problem solving skills for aggressive behaviour

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Advanced Search
• Journal List

Behavioral Interventions for Anger, Irritability, and Aggression in Children and Adolescents

Denis g sukhodolsky , phd, stephanie d smith , phd, spencer a mccauley , bs, karim ibrahim , ms, justyna b piasecka , md.

• Author information
• Copyright and License information

Funding: This work was supported in part by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) grant R01MH101514 to Drs. Denis Sukhodolsky and Kevin Pelphrey.

Address correspondence to:, Denis G. Sukhodolsky, PhD , Child Study Center , Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven, CT 06520 E-mail: [email protected]

Corresponding author.

Objective: Anger, irritability, and aggression are among the most common reasons for child mental health referrals. This review is focused on two forms of behavioral interventions for these behavioral problems: Parent management training (PMT) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT).

Methods: First, we provide an overview of anger/irritability and aggression as the treatment targets of behavioral interventions, followed by a discussion of the general principles and techniques of these treatment modalities. Then we discuss our current work concerning the transdiagnostic approach to CBT for anger, irritability, and aggression.

Results: PMT is aimed at improving aversive patterns of family interactions that engender children's disruptive behavior. CBT targets deficits in emotion regulation and social problem-solving that are associated with aggressive behavior. Both forms of treatment have received extensive support in randomized controlled trials. Given that anger/irritability and aggressive behavior are common in children with a variety of psychiatric diagnoses, a transdiagnostic approach to CBT for anger and aggression is described in detail.

Conclusions: PMT and CBT have been well studied in randomized controlled trials in children with disruptive behavior disorders, and studies of transdiagnostic approaches to CBT for anger and aggression are currently underway. More work is needed to develop treatments for other types of aggressive behavior (e.g., relational aggression) that have been relatively neglected in clinical research. The role of callous-unemotional traits in response to behavioral interventions and treatment of irritability in children with anxiety and mood disorders also warrants further investigation.

Introduction

C hildhood disruptive behaviors such as anger outbursts and aggression are among the most frequent reasons for outpatient mental health referrals. In the current version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), anger/irritability is the core symptom of oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), and aggressive behavior is most commonly associated with conduct disorder (CD) (American Psychiatric Association 2013 ). However, children with other psychiatric disorders are also at increased risk of anger and aggression, and disruptive behavior disorders are often comorbid with other forms of psychopathology. For example, in population-based studies, the prevalence rates of disruptive behavior disorders range from 14% to 35% in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), from 14% to 62% in children with anxiety disorders, and from 9% to 45% in children with mood disorders (Nock et al. 2007 ). This review is focused on psychosocial interventions for anger/irritability and aggression as dimensions of child psychopathology. Specifically, we include parent management training (PMT) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), because these modalities have received extensive empirical support as stand-alone interventions that are provided in the format of outpatient psychotherapy (Sukhodolsky et al. 2004 ; Dretzke et al. 2009 ). There is also evidence that these behavioral interventions can be helpful in conjunction with medication management for severe aggression (Aman et al. 2014 ) and as part of multimodal interventions for serious conduct problems, which address multiple risk factors (Sukhodolsky and Ruchkin 2006 ). First, we provide an overview of anger/irritability and aggression as the treatment targets of behavioral interventions, followed by a discussion of the general principles and techniques of these treatment modalities. Then we discuss our current work concerning the transdiagnostic approach to CBT for anger, irritability, and aggression.

Anger, Irritability, and Aggression as Treatment Targets of Behavioral Interventions

Anger is a negative affective state that may include increased physiological arousal, thoughts of blame, and an increased predisposition toward aggressive behavior (Berkowitz and Harmon-Jones 2004). Anger is often triggered by frustration or interpersonal provocation. It can also vary in duration from minutes to hours and range in intensity from mild annoyance to rage and fury. Factor-analytical studies distinguish between anger experience (i.e., the inner feeling), and anger expression (i.e., an individual's tendency to show anger outwardly, suppress it, or actively cope with it by deploying adaptive anger control skills) (Spielberger 1988 ). Improving anger control skills is a primary focus of child-directed CBT approaches that teach skills for coping with anger and frustration that are part of a broader repertoire of emotion regulation strategies.

From the developmental standpoint, various aspects of the experience and expression of anger emerge at different times and follow different developmental trajectories. Temper tantrums that include crying, stomping, pushing, hitting, and kicking are common in 1–4-year-old children and range in frequency from 5 to 9 times per week with an average duration of 5–10 minutes (Potegal et al. 2003 ). The intensity and number of tantrums tend to decrease with age, although typically developing children continue to outwardly display anger and frustration, behaviors that parents often label as tantrums. This decrease in the frequency of temper tantrums as children age is paralleled by the development of emotion regulation skills and the acquisition of socially appropriate ways to express anger (Blanchard-Fields and Coats 2008). Intense and out-of-control anger outbursts may be of clinical concern in young children (Wakschlag et al. 2010 ). Intense anger outbursts in response to trivial provocations may also persist across development and manifest across various psychiatric disorders. Because of an apparent lack of control, these behaviors have been referred to as “rage attacks” in severe mood dysregulation (Carlson 2007 ) and Tourette Syndrome (TS) (Budman et al. 2003 ) as well as “meltdowns” in children on the autism spectrum (Samson et al. 2015 ).

Over the past decade, factor-analytical studies of ODD symptoms have identified a unique dimension of irritability defined by three symptoms: Often loses temper, easily annoyed, and often angry and resentful (Stringaris and Goodman 2009 ; Burke et al. 2014 ). As a result, the symptoms of ODD are now grouped into three types: Angry/irritable mood, argumentativeness/defiant behavior, and vindictiveness, which highlights both the emotional and behavioral aspects of this disorder. Longitudinal studies have shown that irritability symptoms in childhood are associated with mood and anxiety disorders later in life, whereas defiance and vindictiveness predict later conduct problems (Whelan et al. 2013 ). Growing recognition of irritability in childhood psychopathology (Leibenluft and Stoddard 2013 ) and research on severe mood dysregulation (Leibenluft 2011 ) have led to adding a new diagnostic category in the DSM-5, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD) (American Psychiatric Association 2013 ). The core symptoms of DMDD include frequent temper outbursts (i.e., three or more times per week) and irritable or depressed mood between the temper outbursts lasting for most of the day nearly every day. Temper outburst may be manifested as verbal rages and/or physical aggression toward people and property.

Aggression can be defined as an overt behavior that can result in harm to self or others (Connor 2002 ). Several subtypes of aggression (e.g., impulsive, reactive, hostile, affective) have been described based on the presence of an angry affect and contrasted with instrumental, proactive, or planned types of aggression that are not “fueled” by anger (Vitiello and Stoff 1997 ). Another well-known classification distinguishes between overtly confrontational antisocial behaviors, such as arguing and fighting, and covert antisocial behaviors, such as lying, stealing, and breaking rules (Frick et al. 1993 ). Physical aggression was found to be a significant risk factor for conduct disorder at an early age of onset, later violence, and other mental health problems such as ADHD and anxiety (Loeber et al. 2000 ). Compared with physical aggression, nonaggressive antisocial behavior was shown to follow a different developmental trajectory (Nagin and Tremblay 1999 ) and predict later nonviolent criminal offenses (Kjelsberg 2002 ).

Principles and Efficacy of PMT

The causal pathways to childhood anger/irritability and aggressive behavior involve multiple interacting biological, environmental, and psychosocial risk factors (Loeber et al. 2009 ). PMT aims to ameliorate patterns of family interactions that produce antecedents and consequences of maintaining tantrums, aggression, and noncompliance. PMT techniques stem from the fundamental principle of operant conditioning, which states that the likelihood of behavior to recur is increased or weakened based on the events that follow the behavior (Skinner 1938 ). For example, a child is more likely to have another tantrum if previous anger outbursts have resulted in an escape from parental demands or the continuation of a preferred activity. Behaviors such as noncompliance, whining, or bickering may also be reinforced if the same benefits are afforded to the child (Patterson et al. 1989 ).

Harsh and inconsistent discipline such as excessive scolding and corporal punishment have also been shown to increase aggressive behaviors (Gershoff 2002 ). The broad goals of PMT are to reduce the child's aggression and noncompliance by improving parental competence in dealing with these maladaptive behaviors. During PMT, parents are taught to identify the function of maladaptive behavior, to give praise for appropriate behavior, to communicate directions effectively, to ignore maladaptive attention-seeking behavior, and to use consistent consequences for disruptive behaviors. PMT is conducted with parents, although for some approaches, children are invited to facilitate the practice of new parenting skills (Eyberg et al. 2008 ). The efficacy and effectiveness of PMT have been evaluated in >100 randomized controlled studies (Dretzke et al. 2009 ; Michelson et al. 2013 ) and excellent treatment manuals are available for clinicians (Kazdin 2005 ; Barkley 2013). There is evidence that the improvements in child behavior are stable over time and can prevent antisocial behavior in adulthood (Scott et al. 2014 ).

The relative efficacy of different parent training approaches have not been well studied in randomized controlled studies, but meta-analytic reviews suggest that program components associated with larger effects include increased positive parent–child interactions and emotional communication skills, parental consistency with consequences, and in vivo practice of new skills with parents (Wyatt Kaminski et al. 2008 ). Improving parent–child communication about emotions has become a focus of emotion coaching interventions, which teach parents the importance of acknowledging and accepting their children's emotional experiences as well as modeling for their children how to identify, label, and cope with strong emotions (Ramsden and Hubbard 2002 ). A recent study of emotion coaching for parents of preschool children found improvements in children's emotional knowledge and reductions in behavior problems (Havighurst et al. 2010 ). However, adding an emotion coaching component to the already established Positive Parenting Program (Triple-P) did not show additive effects in reducing disruptive behavior (Salmon et al. 2014 ).

Other developments in parent-directed interventions have included adaptations of PMT for children with specific neurodevelopmental disorders. Our work has shown that PMT could be helpful for disruptive behavior in children with TS (Scahill et al. 2006 ) and in children with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) (Sukhodolsky et al. 2013 ). Modifications of PMT for these clinical populations required careful consideration of anger outbursts in the context of symptoms manifesting from the primary disorder. For example, irritability and noncompliance could be associated with OCD-related fears or failure of parents to provide accommodations for compulsive behaviors (Storch et al. 2012 ). In children with tics, disruptive behaviors have to be disentangled from complex tics that might resemble purposeful behavior (Sukhodolsky and Scahill 2007 ). More recently, the Research Units on Behavioral Intervention (RUBI) Autism Network has developed and tested a parent training program for irritability and noncompliance in young children with autism (Bearss et al. 2015 ). In addition to standard PMT strategies, the parent training for children on the autism spectrum contains extensive functional assessment strategies, visual schedules for daily routines, and instructions to parents on how to teach developmentally appropriate and adaptive skills to their children.

Child-Directed CBT Approaches

CBT targets deficits in emotion regulation and social problem-solving skills that are associated with aggressive behavior (Dodge 2003). The label “cognitive-behavioral” is used to refer to interventions that are conducted with the child and have an emphasis on the learning principles and the use of structured strategies to produce changes in thinking, feeling, and behavior (Kendall 2006 ). Common cognitive-behavioral techniques include identifying the antecedents and consequences of aggressive behavior, learning strategies for recognizing and regulating anger expression, problem-solving and cognitive restructuring techniques, and modeling and rehearsing socially appropriate behaviors that can replace angry and aggressive reactions. Although CBT is conducted with the child, parents have multiple roles in treatment, including bringing their child to therapy, providing information about their child's behavioral problems, and creating an environment between sessions that is conducive to their child practicing CBT skills. Importantly, parents are asked to recognize their child's effort when applying emotion regulation and problem-solving skills learned in CBT to anger-provoking situations and to provide praise and rewards for behavioral improvements.

Various cognitive-behavioral approaches place relative emphasis on at least one of three content areas: Regulation of excessive anger, learning social problem-solving strategies, and/or developing social skills alternative to aggressive behaviors. Anger control training (ACT) aims to improve emotion regulation and social-cognitive deficits in aggressive children. Children are taught to monitor their emotional arousal and to use techniques such as cognitive reappraisal and relaxation for modulating elevated levels of anger. As part of the training, children also practice socially appropriate responses to anger-provoking situations such as being teased by peers or reprimanded by adults. Several programs of research have evaluated versions of ACT with children (Lochman et al. 2003 ), adolescents (Feindler and Ecton 1986; Deffenbacher et al. 1996 ), and young adults (Kassinove and Tafrate 2002 ). Problem-solving skills training (PSST) addresses cognitive processes, such as faulty perceptions and decision making that are involved in social interaction. For example, hostile attribution bias or inability to generate alternative solutions may contribute to aggressive behavior. Originating from research on social information processing (Dodge et al. 1990 ) and problem solving in children (Shure and Spivack 1972 ), hundreds of studies have examined the association between cognitions in social situations and aggressive behavior (Dodge 2003 ). Participants of PSST are taught to analyze interpersonal conflicts, to develop nonaggressive solutions, and to think about the consequences of their actions in problematic situations. The efficacy of PSST has been demonstrated in several controlled studies (Guerra and Slaby 1990 ; Kazdin et al. 1992 ; Hudley and Graham 1993 ). There is initial evidence that the effects of PSST on conduct problems may be mediated by a change in the targeted deficits in social information processing (Sukhodolsky et al. 2005 ). Social skills training (SST) approaches to reducing aggression and developing assertive behavior are rooted in social-learning theory (Bandura 1973 ). Aggressive youth have been shown to have weak verbal skills, poor conflict resolution skills, and deficits in skills that facilitate friendships (Deater-Deckard 2001 ). The goal of SST with aggressive youth is to enhance social behaviors that can be deployed instead of aggression, as well as behaviors that can be used to develop friendships with nondelinquent peers. Meta-analytic reviews report moderate effects of SST on disruptive behavior (Losel and Beelmann 2003 ) and SST is often used as part of multicomponent interventions such as aggression replacement training (Gundersen and Svartdal 2006 ).

Transdiagnostic Approach to CBT for Anger/Irritability and Aggression

Our approach to CBT for childhood anger and aggression has emerged over the course of three randomized controlled trials (Sukhodolsky and Scahill 2012). The first study evaluated CBT in 33 elementary school children referred by teachers for aggressive behavior in the school setting (Sukhodolsky et al. 2000 ). Compared with the no-treatment control condition, children who received CBT displayed a reduction in teacher reports of aggression and improvement in self-reported anger control. The second study utilized a dismantling design to investigate the relative effectiveness of the social skills training and problem-solving training components of CBT in 26 children referred by their parents for high levels of aggressive behavior (Sukhodolsky et al. 2005 ). Children in both conditions showed a reduction in aggression, whereas the problem-solving condition resulted in a greater reduction in hostile attribution bias, and the skills-training condition resulted in a greater improvement in anger control skills. We also evaluated CBT for explosive anger outbursts and aggression in adolescents with TS (Sukhodolsky et al. 2009 ). TS is characterized by chronic motor and phonic tics that co-occur with disruptive behavior in up to 80% of referred cases (Sukhodolsky et al. 2003 ). We conducted the first randomized study of CBT for anger control versus treatment as usual in 26 adolescents with TS and disruptive behavior. Assessments, which included evaluations by a blinded rater, parent reports, and child self-reports, were conducted before and after treatment as well as 3 months posttreatment. All randomized subjects completed the endpoint evaluation. The parent rating of disruptive behavior decreased by 52% in the CBT condition compared with a decrease of 11% in the control condition. The independent evaluator who was unaware of treatment assignment rated 9 of 13 subjects (69%) in the CBT condition as much improved or very much improved as compared with 2 of 13 (15%) subjects improved in the control condition. The CBT treatment manual that has been developed in these clinical studies has been recently published by Guilford Press (Sukhodolsky and Scahill 2012). Our team is currently conducting a large randomized trial of efficacy and neural mechanisms of CBT for aggression versus a supportive psychotherapy control condition in children across diagnostic categories, which has been funded in response to the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative. The design of this study is described in our companion article of this issue (Sukhodolsky at al. 2016 this issue).

The treatment starts with a detailed assessment of the frequency (i.e., number of episodes per week), duration (i.e., time) and intensity (i.e., risk of injury, property damage, and impact on family) of anger outbursts and aggressive behaviors. Aggression is operationalized as instances of verbal threats, physical aggression, property damage, and self-injury (Silver and Yudofsky 1991 ). Based on a structured clinical interview with the parent(s) and the child, two to three of the most pressing behavioral problems are identified as target symptoms, and used to tailor therapeutic techniques as outlined in the treatment manual (Sukhodolsky and Scahill 2012 ). The treatment is organized into three modules: Emotion regulation, social problem-solving, and the development of social skills for preventing and resolving conflict situations. The first module starts with identifying anger triggers, developing prevention strategies, and learning emotion regulation skills such as cognitive reappraisal and relaxation training. Sessions 4–6 cover problem-solving skills such as the generation of multiple solutions and the consideration of consequences for different courses of action in conflicts. Sessions 7–9 focus on developing skills for preventing or resolving potentially anger-provoking situations with friends, siblings, parents, and teachers. For example, participants are asked to recall a situation in which they acted aggressively and to role-play behaviors that would have prevented the enactment of aggressive behaviors. Each session consists of a menu of therapeutic techniques and activities that can be use used in a flexible yet reliable manner in order to achieve session goals. Each child session also includes a parent component in which parents are informed about the skills that their child has learned in the session, and a plan is devised that enables the practicing of these skills before the next session. Parents are asked to serve as coaches to facilitate the acquisition of new skills by rewarding nonaggressive behaviors with praise, attention, and privileges. Three separate parent sessions are provided to identify patterns of aversive family interactions that might initiate or maintain a child's aggressive behavior. Parents are then given instruction on how to pay attention to their child's positive behavior and to provide consistent reinforcement for their child's efforts in tolerating frustration and using cognitive problem-solving strategies. Additional parenting strategies discussed in treatment include giving effective commands, ignoring minor misbehaviors, and setting up behavioral contracts.

Although excellent treatment manuals are available in the area of child and adolescent anger control (Feindler and Ecton 1986 ; Lochman et al. 2008 ), most are written in a group therapy format for use in school or inpatient settings. Our manual has been structured for providing CBT during individual outpatient psychotherapy. Another feature that sets our approach apart is the focus on a flexible yet consistent implementation of CBT in children and adolescents with moderate to severe anger/irritability and physical aggression in the outpatient setting. The manual provides guidelines for flexible delivery by allowing therapists to select from several numbered activities that correspond to each session's treatment goals, which can be matched to targeted behavioral problems on the one hand and to the child's motivation and developmental level on the other hand. Lastly, the manual contains treatment fidelity checklists to aid in evaluating treatment adherence, an important part of implementing treatment in a reliable fashion (Perepletchikova and Kazdin 2005 ).

Considerations for Future Research

Although a considerable number of clinical studies have been dedicated to physical aggression, little is known about the treatment of relational aggression. Relational aggression refers to hurting others by damaging their personal relationships or social status, in contrast to overt aggression, which involves hurting someone by physical means (Crick and Grotpeter 1995 ). Although less apparent than overt aggression, relational aggression is associated with depression, social anxiety, and loneliness (Roecker Phelps 2001 ). To our knowledge, all treatment studies that include relational aggression outcome measures have been conducted in school settings (Leff et al. 2010 ). A recent study of a 15-week curriculum focused on communication and problem-solving skills for reducing various types of aggression, which showed a decrease in physical aggression, but no change in relational aggression (Espelage et al. 2013 ). A review of 13 classroom-based prevention programs showed small effect sizes on measures of relational aggression, and concluded that these programs were less effective in addressing relational aggression than overt aggression. A two-pronged approach would help in the development of evidence-based treatments for relational aggression. First, studies of existing behavioral treatments for children with externalizing disorders should include measures of relational aggression. Second, targeted interventions for this form of aggression in children with clinically significant levels of relational aggression should be tested in randomized controlled trials.

Treatment of anger and aggression in the context of co-occurring anxiety and depression poses questions about the sequencing of interventions for primary and secondary symptoms, as well as what risk factors might contribute to the co-occurrence of externalizing and internalizing problems. On the one hand, some studies show that treatment of the primary mood disorder may result in the reduction of associated behavioral problems (Jacobs et al. 2010 ). On the other hand, disruptive behavior may reduce compliance with psychosocial interventions for internalizing symptoms and contribute to functional impairments conferred by the primary diagnoses (Garcia et al. 2010 ). Children with elevated symptoms of anxiety/depression demonstrate greater gains following treatment with parent training (Ollendick et al. 2015 ) and CBT for aggressive behavior (Jarrett et al. 2014 ). It has been suggested that a combination of permissive and controlling/hostile parenting styles may contribute to co-occurring anxiety and conduct problems (Granic 2014 ) and parent-focused treatments have been increasingly used for treatment of anxiety in children (Forehand et al. 2013 ). Similar techniques of cognitive restructuring and problem solving are used within CBT approaches for anxiety/depression and aggressive behavior, which suggests commonality in the emotion regulation skills that are taught to improve both internalizing and externalizing disorders.

Relatively little is known about the treatment of conduct problems in children with callous-unemotional traits (i.e., lack of guilt and empathy). These traits have been associated with persistent and more severe forms of antisocial behavior as well as with distinct neurocognitive deficits in reward processing and social perception (Blair et al. 2015 ). It has been suggested that reduced sensitivity to negative consequences in children with conduct disorder complicated by callous-unemotional traits may reduce the effectiveness of rewards and discipline-focused components of PMT (Hawes et al. 2014 ). At the same time, the increased parental warmth and sensitivity that has been observed following treatment with PMT (O'Connor et al. 2013 ), may serve as the critical element of family-based interventions for ameliorating the lack of empathy and shallow affect conferred by the callous-unemotional traits. One study showed that a 6-hour program that included teaching emotion recognition skills directly to children with high callous-unemotional traits was more effective than parent training, but the effect size for this difference was relatively small (Dadds et al. 2012 ). This suggests that similar and, perhaps, longer treatments that teach emotion recognition and social problem-solving skills directly to children in combination with parent-focused interventions that increase parental warmth and the quality of parent–child interactions may be helpful for children with callous-unemotional traits. These hypotheses are awaiting investigation in randomized controlled trials.

Conclusions

PMT and CBT have been well studied in randomized controlled trials in children with disruptive behavior disorders, and studies involving the transdiagnostic approach to CBT for anger and aggression are currently underway. More work is needed to develop treatments for other types of aggressive behavior (i.e., relational aggression) that have been relatively neglected in clinical research. The role of callous-unemotional traits in response to behavioral interventions and treatment of irritability in children with anxiety and mood disorders also warrants further investigation.

Clinical Significance

Anger/irritability and aggression are among the most frequent reasons for mental health referrals in children and adolescents. PMT is a form of behavioral therapy that aims to ameliorate patterns of family interactions that produce antecedents and consequences that maintain the child's anger and aggression. CBT is another well-studied psychosocial treatment for anger and aggression in children and adolescents. During CBT, children learn how to regulate their frustration, improve their social problem-solving skills, and role-play assertive behaviors that can be used during conflicts instead of aggression. Both PMT and CBT can be offered in the format of time-limited psychotherapy in outpatient mental health centers.

Disclosures

Dr. Denis Sukhodolsky receives royalties from Guilford Press for a treatment manual on cognitive-behavioral therapy for anger and aggression in children. Dr. Stephanie Smith, Ms. Spencer McCauley, Mr. Karim Ibrahim, and Dr. Justyna Piasecka report no conflicts of interest.

• Aman MG, Bukstein OG, Gadow KD, Arnold LE, Molina BSG, McNamara NK, Rundberg-Rivera EV, Li X, Kipp H, Schneider J, Butter EM, Baker J, Sprafkin J, Rice RR, Jr, Bangalore SS, Farmer CA, Austin AB, Buchan-Page KA, Brown NV, Hurt EA, Grondhuis SN, Findling RL: What does risperidone add to parent training and stimulant for severe aggression in child attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 53:47–60.e41, 2014 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5 th edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013 [ Google Scholar ]
• Bandura A: Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis. Oxford: Prentice-Hall, 1973 [ Google Scholar ]
• Barkley RA: Defiant Children: A Clinician's Manual for Assessment and Parent Training, 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2013 [ Google Scholar ]
• Bearss K, Johnson C, Smith T, Lecavalier L, Swiezy N, Aman M, McAdam DB, Butter E, Stillitano C, Minshawi N, Sukhodolsky DG, Mruzek DW, Turner K, Neal T, Hallett V, Mulick JA, Green B, Handen B, Deng Y, Dziura J, Scahill L: Effect of parent training vs parent education on behavioral problems in children with autism spectrum disorder: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 313:1524–1533, 2015 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Berkowitz L, Harmon–Jones E: Toward an understanding of the determinants of anger. Emotion 4:107–130, 2004 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Blair RJ, Leibenluft E, Pine DS: Conduct disorder and callous-unemotional traits in youth. N Engl J Med 372:784, 2015 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Blanchard–Fields F, Coats AH: The experience of anger and sadness in everyday problems impacts age differences in emotion regulation. Dev Psychol 44:1547–1556, 2008 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Budman CL, Rockmore L, Stokes J, Sossin M: Clinical phenomenology of episodic rage in children with Tourette syndrome. J Psychosom Res 55:59–65, 2003 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Burke JD, Boylan K, Rowe R, Duku E, Stepp SD, Hipwell AE, Waldman ID: Identifying the irritability dimension of odd: Application of a modified bifactor model across five large community samples of children. J Abnorm Psychol 123:841–851, 2014 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Carlson GA: Who are the children with severe mood dysregulation, a.k.a. “rages”? Am J Psychiatry 164:1140–1142, 2007 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Connor DF: Aggression and antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford Press; 2002 [ Google Scholar ]
• Crick NR, Grotpeter JK: Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Dev 66:710–722, 1995 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dadds MR, Cauchi AJ, Wimalaweera S, Hawes DJ, Brennan J: Outcomes, moderators, and mediators of empathic-emotion recognition training for complex conduct problems in childhood. Psychiatry Res 199:201–207, 2012 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Deater–Deckard K: Recent research examining the role of peer relationships in the development of psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 42:565–579, 2001 [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Deffenbacher JL, Lynch RS, Oetting ER, Kemper CC: Anger reduction in early adolescents. J Couns Psychol 43:149–157, 1996 [ Google Scholar ]
• Dodge KA: Do social information-processing patterns mediate aggressive behavior? In: Causes of conduct disorder and juvenile delinquency. Edited by Lahey B.B., Moffitt T.E., Caspi A. New York: Guilford Press; 2003; pp. 254–274 [ Google Scholar ]
• Dodge KA, Bates JE, Pettit GS. Mechanisms in the cycle of violence. Science 250:1678–1683, 1990 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Dretzke J, Davenport C, Frew E, Barlow J, Stewart–Brown S, Bayliss S, Taylor RS, Sandercock J, Hyde C: The clinical effectiveness of different parenting programmes for children with conduct problems: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Mental Health 3:7, 2009 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Espelage DL, Low S, Polanin JR, Brown EC: The impact of a middle school program to reduce aggression, victimization, and sexual violence. J Adolesc Health 53:180–186, 2013 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Eyberg SM, Nelson MM, Boggs SR: Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with disruptive behavior. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 37:215–237, 2008 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Feindler EL, Ecton RB: Adolescent Anger Control: Cognitive-behavioral Techniques. New York: Pergamon Press; 1986 [ Google Scholar ]
• Forehand R, Jones DJ, Parent J: Behavioral parenting interventions for child disruptive behaviors and anxiety: What's different and what's the same. Clin Psychol Rev 33:133–145, 2013 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Frick PJ, Lahey BB, Loeber R, Tannenbaum L, Van Horn Y, Christ MAG, Hart EA, Hanson K: Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: A meta-analytic review of factor analyses and cross-validation in a clinic sample. Clin Psychol Rev 13:319–340, 1993 [ Google Scholar ]
• Garcia AM, Sapyta JJ, Moore PS, Freeman JB, Franklin ME, March JS, Foa EB: Predictors and moderators of treatment outcome in the pediatric obsessive compulsive treatment study (POTS I). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 49:1024–1033, 2010 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gershoff ET: Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull 128:539–579, 2002 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Granic I: The role of anxiety in the development, maintenance, and treatment of childhood aggression. Dev Psychopathol 26:1515–1530, 2014 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Guerra NG, Slaby RG: Cognitive mediators of aggression in adolescent offenders: Intervention. Dev Psychol 26:269–277, 1990 [ Google Scholar ]
• Gundersen K, Svartdal F:Aggression replacement training in Norway: Outcome evaluation of 11 Norwegian student projects. Scandinavian J Ed Res 50:63–81, 2006 [ Google Scholar ]
• Havighurst SS, Wilson KR, Harley AE, Prior MR, Kehoe C: Tuning in to kids: Improving emotion socialization practices in parents of preschool children–findings from a community trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 51:1342–1350, 2010 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hawes DJ, Price MJ, Dadds MR: Callous-unemotional traits and the treatment of conduct problems in childhood and adolescence: A comprehensive review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 17:248–267, 2014 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hudley C, Graham S: An attributional intervention to reduce peer-directed aggression among African-American boys. Child Dev 64:124–138, 1993 [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jacobs RH, Becker–Weidman EG, Reinecke MA, Jordan N, Silva SG, Rohde P, March JS: Treating depression and oppositional behavior in adolescents. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 39:559–567, 2010 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jarrett M, Siddiqui S, Lochman J, Qu L. Internalizing problems as a predictor of change in externalizing problems in at-risk youth. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 43:27–35, 2014 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kassinove H, Tafrate RC: Anger Management: The Complete Treatment Guidebook for Practitioners. Atascadero, CA: Impact Publishers; 2002 [ Google Scholar ]
• Kazdin AE: Parent management training: Treatment for oppositional, aggressive, and antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005 [ Google Scholar ]
• Kazdin AE, Siegel TC, Bass D: Cognitive problem-solving skills training and parent management training in the treatment of antisocial behavior in children. J Consult Clin Psychol 60:733–747, 1992 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kendall PC: Guiding theory for therapy with children and adolescents. In: Child and Adolescent Therapy: Cognitive-Behavioral Procedures. Edited by Kendall P.C. New York: Guilford Press; 2006; pp. 3–30 [ Google Scholar ]
• Kjelsberg E: Pathways to violent and non-violent criminality in an adolescent psychiatric population. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 33:29–42, 2002 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Leff SS, Waasdorp TE, Crick NR: A review of existing relational aggression programs: Strengths, limitations, and future directions. School Psych Rev 39:508–535, 2010 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Leibenluft E: Severe mood dysregulation, irritability, and the diagnostic boundaries of bipolar disorder in youths. Am J Psychiatry 168:129–142, 2011 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Leibenluft E, Stoddard J: The developmental psychopathology of irritability. Dev Psychopathol 25:1473–1487, 2013 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lochman JE, Barry TD, Pardini DA: Anger control training for aggressive youth. In: Evidence-Based Psychotherapies for Children and Adolescents. Edited by Kazdin A.E., Weisz J.R. New York: Guilford Press; 2003; pp. 263–281 [ Google Scholar ]
• Lochman JE, Wells KC, Lenhart LA: Coping Power: Child Group Program. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008 [ Google Scholar ]
• Loeber R, Burke JD, Pardini DA: Development and etiology of disruptive and delinquent behavior. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 5:291–310, 2009 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Loeber R, Green SM, Kalb L, Lahey BB, Loeber R: Physical fighting in childhood as a risk factor for later mental health problems. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39:421–428, 2000 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Losel F, Beelmann A: Effects of child skills training in preventing antisocial behavior: A systematic review of randomized evaluations. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 587:84–109, 2003 [ Google Scholar ]
• Michelson D, Davenport C, Dretzke J, Barlow J, Day C: Do evidence-based interventions work when tested in the “Real World?” A systematic review and meta-analysis of parent management training for the treatment of child disruptive behavior. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 16:18–34, 2013 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nagin D, Tremblay RE: Trajectories of boys' physical aggression, opposition, and hyperactivity on the path to physically violent and nonviolent juvenile delinquency. Child Dev 70:1181–1196, 1999 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nock MK, Kazdin AE, Hiripi E, Kessler RC: Lifetime prevalence, correlates, and persistence of oppositional defiant disorder: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 48:703–713, 2007 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• O'Connor TG, Matias C, Futh A, Tantam G, Scott S: Social learning theory parenting intervention promotes attachment-based caregiving in young children: Randomized clinical trial. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 42:358–370, 2013 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ollendick TH, Greene RW, Austin KE, Fraire MG, Halldorsdottir T, Allen KB, Jarrett MA, Lewis KM, Whitmore Smith M, Cunningham NR, Noguchi RJP, Canavera K, Wolff JC: Parent management training and collaborative and proactive solutions: A randomized control trial for oppositional youth. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2015. Epub ahead of print [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Patterson GR, DeBaryshe BD, Ramsey E: A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. Am Psychol 44:329–335, 1989 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Perepletchikova F, Kazdin AE: Treatment integrity and therapeutic change: Issues and research recommendations. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 12:365–383, 2005 [ Google Scholar ]
• Potegal M, Kosorok MR, Davidson RJ: Temper tantrums in young children: 2. Tantrum duration and temporal organization. J Dev Behav Pediatr 24:148–154, 2003 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ramsden SR, Hubbard JA: Family expressiveness and parental emotion coaching: Their role in children's emotion regulation and aggression. J Abnorm Child Psychol 30:657–667, 2002 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Roecker Phelps CE: Children's responses to overt and relational aggression. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 30:240–252, 2001 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Salmon K, Dittman C, Sanders M, Burson R, Hammington J: Does adding an emotion component enhance the Triple P-Positive parenting program? J Fam Psychol 28:244–252, 2014 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Samson AC, Hardan AY, Podell RW, Phillips JM, Gross JJ: Emotion regulation in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res 8:9–18, 2015 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Scahill L, Sukhodolsky DG, Bearss K, Findley DB, Hamrin V, Carroll DH, Rains AL: A randomized trial of parent management training in children with tic disorders and disruptive behavior. J Child Neurol 21:650–656, 2006 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Scott S, Briskman J, O'Connor TG: Early prevention of antisocial personality: Long-term follow-up of two randomized controlled trials comparing indicated and selective approaches. Am J Psychiatry 171:649–657, 2014 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Shure MB, Spivack G: Means-ends thinking, adjustment, and social class among elementary-school-aged children. J Consult Clin Psychol 38:348–353, 1972 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Silver JM, Yudofsky SC: The Overt Aggression Scale: Overview and guiding principles. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 3:S22–29, 1991 [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Skinner BF: The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis. New York: Free Press; 1938 [ Google Scholar ]
• Spielberger CD: Manual for the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1988 [ Google Scholar ]
• Storch EA, Jones AM, Lack CW, Ale CM, Sulkowski ML, Lewin AB, De Nadai AS, Murphy TK: Rage attacks in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: Phenomenology and clinical correlates. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 51:582–592, 2012 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stringaris A, Goodman R: Three dimensions of oppositionality in youth. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 50:216–223, 2009 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sukhodolsky DG, Golub A, Stone EC, Orban L: Dismantling anger control training for children: A randomized pilot study of social problem-solving versus social skills training components. Beh Ther 36:15–23, 2005 [ Google Scholar ]
• Sukhodolsky DG, Gorman BS, Scahill L, Findley DB, McGuire J: Exposure and response prevention with or without parent management training for children with obsessive-compulsive disorder complicated by disruptive behavior: A multiple-baseline design study. J Anxiety Disord 27:298–305, 2013 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sukhodolsky DG, Kassinove H, Gorman BS: Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anger in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Aggress Violent Beh 9:247–269, 2004 [ Google Scholar ]
• Sukhodolsky DG, Ruchkin V: Evidence-based psychosocial treatments in the juvenile justice system. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 15:501–516, 2006 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sukhodolsky DG, Scahill L: Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anger and Aggression in Children, New York: Guilford Press; 2012 [ Google Scholar ]
• Sukhodolsky DG, Scahill L: Disruptive behavior in persons with Tourette Syndrome: Phenomenology, assessment, and treatment. In: Treating Tourette Syndrome and Tic Disorders. Edited by Woods D.W., Piacentini J.C., Walkup J.T. New York: Guilford Press; 2007; pp. 199–221 [ Google Scholar ]
• Sukhodolsky DG, Scahill L, Zhang H, Peterson BS, King RA, Lombroso PJ, Katsovich L, Findley D, Leckman JF: Disruptive behavior in children with Tourette's syndrome: Association with ADHD comorbidity, tic severity, and functional impairment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 42:98–105, 2003 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sukhodolsky DG, Solomon RM, Perine J: Cognitive-behavioral, anger-control intervention for elementary school children: A treatment outcome study. J Child Adolesc Group Ther 10:159–170, 2000 [ Google Scholar ]
• Sukhodolsky DG, Vander Wyk B, Eilbott J, McCauley SA, Ibrahim K, Crowley MJ, Pelphrey KA: Neural mechanisms of cognitive-behavioral therapy for aggression in children: Design of a randomized controlled trail within the RDoC construct of frustrative non-reward. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2016. In press [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sukhodolsky DG, Vitulano LA, Carroll DH, McGuire J, Leckman JF, Scahill L: Randomized trial of anger control training for adolescents with Tourette's Syndrome and disruptive behavior. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 48:413–421, 2009 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Vitiello B, Stoff DM: Subtypes of aggression and their relevance to child psychiatry. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:307–315, 1997 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wakschlag LS, Tolan PH, Leventhal BL: Research review: 'Ain't misbehavin': Towards a developmentally-specified nosology for preschool disruptive behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 51:1–22, 2010 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Whelan YM, Stringaris A, Maughan B, Barker ED: Developmental continuity of oppositional defiant disorder subdimensions at ages 8, 10, and 13 years and their distinct psychiatric outcomes at age 16 years. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 52:961–969, 2013 [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wyatt Kaminski J, Valle LA, Filene JH, Boyle CL: A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. J Abnorm Child Psychol 36:567–589, 2008 [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• View on publisher site
• PDF (177.3 KB)
• Collections

Similar articles

Cited by other articles, links to ncbi databases.

• Download .nbib .nbib
• Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

Add to Collections

• General Categories
• Mental Health
• IQ and Intelligence
• Bipolar Disorder

ABA Therapy for Aggressive Behavior: Effective Strategies and Interventions

For families grappling with the heart-wrenching reality of a loved one’s aggressive behavior, the promise of effective strategies and interventions through Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) therapy can be a beacon of hope in the darkest of times. The journey of managing aggressive behavior is often fraught with challenges, but ABA therapy offers a scientifically-backed approach that has helped countless individuals and their families find a path towards positive change.

Imagine a world where tantrums, self-injury, and violent outbursts are replaced with calm communication and self-regulation. It’s not a far-fetched dream, but a tangible goal that ABA therapy strives to achieve. But what exactly is ABA, and how does it work its magic on aggressive behavior?

Unlocking the Power of ABA: A Game-Changer for Aggressive Behavior

Applied Behavior Analysis, or ABA, is like a Swiss Army knife for behavior modification. It’s a versatile, evidence-based approach that’s been turning heads in the world of psychology since the 1960s. At its core, ABA is all about understanding why people do what they do and using that knowledge to encourage positive behaviors while discouraging the not-so-great ones.

Now, you might be wondering, “Why all the fuss about aggressive behavior?” Well, let me paint you a picture. Imagine trying to navigate life when every frustration, every unexpected change, every sensory overload might result in a meltdown of epic proportions. That’s the reality for many individuals with developmental disorders who struggle with aggressive behavior. It’s not just a minor inconvenience; it’s a major roadblock to learning, socializing, and living a fulfilling life.

But here’s the kicker: Aggressive Behavior: Understanding Types, Causes, and Management Strategies isn’t a life sentence. With the right interventions, like those offered by ABA therapy, individuals can learn to manage their aggression and develop healthier ways of expressing themselves. It’s like teaching someone to use their words instead of their fists – a skill that can dramatically improve their quality of life and relationships with others.

Decoding the Mystery: Understanding Aggressive Behavior through ABA Lenses

Before we dive into the nitty-gritty of ABA strategies, let’s take a moment to understand what we’re dealing with. Aggressive behavior isn’t just about throwing tantrums or breaking things (although those can certainly be part of it). It’s a complex beast that can manifest in various ways:

1. Physical aggression: Think hitting, kicking, biting, or any other form of physical violence. 2. Verbal aggression: This includes yelling, cursing, or making threats. 3. Self-injurious behavior: When aggression is turned inward, resulting in self-harm. 4. Property destruction: The urge to break or damage objects in the environment.

Now, here’s where ABA really shines. Instead of just looking at these behaviors and saying, “That’s bad, stop it,” ABA takes a detective approach. It’s all about uncovering the ‘why’ behind the behavior. This process, known as functional assessment, is like putting on a pair of behavioral X-ray glasses.

Imagine you’re a behavior analyst (cool job, right?). You’re observing a child who frequently hits others when asked to complete a task. On the surface, it might look like simple defiance. But your ABA training tells you to dig deeper. Is the child trying to escape a task they find challenging? Are they seeking attention, even if it’s negative? Or is there a sensory component – does the task involve textures or sounds that are overwhelming for them?

By identifying these triggers and maintaining factors, ABA practitioners can develop targeted interventions that address the root cause of the aggression, not just the surface-level behavior. It’s like treating the cause of a headache instead of just popping painkillers – much more effective in the long run!

The ABA Toolbox: Core Principles for Taming the Aggression Beast

Now that we’ve put on our detective hats and uncovered the ‘why’ behind aggressive behavior, it’s time to open up the ABA toolbox and see what goodies we have inside. Spoiler alert: it’s packed with effective strategies that can make a real difference in managing aggressive behavior.

First up, we have the superstar of the ABA world: positive reinforcement. This isn’t your grandma’s “here’s a cookie for being good” approach (although, let’s be honest, who doesn’t love cookies?). ABA Behavior Interventions: Effective Strategies for Positive Change take positive reinforcement to a whole new level. It’s about systematically rewarding desired behaviors to increase their frequency. For someone struggling with aggression, this might mean lavishing praise and rewards when they use words to express frustration instead of lashing out physically.

But wait, there’s more! ABA doesn’t just focus on what happens after a behavior occurs. It also looks at what happens before – enter antecedent interventions. These are like behavior prevention ninjas, swooping in to modify the environment or situation to reduce the likelihood of aggressive behavior occurring in the first place. For example, if a child tends to become aggressive when overwhelmed by noise, an antecedent intervention might involve providing noise-canceling headphones during potentially loud situations.

Now, let’s talk about consequence-based interventions. No, this isn’t about punishment (ABA has long moved past the “time-out” era). Instead, it’s about carefully managing the consequences of behavior to discourage aggression and encourage more positive alternatives. This might involve briefly removing attention following an aggressive outburst (because hey, negative attention is still attention) while providing lots of positive attention for appropriate behaviors.

Last but not least, we have the secret weapon: teaching alternative behaviors and coping skills. This is where ABA really flexes its muscles. Instead of just saying “don’t hit,” ABA teaches individuals what to do instead. It might involve learning to use communication cards, practicing deep breathing techniques, or developing problem-solving skills. It’s like giving someone a whole new toolkit for dealing with frustration and anger.

From Theory to Practice: Implementing ABA for Aggressive Behavior

So, we’ve got all these fantastic tools and strategies. But how do we actually put them into practice? Well, buckle up, because we’re about to take a ride through the implementation process of ABA therapy for aggressive behavior.

First stop: developing a behavior intervention plan. This isn’t just a fancy term for a to-do list. It’s a comprehensive, individualized roadmap for addressing aggressive behavior. Think of it as a personalized playbook, detailing specific strategies, reinforcement schedules, and goals tailored to the individual’s unique needs and circumstances.

But here’s the thing about behavior: it’s not static. It changes, evolves, and sometimes throws curveballs when we least expect it. That’s where data collection and progress monitoring come in. ABA practitioners are like behavior scientists, constantly collecting data, analyzing trends, and adjusting interventions based on what the numbers tell them. It’s this commitment to data-driven decision making that sets ABA apart from many other therapeutic approaches.

Now, let’s talk about teamwork. Attention-Seeking Behavior: Effective ABA Strategies and Interventions aren’t just for therapists to implement in clinical settings. For real, lasting change, collaboration with families and caregivers is crucial. After all, they’re the ones on the front lines, dealing with aggressive behavior day in and day out. ABA therapy often involves training family members and caregivers in intervention techniques, ensuring consistency across different environments.

Speaking of different environments, that brings us to our final stop: generalization. The goal of ABA isn’t just to reduce aggressive behavior in the therapy room. It’s about helping individuals apply their new skills and behaviors across different settings – at home, at school, in the community. This might involve gradually introducing new environments or situations, always with support and reinforcement to ensure success.

Tailoring the Approach: Specialized ABA Strategies for Different Types of Aggression

Just as no two snowflakes are alike, no two instances of aggressive behavior are identical. That’s why ABA therapy isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach. Instead, it offers a range of specialized strategies tailored to different types of aggression.

Let’s start with a particularly challenging form of aggression: self-injurious behavior. This can be especially distressing for families to witness. ABA approaches to self-injury often involve a combination of protective measures (to ensure immediate safety) and skill-building interventions. For example, teaching alternative ways to seek sensory input or express frustration can be game-changers for individuals who engage in self-injury.

When it comes to physical aggression towards others, ABA strategies often focus on teaching social skills and emotional regulation. This might involve role-playing scenarios to practice appropriate responses to frustration, or using visual supports to help individuals identify and express their emotions more effectively.

Verbal aggression presents its own unique challenges. Here, ABA Behavioral Health: Exploring Its Role in Modern Therapy often emphasizes communication-based interventions. This could involve teaching alternative ways to express needs or wants, or implementing a token economy system to reinforce appropriate language use.

Last but not least, we have property destruction. Environmental modifications often play a key role here. This might involve creating a designated “calm down” space with safe objects that can be used to release frustration, or gradually introducing more fragile items as the individual learns to control their impulses.

Navigating the Challenges: Considerations in ABA Therapy for Aggressive Behavior

As effective as ABA can be for managing aggressive behavior, it’s not without its challenges and considerations. Let’s pull back the curtain and take an honest look at some of the complexities involved in this type of intervention.

First and foremost, there are important ethical considerations to keep in mind. Aggressive Behavior in Children: Causes, Signs, and Effective Interventions must always prioritize the dignity and autonomy of the individual. This means carefully considering the use of restrictive interventions, ensuring informed consent (from the individual or their guardian), and continuously evaluating whether the benefits of the intervention outweigh any potential negative impacts.

Safety is another crucial consideration. While the goal is to reduce aggressive behavior, there may be times when immediate intervention is necessary to prevent harm. ABA practitioners must walk a fine line, balancing therapeutic goals with the need to ensure the safety of the individual and those around them.

It’s also important to be aware of potential side effects or unintended consequences of interventions. For example, an intervention that successfully reduces one form of aggressive behavior might inadvertently lead to an increase in another form. This is why ongoing monitoring and adjustment of the intervention plan is so crucial.

Finally, there’s the question of long-term maintenance. The goal of ABA isn’t just to create short-term behavior change, but to instill lasting skills and strategies that the individual can use throughout their life. This often involves a gradual fading of supports and reinforcements, always with careful monitoring to ensure that gains are maintained.

The Road Ahead: Empowering Individuals and Families through ABA

As we wrap up our journey through the world of ABA therapy for aggressive behavior, let’s take a moment to reflect on the key takeaways and look towards the future.

First and foremost, it’s crucial to remember that ABA Therapy: Understanding Applied Behavior Analysis in Behavioral Interventions is not a magic wand that instantly eliminates aggressive behavior. Instead, it’s a systematic, evidence-based approach that provides individuals and families with tools and strategies to manage and reduce aggression over time.

The core principles of ABA – positive reinforcement, antecedent interventions, consequence-based strategies, and teaching alternative behaviors – form a powerful toolkit for addressing aggressive behavior. But perhaps even more important is the individualized nature of ABA. Every intervention plan is tailored to the unique needs, circumstances, and goals of the individual and their family.

Looking to the future, the field of ABA continues to evolve and improve. Researchers are constantly exploring new strategies and refining existing ones. Some exciting areas of current research include the use of technology in ABA interventions, the integration of mindfulness techniques, and the development of more naturalistic approaches to skill-building.

But perhaps the most powerful aspect of ABA therapy for aggressive behavior is its ability to empower individuals and families. By providing concrete strategies and skills, ABA helps individuals take control of their behavior and families to better support their loved ones. It’s not just about reducing aggression – it’s about opening up new possibilities for learning, growth, and connection.

ABA Behavior Therapy: Effective Strategies for Growth and Success offers hope and practical solutions for those grappling with aggressive behavior. While the journey may be challenging, the potential for positive change is immense. With patience, persistence, and the right support, individuals can learn to manage their aggression and lead fuller, more connected lives.

As we conclude, let’s remember that behind every statistic, every behavior plan, every intervention strategy, there’s a human story – a story of struggle, resilience, and hope. ABA therapy for aggressive behavior is more than just a clinical approach; it’s a pathway to understanding, growth, and improved quality of life for individuals and their families.

1. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.

2. Matson, J. L., & Jang, J. (2014). Treating aggressive behavior in individuals with intellectual disabilities and autism spectrum disorder: A review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(12), 3386-3391.

3. Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(2), 147-185.

4. Brosnan, J., & Healy, O. (2011). A review of behavioral interventions for the treatment of aggression in individuals with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 437-446.

5. Fitzpatrick, S. E., Srivorakiat, L., Wink, L. K., Pedapati, E. V., & Erickson, C. A. (2016). Aggression in autism spectrum disorder: presentation and treatment options. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 1525-1538.

6. Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Strain, P. S., Todd, A. W., & Reed, H. K. (2002). Problem behavior interventions for young children with autism: A research synthesis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(5), 423-446.

7. Matson, J. L., & Kozlowski, A. M. (2012). Physical aggression in persons with intellectual disabilities. In J. K. Luiselli (Ed.), The handbook of high-risk challenging behaviors in people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 187-202). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

8. Beavers, G. A., Iwata, B. A., & Lerman, D. C. (2013). Thirty years of research on the functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(1), 1-21.

9. Hagopian, L. P., Rooker, G. W., & Rolider, N. U. (2011). Identifying empirically supported treatments for pica in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2114-2120.

10. Schieltz, K. M., & Wacker, D. P. (2020). Functional assessment and function-based treatment delivered via telehealth: A brief summary. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(4), 1242-1258.

Was this article helpful?

Would you like to add any comments (optional), leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Post Comment

Related Resources

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy vs CBT: Key Differences and Similarities

Behavior Change Procedures in ABA: Effective Strategies for Lasting Improvement

Benefits of Behavioral Therapy: Transforming Lives Through Targeted Interventions

MGA Behavior Therapy: A Comprehensive Approach to Treating Behavioral Disorders

Maladaptive Coping Behaviors: Recognizing and Overcoming Unhealthy Stress Responses

Speech and Behavioral Therapy: Integrating Approaches for Comprehensive Treatment

Behavior Therapies: Key Principles and Approaches for Effective Treatment

Intensive Behavior Intervention: Transforming Lives of Children with Autism

Advanced Behavioral Care: Revolutionizing Mental Health Treatment

ABA Behavioral Health: Exploring Its Role in Modern Therapy