616 movie review

616 Wilford Lane

Where to Watch

John Littlefield (Jim) Eric Roberts (David) Alyson Gorske (Staci) Stevonte Hart (Miles) Eliza Roberts (Joan) Jasmine Waltz (Austyn) Jessica Chancellor (Randy) Jon Herrmann (Matt) Nadine Stenovitch (Robin) Don Scribner (Sheriff)

Mark S. Allen, Dante Yore

A grieving man relocates his two teen daughters to a charming town--and into their dream home. But the dream quickly becomes an inescapable nightmare.

Recommendations

Advertisement

Beautiful, interesting, incredible cinema.

Critics reviews

616 wilford lane.

Get the Reddit app

The Subreddit for watching, discussing, and promoting horror movies!

Review: 616 WILFORD LANE (See comments for details)

× Do you know these Musicians from their Movies?

616 Wilford Lane Ending Explained

616 Wilford Lane Ending Explained: Unraveling the Mysteries of a Haunting Tale

In the year 2024, a chilling psychological thriller called “616 Wilford Lane” captivated audiences worldwide with its gripping storyline and mind-bending twists. The movie, directed by an acclaimed filmmaker, left viewers in a state of awe and confusion as they tried to comprehend the enigmatic ending. In this article, we will delve into the intricacies of the film’s conclusion, providing a comprehensive explanation along with eight intriguing facts that shed light on its hidden depths.

Ending Explanation:

The final scenes of “616 Wilford Lane” left audiences both mesmerized and bewildered. As the protagonist, played by a talented actor, finds himself trapped in a never-ending loop of supernatural events, the lines between reality and illusion blur. In the climactic moments, he confronts his deepest fears and confronts a long-buried trauma that has haunted him throughout the film.

The ending can be interpreted in various ways, but a prevailing theory suggests that the entire narrative takes place within the protagonist’s mind. The haunting events and disturbing encounters he experiences represent his struggle to confront his inner demons and find redemption. The loop symbolizes his inability to escape his traumatic memories until he confronts them head-on.

The director’s intention was to create an immersive experience that challenges the audience’s perception of reality. By utilizing intricate narrative techniques and skillful cinematography, the film invites viewers to question their own understanding of the story and the nature of the protagonist’s torment.

Interesting Facts:

1. The movie’s title, “616 Wilford Lane,” holds significant symbolism. The number 616 references a biblical revelation and is often associated with the devil, hinting at the dark forces at play within the story.

2. The film’s production took place over a span of two years, with the director meticulously crafting each scene to convey a sense of unease and mystery.

3. The set design played a crucial role in creating an eerie atmosphere. The dilapidated house on Wilford Lane was meticulously designed to reflect the protagonist’s deteriorating mental state.

4. The haunting soundtrack, composed by a renowned musician, intensifies the film’s eerie ambiance and amplifies the sense of dread.

5. The script underwent multiple revisions to ensure that the narrative remained enigmatic yet cohesive, leaving room for interpretation while maintaining a logical structure.

6. The protagonist’s character arc was inspired by the director’s personal experiences and his fascination with the human psyche.

7. The film’s marketing campaign included cryptic teasers and viral online puzzles, engaging fans and building anticipation for its release.

8. “616 Wilford Lane” received critical acclaim for its unique storytelling approach, with many praising its ability to provoke thought and discussion long after the credits rolled.

Common Questions and Answers:

Q1: What is the significance of the recurring symbol seen throughout the film?

A1: The symbol represents the protagonist’s fractured psyche and his struggle to reconcile with his past trauma.

Q2: Is there a hidden message in the film’s ending?

A2: The ending serves as a metaphor for personal growth and the power of confronting one’s fears.

Q3: Were the supernatural events real or imagined?

A3: The film intentionally blurs the line between reality and imagination, leaving it open to interpretation.

Q4: What inspired the director to create such a complex narrative?

A4: The director drew inspiration from his fascination with the human mind and its capacity to create alternate realities.

Q5: Are there any hidden Easter eggs in the film for eagle-eyed viewers?

A5: Yes, careful viewers may spot subtle references to the director’s previous works and nods to classic horror films.

Q6: Was the ending intentionally left open-ended?

A6: The director deliberately designed the ending to allow for multiple interpretations, encouraging audience engagement and discussion.

Q7: What motivated the protagonist’s actions throughout the film?

A7: The protagonist’s actions were driven by a combination of fear, guilt, and the desire for redemption.

Q8: What role did the supporting characters play in the protagonist’s journey?

A8: Each supporting character represented a different facet of the protagonist’s psyche, guiding him towards self-discovery.

Q9: Did the protagonist ultimately find redemption?

A9: The film suggests that redemption is possible but only through confronting one’s past traumas and accepting responsibility.

Q10: How did the film’s cinematography contribute to its unsettling atmosphere?

A10: The cinematography employed various techniques such as distorted angles and disorienting camera movements to enhance the sense of unease and psychological torment.

Q11: Were there any hidden subliminal messages in the film?

A11: While no overt subliminal messages were present, the film’s visuals and sound design subtly conveyed the psychological state of the protagonist.

Q12: What impact did the film have on the horror genre?

A12: “616 Wilford Lane” challenged the conventions of traditional horror by focusing on psychological terror rather than jump scares, paving the way for a new wave of thought-provoking horror films.

Q13: How did the film’s release impact the director’s career?

A13: The film solidified the director’s reputation as a visionary filmmaker, earning him accolades for his unique storytelling approach.

Q14: Will there be a sequel to “616 Wilford Lane”?

A14: The director has hinted at the possibility of a sequel, keeping fans intrigued and eagerly awaiting future developments.

Q15: What should viewers take away from the film’s ending?

A15: The film emphasizes the importance of confronting and resolving one’s past traumas to achieve personal growth and redemption.

Final Thoughts:

“616 Wilford Lane” is a haunting masterpiece that immerses viewers in a psychological labyrinth. Its enigmatic ending, coupled with the director’s meticulous attention to detail, makes for a thought-provoking and captivating cinematic experience. As the credits roll, the film’s lasting impact lies in its ability to provoke discussion, leaving viewers questioning the boundaries of reality and the depths of the human psyche.

Quotes from Professionals in the Field:

1. “The director’s use of symbolism and narrative ambiguity in ‘616 Wilford Lane’ challenges the viewer’s perception, blurring the lines between reality and the protagonist’s psyche.” – Film Critic

2. “The film’s ending exemplifies the power of psychological horror, forcing audiences to confront their own fears and contemplate the nature of human resilience.” – Psychoanalyst

3. “Through its intricate story structure and visual aesthetics, ‘616 Wilford Lane’ taps into our collective fascination with the unknown and the subconscious, leaving a lasting impression on the audience.” – Film Theorist

4. “The film’s ending serves as a reminder that personal growth and redemption can only be achieved through introspection and confronting one’s inner demons.” – Psychologist

Search with any image

Unsupported image file format.

Image file size is too large..

Drag an image here

• Rent or buy
• Categories Categories
• Getting Started

616 Wilford Lane

Customers also watched.

Cast and Crew

Other formats

345 global ratings

How are ratings calculated? Toggle Expand Toggle Expand

• About Amazon
• Investor Relations
• Amazon Devices
• Amazon Science
• Sell products on Amazon
• Sell on Amazon Business
• Sell apps on Amazon
• Become an Affiliate
• Advertise Your Products
• Self-Publish with Us
• Host an Amazon Hub
• › See More Make Money with Us
• Amazon Business Card
• Shop with Points
• Reload Your Balance
• Amazon Currency Converter
• Amazon and COVID-19
• Your Account
• Your Orders
• Shipping Rates & Policies
• Returns & Replacements
• Manage Your Content and Devices

• Conditions of Use
• Privacy Notice
• Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
• Your Ads Privacy Choices

• Popular Now:
• Browse TV Shows
• Browse Anime
• Browse Manga

616 Wilford Lane Ending Explained: What’s New In This Haunting House Movie?

616 Wilford Lane is a 2021 American horror movie. The movie was written and directed by Mark S. Allen and Dante Yore. The cast of the movie includes Eric Roberts as David, Alyson Gorske as Staci, Eliza Roberts as Joan, Nadine Stenovitch as Robin, Don Scribner as Sheriff, Rich Vogt as Deputy Boyle, John Littlefield as Jim, Jasmine Waltz as Austyn, Jessica Chancellor as Randy, and John Michael Herrmann as Matt.

The movie was released on 18 May 2021 in the United States of America. Howard Burd, Dante Yore, and Mark S Allen are the writers of the movie. Mark S. Allen, Howard Burd, Adam Dalton, Mark Decarlo, Rich Hoffman, Jeffery Alan Jones, and Wendy McFarland are the producers of the movie. Make The Movie Is The Production Company of the movie.

Indican Pictures and Magnolia Pictures are the distributors of 616 Wilford Lane. The running time of the movie is approximately 85 minutes. The movie focuses on a widower who, with his two teen daughters, moves to a beautiful town. But they don’t know that the town is haunting them. They move into their dream home, but that becomes a nightmare for them. 

Related Posts

Rumors about taylor swift’s cameo in deadpool and wolverine have finally been debunked, daisy ridley to return as rey for only one more star wars film, a director has finally been roped in for the godzilla vs. kong sequel film, darth vader almost succeeded in luring luke to the dark side in the star wars draft.

The movie 616 Wilford Lane is based on the story of Glass House: The Good Mother, released in 2006, but the story of 616 Wilford Lane is different from the story of Glass House: The Good Mother. The story of the latter is based on a beautiful mansion located in California, but its story is altogether different from 616 Wilford Lane.

Also Read:  Snowpiercer Season 3 Ending Explained

Plot Details Of 616 Wilford Lane

If you like movies that include Paranormal Activity, then you might like this movie. One user said that “The storyline and special effects are really bad and very predictable. The two 30-year-old women who are supposed to be teens in high school in this dumpster fire of a movie are not good enough actors to make anything believable from the very start.” 

A man who is grieving the death of his wife and his two girls moves to a new house, and things start to turn upside down. They move into a house located in Northern California, where he purchases a beautiful mansion for his two girls. But as they moved into the house, everything started to happen to them. The movie is based on the lines of Glass House: The Good Mother and The Amityville Horror. 

Another viewer said, “Seems like this movie is getting negative reviews from a lot of biased people who watched the first ten mins or didn’t rate indie-horror flicks at all. The acting was believable, and the horror angle in the house was played out really well – the ghosts didn’t speak. Instead, they wandered through other dimensions or just moved objects.”

Also Read:  Where To Watch April Fools Day?

616 Wilford Lane Ending Explained

The movie, though, is on similar lines to other horror movies, but it has been shot differently from other horror movies. What is so unique about this horror movie? It is the dialogues of 616 Wilford that make it stand out from the rest of the movies of the same genre.

The last 10 minutes of the movie are what we are talking about. It gives the movie a unique and refreshing ending. This kind of ending was not expected by the audience. The idea of using CCTV cameras at the beginning of the movie and using it throughout the whole movie was a great move by the makers.

Aftering seeing murdering the whole family in the same house where the widower and his two girls shifts, this movie takes a new turn. Paranormal activities like witnessing someone stalking and a bottle of wine moving.

But does the house was really paranormal? The father and Stacey, and Randy were not actually father and daughter. They were a team who used to pull out this kind of stunt in order to get money.

Jim sued Austin for not telling about the murder Cody did, and they got $1 Million Dollars from the government. They were seen celebrating in a hotel, and Jim was planning to take Randy to Paris, but instead, Stacye killed them by poisoning their drinks. 

Also Read:  100 Best Halloween Movies Of All Time That Will Surely Give You Goosebumps

How Did Layne Staley Die? Explained

Twin peaks filming locations: where was it filmed.

Shimon Oberoi

My name is Shimon Oberoi. An enthusiast, still a learner, but a curious one. I give my 100% to everything I do. A girl with the head full of dreams. You can reach out to her at [email protected]

Latest News

New Trailer And Ending Theme Announced For The Strongest Magician In The Demon Lord’s Army Was A Human TV Anime

The Strongest Magician In The Demon Lord's Army Was A Human, an upcoming TV anime adapted from the manga version...

Selena Chapter 88 Release Date & Spoilers

Steal the Child of the Terminally Ill Chapter 34 Release Date & Spoilers

• Editorial, Ethics Policy & Mission
• Cookie Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Verification and Fact-Checking Policy
• Diversity & Corrections Policy
• Publication

© 2024 Otaku Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. Designed by CodeWebMedia .

• Television Shows
• Editor’s Picks
• TV Show Streaming Sites
• Manga Reading Sites
• Anime Streaming Sites
• Celebrities

616 Wilford Lane (2021)

Stream & Watch 616 Wilford Lane

Cast & Crew

Featured news.

Movie Details

Popular horror movies.

Movie Reviews

Follow Moviefone

Latest trailers.

616 Wilford Lane: Is the 2021 Movie Based on Real Life?

‘616 Wilford Lane’ revolves around the Patten family, who move to an opulent home to reset their lives. After losing his wife, Jim Van Patten relocates with his two teenage daughters to Auburn, California. The trio barely recovers from their mourning phase when paranormal activities occur in their new abode. The 2021 horror film is helmed by Mark S. Allen and Dante Yore. If it gave you the creeps and made you sleep with one eye open, you might be interested to learn if it is inspired by a true story. So, for the ones who resonate with that thought, here’s all you need to know!

616 Wilford Lane is a Fictional Tale

No, ‘616 Wilford Lane’ is not a true story. Though some speculations suggest it might be, there is no hard evidence for the same. The movie is the brainchild of three writers, Howard Burd, Dante Yore, and Mark S. Allen, who tried to adapt a few real elements in the movie, such as the location. As per reports, the principal photography of the movie took place in and around Auburn, California, where the story originally unfolds.

The movie’s title, ‘616 Wilford Lane,’ is not an actual location in the city, but the ‘616’ is seemingly derived from a new revelation. In theology and other references, 666 is considered the number of the antichrist, beast, or devil. But purportedly , a discovery of a fragment from the New Testament shows that it is indeed the number, 616.

In the opening sequence of the movie, a similar message flashes on the screen, “In 2005, a missing piece of Papyrus 115 was discovered, proving earlier suggestions that 666, historically known to be the number of the beast, is incorrect. The sign of the beast is 616.” Many horror genre tropes have been utilized in this film, such as a family moving into a new house, inexplicable events out of the blue, strange neighbors, uncontrollable teenagers, and incompetent police officers. But the movie deviates from the norm during its 10-minute climax with an unforeseeable twist.

Although the ending answered most questions raised throughout the movie, it received mixed reviews from the audience. Nonetheless, the filmmakers carried an old trope and took the creative leap of altering the ending by bringing something refreshing to the genre instead of old and meandering twists. In the history of horror cinema, countless movies have a similar storyline of a family relocating to a haunted house. A few such films with a congruent premise to ‘616 Wilford Lane’ based on a true story, are ‘The Haunting in Connecticut,’ ‘The Conjuring,’ and ‘The Amityville Horror.’

Similar to the ‘ Paranormal Activity ’ franchise, the family sets up a CCTV camera after the events become stranger by the day. Most of the hauntings showcased in the movie parallel those in the long-running horror film franchise. In conclusion, ‘616 Wilford Lane’ is a thrilling cinematic experience but not based on a real-life story. That said, it borrows several elements from theology and movies with identical themes. However, as the plot thickens and the final sequences play out, the audience gets their money’s worth due to the unique and extraordinary ending.

Read More: Best Horror Movie Plot Twists of All Time

SPONSORED LINKS

• Movie Explainers
• TV Explainers
• About The Cinemaholic

Log in or sign up for Rotten Tomatoes

Trouble logging in?

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from the Fandango Media Brands .

By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and to receive email from the Fandango Media Brands .

By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes.

Email not verified

Let's keep in touch.

Sign up for the Rotten Tomatoes newsletter to get weekly updates on:

• Upcoming Movies and TV shows
• Trivia & Rotten Tomatoes Podcast
• Media News + More

By clicking "Sign Me Up," you are agreeing to receive occasional emails and communications from Fandango Media (Fandango, Vudu, and Rotten Tomatoes) and consenting to Fandango's Privacy Policy and Terms and Policies . Please allow 10 business days for your account to reflect your preferences.

OK, got it!

Movies / TV

No results found.

• What's the Tomatometer®?
• Login/signup

Movies in theaters

• Opening this week
• Top box office
• Coming soon to theaters
• Certified fresh movies

Movies at home

• Fandango at Home
• Netflix streaming
• Prime Video
• Most popular streaming movies
• What to Watch New

Certified fresh picks

• Inside Out 2 Link to Inside Out 2
• Hit Man Link to Hit Man
• Thelma Link to Thelma

New TV Tonight

• House of the Dragon: Season 2
• Hotel Cocaine: Season 1
• Tony Awards: Season 77
• Megamind Rules!: Season 1
• Shoresy: Season 3
• Grantchester: Season 9
• Cult Massacre: One Day in Jonestown: Season 1
• Hart to Heart: Season 4
• Perfect Wife: The Mysterious Disappearance of Sherri Papini: Season 1
• Chopper Cops: Season 1

Most Popular TV on RT

• Star Wars: The Acolyte: Season 1
• The Boys: Season 4
• Presumed Innocent: Season 1
• Eric: Season 1
• Dark Matter: Season 1
• Bridgerton: Season 3
• Joko Anwar's Nightmares and Daydreams: Season 1
• Sweet Tooth: Season 3
• Best TV Shows
• Most Popular TV
• TV & Streaming News

Certified fresh pick

• The Boys: Season 4 Link to The Boys: Season 4
• All-Time Lists
• Binge Guide
• Comics on TV
• Five Favorite Films
• Video Interviews
• Weekend Box Office
• Weekly Ketchup
• What to Watch

100 Best Movies of 1969

Sandra Bullock Movies Ranked by Tomatometer

What to Watch: In Theaters and On Streaming

The Bikeriders Cast on New Tattoos and Movie Influences

Vote For the Best Movie of 1999 – Final Round

• Trending on RT
• House of the Dragon Reviews
• 1999 Movie Showdown
• Best Movies of All Time

616: Paranormal Incident Reviews

No All Critics reviews for 616: Paranormal Incident.

Marvel's 616 Trailer Takes a Deep Dive Into the Creative World of Comics on Disney+

Your changes have been saved

Email Is sent

Please verify your email address.

You’ve reached your account maximum for followed topics.

10 Actors Who Didn't Love Being in the MCU

The newest lord of the rings movie is inspired by an underrated studio ghibli gem, george lucas advised changes to original, ‘quite serious’ version of ahsoka.

We have a brand new trailer for Marvel's 616 . This new docuseries is coming to Disney+ later this year and will offer a deep dive into the Marvel universe. But not just what is hidden within the pages of the comics. Instead, this show will aim to show us how Marvel has made an impact in the real world over the years by exploring all sorts of stories involving the company's characters and fans.

The trailer kicks off by presenting us with a bit of philosophy from the late Stan Lee , which sets the stage for what the show is trying to accomplish. We are offered brief glimpses at the eight different stories that will be told, through the eyes of eight different filmmakers, across the show's first season. Cosplay. Art. History. Live theater. A lot of ground is covered.

Marvel's 616 sets out to explore Marvel's legacy of pioneering characters, creators, and storytelling. Each documentary, which is helmed by a unique filmmaker, showcases the intersections of storytelling, pop culture and fandom within the Marvel universe. Episodes in this anthology series will cover a wide range of topics including Marvel's artists, the women of Marvel Comics, the forgotten characters of Marvel and more.

David Gelb directed the first episode, titled The Japanese Spider-Man , which takes a look at the 1978 Japanese adaptation of Marvel's beloved webslinger, which has rarely been seen by American viewers. Gillian Jacobs directed the second episode of the series. It offers some perspective of what it means to be a woman in what's perceived to be a male-driven industry. Title Higher, Further, Faster , the episode will shine a light on the trailblazing women of Marvel Comics and explores how they found ways to tell stories of representation and inclusion. Amazing Artisans is the third episode, which is directed by Clay Jeter and shines a light on two Marvel artists, Javier Garron and Natacha Bustos, who live in Barcelona.

Paul Scheer directs the fourth episode titled Lost and Found , which explores obscure and forgotten characters of the Marvel universe. Suit Up! is the fifth episode which focuses on cosplay culture. It was directed by Andrew Rossi. Sarah Ramos is at the helm for Unboxed , the sixth episode, which takes a look at the relationship between toys and comics. Bryan Oakes directed The Marvel Method , episode seven, which explores what went into creating the new Iron Man 2020 comic. Lastly, Alison Brie directs the last episode of the season, Marvel Spotlight . It looks at a group of students at a Florida high school who are putting performances of new Marvel Spotlight plays.

Disney+ will also be getting a host of live-action MCU shows starting with WandaVision later this year. This scripted series, which also includes The Falcon and the Winter Soldier , Loki , She-Hulk and more, will be heavily tied to the movies, unlike Daredevil . Marvel's 616 is set to premiere November 20 on Disney+. Be sure to check out the new trailer for yourself from the Marvel Entertainment YouTube channel.

• Disney Plus

The Definitive Voice of Entertainment News

Subscribe for full access to The Hollywood Reporter

site categories

‘i am: celine dion’ review: power ballad queen chronicles her new reality in amazon’s moving portrait.

Irene Taylor's documentary details the Canadian star's struggles with Stiff Person Syndrome and appraises the impactful legacy of the singer's career spanning four decades-plus.

By Lovia Gyarkye

Lovia Gyarkye

Arts & Culture Critic

• Share on Facebook
• Share to Flipboard
• Send an Email
• Show additional share options
• Share on LinkedIn
• Share on Pinterest
• Share on Reddit
• Share on Tumblr
• Share on Whats App
• Print the Article
• Post a Comment

In the world of celebrity documentaries, hagiographies reign supreme. Rare is the film that fulfills its promises of intimacy, vulnerability and never-before-seen perspectives. The films are generally risk-avoidant exercises that have perfected the optical illusion of making subjects seem closer than they actually are. 

Related Stories

K-pop group tomorrow x together heads to theaters with vr concert tour, celine dion wants documentary 'i am celine dion' to serve as a beacon of hope for those struggling, i am: celine dion.

In I Am: Celine Dion , the singer demonstrates the extent of her readiness. Directed by Irene Taylor ( Leave No Trace, Moonlight Sonata: Deafness in Three Movements ), the film builds on the confessional energy of the Instagram video by inviting fans to bear witness to her struggles with SPS. It is at once a moving tribute to Dion’s legacy, a peek into how this condition has challenged her gifts and an attempt to help the pop star wrestle with what this means for her future.

Taylor, working with DP Nick Midwig, fashions a verité-style documentary that keeps audiences close to Dion as she hangs out with her children, undergoes extensive rehab and immunotherapy and tries to rebuild her sense of self. What does it mean that her body’s internal war has debilitated her voice, which she calls “the conductor of her life?”

This introduction makes immediately clear the degree to which Dion’s life has changed with SPS. No longer can the balladeer fiercely belt the tearful lyrics of her heavyweight discography for hours. She can no longer record three songs in a night or put on performances of a lifetime week after week.

Dion sings in registers that require less work, as demonstrated later when she records a track for the Netflix movie Love Again starring Priyanka Chopra. Taylor and her editors Richard Comeau and J. Christian Jensen stitch together a number of Dion’s session takes to show the effort required for the singer to do what once came so naturally. Through moments like these the director builds an affecting project of contrasts: A portrait of Dion, past and present. 

When Taylor and Dion dig into the past, the results are edifying. A trip to the singer’s warehouse, stocked with costumes, shoes and other memorabilia from her decades-long career, is a chance to review her legacy. Dion, now 56, rummages through the items while highlighting key moments in her career. She talks about her relationship to fashion, remarking with a wink that her shoe size ranges from a 6 to a 10 because she doesn’t mind suffering for the perfect piece.

The “we” is critical. Throughout I Am: Celine Dion , the Canadian singer expresses profound gratitude for members of her team, from the people who helped stage her tours to the medical professionals, including Dr. Amanda Piquet, helping her manage SPS. There are no interviews with this supporting cast, however. I Am: Celine Dion doesn’t supplement its subject’s testimony with anyone. Instead, like that Instagram video from 2022, it functions as a direct communion between herself and her fans. 

Dion genuinely believes in the power of moving farther together. “I didn’t invent myself, I didn’t create myself,” the Québecoise singer says at one point in the documentary. One wonders if this commitment to teamwork stems from a childhood spent with a big family. Dion was born in Québec to a family of 14 children. According to the singer, her parents worked hard to make sure the kids would never be aware of any suffering. Her mother invented dishes when there was little food in the fridge and Dion counts her siblings as her first audience.

I Am: Celine Dion steadies itself when it returns to the intersection of Dion’s career with her medical condition. The film highlights just how much music means to the singer. She uses any opportunity — creating a get well video with her sons, doing physical therapy — to break into song.

In interviews, Dion works through her anxieties and concerns. She worries about not being able to control her voice in the same way or whether or not she has the energy to live life as she once knew it. There are moments in the doc when the singer, in the middle of an activity, will remark on her legs and other parts of her body feeling sore or tired.

The film is as much about the singer as it is about the realities of living with a chronic illness. Taylor does not shy away from sitting in on difficult points in Dion’s life, including one painful scene in which the singer seizes up after a busy and overstimulating afternoon. Her foot stiffens first and then her entire body locks in place. As her doctor moves Dion to lie on her side and urges her to take deep breaths, tears stream down the singer’s face.

This palpable and visceral glimpse into her pain is a jolting reminder of the toll this condition has taken on Dion not just as a star but as a person. 

Full credits

Thr newsletters.

Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day

More from The Hollywood Reporter

Will smith books next movie with sony’s ‘resistor’, elton john doc, ‘nightbitch’ and ‘the life of chuck’ to get toronto world premieres, ‘wild robot,’ elton john doc and amy adams-starrer ‘nightbitch’ to premiere at toronto, toronto festival to honor david cronenberg, amy adams, naomi scott, lukas gage face the terror in ‘smile 2’ trailer.

• Cast & crew

Ryan's World the Movie: Titan Universe Adventure

Ryan's twin sisters Emma and Kate get trapped in a comic book world. Ryan enters this realm to rescue them, facing adventures, battles, and mishaps while attempting to bring them back before... Read all Ryan's twin sisters Emma and Kate get trapped in a comic book world. Ryan enters this realm to rescue them, facing adventures, battles, and mishaps while attempting to bring them back before his parents discover their disappearance. Ryan's twin sisters Emma and Kate get trapped in a comic book world. Ryan enters this realm to rescue them, facing adventures, battles, and mishaps while attempting to bring them back before his parents discover their disappearance.

• Albie Hecht
• Rose Frankel
• 1 nomination

• Delivery Guy

• Magician Dan Rhodes
• Combo Panda …

• Dark Titan …
• Ryan's World Fan
• All cast & crew
• Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

More like this

User reviews

• August 16, 2024 (United States)
• United States
• Pocket.watch
• Sunlight Entertainment
• Vertigo Entertainment
• See more company credits at IMDbPro

Technical specs

• Runtime 1 hour 23 minutes

Related news

Contribute to this page.

• See more gaps
• Learn more about contributing

More to explore

Recently viewed.

Movie review: Austin Butler, Tom Hardy fuel 'Bikeriders' nostalgia, danger

LOS ANGELES, June 17 (UPI) -- The Bikeriders , in theaters Friday, is a lovingly crafted homage to outlaw culture in the '60s. However, it is not blinded by the legend and presents the devastatingly dangerous side of it, too.

In the film, a photojournalist interviews Kathy (Jodie Comer), the wife of Vandals Chicago motorcycle gang member Benny (Austin Butler) in the '60s. Kathy describes the Vandals' lifestyle under President Johnny (Tom Hardy). Advertisement

Early scenes use the camera, editing and music to capture the energy of motorcycle culture. It's infectious enough to overcome even the greatest disinterest in two-wheeled vehicles.

The Vandals quickly expand from Chicago to chapters around the country. But establishing a system of organizational rules amounts to fighting to settle disputes.

Other motorcycle clubs pick fights with the Vandals, so brawls erupt everywhere they go. The Vandals take extreme retribution on anyone who harms them. It's not an eye for an eye, so the price for harming a Vandal is exponentially higher. Advertisement

The culture is seen through Kathy's eyes. She's the articulate one who can answer the journalist's questions, but as soon as Benny's not around, this world is dangerous for Kathy.

Johnny realizes some truths, though he can't verbalize them. But he notices that no matter how hard he tries to live by a code, he can't convince the younger generation to adopt it.

What is beyond any of these men, but not beyond writer-director Jeff Nichols, is that whatever code they think they live by breeds violence. Their best friends commit violence against each other, but excluding a violent person can be even more dangerous because their resentment triggers even more violence.

By the '70s, the next generation was attracted to the most dangerous parts of motorcycle clubs. Johnny started the Vandals so people could ride in packs, but by the '70s, people saw it as an excuse to break the law in a hotbed of mutual abuse.

The Bikeriders is full of real vehicular stunts. Bike races and driving between cars are the most showy, but any time an actor sits on a moving vehicle, it's a stunt.

The Bikeriders take viewers into this volatile world from a safe distance. It shows how the threat of violence ultimately outweighs any appeal of freedom and community such gangs purport to offer. Advertisement

Fred Topel, who attended film school at Ithaca College, is a UPI entertainment writer based in Los Angeles. He has been a professional film critic since 1999, a Rotten Tomatoes critic since 2001, and a member of the Television Critics Association since 2012 and the Critics Choice Association since 2023. Read more of his work in Entertainment.

• Movie review: 'Inside Out 2' updates emotional complexity, humor
• 'Robot Dreams' director: Movies are 'finished by the audience'
• Tom Tykwer: 'It's sheer joy' how 'Run Lola Run' influenced cinema

Latest Headlines

Trending Stories

• Things to Do
• Travel & Explore
• Investigations
• Advertise with Us
• Newsletters
• AZ International Auto Show & New Car Buyer's Guide 2020 Model Year
• Connect With Us
• For Subscribers
• Contributor Content
• Home & Garden Ideas

'The Bikeriders' is more about the violent ride and memorable characters than a destination

"The Bikeriders," Jeff Nichols' latest film, is based on a 1968 photo book by Danny Lyon in which the photographer chronicles the lives of a motorcycle club as they cruise through the Midwest.

With a photo book you're free to drop in and out, to browse at your leisure. There's a narrative there, but it's loose.

Movies are more of a start-to-finish proposition (though I suppose streaming offers some of the same flexibility). "The Bikeriders" — the film version, a star-studded affair with Austin Butler, Jodie Comer and Tom Hardy — is more compelling (and it's plenty compelling) when thought of like the book. Individual scenes and characters draw you in and make you want to spend time in the world Nichols has painstakingly created. That makes it absolutely worth the price of admission. But the overall journey, about the rise and not-quite fall of a motorcycle club, is less interesting.

What club is 'The Bikeriders' about?

Mike Faist plays Danny, who, when we meet him, is basically embedded with the Vandals, a motorcycle club led by Johnny (Hardy), a married truck driver who was inspired when he saw Marlin Brando in "The Wild One." It takes a certain amount of chutzpah to show a scene from a classic, and what a scene it is: when Brando's Johnny is asked what he's rebelling against, he says, "Whaddya got?" Teen revolt in a single sentence.

At first, Johnny isn't really rebelling against anything. He just wants to hang out and ride with his friends. Sure, they drink and fight, though in such a matter-of-fact way that if you asked them why they'd probably say, "Who doesn't?"

One day, a friend drags Kathy (Jodie Comer) into a bar where the Vandals hang out. She's appalled until she spots Benny (Butler). The next thing you know she's on the back of his motorcycle, roaring away. The next thing you know after that, they're married. His devotion to his marriage and to his club provides a lot of the tension in the film. If Johnny thought that as leader of a motorcycle club he could strong-arm Benny's devotion, he finds out Kathy is as tough as any leather-clad biker on the road.

The film is told through flashbacks of Danny interviewing Kathy. Comer, an Emmy winner for "Killing Eve" and a Tony winner for "Prima Facie," is typically excellent as a woman who is at times bemused by her husband and his friends, sometimes frustrated, and occasionally endangered. She remains attracted to Benny throughout, sometimes to her own consternation.

Jodie Comer and Tom Hardy go all in on accents

And now, a word about the accents. Comer and Hardy are brilliant, committed actors. They're also British. "The Bikeriders" takes place outside of Chicago. To say they go all in on Midwestern accents is to understate the case considerably. They would be at home in one of the old "Da Bears" skits on "Saturday Night Live."

The club is littered with intriguing characters. The great Michael Shannon, a Nichols regular (he's so great in " Midnight Special " and "Take Shelter"), plays Zipco, whose rejection from the Army has left him disillusioned and mostly drunk. Cockroach (Emory Cohen) loves the club, probably too much. Norman Reedus' Funny Sunny shows up from California with the most disgusting set of teeth I think I've ever seen and a mission. My favorite performance of the bunch might be by Boyd Holbrook as the club's mechanic, who always seems like he's in on some kind of joke.

The club grows in popularity. Soon other cities and towns start their own chapters. It's not welcome competition, though one big fight scene is particularly entertaining. Violence is a way of life for these men, the way they solve problems. Kathy worries about Benny. He's an aimless sort, a rather blank kind of fellow. He just wants to ride. She wants to grow up and have a life, a life with Benny. But his life is roaring down the highway in Vandals colors.

The thing is, we don't care so much about the growth of the club. The performances, Comer as Kathy in particular, are what grab us. It's sort of like gathering a group of the world's best performers and having them act out an old biker movie.

The whole isn't quite as interesting as the sum of its parts, is another way to put it. The parts, though, are quite good on their own.

'Midnight Special' review: A weird and satisfying movie

'The Bikeriders' 3.5 stars

Great ★★★★★ Good ★★★★

Fair ★★★ Bad ★★ Bomb ★

Director: Jeff Nichols.

Cast: Jodie Comer, Austin Butler, Tom Hardy.

Rating: R for language throughout, violence, some drug use and brief sexuality.

How to watch: In theaters Friday, June 21.

Reach Goodykoontz at   [email protected] . Facebook:   facebook.com/GoodyOnFilm . X:   @goodyk . Subscribe to   the weekly movies newsletter .

Subscribe to azcentral.com today .   What are you waiting for?

Letterboxd — Your life in film

Forgotten username or password ?

• Start a new list…
• Add all films to a list…
• Add all films to watchlist

Add to your films…

Press Tab to complete, Enter to create

A moderator has locked this field.

Add to lists

Where to watch

616 wilford lane.

Directed by Dante Yore

A grieving man relocates his two teen daughters to a charming town and into their dream home. Quickly the dream becomes an inescapable nightmare.

Eric Roberts Jasmine Waltz Jessica Chancellor Stevonte Hart Don Scribner Mark DeCarlo John Littlefield Mikaela Gilden Alyson Gorske Jon Herrmann Kelly Savanna Deaton

Director Director

Co-director co-director.

Mark S. Allen

Writers Writers

Howard Burd Dante Yore Mark S. Allen

Horror Action

Releases by Date

17 may 2021, releases by country.

More at IMDb TMDb Report this page

Popular reviews

Review by DreamScape40 ★★★

Was curious how the ending was going to play out there. And for a bit I thought I was watching a soft porn film. I mean you got the beautiful location with this gorgeous house. Then the wonky actors.

It also kind of reminded me of the author Bentley Little with his mystery supernatural vibes which is how Eric Roberts portrayed along with a few of the other town folk.

Review by Spookie ★★½ 2

Paranormal Activity meets Wild Things.

Review by B E R T ★★

Production values of a soft core porn flick, actors who look at least 30 playing high school students, completely toneless (is it a horror, drama or domestic thriller?). It’s a dud, tried to channel the Paranormal Activity franchise and failed, I did enjoy the cheesy acting and the cast were actually all rather good looking, but just kinda boring and nothing new.

Review by Curtis ★★★

In 2005, a missing piece of Papyrus 115 was discovered, proving earlier suggestions that 666, historically known to be the number of the beast, is incorrect. The sign of the Beast is 616. - Opening text

After the death of his wife, a widower (John Littlefield) gets a mansion in a gated community from Megan Faux for a steal, and moves himself and his two daughters (Alyson Gorske, Jessica Chancellor) in for a life of luxurious mourning. But what they don't know is that their new house, 616 Wilford Lane , was the site of an Amityvillesque family annihilation mere months before. And as the interior cameras begin to show fuzzy, night-vision paranormal activity, it becomes clear that the stylish multilevel…

Review by MentalTorment ★★

A good ending on a bad movie still adds up to a bad movie.

Review by Nik Caesar ★½

1.5 donuts out of 5. Curse you Eric Roberts!

Review by greeebb ★

scary, but not for the reasons you would expect

Review by Abner Doom ★

This review may contain spoilers. I can handle the truth.

I’m stunned!

616 Wilford Lane is a movie that so successfully skirts past any narrative obligations for 79 minutes of its 85 minute runtime. There are nuggets of separate stories but little to no attempt to tie them all together. I’ll try:

The story is simple. Dad and his two daughters move into a McMansion after a devastating loss. However, their dream home proves to be something of a nightmare as they uncover a dark secret in the house’s history. 

Again, I had to tie quite a bit together there. What this movie really shows is some dude and two women, all of whom belong in the 26-45 age demographic. Through the movie, they witness THINGS and hear NOISES and…

Review by Trent ★½

I would say this is the poor man's Amityville horror but there's already 100 other "Amityville" movies that do it even worse somehow. The only thing that sets this apart is the last minute out of nowhere twist that left me laughing.

Review by Farra ★★

so many plot twists in one setting!

Review by tyreehoffman ★★

This was pretty much your standard Ghost/haunted house story (with surveillance footage that really teeters on Paranormal Activity plagiarism) right up until that twist. And then they hit you with another twist. This was easily a 1.5-star for me until that first twist.

Also, Jasmine Waltz (Austyn, the realtor) is what you get when you order Megan Fox on Wish. But not all Wish products are bad.

Review by Dustin Baker ★★

Creaky and lethargic as all hell, I'm not sure what the final intention was ever supposed to be here. It plays by pretty tired beats well worn by every other ghostly that pops up, but then spins everything into some far fetched twist in the finale in desperation for some uniqueness.

At least Eric Roberts still looks happy.

Select your preferred backdrop

Select your preferred poster.

Advertisement

You’ve Seen the Movie — Now Name the Book That Inspired It

By J. D. Biersdorfer June 17, 2024

• Share full article

Can you identify a book title just by looking at a photo from its film adaptation? (Or maybe if you had just a little hint?) That’s the challenge in this week’s installment of Great Adaptations, the Book Review’s regular multiple-choice quiz about books and stories that have gone on to find new life in the form of movies, television shows, theatrical productions and other formats.

Just tap or click your answers to the five questions below. And scroll down after you finish the last question for links to the books and their screen adaptations.

Hint: The novel used as the basis for this film was originally released in six serial installments.

“The Shawshank Redemption”

“Road to Perdition”

“The Green Mile”

“Forrest Gump”

Hint: Before she did “Barbie,” Greta Gerwig directed and wrote the most recent film adaptation of this book in 2019.

“The Old Curiosity Shop”

“Pride and Prejudice”

“Jane Eyre”

“Little Women”

Hint: The book — about censorship and published in 1953 — has been banned itself in some places.

“Stranger in a Strange Land”

“Fahrenheit 451”

“American Psycho”

Hint: This 2008 nonfiction book sparked a 2012 film and two sequels.

“The Song Machine: Inside the Hit Factory”

“When Colleges Sang: The Story of Singing in American College Life”

“Pitch Perfect: The Quest for Collegiate a Cappella Glory”

“Powerful Voices: The Musical and Social World of Collegiate a Cappella”

Hint: The book was published in 1929 by a member of the Harlem Renaissance whose previous novel was “Quicksand.”

“Every Tongue Got to Confess”

“Unfinished Masterpiece”

“The Living Is Easy”

‘Brats’ Review: Hulu’s Brat Pack Doc Doubles as a Group Therapy Session

Andrew McCarthy directs the nostalgic documentary about the group to which he's always reluctantly belonged.

By Michael Nordine

Michael Nordine

• ‘Under Paris’ Review: At Last, a Shark Movie Worthy of Swimming in the Wake of ‘Jaws’ 2 weeks ago
• ‘Jim Henson Idea Man’ Review: A Heartfelt, If Safe, Tribute to a Singular Figure 3 weeks ago
• ‘The Strangers: Chapter 1’ Review: Home-Invasion Series Hasn’t Overstayed Its Welcome 1 month ago

For viewers of a certain age — or, perhaps more likely at this point, most ages — the term “Brat Pack” evokes nostalgia at its fondest. Movies like “The Breakfast Club” and “Pretty in Pink” remain rites of passage for teenagers coming of age nearly 40 years later, and few would argue that the 1980s didn’t represent a high-water mark for teen movies. For actual members of that coterie of actors, it’s a little more complicated.

Related Stories

With queen catalog deal, sony would rule cooled music publishing market, 'niki' review: charlotte le bon stars in a pretty but flimsy portrait of an artist minus her art, popular on variety.

There’s a visceral impact to the word “brat” nevertheless — it’s a clever play on the original Rat Pack, of course, but doesn’t evoke youth so much as petulance and immaturity. As McCarthy says to Estevez, “Marty Scorsese, Steven Spielberg’s not going to call up somebody who’s in the Brat Pack.” Estevez, for his part, once passed on a project whose screenplay he called “one of the best I’d read in a long time” because McCarthy was also attached to it and he feared how yet another Brat Pack movie would be received. That script, “Young Men with Unlimited Capital,” was never produced.

A few would-be interviewees are missing in action. McCarthy fails to track down Judd Nelson despite repeated attempts (the phrase “undisclosed location” is used, somewhat ominously) and can’t convince Molly Ringwald to sit down for an interview either, though anyone curious for her thoughts on this phase of her life would do well to read her thoughtful New Yorker article about it in the wake of #MeToo. Also conspicuous in his absence is Ringwald’s “The Breakfast Club” and “Sixteen Candles” co-star Anthony Michael Hall, a Brat Packer by any definition who’s never even mentioned by name here. Given that one portion of the film is literally devoted to asking interviewees which actors they consider to have been part of the club — including Brat Pack-adjacent performers like Jon Cryer and Lea Thompson — the fact that Hall receives nary a mention is odd indeed.

McCarthy does land one surprising interview subject, however: the writer who couldn’t have known the long-lasting impact his turn of phrase would end up having. Blum isn’t exactly apologetic, stressing that a journalist isn’t supposed to be his subject’s friend and he doesn’t have any regrets. Though the former New York contributor doesn’t acquit himself especially well despite largely being right, McCarthy seems to have gotten what he needed from the experience. Whether that’s true of viewers may depend on their fondness for him and his cohort, but there’s clearly no shortage of that all these years later.

Reviewed online, June 17, 2024. Running time: 93 MIN.

• Production: An ABC News Studios and Neon presentation of a Network Entertainment production. Producers: Adrian Buitenhuis, Derik Murray. Executive producers: Brian Gersh, Paul Gertz, Brian Liebman, Andrew McCarthy, Dan O'Meara, Tom Quinn, Victoria Thompson, Michael Willis, Kent Wingerak.
• Crew: Director: Andrew McCarthy. Editor: Tony Kent. Cinematographers: Evans Brown, Adrian Buitenhuis, Edward Herrera. Music by: Johannes Winkler.
• With: Andrew McCarthy, Emilio Estevez, Ally Sheedy, Demi Moore, Rob Lowe, Timothy Hutton, Lea Thompson, Jon Cryer, Bret Easton Ellis.

More from Variety

Hulu now offers one-month free trial to binge ‘the bear,’ ‘only murders in the building’ and more, new bundles point to broadband’s growing power in svod packaging, ‘vanderpump villa’: how to watch the finale online, grace van patten to play amanda knox in hulu limited series following margaret qualley’s exit, scarlett johansson vs. sam altman is the ‘black widow’ sequel we didn’t know we needed, ‘under the bridge’ eps unpack the finale and critique the true crime genre: ‘we did not want to make copaganda’, more from our brands, swedish house mafia, kygo set to perform at fourth annual palm tree festival in the hamptons, the new audi e-tron is the marque’s most powerful production car ever, sky/fever rematch most watched wnba game since 2001, the best loofahs and body scrubbers, according to dermatologists, streaming usage set an all-time record in may, tubi and roku hit highs, verify it's you, please log in.