methods of data collection for quantitative research

5 Methods of Data Collection for Quantitative Research

In this blog, read up on five different ways to approach data collection for quantitative studies - online surveys, offline surveys, interviews, etc.

Jan 29, 2024

quantilope is the Consumer Intelligence Platform for all end-to-end research needs

In this blog, read up on five different data collection techniques for quantitative research studies. 

Quantitative research forms the basis for many business decisions. But what is quantitative data collection, why is it important, and which data collection methods are used in quantitative research? 

Table of Contents: 

• What is quantitative data collection?
• The importance of quantitative data collection
• Methods used for quantitative data collection
• Example of a survey showing quantitative data
• Strengths and weaknesses of quantitative data

What is quantitative data collection? 

Quantitative data collection is the gathering of numeric data that puts consumer insights into a quantifiable context. It typically involves a large number of respondents - large enough to extract statistically reliable findings that can be extrapolated to a larger population.

The actual data collection process for quantitative findings is typically done using a quantitative online questionnaire that asks respondents yes/no questions, ranking scales, rating matrices, and other quantitative question types. With these results, researchers can generate data charts to summarize the quantitative findings and generate easily digestible key takeaways. 

Back to Table of Contents

The importance of quantitative data collection 

Quantitative data collection can confirm or deny a brand's hypothesis, guide product development, tailor marketing materials, and much more. It provides brands with reliable information to make decisions off of (i.e. 86% like lemon-lime flavor or just 12% are interested in a cinnamon-scented hand soap). 

Compared to qualitative data collection, quantitative data allows for comparison between insights given higher base sizes which leads to the ability to have statistical significance. Brands can cut and analyze their dataset in a variety of ways, looking at their findings among different demographic groups, behavioral groups, and other ways of interest. It's also generally easier and quicker to collect quantitative data than it is to gather qualitative feedback, making it an important data collection tool for brands that need quick, reliable, concrete insights. 

In order to make justified business decisions from quantitative data, brands need to recruit a high-quality sample that's reflective of their true target market (one that's comprised of all ages/genders rather than an isolated group). For example, a study into usage and attitudes around orange juice might include consumers who buy and/or drink orange juice at a certain frequency or who buy a variety of orange juice brands from different outlets. 

Methods used for quantitative data collection 

So knowing what quantitative data collection is and why it's important , how does one go about researching a large, high-quality, representative sample ?

Below are five examples of how to conduct your study through various data collection methods : 

Online quantitative surveys 

Online surveys are a common and effective way of collecting data from a large number of people. They tend to be made up of closed-ended questions so that responses across the sample are comparable; however, a small number of open-ended questions can be included as well (i.e. questions that require a written response rather than a selection of answers in a close-ended list). Open-ended questions are helpful to gather actual language used by respondents on a certain issue or to collect feedback on a view that might not be shown in a set list of responses).

Online surveys are quick and easy to send out, typically done so through survey panels. They can also appear in pop-ups on websites or via a link embedded in social media. From the participant’s point of view, online surveys are convenient to complete and submit, using whichever device they prefer (mobile phone, tablet, or computer). Anonymity is also viewed as a positive: online survey software ensures respondents’ identities are kept completely confidential.

To gather respondents for online surveys, researchers have several options. Probability sampling is one route, where respondents are selected using a random selection method. As such, everyone within the population has an equal chance of getting selected to participate. 

There are four common types of probability sampling . 

• Simple random sampling is the most straightforward approach, which involves randomly selecting individuals from the population without any specific criteria or grouping. 
• Stratified random sampling  divides the population into subgroups (strata) and selects a random sample from each stratum. This is useful when a population includes subgroups that you want to be sure you cover in your research. 
• Cluster sampling   divides the population into clusters and then randomly selects some of the clusters to sample in their entirety. This is useful when a population is geographically dispersed and it would be impossible to include everyone.
• Systematic sampling  begins with a random starting point and then selects every nth member of the population after that point (i.e. every 15th respondent). 

Learn how to leverage AI to help generate your online quantitative survey inputs:

While online surveys are by far the most common way to collect quantitative data in today’s modern age, there are still some harder-to-reach respondents where other mediums can be beneficial; for example, those who aren’t tech-savvy or who don’t have a stable internet connection. For these audiences, offline surveys   may be needed.

Offline quantitative surveys

Offline surveys (though much rarer to come across these days) are a way of gathering respondent feedback without digital means. This could be something like postal questionnaires that are sent out to a sample population and asked to return the questionnaire by mail (like the Census) or telephone surveys where questions are asked of respondents over the phone. 

Offline surveys certainly take longer to collect data than online surveys and they can become expensive if the population is difficult to reach (requiring a higher incentive). As with online surveys, anonymity is protected, assuming the mail is not intercepted or lost.

Despite the major difference in data collection to an online survey approach, offline survey data is still reported on in an aggregated, numeric fashion. 

In-person interviews are another popular way of researching or polling a population. They can be thought of as a survey but in a verbal, in-person, or virtual face-to-face format. The online format of interviews is becoming more popular nowadays, as it is cheaper and logistically easier to organize than in-person face-to-face interviews, yet still allows the interviewer to see and hear from the respondent in their own words. 

Though many interviews are collected for qualitative research, interviews can also be leveraged quantitatively; like a phone survey, an interviewer runs through a survey with the respondent, asking mainly closed-ended questions (yes/no, multiple choice questions, or questions with rating scales that ask how strongly the respondent agrees with statements). The advantage of structured interviews is that the interviewer can pace the survey, making sure the respondent gives enough consideration to each question. It also adds a human touch, which can be more engaging for some respondents. On the other hand, for more sensitive issues, respondents may feel more inclined to complete a survey online for a greater sense of anonymity - so it all depends on your research questions, the survey topic, and the audience you're researching.

Observations

Observation studies in quantitative research are similar in nature to a qualitative ethnographic study (in which a researcher also observes consumers in their natural habitats), yet observation studies for quant research remain focused on the numbers - how many people do an action, how much of a product consumer pick up, etc.

For quantitative observations, researchers will record the number and types of people who do a certain action - such as choosing a specific product from a grocery shelf, speaking to a company representative at an event, or how many people pass through a certain area within a given timeframe. Observation studies are generally structured, with the observer asked to note behavior using set parameters. Structured observation means that the observer has to hone in on very specific behaviors, which can be quite nuanced. This requires the observer to use his/her own judgment about what type of behavior is being exhibited (e.g. reading labels on products before selecting them; considering different items before making the final choice; making a selection based on price).

Document reviews and secondary data sources

A fifth method of data collection for quantitative research is known as secondary research : reviewing existing research to see how it can contribute to understanding a new issue in question. This is in contrast to the primary research methods above, which is research that is specially commissioned and carried out for a research project. 

There are numerous secondary data sources that researchers can analyze such as  public records, government research, company databases, existing reports, paid-for research publications, magazines, journals, case studies, websites, books, and more.

Aside from using secondary research alone, secondary research documents can also be used in anticipation of primary research, to understand which knowledge gaps need to be filled and to nail down the issues that might be important to explore further in a primary research study. Back to Table of Contents

Example of a survey showing quantitative data 

The below study shows what quantitative data might look like in a final study dashboard, taken from quantilope's Sneaker category insights study . 

The study includes a variety of usage and attitude metrics around sneaker wear, sneaker purchases, seasonality of sneakers, and more. Check out some of the data charts below showing these quantitative data findings - the first of which even cuts the quantitative data findings by demographics. 

Beyond these basic usage and attitude (or, descriptive) data metrics, quantitative data also includes advanced methods - such as implicit association testing. See what these quantitative data charts look like from the same sneaker study below:

These are just a few examples of how a researcher or insights team might show their quantitative data findings. However, there are many ways to visualize quantitative data in an insights study, from bar charts, column charts, pie charts, donut charts, spider charts, and more, depending on what best suits the story your data is telling. Back to Table of Contents

Strengths and weaknesses of quantitative data collection

quantitative data is a great way to capture informative insights about your brand, product, category, or competitors. It's relatively quick, depending on your sample audience, and more affordable than other data collection methods such as qualitative focus groups. With quantitative panels, it's easy to access nearly any audience you might need - from something as general as the US population to something as specific as cannabis users . There are many ways to visualize quantitative findings, making it a customizable form of insights - whether you want to show the data in a bar chart, pie chart, etc. 

For those looking for quick, affordable, actionable insights, quantitative studies are the way to go.  

quantitative data collection, despite the many benefits outlined above, might also not be the right fit for your exact needs. For example, you often don't get as detailed and in-depth answers quantitatively as you would with an in-person interview, focus group, or ethnographic observation (all forms of qualitative research). When running a quantitative survey, it’s best practice to review your data for quality measures to ensure all respondents are ones you want to keep in your data set. Fortunately, there are a lot of precautions research providers can take to navigate these obstacles - such as automated data cleaners and data flags. Of course, the first step to ensuring high-quality results is to use a trusted panel provider.  Back to Table of Contents

Quantitative research typically needs to undergo statistical analysis for it to be useful and actionable to any business. It is therefore crucial that the method of data collection, sample size, and sample criteria are considered in light of the research questions asked.

quantilope’s online platform is ideal for quantitative research studies. The online format means a large sample can be reached easily and quickly through connected respondent panels that effectively reach the desired target audience. Response rates are high, as respondents can take their survey from anywhere, using any device with internet access.

Surveys are easy to build with quantilope’s online survey builder. Simply choose questions to include from pre-designed survey templates or build your own questions using the platform’s drag & drop functionality (of which both options are fully customizable). Once the survey is live, findings update in real-time so that brands can get an idea of consumer attitudes long before the survey is complete. In addition to basic usage and attitude questions, quantilope’s suite of advanced research methodologies provides an AI-driven approach to many types of research questions. These range from exploring the features of products that drive purchase through a Key Driver Analysis , compiling the ideal portfolio of products using a TURF , or identifying the optimal price point for a product or service using a Price Sensitivity Meter (PSM) .

Depending on the type of data sought it might be worth considering a mixed-method approach, including both qual and quant in a single research study. Alongside quantitative online surveys, quantilope’s video research solution - inColor , offers qualitative research in the form of videoed responses to survey questions. inColor’s qualitative data analysis includes an AI-drive read on respondent sentiment, keyword trends, and facial expressions.

To find out more about how quantilope can help with any aspect of your research design and to start conducting high-quality, quantitative research, get in touch below:

Get in touch to learn more about quantitative research studies!

Latest articles.

The Essential Guide to Idea Screening: Turning Concepts Into Reality

In this guide, we'll break down the essentials of idea screening, starting by defining its purpose and exploring the top techniques for suc...

September 04, 2024

The New quantilope Brand Experience

Introducing quantilope's new brand experience featuring a brighter, fresher look and feel.

Unleash Brand Growth With Our Better Brand Health Tracking Certification

This Certification Course from the quantilope Academy empowers researchers to learn how to effectively grow their brand through Better Bran...

August 15, 2024

Popular searches

• How to Get Participants For Your Study
• How to Do Segmentation?
• Conjoint Preference Share Simulator
• MaxDiff Analysis
• Likert Scales
• Reliability & Validity

Request consultation

Do you need support in running a pricing or product study? We can help you with agile consumer research and conjoint analysis.

Looking for an online survey platform?

Conjointly offers a great survey tool with multiple question types, randomisation blocks, and multilingual support. The Basic tier is always free.

Catherine Chipeta

Fully-functional online survey tool with various question types, logic, randomisation, and reporting for unlimited number of surveys.

Monthly newsletter

Get the latest updates about market research, automated tools, product testing and pricing techniques.

We explore quantitative data collection methods’ best use, and the pros and cons of each to help you decide which method to use for your next quantitative study.

Survey Tool

There are many ways to categorise research methods, with most falling into the fields of either qualitative or quantitative.

Qualitative research uses non-measurable sources of data and relies mostly on observation techniques to gain insights. It is mostly used to answer questions beginning with “why?” and how?”. Examples of qualitative data collection methods include focus groups, observation, written records, and individual interviews.

Quantitative research presents data in a numerical format, enabling researchers to evaluate and understand this data through statistical analysis . It answers questions such as “who?”, “when?” “what?”, and “where?”. Common examples include interviews , surveys , and case studies/document review. Generally, quantitative data tells us what respondents’ choices are and qualitative tells us why they made those choices.

Once you have determined which type of research you wish to undertake, it is time to select a data collection method. Whilst quantitative and qualitative collection methods often overlap, this article focuses on quantitative data collection methods.

The Nature of Quantitative Observation

As quantitative observation uses numerical measurement , its results are more accurate than qualitative observation methods, which cannot be measured.

To ensure accuracy and consistency, an appropriate sample size needs to be determined for quantitative research. A sample should include enough respondents to make general observations that are most reflective of the whole population.

The more credible the sample size, the more meaningful the insights that the market researcher can draw during the analysis process.

Quantitative surveys are a data collection tool used to gather close-ended responses from individuals and groups. Question types primarily include categorical (e.g. “yes/no”) and interval/ratio questions (e.g. rating-scale, Likert-scale ). They are used to gather information such based upon the behaviours, characteristics, or opinions , and demographic information such as gender, income, occupation.

Surveys are traditionally completed on pen-and-paper but these days are commonly found online , which is a more convenient method.

When to use

Surveys are an ideal choice when you want simple, Quick Feedback which easily translates into statistics for analysis. For example, “60% of respondents think price is the most important factor when making buying decisions”.

• Speedy collection: User-friendly, optimal length surveys are quick to complete and online responses are available instantly.
• Wide reach: Online survey invites can be sent out to hundreds of potential respondents at a time.
• Targeted respondents: Using online panels allows you to target the right respondents for your study based on demographics and other profiling information.

Disadvantages

• Less detail: Surveys often collect less detailed responses than other forms of collection due to the limited options available for respondents to choose.
• Design reliant: If survey design is not effective, the quality of responses will be diminished.
• Potential bias: If respondents feel compelled to answer a question in a particular way due to social or other reasons, this lowers the accuracy of results.

Quantitative interviews are like surveys in that they use a question-and-answer format. The major difference between the two methods is the recording process.

In interviews, respondents are read each question and answer option to them by an interviewer who records responses, whereas in surveys, the respondent reads each question and answers themselves, recording their own response.

For quantitative interviews to be effective, each question and answer must be asked the same way to each respondent, with little to no input from the interviewer.

Quantitative interviews work well when the market researcher is conducting fieldwork to scope potential respondents. For example, approaching buyers of a certain product at a supermarket.

• Higher responsiveness: Potential respondents are more likely to say ‘yes’ to a market researcher in-person than in other ways, e.g. a phone call.
• Clearer understanding: Interviews allow respondents to seek classification from the interviewer if they are confused by a question.
• Less downtime: The market researcher can collect data as soon as the interview is conducted, rather than wait to hear back from the respondent first.
• Interviewer effect: Having an interviewer present questions to the respondent poses the risk of influencing the way in which the respondent answers.
• Time consuming: Interviews usually take longer to complete than other methods, such as surveys.
• Less control: Interviews present more variables, such as tone and pace, which could affect data quality.

Secondary Data Collection Methods

Published case studies and online sources are forms of secondary data, that is, data which has already been prepared and compiled for analysis.

Case studies are descriptive or explanatory publications which detail specific individuals, groups, or events. Whilst case studies are conducted using qualitative methods such as direct observation and unstructured interviewing, researchers can gather statistical data published in these sources to gain quantitative insights.

Other forms of secondary data include journals, books, magazines, and government publications.

Secondary data collection methods are most appropriately used when the market researcher is exploring a topic which already has extensive information and data available and is looking for supplementary insights for guidance.

For example, a study on caffeine consumption habits could draw statistics from existing medical case studies.

• Easier collection: As secondary data is readily available, it is relatively easy to collect for further analysis.
• More credibility: If collected from reputable sources, secondary data can be trusted as accurate and of quality.
• Less expensive: Collecting secondary data often costs a lot less than if the same data were collected primarily.
• Differing context: Secondary data collected will not necessarily align with the market researcher’s research questions or objectives.
• Limited availability: The amount and detail of secondary data available for a particular research topic is varied and not dependable.
• Less control: As secondary data is originally collected externally, there is no control over the quality of available data on a topic.

Quantitative research produces the most accurate and meaningful insights for analysis.

Surveys are a common form of quantitative data collection and can be created and completed online, making them a convenient and accessible choice. However, they must be well-designed and executed to ensure accurate results.

Interviews are an ideal choice for in-person data collection and can improve respondents’ understanding of questions. Time and potential interview bias are drawbacks to this method.

Collecting secondary data is a relatively quick and inexpensive way of gathering supplementary insights for research but there is limited control over context, availability, and quality of the data.

Find the right respondents for your survey

We use quality panel providers to source respondents that suit your specific research needs.

Read these articles next:

How to use the clustering demo.

Easily segment your audience using preference data and other survey answers with the Clustering Demo.

Sample Size Calculator and Guide to Survey Sample Size

How many respondents do you need? Use our sample size calculator to get the right sample size for your next survey. We also answer frequently asked questions on sample size and provide suggestions to improve your surveys in this handy guide.

Comparing the Twitter, X, and Threads logos

To evaluate the recent Twitter/X rebranding, this Logo Test compares the Blue Bird icon with the new X and competitor Threads icons.

Which one are you?

I am new to conjointly, i am already using conjointly, cookie consent.

Conjointly uses essential cookies to make our site work. We also use additional cookies in order to understand the usage of the site, gather audience analytics, and for remarketing purposes.

For more information on Conjointly's use of cookies, please read our Cookie Policy .

Do you want to be updated on new features from Conjointly?

We send occasional emails to keep our users informed about new developments on Conjointly , such as new types of analysis and features.

Subscribe to updates from Conjointly

You can always unsubscribe later. Your email will not be shared with other companies.

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• What Is Quantitative Research? | Definition, Uses & Methods

What Is Quantitative Research? | Definition, Uses & Methods

Published on June 12, 2020 by Pritha Bhandari . Revised on June 22, 2023.

Quantitative research is the process of collecting and analyzing numerical data. It can be used to find patterns and averages, make predictions, test causal relationships, and generalize results to wider populations.

Quantitative research is the opposite of qualitative research , which involves collecting and analyzing non-numerical data (e.g., text, video, or audio).

Quantitative research is widely used in the natural and social sciences: biology, chemistry, psychology, economics, sociology, marketing, etc.

• What is the demographic makeup of Singapore in 2020?
• How has the average temperature changed globally over the last century?
• Does environmental pollution affect the prevalence of honey bees?
• Does working from home increase productivity for people with long commutes?

Table of contents

Quantitative research methods, quantitative data analysis, advantages of quantitative research, disadvantages of quantitative research, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about quantitative research.

You can use quantitative research methods for descriptive, correlational or experimental research.

• In descriptive research , you simply seek an overall summary of your study variables.
• In correlational research , you investigate relationships between your study variables.
• In experimental research , you systematically examine whether there is a cause-and-effect relationship between variables.

Correlational and experimental research can both be used to formally test hypotheses , or predictions, using statistics. The results may be generalized to broader populations based on the sampling method used.

To collect quantitative data, you will often need to use operational definitions that translate abstract concepts (e.g., mood) into observable and quantifiable measures (e.g., self-ratings of feelings and energy levels).

Note that quantitative research is at risk for certain research biases , including information bias , omitted variable bias , sampling bias , or selection bias . Be sure that you’re aware of potential biases as you collect and analyze your data to prevent them from impacting your work too much.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Once data is collected, you may need to process it before it can be analyzed. For example, survey and test data may need to be transformed from words to numbers. Then, you can use statistical analysis to answer your research questions .

Descriptive statistics will give you a summary of your data and include measures of averages and variability. You can also use graphs, scatter plots and frequency tables to visualize your data and check for any trends or outliers.

Using inferential statistics , you can make predictions or generalizations based on your data. You can test your hypothesis or use your sample data to estimate the population parameter .

First, you use descriptive statistics to get a summary of the data. You find the mean (average) and the mode (most frequent rating) of procrastination of the two groups, and plot the data to see if there are any outliers.

You can also assess the reliability and validity of your data collection methods to indicate how consistently and accurately your methods actually measured what you wanted them to.

Quantitative research is often used to standardize data collection and generalize findings . Strengths of this approach include:

• Replication

Repeating the study is possible because of standardized data collection protocols and tangible definitions of abstract concepts.

• Direct comparisons of results

The study can be reproduced in other cultural settings, times or with different groups of participants. Results can be compared statistically.

• Large samples

Data from large samples can be processed and analyzed using reliable and consistent procedures through quantitative data analysis.

• Hypothesis testing

Using formalized and established hypothesis testing procedures means that you have to carefully consider and report your research variables, predictions, data collection and testing methods before coming to a conclusion.

Despite the benefits of quantitative research, it is sometimes inadequate in explaining complex research topics. Its limitations include:

• Superficiality

Using precise and restrictive operational definitions may inadequately represent complex concepts. For example, the concept of mood may be represented with just a number in quantitative research, but explained with elaboration in qualitative research.

• Narrow focus

Predetermined variables and measurement procedures can mean that you ignore other relevant observations.

• Structural bias

Despite standardized procedures, structural biases can still affect quantitative research. Missing data , imprecise measurements or inappropriate sampling methods are biases that can lead to the wrong conclusions.

• Lack of context

Quantitative research often uses unnatural settings like laboratories or fails to consider historical and cultural contexts that may affect data collection and results.

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Chi square goodness of fit test
• Degrees of freedom
• Null hypothesis
• Discourse analysis
• Control groups
• Mixed methods research
• Non-probability sampling
• Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Research bias

• Rosenthal effect
• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Selection bias
• Negativity bias
• Status quo bias

Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.

Quantitative methods allow you to systematically measure variables and test hypotheses . Qualitative methods allow you to explore concepts and experiences in more detail.

In mixed methods research , you use both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods to answer your research question .

Data collection is the systematic process by which observations or measurements are gathered in research. It is used in many different contexts by academics, governments, businesses, and other organizations.

Operationalization means turning abstract conceptual ideas into measurable observations.

For example, the concept of social anxiety isn’t directly observable, but it can be operationally defined in terms of self-rating scores, behavioral avoidance of crowded places, or physical anxiety symptoms in social situations.

Before collecting data , it’s important to consider how you will operationalize the variables that you want to measure.

Reliability and validity are both about how well a method measures something:

• Reliability refers to the  consistency of a measure (whether the results can be reproduced under the same conditions).
• Validity   refers to the  accuracy of a measure (whether the results really do represent what they are supposed to measure).

If you are doing experimental research, you also have to consider the internal and external validity of your experiment.

Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses , by calculating how likely it is that a pattern or relationship between variables could have arisen by chance.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Bhandari, P. (2023, June 22). What Is Quantitative Research? | Definition, Uses & Methods. Scribbr. Retrieved September 4, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/quantitative-research/

Is this article helpful?

Pritha Bhandari

Other students also liked, descriptive statistics | definitions, types, examples, inferential statistics | an easy introduction & examples, get unlimited documents corrected.

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

3.3 Methods of Quantitative Data Collection

Data collection is the process of gathering information for research purposes. Data collection methods in quantitative research refer to the techniques or tools used to collect data from participants or units in a study. Data are the most important asset for any researcher because they provide the researcher with the knowledge necessary to confirm or refute their research hypothesis. 2 The choice of data collection method will depend on the research question, the study design, the type of data to be collected, and the available resources. There are two main types of data which are primary data and secondary data. 34 These data types and their examples are discussed below.

Data Sources

Secondary data

Secondary data is data that is already in existence and was collected for other purposes and not for the sole purpose of a researcher’s project. 34 These pre-existing data include data from surveys, administrative records, medical records, or other sources (databases, internet). Examples of these data sources include census data, vital registration (birth and death), registries of notifiable diseases, hospital data and health-related data such as the national health survey data and national drug strategy household survey. 2 While secondary data are population-based, quicker to access, and cheaper to collect than primary data, there are some drawbacks to this data source. Potential disadvantages include accuracy of the data, completeness, and appropriateness of the data, given that the data was collected for an alternative purpose. 2 

Primary data

Primary data is collected directly from the study participants and used expressly for research purposes. 34 The data collected is specifically targeted at the research question, hypothesis and aims. Examples of primary data include observations and surveys (questionnaires). 34

• Observations: In quantitative research, observations entail systematically watching and recording the events or behaviours of interest. Observations can be used to collect information on variables that may be difficult to quantify through self-reported methods. Observations, for example, can be used to obtain clinical measurements involving the use of standardised instruments or tools to measure physical, cognitive, or other variables of interest. Other examples include experimental or laboratory studies that necessitate the collection of physiological data such as blood pressure, heart rate, urine, e.t.c. 2
• Surveys:  While observations are useful data collection methods, surveys are more commonly used data collection methods in healthcare research. 2, 34 Surveys or questionnaires are designed to seek specific information such as knowledge, beliefs, attitudes and behaviour from respondents. 2, 34 Surveys can be employed as a single research tool (as in a cross-sectional survey) or as part of clinical trials or epidemiological studies. 2, 34   They can be administered face-to-face, via telephone, paper-based, computer-based or a combination of the different methods. 2 Figure 3.7 outlines some advantages and disadvantages of questionnaires/surveys.

Designing a survey/questionnaire

A questionnaire is a research tool that consists of questions that are designed to collect information and generate statistical data from a specified group of people (target population). There are two main considerations in relation to design principles, and these are (1) content and (2) layout and sequence. 36 In terms of content, it is important to review the literature for related validated survey tools, as this saves time and allows for the comparison of results. Additionally, researchers need to minimise complexity by using simple direct language, including only relevant and accurate questions, with no jargon. 36 Concerning layout and sequence, there should be a logical flow of questions from general and easier to more sensitive ones, and the questionnaire should be as short as possible and NOT overcrowded. 36 The following steps can be used to develop a survey/ questionnaire.

Question Formats

Open and closed-ended questions are the two main types of question formats. 2   Open-ended questions allow respondents to express their thoughts without being constrained by the available options. 2, 38 Open-ended questions are chosen if the options are many and the range of answers is unknown. 38

On the other hand, closed-ended questions provide respondents with alternatives and require that they select one or more options from a list. 38 The question type is favoured if the choices are few and the range of responses is well-known. 38 However, other question formats may be used when assessing things on a continuum, like attitudes and behaviour. These variables can be considered using rating scales like visual analogue scales, adjectival scales and Likert scales. 2 Figure 3.8 presents a visual representation of some question types, including open-ended, closed-ended, likert rating scales, symbols, and visual Analogue Scales.

It is important to carefully craft survey questions to ensure that they are clear, unbiased and accurately capture the information researchers seek to gather. Clearly written questions with consistency in wording increase the likelihood of obtaining accurate and reliable data. Poorly crafted questions, on the other hand, may sway respondents to answer in a particular way which can undermine the validity of the survey. The following are some general guidelines for question wording. 39

Be concise and clear: Ask succinct and precise questions, and do not use ambiguous and vague words. For example, do not ask a patient, “ how was your clinic experience ? What do you mean by clinic experience? Are you referring to their interactions with the nurses, doctors or physiotherapists?

Instead, consider using a better-phrased question such as “ please rate your experience with the doctor during your visit today ”.

Avoid double-barrelled questions. Some questions may have dual questions, for example: Do you think you should eat less and exercise more?

Instead, ask:

• Do you think you should eat less?
• Do you think you should exercise more?

Steer clear of questions that involve negatives: Negatively worded questions can be confusing. For example, I find it difficult to fall asleep unless I take sleeping pills .

A better phrase is, “sleeping pills make it easy for me to fall asleep.”

Ask for specific answers. It is better to ask for more precise information. For example, “what is your age in years?________ Is preferable to -Which age category do you belong to?

☐  <18 years

☐ 18 – 25 years

☐ 25 – 35 years

☐ > 35 years

The options above will give more room for errors because the options are not mutually exclusive (there are overlaps) and not exhaustive (there are older age groups above 35 years).

Avoid leading questions. Leading questions reduces objectivity and make respondents answer in a particular way. Questions related to values and beliefs should be neutrally phrased. For example, the question below is worded in a leading way – Conducting research is challenging. Does research training help to prepare you for your research project?

An appropriate alternative: Research training prepares me for my research project.

Strongly agree           Agree                    Disagree              Strongly disagree

An Introduction to Research Methods for Undergraduate Health Profession Students Copyright © 2023 by Faith Alele and Bunmi Malau-Aduli is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

• Privacy Policy

Home » Data Collection – Methods Types and Examples

Data Collection – Methods Types and Examples

Table of Contents

Data Collection

Definition:

Data collection is the process of gathering and collecting information from various sources to analyze and make informed decisions based on the data collected. This can involve various methods, such as surveys, interviews, experiments, and observation.

In order for data collection to be effective, it is important to have a clear understanding of what data is needed and what the purpose of the data collection is. This can involve identifying the population or sample being studied, determining the variables to be measured, and selecting appropriate methods for collecting and recording data.

Types of Data Collection

Types of Data Collection are as follows:

Primary Data Collection

Primary data collection is the process of gathering original and firsthand information directly from the source or target population. This type of data collection involves collecting data that has not been previously gathered, recorded, or published. Primary data can be collected through various methods such as surveys, interviews, observations, experiments, and focus groups. The data collected is usually specific to the research question or objective and can provide valuable insights that cannot be obtained from secondary data sources. Primary data collection is often used in market research, social research, and scientific research.

Secondary Data Collection

Secondary data collection is the process of gathering information from existing sources that have already been collected and analyzed by someone else, rather than conducting new research to collect primary data. Secondary data can be collected from various sources, such as published reports, books, journals, newspapers, websites, government publications, and other documents.

Qualitative Data Collection

Qualitative data collection is used to gather non-numerical data such as opinions, experiences, perceptions, and feelings, through techniques such as interviews, focus groups, observations, and document analysis. It seeks to understand the deeper meaning and context of a phenomenon or situation and is often used in social sciences, psychology, and humanities. Qualitative data collection methods allow for a more in-depth and holistic exploration of research questions and can provide rich and nuanced insights into human behavior and experiences.

Quantitative Data Collection

Quantitative data collection is a used to gather numerical data that can be analyzed using statistical methods. This data is typically collected through surveys, experiments, and other structured data collection methods. Quantitative data collection seeks to quantify and measure variables, such as behaviors, attitudes, and opinions, in a systematic and objective way. This data is often used to test hypotheses, identify patterns, and establish correlations between variables. Quantitative data collection methods allow for precise measurement and generalization of findings to a larger population. It is commonly used in fields such as economics, psychology, and natural sciences.

Data Collection Methods

Data Collection Methods are as follows:

Surveys involve asking questions to a sample of individuals or organizations to collect data. Surveys can be conducted in person, over the phone, or online.

Interviews involve a one-on-one conversation between the interviewer and the respondent. Interviews can be structured or unstructured and can be conducted in person or over the phone.

Focus Groups

Focus groups are group discussions that are moderated by a facilitator. Focus groups are used to collect qualitative data on a specific topic.

Observation

Observation involves watching and recording the behavior of people, objects, or events in their natural setting. Observation can be done overtly or covertly, depending on the research question.

Experiments

Experiments involve manipulating one or more variables and observing the effect on another variable. Experiments are commonly used in scientific research.

Case Studies

Case studies involve in-depth analysis of a single individual, organization, or event. Case studies are used to gain detailed information about a specific phenomenon.

Secondary Data Analysis

Secondary data analysis involves using existing data that was collected for another purpose. Secondary data can come from various sources, such as government agencies, academic institutions, or private companies.

How to Collect Data

The following are some steps to consider when collecting data:

• Define the objective : Before you start collecting data, you need to define the objective of the study. This will help you determine what data you need to collect and how to collect it.
• Identify the data sources : Identify the sources of data that will help you achieve your objective. These sources can be primary sources, such as surveys, interviews, and observations, or secondary sources, such as books, articles, and databases.
• Determine the data collection method : Once you have identified the data sources, you need to determine the data collection method. This could be through online surveys, phone interviews, or face-to-face meetings.
• Develop a data collection plan : Develop a plan that outlines the steps you will take to collect the data. This plan should include the timeline, the tools and equipment needed, and the personnel involved.
• Test the data collection process: Before you start collecting data, test the data collection process to ensure that it is effective and efficient.
• Collect the data: Collect the data according to the plan you developed in step 4. Make sure you record the data accurately and consistently.
• Analyze the data: Once you have collected the data, analyze it to draw conclusions and make recommendations.
• Report the findings: Report the findings of your data analysis to the relevant stakeholders. This could be in the form of a report, a presentation, or a publication.
• Monitor and evaluate the data collection process: After the data collection process is complete, monitor and evaluate the process to identify areas for improvement in future data collection efforts.
• Ensure data quality: Ensure that the collected data is of high quality and free from errors. This can be achieved by validating the data for accuracy, completeness, and consistency.
• Maintain data security: Ensure that the collected data is secure and protected from unauthorized access or disclosure. This can be achieved by implementing data security protocols and using secure storage and transmission methods.
• Follow ethical considerations: Follow ethical considerations when collecting data, such as obtaining informed consent from participants, protecting their privacy and confidentiality, and ensuring that the research does not cause harm to participants.
• Use appropriate data analysis methods : Use appropriate data analysis methods based on the type of data collected and the research objectives. This could include statistical analysis, qualitative analysis, or a combination of both.
• Record and store data properly: Record and store the collected data properly, in a structured and organized format. This will make it easier to retrieve and use the data in future research or analysis.
• Collaborate with other stakeholders : Collaborate with other stakeholders, such as colleagues, experts, or community members, to ensure that the data collected is relevant and useful for the intended purpose.

Applications of Data Collection

Data collection methods are widely used in different fields, including social sciences, healthcare, business, education, and more. Here are some examples of how data collection methods are used in different fields:

• Social sciences : Social scientists often use surveys, questionnaires, and interviews to collect data from individuals or groups. They may also use observation to collect data on social behaviors and interactions. This data is often used to study topics such as human behavior, attitudes, and beliefs.
• Healthcare : Data collection methods are used in healthcare to monitor patient health and track treatment outcomes. Electronic health records and medical charts are commonly used to collect data on patients’ medical history, diagnoses, and treatments. Researchers may also use clinical trials and surveys to collect data on the effectiveness of different treatments.
• Business : Businesses use data collection methods to gather information on consumer behavior, market trends, and competitor activity. They may collect data through customer surveys, sales reports, and market research studies. This data is used to inform business decisions, develop marketing strategies, and improve products and services.
• Education : In education, data collection methods are used to assess student performance and measure the effectiveness of teaching methods. Standardized tests, quizzes, and exams are commonly used to collect data on student learning outcomes. Teachers may also use classroom observation and student feedback to gather data on teaching effectiveness.
• Agriculture : Farmers use data collection methods to monitor crop growth and health. Sensors and remote sensing technology can be used to collect data on soil moisture, temperature, and nutrient levels. This data is used to optimize crop yields and minimize waste.
• Environmental sciences : Environmental scientists use data collection methods to monitor air and water quality, track climate patterns, and measure the impact of human activity on the environment. They may use sensors, satellite imagery, and laboratory analysis to collect data on environmental factors.
• Transportation : Transportation companies use data collection methods to track vehicle performance, optimize routes, and improve safety. GPS systems, on-board sensors, and other tracking technologies are used to collect data on vehicle speed, fuel consumption, and driver behavior.

Examples of Data Collection

Examples of Data Collection are as follows:

• Traffic Monitoring: Cities collect real-time data on traffic patterns and congestion through sensors on roads and cameras at intersections. This information can be used to optimize traffic flow and improve safety.
• Social Media Monitoring : Companies can collect real-time data on social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook to monitor their brand reputation, track customer sentiment, and respond to customer inquiries and complaints in real-time.
• Weather Monitoring: Weather agencies collect real-time data on temperature, humidity, air pressure, and precipitation through weather stations and satellites. This information is used to provide accurate weather forecasts and warnings.
• Stock Market Monitoring : Financial institutions collect real-time data on stock prices, trading volumes, and other market indicators to make informed investment decisions and respond to market fluctuations in real-time.
• Health Monitoring : Medical devices such as wearable fitness trackers and smartwatches can collect real-time data on a person’s heart rate, blood pressure, and other vital signs. This information can be used to monitor health conditions and detect early warning signs of health issues.

Purpose of Data Collection

The purpose of data collection can vary depending on the context and goals of the study, but generally, it serves to:

• Provide information: Data collection provides information about a particular phenomenon or behavior that can be used to better understand it.
• Measure progress : Data collection can be used to measure the effectiveness of interventions or programs designed to address a particular issue or problem.
• Support decision-making : Data collection provides decision-makers with evidence-based information that can be used to inform policies, strategies, and actions.
• Identify trends : Data collection can help identify trends and patterns over time that may indicate changes in behaviors or outcomes.
• Monitor and evaluate : Data collection can be used to monitor and evaluate the implementation and impact of policies, programs, and initiatives.

When to use Data Collection

Data collection is used when there is a need to gather information or data on a specific topic or phenomenon. It is typically used in research, evaluation, and monitoring and is important for making informed decisions and improving outcomes.

Data collection is particularly useful in the following scenarios:

• Research : When conducting research, data collection is used to gather information on variables of interest to answer research questions and test hypotheses.
• Evaluation : Data collection is used in program evaluation to assess the effectiveness of programs or interventions, and to identify areas for improvement.
• Monitoring : Data collection is used in monitoring to track progress towards achieving goals or targets, and to identify any areas that require attention.
• Decision-making: Data collection is used to provide decision-makers with information that can be used to inform policies, strategies, and actions.
• Quality improvement : Data collection is used in quality improvement efforts to identify areas where improvements can be made and to measure progress towards achieving goals.

Characteristics of Data Collection

Data collection can be characterized by several important characteristics that help to ensure the quality and accuracy of the data gathered. These characteristics include:

• Validity : Validity refers to the accuracy and relevance of the data collected in relation to the research question or objective.
• Reliability : Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of the data collection process, ensuring that the results obtained are consistent over time and across different contexts.
• Objectivity : Objectivity refers to the impartiality of the data collection process, ensuring that the data collected is not influenced by the biases or personal opinions of the data collector.
• Precision : Precision refers to the degree of accuracy and detail in the data collected, ensuring that the data is specific and accurate enough to answer the research question or objective.
• Timeliness : Timeliness refers to the efficiency and speed with which the data is collected, ensuring that the data is collected in a timely manner to meet the needs of the research or evaluation.
• Ethical considerations : Ethical considerations refer to the ethical principles that must be followed when collecting data, such as ensuring confidentiality and obtaining informed consent from participants.

Advantages of Data Collection

There are several advantages of data collection that make it an important process in research, evaluation, and monitoring. These advantages include:

• Better decision-making : Data collection provides decision-makers with evidence-based information that can be used to inform policies, strategies, and actions, leading to better decision-making.
• Improved understanding: Data collection helps to improve our understanding of a particular phenomenon or behavior by providing empirical evidence that can be analyzed and interpreted.
• Evaluation of interventions: Data collection is essential in evaluating the effectiveness of interventions or programs designed to address a particular issue or problem.
• Identifying trends and patterns: Data collection can help identify trends and patterns over time that may indicate changes in behaviors or outcomes.
• Increased accountability: Data collection increases accountability by providing evidence that can be used to monitor and evaluate the implementation and impact of policies, programs, and initiatives.
• Validation of theories: Data collection can be used to test hypotheses and validate theories, leading to a better understanding of the phenomenon being studied.
• Improved quality: Data collection is used in quality improvement efforts to identify areas where improvements can be made and to measure progress towards achieving goals.

Limitations of Data Collection

While data collection has several advantages, it also has some limitations that must be considered. These limitations include:

• Bias : Data collection can be influenced by the biases and personal opinions of the data collector, which can lead to inaccurate or misleading results.
• Sampling bias : Data collection may not be representative of the entire population, resulting in sampling bias and inaccurate results.
• Cost : Data collection can be expensive and time-consuming, particularly for large-scale studies.
• Limited scope: Data collection is limited to the variables being measured, which may not capture the entire picture or context of the phenomenon being studied.
• Ethical considerations : Data collection must follow ethical principles to protect the rights and confidentiality of the participants, which can limit the type of data that can be collected.
• Data quality issues: Data collection may result in data quality issues such as missing or incomplete data, measurement errors, and inconsistencies.
• Limited generalizability : Data collection may not be generalizable to other contexts or populations, limiting the generalizability of the findings.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Appendix in Research Paper – Examples and...

Context of the Study – Writing Guide and Examples

Implications in Research – Types, Examples and...

Delimitations in Research – Types, Examples and...

Research Topics – Ideas and Examples

Informed Consent in Research – Types, Templates...

Quantitative Methods

• Living reference work entry
• First Online: 11 June 2021
• Cite this living reference work entry

• Juwel Rana 2 , 3 , 4 ,
• Patricia Luna Gutierrez 5 &
• John C. Oldroyd 6  

645 Accesses

2 Citations

Quantitative analysis ; Quantitative research methods ; Study design

Quantitative method is the collection and analysis of numerical data to answer scientific research questions. Quantitative method is used to summarize, average, find patterns, make predictions, and test causal associations as well as generalizing results to wider populations. It allows us to quantify effect sizes, determine the strength of associations, rank priorities, and weigh the strength of evidence of effectiveness.

Introduction

This entry aims to introduce the most common ways to use numbers and statistics to describe variables, establish relationships among variables, and build numerical understanding of a topic. In general, the quantitative research process uses a deductive approach (Neuman 2014 ; Leavy 2017 ), extrapolating from a particular case to the general situation (Babones 2016 ).

In practical ways, quantitative methods are an approach to studying a research topic. In research, the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Babones S (2016) Interpretive quantitative methods for the social sciences. Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515583637

Balnaves M, Caputi P (2001) Introduction to quantitative research methods: an investigative approach. Sage, London

Book   Google Scholar  

Brenner PS (2020) Understanding survey methodology: sociological theory and applications. Springer, Boston

Google Scholar  

Creswell JW (2014) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage, London

Leavy P (2017) Research design. The Gilford Press, New York

Mertens W, Pugliese A, Recker J (2018) Quantitative data analysis, research methods: information, systems, and contexts: second edition. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102220-7.00018-2

Neuman LW (2014) Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh

Treiman DJ (2009) Quantitative data analysis: doing social research to test ideas. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Public Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA

Department of Research and Innovation, South Asia Institute for Social Transformation (SAIST), Dhaka, Bangladesh

Independent Researcher, Masatepe, Nicaragua

Patricia Luna Gutierrez

School of Behavioral and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia

John C. Oldroyd

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juwel Rana .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA

Ali Farazmand

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Rana, J., Gutierrez, P.L., Oldroyd, J.C. (2021). Quantitative Methods. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_460-1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_460-1

Received : 31 January 2021

Accepted : 14 February 2021

Published : 11 June 2021

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-31816-5

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-31816-5

eBook Packages : Springer Reference Economics and Finance Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Quantitative Data Collection Methods

Quantitative research methods describe and measure the level of occurrences on the basis of numbers and calculations. Moreover, the questions of “how many?” and “how often?” are often asked in quantitative studies. Accordingly, quantitative data collection methods are based on numbers and mathematical calculations.

Quantitative research can be described as ‘entailing the collection of numerical data and exhibiting the view of relationship between theory and research as deductive, a predilection for natural science approach, and as having an objectivist conception of social reality’ [1] . In other words, quantitative studies mainly examine relationships between numerically measured variables with the application of statistical techniques.

Quantitative data collection methods are based on random sampling and structured data collection instruments. Findings of quantitative studies are usually easy to present, summarize, compare and generalize.

Qualitative studies , on the contrary, are usually based on non-random sampling methods and use non-quantifiable data such as words, feelings, emotions ect. Table below illustrates the main differences between qualitative and quantitative data collection and research methods:

Main differences between quantitative and qualitative methods

The most popular quantitative data collection methods include the following:

• Face-to-face interviews;
• Telephone interviews;
• Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI).
• Internet-based questionnaire;
• Mail questionnaire;
• Face-to-face survey.
• Observations . The type of observation that can be used to collect quantitative data is systematic, where the researcher counts the number of occurrences of phenomenon.

My  e-book,  The Ultimate Guide to Writing a Dissertation in Business Studies: a step by step approach  contains a detailed, yet simple explanation of quantitative methods. The e-book explains all stages of the research process starting from the selection of the research area to writing personal reflection. Important elements of dissertations such as research philosophy, research approach, research design, methods of data collection and data analysis are explained in simple words. John Dudovskiy

[1] Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2015) “Business Research Methods” 4 th edition,  p.160

• Databank Solution
• Credit Risk Solution
• Valuation Analytics Solution
• ESG Sustainability Solution
• Quantitative Finance Solution
• Regulatory Technology Solution
• Product Introduction
• Service Provide Method
• Learning Video

Quantitative Data Analysis Guide: Methods, Examples & Uses

This guide will introduce the types of data analysis used in quantitative research, then discuss relevant examples and applications in the finance industry.

Table of Contents

An Overview of Quantitative Data Analysis

What is quantitative data analysis and what is it for .

Quantitative data analysis is the process of interpreting meaning and extracting insights from numerical data , which involves mathematical calculations and statistical reviews to uncover patterns, trends, and relationships between variables.

Beyond academic and statistical research, this approach is particularly useful in the finance industry. Financial data, such as stock prices, interest rates, and economic indicators, can all be quantified with statistics and metrics to offer crucial insights for informed investment decisions. To illustrate this, here are some examples of what quantitative data is usually used for:

• Measuring Differences between Groups: For instance, analyzing historical stock prices of different companies or asset classes can reveal which companies consistently outperform the market average.
• Assessing Relationships between Variables: An investor could analyze the relationship between a company’s price-to-earnings ratio (P/E ratio) and relevant factors, like industry performance, inflation rates, interests, etc, allowing them to predict future stock price growth.
• Testing Hypotheses: For example, an investor might hypothesize that companies with strong ESG (Environment, Social, and Governance) practices outperform those without. By categorizing these companies into two groups (strong ESG vs. weak ESG practices), they can compare the average return on investment (ROI) between the groups while assessing relevant factors to find evidence for the hypothesis. 

Ultimately, quantitative data analysis helps investors navigate the complex financial landscape and pursue profitable opportunities.

Quantitative Data Analysis VS. Qualitative Data Analysis

Although quantitative data analysis is a powerful tool, it cannot be used to provide context for your research, so this is where qualitative analysis comes in. Qualitative analysis is another common research method that focuses on collecting and analyzing non-numerical data , like text, images, or audio recordings to gain a deeper understanding of experiences, opinions, and motivations. Here’s a table summarizing its key differences between quantitative data analysis:

Due to their characteristics, quantitative analysis allows you to measure and compare large datasets; while qualitative analysis helps you understand the context behind the data. In some cases, researchers might even use both methods together for a more comprehensive understanding, but we’ll mainly focus on quantitative analysis for this article.

The 2 Main Quantitative Data Analysis Methods

Once you have your data collected, you have to use descriptive statistics or inferential statistics analysis to draw summaries and conclusions from your raw numbers. 

As its name suggests, the purpose of descriptive statistics is to describe your sample . It provides the groundwork for understanding your data by focusing on the details and characteristics of the specific group you’ve collected data from. 

On the other hand, inferential statistics act as bridges that connect your sample data to the broader population you’re truly interested in, helping you to draw conclusions in your research. Moreover, choosing the right inferential technique for your specific data and research questions is dependent on the initial insights from descriptive statistics, so both of these methods usually go hand-in-hand.

Descriptive Statistics Analysis

With sophisticated descriptive statistics, you can detect potential errors in your data by highlighting inconsistencies and outliers that might otherwise go unnoticed. Additionally, the characteristics revealed by descriptive statistics will help determine which inferential techniques are suitable for further analysis.

Measures in Descriptive Statistics

One of the key statistical tests used for descriptive statistics is central tendency . It consists of mean, median, and mode, telling you where most of your data points cluster:

• Mean: It refers to the “average” and is calculated by adding all the values in your data set and dividing by the number of values.
• Median: The middle value when your data is arranged in ascending or descending order. If you have an odd number of data points, the median is the exact middle value; with even numbers, it’s the average of the two middle values. 
• Mode: This refers to the most frequently occurring value in your data set, indicating the most common response or observation. Some data can have multiple modes (bimodal) or no mode at all.

Another statistic to test in descriptive analysis is the measures of dispersion , which involves range and standard deviation, revealing how spread out your data is relative to the central tendency measures:

• Range: It refers to the difference between the highest and lowest values in your data set. 
• Standard Deviation (SD): This tells you how the data is distributed within the range, revealing how much, on average, each data point deviates from the mean. Lower standard deviations indicate data points clustered closer to the mean, while higher standard deviations suggest a wider spread.

The shape of the distribution will then be measured through skewness. 

• Skewness: A statistic that indicates whether your data leans to one side (positive or negative) or is symmetrical (normal distribution). A positive skew suggests more data points concentrated on the lower end, while a negative skew indicates more data points on the higher end.

While the core measures mentioned above are fundamental, there are additional descriptive statistics used in specific contexts, including percentiles and interquartile range.

• Percentiles: This divides your data into 100 equal parts, revealing what percentage of data falls below a specific value. The 25th percentile (Q1) is the first quartile, the 50th percentile (Q2) is the median, and the 75th percentile (Q3) is the third quartile. Knowing these quartiles can help visualize the spread of your data.
• Interquartile Range (IQR): This measures the difference between Q3 and Q1, representing the middle 50% of your data.

Example of Descriptive Quantitative Data Analysis 

Let’s illustrate these concepts with a real-world example. Imagine a financial advisor analyzing a client’s portfolio. They have data on the client’s various holdings, including stock prices over the past year. With descriptive statistics they can obtain the following information:

• Central Tendency: The mean price for each stock reveals its average price over the year. The median price can further highlight if there were any significant price spikes or dips that skewed the mean.
• Measures of Dispersion: The standard deviation for each stock indicates its price volatility. A high standard deviation suggests the stock’s price fluctuated considerably, while a low standard deviation implies a more stable price history. This helps the advisor assess each stock’s risk profile.
• Shape of the Distribution: If data allows, analyzing skewness can be informative. A positive skew for a stock might suggest more frequent price drops, while a negative skew might indicate more frequent price increases.

By calculating these descriptive statistics, the advisor gains a quick understanding of the client’s portfolio performance and risk distribution. For instance, they could use correlation analysis to see if certain stock prices tend to move together, helping them identify expansion opportunities within the portfolio.

While descriptive statistics provide a foundational understanding, they should be followed by inferential analysis to uncover deeper insights that are crucial for making investment decisions.

Inferential Statistics Analysis

Inferential statistics analysis is particularly useful for hypothesis testing , as you can formulate predictions about group differences or potential relationships between variables , then use statistical tests to see if your sample data supports those hypotheses.

However, the power of inferential statistics hinges on one crucial factor: sample representativeness . If your sample doesn’t accurately reflect the population, your predictions won’t be very reliable. 

Statistical Tests for Inferential Statistics

Here are some of the commonly used tests for inferential statistics in commerce and finance, which can also be integrated to most analysis software:

• T-Tests: This compares the means, standard deviation, or skewness of two groups to assess if they’re statistically different, helping you determine if the observed difference is just a quirk within the sample or a significant reflection of the population.
• ANOVA (Analysis of Variance): While T-Tests handle comparisons between two groups, ANOVA focuses on comparisons across multiple groups, allowing you to identify potential variations and trends within the population.
• Correlation Analysis: This technique tests the relationship between two variables, assessing if one variable increases or decreases with the other. However, it’s important to note that just because two financial variables are correlated and move together, doesn’t necessarily mean one directly influences the other.
• Regression Analysis: Building on correlation, regression analysis goes a step further to verify the cause-and-effect relationships between the tested variables, allowing you to investigate if one variable actually influences the other.
• Cross-Tabulation: This breaks down the relationship between two categorical variables by displaying the frequency counts in a table format, helping you to understand how different groups within your data set might behave. The data in cross-tabulation can be mutually exclusive or have several connections with each other. 
• Trend Analysis: This examines how a variable in quantitative data changes over time, revealing upward or downward trends, as well as seasonal fluctuations. This can help you forecast future trends, and also lets you assess the effectiveness of the interventions in your marketing or investment strategy.
• MaxDiff Analysis: This is also known as the “best-worst” method. It evaluates customer preferences by asking respondents to choose the most and least preferred options from a set of products or services, allowing stakeholders to optimize product development or marketing strategies.
• Conjoint Analysis: Similar to MaxDiff, conjoint analysis gauges customer preferences, but it goes a step further by allowing researchers to see how changes in different product features (price, size, brand) influence overall preference.
• TURF Analysis (Total Unduplicated Reach and Frequency Analysis): This assesses a marketing campaign’s reach and frequency of exposure in different channels, helping businesses identify the most efficient channels to reach target audiences.
• Gap Analysis: This compares current performance metrics against established goals or benchmarks, using numerical data to represent the factors involved. This helps identify areas where performance falls short of expectations, serving as a springboard for developing strategies to bridge the gap and achieve those desired outcomes.
• SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats): This uses ratings or rankings to represent an organization’s internal strengths and weaknesses, along with external opportunities and threats. Based on this analysis, organizations can create strategic plans to capitalize on opportunities while minimizing risks.
• Text Analysis: This is an advanced method that uses specialized software to categorize and quantify themes, sentiment (positive, negative, neutral), and topics within textual data, allowing companies to obtain structured quantitative data from surveys, social media posts, or customer reviews.

Example of Inferential Quantitative Data Analysis

If you’re a financial analyst studying the historical performance of a particular stock, here are some predictions you can make with inferential statistics:

• The Differences between Groups: You can conduct T-Tests to compare the average returns of stocks in the technology sector with those in the healthcare sector. It can help assess if the observed difference in returns between these two sectors is simply due to random chance or if it’s statistically significant due to a significant difference in their performance.
• The Relationships between Variables: If you’re curious about the connection between a company’s price-to-earnings ratio (P/E ratios) and its future stock price movements, conducting correlation analysis can let you measure the strength and direction of this relationship. Is there a negative correlation, suggesting that higher P/E ratios might be associated with lower future stock prices? Or is there no significant correlation at all?

Understanding these inferential analysis techniques can help you uncover potential relationships and group differences that might not be readily apparent from descriptive statistics alone. Nonetheless, it’s important to remember that each technique has its own set of assumptions and limitations . Some methods are designed for parametric data with a normal distribution, while others are suitable for non-parametric data. 

Guide to Conduct Data Analysis in Quantitative Research

Now that we have discussed the types of data analysis techniques used in quantitative research, here’s a quick guide to help you choose the right method and grasp the essential steps of quantitative data analysis.

How to Choose the Right Quantitative Analysis Method?

Choosing between all these quantitative analysis methods may seem like a complicated task, but if you consider the 2 following factors, you can definitely choose the right technique:

Factor 1: Data Type

The data used in quantitative analysis can be categorized into two types, discrete data and continuous data, based on how they’re measured. They can also be further differentiated by their measurement scale. The four main types of measurement scales include: nominal, ordinal, interval or ratio. Understanding the distinctions between them is essential for choosing the appropriate statistical methods to interpret the results of your quantitative data analysis accurately.

Discrete data , which is also known as attribute data, represents whole numbers that can be easily counted and separated into distinct categories. It is often visualized using bar charts or pie charts, making it easy to see the frequency of each value. In the financial world, examples of discrete quantitative data include:

• The number of shares owned by an investor in a particular company
• The number of customer transactions processed by a bank per day
• Bond ratings (AAA, BBB, etc.) that represent discrete categories indicating the creditworthiness of a bond issuer
• The number of customers with different account types (checking, savings, investment) as seen in the pie chart below:

Discrete data usually use nominal or ordinal measurement scales, which can be then quantified to calculate their mode or median. Here are some examples:

• Nominal: This scale categorizes data into distinct groups with no inherent order. For instance, data on bank account types can be considered nominal data as it classifies customers in distinct categories which are independent of each other, either checking, savings, or investment accounts. and no inherent order or ranking implied by these account types.
• Ordinal: Ordinal data establishes a rank or order among categories. For example, investment risk ratings (low, medium, high) are ordered based on their perceived risk of loss, making it a type or ordinal data.

Conversely, continuous data can take on any value and fluctuate over time. It is usually visualized using line graphs, effectively showcasing how the values can change within a specific time frame. Examples of continuous data in the financial industry include:

• Interest rates set by central banks or offered by banks on loans and deposits
• Currency exchange rates which also fluctuate constantly throughout the day
• Daily trading volume of a particular stock on a specific day
• Stock prices that fluctuate throughout the day, as seen in the line graph below:

Source: Freepik

The measurement scale for continuous data is usually interval or ratio . Here is breakdown of their differences:

• Interval: This builds upon ordinal data by having consistent intervals between each unit, and its zero point doesn’t represent a complete absence of the variable. Let’s use credit score as an example. While the scale ranges from 300 to 850, the interval between each score rating is consistent (50 points), and a score of zero wouldn’t indicate an absence of credit history, but rather no credit score available. 
• Ratio: This scale has all the same characteristics of interval data but also has a true zero point, indicating a complete absence of the variable. Interest rates expressed as percentages are a classic example of ratio data. A 0% interest rate signifies the complete absence of any interest charged or earned, making it a true zero point.

Factor 2: Research Question

You also need to make sure that the analysis method aligns with your specific research questions. If you merely want to focus on understanding the characteristics of your data set, descriptive statistics might be all you need; if you need to analyze the connection between variables, then you have to include inferential statistics as well.

How to Analyze Quantitative Data 

Step 1: data collection  .

Depending on your research question, you might choose to conduct surveys or interviews. Distributing online or paper surveys can reach a broad audience, while interviews allow for deeper exploration of specific topics. You can also choose to source existing datasets from government agencies or industry reports.

Step 2: Data Cleaning

Raw data might contain errors, inconsistencies, or missing values, so data cleaning has to be done meticulously to ensure accuracy and consistency. This might involve removing duplicates, correcting typos, and handling missing information.

Furthermore, you should also identify the nature of your variables and assign them appropriate measurement scales , it could be nominal, ordinal, interval or ratio. This is important because it determines the types of descriptive statistics and analysis methods you can employ later. Once you categorize your data based on these measurement scales, you can arrange the data of each category in a proper order and organize it in a format that is convenient for you.

Step 3: Data Analysis

Based on the measurement scales of your variables, calculate relevant descriptive statistics to summarize your data. This might include measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode) and dispersion (range, standard deviation, variance). With these statistics, you can identify the pattern within your raw data. 

Then, these patterns can be analyzed further with inferential methods to test out the hypotheses you have developed. You may choose any of the statistical tests mentioned above, as long as they are compatible with the characteristics of your data.

Step 4. Data Interpretation and Communication 

Now that you have the results from your statistical analysis, you may draw conclusions based on the findings and incorporate them into your business strategies. Additionally, you should also transform your findings into clear and shareable information to facilitate discussion among stakeholders. Visualization techniques like tables, charts, or graphs can make complex data more digestible so that you can communicate your findings efficiently. 

Useful Quantitative Data Analysis Tools and Software 

We’ve compiled some commonly used quantitative data analysis tools and software. Choosing the right one depends on your experience level, project needs, and budget. Here’s a brief comparison: 

Quantitative Data in Finance and Investment

So how does this all affect the finance industry? Quantitative finance (or quant finance) has become a growing trend, with the quant fund market valued at $16,008.69 billion in 2023. This value is expected to increase at the compound annual growth rate of 10.09% and reach $31,365.94 billion by 2031, signifying its expanding role in the industry.

What is Quant Finance?

Quant finance is the process of using massive financial data and mathematical models to identify market behavior, financial trends, movements, and economic indicators, so that they can predict future trends.These calculated probabilities can be leveraged to find potential investment opportunities and maximize returns while minimizing risks.

Common Quantitative Investment Strategies

There are several common quantitative strategies, each offering unique approaches to help stakeholders navigate the market:

1. Statistical Arbitrage

This strategy aims for high returns with low volatility. It employs sophisticated algorithms to identify minuscule price discrepancies across the market, then capitalize on them at lightning speed, often generating short-term profits. However, its reliance on market efficiency makes it vulnerable to sudden market shifts, posing a risk of disrupting the calculations.

2. Factor Investing 

This strategy identifies and invests in assets based on factors like value, momentum, or quality. By analyzing these factors in quantitative databases , investors can construct portfolios designed to outperform the broader market. Overall, this method offers diversification and potentially higher returns than passive investing, but its success relies on the historical validity of these factors, which can evolve over time.

3. Risk Parity

This approach prioritizes portfolio balance above all else. Instead of allocating assets based on their market value, risk parity distributes them based on their risk contribution to achieve a desired level of overall portfolio risk, regardless of individual asset volatility. Although it is efficient in managing risks while potentially offering positive returns, it is important to note that this strategy’s complex calculations can be sensitive to unexpected market events.

4. Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Quant analysts are beginning to incorporate these cutting-edge technologies into their strategies. Machine learning algorithms can act as data sifters, identifying complex patterns within massive datasets; whereas AI goes a step further, leveraging these insights to make investment decisions, essentially mimicking human-like decision-making with added adaptability. Despite the hefty development and implementation costs, its superior risk-adjusted returns and uncovering hidden patterns make this strategy a valuable asset.

Pros and Cons of Quantitative Data Analysis

Advantages of quantitative data analysis, minimum bias for reliable results.

Quantitative data analysis relies on objective, numerical data. This minimizes bias and human error, allowing stakeholders to make investment decisions without emotional intuitions that can cloud judgment. In turn, this offers reliable and consistent results for investment strategies.

Precise Calculations for Data-Driven Decisions

Quantitative analysis generates precise numerical results through statistical methods. This allows accurate comparisons between investment options and even predictions of future market behavior, helping investors make informed decisions about where to allocate their capital while managing potential risks.

Generalizability for Broader Insights 

By analyzing large datasets and identifying patterns, stakeholders can generalize the findings from quantitative analysis into broader populations, applying them to a wider range of investments for better portfolio construction and risk management

Efficiency for Extensive Research

Quantitative research is more suited to analyze large datasets efficiently, letting companies save valuable time and resources. The softwares used for quantitative analysis can automate the process of sifting through extensive financial data, facilitating quicker decision-making in the fast-paced financial environment.

Disadvantages of Quantitative Data Analysis

Limited scope .

By focusing on numerical data, quantitative analysis may provide a limited scope, as it can’t capture qualitative context such as emotions, motivations, or cultural factors. Although quantitative analysis provides a strong starting point, neglecting qualitative factors can lead to incomplete insights in the financial industry, impacting areas like customer relationship management and targeted marketing strategies.

Oversimplification 

Breaking down complex phenomena into numerical data could cause analysts to overlook the richness of the data, leading to the issue of oversimplification. Stakeholders who fail to understand the complexity of economic factors or market trends could face flawed investment decisions and missed opportunities.

Reliable Quantitative Data Solution 

In conclusion, quantitative data analysis offers a deeper insight into market trends and patterns, empowering you to make well-informed financial decisions. However, collecting comprehensive data and analyzing them can be a complex task that may divert resources from core investment activity. 

As a reliable provider, TEJ understands these concerns. Our TEJ Quantitative Investment Database offers high-quality financial and economic data for rigorous quantitative analysis. This data captures the true market conditions at specific points in time, enabling accurate backtesting of investment strategies.

Furthermore, TEJ offers diverse data sets that go beyond basic stock prices, encompassing various financial metrics, company risk attributes, and even broker trading information, all designed to empower your analysis and strategy development. Save resources and unlock the full potential of quantitative finance with TEJ’s data solutions today!

Subscribe to newsletter

• Data Analysis 107
• Market Research 48
• TQuant Lab 26
• Solution&DataSets
• Privacy Policy Statement
• Personal Data Policy
• Copyright Information
• Website licensing terms
• Information Security Policy 

• 11th Floor, No. 57, DongXing Road, Taipei 11070, Taiwan(R.O.C.)
• +886-2-8768-1088
• +886-2-8768-1336
• [email protected]

• Data Science

Caltech Bootcamp / Blog / /

Data Collection Methods: A Comprehensive View

• Written by John Terra
• Updated on February 21, 2024

Companies that want to be competitive in today’s digital economy enjoy the benefit of countless reams of data available for market research. In fact, thanks to the advent of big data, there’s a veritable tidal wave of information ready to be put to good use, helping businesses make intelligent decisions and thrive.

But before that data can be used, it must be processed. But before it can be processed, it must be collected, and that’s what we’re here for. This article explores the subject of data collection. We will learn about the types of data collection methods and why they are essential.

We will detail primary and secondary data collection methods and discuss data collection procedures. We’ll also share how you can learn practical skills through online data science training.

But first, let’s get the definition out of the way. What is data collection?

What is Data Collection?

Data collection is the act of collecting, measuring and analyzing different kinds of information using a set of validated standard procedures and techniques. The primary objective of data collection procedures is to gather reliable, information-rich data and analyze it to make critical business decisions. Once the desired data is collected, it undergoes a process of data cleaning and processing to make the information actionable and valuable for businesses.

Your choice of data collection method (or alternately called a data gathering procedure) depends on the research questions you’re working on, the type of data required, and the available time and resources and time. You can categorize data-gathering procedures into two main methods:

• Primary data collection . Primary data is collected via first-hand experiences and does not reference or use the past. The data obtained by primary data collection methods is exceptionally accurate and geared to the research’s motive. They are divided into two categories: quantitative and qualitative. We’ll explore the specifics later.
• Secondary data collection. Secondary data is the information that’s been used in the past. The researcher can obtain data from internal and external sources, including organizational data.

Let’s take a closer look at specific examples of both data collection methods.

Also Read: Why Use Python for Data Science?

The Specific Types of Data Collection Methods

As mentioned, primary data collection methods are split into quantitative and qualitative. We will examine each method’s data collection tools separately. Then, we will discuss secondary data collection methods.

Quantitative Methods

Quantitative techniques for demand forecasting and market research typically use statistical tools. When using these techniques, historical data is used to forecast demand. These primary data-gathering procedures are most often used to make long-term forecasts. Statistical analysis methods are highly reliable because they carry minimal subjectivity.

• Barometric Method. Also called the leading indicators approach, data analysts and researchers employ this method to speculate on future trends based on current developments. When past events are used to predict future events, they are considered leading indicators.
• Smoothing Techniques. Smoothing techniques can be used in cases where the time series lacks significant trends. These techniques eliminate random variation from historical demand and help identify demand levels and patterns to estimate future demand. The most popular methods used in these techniques are the simple moving average and the weighted moving average methods.
• Time Series Analysis. The term “time series” refers to the sequential order of values in a variable, also known as a trend, at equal time intervals. Using patterns, organizations can predict customer demand for their products and services during the projected time.

Qualitative Methods

Qualitative data collection methods are instrumental when no historical information is available, or numbers and mathematical calculations aren’t required. Qualitative research is closely linked to words, emotions, sounds, feelings, colors, and other non-quantifiable elements. These techniques rely on experience, conjecture, intuition, judgment, emotion, etc. Quantitative methods do not provide motives behind the participants’ responses. Additionally, they often don’t reach underrepresented populations and usually involve long data collection periods. Therefore, you get the best results using quantitative and qualitative methods together.

• Questionnaires . Questionnaires are a printed set of either open-ended or closed-ended questions. Respondents must answer based on their experience and knowledge of the issue. A questionnaire is a part of a survey, while the questionnaire’s end goal doesn’t necessarily have to be a survey.
• Surveys. Surveys collect data from target audiences, gathering insights into their opinions, preferences, choices, and feedback on the organization’s goods and services. Most survey software has a wide range of question types, or you can also use a ready-made survey template that saves time and effort. Surveys can be distributed via different channels such as e-mail, offline apps, websites, social media, QR codes, etc.

Once researchers collect the data, survey software generates reports and runs analytics algorithms to uncover hidden insights. Survey dashboards give you statistics relating to completion rates, response rates, filters based on demographics, export and sharing options, etc. Practical business intelligence depends on the synergy between analytics and reporting. Analytics uncovers valuable insights while reporting communicates these findings to the stakeholders.

• Polls. Polls consist of one or more multiple-choice questions. Marketers can turn to polls when they want to take a quick snapshot of the audience’s sentiments. Since polls tend to be short, getting people to respond is more manageable. Like surveys, online polls can be embedded into various media and platforms. Once the respondents answer the question(s), they can be shown how they stand concerning other people’s responses.
• Delphi Technique. The name is a callback to the Oracle of Delphi, a priestess at Apollo’s temple in ancient Greece, renowned for her prophecies. In this method, marketing experts are given the forecast estimates and assumptions made by other industry experts. The first batch of experts may then use the information provided by the other experts to revise and reconsider their estimates and assumptions. The total expert consensus on the demand forecasts creates the final demand forecast.
• Interviews. In this method, interviewers talk to the respondents either face-to-face or by telephone. In the first case, the interviewer asks the interviewee a series of questions in person and notes the responses. The interviewer can opt for a telephone interview if the parties cannot meet in person. This data collection form is practical for use with only a few respondents; repeating the same process with a considerably larger group takes longer.
• Focus Groups. Focus groups are one of the primary examples of qualitative data in education. In focus groups, small groups of people, usually around 8-10 members, discuss the research problem’s common aspects. Each person provides their insights on the issue, and a moderator regulates the discussion. When the discussion ends, the group reaches a consensus.

Also Read: A Beginner’s Guide to the Data Science Process

Secondary Data Collection Methods

Secondary data is the information that’s been used in past situations. Secondary data collection methods can include quantitative and qualitative techniques. In addition, secondary data is easily available, so it’s less time-consuming and expensive than using primary data. However, the authenticity of data gathered with secondary data collection tools cannot be verified.

Internal secondary data sources:

• CRM Software
• Executive summaries
• Financial Statements
• Mission and vision statements
• Organization’s health and safety records
• Sales Reports

External secondary data sources:

• Business journals
• Government reports
• Press releases

The Importance of Data Collection Methods

Data collection methods play a critical part in the research process as they determine the accuracy and quality and accuracy of the collected data. Here’s a sample of some reasons why data collection procedures are so important:

• They determine the quality and accuracy of collected data
• They ensure the data and the research findings are valid, relevant and reliable
• They help reduce bias and increase the sample’s representation
• They are crucial for making informed decisions and arriving at accurate conclusions
• They provide accurate data, which facilitates the achievement of research objectives

Also Read: What Is Data Processing? Definition, Examples, Trends

So, What’s the Difference Between Data Collecting and Data Processing?

Data collection is the first step in the data processing process. Data collection involves gathering information (raw data) from various sources such as interviews, surveys, questionnaires, etc. Data processing describes the steps taken to organize, manipulate and transform the collected data into a useful and meaningful resource. This process may include tasks such as cleaning and validating data, analyzing and summarizing data, and creating visualizations or reports.

So, data collection is just one step in the overall data processing chain of events.

Do You Want to Become a Data Scientist?

If this discussion about data collection and the professionals who conduct it has sparked your enthusiasm for a new career, why not check out this online data science program ?

The Glassdoor.com jobs website shows that data scientists in the United States typically make an average yearly salary of $129,127 plus additional bonuses and cash incentives. So, if you’re interested in a new career or are already in the field but want to upskill or refresh your current skill set, sign up for this bootcamp and prepare to tackle the challenges of today’s big data.

You might also like to read:

Navigating Data Scientist Roles and Responsibilities in Today’s Market

Differences Between Data Scientist and Data Analyst: Complete Explanation

What Is Data Collection? A Guide for Aspiring Data Scientists

A Data Scientist Job Description: The Roles and Responsibilities in 2024

Top Data Science Projects With Source Code to Try

Data Science Bootcamp

• Learning Format:

Online Bootcamp

Leave a comment cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Recommended Articles

What is Bayesian Statistics, and How Does it Differ from Classical Methods?

What is Bayesian statistics? Learn about this tool used in data science, its fundamentals, uses, and advantages.

What is Data Imputation, and How Can You Use it to Handle Missing Data?

This article defines data imputation and demonstrates its importance, techniques, and challenges.

What is Data Governance, How Does it Work, Who Performs it, and Why is it Essential?

What is data governance? This article explores its goals and components, how to implement it, best practices, and more.

What is Data Visualization, and What is its Role in Data Science?

Visualizing data can transform complex information into meaningful insights. This guide answers the question: “What is data visualization?” and discusses everything you need to know about it.

Technology at Work: Data Science in Finance

In today’s data-driven world, industries leverage advanced data analytics and AI-powered tools to improve services and their bottom line. The financial services industry is at the forefront of this innovation. This blog discusses data science in finance, including how companies use it, the skills required to leverage it, and more.

The Top Data Science Interview Questions for 2024

This article covers popular basic and advanced data science interview questions and the difference between data analytics and data science.

Learning Format

Program Benefits

• 12+ tools covered, 25+ hands-on projects
• Masterclasses by distinguished Caltech CTME instructors
• Caltech CTME Circle Membership
• Industry-specific training from global experts
• Call us on : 1800-212-7688

• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer
• QuestionPro

• Solutions Industries Gaming Automotive Sports and events Education Government Travel & Hospitality Financial Services Healthcare Cannabis Technology Use Case AskWhy Communities Audience Contactless surveys Mobile LivePolls Member Experience GDPR Positive People Science 360 Feedback Surveys
• Resources Blog eBooks Survey Templates Case Studies Training Help center

Home QuestionPro QuestionPro Products

Data Collection Methods: Types & Examples

Data is a collection of facts, figures, objects, symbols, and events from different sources. Organizations collect data using various methods to make better decisions. Without data, it would be difficult for organizations to make appropriate decisions, so data is collected from different audiences at various times.

For example, an organization must collect data on product demand, customer preferences, and competitors before launching a new product. If data is not collected beforehand, the organization’s newly launched product may fail for many reasons, such as less demand and inability to meet customer needs. 

Although data is a valuable asset for every organization, it does not serve any purpose until it is analyzed or processed to achieve the desired results.

What are Data Collection Methods?

Data collection methods are techniques and procedures for gathering information for research purposes. They can range from simple self-reported surveys to more complex quantitative or qualitative experiments.

Some common data collection methods include surveys , interviews, observations, focus groups, experiments, and secondary data analysis . The data collected through these methods can then be analyzed to support or refute research hypotheses and draw conclusions about the study’s subject matter.

Understanding Data Collection Methods

Data collection methods encompass a variety of techniques and tools for gathering quantitative and qualitative data. These methods are integral to the data collection and ensure accurate and comprehensive data acquisition. 

Quantitative data collection methods involve systematic approaches, such as

• Numerical data,
• Surveys, polls and
• Statistical analysis
• To quantify phenomena and trends. 

Conversely, qualitative data collection methods focus on capturing non-numerical information, such as interviews, focus groups, and observations, to delve deeper into understanding attitudes, behaviors, and motivations. 

Combining quantitative and qualitative data collection techniques can enrich organizations’ datasets and gain comprehensive insights into complex phenomena.

Effective utilization of accurate data collection tools and techniques enhances the accuracy and reliability of collected data, facilitating informed decision-making and strategic planning.

Learn more about what is Self-Selection Bias, methods & its examples

Importance of Data Collection Methods

Data collection methods play a crucial role in the research process as they determine the quality and accuracy of the data collected. Here are some major importance of data collection methods.

• Quality and Accuracy: The choice of data collection technique directly impacts the quality and accuracy of the data obtained. Properly designed methods help ensure that the data collected is error-free and relevant to the research questions.
• Relevance, Validity, and Reliability: Effective data collection methods help ensure that the data collected is relevant to the research objectives, valid (measuring what it intends to measure), and reliable (consistent and reproducible).
• Bias Reduction and Representativeness: Carefully chosen data collection methods can help minimize biases inherent in the research process, such as sampling or response bias. They also aid in achieving a representative sample, enhancing the findings’ generalizability.
• Informed Decision Making: Accurate and reliable data collected through appropriate methods provide a solid foundation for making informed decisions based on research findings. This is crucial for both academic research and practical applications in various fields.
• Achievement of Research Objectives: Data collection methods should align with the research objectives to ensure that the collected data effectively addresses the research questions or hypotheses. Properly collected data facilitates the attainment of these objectives.
• Support for Validity and Reliability: Validity and reliability are essential to research validity. The choice of data collection methods can either enhance or detract from the validity and reliability of research findings. Therefore, selecting appropriate methods is critical for ensuring the credibility of the research.

The importance of data collection methods cannot be overstated, as they play a key role in the research study’s overall success and internal validity .

Types of Data Collection Methods

The choice of data collection method depends on the research question being addressed, the type of data needed, and the resources and time available. Data collection methods can be categorized into primary and secondary methods.

1. Primary Data Collection Methods

Primary data is collected from first-hand experience and is not used in the past. The data gathered by primary data collection methods are highly accurate and specific to the research’s motive.

Primary data collection methods can be divided into two categories: quantitative and qualitative.

Quantitative Methods:

Quantitative techniques for market research and demand forecasting usually use statistical tools. In these techniques, demand is forecasted based on historical data. These methods of primary data collection are generally used to make long-term forecasts. Statistical analysis methods are highly reliable as subjectivity is minimal.

• Time Series Analysis: A time series refers to a sequential order of values of a variable, known as a trend, at equal time intervals. Using patterns, an organization can predict the demand for its products and services over a projected time period. 
• Smoothing Techniques: Smoothing techniques can be used in cases where the time series lacks significant trends. They eliminate random variation from the historical demand, helping identify patterns and demand levels to estimate future demand.  The most common methods used in smoothing demand forecasting are the simple moving average and weighted moving average methods. 
• Barometric Method: Also known as the leading indicators approach, researchers use this method to speculate future trends based on current developments. When past events are considered to predict future events, they act as leading indicators.

Qualitative Methods:

Qualitative data collection methods are especially useful when historical data is unavailable or when numbers or mathematical calculations are unnecessary.

Qualitative research is closely associated with words, sounds, feelings, emotions, colors, and non-quantifiable elements. These techniques are based on experience, judgment, intuition, conjecture, emotion, etc.

Quantitative methods do not provide the motive behind participants’ responses, often don’t reach underrepresented populations, and require long periods of time to collect the data. Hence, it is best to combine quantitative methods with qualitative methods.

1. Surveys: Surveys collect data from the target audience and gather insights into their preferences, opinions, choices, and feedback related to their products and services. Most survey software offers a wide range of question types.

You can also use a ready-made survey template to save time and effort. Online surveys can be customized to match the business’s brand by changing the theme, logo, etc. They can be distributed through several channels, such as email, website, offline app, QR code, social media, etc. 

You can select the channel based on your audience’s type and source. Once the data is collected, survey software can generate reports and run analytics algorithms to discover hidden insights. 

A survey dashboard can give you statistics related to response rate, completion rate, demographics-based filters, export and sharing options, etc. Integrating survey builders with third-party apps can maximize the effort spent on online real-time data collection . 

Practical business intelligence relies on the synergy between analytics and reporting , where analytics uncovers valuable insights, and reporting communicates these findings to stakeholders.

2. Polls: Polls comprise one single or multiple-choice question . They are useful when you need to get a quick pulse of the audience’s sentiments. Because they are short, it is easier to get responses from people.

Like surveys, online polls can be embedded into various platforms. Once the respondents answer the question, they can also be shown how their responses compare to others.

Interviews: In this method, the interviewer asks the respondents face-to-face or by telephone. 

3. Interviews: In face-to-face interviews, the interviewer asks a series of questions to the interviewee in person and notes down responses. If it is not feasible to meet the person, the interviewer can go for a telephone interview. 

This form of data collection is suitable for only a few respondents. It is too time-consuming and tedious to repeat the same process if there are many participants.

4. Delphi Technique: In the Delphi method, market experts are provided with the estimates and assumptions of other industry experts’ forecasts. Based on this information, experts may reconsider and revise their estimates and assumptions. The consensus of all experts on demand forecasts constitutes the final demand forecast.

5. Focus Groups: Focus groups are one example of qualitative data in education . In a focus group, a small group of people, around 8-10 members, discuss the common areas of the research problem. Each individual provides his or her insights on the issue concerned. 

A moderator regulates the discussion among the group members. At the end of the discussion, the group reaches a consensus.

6. Questionnaire: A questionnaire is a printed set of open-ended or closed-ended questions that respondents must answer based on their knowledge and experience with the issue. The questionnaire is part of the survey, whereas the questionnaire’s end goal may or may not be a survey.

7. Digsite: Digsite is a purpose-built platform for conducting fast and flexible qualitative research, enabling users to understand the ‘whys’ behind consumer behavior. With Digsite, businesses can efficiently recruit targeted participants and gather rich qualitative insights through various methods, such as

• Live video interviews,
• Focus groups.

The platform supports agile, iterative learning by blending surveys, open-ended research, and intelligent dashboards for actionable results. Its natural language processing (NLP) and AI capabilities offer deeper emotional insights, enhancing user experience and product development. Supporting over 50 languages and ensuring compliance with regulations like GDPR and HIPAA, Digsite provides a secure and comprehensive research solution.

2. Secondary Data Collection Methods

Secondary data is data that has been used in the past. The researcher can obtain data from the data sources , both internal and external, to the organizational data . 

Internal sources of secondary data:

• Organization’s health and safety records
• Mission and vision statements
• Financial Statements
• Sales Report
• CRM Software
• Executive summaries

External sources of secondary data:

• Government reports
• Press releases
• Business journals

Secondary data collection methods can also involve quantitative and qualitative techniques. Secondary data is easily available, less time-consuming, and expensive than primary data. However, the authenticity of the data gathered cannot be verified using these methods.

Secondary data collection methods can also involve quantitative and qualitative observation techniques. Secondary data is easily available, less time-consuming, and more expensive than primary data. 

However, the authenticity of the data gathered cannot be verified using these methods.

Regardless of the data collection method of your choice, there must be direct communication with decision-makers so that they understand and commit to acting according to the results.

For this reason, we must pay special attention to the analysis and presentation of the information obtained. Remember that these data must be useful and functional to us, so the data collection method has much to do with it.

LEARN ABOUT: Data Asset Management: What It Is & How to Manage It

Steps in the Data Collection Process

The data collection process typically involves several key steps to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data gathered. These steps provide a structured approach to gathering and analyzing data effectively. Here are the key steps in the data collection process:

• Define the Objectives: Clearly outline the goals of the data collection. What questions are you trying to answer?
• Identify Data Sources: Determine where the data will come from. This could include surveys, interviews, existing databases, or observational data .
• Surveys and questionnaires
• Interviews (structured or unstructured)
• Focus groups
• Observational Research
• Document analysis
• Develop Data Collection Instruments: Create or adapt tools for collecting data, such as questionnaires or interview guides. Ensure they are valid and reliable.
• Select a Sample: If you are not collecting data from the entire population, determine how to select your sample. Consider sampling methods like random, stratified, or convenience sampling .
• Collect Data: Execute your data collection plan , following ethical guidelines and maintaining data integrity.
• Store Data: Organize and store collected data securely, ensuring it’s easily accessible for analysis while maintaining confidentiality.
• Analyze Data: After collecting the data, process and analyze it according to your objectives, using appropriate statistical or qualitative methods.
• Interpret Results: Conclude your analysis, relating them back to your original objectives and research questions.
• Report Findings: Present your findings clearly and organized, using visuals and summaries to communicate insights effectively.
• Evaluate the Process: Reflect on the data collection process. Assess what worked well and what could be improved for future studies.

Recommended Data Collection Tools

Choosing the right data collection tools depends on your specific needs, such as the type of data you’re collecting, the scale of your project, and your budget. Here are some widely used tools across different categories:

Survey Tools

Survey tools are software applications designed to collect quantitative data from a large audience through structured questionnaires. These tools are ideal for gathering customer feedback, employee opinions, or market research insights. They offer features like customizable templates, real-time analytics, and multiple distribution channels to help you reach your target audience effectively.

• QuestionPro: Offers advanced survey features and analytics.
• SurveyMonkey: User-friendly interface with customizable survey options.
• Google Forms: Free and easy to use, suitable for simple surveys.

Interview and Focus Group Tools

Interview and focus group tools facilitate the collection of qualitative data through guided conversations and group discussions. These tools often include features for recording, transcribing, and analyzing spoken interactions, enabling researchers to gain in-depth insights into participants’ thoughts, attitudes, and behaviors.

• Zoom: Great for virtual interviews and focus group discussions.
• Microsoft Teams: Offers features for collaboration and recording sessions.

Observation and Field Data Collection

• Open Data Kit (ODK): This is for mobile data collection in field settings.
• REDCap: A secure web application for building and managing online surveys.

Mobile Data Collection

Mobile data collection tools leverage smartphones and tablets to gather data on the go. These tools enable users to collect data offline and sync it when an internet connection is available. They are ideal for remote areas or fieldwork where traditional data collection methods are impractical, offering features like GPS tagging, photo capture, and form-based inputs.

• KoboToolbox: Designed for humanitarian work, useful for field data collection.
• SurveyCTO: Provides offline data collection capabilities for mobile devices.

Data Analysis Tools

Data analysis tools are software applications that process and analyze quantitative data, helping researchers identify patterns, trends, and insights. These tools support various statistical methods and data visualization techniques, allowing users to interpret data effectively and make informed decisions based on their findings.

• Tableau: Powerful data visualization tool to analyze survey results.
• SPSS: Widely used for statistical analysis in research.

Qualitative Data Analysis

Qualitative data analysis tools help researchers organize, code, and interpret non-numerical data, such as text, images, and videos. These tools are essential for analyzing interview transcripts, open-ended survey responses, and social media content, providing features like thematic analysis, sentiment analysis, and visualization of qualitative patterns.

• NVivo: For analyzing qualitative data like interviews or open-ended survey responses.
• Dedoose: Useful for mixed-methods research, combining qualitative and quantitative data.

General Data Collection and Management

General data collection and management tools provide a comprehensive solution for collecting, storing, and organizing data from various sources. These tools often include features for data integration, cleansing, and security, ensuring that data is accessible and usable for analysis across different departments and projects. They are ideal for organizations looking to streamline their data management processes and enhance collaboration.

• Airtable: Combines spreadsheet and database functionalities for organizing data.
• Microsoft Excel: A versatile tool for data entry, analysis, and visualization.

If you are interested in purchasing, we invite you to visit our article, where we dive deeper and analyze the best data collection tools in the industry.

How Can QuestionPro Help to Create Effective Data Collection?

QuestionPro is a comprehensive online survey software platform that can greatly assist in various data collection methods. Here’s how it can help:

• Survey Creation: QuestionPro offers a user-friendly interface for creating surveys with various question types, including multiple-choice, open-ended, Likert scale, and more. Researchers can customize surveys to fit their specific research needs and objectives.
• Diverse Distribution Channels: The platform provides multiple channels for distributing surveys, including email, web links, social media, and website embedding surveys. This enables researchers to reach a wide audience and collect data efficiently.
• Panel Management: QuestionPro offers panel management features, allowing researchers to create and manage panels of respondents for targeted data collection. This is particularly useful for longitudinal studies or when targeting specific demographics.
• Data Analysis Tools: The platform includes robust data analysis tools that enable researchers to analyze survey responses in real time. Researchers can generate customizable reports, visualize data through charts and graphs, and identify trends and patterns within the data.
• Data Security and Compliance: QuestionPro prioritizes data security and compliance with regulations such as GDPR and HIPAA. The platform offers features such as SSL encryption, data masking, and secure data storage to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of collected data.
• Mobile Compatibility: With the increasing use of mobile devices, QuestionPro ensures that surveys are mobile-responsive, allowing respondents to participate in surveys conveniently from their smartphones or tablets.
• Integration Capabilities: QuestionPro integrates with various third-party tools and platforms, including CRMs, email marketing software, and analytics tools. This allows researchers to streamline their data collection processes and incorporate survey data into their existing workflows.
• Customization and Branding: Researchers can customize surveys with their branding elements, such as logos, colors, and themes, enhancing the professional appearance of surveys and increasing respondent engagement.

The conclusion you obtain from your investigation will set the course of the company’s decision-making, so present your report clearly and list the steps you followed to obtain those results.

Make sure that whoever will take the corresponding actions understands the importance of the information collected and that it gives them the solutions they expect.

QuestionPro offers a comprehensive suite of features and tools that can significantly streamline the data collection process, from survey creation to analysis, while ensuring data security and compliance. Remember that at QuestionPro, we can help you collect data easily and efficiently. Request a demo and learn about all the tools we have for you.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

A: Common methods include surveys, interviews, observations, focus groups, and experiments.

A: Data collection helps organizations make informed decisions and understand trends, customer preferences, and market demands.

A: Quantitative methods focus on numerical data and statistical analysis, while qualitative methods explore non-numerical insights like attitudes and behaviors.

A: Yes, combining methods can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the research topic.

A: Technology streamlines data collection with tools like online surveys, mobile data gathering, and integrated analytics platforms.

MORE LIKE THIS

Experimental vs Observational Studies: Differences & Examples

Sep 5, 2024

Interactive Forms: Key Features, Benefits, Uses + Design Tips

Sep 4, 2024

Closed-Loop Management: The Key to Customer Centricity

Sep 3, 2024

Net Trust Score: Tool for Measuring Trust in Organization

Sep 2, 2024

Other categories

• Academic Research
• Artificial Intelligence
• Assessments
• Brand Awareness
• Case Studies
• Communities
• Consumer Insights
• Customer effort score
• Customer Engagement
• Customer Experience
• Customer Loyalty
• Customer Research
• Customer Satisfaction
• Employee Benefits
• Employee Engagement
• Employee Retention
• Friday Five
• General Data Protection Regulation
• Insights Hub
• Life@QuestionPro
• Market Research
• Mobile diaries
• Mobile Surveys
• New Features
• Online Communities
• Question Types
• Questionnaire
• QuestionPro Products
• Release Notes
• Research Tools and Apps
• Revenue at Risk
• Survey Templates
• Training Tips
• Tuesday CX Thoughts (TCXT)
• Uncategorized
• What’s Coming Up
• Workforce Intelligence

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Methodology
• Data Collection Methods | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples

Data Collection Methods | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples

Published on 4 May 2022 by Pritha Bhandari .

Data collection is a systematic process of gathering observations or measurements. Whether you are performing research for business, governmental, or academic purposes, data collection allows you to gain first-hand knowledge and original insights into your research problem .

While methods and aims may differ between fields, the overall process of data collection remains largely the same. Before you begin collecting data, you need to consider:

• The  aim of the research
• The type of data that you will collect
• The methods and procedures you will use to collect, store, and process the data

To collect high-quality data that is relevant to your purposes, follow these four steps.

Table of contents

Step 1: define the aim of your research, step 2: choose your data collection method, step 3: plan your data collection procedures, step 4: collect the data, frequently asked questions about data collection.

Before you start the process of data collection, you need to identify exactly what you want to achieve. You can start by writing a problem statement : what is the practical or scientific issue that you want to address, and why does it matter?

Next, formulate one or more research questions that precisely define what you want to find out. Depending on your research questions, you might need to collect quantitative or qualitative data :

• Quantitative data is expressed in numbers and graphs and is analysed through statistical methods .
• Qualitative data is expressed in words and analysed through interpretations and categorisations.

If your aim is to test a hypothesis , measure something precisely, or gain large-scale statistical insights, collect quantitative data. If your aim is to explore ideas, understand experiences, or gain detailed insights into a specific context, collect qualitative data.

If you have several aims, you can use a mixed methods approach that collects both types of data.

• Your first aim is to assess whether there are significant differences in perceptions of managers across different departments and office locations.
• Your second aim is to gather meaningful feedback from employees to explore new ideas for how managers can improve.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Based on the data you want to collect, decide which method is best suited for your research.

• Experimental research is primarily a quantitative method.
• Interviews , focus groups , and ethnographies are qualitative methods.
• Surveys , observations, archival research, and secondary data collection can be quantitative or qualitative methods.

Carefully consider what method you will use to gather data that helps you directly answer your research questions.

When you know which method(s) you are using, you need to plan exactly how you will implement them. What procedures will you follow to make accurate observations or measurements of the variables you are interested in?

For instance, if you’re conducting surveys or interviews, decide what form the questions will take; if you’re conducting an experiment, make decisions about your experimental design .

Operationalisation

Sometimes your variables can be measured directly: for example, you can collect data on the average age of employees simply by asking for dates of birth. However, often you’ll be interested in collecting data on more abstract concepts or variables that can’t be directly observed.

Operationalisation means turning abstract conceptual ideas into measurable observations. When planning how you will collect data, you need to translate the conceptual definition of what you want to study into the operational definition of what you will actually measure.

• You ask managers to rate their own leadership skills on 5-point scales assessing the ability to delegate, decisiveness, and dependability.
• You ask their direct employees to provide anonymous feedback on the managers regarding the same topics.

You may need to develop a sampling plan to obtain data systematically. This involves defining a population , the group you want to draw conclusions about, and a sample, the group you will actually collect data from.

Your sampling method will determine how you recruit participants or obtain measurements for your study. To decide on a sampling method you will need to consider factors like the required sample size, accessibility of the sample, and time frame of the data collection.

Standardising procedures

If multiple researchers are involved, write a detailed manual to standardise data collection procedures in your study.

This means laying out specific step-by-step instructions so that everyone in your research team collects data in a consistent way – for example, by conducting experiments under the same conditions and using objective criteria to record and categorise observations.

This helps ensure the reliability of your data, and you can also use it to replicate the study in the future.

Creating a data management plan

Before beginning data collection, you should also decide how you will organise and store your data.

• If you are collecting data from people, you will likely need to anonymise and safeguard the data to prevent leaks of sensitive information (e.g. names or identity numbers).
• If you are collecting data via interviews or pencil-and-paper formats, you will need to perform transcriptions or data entry in systematic ways to minimise distortion.
• You can prevent loss of data by having an organisation system that is routinely backed up.

Finally, you can implement your chosen methods to measure or observe the variables you are interested in.

The closed-ended questions ask participants to rate their manager’s leadership skills on scales from 1 to 5. The data produced is numerical and can be statistically analysed for averages and patterns.

To ensure that high-quality data is recorded in a systematic way, here are some best practices:

• Record all relevant information as and when you obtain data. For example, note down whether or how lab equipment is recalibrated during an experimental study.
• Double-check manual data entry for errors.
• If you collect quantitative data, you can assess the reliability and validity to get an indication of your data quality.

Data collection is the systematic process by which observations or measurements are gathered in research. It is used in many different contexts by academics, governments, businesses, and other organisations.

When conducting research, collecting original data has significant advantages:

• You can tailor data collection to your specific research aims (e.g., understanding the needs of your consumers or user testing your website).
• You can control and standardise the process for high reliability and validity (e.g., choosing appropriate measurements and sampling methods ).

However, there are also some drawbacks: data collection can be time-consuming, labour-intensive, and expensive. In some cases, it’s more efficient to use secondary data that has already been collected by someone else, but the data might be less reliable.

Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.

Quantitative methods allow you to test a hypothesis by systematically collecting and analysing data, while qualitative methods allow you to explore ideas and experiences in depth.

Reliability and validity are both about how well a method measures something:

• Reliability refers to the  consistency of a measure (whether the results can be reproduced under the same conditions).
• Validity   refers to the  accuracy of a measure (whether the results really do represent what they are supposed to measure).

If you are doing experimental research , you also have to consider the internal and external validity of your experiment.

In mixed methods research , you use both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods to answer your research question .

Operationalisation means turning abstract conceptual ideas into measurable observations.

For example, the concept of social anxiety isn’t directly observable, but it can be operationally defined in terms of self-rating scores, behavioural avoidance of crowded places, or physical anxiety symptoms in social situations.

Before collecting data , it’s important to consider how you will operationalise the variables that you want to measure.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

Bhandari, P. (2022, May 04). Data Collection Methods | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 3 September 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/data-collection-guide/

Is this article helpful?

Pritha Bhandari

Other students also liked, qualitative vs quantitative research | examples & methods, triangulation in research | guide, types, examples, what is a conceptual framework | tips & examples.

• Get new issue alerts Get alerts
• Submit a Manuscript

Secondary Logo

Journal logo.

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.

Save my selection

Data Collection Methods in Quantitative Research

Sadan, Vathsala M.Sc (N)., Ph.D (N) *

* Professor, College of Nursing, CMC, Vellore

The information provided by the study participants on specific area of research called the data are very important that enable accurate information on the research work done by nurse researchers. Data collection methods are used to collect data in a systematic way. The researchers choose and use various data collection methods. They are broadly classified as self -reports, observation, and biophysiologic measures. This article highlights on the sources of data and on the various data collection techniques which include interviews, questionnaires, scales, category system and check lists, rating scales, and biophysiologic measures. It also analyses the advantages and disadvantages of each of these methods. Emphasis should be given on choosing appropriate method to collect accurate information which will lead to good quality research outcomes.

Introduction

In quantitative research process, data collection is a very important step. Quality data collection methods improve the accuracy or validity of study outcomes or findings. Nurse researchers have emphasized on the use of valid and reliable instruments to measure a variety of phenomena of interest in nursing. We need to be aware of the various measurement methods which are of importance to generate evidences needed for nursing practice. Researchers must choose appropriate data collection methods and approaches. An ideal data collection procedure captures a construct that is accurate, truthful, and sensitive (Polit & Beck, 2017). Quantitative data are collected in a more structured manner as compared to the qualitative data which are unstructured or semi-structured.

Data Collection and Data Resources

Data collection is a real challenge for researchers and it requires much time and effort. Nurse researchers should first identify the type of data to be collected and the sources from where they can be collected. The data sources can be either the existing data or the new data. Existing data such as from the existing records and documents can be of great value in some of the research studies. For answering the research question, if existing data are unavailable, researchers need to collect new data. The type of data also can be classified as primary data and secondary data. Primary data collection involves data collected directly from the study participants by the researcher or a trained data collector which includes surveys, questionnaires, interviews, observations, or biophysiologic measures. Secondary data collection is the use of data that were collected for another purpose such as patient's records, government data bases (Houser, 2011). After identifying what data need to be collected, the nurse researchers must choose the data collection methods and develop a data collection plan. The decision about choosing the data collection methods also should be based on the ethical guidelines, the cost, the time constraints, population appropriateness as well as the availability of research assistants to collect data.

Data Collection Methods

The most commonly used data collection approaches by nurse researchers include self-reports, observation, and bio- physiological measures. Whatever approaches the researcher uses, the data collection method differ along the four important dimensions: structure, quantifiability, researcher obtrusiveness, and objectivity. The data collected in quantitative studies are based on a structured plan which guides the researcher to what data to be collected, how long, and how to collect them. The information gathered must be quantified by doing statistical analysis. There is a possibility that the study participants can change their responses or behavior under some circumstances which need to be taken in to consideration. The data collected should be objective wherein similar observations are made even if two researchers observe the same concepts of interest. Data collection is an important component in creating relevant research evidence and hence need to be carried out rigorously. The most common methods of data collection are discussed below (see Figure 1 ).

1. Self - reports

Structured self- reports are the most commonly used data collection method among the nurse researchers (Polit & Beck, 2017). The self-report instruments are interview schedule, questionnaires, and scales. In an interview schedule, data are collected by asking questions orally either face-to face or through telephone. In a questionnaire or Self- Administered Questionnaire (SAQ), the study participants complete answering questions themselves, either on a paper or onto computer (Polit & Beck, 2017). Scales are also a form of self-report in which the phenomena of interest are measured (Grove, Burns, & Gray, 2013).

1.1. Interviews

Interviews can be used in descriptive studies and qualitative studies. They can be unstructured in which the content is controlled by the study participant or structured in which the content is similar to that of a questionnaire, with the possible responses to questions that are carefully designed by the researcher (Creswell, 2014). The questions can be closed, open ended, or probing. The interview questions are developed before the researcher begins data collection and are arranged in a logical sequence. The questions are asked orally to the participants, and explained if clarification is required by the participants. The order of questions arranged should be from broad to specific and topic wise. The sensitive nature of questions should be asked at the end. The vocabulary and sentence structuring of the question should be at the reading and understanding level of participants. After the interview questions are developed, the instrument is validated by experts for content. It has to be field tested through pilot study in order to identify problems in the design of questions, sequencing of questions, or procedure for recording responses. Piloting also provides an opportunity to establish the reliability and validity of the interview instrument (Grove et al., 2013).

The researcher or the data collector need to be skillful in obtaining interview data. They need to be familiar or trained with the content of the interview. The questions should be asked in a clear and unambiguous manner. The verbal and nonverbal communication must be unbiased. Sometimes the interviewer may have to repeat questions or explain questions, or probe to get more information. Probing has to be done carefully to avoid biased responses. The data can be written or recorded responses. It has to be done without distracting the interviewee. Prior permission should be obtained from Institutional Review Board (IRB) as well as from the study participants before the data collection procedure can be initiated.

In the present scenario, telephone interviews are used widely and it has been a convenient method to collect data. The interviewer has to be more tactful while collecting data through telephone interviews. They are faster and less expensive. However, the data can be collected only during a limited duration of time. The challenge is to ensure the true identification of the respondent, and can also cause bias and trigger unwanted responses since the researcher is not present physically. Focus group interviews, another method of data collection help to get aggregate perception of people, their feelings as well their thinking (Murugan, 2015). The researcher or the data collector who conducts the interview should get adequate training to ask questions in a logical sequence, and how to handle unanticipated questions or answers that might arise during the interview process.

Advantages and disadvantages

Through face to-face interview in-depth information can be obtained and it is more often a very flexible technique. In fact, the questions are restructured during the interview. It is an opportunity to obtain personal information and responses to all questions can be obtained. It provides an opportunity for probing and complex answers can be obtained. The response rate is higher and interviews provide a more representative sample. Data can also be collected from sick individuals, and from those who have problems with reading, writing, or difficulty in expressing. However, interview has its own disadvantages. It requires more time and it is expensive. As it needs more time, the sample size is usually minimized. Subject bias is always a threat to validity of the findings and its consistency in data collection from one subject to another (Grove et al., 2013). Interviewing children and lack of language skills are the other challenges faced while using interview schedule as a data collection technique.

1.2 Questionnaires

The most common instrument used for data collection is questionnaires. The participants fill in their responses themselves on a paper pencil instrument or on computer directly. Questionnaires can be structured or unstructured. In structured questionnaires, both the questions and the responses/answers are provided and the study participants need to pick up the correct responses. In unstructured questionnaires, the participants are required to give their own responses to the predetermined questions. Structured questionnaires can consist of either open ended or closed ended questions. In open ended questions, the participants provide their own answers in narrative form whereas in closed ended questions, there are fixed answers to the questions and the participants need to choose the correct/best response (s).

Good closed ended questions are more difficult to develop than open ended questions but are easy to analyze. Open ended questions can yield rich information, provided the participants are expressive and cooperative. While constructing structured questionnaires, the researchers must be careful with the wording of questions for clarity, sensitive to participant's psychological state, ensure absence of bias, and consider the reading level of participants (Polit & Beck, 2015).

Closed ended questions are of various types which are given below (Houser, 2011; Polit & Beck, 2017).

• Dichotomous questions: The participants decide between two choices of answers/responses such as yes/no and these type of questions are useful in collecting facts and provide only limited information.
• Multiple choice questions: There will be four to seven alternative responses to each of the questions, and the study participant chooses the responses as their answers. These type of questions are useful in collecting people's opinion and views.
• Rank order questions: The participants choose their answers along a continuum such as most to least important. When we use these type of questions clear instructions should be provided.
• Forced-choice questions: In this type of questions, participants are required to choose between two related statements.
• Rating questions: Here, the participants need to evaluate something on a given ordered continuum of responses. The rating questions can be from 0 to 10
• Check lists: In this type of instrument, a series of questions are listed and arranged vertically and the responses are also listed along with the other.
• Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): The subjective experiences such as pain are measured using VAS. It is a straight line and the end of the line are labelled as the extreme limits of the participant's experiences or feelings.

When developing a questionnaire, the researcher has to first identify the information that need to be collected. A blue print has to be made including the different aspects of the topic. A literature review on the pertinent topic will guide the researcher in the development of questionnaires. Each question should be carefully designed and clearly expressed according to the level of the participants. They should not be ambiguous or vague. Long question can threaten the validity of the instrument (Grove et al., 2013). The instrument should have proper instructions on how to fill the responses. The validity and the reliability of the developed questionnaires should be established and the instrument must be pilot tested before it is used in the study.

Self-reported questionnaires are administered either in person or through e-mails. Questionnaires usually appear easy to develop, but it requires much time and effort. They are less expensive, involves less time and less energy to administer as compared to interview schedule. Electronically mailed questionnaire is faster and cheaper too. A larger number of samples can be included in the study, and it provides an opportunity for complete anonymity in data collection. There is less possibilities for interviewer bias. However, information may be incomplete leading to missing data. The response rate especially when data are collected through posted mails and e mails is less.

1.3. Scales

Scales are a form of self-report and are a more precise form of measuring a phenomena than questionnaires (Grove et al., 2013). Scales measure the characteristics or traits of human beings in which more emphasis is placed on verification of reliability and validity. They are also called as psychometric instrumentation (Houser, 2014). There are existing scales available. If located, the researcher should get the psychometric properties of theses scales and document them. Psychosocial variables such as pain, nausea etc., are commonly measured using scales. Scores are given to each of ? the items to be measured in the scale. The types of scales commonly used in nursing studies are rating scale, Likert scale, Sementic Differential scale (SD) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (Grove, Gray & Burns, 2015), which are discussed below (see Figure 3 ).

• Rating scale: In a rating scale, an ordered series of categories of a phenomena being studied is listed. A numerical value is assigned to each of the categories and the distinction between the categories vary. On this scale, the participants choose the best catergory that fits their experience. They are easy to construct but should be careful with extreme statements. e.g., Faces Pain Scale
• Likert scale: It is the most commonly used scale which contains many declarative statements that express the view point on a topic. The study participants are expected to indicate the degree to which they agree or disagree with the view point expressed in the statement. Likert scale usually consists of 10 to 20 items, each addressing an element of the concept which is being measured. The scale has both positively and negatively worded statements. The responses provided by the participants are scored and the total scores are summated
• Semantic Differential Scales: Psychological characteristics of people are measured by semantic differential scales. It is used to measure the variation in the views of a phenomena of interest. It is a 7 point scale and one end is the most positive and the other margin is the most negative. Each line is considered as one scale and the scores are summed up.
• Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): VAS is used to measure magnitude, strength, and intensity of people's feelings, sensations, or attitude about symptoms or situations. In VAS, there is a vertical or horizontal line with descriptors at both ends, as well as range of possible feelings of participants along the line. The participants need to place a mark on the line to indicate the intensity of their sensation or feeling, e.g., Visual Analogue Pain Scale. It is commonly used in health research.

2. Observational Methods

Observation technique is used to record the specific behaviors, actions of people and events. Observational measurement can be unstructured or structured. Unstructured observations are done spontaneously and recorded as what is seen in words. Whereas, in structured observations, the researcher should carefully decide what to observe, how to observe, how long, and how to record the observed data. Observational measurement are usually more subjective than other methods of data collection. However, in some situations, observation may be the only way to collect information. In structured observations the specific behaviors of study subjects or the events to be observed or studied should be carefully defined.

In observation measurement, the observer plays an important role. A participant observer plays an active role and take part in the activity or event being observed. The nonparticipant observer adopts a passive role while observing the phenomena of interest. If observations are done by more than one data collector, establishing interrater reliability is vital. The most commonly used observation methods are discussed below (Polit & Beck, 2017):

2.1 Category systems and check lists

Behaviors, events or attributes of the subjects to be studied are grouped into categories and the categories are observed and recorded. The categories must by explained clearly. The maximum number of categories for effective observation is 15 to 20. The observer makes inference from the recorded observation from the category (Grove et al., 2013).

Behavior of participants are observed to see whether the behavior occurred or not and is recorded as tally marks in various categories. In observational check list, single category is selected for observation. Check lists are designed using category system. For example, while measuring the behavioral indicator related to pain, it can be cry and facial expressions which are called as categories. The facial expressions are measured by checking whether brow bulge, eye squeeze, and naso- labial furrow occurred or not

2.2 Rating scales

Rating scales permit the observers to rate the behavior of the participant or the event on a scale at specified time intervals and then it is quantified. However, rating scales provide more information than check lists. If they are combined with category system and check lists, the data collected will be much useful in studying the phenomena. Rating scales can be used for observation as well as for self - reporting.

3. Physiologic measurement

Many of the nursing studies have included physiological measures to assess the outcomes of nursing care. Today, nurse researchers use different kinds of bio-physiologic measures in research. For example, Yeo (2009) examined the effects of a walking versus stretching exercise on preeclampsia risk factors such as heart rate, and blood pressure in sedentary pregnant women as cited in Polit and Beck (2017). Biophysical and bio-chemical measures are the two categories included in the physiological measurement. Use of stethoscope and sphygmomanometer to check the blood pressure is an example of bio-physical measurement and laboratory value of blood sugar is an example of bio-chemical measure. Physiological measurements are either direct (body temperature) or indirect (blood sugar). Physiological measures can be obtained through self- reports, observation, laboratory tests, and electronic monitoring. Example: irregular heartbeats can be self reported by subjects, observed by the nurse as well as monitored electronically (Grove et al., 2015).

In this method of data collection, use of specialized equipment are needed to measure the study variables. The two types of biophysiological methods used for data collection include in vivo and in vitro. In vivo measurements are done directly in or on living organism, whereas, in vitro measurements are performed outside the body as in case of checking the blood sugar level (Polit & Beck, 2017). In many studies, nurse researchers link physiological variables with psychological and social variables such as linking stress with blood pressure measures over a period of time.

The data obtained through laboratory tests and electronic monitoring provide precise and accurate data and are direct measures of many physiological variables. Bio-physiologic measures are more objective. Since the data collection setting is hospitals, the cost involved in collecting bio-physiologic information may be low. However, there are few disadvantages of using these measurements. The measuring instrument itself can affect the study variables. There are possibilities of related risks while applying energy and instruments. Special care must be taken in selecting appropriate instruments in relation to practical, ethical, medical, and technical considerations.

Data collection methods play a vital role in generating evidence through research. Each of the measurement approaches have their own advantages and disadvantages. Researchers must identify the type of data that need to be collected. Importance should be given to make sure that the data collection techniques are carefully chosen, applied, and properly managed to provide accurate information which can support the quality of research work done by the nurse researchers. Nurse researchers should be aware of the different data collection approaches and need to get familiarized with them.

Conflicts of Interest: The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

data; quantitative; interview; questionnaire; observation; biophysiologic

• + Favorites
• View in Gallery

Readers Of this Article Also Read

Effectiveness of structured pre operative education on anxiety level of..., what is team-based learning, and how is it used in nursing.

Examples of Quantitative Data, Types & Collection Methods

Ever wondered what makes the difference between a hit product and a missed opportunity? It’s often the precise insights that come from analyzing quantitative data. But with so many types of quantitative data available, where do you start?

In this article, we’ll explore various examples of quantitative data + how to collect them and make smarter decisions that keep users engaged .

• Quantitative data refers to numerical information you can measure and analyze statistically, while qualitative data offers deeper insights. The first answers the “what” and “how much”, while the latter answers the “why” and “how.”
• High-level types of quantitative data include:
• Discrete data.
• Continuous data.
• Interval data.
• Ratio data.
• SaaS examples of quantitative data include:
• User activation rate . The percentage of users who complete a key action that signifies they have found value in the product.
• Time to value . The amount of time it takes for a new user to experience the value of a product.
• Onboarding checklist completion rate . The percentage of new users who complete a predefined set of onboarding steps.
• Core feature adoption rate . The percentage of users who actively use a key feature.
• 1-month retention rate . The percentage of users who continue to use a product one month after their initial engagement.
• Customer churn rate . The percentage of customers who stop using a product within a specific period.
• User stickiness . A measure of how frequently and consistently users engage with a product over a specific period.
• NPS . A measure of customer loyalty based on how likely they are to recommend a product to others.
• CSAT . A measure of how satisfied customers are with a product.
• CES . A measure of how easy it is for customers to use a product.
• Here’s how to collect quantitative data with Userpilot:
• Autocapture clicks, text inputs, and form submissions.
• Perform A/B testing and see how different elements perform.
• Conduct in-app surveys to find out your CSAT, CES, and NPS.
• If you want to learn more about collecting quantitative data automatically, analyzing the data, and taking action, book a demo with Userpilot now.

Try Userpilot and Take Your User Engagement to the Next Level

• 14 Day Trial
• No Credit Card Required

What is quantitative data?

Quantitative data refers to numerical data that can be measured, such as adoption rates, number of users, or net promoter scores.

Collecting this data is useful because it provides objective and measurable insights that you can analyze statistically and benchmark, minimizing subjective interpretation and bias.

The difference between quantitative and qualitative data

Quantitative data refers to information that can be measured and expressed numerically, allowing for objective analysis . It answers the questions such as “what” and “how many.”

In contrast, qualitative data involves non-numerical information, such as opinions, behaviors, and experiences. You typically gather this through interviews, observations, or open-ended surveys to understand “why” and “how.”

While quantitative data provides measurable and comparable results, qualitative data offers deeper insights into the underlying reasons, opinions, and motivations behind those numbers.

Together, quantitative data and qualitative data offer a comprehensive understanding of user behavior and decision-making processes.

High-level types of quantitative data

You can categorize quantitative data into several high-level types, each crucial to data-driven analysis methods.

Discrete data

Discrete data is a type of quantitative data that comprises specific and countable numerical values that cannot be subdivided meaningfully. For example, discrete data could be the number of customer support tickets that are counted individually—you cannot have 2.5 support tickets.

Continuous data

Continuous data is a type of quantitative data that represents measurements that can take any numerical value within a range. For example, you can measure time-to-value in minutes and seconds and divide it into smaller increments, such as 5 minutes and 34 seconds, 5 minutes and 35 seconds, etc.

Interval data

Interval data is numerical data where the differences between values are meaningful, but there is no true zero point. A typical example is the temperature, where you can measure the difference between numerical values, but 0°C does not mean the absence of temperature.

Ratio data is quantitative data that allows for meaningful differences and ratios between numerical values, with a true zero point showing the absence of the measured quantity. An example of ratio data is MRR, where $0 MRR indicates no recurring revenue , and you can compare it meaningfully, such as saying one company has twice the MRR of another.

SaaS examples of quantitative data to track

Here are some SaaS examples of quantitative data that PLG companies should track.

User activation rate

User activation rate is quantitative data that measures the percentage of users who complete a key action that signifies they are gaining value from the product. It helps you understand how your onboarding process converts new users into active, engaged customers.

You can calculate this metric with the following formula:

User Activation Rate = (Number of Activated Users / Total Number of Sign-Ups) × 100.

According to our metrics report , the average user activation rate is 37.5%.

Time to value

Time to Value (TTV) is a type of quantitative data that measures the time it takes for a new user to realize the value of your product. This metric helps you understand whether your onboarding process effectively guides users to that “Aha” moment .

You can calculate this product metric as the time elapsed between the user’s initial sign-up and the “Aha” moment .

The average TTV across different industries based on our first-party data is one day, 12 hours, and 23 minutes.

Onboarding checklist completion rate

Among examples of quantitative data, the onboarding checklist completion rate measures the percentage of users who complete all the tasks in your onboarding checklist . This rate is a key indicator of how effectively your user onboarding process guides new users through the essential steps.

You can calculate this metric using the following formula:

Onboarding Checklist Completion Rate = (Number of Users Who Completed the Checklist / Total Number of Users Who Started the Checklist) × 100

According to our report, the average checklist completion rate is 19%.

The core feature adoption rate

The core feature adoption rate is quantitative data that measures the percentage of users who adopt and regularly use your product’s most essential features.

This metric shows how well users integrate your product’s key functionalities into their workflows, which can directly affect customer retention and satisfaction.

Core Feature Adoption Rate = (Number of Monthly Active Users / Total Number of User Logins) × 100

Based on our findings, the average core feature adoption rate is 24.5%.

1-month retention rate

The 1-month retention rate is quantitative data that measures the percentage of users who continue to use your product one month after signing up. This metric shows how well your product meets user needs and keeps them engaged over the critical initial period.

To calculate the 1-month retention rate , you can use the following formula:

1-Month Retention Rate = (Number of Users Who Remain Active After 1 Month / Total Number of Users at the Start of the Month) × 100

Our data shows that the average 1-month retention rate is 46.9%.

Customer churn rate

Customer churn rate is quantitative data that measures the percentage of customers who stop using your product or service within a specific period.

This metric is crucial for understanding customer satisfaction and the overall health of your business because a high churn rate can show underlying issues with product value, user experience, or customer support.

To calculate the customer churn rate , you can use the following formula:

If you started the month with 1,000 customers and 50 customers churned by the end of the month, your churn rate would be as follows:

(50 / 1,000) × 100 = 5%

User stickiness

User stickiness is quantitative data that measures how often users return to your product within a specific period. This metric is a key indicator of user engagement and loyalty, showing how well your product keeps users returning regularly.

High customer stickiness typically means your product is valuable and engaging enough to become a regular part of users’ routines.

You can use the following formula to calculate stickiness:

If your product has 5,000 Daily Active Users (DAU) and 20,000 Monthly Active Users ( MAU ), the stickiness expressed in percentage would be:

(5,000 / 20,000) × 100 = 25%

Net Promoter Score (NPS)

Net Promoter Score (NPS) is quantitative data that measures customer loyalty and satisfaction by asking users how likely they are to recommend your product or service to others. NPS helps you understand the overall perception of your brand and can show areas for improvement in customer experience.

To calculate NPS , ask customers to rate their likelihood of recommending your product on a scale from 0 to 10. Based on their responses, customers are categorized into three groups:

• Promoters (9-10) : Loyal customers who will probably recommend your product.
• Passives (7-8) : Satisfied but unenthusiastic customers who competitors could sway.
• Detractors (0-6) : Unhappy customers who are unlikely to recommend your product and may even discourage others from using it.

You can calculate NPS using the following formula:

(Net Promoter Score) = % of Promoters – % of Detractors

Our report records the average NPS to be 35.7%.

Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT)

Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT) measures how satisfied customers are with your product.

To calculate CSAT, you typically ask customers to rate their satisfaction from 1 to 5, with one being very dissatisfied and five being very satisfied. After the quantitative data collection, you count the number of satisfied customers who gave a rating of 4 or 5.

Then, apply this formula to get your CSAT score:

For example, if you surveyed 100 customers and 80 of them gave you a rating of 4 or 5, your CSAT would be:

(80 / 100) × 100 = 80%

Customer Effort Score (CES)

Among quantitative data examples, Customer Effort Score (CES) measures how much effort a customer has to exert to use your product or resolve an issue. CES is critical for understanding how user-friendly your product is.

To calculate this metric, you typically ask customers to rate their agreement with a statement like “The product is easy to use” on a Likert scale, usually ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). After collecting responses, you count the number of customers who answered “agree” (4) or “strongly agree” (5).

Then, you can calculate the CES with this formula:

For instance, if you surveyed 100 customers and 70 of them responded with “agree” or “strongly agree,” your CES score would be:

(70 / 100) × 100 = 70%

How to collect quantitative data with Userpilot

Now that you know which examples of quantitative data you should collect, the question is: how? Here are three simple ways to collect quantitative data with product growth tools like Userpilot:

Use the auto-capture functionality to automatically track events

With Userpilot’s auto-capture functionality , you can automatically track quantitative data on clicks, text inputs, and form submissions without manually tagging each interaction.

Using retroactive analysis saves your valuable time and removes the dependencies on engineering as they don’t need to write code. Also, there are no data gaps, and you don’t have to decide which data to track in advance. Pretty neat, huh?

Set up A/B and multivariate testing to collect experiment data

With Userpilot, you can easily set up A/B testing and multivariate testing to collect valuable quantitative data.

For example, you can test different elements, such as onboarding flows, and get data on how different segments interact with them.

Launch surveys to gather NPS, CSAT, and CES scores

You can launch in-app surveys with Userpilot to efficiently gather NPS, CSAT, and CES data. These surveys provide a reliable method for collecting and analyzing quantitative data on user sentiment and overall satisfaction.

Plus, you can enrich these surveys with open-ended questions , allowing you to gather additional qualitative feedback . This combination of quantitative and qualitative data provides a more comprehensive understanding of user experiences and sentiments.

There are many examples of quantitative data, but thankfully there are product analytics tools that make collecting them easier. One of the best ways of achieving this is by automatically capturing key events, which is exactly what Userpilot enables.

If you want to auto-capture key user actions, launch no-code surveys, perform quantitative data analysis, and then create personalized product experiences, book a demo now to see how we can help.

Try Userpilot and Take Your Product Experience to the Next Level

Leave a comment cancel reply.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Get The Insights!

The fastest way to learn about Product Growth,Management & Trends.

The coolest way to learn about Product Growth, Management & Trends. Delivered fresh to your inbox, weekly.

The fastest way to learn about Product Growth, Management & Trends.

You might also be interested in ...

What’s the best google analytics alternative: top 7 options.

Aazar Ali Shad

What is Direct Data Capture in SaaS

How to leverage customer insights.

Methods for Quantitative Research in Psychology

• Conducting Research

Psychological Research

August 2023

This seven-hour course provides a comprehensive exploration of research methodologies, beginning with the foundational steps of the scientific method. Students will learn about hypotheses, experimental design, data collection, and the analysis of results. Emphasis is placed on defining variables accurately, distinguishing between independent, dependent, and controlled variables, and understanding their roles in research.

The course delves into major research designs, including experimental, correlational, and observational studies. Students will compare and contrast these designs, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses in various contexts. This comparison extends to the types of research questions scientists pose, highlighting how different designs are suited to different inquiries.

A critical component of the course is developing the ability to judge the quality of sources for literature reviews. Students will learn criteria for evaluating the credibility, relevance, and reliability of sources, ensuring that their understanding of the research literature is built on a solid foundation.

Reliability and validity are key concepts addressed in the course. Students will explore what it means for an observation to be reliable, focusing on consistency and repeatability. They will also compare and contrast different forms of validity, such as internal, external, construct, and criterion validity, and how these apply to various research designs.

The course concepts are thoroughly couched in examples drawn from the psychological research literature. By the end of the course, students will be equipped with the skills to design robust research studies, critically evaluate sources, and understand the nuances of reliability and validity in scientific research. This knowledge will be essential for conducting high-quality research and contributing to the scientific community.

Learning objectives

• Describe the steps of the scientific method.
• Specify how variables are defined.
• Compare and contrast the major research designs.
• Explain how to judge the quality of a source for a literature review.
• Compare and contrast the kinds of research questions scientists ask.
• Explain what it means for an observation to be reliable.
• Compare and contrast forms of validity as they apply to the major research designs.

This program does not offer CE credit.

More in this series

Introduces applying statistical methods effectively in psychology or related fields for undergraduates, high school students, and professionals.

August 2023 On Demand Training

Introduces the importance of ethical practice in scientific research for undergraduates, high school students, and professionals.

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

• You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
• You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
• You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
• A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

Home > Blog >

Data analysis in qualitative research, theertha raj, august 30, 2024.

While numbers tell us "what" and "how much," qualitative data reveals the crucial "why" and "how." But let's face it - turning mountains of text, images, and observations into meaningful insights can be daunting.

This guide dives deep into the art and science of how to analyze qualitative data. We'll explore cutting-edge techniques, free qualitative data analysis software, and strategies to make your analysis more rigorous and insightful. Expect practical, actionable advice on qualitative data analysis methods, whether you're a seasoned researcher looking to refine your skills or a team leader aiming to extract more value from your qualitative data.

What is qualitative data?

Qualitative data is non-numerical information that describes qualities or characteristics. It includes text, images, audio, and video. 

This data type captures complex human experiences, behaviors, and opinions that numbers alone can't express.

A qualitative data example can include interview transcripts, open-ended survey responses, field notes from observations, social media posts and customer reviews

Importance of qualitative data

Qualitative data is vital for several reasons:

• It provides a deep, nuanced understanding of complex phenomena.
• It captures the 'why' behind behaviors and opinions.
• It allows for unexpected discoveries and new research directions.
• It puts people's experiences and perspectives at the forefront.
• It enhances quantitative findings with depth and detail.

What is data analysis in qualitative research?

Data analysis in qualitative research is the process of examining and interpreting non-numerical data to uncover patterns, themes, and insights. It aims to make sense of rich, detailed information gathered through methods like interviews, focus groups, or observations.

This analysis moves beyond simple description. It seeks to understand the underlying meanings, contexts, and relationships within the data. The goal is to create a coherent narrative that answers research questions and generates new knowledge.

How is qualitative data analysis different from quantitative data analysis?

Qualitative and quantitative data analyses differ in several key ways:

• Data type: Qualitative analysis uses non-numerical data (text, images), while quantitative analysis uses numerical data.
• Approach: Qualitative analysis is inductive and exploratory. Quantitative analysis is deductive and confirmatory.
• Sample size: Qualitative studies often use smaller samples. Quantitative studies typically need larger samples for statistical validity.
• Depth vs. breadth: Qualitative analysis provides in-depth insights about a few cases. Quantitative analysis offers broader insights across many cases.
• Subjectivity: Qualitative analysis involves more subjective interpretation. Quantitative analysis aims for objective, statistical measures.

What are the 3 main components of qualitative data analysis?

The three main components of qualitative data analysis are:

• Data reduction: Simplifying and focusing the raw data through coding and categorization.
• Data display: Organizing the reduced data into visual formats like matrices, charts, or networks.
• Conclusion drawing/verification: Interpreting the displayed data and verifying the conclusions.

These components aren't linear steps. Instead, they form an iterative process where researchers move back and forth between them throughout the analysis.

How do you write a qualitative analysis?

Step 1: organize your data.

Start with bringing all your qualitative research data in one place. A repository can be of immense help here. Transcribe interviews , compile field notes, and gather all relevant materials.

Immerse yourself in the data. Read through everything multiple times.

Step 2: Code & identify themes

Identify and label key concepts, themes, or patterns. Group related codes into broader themes or categories. Try to connect themes to tell a coherent story that answers your research questions.

Pick out direct quotes from your data to illustrate key points.

Step 3: Interpret and reflect

Explain what your results mean in the context of your research and existing literature.

Als discuss, identify and try to eliminate potential biases or limitations in your analysis. 

Summarize main insights and their implications.

What are the 5 qualitative data analysis methods?

Thematic Analysis Identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) within data.

Content Analysis Systematically categorizing and counting the occurrence of specific elements in text.

Grounded Theory Developing theory from data through iterative coding and analysis.

Discourse Analysis Examining language use and meaning in social contexts.

Narrative Analysis Interpreting stories and personal accounts to understand experiences and meanings.

Each method suits different research goals and data types. Researchers often combine methods for comprehensive analysis.

What are the 4 data collection methods in qualitative research?

When it comes to collecting qualitative data, researchers primarily rely on four methods.

• Interviews : One-on-one conversations to gather in-depth information.
• Focus Groups : Group discussions to explore collective opinions and experiences.
• Observations : Watching and recording behaviors in natural settings.
• Document Analysis : Examining existing texts, images, or artifacts.

Researchers often use multiple methods to gain a comprehensive understanding of their topic.

How is qualitative data analysis measured?

Unlike quantitative data, qualitative data analysis isn't measured in traditional numerical terms. Instead, its quality is evaluated based on several criteria. 

Trustworthiness is key, encompassing the credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability of the findings. The rigor of the analysis - the thoroughness and care taken in data collection and analysis - is another crucial factor. 

Transparency in documenting the analysis process and decision-making is essential, as is reflexivity - acknowledging and examining the researcher's own biases and influences. 

Employing techniques like member checking and triangulation all contribute to the strength of qualitative analysis.

Benefits of qualitative data analysis

The benefits of qualitative data analysis are numerous. It uncovers rich, nuanced understanding of complex phenomena and allows for unexpected discoveries and new research directions. 

By capturing the 'why' behind behaviors and opinions, qualitative data analysis methods provide crucial context. 

Qualitative analysis can also lead to new theoretical frameworks or hypotheses and enhances quantitative findings with depth and detail. It's particularly adept at capturing cultural nuances that might be missed in quantitative studies.

Challenges of Qualitative Data Analysis

Researchers face several challenges when conducting qualitative data analysis. 

Managing and making sense of large volumes of rich, complex data can lead to data overload. Maintaining consistent coding across large datasets or between multiple coders can be difficult. 

There's a delicate balance to strike between providing enough context and maintaining focus on analysis. Recognizing and mitigating researcher biases in data interpretation is an ongoing challenge. 

The learning curve for qualitative data analysis software can be steep and time-consuming. Ethical considerations, particularly around protecting participant anonymity while presenting rich, detailed data, require careful navigation. Integrating different types of data from various sources can be complex. Time management is crucial, as researchers must balance the depth of analysis with project timelines and resources. Finally, communicating complex qualitative insights in clear, compelling ways can be challenging.

Best Software to Analyze Qualitative Data

G2 rating: 4.6/5

Pricing: Starts at $30 monthly.

Looppanel is an AI-powered research assistant and repository platform that can make it 5x faster to get to insights, by automating all the manual, tedious parts of your job. 

Here’s how Looppanel’s features can help with qualitative data analysis:

• Automatic Transcription: Quickly turn speech into accurate text; it works across 8 languages and even heavy accents, with over 90% accuracy.
• AI Note-Taking: The research assistant can join you on calls and take notes, as well as automatically sort your notes based on your interview questions.
• Automatic Tagging: Easily tag and organize your data with free AI tools.
• Insight Generation: Create shareable insights that fit right into your other tools.
• Repository Search: Run Google-like searches within your projects and calls to find a data snippet/quote in seconds
• Smart Summary: Ask the AI a question on your research, and it will give you an answer, using extracts from your data as citations.

Looppanel’s focus on automating research tasks makes it perfect for researchers who want to save time and work smarter.

G2 rating: 4.7/5

Pricing: Free version available, with the Plus version costing $20 monthly.

ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, offers a range of capabilities for qualitative data analysis including:

• Document analysis : It can easily extract and analyze text from various file formats.
• Summarization : GPT can condense lengthy documents into concise summaries.
• Advanced Data Analysis (ADA) : For paid users, Chat-GPT offers quantitative analysis of data documents.
• Sentiment analysis: Although not Chat-GPT’s specialty, it can still perform basic sentiment analysis on text data.

ChatGPT's versatility makes it valuable for researchers who need quick insights from diverse text sources.

How to use ChatGPT for qualitative data analysis

ChatGPT can be a handy sidekick in your qualitative analysis, if you do the following:

• Use it to summarize long documents or transcripts
• Ask it to identify key themes in your data
• Use it for basic sentiment analysis
• Have it generate potential codes based on your research questions
• Use it to brainstorm interpretations of your findings

G2 rating: 4.7/5 Pricing: Custom

Atlas.ti is a powerful platform built for detailed qualitative and mixed-methods research, offering a lot of capabilities for running both quantitative and qualitative research.

It’s key data analysis features include:

• Multi-format Support: Analyze text, PDFs, images, audio, video, and geo data all within one platform.
• AI-Powered Coding: Uses AI to suggest codes and summarize documents.
• Collaboration Tools: Ideal for teams working on complex research projects.
• Data Visualization: Create network views and other visualizations to showcase relationships in your data.

G2 rating: 4.1/5 Pricing: Custom

NVivo is another powerful platform for qualitative and mixed-methods research. It’s analysis features include:

• Data Import and Organization: Easily manage different data types, including text, audio, and video.
• AI-Powered Coding: Speeds up the coding process with machine learning.
• Visualization Tools: Create charts, graphs, and diagrams to represent your findings.
• Collaboration Features: Suitable for team-based research projects.

NVivo combines AI capabilities with traditional qualitative analysis tools, making it versatile for various research needs.

Can Excel do qualitative data analysis?

Excel can be a handy tool for qualitative data analysis, especially if you're just starting out or working on a smaller project. While it's not specialized qualitative data analysis software, you can use it to organize your data, maybe putting different themes in different columns. It's good for basic coding, where you label bits of text with keywords. You can use its filter feature to focus on specific themes. Excel can also create simple charts to visualize your findings. But for bigger or more complex projects, you might want to look into software designed specifically for qualitative data analysis. These tools often have more advanced features that can save you time and help you dig deeper into your data.

How do you show qualitative analysis?

Showing qualitative data analysis is about telling the story of your data. In qualitative data analysis methods, we use quotes from interviews or documents to back up our points. Create charts or mind maps to show how different ideas connect, which is a common practice in data analysis in qualitative research. Group your findings into themes that make sense. Then, write it all up in a way that flows, explaining what you found and why it matters.

What is the best way to analyze qualitative data?

There's no one-size-fits-all approach to how to analyze qualitative data, but there are some tried-and-true steps. 

Start by getting your data in order. Then, read through it a few times to get familiar with it. As you go, start marking important bits with codes - this is a fundamental qualitative data analysis method. Group similar codes into bigger themes. Look for patterns in these themes - how do they connect? 

Finally, think about what it all means in the bigger picture of your research. Remember, it's okay to go back and forth between these steps as you dig deeper into your data. Qualitative data analysis software can be a big help in this process, especially for managing large amounts of data.

In qualitative methods of test analysis, what do test developers do to generate data?

Test developers in qualitative research might sit down with people for in-depth chats or run group discussions, which are key qualitative data analysis methods. They often use surveys with open-ended questions that let people express themselves freely. Sometimes, they'll observe people in their natural environment, taking notes on what they see. They might also dig into existing documents or artifacts that relate to their topic. The goal is to gather rich, detailed information that helps them understand the full picture, which is crucial in data analysis in qualitative research.

Which is not a purpose of reflexivity during qualitative data analysis?

Reflexivity in qualitative data analysis isn't about proving you're completely objective. That's not the goal. Instead, it's about being honest about who you are as a researcher. It's recognizing that your own experiences and views might influence how you see the data. By being upfront about this, you actually make your research more trustworthy. It's also a way to dig deeper into your data, seeing things you might have missed at first glance. This self-awareness is a crucial part of qualitative data analysis methods.

What is a qualitative data analysis example?

A simple example is analyzing customer feedback for a new product. You might collect feedback, read through responses, create codes like "ease of use" or "design," and group similar codes into themes. You'd then identify patterns and support findings with specific quotes. This process helps transform raw feedback into actionable insights.

How to analyze qualitative data from a survey?

First, gather all your responses in one place. Read through them to get a feel for what people are saying. Then, start labeling responses with codes - short descriptions of what each bit is about. This coding process is a fundamental qualitative data analysis method. Group similar codes into bigger themes. Look for patterns in these themes. Are certain ideas coming up a lot? Do different groups of people have different views? Use actual quotes from your survey to back up what you're seeing. Think about how your findings relate to your original research questions. 

Which one is better, NVivo or Atlas.ti?

NVivo is known for being user-friendly and great for team projects. Atlas.ti shines when it comes to visual mapping of concepts and handling geographic data. Both can handle a variety of data types and have powerful tools for qualitative data analysis. The best way to decide is to try out both if you can. 

While these are powerful tools, the core of qualitative data analysis still relies on your analytical skills and understanding of qualitative data analysis methods.

Do I need to use NVivo for qualitative data analysis?

You don't necessarily need NVivo for qualitative data analysis, but it can definitely make your life easier, especially for bigger projects. Think of it like using a power tool versus a hand tool - you can get the job done either way, but the power tool might save you time and effort. For smaller projects or if you're just starting out, you might be fine with simpler tools or even free qualitative data analysis software. But if you're dealing with lots of data, or if you need to collaborate with a team, or if you want to do more complex analysis, then specialized qualitative data analysis software like NVivo can be a big help. It's all about finding the right tool for your specific research needs and the qualitative data analysis methods you're using.

Here’s a guide that can help you decide.

How to use NVivo for qualitative data analysis

First, you import all your data - interviews, documents, videos, whatever you've got. Then you start creating "nodes," which are like folders for different themes or ideas in your data. As you read through your material, you highlight bits that relate to these themes and file them under the right nodes. NVivo lets you easily search through all this organized data, find connections between different themes, and even create visual maps of how everything relates.

How much does NVivo cost?

NVivo's pricing isn't one-size-fits-all. They offer different plans for individuals, teams, and large organizations, but they don't publish their prices openly. Contact the team here for a custom quote.

What are the four steps of qualitative data analysis?

While qualitative data analysis is often iterative, it generally follows these four main steps:

1. Data Collection: Gathering raw data through interviews, observations, or documents.

2. Data Preparation: Organizing and transcribing the collected data.

3. Data Coding: Identifying and labeling important concepts or themes in the data.

4. Interpretation: Drawing meaning from the coded data and developing insights.

Follow us on

Get the best resources for ux research, in your inbox, related articles.

Resources & Guides

February 15, 2024

How to use AI for Qualitative Data Analysis

August 15, 2024

Transcription in Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Guide for UX Researchers

May 22, 2024

Triangulation in Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Guide [2024]

Looppanel automatically records your calls, transcribes them, and centralizes all your research data in one place

We Trust in Human Precision

20,000+ Professional Language Experts Ready to Help. Expertise in a variety of Niches.

API Solutions

• API Pricing
• Cost estimate
• Customer loyalty program
• Educational Discount
• Non-Profit Discount
• Green Initiative Discount1

Value-Driven Pricing

Unmatched expertise at affordable rates tailored for your needs. Our services empower you to boost your productivity.

• Special Discounts
• Enterprise transcription solutions
• Enterprise translation solutions
• Transcription/Caption API
• AI Transcription Proofreading API

Trusted by Global Leaders

GoTranscript is the chosen service for top media organizations, universities, and Fortune 50 companies.

GoTranscript

One of the Largest Online Transcription and Translation Agencies in the World. Founded in 2005.

Speaker 1: Welcome to this overview of quantitative research methods. This tutorial will give you the big picture of quantitative research and introduce key concepts that will help you determine if quantitative methods are appropriate for your project study. First, what is educational research? Educational research is a process of scholarly inquiry designed to investigate the process of instruction and learning, the behaviors, perceptions, and attributes of students and teachers, the impact of institutional processes and policies, and all other areas of the educational process. The research design may be quantitative, qualitative, or a mixed methods design. The focus of this overview is quantitative methods. The general purpose of quantitative research is to explain, predict, investigate relationships, describe current conditions, or to examine possible impacts or influences on designated outcomes. Quantitative research differs from qualitative research in several ways. It works to achieve different goals and uses different methods and design. This table illustrates some of the key differences. Qualitative research generally uses a small sample to explore and describe experiences through the use of thick, rich descriptions of detailed data in an attempt to understand and interpret human perspectives. It is less interested in generalizing to the population as a whole. For example, when studying bullying, a qualitative researcher might learn about the experience of the victims and the experience of the bully by interviewing both bullies and victims and observing them on the playground. Quantitative studies generally use large samples to test numerical data by comparing or finding correlations among sample attributes so that the findings can be generalized to the population. If quantitative researchers were studying bullying, they might measure the effects of a bully on the victim by comparing students who are victims and students who are not victims of bullying using an attitudinal survey. In conducting quantitative research, the researcher first identifies the problem. For Ed.D. research, this problem represents a gap in practice. For Ph.D. research, this problem represents a gap in the literature. In either case, the problem needs to be of importance in the professional field. Next, the researcher establishes the purpose of the study. Why do you want to do the study, and what do you intend to accomplish? This is followed by research questions which help to focus the study. Once the study is focused, the researcher needs to review both seminal works and current peer-reviewed primary sources. Based on the research question and on a review of prior research, a hypothesis is created that predicts the relationship between the study's variables. Next, the researcher chooses a study design and methods to test the hypothesis. These choices should be informed by a review of methodological approaches used to address similar questions in prior research. Finally, appropriate analytical methods are used to analyze the data, allowing the researcher to draw conclusions and inferences about the data, and answer the research question that was originally posed. In quantitative research, research questions are typically descriptive, relational, or causal. Descriptive questions constrain the researcher to describing what currently exists. With a descriptive research question, one can examine perceptions or attitudes as well as more concrete variables such as achievement. For example, one might describe a population of learners by gathering data on their age, gender, socioeconomic status, and attributes towards their learning experiences. Relational questions examine the relationship between two or more variables. The X variable has some linear relationship to the Y variable. Causal inferences cannot be made from this type of research. For example, one could study the relationship between students' study habits and achievements. One might find that students using certain kinds of study strategies demonstrate greater learning, but one could not state conclusively that using certain study strategies will lead to or cause higher achievement. Causal questions, on the other hand, are designed to allow the researcher to draw a causal inference. A causal question seeks to determine if a treatment variable in a program had an effect on one or more outcome variables. In other words, the X variable influences the Y variable. For example, one could design a study that answered the question of whether a particular instructional approach caused students to learn more. The research question serves as a basis for posing a hypothesis, a predicted answer to the research question that incorporates operational definitions of the study's variables and is rooted in the literature. An operational definition matches a concept with a method of measurement, identifying how the concept will be quantified. For example, in a study of instructional strategies, the hypothesis might be that students of teachers who use Strategy X will exhibit greater learning than students of teachers who do not. In this study, one would need to operationalize learning by identifying a test or instrument that would measure learning. This approach allows the researcher to create a testable hypothesis. Relational and causal research relies on the creation of a null hypothesis, a version of the research hypothesis that predicts no relationship between variables or no effect of one variable on another. When writing the hypothesis for a quantitative question, the null hypothesis and the research or alternative hypothesis use parallel sentence structure. In this example, the null hypothesis states that there will be no statistical difference between groups, while the research or alternative hypothesis states that there will be a statistical difference between groups. Note also that both hypothesis statements operationalize the critical thinking skills variable by identifying the measurement instrument to be used. Once the research questions and hypotheses are solidified, the researcher must select a design that will create a situation in which the hypotheses can be tested and the research questions answered. Ideally, the research design will isolate the study's variables and control for intervening variables so that one can be certain of the relationships being tested. In educational research, however, it is extremely difficult to establish sufficient controls in the complex social settings being studied. In our example of investigating the impact of a certain instructional strategy in the classroom on student achievement, each day the teacher uses a specific instructional strategy. After school, some of the students in her class receive tutoring. Other students have parents that are very involved in their child's academic progress and provide learning experiences in the home. These students may do better because they received extra help, not because the teacher's instructional strategy is more effective. Unless the researcher can control for the intervening variable of extra help, it will be impossible to effectively test the study's hypothesis. Quantitative research designs can fall into two broad categories, experimental and quasi-experimental. Classic experimental designs are those that randomly assign subjects to either a control or treatment comparison group. The researcher can then compare the treatment group to the control group to test for an intervention's effect, known as a between-subject design. It is important to note that the control group may receive a standard treatment or may receive a treatment of any kind. Quasi-experimental designs do not randomly assign subjects to groups, but rather take advantage of existing groups. A researcher can still have a control and comparison group, but assignment to the groups is not random. The use of a control group is not required. However, the researcher may choose a design in which a single group is pre- and post-tested, known as a within-subjects design. Or a single group may receive only a post-test. Since quasi-experimental designs lack random assignment, the researcher should be aware of the threats to validity. Educational research often attempts to measure abstract variables such as attitudes, beliefs, and feelings. Surveys can capture data about these hard-to-measure variables, as well as other self-reported information such as demographic factors. A survey is an instrument used to collect verifiable information from a sample population. In quantitative research, surveys typically include questions that ask respondents to choose a rating from a scale, select one or more items from a list, or other responses that result in numerical data. Studies that use surveys or tests need to include strategies that establish the validity of the instrument used. There are many types of validity that need to be addressed. Face validity. Does the test appear at face value to measure what it is supposed to measure? Content validity. Content validity includes both item validity and sampling validity. Item validity ensures that the individual test items deal only with the subject being addressed. Sampling validity ensures that the range of item topics is appropriate to the subject being studied. For example, item validity might be high, but if all the items only deal with one aspect of the subjects, then sampling validity is low. Content validity can be established by having experts in the field review the test. Concurrent validity. Does a new test correlate with an older, established test that measures the same thing? Predictive validity. Does the test correlate with another related measure? For example, GRE tests are used at many colleges because these schools believe that a good grade on this test increases the probability that the student will do well at the college. Linear regression can establish the predictive validity of a test. Construct validity. Does the test measure the construct it is intended to measure? Establishing construct validity can be a difficult task when the constructs being measured are abstract. But it can be established by conducting a number of studies in which you test hypotheses regarding the construct, or by completing a factor analysis to ensure that you have the number of constructs that you say you have. In addition to ensuring the validity of instruments, the quantitative researcher needs to establish their reliability as well. Strategies for establishing reliability include Test retest. Correlates scores from two different administrations of the same test. Alternate forms. Correlates scores from administrations of two different forms of the same test. Split half reliability. Treats each half of one test or survey as a separate administration and correlates the results from each. Internal consistency. Uses Cronbach's coefficient alpha to calculate the average of all possible split halves. Quantitative research almost always relies on a sample that is intended to be representative of a larger population. There are two basic sampling strategies, random and non-random, and a number of specific strategies within each of these approaches. This table provides examples of each of the major strategies. The next section of this tutorial provides an overview of the procedures in conducting quantitative data analysis. There are specific procedures for conducting the data collection, preparing for and analyzing data, presenting the findings, and connecting to the body of existing research. This process ensures that the research is conducted as a systematic investigation that leads to credible results. Data comes in various sizes and shapes, and it is important to know about these so that the proper analysis can be used on the data. In 1946, S.S. Stevens first described the properties of measurement systems that allowed decisions about the type of measurement and about the attributes of objects that are preserved in numbers. These four types of data are referred to as nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio. First, let's examine nominal data. With nominal data, there is no number value that indicates quantity. Instead, a number has been assigned to represent a certain attribute, like the number 1 to represent male and the number 2 to represent female. In other words, the number is just a label. You could also assign numbers to represent race, religion, or any other categorical information. Nominal data only denotes group membership. With ordinal data, there is again no indication of quantity. Rather, a number is assigned for ranking order. For example, satisfaction surveys often ask respondents to rank order their level of satisfaction with services or programs. The next level of measurement is interval data. With interval data, there are equal distances between two values, but there is no natural zero. A common example is the Fahrenheit temperature scale. Differences between the temperature measurements make sense, but ratios do not. For instance, 20 degrees Fahrenheit is not twice as hot as 10 degrees Fahrenheit. You can add and subtract interval level data, but they cannot be divided or multiplied. Finally, we have ratio data. Ratio is the same as interval, however ratios, means, averages, and other numerical formulas are all possible and make sense. Zero has a logical meaning, which shows the absence of, or having none of. Examples of ratio data are height, weight, speed, or any quantities based on a scale with a natural zero. In summary, nominal data can only be counted. Ordinal data can be counted and ranked. Interval data can also be added and subtracted, and ratio data can also be used in ratios and other calculations. Determining what type of data you have is one of the most important aspects of quantitative analysis. Depending on the research question, hypotheses, and research design, the researcher may choose to use descriptive and or inferential statistics to begin to analyze the data. Descriptive statistics are best illustrated when viewed through the lens of America's pastimes. Sports, weather, economy, stock market, and even our retirement portfolio are presented in a descriptive analysis. Basic terminology for descriptive statistics are terms that we are most familiar in this discipline. Frequency, mean, median, mode, range, variance, and standard deviation. Simply put, you are describing the data. Some of the most common graphic representations of data are bar graphs, pie graphs, histograms, and box and whisker graphs. Attempting to reach conclusions and make causal inferences beyond graphic representations or descriptive analyses is referred to as inferential statistics. In other words, examining the college enrollment of the past decade in a certain geographical region would assist in estimating what the enrollment for the next year might be. Frequently in education, the means of two or more groups are compared. When comparing means to assist in answering a research question, one can use a within-group, between-groups, or mixed-subject design. In a within-group design, the researcher compares measures of the same subjects across time, therefore within-group, or under different treatment conditions. This can also be referred to as a dependent-group design. The most basic example of this type of quasi-experimental design would be if a researcher conducted a pretest of a group of students, subjected them to a treatment, and then conducted a post-test. The group has been measured at different points in time. In a between-group design, subjects are assigned to one of the two or more groups. For example, Control, Treatment 1, Treatment 2. Ideally, the sampling and assignment to groups would be random, which would make this an experimental design. The researcher can then compare the means of the treatment group to the control group. When comparing two groups, the researcher can gain insight into the effects of the treatment. In a mixed-subjects design, the researcher is testing for significant differences between two or more independent groups while subjecting them to repeated measures. Choosing a statistical test to compare groups depends on the number of groups, whether the data are nominal, ordinal, or interval, and whether the data meet the assumptions for parametric tests. Nonparametric tests are typically used with nominal and ordinal data, while parametric tests use interval and ratio-level data. In addition to this, some further assumptions are made for parametric tests that the data are normally distributed in the population, that participant selection is independent, and the selection of one person does not determine the selection of another, and that the variances of the groups being compared are equal. The assumption of independent participant selection cannot be violated, but the others are more flexible. The t-test assesses whether the means of two groups are statistically different from each other. This analysis is appropriate whenever you want to compare the means of two groups, and especially appropriate as the method of analysis for a quasi-experimental design. When choosing a t-test, the assumptions are that the data are parametric. The analysis of variance, or ANOVA, assesses whether the means of more than two groups are statistically different from each other. When choosing an ANOVA, the assumptions are that the data are parametric. The chi-square test can be used when you have non-parametric data and want to compare differences between groups. The Kruskal-Wallis test can be used when there are more than two groups and the data are non-parametric. Correlation analysis is a set of statistical tests to determine whether there are linear relationships between two or more sets of variables from the same list of items or individuals, for example, achievement and performance of students. The tests provide a statistical yes or no as to whether a significant relationship or correlation exists between the variables. A correlation test consists of calculating a correlation coefficient between two variables. Again, there are parametric and non-parametric choices based on the assumptions of the data. Pearson R correlation is widely used in statistics to measure the strength of the relationship between linearly related variables. Spearman-Rank correlation is a non-parametric test that is used to measure the degree of association between two variables. Spearman-Rank correlation test does not assume any assumptions about the distribution. Spearman-Rank correlation test is used when the Pearson test gives misleading results. Often a Kendall-Taw is also included in this list of non-parametric correlation tests to examine the strength of the relationship if there are less than 20 rankings. Linear regression and correlation are similar and often confused. Sometimes your methodologist will encourage you to examine both the calculations. Calculate linear correlation if you measured both variables, x and y. Make sure to use the Pearson parametric correlation coefficient if you are certain you are not violating the test assumptions. Otherwise, choose the Spearman non-parametric correlation coefficient. If either variable has been manipulated using an intervention, do not calculate a correlation. While linear regression does indicate the nature of the relationship between two variables, like correlation, it can also be used to make predictions because one variable is considered explanatory while the other is considered a dependent variable. Establishing validity is a critical part of quantitative research. As with the nature of quantitative research, there is a defined approach or process for establishing validity. This also allows for the findings transferability. For a study to be valid, the evidence must support the interpretations of the data, the data must be accurate, and their use in drawing conclusions must be logical and appropriate. Construct validity concerns whether what you did for the program was what you wanted to do, or whether what you observed was what you wanted to observe. Construct validity concerns whether the operationalization of your variables are related to the theoretical concepts you are trying to measure. Are you actually measuring what you want to measure? Internal validity means that you have evidence that what you did in the study, i.e., the program, caused what you observed, i.e., the outcome, to happen. Conclusion validity is the degree to which conclusions drawn about relationships in the data are reasonable. External validity concerns the process of generalizing, or the degree to which the conclusions in your study would hold for other persons in other places and at other times. Establishing reliability and validity to your study is one of the most critical elements of the research process. Once you have decided to embark upon the process of conducting a quantitative study, use the following steps to get started. First, review research studies that have been conducted on your topic to determine what methods were used. Consider the strengths and weaknesses of the various data collection and analysis methods. Next, review the literature on quantitative research methods. Every aspect of your research has a body of literature associated with it. Just as you would not confine yourself to your course textbooks for your review of research on your topic, you should not limit yourself to your course texts for your review of methodological literature. Read broadly and deeply from the scholarly literature to gain expertise in quantitative research. Additional self-paced tutorials have been developed on different methodologies and techniques associated with quantitative research. Make sure that you complete all of the self-paced tutorials and review them as often as needed. You will then be prepared to complete a literature review of the specific methodologies and techniques that you will use in your study. Thank you for watching.

When to Use the 4 Qualitative Data Collection Methods

Qualitative data collection methods are the different ways to gather descriptive, non-numerical data for your research. 

Popular examples of qualitative data collection methods include surveys, observations, interviews, and focus groups. 

But it’s not enough to know what these methods are. Even more important is knowing when to use them. 

In an article published in Neurological Research and Practice titled, “How to use and assess qualitative research methods,” authors Busetto, Wick, and Gambinger assert that qualitative research is all about “flexibility, openness and responsivity to context . ” 

Because of this, “the steps of data collection and analysis are not as separate and consecutive as they tend to be in quantitative research,” according to the authors. 

This makes sense to me, too. And it means you have to use intuition and a pinch of guidance to know when—and how often—to use a specific qualitative data collection method. 

In this post, you’ll learn when to use the most common methods: interviews, focus groups, observations, and open-ended surveys.

#1. Interviews

An interview is a qualitative data collection method where a researcher has a one-on-one conversation with a participant. 

The goal of an interview is to explore how the participant feels about a specific topic. You’re mining for their unique experiences, perceptions, and thoughts.

There’s usually an element of structure here, with the researcher asking specific questions. But there’s room for organic discussion, too. The interviewer might take notes or record the session—or both—to capture the qualitative data collected.  

Interviews are slower, in some ways, than other qualitative data collection methods. Since you can only talk to one person at a time, you might not get as much data as you would from a survey sent out to 100 people at once. 

But interviews are a great way to go deep into a subject and collect details you wouldn’t get from a static survey response. 

Interviews are ideal to use when: 

• You need to know the “why”: A one-on-one conversation can help participants open up about the reasons they feel the way they do about a certain topic.
• You’re dealing with a sensitive topic: With an interview, you can create a safe space for a person to share their feelings without fear of judgment from other people.
• You want to know someone’s personal, lived experience: In a group setting, no one likes the person who takes over and tells their life story rather than participate in a larger conversation. But if you want that life story—if it’s relevant to your research—an interview is ideal.

There are times when interviews aren’t such a great choice, though. 

Choose another qualitative data collection method when:  

• You need information from lots of people, and quickly. Interviews are slow. If you need less depth and more breadth, go with a survey or questionnaire. 
• You don’t have a lot of resources to spare. It takes a significant amount of time and money to plan and carry out interviews. Most of the time, people don’t jump at the opportunity to participate in your research unless there’s an incentive—usually cash or a gift card. It ends up adding up to quite a bit.

#2. Focus Groups

A focus group is a qualitative data collection method where a small group of people discuss a topic together. A moderator is there to help guide the conversation. The goal here is to get everyone talking about their unique perspectives—and their shared experiences on a topic.

There’s one giant difference between focus groups and interviews, according to the authors of a 2018 article, “The use of focus groups discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation,” published in the journal Methods in Ecology and Evolution . The article argues that in a one-on-one interview, the interviewer takes on the role of “investigator” and plays a central role in how the dynamics of the discussion play out. 

But in a focus group, the researcher “takes a peripheral, rather than a centre-stage role in a focus group discussion.”

AKA, researchers don’t have as much control over focus groups as they do interviews. 

And that can be a good thing. 

Focus groups are ideal to use when:  

• You’re in the early stages of research. If you haven’t been able to articulate the deeper questions you want to explore about a topic, a focus group can help you identify compelling areas to dig into. 
• You want to study a wide range of perspectives. A focus group can bring together a very diverse group of people if you want it to—and the conversation that results from this gathering of viewpoints can be incredibly insightful. 

So when should you steer clear of focus groups? 

Another research method might be better if: 

• You need raw, real honesty—from as many people as possible. Some participants might share valuable, sensitive information (like their honest opinions!) in a focus group. But many won’t feel comfortable doing so. The social dynamics in a group of people can greatly influence who shares what. If you want to build rapport with people and create a trusting environment, an interview might be a better choice. 

#3. Observation

Do you remember those strange, slightly special-feeling days in school when a random person, maybe the principal, would sit in on your class? Watching everyone, but especially your teacher? Jotting down mysterious notes from time to time? 

If you were anything like me, you behaved extra-good for a few minutes…and then promptly forgot about the person’s presence as you went about your normal school day.

That’s observation in a nutshell, and it’s a useful way to gather objective qualitative data. You don’t interfere or intrude when you’re observing. 

You just watch. 

Observation is a useful tool when: 

• You need to study natural behavior. Observation is ideal when you want to understand how people behave in a natural (aka non-conference-room) environment without interference. It allows you to see genuine interactions, routines, and practices as they happen. Think of observing kids on a playground or shoppers in a grocery store. 
• Participants may not be likely to accurately self-report behaviors. Sometimes participants might not be fully aware of their behaviors, or they might alter their responses to seem more “normal” or desirable to others. Observation allows you to capture what people do, rather than what they say they do. 

But observation isn’t always the best choice. 

Consider using another qualitative research method when: 

• The topic and/or behaviors studied are private or sensitive. Publicly observable behavior is one thing. Stuff that happens behind closed doors is another. If your research topic requires more of the latter and less of the former, go with interviews or surveys instead.
• You need to know the reasons behind specific behaviors. Observation gets you the what , but not the why . For detailed, in-depth insights, run an interview or open-ended survey.

#4. Open-Ended Surveys/Questionnaires

A survey is a series of questions sent out to a group of people in your target audience. 

In a qualitative survey, the questions are open-ended. This is different from quantitative questions, which are closed, yes-or-no queries. 

There’s a lot more room for spontaneity, opinion, and subjectivity with an open-ended survey question, which is why it’s considered a pillar of qualitative data collection. 

Of course, you can send out a survey that asks closed and open-ended questions. But our focus here is on the value of open-ended surveys.

Consider using an open-ended survey when:  

• You need detailed information from a diverse audience. The beauty of an open-ended questionnaire is you can send it to a lot of people. If you’re lucky, you’ll get plenty of details from each respondent. Not as much detail as you would in an interview, but still a super valuable amount.
• You’re just exploring a topic. If you’re in the early stages of research, an open-ended survey can help you discover angles you hadn’t considered before. You can move from a survey to a different data collection method, like interviews, to follow the threads you find intriguing.
• You want to give respondents anonymity. Surveys can easily be made anonymous in a way other methods, like focus groups, simply can’t. (And you can still collect important quantitative data from anonymous surveys, too, like age range, income level, and years of education completed.)

Useful though they are, open-ended surveys aren’t foolproof. 

Choose another method when:  

• You want to ask more than a few questions about a topic. It takes time and energy to compose an answer to an open-ended question. If you include more than three or four questions, you can expect the answers to get skimpier with each one. Or even completely absent by Question #4. 
• You want consistently high-quality answers. Researchers at Pew Research Center know a thing or two about surveys. According to authors Amina Dunn and Vianney Gómez in a piece for Decoded , Pew Research Center’s behind-the-scenes blog about research methods, “open-ended survey questions can be prone to high rates of nonresponse and wide variation in the quality of responses that are given.” If you need consistent, high-quality answers, consider hosting interviews instead. 

How to Decide Which Qualitative Data Collection Method to Use

Choosing the right qualitative data collection method can feel overwhelming. That’s why I’m breaking it down into a logical, step-by-step guide to help you choose the best method for your needs.

(Psst: you’ll probably end up using more than one of these methods throughout your qualitative research journey. That’s totally normal.)

Okay. Here goes. 

1. Start with your research goal

• If your goal is to understand deep, personal experiences or the reasons behind specific behaviors, then interviews are probably your best choice. There’s just no substitute for the data you’ll get during a one-on-one conversation with a research participant. And then another, and another. 
• If you’re not sure what your research goals are, begin by sending out a survey with general, open-ended questions asking for your respondents’ opinions about a topic. You can dig deeper from there.

2. Consider how sensitive your topic is

• If you’re dealing with a sensitive or private topic, where participants might not feel comfortable sharing in a group setting, interviews are ideal. They create a safe, confidential environment for open discussion between you and the respondent.
• If the topic is less sensitive and you want to see how social dynamics influence opinions, consider using focus groups instead.

3. Evaluate whether you need broad vs. deep data

• If you need broad data from a large number of people quickly, go with open-ended surveys or questionnaires . You don’t have to ask your respondents to write you an essay for each question. A few insightful lines will do just fine.
• If you need deep data, run interviews or focus groups. These allow for more in-depth responses and discussions you won’t get with a survey or observation.

4. Think about the context of your research

• If you want to study behavior in a natural setting without interference, observation is the way to go. More than any other, this method helps you capture genuine behaviors as they happen in real life. 
• But if you need to understand the reasons behind those behaviors, remember that observation only provides the what, not the why. In these cases, follow up with interviews or open-ended surveys for deeper insights.

5. Assess your resources If time and budget are limited, consider how many resources each qualitative data collection method will require. Open-ended surveys are less expensive—and faster to send out and analyze —than interviews or focus groups. The latter options require more time and effort from participants—and probably incentives, too.

Make your website better. Instantly.

Keep reading about user experience.

The 5 Best UI/UX Design Agencies Compared

UI/UX design agencies help bring brands to life and deliver optimized user experiences with well-researched and thoughtfully designed websites, apps, and products. All of the…

Qualitative data collection methods are the different ways to gather descriptive, non-numerical data for your research.  Popular examples of qualitative data collection methods include surveys,…

dscout Review–The Good and Bad

dscout is a great tool for doing qualitative user research, like live interviews or diary studies. But it isn’t the best choice for everyone.  If…

Out Of All Tips to Improve User Experience, 7 Are Legit

Figuring out the most effective ways to improve the user experience can be hard. There is tons of information out there, and it gets overwhelming…

Is Nominal Data Useful? Yes, In These Situations

Nominal data is descriptive information wherein rank and order don’t matter. Still confused? It helps to contrast nominal data with the other three main types…

What Is User Experience? Answers From 7 Top UX Designers

If you Google user experience the definition you’ll find is “the overall experience of a person using a product like a website or computer application,…

How to Do Each Qualitative Data Coding Type (All Steps)

Qualitative data coding is the process of organizing all the descriptive data you collect during a research project.  It has nothing to do with computer…

7 Qualitative Data Examples and Why They Work

Qualitative data presents information using descriptive language, images, and videos instead of numbers. To help make sense of this type of data—as opposed to quantitative…

The 5 Best Usability Testing Tools Compared

Usability testing helps designers, product managers, and other teams figure out how easily users can use a website, app, or product.  With these tools, user…

5 Qualitative Data Analysis Methods + When To Use Each

Qualitative data analysis is the work of organizing and interpreting descriptive data. Interview recordings, open-ended survey responses, and focus group observations all yield descriptive—qualitative—information. This…

The 5 Best UX Research Tools Compared

UX research tools help designers, product managers, and other teams understand users and how they interact with a company’s products and services. The tools provide…

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Data: 7 Key Differences

Qualitative data is information you can describe with words rather than numbers.  Quantitative data is information represented in a measurable way using numbers.  One type…

6 Real Ways AI Has Improved the User Experience

It seems like every other company is bragging about their AI-enhanced user experiences. Consumers and the UX professionals responsible for designing great user experiences are…

12 Key UX Metrics: What They Mean + How To Calculate Each

UX metrics help identify where users struggle when using an app or website and where they are successful. The data collected helps designers, developers, and…

5 Key Principles Of Good Website Usability

Ease of use is a common expectation for a site to be considered well designed. Over the past few years, we have been used to…

Over 300,000 websites use Crazy Egg to improve what's working, fix what isn't and test new ideas.

Last Updated on September 30, 2021

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Toward a sustainable surimi industry: comprehensive review and future research directions of demersal fish stock assessment techniques.

1. Introduction

• What are the knowledge coverage and research gaps concerning key sustainability-related concepts in the utilization of demersal fish in the surimi industry, as well as in the LB-SPR method for assessing biological length-based reproduction as a support method in the surimi industry, and how can these gaps be addressed in future research?
• What aspects of implementation can enhance the quality and scope of the LB-SPR method in assessing reproduction based on biological length, and how can these steps contribute to improving sustainability in the surimi industry?

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. study design, 2.2. data collection and materials, 2.3. literature selection and mapping methods, 2.4. analytical method, 2.5. study framework, 3. results and discussion, 3.1. study selection, credibility–validity assessment, and knowledge cluster mapping.

3.2. Sustainability-Related Information in Demersal Fish Stock Assessments for the Surimi Industry

3.3. methodology of length-based reproductive assessments (lb-sprs), 3.4. case studies on the application and benefits of the lb-spr, 3.5. multi-aspect implications of lb-spr: fisheries business, communities, and policies, 3.6. contribution to the field, gaps, and recommendations for future research, 4. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest.

• Sihono, S.; Purnomo, A.; Wibowo, S.; Dewi, F. Current 2021 Status of Surimi Industry in Indonesia and Possible Solutions: A Review. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021 , 919 , 012036. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, W.; Lyu, J.; Wu, D.; Cao, Y.; Ma, Q.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, X. Cutting Techniques in the Fish Industry: A Critical Review. Foods 2022 , 11 , 3206. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Rowan, N.J. The Role of Digital Technologies in Supporting and Improving Fishery and Aquaculture across the Supply Chain—Quo Vadis? Aquac. Fish. 2023 , 8 , 365–374. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dimarchopoulou, D.; Mous, P.J.; Firmana, E.; Wibisono, E.; Coro, G.; Humphries, A.T. Exploring the Status of the Indonesian Deep Demersal Fishery Using Length-Based Stock Assessments. Fish. Res. 2021 , 243 , 106089. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yin, T.; Park, J.W. Comprehensive Review: By-Products from Surimi Production and Better Utilization. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2023 , 32 , 1957–1980. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Huber, R.; D’Onofrio, C.; Devaraju, A.; Klump, J.; Loescher, H.W.; Kindermann, S.; Guru, S.; Grant, M.; Morris, B.; Wyborn, L.; et al. Integrating Data and Analysis Technologies within Leading Environmental Research Infrastructures: Challenges and Approaches. Ecol. Inform. 2021 , 61 , 101245. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science ; National Academies Press (US): Washington, DC, USA, 2019; pp. 1–257. [ Google Scholar ]
• Coscino, C.L.; Bellquist, L.; Harford, W.J.; Semmens, B.X. Influence of Life History Characteristics on Data-Limited Stock Status Assertions and Minimum Size Limit Evaluations Using Length-Based Spawning Potential Ratio (LB-SPR). Fish. Res. 2024 , 276 , 107036. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Prince, J.; Lalavanua, S.; Tamanitoakula, J.; Tamata, L.; Green, S.; Radway, S.; Loganimoce, E.; Vodivodi, T.; Marama, K.; Waqainabete, P.; et al. Spawning Potential Surveys in Fiji: A New Song of Change for Small-Scale Fisheries in the Pacific. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2020 , 3 , e273. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Eskandari, G.R.; Savari, A.; Koochaknejad, E.; Ghefleh, M.J. Spawner Stock Biomass per Recruit, Spawning Potential Ratio and Biological Reference Point of the Tiger Tooth Croaker (Otolithes Ruber), in the Northwestern Part of the Persian Gulf. J. Ichthyol. Res. 2013 , 1 , 1–14. [ Google Scholar ]
• Prince, J.; Victor, S.; Kloulchad, V.; Hordyk, A. Length Based SPR Assessment of Eleven Indo-Pacific Coral Reef Fish Populations in Palau. Fish. Res. 2015 , 171 , 42–58. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lindfield, S. Palau’s Reef Fisheries: Changes in Size and Spawning Potential from Past to Present ; Coral Reef Research Foundation: Koror, Palau, 2017; pp. 1–23. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yonvitner; Boer, M.; Kurnia, R. Length Based Data of Nemipterus Japonicus to Spawning Potential Ratio (SPR) Estimation on Small Scale Fisheries (SSF) Management in Sunda Strait. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021 , 674 , 012002. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yonvitner; Kurnia, R.; Boer, M. Length Based-Spawning Potential Ratio (LB-SPR), on Exploited Demersal Stock ( Priachantus tayenus ) in Small Scale Fisheries, Sunda Strait. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021 , 744 , 012103. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bekova, R.; Raikova-Petrova, G. Maturity, Sex Ratio and Spawning Time of Liza Aurata Risso, 1810 and Liza Saliens Risso, 1810 (Mugilidae) from the Bulgarian Black Sea Coast. J. BioSci. Biotechnol. 2017 , 6 , 17–21. [ Google Scholar ]
• Priatna, A.; Boer, M.; Kurnia, R.; Yonvitner. Length Based Spawning Potential Ratio of Indian Scad (Decapterus Russeli, Rupell, 1928) in the South China Sea. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021 , 744 , 012056. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ba, K.; Woods, P.J. Assessing the North-West African Stock of Black Hakes (Merluccius Polli and Merluccius Senegalensis) Using Catch-Msy and Length-Based Spawning Potential Ratio Models. In Proceedings of the GRÓ Fisheries Training Program Under the Auspices of UNESCO, Hafnarfjörður, Iceland, 1 January 2020; GRÓ-FTP: Reykjavík, Iceland, 2019; pp. 1–32. [ Google Scholar ]
• Prince, J.; Smith, A.; Raffe, M.; Seeto, S.; Higgs, J. Spawning Potential Surveys in Solomon Islands’ Western Province. SPC Fish. Newsl. 2020 , 162 , 58–68. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yonvitner; Kurnia, R.; Boer, M. Life History and Length Based-Spawning Potential Ratio (LB-SPR) of Exploited Demersal Fish Stock (Upeneus Sp) in Sunda Strait. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021 , 718 , 012074. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yokie, A.A. An Assessment of the Sardinella Maderensis Stock of Liberia Coastal Waters Using the Length Based Spawning Potential Ratio (LBSPR). In Proceedings of the GRÓ Fisheries Training Program Under the Auspices of UNESCO, Hafnarfjörður, Iceland, 1 January 2020; GRÓ-FTP: Reykjavík, Iceland, 2019; pp. 1–22. [ Google Scholar ]
• Miles, D. A Taxonomy of Research Gaps: Identifying and Defining the Seven Research Gaps. In Proceedings of the Doctoral Workshop: Finding Research Gaps-Research Methods and Strategies, Dallas, TX, USA, 16 August 2017; Volume 1, pp. 1–15. [ Google Scholar ]
• Goodyear, C. Spawning Stock Biomass per Recruit in Fisheries Management: Foundation and Current Use. In Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences ; No. 120; National Research Council of Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1993; pp. 67–82. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gabriel, W.L.; Sissenwine, M.P.; Overholtz, W.J. Analysis of Spawning Stock Biomass per Recruit: An Example for Georges Bank Haddock. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 1989 , 9 , 383–391. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ault, J.S.; Smith, S.G.; Luo, J.; Monaco, M.E.; Appeldoorn, R.S. Length-Based Assessment of Sustainability Benchmarks for Coral Reef Fishes in Puerto Rico. Environ. Conserv. 2008 , 35 , 221–231. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Arocha, F.; Bárrios, A. Sex Ratios, Spawning Seasonality, Sexual Maturity, and Fecundity of White Marlin (Tetrapturus Albidus) from the Western Central Atlantic. Fish. Res. 2009 , 95 , 98–111. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kibona, O.M.; Jonasson, J.P. Application of Length-Based Spawning Potential Ratio Method and Analysis of the Structure of the Electronic Catch Assessment Survey in Marine Waters of Mainland, Tanzania. In Proceedings of the GRÓ Fisheries Training Program under the Auspices of UNESCO, Hafnarfjörður, Iceland, 1 January 2020; GRÓ-FTP: Reykjavík, Iceland, 2019; pp. 1–40. [ Google Scholar ]
• Prayitno, M.; Setiawan, H.; Jatmiko, I.; Arif Rahman, M.; Wiadnya, D. Spawning Potential Ratio (SPR) of Sulphur Goatfish ( Upeneus sulphureus ): Biological Basis for Demersal Fishery Management in Java Sea. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020 , 441 , 012141. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Brooks, E.N.; Powers, J.E.; Cortés, E. Analytical Reference Points for Age-Structured Models: Application to Data-Poor Fisheries. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2010 , 67 , 165–175. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nugroho, D.; Patria, M.P.; Supriatna, J.; Adrianto, L. The Estimates Spawning Potential Ratio of Three Dominant Demersal Fish Species Landed in Tegal, North Coast of Central Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas J. Biol. Divers. 2017 , 18 , 844–849. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leadbitter, D.; Guenneugues, P.; Park, J. Tropical Surimi Performance Improvement—Certifications and Ratings ; Tropical Surimi Performance Improvement—Certifications and Ratings; Certification and Ratings Collaboration: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2020; p. 201. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cooper, K.; White, R.E. An Introduction to Critical Approaches. In Qualitative Research in the Post-Modern Era: Critical Approaches and Selected Methodologies ; Springer: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 29–58. [ Google Scholar ]
• Creswell, J.W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 3rd ed.; SAGE Publications Ltd.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009; Volume 3, pp. 1–270. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee, S.; Smith, C.A.M. Criteria for Quantitative and Qualitative Data Integration: Mixed-Methods Research Methodology. CIN Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2012 , 30 , 251–256. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Harzing, A.-W. The Publish or Perish Book: Your Guide to Effective and Responsible Citation Analysis ; Tarma Software Research: Melbourne, Australia, 2010; Volume 1, pp. 1–255. [ Google Scholar ]
• Scopus. How Do I Work with Document Search Results? Available online: https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/11423/supporthub/scopus/ (accessed on 7 December 2023).
• Cooke, A.; Smith, D.; Booth, A. Beyond PICO: The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. Qual. Health Res. 2012 , 22 , 1435–1443. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Frandsen, T.F.; Bruun Nielsen, M.F.; Lindhardt, C.L.; Eriksen, M.B. Using the Full PICO Model as a Search Tool for Systematic Reviews Resulted in Lower Recall for Some PICO Elements. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2020 , 127 , 69–75. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Moher, D.; Shamseer, L.; Clarke, M.; Ghersi, D.; Liberati, A.; Petticrew, M.; Shekelle, P.; Stewart, L.A.; PRISMA-P Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement. Syst. Rev. 2015 , 4 , 1–9. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Page, M.J.; Moher, D.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. PRISMA 2020 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated Guidance and Exemplars for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021 , 372 , n160. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Waltman, L.; van Eck, N.J.; Noyons, E.C.M. A Unified Approach to Mapping and Clustering of Bibliometric Networks. J. Informetr. 2010 , 4 , 629–635. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme CASP (Qualitative Studies Checklist). Available online: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists (accessed on 13 October 2023).
• Peterson, B.L. Thematic Analysis/Interpretive Thematic Analysis. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods ; Matthes, J., Davis, C.S., Potter, R.F., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 1–9. [ Google Scholar ]
• Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Conceptual and Design Thinking for Thematic Analysis. Qual. Psychol. 2022 , 9 , 3–26. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fishery Product Quarantine Agency. (Indonesia Marine and Fishery Ministry, Central Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia). Personal Communication. 2024. [ Google Scholar ]
• Marine and Fishery Ministry. (Government of Indonesia, Central Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia). Unpublished Data. 2024. [ Google Scholar ]
• Trade Ministry. (Government of Indonesia, Central Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia). Unpublished Data. 2024. [ Google Scholar ]
• United Nations Commodity Trade ; Personal Communication; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2012.
• Cooper, K.; White, R.E. (Eds.) Qualitative Research in the Post-Modern Era: Contexts of Qualitative Research ; Springer: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2012; p. 159. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tomaszewski, L.E.; Zarestky, J.; Gonzalez, E. Planning Qualitative Research: Design and Decision Making for New Researchers. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2020 , 19 , 1609406920967174. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Makri, C.; Neely, A. Grounded Theory: A Guide for Exploratory Studies in Management Research. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2021 , 20 , 16094069211013654. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jackson, H.W.; Tiller, R.E. Preliminary Observations on Spawning Potential in the Striped Bass (Roccus Saxatilis Walbaum) ; Chesapeake Biological Laboratory: Solomons Island, MD, USA, 1952; pp. 1–16. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zamroni, A.; Ernawati, T. Population Dynamic and Spawning Potential Ratio of Short Mackerel (Rastrelliger Brachysoma Bleeker, 1851) in the Northern Coast of Java. Indones. Fish. Res. J. 2019 , 25 , 1. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jaya, M.M.; Wiryawan, B.; Simbolon, D. The Analysis of Tuna Resource Utilization Level with Spawning Potential Ratio Method in Sendangbiru Waters. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Teknologi Kelautan Tropis. 2017 , 9 , 597–604. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Collins, L.A.; Johnson, A.G.; Koenig, C.C.; Baker, M.S., Jr. Reproductive Patterns, Sex Ratio, and Fecundity in Gag, Mycteroperca Microlepis (Serranidae), a Protogynous Grouper from the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Fish. Bull. 1998 , 96 , 415–427. [ Google Scholar ]
• White, D.B.; Palmer, S.M. Age, Growth, and Reproduction of the Red Snapper, Lutjanus Campechanus, from the Atlantic Waters of the Southeastern US. Bull. Mar. Sci. 2004 , 75 , 335–360. [ Google Scholar ]
• Manickchand-Heileman, S.; Ehrhardt, N. Spawning Frequency, Fecundity and Spawning Potential of the Whitemouth Croaker Micropogonias Furnieri in Trinidad, West Indies. Bull. Mar. Sci. 1996 , 58 , 156–164. [ Google Scholar ]
• Beets, J.; Friedlander, A. Evaluation of a Conservation Strategy: A Spawning Aggregation Closure for Red Hind, Epinephelus Guttatus, in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Environ. Biol. Fishes 1999 , 55 , 91–98. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fisch, N.; Camp, E.V. Spawning Potential Ratio: A Key Metric Considered in Managing Florida’s Fisheries: FA241, 5/2022. EDIS 2022 , 3 , 1–4. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mace, P.M.; Sissenwine, M.P. How Much Spawning per Recruit Is Enough? In Risk Evaluation and Biological Reference Points for Fisheries Management ; Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences; Smith, S.J., Hunt, J.J., Rivard, D., Eds.; National Research Council and Department of Fisheries and Oceans: Ottawa, Canada, 1993; pp. 101–118. [ Google Scholar ]
• Taylor, R.G.; Whittington, J.A.; Grier, H.J.; Crabtree, R.E. Age, Growth, Maturation, and Protandric Sex Reversal in Common Snook, Centropomus Undecimalis, from the East and West Coasts of South Florida. Fish. Bull. 2000 , 98 , 612–624. [ Google Scholar ]
• Coleman, F.C.; Koenig, C.C.; Eklund, A.-M.; Grimes, C.B. Management and Conservation of Temperate Reef Fishes in the Grouper-Snapper Complex. In Life in the Slow Lane: Ecology and Conservation of Long-Lived Marine Animals ; American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, MD, USA, 1999; Volume 23, pp. 233–242. [ Google Scholar ]
• Farley, J.H.; Williams, A.J.; Hoyle, S.D.; Davies, C.R.; Nicol, S.J. Reproductive Dynamics and Potential Annual Fecundity of South Pacific Albacore Tuna ( Thunnus alalunga ). PLoS ONE 2013 , 8 , e60577. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhou, S.; Punt, A.E.; Lei, Y.; Deng, R.A.; Hoyle, S.D. Identifying Spawner Biomass Per-recruit Reference Points from Life-history Parameters. Fish Fish. 2020 , 21 , 760–773. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ernawati, T.; Agustina, S.; Kembaren, D.; Yulianto, I.; Satria, F. Life History Parameters and Spawning Potential Ratio of Some Reef Fish Species in Fisheries Management Area 715 of Indonesia. AACL Bioflux 2021 , 14 , 3092–3103. [ Google Scholar ]
• Vahabnezhad, A.; Hashemi, S.A.R.; Taghavimotlagh, S.; Daryanabard, R. Length Based Spawning Potential Ratio (LB-SPR) of Javelin Grunter, Pomadasys Kaakan (Cuvier, 1830) in the Persian Gulf and Oman Sea. Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 2021 , 20 , 1560–1572. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ernawati, T.; Budiarti, T. Life History and Length Base Spawning Potential Ratio (LB-SPR) of Malabar Snapper Lutjanus Malabaricus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) in Western of South Sulawesi, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019 , 404 , 012023. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zedta, R.R.; Madduppa, H. Exploitation Level of Yellowfin Tuna ( Thunnus albacares ) Resources in Indian Ocean Using Spawning Potential Ratio Analysis Approach. J. Penelit. Perikan. Indones. 2021 , 27 , 33–41. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sigler, M.F.; Lunsford, C.R. Effects of Individual Quotas on Catching Efficiency and Spawning Potential in the Alaska Sablefish Fishery. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2001 , 58 , 1300–1312. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Prince, J. Informing Community-Based Fisheries Management with Spawning Potential Surveys. Pac. Community Newsl. 2017 , 154 , 43–52. [ Google Scholar ]
• Silberschneider, V.; Gray, C.A.; Stewart, J. Age, Growth, Maturity and the Overfishing of the Iconic Sciaenid, Argyrosomus Japonicus, in South-Eastern, Australia. Fish. Res. 2009 , 95 , 220–229. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hordyk, A. The Development and Application of a Length-Based Method to Estimate the Spawning Potential Ratio in Data-Poor Fish Stocks. Ph.D. Dissertation, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• Goodyear, C. Spawning Stock Biomass per Recruit: The Biological Basis for a Fisheries Management Tool. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 1990 , 32 , 487–497. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yonvitner, Y.; Boer, M.; Kurnia, R. Spawning Potential Ratio (SPR) Approach as a Management Measure of Skipjack Sustainability Record from Cilacap Fishing Port, Central Java, Indonesia. J. Ilm. Perikan. Dan Kelaut. 2021 , 13 , 199–207. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Brooks, E.N.; Shertzer, K.W.; Gedamke, T.; Vaughan, D.S. Stock Assessment of Protogynous Fish: Evaluating Measures of Spawning Biomass Used to Estimate Biological Reference Points. Fish. Bull. 2008 , 106 , 12–23. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hordyk, A.; Ono, K.; Valencia, S.; Loneragan, N.; Prince, J. A Novel Length-Based Empirical Estimation Method of Spawning Potential Ratio (SPR), and Tests of Its Performance, for Small-Scale, Data-Poor Fisheries. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2015 , 72 , 217–231. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Satria, F.; Sadiyah, L. Possible Use of Length-Based Spawning Potential Ratio for Skipjack (Katsuwonus Pelamis) in Indonesia’s Archipelagic Waters. Indones. Fish. Res. J. 2017 , 23 , 45–53. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• IISD Indonesia Should Assess Fisheries Support to Minimize Overfishing Risk. Global Studies Initiatives. July 2021. Available online: https://www.iisd.org/gsi/news-events/government-support-marine-fisheries-indonesia-should-be-assessed-minimize-risk (accessed on 1 June 2024).
• Hordyk, A.; Ono, K.; Sainsbury, K.; Loneragan, N.; Prince, J. Some Explorations of the Life History Ratios to Describe Length Composition, Spawning-per-Recruit, and the Spawning Potential Ratio. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2015 , 72 , 204–216. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nadon, M.O.; Ault, J.S.; Williams, I.D.; Smith, S.G.; DiNardo, G.T. Length-Based Assessment of Coral Reef Fish Populations in the Main and Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. PLoS ONE 2015 , 10 , 0133960. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Nurdin, M.S.; Putri, A.P.; Satari, D.Y.; Valentine, R.Y.; Azmi, F.; Haser, T.F. Spawning and Reproductive Potential of Blue Swimming Crab (Portunus Pelagicus) at Spermonde Archipelago, Indonesia. J. Biodjati 2022 , 7 , 199–211. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Munyandorero, J. Embracing Uncertainty, Continual Spawning, Estimation of the Stock–Recruit Steepness, and Size-Limit Designs with Length–Based per-Recruit Analyses for African Tropical Fisheries. Fish. Res. 2018 , 199 , 137–157. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Williams, E.H.; Shertzer, K.W. Implications of Life-History Invariants for Biological Reference Points Used in Fishery Management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2003 , 60 , 710–720. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Maccall, A.D. Population Estimates for the Waning Years of the Pacific Sardine Fishery. CalCOFI Rep. 1979 , 20 , 72–82. [ Google Scholar ]
• Alejo-Plata, C.; Díaz-Jaimes, P.; Salgado-Ugarte, I.H. Sex Ratios, Size at Sexual Maturity, and Spawning Seasonality of Dolphinfish ( Coryphaena hippurus ) Captured in the Gulf of Tehuantepec, Mexico. Fish. Res. 2011 , 110 , 207–216. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stock, B.C.; Heppell, S.A.; Waterhouse, L.; Dove, I.C.; Pattengill-Semmens, C.V.; McCoy, C.M.; Bush, P.G.; Ebanks-Petrie, G.; Semmens, B.X. Pulse Recruitment and Recovery of Cayman Islands Nassau Grouper ( Epinephelus striatus ) Spawning Aggregations Revealed by in Situ Length-Frequency Data. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2021 , 78 , 277–292. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hoyle, S. Adjusted Biological Parameters and Spawning Biomass Calculations for Albacore Tuna in the South Pacific, and Their Implications for Stock Assessments. In Proceedings of the Scientific Committee Fourth Regular Session, WCPFC-SC4 ME-WP-02. Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea, 11–22 August 2008; pp. 11–22. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hilborn, R.; Walters, C.J. Role of Stock Assessment in Fisheries Management. In Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment: Choice, Dynamics and Uncertainty ; Hilborn, R., Walters, C.J., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1992; pp. 3–21. [ Google Scholar ]
• Venugopal, V.; Shahidi, F.; Lee, T. Value-added Products from Underutilized Fish Species. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1995 , 35 , 431–453. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Oktavia, S.; Setiawan, U.; Nurpadiana, H. Morphological Character Analysis of Mackerel (Scomberomorus Commerson Lac., 1800) in Sunda Strait. Biosf. J. Tadris Biol. 2020 , 11 , 1–10. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Daliri, M.; Kamrani, E.; Salarpouri, A.; Ben-Hasan, A. The Geographical Expansion of Fisheries Conceals the Decline in the Mean Trophic Level of Iran’s Catch. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2021 , 199 , 105411. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Buchanan, J.R.; Ralph, G.M.; Krupp, F.; Harwell, H.; Abdallah, M.; Abdulqader, E.; Al-Husaini, M.; Bishop, J.M.; Burt, J.A.; Choat, J.H. Regional Extinction Risks for Marine Bony Fishes Occurring in the Persian/Arabian Gulf. Biol. Conserv. 2019 , 230 , 10–19. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Valinassab, T.; Adjeer, M.; Sedghi, N.; Kamali, E. Monitoring of demersal resources by Swept Area Method within the Persian Gulf and Oman Sea. J. Anim. Environ. 2010 , 2 , 45–56. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lisamy, S.E.; Simanjuntak, C.P.; Ervinia, A.; Romdoni, T.A.; Munandar, A.; Nurfaiqah, S.; Guarte, D.M. Reproductive Aspects of the Japanese Threadfin Bream, Nemipterus Japonicus (Bloch, 1791) in the Southern Java Waters (FMA-RI 573). In Proceedings of the E3S Web of Conferences, Bali, Indonesia, 8–9 November 2023; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2023; Volume 442, p. 01025. [ Google Scholar ]
• Prince, J.; Creech, S.; Madduppa, H.; Hordyk, A. Length Based Assessment of Spawning Potential Ratio in Data-Poor Fisheries for Blue Swimming Crab ( Portunus Spp.) in Sri Lanka and Indonesia: Implications for Sustainable Management. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2020 , 36 , 101309. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aulia, I.; Rahmawati, A.; Syauqi, M.; Wahyuningsih, M.; Raimahua, S.; Akmalia, W.; Khalifa, M. Age Structure, Growth, and Mortality of Blue Swimming Crab ( Portunus pelagicus Linnaeus, 1758) in Banten Bay Waters. J. Biodjati 2023 , 8 , 69–80. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hommik, K.; Fitzgerald, C.J.; Kelly, F.; Shephard, S. Dome-Shaped Selectivity in LB-SPR: Length-Based Assessment of Data-Limited Inland Fish Stocks Sampled with Gillnets. Fish. Res. 2020 , 229 , 105574. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sumaila, U.R.; Tai, T.C. End Overfishing and Increase the Resilience of the Ocean to Climate Change. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020 , 7 , 523. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dadzie, S. Vitellogenesis, Oocyte Maturation Pattern, Spawning Rhythm and Spawning Frequency in Otolithes Ruber (Schneider, 1801) (Sciaenidae) in the Kuwaiti Waters of the Arabian Gulf. Sci. Mar. 2007 , 71 , 239–248. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jueseah, A.S. A Critical Review of the Liberian Fisheries Sector: A Technical Report. Ph.D Dissertation, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wuor, M.; Mabon, L. Development of Liberia’s Fisheries Sectors: Current Status and Future Needs. Mar. Policy 2022 , 146 , 105325. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sossoukpe, E.; Hoto, G.; Djidohokpin, G.; Fiogbe, E.D. Fishing of the Flat Sardinella (Sardinella Maderensis, Pisces, Lowe 1838) in Benin (West Africa) Nearshore Waters: Production, Typology of Fishing Gear and Current Status of Its Stock. Agric. Sci. 2022 , 13 , 1136–1150. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Porch, C.E.; Eklund, A.-M.; Scott, G.P. A Catch-Free Stock Assessment Model with Application to Goliath Grouper (Epinephelus itajara) off Southern Florida ; Southeast Fisheries Science Center: Miami, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 89–101. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pieniak, Z.; Vanhonacker, F.; Verbeke, W. Consumer Knowledge and Use of Information about Fish and Aquaculture. Food Policy 2013 , 40 , 25–30. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Adkisson, R. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness. Soc. Sci. J. 2008 , 45 , 700–701. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sun, C.-L.; Ehrhardt, N.M.; Porch, C.E.; Yeh, S.-Z. Analyses of Yield and Spawning Stock Biomass per Recruit for the South Atlantic Albacore ( Thunnus alalunga ). Fish. Res. 2002 , 56 , 193–204. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Froehlich, H.E.; Gentry, R.R.; Halpern, B.S. Global Change in Marine Aquaculture Production Potential under Climate Change. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2018 , 2 , 1745–1750. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Priyadarshini, B.; Xavier, M.; Nayak, B.B.; Apang, T.; Balange, A.K. Quality Characteristics of Tilapia Surimi: Effect of Single Washing Cycle and Different Washing Media. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2018 , 27 , 643–655. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Henriksson, P.J.G.; Banks, L.K.; Suri, S.K.; Pratiwi, T.Y.; Fatan, N.A.; Troell, M. Indonesian Aquaculture Futures-Identifying Interventions for Reducing Environmental Impacts. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019 , 14 , 124062. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gentry, R.R.; Froehlich, H.E.; Grimm, D.; Kareiva, P.; Parke, M.; Rust, M.; Gaines, S.D.; Halpern, B.S. Mapping the Global Potential for Marine Aquaculture. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017 , 1 , 1317–1324. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tal, Y.; Schreier, H.J.; Sowers, K.R.; Stubblefield, J.D.; Place, A.R.; Zohar, Y. Environmentally Sustainable Land-Based Marine Aquaculture. Aquaculture 2009 , 286 , 28–35. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Newman, S.G. Shrimp Farming Yesterday to Tomorrow. In Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences , 3rd ed.; Dikeman, M., Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2024; pp. 12–28. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gaspar, M.B.; Carvalho, S.; Cúrdia, J.; dos Santos, M.N.; Vasconcelos, P. Restoring Coastal Ecosystems from Fisheries and Aquaculture Impacts. In Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science , 2nd ed.; Baird, D., Elliott, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2024; pp. 737–764. [ Google Scholar ]
• Johnson, T.R.; Beard, K.; Brady, D.C.; Byron, C.J.; Cleaver, C.; Duffy, K.; Keeney, N.; Kimble, M.; Miller, M.; Moeykens, S.; et al. A Social-Ecological System Framework for Marine Aquaculture Research. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 2522. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gentry, R.R.; Alleway, H.K.; Bishop, M.J.; Gillies, C.L.; Waters, T.; Jones, R. Exploring the Potential for Marine Aquaculture to Contribute to Ecosystem Services. Rev. Aquac. 2020 , 12 , 499–512. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bradley, D.; Merrifield, M.; Miller, K.M.; Lomonico, S.; Wilson, J.R.; Gleason, M.G. Opportunities to Improve Fisheries Management through Innovative Technology and Advanced Data Systems. Fish Fish. 2019 , 20 , 564–583. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Blasiak, R.; Anderson, J.L.; Bridgewater, P.; Furuya, K.; Halpern, B.S.; Kurokura, H.; Morishita, J.; Yagi, N.; Minohara, A. Paradigms of Sustainable Ocean Management. Mar. Policy 2014 , 48 , 206–211. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sun, C.-L.; Wang, S.-P.; Porch, C.E.; Yeh, S.-Z. Sex-Specific Yield per Recruit and Spawning Stock Biomass per Recruit for the Swordfish, Xiphias Gladius, in the Waters around Taiwan. Fish. Res. 2005 , 71 , 61–69. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• DeMartini, E.E.; Everson, A.R.; Nichols, R.S. Estimates of Body Sizes at Maturation and at Sex Change, and the Spawning Seasonality and Sex Ratio of the Endemic Hawaiian Grouper ( Hyporthodus quernus , F. Epinephelidae). Fish Bull. 2010 , 109 , 123–134. [ Google Scholar ]
• Arocha, F. Management Implications in Using Spawning Stock Biomass as a Proxy for Total Egg Production in a Highly Fecund Species: The Swordfish Case. In Proceedings of the 51st Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute Proceedings, November 1998 ; Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute: Marathon, FL, USA, 2000; pp. 629–645. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tully, O.; Roantree, V.; Robinson, M. Maturity, Fecundity and Reproductive Potential of the European Lobster ( Homarus gammarus ) in Ireland. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. United Kingd. 2001 , 81 , 61–68. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Luers, M.A.; DeMartini, E.E.; Humphreys, R.L. Seasonality, Sex Ratio, Spawning Frequency and Sexual Maturity of the Opakapaka Pristipomoides Filamentosus (Perciformes: Lutjanidae) from the Main Hawaiian Islands: Fundamental Input to Size-at-Retention Regulations. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2017 , 69 , 325–335. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Park, J.W.; Graves, D.; Draves, R.; Yongsawatdigul, J. Manufacture of Surimi. In Surimi and Surimi Seafood , 3rd ed.; CPC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013; pp. 55–96. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pangsorn, S.; Laong-manee, P.; Siriraksophon, S. Status of Surimi Industry in the Southeast Asia ; Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center: Laem Fa Pha, Thailand, 2007; p. 29. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sonu, S.C. Surimi ; NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS; National Marine Fisheries Service: Sacramento, CA, USA, 1986; p. 135. [ Google Scholar ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Nugroho, K.C.; Zulbainarni, N.; Asikin, Z.; Budijanto, S.; Marimin, M. Toward a Sustainable Surimi Industry: Comprehensive Review and Future Research Directions of Demersal Fish Stock Assessment Techniques. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 7759. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177759

Nugroho KC, Zulbainarni N, Asikin Z, Budijanto S, Marimin M. Toward a Sustainable Surimi Industry: Comprehensive Review and Future Research Directions of Demersal Fish Stock Assessment Techniques. Sustainability . 2024; 16(17):7759. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177759

Nugroho, Kuncoro Catur, Nimmi Zulbainarni, Zenal Asikin, Slamet Budijanto, and Marimin Marimin. 2024. "Toward a Sustainable Surimi Industry: Comprehensive Review and Future Research Directions of Demersal Fish Stock Assessment Techniques" Sustainability 16, no. 17: 7759. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177759

Article Metrics

Further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals