Visible Learning database and found that student achievement tracks closely with teacher expectations . In some cases, race, ethnicity, language proficiency, disability, gender, even appearance can subconsciously influence the expectations of a child. In other words, the evidence is you get what you expect .

Expectations telegraph to students what the teacher believes they can and cannot accomplish. Many of these come in the form of actions, not words. Assignments are a stellar example of this. Educators rarely assign tasks to students that they do not believe most can successfully complete as a result of teaching. Education Trust explored this phenomenon in a series of Equity in Motion reports . They analyzed thousands of assignments in English/language arts and mathematics in the spring of the school year. The researchers found that a startling percentage of tasks were below grade level, focused on basic recall rather than analysis, and held a low cognitive demand. TNTP (formerly The New Teacher Project) further documented the long-term trajectory of low expectations over multiple school years, noting that some students fall further behind with each passing year and never catch up .

In no way do we believe that caring educators intentionally lower expectations. So how might we interrupt the damage that low expectations causes? We turn to the work of Australian educator Christine Rubie-Davies, who has researched how high-expectations teaching is manifested in daily practice.

Communicate high expectations through your planning. Develop tasks that require students to engage in analysis and reasoning, not just simple recall of facts. Revisit tasks assigned in units to see if they align to the content standards and identify the high-level goals they should be working toward. Ways to increase the cognitive demand of tasks include asking open, rather than closed questions, withholding some information in tasks such that students must work together to locate additional resources, and requiring them to link new knowledge to existing skills and prior concepts.
Group students carefully. Use mixed-ability groups that encourage students to work together to accomplish tasks. Use differentiation as it was meant to be used: The learning is held constant, while the pathways to get there may differ. Ability grouping widens, rather than narrows, learning differences, because it makes it easier to change the learning expectations among groups. And don’t forget to change mixed-ability groups every few weeks so that students profit from learning alongside each of their classmates.
Set goals with students and assist them in monitoring their progress. Too often, students have vague and distant goals (passing Algebra 1; making their family proud) with little sense of the actions and incremental steps needed to get there. Meet with students regularly to set goals that are measurable, attainable, and progress toward long-term outcomes. Then ensure that students can regularly gauge their progress. For instance, make sure each lesson includes learning intentions, relevance, and success criteria and then pose them again near the end of the lesson. One frame is, “ Today we’re learning [learning intention] so that [statement of relevance.] You’ll know you’ve learned it when [success criteria.] ” At the end of the lesson, pose these as questions for students to answer with partners, as an exit slip, or on a Google form: “What did you learn today? Why is that important? How did you know you learned it? What do you need to be more confident in your learning?” Student responses to these questions are invaluable to the teacher, who can better calibrate their teaching, provide just-in-time supports to less confident learners, and make decisions about moving forward in the unit.

The good news is that students rise to the expectations we hold for them. Let’s ensure that our actions pair with the words of encouragement we provide.

Austin’s Butterfly

Whitney Emke is a former special educator and behavior interventionist who specialized in working with students diagnosed with emotional and behavioral disorders and autism spectrum disorders. She is the associate director of communications for EL Education :

Austin, a 1st grader in Boise, Idaho, was once tasked with creating a scientific illustration of a western tiger swallowtail.

Not just a drawing or a picture , but an accurate, colored scientific illustration of the butterfly that could be used for identification.

His first draft was fine—it certainly looked like a butterfly:

But when Austin asked his classmates if they could use this picture to identify a western tiger swallowtail accurately, they weren’t so sure.

At a critique group facilitated by their teacher, Austin’s 5- and 6-year-old peers gathered in a circle on their classroom’s carpet to look closely at his butterfly alongside the picture he based the drawing on. They offered him Kind, Specific, and Helpful feedback . They said, “Make the wing shape more pointy,” “more triangular,” and “less round.” They also suggested he include the swallowtails—the extensions to the wing at the bottom.

Austin took the feedback seriously and revised his work. His second draft was better:

Often, teachers allow students to stop here. After all, the student completed the assignment and revised it based on a round of peer feedback—this is an impressive feat.

But Austin’s teacher had even higher expectations for these students; Austin and his classmates engaged in three additional rounds of feedback and revision. Each time, the butterfly improved even more, becoming closer and closer to a true scientific illustration before, at last, Austin’s butterfly emerged from its cocoon as an inspirational model of the impact that high teacher expectations can have on the quality of student work when coupled with rigorous peer critique and revision procedures:

Artwork by Austin, a former 1st grade student at Anser Charter School in Boise, Idaho

Twenty years after Austin created this original butterfly in 2002, the message behind his story continues to resonate with teachers and educational leaders across the country; in order for students to achieve more than they think possible, educators must first ourselves believe in students’ ability to achieve more than we think possible.

In Austin’s case, this deep belief in student achievement was coupled with clear, concise guidelines for success, which ultimately led to deeper, more equitable outcomes for all students in the classroom. His teacher leveraged practices like a high-quality student-work protocol ; the teacher began by choosing a highly complex, rigorous task for students—one that might be expected of a professional scientist even though Austin and his peers were just 1st graders—because they understood that in order for students to strengthen their intellectual muscles, the tasks we ask them to complete must stretch them cognitively.

From there, the teacher ensured that all students understood the expectations of the assignment and could internalize and implement the feedback they received from one another. At the end of the protocol, Austin and his classmates had created a body of evidence their school could use for years to come as a reflection tool on how student work has changed and improved over time in their building.

When educators set a high bar for student achievement, provide students with the right structures and support to meet that bar, and genuinely believe their students will meet it, all students can achieve equitable outcomes.

Challenges like Austin’s butterfly don’t need to be one-off activities, either. High expectations can and should be built in at the curricular level because we know that the expectations school leaders set in their buildings ultimately influence the expectations teachers set in their classrooms. Students deserve to be assigned complex texts—at or above grade level—and be regularly engaged in tasks that both stretch their abilities and grow their confidence.

In the fall of 2016, Hollis Innovation Academy in Atlanta, opened its doors for the very first time to welcome a set of students who almost exclusively came from another school that was closed due to underperformance; students who were “historically marginalized, consistently discounted, and often underestimated,” says school leader Diamond Ford, Ph.D. Ford and her colleagues were determined to provide these students with “a school that embraces their identity and empowers them to speak their truth,” as well as the “knowledge and the skill to dream bigger and lead choice-filled lives.”

A key element in Ford’s plan was providing teachers with a rigorous ELA curriculum to use in their classrooms, based on the evidence that improving curriculum can improve student outcomes.

Ford’s plan was met with concern. Detractors said that the EL Education language arts curriculum she selected would be “too hard for our students” and that they would become frustrated since they weren’t yet proficient readers. Instead, they urged Ford to consider low-level readers, which they believed would be the safest, surest way to ensure those students would make literacy gains.

Ford refused to back down and insisted on setting the bar high for students at Hollis from the start.

Her students would go on to not only meet that bar but to exceed it. When provided with a standards-aligned rigorous curriculum and the support needed to access it, students at Hollis began “facilitating their own learning, establishing their own projects, and just taking their education into their own hands,” says Ford. They went on to grow 18.9 points on the College and Career Ready Performance Index (CCRPI), compared with almost the same population of students a year prior while at their previous school. The CCRPI is a comprehensive school improvement, accountability, and communication platform for educational stakeholders in Georgia that promotes college and career readiness for all students. Hollis’ success would become an exemplar for student achievement across three dimensions : mastery of knowledge and skills, character, and high-quality Work.

Austin and the students of Hollis Innovation Academy are extraordinary but not necessarily unique in this regard; in schools across the country—from Woodruff, W is., to Portland, M aine, to Detroit —we consistently see that when educators set clear expectations for students to create high-quality work while enabling and empowering them to meet those expectations, students will rise to the occasion every time.

Thanks to Nancy, Doug, and Whitney for contributing their thoughts!

Consider contributing a question to be answered in a future post. You can send one to me at [email protected] . When you send it in, let me know if I can use your real name if it’s selected or if you’d prefer remaining anonymous and have a pseudonym in mind.

You can also contact me on Twitter at @Larryferlazzo .

Education Week has published a collection of posts from this blog, along with new material, in an e-book form. It’s titled Classroom Management Q&As: Expert Strategies for Teaching .

Just a reminder; you can subscribe and receive updates from this blog via email (The RSS feed for this blog, and for all Ed Week articles, has been changed by the new redesign—new ones are not yet available). And if you missed any of the highlights from the first 10 years of this blog, you can see a categorized list below.

It Was Another Busy School Year. What Resonated for You?
How to Best Address Race and Racism in the Classroom
Schools Just Let Out, But What Are the Best Ways to Begin the Coming Year?
Classroom Management Starts With Student Engagement
Teacher Takeaways From the Pandemic: What’s Worked? What Hasn’t?
The School Year Has Ended. What Are Some Lessons to Close Out Next Year?
Student Motivation and Social-Emotional Learning Present Challenges. Here’s How to Help
How to Challenge Normative Gender Culture to Support All Students
What Students Like (and Don’t Like) About School
Technology Is the Tool, Not the Teacher
How to Make Parent Engagement Meaningful
Teaching Social Studies Isn’t for the Faint of Heart
Differentiated Instruction Doesn’t Need to Be a Heavy Lift
How to Help Students Embrace Reading. Educators Weigh In
10 Strategies for Reaching English-Learners
10 Ways to Include Teachers in Important Policy Decisions
10 Teacher-Proofed Strategies for Improving Math Instruction
Give Students a Role in Their Education
Are There Better Ways Than Standardized Tests to Assess Students? Educators Think So
How to Meet the Challenges of Teaching Science
If I’d Only Known. Veteran Teachers Offer Advice for Beginners
Writing Well Means Rewriting, Rewriting, Rewriting
Christopher Emdin, Gholdy Muhammad, and More Education Authors Offer Insights to the Field
How to Build Inclusive Classrooms
What Science Can Teach Us About Learning
The Best Ways for Administrators to Demonstrate Leadership
Listen Up: Give Teachers a Voice in What Happens in Their Schools
10 Ways to Build a Healthier Classroom
Educators Weigh In on Implementing the Common Core, Even Now
What’s the Best Professional-Development Advice? Teachers and Students Have Their Say
Plenty of Instructional Strategies Are Out There. Here’s What Works Best for Your Students
How to Avoid Making Mistakes in the Classroom
Looking for Ways to Organize Your Classroom? Try Out These Tips
Want Insight Into Schooling? Here’s Advice From Some Top Experts

I am also creating a Twitter list including all contributors to this column .

The opinions expressed in Classroom Q&A With Larry Ferlazzo are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Sign Up for EdWeek Update

Edweek top school jobs.

Collage art of civics and democracy images.

Sign Up & Sign In

My expectation to my teacher essay

my expectation to my teacher essay

My Expectation to My Teacher Essay

Answer: Writing an essay on “My Expectation to My Teacher” is a wonderful opportunity to reflect on the qualities and actions you believe are essential for an effective teacher-student relationship. This type of essay allows you to express your hopes and desires for the educational experience and the role your teacher plays in it. Here’s a comprehensive guide to help you craft an engaging and meaningful essay.

Introduction:

Start your essay with an engaging introduction that states the importance of the teacher-student relationship. You could mention why having clear expectations of your teacher is vital for your academic and personal growth.

Example: Education is a collaborative journey between teachers and students. As learners, our expectations from teachers significantly shape our academic experience and personal development. Understanding and articulating these expectations can foster a more productive and fulfilling educational environment.

Body Paragraphs:

Expectation of Knowledge and Expertise:

Discuss the importance of your teacher being knowledgeable and well-versed in the subject matter. Explain how a deep understanding of the content boosts your confidence and trust in their teaching.

Example: I expect my teacher to possess a thorough understanding of the subject they are teaching. A teacher’s expertise not only helps in clearly explaining complex concepts but also instills confidence in us as students. When a teacher is knowledgeable, it enhances our trust in their guidance and motivates us to delve deeper into the subject.

Effective Communication Skills:

Emphasize the need for clear and effective communication. This includes not only explaining lessons well but also being approachable for questions and discussions.

Example: Communication is a cornerstone of effective teaching. I expect my teacher to be able to convey ideas and concepts clearly and succinctly. Additionally, having an open-door policy where students feel comfortable approaching the teacher for questions or discussions is crucial for a supportive learning environment.

Encouragement and Support:

Highlight the importance of emotional support and encouragement. Explain how validation and motivation from the teacher can enhance student performance and confidence.

Example: A good teacher recognizes the importance of encouragement and support in a student’s academic journey. I hope my teacher is someone who acknowledges our efforts, provides constructive feedback, and motivates us to achieve our full potential. Supportive teachers create a positive classroom atmosphere where students feel valued and encouraged to take risks and learn from their mistakes.

Adaptability and Flexibility:

Discuss the significance of a teacher’s adaptability to different learning styles and needs. Mention how a flexible approach can cater to diverse student backgrounds and preferences.

Example: Each student has a unique learning style and pace. Therefore, I expect my teacher to be adaptable and flexible in their teaching methods. By incorporating various instructional strategies, and technology, and providing additional resources, a teacher can cater to the diverse needs of all students, ensuring no one is left behind.

Fairness and Respect:

Address the necessity of fairness and respect in the classroom. Explain how equitable treatment and mutual respect form the foundation of a healthy learning environment.

Example: Fairness and respect are fundamental qualities I expect from my teacher. It is essential for students to feel that they are treated with respect and that grading and classroom policies are administered equitably. A respectful and fair teacher fosters a trusting and inclusive classroom environment where all students feel valued and supported.

Conclusion:

Summarize the key points discussed in the body paragraphs and restate the overall significance of having clear and positive expectations from your teacher. Conclude with a hopeful note on how meeting these expectations can lead to a fruitful educational experience for both the student and the teacher.

Example: In conclusion, my expectations of my teacher encompass a combination of knowledge, effective communication, emotional support, adaptability, and fairness. By meeting these expectations, teachers can create a nurturing and stimulating educational environment that not only facilitates academic success but also promotes personal growth. I am hopeful that with a strong teacher-student partnership, we can achieve remarkable progress and excellence.

By following this structure and enriching it with your personal insights and experiences, you can create a compelling and insightful essay on “My Expectation to My Teacher.” This will not only reflect your aspirations but also help in establishing a blueprint for a positive and impactful educational experience.

How teacher expectations empower student learning

Subscribe to the center for universal education bulletin, niharika gupta and ng niharika gupta project lead - central square foundation sameer sampat ss sameer sampat co-founder - global school leaders.

July 29, 2021

In primary school, we were both lucky to have teachers who thought we were brilliant: Ms. Darrow believed Sameer was an excellent student despite average grades, and Ms. Lewis made Niharika feel like she could survive anything. Looking back, neither of us knows why they thought this way, but we’re certain that they both truly felt this way, and their feelings made us believe it as well. Our time with these teachers made us believe in our ability to take on academic challenges, building a base of confidence that we would draw on throughout our lives.

We experienced firsthand that what a teacher expects from a student can have a powerful effect. But we also know that there are many students who never have a teacher who believes in them. There is a strong perception among teachers and other stakeholders that students from disadvantaged economic and social backgrounds cannot learn as well. These beliefs adversely impact what teachers do in the classroom and in turn how much students learn and grow. It’s precisely these students from disadvantaged backgrounds who have been hit hardest by COVID-19 and who need the most help. To bridge this growing inequality in learning, we must design support for teachers to nurture the belief that all students can learn.

The problem: The belief that all students can learn is not universal

We recently surveyed school leaders and teachers from India, Kenya, Malaysia, and Indonesia and found that only 48 percent of teachers in our sample believed that all students can learn, regardless of familial background or educational experience. This confirms a comprehensive World Bank survey of 16,000 teachers from eight low- and middle-income Latin American, African, and Asian countries, which found that a substantial portion of teachers believe they can’t help students who start out below grade level or come from troubled homes (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Teacher beliefs on their students’ learning abilities

Teacher expectations on student perfomance

Teachers underestimate the abilities of their students because of social attitudes and community prejudices. In low-income countries, the high social gap between teachers and students may reduce teacher empathy and motivation to work with their students.

Further, because school leaders and government officials rarely track teaching practices and student progress, teachers don’t internalize their responsibility toward ensuring all students are learning.

All of the above coupled with persistently low levels of prior student performance may reinforce teacher beliefs that not all students can learn.

Why the problem matters: There is a vicious cycle of low expectations

What teachers expect students to learn influences outcomes for their students. In a famous psychology experiment from 65 years ago , Rosenthal and Jacobsen (1968) falsely told teachers that selected students were identified by a test to be “late bloomers” and would learn great amounts over the course of the years when in fact the researchers had selected students at random. A year later, the students identified as “late bloomers” had learned more than their peers because the teachers increased their support to these students.

Since this experiment, many other psychology studies have been done to replicate and understand the impact of teacher expectations on student achievement. In a landmark review of more than 30 years of research , Jussim and Harber (2005) find that while the original study may be overstating its results, teacher expectations do impact students, and this can be particularly strong for students from stigmatized groups. Rubie-Davies and colleagues ( 2006 ) found that teacher expectations of Maori students in New Zealand were lower than their peers, and can lead to lower outcomes. Recent research in economics to understand school effectiveness ( here and here ) in the United States find that schools that develop a culture that assumes all students can learn at high levels are best at raising the achievement of students from marginalized backgrounds.

Teacher expectations create a reinforcing cycle. Teacher beliefs about students’ growth potential shape those teachers’ actions, which then, in turn, impacts students’ growth, feeding back into teachers’ beliefs about students. In low- and middle-income countries, decades of underperformance of school systems have created a deeply ingrained belief that not all students can learn, which continues to limit the potential of these school systems to improve what they deliver to students (Figure 2).

Figure 2. The reinforcing cycle of teachers’ beliefs on student outcomes

How we can address the problem: Shift teacher expectations and behavior

Behavioral science has taught us that we must understand the mental models of key actors in a system to shift its outcomes. Sectors like health have extensively relied on learnings from behavioral science to improve health outcomes . In education, we must similarly research, develop, and test behavioral approaches to improving teacher performance. We suggest three broad categories of interventions for school systems to explore.

1. Develop leaders that build a culture of high expectations in the system

In a Global School Leader survey , we find that in schools where leaders do believe that students can learn, 54 percent of teachers also share this belief, compared with 37 percent of teachers that hold high expectations when the school leader does not. This reinforces studies that suggest that school leaders can increase teacher responsibility for student learning through organizational structures and discourse that help challenge existing beliefs . School systems should invest in understanding how they can grow and empower leaders to create an environment where the primary focus is on improving learning outcomes.

2. Explicitly discuss the power of teacher expectations

Pre-service and in-service teacher training must address the power of teacher expectations directly. Teachers can be supported to develop a growth mindset so that they view the problem of low student-learning levels as something they can change. Highlighting positive case studies that illustrate challenges that teachers and students face on a regular basis and ways they can overcome them can encourage teachers to reflect on the link between their classroom practices and the impact on students. Experiential training models can help teachers experience firsthand how their empathy for and expectations of students can drive learning.

3. Improving practices can shift beliefs

Beliefs can be deep rooted and hard to shift, but when teachers succeed in the classroom, that can also shift their beliefs on what students can achieve. Encouraging teachers to adopt classroom tools and effective pedagogical practices could help improve students’ learning levels, which could, in turn, shift teachers’ beliefs on student abilities.

Ensuring that all students have teachers like Ms. Darrow and Ms. Lewis with high expectations for their students’ success will require a totally fresh perception of students’ intelligence and ability. Until current practices address teacher expectations head-on and shift the “soft bigotry of low expectations” into the tangible empowerment of high expectations, students won’t reach their full growth potential.

Your Health

Treatments & Tests
Health Inc.
Public Health

Teachers' Expectations Can Influence How Students Perform

Alix Spiegel

Teachers interact differently with students expected to succeed. But they can be trained to change those classroom behaviors. iStockphoto.com hide caption

Teachers interact differently with students expected to succeed. But they can be trained to change those classroom behaviors.

In my Morning Edition story today, I look at expectations — specifically, how teacher expectations can affect the performance of the children they teach.

The first psychologist to systematically study this was a Harvard professor named Robert Rosenthal , who in 1964 did a wonderful experiment at an elementary school south of San Francisco.

The idea was to figure out what would happen if teachers were told that certain kids in their class were destined to succeed, so Rosenthal took a normal IQ test and dressed it up as a different test.

"It was a standardized IQ test, Flanagan's Test of General Ability," he says. "But the cover we put on it, we had printed on every test booklet, said 'Harvard Test of Inflected Acquisition.' "

Rosenthal told the teachers that this very special test from Harvard had the very special ability to predict which kids were about to be very special — that is, which kids were about to experience a dramatic growth in their IQ.

After the kids took the test, he then chose from every class several children totally at random. There was nothing at all to distinguish these kids from the other kids, but he told their teachers that the test predicted the kids were on the verge of an intense intellectual bloom.

As he followed the children over the next two years, Rosenthal discovered that the teachers' expectations of these kids really did affect the students. "If teachers had been led to expect greater gains in IQ, then increasingly, those kids gained more IQ," he says.

But just how do expectations influence IQ?

As Rosenthal did more research, he found that expectations affect teachers' moment-to-moment interactions with the children they teach in a thousand almost invisible ways. Teachers give the students that they expect to succeed more time to answer questions, more specific feedback, and more approval: They consistently touch, nod and smile at those kids more.

7 Ways Teachers Can Change Their Expectations

Researcher Robert Pianta offered these suggestions for teachers who want to change their behavior toward problem students:

Watch how each student interacts. How do they prefer to engage? What do they seem to like to do? Observe so you can understand all they are capable of.
Listen. Try to understand what motivates them, what their goals are and how they view you, their classmates and the activities you assign them.
Engage. Talk with students about their individual interests. Don't offer advice or opinions – just listen.
Experiment: Change how you react to challenging behaviors. Rather than responding quickly in the moment, take a breath. Realize that their behavior might just be a way of reaching out to you.
Meet: Each week, spend time with students outside of your role as "teacher." Let the students choose a game or other nonacademic activity they'd like to do with you. Your job is to NOT teach but watch, listen and narrate what you see, focusing on students' interests and what they do well. This type of activity is really important for students with whom you often feel in conflict or who you avoid.
Reach out: Know what your students like to do outside of school. Make it a project for them to tell you about it using some medium in which they feel comfortable: music, video, writing, etc. Find both individual and group time for them to share this with you. Watch and listen to how skilled, motivated and interested they can be. Now think about school through their eyes.
Reflect: Think back on your own best and worst teachers, bosses or supervisors. List five words for each that describe how you felt in your interactions with them. How did the best and the worst make you feel? What specifically did they do or say that made you feel that way? Now think about how your students would describe you. Jot down how they might describe you and why. How do your expectations or beliefs shape how they look at you? Are there parallels in your beliefs and their responses to you?

"It's not magic, it's not mental telepathy," Rosenthal says. "It's very likely these thousands of different ways of treating people in small ways every day."

So since expectations can change the performance of kids, how do we get teachers to have the right expectations? Is it possible to change bad expectations? That was the question that brought me to the Curry School of Education at the University of Virginia, where I met Robert Pianta.

Pianta, dean of the Curry School, has studied teachers for years, and one of the first things he told me when we sat down together was that it is truly hard for teachers to control their expectations.

"It's really tough for anybody to police their own beliefs," he said. "But think about being in a classroom with 25 kids. The demands on their thinking are so great."

Still, people have tried. The traditional way, Pianta says, has been to sit teachers down and try to change their expectations through talking to them.

"For the most part, we've tried to convince them that the beliefs they have are wrong," he says. "And we've done most of that convincing using information."

But Pianta has a different idea of how to go about changing teachers' expectations. He says it's not effective to try to change their thoughts; the key is to train teachers in an entirely new set of behaviors.

For years, Pianta and his colleagues at the Curry School have been collecting videotapes of teachers teaching. By analyzing these videos in minute ways, they've developed a good idea of which teaching behaviors are most effective. They can also see, Pianta tells me, how teacher expectations affect both their behaviors and classroom dynamics.

Pianta gives one very specific example: the belief that boys are disruptive and need to be managed.

"Say I'm a teacher and I ask a question in class, and a boy jumps up, sort of vociferously ... 'I know the answer! I know the answer! I know the answer!' " Pianta says.

"If I believe boys are disruptive and my job is control the classroom, then I'm going to respond with, 'Johnny! You're out of line here! We need you to sit down right now.' "

This, Pianta says, will likely make the boy frustrated and emotionally disengaged. He will then be likely to escalate his behavior, which will simply confirm the teacher's beliefs about him, and the teacher and kid are stuck in an unproductive loop.

But if the teacher doesn't carry those beliefs into the classroom, then the teacher is unlikely to see that behavior as threatening.

Instead it's: " 'Johnny, tell me more about what you think is going on ... But also, I want you to sit down quietly now as you tell that to me,' " Pianta says.

"Those two responses," he says, "are dictated almost entirely by two different interpretations of the same behavior that are driven by two different sets of beliefs."

To see if teachers' beliefs would be changed by giving them a new set of teaching behaviors, Pianta and his colleagues recently did a study.

They took a group of teachers, assessed their beliefs about children, then gave a portion of them a standard pedagogy course, which included information about appropriate beliefs and expectations. Another portion got intense behavioral training, which taught them a whole new set of skills based on those appropriate beliefs and expectations.

For this training, the teachers videotaped their classes over a period of months and worked with personal coaches who watched those videos, then gave them recommendations about different behaviors to try.

After that intensive training, Pianta and his colleagues analyzed the beliefs of the teachers again. What he found was that the beliefs of the trained teachers had shifted way more than the beliefs of teachers given a standard informational course.

This is why Pianta thinks that to change beliefs, the best thing to do is change behaviors.

"It's far more powerful to work from the outside in than the inside out if you want to change expectations," he says.

In other words, if you want to change a mind, simply talking to it might not be enough.

‘Believe in me, and I will too’: a study of how teachers’ expectations instilled confidence in Grade 10 students

Open access
Published: 20 October 2021
Volume 24 , pages 1535–1556, ( 2021 )

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Olivia Johnston ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3314-9031 1 ,
Helen Wildy 2 &
Jennifer Shand 2

15k Accesses

11 Citations

1 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Teacher expectation research has continued to establish an association between what teachers expect of their students and what students accomplish academically. These expectations affect students when they are communicated by teachers through differential treatment in the class, but no qualitative research has sought adolescent students’ points of view about how they experience teacher expectation effects. This paper presents new research findings that explain how Grade 10 students experienced their teachers’ expectations in ways that they reflected impacted their academic outcomes. Classic grounded theory methods were used to develop this new knowledge, which has implications for how teachers are educated for, and practice, interacting with secondary school students. The findings are grounded in data from more than 100 interviews with students and 175 classroom observations in three Western Australian metropolitan public secondary schools. Students’ voices are projected, explaining how their teachers convey high academic expectations through classroom interactions that instil confidence in students. The discussion invokes a connection to Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory and its enduring tenants of self-efficacy beliefs and mastery learning experiences.

A grounded theory about how teachers communicated high expectations to their secondary school students

Teacher Expectations and Self-Determination Theory: Considering Convergence and Divergence of Theories

An Organizing Framework for Teaching Practices that Can “Expand” the Self and Address Social Identity Concerns

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

1 Introduction

Teachers’ expectations can have powerful effects on student academic attainment and their educational pathways (Papageorge et al., 2020 ; Wu & Bai, 2015 ). The phrase ‘teacher expectations’ is defined here as the judgements that teachers infer from their knowledge of students about if, when, and what students can achieve academically at school (Good, 1987 ; Rubie-Davies, 2014 ). Despite the relevance of teachers’ expectations for students’ experiences of school, a minority of research in this area has considered students’ points of view. Viewpoints of adults and educators have been privileged in the design of research approaches for the study and conceptualisation of teacher expectations.

A range of research methods have reflected this adult-educator focus in teacher expectation research. For example, some research has measured teacher expectations through teachers’ ability group recommendations (de Boer et al., 2010 ; Timmermans et al., 2016 ), surveying teachers about students’ future prospects (Friedrich et al., 2015 ), or by observations of teachers’ differential treatment (Bohlmann & Weinstein, 2013 ; Weinstein & Middlestadt, 1979 ). Only a small minority of studies about teacher expectations have sought to focus on the students’ points of view about their teachers’ expectations (Weinstein, 2002 ). While several studies have included quantitative surveys of students (Bohlmann & Weinstein, 2013 ; Chen et al., 2011 ; Rubie-Davies & Peterson, 2016 ), the hypotheses tested still originated from an adult-educator viewpoint. Before the research presented in this paper, Weinstein’s ( 2002 ) research was still the only qualitative study that included both interviews and observations about how students experienced their teachers’ expectations of them.

The research findings presented in this paper are from a project that generated new theory about students’ experiences of their teachers’ expectations of them. The participants included 25 secondary school students, who were observed interacting with their various learning area teachers across a week of school. The research contributes new substantive theory that explains how students experience teacher expectation effects, including through classroom interactions that instil confidence in students.

2 Literature about teacher expectations

The influence and formation of teachers’ expectations of their students is a topic with a long history of educational research, beginning even before the infamous Pygmalion study (Merton, 1948 ; Rosenthal & Jacobson, 1968 ). Research has continued to show that teacher expectations can be significantly related to academic outcomes (Gentrup et al., 2020 ; Papageorge et al., 2020 ). The effect of teacher expectations is generally accepted to be a significant factor for student learning, with meta-analysis calculating an average effect size of 0.43 (Hattie, 2008 ). Further meta-analyses of the existing research have quantified the effect, showing that teacher expectations can account for anywhere from 3 to 60% of variance in student academic outcomes (Brophy & Good, 1984 ; Jussim & Harber, 2005 ; Jussim et al., 1996 ). The wide variance in teacher expectation effects reflects a broad range of contextual factors that play a role (Weinstein, 2008 ), including differences in student and teacher characteristics.

Differences in student characteristics can influence the expectations that teachers form for their students’ academic achievement. Students from already disadvantaged backgrounds, such as low socio-economic status (SES) (Alvidrez & Weinstein, 1999 ; Rubie-Davies, 2006 ) and minority ethnicities (Tenenbaum & Ruck, 2007 ; van den Bergh et al., 2010 ) are more likely to experience teacher expectation effects than their higher SES and majority ethnic group peers. Furthermore, some teachers have more pronounced expectancy effects on their students than others. Teachers’ differential behaviour between students communicates their expectations through both verbal and non-verbal messages (Babad & Taylor, 1992 ; Rosenthal, 2003 ). Differential behaviours can include preferential treatment, the work and activities offered, questioning of students, use of praise and criticism, ability grouping, behavioural expectations, offering of assistance, and the amount of student autonomy offered (Babad et al., 1982 ; Marshall & Weinstein, 1984 ; Rosenthal, 1994 ). Some teachers are prone to developing more stratified expectations of their students than others (Babad et al., 1982 ; Donohue et al., 2000 ), which can lead to increased differences in how they behave with different students in the class (Joseph et al., 2016 ; Le, 2014 ).

Teachers who use more of these differential behaviours when interacting with students have greater expectation effects on their students than teachers who use fewer differentiating behaviours (Kuklinski & Weinstein, 2001 ; Rubie-Davies, 2007 ). Differential behaviour is to be distinguished from Tomlinson’s ( 2003 ) notion of differentiation, which is a philosophical approach to teaching and learning that provides variety in learning experiences in appreciation of student diversity (Tomlinson, 2003 , 2014 ). Differential behaviour communicates varying expectations for learning to students and sends them messages about their place on the classroom achievement hierarchy (Weinstein, 2002 ), which is contrary to the flexibility integral in Tomlinson’s model of differentiation (Tomlinson, 2014 ).

In addition to varying levels of differential behaviours, some teachers communicate expectations of student achievement that are overall ‘high’ or ‘low’. High expectation teachers tend to use differential behaviours less frequently, communicating high expectations to their students by using a facilitative approach, continually monitoring students’ progress, giving all students the same opportunities to learn, and encouraging student autonomy (Rubie-Davies et al., 2015 ; Weinstein, 2002 ). On the other hand, low expectations teachers ask closed questions, group students inflexibly by ability, use more direct instruction and offer less choice (Rubie-Davies, 2007 ). Surveys of students have confirmed that students associate these behaviours with teachers’ expectations (Rio, 2017 ; Segedin et al., 2012 ) and that these teacher behaviours can influence student academic self-concepts (Bohlmann & Weinstein, 2013 ; Chen et al., 2011 ). However, there is very little research that provides qualitative explanation about how teachers’ expectations are related to student achievement from the students’ point of view.

3 Students’ experiences of their teachers’ expectations

Research has investigated student perspectives of the influence that teachers’ expectations have on student academic outcomes, with both quantitative and qualitative research findings that teacher expectations can influence students’ own beliefs about their capacity to succeed at school (Bohlmann & Weinstein, 2013 ; Rubie-Davies, 2008 ). Students can be astute observers of their teachers’ expectations of them (Wong, 2014 ), even at the primary school level (Le, 2014 ; Weinstein, 2002 ). However, Weinstein’s research is the only study to include deep qualitative exploration of students’ perspectives of their teachers’ differing expectations (Weinstein, 2002 , 2008 ; Weinstein & Worrell, 2016 ). Her work (2002) included observation and interviews of primary school students in the United States, developing new knowledge that students saw their position in the classroom hierarchy as more or less static depending on how much differentiating behaviour the teacher used. Consequentially, students who experienced a lot of differential treatment had little hope that their efforts at school would make a difference to their achievement, while students whose teachers used less differential treatment felt their efforts would positively impact on their learning outcomes.

Since Weinstein’s work, only one small study from India (Chandrasegaran & Padmakumari, 2018 ) has included some qualitative data about students’ perceptions of their teachers’ expectations, but these were pitted against their educators’ perspectives. The students in this study reported a general increase in confidence and feelings of self-worth that resulted in a positive attitude for students, which was attributed to the teachers’ feedback, but the data from the students lacked descriptive depth. Further research from Gillborn et al. ( 2012 ) has considered how Black Caribbean adults in the United Kingdom recollect their experiences of low teachers’ expectations retrospectively and from their current perspectives as parents, reinforcing racialised expectations as a barrier to equity in education. Yet, this research still does not include the perspectives of the students themselves, instead relying on their adult parents to qualify the students’ experiences.

Multiple international studies have found that young people continue to find their teachers’ expectations relevant for their experiences of schooling and their academic achievement (Andrews & Gutwein, 2017 ; Bae et al., 2008 ; Bishop & Berryman, 2006 ; Williams, 2013 ). However, these studies encountered teacher expectations in their findings while aiming to explore students’ experiences at school more generally. Teacher expectations were also found to be relevant in research that set out to study other aspects of students’ educational experiences, such as ability grouping (Hallam & Ireson, 2007 ). Other than Weinstein’s work, no qualitative research has been specifically designed to achieve to research aim of explaining how students experience their teachers’ expectations of them, from their perspectives.

Surveys of students and other quantitative approaches used in educational psychology continue to establish how teachers’ expectations influence students when students adopt self-perceptions that reflect teachers’ expectations (Friedrich et al., 2015 ; Trusz, 2018 ). Researchers initially established a theoretical connection between teachers’ use of differential treatment, which communicated expectations to influence student “self-concepts” or “self-esteem” (Brattesani et al., 1984 ; Weinstein et al., 1982 ). This link between teachers’ communication of expectations through differential behaviour and the impact on students’ self-confidence has been established further in more recent research (Bohlmann & Weinstein, 2013 ; Trusz, 2018 ). Students’ self-beliefs become more congruent with their teachers’ expectations when their teachers’ use more differential behaviours in the classroom, reflecting how students’ perceptions of themselves mediate the teacher expectation effect (Chen et al., 2011 ; Friedrich et al., 2015 ).

Students’ role in the teacher expectation effect is pivotal, yet no qualitative research in this area has sought the views of secondary school students to develop new knowledge about how they experience teacher expectation effects. Adolescents can provide a unique perspective as they find themselves at junctions where their educational decisions are directly associated with their future pathways. They also have distinct learning needs, and their maturity can make them more self-aware and reflective in their experiences of their teachers’ expectations. They interact with a variety of learning-area teachers in a variety of classrooms, so they experience different teacher expectations that they could contrast.

4 Research aim

This study sought to develop substantive grounded theory to explain how students experience their teachers’ expectations of them. The main research question was: How do students experience their teachers’ expectations for their academic achievement?

5 Research approach

To answer the research question, a qualitative research approach based on the theoretical framework of symbolic interactionism was selected as most appropriate. Qualitative research allows research to ‘get at’ the inner happenings of participants to describe the experiences of the participants (Corbin & Strauss, 2008 ; Creswell, 2014 ), so this suited my study’s aim to focus on the meanings constructed by the Grade 10 student participants. The theoretical framework of symbolic interactionism was used to inform the study because teacher expectations are communicated through the symbolic exchanges between teachers and students during classroom interactions (Blumer, 1969 ; Francis & Adams, 2019 ). The study sought to develop new theory about how students experience their teachers’ expectations of them, so a framework that acknowledges the importance of social interaction in creating mutually constructed realities was appropriate (Blumer, 1969 ; Powell, 2014 ).

Grounded theory was selected as the research approach because it is consistent with the philosophical framework of symbolic interactionism and suitable for the research goal of developing new theory (Corbin & Strauss, 2008 ; Handberg et al., 2015 ). Through grounded theory, a ‘web of meaning’ was created to reflect the mutual construction of social reality as well as its complexity and interconnectivity (Aldiabat & Navenec, 2011 ; Ezzy, 2002 ). Grounded theory, symbolic interactionism, and the review of the literature about teacher expectations were drawn upon to develop a conceptual framework for this research, in conjunction with the existing literature about teacher expectations. The conceptual framework was designed as a basis for qualitative exploration of the conditions, actions, strategies and tactics, and consequences of students’ experiences of their teachers’ expectations (Blumer, 1969 ; Corbin & Strauss, 2008 ). Further guiding research questions were developed based on the conceptual framework, which were used to develop conversational semi-structured interview questions.

Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Western Australia Human Research Ethics Committee and the Department of Education System Performance Branch. Student participants were recruited from three secondary schools in a Western Australian Metropolitan area with student populations from mid-low average socio-economic status backgrounds. Students who were invited to participate were those who were identified by their peers, teachers, or through my own observation as students who were influenced by their teachers’ expectations of them—these students obtained As in some classes but Fs in others and were observed by the researcher, their peers, and/or their teacher to have altered behaviour according to class and teacher. Layered consent was gained firstly through the school principal, then the teachers, students, and parents who were progressively recruited.

Each participant student was followed to a variety of their Grade 10 classes over the course of a week of school, with interviews at the end of each day about their experiences of their teachers’ expectations. The classroom observations provided a shared “Appendix A ” context for discussion between the students and I (the researcher) during the interviews. A classroom observation tool is presented in “”, which was developed from observation tools that have been designed in previous research for observation of teacher expectations in the classroom (Bohlmann & Weinstein, 2013 ; Weinstein et al., 1982 ). All observations were conducted by a single field researcher, with students’ confirming instances where expectations had been communicated during the interviews. A total of 100 interviews and 175 classroom observations were conducted across 25 weeks of school with 25 student participants, with 34 different teachers’ classes observed. At each school, some of the Grade 10 teachers allowed multiple student participants in their class to be observed, so for example one English teacher allowed eight of her students to be observed in her class over eight weeks (one student per week was observed, one at a time). Each student was observed interacting with at least two different teachers in two different classes to facilitate comparison. The interview schedule (see “Appendix B ”) included questions that invoked comparison between teachers, which was facilitated by the field researcher observing multiple classes each day.

Interviews were coded separately by the three authors of this paper to establish consistency of the coding and inter-rater reliability. Each interview was transcribed and analysed before returning to the field to collect more data the next day to allow for the grounded theory to develop through theoretical sampling (Corbin & Strauss, 2008 ; Glaser & Strauss, 2017 ). Theoretical sampling is integral to grounded theory research because it allows the theory to be built iteratively. This type of sampling is purposive and involves the intentional recruitment of participants who will maximize opportunities for the theory to be constructed (Corbin & Strauss, 2008 ). By progressively building the theory, the students were involved as we gradually constructed the theory together. A brief example is provided below and a full description of the process used to generate the grounded theory together with the students is available in a separate paper (Authors, 2021).

One example of how the students and I worked together to develop the theory also reflects the data analysis, synthesis, and abstraction process. I was observing and interviewing the second student participant, “Curt.” I asked Curt how he knew that his teacher had high expectations of him, and he explained that high expectations were communicated when his teacher praised him for “good thinking,” by saying “well done.” I asked Curt how he responded to the teachers’ communication of high expectations and he said it made him feel “good, because I got it right. It means I’m on the right track. He (the teacher) said to all the people who got it, he said ‘you guys should do Physics next year” (Curt). Footnote 1 After transcribing the interview with Curt that evening, I coded this data with the open code of “encouragement” in NVivo, which I used to record my data analysis.

After the next day of classroom observations with Curt, I asked him during our interview if the code of “encouragement” was appropriate for what he had described. He confirmed that it was. We used the opportunity to further explore his experience, and he elaborated that the teachers’ encouragement “makes me feel smart…when I feel smart, I’m getting everything correct and I get higher marks in the test” (Curt). I coded this next piece of data under the open code of “feeling smart,” but Curt had pointed me towards a connection between teachers’ encouragement conveying high expectations and his “feeling smart.” Later, I would abstract these two open codes into the theoretical code of “increasing student confidence.”

By the time I was working with the 12th student participant, more than 200 open codes had accumulated and there was a need to abstract the data into provisional theoretical codes. The codes that Curt’s data had developed: “feeling smart” and “encouragement’ were synthesised with the codes of “pride,” and “self-confidence.” The theoretical category of “increasing student confidence” was developed, including negative cases from the open codes of “disappointment” and “embarrassment.” The theoretical code was further explored and refined through theoretical sampling and constant comparison with the next student participants, until saturation of the theory was confirmed with the final 3 participants. In grounded theory, saturation occurs when there are no new properties and dimensions of the theory emerging, only data indicators of elements that have already been discovered (Corbin & Strauss, 2008 ; Giles et al., 2016 ). Thus, the grounded theory was complete.

6 The grounded theory: reconciling with teachers’ expectations

The findings of the research are synthesised in a substantive theory which is a Basic Social Process (BSP) called Reconciling with teachers’ expectations. A BSP is a type of grounded theory that explains a fundamental process that occurs in social environments (Glaser, 1978 ). The BSP of Reconciling with teachers’ expectations explains the four-stage process through which students experience their teachers’ expectations of them.

Firstly, the students go through the step of ‘Appraising’, during which they ascertain their teachers’ expectations of them. These interactions inform students’ ‘Responding’ to their teachers’ expectations during Stage 2. The students’ responses to the teacher expectations inform their ‘Acting’ in Stage 3 in ways that they ‘Reflect’ in Stage 4 are productive or detrimental to their academic outcomes at school. An example of this BSP is explored in the findings below, where students appraise high expectations when teachers convey belief in their capacity to succeed academically. The students respond by feeling encouraged and capable of achieving, which motivates them academically. They give their work effort and experience improved results, which leads to a self-reinforcing cycle of increased achievement.

The next two sections present the research findings according to the four stages. The first two stages and second two stages are reported together since the quotes from students are often illustrative of two stages. Rather than segment the quotes, they are presented together to provide to illustrate the richness of the data in context.

6.1 Appraising and responding

The students appraised whether their teachers had high expectations of them during student–teacher interactions that conveyed belief in their capacity to succeed. Student–teacher interactions conveyed high expectations when teachers encouraged students by expressing pride in them, challenging them, and giving them opportunities to succeed.

Students were asked when their teachers had communicated high expectations during the interviews. Their responses included “teachers that notice us doing good,” (Adam) “encouraging” (Corey) and “she encourages us” (Jaida). Encouragement was appraised by students as conveying high teacher expectations for their academic achievement by conveying pride in students verbally or non-verbally. For example, Rachel appraised high expectations in how her teacher had assigned a project: “He has high expectations, like he’s pretty impressed with all of us. Like I think he is excited to see what we come up with” (Rachel). High expectations were conveyed by teachers that that encouraged students by expressing pride in what they could accomplish.

Other students agreed that their teachers had communicated high teachers’ expectations through encouragement when the students understood that their teachers were proud of them. Araya explained how she responded to high teachers’ expectations that were communicated through praise positively. She was asked when her teachers had communicated high expectations, and she brought up the example of a teachers’ praise when she answered a question correctly in class. She explained that when her teacher…

…was like ‘right! You are right on the money!’ and ‘Wow, you got it in one!’ I’m kind of really proud of myself. I’m like—yeah the teacher’s proud of me, and that makes me feel good about myself. I get more confident and put up my hand. I also just sort of feel like maybe it’s not a sort of hard as it would be before. (Araya)

Araya’s appraisal of high teachers’ expectations, communicated through encouragement, made her feel proud of herself. Furthermore, her self-efficacy beliefs were improved, and she considers herself to be more likely to experience continued success at learning in that class. Sarah echoed that a teacher had communicated high expectations that made her feel more confident when she praised her success:

I explained it to her and she was really happy with the overall idea… she was like Yes YES YES! and thrusting her arms.…when she does stuff like that, it actually makes me feel really proud, because you’re on the right track, you’re going to do good (Sarah).

When Sarah’s teacher communicated high expectations by conveying pride in her, Sarah felt proud too. Other students agreed that verbal praise conveyed high expectations, which they responded to by feeling encouraged to engage in subsequent learning because they considered it likely that the outcome would be positive. When teachers were positive about students’ capacity to succeed, the students were positive in their approach to the learning too, because they were more confident that they would be successful.

The encouragement that conveyed high teacher expectations to students could be associated with praise in having noticed the students’ success, or in terms of encouraging students to engage in challenging learning. Thus, the students appraised high teachers’ expectations when their teachers looked back on their successes with pride, but also when their teachers carried this belief forward to share anticipation that the students could also succeed in the future. Belief that the students could achieve in the future was communicated by encouraging students to give effort. For example, the students described how they had experienced high teachers’ expectations when teachers said things that them feel more confident that they could succeed at future challenges. For example, Libby remembered a teacher who conveyed high expectations when “…he always says that “I really like that, you’re really trying”. He says that to every student. It gives you more confidence” (Libby). Araya elaborated that high expectations were communicated when her teacher challenged her: “…when he says, ‘I’m trying to make you think!’ …we need to think about it, like find the right answer. He’s just like, encouraging us” (Araya). Encouragement to give effort and engage in challenge was experienced by these students as indicative of the teachers’ high expectations that they could accomplish difficult learning.

Students often responded positively when high teacher expectations were communicated by teachers who challenged students to succeed at difficult learning. When the teachers encouraged challenge and conveyed a belief that the students could succeed, the students responded by sharing the teachers’ belief that they could succeed. Furthermore, they became motivated to manifest this belief. Jaida explained that when teachers “encourage us (students), it makes me feel like I can do it. It makes me want to try” (Jaida). The students’ self-efficacy belief towards future learning was in this way improved when teacher communicated high expectations by encouraging and challenging students. Erin explained further when she mentioned that high expectations had been communicated when her teacher challenging her to attempt some “tricky” new work with encouragement, and how she felt when she experienced success:

…it kind of makes you feel good, because I understand it, but it’s tricky and new. It makes me feel happy, and good, because like, oh, I get it now, and it will be easier to do the other questions as well (Erin).

Erin responded to her teachers’ high expectations by feeling encouraged to keep trying and complete further questions when she experienced success. Her initial success was a result of the teachers’ encouragement, which was perceived as praise for being able to accomplish a challenging learning task. Erin’s mastery led to her approaching further questions with confidence that she would be successful. Because her teacher encouraged her, she felt encouraged, too.

Students like Erin responded positively to teachers who communicated high expectations through assigning challenging learning. However, the challenging learning was presented encouragingly in a way that they reflected allowed them to succeed. They appraised this as communicating high expectations through encouragement, but some challenges were not appraised as high expectations or responded to positively. For example, Sarah invoked a comparison between high teacher expectations in her above example with a scenario where the teacher had:

…he showed like a graph of our grades, and none of ours really moved. It was only like the other classes that moved. The grades went up, and ours did not. It was actually kind of confronting, because our class, like, it was BAD (students’ emphasis)… It was kind of, exposing…it was so unfair… whenever the class was doing bad the teacher would be like “oh this is the (highest) class, you’re supposed to be good at this!” It was pretty mean (Sarah).

For student like Sarah, the teacher did not communicate high expectations when they compared them unfavourably to other students. She described this as not communicating high expectations, but as “mean”. Other students like Brad, Zane and Libby used the word ‘mean’ to describe teachers who compared them unfavourably with their peers.

Thus, the students appraised high expectations when their teachers encouraged them in their successes and efforts. High expectations were experienced by students whose teachers assigned them challenging learning tasks without comparing them unfavourably to other students. The students responded positively when high teachers’ expectations were appraised through actions that improved their confidence, encouraging them to persevere in their learning. The students responded by becoming confident that they could succeed, too.

6.2 Acting and reflecting

The students reflected that they would end up doing better in school when their teachers conveyed high expectations that instilled confidence in them. They approached their learning with more positivity and higher self-efficacy beliefs, which they felt improved their academic outcomes. For example, Brad reflected that when his teachers have high expectations:

…I think they just try to push me then, because they know that I can do that, but sometimes I just don’t. Instead of just saying, just say I don’t want to do my work, then they’ll say like “I can see you can do it” and then I end up doing it. I think I do more work when they do that (Brad).

Brad’s reflection summarises the students’ descriptions of their increased motivation when their teachers conveyed high expectations that increased their confidence. When the teachers communicated high expectations by encouraging them and communicating belief in them, they felt like they could do it, so they tried harder and did “more work”.

Other students reflected that they persevered in giving difficult learning effort when their teachers had communicated confidence in their capacity to succeed. After describing her response to her teacher’s high expectations for a “tricky” learning task (above), Erin was asked how this affected her academic achievement. She explained that “…I have not met it (the teachers’ expectation) yet. I probably will soon, but not yet. Just not now” (Erin). Erin was working towards meeting the teacher’s high expectations and described her own confidence that she would eventually get there. She attributed her own confidence to the teachers’ confidence in her. Other students agreed that when teachers believed they would be able to achieve, they felt motivated. Jessica recalled her teacher challenging her:

… he’s like “prove it” and then I have that logic, okay I’ll prove it here, then I’ll think this is going to work, prove it. So I just sort of clarify how I think, like we had to change to this idea, that won’t work, we had to change to this idea, that won’t work, so we had to continuously trial and error (Jessica).

Jessica is prepared to persevere to meet her teachers’ high expectations, like Erin. These examples illustrate how the students’ confidence inspired their motivation to persist when learning was difficult.

Students also described committing more time to their learning when their teachers had instilled confidence in them by communicating high expectations. For example, Jenny described working towards achieving: “…some of them, just like the harder ones, because there’s lots of working out that you have to do, I just have to like, it’s like time“ (Jenny). She explained she “do(es) a lot of work at home” to meet her teachers’ high expectations. Her willingness to devote a lot of time to engaging to challenging learning was accredited to her teachers’ expectation of success: “…he thinks we probably could do it” (Jenny). Further willingness to devote time to study and schoolwork was described by students as a result of their teachers’ high expectations. Ryan described how he would have to do “extra when I get home and stuff” (Ryan) to make sure he understood. The students acted with increased time commitment when their teachers communicated high expectations through confidence.

The students explained that when their teachers communicated high expectations by having belief in their capacity to succeed, they feel confident and “actually try.” This phrase was repeated by several students, including Libby who had described increased confidence from her teachers’ verbal encouragement (above). She went on to explain that “…it gives you more confidence. If a teacher just doesn’t say anything, you just feel like you’re not good enough and you don’t know how to do it. I actually try (in that class)” (Libby). Libby’s negative case of the teacher who does not build confidence emphasises the importance of communicating high expectations to students, who can be susceptible to feeling “not good enough.” When students felt confident that they knew “how to do it,” they gave their learning authentic effort.

Teachers’ high expectations were motivating for students when they adopted their teachers’ beliefs in their capacity to succeed. Corey explained that his teachers’ praise had “encourage(d) me to do more work. I want to do more.” (Corey). When the students were motivated by high teacher expectations, they did more. Sarah added that “I like just work to improve every time” (Sarah).

Nadia explained that his was because of increasing self-efficacy belief:

…he would motivate me to do more, I‘d be like “oh wow!” And I’d realise that I actually could do more. So it means that in like the next assignments he wouldn’t have to tell me, I could just do it, and it would just come naturally, and I wouldn’t have to put that extra effort in, like when he helped me with it. So after that it just starting increasing and my grades just kept getting higher (Nadia).

Nadia’s quote represents how students’ self-efficacy beliefs were improved when their teachers communicated high expectations through confidence, which could lead to a self-perpetuating cycle of continued achievement. For students like Nadia, it was the teachers’ high expectations that initiated academic improvements.

However, students did not always respond positively to teachers’ communication of high expectations for students’ capacity to succeed when it was communicated as disappointment in the students’ not fulfilling expectations. This was the case in the example from Sarah in the above section, when she described the teacher as “mean” for pressuring students to do better by comparing them unfavourably to another group. Sarah described this as communicating high expectations, but by using pressure to succeed rather than instilling confidence. Other students agreed that high teachers’ expectations only instilled confidence when they were encouraging, not negative. For example, when Rachel was asked to explain when her teacher had communicated expectations for her academic achievement that day, she brought up an interaction where a teacher had been disappointed in her.

I know she’s, like, very disappointed. I’m like walk in—didn’t happen! When I feel, like, bad or, like, oh—why am I in this situation that I put myself in—I’m just, like,—don’t think about it. but it probably, like, builds up and then at times I’ll think, oh a big sad, and then it will all, like, come up. I feel, like, yeah I’m living in the, like, yeah I’ll try hard next year, you know what I mean? (Rachel)

Rachel is describing how her teachers’ expectations made her feel as if she didn’t measure up, which had disappointed the teacher and led to Rachel being passive about her learning. Rachel explained that her teachers’ disappointment made her want to avoid future interactions with the teacher. Furthermore, she was passive about her efforts when her teacher expressed disappointment in her.

These findings show that when expectations were communicated in a context of students having not met expectations, students responded negatively and became passive about their learning. On the other hand, teachers’ high expectations that instilled confidence in students were experienced positively by students only when the teachers were encouraging during interactions with students.

Overall, the research findings illustrate how students experienced the influence of their teachers’ expectations through the teachers’ instilling confidence in them. The teachers’ expectations improved the students’ learning outcomes when they effectively instilled a shared belief in the students’ capacity to succeed. The students appraised teachers as having high expectations when the teachers encouraged them and made them feel capable of learning, challenging them to engage in challenging tasks. The students felt that they could succeed and were motivated to persevere when the learning became difficult, which they reflected led to successes in learning. Success empowered the students so that they continued to act in and then acting in ways that they reflected upon as improving academic outcomes. However, when teachers communicated high expectations by emphasising students’ lack of success by contrasting them to peers or dwelling on the students’ failure to meet high expectations, the students became passive about their learning. Such teachers were appraised as “mean” and did not effectively communicate high expectations that positively impacted on student learning.

7 Discussion

The findings of this study explain that students experience high teachers’ expectations as instilling confidence in their ability as learners. This finding can be understood with consideration of enduring educational theory, such as that of student self-efficacy beliefs from Bandura ( 1986 ) and Dweck’s theory of Mindset (Dweck, 2012 ). The findings also show how some of Weinstein’s findings about how primary school students experience their teachers’ expectations are exacerbated in the secondary school setting where student confidence is particularly vulnerable (Weinstein, 2002 ). A discussion of Rubie-Davies’ work ( 2006 ; Rubie-Davies & Peterson, 2016 ) also furthers a situated understanding of the contribution to knowledge and understanding of teachers’ expectations provided by this research.

The connection between teachers’ expectations and students’ self-beliefs about their capacity to succeed at school has been established in previous quantitative research from educational psychology (Tyler & Boelter, 2008 ). The research findings presented in this paper provide a student perspective on how teacher expectation effects occur, emphasising the direct effect on student self-beliefs. The students in the study referred to this as “confidence,” but their descriptions of the role of verbal encouragement and task mastery are most reminiscent of Bandura’s ( 1986 ) theoretical construct of self-efficacy belief. Bandura’s notion of self-efficacy beliefs are the crux of his enduring Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 1986 ). Student self-efficacy beliefs, in education, are students’ perceptions of their own capacity for the organisation and behaviour they need to achieve a particular effect or outcome in their learning (Bandura, 1986 ; Zimmerman, 2000 ). The students’ self-efficacy about a learning task, for example, will shape their behaviour as they conduct that task.

The findings of the study presented in this paper can be understood through Bandura’s theory, reinforcing that when students have high self-efficacy beliefs, they act by “pushing” themselves and “doing extra work” to achieve challenging learning outcomes. Bandura’s self-efficacy belief is conceptualised as specific to performance on certain tasks. Teachers can influence students’ self-efficacy beliefs positively by providing them with mastery learning experiences, encouragement, and access to other students who model the skills and organisation that lead to success (Schunk & Usher, 2012 ; Sewell & St George, 2009 ). The students in this study experienced teachers who positively influenced their self-efficacy beliefs as communicating high expectations for their learning. This provides an explanation of how students experienced their teachers’ expectations of them in ways that influence their achievement at school: through their self-efficacy beliefs.

The study presented in this paper is unique in that it included data about Grade 10 students’ experiences of their teachers’ expectations across several of their different secondary school classes, explaining how these students were influenced by their teachers’ expectations: through classroom interactions that instilled confidence. When teachers provided challenging, but attainable, opportunities for students to experience mastery learning experiences, students regarded this as a characteristic of high expectation teachers and experienced increased confidence and academic attainment. As illustrated in the above examples of students like Sarah and Rachel, a student could experience confidence in learning in one class, but experience feelings of inadequacy in learning in another class. For these students, this was related to how the teachers’ expectations were communicated during interactions with the teacher.

Previous research has discussed the notion of subject-specific student self-belief (Marsh et al., 2012 ), but this has been associated with the learning area itself rather than the teacher. The research presented in this paper shows that when teachers communicated high expectations with encouragement, pride, and challenge, students reacted by embracing challenging learning, “trying really hard” (Libby). However, when teachers communicated high expectations in a way that was comparative and emphasised students’ previous failure to meet high expectations, the students responded negatively. They appraised teachers that applied academic pressure in this way as “mean” (Sarah, Libby, Brad, Zane) and became passive about their learning. These findings suggest that student self-efficacy beliefs can become differentiated across learning areas based on varying experiences of teacher expectations.

The student experiences that were illustrated in the findings also reflect how students mindsets and concepts about themselves as learners are related to teacher expectations, which is reminiscent of Dweck’s contrasting growth and fixed mindsets about learning (Dweck, 2008 ). Similar to the primary school students in Rhona Weinstein’s ( 2002 ) study who experienced a loss of hope and belief in their capacity to change their position in the classroom hierarchy when their teacher communicated low expectations, the students in the study presented in this paper described their experience of giving up on learning in classes where the teacher was appraised communicating expectations framed by contrasting student achievement against one another. When the students were compared unfavourably to their peers, they became passive in their learning. Rubie-Davies’ research ( 2007 ) affirms that teachers with low expectations group students inflexibly into ability groups. The research presented in this paper suggests that students experience fixed views of ability as detrimental to their confidence.

On the other hand, students felt empowered and confident in their learning with teachers who communicated high expectations. These findings show that Weinstein’s research with primary students is also relevant in the context of adolescent students. Adolescent students are on the cusp of adulthood and are in the process of developing individual identity and aspiration, so the role of teacher expectations in this process is highly relevant. The findings also elaborate on why interactions that communicate teacher expectations are associated with student academic achievement: through student confidence. Rubie-Davies and her colleagues have also established that high expectations teachers are more likely to give students another try at answering questions and ask for more detail, provide more feedback, and encourage student motivation and autonomy (Rubie-Davies et al., 2015 ; Wang et al., 2019 ). These practices communicate high expectations to students, but the research presented in this paper suggests that this is because they communicate a belief in students that students then adopt in their own self-beliefs.

8 Limitations

This paper presents the results of a grounded theory study that was conducted at three Schools in the Perth Metropolitan area. The findings are only representative of the group and students under study, and more research would be needed to ascertain the extent to which the substantive theory could be used to develop a formal theory that is generalisable. It was not within this study’s aims to create a formal theory that represents all human interactions, because the research aim was to generate a substantive theory. Thus, the study is limited in its generalisability and makes no claims to apply to populations beyond those from which the data were collected. Some readers, however, may find the research or some aspects of it transferable to their own contexts.

9 Conclusion

The findings of this study presented in this paper show that students experience teacher expectation effects through the BSP of Reconciling with teachers’ expectations when the teacher communicates expectations in ways that instil confidence in students (or fail to do so). The students’ beliefs about themselves as learners are shaped by the teacher’s communication of expectations for students, so that when the teacher coveys a belief that the student can succeed at school, the student believes it too and acts accordingly.

These findings have implications for teacher education and how teachers prepare for and practice interacting with their students. Teachers who aim to communicate high expectations can adopt the strategies suggested by the students in these findings, including praising and encouraging student success during classroom interactions to instil confidence. Teachers could also adapt these findings to inform how they challenge students to learn in their class, striking the right balance between pressuring students and empowering them. High teacher expectations were only effective in motivating students to act in ways that improved academic outcomes when they were presented without unfavourable comparison. High expectations for all students, not just the top performers, were a contingency of positive teacher expectation effects.

The findings of this study add to knowledge about teacher expectations by explaining how teacher expectations can affect student academic outcomes through student confidence. High expectations were communicated when the teachers supported students’ accomplishment in challenging learning tasks by questioning them and encouraging their efforts and perseverance, expressing belief that they would succeed. Continued research in education emphasises that mastery experiences and verbal encouragement can shape student self-efficacy beliefs (Hendricks, 2016 ; Schunk, 2003 ; Wilson et al., 2014 ) and that self-efficacy beliefs are associated with improved student outcomes (Honicke & Broadbent, 2016 ). The research adds to this knowledge by explaining how teacher expectations influenced student self-beliefs and why this affected their educational outcomes. Interactions where students appraised high teacher expectations improved their self-belief, which led them to act in ways that they reflected promoted academic attainment.

Random pseudonyms are used for the 14 participants whose quotes are used in this manuscript so that readers can differentiate between their voices.

Aldiabat, K. M., & Navenec, L. (2011). Philosophical roots of classical grounded theory: Its foundations in symbolic interactionism. Qualitative Report , 16 (4), 1063–1080. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol16/iss4/9

Alvidrez, J., & Weinstein, R. (1999). Early teacher perceptions and later student academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology , 91 (4), 731–746. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.731

Andrews, D. J. C., & Gutwein, M. (2017). “Maybe that concept is still with us”: Adolescents' racialized and classed perceptions of teachers' expectations. Multicultural Perspectives , 19 (1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2016.126396

Babad, E., Inbar, J., & Rosenthal, R. (1982). Pygmalion, Galatea, and the Golem: Investigations of biased and unbiased teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology , 74 (4), 459–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.459

Babad, E., & Taylor, P. J. (1992). Transparency of teacher expectancies across language, cultural boundaries. The Journal of Educational Research , 86 (2), 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1992.9941148

Bae, S., Holloway, S. D., Li, J., & Bempechat, J. (2008). Mexican-American students’ perceptions of teachers’ expectations: Do perceptions differ depending on student achievement levels? The Urban Review, 40 (2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0070-x

Article Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action . Englewood Cliffs.

Bishop, R., & Berryman, M. (2006). Culture speaks: Cultural relationships and classroom learning . Huia Publishers.

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism : Perspective and method . Prentice-Hall.

Bohlmann, N. L., & Weinstein, R. (2013). Classroom context, teacher expectations, and cognitive level: Predicting children’s math ability judgments. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34 (6), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2013.06.003

Brattesani, K. A., Weinstein, R. S., & Marshall, H. (1984). Student perceptions of differential teacher treatment as moderators of teacher expectation effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76 (2), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.2.236

Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1984). Teacher behavior and student achievement . The Institute for Research on Teaching.

Chandrasegaran, J., & Padmakumari, P. (2018). The role of self-fulfilling prophecies in education: Teacher-student perceptions. Journal on Educational Psychology , 12 (1), 8. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.12.1.14639

Chen, Y.-H., Thompson, M. S., Kromrey, J. D., & Chang, G. H. (2011). Relations of student perceptions of teacher oral feedback with teacher expectancies and student self-concept. Journal of Experimental Education, 79 (4), 452–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2010.547888

Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. (2014). The selection of a research approach. In Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (pp. 3–24). SAGE Publications.

de Boer, H., Bosker, R. J., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2010). Sustainability of teacher expectation bias effects on long-term student performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102 (1), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017289

Donohue, K. M., Weinstein, R., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2000). Patterns of teachers’ whole-class perceptions and predictive relationships between teachers’ and parents’ perceptions of individual child competence. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15 (3), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(00)00068-5

Dweck, C. (2008). Mindset: The new psychology of success . Random House Digital, Inc.

Dweck, C. (2012). Mindset: How you can fulfil your potential . Constable & Robinson.

Ezzy, D. (2002). Data analysis during data collection. In D. Ezzy (Ed.), Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation (pp. 60–79). Routledge.

Google Scholar

Francis, L. E., & Adams, R. E. (2019). Two faces of self and emotion in symbolic interactionism: From process to structure and culture—and back. Symbolic Interaction, 42 (2), 250–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.383

Friedrich, A., Flunger, B., Nagengast, B., Jonkmann, K., & Trautwein, U. (2015). Pygmalion effects in the classroom: Teacher expectancy effects on students’ math achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41 , 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.10.006

Gentrup, S., Lorenz, G., Kristen, C., & Kogan, I. (2020). Self-fulfilling prophecies in the classroom: Teacher expectations, teacher feedback and student achievement. Learning and Instruction, 66 (4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101296

Giles, M. T., De Lacey, M. S., & Muir-Cochrane, M. E. (2016). Coding, constant comparisons, and core categories: A worked example for novice constructivist grounded theorists. Advances in Nursing Science, 39 (1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000109

Gillborn, D., Rollock, N., Vincent, C., & Ball, S. J. (2012). ‘You got a pass, so what more do you want?’ Race, class and gender intersections in the educational experiences of the Black middle class. Race Ethnicity and Education, 15 (1), 121–139.

Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory . Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory : Strategies for qualitative research , 3rd ed. Routledge.

Good, T. L. (1987). Two decades of research on teacher expectations: Findings and future directions. Journal of Teacher Education, 38 (4), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718703800406

Hallam, S., & Ireson, J. (2007). Secondary school pupils’ satisfaction with their ability grouping placements. British Educational Research Journal, 33 (1), 27–45.

Handberg, C., Thorne, S., Midtgaard, J., Nielsen, C. V., & Lomborg, K. (2015). Revisiting symbolic interactionism as a theoretical framework beyond the grounded theory tradition. Qualitative Health Research, 25 (8), 1023–1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314554231

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement , 1st ed. Taylor and Francis.

Hendricks, K. S. (2016). The sources of self-efficacy: Educational research and implications for music. Applications of Research in Music Education, 35 (1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123315576535

Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17 , 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002

Joseph, N. M., Viesca, K. M., & Bianco, M. (2016). Black female adolescents and racism in schools: Experiences in a colorblind society. The High School Journal, 100 (1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2016.0018

Jussim, L., Eccles, J., & Madon, S. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 28 (C), 281-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60240-3

Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9 (2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_3

Kuklinski, M. R., & Weinstein, R. (2001). Classroom and developmental differences in a path model of teacher expectancy effects. Child Development, 72 (5), 1554–1578. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00365

Le, M. (2014). The just distribution of educational resources: Children's judgments about differential treatment by teachers (Publication Number 14148) University of California. eScholarship. https://digitalassets.lib.berkeley.edu/etd/ucb/text/Le_berkeley_0028E_14148.pdf

Marsh, H. W., Xu, M., & Martin, A. J. (2012). Self-concept: A synergy of theory, method, and application. In S. Harris, T. Graham, C. Urdan, G. McCormick, G. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Theories, constructs and critical issues (Vol. 1, pp. 427–458). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13273-015

Marshall, H. H., & Weinstein, R. (1984). Classroom factors affecting students’ self-evaluations: An interactional model. Review of Educational Research, 54 (3), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543054003301

Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8 (2), 193–210.

Papageorge, N. W., Gershenson, S., & Kang, K. M. (2020). Teacher expectations matter. Review of Economics and Statistics, 102 (2), 234–251.

Powell, J. L. (2014). Symbolic Interactionism . Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Rio, N. (2017). Teacher expectations and ethnicity: Student and teacher perspectives (Publication Number 32245) ResearchSpace. Auckland. http://hdl.handle.net/2292/32245 .

Rosenthal, R. (1994). Interpersonal expectancy effects: A 30-year perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3 (6), 176–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770698

Rosenthal, R. (2003). Covert communication in laboratories, classrooms, and the truly real world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12 (5), 151–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.t01-1-01250

Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. The Urban Review, 3 (1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02322211

Rubie-Davies, C. (2008). Teacher beliefs and expectations: Relationships with student learning. In C. Rubie-Davies & C. Rawlinson (Eds.), Challenging thinking about teaching and learning (pp. 25–39). Nova Science Publishers.

Rubie-Davies, C. (2014). Becoming a high expectation teacher: Raising the bar . Taylor and Francis.

Rubie-Davies, C., & Peterson, E. (2016). Relations between teachers’ achievement, over- and underestimation, and students’ beliefs for Māori and Pākehā students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 47 , 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.01.001

Rubie-Davies, C., Peterson, E., Sibley, C., & Rosenthal, R. (2015). A teacher expectation intervention: Modelling the practices of high expectation teachers. Contemporary Educational Psychology , 40 (C), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.003 .

Rubie-Davies, C. (2006). Teacher expectations and student self-perceptions: Exploring relationships. Psychology in the Schools, 43 (5), 537–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20169

Rubie-Davies, C. (2007). Classroom interactions: Exploring the practices of high- and low-expectation teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77 (2), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X101601

Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19 (2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308219

Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2012). Social cognitive theory. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. McCormick, G. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 101–123). American Pyschological Association.

Segedin, L., Peters, S., Asghar, A., Choudry, A., Savard, A., & Strong-Wilson, T. (2012). Listening to the student voice: Understanding the school-related factors that limit student success. McGill Journal of Education , 47 (1), 93-107. https://mje.mcgill.ca/article/viewFile/9084/6875 .

Sewell, A., & St George, A. (2009). Developing efficacy beliefs in the classroom. The Journal of Educational Enquiry , 1 (2). https://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/EDEQ/article/view/576 .

Tenenbaum, H. R., & Ruck, M. D. (2007). Are teachers’ expectations different for racial minority than for European American students? A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99 (2), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.253

Timmermans, A. C., de Boer, H., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2016). An investigation of the relationship between teachers’ expectations and teachers’ perceptions of student attributes. Social Psychology of Education: an International Journal, 19 (2), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9326-6

Tomlinson, C. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching . Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Tomlinson, C. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners , 2nd ed. ASCD.

Trusz, S. (2018). Four mediation models of teacher expectancy effects on students’ outcomes in mathematics and literacy. Social Psychology of Education : an International Journal, 21 (2), 257–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9418-6

Tyler, K. M., & Boelter, C. M. (2008). Linking black middle school students' perceptions of teachers' expectations to academic engagement and efficacy. Negro Educational Review , 59 (1/2), 27–44,125–126. https://search.proquest.com/docview/219037863?accountid=14681 .

van den Bergh, L., Denessen, E., Hornstra, L., Voeten, M., & Holland, R. W. (2010). The implicit prejudiced attitudes of teachers: Relations to teacher expectations and the ethnic achievement gap. American Educational Research Journal, 47 (2), 497–527. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209353594

Wang, S., Rubie-Davies, C. M., & Meissel, K. (2019). Instructional practices and classroom interactions of high and low expectation teachers in China. Social Psychology of Education, 22 (4), 841–866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09507-4

Weinstein, R. (2002). Reaching higher: The power of expectations in schooling . Harvard University Press.

Weinstein, R. (2008). Schools that actualize high expectations for all youth: Theory for setting change and setting creation. Oxford University Press . https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327892.003.0005

Weinstein, R., Marshall, H., Brattesani, K., & Middlestadt, S. (1982). Student perceptions of differential teacher treatment in open and traditional classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74 (5), 678–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.6.441

Weinstein, R., & Middlestadt, S. (1979). Student perceptions of teacher interactions with male high and low achievers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71 (4), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.4.421

Weinstein, R., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Achieving college dreams: How a university-charter district partnership created an early college high school . Oxford University Press.

Williams, R. M. F. (2013). When gray matters more than black or white: The schooling experiences of black-white biracial students. Education and Urban Society, 45 (2), 175–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124511406917

Wilson, H. E., Siegle, D., McCoach, D. B., Little, C. A., & Reis, S. M. (2014). A model of academic self-concept: Perceived difficulty and social comparison among academically accelerated secondary school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58 (2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214522858

Wong, M. (2014). Voices of children, parents and teachers: How children cope with stress during school transition. Early Childhood Development and Care, 185 , 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.948872

Wu, C., & Bai, H. (2015). From early aspirations to actual attainment: the effects of economic status and educational expectations on university pursuit. Higher Education, 69 (3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9778-1

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 (1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was written with support from the Australian Department of Education Research Training Program.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Education, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia

Olivia Johnston

Graduate School of Education, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia

Helen Wildy & Jennifer Shand

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Olivia Johnston. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Olivia Johnston and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivia Johnston .

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Observation tool

See Fig. 1 .

" Appendix A ".

Appendix B: Interview schedule

See Fig. 2 .

" Appendix B ".

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Johnston, O., Wildy, H. & Shand, J. ‘Believe in me, and I will too’: a study of how teachers’ expectations instilled confidence in Grade 10 students. Soc Psychol Educ 24 , 1535–1556 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09668-1

Download citation

Received : 04 July 2021

Accepted : 24 September 2021

Published : 20 October 2021

Issue Date : December 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09668-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Teacher expectations
Grounded theory
Student self-efficacy beliefs
Student voice
Find a journal
Publish with us
Track your research

Home — Essay Samples — Education — Academic Performance — A Research on the Relationship Between Teacher Expectation and Academic Performance of Students in Schools

A Research on The Relationship Between Teacher Expectation and Academic Performance of Students in Schools

Categories: Academic Performance

About this sample

Words: 4519 |

Pages: 10 |

23 min read

Published: Jun 5, 2019

Words: 4519 | Pages: 10 | 23 min read

The long term impact of teacher expectations, bases of teacher expectations, high expectations versus low expectations, teachers’ expectations and classroom interactions, teacher gender biased interactions in the classroom, students’ perceptions of differential teacher treatment, the self-fulfilling prophecy, students’ socioeconomic status, students’ racial background, physical attractiveness of students, social learning theory: students’ self-efficacy, students’ self-perceptions of ability, teacher’s expectations of student ability in specific domains.

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Let us write you an essay from scratch

450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr Jacklynne

Verified writer

Expert in: Education

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

1 pages / 583 words

4 pages / 2013 words

3 pages / 1478 words

1 pages / 603 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Academic Performance

Haase, H. (2018, April 10). Students should pay attention more in class. Retrieved from https://prezi.com/5feco4b63ss7/why-you-should-pay-attention-in-class/

This essay presents findings from a study conducted among school children to investigate the potential correlation between dietary habits and academic achievement. Through inductive analysis of the study's results, we aim to [...]

In conclusion, the hat hood policy has been a subject of intense debate within educational institutions. While proponents argue that these policies are necessary for discipline and a focused learning environment, opponents [...]

Technology integration in education has become increasingly prevalent, but its effectiveness in improving student academic performance is a subject of inquiry. This quantitative essay aims to analyze the impact of technology [...]

There are some students in every class whom we call ‘weak students’, ‘low performers’, ‘poor performers’, ‘low achievers’ or ‘underachievers’. Most of these students are trapped in the vicious cycle of underperforming which [...]

In today’s world, stress is unavoidable especially for people who work or study in universities. Studying in a university is very stressful for most of students especially for those who come from another country with different [...]

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

Instructions Followed To The Letter
Deadlines Met At Every Stage
Unique And Plagiarism Free

Undergraduate
High School
Architecture
American History
Asian History
Antique Literature
American Literature
Asian Literature
Classic English Literature
World Literature
Creative Writing
Linguistics
Criminal Justice
Legal Issues
Anthropology
Archaeology
Political Science
World Affairs
African-American Studies
East European Studies
Latin-American Studies
Native-American Studies
West European Studies
Family and Consumer Science
Social Issues
Women and Gender Studies
Social Work
Natural Sciences
Pharmacology
Earth science
Agriculture
Agricultural Studies
Computer Science
IT Management
Mathematics
Investments
Engineering and Technology
Engineering
Aeronautics
Medicine and Health
Alternative Medicine
Communications and Media
Advertising
Communication Strategies
Public Relations
Educational Theories
Teacher's Career
Chicago/Turabian
Company Analysis
Education Theories
Shakespeare
Canadian Studies
Food Safety
Relation of Global Warming and Extreme Weather Condition
Movie Review
Admission Essay
Annotated Bibliography
Application Essay
Article Critique
Article Review
Article Writing
Book Review
Business Plan
Business Proposal
Capstone Project
Cover Letter
Creative Essay
Dissertation
Dissertation - Abstract
Dissertation - Conclusion
Dissertation - Discussion
Dissertation - Hypothesis
Dissertation - Introduction
Dissertation - Literature
Dissertation - Methodology
Dissertation - Results
GCSE Coursework
Grant Proposal
Marketing Plan
Multiple Choice Quiz
Personal Statement
Power Point Presentation
Power Point Presentation With Speaker Notes
Questionnaire
Reaction Paper

Research Paper

Research Proposal
SWOT analysis
Thesis Paper
Online Quiz
Literature Review
Movie Analysis
Statistics problem
Math Problem
All papers examples
How It Works
Money Back Policy
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
We Are Hiring

Expectations for Student Teaching, Essay Example

Pages: 1

Words: 327

Hire a Writer for Custom Essay

Use 10% Off Discount: "custom10" in 1 Click 👇

You are free to use it as an inspiration or a source for your own work.

In my student teaching I attempt to emphasize knowledge gained by feeling. Feelings stir the intellect, provoke reflection, and inspire authentic inquiry. Through dialogue and independent and collaborative work, I develop my skills of imagination and reflection and put them to the purpose of understanding learning – to unveil what has been tacit and to make explicit my thought processes and the impact of my life experiences to my behaviors in classroom.

I believe each student comes into the classroom experience with different readiness, experiences, motivations, and perceptions and will therefore have somespecialwants from me as a teacher. While a lot of time spent on organizing, reading, and preparing, I do so with less anxiety and nervousness to be ‘perfect’. In reassessing my role as a student teacher, I realized my responsibility to improve my students’ proficiency fulfilled only part part of my responsibility to them. I had an equal responsibility to improve their learning. I needed to reflect on the implications of this new responsibility. I had always seen my role in terms of providing language support for my students until they were capable of assuming that role for themselves. I believeI will work diligently to further my skills.

Clear, measurable, and realistic – that is how I evaluate the efficacy of students process. A change in the quality of being, growth in the quality of consciousness, evolution of spirit: these are the results I am talking about. It is about who I am, not what I know. It is about why I do what I do, not what I say, or what I do. I teach students their roles and my expectations. As a student teacher, I work to identify readiness-to-learn moments. For example, I identifyrequired vocabulary and write them on the chalkboard, or I conclude a quick role-play activity to focus attention on the correct words or phrases to use. I conduct ongoing needs analysis so as to effectively prepare for whole-class and more individualized instruction.

Stuck with your Essay?

Get in touch with one of our experts for instant help!

Louis XIV, Research Paper Example

Compassion: A “Universal” Value, Essay Example

Time is precious

don’t waste it!

Plagiarism-free guarantee

Privacy guarantee

Secure checkout

Money back guarantee

Related Essay Samples & Examples

Relatives, essay example.

Words: 364

Voting as a Civic Responsibility, Essay Example

Words: 287

Utilitarianism and Its Applications, Essay Example

Words: 356

The Age-Related Changes of the Older Person, Essay Example

Pages: 2

Words: 448

The Problems ESOL Teachers Face, Essay Example

Pages: 8

Words: 2293

Should English Be the Primary Language? Essay Example

Pages: 4

Words: 999

COMMENTS

Essay on Expectation In Teacher - AspiringYouths
500 Words Essay on Expectation In Teacher What We Expect from Our Teachers. Teachers play a very big role in our lives. They are not just people who teach us math, science, or English, but they also help us become better people. When we talk about what we expect from our teachers, we mean the things we think they should do or be like.
Teacher Expectations Play a Big Role in the Classroom. Here's ...
Hattie analyzed 613 studies on teacher expectations as part of the Visible Learning database and found that student achievement tracks closely with teacher expectations . In some cases, race ...
Expectations: Myself, My Class, My Professor | Lit Circles
This year, I have put a couple of expectations for myself. First one is to continue doing my best, even when it can get really hard. I am a good learner, but I have struggled with virtual classes this past year and a half. As everyone in this class, I have a set goal of what I want to achieve academically, and I will work towards that goal.
My Expectation to My Teacher Essay - Sorumatik
Answer: Writing an essay on “My Expectation to My Teacher” is a wonderful opportunity to reflect on the qualities and actions you believe are essential for an effective teacher-student relationship. This type of essay allows you to express your hopes and desires for the educational experience and the role your teacher plays in it.
How teacher expectations empower student learning - Brookings
1. Develop leaders that build a culture of high expectations in the system. In a Global School Leader survey, we find that in schools where leaders do believe that students can learn, 54 percent ...
Teachers' Expectations Can Influence How Students Perform - NPR
Email. Teachers' expectations about their students' abilities affect classroom interactions in myriad ways that can impact student performance. Students expected to succeed, for example, get more ...
‘Believe in me, and I will too’: a study of how teachers ...
Teachers’ expectations can have powerful effects on student academic attainment and their educational pathways (Papageorge et al., 2020; Wu & Bai, 2015).The phrase ‘teacher expectations’ is defined here as the judgements that teachers infer from their knowledge of students about if, when, and what students can achieve academically at school (Good, 1987; Rubie-Davies, 2014).
The effects of teacher expectation interventions on teachers ...
ABSTRACT. This study provides a systematic review of the effects of 19 teacher expectation interventions. Prior research on teacher expectations primarily focussed on correlational relationships with student and teacher characteristics, leaving open the questions of whether it is possible to raise teacher expectations and to prevent (too) low expectations from having detrimental effects on ...
A Research on The Relationship Between Teacher Expectation ...
The relationship between teacher expectations and academic performance has been a topic of interest for the last 50 years. Teachers’ judgements often play a role in facilitating or inhibiting students’ academic performance (Südkamp, Kaiser & Möller, 2012).
Expectations for Student Teaching, Essay Example
Expectations for Student Teaching, Essay Example. HIRE A WRITER! You are free to use it as an inspiration or a source for your own work. In my student teaching I attempt to emphasize knowledge gained by feeling. Feelings stir the intellect, provoke reflection, and inspire authentic inquiry. Through dialogue and independent and collaborative ...