Required Practical: Investigating Specific Heat Capacity ( AQA GCSE Physics )
Revision note.
Required Practical 1: Investigating Specific Heat Capacity
Aims of the experiment.
- The aim of the experiment is to determine the specific heat capacity of a substance, by linking the amount of energy transferred to the substance with the rise in temperature of the substance
- Independent variable = Time, t
- Dependent variable = Temperature, θ
- Material of the block
- Current supplied, I
- Potential difference supplied, V
Equipment List
- Thermometer = 1 °C
- Stopwatch = 0.01 s
- Voltmeter = 0.1 V
- Ammeter = 0.01 A
Apparatus to investigate the specific heat capacity of the aluminium block
- Start by assembling the apparatus, placing the heater into the top of the block
- Measure the initial temperature of the aluminium block from the thermometer
- Turn on the power supply and start the stopwatch
- Whilst the power supply is on, the heater will heat up the block. Take several periodic measurements, eg. every 1 minute of the voltage and current from the voltmeter and ammeter respectively, calculating an average for each at the end of the experiment up to 10 minutes
- Switch off the power supply, stop the stopwatch and leave the apparatus for about a minute. The temperature will still rise before it cools
- Monitor the thermometer and record the final temperature reached for the block
- An example table of results might look like this:
Analysis of Results
- The thermal energy supplied to the block can be calculated using the equations:
- E = thermal energy, in joules (J)
- Q = Charge, in coulombs (C)
- I = current, in amperes (A)
- V = potential difference, in volts (V)
- t = time, in seconds (s)
- Rearrange to make Q the subject
- Substitute into the Q = It equation
- Rearrange to make E the subject
- The change in thermal energy is defined by the equation:
- Δ E = change in energy, in joules (J)
- m = mass, in kilograms (kg)
- c = specific heat capacity, in joules per kilogram per degree Celsius (J/kg °C)
- Δ θ = change in temperature, in degrees Celsius (°C)
- Rearranging for the specific heat capacity, c :
- To calculate Δθ:
- To calculate Δ E:
- I = average current, in amperes (A)
- V = average potential difference (V)
- θ f = final time, in seconds (s)
- θ i = initial time, in seconds (s)
- These values are then substituted into the specific heat capacity equation to calculate the specific heat capacity of the aluminium block
Evaluating the Experiment
Systematic Errors:
- Make sure the voltmeter and ammeter are initially set to zero, to avoid zero error
Random Errors:
- This means the measured value of the specific heat capacity is likely to be higher than what it actually is
- To reduce this effect, make sure the block is fully insulated
- This would eliminate errors from the voltmeter, ammeter and the stopwatch
- Make sure the temperature value is read at eye level from the thermometer, to avoid parallax error
- The experiment can also be repeated with a beaker of water of equal mass, the water should heat up slower than the aluminium block
Safety Considerations
- Run any burns immediately under cold running water for at least 5 minutes
- Allow time for all the equipment, including the heater, wire and block to cool before packing away the equipment
- Keep water away from all electrical equipment
- Wear eye protection if using a beaker of hot water
Teacher tip
From my experience of teaching this practical investigation, it is usually done as a teacher demonstration because of the specialist equipment used. Therefore, students find it more difficult to engage with than a hands-on practical, and so can often find it quite confusing. This Required Practical does come up in exams very frequently, so you do need to make the extra effort to understand the equipment, the set-up and how the measurements are taken.
The main idea is that the measurements of current and potential difference allow you to calculate the energy transferred to the metal block, and from there you can use the change in temperature and the energy supplied to calculate the specific heat capacity of the metal.
You've read 0 of your 10 free revision notes
Get unlimited access.
to absolutely everything:
- Downloadable PDFs
- Unlimited Revision Notes
- Topic Questions
- Past Papers
- Model Answers
- Videos (Maths and Science)
Join the 100,000 + Students that ❤️ Save My Exams
the (exam) results speak for themselves:
Did this page help you?
Author: Leander
Leander graduated with First-class honours in Science and Education from Sheffield Hallam University. She won the prestigious Lord Robert Winston Solomon Lipson Prize in recognition of her dedication to science and teaching excellence. After teaching and tutoring both science and maths students, Leander now brings this passion for helping young people reach their potential to her work at SME.
14 Calorimetry for Determination of Specific Heat Capacity
Calorimetry for determination of specific heat capacity.
This lab is designed to align with AAOT science outcome #1: Gather, comprehend, and communicate scientific and technical information in order to explore ideas, models, and solutions and generate further questions.
- digital device with spreadsheet program
- digital device with internet access
- Model the contents of a calorimeter as an isolated system to determine the unknown specific heat value of an unidentified metal.
- Identify the metal by comparing the determined specific heat value to tabulated values.
- Apply an improved model that includes calorimeter components in the isolated system and compare the results with the model that excludes the calorimeter from the system.
- Estimate the uncertainty in the specific heat value caused by cooling of the hot metal during the transfer to the calorimeter.
Experimental Methods
The video below shows the methods used to warm a piece of metal in a hot water bath and then transfer the metal to a Styrofoam cup filled with water inside a calorimeter. The Styrofoam cup provides insulation, and the cup itself is suspended within an aluminum cylinder with a layer of air between to provide additional insulation. The shiny metal cylinder also reduces radiative exchange of thermal energy. The cylinder itself is then suspended within a larger metal shell, once again separated by a layer of insulating air. A lid prevents significant convection or evaporation, but does have a hole to allow insertion of of a thermometer to monitor the contents of the calorimeter. Due to the hold in the lid, the calorimeter is an open system. If we assume the hole is sufficiently small that there is negligible exchange of particles in/out of the calorimeter then we can treat the contents as a ___________ system. If we also assume that the insulation is essentially perfect and the heat transfer in/out of the calorimeter is negligible then we can treat the contents as an _____________ system.
Analysis Methods
2) Enter the values from the video into your model for the metal specific heat and calculate a value. Show you work.
Conclusions
3) Look at this table of specific heat values and compare your value to those listed to identify the metal in this experiment. List the value of the metal you chose from the list and calculate a % difference from the value found in this experiment.
Further Questions
4) List some possible sources of uncertainty in our determination of the specific heat value that were related to the experimental methods and measurement tools, but not caused by mistakes in calculations.
5) Our model neglected any temperature change by the Styrofam cup in the calorimeter. Now include the Styrofoam cup in the model and recalculate the specific heat value of the metal. Assume the initial and final temperatures of the Styrofoam were the same as the water it contained. Look up a value for Styrofoam specific heat capacity from a reliable source and provide a full URL for your source. Show all work.
6) How much did the determined specific heat value change when accounting for heating of the Styrofoam cup, and did it increase or decrease? Calculate a % difference between the two values produced by the two models.
7) Did accounting for this effect bring the specific heat value closer to a different metal the the one you identified previously? Explain. Does it appear to be necessary to include the Styrofoam cup in the analysis for this type of experiment? Explain your reasoning.
Our analysis methods neglected any cooling of the metal during the transfer from the hot water bath to the calorimeter. The following infrared images indicate that the metal is radiating and that air surrounding the metal is undergoing natural convection (which implies that the air is first warmed by conduction from the metal).
To estimate how much cooling may have occurred, another experiment was performed. The metal was once again removed from the hot water bath and it’s temperature was measured and recorded by an infrared thermometer as seen in the following video.
8) How much did the temperature of the metal change during three seconds in the air just after being removed from the hot water bath?
9) Assume the same temperature change occurred for the metal in the original calorimetry experiment and that the metal was actually that much colder than you originally thought. Recalculate the metal specific heat with the expected lower initial temperature value. Show all work.
10) How much did the determined specific heat value change when accounting for cooling of the metal during transfer, and did it increase or decrease? Calculate a % difference between the two values produced by the two models.
11) Did accounting for this effect bring the specific heat value closer to a different metal than the one you identified previously? Explain. Does it appear necessary to be concerned about the heat loss during transfer to the calorimeter for this type of experiment? Explain your reasoning. (Consider the error in determining specific heat that you discovered was caused by these effects and compared to the difference in specific heat between metals).
12) The metal used in the experiment was actually zink. Was that the metal you identified?
13) Calculate a % difference between the final experimental specific heat capacity of the metal and the tabulated value for zink (look it up and provide a citation for your source).
General Physics Remote Lab Manual Copyright © by Lawrence Davis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.
Share This Book
- CBSE Class 11
- CBSE Class 11 Physics Practical
- To Determine Specific Heat Capacity Of A Given Solid By Method Of Mixture
To Determine Specific Heat Capacity of a Given Solid by Method of Mixture
Specific heat capacity is defined as the amount of heat required for one gram of substance at 1℃. To understand how to determine the specific heat capacity of a given solid by the method of mixtures, please read the below article.
To determine the specific heat capacity of a given solid by the method of mixtures.
Materials Required
- A hypsometer
- Calorimeter
- A lid and outer jacket
- Solid in small pieces
- Two half-degree thermometers
- Clamp stand
The calorimeter is a device used to measure the heat flow of a chemical or physical reaction. Calorimetry is the process of measuring this heat. It consists of a metal container to hold water above the combustion chamber and a thermometer to measure the temperature change. Hypsometer is an instrument used to determine the boiling point of water at a given altitude.
- Put thermometers A and B in a beaker containing water and note their reading. Let thermometer A be a standard to find the correction that is to be applied to thermometer B.
- Put the thermometer B into the copper tube of a hypsometer containing the powder of the given solid. Before placing the hypsometer on the burner, add a sufficient amount of water.
- Record the weight of the calorimeter with a stirrer and lid over it.
- Add water (temperature between 5 to 8℃) to the calorimeter at half-length and weigh it again.
- Heat the hypsometer till the temperature of the solid is steady.
- Note the temperature of water in calorimetry. Now slowly stir and add the solid powder from the hypsometer to the calorimeter and record the final temperature of the mixture.
- Remove thermometer A from the calorimeter.
- Note the weight of the calorimeter with the contents and lid.
Observations
Reading of thermometer A = T A = ……… ℃
Reading of thermometer B = T B = ……… ℃
Correction applied in B with respect to A (T A – T B ) = …….. ℃
Mass of calorimeter and stirrer m = …….. g
Water equivalent of calorimeter ω = m × 0.095 = …….. g
Specific heat of copper calorimeter = 0.095 cal/g
Mass of calorimeter + stirrer + lid = m 1 = ……. g
Mass of calorimeter + stirrer + lid + cold water = m 2 = …… g
The steady temperature of hot solid = T s = …….. ℃
Corrected temperature of hot solid T =T s – (T A – T B ) = ……… ℃
The temperature of cold water = t =……… ℃
The temperature of the mixture = Ө =…….. ℃
Mass of calorimeter, stirrer, lid, cold water, and solid = m 3 =…… g
Calculations
Mass of cold water = m 2 – m 1 =…….. g
Mass of hot solid = m 3 – m 2 =…….. g
Rise of the temperature of cold water and calorimeter = Ө – t =………. ℃
Fall in temperature of solid = T – Ө =……… ℃
Heat gain by calorimeter, cold water and stirrer = [ω + ( m 2 – m 1 )(Ө – t)] =……. (a)
Heat lost by solid = (m 3 – m 2 ) × C × (T – Ө) =……. (a)
Here, C is the specific heat of solid to be calculated.
According to the principle of calorimeter, heat lost = heat gained
Specific heat of given solid by the method of the mixture is ………. cal g -1 ℃ -1 .
Precautions
- A sufficient amount of solid powder should be used to cover the tip of the thermometer.
- A sufficient amount of water should be taken in a hypsometer.
- Dropping of solid should be quick and gentle.
- To avoid excess radiation, the calorimeter should be polished from the outside.
- The temperature of cold water should not cross the dew point.
Sources of Error
- There might be heat loss while transferring solid into the calorimeter.
- During conduction, convection, and radiation, there might be heat loss.
- The bulbs of the thermometer might not be completely inside the solid.
Note: To determine the specific heat of a given liquid by the method of mixtures, the liquid is taken in place of cold water to determine the specific heat. Proceed with the same procedure as in the experiment.
Q1. What is the heat?
Ans: Heat is defined as the quality of being hot at high temperatures.
Q2. Define the specific heat of the substance.
Ans: It is defined as the amount of heat energy required to raise the temperature of 1 gram of a substance by 1℃.
Q3. State the principle of calorimetry.
Ans: The principle of calorimetry is heat lost is equal to the heat gained.
Q4. Why is calorimeter made of copper is used in the experiment?
Ans: The specific heat of copper is very low. The absorption and liberation of heat will be less during heat transfer.
Q5. Is heat gained always equal to the heat lost?
Ans: If there is no chemical reaction taking place between the components only then heat loss will be always equal to the heat gain.
Stay tuned with BYJU’S to learn more about other Physics related experiments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Put your understanding of this concept to test by answering a few MCQs. Click ‘Start Quiz’ to begin!
Select the correct answer and click on the “Finish” button Check your score and answers at the end of the quiz
Visit BYJU’S for all Physics related queries and study materials
Your result is as below
Request OTP on Voice Call
PHYSICS Related Links | |
Register with BYJU'S & Download Free PDFs
Register with byju's & watch live videos.
Join us at the International Thermal Conductivity Conference (ITCC) and the International Thermal Expansion Symposium (ITES).
Absolute vs Direct Thermal Conductivity
May 3, 2024
What is the difference between an absolute and direct (calibrated) measurement of thermal conductivity?
Thermal Conductance Calculator
July 7, 2022
For materials which are non-homogenous or anisotropic are described with a more real world dependent term as Thermal Conduction.
Thermal Conductivity & Thermal Resistance Calculator
June 24, 2022
Calculates thermal resistance of a material when its thickness and thermal conductivity are known or measured.
Chasing Rainbows
January 24, 2022
Thermal Conductivity Renaissance Man Part 7 by Ron Tye
Efim Litovsky
October 28, 2021
Towards the Unattainable Perfection
June 21, 2021
Thermal Conductivity Renaissance Man Part 6 by Ron Tye
Decisions! Decisions! Decisions!
March 16, 2021
Thermal Conductivity Renaissance Man Part 5 by Ron Tye
Last of the Summer wine
November 18, 2020
Thermal Conductivity Renaissance Man Part 4 by Ron Tye
The Transient Era
September 30, 2020
Thermal Conductivity Renaissance Man Part 3 by Ron Tye
Paper Database
September 29, 2020
Hundreds of thermal conductivity papers searchable by testing method, application or author.
The Thermal Conductivity Blog features the latest announcements, news, perspectives, and more.
The Golden Age
May 8, 2020
Thermal Conductivity Renaissance Man Part 2 by Ron Tye
Thermal Conductivity Renaissance Man
April 1, 2020
Addressing the measurement of thermal conductivity and related thermal transport properties by Ron Tye.
The Renaissance Man
March 24, 2020
Thermal Conductivity Renaissance Man Part 1 by Ron Tye
Top 10 Thermally Resistive Materials and Gases
November 6, 2019
Thermally Resistive Materials and Gases
We Measure Everything
September 10, 2019
We measure everything from Solids, liquids, fabrics, textile and more.
Famous Scientists and Thermal Conductivity
August 1, 2019
Famous Scientist and Thermal Conductivity
Rekindling an Antique Searle’s Bar Experiment
July 18, 2019
Determining the thermal conductivity with Searle’s bar experiment
Top 10 Thermally Conductive Materials
July 8, 2019
Specific Heat Test Experiment
June 11, 2019
Specific heat test experiment using a 3 different simple set up.
Top 10 Most Visited Thermal Resources
June 4, 2019
Top 10 most visited thermal resources
Top 10 Low Thermal Conductivity Research Papers
May 31, 2019
Top 10 academic papers related to low thermal conductivity
Top Ten Resources
A collection of Top 10 resources, ideas, tools, etc for people interested in thermal conductivity.
Restoration of Antique Searle’s Bar
May 27, 2019
The overview of Searle’s Bar Experiment.
Specific Heat Capacity Test: The Method of Mixture
May 13, 2019
Instructions on how to build and operate your own specific heat capacity test for your sample material.
Thermal Conductivity – Resistance: Temperature
April 9, 2019
Effect Temperature has on thermal resistance.
Rule of Mixtures Calculator
January 30, 2019
The heat capacity of a mixture can be calculated using the rule of mixtures.
What is Thermal Conductivity?
November 26, 2018
An easy to understand explanation of Thermal Conductivity and its importance.
Andrzej Brzezinski
September 12, 2018
John Koenig
Gernot pottlacher, robert zarr, david r. salmon.
William J. Parker
Daniel flynn.
Ralph Dinwiddie
Ulf Hammerschmidt
Silas E. Gustafsson
Ludovit Kubicar
Tetsuya Baba
Kenneth E. Wilkes
William wakeham, didericus p.h. hasselman, david w. yarbrough.
R. (ROY) Taylor
Jochen Fricke
Paul Wagner
Ared cezairliyan.
Russell U. Acton
Merrill L. Minges
Guy k. white.
Robert Berman
John P. Moore
Ronald P. Tye
Yeram S. Touloukian
Ray e. taylor.
Marek J. Laubitz
September 11, 2018
Charles F. Lucks
Paul G. Klemens
David l. mcelroy.
Thermal Conductivity Award
Recipients of the Thermal Conductivity Awards
Reginald W. Powell
August 13, 2018
As the founding editor of the International Journal of Thermophysics, Dr. Ared Cezairliyan is an internationally acclaimed physicist in the field of high-temperature thermophysics. Born in Turkey, Cezairliyan established an early reputation as an outstanding student and attended Robert College in Istanbul, receiving a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering and demonstrating a keen interest in arts and philosophy.
August 10, 2018
As a condensed matter physicist and emeritus professor of physics, Paul G. Klemens was one of the top researchers on the theory of phonons. Born in Vienna, Klemens and his family fled to Australia shortly before World War II broke out, where he learned to speak English and was awarded a scholarship to the University of Sydney, earning his BS degree and his MS degree in physics.
Yeram Touloukian believed in the importance of high-quality research and was influential world-wide in the establishment of some of the best research facilities in thermophysical measurements. Born in Istanbul, Turkey, Touloukian earned his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering before moving to the United States to pursue his master’s degree and Ph.D.
Akira Nagashima
Dr. Akira Nagashima is known for his active role in the field of thermal conductivity. He is a member of several scientific committees, like international organizing committee of the European Conference on Thermophysical Properties.
Specializing in the standards and metrology of thin film thermophysical properties, Dr. Tetsuya Baba graduated from the University of Tokyo, earning a Doctor of Science degree in 1979. Baba currently works as the senior researcher of TherMAT and is an emeritus researcher at the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology.
February 9, 2018
In 2014, he was the invited speaker at the Thermophysics Conference, where he presented his paper titled: Possible Ways of Measuring the Thermal Transport Properties of Anisotrophic Materials. Dr. Gustafsson was awarded the “ITCC Thermal Conductivity Award” at the 27th International Thermal Conductivity Conference in 2003.
February 1, 2018
In 2000, he received the “INCHEBA 2000” award at the 32nd International Chemical Fair in Bratislava for his Thermophysical Transient Tester RT 1.02. The following year, Kubicar accepted the “Thermal Conductivity Award” at the 26th International Thermal Conductivity Conference and the 14th International Thermal Expansion Symposium in Cambridge, MA, for that same work.
Dr. Vlastimil Boháč
January 25, 2018
With a career spanning over 33 years, Boháč is the author and co-author of more than 60 published research papers, and co-authored the patents for the pulse method that measures thermophysical parameters.
Thermal Conductivity Pioneers
Read about the earliest and more recent pioneers in the field of thermal conductivity measurements.
Professor Sir William A. Wakeham FREng
January 16, 2018
With a lifelong career devoted to research and leadership, over 400 research items and 10,000 citations to his name, Wakeham is undoubtedly considered a founding father of modern thermal conductivity.
Professor Marc J. Assael Ficheme
January 12, 2018
With a career spanning over 35 years, Marc Assael has published more than 186 papers in international journals, 163 papers in conference proceedings, 29 chapters, and 9 books.
John C. Jaeger
January 11, 2018
As an author of many books, Jaeger collaborated with Horatio S. Carslaw on two: Conduction of heat in solids and Operational methods in applied mathematics. After the passing of Carslaw, Jaeger continued his research efforts on the theory of heat conduction, to further improve the Carslaw method.
Tye is an author and co-author of seven books, over 150 research papers, and has more than 700 citations. In 2005, Ronald P. Tye received the “ECTP Lifetime Award”, to honour his outstanding scientific research on thermophysical properties.
Dr. William J. Parker
Dr. William J. Parker received the highly acclaimed Thermal Conductivity Award for his dedicated work on the Laser Flash Method, which remains the most popular method of measuring the thermal diffusivity of solids.
Horatio. S. Carslaw
As lead writer and theory developer of the books: Conduction of heat in solids and Operational methods in applied mathematics, Carslaw contributed a “pure” sense to the pieces of work, while his partner, and previous student, John Conrad Jaeger contributed more of an “applied” sense.
Gustav R. Kirchhoff
It was Kirchhoff who proposed the equation that stated the difference in heat capacity between products and reactants, accounts for the variation of heat in a chemical reaction. In 1860, Kirchhoff helped lead Robert Bunsen to the discovery of two novel chemical elements; cesium and rubidium, thanks to his extraordinary knowledge of spectral analysis.
Anders J. Ångström
Ångström was awarded the Rumford medal from the Royal Society in 1872, for his work with spectrum analysis. More specifically, Ångström, deduced the theory that states a spark emits, not one, but two superposed spectra; one from the metal and the other from the gas.
Jean-Baptiste J. Fourier
Without Fourier’s contributions in mathematics and physics, scientists of today would not be where they are. Most notably, Fourier’s theory of heat flux, led to the discovery of global warming. As such, Fourier is regarded as one of the grandfathers of thermal conductivity.
December 1, 2017
List of definitions of commonly used terms in thermal conductivity industry
Heating Water in a Balloon
October 3, 2017
Test and demonstrate the difference in thermal conductivity of air and water.
Materials Database
September 27, 2017
Over 1000 searchable materials, with corresponding thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, thermal effusivity, specific heat and density information.
Conduction Calculator
September 22, 2017
Simple calculator for determination of heat transfer between substances that are in direct contact with each other.
Thermal Simulation Software – Energy2D
August 1, 2017
Free simulation software suitable to academics, students, or anyone looking to have fun with heat transfer
Uncertainty of Calibration
July 24, 2017
The calculator determines the uncertainty of comparative thermal conductivity methods.
Thermal Resistance in Series Calculator
July 21, 2017
Convenient conversions between different units of Thermal Conductivity, Thermal Diffusivity, and Specific Heat.
Thermal Conductivity – Resistance: Surface Area
June 9, 2017
Effect surface area has on thermal resistance.
Thermal Conductivity Meter: Searle’s Apparatus
Instructions on how to build and operate your own thermal conductivity meter for materials with high thermal conductivity.
Thermal Conductivity Meter: Lee’s Disc
Instructions on how to build and operate your own thermal conductivity meter for materials with low thermal conductivity.
Build Your Own
Free instructions on how to build your own thermal conductivity meter.
Thermal Conductivity – Resistance: Length
Effect length has on thermal resistance.
Thermal Conductivity – Resistance: Materials
Effect thermal conductivity has on thermal resistance.
Qualitative testing of the Thermal Conductivity of liquids
Comparison of the Thermal Conductivity of various liquids using a simple set up.
Unburnable paper! The impressive effects of high thermal conductivity materials.
Make Paper flame-proof using only a metal rod.
Using Heat flux to determine the length of an aluminum rod of unknown length
Learn how to use heat flux and thermal conductivity to calculate length of a rod with unknown length.
Touch Metal, Touch Wood Experiment
Why does metal feel different than wood?
Ice Cutter Experiment with High Thermal Conductivity Graphite Sheet
Instantly cut ice with the amazing high thermal conductivity graphite sheets. Get your own free piece of graphite to run this experiment.
Thermal Conductivity Experiments
June 8, 2017
Easy thermal conductivity science experiments for all ages.
Thermal Conductivity of Graphite
Nicholas explains how to effectively cut a freezy in two using thermal conductivity!
Touch NASA foam at 1980°C
An explanation of why NASA uses special ceramic tiles to protect the space shuttle
Thermal Conductivity Explained by a 12 Year Old
Thermal conductivity definition explained by a 12 Year old scientist
Thermal Conductivity Adventures
Follow the exploits of some junior scientists as they discover thermal conductivity!
Thermal Properties Calculator
May 23, 2017
Calibrate & Test
May 19, 2017
Simulate testing of various absolute or calibrated methods.
Thermal Properties Converter
May 17, 2017
Penetration Calculator
May 15, 2017
Easy to use calculator to determine how far the heat from your measurement sensor penetrates into your sample.
Absolute: LFA
Laser Flash Apparatus Simulate Absolute Testing
Absolute: TPS
Transient Plane Source Simulate Absolute Testing
Calibration: THW
Transient Hot Wire Calibrate & Test Simulation
Calibration: HFM
Heat Flow Meter Calibrate & Test Simulation
Calibration: TLS
Transient Line Source Calibrate & Test Simulation
Calibration: MTPS
Modified Transient Plane Source Calibrate & Test Simulation
Method Comparison
January 24, 2017
A convenient list to quickly compare specifications of 8 methods.
1.0 Introduction
When performing an experiment and carefully following the proper procedure methods, the results obtained should be relatively accurate. Many experiments require multiple trials and sometimes never result in a complete conclusion.
The specific heat test described in this article required many modifications and repetitions to display conclusive results. The results obtained were relatively accurate even taking into consideration the modification of using a calorimeter made of Styrofoam cups. Often results from experiments using modifications can be inaccurate or inconclusive, especially when there is only a single recorded data point. In this article we will go through proper data acquisition and analysis.
When using proper procedure for this in-home experiment, it is unlikely that 100% accuracy will be achieved due to the unstoppable nature of thermodynamics. Following this method can give an accuracy of approximately 80%. This is a respectable degree of accuracy to be achieved from a simple DIY application.
2.0 Procedure
The procedure for this experiment is thoroughly covered in the coinciding Specific Heat Test article. A brief summary of the procedure is outlined below.
A mass of water was measured than poured into the calorimeter, the water remained there until it reached room temperature. For the most accurate and readable results, there should only be enough water in the calorimeter to completely cover the sample.
Figure 1: Calorimeter made of two Styrofoam cups and a thermometer
A beaker filled with approximately 300mL of water was placed on a hot plate. A sample of the stainless-steel variety used for the purpose of this experiment was then placed in a test tube and set in a stand so that the majority of the tube was submerged in the beaker. The sample tube was placed vertically to ensure that it did not come into contact with the bottom or sides of the beaker. Once the sample tube was placed properly; the hot plate was turned on.
Figure 2: Beaker on a hot plate with a test tube containing the sample submerged in boiling water
During the initial trial of this experiment a solid 25.22-gram cylindrical stainless-steel-316 sample was used. Using a test tube to hold the sample in the water (as shown above), did not lead to favorable results. This poor experimental outcome is likely due to the sample’s radius being smaller than the radius of the test tube. This additional space around the sample added a layer of insulating air in the test tube. This error could be averted if the sample were a powder or composed of smaller pieces.
However, if changes were made to the sample at this point in the experiment, the sample would be completely destroyed. For the remainder of the experiment the sample was held in place with a pair of insulated tongs instead of the test tube. Altering this element of the procedure for the remainder of the trials dramatically improved the results.
Figure 3: Beaker on a hot plate with a sample submerged and hovered above the bottom by tongs
Once the water in the beaker was boiling, it was recommended to wait approximately 10 minutes to ensure the sample is evenly heated. Note that to achieve a boiling condition the sample needs to be heated to 100 degrees Celsius.
2.3 Material Transfer
After 10 minutes the test tube was detached from the stand and the sample was poured into the calorimeter. The sample must be poured safely but quickly into the calorimeter, so that a minimal amount of heat is lost to the surrounding air. It is also crucial not to transfer any water from the beaker into the calorimeter. If water from the beaker entered the calorimeter in would add heat that is unrelated to the sample and alter the calculated mass of water.
A Styrofoam cup calorimeter was used for the first two trials of this experiment. For the third and fourth trials a metal thermos replaced the Styrofoam cups to determine the difference a conductive material had on the results.
Figure 4: A Calorimeter made from a thermos and a digital thermometer
2.4 Record Data
Once the sample was stabilized in the enclosed calorimeter, data was collected from the thermometer. For the purposes of this experiment, data was recorded at every 30 second interval. However, this experiment is not time sensitive so depending on the conditions, data can be reordered at multiple different intervals. Data was continuously recorded until the temperature of the substance started to drop indicating that the highest possible temperature was achieved.
Recording temperatures at intervals is the recommended option compared to just waiting for the temperature peak. Having a consistent recording time ensures the most accurate results and minimalizes chances for error.
3.0 Analyzing your Data
3.1 a preliminary look.
The data obtained from the temperature analysis was entered into Microsoft excel (any program would suffice). Using Microsoft excel the data was placed into a graph format for easy comparison between trials. The graphs produced from the data would indicate any errors that could have possibly occurred during the experimental trials. If errors are observed the experiment would have to be repeated before continuing further analysis.
Acceptable data will display a noticeable curve in the graph indicating the relationship between temperature and time. Additional modifications that could be implemented to improve results could be breaking the sample into smaller pieces, having a larger mass of sample or having less water in the calorimeter. All of these would impact the deviation in the temperature difference displaying more drastic changes in temperature. Increased variation would make the results more noticeable and the data calculations would also be more accurate.
3.2 A Deeper Look
The time that the peak temperature occurred is displayed noticeably in the graphs of the experimental data. Depending on the compatibility of the data with the software being used for the analysis a line of best fit can be produced from the peak temperature. Errors bars are optional depending on the purpose of the experiment and the results obtained. The majority of the error in the results would be due to the unpreventable loss of heat to the air and the calorimeter.
3.3 Results
Figure 5: Graph displaying the relationship between Temperature (°C) and Time (minutes) during the first trial using a Styrofoam cup calorimeter and heated sample test tube
Figure 7: Graph displaying the relationship between Temperature (°C) and Time (minutes) during the third trial using a thermos as the calorimeter, tongs held the sample while heated.
Figure 6: Graph displaying the relationship between Temperature (°C) and Time (minutes) during the second trial using a Styrofoam cup, tongs held the sample while heated.
Figure 8: Graph displaying the relationship between Temperature (°C) and Time (minutes) during the fourth trial using a thermos at room temperature as the calorimeter, tongs held the sample while heated.
(Note that the ideal form of a graph of temperature change versus time due to a gradient would be logarithmic.)
3.4 Calculations
The first law of thermal dynamics states that all energy in the universe is conserved. This law can be applied to the results from the experiment. When the sample cools down, energy is lost in the form of heat. As the law states, this energy doesn’t just disappear, in the case of this experiment that energy is absorbed by the water. This increase in energy will cause the water’s temperature to rise. Measuring this change determines the amount of heat absorbed by the water which leads to determining the heat lost by the stainless-steel sample.
Q w = -Q s Where Q is the change in heat.
Using specific heat of water and the mass of water being used, we can express the above more informatively.
Q w = c w m w (T peak – T initial ) w = -Q s = c s m s (T peak – T initial ) s
The formula can then be rearranged for determining the specific heat of the sample.
c s = c w m w ΔT w / m s ΔT s
3.5 Discussing Results
For the first trial of the experiment, Styrofoam cups were used as the calorimeter along with a test tube for holding the sample. The results from this trial were inconclusive and had a large amount of error. In the second trial a pair of insulated tongs replaced the test tube for holding the sample. The results from this trial displayed substantially less error. Modifications were made for the second trial in an attempt to produce viable results.
In the second trial, the water in the calorimeter rested longer at room temperature before the data was collected. This modification produced a result of 305.4 Joules per kilogram kelvin, which was 67.9% accurate to the theoretical value of grade 316 stainless steel, 470.
Another modification was used for the third and fourth trial to determine the change in accuracy when using a conductive calorimeter. A standard beverage thermos was used as the calorimeter for these trials. The thermometer used to measure temperature was upgraded to a digital one with long wire probes that enabled the thermos to have a tight seal. The first trial using this modification produced a result of 553.29 Joules per kilogram kelvin, which is 84.9% accurate, however, it was above the theoretical value. Accuracy above theoretical value indicated that an error was made.
Using a thermos as the calorimeter means that the water would take longer to reach room temperature . It is debatable if the water inside the thermos not being at room temperature would affect the results of the experiment. However, after further analysis the size of the thermos was determined as the cause of error in accuracy values. Due to the large size of the thermos, additional spaced remained inside the container for room temperature air to be trapped when the lid was placed on. This large volume of air was in direct contact with the water inside the thermos and affected the water’s temperature.
A further modification was made for the fourth trial of this experiment to limit error caused by the room temperature air. Only enough water to cover the sample was added and it was stressed that this water was at room temperature. This modification received results of 367.56 Joules per kilogram kelvin, which is 78.2% accurate.
4.0 Conclusion
An accurate result was not the goal of these experiments. Science is a slow process that is full of opportunity for mistakes, trial and error, and improvement. Scientific theories take years to develop and even longer for the scientific community to accept them. Science is an art and should be played with. Most earth-shattering discoveries were made by accident or with a different end goal in mind. For experiments such as the one described above, it is good practice to aim for an 80% accuracy for an at home value. When experimenting, it is key to have an open mind, roll with punches and most of all be safe.
5.0 References
‘Theory of Heat’ – Maxwell, James Clerk – page 57-67 – Westport, Conn., Greenwood Press – 1970: https://archive.org/details/theoryheat04maxwgoog/page/n77 -Talks about conservation of heat, the form, function and a bit of history of calorimeters, and the Method of Mixture. It is also a good book to understand heat in general, and it’s free.
Author: Cole Boucher, Junior Technical Writer at Thermtest
Can’t find the right product for your testing?
Measure the Specific Heat of Water and Other Fluids
Introduction: Measure the Specific Heat of Water and Other Fluids
Step 1: Equipment
- Digital postal scale
- Plastic cup that will hold at least 250ml
- Variable power supply]
- Digital thermometer with probe
- 7.5 ohm, 5W resistor] (or something close)
- Short length of wire
- Clock showing time in seconds (not shown)
- 250 ml of cold water (tap water will do, distilled is better) (not shown)
Step 2: Setup
1. Prepare some cold water (preferably distilled) by putting it in a container in a refrigerator for an hour or so. You want to start with cold water so that your experimental data will include temperatures on either side of the ambient temperature. 2. Put the cup on the digital scale and zero the scale. 3. Pour cold water into the cup until the scale reads at least 250 g. Record the mass "M" of water that you actually added. 3. Strip a short length of the insulation from the wire and connect the resistor in series with the variable power supply by twisting the bare wires around the resistor leads. 4. Put the resistor into the cup of water so that the resistor is submerged 5. Record the ambient temperature "Ta" and then put the temperature probe into the water as well.
Step 3: Procedure
1. Turn on the power supply and adjust the voltage to around 7.5 volts (or the value of the resistor that you used). Record the voltage "V" and the current "I". Note that with a DC power supply there is no danger of electric shock. You can handle the bare wires by hand. 2. Record the water temperature every 2 minutes until the temperature is about 5 degrees C above the ambient room temperature. Aside: Ohm's law states that Voltage (V), Current (I), and Resistance (R) are related by the formula V = I*R (where V is in volts, I is in Amps, and R is in Ohms). You measured V and I. Therefore you can calculate R = V/I and compare this with the known value of your resistor. In my case, V=7.5V, and I=1.00A. Therefore R=V/I = 7.5 Ohms which is the value of the resistor that I used. Hurray!
Step 4: Results
The ambient temperature was 20.1 degrees C. One of the datapoints was 20.2 degrees C which is very close to ambient. To minimize error due to heat transfer to or from the surroundings, lets look at the data from 10 minutes before till 10 minutes after this datapoint.
Step 5: Conclusion
Recommendations
Woodworking Contest
Microcontrollers Contest
Outdoor Life Contest
- Engineering & Technology
- Mechanical Engineering
- Heat Transfer
Specific Heat Capacity – Lab Report
Related documents.
Add this document to collection(s)
You can add this document to your study collection(s)
Add this document to saved
You can add this document to your saved list
Suggest us how to improve StudyLib
(For complaints, use another form )
Input it if you want to receive answer
Teacher Resource Center
Pasco partnerships.
2024 Catalogs & Brochures
Specific heat.
Students use a temperature sensor to experimentally determine the identity of a metal based on its specific heat capacity.
Supports NGSS Performance Expectation HS-PS3-1: Create a computational model to calculate the change in the energy of one component in a system when the change in energy of the other component(s) and energy flows in and out of the system are known.
Grade Level: High School
Subject: Chemistry
Student Files
575.17 KB | ||
134.58 KB | ||
273.41 KB | ||
514.18 KB | ||
66.96 KB |
Teacher Files
Sign In to your PASCO account to access teacher files and sample data.
Watch Video
Combining equal masses of the same substance with different temperatures will produce a mixture with a temperature that is an average of the two samples. Will...
Featured Equipment
Calorimetry Cups (6)
Set of six polystyrene calorimeter cups for beginning calorimetry.
Specific Heat Set
Has five different materials, all having same mass (80g).
Wireless Temperature Sensor with Display
The Wireless Temperature Sensor with display is a general-purpose sensor useful in many science labs. With a rugged, water resistant design and rechargeable lithium ion battery, students can get spot reads from the display or auto collect data to a device to study trends.
Wireless Temperature Sensor
The Wireless Temperature Sensor is a general-purpose sensor found in many science labs. With a rugged, waterproof design and a long-lasting battery, students can spend more time collecting data and less time dealing with equipment.
Essential Chemistry Starter Lab Kit
This Starter Lab Station includes the wireless temperature, conductivity, pressure, and pH sensors to perform key lab activities from the Essential Chemistry Student Lab Manual.
Many lab activities can be conducted with our Wireless , PASPORT , or even ScienceWorkshop sensors and equipment. For assistance with substituting compatible instruments, contact PASCO Technical Support . We're here to help. Copyright © 2018 PASCO
Source Collection: Lab #02
Source Collection: Lab #09
Essential Chemistry Teacher Lab Manual
More experiments.
Advanced Placement
- Investigation of Acid-Base Titrations
- Measuring The Speed Of A Reaction
High School
- Lemon Battery
- Counting by Weighing
- Ocean Currents
- Respiration and Energy
- TPC and eLearning
- What's NEW at TPC?
- Read Watch Interact
- Practice Review Test
- Teacher-Tools
- Request a Demo
- Get A Quote
- Subscription Selection
- Seat Calculator
- Ad Free Account
- Edit Profile Settings
- Metric Conversions Questions
- Metric System Questions
- Metric Estimation Questions
- Significant Digits Questions
- Proportional Reasoning
- Acceleration
- Distance-Displacement
- Dots and Graphs
- Graph That Motion
- Match That Graph
- Name That Motion
- Motion Diagrams
- Pos'n Time Graphs Numerical
- Pos'n Time Graphs Conceptual
- Up And Down - Questions
- Balanced vs. Unbalanced Forces
- Change of State
- Force and Motion
- Mass and Weight
- Match That Free-Body Diagram
- Net Force (and Acceleration) Ranking Tasks
- Newton's Second Law
- Normal Force Card Sort
- Recognizing Forces
- Air Resistance and Skydiving
- Solve It! with Newton's Second Law
- Which One Doesn't Belong?
- Component Addition Questions
- Head-to-Tail Vector Addition
- Projectile Mathematics
- Trajectory - Angle Launched Projectiles
- Trajectory - Horizontally Launched Projectiles
- Vector Addition
- Vector Direction
- Which One Doesn't Belong? Projectile Motion
- Forces in 2-Dimensions
- Being Impulsive About Momentum
- Explosions - Law Breakers
- Hit and Stick Collisions - Law Breakers
- Case Studies: Impulse and Force
- Impulse-Momentum Change Table
- Keeping Track of Momentum - Hit and Stick
- Keeping Track of Momentum - Hit and Bounce
- What's Up (and Down) with KE and PE?
- Energy Conservation Questions
- Energy Dissipation Questions
- Energy Ranking Tasks
- LOL Charts (a.k.a., Energy Bar Charts)
- Match That Bar Chart
- Words and Charts Questions
- Name That Energy
- Stepping Up with PE and KE Questions
- Case Studies - Circular Motion
- Circular Logic
- Forces and Free-Body Diagrams in Circular Motion
- Gravitational Field Strength
- Universal Gravitation
- Angular Position and Displacement
- Linear and Angular Velocity
- Angular Acceleration
- Rotational Inertia
- Balanced vs. Unbalanced Torques
- Getting a Handle on Torque
- Torque-ing About Rotation
- Properties of Matter
- Fluid Pressure
- Buoyant Force
- Sinking, Floating, and Hanging
- Pascal's Principle
- Flow Velocity
- Bernoulli's Principle
- Balloon Interactions
- Charge and Charging
- Charge Interactions
- Charging by Induction
- Conductors and Insulators
- Coulombs Law
- Electric Field
- Electric Field Intensity
- Polarization
- Case Studies: Electric Power
- Know Your Potential
- Light Bulb Anatomy
- I = ∆V/R Equations as a Guide to Thinking
- Parallel Circuits - ∆V = I•R Calculations
- Resistance Ranking Tasks
- Series Circuits - ∆V = I•R Calculations
- Series vs. Parallel Circuits
- Equivalent Resistance
- Period and Frequency of a Pendulum
- Pendulum Motion: Velocity and Force
- Energy of a Pendulum
- Period and Frequency of a Mass on a Spring
- Horizontal Springs: Velocity and Force
- Vertical Springs: Velocity and Force
- Energy of a Mass on a Spring
- Decibel Scale
- Frequency and Period
- Closed-End Air Columns
- Name That Harmonic: Strings
- Rocking the Boat
- Wave Basics
- Matching Pairs: Wave Characteristics
- Wave Interference
- Waves - Case Studies
- Color Addition and Subtraction
- Color Filters
- If This, Then That: Color Subtraction
- Light Intensity
- Color Pigments
- Converging Lenses
- Curved Mirror Images
- Law of Reflection
- Refraction and Lenses
- Total Internal Reflection
- Who Can See Who?
- Formulas and Atom Counting
- Lab Equipment
- Atomic Models
- Bond Polarity
- Entropy Questions
- Cell Voltage Questions
- Heat of Formation Questions
- Reduction Potential Questions
- Oxidation States Questions
- Measuring the Quantity of Heat
- Hess's Law
- Oxidation-Reduction Questions
- Galvanic Cells Questions
- Thermal Stoichiometry
- Molecular Polarity
- Quantum Mechanics
- Balancing Chemical Equations
- Bronsted-Lowry Model of Acids and Bases
- Classification of Matter
- Collision Model of Reaction Rates
- Density Ranking Tasks
- Dissociation Reactions
- Complete Electron Configurations
- Elemental Measures
- Enthalpy Change Questions
- Equilibrium Concept
- Equilibrium Constant Expression
- Equilibrium Calculations - Questions
- Equilibrium ICE Table
- Intermolecular Forces Questions
- Ionic Bonding
- Lewis Electron Dot Structures
- Limiting Reactants
- Line Spectra Questions
- Mass Stoichiometry
- Measurement and Numbers
- Metals, Nonmetals, and Metalloids
- Metric Estimations
- Metric System
- Molarity Ranking Tasks
- Mole Conversions
- Name That Element
- Names to Formulas
- Names to Formulas 2
- Nuclear Decay
- Particles, Words, and Formulas
- Periodic Trends
- Precipitation Reactions and Net Ionic Equations
- Pressure Concepts
- Pressure-Temperature Gas Law
- Pressure-Volume Gas Law
- Chemical Reaction Types
- Significant Digits and Measurement
- States Of Matter Exercise
- Stoichiometry Law Breakers
- Stoichiometry - Math Relationships
- Subatomic Particles
- Spontaneity and Driving Forces
- Gibbs Free Energy
- Volume-Temperature Gas Law
- Acid-Base Properties
- Energy and Chemical Reactions
- Chemical and Physical Properties
- Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion Theory
- Writing Balanced Chemical Equations
- Mission CG1
- Mission CG10
- Mission CG2
- Mission CG3
- Mission CG4
- Mission CG5
- Mission CG6
- Mission CG7
- Mission CG8
- Mission CG9
- Mission EC1
- Mission EC10
- Mission EC11
- Mission EC12
- Mission EC2
- Mission EC3
- Mission EC4
- Mission EC5
- Mission EC6
- Mission EC7
- Mission EC8
- Mission EC9
- Mission RL1
- Mission RL2
- Mission RL3
- Mission RL4
- Mission RL5
- Mission RL6
- Mission KG7
- Mission RL8
- Mission KG9
- Mission RL10
- Mission RL11
- Mission RM1
- Mission RM2
- Mission RM3
- Mission RM4
- Mission RM5
- Mission RM6
- Mission RM8
- Mission RM10
- Mission LC1
- Mission RM11
- Mission LC2
- Mission LC3
- Mission LC4
- Mission LC5
- Mission LC6
- Mission LC8
- Mission SM1
- Mission SM2
- Mission SM3
- Mission SM4
- Mission SM5
- Mission SM6
- Mission SM8
- Mission SM10
- Mission KG10
- Mission SM11
- Mission KG2
- Mission KG3
- Mission KG4
- Mission KG5
- Mission KG6
- Mission KG8
- Mission KG11
- Mission F2D1
- Mission F2D2
- Mission F2D3
- Mission F2D4
- Mission F2D5
- Mission F2D6
- Mission KC1
- Mission KC2
- Mission KC3
- Mission KC4
- Mission KC5
- Mission KC6
- Mission KC7
- Mission KC8
- Mission AAA
- Mission SM9
- Mission LC7
- Mission LC9
- Mission NL1
- Mission NL2
- Mission NL3
- Mission NL4
- Mission NL5
- Mission NL6
- Mission NL7
- Mission NL8
- Mission NL9
- Mission NL10
- Mission NL11
- Mission NL12
- Mission MC1
- Mission MC10
- Mission MC2
- Mission MC3
- Mission MC4
- Mission MC5
- Mission MC6
- Mission MC7
- Mission MC8
- Mission MC9
- Mission RM7
- Mission RM9
- Mission RL7
- Mission RL9
- Mission SM7
- Mission SE1
- Mission SE10
- Mission SE11
- Mission SE12
- Mission SE2
- Mission SE3
- Mission SE4
- Mission SE5
- Mission SE6
- Mission SE7
- Mission SE8
- Mission SE9
- Mission VP1
- Mission VP10
- Mission VP2
- Mission VP3
- Mission VP4
- Mission VP5
- Mission VP6
- Mission VP7
- Mission VP8
- Mission VP9
- Mission WM1
- Mission WM2
- Mission WM3
- Mission WM4
- Mission WM5
- Mission WM6
- Mission WM7
- Mission WM8
- Mission WE1
- Mission WE10
- Mission WE2
- Mission WE3
- Mission WE4
- Mission WE5
- Mission WE6
- Mission WE7
- Mission WE8
- Mission WE9
- Vector Walk Interactive
- Name That Motion Interactive
- Kinematic Graphing 1 Concept Checker
- Kinematic Graphing 2 Concept Checker
- Graph That Motion Interactive
- Two Stage Rocket Interactive
- Rocket Sled Concept Checker
- Force Concept Checker
- Free-Body Diagrams Concept Checker
- Free-Body Diagrams The Sequel Concept Checker
- Skydiving Concept Checker
- Elevator Ride Concept Checker
- Vector Addition Concept Checker
- Vector Walk in Two Dimensions Interactive
- Name That Vector Interactive
- River Boat Simulator Concept Checker
- Projectile Simulator 2 Concept Checker
- Projectile Simulator 3 Concept Checker
- Hit the Target Interactive
- Turd the Target 1 Interactive
- Turd the Target 2 Interactive
- Balance It Interactive
- Go For The Gold Interactive
- Egg Drop Concept Checker
- Fish Catch Concept Checker
- Exploding Carts Concept Checker
- Collision Carts - Inelastic Collisions Concept Checker
- Its All Uphill Concept Checker
- Stopping Distance Concept Checker
- Chart That Motion Interactive
- Roller Coaster Model Concept Checker
- Uniform Circular Motion Concept Checker
- Horizontal Circle Simulation Concept Checker
- Vertical Circle Simulation Concept Checker
- Race Track Concept Checker
- Gravitational Fields Concept Checker
- Orbital Motion Concept Checker
- Angular Acceleration Concept Checker
- Balance Beam Concept Checker
- Torque Balancer Concept Checker
- Aluminum Can Polarization Concept Checker
- Charging Concept Checker
- Name That Charge Simulation
- Coulomb's Law Concept Checker
- Electric Field Lines Concept Checker
- Put the Charge in the Goal Concept Checker
- Circuit Builder Concept Checker (Series Circuits)
- Circuit Builder Concept Checker (Parallel Circuits)
- Circuit Builder Concept Checker (∆V-I-R)
- Circuit Builder Concept Checker (Voltage Drop)
- Equivalent Resistance Interactive
- Pendulum Motion Simulation Concept Checker
- Mass on a Spring Simulation Concept Checker
- Particle Wave Simulation Concept Checker
- Boundary Behavior Simulation Concept Checker
- Slinky Wave Simulator Concept Checker
- Simple Wave Simulator Concept Checker
- Wave Addition Simulation Concept Checker
- Standing Wave Maker Simulation Concept Checker
- Color Addition Concept Checker
- Painting With CMY Concept Checker
- Stage Lighting Concept Checker
- Filtering Away Concept Checker
- InterferencePatterns Concept Checker
- Young's Experiment Interactive
- Plane Mirror Images Interactive
- Who Can See Who Concept Checker
- Optics Bench (Mirrors) Concept Checker
- Name That Image (Mirrors) Interactive
- Refraction Concept Checker
- Total Internal Reflection Concept Checker
- Optics Bench (Lenses) Concept Checker
- Kinematics Preview
- Velocity Time Graphs Preview
- Moving Cart on an Inclined Plane Preview
- Stopping Distance Preview
- Cart, Bricks, and Bands Preview
- Fan Cart Study Preview
- Friction Preview
- Coffee Filter Lab Preview
- Friction, Speed, and Stopping Distance Preview
- Up and Down Preview
- Projectile Range Preview
- Ballistics Preview
- Juggling Preview
- Marshmallow Launcher Preview
- Air Bag Safety Preview
- Colliding Carts Preview
- Collisions Preview
- Engineering Safer Helmets Preview
- Push the Plow Preview
- Its All Uphill Preview
- Energy on an Incline Preview
- Modeling Roller Coasters Preview
- Hot Wheels Stopping Distance Preview
- Ball Bat Collision Preview
- Energy in Fields Preview
- Weightlessness Training Preview
- Roller Coaster Loops Preview
- Universal Gravitation Preview
- Keplers Laws Preview
- Kepler's Third Law Preview
- Charge Interactions Preview
- Sticky Tape Experiments Preview
- Wire Gauge Preview
- Voltage, Current, and Resistance Preview
- Light Bulb Resistance Preview
- Series and Parallel Circuits Preview
- Thermal Equilibrium Preview
- Linear Expansion Preview
- Heating Curves Preview
- Electricity and Magnetism - Part 1 Preview
- Electricity and Magnetism - Part 2 Preview
- Vibrating Mass on a Spring Preview
- Period of a Pendulum Preview
- Wave Speed Preview
- Slinky-Experiments Preview
- Standing Waves in a Rope Preview
- Sound as a Pressure Wave Preview
- DeciBel Scale Preview
- DeciBels, Phons, and Sones Preview
- Sound of Music Preview
- Shedding Light on Light Bulbs Preview
- Models of Light Preview
- Electromagnetic Radiation Preview
- Electromagnetic Spectrum Preview
- EM Wave Communication Preview
- Digitized Data Preview
- Light Intensity Preview
- Concave Mirrors Preview
- Object Image Relations Preview
- Snells Law Preview
- Reflection vs. Transmission Preview
- Magnification Lab Preview
- Reactivity Preview
- Ions and the Periodic Table Preview
- Periodic Trends Preview
- Chemical Reactions Preview
- Intermolecular Forces Preview
- Melting Points and Boiling Points Preview
- Bond Energy and Reactions Preview
- Reaction Rates Preview
- Ammonia Factory Preview
- Stoichiometry Preview
- Nuclear Chemistry Preview
- Gaining Teacher Access
- Task Tracker Directions
- Conceptual Physics Course
- On-Level Physics Course
- Honors Physics Course
- Chemistry Concept Builders
- All Chemistry Resources
- Users Voice
- Tasks and Classes
- Webinars and Trainings
- Subscription
- Subscription Locator
- 1-D Kinematics
- Newton's Laws
- Vectors - Motion and Forces in Two Dimensions
- Momentum and Its Conservation
- Work and Energy
- Circular Motion and Satellite Motion
- Thermal Physics
- Static Electricity
- Electric Circuits
- Vibrations and Waves
- Sound Waves and Music
- Light and Color
- Reflection and Mirrors
- About the Physics Interactives
- Task Tracker
- Usage Policy
- Newtons Laws
- Vectors and Projectiles
- Forces in 2D
- Momentum and Collisions
- Circular and Satellite Motion
- Balance and Rotation
- Electromagnetism
- Waves and Sound
- Atomic Physics
- Forces in Two Dimensions
- Work, Energy, and Power
- Circular Motion and Gravitation
- Sound Waves
- 1-Dimensional Kinematics
- Circular, Satellite, and Rotational Motion
- Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity
- Waves, Sound and Light
- QuickTime Movies
- About the Concept Builders
- Pricing For Schools
- Directions for Version 2
- Measurement and Units
- Relationships and Graphs
- Rotation and Balance
- Vibrational Motion
- Reflection and Refraction
- Teacher Accounts
- Kinematic Concepts
- Kinematic Graphing
- Wave Motion
- Sound and Music
- About CalcPad
- 1D Kinematics
- Vectors and Forces in 2D
- Simple Harmonic Motion
- Rotational Kinematics
- Rotation and Torque
- Rotational Dynamics
- Electric Fields, Potential, and Capacitance
- Transient RC Circuits
- Light Waves
- Units and Measurement
- Stoichiometry
- Molarity and Solutions
- Thermal Chemistry
- Acids and Bases
- Kinetics and Equilibrium
- Solution Equilibria
- Oxidation-Reduction
- Nuclear Chemistry
- Newton's Laws of Motion
- Work and Energy Packet
- Static Electricity Review
- NGSS Alignments
- 1D-Kinematics
- Projectiles
- Circular Motion
- Magnetism and Electromagnetism
- Graphing Practice
- About the ACT
- ACT Preparation
- For Teachers
- Other Resources
- Solutions Guide
- Solutions Guide Digital Download
- Motion in One Dimension
- Work, Energy and Power
- Chemistry of Matter
- Names and Formulas
- Algebra Based On-Level Physics
- Honors Physics
- Conceptual Physics
- Other Tools
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Purchasing the Download
- Purchasing the Digital Download
- About the NGSS Corner
- NGSS Search
- Force and Motion DCIs - High School
- Energy DCIs - High School
- Wave Applications DCIs - High School
- Force and Motion PEs - High School
- Energy PEs - High School
- Wave Applications PEs - High School
- Crosscutting Concepts
- The Practices
- Physics Topics
- NGSS Corner: Activity List
- NGSS Corner: Infographics
- About the Toolkits
- Position-Velocity-Acceleration
- Position-Time Graphs
- Velocity-Time Graphs
- Newton's First Law
- Newton's Second Law
- Newton's Third Law
- Terminal Velocity
- Projectile Motion
- Forces in 2 Dimensions
- Impulse and Momentum Change
- Momentum Conservation
- Work-Energy Fundamentals
- Work-Energy Relationship
- Roller Coaster Physics
- Satellite Motion
- Electric Fields
- Circuit Concepts
- Series Circuits
- Parallel Circuits
- Describing-Waves
- Wave Behavior Toolkit
- Standing Wave Patterns
- Resonating Air Columns
- Wave Model of Light
- Plane Mirrors
- Curved Mirrors
- Teacher Guide
- Using Lab Notebooks
- Current Electricity
- Light Waves and Color
- Reflection and Ray Model of Light
- Refraction and Ray Model of Light
- Teacher Resources
- Subscriptions
- Newton's Laws
- Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity
- About Concept Checkers
- School Pricing
- Newton's Laws of Motion
- Newton's First Law
- Newton's Third Law
404 - Not Found
The page or resource you were looking for was not found.
- Sign in / Register
- Administration
- Edit profile
Specific Heat Capacity
- SPECIFIC HEAT CAPACITY - phet.docx - 508 kB
Specific Heat Capacity | |
Physics | |
High School | |
Demonstration | |
60 minutes | |
No | |
English | |