Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

How to test for lead and nitrates in water

My son is doing a science fair project and I need to know what chemicals I can use to test water contaminates. What chemicals can test for lead and nitrates/nitrite?

Melanie Shebel's user avatar

  • 1 $\begingroup$ Welcome to SE.Chemistry! Have you done any online searching for your answer? You may find your answer pretty quickly that way. Also, if you can include ideas that you have found yourself, that shows a degree of effort on your part. This will make it more likely that people here will invest there time and efforts to help you further. $\endgroup$ –  airhuff Commented Jan 29, 2017 at 21:15
  • 2 $\begingroup$ Searching a prominent online store for "lead test kits" I found products for a little as $12 US that test drinking water for lead, nitrites/nitrates and more. This would be a semi-quantitative solution. Your question doesn't state what your specific goals and requirements are; is something like this what you are looking for? $\endgroup$ –  airhuff Commented Jan 29, 2017 at 22:44

3 Answers 3

Since this is a science fair experiment, you will need only common chemicals to test the contaminants in water.

You can use hydrogen sulfide, $\ce{H2S}$ to test lead. (Warning: it has rotten egg smell.) It is a common reagent and can be found in laboratory. You can also use sodium sulfide instead but it too has rotten egg smell.

$$\ce{Pb^2+ + H2S -> PbS + 2H+}$$

Due to the insolubility of lead sulfide in water ($\ce{4.9 \times 10^{-11}g l^{-1}}$), hydrogen sulfide test is such a sensitive test for the detection of lead and also can be detected in filtrate from separation of sparingly soluble lead chloride and other salts and hydrochloric acid.

You can perform the brown ring test because this test is very sensitive to nitrates in solution. You need conc. sulfuric acid and ferrous sulfate. A brown ring is formed at the junction of two layers probably due to formation of $\ce{[Fe(NO)^2+]}$.

$$\ce{2NO3- + 4H2SO4 + 6Fe^2+ -> 6Fe^3+ + 2NO^ + 4SO4^2- + 4H2O}$$ $$\ce{Fe^2+ + NO^ -> [Fe(NO)^2+]}$$

Sensitivity: $\ce{2.5 \mu g}$ ; Concentration limit: 1 in 25000

Similar to brown ring test but uses dilute sulfuric acid.

Extra info.

The regulatory standard method for testing for lead in water uses an A tomic Absorption (AA) spectrophotometer or XRF machines (cost $30,000)( source )

For testing nitrate/nitrite in water, see here .

Other very specific and expensive test used to detect contaminants are Gallocyanin test and diphenylthiocarbazone test for lead, diphenylamine test and nitron test for nitrate and sulfanilic test and indole test for nitrite but I won't elaborate them since it is a science project. :)

Community's user avatar

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much! How much of each chemical do I need to be able to test? $\endgroup$ –  Diego Zamora Commented Jan 31, 2017 at 5:34
  • $\begingroup$ The complex is $\ce{[Fe(H2O)5(NO)]^2+}$ $\endgroup$ –  Sid Commented Dec 14, 2023 at 9:46

If you're looking for characteristic reations, two come to mind (unfortunately I do not know what chemicals you have access to).

Nitrates can be tested for with the "brown ring test", sulfuric acid and iron(II) sulfate (see here ).

For lead you can test with the "golden rain" reaction using any iodine salt that is soluble in water (see here , they're using lead(II) nitrate in this example).

Depending on what else is in your water solution, you might need to divide it into several solutions of ions from the 3 distinct analytical groups that are generally discussed in literature. You can do this using distinct group reagents for each of the groups. If that's what you're looking for, I suggest reading up on it on the internet, it's a big topic but there's plenty of resources covering it quite well.

SirJ0hnson's user avatar

  • 1 $\begingroup$ Drinking water contaminates are in the parts per million range. I highly doubt that either of these tests has enough sensitivity. $\endgroup$ –  MaxW Commented Jan 29, 2017 at 23:46

If your son has to perform this experiment in the science fair, I'm sorry to disappoint you but it will not be possible (only if his school has adequate instrumentation such as an Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer or a Mass Chromatograph. Contamination of water by lead is in the order of parts per billion (1 part of lead per 1 billion parts of water), and although it is sometimes enough to cause health problems, it is indeed a very low amount of lead to be detected by simple experiments such as the reaction with potassium iodide. And I wouldn't recommend leaving a teenager with a big amount of lead in hands because of its extreme toxicity.

To test for nitrates, the brown ring experiment cited by Diego Zamora can possibly provide a visual result in water, since the nitrate concentration in it is not that small. However, test it before with your son so he don't get frustrated if the experiment goes wrong during the fair. Concentrated sulphuric acid can be found as car battery liquid in some specialized stores (is not very difficult to find). Ferrous sulphate can be found in pool products stores. Handle it with extreme care since sulphuric acid is corrosive and a powerful dehydrating compound that can cause severe burns if in contact with skin.

Raul Luciano's user avatar

Your Answer

Reminder: Answers generated by artificial intelligence tools are not allowed on Chemistry Stack Exchange. Learn more

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest.

Required, but never shown

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy .

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged water or ask your own question .

  • Featured on Meta
  • Preventing unauthorized automated access to the network
  • User activation: Learnings and opportunities
  • Join Stack Overflow’s CEO and me for the first Stack IRL Community Event in...

Hot Network Questions

  • Do all languages distinguish between persons and non-persons?
  • Does AI use lots of water?
  • Where did the baseball term "lace" come from?
  • What will the pressure of accelerated air be relative to the pressure that accelerated it?
  • What effect will a planet’s narcotic atmosphere have on sound of music at rave parties?
  • How to implement a "scanner" effect on Linux to fix documents with varying darkness of background?
  • dd backup fails with "File too large" error despite ample free space on FAT32 partition
  • Possible distinction between operator-valued scalar & vectors functions in QM
  • How to solve this partial differential equation for y?
  • Uppercase, lowercase – "in any case"?
  • Is a TARDIS a deprecated piece of Time Lord equipment?
  • Prove that the equation of a circle is unique
  • How do gravitational waves cause photons to be polarized?
  • Can Inductors be thought of as storing voltage?
  • The King takes a stroll
  • Paired or unpaired t test in two samples of horses and their wound size
  • What is this contraption off the wing of a US Navy DHC-6?
  • Would all disagreements vanish if everyone had access to the same information and followed the same reasoning process?
  • Why aren't some "conditions" officially a condition? (Burning, Bloodied)
  • What to consider as reviewer before dooming a paper
  • What is the difference between k-averaged transmission and gamma point transmission?
  • Does Newton's third law violate the law of energy conservation?
  • Why does lottery write "in trust" on winner's cheque?
  • "immer noch" meaning "still"

nitrate in water experiment

NOTIFICATIONS

Testing water for nitrate.

  • + Create new collection

In this activity, students test nitrate levels in various samples of water and draw possible informed conclusions about the results.

By the end of this activity, students should be able to:

  • explain why excessive nitrate can be harmful
  • demonstrate how to test water for nitrate
  • make an informed decision about safe nitrate levels in drinking water.

Download the Word file for:

  • introduction/background notes
  • what you need
  • discussion questions
  • student handout.

Useful links

Taumata Arowai, New Zealand's water regulator, has a lot of resources and guides about drinking water standards. Specific information for the public is found here .

See our newsletters here .

Would you like to take a short survey?

This survey will open in a new tab and you can fill it out after your visit to the site.

LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Create a new account.

Can't sign in? Forgot your password?

Enter your email address below and we will send you the reset instructions

If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password.

Change Password

Your password must have 8 characters or more and contain 3 of the following:.

  • a lower case character, 
  • an upper case character, 
  • a special character 

Password Changed Successfully

Your password has been changed

Standard Methods

For the examination of water and wastewater, 4500-no 3 − nitrogen (nitrate).

  • Previous Versions

1. Selection of Method

Nitrate (NO 3 − ) determination can be difficult because of the high probability that interfering constituents are present in various matrices. This section includes numerous methods that can be used to detect NO 3 − . Consider the advantages and limitations of each method when selecting a test strategy by reviewing the sample matrix, concentration range, and data needs for a particular application.

The ultraviolet (UV) light technique (4500-NO 3 − B), which measures NO 3 − absorbance at 220 nm, is suitable for screening uncontaminated water (low in organic matter).

• 0.2 to 11 mg nitrate-nitrogen (NO 3 -N)/L; Ultraviolet Spectrophotometric Method (4500-NO 3 − B)

• 0.5 to 2.5 mg NO 3 -N/L; Second Derivative Ultraviolet Screening Method (4500-NO 3 − C)

• 1 to 50 mg NO 3 -N/L; Nitrate Electrode Method (4500-NO 3 − D)

• 0.05 to 1.0 mg nitrate + nitrite-nitrogen (NO 3 + NO 2 -N)/L; Cadmium Reduction Method (4500-NO 3 − E)

• 0.05 to 10 mg nitrate + nitrite-nitrogen (NO 3 + NO 2 -N)/L; Automated Cadmium Reduction Method (4500-NO 3 − F)

• 0.05 to 10 mg nitrate + nitrite nitrogen (NO 3 + NO 2 -N)/L; Automated Hydrazine Reduction Method (4500-NO 3 − H)

• 0.01 to 2.0 mg or 0.05 to 5.0 mg nitrate + nitrite (NO 3 + NO 2 -N)/L; Cadmium Reduction Flow Injection Method (4500-NO 3 − I)

• 0.05 to 10 mg nitrate + nitrite-nitrogen (NO 3 + NO 2 -N)/L; Enzymatic Reduction Manual Method (4500-NO 3 − J)

Other ranges may be possible for any of the above referenced methods. Refer to manufacturer’s instructions.

For higher NO 3 − -N concentrations, dilute to the range of the selected method. See Sections 4110 B and 4110 C for the working range of ion chromatography methods.

Filter turbid samples. Test filters for NO 3 − contamination.

2. Collection and Storage of Samples

Collect samples in polyethylene, fluoropolymer, or glass containers. If possible, start NO 3 − determinations promptly after sampling. Samples can be stored un-acidified for up to 48 h below 6 ° C without freezing. Acidification converts any nitrite (NO 2 − ) to NO 3 − . As a result, NO 3 − values are the sum of NO 3 − and NO 2 − levels. If samples must be stored for more than 48 h, acidify to pH <2 with sulfuric or hydrochloric acid (depending on the method) and store from 0 to 6 °C without freezing (or 2-6 °C for Safe Drinking Water Act [SDWA] compliance samples) for up to 28 d. Chlorinated samples are stable for at least 14 d without acid preservation.

3. Quality Control

Quality control (QC) practices and acceptance criteria are described in Sections 1020 and 4020. The following section applies to all NO 3 − -N methods; however, some methods have additional QC measures. Complete the initial QC tasks, including initial demonstration of capability for each analyst, estimation of the method detection limit (MDL), and determination of the dynamic range, before analyzing any samples and at least annually thereafter. Apply the rest of these measures whenever samples are analyzed. If the acceptance criteria are not satisfied, stop and correct the problem. Regulators may specify different acceptance criteria than those given here.

Calibrate or verify the calibration of each instrument daily. Using a calculator, electronic spreadsheet, or instrument software, calculate the slope, intercept, and correlation coefficient ( r ) or coefficient of determination ( r 2 ) of the calibration curve. The r value must be at least 0.995 ( r 2 ≥ 0.99). Back-calculate the apparent concentrations of the standards. For standards more than 10 times the MDL, the measured values must be 90% to 110% of the true values. The calibration requirements are different for the method described in 4500-NO 3 − D; see instructions in 4500-NO 3 − D.4 b or 4500-NO 3 − D.4 c .

Prepare a calibration-verification standard (CVS) from a stock solution separate from that used to prepare the calibration standards. The CVS’s NO 3 − -N concentration should be 30% to 70% of the highest calibration standard; however, some QA/QC programs may require different concentrations. Run the CVS immediately after calibration; the result must be 90% to 110% of the expected value.

Run an initial calibration blank (ICB) immediately after the CVS to check for contamination. The ICB reading must be less than one-half of the minimum reporting level (MRL).

Run a midpoint calibration standard as continuing calibration verification (CCV) and a continuing calibration blank (CCB) after every 10 samples and after the last sample. If the measured NO 3 − -N concentration in the CCV is not 90% to 110% of the expected value, recalibrate and rerun all samples read since the last good CCV reading. The CCB must be less than one-half of the MRL.

  • Export Citation
  • Track Citations
  • Permissions
  • Add To Favorites

DOI: 10.2105/SMWW.2882.089

FROM THE DISCUSSION FORUM:

Remember Me

Vernier

Shop Experiment Nitrate Experiments​

Experiment #8 from Water Quality with Vernier

Introduction

The tests described here are used to measure the concentration of nitrate ions, NO 3 – , in a water sample. The concentration of nitrate will be expressed throughout this section in units of mg/L NO 3 – -N. The unit, NO 3 – -N, means simply “nitrogen that is in the form of nitrate.”

Nitrate ions found in freshwater samples result from a variety of natural and industrial sources. Nitrates are an important source of the nitrogen that used by plants and animals to synthesize necessary amino acids and proteins. Most nitrogen on earth is found in the atmosphere in the form of nitrogen gas, N 2 . Through a process called the nitrogen cycle , nitrogen gas is converted into forms that are useable by plants and animals. These conversions include industrial production of fertilizers, as well as natural processes, such as legume-plant nitrogen fixation, plant and animal decomposition, and animal waste.

Although nitrate levels in freshwater are usually less than 1 mg/L, human-created sources of nitrate may elevate levels above 3 mg/L. These sources include animal feedlots, runoff from fertilized fields, or treated municipal wastewater being returned to streams. Levels above 10 mg/L in drinking water can cause a potentially fatal disease in infants called methemoglobinemia , or Blue-Baby Syndrome. In this disease, nitrate converts hemoglobin into a form that can no longer transport oxygen.

High nitrate concentrations also contribute to a condition in lakes and ponds called eutrophication , the excessive growth of aquatic plants and algae. Unpleasant odor and taste of water, as well as reduced clarity, often accompany this process. Eventually, dead biomass accumulates in the bottom of the lake, where it decays and compounds the problem by recycling nutrients. If other necessary nutrients are present, algal blooms can occur in a lake with as little as 0.50 mg/L NO 3 – -N.

Nitrate pollution of surface and groundwater has become a major ecological problem in some agricultural areas. Although fertilizer in runoff is most often blamed, there is evidence that concentration of livestock in feedlots is now the major source of agricultural nitrate pollution. Runoff from fertilized fields is still a significant source of nitrate.

  • Determine the concentration of nitrate ions, NO 3 − , in a water sample from a stream or lake.

Sensors and Equipment

This experiment features the following sensors and equipment. Additional equipment may be required.

nitrate in water experiment

Ready to Experiment?

Ask an expert.

Get answers to your questions about how to teach this experiment with our support team.

Purchase the Lab Book

This experiment is #8 of Water Quality with Vernier . The experiment in the book includes student instructions as well as instructor information for set up, helpful hints, and sample graphs and data.

nitrate in water experiment

  • Faculty Resource Center
  • Biochemistry
  • Bioengineering
  • Cancer Research
  • Developmental Biology
  • Engineering
  • Environment
  • Immunology and Infection
  • Neuroscience
  • JoVE Journal
  • JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
  • JoVE Chrome Extension
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Pharmacology
  • JoVE Science Education
  • JoVE Lab Manual
  • JoVE Business
  • Videos Mapped to your Course
  • High Schools
  • Videos Mapped to Your Course
  • 00:00 Overview
  • 01:40 Principles of Nitrate and Phosphate Detection
  • 03:40 Measuring Nitrogen in a Sample
  • 05:11 Measuring Phosphorus in a Sample
  • 07:11 Results
  • 08:29 Applications
  • 10:25 Summary

Nutrients in Aquatic Ecosystems

Source: Laboratories of Margaret Workman and Kimberly Frye – Depaul University

Nitrogen and phosphorus are essential plant nutrients found in aquatic ecosystems and both are monitored as a part of water quality testing because in excess amounts they can cause significant water quality problems. 

Nitrogen in water is measured as the common form nitrate (NO 3 – ) that is dissolved in water and readily absorbed by photosynthesizers such as algae. The common form of phosphorus measured is phosphate (PO 4 3- ), which is strongly attracted to sediment particles as well as dissolved in water. In excess amounts, both nutrients can cause an increase in aquatic plant growth (algal bloom, Figure 1 ) that can disrupt the light, temperature, and oxygen levels in the water below and lead to eutrophication and hypoxia (low dissolved oxygen in water) forming a “dead zone” of no biological activity. Sources of nitrates and phosphorus include wastewater treatment plants, runoff from fertilized lawns and agricultural lands, faulty septic systems, animal manure runoff, and industrial waste discharge.

Figure 1

Nitrate and phosphate concentrations can be measured in water samples using known chemical reagents that cause the sample to change color when in the presence of a specific nutrient, with increasing color intensity indicating an increased concentration of the nutrient. To ensure release of any phosphate molecules that are bonded to sediments in the water, phosphorus samples are digested chemically and with heat to release phosphate bonds for a measure of total phosphate in the sample.

To quantify the color intensity produced by the reagent, a spectrophotometer is used to measure the specific wavelength of light that corresponds with each color caused by the nutrients and their reagents (nitrates amber; phosphates blue). The spectrophotometer then sends a beam of light through each sample to measure the amount of that light that is absorbed by the color (absorbance). The darker the color, the higher the absorbance. The spectrophotometer then converts the absorbance to a displayed nutrient concentration (mg/L) based on known concentration assays.

1. Measure Nitrogen in Sample

  • On the spectrophotometer, find the program for nitrate (with user manual or instrument menu) and enter the program number.  
  • Pipette 10 mL of the water sample into one of the sample tubes. Pour this into one of the sample tubes.
  • Repeat for a second sample tube.
  • Add the contents of one nitrate reagent powder pillow to one sample tube.
  • Cap both sample tubes.
  • On the spectrophotometer, press timer and enter to start a reaction period for the reagent. Shake the sample vigorously until the reaction time is over and timer beeps. Sample will begin to turn amber.
  • Press enter. A second 5-min reaction period will begin.
  • After the timer beeps the second time, wipe off the outside of the two sample tubes with a lint-free paper towel.
  • Place the sample tube without reagent (blank) tube into the spectrophotometer.
  • Tightly cover the cell with the instrument cap to ensure ambient light is blocked.
  • Zero the spectrophotometer for a reading of 0.0 mg/L NO 3 -N.
  • Remove the blank cell and place the sample cell with reagent into the cell holder. Tightly cover the sample cell with the instrument cap.
  • Press READ . The cursor will move to the right, then the results in mg/L NO 3 -N will be displayed.

2. Measure Phosphorus in Sample

  • Measure out 5.0 mL of the water sample using a pipette.
  • Pour measured water into a sample tube.
  • Add the contents of one potassium persulfate powder pillow for phosphonate to the sample tube. 
  • Cap the tube tightly and shake to dissolve.
  • Label the top of the tube cap and place the tube in a COD reactor (in a chemical hood) and heat for 30 min. 
  • Place it in a test tube rack and allow to cool to room temperature.
  • Using a graduated cylinder, measure out 2 mL of 1.54 N sodium hydroxide.
  • Pour this into the sample tube. Cap and mix.
  • On the spectrophotometer, find the program number for phosphate (with user manual or instrument menu) and enter the program number.
  • Clean the outside of the sample tube with a lint-free paper towel.
  • Place the test tube so that it is facing the front of the instrument.
  • Place the cover on the test tube.
  • Take out test tube and add the contents of the purchased reagent powder pillow for the ascorbic acid method.
  • Cap tightly and shake for 10-15 s.
  • Press timer and then enter. A 2-min waiting period will begin.
  • After the timer beeps, clean the outside of the test tube with a lint-free paper towel.
  • Place the test tube into the instrument with the logo facing the front of the instrument.
  • Place the cover over the test tube.
  • Press read. The display will show the results in mg/L.

Nitrogen and phosphorus are essential plant nutrients found in aquatic ecosystems, however, in excess amounts, they can cause significant water quality problems. Nitrogen and phosphorous in water are typically found in the forms of nitrate and phosphate, respectively. Both nutrients are dissolved in water and are readily absorbed by photosynthesizers such as algae.

Nitrates and phosphates enter the water systems through freshwater runoff from wastewater treatment plants, fertilized lawns and agricultural lands, faulty septic systems, and industrial waste discharge. In excess amounts, both nutrients can cause an increase in aquatic plant growth and algae blooms, called eutrophication. These algae blooms live at the water surface, in order to easily access oxygen and sunlight.

As a result, eutrophication prevents lower water levels from access to sunlight and oxygen in the air. When the algae die, they sink into the lower water levels and decompose, consuming oxygen in the deeper water causing hypoxia, or low dissolved oxygen levels. Starved of oxygen, and cut off from resupply, the deep water becomes a dead zone. As a result, fish and other organisms die in massive numbers. Dead zones are widespread in the world's oceans and lakes, predominantly in highly populated urban areas.

This video will introduce the methodology for measuring nitrate and phosphate concentrations in surface water, and demonstrate the measurements in the laboratory.

Nitrogen in water is reported in terms of "nitrate-as-nitrogen." The phrase "nitrate-as-nitrogen" refers to the amount of nitrogen in nitrate form. Therefore, the nitrate-as-nitrogen concentration can be converted to nitrate concentration using the ratios of the molecular weights of nitrogen and nitrate.

The nitrate concentration is measured using the cadmium reduction method. The cadmium metal reduces the nitrates to nitrites, then the nitrite ions react with sulfanilic acid to form an intermediate diazonium salt. The diazonium salt then couples with gentisic acid, and forms an amber-colored compound. The darker the amber color, the higher the concentration of nitrate in the sample.

The concentration of phosphorus in water samples is reported similarly, in terms of the amount of phosphorus in phosphate form. The conversion between phosphate concentration and phosphate-as-phosphorus concentration can be easily completed using molecular weight. Phosphates are present in water in many different conformations. All phosphates must first be converted to orthophosphates through hydrolysis by heating samples with acid and potassium persulfate.

The ascorbic acid/molybdate method is used to calculate orthophosphate concentration. Orthophosphates react with sodium molybdate in acidic conditions to produce a phosphate/molybdate complex. Ascorbic acid is then used to reduce the complex, producing a blue colored product. To quantify the color intensity produced by the reagent in both experiments, a colorimeter is used to measure the amount of light absorbed by the colored species. The absorbance is then converted to concentration.

The following experiment will demonstrate the analysis of nitrate and phosphate concentrations in water samples using pre-mixed reagent packets to perform this colorimetric technique.

To begin the nitrogen measurement, find the program for nitrate on the colorimeter, and input the appropriate program number or set the colorimeter to measure at 420 nm. Measure 10 mL of the water sample, pipet into a sample tube, and label the tube. Prepare a second identical tube, and label it as the blank.

Add the contents of one premixed cadmium reduction method reagent packets to the sample tube. Cap both sample tubes. Begin timing the 1-min reaction period for the reagent. Shake the tube vigorously by hand until the reaction time is complete.

Set the tube down, and begin a second 5-min reaction period to allow for the cadmium to reduce nitrogen. When the reaction period is over, wipe both tubes clean with a lint-free paper towel.

Place the sample tube with no reagent, labeled the blank, in the colorimeter. Ensure that no labels interfere with the light path. Tightly cover the cell with the instrument cap to ensure that all ambient light is blocked from the sample chamber.

Calibrate the colorimeter with the blank for a reading of 0.0 mg/L nitrate as nitrogen. Remove the blank tube and place the sample tube in the sample holder, and replace the instrument cap. Measure the sample absorbance, and display the concentration of nitrate as nitrogen in the sample.

The measurement of phosphorus in a water sample is similar to the measurement of nitrogen. First, measure 5 mL of the water sample and pipet it into a sample tube. Add the contents of one pre-mixed potassium persulfate powder pillow for phosphonate to the sample tube.

Cap the tube tightly and shake to dissolve the powder. Label the top of the cap. Place the tube in the reactor in a hood, and heat for 30 min at 150 °C. After heating, remove the tube from the reactor, place it in a tube rack, and allow it to cool to room temperature.

Next, adjust the pH by adding 2 mL of 1.54 M sodium hydroxide to the sample tube. Cap the tube and mix. On the colorimeter, locate the program number for phosphate and enter the program number, or set the spectrophotometer to measure absorbance at 880 nm.

Clean the sample tube with a lint-free wipe, and load the test tube into the colorimeter. Make sure that no labels interfere with the light path in the instrument. Place the cover on the instrument, and calibrate using the unreacted sample as the blank.

Remove the tube from the instrument, and add the contents of a premixed ascorbic acid method reagent packet to the test tube. Cap the tube tightly, and shake the tube to mix. Place the tube in a rack, and initiate a 2-min reaction period using a timer.

After the reaction period is over the solution color should be blue. Clean the outside of the tube with a lint free paper towel. Place the test tube into the instrument with all labels out of the light path.

Close the sample chamber cover and push the READ button. The results will be shown in mg/L. If using a spectrophotometer, measure the sample absorbance at 880 nm.

The concentrations of nitrate and phosphate in a metropolitan river branch were compared at 5 different sample sites in this experiment.

Clean river water typically contains 0 to 1 mg/L of nitrate-nitrogen and 0 to 0.03 mg/L of phosphate-phosphorus. Concentrations between 3 to 5 mg/L of nitrate-nitrogen and 0.03 to 0.1 mg/L of phosphate-phosphorus is considered high, and above these ranges considered eutrophic.

The nitrate and phosphate levels were high in 3 of the 5 sampling locations. Similarly, average nitrate and phosphate concentrations were compared upstream and downstream of a water treatment plant. The upstream measurement represents untreated water, while the downstream measurement represents runoff from the treatment plant.

The downstream measurement was low in phosphates due to the removal of organic material during the treatment process. However, average nitrate concentrations were higher downstream, indicating possible nitrate inputs near the discharge area, possibly from lawn fertilizer.

Understanding the nutrient content of water runoff, and its resulting effect on marine plant life is extremely important to preserving our natural ecosystems.

In the following example, marine microorganisms were studied in remote environments such as reefs. These results can help elucidate changing microbial populations due to nitrate concentrations and the resulting algal blooms.

Water samples were collected in containers that are closed off to the external environment to prevent contamination. Microbes were collected on a 0.22-μm filter. The filtered water was analyzed to examine inorganic impurities. Metagenomic analysis found that the transfer of microbial genetic material was positively correlated with nitrate concentration.

In order to combat eutrophication, it is important to understand soil runoff and the fate and transport of contaminants in soil. In the following example, rainfall was simulated, and the fate of contaminants in soil studied. Soil boxes were packed with soil containing contaminants of interest, in this case urea, a common form of nitrogen fertilizer. Phosphorous-containing molecules can be studied with the same procedure. Rainfall was simulated under different conditions, and the runoff collected and analyzed.

Similar to the last example, runoff can also be studied outdoors in natural environments. Here, a runoff research facility was constructed in an urban area. A retaining wall was constructed to prevent runoff contamination to other areas, and to enable controlled water collection. Plot areas were separated as well, to prevent lateral water movement. Water runoff studies were conducted using irrigation systems. Water runoff was collected and a chemical analysis completed to determine contaminants in the water.

You've just watched JoVE's introduction to water nutrient analysis in surface water. You should now understand the challenges associated with water runoff and eutrophication, and how to measure nutrient content in water samples. Thanks for watching!

Figure 2

Average nitrate concentrations compared upstream and downstream from a water treatment plant ( Figure 3 ). The downstream measurement represents the discharge from the treatment.

Figure 3

Average phosphate concentrations compared upstream and downstream from a water treatment plant ( Figure 5 ). The downstream measurement represent the discharge from the treatment.

Figure 5

Applications and Summary

High concentrations of nitrates and phosphorus can stimulate eutrophic conditions in water by causing algal bloom that negatively affects other water quality factors including dissolved oxygen, temperature, and other indicators. Excess nitrates can lead to hypoxic water (low levels of dissolved oxygen) no longer able to support aerobic life creating a “dead zone,” where non-mobile species mass die-offs and mobile species move away to other waters. Dead zones are occurring globally in coastal regions where large amounts of high-nutrient runoff and wastewater converge, and aquatic life is most highly concentrated ( Figure 6 ). Two of the largest dead zones are in the Baltic Sea where on average 49,000 km 2 of water contained less than 2 mg/L of dissolved oxygen, and the northern Gulf of Mexico with a dead zone measured at 17,353 km 2 .

Figure 6

As a result, eutrophication prevents lower water levels from access to sunlight and oxygen in the air. When the algae die, they sink into the lower water levels and decompose, consuming oxygen in the deeper water causing hypoxia, or low dissolved oxygen levels. Starved of oxygen, and cut off from resupply, the deep water becomes a dead zone. As a result, fish and other organisms die in massive numbers. Dead zones are widespread in the world’s oceans and lakes, predominantly in highly populated urban areas.

Nitrogen in water is reported in terms of “nitrate-as-nitrogen.” The phrase “nitrate-as-nitrogen” refers to the amount of nitrogen in nitrate form. Therefore, the nitrate-as-nitrogen concentration can be converted to nitrate concentration using the ratios of the molecular weights of nitrogen and nitrate.

Cap the tube tightly and shake to dissolve the powder. Label the top of the cap. Place the tube in the reactor in a hood, and heat for 30 min at 150 °C. After heating, remove the tube from the reactor, place it in a tube rack, and allow it to cool to room temperature.

Remove the tube from the instrument, and add the contents of a premixed ascorbic acid method reagent packet to the test tube. Cap the tube tightly, and shake the tube to mix. Place the tube in a rack, and initiate a 2-min reaction period using a timer.

Water samples were collected in containers that are closed off to the external environment to prevent contamination. Microbes were collected on a 0.22-μm filter. The filtered water was analyzed to examine inorganic impurities. Metagenomic analysis found that the transfer of microbial genetic material was positively correlated with nitrate concentration.

You’ve just watched JoVE’s introduction to water nutrient analysis in surface water. You should now understand the challenges associated with water runoff and eutrophication, and how to measure nutrient content in water samples. Thanks for watching!

Related Videos

nitrate in water experiment

Introduction to the Spectrophotometer

nitrate in water experiment

Dissolved Oxygen in Surface Water

nitrate in water experiment

Water Quality Analysis via Indicator Organisms

Simple Hit Counter

How to Test Nitrates in Water (Step-By-Step)

Scott Winfield

Nitrates are naturally occurring compounds composed of nitrogen and oxygen. Consuming them in high levels via drinking water can cause serious health issues. So, the EPA recommends testing the nitrate levels in your water once a year.

HOW TO TEST NITRATES IN WATER (STEP-BY-STEP)

Since you’re here, you’re probably wondering how to go about this. You’re in exactly the right place.

There are two ways to test your water for nitrate presence—DIY testing and sending water samples to a lab, and today, we’ll guide you through both. We’ll also discuss the EPA’s maximum limits for nitrates in drinking water, how nitrates get into water supplies, and how to prevent nitrates from contaminating your drinking water.

The Tolerable Limit Of Nitrates in Drinking Water

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets the maximum permissible limit of nitrate in drinking water at 10 mg/L (10 milligrams of nitrate per liter of drinking water). This means that water with nitrate levels at or below 10mg/L is considered safe to drink .

However, the EPA does allow states the discretion to set stricter nitrate limits. For example, a state may decide to set the maximum permissible limit to 8 mg/L rather than 10 mg/L.

How to Test Nitrates in Water

The best and most reliable way to test water for any kind of contamination, including nitrates, is to collect a sample from your faucets or well and send it to an EPA-certified water testing lab .

In return, the lab will provide you with a data sheet detailing all the contaminants present in your water supply, including the amount of each contaminant. If the nitrate levels in your water are higher than the EPA maximum limit or your state’s limit, you’ll need to start working on a solution (we’ll guide you through this later).

That said, not everyone has the time to wait for a certified lab to test their water and present them with a detailed list. Sometimes, you may need to conduct an immediate test to prevent exposure.

In such cases, you should contact your local Environmental Services or Soil and Water Conservation District and ask whether they have a nitrate testing kit.

If this doesn’t work, you can purchase a water testing kit online or from a hardware/appliance store nearby and conduct your own test as instructed on the package of the test kit. However, as this is not the most reliable method for testing nitrate levels in water, we still advise you to send a water sample to a certified testing lab at the first opportunity.

As per EPA guidelines, no matter how much trust you have in the purity of your water supply, you should have your water tested for nitrates at least once a year .

DIY Nitrates Testing at Home:

Here’s another method to test for nitrates at home:

  • Collect the sample water and put it into the sample bottle.
  • Place about 2.5 milliliters of sample water into a clean test tube.
  • Top this with mixed acid reagent to 5.0 milliliters.
  • Let it rest for about 3 minutes to react.
  • Using a 0.1-gram spoon, scoop a level amount and leave it for about 9 minutes.
  • Place the test tube in a comparator of nitrate-nitrogen, then check the color of the sample compared to the color of the standard.
  • Then, document the results in parts per million or milligrams per liter of nitrate. You can then multiply the measured nitrate concentration (in ppm or mg/L) by 4.4 to get the nitrogen content (in mg/L).
  • Safely dispose of the sample that is reacting.

Of course, the methods used for DIY testing kits can vary so make sure you read the instructions carefully before you carry out the test.

How Nitrates Get Into Water

Nitrate

As nitrates are naturally occurring in the environment, they can easily leach into groundwater resources from nitrate-rich soil or through surface water runoff.

Additionally, nitrates are used to manufacture agricultural chemicals like pesticides, fertilizers, and plant growth hormones . These chemicals often enter water supplies and private wells due to poor disposal and leaking septic systems and landfills.

The location and construction of a private well can also make it more susceptible to nitrate contamination. For instance, a well is more likely to be contaminated if it’s close to a septic tank .

Why is Testing for Nitrates Important?

As we mentioned earlier, the maximum nitrate limit in drinking water, according to the EPA, is 10 mg/L. This limit is stipulated in the 2012 United States Environmental Protection Agency regulations . This limitation aims to protect against blue baby syndrome , a condition that causes babies’ skin to turn blue due to poorly oxygenated blood and a nitrate-rich diet.

But, blue baby syndrome is not the only health condition associated with nitrates. According to the Minnesota Department of Health , high nitrate toxicity in humans causes methemoglobinemia, elevated heart rate, muscle weakness, ptyalism, and depression.

Side effects of nitrate toxicity include hypotension, arrhythmia, headache, flushing, and dizziness. Furthermore, nitrate consumption via drinking water can have lethal repercussions and precipitate colon and colorectal cancers .

Plus, a 2020 study suggests that colon and colorectal cancers aren’t the only cancers caused by nitrates. High amounts of nitrates, when ingested through drinking water, tend to mix and combine with endogenous chemicals such as amines and amide in the gastrointestinal tract to form N-nitroso compounds like nitrosamines.

Nitrosamine in the alimentary canal reacts with internal linings in a carcinogenic manner, which can ultimately result in tumors and carcinoma. The nitroso compounds are also linked to cancers in the lungs, bladder, liver, skin, trachea, bone, thyroid, myelocytic leukemia, and T and B cell lymphomas.

Elevated nitrate levels also affect aquatic life by promoting eutrophication and stimulating rapid algae and plant growth which has a negative effect on the plankton population.

Preventing Nitrates From Contaminating Water

Considering all the health effects of nitrates in drinking water, we should do our best to prevent contamination. To that end, there are things we can do socially and personally.

Socially, we can raise public awareness about nitrate contamination and urge authorities to take the necessary measures, which include:

  • Controlling and minimizing the use of agrochemicals
  • Reducing stagnant and untreated bodies of water, whether it be for consumption or waste practices
  • Discouraging open-air defecation
  • Pressuring manufacturing industries to embrace good disposal practices
  • Making efforts to provide adequate sewage treatment

Personally, we can take the following actions:

  • Remove nitrates from water using reverse osmosis and other methods we’ll cover shortly
  • Discourage giving food, like beets and spinach, and water that’s high in nitrates (more than 10mg/L) to infants when weaning
  • Avoid food and drink items that have nitrogenous preservatives

Best Treatment Methods For Nitrates in Water

If the nitrates in your water are above the EPA limit, there are a number of ways you can address this. The two best solutions for domestic water supplies are:

Reverse Osmosis

Whole House Reverse Osmosis System

Reverse osmosis is a water filtration process in which the contaminated water is pushed through a semi-permeable membrane that has microscopic pores of 0.0001-micron size.

This means that tiny molecules like nitrates are unable to pass through the filter. As a result, the nitrate levels in the water are significantly reduced. In fact, some reverse osmosis systems can remove up to 99% of nitrates from drinking water. There are plenty of different types of reverse osmosis systems including whole-house, under-sink, and countertop units.

As the name suggests, whole-house systems purify water for your entire household. Under-sink units filter the water from a single faucet and countertop units aren’t typically connected to a water supply. To use a countertop unit, you need to fill it with water manually.

Distillation

Distillation

Distillation is a traditional water treatment method, but it’s still one of the most effective ways to remove nitrates from water.

In this process, the water is boiled in a container until it turns into vapor. The vapor is then transferred to another container, where it’s cooled and condensed. In the vapor state, the contaminant particles can’t find any surfaces to cling to, so they evaporate. Once the distilled water cools and returns to its liquid form, the nitrates will no longer be present.

Although whole-house distillers are expensive, industrial-strength devices, you can still find some great countertop distillers on the market. Just make sure that the device you choose is capable of dealing with nitrates by consulting the manufacturer before you purchase.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, high amounts of nitrates cause a complex condition in infants that results in methemoglobinemia (which happens when a baby’s gastrointestinal tract converts nitrate to nitrite and starts producing methemoglobin), leading to a syndrome called blue baby.

Yes, in the gastrointestinal tract, nitrates have been found to have antimicrobial properties , while endogenous nitrous oxide has been seen to act as a vasodilator in the cardiovascular system.

Nitrates are inversely related to diabetes. A 2013 study shows that a high nitrate intake has a therapeutic effect on individuals with Type 2 Diabetes. However, the study also emphasizes that the source of nitrate intake should be vegetables that naturally contain it and not as a result of contamination. So, in no way does that mean that nitrate-contaminated water is beneficial for humans and should be consumed untreated.

One healthy source of nitrates is leafy green vegetables, such as spinach, arugula, and kale. Other sources include beets, beetroot juice, and celery.

Yes, nitrate toxicity has been connected to abortions where stillbirths, low birth weights, slow weight gain, and deaths have been evidenced by teratogenicity caused by N-nitroso compounds formed from drinking contaminated water.   The adverse effects of methemoglobinemia caused by lethal nitrate doses impair fetal growth. The transplacental passage of these toxins leads to congenital disabilities.

Consuming elevated concentrations of nitrates can inhibit iodine uptake in the thyroid gland. If the thyroid gland is blocked from using iodine , it can grow bigger and may even stop working.

Although nitrates are naturally found in common dietary sources like veggies, drinking water with more than 10 mg/L of nitrates can cause various health conditions like blue baby syndrome in infants and many forms of cancer in adults. To protect against such health effects, the EPA recommends testing water for nitrate levels at least once a year.

To test your water, you can send a sample to an EPA-certified lab, ask local departments whether they have relevant water testing kits, or purchase your own kit online.

If the tests show an alarming presence of nitrates in your water, you need to address the issue quickly. Currently, reverse osmosis systems and countertop water distillers are the best household solutions to deal with nitrates.

Sign Up for Weekly Water Quality News & Advice

Join our 1 Million+ strong water defense community and get updated on the latest product news & gear reviews.

We HATE spam. Your e-mail will never sold or shared!

Scott Winfield

I appreciate you mentioning that one should compare the sample’s color to the standard’s color. I have moved into a new home and want to filter the water to improve the quality of the drinking water. I intend to hire a water nitrate filtration service to put in my home.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Jump to main content or area navigation .

  • Learn the Issues
  • Science & Technology
  • Laws & Regulations

Water: Monitoring & Assessment

5.7 Nitrates

What are nitrates and why are they important.

Nitrates are a form of nitrogen, which is found in several different forms in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. These forms of nitrogen include ammonia (NH3), nitrates (NO3), and nitrites (NO2). Nitrates are essential plant nutrients, but in excess amounts they can cause significant water quality problems. Together with phosphorus, nitrates in excess amounts can accelerate eutrophication, causing dramatic increases in aquatic plant growth and changes in the types of plants and animals that live in the stream. This, in turn, affects dissolved oxygen, temperature, and other indicators. Excess nitrates can cause hypoxia (low levels of dissolved oxygen) and can become toxic to warm-blooded animals at higher concentrations (10 mg/L) or higher) under certain conditions. The natural level of ammonia or nitrate in surface water is typically low (less than 1 mg/L); in the effluent of wastewater treatment plants, it can range up to 30 mg/L.

Sources of nitrates include wastewater treatment plants, runoff from fertilized lawns and cropland, failing on-site septic systems, runoff from animal manure storage areas, and industrial discharges that contain corrosion inhibitors.

Sampling and equipment considerations

Nitrates from land sources end up in rivers and streams more quickly than other nutrients like phosphorus. This is because they dissolve in water more readily than phosphates, which have an attraction for soil particles. As a result, nitrates serve as a better indicator of the possibility of a source of sewage or manure pollution during dry weather.

Water that is polluted with nitrogen-rich organic matter might show low nitrates. Decomposition of the organic matter lowers the dissolved oxygen level, which in turn slows the rate at which ammonia is oxidized to nitrite (NO2) and then to nitrate (NO3). Under such circumstances, it might be necessary to also monitor for nitrites or ammonia, which are considerably more toxic to aquatic life than nitrate. (See Standard Methods section 4500-NH3 and 4500-NO2 for appropriate nitrite methods; APHA, 1992)

Water samples to be tested for nitrate should be collected in glass or polyethylene containers that have been prepared by using Method B in the introduction.

Volunteer monitoring programs usually use two methods for nitrate testing: the cadmium reduction method and the nitrate electrode. The more commonly used cadmium reduction method produces a color reaction that is then measured either by comparison to a color wheel or by use of a spectrophotometer. A few programs also use a nitrate electrode, which can measure in the range of 0 to 100 mg/L nitrate. A newer colorimetric immunoassay technique for nitrate screening is also now available and might be applicable for volunteers.

Cadmium Reduction Method

The cadmium reduction method is a colorimetric method that involves contact of the nitrate in the sample with cadmium particles, which cause nitrates to be converted to nitrites. The nitrites then react with another reagent to form a red color whose intensity is proportional to the original amount of nitrate. The red color is then measured either by comparison to a color wheel with a scale in milligrams per liter that increases with the increase in color hue, or by use of an electronic spectrophotometer that measures the amount of light absorbed by the treated sample at a 543-nanometer wavelength. The absorbance value is then converted to the equivalent concentration of nitrate by using a standard curve. Methods for making standard solutions and standard curves are presented at the end of this section.

This curve should be created by the program advisor before each sampling run. The curve is developed by making a set of standard concentrations of nitrate, reacting them and developing the corresponding color, and then plotting the absorbance value for each concentration against concentration. A standard curve could also be generated for the color wheel.

Use of the color wheel is appropriate only if nitrate concentrations are greater than 1 mg/L. For concentrations below 1 mg/L, a spectrophotometer should be used. Matching the color of a treated sample at low concentrations to a color wheel (or cubes) can be very subjective and can lead to variable results. Color comparators can, however, be effectively used to identify sites with high nitrates.

This method requires that the samples being treated are clear. If a sample is turbid, it should be filtered through a 0.45-micron filter. Be sure to test whether the filter is nitrate-free. If copper, iron, or other metals are present in concentrations above several mg/L, the reaction with the cadmium will be slowed down and the reaction time will have to be increased.

The reagents used for this method are often prepackaged for different ranges, depending on the expected concentration of nitrate in the stream. For example, the Hach Company provides reagents for the following ranges: low (0 to 0.40 mg/L), medium (0 to 4.5 mg/L), and high (0 to 30 mg/L). You should determine the appropriate range for the stream being monitored.

Nitrate Electrode Method

A nitrate electrode (used with a meter) is similar in function to a dissolved oxygen meter. It consists of a probe with a sensor that measures nitrate activity in the water; this activity affects the electric potential of a solution in the probe. This change is then transmitted to the meter, which converts the electric signal to a scale that is read in millivolts. The millivolts are then converted to mg/L of nitrate by plotting them from a standard curve (see above). The accuracy of the electrode can be affected by high concentrations of chloride or bicarbonate ions in the sample water. Fluctuating pH levels can also affect the reading by the meter.

Nitrate electrodes and meters are expensive compared to field kits that employ the cadmium reduction method. (The expense is comparable, however, if a spectrophotometer is used rather than a color wheel.) Meter/probe combinations run between $700 and $1,200 including a long cable to connect the probe to the meter. If the program has a pH meter that displays readings in millivolts, it can be used with a nitrate probe and no separate nitrate meter is needed. Results are read directly as milligrams per liter.

Although nitrate electrodes and spectrophotometers can be used in the field, they have certain disadvantages. These devices are more fragile than the color comparators and are therefore more at risk of breaking in the field. They must be carefully maintained and must be calibrated before each sample run and, if you are doing many tests, between samplings. This means that samples are best tested in the lab. Note that samples to be tested with a nitrate electrode should be at room temperature, whereas color comparators can be used in the field with samples at any temperature.

How to collect and analyze samples

The procedures for collecting and analyzing samples for nitrate consist of the following tasks:

TASK 1 Prepare the sample containers

If factory-sealed, disposable Whirl-pak® bags are used for sampling, no preparation is needed. Reused sample containers (and all glassware used in this procedure) must be cleaned before the first run and after each sampling by following the method described on page 128 under Method B. Remember to wear latex gloves.

TASK 2 Prepare before leaving for the sampling site

Refer to section 2.3 - Safety Considerations for details on confirming sampling date and time, safety considerations, checking supplies, and checking weather and directions. In addition to the standard sampling equipment and apparel, the following equipment is needed when analyzing nitrate nitrogen in the field:

  • Color comparator or field spectrophotometer with sample tubes (for reading absorbance of the sample)
  • Reagent powder pillows (reagents to turn the water red)
  • Deionized or distilled water to rinse the sample tubes between uses
  • Wash bottle to hold rinse water
  • Waste bottle with secure lid to hold used cadmium particles, which should be clearly labeled and returned to the lab, where the cadmium will be properly disposed of
  • Mixing container with a mark at the sample volume (usually 25 mL) to hold and mix the sample
  • Clean, lint-free wipes to clean and dry the sample tubes

TASK 3 Collect the sample

Refer to Task 2 in Chapter 5 - Water Quality Conditions for details on collecting a sample using screw-cap bottles or Whirl-pak® bags.

TASK 4 Analyze the sample in the field

Cadmium Reduction Method With a Spectrophotometer

The following is the general procedure to analyze a sample using the cadmium reduction method with a spectrophotometer. However, this should not replace the manufacturer's directions if they differ from the steps provided below:

  • Pour the first field sample into the sample cell test tube and insert it into the sample cell of the spectrophotometer.
  • Record the bottle number on the lab sheet.
  • Place the cover over the sample cell. Read the absorbance or concentration of this sample and record it on the field data sheet.
  • Pour the sample back into the waste bottle for disposal at the lab.

Cadmium Reduction Method With a Color Comparator

To analyze a sample using the cadmium reduction method with a color comparator, follow the manufacturer's directions and record the concentration on the field data sheet.

TASK 5 Return the samples and the field data sheets to the lab/drop-off point for analysis

Samples being sent to a lab for analysis must be tested for nitrates within 48 hours of collection. Keep samples in the dark and on ice or refrigerated.

TASK 6 Determine results (for spectrophotometer absorbance or nitrate electrode) in lab

Preparation of standard concentrations.

First determine the range you will be testing (low, medium, or high). For each range you will need to determine the lower end, which will be determined by the detection limit of your spectrophotometer. The high end of the range will be the endpoint of the range you are using. Use a nitrate nitrogen standard solution of appropriate strength for the range in which you are working. A 1-mg/L nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) solution would be suitable for low-range (0 to 1.0 mg/L) tests. A 100-mg/L standard solution would be appropriate for medium- and high-range tests. In the following example, it is assumed that a set of standards for a 0 to 5.0 mg/L range is being prepared.

  • Set out six 25-mL volumetric flasks (one for each standard). Label the flasks 0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0.
  • Pour 30 mL of a 25-mg/L nitrate nitrogen standard solution into a 50-mL beaker.
Standard
Solution mL of Nitrate Nitrogen
Standard Solution 0.0 0 1.0 1 2.0 2 3.0 3 4.0 4 5.0 5

Analysis of the Cadmium Reduction Method Standard Concentrations

Use the following procedure to analyze the standard concentrations.

  • Add reagent powder pillows to the nitrate nitrogen standard concentrations.
  • Shake each tube vigorously for at least 3 minutes.
  • For each tube, wait at least 10 minutes but not more than 20 minutes to proceed.
  • "Zero" the spectrophotometer using the 0.0 standard concentration and following the manufacturer's directions. Record the absorbance as "0" in the absorbance column on the lab sheet. Rinse the sample cell three times with distilled water.
  • Read and record the absorbance of the 1.0-mg/L standard concentration.
  • Rinse the sample cell test tube three times with distilled or deionized water. Avoid touching the lower part of the sample cell test tube. Wipe with a clean, lint-free wipe. Be sure that the lower part of the sample cell test tube is clean and free of smudges or water droplets.
  • Repeat steps 3 and 4 for each standard.
  • Make an absorbance versus concentration graph on graph paper: (a) Make the vertical (y) axis and label it "absorbance." Mark this axis in 1.0 increments from 0 as high as the graph paper will allow. (b) Make the horizontal (x) axis and label it "concentration: mg/L as nitrate nitrogen." Mark this axis with the concentrations of the standards: 0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0.
  • Plot the absorbance of the standard concentrations on the graph.
  • Draw a "best fit" straight line through these points. The line should touch (or almost touch) each of the points. If it doesn't, the results of this procedure are not valid.
  • For each sample, locate the absorbance on the "y" axis, read over horizontally to the line, and then move down to read the concentration in mg/L as nitrate nitrogen.
  • Record the concentration on the lab sheet in the appropriate column.

For Nitrate Electrode

Standards are prepared using nitrate standard solutions of 100 and 10 mg/L as nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N). All references to concentrations and results in this procedure will be expressed as mg/L as NO3-N. Eight standard concentrations will be prepared:

100.0 mg/L 0.40 mg/L 10.0 mg/L 0.32 mg/L 1.0 mg/L 0.20 mg/L 0.8 mg/L 0.12 mg/L

Use the following procedure:

  • Set out eight 25-mL volumetric flasks (one for each standard). Label the flasks 100.0, 10.0, 1.0, 0.8, 0.4, 0.32, 0.2, and 0.12.
  • To make the 100.0-mg/L standard, pour 25 mL of the 100-mg/L nitrate standard solution into the flask labeled 100.0.
  • To make the 10.0-mg/L standard, pour 25 mL of the 10-mg/L nitrate standard solution into the flask labeled 10.0.
  • To make the 1.0-mg/L standard, use a 10- or 5-mL pipet to measure 2.5 mL of the 10-mg/L nitrate standard solution into the flask labeled 1.0. Fill the flask with 22.5 mL distilled, deionized water to the fill line. Rinse the pipet with deionized water.
  • To make the 0.8-mg/L standard, use a 10- or 5-mL pipet or a 2-mL volumetric pipet to measure 2 mL of the 10-mg/L nitrate standard solution into the flask labeled 0.8. Fill the flask with about 23 mL distilled, deionized water to the fill line. Rinse the pipet with deionized water. 6. To make the 0.4-mg/L standard, use a 10- or 5-mL pipet or a 1-mL volumetric pipet to measure 1 mL of the 10-mg/L nitrate standard solution into the flask labeled 0.4. Fill the flask with about 24 mL distilled, deionized water to the fill line. Rinse the pipet with deionized water.
Standard
Solution mL of Nitrate Nitrogen
Standard Solution 0.32 8 0.20 5 0.12 3

Analysis of the Nitrate Electrode Standard Concentrations

  • List the standard concentrations (100.0, 10.0, 1.0, 0.8, 0.4, 0.32, 0.2, and 0.12) under "bottle #" on the lab sheet.
  • Plot absorbance or mV readings for the 100-, 10-, and 1-mg/L standards on semi-logarithmic graph paper, with concentration on the logarithmic (x) axis and the absorbance or millivolts (mV) on the linear (y) axis. For the nitrate electrode curve, a straight line with a slope of 58 ñ 3 mV/decade at 25 C should result. That is, measurements of 10- and 100-mg/L standard solutions should be no more than 58 ± 3 mV apart.
  • Plot absorbance or mV readings for the 1.0-, 0.8-, 0.4-, 0.32-, 0.2-, and 0.12-mg/L standards on semi-logarithmic graph paper, with concentration on the logarithmic (x) axis and the millivolts (mV) on the linear (y) axis. For the nitrate electrode, the result here should be a curved line since the response of the electrode at these low concentrations is not linear.
  • For the nitrate electrode, recalibrate the electrodes several times daily by checking the mV reading of the 10-mg/L and 0.4-mg/L standards and adjusting the calibration control on the meter until the reading plotted on the calibration curve is displayed again.

APHA. 1992. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 18 th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.

Area Navigation

  • Drinking Water
  • Education & Training
  • Grants & Funding
  • Ground Water
  • Oceans, Coasts, Estuaries & Beaches
  • Rivers & Streams
  • Where You Live
  • Pollution Prevention & Control
  • Resources & Performance
  • Water Infrastructure
  • What You Can Do
  • News by Email
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Last updated on Tuesday, March 06, 2012

The Seal of the United States Environmental Protection Agency

Jump to main content.

Nitrate/Nitrite determination in water and soil samples accompanied by in situ azo dye formation and its removal by superabsorbent cellulose hydrogel

  • Research Article
  • Published: 16 June 2020
  • Volume 2 , article number  1225 , ( 2020 )

Cite this article

nitrate in water experiment

  • B. U. Gauthama 1 ,
  • B. Narayana   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8945-4516 1 ,
  • B. K. Sarojini 2 ,
  • Kabiru Bello 2 &
  • N. K. Suresh 1  

13k Accesses

9 Citations

Explore all metrics

In the present work, an efficient method is developed for the spectrophotometric determination of nitrite and nitrate ions in water and soil samples by in situ formation of azo dye (Griess reagent) which showed λ max at 385 nm. The reaction condition and the concentration of reagents used are optimized. The molar absorptivity, Sandell’s sensitivity, detection limit and quantification limit of the method are found to be 3.22 × 10 4 L mol −1 cm −1 , 1.98 × 10 −6 µg cm −2 , 0.0030 µg mL −1 and 0.0092 µg mL −1 respectively with the linearity range up to 2.6 µg mL −1 . The formation of azo dye is confirmed by 1 H and 13 C Nuclear Magnetic Spectroscopy. The azo dye formed during the determination is effectively removed using custom made ecofriendly cellulose modified hydrogel in order to reduce organic load in the test samples. The structure, morphology and the thermal properties of hydrogel are determined by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy and thermogravimetric analysis respectively. The dye removal mechanism involves pseudo second order kinetics, adsorption is found to be spontaneous based on the thermodynamic parameters and it is befitting to Freundlich isotherm model.

Similar content being viewed by others

nitrate in water experiment

Carbon nanotube/Chitosan hydrogel for adsorption of acid red 73 in aqueous and soil environments

nitrate in water experiment

Cellulose based adsorbent for cationic methylene blue dye removal

nitrate in water experiment

Removal of Methylene Blue from Wastewater by Red Sandy Soil-Based Alkali-Activated Binder

Explore related subjects.

  • Environmental Chemistry

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

1 Introduction

The bioaccumulation of nitrogenous pollutants like nitrite and nitrate in water and soil pose hazard to humans and plants. Nitrite is also utilized as an additive agent in food industry and its mishandle might lead to excessive amount of nitrite in consumables which is unwholesome to the public health. Organic nitrogen undergoes biochemical oxidation to form nitrate and can be readily converted into the more toxic nitrite by microbial reduction. The WHO recommends 6.5 × 10 −5 M is to be the maximal allowed nitrite concentration in drinking water as per the norms of WHO [ 1 ].

Excess of nitrite in the aquatic ecosystem leads to the formation of algal blooms more and more which also the consequences of low oxygen level in the water, and it further leads to the increase in the temperature of that ecosystem leading to dead zone. Nitrite is an active ion in the nitrogen cycle, formed due to the imperfect oxidation of ammonia or reduction of nitrates. Nitrosamines are the potential carcinogen mostly formed due to nitrites [ 2 ]. Nitrite can enter the body as nitrate, can be converted into nitrite which effects the hemoglobin in delivering oxygen to the cells. A potentially fatal blue baby syndrome ( methemoglobinemia )is also caused in infants due to nitrites. So, it is a major environmental concern, determination and removal of nitrite from water body has large scope [ 3 , 4 ].

There are many methods and instrumental techniques such as polarography [ 5 ], voltammetry [ 6 ], fluorimetry [ 7 ], flow injection spectroscopy [ 8 ], bioamperometry [ 9 ], gas chromatography mass spectroscopy [ 10 ], kinetic methods [ 11 , 12 ] described for the detection of nitrite, nitrate ions. But not all the methods are suitable for routine trace determination because some methods reported are either require expensive instruments or has complicated procedures. Thus, a utilization of above said methods is limited. On comparing with other methods spectrophotometric determination method gained more attention. Thus, highly sensitive, selective spectrophotometric method plays a significant role in the detection of nitrite and nitrate [ 13 ].

This spectrophotometric determination method is based on the Griess technique [ 14 ]. This involves the formation of diazonium salt from an aromatic primary amine, which is later couples with a coupling agent to form an azo dye which imparts colour to the solution. Nitrite ion in acidic medium gets converted into nitrous acid which catalyzes diazonium salt formation. Azo dye is a colour imparting material and the dye itself causes detrimental effects like intervening in the photosynthesis cycle of plants. It also has the affinity to generate carcinogenic/mutagenic products. The adsorption is the preferable method for the dye removal, since its relatively fast, appropriate and easy to carry out [ 15 , 16 ].

Nature of adsorbent is the main effecting factor for the adsorption efficiency. Environmental safety, high adsorption capacity and low-cost productivity are the criteria for the ideal adsorbent. Biodegradable and biocompatible polysaccharide-based hydrogels induced interest in many researchers for testing them in application [ 17 ]. Hydrogel is the material which has an ability to absorb large amount of water in comparing with normal water absorbent material. They are insoluble in water and in most of the organic solvents which could be suitable for the liquid environment [ 18 ]. Their commendatory water sorption property makes them suitable for many fields such as cosmetics [ 19 ], sanitary napkins [ 20 ], tissue engineering [ 21 ], waste water treatment [ 22 ], biomedicine [ 23 ] and many more. Cellulose is the most available natural polymer at present, is one of the most ecofriendly non-dietary sources for the manufacture of variety of nature friendly materials such as paper products, biopolymers, biocomposites and so on. Notably its biodegradability, biocompatibility renewability and low preparation cost made researchers to focus more and more [ 24 ].

In the present study a method has been developed for the detection of nitrite and nitrate in water with high sensitivity, reproducibility with accuracy. Once the determination of nitrite and nitrate are carried out, the coloured solution which contains a hazardous organic pollutant dye was put into sewage without separation. To avoid this, present work involves the removal of dye using newly synthesized cellulose derived hydrogel namely poly (ATAC-co-NaAc) prepared using APS as initiator and MBA as crosslinker, grafted on the carboxy methyl cellulose backbone part. The optimized hydrogel was investigated for kinetics, isothermal and thermodynamic studies and adsorption–desorption studies in order to check the practicability of dye adsorption.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 instrumentation.

Spectrophotometric data were recorded using SHIMADZU UV-2550 double beam spectrophotometer (Shimadzu corporation, Japan) with 1 cm quarts cell. The infrared spectrum of the material was recorded on Bruker tensor 27 spectrophotometer. The functional group analysis of oven dried material was carried out using Attenuated Transmission Method with the frequency range of 400–4000 cm −1 . TGA analysis of the synthesized polymer was taken by thermogravimetric instrument (model: TGA 8000, Perkin Elmer). All samples (5–7 mg) injected with gas flow rate of 100 mL/min with heating rate of 10 °C/min at a temperature range of 25–600 °C under nitrogen atmosphere. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) (JEOL 7600) was used for the determination of surface morphology of the CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc). This sample analysis sputtered with gold up to 15 min and microgram were recorded at 15 kV accelerating current voltage. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy was used for the structural confirmation of synthesized dye and it was recorded in Bruker 400 MHz and 100 MHz for proton and carbon 13 spectra respectively.

2.2 Reagents and solutions used for spectrophotometric determination

Chemicals used were analytic grade, all solutions were prepared using double distilled water. NaNO 2 (0.1500 g) and KNO 3 (0.7200 g) were dissolved in water for the making of nitrite and nitrate solutions of 1000 µg mL −1 each in two different 100 mL standard flask respectively. Aqueous solutions of sulfanilic acid (0.5%), Resorcinol (0.5%), Hydrochloric acid (2.5 M), Sodium Hydroxide (2.5 M) and EDTA (2%) was prepared.

2.3 Materials used for the preparation of hydrogel

Ethanol and toluene used for the wax extraction were procured from Spectrochem India. For the cellulose extraction sodium hydroxide and sodium hypochlorite were used was obtained from Loba chem India. Ammonium persulfate (APS), isopropyl alcohol, acrylic acid, N, N-methylene-bis-acrylamide (MBA) and sodium monochloroacetate were obtained from Spectrochem India, whereas 3-acryloxyethyltrimethylammonium chloride (ATAC) and Sodium acrylate (SA) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich. Entire chemicals used were of analytical grade and were used as received without purification.

2.4 General procedure for the spectrophotometric detection of nitrite in water

To the series of 25 mL standard flask, added Aliquot of the nitrite sample of 0.2–30 µg mL −1 , added 1 mL each of sulfanilic acid and hydrochloric acid, shaken well for 2 min. Made to stand for 3 min at 0–5 °C for the diazotization reaction to conclude. Then added 1 mL each of resorcinol and sodium hydroxide. Distilled water used to make up to the mark. [ 25 , 26 ]. The schematic representation was given in the Scheme 1 .

scheme 1

Schematic representation of preparation dye

2.5 General procedure for spectrophotometric detection of nitrate in water

Aliquot of nitrate of volume 10 mL was added to the beaker and added 5 mL conc. HCl and 2 g of granulated Zn/NaCl mixture, it was stirred at 30 rpm for 20 min to convert nitrate into nitrite. It was filtered through No. 41 Whatman filter paper to standard flask and diluted to 100 mL. Rest of the procedure was same as procedure for the detection of nitrite in water [ 27 ].

2.6 General procedure for detection of nitrate/nitrite in soil sample

To a clean 50 mL beaker, 1.0 g of soil sample was transferred. Then it was extracted using 0.5% sodium carbonate solution 4 times with 5 mL each, Whatman filter paper No. 41 was used for the filtration. Appropriate aliquots of the sample were transferred to 25 mL standard flask and analyzed for nitrite and nitrate according to the above procedure. All gave negative results. Now known amount of nitrite and nitrate were added separately, then analyzed using the same procedure.

2.7 General procedure for the Preparation of CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc)

Graft copolymerization via free radical mechanism was performed for the making CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc) on CMC. APS helped to initiate the reaction and role of MBA as cross linker. The main raw material i.e. CMC was made in our laboratory as reported [ 28 ], the preparation of performed via copolymerization of poly (ATAC-co-NaAc) on CMC using (APS) and (MBA) as initiator and cross linker respectively. In a typical reaction, 0.5 g of CMC was taken in a beaker containing 20 mL of distilled water with stirring for 10 h to get clear solution. Subsequently varied quantity of APS, ATAC and SA were added to the mixture with uniform stirring. Furthermore, different amount of MBA (0.01-0.120 g dissolved in 2 mL of demineralized water) was added and stirring continued for 3 h. Finally, the reactants were irradiated with 100-watt microwave power for 60 s for gelation. The hydrogel obtained was allowed overnight, followed by treated with three-fold of acetone for 3 h for the extraction of homopolymer. The unreacted monomers were removed by washing with distilled water [ 29 ]. It was then dried in an oven at 50 ° C for 2 h and finally stored for further analysis. The percentage of grafting and its efficiency were evaluated using Eqs. ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) respectively.

where W 0 is the weight of CMC, W 1 represents weight of (ATAC-co- NaAc) and W 2 represents CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc) after the extraction of homopolymer. The schematic representation of the reaction was given in the Scheme 2 .

scheme 2

Proposed reaction mechanism of CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co- NaAc)

2.8 General procedure for adsorption studies

A known quantity of CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc) was placed in 200 mL of 100 mg L −1 dye solution. The solution was stirred for predetermined time at 100 rpm, at each time interval 3 mL of dye solution was taken out, centrifuged to remove solid particles and diluted to predefined concentration, analyzed in spectrophotometer. The sample were analyzed in the wave length range of 200–800 nm. The calibration curve and linear regression plot was obtained by converting λ max of each sample into its concentration. The amount of dye adsorbed can be evaluated by the Eq. ( 3 )

where q e (mg g −1 ) represents the adsorption potential at equilibrium, C o indicates initial dye concentration and C e represents equilibrium dye concentration (mg L −1 ) in aqueous solution, M (mg) and V (mL) represents the weight of the hydrogel and volume of dye solution taken respectively.

2.9 General procedure for dye recycling studies

Dye adsorption–desorption investigation were performed out to check the reusability of the polymer. On the experiment, 100 mL of dye (isolated azo dye) solution of 100 mg L −1 was taken in a beaker to which added 17.4 mg of hydrogel and allowed it for adsorption up to its maximum adsorption of 3600 min. Later the hydrogel was removed from the solution and desorption experiment was proceeded. The adsorbed hydrogel was immersed in 0.5 mol L −1 each of HCl and NaOH solution, saturated NaCl solution of 100 mL each for 2 h at room temperature, hydrogel was taken out from the solution and washed with water to ensure hydrogel was free from dye on its surface, finally it was dried at 50 °C [ 30 ]. UV–Vis spectrophotometer was used to find out the amount of dye desorbed. The desorption ratio was calculated using the Eq. ( 4 )

where C o was the initial concentration and C e was the equilibrium concentration in the adsorbed solution whereas C d was the dye concentration in the desorbed solution, V i and V d were the solution volume taken for adsorption and desorption respectively.

2.10 General procedure for the removal of azo dye from the real test samples

In order to remove the azo dye from the test samples, we used 2.6 µg mL −1 of nitrite test solutions as such with varied quantity of hydrogel to check the adsorption capacity of azo dye. Immediately after testing for nitrite and nitrate hydrogel was put into the test solutions for 20 h.

2.11 General procedure for the removal of excess of resorcinol

Since the dye formation involves resorcinol as a key raw material, there was a chance of presence of excess of resorcinol in the solution. The excess of unreacted resorcinol from the solution was removed by activated charcoal [ 31 ].

3 Results and discussions

3.1 study of reagent concentration.

The effect of variation of sulfanilic acid and resorcinol concentration on the colour intensity of the forming azo dye was studied using present method (Fig. S1 ESI*). From the study it was revealed that the volume of 1 mL of 0.5% each of sulfanilic acid and resorcinol solutions gave the maximum absorbance. A higher or lower concentration of the reagent showed less absorbance intensity and 1 mL each of both solutions was enough for the complete colour development.

3.2 Spectrophotometric study

The azo dye formed by the reaction of sulfanilic acid and resorcinol showed absorption maximum at 385 nm (Fig. 1 a) in the spectrophotometer with the orange red colour. It was documented in the literature that the azo dye (was also called as Chrysoine resorcinol) exhibits absorption maximum at 387 nm evidencing the successful diazotization and coupling reactions [ 32 ]. Diazotization and coupling reaction were found to be temperature dependent and it should be carried at 0–5 °C and at 25 °C respectively. There were no distinguishable changes in the colour up to 35 °C. Above 40 °C there was a decrease in the intensity of colour of the solution. The reagents, 0.5% sulfanilic acid (1 mL), 0.5% resorcinol (1 mL), 2.5 M solution of both hydrochloric acid (1 mL) and sodium hydroxide (1 mL) solution per aliquot amount of sample 0.2–30 µg mL −1 resulted in maximum absorbance.

figure 1

a Absorption spectra of dye and reagent blank. b Absorption spectra at different concentrations. c Calibration curve

3.3 Validity of Beer–Lambert’s law

By measuring the absorbance values of various concentration of nitrite solution ranging from 0.2 to 30 µg mL −1 (Fig. 1 b). Beer’s law was studied and results shows in the plot of absorbance versus concentration (Fig. 1 c). From the plot it was evident that Beer’s law obeyed from 0.2 to 2.6 µg mL −1 of nitrite. The molar absorptivity, Sandell’s sensitivity, LOD (D L  = 3.3 σ/S) and LOQ (Q L  = 3.3 σ/S; where σ was the standard deviation of reagent blank (n = 5) and S was the slope of the calibration curve) of the method were 3.22 × 10 4 L mol −1 cm −1 , 1.98 × 10 −6 µg cm −2 , 0.0030 µg mL −1 and 0.0092 µg mL −1 respectively which was compared to be better than the reference method developed earlier at our lab [ 25 ]. Comparison of final results obtained in present method with other cited methods are given in the Tables 1 , 2 a, b, 3 .

3.4 Effect of interfering ions

The effect of diverse ions on the detection of nitrite/nitrate in the proposed method was studied with the fixed concentration of nitrite (2.6 µg mL −1 ) and nitrate (2.6 µg mL −1 ). The test result unveiled that Pb(II), Hg(II), Sn(II), Fe(III) found to interfere severely. The intensity of absorbance decreased substantially by the addition of these metal ions into the solution. The reaction of these metal ions with nitrite ions could be the reason for the early removal of nitrite ions from the solution thereby reducing the concentration of nitrite ions for diazotization. Anyhow, the tolerance limit of these ions was increased by adding 3 mL of 2% EDTA solution which preferentially chelates with these metal ions [ 42 ]. The tolerance limits of all tested ions are listed in the Table 4 . The change in intensity of absorbance was not more than ± 2% caused by the change in the amount of targeted ions.

3.5 The NMR analysis for the confirmation of formation of azo dye

Structure of the dye, 4-((2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)diazinyl)benzenesulfonic acid) was confirmed by 1 H and 13 C NMR spectra (Fig. 2 a, b). 1H NMR(400 MHz, DMSO–d 6 ): δ ppm, 6.36 (s, 1H, Ar–H), 6.51 (d,1H, Ar–H), 7.65–7.85 (m, 5H, Ar–H), 10.62 (s, 1H, Ar–OH), 12.38 (s, 1H, Ar–OH), 13 C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO–d 6 ) 102.989 (C–N), 109.21 (C–N), 121.07, 126.66, 129.84, 132.34 (aromatic C’s), 149.46 (CH), 150.36 (C–S), 156.53 (C–OH),163.17 (C–OH).

figure 2

a 1 H NMR of 4-((2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)diazinyl)benzenesulfonic acid), b 13 C NMR of 4-((2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)diazinyl)benzenesulfonic acid)

3.6 FT-IR analysis of hydrogel

Structural confirmation through functional groups identification of CMC and CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc) was followed by FT-IR spectroscopy and its typical FTIR spectra were shown in the Fig. 3 . IR spectra of CMC has all the normal peaks of cellulose includes peaks at 3332, 2914, 1626, 1026 cm −1 which were attributed to O–H, C–H, C=O, C–O stretching vibrations respectively. The same peaks observed in the backbone of CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc). In addition to the above, CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc) showed new peak at 1718 cm −1 corresponds to stretching vibrations of carbonyl groups of esters indicating the successful grafting [ 20 ]. The band at 1484 and 960 cm −1 corresponds to symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibrations of C–N bond in the 2-acryloxy ethyl trimethyl ammonium group which also another evident for the successful grafting. The one more evident for the successful grafting was shown by the peak at 1139 cm −1 , correlate with the C–O–C bond between carboxy cellulose back bone and alkyl group in the polymer [ 43 ].

figure 3

FTIR spectra of graft copolymerized CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc)

3.7 FESEM analysis

Surface morphology of CMC and CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc) were analyzed by FESEM. Figure 4 shows that CMC has a rod like shape whereas CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc) surface morphology has completely different indicating successful grafting [ 44 ].

figure 4

SEM images of a CMC, b and c CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc)

3.8 Thermogravimetric analysis

Thermogravimetric analysis was a complimentary technique from which one can get the idea about the composition and the thermal stability of the sample. Thermograms of the CMC and CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc) were shown in the Fig. 5 . It was integrated like, CMC has 3 stages of decomposition whereas CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc) has 4 stages of decomposition with proportionate weight loss up on increase in the temperature. Both CMC and CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc) dissipated initially from 25 to 91 °C and 25 to 70 °C with the loss in 10% and 4% mass respectively which might be due to loss disappearance of moisture content in the sample. There was insignificant decrease in weight on increase in temperature up to 280 °C for CMC. In addition, the second decomposition stage from 280 to 340 °C with 70% of total weight which may correspond to the decomposition of hydroxyl and carbonyl group of the polymer, similarly, third decomposition stage started from 340 °C till 500 °C with 20% weight loss. The CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc) showed its second decomposition curve in the range of 250–290 °C with 30% loss in weight corresponded to the decomposition of carbonyl and hydroxyl groups. Third and its successive decomposition stage observed in the range of 350–400 °C with 20% weight loss and 450–550 °C with 15% of weight loss respectively. From the curve, it was concluded that CMC has lost its 70% of its weight below 340 °C whereas CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc) lost only 30% of its weight indicating its significant higher thermal stability than the parent cellulose. It can also be considered as one of the evidences for successful grafting of CMC [ 45 ].

figure 5

TGA graph of CMC and CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc)

3.9 Adsorption kinetics

Kinetic study gives an important information about the adsorption mechanism of dye between the adsorbent and adsorbate which was necessary to predict the adsorbent adsorption rate and time, was given in the Fig. 6 . The effect of contact time on the adsorption ability of CMC-g-poly with the dye. The adsorption of dye increased rapidly until reaching a constant value at a contact time of 3600 min. Pseudo first order (linear and nonlinear) and pseudo second order kinetics in the linear form were analyzed and were evidenced by Eqs. ( 5 ) and ( 6 ) respectively:

figure 6

a The pseudo second-order linear fit. b Pseudo second-order non-linear fit. c Pseudo first order adsorption kinetics for dye adsorption onto CMC-g-poly (APTAC-co-DMA; pH = 5–6, Dye concentrations = 100 mgL −1 , adsorbent dose = 76.5 mg 100 mL −1 ). d Effect of contact time on adsorption of dye by CMC-g-poly(APTAC-co-DMA)

where k 1 and k 2 (g mg/min) are the rate constants, q e (mg/g) was the amounts of dye adsorbed at equilibrium contact time and q t (mg/g) was the adsorption at time t min, respectively.

The correlation coefficient (R 2 ) for the pseudo-second (Linear) order kinetic model was 0.9811 and was considerably more than those of pseudo-second (Non-Linear) model and pseudo-first order model with correlation coefficient 0.8698 and 0.9562 (Table 5 ). This means the adsorption mechanism is chemisorption. Most importantly, theoretical amount of adsorption was near to the experimental values of pseudo second order kinetics [ 46 , 47 , 48 ].

3.10 Adsorption isotherm

Adsorption isotherm were predominant for discern the adsorbent-adsorbate interaction. Freundlich and Langmuir adsorption models were the two major, important models demonstrating the association between the adsorbent and adsorbate. Freundlich model gave empirical relation between the solute concentration on the adsorbent surface to the solute concentration in the medium whereas Langmuir model gives a relation between monolayer of adsorbate molecules surrounding a homogeneous solid surface called adsorbent. These two isotherm models were denoted by the Eqs. ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) respectively.

where q e (mg g −1 ) was the amount of adsorbate at equilibrium adsorption and q m was the amount of adsorbent adsorbed on saturated monolayer. The K L and K F were the constants of Langmuir and Freundlich models respectively and C e (mg L −1 ) was the dye concentration in solution at equilibrium. The heterogeneity factor 1/n or n represents adsorption intensity. From the plot of log q e versus log C e and C e /q e versus C e , Freundlich and Langmuir adsorption models were demonstrated respectively (Fig. 7 ) [ 49 ].

figure 7

a Freundlich. b Langmuir adsorption isotherms for the dye adsorption

It was evident that Freundlich isotherm model was fitted for the experimental value when compared with the Langmuir model since the correlation coefficient R 2 for Freundlich was 0.9962 on comparing with the correlation coefficient R 2 for Langmuir model. Freundlich adsorption isotherm model was depend on the hypothesis that adsorption was a multilayer process on the heterogeneous surface with irregular adsorption heat and affinity distribution [ 50 ]. If the n value was in between 1 and 10 then the adsorption was favorable and here it was 1.103. Remaining parameters were tabulated in the Table 6 .

3.11 Adsorption thermodynamics

The adsorption rate and adsorption feasibility also depend on temperature of adsorption and it was evaluated by the thermodynamic specifications namely change in standard Gibb’s free energy ΔG o , change in standard enthalpy ΔH° and change in standard entropy ΔS°. The spontaneity of adsorption depends on the Gibb’s free energy and it was determined by the Eq. ( 9 )

where K was thermodynamic equilibrium constant, R was the gas constant T was the temperature.

Thermodynamic constant K was affected by the change in temperature and it was given by the Eq. ( 10 )

By integrating and on rearrangements of the Eq. ( 10 ), we get

The change in the Gibb’s free energy was given by

Δ H ° and Δ S ° were determined from the intercept and slope of the graph lnK versus 1/T (Fig. 8 ). The calculated and theoretical thermodynamic parameters were reported in the Table 7 . The positive value of Δ H ° shows the adsorption process was endothermic in nature [ 51 ]. Theoretical and experimental Gibb’s free energy value were approximately nearer which reflects that the adsorption was feasible with negative value indicating the spontaneous adsorption.

figure 8

Plot of ln K versus 1/T of adsorption of dye at different temperatures

3.12 Recycling studies-adsorption and desorption

The recycling ability of the newly synthesized hydrogel was analyzed via continues adsorption–desorption process of dye. The stability of the hydrogel also studied by collecting the data of adsorption–desorption cycle. For the adsorption, solution of 100 mgL −1 of dye with hydrogel was stirred at room 28° C until the equilibrium adsorption achieved which was followed desorption studies. The desorption experiment was conducted at three different conditions i.e. acidic (0.5 M HCl solution), neutral (1% NaCl solution) and basic (0.5 M NaOH solution) pH. In the basic medium, adsorption–desorption cycle was restricted to one, this might be due to the nature of the hydrogel, the result shown in the Fig. S2 (ESI*). From the figure, it was evident that in acidic medium was favorable for the recycling over neutral medium and desorption experiment attained equilibrium in 1 h. Afterwards it was regenerated by drying at 50 o C and reused for both adsorptive and desorptive studies. The adsorption–desorption cycle was carried out three times and there was a minimal decrease in the efficiency of hydrogel on multiple cycles. Therefore, the synthesized hydrogel has enough efficiency to use it several times with appreciable capacity [ 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ].

3.13 Removal of dye from the test samples

Based on the above experiment, for the removal of azo dye from the test samples which was formed during the nitrite estimation, varied amount of hydrogel i.e. 20 mg, 40 mg and 70 mg were put into the test samples of 2.6 µg mL −1 of nitrite for 20 h. The results are shown in the Fig. S3 (ESI*). The figure shows that 20 mg and 40 mg of hydrogels were not adequate enough to remove azo dye completely whereas 70 mg of hydrogel was sufficient for the removal of 2.6 µg mL −1 azo dye completely.

3.14 Removal of surplus reagents

In the process of determining nitrite, resorcinol and sulfanilic acid were being used as reagents. There observed a peak of lesser intensity around 280 nm which could be attributed either resorcinol (λmax:273 nm) or sulfanilic acid (λ max: 290 nm) [ 56 ]. In order to remove these impurities, activated charcoal (100 mg) was added to the test sample priory treated with 70 mg of hydrogel and kept for equilibration for 12 h. The UV absorption spectrum depicted in Fig. S4 (ESI*) indicated absence of absorption peak (red line) attributing both for dye as well as impurities. Hence this was an attempt to detect nitrite/nitrate by in situ azo dye formation and removal of the pollutants and contaminants from the water body.

4 Conclusion

In summary, this paper presents an approach to determine the nitrite and nitrate present in soil and water with high sensitivity and selectivity using Griess reagent prepared by commercially available sulfanilic acid and resorcinol. This method of detection of nitrite and nitrate exhibits a wide linearity range and low detection limit compared to the previously reported results. In the determination process, the azo dye formed could be considered as secondary pollutant for the environment. Hence dye from the test solutions was effectively removed by adsorption using custom made ecofriendly superabsorbent hydrogel [graft copolymer CMC-g-poly (ATAC-co-NaAc)]. The 70 mg of the hydrogel successively removed dye with a concentration of 2.6 μg mL −1 . The dye removal mechanism involved pseudo second order kinetics, adsorption was found to be spontaneous based on the thermodynamic parameters and it was befitting to Freundlich isotherm model. In addition, the impurities like unreacted reagents resorcinol/sulfanilic acids were removed from the test solutions by equilibrating with activated charcoal for 12 h. Therefore, the present investigation uses the versatile Griess reagent to determine the primary pollutants effectively at the same time suggests an efficient method to remove secondary pollutant azo dye formed during the determination.

Ren HH, Fan Y, Wang B, Yu LP (2018) Polyethylenimine-capped CdS quantum dots for sensitive and selective detection of nitrite in vegetables and water. J Agric Food Chem 66(33):8851–8858. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01951

Article   Google Scholar  

Gürkan R, Altunay N (2018) Preconcentration and indirect quantification of trace nitrite, nitrate and total nitrite in selected beverage and milk samples using ion-pairing cloud-point extraction with acridine orange. J Food Compos Anal 69:129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2018.03.002

Wolff IA, Wasserman AE (1972) Nitrates, nitrites, and nitrosamines. Science 177(4043):15–19

Hetrick EM, Schoenfisch MH (2009) Analytical chemistry of nitric oxide. Ann Rev Anal Chem 2:409–433. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anchem-060908-155146

Sabharwal S (1990) Determination of nitrite ion by differential-pulse polarography using N-(1-naphthyl) ethylenediamine. Analyst 115(10):1305–1307. https://doi.org/10.1039/AN9901501305

Van den Berg CM, Li H (1988) The determination of nanomolar levels of nitrite in fresh and sea water by cathodic stripping voltammetry. Anal Chim Acta 212:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)84126-4

Diallo S, Bastard P, Prognon P, Dauphin C, Hamon M (1996) A new spectrofluorimetric microdetermination of nitrite in water after derivatization with 4-methyl-7-aminocoumarin. Talanta 43(3):359–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-9140(95)01814-X

Chaurasia A, Verma KK (1994) Flow injection spectrophotometric determination of nitrite. Talanta 41(8):1275–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-9140(94)E0007-E

Jaim L (1993) Maria olimpia de oliveira rezende. Electroanalysis 5:251

Akyüz M, Ata Ş (2009) Determination of low level nitrite and nitrate in biological, food and environmental samples by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Talanta 79(3):900–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2009.05.016

Nouroozi S, Mirshafian R (2009) Flow injection kinetic spectrophotometric method for the determination of trace amounts of nitrite. Talanta 79(4):1149–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2009.03.025

Kozub BR, Rees NV, Compton RG (2010) Electrochemical determination of nitrite at a bare glassy carbon electrode; why chemically modify electrodes. Sens Actuat B Chem 143(2):539–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2009.09.065

Veena K, Narayana B (2009) Spectrophotometric determination of nitrite using new coupling agents. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3216

Zimmermann K (1979) Analytical methods for nitrate and nitrite determination in foods. 3. Spectrophotometric determination of nitrate and nitrite using sulphanilic acid/1-naphylamine, and of nitrite using resorcinol/zirconium (IV) oxychloride. Die Nahrung 23(9–10):929–934

Khatri A, Peerzada MH, Mohsin M, White M (2015) A review on developments in dyeing cotton fabrics with reactive dyes for reducing effluent pollution. J Clean Prod 87:50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.017

Kono H, Fujita S (2012) Biodegradable superabsorbent hydrogels derived from cellulose by esterification crosslinking with 1, 2, 3, 4-butanetetracarboxylic dianhydride. Carbohydr Polym 87(4):2582–2588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.045

Crini G (2006) Non-conventional low-cost adsorbents for dye removal: a review. Bioresour Technol 97(9):1061–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.05.001

Soliman FM, Yang W, Guo H, Shinger MI, Idris AM, Hassan ES (2016) Preparation of carboxymethyl cellulose-g-poly (acrylic acid-2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid)/attapulgite superabsorbent composite. Am J Polym Sci Technol 2(1):11–19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpst.20160201.12

Lee E, Kim B (2011) Smart delivery system for cosmetic ingredients using pH-sensitive polymer hydrogel particles. Korean J Chem Eng 28(6):1347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-010-0509-8

Li Q, Ma Z, Yue Q, Gao B, Li W, Xu X (2012) Synthesis, characterization and swelling behavior of superabsorbent wheat straw graft copolymers. Bioresour Technol 118:204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.028

Chen Z, Wang W, Guo L, Yu Y, Yuan Z (2013) Preparation of enzymatically cross-linked sulfated chitosan hydrogel and its potential application in thick tissue engineering. Sci China Chem 56(12):1701–1709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-013-4887-8

Souda P, Sreejith L (2014) Environmental sensitive hydrogel for purification of waste water: part 1: synthesis and characterization. Polym Bull 71(4):839–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-014-1097-2

Almomen A, Cho S, Yang CH, Li Z, Jarboe EA, Peterson CM, Huh KM, Janát-Amsbury MM (2015) Thermosensitive progesterone hydrogel: a safe and effective new formulation for vaginal application. Pharm Res 32(7):2266–2279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-014-1616-8

Sun JX, Sun XF, Zhao H, Sun RC (2004) Isolation and characterization of cellulose from sugarcane bagasse. Polym Degrad Stab 84(2):331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.02.008

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Sreekumar NV, Narayana B, Hegde P, Manjunatha BR, Sarojini BK (2003) Determination of nitrite by simple diazotization method. Microchem J 74(1):27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-265X(02)00093-0

Cherian T, Narayana B (2006) A new system for the spectrophotometric determination of trace amounts of nitrite in environmental samples. J Braz Chem Soc 17(3):577–581. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532006000300022

Horita K, Wang G, Satake M (1997) Spectrophotometric determination of nitrate and nitrite in soil and water samples with a diazotizable aromatic amine and coupling agent using column preconcentration on naphthalene supported with ion-pair of tetradecyldimethylbenzylammonium and iodide. Anal Chim Acta 350(3):295–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(97)00316-4

Bello K, Sarojini BK, Narayana B, Rao A, Byrappa K (2018) A study on adsorption behavior of newly synthesized banana pseudo-stem derived superabsorbent hydrogels for cationic and anionic dye removal from effluents. Carbohydr Polym 181:605–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.106

Soleimani F, Sadeghi H, Shahsavari H, Soleimani A, Sadeghi F (2013) Investigation of effective parameters onto swelling behaviour of superabsorbent hydrogels. Asian J Chem 25(9):4797–4800

Hakam A, Rahman IA, Jamil MSM, Othaman R, Amin MCIM, Lazim AM (2015) Removal of methylene blue dye in aqueous solution by sorption on a bacterial-g-poly-(acrylic acid) polymer network hydrogel. Sains Malays 44(6):827–834

Aghav RM, Kumar S, Mukherjee SN (2011) Artificial neural network modeling in competitive adsorption of phenol and resorcinol from water environment using some carbonaceous adsorbents. J Hazard Mater 188(1–3):67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.067

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrysoine_resorcinol

Langley CE, Šljukic B, Banks CE, Compton RG (2007) Manganese dioxide graphite composite electrodes: application to the electroanalysis of hydrogen peroxide, ascorbic acid and nitrite. Anal Sci 23(2):165–170. https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.23.165

Salimi A, Hallaj R, Mamkhezri H, Hosaini SMT (2008) Electrochemical properties and electrocatalytic activity of FAD immobilized onto cobalt oxide nanoparticles: application to nitrite detection. J Electroanal Chem 619:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2008.03.003

Šljukić B, Banks CE, Crossley A, Compton RG (2007) Copper oxide–graphite composite electrodes: application to nitrite sensing. Electroanal Int J Devot Fundam Pract Asp Electroanal 19(1):79–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.200603708

Šljukić B, Banks CE, Crossley A, Compton RG (2007) Lead (IV) oxide–graphite composite electrodes: application to sensing of ammonia, nitrite and phenols. Anal Chim Acta 587(2):240–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2007.01.041

Pandikumar A, Yusoff N, Huang NM, Lim HN (2015) Electrochemical sensing of nitrite using a glassy carbon electrode modified with reduced functionalized graphene oxide decorated with flower-like zinc oxide. Microchim Acta 182(5–6):1113–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-014-1436-x

Ehsan MA, Khaledi H, Pandikumar A, Rameshkumar P, Huang NM, Arifin Z, Mazhar M (2015) Nitrite ion sensing properties of ZnTiO 3 –TiO 2 composite thin films deposited from a zinc–titanium molecular complex. New J Chem 39(9):7442–7452. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NJ00850F

Ehsan MA, Naeem R, McKee V, Saeed AH, Pandikumar A, Huang NM, Mazhar M (2016) Electrochemical sensing of nitrite using a copper–titanium oxide composite derived from a hexanuclear complex. RSC Adv 6(33):27852–27861. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA00104A

Fan X, Lin P, Liang S, Hui N, Zhang R, Feng J, Xu G (2017) Gold nanoclusters doped poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene) for highly sensitive electrochemical sensing of nitrite. Ionics 23(4):997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-016-1865-0

Peng ZW, Yuan D, Jiang ZW, Li YF (2017) Novel metal-organic gels of bis (benzimidazole)-based ligands with copper (II) for electrochemical selectively sensing of nitrite. Electrochim Acta 238:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.121

Narayana B, Sunil K (2009) A spectrophotometric method for the determination of nitrite and nitrate. Eurasian J Anal Chem 4(2):204–214

Google Scholar  

Dangge G, Xiying D, Chen C, Bin L, Jianzhong M (2015) Synthesis of polymer quaternary ammonium salt containing epoxy group/nanoZnO long-acting antimicrobial coating for cotton fabrics. Ind Eng Chem Res 54(43):10560–10567. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02509

Mahmoud GA, Mohamed SF, Hassan HM (2015) Removal of methylene blue dye using biodegradable hydrogel and reusing in a secondary adsorption process. Desalin Water Treat 54(10):2765–2776. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.905978

Rusu AG, Popa MI, Lisa G, Vereştiuc L (2015) Thermal behavior of hydrophobically modified hydrogels using TGA/FTIR/MS analysis technique. Thermochim Acta 613:28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2015.05.018

Mushtaq M, Bhatti HN, Iqbal M, Noreen S (2016) Eriobotrya japonica seed biocomposite efficiency for copper adsorption: isotherms, kinetics, thermodynamic and desorption studies. J Environ Manage 176:21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.013

Borah L, Goswami M, Phukan P (2015) Adsorption of methylene blue and eosin yellow using porous carbon prepared from tea waste: adsorption equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics study. J Environ Chem Eng 3(2):1018–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.02.013

Oladipo AA, Gazi M, Yilmaz E (2015) Single and binary adsorption of azo and anthraquinone dyes by chitosan-based hydrogel: selectivity factor and Box–Behnken process design. Chem Eng Res Des 104:264–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.08.018

Wibowo E, Rokhmat M, Abdullah M (2017) Reduction of seawater salinity by natural zeolite (Clinoptilolite): adsorption isotherms, thermodynamics and kinetics. Desalination 409:146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.01.026

El Qada EN, Allen SJ, Walker GM (2006) Adsorption of methylene blue onto activated carbon produced from steam activated bituminous coal: a study of equilibrium adsorption isotherm. Chem Eng J 124(1–3):103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2006.08.015

Maneerung T, Liew J, Dai Y, Kawi S, Chong C, Wang CH (2016) Activated carbon derived from carbon residue from biomass gasification and its application for dye adsorption: kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamic studies. Bioresour Technol 200:350–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.047

Malekbala MR, Khan MA, Hosseini S, Abdullah LC, Choong TS (2015) Adsorption/desorption of cationic dye on surfactant modified mesoporous carbon coated monolith: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J Ind Eng Chem 21:369–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2014.02.047

Oladipo AA, Ifebajo AO, Gazi M (2019) Magnetic LDH-based CoO–NiFe2O4 catalyst with enhanced performance and recyclability for efficient decolorization of azo dye via Fenton-like reactions. Appl Catal B 243:243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.050

Chieng HI, Lim LB, Priyantha N (2015) Enhancing adsorption capacity of toxic malachite green dye through chemically modified breadnut peel: equilibrium, thermodynamics, kinetics and regeneration studies. Environ Technol 36(1):86–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2014.938124

Ifebajo AO, Oladipo AA, Gazi M (2020) Sun-light driven enhanced azo dye decontamination from aqueous solution by CoO–CuFe. Desalin Water Treat 177(2020):423–430. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2020.25247

Suresh S, Srivastava VC, Mishra IM (2011) Study of catechol and resorcinol adsorption mechanism through granular activated carbon characterization, pH and kinetic study. Sep Sci Technol 46(11):1750–1766. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2011.570284

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge BSR one time Grant to BN for purchase of chemicals. Authors thank DST-PURSE laboratory for TGA analysis and other facilities.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Studies in Chemistry, Mangalore University, Mangalagangothri, Karnataka, 574199, India

B. U. Gauthama, B. Narayana & N. K. Suresh

Department of Industrial Chemistry, Mangalore University, Mangalagangothri, Karnataka, 574199, India

B. K. Sarojini & Kabiru Bello

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors have participated in this research, either by conception and design, or analysis and interpretation of the data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and approval of the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Narayana .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 693 kb)

Rights and permissions.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Gauthama, B.U., Narayana, B., Sarojini, B.K. et al. Nitrate/Nitrite determination in water and soil samples accompanied by in situ azo dye formation and its removal by superabsorbent cellulose hydrogel. SN Appl. Sci. 2 , 1225 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-3016-5

Download citation

Received : 24 February 2020

Accepted : 09 June 2020

Published : 16 June 2020

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-3016-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Spectrophotometric

Advertisement

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings

The PMC website is updating on October 15, 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List
  • Micromachines (Basel)

Logo of micromac

Nitrite Determination in Environmental Water Samples Using Microchip Electrophoresis Coupled with Amperometric Detection

Simone bernardino lucas.

1 Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74690-900, GO, Brazil

Lucas Mattos Duarte

2 Instituto de Química, Departamento de Química Analítica, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói 24020-141, RJ, Brazil

Kariolanda Cristina Andrade Rezende

Wendell karlos tomazelli coltro.

3 Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Bioanalítica (INCTBio), Campinas 13083-861, SP, Brazil

Associated Data

Not applicable.

Nitrite is considered an important target analyte for environmental monitoring. In water resources, nitrite is the result of the nitrogen cycle and the leaching processes of pesticides based on nitrogenous compounds. A high concentration of nitrite can be associated with intoxication processes and metabolic disorders in humans. The present study describes the development of a portable analytical methodology based on microchip electrophoresis coupled with amperometric detection for the determination of nitrite in environmental water samples. Electrophoretic and detection conditions were optimized, and the best separations were achieved within 60 s by employing a mixture of 30 mmol L −1 lactic acid and 15 mmol L −1 histidine (pH = 3.8) as a running buffer applying 0.7 V to the working electrode ( versus Pt) for amperometric measurements. The developed methodology revealed a satisfactory linear behavior in the concentration range between 20 and 80 μmolL −1 (R 2 = 0.999) with a limit of detection of 1.3 μmolL −1 . The nitrite concentration was determined in five water samples and the achieved values ranged from (28.7 ± 1.6) to (67.1 ± 0.5) µmol L −1 . The data showed that using the proposed methodology revealed satisfactory recovery values (83.5–103.8%) and is in good agreement with the reference technique. Due to its low sample consumption, portability potential, high analytical frequency, and instrumental simplicity, the developed methodology may be considered a promising strategy to monitor and quantitatively determine nitrite in environmental samples.

1. Introduction

Inorganic ions are widely considered as parameters for monitoring and controlling the quality of food samples [ 1 , 2 ], biological matrices [ 3 , 4 ], environmental samples [ 5 , 6 ], and clinical diagnoses [ 7 , 8 ]. Among the inorganic ions, nitrite has been studied to evaluate food quality. Cardoso and coworkers determined the presence of nitrite in sausage and ham samples, due to the use of this compound as a food preservative [ 9 , 10 ]. In biological matrices, nitrite is evaluated due to its relationship with the metabolic pathway of nitrous oxide and a series of other clinical diagnoses, depending on the fluid in which it is evaluated (urine, saliva, or blood) [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. In the field of environmental analysis, the presence of nitrite in water samples comes from natural processes such as biological denitrification and acid rain, or it is due to contamination by industrial waste and other economic activities [ 13 , 14 ].

In recent years, fertilizers and agrochemicals based on nitrogen species have been increasingly used, and in the case of an over-application, the lixiviation process can transfer nitrite to rivers and lakes [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. The consumption of water and food containing nitrite above the limit can cause its accumulation in the human body [ 18 ]. In high concentrations, nitrite may be associated with methemoglobinemia or “blue baby syndrome” [ 19 ], carcinogenic nitrosamines, gastric cancer, spontaneous intrauterine growth restriction, abortions, and birth defects of the central nervous system, among other diagnoses [ 20 , 21 , 22 ].

The quantification of nitrite in environmental water supply samples is an important procedure to monitor and control the increase of NO 2 − in water resources and avoid possible poisoning [ 18 , 23 , 24 ]. Nitrite can be determined by spectrophotometric measurements through different methodologies including nitrosation-based [ 25 ], catalytic [ 26 ], and Griess reaction [ 14 ] assays. The latter is the most widely used due to its simplicity and the low cost per analysis; however, bench-based standard methodologies require a large volume of reagents, generate a considerable amount of waste, and may be considered time-consuming [ 14 , 25 ].

Other techniques have also been employed for nitrite analysis like chemiluminescence, chromatography, electrochemistry, and capillary electrophoresis (CE) [ 27 ]. Chemiluminescence provides simplicity, a wide linear range, and low cost, but it also offers poor stability and reproducibility [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Chromatographic methods such as gas chromatography hyphenated with mass spectrometry detection (GC-MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) are explored more often due to their high selectivity and the potential to perform a faster analysis [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]; however, they require high-cost instrumentation, sample pre-treatment, and derivatization steps [ 25 ]. Electrochemical detection has also been explored for nitrite analysis, offering low-cost analyses with miniaturization capability. In addition, the use of modified electrodes helps to potentially increase sensitivity and selectivity [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. Lastly, conventional CE systems have gained prominence among the available separation techniques due to their efficiency, resolution, and relatively short analysis times, when compared to chromatographic separations [ 7 ].

With the aim of employing a faster alternative approach for the detection of nitrite, portable microsystems have been described in the literature, including paper-based colorimetric assays [ 38 ]. Nevertheless, paper-based devices can suffer interference from other ions, as well as limiting the possibility of using some solvents due to their interaction with the platform material [ 10 , 17 , 42 , 43 ]. Another alternative is the use of microchip electrophoresis (ME) devices due to their potential for portability and high separation efficiency, short analysis time, reduced sample consumption, and low waste generation [ 44 ]. In addition, ME devices can be manufactured on different materials including glass, silicon, polymers, threads, 3D printing filaments toner, and paper-based platforms on paper or polymers [ 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ].

Freitas and coworkers used ME with capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection (C 4 D) to monitor inorganic species, including nitrite in aquarium and river water, achieving a limit of detection (LOD) of 4.9 µmoL −1 [ 50 ]. In addition to conductometric detection [ 50 , 51 , 52 ], amperometric detection (AD) can be used in association with chip-based systems, because it provides better selectivity and sensitivity [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ]. For environmental samples, selectivity is an important feature to be considered, especially because the presence of other charged species in water samples, such as chloride, nitrate, and sulfate anions, can negatively affect the separation performance when conductivity detection modes are used [ 57 , 58 ]. To increase the selectivity and sensitivity of amperometric detection for nitrite determination, different groups have proposed the use of simple hybrid electrodes, nanotubes, and/or nanocomposites [ 22 , 24 , 59 , 60 ].

In this context, the present study proposes the use of ME–AD for the quantification of nitrite in environmental water samples. The methodology was developed using a commercial and portable instrument, which comprises a potentiostat, a high voltage power supply, and a microfluidic platform to assemble ME devices with integrated electrodes. The feasibility of the proposed methodology was demonstrated through nitrite determination in water samples from two types of ecosystems, a small aquarium, and a fish breeding dam. The obtained results were compared with the standard spectrophotometric method based on the Griess reaction.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. reagents and solutions.

Histidine (His), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sulphanilamide, and N-(1-naphtyl)-ethylenediamine dihydrochloride (NED) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Lactic Acid (HLat) was acquired from Cromoline (Diadema, SP, Brazil), and sodium nitrite (NaNO 2 ) and citric acid were supplied by NEON (Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil). Stock solutions of HLat, His, NaOH, and NaNO 2 were prepared at concentrations of 200, 100, 100, and 10 mmol L −1 , respectively. For the reference methodology using the Griess reaction, stock solutions of 4 mmol L −1 NED and 50 mmol L −1 sulphanilamide were used. All solutions were weekly prepared with ultrapure water (resistivity 18 MΩ cm) and filtered through nylon filters with 0.22 µm pore diameter. All experiments were performed at 23 ± 1 °C.

2.2. Samples

Water samples were collected from two types of ecosystems located in the city of Inhumas-GO: a small aquarium (16°22′24.9″ S 49°29′04.4″ W) and a fish breeding dam (16°20′16.8″ S 49°29′44.4″ W). Both types of samples were collected, filtered through nylon filters with 0.22 µm pore diameter, and stored in polymeric sterile tubes. No further pretreatment was necessary, and dilutions were made for quantification by the reference and the proposed methods.

2.3. Instrumentation

For the analytical procedures performed with amperometric detection, an HVStat system supplied by MicruX Technologies (Asturias, Spain) was used. This system consists of a portable instrument that includes a high voltage power supply integrated with a 165 × 150 × 85 mm 3 potentiostat ( Figure 1 A) and a platform ( Figure 1 B) that has been specifically developed for use by coupling the microchips with the detection system. This system also incorporates software (MicruX Manager) for instrumentation control, data acquisition, and processing.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is micromachines-13-01736-g001.jpg

Portable instrumentation for ME–AD analysis including: ( A ) HVStat system manufactured by MicruX Technologies (Asturias, Spain) with integrated bipotentiostat coupled with a high voltage power source, ( B ) microfluidic holder (model MCE-HOLDER-DC02), ( C ) layout of the hybrid microchip composed of SU-8/glass with integrated electrodes for electrochemical detection highlighting the positioning of electrodes at end-channel arrangement.

The electrophoresis microchip was composed of a hybrid SU-8/glass platform (38 mm long × 13 mm wide × 0.8 mm thick) ( Figure 1 C) containing injection and separation microchannels (50 µm width × 20 µm deep) designed in a cross-shaped arrangement. The total and effective separation microchannel lengths were 35 and 30 mm, respectively. Amperometric detection was performed using integrated Ti/Pt (50/150 nm) thin-film electrodes, where the working electrode (WE) was positioned at 20 µm from the separation channel extremity (end-channel mode). All three electrodes were spaced at 100 μm from each other.

2.4. Electrophoretic Procedure

The microchips were preconditioned and rinsed with 0.1 mol L −1 NaOH, ultrapure water, and running buffer for 30, 15, and 10 min, respectively. The procedure was performed with the aid of a simple vacuum system, at 560 mmHg. After the preconditioning stage, all the reservoirs and microchannels were filled with the running buffer solution.

The microchip was connected to the HVStat system while fixed in its holder and the baseline was stabilized. The sample was electrokinetically injected using the floating mode, where an electric potential was applied for enough time to fill the injection channel [ 61 , 62 , 63 ]. Following this, another electric potential was applied so that the sample volume at the intersection of the channels went to the detection zone. Finally, the detection potential was applied and the electropherogram was recorded. All experiments were performed at 23 ± 1 °C.

2.5. Reference Analytical Method

To assess the accuracy of the developed methodology, the samples were also analyzed according to the spectrophotometric procedure based on the Griess reaction, following the protocol of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [ 64 ]. After the colorimetric reaction, measurements were carried out with a UV-Vis Spectrophotometer manufactured by FEMTO (São Paulo, SP, Brazil) at 530 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. detection potential optimization.

Hydrodynamic voltammograms were recorded to evaluate the best potential for nitrite detection during electrophoretic procedure. A standard solution of 200 µmolL −1 NO 2 − was then used as a model in electrophoretic runs and detected by applying potentials between 0.5 and 1.0 V to the working electrode (see the electropherograms presented in Figure S1A —available in the Supplementary Materials ). The signals were evaluated for the area, intensity, and peak width. In addition, the stability of the electric current was observed. Considering all these parameters, the potential of 0.7 V was defined as optimum and kept constant for the next steps due to providing the highest intensity and peak area, as shown in Figure S1B . Furthermore, it is important to mention that the baseline current remained stable for the analysis that was applying this detection potential. For a higher potential, a noticeable increase in the background current was observed ( Figure S1C ).

3.2. Optimization of the Running Buffer

According to the literature, the separation of the anionic species by ME devices is successfully performed when lactic acid is used on the running buffer [ 50 , 51 ]. Therefore, a buffer solution composed of lactic acid and histidine was prepared at different ratios to investigate the pH effect on nitrite determination. Th analyses were carried out in an acidic medium to favor nitrite oxidation [ 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 ]. For this purpose, the lactic acid concentration was fixed at 30 mmol L −1 and the histidine concentration ranged from 5 to 25 mmol L −1 (5 mmol L −1 increments), providing solutions with pH at 3.2, 3.6, 3.8, 4.1, and 4.5, respectively (a–e) ( Figure 2 A). An increase in the concentration of histidine led to an increase in the pH of the electrolyte and an improvement in peak shape. However, at 20 mmol L −1 of histidine, the peak area decreased, and the peak width had widened ( Figure 2 B), which negatively impacted the sensitivity and separation efficiency. Thus, the run buffer that was composed of 30 mmol L −1 lactic acid and 15 mmol L −1 histidine (pH = 3.8) was defined as optimum and kept constant once it also provided the lower relative standard deviation values.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is micromachines-13-01736-g002.jpg

( A ) Electropherograms showing the separation and detection of nitrite (50 µmol L −1 ) using a running buffer composed of 30 mmol L −1 lactic acid and histidine in the concentrations between 5 and 25 mmol L −1 , resulting in a pH from 3.2 to 4.5 (a–e). ( B ) Peak area and width versus buffer pH values. Injection: −800 V for 10 s, Separation: −1000 V for 60 s, Detection 0.7 V versus Pt.

3.3. Eletrophoretic Parameters

The sample was electrokinetically introduced into microchannels using the floating mode. To achieve the suitable injection time, a 50 µmol L −1 nitrite standard solution was used as model. For this purpose, injection time was varied from 1 to 20 s. As shown in Figure 3 A, the presence of nitrite was observed only for injection times longer than 3 s. As expected, the increase in the injection time caused a greater volume of the sample to be injected and, consequently, a higher signal was observed [ 63 ]. For injection times longer than 10s, a noticeable peak broadening with a consequent loss of peak symmetry was observed. Based on the data presented in Figure 3 B, the injection time of 10 s was then selected as ideal for the subsequent experiments.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is micromachines-13-01736-g003.jpg

( A ) Electropherograms showing the separation and detection of nitrite (50 µmol L −1 ) introduced into microchannels under different injection times: 1–20 s. ( B ) Area and peak width versus injection time. Running buffer: 30/15 mmol L −1 Lactic Acid/Histidine (pH = 3.8). Injection: −800 V, Separation: −1000 V for 60 s, Detection 0.7 V versus Pt.

The potentials used for electrokinetic control of solutions into microchannels were also optimized. The injection potential was varied from −300 to −1000 V, and separation from −500 to −1200 V ( Figure 4 A). The peak width and migration times presented similar behaviors, being inversely proportional to the application of potential. The peak area, as expected, was directly proportional to the increase in the applied potential ( Figure 4 B).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is micromachines-13-01736-g004.jpg

( A ) Electropherograms showing the separation and detection of nitrite (50 µmol L −1 ) under different injection/separation voltages. ( B ) Peak area and migration time versus injection/separation potentials. Experimental conditions are given in Figure 3 .

When applying −1200 V for the separation potential, despite obtaining the highest peak area and the shortest migration time, a slightly higher RSD value (8.6%, n = 3) was obtained. Therefore, −1000 V was defined for the separation potential since the difference in the area for both conditions was low, and under these conditions a lower RSD was obtained between the replicates ( Figure 4 B).

The effect of the difference in conductivity between the sample and the running buffer, in the detection, was also evaluated ( Figure S2 ). To achieve this, a fortified sample and a standard solution were prepared at the same concentration (30 μmolL −1 of NO 2 − ). The samples were diluted in water and a 10% v/v running buffer. When comparing the nitrite peak areas and intensities recorded under the two dilution procedures, it was observed that samples diluted in 10% v/v buffer presented a smaller standard deviation. The difference in the peak area in the fortified sample compared to that obtained in the standard solution was lower than 12.4%. This may be attributed to a biased electrokinetic injection and possibly to sample stacking. Therefore, a 10% v/v running buffer was used in all subsequent dilutions.

3.4. Method Validation

After experimental optimizations, the analytical performance of the proposed methodology was investigated by consecutive injections of a standard nitrite solution prepared at 100 μmol L −1 . For a sequence of three sequential injections, the relative standard deviation (RSD) values for migration time, peak area, and intensity ranged from 0.1 to 2.3% ( Table 1 ), thus suggesting satisfactory injection–to–injection repeatability in an intra-day comparison. In the same way, the nitrite analysis was also performed on three different days using two different commercial microchips of the same model (MCE-SU8-Pt001). In the inter-day comparison ( n = 3), the RSD values for the measured parameters varied from 3.3 to 15.6%. Lastly, for an inter-chip comparison and based on the recorded electropherograms, the RSD values calculated for migration time, peak area, and intensity varied between 3.4 and 11.8%. All the data obtained are summarized in Table 1 and the variations observed may be associated with slight changes on the electroosmotic flow mobility. Nevertheless, the comparison discussed herein demonstrates the potential of SU-8/glass devices for routine analysis employing a portable instrument, which may enable its use for in-field assays.

Summary of intra-day, inter-day, and inter-chip comparisons for the analysis of a 100 µmolL −1 nitrite standard solution ( n = 3).

ParameterIntra-DayInter-DayInter-Chip
RSD (%)0.112.311.8
RSD (%)2.315.69.8
RSD (%)0.63.33.4

In addition to the comparisons discussed above, the analytical performance was also investigated in terms of linear range and detectability levels. The developed method exhibited good linear behavior (R 2 = 0.999) in the concentration range between 20 and 80 μmol L −1 (Area = −7.123 + 0.692 × [NO 2 − ]; R 2 = 0.999). The limit of detection (LOD) was calculated based on the ratio between three times the standard deviation for the blank and the angular coefficient of the analytical curve and the value was 1.3 μmol L −1 . The LOD value achieved using the ME–AD system was compared to other reports published in the last five years involving miniaturized and conventional techniques, as summarized in Table 2 . In addition to the LOD, other features such as analysis time, tested sample, employed technique, and portability ware also included.

Comparison of the analytical performance of the proposed methodology for nitrite determination with other studies reported since 2017.

SampleAnalytical TechniqueAnalysis Time (s)LOD (μmol L )PortableRef
bloodIC—conductivity detection~1920 0.078No[ ]
waterHPLC—UV/DAD1809.78No[ ]
foodCPE/UV–Vis~9000.003No[ ]
water and foodPaper-based electrochemical devicesN/E0.1Yes[ ]
waterPaper-based colorimetric devices~9002.6Yes[ ]
SalivaPaper-based colorimetric devices ~3004.8Yes[ ]
Meat and waterElectrocatalysis/AD~1200.020No[ ]
waterElectrocatalysis/AD~30.038No[ ]
waterElectrocatalysis/AD~500.000184No[ ]
waterME-conductivity detection~350 *0.652No[ ]
post-blast explosive residuesME–C D1509.5Yes[ ]
waterME–AD802.8No[ ]
waterME–AD708.2No[ ]
CellsME–AD350.50No[ ]
waterME–AD501.3YesThis study

N/E: not specified. * Time of sample treatment not considered.

As shown in Table 2 , well-established analytical techniques have provided better LOD values. However, most of the examples exploring these techniques require bulky and costly instrumentation, which are restricted to a few research groups and are not compatible with portability, making their in-field use difficult [ 3 , 24 , 26 , 44 , 59 , 60 ]. Furthermore, when compared to paper-based devices [ 38 , 43 ], the portability of ME–AD has a noticeably lower appeal. On the other hand, ME–AD devices can be reused many times (estimated up to 1000 analyses) and, although not demonstrated in this study, they can allow selective analysis in the presence of other anionic species.

In comparison to the recent studies employing the ME–AD, our proposed methodology has provided one of the lowest LOD values that was achieved using unmodified electrodes, thus revealing attractive advantages over other methods which use modified electrodes and sample pretreatment steps [ 56 ]. Moreover, based on the examples using ME devices with portable instrumentation, the device explored in this study has offered the shortest analysis time. In view of the studies compared in Table 2 , the performance obtained through the proposed method as well as the previously discussed advantages make clear its potential for in-field analysis.

3.5. Environmental Water Analysis and Comparison with a Reference Methodology

Environmental samples of aquarium water (A) and fish breeding dam water (D) were analyzed and the recorded electropherograms are displayed in Figure 5 . Samples were diluted 50% ( v / v ) and then spiked with nitrite standard solution. Thus, samples labelled as A1, A2, and A3 correspond to the signal obtained for the analysis of aquarium water diluted at 50% ( v / v ) and fortified with 30, 40, and 60 μmol L −1 of NO 2 − , respectively. On the other hand, samples labelled as D1 refer to a sample of dam water diluted by 50% ( v / v ), while samples D2 and D3 are the same dam water diluted but fortified with 20 and 40 μmol L −1 of NO 2 − , respectively. All six samples (A1, A2, A3, D1, D2, and D3) were analyzed in triplicate by both the proposed and the reference methods. The aquarium samples (A) showed a lower concentration of nitrite due to the nitrogen cycle, presenting concentrations below the detection limit for both the proposed method and the reference method. Freitas and collaborators also found this nitrite profile in aquarium water samples in the first weeks (0 to 8) of operation; however, due to the formation and development of the ecosystem of a small aquarium, the conversion of species to nitrite is not very significant, and the aquarium where the samples were collected had recently been cleaned and reassembled [ 50 ].

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is micromachines-13-01736-g005.jpg

Electropherograms showing the detection of nitrite in (A1–A3) aquarium water samples (A1–A3) and fish breeding dam water samples (D1–D3). Injection: −800 V for 10 s; Separation: −1000 V for 60 s. For the other conditions, see Figure 3 .

Reference analyses were carried out using a spectrophotometric procedure based on the Griess reaction. The obtained linear regression equation related to the analytical curve was: Absorbance = 0.002 + 0.037 × [NO 2 − ] (R 2 = 0.999). The original dam water sample (D) showed a NO 2 − concentration of 64.4 ± 0.6 μmol L −1 . Based on this, the final concentration of NO 2 − in samples D1, D2, and D3 were 32.2 ± 0.3; 52.2 ± 0.5, and 72.2 ± 0.6 μmol L −1 , respectively. The electropherograms obtained for the analysis of each of the samples are shown in Figure 5 . It was possible to observe the increase of the signal referring to the nitrite after the fortifications. There was also a difference in the profile of the signals obtained for nitrite according to the sample matrix. For aquarium samples (A1–A3) the nitrite peaks had a lower intensity and peak symmetry, resulting in wider signals. In the samples from dam water (D1–D3), the signals obtained were more intense and symmetrical.

This difference in the peak symmetry can be justified by the fact that the aquarium water was collected only one day after changing the filters. In addition, the aquarium fish population was entirely the same species, Kinguio (Carassius auratus) a small fish, while the dam water samples showed a population of larger fish. This difference between ecosystems affects the conductivity of the matrix that influences the peak shape, as already reported by Ollikainen and collaborators, who used the same instrumentation (HVStat) [ 69 ]. Using the nitrite peak area and the obtained linear regression from the quantification by the ME–AD, the nitrite concentration for the six samples was calculated. The results are presented in Table 3 .

Nitrite concentration values found in water samples using the reference and the proposed methodologies ( n = 3).

SampleReference Methodology
(µmol L )
ME-DA
(µmol L )
Recovery (%)RSD (%)
D132.2 ± 0.330.4 ± 1.090.7–97.13.3
D252.2 ± 0.546.3 ± 5.388.8–98.6 6.3
D372.2 ± 0.667.1 ± 0.592.5–93.80.7
A130.0 ± 0.328.7 ± 1.690.1–100.85.6
A240.0 ± 0.435.9 ± 2.983.5–97.78.1
A360.0 ± 0.556.6 ± 5.087.8–103.8 8.8

For all analyses, recoveries above 83.5% were achieved. Thus, the determination of nitrite by the ME–AD developed in this study is a promising methodology for analysis in environmental samples, with no detected matrix effect that changes the reliability of the determination.

4. Conclusions

In this study, a promising methodology using ME–AD for the quantification of nitrite in water samples was developed. The use of a portable instrument has offered a satisfactory analytical performance. The proposed methodology was optimized, and the proof-of-concept was successfully demonstrated through the determination of nitrite in environmental samples of water from aquariums and dams. The obtained results revealed a good agreement with the data recorded by the reference technique. Based on the achieved results, the methodology developed in a portable and compact instrument may emerge as powerful analytical tool for in-field analysis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/mi13101736/s1 , optimization of the detection potential; effect of the medium conductivity on the electrophoretic performance.

Funding Statement

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from CNPq (grants 307554/2020-1 and 405620/2021-7), CAPES (grant 88887.192880/2018-00 and finance code 001), and INCTBio (grant 465389/2014-7). CAPES and CNPq are also recognized for the scholarships and researcher fellowship granted to the authors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.B.L., L.M.D., K.C.A.R. and W.K.T.C.; methodology, S.B.L. and L.M.D.; validation, S.B.L. and K.C.A.R.; formal analysis, S.B.L. and K.C.A.R.; investigation, S.B.L. and L.M.D.; data curation, L.M.D. and K.C.A.R.; writing—original draft preparation, S.B.L. and K.C.A.R.; writing—review and editing, K.C.A.R., L.M.D. and W.K.T.C.; resources; W.K.T.C.; supervision, L.M.D. and W.K.T.C.; project administration, W.K.T.C.; funding acquisition, W.K.T.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Conflicts of interest.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Your browser is not supported

Sorry but it looks as if your browser is out of date. To get the best experience using our site we recommend that you upgrade or switch browsers.

Find a solution

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to navigation

nitrate in water experiment

  • Back to parent navigation item
  • Primary teacher
  • Secondary/FE teacher
  • Early career or student teacher
  • Higher education
  • Curriculum support
  • Literacy in science teaching
  • Periodic table
  • Interactive periodic table
  • Climate change and sustainability
  • Resources shop
  • Collections
  • Remote teaching support
  • Starters for ten
  • Screen experiments
  • Assessment for learning
  • Microscale chemistry
  • Faces of chemistry
  • Classic chemistry experiments
  • Nuffield practical collection
  • Anecdotes for chemistry teachers
  • On this day in chemistry
  • Global experiments
  • PhET interactive simulations
  • Chemistry vignettes
  • Context and problem based learning
  • Journal of the month
  • Chemistry and art
  • Art analysis
  • Pigments and colours
  • Ancient art: today's technology
  • Psychology and art theory
  • Art and archaeology
  • Artists as chemists
  • The physics of restoration and conservation
  • Ancient Egyptian art
  • Ancient Greek art
  • Ancient Roman art
  • Classic chemistry demonstrations
  • In search of solutions
  • In search of more solutions
  • Creative problem-solving in chemistry
  • Solar spark
  • Chemistry for non-specialists
  • Health and safety in higher education
  • Analytical chemistry introductions
  • Exhibition chemistry
  • Introductory maths for higher education
  • Commercial skills for chemists
  • Kitchen chemistry
  • Journals how to guides
  • Chemistry in health
  • Chemistry in sport
  • Chemistry in your cupboard
  • Chocolate chemistry
  • Adnoddau addysgu cemeg Cymraeg
  • The chemistry of fireworks
  • Festive chemistry
  • Education in Chemistry
  • Teach Chemistry
  • On-demand online
  • Live online
  • Selected PD articles
  • PD for primary teachers
  • PD for secondary teachers
  • What we offer
  • Chartered Science Teacher (CSciTeach)
  • Teacher mentoring
  • UK Chemistry Olympiad
  • Who can enter?
  • How does it work?
  • Resources and past papers
  • Top of the Bench
  • Schools' Analyst
  • Regional support
  • Education coordinators
  • RSC Yusuf Hamied Inspirational Science Programme
  • RSC Education News
  • Supporting teacher training
  • Interest groups

A primary school child raises their hand in a classroom

  • More navigation items

Diffusion in liquids

In association with Nuffield Foundation

Demonstrate that diffusion takes place in liquids by allowing lead nitrate and potassium iodide to form lead iodide as they diffuse towards each other in this practical

In this experiment, students place colourless crystals of lead nitrate and potassium iodide at opposite sides of a Petri dish of deionised water. As these substances dissolve and diffuse towards each other, students can observe clouds of yellow lead iodide forming, demonstrating that diffusion has taken place.

This practical activity takes around 30 minutes.

  • Eye protection
  • White tile or piece of white paper
  • Lead nitrate (TOXIC, DANGEROUS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT), 1 crystal
  • Potassium iodide, 1 crystal
  • Deionised water

Greener alternatives

To reduce the use of toxic chemicals in this experiment you can conduct the experiment in microscale, using drops of water on a laminated sheet, find full instructions and video here, and/or use a less toxic salt than lead nitrate, eg sodium carbonate and barium chloride. More information is available from CLEAPSS.

Health, safety and technical notes

  • Read our standard health and safety guidance.
  • Wear eye protection throughout.
  • Lead nitrate, Pb(NO 3 ) 2 (s), (TOXIC, DANGEROUS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT) – see CLEAPSS Hazcard HC057a .
  • Potassium iodide, KI(s) – see CLEAPSS Hazcard HC047b .
  • Place a Petri dish on a white tile or piece of white paper. Fill it nearly to the top with deionised water.
  • Using forceps, place a crystal of lead nitrate at one side of the petri dish and a crystal of potassium iodide at the other.
  • Observe as the crystals begin to dissolve and a new compound is formed between them.

A diagram showing a petri dish, with crystals of potassium iodide and lead nitrate at opposite ends

Source: Royal Society of Chemistry

As the crystals of potassium iodide and lead nitrate dissolve and diffuse, they will begin to form yellow lead iodide

Teaching notes

The lead nitrate and potassium iodide each dissolve and begin to diffuse through the water. When the lead ions and iodide ions meet they react to form solid yellow lead iodide which precipitates out of solution.

lead nitrate + potassium iodide → lead iodide + potassium nitrate

Pb(aq) + 2I – (aq) → PbI 2 (s)

The precipitate does not form exactly between the two crystals. This is because the lead ion is heavier and diffuses more slowly through the liquid than the iodide ion.

Another experiment – a teacher demonstration providing an example of a solid–solid reaction  – involves the same reaction but in the solid state.

Additional information

This is a resource from the  Practical Chemistry project , developed by the Nuffield Foundation and the Royal Society of Chemistry. This collection of over 200 practical activities demonstrates a wide range of chemical concepts and processes. Each activity contains comprehensive information for teachers and technicians, including full technical notes and step-by-step procedures. Practical Chemistry activities accompany  Practical Physics  and  Practical Biology .

The experiment is also part of the Royal Society of Chemistry’s Continuing Professional Development course:  Chemistry for non-specialists .

© Nuffield Foundation and the Royal Society of Chemistry

  • 11-14 years
  • 14-16 years
  • Practical experiments
  • Physical chemistry
  • Reactions and synthesis

Specification

  • Precipitation is the reaction of two solutions to form an insoluble salt called a precipitate.
  • Motion of particles in solids, liquids and gases.
  • Diffusion (Graham's law not required).

Related articles

A diagram and graph showing how a reversible reaction reaches equilibrium

Help learners master equilibrium and reversible reactions

2024-06-24T06:59:00Z By Emma Owens

Use this poster, fact sheet and storyboard activity to ensure your 14–16 students understand dynamic equilibrium

A hand using scissor-handle tweezers to hold a piece of paper that is on fire but not burning

Non-burning paper: investigate the fire triangle and conditions for combustion

2024-06-10T05:00:00Z By Declan Fleming

Use this reworking of the classic non-burning £5 note demonstration to explore combustion with learners aged 11–16 years

A bottle of bromine water next to two test tubes - one contains only clear liquid and the other contains clear liquid sitting on an orange liquid

Everything you need to introduce alkenes

2024-06-04T08:22:00Z By Dan Beech

Help your 14–16 learners to master the fundamentals of the reactions of alkenes with these ideas and activities

1 Reader's comment

Only registered users can comment on this article., more experiments.

Image showing a one page from the technician notes, teacher notes, student sheet and integrated instructions that make up this resource, plus two bags of chocolate coins

‘Gold’ coins on a microscale | 14–16 years

By Dorothy Warren and Sandrine Bouchelkia

Practical experiment where learners produce ‘gold’ coins by electroplating a copper coin with zinc, includes follow-up worksheet

potion labels

Practical potions microscale | 11–14 years

By Kirsty Patterson

Observe chemical changes in this microscale experiment with a spooky twist.

An image showing the pages available in the downloads with a water bottle in the shape of a 6 in the foreground.

Antibacterial properties of the halogens | 14–18 years

By Kristy Turner

Use this practical to investigate how solutions of the halogens inhibit the growth of bacteria and which is most effective

  • Contributors
  • Email alerts

Site powered by Webvision Cloud

nitrate in water experiment

AgBioResearch

Msu scientists study how to increase water-, nutrient-use efficiency in greenhouses, nurseries.

Jack Falinski <[email protected]> - September 18, 2024

share this on facebook

Tom Fernandez, a professor in the Department of Horticulture, has conducted extensive research on how to efficiently irrigate plants in greenhouses and nurseries. His newest project examines how to effectively treat water after it’s used in production.

EAST LANSING, Mich. — Tom Fernandez , a Michigan State University professor in the Department of Horticulture , has spent much of his 25-year career at MSU studying how to effectively manage water in greenhouses and nurseries to increase water-use efficiency and reduce nutrient runoff.

With funding support from Project GREEEN — Michigan’s plant agriculture initiative based at MSU and supported by the Michigan Plant Coalition, Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development , MSU AgBioResearch and MSU Extension — Fernandez has developed management strategies to ensure agricultural inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides aren’t washed away from their intended targets, harming the surrounding environment and diminishing water quality.

TomFernandez2022.jpg

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, about a half million tons of pesticides, 12 million tons of nitrogen and 4 million tons of phosphorous fertilizer are annually applied to crops. The runoff of these inputs contributes to some of the leading strains on water quality.

In greenhouses and nurseries, it’s easy to overwater many plants because the containers they’re in allow water to easily drain. Fernandez has found that by applying water based on a plant’s daily water use, irrigation can be reduced between 30%-80% depending on the species, and growers can conserve water and reduce the runoff of nutrients from the potting mix.  

In addition to minimizing the runoff of nutrients from fertilizers, such as nitrates and phosphates, Fernandez has also examined how to lessen the movement of pesticides from the soil and nontarget areas. Pesticides are sprayed over the top of plants, so as a result, they hit unintended spaces such as the gaps between plants or the groundcover in greenhouses and nurseries. When irrigation is applied overhead, the pesticides in these spaces can move with the water and impact its quality.

Like how the movement of nutrients from fertilizer in the soil were reduced, Fernandez said applying less water to plants can help mitigate pesticides from moving in the soil and from nontarget surfaces. He also said that micro-irrigating individual pots using spray stakes, which fan water over single containers, proved to significantly reduce the surface runoff of pesticides.

“Time really is on our side when we’re thinking about both nutrients and pesticides,” Fernandez said. “The longer we keep them from getting into water systems, the more can happen to them biologically so they don’t cause a problem.”

With these strategies, Fernandez said there became a better understanding for how to irrigate container plants without promoting runoff. Since then, he’s taken on a new project: studying how to treat the water used in production by addressing the amount of nutrients and pesticides in it after application.

Beginning in 2018, Fernandez and Gemma Reguera , associate dean of faculty affairs and development in MSU’s College of Natural Science and professor in the Department of Microbiology, Genetics and Immunology , started to examine how nutrients from fertilizers interact with bioreactors, as well as to what extent bioreactors separate them from water used in greenhouses — an undertaking originally studied by Fernandez’s former doctoral student Damon Abdi, now an assistant professor of horticulture at Louisiana State University.

What do these bioreactors look like?

“They have a fancy name, but they’re really just big tubs of woodchips,” Fernandez said.

IMG_5606.JPG

Fernandez said they originally developed a two-stage bioreactor system composed of woodchips, which convert nitrates into nitrogen gas, and heat-expanded clay, which gives the phosphorus from phosphates a large surface area to bind to when water runs through it.

Research showed that when water ran through the system, over 95% of nitrates could be taken out, and 80%-87% of phosphates could be broken down and removed. Fernandez and his team discovered that the activity occurred mostly in the woodchips, so the second stage of the bioreactor that implemented heat-expanded clay has since been discontinued.

This function of the bioreactor is critical for water that may not be reused in operations because it reduces the chance nutrients discharge into and contaminate the environment. However, many modern greenhouses and nurseries operate using closed-loop water systems where water is kept within the facility and oftentimes recycled in production. Fernandez said for water that’s recycled, he’s received inquiries about the potential to recycle nutrients in the bioreactor while reducing the presence of pesticides.

“Our partners wanted to remove the pesticides but keep the nutrients in the water because they’re paying for those — that’s fertilizer,” Fernandez said.

To keep the nutrients in water, water must travel through the bioreactor at a quicker pace. When it does so, there’s less time for the bioreactor to become anaerobic — a state without oxygen — preventing nutrients such as nitrates to be off-gassed.

After modifying the bioreactor to allow water to move through it at around a 4-hour pace instead of a 72-hour pace, which was roughly the amount of time it took for nutrients to be removed from water, Fernandez said his team has been able to recycle 90%-100% of the nutrients in water to be used again for production.

IMG_5598.JPG

Fernandez and Reguera also observed that when pesticides ran through the bioreactor, they didn’t affect the functionality of the microorganisms working within the system. In fact, they found that — depending on the mobility of each pesticide in water — the bioreactor could reduce the total amount of pesticides in water anywhere between 30%-75%.

“In our lab experiments, we found if we went to a low retention time — the length in which water is kept within the bioreactor — we could keep the nutrients in the water stream and remove many of the pesticides,” Fernandez said.

Amy Upton, executive director of the Michigan Nursery and Landscape Association, said the data from Fernandez and his team’s research helps the greenhouse and nursery industries market their clean-water production, and the hands-on demonstrations offered by the team aid growers in evaluating and adopting these technologies.

“Water quality and security are critically important to the nursery and greenhouse industries,” Upton said. “Dr. Fernandez and his team’s research not only address quality and security, but also incorporate important aspects such as improved soilless substrates that optimize water and nutrient retention and proven at-scale treatment technologies that reduce pesticides and pathogens in water sources.

“Michigan’s nursery and greenhouse industries are appreciative of the support from Dr. Fernandez and his team, as well as the continued funding support from Project GREEEN.”

IMG_8087.jpeg

Jim Kells , coordinator of Project GREEEN, said the novel ability to manage nutrients in the water will help greenhouses and nurseries increase sustainability and efficiency.

“Through research supported by Project GREEEN, Dr. Fernandez has developed innovative systems to minimize water use and reduce pesticides in water while recycling valuable nutrients,” Kells said. “This research has the potential to reduce the environmental impact of greenhouse and nursery systems while increasing grower profitability.”

This will be the third year in which Fernandez and his team, including doctoral students Henry Gonzalez and Marcela Tabares , monitor how bioreactors perform within a large-scale greenhouse operation. Using 300- and 600-gallon water tanks as the bioreactor containers, Fernandez said they’re currently studying how pesticides degrade differently in anaerobic (without oxygen) and aerobic (with oxygen) conditions, hoping that the information gathered can further advance the degree to which pesticides can be removed from water.

“It’s really the first time I know of that anyone has used this type of system for bioreactors,” Fernandez said.

Michigan State University AgBioResearch scientists discover dynamic solutions for food systems and the environment. More than 300 MSU faculty conduct leading-edge research on a variety of topics, from health and climate to agriculture and natural resources. Originally formed in 1888 as the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station, MSU AgBioResearch oversees numerous on-campus research facilities, as well as 15 outlying centers throughout Michigan. To learn more, visit agbioresearch.msu.edu .

Did you find this article useful?

Fish Notes: A seasonal e-newsletter about fish and fishing in West Michigan.

new - method size: 3 - Random key: 1, method: tagSpecific - key: 1

You Might Also Be Interested In

nitrate in water experiment

Bringing you the Michigan cherry on top

Published on June 14, 2019

nitrate in water experiment

AgBioResearch: Global Scope, Local Impact

Published on December 20, 2007

nitrate in water experiment

Environmental Stewardship and Natural Resources Policy and Management

Published on December 20, 2005

nitrate in water experiment

Research to Energize Michigan's Economic Development

Published on March 20, 2010

nitrate in water experiment

A Global Perspective: Spatial Decision Support Systems

Published on December 15, 2004

nitrate in water experiment

2014 Annual Report

Published on December 31, 2014

  • abr campaign
  • agriculture
  • agriculture water management
  • department of horticulture
  • drainage water recycling
  • featured news
  • floriculture
  • greenhouse crop production
  • landscape and nursery management
  • landscaping
  • nutrient management
  • recycled water
  • water management
  • water quality
  • abr campaign,
  • agriculture,
  • agriculture water management,
  • department of horticulture,
  • drainage water recycling,
  • featured news,
  • floriculture,
  • greenhouse crop production,
  • landscape and nursery management,
  • landscaping,
  • nutrient management,
  • recycled water,
  • water management,
  • water quality,
  • agbioresearch
  • Project GREEEN
  • Michigan Alliance for Animal Agriculture
  • Partnership for Ecosystem Research and Management
  • Institute of Water Research

Researcher Resources

  • Commodity Group RFPs
  • Research Projects - REEport Forms
  • Commodity Groups Granted Waiver of Indirect Costs
  • Policies, Procedures and Guidelines
  • Animal Agriculture Priorities
  • Plant Agriculture Priorities

Office of Research Support

  • Funding Opportunities

News & Publications

  • MSU AgBioResearch & MSU Extension Legislative Report

IMAGES

  1. How to Test Nitrates in Water (Step-by-Step)

    nitrate in water experiment

  2. Solubility of Potassium Nitrate

    nitrate in water experiment

  3. How to do Nitrate Test in Water (No3)

    nitrate in water experiment

  4. Nitrate Analysis Instructions

    nitrate in water experiment

  5. Testing Water for Nitrate

    nitrate in water experiment

  6. Pond Test Kit

    nitrate in water experiment

VIDEO

  1. Nitrate Water Testing Demo ENG

  2. Nitrate Water Testing Demo SPA

  3. Nitrate Water Testing in Canterbury

  4. Nitrate Graph by UV Spectrophotometer

  5. Nitration of paper

  6. Understanding Nitrate Water Treatment replay 2021 06 10

COMMENTS

  1. How to test for lead and nitrates in water

    1. Since this is a science fair experiment, you will need only common chemicals to test the contaminants in water. Lead. You can use hydrogen sulfide, H X S to test lead. (Warning: it has rotten egg smell.) It is a common reagent and can be found in laboratory. You can also use sodium sulfide instead but it too has rotten egg smell.

  2. PDF Lab 2: NITRATE ANALYSIS Introduction

    Drain excess water into a waste beaker whenever needed. Make 200mL of a "wash" solution - 150mL Reagent C + 40mL Milli-Q water + 10mL stock NO3 -. Add to the column. Drain until the water level is approximately 1 cm above the granules. Wash the column a second time but with 200mL dilute NH4-EDTA solution (Reagent C).

  3. Testing water for nitrate

    In this activity, students test nitrate levels in various samples of water and draw possible informed conclusions about the results. By the end of this activity, students should be able to: explain why excessive nitrate can be harmful. demonstrate how to test water for nitrate. make an informed decision about safe nitrate levels in drinking water.

  4. 4500-NO 3 − NITROGEN (NITRATE)

    The ultraviolet (UV) light technique (4500-NO 3− B), which measures NO 3− absorbance at 220 nm, is suitable for screening uncontaminated water (low in organic matter). Screen a sample if necessary, then select a method suitable for its concentration range and probable interferences. Nitrate can be determined by ion chromatography (Section ...

  5. Nitrates in Drinking Water (What are Nitrates, and How to Test?)

    In this video we take a good look at nitrates. Corey explains what nitrates are, who they affect most, and the various testing methods. We do not want people...

  6. Detection methods of nitrate in water: A review

    The detection limit was 0.5-60 μg/mL and a carbon-paste electrode was used as the working electrode. A differential pulse voltametric method [55] has been reported to determine the nitrate in natural water. The detection limit was 2.8 μM and the linear detection range was 2.8 μM - 80 μM.

  7. Nitrate > Experiment 8 from Water Quality with Vernier

    The tests described here are used to measure the concentration of nitrate ions, NO3-, in a water sample. The concentration of nitrate will be expressed throughout this section in units of mg/L NO3--N. The unit, NO3--N, means simply "nitrogen that is in the form of nitrate." Nitrate ions found in freshwater samples result from a variety of natural and industrial sources. Nitrates are an ...

  8. PDF Colorimetric Determination of Nitrate Plus Nitrite in Water by

    6.1.2 Phosphate buffer (pH = 7.5).—Dissolve 3.75 g potassium di-hydrogen phosphate (KH2PO 4, FW = 136.1) and 1.4 g potassium hydroxide (KOH, FW = 56.11) in about 800 mL of DI water contained in a 1-L volumetric flask. Add 1 mL 25 mM EDTA and dilute the resulting solution to the mark with DI water; mix it well.

  9. Nutrients in Aquatic Ecosystems (video)

    The following experiment will demonstrate the analysis of nitrate and phosphate concentrations in water samples using pre-mixed reagent packets to perform this colorimetric technique. To begin the nitrogen measurement, find the program for nitrate on the colorimeter, and input the appropriate program number or set the colorimeter to measure at ...

  10. Methods for the detection and determination of nitrite and nitrate: A

    Burakham et al. [22] developed a novel spectrophotometric reaction system for the determination of nitrite as well as nitrate in water samples based on the nitrosation reaction between nitrite ion and phloroglucinol (1,3,5-trihydroxybenzene). The system was applied to a flow-injection analysis and up to 20 samples can be analyzed per hour with ...

  11. PDF Analysis of Nitrate Nitrogen (NO3-) in Water by the EPA Approved

    The Brucine method for nitrate is approved by the United States EPA as Method No. 352.1.1 When a water sample containing nitrate ion is treated with Brucine in sulfuric acid, a yellow solution results. The concentration of nitrate nitrogen may be calculated based upon the absorbance of the solution at 410 nm. Experimental.

  12. Experiment No. 9: Determination of Nitrates using ...

    Environmental Engineering Lab - 17CVL76B. E. 7th Semester , Conducted by:Course Co-ordinator: Dr. Harish Kumar .S, Assistant Professor &Ms. Veena .R, Assista...

  13. How to Test Nitrates in Water (Step-By-Step)

    Place about 2.5 milliliters of sample water into a clean test tube. Top this with mixed acid reagent to 5.0 milliliters. Let it rest for about 3 minutes to react. Using a 0.1-gram spoon, scoop a level amount and leave it for about 9 minutes. Place the test tube in a comparator of nitrate-nitrogen, then check the color of the sample compared to ...

  14. PDF The Thermodynamics of Potassium Nitrate Dissolving in Water Version V121113

    NAMICS OF POTASSIUM NITRATE DISSOLVING IN WATER VERSION V121113OBJECTIVEThe ΔG, ΔH and ΔS of the potassium nitrate (KNO3) dissolving reaction will be deter. ri. g the equilibrium constant (Ksp) at different temperatures. BACKGROUND1. Solubility product constant (. In a saturated potassium nitrate (KNO3) solution in water (H2O), a dynamic ...

  15. 5.7 Nitrates

    Nitrates are a form of nitrogen, which is found in several different forms in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. These forms of nitrogen include ammonia (NH3), nitrates (NO3), and nitrites (NO2). Nitrates are essential plant nutrients, but in excess amounts they can cause significant water quality problems. Together with phosphorus, nitrates ...

  16. A Spectrophotometric Method for the Determination of Nitrite and Nitrate

    The method can be applied directly for the determination of 0.2-20 mg of nitrate/l in 2.5-ml samples of water. Over 4000 mg of chloride/l can be tolerated. The method is simple, rapid and reliable.

  17. Precipitation reactions of lead nitrate

    In this experiment, students observe the colour changes of lead nitrate solutions when different anions are added to identify which compounds would make good pigments. ... Part 2: adding deionised water and tap water to lead nitrate solution. With the worksheet still covered, put one drop of lead nitrate solution into each box of table 2. ...

  18. Nitrate/Nitrite determination in water and soil samples accompanied by

    In the present work, an efficient method is developed for the spectrophotometric determination of nitrite and nitrate ions in water and soil samples by in situ formation of azo dye (Griess reagent) which showed λmax at 385 nm. The reaction condition and the concentration of reagents used are optimized. The molar absorptivity, Sandell's sensitivity, detection limit and quantification limit ...

  19. Nitrite Determination in Environmental Water Samples Using Microchip

    On the other hand, samples labelled as D1 refer to a sample of dam water diluted by 50% (v/v), while samples D2 and D3 are the same dam water diluted but fortified with 20 and 40 μmol L −1 of NO 2 −, respectively. All six samples (A1, A2, A3, D1, D2, and D3) were analyzed in triplicate by both the proposed and the reference methods.

  20. A New Titrimetric Procedure for Determination of Nitrate Utilizing

    the determination of nitrate in water and waste-water involves the reduction of nitrate to nitrite at pH 8 to 9 with cadmium amalgam and concomitant diazotization of Sulfanila- ... olina Experiment Station. Pub|ished by permission of the Director. TABLE 1. Comparison of the spectrophotometrie versus titrimetric procedure for the determination ...

  21. Method for Nitrate Determination in Water in the Presence of Nitrite

    The most appropriate method to determine nitrates in the presence of nitrites is the process for removal of nitrite. from the solution/water using sulfaminic acid [5] and the process of nitrate to ...

  22. Diffusion in liquids

    Procedure. Place a Petri dish on a white tile or piece of white paper. Fill it nearly to the top with deionised water. Using forceps, place a crystal of lead nitrate at one side of the petri dish and a crystal of potassium iodide at the other. Observe as the crystals begin to dissolve and a new compound is formed between them. Show Fullscreen.

  23. Nitrate Analysis Lab Report

    Excess amounts of nitrate may accelerate eutrophication process promoting excessive growth of plant, and alterations of plant types as well as animals that live in the stream. Therefore, testing and monitoring the water environment is essential to protect water quality in order to avoid the damage of aquatic ecosystems (Scottish Government, 2015).

  24. Nitrate Enhanced Sulfamethoxazole Degradation by 222 nm Far-UVC

    The application of 222 nm far-UVC irradiation for degrading organic micropollutants in water shows promise. Nitrate (NO3-), found in nearly all water bodies, can significantly impact the performance of 222 nm far-UVC-driven systems. This work was the first to investigate the effect of NO3- on sulfamethoxazole (SMX) photodegradation at 222 nm, finding that NO3- significantly enhances SMX ...

  25. MSU scientists study how to increase water-, nutrient-use efficiency in

    Research showed that when water ran through the system, over 95% of nitrates could be taken out, and 80%-87% of phosphates could be broken down and removed. Fernandez and his team discovered that the activity occurred mostly in the woodchips, so the second stage of the bioreactor that implemented heat-expanded clay has since been discontinued.