• Skip to main content

India’s Largest Career Transformation Portal

Essay on Child Rights for Students in English [500+ Words]

January 3, 2021 by Sandeep

Essay on Child Rights: The sound development of a child in terms of physical, mental, emotional and social growth is the essential right of every child. Children can express their claim to these rights without any hesitation. Right to education is also a fundamental right, and these factors have been placed on world agenda tables. The UN General Assembly has adopted these rights as universal claims, and any form of discrimination/ violence against children can attract penal action against offenders.

Essay on Child Rights 500 Words in English

Below we have provided Child Rights Essay in English, suitable for class 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 & 10.

Child rights are the sub-category of human rights catering, especially to the children in terms of their health, education, recreation, family, etc. It also highlights their development and age-appropriate needs that change a passage of time. Three general principles foster all children’s rights,

Non-discrimination – under this, every child is treated equally and has a right to strengthen their potential at all times. For instance, every child will gain access to education irrespective of its gender, nationality, caste, disability or another status.

Opinion of the child – the child wants to be heard and understood; that’s why the voice of the children is pivotal in their overall development. For example, the parents or the elders of the house should take into consideration their children’s needs before making decisions that will further cause damage.

Right to inclusive education – A child with a disability should receive equal access to training and development without being neglected.

United Nation Convention has listed the below rights for the children who come under the age of 18. These rights embody the freedom of children, favourable family environment, leisure, education, health care and cultural activities.

Right to Survival

  • Right to live with respect.
  • Right to be born.
  • Right to have access to basic food, clothing and shelter.

Right to Protection

  • Right to be protected from violence.
  • Right to be protected from drugs.
  • Right to be protected from exploitation.
  • Right to be protected from abandon.

Right to Participation

  • Right to freedom of voice.
  • Right to freedom of expression.
  • Right to freedom to form an association.
  • Right to information.

Right to Development

  • Right to learn and explore.
  • Right to rest and play.
  • Right to seek education.
  • Right to overall development-emotional, physical and psychological.

Significance of Children’s Rights

Children’s are not a commodity or an item to be owned by the parents or the society, but an individual who possesses equal status as a member of the human race. They have their likes and dislikes, which assists them to harness their energy for future growth. Parents can love, care and nurture children through guidance and advice gradually. They need to be thrust towards independence continuously. The sense of accountability needs to be developed by providing necessary tasks so that they realize their value and voice.

The course of their progress determines the future of the children and the country as a whole. The devastating changes like climate change, globalisation, the disintegration of the family, mass migration, etc. affects children to a massive level crippling their identity and social welfare. In situations like armed conflict and other national emergencies, the conditions worsen. Children are vulnerable and susceptible to health risks. The repercussions of disease, malnutrition and poverty endanger their future potential.

They fall prey to sordid living conditions, poor health-care, lack of safe water and housing and environmental damage. Because of all these reasons, children are deprived of the proper home as they are left on the streets. Not only the government but also the citizens of the nation should take charge of enhancing their requirements and taking an initiative to bring change. It is paramount to show respect and appreciation towards children as it helps them to develop healthy mentally. By doing so, their personality is not disabled, and they feel part of society.

10 Lines on Child Rights

  • The declaration of Child’s Right was established in the year 1924.
  • The rights were formulated by saving the children founder, Eglantyne Jebb.
  • The most important rights are- survival, developmental, protection and participation rights.
  • It is an extension of human rights, especially for children below 18 years of age.
  • These rights emphasize on the age-appropriate needs.
  • The violation of the rights includes violence, poverty, and discrimination.
  • The United Nation Convention has further elaborated the rights for better understanding and knowledge.
  • Through these rights, the government is encouraging people to contribute through donations, adoption and sponsorship.
  • Also, these rights stress on having their opinion and say in every decision taken for their betterment.
  • The government, through its efforts, is urging people to be vigilant around what is happening and report if there is any violation regarding the rights of the children.

TeachingBanyan.com

Paragraph on Child Rights

Children are the part of society who decides the destiny of the country. Their protection and development is the responsibility of the government of the country, which they fulfilled through child rights. You can have detailed information about it through the paragraphs below. I would suggest you go through all of them to check its usefulness for you.

Short and Long Paragraphs on Child Rights

Paragraph 1 – 100 words.

The term ‘Child Rights’ means some basic rights that every child of a nation should have. The Child Rights are available for children without any religious, racial or any other discrimination. Almost all the countries of the world have become serious for the rights to children. They are making every effort in this step.

Our Indian government has also done commendable work in this direction. The most suitable example of it, is making primary education free and compulsory for every child. Making child labour a criminal offence is another great work by the Indian Government. We should also stand in support of Child Rights.

Paragraph 2 – 120 Words

The United Nations and the Government of India have determined the rights and policies for children. Children get the rights of their identity, security, education, health, food, and equality right from their birth, without any caste, religion and gender discrimination.

According to the Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act 2005, child rights include all rights of children (boys and girls) which were accepted by the United Nations Children’s Rights Convention on 20 November 1989 and agreed by the Government of India on 11 December 1992.

Child Rights include rights to live, growth/development, protection, participation and education etc. These child rights are available to all children in India without any discrimination or delay. They prepare children for a better future.

Paragraph 3 – 150 Words

There was a declaration of Child Right called ‘Geneva Declaration of Child Right in 1924, which the United Nations adopted in 1959. India implemented this Child Rights on 20 November 2007 in every part of the Nation. These rights are for saving children from abuses, trafficking and violence, and working on their all-round development.

The Child Rights act in India ensures that every child of India has the right to identity, health, education, family-life, opinion. It also provides every child with protection from violence, armed conflict and exploitation as well. These are the fundamental rights of children in India without discrimination based on the caste, religion, colour or any other.

‘Child’s Rights’ is a very crucial term that seeks everyone’s attention. The Indian Government has created a constitutional body in 2007, which keeps its eye on the matters related to the rights of children in India.

Paragraph 4 – 200 Words

Not only India but the whole world has laid great emphasis on the development of its children. The governments of all the countries are working at their level to promote the childhood and mental development of children, just as the child gets the right to live from the 20th week of pregnancy in India.

Children are that part of society which lacks social knowledge and awareness. Anyone can misuse their innocence and put them in child abuse. They are the most vulnerable, hence are most affected by the society which can destroy their childhood as well as their life completely.

We have witnessed it many times in our society that some mentally unhealthy parents put their child in a very deplorable situation due to their inability or desire to work. These children don’t get what they need or deserve and forcibly work to feed themselves and their family.

It is sometimes when children raise their voice for what they need, but the society ignores them. The child rights like the right to education, right to expression and right to survive will yield them the power they should have to build a strong future for them. Child Right is important to establish the foundation of a nation.

Paragraph 5 – 250 Words

The ‘Child Rights’ is a constitutional and essential term that our society needs the most. Child Right includes all the basic rights that our constitution provides to the children of India. The child right is for survival, protection, development and participation of the children which nation should necessarily grant them.

According to the Indian Constitution, every boy and girl under the age of 18 is a child, and it is the part of life in which they experience the most of the mental growth. They should have some basic rights to attain freedom and enjoy life so that they can differentiate between justice and injustice.

India’s commission for the protection of children’s rights (act 2005 and amended in 2006) has some basic and special provisions for every child in India. The Child Right Commission ensures the rights of every single child and keeps a record of it for future programmes.

Some fundamental rights of children under the constitution are the right to education, right to life, the right to protection and freedom of expression and right to identity. To make all these right reach every child of India, the government is constantly working on promoting some awareness programmes and campaigns.

Although the Government of India and many public institutions are taking important steps in the field of child rights, all of us also need to extend our support. We should immediately report the complaint of any child abuse happening around us or in our knowledge to the nearest police station.

FAQs: Frequently Asked Questions

Ans. Child rights can help children to get rid of exploitation and give them chance to get education.

Ans. National Commission for Protection of Child Rights is established for welfare of children.

Ans. The 11th fundamental duty asks to education to children.

Ans. Child is exploited by labour, pornography and harassment in India.

Related Posts

Paragraph on moral values, paragraph on republic day of india 2023, paragraph on national festivals of india, paragraph on national flag of india, paragraph on importance of republic day of india, paragraph on education, paragraph on my best friend, paragraph on zoo, paragraph on diwali.

Logo

Essay on Importance of Child Rights

Students are often asked to write an essay on Importance of Child Rights in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Importance of Child Rights

Introduction.

Child rights are fundamental freedoms and the inherent rights of all human beings below the age of 18. These rights apply to every child, irrespective of their race, religion, or abilities.

Importance of Child Rights

Child rights are important to safeguard the future of our society. They ensure children get the necessary care, protection, and opportunities for growth. They help in creating a safe and nurturing environment.

In conclusion, child rights are essential for a child’s overall development. They help in building a just society where every child gets an equal chance to grow and prosper.

Also check:

250 Words Essay on Importance of Child Rights

Child rights are fundamental freedoms and the inherent rights of all human beings below the age of 18. These rights apply to every child, regardless of their race, religion, or abilities. The importance of child rights cannot be understated as they ensure the holistic development of a child.

Protection and Survival

Child rights are crucial for the protection and survival of children. They safeguard children from harmful influences, abuse, and exploitation, and help provide access to basic necessities such as food, shelter, and clean water. These rights are essential for a child’s survival and overall well-being.

Education and Development

Child rights also play a pivotal role in education and development. They ensure every child has access to free, quality education, which is crucial for their intellectual growth, skill development, and future opportunities. Furthermore, child rights promote the participation of children in social, cultural, and educational activities, facilitating their holistic development.

Empowerment and Participation

Child rights empower children, encouraging them to voice their opinions and participate in decisions affecting their lives. This not only fosters a sense of responsibility but also helps in the development of their personality, self-esteem, and respect for others.

In conclusion, child rights are indispensable for the survival, protection, development, and empowerment of children. They are the building blocks that ensure a child grows into a healthy, educated, and responsible adult. Upholding child rights is not just a legal obligation but a moral imperative that society must fulfill.

500 Words Essay on Importance of Child Rights

Child rights are fundamental freedoms and inherent rights of all human beings below the age of 18. These rights apply to every child, irrespective of their race, religion or nationality. They ensure that children can grow up in an environment where they can thrive, learn, and develop to their full potential.

Recognition of Child Rights

The importance of child rights.

Child rights are fundamental to ensuring a healthy development of a child and to preserving human dignity. Firstly, child rights are crucial for the survival and development of the child. Rights such as access to adequate healthcare, nutritious food, clean water, and education are vital for a child’s growth and development.

Secondly, child rights are important for the protection of the child. Children are vulnerable and often unable to protect themselves. Rights such as protection from abuse, exploitation and harmful cultural practices safeguard children from harm.

Child Rights and Society

Child rights have a significant impact on society. By ensuring that every child has access to education, society benefits from a knowledgeable and skilled workforce in the future. Protecting children from harm reduces societal costs associated with healthcare and criminal justice. Encouraging child participation helps to create a more inclusive and democratic society.

Challenges to Child Rights

Despite the recognition of child rights, there are numerous challenges to their realization. Poverty, conflict, discrimination, and lack of education are some of the main obstacles. Additionally, the rights of certain groups of children, such as those who are refugees, disabled, or belong to minority groups, are often overlooked.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Happy studying!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Child Protection — The Effectiveness of the Convention on the Children’s Rights

test_template

The Effectiveness of The Convention on The Children's Rights

  • Categories: Child Protection

About this sample

close

Words: 3053 |

16 min read

Published: May 17, 2022

Words: 3053 | Pages: 7 | 16 min read

Table of contents

Introduction, the vulnerability of children, the convention on the rights of the child, the crc achievements and key challenges.

Image of Dr. Oliver Johnson

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Let us write you an essay from scratch

  • 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
  • Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

author

Dr Jacklynne

Verified writer

  • Expert in: Social Issues

writer

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

4 pages / 2132 words

1 pages / 559 words

2 pages / 1085 words

1 pages / 636 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Child Protection

Child neglect is a distressing and pervasive issue that has profound implications for the well-being of children and society as a whole. Neglect occurs when a child's basic needs for care, supervision, and support are not [...]

Dante, J. M. (2014). The impact of beauty pageants on mental health: A meta-analysis. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychology, 42(5), 564-575.Hassan, L. M., Shrivastava, A., & Edmonds, J. (2017). The impact of child beauty [...]

When talking about a Montessori school you must first explain what that is, why this type of schooling is beneficial, and what this has to do with Child Welfare & Development. Montessori Education is a child centered [...]

The beauty pageant has been a frequent form of competition and entertainment in the modern society. In these forms of contexts, participants compete in presentations, costumes, plays, scenes, and tableau among other types of [...]

About CAPTA: A Legislative History. (2019, February). https://www.pbc2019.org/protection-of-minors/child-abuse-on-the-global-level

In reading this report a lot of things stood out to me, but one of the most shocking things in my opinion was that children under the age of one are the most likely to be maltreated or at risk of maltreatment. According to [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

  • Instructions Followed To The Letter
  • Deadlines Met At Every Stage
  • Unique And Plagiarism Free

children's rights essay in english

Children’s Rights: Global and Cultural View Essay

  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment

Global Perspective

Cultural perspective, personal reflection, reference list.

At first, it is necessary to focus on such an aspect as the right to “freedom from violence, abuse, hazardous employment, exploitation, abduction, or sale” since it can safeguard a child against various risks (Amnesty International, 2013). This is one of the issues that are poorly addressed by the governments of various countries. Certainly, the situation in various countries can differ significantly.

For instance, in European or the United States, governments have been able to resolve such problems as exploitation or hazardous employment (Amnesty International, 2013). However, even in these countries, children can become victims of both sexual and physical abuse. In turn, if one speaks about such countries struggling countries located in Africa or Asia, it is possible to argue that the situation is almost catastrophic since.

For example, according to the estimations made by the International Labor Organization (2012), approximately 1.8 million children living in Egypt can work long hours, and they can be exposed to various workplace hazards. These data indicate that the governments of various countries must work on the enforcement of the UN Charter.

Secondly, one can speak about the right to “free compulsory primary education” (Amnesty International, 2013). This is one of the areas in which the global community has achieved considerable successes. One can argue that industrialized countries have been able to enforce this provision of the UN Declaration.

In Europe and North America, this requirement is effectively enforced by the state. Moreover, this issue is effectively addressed in many Asian countries such as Japan, North Korea, or Singapore (OECD 2013, p. 165).

Nevertheless, one should not suppose that this right is universally reinforced. This problem is particularly urgent in African states, where children cannot attend or graduate from schools due to economic difficulties (UNICEF, 2013). Therefore, this issue should not be overlooked by international organizations because the deficiencies of primary education are one of the factors that hinder the development of African countries.

Furthermore, it is important to focus on such aspects as the right to express views as well as freedom of thought. One can say that this is one of the most overlooked provisions included in the UN Charter. Policy-makers in various states admit that children should have an opportunity to speak about their needs (Murdoch, 2012).

Moreover, they try to make sure that educators enable children to think critically and objectively (Australian Government, 2012, unpaged). Nevertheless, there are virtually no studies that can show whether this right is properly protected by the state. This is one of the main limitations that can be singled out.

When speaking about the rights of children in the United Arab Emirates, one can first say that the government of this state attempts to address various problems related to the rights of children (Gomaa, 2012). The public administrators admit they should focus more on the protection of rights. For example, they attach much importance to the provision of primary education to children.

For instance, they guarantee that children can have access to free primary education regardless of their nationality, gender, or, race (Gomaa, 2012, p. 12). Furthermore, they increase their spending on primary education. The only limitation is that the state cannot always enforce this requirement.

However, there is a significant problem which should not be disregarded. In particular, the country has failed to protect their children from hunger. In the UAE, approximately 14 percent of children suffer from malnutrition (Gomaa, 2012).

This is the most urgent problem on which they should concentrate now. To some degree, the failure to guarantee this right indicates at significant economic inequalities within this country. This is one of the points that can be made.

There are several surprising findings that attracted my attention during my research. First of all, there is a significant discrepancy between the declared policies of various governments and real actions. For instance, Conventions on the Rights of the Child has been ratified by 193 countries. However, in many of these states, the policy-makers do not do anything to reinforce these norms.

This is one of the details that can be identified. Moreover, I have been surprised by the fact that the United States is one of the two countries that have not ratified the UN Charter (Amnesty International, 2013). However, I think that the lack of this ratification does not imply that the U.S. government cannot safeguard the rights of children.

As a person, I can contribute to the promotion of human rights in several ways. First of all, it is possible for me to support those organizations that combat the trafficking and exploitation of children.

In my opinion, the efforts of such NGOs are important for the improvement of living conditions. Secondly, I can raise people awareness about various hazards to which children can be exposed. I believe that such activities are also necessary because the rights of children are not sufficiently discussed by the media.

Amnesty International. (2013). Convention on the Rights of the Child . Web.

Australian Government. (2012). Right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion or belief . Web.

Gomaa, F. (2012) Children Rights in the UAE . Web.

International Labor Organization. (2012). Working Children in Egypt: Results of the 2010National Child Labour Survey . Web.

Murdoch, J. (2012). Protecting the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion . Web.

OECD. (2013). Education at a Glance 2013 . Web.

UNICEF. (2013). Nigeria: Education . Web.

  • Health Law: The Never-Ending War on Drugs
  • The Public Health Problems
  • Classification of Hazardous Wastes
  • Charter Schools and Its Privileges
  • Identifying of Hazardous Waste and How to Manage It
  • Debate on the Legal Drinking Age
  • Medicare: Who Should Pay?
  • The Role of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and the Equity Principle in Relation to the Health Promotion Practice in New Zealand
  • The Effects of Healthcare Reforms on Organizations
  • What is "Obamacare" and What are the Conflicting Values of the Opposing Sides?
  • Chicago (A-D)
  • Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2020, March 18). Children's Rights: Global and Cultural View. https://ivypanda.com/essays/childrens-rights/

"Children's Rights: Global and Cultural View." IvyPanda , 18 Mar. 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/childrens-rights/.

IvyPanda . (2020) 'Children's Rights: Global and Cultural View'. 18 March.

IvyPanda . 2020. "Children's Rights: Global and Cultural View." March 18, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/childrens-rights/.

1. IvyPanda . "Children's Rights: Global and Cultural View." March 18, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/childrens-rights/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Children's Rights: Global and Cultural View." March 18, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/childrens-rights/.

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy .

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy .

  • Subject List
  • Take a Tour
  • For Authors
  • Subscriber Services
  • Publications
  • African American Studies
  • African Studies
  • American Literature
  • Anthropology
  • Architecture Planning and Preservation
  • Art History
  • Atlantic History
  • Biblical Studies
  • British and Irish Literature

Childhood Studies

  • Chinese Studies
  • Cinema and Media Studies
  • Communication
  • Criminology
  • Environmental Science
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • International Law
  • International Relations
  • Islamic Studies
  • Jewish Studies
  • Latin American Studies
  • Latino Studies
  • Linguistics
  • Literary and Critical Theory
  • Medieval Studies
  • Military History
  • Political Science
  • Public Health
  • Renaissance and Reformation
  • Social Work
  • Urban Studies
  • Victorian Literature
  • Browse All Subjects

How to Subscribe

  • Free Trials

In This Article Expand or collapse the "in this article" section Children’s Rights

Introduction, general overviews.

  • Anthologies
  • Reference Works
  • Liberationist Perspectives on Children’s Rights
  • Protection, or Caretaker, Approaches
  • Women’s Rights and Children’s Rights
  • Children’s Rights and Citizenship
  • Psychology and Children’s Rights
  • Children’s Views on Rights
  • Optional Protocols
  • Criticisms of Children’s Rights and the CRC
  • The CRC after Twenty-Five Years
  • Early Childhood
  • Rights to Participation
  • The Justice System
  • Children’s Rights in the Digital World
  • Australia and New Zealand
  • European Union
  • Latin America and the Caribbean
  • United States

Related Articles Expand or collapse the "related articles" section about

About related articles close popup.

Lorem Ipsum Sit Dolor Amet

Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Aliquam ligula odio, euismod ut aliquam et, vestibulum nec risus. Nulla viverra, arcu et iaculis consequat, justo diam ornare tellus, semper ultrices tellus nunc eu tellus.

  • Adolescent Consent to Medical Treatment
  • Best Interest of the Child
  • Childhood as Discourse
  • Children and Politics
  • Children and Social Policy
  • Children’s Parliaments
  • Colonialism and Human Rights
  • Pierre Bourdieu

Other Subject Areas

Forthcoming articles expand or collapse the "forthcoming articles" section.

  • Agency and Childhood
  • Childhood Publics
  • Children in Art History
  • Find more forthcoming articles...
  • Export Citations
  • Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Children’s Rights by Heather Montgomery LAST REVIEWED: 18 January 2022 LAST MODIFIED: 11 January 2018 DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199791231-0001

Children’s rights are an integral part of human rights; children have rights because they are human. This has been acknowledged and codified in national and international legislation, most notably in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC; 1989). Children are also accorded additional rights because it is recognized that they are more vulnerable than adults and have less power and access to resources. In law, children’s rights apply to persons between the ages of newborn and eighteen, following Article 1 of the CRC. Although this article has come under criticism for imposing an arbitrary time frame on childhood and for ignoring other phases in the life cycle, such as adolescence, discussions of children’s rights are framed by these chronological boundaries. The study of children’s rights is a comparatively new topic of interest, but it has generated a great deal of controversy across several fields, including social policy, law, philosophy, anthropology, and sociology. It also has significant impact in fields such as health care, education, and welfare provision. Certain rights have been enshrined in law, yet there is still much debate over the moral rights of children—whether these rights do, or should, exist and who should safeguard them.

The topic of children’s rights has been approached from a number of different perspectives—most notably, legal and philosophical. The majority of the key texts in the field came out in the 1990s, when legislation, such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), was coming into force. The debates and philosophical background to the issue are most fully discussed in Archard 2004 and updated in Archard 2015 . The essays collected in Freeman 2004 analyze the tensions between autonomy and dependence and examine why children should have particular rights and how they should best be implemented. These issues are picked up and summarized in a single article, Campbell 1992 . John 2003 argues for a change of emphasis such that children’s rights be seen in terms of power relationships and structural inequalities rather than protection. Liebel, et al. 2012 and Denov, et al. 2011 look at the impacts of international children’s rights legislation on children’s lives and at the difficulties of implementation and supporting the philosophies behind the CRC in practice, particularly in the developing world. Hanson and Nieuwenhuys 2012 acknowledges these problems and proposes a new conceptual framework, examining the difficulties and challenges of implementing children’s rights cross-culturally.

Archard, David. Children: Rights and Childhood . 2d ed. London and New York: Routledge, 2004.

The key academic text for understanding the philosophical and moral basis of children’s rights. Clearly written, and suitable for undergraduates and above, the text relates children’s rights to ideas about childhood, examining why children need particular rights and relationships among child, adult, and state. Also looks at issues of age-related competencies.

Archard, David. Children: Rights and Childhood . 3d ed. London and New York: Routledge, 2015.

While retaining much of the overview of the second edition, this edition has a new chapter on the impacts of the CRC and a great emphasis on children’s rights in practice.

Campbell, Tom D. “The Rights of the Minor: As Person, as Child, as Juvenile, as Future Adult.” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 6.1 (1992): 1–23.

DOI: 10.1093/lawfam/6.1.1

A concise but comprehensive look at the philosophical basis of children’s rights, asking what differentiates children and children’s rights from adults and their rights. The article discusses positive and moral rights and whether there is a contradiction between them. Also raises important questions of dependence and autonomy. Available online through purchase.

Denov, Myriam, Richard Maclure, and Kathryn Campbell, eds. Children’s Rights and International Development: Lessons and Challenges from the Field . New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.

DOI: 10.1057/9780230119253

An edited volume that looks at the difficulties of implementing children’s rights in the developing world. It uses case studies from South Africa, Asia, and Africa to illustrate the problems of ensuring children’s welfare holistically. Useful for practitioners and undergraduates.

Freeman, Michael D. A., ed. Children’s Rights . 2 vols. Aldershot, UK, and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2004.

A collection of previously published scholarly articles that cover the key theorists from the early 1970s to 2003 in a variety of different disciplines, thereby showing the evolution in thinking on the subject. The text looks at arguments both for and against children’s rights and covers Europe, the United States, and the rest of the world.

Freeman, Michael, ed. The Future of Children’s Rights . Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2015.

Containing updated essays by many of the same scholars as in Freeman 2004 , the essays in this edited book look at the progress made and the ways forward. Contains works by some of the most important scholars in the field.

Hanson, Karl, and Olga Nieuwenhuys, eds. Reconceptualizing Children’s Rights in International Development: Living Rights, Social Justice, Translations . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139381796

A collection of essays edited by two key academics in childhood studies, with an excellent introduction that proposes a new conceptual framework for implementing children’s rights cross-culturally. Provides an overview of emerging issues and new ideas in the field.

John, Mary. Children’s Rights and Power: Charging Up for a New Century . Children in Charge. London and New York: Jessica Kingsley, 2003.

Concentrates on the issue of power in children’s relationships with adults and raises questions about how greatly children have been, or can be, empowered through rights. Using international case studies and examples, this book frames discussions of rights in terms of power and agency rather than autonomy or dependency.

Liebel, Manfred, Karl Hanson, Iven Saadi, and Wouter Vandenhole. Children’s Rights from Below: Cross-Cultural Perspectives . Studies in Childhood and Youth. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

DOI: 10.1057/9780230361843

Emphasizes the importance of cross-cultural understandings of children’s rights and of examining the differing contexts in which children live. Each chapter is written by an expert in the field, and this book is a vital starting point for understanding children’s rights in different parts of the world.

back to top

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login .

Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here .

  • About Childhood Studies »
  • Meet the Editorial Board »
  • Abduction of Children
  • Aboriginal Childhoods
  • Addams, Jane
  • ADHD, Sociological Perspectives on
  • Adolescence and Youth
  • Adoption and Fostering
  • Adoption and Fostering, History of Cross-Country
  • Adoption and Fostering in Canada, History of
  • Advertising and Marketing, Psychological Approaches to
  • Advertising and Marketing, Sociocultural Approaches to
  • Africa, Children and Young People in
  • African American Children and Childhood
  • After-school Hours and Activities
  • Aggression across the Lifespan
  • Ancient Near and Middle East, Child Sacrifice in the
  • Animals, Children and
  • Animations, Comic Books, and Manga
  • Anthropology of Childhood
  • Archaeology of Childhood
  • Ariès, Philippe
  • Attachment in Children and Adolescents
  • Australia, History of Adoption and Fostering in
  • Australian Indigenous Contexts and Childhood Experiences
  • Autism, Females and
  • Autism, Medical Model Perspectives on
  • Autobiography and Childhood
  • Benjamin, Walter
  • Bereavement
  • Bioarchaeology of Childhood
  • Body, Children and the
  • Bourdieu, Pierre
  • Boy Scouts/Girl Guides
  • Boys and Fatherhood
  • Breastfeeding
  • Bronfenbrenner, Urie
  • Bruner, Jerome
  • Buddhist Views of Childhood
  • Byzantine Childhoods
  • Child and Adolescent Anger
  • Child Beauty Pageants
  • Child Homelessness
  • Child Mortality, Historical Perspectives on Infant and
  • Child Protection
  • Child Protection, Children, Neoliberalism, and
  • Child Public Health
  • Child Trafficking and Slavery
  • Childcare Manuals
  • Childhood and Borders
  • Childhood and Empire
  • Childhood, Confucian Views of Children and
  • Childhood, Memory and
  • Childhood Studies and Leisure Studies
  • Childhood Studies in France
  • Childhood Studies, Interdisciplinarity in
  • Childhood Studies, Posthumanism and
  • Childhoods in the United States, Sports and
  • Children and Dance
  • Children and Film-Making
  • Children and Money
  • Children and Social Media
  • Children and Sport
  • Children and Sustainable Cities
  • Children as Language Brokers
  • Children as Perpetrators of Crime
  • Children, Code-switching and
  • Children in the Industrial Revolution
  • Children with Autism in a Brazilian Context
  • Children, Young People, and Architecture
  • Children's Humor
  • Children’s Museums
  • Children’s Reading Development and Instruction
  • Children's Views of Childhood
  • China, Japan, and Korea
  • China's One Child Policy
  • Citizenship
  • Civil Rights Movement and Desegregation
  • Classical World, Children in the
  • Clothes and Costume, Children’s
  • Colonial America, Child Witches in
  • Colonization and Nationalism
  • Color Symbolism and Child Development
  • Common World Childhoods
  • Competitiveness, Children and
  • Conceptual Development in Early Childhood
  • Congenital Disabilities
  • Constructivist Approaches to Childhood
  • Consumer Culture, Children and
  • Consumption, Child and Teen
  • Conversation Analysis and Research with Children
  • Critical Approaches to Children’s Work and the Concept of ...
  • Cultural psychology and human development
  • Debt and Financialization of Childhood
  • Discipline and Punishment
  • Discrimination
  • Disney, Walt
  • Divorce And Custody
  • Domestic Violence
  • Drawings, Children’s
  • Early Childhood Care and Education, Selected History of
  • Eating disorders and obesity
  • Education: Learning and Schooling Worldwide
  • Environment, Children and the
  • Environmental Education and Children
  • Ethics in Research with Children
  • Europe (including Greece and Rome), Child Sacrifice in
  • Evolutionary Studies of Childhood
  • Family Meals
  • Fandom (Fan Studies)
  • Female Genital Cutting
  • Feminist New Materialist Approaches to Childhood Studies
  • Feral and "Wild" Children
  • Fetuses and Embryos
  • Films about Children
  • Films for Children
  • Folk Tales, Fairy Tales and
  • Foundlings and Abandoned Children
  • Freud, Anna
  • Freud, Sigmund
  • Friends and Peers: Psychological Perspectives
  • Froebel, Friedrich
  • Gay and Lesbian Parents
  • Gender and Childhood
  • Generations, The Concept of
  • Geographies, Children's
  • Gifted and Talented Children
  • Globalization
  • Growing Up in the Digital Era
  • Hall, G. Stanley
  • Happiness in Children
  • Hindu Views of Childhood and Child Rearing
  • Hispanic Childhoods (U.S.)
  • Historical Approaches to Child Witches
  • History of Childhood in America
  • History of Childhood in Canada
  • HIV/AIDS, Growing Up with
  • Homeschooling
  • Humor and Laughter
  • Images of Childhood, Adulthood, and Old Age in Children’s ...
  • Infancy and Ethnography
  • Infant Mortality in a Global Context
  • Innocence and Childhood
  • Institutional Care
  • Intercultural Learning and Teaching with Children
  • Islamic Views of Childhood
  • Japan, Childhood in
  • Juvenile Detention in the US
  • Klein, Melanie
  • Labor, Child
  • Latin America
  • Learning, Language
  • Learning to Write
  • Legends, Contemporary
  • Literary Representations of Childhood
  • Literature, Children's
  • Love and Care in the Early Years
  • Magazines for Teenagers
  • Maltreatment, Child
  • Maria Montessori
  • Marxism and Childhood
  • Masculinities/Boyhood
  • Material Cultures of Western Childhoods
  • Mead, Margaret
  • Media, Children in the
  • Media Culture, Children's
  • Medieval and Anglo-Saxon Childhoods
  • Menstruation
  • Middle Childhood
  • Middle East
  • Miscarriage
  • Missionaries/Evangelism
  • Moral Development
  • Moral Panics
  • Multi-culturalism and Education
  • Music and Babies
  • Nation and Childhood
  • Native American and Aboriginal Canadian Childhood
  • New Reproductive Technologies and Assisted Conception
  • Nursery Rhymes
  • Organizations, Nongovernmental
  • Parental Gender Preferences, The Social Construction of
  • Pediatrics, History of
  • Peer Culture
  • Perspectives on Boys' Circumcision
  • Philosophy and Childhood
  • Piaget, Jean
  • Politics, Children and
  • Postcolonial Childhoods
  • Post-Modernism
  • Poverty, Rights, and Well-being, Child
  • Pre-Colombian Mesoamerica Childhoods
  • Premodern China, Conceptions of Childhood in
  • Prostitution and Pornography, Child
  • Psychoanalysis
  • Queer Theory and Childhood
  • Race and Ethnicity
  • Racism, Children and
  • Radio, Children, and Young People
  • Readers, Children as
  • Refugee and Displaced Children
  • Reimagining Early Childhood Education, Reconceptualizing a...
  • Relational Ontologies
  • Relational Pedagogies
  • Rights, Children’s
  • Risk and Resilience
  • School Shootings
  • Sex Education in the United States
  • Social and Cultural Capital of Childhood
  • Social Habitus in Childhood
  • Social Movements, Children's
  • Social Policy, Children and
  • Socialization and Child Rearing
  • Socio-cultural Perspectives on Children's Spirituality
  • Sociology of Childhood
  • South African Birth to Twenty Project
  • South Asia, History of Childhood in
  • Special Education
  • Spiritual Development in Childhood and Adolescence
  • Spock, Benjamin
  • Sports and Organized Games
  • Street Children
  • Street Children And Brazil
  • Subcultures
  • Teenage Fathers
  • Teenage Pregnancy
  • The Bible and Children
  • The Harms and Prevention of Drugs and Alcohol on Children
  • The Spaces of Childhood
  • Theater for Children and Young People
  • Theories, Pedagogic
  • Transgender Children
  • Twins and Multiple Births
  • Unaccompanied Migrant Children
  • United Kingdom, History of Adoption and Fostering in the
  • United States, Schooling in the
  • Value of Children
  • Views of Childhood, Jewish and Christian
  • Violence, Children and
  • Visual Representations of Childhood
  • Voice, Participation, and Agency
  • Vygotsky, Lev and His Cultural-historical Approach to Deve...
  • Welfare Law in the United States, Child
  • Well-Being, Child
  • Western Europe and Scandinavia
  • Witchcraft in the Contemporary World, Children and
  • Work and Apprenticeship, Children's
  • Young Carers
  • Young Children and Inclusion
  • Young Children’s Imagination
  • Young Lives
  • Young People, Alcohol, and Urban Life
  • Young People and Climate Activism
  • Young People and Disadvantaged Environments in Affluent Co...
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Accessibility

Powered by:

  • [185.80.150.64]
  • 185.80.150.64

Essay Curve

Essay Curve

Essay on Child Rights – Samples, 10 Lines to 1500 Words

Short Essay on Child Rights

Essay on Child Rights: Child rights are fundamental to ensuring the well-being and development of every child. In this essay, we will explore the importance of child rights and the impact they have on society as a whole. From the right to education and healthcare to protection from abuse and exploitation, children deserve to have their rights upheld and respected. By understanding and advocating for child rights, we can create a more just and equitable world for all children to thrive in.

Table of Contents

Child Rights Essay Writing Tips

1. Introduction: Start your essay by introducing the topic of child rights and why it is important to discuss and protect them. You can also provide a brief overview of the history of child rights and the international conventions that have been established to protect them.

2. Define child rights: Define what child rights are and why they are important. Child rights are the fundamental human rights that every child is entitled to, regardless of their race, religion, or nationality. These rights include the right to education, healthcare, protection from abuse and exploitation, and the right to participate in decisions that affect them.

3. Discuss the importance of child rights: Explain why child rights are important for the overall well-being and development of children. Children who are able to exercise their rights are more likely to grow up healthy, educated, and empowered to reach their full potential. Protecting child rights also helps to create a more just and equal society for all.

4. International conventions on child rights: Discuss the key international conventions that have been established to protect child rights, such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). Explain the principles outlined in these conventions and how they have influenced national laws and policies around the world.

5. Challenges to child rights: Identify some of the challenges that children face in exercising their rights, such as poverty, discrimination, violence, and lack of access to education and healthcare. Discuss how these challenges can be addressed through advocacy, policy changes, and community support.

6. Role of governments and organizations: Explain the role that governments, non-governmental organizations, and other stakeholders play in promoting and protecting child rights. Discuss some of the initiatives and programs that have been implemented to support children’s rights, such as child protection services, education programs, and healthcare services.

7. Conclusion: Summarize the key points of your essay and reiterate the importance of protecting child rights. Encourage readers to take action to support children’s rights in their own communities and advocate for policies that promote the well-being of all children.

Essay on Child Rights in 10 Lines – Examples

1. Child rights are the fundamental human rights that every child is entitled to, regardless of their race, religion, or nationality. 2. These rights include the right to education, healthcare, protection from violence and exploitation, and the right to a safe and nurturing environment. 3. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) is the most widely ratified human rights treaty in history, outlining the rights of children worldwide. 4. Children have the right to express their opinions and have them taken into account in all matters that affect them. 5. Child rights also include the right to play, rest, and leisure, as well as the right to access information and participate in cultural and artistic activities. 6. Governments have a responsibility to protect and uphold the rights of children, and to ensure that they are able to grow up in a safe and supportive environment. 7. Child rights are essential for the well-being and development of children, and are crucial for building a more just and equitable society. 8. Despite progress in recent years, many children around the world still face violations of their rights, including child labor, child marriage, and lack of access to education. 9. It is important for individuals, communities, and governments to work together to promote and protect the rights of children, and to ensure that every child has the opportunity to reach their full potential. 10. By recognizing and respecting the rights of children, we can create a better future for all.

Sample Essay on Child Rights in 100-180 Words

Child rights are fundamental human rights that every child is entitled to. These rights include the right to education, healthcare, protection from abuse and exploitation, and the right to express their opinions. Children have the right to live in a safe and nurturing environment, free from violence and discrimination.

It is important to protect and uphold the rights of children as they are the most vulnerable members of society. Governments, communities, and individuals all have a responsibility to ensure that children are able to grow up in a safe and supportive environment.

By recognizing and respecting the rights of children, we can help them reach their full potential and become active and productive members of society. It is essential that we continue to advocate for the rights of children and work towards creating a world where every child is able to thrive and succeed.

Short Essay on Child Rights in 200-500 Words

Child rights are fundamental human rights that are inherent to all children, regardless of their race, religion, or nationality. These rights are enshrined in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), which was adopted in 1989 and has been ratified by almost every country in the world. The UNCRC sets out the basic rights that all children are entitled to, including the right to life, survival, and development; the right to education; the right to health care; the right to protection from violence, abuse, and exploitation; and the right to participate in decisions that affect them.

One of the most important child rights is the right to education. Education is a fundamental human right that is essential for the development of children and for the future prosperity of society as a whole. All children have the right to a quality education that is free, compulsory, and accessible to all. Education not only provides children with the knowledge and skills they need to succeed in life, but also helps to promote their social and emotional development, and enables them to become active and responsible members of society.

Another crucial child right is the right to health care. All children have the right to access quality health care services that are affordable, accessible, and of a high standard. This includes the right to receive vaccinations, regular health check-ups, and treatment for illnesses and injuries. Ensuring that children have access to adequate health care is essential for their physical and mental well-being, and is crucial for their overall development and future success.

Child rights also include the right to protection from violence, abuse, and exploitation. All children have the right to be protected from all forms of violence, abuse, and exploitation, including physical and emotional abuse, neglect, trafficking, and child labor. Governments have a responsibility to ensure that children are safe from harm and that perpetrators of violence and abuse are held accountable for their actions. Protecting children from violence and exploitation is essential for their well-being and is crucial for creating a safe and nurturing environment in which they can thrive.

In addition to these rights, children also have the right to participate in decisions that affect them. This means that children have the right to express their opinions, be heard, and have their views taken into account in all matters that concern them. Giving children a voice in decisions that affect them helps to empower them, build their self-confidence, and foster a sense of responsibility and accountability. It also helps to ensure that policies and programs are designed in a way that meets the needs and interests of children, and that their rights are respected and upheld.

In conclusion, child rights are essential for the well-being and development of children, and are crucial for creating a just and equitable society. Governments, communities, and individuals all have a responsibility to uphold and protect the rights of children, and to ensure that they are able to grow up in a safe, nurturing, and supportive environment. By promoting and protecting child rights, we can help to ensure that all children have the opportunity to reach their full potential and lead happy, healthy, and fulfilling lives.

Essay on Child Rights in 1000-1500 Words

Child rights are fundamental human rights that are inherent to all children, regardless of their race, religion, or nationality. These rights are enshrined in various international conventions and treaties, such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), which was adopted in 1989. The UNCRC outlines the rights that all children are entitled to, including the right to life, survival, and development, the right to education, and the right to protection from harm and exploitation.

One of the most important child rights is the right to education. Education is a fundamental human right that is essential for the development of children and the realization of their full potential. It is through education that children learn the skills and knowledge they need to succeed in life, and to become productive members of society. Education also plays a crucial role in breaking the cycle of poverty and inequality, and in promoting social and economic development.

Unfortunately, millions of children around the world are denied their right to education. According to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), there are an estimated 263 million children and youth who are out of school, and many more who are not receiving a quality education. This is a violation of their rights, and a major barrier to their future success and well-being.

Another important child right is the right to protection from harm and exploitation. Children are among the most vulnerable members of society, and are often at risk of abuse, neglect, and exploitation. They may be subjected to violence, trafficking, child labor, and other forms of exploitation that can have a lasting impact on their physical and emotional well-being.

It is the responsibility of governments, communities, and individuals to protect children from harm and exploitation, and to ensure that their rights are respected and upheld. This includes enacting and enforcing laws that protect children from abuse and exploitation, providing support services for children who have been victims of violence, and raising awareness about the importance of child rights.

In addition to education and protection, children also have the right to health, nutrition, and a safe environment. These rights are essential for the physical and mental well-being of children, and are crucial for their overall development and growth. Access to healthcare, clean water, nutritious food, and a safe living environment are all important factors that contribute to the health and well-being of children.

Despite the importance of child rights, many children around the world continue to face violations of their rights on a daily basis. Poverty, conflict, discrimination, and other factors can all contribute to the denial of children’s rights, and can have a devastating impact on their lives. It is essential that governments, civil society organizations, and individuals work together to promote and protect the rights of children, and to ensure that they are able to live healthy, happy, and fulfilling lives.

In conclusion, child rights are fundamental human rights that are essential for the well-being and development of all children. Education, protection, health, and a safe environment are all important rights that children are entitled to, and that must be upheld and respected by all members of society. It is the responsibility of governments, communities, and individuals to ensure that children’s rights are protected and promoted, and to work towards a world where all children can thrive and reach their full potential. By upholding and respecting child rights, we can create a better future for all children, and build a more just and equitable society for generations to come.

Related Essays

Essay on A Visit To A Fair – 10 Lines, 100 to 1500 Words

Value of Games And Sports – Essay in 10 Lines, 100 to 1500 Words

Essay on Importance of Teacher – 100, 200, 500, 1000 Words

Essay on A Visit To A Museum – 100, 200, 500, 1000 Words

Essay on Effect of Social Media On Youth

Essay on Shri Guru Nanak Dev Ji – Short & Long Essay Examples

Essay on Nuclear Family – Short Essay & Long Essay upto 1500 Words

Essay on Anudeep Durishetty – 10 Lines, 100 to 1500 Words

Essay on Non Violence – Samples, 10 Lines to 1500 Words

Covid 19 Responsive School – Essay in 10 Lines, 100 to 1500 Words

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

rights-and-responsibilities-children(thumbnail)

The Rights and Responsibilities of Children

1.1 MiB (PDF)

Save the Children

Content type

Child Friendly Materials, Teaching Resources

Child protection, Children's rights

Oxford Martin School logo

Violence Against Children and Children’s Rights

By: Esteban Ortiz-Ospina and Max Roser

Children are entitled to the same fundamental rights as adults , but because of their age, they require special protection and care.

Key rights of children include the right to a safe environment, the right to education , the right to play, and to be heard in decisions that affect them.

Protecting these rights is crucial for children to have fulfilling childhoods and continue to thrive as adults.

Unfortunately, violations of these rights are common and often accepted. Many children are coerced into work or early marriage, or suffer emotional, physical, or sexual abuse.

On this page, you can find data and visualizations on how the protection of children’s rights differs across countries and how common violence against children is.

Interactive charts on violence against children and children’s rights

Cite this work.

Our articles and data visualizations rely on work from many different people and organizations. When citing this topic page, please also cite the underlying data sources. This topic page can be cited as:

BibTeX citation

Reuse this work freely

All visualizations, data, and code produced by Our World in Data are completely open access under the Creative Commons BY license . You have the permission to use, distribute, and reproduce these in any medium, provided the source and authors are credited.

The data produced by third parties and made available by Our World in Data is subject to the license terms from the original third-party authors. We will always indicate the original source of the data in our documentation, so you should always check the license of any such third-party data before use and redistribution.

All of our charts can be embedded in any site.

Our World in Data is free and accessible for everyone.

Help us do this work by making a donation.

Logo

Brill | Nijhoff

Brill | Wageningen Academic

Brill Germany / Austria

Böhlau

Brill | Fink

Brill | mentis

Brill | Schöningh

Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht

V&R unipress

Open Access

Open Access for Authors

Transformative Agreements

Open Access and Research Funding

Open Access for Librarians

Open Access for Academic Societies

Discover Brill’s Open Access Content

Organization

Stay updated

Corporate Social Responsiblity

Investor Relations

Policies, rights & permissions

Review a Brill Book

 
 
 

Author Portal

How to publish with Brill: Files & Guides

Fonts, Scripts and Unicode

Publication Ethics & COPE Compliance

Data Sharing Policy

Brill MyBook

Ordering from Brill

Author Newsletter

Piracy Reporting Form

Sales Managers and Sales Contacts

Ordering From Brill

Titles No Longer Published by Brill

Catalogs, Flyers and Price Lists

E-Book Collections Title Lists and MARC Records

How to Manage your Online Holdings

LibLynx Access Management

Discovery Services

KBART Files

MARC Records

Online User and Order Help

Rights and Permissions

Latest Key Figures

Latest Financial Press Releases and Reports

Annual General Meeting of Shareholders

Share Information

Specialty Products

Press and Reviews

 
   
   
   
   

Share link with colleague or librarian

Stay informed about this journal!

  • Get New Issue Alerts
  • Get Advance Article alerts
  • Get Citation Alerts

Children’s Views on Children’s Rights: A Systematic Literature Review

Children’s rights are set out in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. This systematic literature review aimed to investigate children’s views of children’s rights, at a broad level. Nine papers were included, from a range of countries and contexts. They all accessed the views of children and young people (aged up to 18 years). A content analysis was carried out using a recursive process of hybrid aggregative-configurative synthesis, and themes within children’s views and factors that may affect these were identified. These were ‘awareness of rights’, ‘value placed on (importance of) rights’, ‘impact of having/not having rights fulfilled’, ‘realisation and respect of rights’, ‘equality of rights’, ‘identifying and categorising of rights’, and ‘factors that may affect children’s views’. These were developed into a progression of rights realisation and implications for practice and further research were considered.

  • 1 Introduction

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child ( uncrc ) sets out rights of every child, consisting of 54 Articles which include civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights for all children (Save the Children, n.d.-b ; unicef , 2005 ; United Nations, 1989 ). Further to the specific Articles of the uncrc , there are four overarching core principles: of non-discrimination, devotion to the best interests of the child, the rights to life, survival and development, and respect for the views of the child (often referenced as participation or “children’s voice”) ( United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, 2003 ; Woods and Bond, 2014 ). Notably, however, the conceptualisation and integration of these “general principles” at their foundation within the uncrc has been shown to be weak ( Hanson and Lundy, 2017 ). Whilst this review does not take a specific focus on the participation principle, often specifically related to Articles 12–17, it does relate to the rationale of this review which has a focus upon children’s views of their rights. Since the uncrc has been established, significant amounts of scholarly, research and practitioner attention has focused upon this ( Anderson and Graham, 2016 ; Quennerstedt and Moody, 2020 ; Sargeant and Gillett-Swan, 2015 ; Wyse, 2001 ).

Since the adoption of the uncrc , the principles have frequently been divided into three groups (often known as the 3 Ps), of provision, protection and participation ( Hammarberg, 1990 ; Thomas, 2011 ). Quennerstedt (2010: 633) argues that these in fact have a hampering effect and suggests ‘constructing what children’s rights are about from a general human rights language of civil, political and social rights will form a better base for research’.

The “3Ps”, the four guiding principles, and the 54 Articles have created much research and critical debate both from children’s rights scholars and from those working within the framework of the uncrc ( Hanson and Lundy, 2017 ). Byrne and Lundy (2019) , focusing on creation of rights-based policy, described the comprehensiveness of the uncrc as one of its many advantages, but also noted that even from the four principles, there tends to be a focus on two of these (best interests and participation), arguably distorting overall understanding. Prior to the adoption of the uncrc , Melton (1980) carried out research to find out children’s perspectives on children’s rights, noting that ‘until the present study, no one had even asked children what they think about their rights’ ( Melton, 1980 : 186), and without the framework of the uncrc focus, this was researched more generally, and found that age, stage of cognitive development and ses status affected children’s concepts of their rights and also their attitudes towards them.

Further to this, and perhaps as further evidence to the poor integration of the principles of the uncrc to its provisions ( Hanson and Lundy, 2017 ), it is documented that children were not directly involved to any significant extent in the drafting of the uncrc , which seems somewhat paradoxical to the principle of participation ( Lundy et al. , 2015 ) and Lundy et al. (2015) speculate upon the question of what might have been the consequences had children been involved in the drafting process. It has been been established that, when listened to, children are good reporters ( unicef , 2012 ) and that, following Melton and Limber (1992) , adults will only comprehensively identify what is important to children by being aware of their views ( Taylor et al. , 2001 ).

How do children conceive of the notion of rights? What do they think their rights should be? Are they aware of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child? Do they feel that they have a say in making decisions (Article 12)? Do they want participatory rights? Does it ultimately matter what they think?

At this time, she recognised this as a growing area, as did Taylor et al. (2001) , who nevertheless identified a scarcity of studies exploring views of children and young people ( cyp ) on their rights, and how these may differ from adults. This research took place in New Zealand with a focus on awareness and understanding of rights. The authors summarised what had been found about children’s views, and factors that may affect these, including age, socioeconomic status, cultural background, ethnicity; they also indicated that previous studies suggested significant percentages of children were not familiar with the uncrc . Similarly, Alderson (2000) found more than three quarters of pupils surveyed had not heard about the uncrc , and most of the others had heard only a small amount. This is despite Article 42 which states that children, young people and adults should know about the Convention and steps should be taken to achieve this ( United Nations, 1989 ). Taylor et al. (2001) recognised the potential role of schools as places for both pupils and staff to develop understanding of rights.

The complexity of the uncrc is identified as a barrier (for adults) to implementing a child-rights approach ( Williams, 2017 ) and is clearly not a simple document for children to access, even with an understanding that children can cope and engage with complex information (see Sargeant and Gillett-Swan, 2015 ). There do now exist child-friendly copies of the uncrc (Save the Children, n.d.-a ; The Scottish Government, 2008 ; unicef , n.d.-a ) and these appear to offer ways to make the uncrc more accessible for children, from a young age. Further development of this is a current focus for Child Rights Connect linked to the 30th Anniversary ( The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, n.d. ). There are also focused ways to implement, support and develop children’s education about their rights, such as through Unicef UK’s rights-respecting schools award, and in a variety of other publications used in and beyond the UK (for example, see Brantefors and Quennerstedt’s research synthesis, 2016 ).

The present review aims to identify and synthesise findings from a range of primary research studies to present a view upon children’s views of children’s rights, and as such includes research from different countries, ages, groups (such as those in residential care) and level of exposure to children’s rights. The importance of understanding constructions of children’s rights through children’s views and experiences at a broad, and indeed global, level and considering their different contexts, is identified by Stalford and Lundy (2020) . It is fundamental within the uncrc itself, within the guiding principles, the 3Ps and the specific articles.

  • 2 Methodology

From a background in professional practice, the researchers adopted a critical realist approach in conceptualising and structuring this review ( Fletcher, 2017 ). This has the advantage of communicating a particular understanding of “rigour” which is readily understandable to professional practice communities (e.g. children’s services workers) and policy makers/influencers ( Gough and Thomas, 2017 ). (The limitations of this approach are considered at a later point in this paper.)

From the research question of “What are children’s views on children’s rights?”, included research needed to access the views of children (up to 18 years) about children’s rights and this needed to be at a general or “meta” level, for all or some of the focus of the paper. The authors read carefully around this aim, with recognition of the nuanced nature of identifying relevant literature. There is much research which implicitly recognises the need to access children’s views and acknowledges the importance of children’s rights, without these being the focus of the research itself. Databases searched included: assia (via ProQuest), eric (via ProQuest) and PsycInfo (via Ovid Online). These three databases were selected in order to gather research from a range of discipline areas including education, social sciences and psychology, with a focus on accessing research on children’s views. Whilst the importance of interdisciplinarity is recognised (see Stalford and Lundy, 2020 ), it was beyond the scope of the authors to extend searches further for this review. The three databases were searched using noft ( assia , eric ) and within Abstract and within Title (PsycInfo) on 2–4 January 2019 and generated a total of 1,536 returns, including duplications, using the following search terms:

  • – ‘child* rights’ or uncrc or ‘United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child’
  • – child* or young people or student* or pupil* or adolescent*
  • – concept* or perspective* or view* or attitude* or perceive or awareness or perception* or opinion* or thought* or value*

Each paper was scanned by title, and where necessary by abstract, and papers that did not meet the mandatory criteria of accessing children’s views about children’s rights were excluded. This left a shortlist of 116 studies, from assia (6), eric (72), PsycInfo Abstract (30) and PsycInfo Title (8). Using the same search terms, a hand search of The International Journal of Children’s Rights from the last ten years was carried out as were Google searches, and experts 1 within relevant fields were consulted, together providing another five papers at this stage.

The authors recognise there is a “grey area” around research relevance, and searched for papers with a focus upon children’s view of their rights in general, rather than any specific area of rights (e.g. participation, protection, uncrc ). Search terms did not include “voice” and “participation”, as earlier scoping showed that this understandably added a large body of research with a focus on participation as a specific aspect within the uncrc . This review aimed to access a broader view.

In order to create a final list that most reliably accessed these, several papers were discussed in detail between the authors, using the abstracts and in six cases, the full papers. A conservative approach was taken which required agreement of both authors in order for papers to be included. To meet inclusion criteria, papers were required to have a focus on rights generally and not only on specific rights, or uncrc Articles, or with a specific focus such as on “nurturance” or “self-determination”. Research was not excluded if it did not use the uncrc specifically as a framework. Papers were manually filtered to include all those published within the last ten years (2009–2019) and grey literature was not included. Whilst this exclusion decision and cut off period was not linked to any specific event or legislation, it has the benefit of accessing views from children in a contemporary context, whilst also providing a dataset of manageable proportions.

The review did not extend to search for research reported in languages other than English. Nonetheless, if the search terms had produced abstracts (and not full papers) written in English, the authors would have sought assistance to translate these.

This process led to 15 papers being identified as suitable for inclusion. These were each read in full and a further six papers were excluded as they did not meet the inclusion criteria; for example, including pupil participants who were over the age of 18 years, or utilising a structured and directive approach focused on outcomes of children’s rights training. This was due to some research focusing on knowledge of structured content pre and post teaching on children’s rights, without gathering children’s more broadly formed views about their rights, either pre- or post- rights teaching, which was the primary focus on this review.

The final inclusion criteria required papers to:

  • – access the views of children (up to 18 years) about children’s rights;
  • – have a general or “meta” rights focus, and not a narrow focus on specific rights or rights frameworks;
  • – be peer-reviewed research published in the last ten years;
  • – not use a structured and directive approach focused on outcomes of rights training/education.

Full review then progressed with the evaluation of the remaining nine papers. It is relevant to note that two of these, Kosher and Ben-Arieh (2017) and af Ursin and Haanpää (2018) , utilise the same dataset but with differing scope and analyses.

Gough’s (2007) Weight of Evidence (WofE) framework was used. Quantitative and/or qualitative review frameworks as appropriate to the specific piece of research were used critically to review the nine papers for methodological quality (WofE A). The qualitative investigation and evaluation papers utilised the frameworks used by Bond et al. (2013) in their review of the effectiveness of solution focused brief therapy (cf. also Law and Woods, 2018 ). Each paper was coded with final scores assigned up to 14 points, with criteria including execution of data collection, analysis close to data, evidence of explicit reflexivity and evidence of attention to ethical issues.

The quantitative investigations utilised a framework previously used by Flitcroft and Woods (2018) , and Woodley-Hume and Woods (2019) , and based on research appraisal guidelines ( Genaidy et al. , 2007 ; Wallace and Wray, 2011 ). These were coded with final scores assigned up to 16 points, with criteria including clear research question or hypothesis, multi-level or intergroup analyses, limitations of the research and implications of findings. Following Bond et al. (2013) , mixed methods research was coded using both frameworks. As frameworks had different totals, final scores were converted to percentages to allow for comparison, and the higher percentage was used. Following Law and Woods (2018) , these percentages were then used to categorise each paper as high quality (67–100 per cent), medium quality (34–66 per cent), or low quality (33 per cent or less).

Each paper was also rated for methodological appropriateness (WofE B). In this case, papers were assessed as high if they used qualitative methods, medium for mixed methods and low for quantitative methods. Whilst the use of qualitative methods enables gathering of data close to participant views, quantitative research also adds relevant information about these (cf. Law and Woods, 2018 ).

Each paper was also evaluated for relevance of focus (WofE C) and categorised as:

  • – high (central and open focus on children’s views on children’s rights in general);
  • – medium (partial and open focus on children’s views on children’s rights in general or central focus on children’s views on children’s rights with (de)limiting context/framework);
  • – low (tangential focus on children’s views on children’s rights in general).

Approximately one third (n = 3) of these papers were reviewed by both authors for the purpose of moderating evaluation, and inter-rater agreement percentages following joint moderation were calculated at an average of 97 per cent final inter-rater agreement; the remaining six papers were read in their entirety and reviewed by the first author.

Each paper was read several times by the first author and key data from each paper was mapped and summarised (see Table 1 ). A content analysis of the findings of each paper was then carried out (cf. Brantefors and Quennerstedt, 2016 ), which supported a recursive process of hybrid aggregative-configurative synthesis ( Gough et al. , 2013 ), which referenced both broad conceptualisations of children’s rights, as well as to the principles of the uncrc and its Articles. This process is summarised in Figure 1 above:

Summary of data analysis and synthesis

Citation: The International Journal of Children's Rights 29, 4 (2021) ;

The nine studies included four qualitative investigations and one qualitative evaluation, three quantitative investigations and one mixed methods investigation (see , above). Each study accessed the views of children about their rights at a general level, was peer-reviewed and published between 2009 and 2019. Three studies used a focus group, two studies used a survey (based on the same survey, the International Survey of Children’s Well-Being (ISCWeB)), four used a questionnaire (including one focused on one open-ended question as part of a larger questionnaire), one used interviews, one included a written composition and one used a participatory research method. The studies come from a range of countries; the two using the ISCWeB data utilise data from 16 countries. The other studies each focused on one country.

Whilst each study focused on children’s rights at a general level, the contexts were different. Most collected data through schools, and one collected data in residential care settings. The foci of the studies included:

psychosocial functioning; a human rights friendly ethos in school; perceptions of rights including in relation to participation and subjective well-being and across different countries, age groups and gender; experiences of rights; what human rights means to children in educational settings; contribution of school climate to views of rights; perspectives of rights; awareness and knowledge of rights and perceptions of the respect these are given across different countries, gender and social contexts; perspectives of rights when attending a Rights Respecting School.

The synthesised findings have been grouped into themes, which are presented in a thematic network (see ). Themes 4.1–4.6 are main themes, directly addressing the research question. 4.7 is a secondary theme which emerged from the process of analysis as an integral consideration alongside children’s views and the role of context.

Thematic network

Citation: The International Journal of Children's Rights 29, 4 (2021) ;

Three studies quantified children’s reported awareness of their rights. Where percentage descriptions are used, it may be useful to consider that the actual numbers of children vary greatly across the studies (see ). found 92 per cent of children in South Africa indicated they have rights. However, children also indicated that parents and teachers did not know about rights and some children also linked this lack of knowledge and awareness to their rights being violated. Children identified other children’s misunderstanding of their rights, giving examples such as children claiming their own rights when they wanted to use them as a defence/protection for when they were not upholding the rights of others. In contrast, found 52 per cent of children reported knowing about children’s rights. When looking specifically for awareness of the uncrc, 37 per cent reported knowing about this, with clear variation by country. found 45 per cent of children reported knowing what rights children had, reducing to 32 per cent reporting knowing about the crc. In England, the results were lower: found approximately one quarter of pupils surveyed knew about the uncrc (27 per cent), whilst found this to be approximately one fifth (21 per cent) of pupils in the UK as a whole. Exploring perspectives of rights with children who attended a Rights Respecting School, found children who had this rights-based experience showed an awareness and understanding of themselves as right-holders and that all human beings are rights-holders. The suggestion from the studies overall is that awareness and learning about children’s rights, through schools at least, was not consistently embedded practice; it is also unclear, in some of these studies, what level of detailed conceptualisation of rights children have.

In Yan Lam (2015), the questionnaire used the term “rights” and “crc” for some items, apparently assuming pupils would have enough rights awareness to understand these, although they also identify that, ‘Traditional schools [like one of the schools in the study] in Hong Kong tend to overemphasize students’ responsibilities and avoid mentioning their rights in order to make students obedient and compliant to school rules (Yan Lam , 2015: 196). From the quotes included in the qualitative part of this study, pupils (or teachers) do not use the vocabulary of “rights” apart from one example: ‘Many schools claim that they give students freedom, but actually the freedom they offer you does not give you a right to voice, and you can’t express your opinions about the inadequacies of school to your teachers’ (Yan Lam , 2015: 206).

For some parts of her research, intentionally moved away from the language of rights, identifying that ‘many children’ were ‘unfamiliar’ with it, and that by talking to children without using the term, children would be better able to explain their own ideas about these. In this case, children’s ideas were then linked to a human rights framework.

These results give a varied picture of children’s awareness of rights, with variation suggested by country, identifying that the mandate of Article 42 to work to ensure that the uncrc and its principles are known about by adults and children is some way from full realisation.

found 40 per cent of learners indicated the importance of rights and found children wanted to continue to support the rights of all children in the school, and they identified learning about rights as improving relationships (and behaviour), indicating the value of rights to cyp. found children identifying their right to learn their rights (and to defend them) to be the third most commonly occurring category in their study, suggesting children recognised this to be valuable, and that even without rights education they recognised they were not accessing rights or having rights promoted (in school) despite their importance. Studies in this review varied as to whether they focused explicitly on the value and importance of rights. Sometimes this is drawn out and inferred from the perceived impact of having rights fulfilled or not, and the authors recognise the link between these themes. In the studies where importance of rights and children’s attitudes towards them was a focus, cyp appeared to have a positive attitude towards rights when these were perceived as being upheld

Several studies gathered views about the impact of rights being fulfilled, or not. found that children support children’s rights more strongly when they describe their school and teachers as being open to their criticism. Arguably, this may suggest that children perceive openness to criticism as indicative of more evenly balanced power relationships, and within that context feel that their rights are more evident and tangible. (The present authors offer this particular nuanced interpretation transparently, allowing, and indeed encouraging, other readers to consider alternative possible interpretations.)

Linked to this, is that Kosher and Ben-Arieh found that children who felt their rights were more respected appeared more satisfied, leading to an identified association between children’s views on their rights, their participation, and their subjective well-being ( ). One of the findings by (2015) was that pupils’ views did not match exactly with teachers’ views, and the level of disagreement between teachers and pupils was more significant when the school environment was less supportive of human rights. This may suggest that higher levels of support for children’s rights may encourage more shared perspectives between children and adults, and further indicates the importance of accessing children’s views about this. Magelhaus’ ( ) findings identified children’s views that compromising some rights impacted (negatively) on their psychosocial functioning, resulting in internalising and externalising problems such as feelings of sadness, loneliness and emotional insecurity, and physical and verbal aggression. In this study, the cyp were children living in residential care settings and Magelhaus emphasised the importance of recognising the influence of social context for all children.

Some children’s quotes in study indicate not only that some children view being happy as a right, but also that only by fulfilling the rights they identify will children be happy. For example, one child’s response is that, ‘As children, we have the right to play comfortably and as much as we want. We can be happy only this way. All the children have the right to be happy and cheerful’ ( : 347).

In study, children identified learning about rights (in combination with accessing a rights-respecting school environment) had a positive effect on improving relationships and behaviour. Dunhill also described children who have accessed this as ‘rights holders but also upholders of rights’ ( : 24), recognising this rights education and environment as preparing children for their experiences beyond school, as global citizens.

Across differing contexts and , then, it appears that children identify the positive impact of accessing their rights, and the necessity of this, so as to be able to share their views and for their increased well-being, including in their relationships with others.

Children’s views show their awareness of others, including adults, needing to know, understand and support both their own and other children’s rights. found 59 per cent of children felt their rights were respected by adults, and found 52 per cent of children overall thought adults in their country respected their rights. The authors identified variation by country, from 35 per cent to 83 per cent, and by age, with younger children more likely to feel adults respected their rights.

found 64 per cent of children felt many people did not know and understand these and this led to a violation of their rights. Additionally, 45 per cent of children identified the need to report violations of their rights, although it was unclear whether children had tried to do so and/or what the impact of this was/was felt to be. Notably, , (2015) found there were criticisms made by pupils who felt their rights were not being realised, indicating the value they place on this access. found children recognised (other) children’s rights were not always upheld; the examples given are about children living in other parts of the world so it is unclear whether children have an understanding of, for example, experiences of children who may live nearby, in the same community, but attend a school without a focus on being rights-respecting.

Several studies explored children’s concepts of rights, and rights they identified or claimed, and found some rights occurred more frequently. found cyp in residential care to feel psychosocial functioning was affected when particular rights were compromised; private life, perceived social image, non-discrimination, and respect for themselves and their families. Within Harakat and Yel’s categories of rights, there were certain rights codes identified with more frequency than others ( ). The codes with a frequency of 40 or over came mainly from their “basic needs and developmental period needs” category and are ‘to play’ (77), ‘to be respected’ (72), ‘to be loved and cared for’ (55) and ‘to be happy and cheerful’ (40), and also, from their “legal assurances” category: ‘to learn their rights and defend these when necessary’ (66) and ‘to attend school and to get an education’ (41). Similarly, identified the rights which she described as ‘strongly claimed’ by the children in her study. She framed these within the “vocabulary of human rights” and they come mainly under the civil rights category, and included ‘not being hit’, ‘not being shouted at’, ‘being valued and treated as others’, ‘not being hurt with words’, with one strongly claimed socio-economic right, which was ‘to go to school and learn’.

Several studies classified identified rights and did so in different ways. Two ( ; ) used the uncrc within their relative ISCWeB survey data; in addition to finding out whether children knew about the uncrc, they found out whether children felt they knew “what rights children have”. explored children’s concepts of rights within the context of the uncrc and its Articles, and described “misconceptions” where children’s views did not align with this framework. wanted to access children’s views without the constraints of a framework and removed the language of “rights” entirely for some parts of the research and where the term “rights” was used, her preferred framework was of one of human (as opposed to children’s) rights, split into categories of civil rights, political rights and socio-economic rights. When qualitative data was gained without boundaries imposed by frameworks, some studies found children to identify rights not directly included within the uncrc. identified a category within her data, of “rights that go beyond hr [human rights] categorisation”. These were: “teachers who care and support”, “feel safe”, and “play and have fun”. Linked to this, fourth most frequent code (frequency of 55) was “to be loved and cared for” and “to be happy and cheerful” (40) was also frequently occurring ( ). found children also identified positive and supportive relationships as protective factors for their psychological functioning, and this appears to link to the [teachers who] “care and support” category of .

pointed to some rights identified by children as equally interpretable as responsibilities: in one example, a child linked their right to do tests and study to their aspiration of being successful in lessons and exams (which in turn they may have identified as supporting rights such as education).

Whilst some of these rights, from each of the studies, can map on to the uncrc, they do not represent all rights and some do not map directly on to this framework at all. These are rights which included emotional and relational aspects and how children feel, e.g. safe, not only being safe.

The studies in this review investigated and evaluated a range of factors which may impact on children’s views of their rights.

found younger children to report less knowledge and awareness of children’s rights, yet this group also displayed higher levels of agreement that adults respected their rights. These researchers argued this was due to the poorer understanding (of the concepts of children’s rights) of the youngest children, although no significant age differences were found relating to children’s views on their participation.

Significant gender differences were not consistently found. found minor differences, with a small number of countries identified where gender did appear to affect children’s views. , however, found female adolescents were more likely than males to support most of the children’s rights measures examined, with the exception of rights within the public/governmental context and that this was the case for both nationality groups in their sample. identified gender differences in psychological outcomes; with more males reported externalising behaviours when rights were not fulfilled.

identified cross-national differences in children’s knowledge and perceptions of their rights and their views about their participation. They linked this to the cultural model of rights; that children’s knowledge and views of their rights are constrained by their experiences of these ( , 2014), and identified that it can be argued children’s views appear to be shaped in a “specific cultural, national, and political environment” ( : 267). identified high levels of variation by country for each of the questions children answered about their rights and linked this to children’s lived experiences. Similarly, identified differences in views linked to cultural background, specifically that overall Jewish children were more supportive of children’s rights compared to Arab peers including in a personal context, and Arab adolescents more strongly supported rights within a public/governmental context.

Yan Lam (2015) found a rights-respecting school ethos was related to a greater agreement between teachers and pupils with school mission, structure for enforcing discipline, structure for the appeal of rights, structure for student participation and attitudes of teachers recognised as relevant factors; the more rights-respecting ethos also had higher mean outcomes for these areas. Similarly, identified the role of school climate, with their link between schools and teachers being open to criticism and the increase in cyp support for children’s rights. af-Ursin and Haanpää ( ) also identified school climate as a factor that impacted on children’s views of rights. One study, ( ) focused on children’s views when they attended a rights-respecting school and concluded this encouraged children to “practice, protect and promote the rights of others within their school” and that they also considered their potential “not only in the school but also in their community and globally” ( : 24).

Relational factors (“perceived social support”) were identified as important by as were “socio-cognitive variables” (perceived benefits or perceived favouritism) in affecting perceptions of cyp ( : 20). Contrastingly, found teacher-student relationships had low correlations with children’s support of children’s rights. In (2015), however, it is difficult to separate out the relational and the school climate/ethos influences; for example, some of the features of the school with the more rights-respecting ethos include gaining views of pupils which may in turn help to build a positive relationship.

In Munongi and Pillay’s study ( ), the impact of social context is also linked to the country in which the study is carried out. 92 per cent of children from South Africa showed an awareness of rights and the authors recognised the country’s “strong history of violation of human rights due to Apartheid…” and government help for “children to be more aware of their rights to promote social justice among its citizens” ( : 288). More generally, af-Ursin and Haanpää ( ) investigated a range of social factors and found those to have the greatest difference on rights outcomes (overall) were level of deprivation and home climate (and they identified school climate in this category, already classified above). They also found, with modest significance, children with immigrant backgrounds felt their rights were more respected by adults than children without immigrant backgrounds, and recognised this as needing further investigation. Similarly, identified the role of family factors, and found that the more children reported their parents listened to them and treated them fairly, the more they were satisfied with their family life and with their life overall.

This review examines children’s views on children’s rights and identifies factors affecting these. Analysis of nine papers revealed the following themes: awareness of rights, value placed on (importance of) rights, impact of having/not having rights fulfilled, realisation and respect of rights, equality of rights, identifying and categorising of rights, and factors that may affect children’s views.

The uncrc sets out to protect and promote children’s rights and yet many children who do not know about this, or about their rights more broadly. For example, in England approximately one quarter of children are aware of the uncrc ( ). Some children identify that many people generally are not children’s rights aware and identify this as a block to their rights being realised ( ). Article 42 ( ) seeks to ensure all duty bearers know about children’s rights; if many children do not know about them, or feel adults know and/or respect them, how can they be truly protected, provided and promoted?

Children appear to value, to want to know and learn their rights, and to feel positive about them; this applies both to children who have received direct rights experience and education and those who have not ( ). Furthermore, when children have accessed a rights-respecting environment they wish to continue to support the rights of all children ( ).

Children identify a negative impact on their psychosocial development when they do not fully access their rights whilst in residential care ( ), a specific focus within the uncrc (Articles 20 and 21 ). Rights-respecting environments can have positive impacts upon adult-pupil relationships (Yan Lam , 2015); furthermore, pupils can use their own views and understanding as rights-holders to consider their own rights and the rights of others ( ).

Children identify some rights, themes and principles with greater frequency than others, including concepts going beyond the legal entitlements and specific provisions of the uncrc. This is not to say that the views they share can or should be easily interpreted in the context of existing rights framework of the uncrc; however, they may provide information to help to consider provisions that support certain outcomes and how these may be operationalised. For example, children identify emotional support and resultant feelings (e.g. of safety), and also of things they do not want (e.g. to be shouted at). Notably, there have been examples of provisions to support children’s feelings of well-being such as in the UK Government “Every Child Matters” ( ), which identified children’s ‘enjoyment and achievement’ as a key outcome area.

Whilst children’s feelings are not the same as children’s rights, when children’s perception is that their rights are not realised, decreased well-being may occur. In the case of the child’s quote from (‘As children, we have the right to play comfortably and as much as we want. We can be happy only this way. All the children have the right to be happy and cheerful’), this thought-provoking interpretation is that of a child, which is explicitly what this review has investigated. By carrying out an open exploration of children’s views and concepts about their rights at a broad level, identification of what happens for children, what may be done to prevent violations of rights, and what helps to support realisation of rights can take place, supporting adult understanding of the purpose and scope of children’s rights, and the associated legal frameworks.

The uncrc details a rights framework across 54 Articles ( ) which may be difficult for younger children to internalise; a clearer focus on the four guiding uncrc “principles” may promote communication and embedding. At the same time, it is acknowledged that the four identified principles may themselves be relatively thinly conceptualised and not well integrated within the broader framework of the uncrc and propose instead a more meaningful and effective development of a set of cross-cutting standards. Nonetheless, reduced specificity within the children’s rights framework may serve to make “space” for children’s views and concepts to be more readily captured, integrated and built upon (cf. ).

This review found that national/cultural factors, social context, age, gender, relationships and school climate may impact on how children view their rights (cf. also , 2001). There were mixed findings, in relation to gender, with some identification of females being generally more supportive of children’s rights ( ), although significant gender differences were not found in all the studies; see for example, .

incorporates the findings presented following hybrid aggregative-configurative synthesis of the papers included in the present review and develops these into a progression of rights realisation. identified that research has not tended to focus on how children may develop into rights bearers, or on which processes may support children in this development. Through synthesis of research utilising children’s views, this way to consider a pathway to rights realisation sets out the need for the existence of children’s rights for children, in their lives and experiences as well as set out in the uncrc. It may be helpful to consider this as a foundation for progression of children’s rights, towards full protection, promotion and provision. This requires adults (and other children) to be able to know and support children’s rights. Alongside this, children need to be safe, and to feel safe, to share their views.

A progressions to children’s rights realisation

Citation: The International Journal of Children's Rights 29, 4 (2021) ;

Children want and need to know about their rights; this may be direct or indirect at an early stage, and dialogue and shared language facilitates this process and the following stages, as they identify as rights holders and increase in their levels of knowledge, understanding, experience and participation. This may enable and empower children to utilise and uphold their rights and then potentially to be able to communicate, shape, develop and build on children’s rights and their provision, protection and promotion. In turn, this may then support further embedding of a strong rights foundation.

As recognised by many children, in order to build the foundation needed for children’s rights to be realised, adults need to know about and uphold them. describe children’s participation as ‘meaningless’ if adults do not hear and respect their views. Programmes taking a child rights-based approach (crba) focus on developing capacities of adults and children ( ), Unicef UK has partnered with local government with the aim of embedding a crba into public services (unicef, ) and professional training and awareness campaigns established in many countries by children’s rights organisations have supported ongoing promotion of the uncrc ( ). This is relevant to support a range of professionals working with children, e.g. teachers, social workers and school nurses, in order to implement children’s rights with increased knowledge and understanding of the uncrc and also children’s views, such as of the importance of supportive adult relationships. Programmes such as the UK’s Rights Respecting Schools Award (rrsa) could increase their emphasis on reaching out to other, as yet non-awarded, schools in order to develop capacity through training, access to parents and community and outreach work with cyp. Increased emphasis at a statutory level may also be a way in which to create a catalyst for adult action and development in this area.

The increased focus on and drive towards greater participation of children in research and in practice has already been identified; further development of this is important, to adhere to the uncrc and its principles, and to continue to increase understanding of how children view children’s rights and empower children to be able to influence and progress children’s rights at a general level.

It may be helpful to identify and develop new ways to focus on rights if current ways do not align with children’s views. For example, some rights are identified by children with a greater frequency than others, and some previous research has used Maslow’s hierarchy ( ) as a way to classify rights; see for example (2015). If children do not view rights as all being equal, it is important to find out when and why this may be and what happens to children’s views about this as realisation of their rights progresses. It is also through participation and progression through the levels identified in (above) that rights identified by children which are outside the framework of the uncrc can be understood and responded to.

The negative impact of psychosocial functioning when some rights are compromised ( ) suggests that working to support the upholding of rights may play an important role in meeting needs, supporting social, emotional and mental health and acting as a protective benefit. Educational psychologists are well-placed to support schools and families through provision of information about children’s rights and supporting schools to provide, promote and protect these, and to gain the views of pupils better to understand how this may be of maximum utility in order to lead to rights realisation.

Following a rigorous and comprehensive process and framework for critical appraisal, seven of the nine included studies were rated as having high methodological quality, with the other two being medium and low respectively. As such, research in this area is generally strong, albeit there is a somewhat unco-ordinated variety of foci and contexts, and not much evidence of a programme of research relating to the focus of this review. Future research could help to embed a more consistent approach in investigating not only specific provisions of the uncrc, but also children’s views on rights more generally. If this happened with greater frequency, it may be easier to see patterns and differences whilst also acknowledging the importance of social context.

The importance of reviewing what research informs us about children’s views of children’s rights is identified, and it would be useful to develop understanding of the identified themes; for example, whether it is helpful to introduce children’s rights to children and adults who are unfamiliar with them through a focus on the four guiding principles to support awareness and understanding.

Further research may also support the development of participation, as it is through further investigating the views of children, and continuing to access views at a general level, that greater understanding will be gained. For example, how do children find it most useful and relevant to view their rights, and how may this change as progression is made towards rights realisation. This could include using a longitudinal approach, including what happens following input and exposure to a rights-respecting environment and how development may be sustained and transferred to new contexts. The model of progression identified in this review suggests that as children move towards rights realisation, they may become more able to impact positively on the rights of others and on children’s rights more generally.

In the interests of accessibility to professional practice and policy makers/influencers, the researchers adopted a critical realist approach in conceptualising and structuring this review, which privileged comprehensive empirical reports of primary research demonstrating adherence to a comprehensive range of quality criteria ( ; ). It is acknowledged that a more interpretive approach to conceptualising and structuring the review (e.g. a meta-narrative synthesis) might have led to the inclusion of other studies integrating primary and/or secondary data in conjunction with relevant rigorous argumentation ( , 2005).

Furthermore, within the terms of this review, other limitations should be considered. Though clear inclusion criteria were used, the nuanced nature of identifying papers is acknowledged. Furthermore, the search terms contain possible omissions such as using “young people” but not “young person”. Whilst the authors decided not to include terms such as “participation” and “voice” based on earlier scoping exercises, it is acknowledged that this may have resulted in some research relevant to the current review being missed, and also that the included studies mainly gathered research in school contexts.

The process of analysing and synthesising the data was primarily led by the first author and it is recognised that, as a hybrid aggregative-configurative synthesis, albeit with reference to the uncrc as a framework, this may necessarily incorporate a degree of subjectivity or “bias”. The authors have endeavoured to be clear in the presentation and discussion of findings that the interpretations presented are those of the authors, allowing and indeed welcoming other readers the opportunity to consider alternative interpretations and thereby advance debate.

This research aimed to access children’s views about their thinking about rights at a “meta” level. However, this perhaps necessarily increases the likelihood that children’s interpretations of what they were asked about was different, depending on context, experience, and the framework and methods used, which varied across the included studies. The papers selected provide a snapshot of some children’s views over the last ten years and the resulting synthesis presents a broad picture over a variety of contexts. Whilst variation by context is acknowledged, it is also relevant and useful to note the consistency and strong thread of many identified themes.

, P.-K. and Haanpää, L., “A Comparative Study on Children’s Rights Awareness in 16 Countries”, 2018 (11(5)), 14251443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9508-1.

, and , , “ ”, Child Indicators Research ( ( )), – . .)| false , P., “School students’ views on school councils and daily life at school”, , 2000 (14), 121134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2000.tb00160.x.

, , “ ”, Children & Society, ( ), – . : .)| false , D.L. and Graham, A.P., “Improving student wellbeing: having a say at school”, 2016 (27(3)), 348366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1084336.

, and , , “ ”, School Effectiveness and School Improvement ( ( )), – . .)| false , C., Woods, K., Humphrey, N., Symes, W. and Green, L., “Practitioner review: The effectiveness of solution focused brief therapy with children and families: a systematic and critical evaluation of the literature from 1990–2010”, 2013 (54(7)), 707723. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12058.

, , , , , , , and , , “ ”, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines ( ( )), – . .)| false , L. and Quennerstedt, A., “Teaching and learning children’s human rights: A research synthesis”, 2016 (3(1)), 119. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1247610.

, and , , “ ”, Cogent Education ( ( )), – . .)| false , B. and Lundy, L., “Children’s rights-based childhood policy: A six-P framework”, 2019 (23(3)), 357373. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2018.1558977.

, and , , “ ”, International Journal of Human Rights ( ( )), – . .)| false , “Every Child Matters: Aims and Outcomes”, 2004: . Accessed 2 October 2020.

, “ ”, : . Accessed .)| false , A., “Does teaching children about human rights, encourage them to practice, protect and promote the rights of others?”, 2018 (46(1)), 1626. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2016.1165717.

, , “ ”, Education 3-13 ( ( )), – . .)| false , A.J., “Applying critical realism in qualitative research: methodology meets method.”, 2017 (20(2)), 181194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401.

, , “ ”, International Journal of Social Research Methodology ( ( )), – . .)| false , D. and Woods, K., “What does research tell high school teachers about student motivation for test performance?”, 2018 (36(2)), 112125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2018.1453858.

, and , , “ ”, Pastoral Care in Education ( ( )), – . .)| false , A.M., LeMasters, G.K., Lockey, J., Succop, P., Deddens, J., Sobeih, T. and Dunning, K., “An epidemiological appraisal instrument – a tool for evaluation of epidemiological studies”, 2007 (50(6)), 920960. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130701237667.

, , , , , , , , , , , and , , “ ”, Ergonomics ( ( )), – . .)| false , T., Robert, G., MacFarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O. and Peacock, R., “Storylines of research in diffusion in innovation: A meta-narrative approach to systematic review”, 2005 (61) 417430.

, , , , , , , , , and , , “ ”, Social Science and Medicine ( ) – .)| false , D., “Weight of Evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence”, (22(2), 213228. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296189

, , “ ”, Research Papers in Education 2007 ( ( ), – . : )| false , D., Oliver, S. and Thomas, J, “Learning From Research: Systematic Reviews for Informing Policy Decisions. A Quick Guide”, 2013: .

, , , and , , “ ”, : .)| false , D. and Thomas, J, “Commonality and Diversity in Reviews” in D. Gough, S. Oliver and J. Thomas (eds.), (2nd edn.) (London: Sage, 2017).

, and , , “ ” in

, and (eds.), An Introduction to Systematic Reviews ( ) (

London:

Sage, ).)| false , T., “The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child--And How to Make It Work”, 1990 (12(1)), 97105. https://doi.org/10.2307/762167.

, , “ ”, Human Rights Quarterly ( ( )), – . .)| false , K. and Lundy, L., “Does Exactly What it Says on the Tin? A Critical Analysis and Alternative Conceptualisation of the So-called “General Principles” of the Convention on the Rights of the Child”, 2017 (25) 285306. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02502011.

, and , , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ) – . .)| false , E. and Yel, S., “Which Perceptions Do We Have Related to Our Rights as Child? Child Rights from the Perspective of Primary School Students”, 2017 (6(3)), 340349. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n3p340.

, and , , “ ”, Journal of Education and Learning ( ( )), – . .)| false , K., Granlund, M., Bornman, J. and Lygnegård, F., “Human rights of children with intellectual disabilities: Comparing self-ratings and proxy ratings”, 2015 (41(6)), 10101017. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12244.

, , , , , and , , “ ”, Child: Care, Health and Development ( ( )), – . .)| false , M. and Ben-Arieh, A., “School climate and children’s views of their rights: A multi-cultural perspective among Jewish and Arab adolescents”, 2009 (31(1)), 97103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.06.002.

, and , , “ ”, Children and Youth Services Review ( ( )), – . .)| false , H. and Ben-Arieh, A., “What children think about their rights and their well-being: A cross-national comparison”, 2017 (87(3)), 256273. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000222.

, and , , “ ”, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry ( ( )), – . .)| false , C.E. and Woods, K., “The representation of the management of behavioural difficulties in ep practice”, 2018 (34(4)), 352369. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2018.1466269.

, and , , “ practice”, Educational Psychology in Practice ( ( )), – . .)| false , Y. and Krappman, L., “Status of Child Rights in the International Community”, in B.K. Nastasi, S.N. Hart and S.C Naser (eds.), (Cham: Springer, 2020).

, and , , “ ”, in

, and (eds.), International Handbook on Child Rights and School Psychology (

Cham:

Springer, ).)| false , L., “‘Voice’ is not enough: conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child”, 2007 (33(6)), 927942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033.

, , “ ”, British Educational Research Journal ( ( )), – . .)| false , L., Welty, E., Blue Swadener, B., Blanchet Cohen, N., Smith, K. and Devine, D., “What if children had been involved in drafting the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child?”, in A. Diduck, N. Peleg and H. Reece (eds.), (Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff, 2015).

, , , , , , , , , and , , “ ”, in

, and (eds.), Law in Society: Reflections on Children, Families, Culture and Philosophy: Essays in Honour Michael Freeman (

Leiden, the Netherlands:

Brill Nijhoff, ).)| false , E., Calheiros, M. M. and Antunes, C., “‘I always say what I think’: a rights-based approach of young people’s psychosocial functioning in residential care”, 2018 (351), 123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9511-6

, , , and , , “ ”, Child Indicators Research ( ), – . : )| false , A., “A theory of human motivation”, 1943 (50(4)), 370396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346.

, , “ ”, Psychological Review ( ( )), – . .)| false , G.B., “Children’s concepts of their rights”, 1980 (9(3)), 186190. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374418009532985.

, , “ ”, Journal of Clinical Child Psychology ( ( )), – . .)| false , G.B. and Limber, S.P., “What Children’s Rights Mean to Children: Children’s Own Views”, in M. Freeman and P. Veerman (eds.), (Dordrect: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1992), 167187.

, and , , “ ”, in

and (eds.), The Ideologies of Children’s Rights (

Dordrect:

Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, ), – .)| false , V., “We Are People Too: Children’s and Young People’s Perspectives on Children’s Rights and Decision-Making in England”, 1999 (1(1)), 35. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000109.

, , “ ”, Child Development ( ( )), – . .)| false , L. and Pillay, J., “A South African Perspective of Grade 9 Learners’ Experiences of Children’s Rights”, 2018 (26) 278294. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02602003.

, and , , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ) – . .)| false , M. and Ruck, M., “Studying Children’s Perspectives on Self-Determination and Nurturance Rights: Issues and Challenges”, , 2008 (64), 749769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00587.x.

, and , , “ ”, Journal of Social Issues, ( ), – . .)| false , A., “Children, but not really humans? Critical reflections on the hampering effect of the ‘3 p’s’”, 2010 (18(4)), 619635. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181810X490384.

, , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ( )), – . .)| false , A., “Children ’s Human Rights at School – As Formulated by Children”, 2016 (24), 657677. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02403004.

, , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ), – . .)| false , A. and Moody, Z., “Educational Children’s Rights Research 1989–2019: Achievements, Gaps and Future Prospects”, 2020 (28(1)), 183208. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02801003.

, and , , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ( )), – . .)| false , M.D., Peterson-Badali, M. and Hedwig, C.C., “Handbook of Child Well-Being: Theories, Methods and Policies in Global Perspective”, in A. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frønes and J.E. Korbin (eds.), (New York: Springer, 2014), 13258. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8.

, , , and , , “ ”, in

, , and (eds.), Handbook of Child Well-Being: Theories, Methods and Policies in Global Perspective (

New York:

Springer, ), – . .)| false , J. and Gillett-Swan, J.K., “Empowering the disempowered through voice-inclusive practice: Children’s views on adult-centric educational provision”, 2015 (14(2)), 177191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115571800.

, and , , “ ”, European Educational Research Journal ( ( )), – . .)| false , “The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child”, n.d.-a: . Accessed 13 August 2019).

, “ ”, : . Accessed 13 August 2019).)| false , “UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (uncrc): An international agreement for child rights”, n.d.-b: . Accessed 13 August 2019.

, “ ): An international agreement for child rights”, : . Accessed 1 .)| false , H. and Lundy, L., “The Field of Children’s Rights: Taking Stock, Travelling Forward”, 2020 (28(1)), 113. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02801010.

, and , , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ( )), – . .)| false , N., Smith, A. and Nairn, K., “Rights Important to Young People: Secondary Student and Staff Perspectives”, 2001(9), 137156. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000109.

, , , and , , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ), – . .)| false , “Initiatives by partners to celebrate crc30”, n.d.: . Accessed 13 August 2019.

, “ 30”, : . Accessed 1 .)| false , “The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child A Guide for Children and Young People”, 2008: .

, “ ”, : .)| false , N., “Children’s rights: policy into practice”, 2011: .

, , “ ”, : .)| false , “UN Convention on the Rights of the Child In Child Friendly Language”, n.d.-a: .

, “ ”, : .)| false , “Convention on the Rights of the Child: Frequently asked questions”, 2005: . Accessed 19 May 2018.

, “ ”, : . Accessed 1 .)| false , “Children’s well-being from their own point of view”, 2012: .

, “ ”, : .)| false , “Child Rights Partners Putting Children’s Rights at the Hear t of Public Services”, 2014: .

, “ ”, : .)| false , “The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child”, 1989: . Accessesd 13 January 2018.

, “ ”, : . Accessesd .)| false , “General Comment No. 5 (2003): General measures of implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (arts. 4, 42 and 44, para. 6)”, 2003: . Accessed 6 August 2020.

, “ ”, : . Accessed .)| false , M. and Wray, A., (2nd edn.) (London: SAGE, 2011).

, and , , Critical Reading and Writing for Postgraduates ( ) (

London:

SAGE, ).)| false , N., “Barriers and solutions to using children’s rights approaches in policy”, 2017: .

, , “ ”, : .)| false , T. and Woods, K., “The Contribution of Assistant Psychologists in the UK”, 2019 (5(1)), 112.

, and , , “ ”, Educational Psychology Research and Practice ( ( )), – .)| false , K. and Bond, C., “Linking regulation of practitioner school psychology and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: The need to build a bridge”, 2014 (35(1)), 6784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034313508878.

, and , , “ ”, School Psychology International ( ( )), – . .)| false , D., “Felt tip pens and school councils: Children’s participation rights in four English schools”, 2001 (15(4)), 209218. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.651.

, , “ ”, Children and Society ( ( )), – . .)| false Lo, Yan Wing Leung and Wai Wa Yuen, “Exploring school ethos: an investigation of children’s human rights in two secondary institutions in Hong Kong”, 2015 (26(3)), 192209. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2015.1048078.

, and , “ ”, Intercultural Education ( ( )), – . .)| false

Experts working within the field of children’s rights, from the areas of critical psychology, school psychology, social care and law, and identified by specialist academics working at The University of Manchester, were consulted by email and/or telephone conversation to support identification of relevant studies.

; ; ; , , P.-K. and Haanpää, L., “A Comparative Study on Children’s Rights Awareness in 16 Countries”, 2018 (11(5)), 14251443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9508-1.

, and , , “ ”, Child Indicators Research ( ( )), – . .)| false , P., “School students’ views on school councils and daily life at school”, , 2000 (14), 121134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2000.tb00160.x.

, , “ ”, Children & Society, ( ), – . : .)| false , D.L. and Graham, A.P., “Improving student wellbeing: having a say at school”, 2016 (27(3)), 348366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1084336.

, and , , “ ”, School Effectiveness and School Improvement ( ( )), – . .)| false , C., Woods, K., Humphrey, N., Symes, W. and Green, L., “Practitioner review: The effectiveness of solution focused brief therapy with children and families: a systematic and critical evaluation of the literature from 1990–2010”, 2013 (54(7)), 707723. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12058.

, , , , , , , and , , “ ”, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines ( ( )), – . .)| false , L. and Quennerstedt, A., “Teaching and learning children’s human rights: A research synthesis”, 2016 (3(1)), 119. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1247610.

, and , , “ ”, Cogent Education ( ( )), – . .)| false , B. and Lundy, L., “Children’s rights-based childhood policy: A six-P framework”, 2019 (23(3)), 357373. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2018.1558977.

, and , , “ ”, International Journal of Human Rights ( ( )), – . .)| false , “Every Child Matters: Aims and Outcomes”, 2004: . Accessed 2 October 2020.

, “ ”, : . Accessed .)| false , A., “Does teaching children about human rights, encourage them to practice, protect and promote the rights of others?”, 2018 (46(1)), 1626. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2016.1165717.

, , “ ”, Education 3-13 ( ( )), – . .)| false , A.J., “Applying critical realism in qualitative research: methodology meets method.”, 2017 (20(2)), 181194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401.

, , “ ”, International Journal of Social Research Methodology ( ( )), – . .)| false , D. and Woods, K., “What does research tell high school teachers about student motivation for test performance?”, 2018 (36(2)), 112125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2018.1453858.

, and , , “ ”, Pastoral Care in Education ( ( )), – . .)| false , A.M., LeMasters, G.K., Lockey, J., Succop, P., Deddens, J., Sobeih, T. and Dunning, K., “An epidemiological appraisal instrument – a tool for evaluation of epidemiological studies”, 2007 (50(6)), 920960. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130701237667.

, , , , , , , , , , , and , , “ ”, Ergonomics ( ( )), – . .)| false , T., Robert, G., MacFarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O. and Peacock, R., “Storylines of research in diffusion in innovation: A meta-narrative approach to systematic review”, 2005 (61) 417430.

, , , , , , , , , and , , “ ”, Social Science and Medicine ( ) – .)| false , D., “Weight of Evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence”, (22(2), 213228. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296189

, , “ ”, Research Papers in Education 2007 ( ( ), – . : )| false , D., Oliver, S. and Thomas, J, “Learning From Research: Systematic Reviews for Informing Policy Decisions. A Quick Guide”, 2013: .

, , , and , , “ ”, : .)| false , D. and Thomas, J, “Commonality and Diversity in Reviews” in D. Gough, S. Oliver and J. Thomas (eds.), (2nd edn.) (London: Sage, 2017).

, and , , “ ” in

, and (eds.), An Introduction to Systematic Reviews ( ) (

London:

Sage, ).)| false , T., “The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child--And How to Make It Work”, 1990 (12(1)), 97105. https://doi.org/10.2307/762167.

, , “ ”, Human Rights Quarterly ( ( )), – . .)| false , K. and Lundy, L., “Does Exactly What it Says on the Tin? A Critical Analysis and Alternative Conceptualisation of the So-called “General Principles” of the Convention on the Rights of the Child”, 2017 (25) 285306. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02502011.

, and , , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ) – . .)| false , E. and Yel, S., “Which Perceptions Do We Have Related to Our Rights as Child? Child Rights from the Perspective of Primary School Students”, 2017 (6(3)), 340349. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n3p340.

, and , , “ ”, Journal of Education and Learning ( ( )), – . .)| false , K., Granlund, M., Bornman, J. and Lygnegård, F., “Human rights of children with intellectual disabilities: Comparing self-ratings and proxy ratings”, 2015 (41(6)), 10101017. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12244.

, , , , , and , , “ ”, Child: Care, Health and Development ( ( )), – . .)| false , M. and Ben-Arieh, A., “School climate and children’s views of their rights: A multi-cultural perspective among Jewish and Arab adolescents”, 2009 (31(1)), 97103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.06.002.

, and , , “ ”, Children and Youth Services Review ( ( )), – . .)| false , H. and Ben-Arieh, A., “What children think about their rights and their well-being: A cross-national comparison”, 2017 (87(3)), 256273. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000222.

, and , , “ ”, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry ( ( )), – . .)| false , C.E. and Woods, K., “The representation of the management of behavioural difficulties in ep practice”, 2018 (34(4)), 352369. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2018.1466269.

, and , , “ practice”, Educational Psychology in Practice ( ( )), – . .)| false , Y. and Krappman, L., “Status of Child Rights in the International Community”, in B.K. Nastasi, S.N. Hart and S.C Naser (eds.), (Cham: Springer, 2020).

, and , , “ ”, in

, and (eds.), International Handbook on Child Rights and School Psychology (

Cham:

Springer, ).)| false , L., “‘Voice’ is not enough: conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child”, 2007 (33(6)), 927942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033.

, , “ ”, British Educational Research Journal ( ( )), – . .)| false , L., Welty, E., Blue Swadener, B., Blanchet Cohen, N., Smith, K. and Devine, D., “What if children had been involved in drafting the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child?”, in A. Diduck, N. Peleg and H. Reece (eds.), (Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff, 2015).

, , , , , , , , , and , , “ ”, in

, and (eds.), Law in Society: Reflections on Children, Families, Culture and Philosophy: Essays in Honour Michael Freeman (

Leiden, the Netherlands:

Brill Nijhoff, ).)| false , E., Calheiros, M. M. and Antunes, C., “‘I always say what I think’: a rights-based approach of young people’s psychosocial functioning in residential care”, 2018 (351), 123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9511-6

, , , and , , “ ”, Child Indicators Research ( ), – . : )| false , A., “A theory of human motivation”, 1943 (50(4)), 370396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346.

, , “ ”, Psychological Review ( ( )), – . .)| false , G.B., “Children’s concepts of their rights”, 1980 (9(3)), 186190. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374418009532985.

, , “ ”, Journal of Clinical Child Psychology ( ( )), – . .)| false , G.B. and Limber, S.P., “What Children’s Rights Mean to Children: Children’s Own Views”, in M. Freeman and P. Veerman (eds.), (Dordrect: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1992), 167187.

, and , , “ ”, in

and (eds.), The Ideologies of Children’s Rights (

Dordrect:

Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, ), – .)| false , V., “We Are People Too: Children’s and Young People’s Perspectives on Children’s Rights and Decision-Making in England”, 1999 (1(1)), 35. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000109.

, , “ ”, Child Development ( ( )), – . .)| false , L. and Pillay, J., “A South African Perspective of Grade 9 Learners’ Experiences of Children’s Rights”, 2018 (26) 278294. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02602003.

, and , , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ) – . .)| false , M. and Ruck, M., “Studying Children’s Perspectives on Self-Determination and Nurturance Rights: Issues and Challenges”, , 2008 (64), 749769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00587.x.

, and , , “ ”, Journal of Social Issues, ( ), – . .)| false , A., “Children, but not really humans? Critical reflections on the hampering effect of the ‘3 p’s’”, 2010 (18(4)), 619635. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181810X490384.

, , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ( )), – . .)| false , A., “Children ’s Human Rights at School – As Formulated by Children”, 2016 (24), 657677. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02403004.

, , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ), – . .)| false , A. and Moody, Z., “Educational Children’s Rights Research 1989–2019: Achievements, Gaps and Future Prospects”, 2020 (28(1)), 183208. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02801003.

, and , , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ( )), – . .)| false , M.D., Peterson-Badali, M. and Hedwig, C.C., “Handbook of Child Well-Being: Theories, Methods and Policies in Global Perspective”, in A. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frønes and J.E. Korbin (eds.), (New York: Springer, 2014), 13258. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8.

, , , and , , “ ”, in

, , and (eds.), Handbook of Child Well-Being: Theories, Methods and Policies in Global Perspective (

New York:

Springer, ), – . .)| false , J. and Gillett-Swan, J.K., “Empowering the disempowered through voice-inclusive practice: Children’s views on adult-centric educational provision”, 2015 (14(2)), 177191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115571800.

, and , , “ ”, European Educational Research Journal ( ( )), – . .)| false , “The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child”, n.d.-a: . Accessed 13 August 2019).

, “ ”, : . Accessed 13 August 2019).)| false , “UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (uncrc): An international agreement for child rights”, n.d.-b: . Accessed 13 August 2019.

, “ ): An international agreement for child rights”, : . Accessed 1 .)| false , H. and Lundy, L., “The Field of Children’s Rights: Taking Stock, Travelling Forward”, 2020 (28(1)), 113. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02801010.

, and , , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ( )), – . .)| false , N., Smith, A. and Nairn, K., “Rights Important to Young People: Secondary Student and Staff Perspectives”, 2001(9), 137156. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000109.

, , , and , , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ), – . .)| false , “Initiatives by partners to celebrate crc30”, n.d.: . Accessed 13 August 2019.

, “ 30”, : . Accessed 1 .)| false , “The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child A Guide for Children and Young People”, 2008: .

, “ ”, : .)| false , N., “Children’s rights: policy into practice”, 2011: .

, , “ ”, : .)| false , “UN Convention on the Rights of the Child In Child Friendly Language”, n.d.-a: .

, “ ”, : .)| false , “Convention on the Rights of the Child: Frequently asked questions”, 2005: . Accessed 19 May 2018.

, “ ”, : . Accessed 1 .)| false , “Children’s well-being from their own point of view”, 2012: .

, “ ”, : .)| false , “Child Rights Partners Putting Children’s Rights at the Hear t of Public Services”, 2014: .

, “ ”, : .)| false , “The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child”, 1989: . Accessesd 13 January 2018.

, “ ”, : . Accessesd .)| false , “General Comment No. 5 (2003): General measures of implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (arts. 4, 42 and 44, para. 6)”, 2003: . Accessed 6 August 2020.

, “ ”, : . Accessed .)| false , M. and Wray, A., (2nd edn.) (London: SAGE, 2011).

, and , , Critical Reading and Writing for Postgraduates ( ) (

London:

SAGE, ).)| false , N., “Barriers and solutions to using children’s rights approaches in policy”, 2017: .

, , “ ”, : .)| false , T. and Woods, K., “The Contribution of Assistant Psychologists in the UK”, 2019 (5(1)), 112.

, and , , “ ”, Educational Psychology Research and Practice ( ( )), – .)| false , K. and Bond, C., “Linking regulation of practitioner school psychology and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: The need to build a bridge”, 2014 (35(1)), 6784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034313508878.

, and , , “ ”, School Psychology International ( ( )), – . .)| false , D., “Felt tip pens and school councils: Children’s participation rights in four English schools”, 2001 (15(4)), 209218. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.651.

, , “ ”, Children and Society ( ( )), – . .)| false Lo, Yan Wing Leung and Wai Wa Yuen, “Exploring school ethos: an investigation of children’s human rights in two secondary institutions in Hong Kong”, 2015 (26(3)), 192209. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2015.1048078.

, and , “ ”, Intercultural Education ( ( )), – . .)| false -->

Summary of data analysis and synthesis

-->

Thematic network

-->

A progressions to children’s rights realisation

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days Abstract Views 0 0 0 Full Text Views 9961 3304 212 PDF Views & Downloads 15010 4530 331

Summary of data analysis and synthesis

Citation: The International Journal of Children's Rights 29, 4 (2021) ;

The nine studies included four qualitative investigations and one qualitative evaluation, three quantitative investigations and one mixed methods investigation (see , above). Each study accessed the views of children about their rights at a general level, was peer-reviewed and published between 2009 and 2019. Three studies used a focus group, two studies used a survey (based on the same survey, the International Survey of Children’s Well-Being (ISCWeB)), four used a questionnaire (including one focused on one open-ended question as part of a larger questionnaire), one used interviews, one included a written composition and one used a participatory research method. The studies come from a range of countries; the two using the ISCWeB data utilise data from 16 countries. The other studies each focused on one country.

Whilst each study focused on children’s rights at a general level, the contexts were different. Most collected data through schools, and one collected data in residential care settings. The foci of the studies included:

psychosocial functioning; a human rights friendly ethos in school; perceptions of rights including in relation to participation and subjective well-being and across different countries, age groups and gender; experiences of rights; what human rights means to children in educational settings; contribution of school climate to views of rights; perspectives of rights; awareness and knowledge of rights and perceptions of the respect these are given across different countries, gender and social contexts; perspectives of rights when attending a Rights Respecting School.

The synthesised findings have been grouped into themes, which are presented in a thematic network (see ). Themes 4.1–4.6 are main themes, directly addressing the research question. 4.7 is a secondary theme which emerged from the process of analysis as an integral consideration alongside children’s views and the role of context.

Thematic network

Citation: The International Journal of Children's Rights 29, 4 (2021) ;

Three studies quantified children’s reported awareness of their rights. Where percentage descriptions are used, it may be useful to consider that the actual numbers of children vary greatly across the studies (see ). found 92 per cent of children in South Africa indicated they have rights. However, children also indicated that parents and teachers did not know about rights and some children also linked this lack of knowledge and awareness to their rights being violated. Children identified other children’s misunderstanding of their rights, giving examples such as children claiming their own rights when they wanted to use them as a defence/protection for when they were not upholding the rights of others. In contrast, found 52 per cent of children reported knowing about children’s rights. When looking specifically for awareness of the uncrc, 37 per cent reported knowing about this, with clear variation by country. found 45 per cent of children reported knowing what rights children had, reducing to 32 per cent reporting knowing about the crc. In England, the results were lower: found approximately one quarter of pupils surveyed knew about the uncrc (27 per cent), whilst found this to be approximately one fifth (21 per cent) of pupils in the UK as a whole. Exploring perspectives of rights with children who attended a Rights Respecting School, found children who had this rights-based experience showed an awareness and understanding of themselves as right-holders and that all human beings are rights-holders. The suggestion from the studies overall is that awareness and learning about children’s rights, through schools at least, was not consistently embedded practice; it is also unclear, in some of these studies, what level of detailed conceptualisation of rights children have.

In Yan Lam (2015), the questionnaire used the term “rights” and “crc” for some items, apparently assuming pupils would have enough rights awareness to understand these, although they also identify that, ‘Traditional schools [like one of the schools in the study] in Hong Kong tend to overemphasize students’ responsibilities and avoid mentioning their rights in order to make students obedient and compliant to school rules (Yan Lam , 2015: 196). From the quotes included in the qualitative part of this study, pupils (or teachers) do not use the vocabulary of “rights” apart from one example: ‘Many schools claim that they give students freedom, but actually the freedom they offer you does not give you a right to voice, and you can’t express your opinions about the inadequacies of school to your teachers’ (Yan Lam , 2015: 206).

For some parts of her research, intentionally moved away from the language of rights, identifying that ‘many children’ were ‘unfamiliar’ with it, and that by talking to children without using the term, children would be better able to explain their own ideas about these. In this case, children’s ideas were then linked to a human rights framework.

These results give a varied picture of children’s awareness of rights, with variation suggested by country, identifying that the mandate of Article 42 to work to ensure that the uncrc and its principles are known about by adults and children is some way from full realisation.

found 40 per cent of learners indicated the importance of rights and found children wanted to continue to support the rights of all children in the school, and they identified learning about rights as improving relationships (and behaviour), indicating the value of rights to cyp. found children identifying their right to learn their rights (and to defend them) to be the third most commonly occurring category in their study, suggesting children recognised this to be valuable, and that even without rights education they recognised they were not accessing rights or having rights promoted (in school) despite their importance. Studies in this review varied as to whether they focused explicitly on the value and importance of rights. Sometimes this is drawn out and inferred from the perceived impact of having rights fulfilled or not, and the authors recognise the link between these themes. In the studies where importance of rights and children’s attitudes towards them was a focus, cyp appeared to have a positive attitude towards rights when these were perceived as being upheld

Several studies gathered views about the impact of rights being fulfilled, or not. found that children support children’s rights more strongly when they describe their school and teachers as being open to their criticism. Arguably, this may suggest that children perceive openness to criticism as indicative of more evenly balanced power relationships, and within that context feel that their rights are more evident and tangible. (The present authors offer this particular nuanced interpretation transparently, allowing, and indeed encouraging, other readers to consider alternative possible interpretations.)

Linked to this, is that Kosher and Ben-Arieh found that children who felt their rights were more respected appeared more satisfied, leading to an identified association between children’s views on their rights, their participation, and their subjective well-being ( ). One of the findings by (2015) was that pupils’ views did not match exactly with teachers’ views, and the level of disagreement between teachers and pupils was more significant when the school environment was less supportive of human rights. This may suggest that higher levels of support for children’s rights may encourage more shared perspectives between children and adults, and further indicates the importance of accessing children’s views about this. Magelhaus’ ( ) findings identified children’s views that compromising some rights impacted (negatively) on their psychosocial functioning, resulting in internalising and externalising problems such as feelings of sadness, loneliness and emotional insecurity, and physical and verbal aggression. In this study, the cyp were children living in residential care settings and Magelhaus emphasised the importance of recognising the influence of social context for all children.

Some children’s quotes in study indicate not only that some children view being happy as a right, but also that only by fulfilling the rights they identify will children be happy. For example, one child’s response is that, ‘As children, we have the right to play comfortably and as much as we want. We can be happy only this way. All the children have the right to be happy and cheerful’ ( : 347).

In study, children identified learning about rights (in combination with accessing a rights-respecting school environment) had a positive effect on improving relationships and behaviour. Dunhill also described children who have accessed this as ‘rights holders but also upholders of rights’ ( : 24), recognising this rights education and environment as preparing children for their experiences beyond school, as global citizens.

Across differing contexts and , then, it appears that children identify the positive impact of accessing their rights, and the necessity of this, so as to be able to share their views and for their increased well-being, including in their relationships with others.

Children’s views show their awareness of others, including adults, needing to know, understand and support both their own and other children’s rights. found 59 per cent of children felt their rights were respected by adults, and found 52 per cent of children overall thought adults in their country respected their rights. The authors identified variation by country, from 35 per cent to 83 per cent, and by age, with younger children more likely to feel adults respected their rights.

found 64 per cent of children felt many people did not know and understand these and this led to a violation of their rights. Additionally, 45 per cent of children identified the need to report violations of their rights, although it was unclear whether children had tried to do so and/or what the impact of this was/was felt to be. Notably, , (2015) found there were criticisms made by pupils who felt their rights were not being realised, indicating the value they place on this access. found children recognised (other) children’s rights were not always upheld; the examples given are about children living in other parts of the world so it is unclear whether children have an understanding of, for example, experiences of children who may live nearby, in the same community, but attend a school without a focus on being rights-respecting.

Several studies explored children’s concepts of rights, and rights they identified or claimed, and found some rights occurred more frequently. found cyp in residential care to feel psychosocial functioning was affected when particular rights were compromised; private life, perceived social image, non-discrimination, and respect for themselves and their families. Within Harakat and Yel’s categories of rights, there were certain rights codes identified with more frequency than others ( ). The codes with a frequency of 40 or over came mainly from their “basic needs and developmental period needs” category and are ‘to play’ (77), ‘to be respected’ (72), ‘to be loved and cared for’ (55) and ‘to be happy and cheerful’ (40), and also, from their “legal assurances” category: ‘to learn their rights and defend these when necessary’ (66) and ‘to attend school and to get an education’ (41). Similarly, identified the rights which she described as ‘strongly claimed’ by the children in her study. She framed these within the “vocabulary of human rights” and they come mainly under the civil rights category, and included ‘not being hit’, ‘not being shouted at’, ‘being valued and treated as others’, ‘not being hurt with words’, with one strongly claimed socio-economic right, which was ‘to go to school and learn’.

Several studies classified identified rights and did so in different ways. Two ( ; ) used the uncrc within their relative ISCWeB survey data; in addition to finding out whether children knew about the uncrc, they found out whether children felt they knew “what rights children have”. explored children’s concepts of rights within the context of the uncrc and its Articles, and described “misconceptions” where children’s views did not align with this framework. wanted to access children’s views without the constraints of a framework and removed the language of “rights” entirely for some parts of the research and where the term “rights” was used, her preferred framework was of one of human (as opposed to children’s) rights, split into categories of civil rights, political rights and socio-economic rights. When qualitative data was gained without boundaries imposed by frameworks, some studies found children to identify rights not directly included within the uncrc. identified a category within her data, of “rights that go beyond hr [human rights] categorisation”. These were: “teachers who care and support”, “feel safe”, and “play and have fun”. Linked to this, fourth most frequent code (frequency of 55) was “to be loved and cared for” and “to be happy and cheerful” (40) was also frequently occurring ( ). found children also identified positive and supportive relationships as protective factors for their psychological functioning, and this appears to link to the [teachers who] “care and support” category of .

pointed to some rights identified by children as equally interpretable as responsibilities: in one example, a child linked their right to do tests and study to their aspiration of being successful in lessons and exams (which in turn they may have identified as supporting rights such as education).

Whilst some of these rights, from each of the studies, can map on to the uncrc, they do not represent all rights and some do not map directly on to this framework at all. These are rights which included emotional and relational aspects and how children feel, e.g. safe, not only being safe.

The studies in this review investigated and evaluated a range of factors which may impact on children’s views of their rights.

found younger children to report less knowledge and awareness of children’s rights, yet this group also displayed higher levels of agreement that adults respected their rights. These researchers argued this was due to the poorer understanding (of the concepts of children’s rights) of the youngest children, although no significant age differences were found relating to children’s views on their participation.

Significant gender differences were not consistently found. found minor differences, with a small number of countries identified where gender did appear to affect children’s views. , however, found female adolescents were more likely than males to support most of the children’s rights measures examined, with the exception of rights within the public/governmental context and that this was the case for both nationality groups in their sample. identified gender differences in psychological outcomes; with more males reported externalising behaviours when rights were not fulfilled.

identified cross-national differences in children’s knowledge and perceptions of their rights and their views about their participation. They linked this to the cultural model of rights; that children’s knowledge and views of their rights are constrained by their experiences of these ( , 2014), and identified that it can be argued children’s views appear to be shaped in a “specific cultural, national, and political environment” ( : 267). identified high levels of variation by country for each of the questions children answered about their rights and linked this to children’s lived experiences. Similarly, identified differences in views linked to cultural background, specifically that overall Jewish children were more supportive of children’s rights compared to Arab peers including in a personal context, and Arab adolescents more strongly supported rights within a public/governmental context.

Yan Lam (2015) found a rights-respecting school ethos was related to a greater agreement between teachers and pupils with school mission, structure for enforcing discipline, structure for the appeal of rights, structure for student participation and attitudes of teachers recognised as relevant factors; the more rights-respecting ethos also had higher mean outcomes for these areas. Similarly, identified the role of school climate, with their link between schools and teachers being open to criticism and the increase in cyp support for children’s rights. af-Ursin and Haanpää ( ) also identified school climate as a factor that impacted on children’s views of rights. One study, ( ) focused on children’s views when they attended a rights-respecting school and concluded this encouraged children to “practice, protect and promote the rights of others within their school” and that they also considered their potential “not only in the school but also in their community and globally” ( : 24).

Relational factors (“perceived social support”) were identified as important by as were “socio-cognitive variables” (perceived benefits or perceived favouritism) in affecting perceptions of cyp ( : 20). Contrastingly, found teacher-student relationships had low correlations with children’s support of children’s rights. In (2015), however, it is difficult to separate out the relational and the school climate/ethos influences; for example, some of the features of the school with the more rights-respecting ethos include gaining views of pupils which may in turn help to build a positive relationship.

In Munongi and Pillay’s study ( ), the impact of social context is also linked to the country in which the study is carried out. 92 per cent of children from South Africa showed an awareness of rights and the authors recognised the country’s “strong history of violation of human rights due to Apartheid…” and government help for “children to be more aware of their rights to promote social justice among its citizens” ( : 288). More generally, af-Ursin and Haanpää ( ) investigated a range of social factors and found those to have the greatest difference on rights outcomes (overall) were level of deprivation and home climate (and they identified school climate in this category, already classified above). They also found, with modest significance, children with immigrant backgrounds felt their rights were more respected by adults than children without immigrant backgrounds, and recognised this as needing further investigation. Similarly, identified the role of family factors, and found that the more children reported their parents listened to them and treated them fairly, the more they were satisfied with their family life and with their life overall.

This review examines children’s views on children’s rights and identifies factors affecting these. Analysis of nine papers revealed the following themes: awareness of rights, value placed on (importance of) rights, impact of having/not having rights fulfilled, realisation and respect of rights, equality of rights, identifying and categorising of rights, and factors that may affect children’s views.

The uncrc sets out to protect and promote children’s rights and yet many children who do not know about this, or about their rights more broadly. For example, in England approximately one quarter of children are aware of the uncrc ( ). Some children identify that many people generally are not children’s rights aware and identify this as a block to their rights being realised ( ). Article 42 ( ) seeks to ensure all duty bearers know about children’s rights; if many children do not know about them, or feel adults know and/or respect them, how can they be truly protected, provided and promoted?

Children appear to value, to want to know and learn their rights, and to feel positive about them; this applies both to children who have received direct rights experience and education and those who have not ( ). Furthermore, when children have accessed a rights-respecting environment they wish to continue to support the rights of all children ( ).

Children identify a negative impact on their psychosocial development when they do not fully access their rights whilst in residential care ( ), a specific focus within the uncrc (Articles 20 and 21 ). Rights-respecting environments can have positive impacts upon adult-pupil relationships (Yan Lam , 2015); furthermore, pupils can use their own views and understanding as rights-holders to consider their own rights and the rights of others ( ).

Children identify some rights, themes and principles with greater frequency than others, including concepts going beyond the legal entitlements and specific provisions of the uncrc. This is not to say that the views they share can or should be easily interpreted in the context of existing rights framework of the uncrc; however, they may provide information to help to consider provisions that support certain outcomes and how these may be operationalised. For example, children identify emotional support and resultant feelings (e.g. of safety), and also of things they do not want (e.g. to be shouted at). Notably, there have been examples of provisions to support children’s feelings of well-being such as in the UK Government “Every Child Matters” ( ), which identified children’s ‘enjoyment and achievement’ as a key outcome area.

Whilst children’s feelings are not the same as children’s rights, when children’s perception is that their rights are not realised, decreased well-being may occur. In the case of the child’s quote from (‘As children, we have the right to play comfortably and as much as we want. We can be happy only this way. All the children have the right to be happy and cheerful’), this thought-provoking interpretation is that of a child, which is explicitly what this review has investigated. By carrying out an open exploration of children’s views and concepts about their rights at a broad level, identification of what happens for children, what may be done to prevent violations of rights, and what helps to support realisation of rights can take place, supporting adult understanding of the purpose and scope of children’s rights, and the associated legal frameworks.

The uncrc details a rights framework across 54 Articles ( ) which may be difficult for younger children to internalise; a clearer focus on the four guiding uncrc “principles” may promote communication and embedding. At the same time, it is acknowledged that the four identified principles may themselves be relatively thinly conceptualised and not well integrated within the broader framework of the uncrc and propose instead a more meaningful and effective development of a set of cross-cutting standards. Nonetheless, reduced specificity within the children’s rights framework may serve to make “space” for children’s views and concepts to be more readily captured, integrated and built upon (cf. ).

This review found that national/cultural factors, social context, age, gender, relationships and school climate may impact on how children view their rights (cf. also , 2001). There were mixed findings, in relation to gender, with some identification of females being generally more supportive of children’s rights ( ), although significant gender differences were not found in all the studies; see for example, .

incorporates the findings presented following hybrid aggregative-configurative synthesis of the papers included in the present review and develops these into a progression of rights realisation. identified that research has not tended to focus on how children may develop into rights bearers, or on which processes may support children in this development. Through synthesis of research utilising children’s views, this way to consider a pathway to rights realisation sets out the need for the existence of children’s rights for children, in their lives and experiences as well as set out in the uncrc. It may be helpful to consider this as a foundation for progression of children’s rights, towards full protection, promotion and provision. This requires adults (and other children) to be able to know and support children’s rights. Alongside this, children need to be safe, and to feel safe, to share their views.

A progressions to children’s rights realisation

Citation: The International Journal of Children's Rights 29, 4 (2021) ;

Children want and need to know about their rights; this may be direct or indirect at an early stage, and dialogue and shared language facilitates this process and the following stages, as they identify as rights holders and increase in their levels of knowledge, understanding, experience and participation. This may enable and empower children to utilise and uphold their rights and then potentially to be able to communicate, shape, develop and build on children’s rights and their provision, protection and promotion. In turn, this may then support further embedding of a strong rights foundation.

As recognised by many children, in order to build the foundation needed for children’s rights to be realised, adults need to know about and uphold them. describe children’s participation as ‘meaningless’ if adults do not hear and respect their views. Programmes taking a child rights-based approach (crba) focus on developing capacities of adults and children ( ), Unicef UK has partnered with local government with the aim of embedding a crba into public services (unicef, ) and professional training and awareness campaigns established in many countries by children’s rights organisations have supported ongoing promotion of the uncrc ( ). This is relevant to support a range of professionals working with children, e.g. teachers, social workers and school nurses, in order to implement children’s rights with increased knowledge and understanding of the uncrc and also children’s views, such as of the importance of supportive adult relationships. Programmes such as the UK’s Rights Respecting Schools Award (rrsa) could increase their emphasis on reaching out to other, as yet non-awarded, schools in order to develop capacity through training, access to parents and community and outreach work with cyp. Increased emphasis at a statutory level may also be a way in which to create a catalyst for adult action and development in this area.

The increased focus on and drive towards greater participation of children in research and in practice has already been identified; further development of this is important, to adhere to the uncrc and its principles, and to continue to increase understanding of how children view children’s rights and empower children to be able to influence and progress children’s rights at a general level.

It may be helpful to identify and develop new ways to focus on rights if current ways do not align with children’s views. For example, some rights are identified by children with a greater frequency than others, and some previous research has used Maslow’s hierarchy ( ) as a way to classify rights; see for example (2015). If children do not view rights as all being equal, it is important to find out when and why this may be and what happens to children’s views about this as realisation of their rights progresses. It is also through participation and progression through the levels identified in (above) that rights identified by children which are outside the framework of the uncrc can be understood and responded to.

The negative impact of psychosocial functioning when some rights are compromised ( ) suggests that working to support the upholding of rights may play an important role in meeting needs, supporting social, emotional and mental health and acting as a protective benefit. Educational psychologists are well-placed to support schools and families through provision of information about children’s rights and supporting schools to provide, promote and protect these, and to gain the views of pupils better to understand how this may be of maximum utility in order to lead to rights realisation.

Following a rigorous and comprehensive process and framework for critical appraisal, seven of the nine included studies were rated as having high methodological quality, with the other two being medium and low respectively. As such, research in this area is generally strong, albeit there is a somewhat unco-ordinated variety of foci and contexts, and not much evidence of a programme of research relating to the focus of this review. Future research could help to embed a more consistent approach in investigating not only specific provisions of the uncrc, but also children’s views on rights more generally. If this happened with greater frequency, it may be easier to see patterns and differences whilst also acknowledging the importance of social context.

The importance of reviewing what research informs us about children’s views of children’s rights is identified, and it would be useful to develop understanding of the identified themes; for example, whether it is helpful to introduce children’s rights to children and adults who are unfamiliar with them through a focus on the four guiding principles to support awareness and understanding.

Further research may also support the development of participation, as it is through further investigating the views of children, and continuing to access views at a general level, that greater understanding will be gained. For example, how do children find it most useful and relevant to view their rights, and how may this change as progression is made towards rights realisation. This could include using a longitudinal approach, including what happens following input and exposure to a rights-respecting environment and how development may be sustained and transferred to new contexts. The model of progression identified in this review suggests that as children move towards rights realisation, they may become more able to impact positively on the rights of others and on children’s rights more generally.

In the interests of accessibility to professional practice and policy makers/influencers, the researchers adopted a critical realist approach in conceptualising and structuring this review, which privileged comprehensive empirical reports of primary research demonstrating adherence to a comprehensive range of quality criteria ( ; ). It is acknowledged that a more interpretive approach to conceptualising and structuring the review (e.g. a meta-narrative synthesis) might have led to the inclusion of other studies integrating primary and/or secondary data in conjunction with relevant rigorous argumentation ( , 2005).

Furthermore, within the terms of this review, other limitations should be considered. Though clear inclusion criteria were used, the nuanced nature of identifying papers is acknowledged. Furthermore, the search terms contain possible omissions such as using “young people” but not “young person”. Whilst the authors decided not to include terms such as “participation” and “voice” based on earlier scoping exercises, it is acknowledged that this may have resulted in some research relevant to the current review being missed, and also that the included studies mainly gathered research in school contexts.

The process of analysing and synthesising the data was primarily led by the first author and it is recognised that, as a hybrid aggregative-configurative synthesis, albeit with reference to the uncrc as a framework, this may necessarily incorporate a degree of subjectivity or “bias”. The authors have endeavoured to be clear in the presentation and discussion of findings that the interpretations presented are those of the authors, allowing and indeed welcoming other readers the opportunity to consider alternative interpretations and thereby advance debate.

This research aimed to access children’s views about their thinking about rights at a “meta” level. However, this perhaps necessarily increases the likelihood that children’s interpretations of what they were asked about was different, depending on context, experience, and the framework and methods used, which varied across the included studies. The papers selected provide a snapshot of some children’s views over the last ten years and the resulting synthesis presents a broad picture over a variety of contexts. Whilst variation by context is acknowledged, it is also relevant and useful to note the consistency and strong thread of many identified themes.

, P.-K. and Haanpää, L., “A Comparative Study on Children’s Rights Awareness in 16 Countries”, 2018 (11(5)), 14251443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9508-1.

, and , , “ ”, Child Indicators Research ( ( )), – . .)| false , P., “School students’ views on school councils and daily life at school”, , 2000 (14), 121134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2000.tb00160.x.

, , “ ”, Children & Society, ( ), – . : .)| false , D.L. and Graham, A.P., “Improving student wellbeing: having a say at school”, 2016 (27(3)), 348366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1084336.

, and , , “ ”, School Effectiveness and School Improvement ( ( )), – . .)| false , C., Woods, K., Humphrey, N., Symes, W. and Green, L., “Practitioner review: The effectiveness of solution focused brief therapy with children and families: a systematic and critical evaluation of the literature from 1990–2010”, 2013 (54(7)), 707723. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12058.

, , , , , , , and , , “ ”, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines ( ( )), – . .)| false , L. and Quennerstedt, A., “Teaching and learning children’s human rights: A research synthesis”, 2016 (3(1)), 119. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1247610.

, and , , “ ”, Cogent Education ( ( )), – . .)| false , B. and Lundy, L., “Children’s rights-based childhood policy: A six-P framework”, 2019 (23(3)), 357373. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2018.1558977.

, and , , “ ”, International Journal of Human Rights ( ( )), – . .)| false , “Every Child Matters: Aims and Outcomes”, 2004: . Accessed 2 October 2020.

, “ ”, : . Accessed .)| false , A., “Does teaching children about human rights, encourage them to practice, protect and promote the rights of others?”, 2018 (46(1)), 1626. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2016.1165717.

, , “ ”, Education 3-13 ( ( )), – . .)| false , A.J., “Applying critical realism in qualitative research: methodology meets method.”, 2017 (20(2)), 181194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401.

, , “ ”, International Journal of Social Research Methodology ( ( )), – . .)| false , D. and Woods, K., “What does research tell high school teachers about student motivation for test performance?”, 2018 (36(2)), 112125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2018.1453858.

, and , , “ ”, Pastoral Care in Education ( ( )), – . .)| false , A.M., LeMasters, G.K., Lockey, J., Succop, P., Deddens, J., Sobeih, T. and Dunning, K., “An epidemiological appraisal instrument – a tool for evaluation of epidemiological studies”, 2007 (50(6)), 920960. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130701237667.

, , , , , , , , , , , and , , “ ”, Ergonomics ( ( )), – . .)| false , T., Robert, G., MacFarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O. and Peacock, R., “Storylines of research in diffusion in innovation: A meta-narrative approach to systematic review”, 2005 (61) 417430.

, , , , , , , , , and , , “ ”, Social Science and Medicine ( ) – .)| false , D., “Weight of Evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence”, (22(2), 213228. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296189

, , “ ”, Research Papers in Education 2007 ( ( ), – . : )| false , D., Oliver, S. and Thomas, J, “Learning From Research: Systematic Reviews for Informing Policy Decisions. A Quick Guide”, 2013: .

, , , and , , “ ”, : .)| false , D. and Thomas, J, “Commonality and Diversity in Reviews” in D. Gough, S. Oliver and J. Thomas (eds.), (2nd edn.) (London: Sage, 2017).

, and , , “ ” in

, and (eds.), An Introduction to Systematic Reviews ( ) (

London:

Sage, ).)| false , T., “The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child--And How to Make It Work”, 1990 (12(1)), 97105. https://doi.org/10.2307/762167.

, , “ ”, Human Rights Quarterly ( ( )), – . .)| false , K. and Lundy, L., “Does Exactly What it Says on the Tin? A Critical Analysis and Alternative Conceptualisation of the So-called “General Principles” of the Convention on the Rights of the Child”, 2017 (25) 285306. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02502011.

, and , , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ) – . .)| false , E. and Yel, S., “Which Perceptions Do We Have Related to Our Rights as Child? Child Rights from the Perspective of Primary School Students”, 2017 (6(3)), 340349. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n3p340.

, and , , “ ”, Journal of Education and Learning ( ( )), – . .)| false , K., Granlund, M., Bornman, J. and Lygnegård, F., “Human rights of children with intellectual disabilities: Comparing self-ratings and proxy ratings”, 2015 (41(6)), 10101017. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12244.

, , , , , and , , “ ”, Child: Care, Health and Development ( ( )), – . .)| false , M. and Ben-Arieh, A., “School climate and children’s views of their rights: A multi-cultural perspective among Jewish and Arab adolescents”, 2009 (31(1)), 97103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.06.002.

, and , , “ ”, Children and Youth Services Review ( ( )), – . .)| false , H. and Ben-Arieh, A., “What children think about their rights and their well-being: A cross-national comparison”, 2017 (87(3)), 256273. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000222.

, and , , “ ”, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry ( ( )), – . .)| false , C.E. and Woods, K., “The representation of the management of behavioural difficulties in ep practice”, 2018 (34(4)), 352369. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2018.1466269.

, and , , “ practice”, Educational Psychology in Practice ( ( )), – . .)| false , Y. and Krappman, L., “Status of Child Rights in the International Community”, in B.K. Nastasi, S.N. Hart and S.C Naser (eds.), (Cham: Springer, 2020).

, and , , “ ”, in

, and (eds.), International Handbook on Child Rights and School Psychology (

Cham:

Springer, ).)| false , L., “‘Voice’ is not enough: conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child”, 2007 (33(6)), 927942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033.

, , “ ”, British Educational Research Journal ( ( )), – . .)| false , L., Welty, E., Blue Swadener, B., Blanchet Cohen, N., Smith, K. and Devine, D., “What if children had been involved in drafting the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child?”, in A. Diduck, N. Peleg and H. Reece (eds.), (Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff, 2015).

, , , , , , , , , and , , “ ”, in

, and (eds.), Law in Society: Reflections on Children, Families, Culture and Philosophy: Essays in Honour Michael Freeman (

Leiden, the Netherlands:

Brill Nijhoff, ).)| false , E., Calheiros, M. M. and Antunes, C., “‘I always say what I think’: a rights-based approach of young people’s psychosocial functioning in residential care”, 2018 (351), 123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9511-6

, , , and , , “ ”, Child Indicators Research ( ), – . : )| false , A., “A theory of human motivation”, 1943 (50(4)), 370396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346.

, , “ ”, Psychological Review ( ( )), – . .)| false , G.B., “Children’s concepts of their rights”, 1980 (9(3)), 186190. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374418009532985.

, , “ ”, Journal of Clinical Child Psychology ( ( )), – . .)| false , G.B. and Limber, S.P., “What Children’s Rights Mean to Children: Children’s Own Views”, in M. Freeman and P. Veerman (eds.), (Dordrect: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1992), 167187.

, and , , “ ”, in

and (eds.), The Ideologies of Children’s Rights (

Dordrect:

Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, ), – .)| false , V., “We Are People Too: Children’s and Young People’s Perspectives on Children’s Rights and Decision-Making in England”, 1999 (1(1)), 35. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000109.

, , “ ”, Child Development ( ( )), – . .)| false , L. and Pillay, J., “A South African Perspective of Grade 9 Learners’ Experiences of Children’s Rights”, 2018 (26) 278294. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02602003.

, and , , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ) – . .)| false , M. and Ruck, M., “Studying Children’s Perspectives on Self-Determination and Nurturance Rights: Issues and Challenges”, , 2008 (64), 749769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00587.x.

, and , , “ ”, Journal of Social Issues, ( ), – . .)| false , A., “Children, but not really humans? Critical reflections on the hampering effect of the ‘3 p’s’”, 2010 (18(4)), 619635. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181810X490384.

, , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ( )), – . .)| false , A., “Children ’s Human Rights at School – As Formulated by Children”, 2016 (24), 657677. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02403004.

, , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ), – . .)| false , A. and Moody, Z., “Educational Children’s Rights Research 1989–2019: Achievements, Gaps and Future Prospects”, 2020 (28(1)), 183208. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02801003.

, and , , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ( )), – . .)| false , M.D., Peterson-Badali, M. and Hedwig, C.C., “Handbook of Child Well-Being: Theories, Methods and Policies in Global Perspective”, in A. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frønes and J.E. Korbin (eds.), (New York: Springer, 2014), 13258. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8.

, , , and , , “ ”, in

, , and (eds.), Handbook of Child Well-Being: Theories, Methods and Policies in Global Perspective (

New York:

Springer, ), – . .)| false , J. and Gillett-Swan, J.K., “Empowering the disempowered through voice-inclusive practice: Children’s views on adult-centric educational provision”, 2015 (14(2)), 177191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115571800.

, and , , “ ”, European Educational Research Journal ( ( )), – . .)| false , “The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child”, n.d.-a: . Accessed 13 August 2019).

, “ ”, : . Accessed 13 August 2019).)| false , “UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (uncrc): An international agreement for child rights”, n.d.-b: . Accessed 13 August 2019.

, “ ): An international agreement for child rights”, : . Accessed 1 .)| false , H. and Lundy, L., “The Field of Children’s Rights: Taking Stock, Travelling Forward”, 2020 (28(1)), 113. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02801010.

, and , , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ( )), – . .)| false , N., Smith, A. and Nairn, K., “Rights Important to Young People: Secondary Student and Staff Perspectives”, 2001(9), 137156. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000109.

, , , and , , “ ”, The International Journal of Children’s Rights ( ), – . .)| false , “Initiatives by partners to celebrate crc30”, n.d.: . Accessed 13 August 2019.

, “ 30”, : . Accessed 1 .)| false , “The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child A Guide for Children and Young People”, 2008: .

, “ ”, : .)| false , N., “Children’s rights: policy into practice”, 2011: .

, , “ ”, : .)| false , “UN Convention on the Rights of the Child In Child Friendly Language”, n.d.-a: .

, “ ”, : .)| false , “Convention on the Rights of the Child: Frequently asked questions”, 2005: . Accessed 19 May 2018.

, “ ”, : . Accessed 1 .)| false , “Children’s well-being from their own point of view”, 2012: .

, “ ”, : .)| false , “Child Rights Partners Putting Children’s Rights at the Hear t of Public Services”, 2014: .

, “ ”, : .)| false , “The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child”, 1989: . Accessesd 13 January 2018.

, “ ”, : . Accessesd .)| false , “General Comment No. 5 (2003): General measures of implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (arts. 4, 42 and 44, para. 6)”, 2003: . Accessed 6 August 2020.

, “ ”, : . Accessed .)| false , M. and Wray, A., (2nd edn.) (London: SAGE, 2011).

, and , , Critical Reading and Writing for Postgraduates ( ) (

London:

SAGE, ).)| false , N., “Barriers and solutions to using children’s rights approaches in policy”, 2017: .

, , “ ”, : .)| false , T. and Woods, K., “The Contribution of Assistant Psychologists in the UK”, 2019 (5(1)), 112.

, and , , “ ”, Educational Psychology Research and Practice ( ( )), – .)| false , K. and Bond, C., “Linking regulation of practitioner school psychology and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: The need to build a bridge”, 2014 (35(1)), 6784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034313508878.

, and , , “ ”, School Psychology International ( ( )), – . .)| false , D., “Felt tip pens and school councils: Children’s participation rights in four English schools”, 2001 (15(4)), 209218. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.651.

, , “ ”, Children and Society ( ( )), – . .)| false Lo, Yan Wing Leung and Wai Wa Yuen, “Exploring school ethos: an investigation of children’s human rights in two secondary institutions in Hong Kong”, 2015 (26(3)), 192209. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2015.1048078.

, and , “ ”, Intercultural Education ( ( )), – . .)| false

Experts working within the field of children’s rights, from the areas of critical psychology, school psychology, social care and law, and identified by specialist academics working at The University of Manchester, were consulted by email and/or telephone conversation to support identification of relevant studies.

; ; ; , All Time Past Year Past 30 Days Abstract Views 0 0 0 Full Text Views 9961 3304 212 PDF Views & Downloads 15010 4530 331

Cover The International Journal of Children's Rights

Reference Works

Primary source collections

COVID-19 Collection

How to publish with Brill

Open Access Content

Contact & Info

Sales contacts

Publishing contacts

Stay Updated

Newsletters

Social Media Overview

Terms and Conditions  

Privacy Statement  

Cookie Settings  

Accessibility

Legal Notice

Terms and Conditions   |   Privacy Statement   |  Cookie Settings   |   Accessibility   |  Legal Notice   |  Copyright © 2016-2024

Copyright © 2016-2024

Character limit 500 /500

COMMENTS

  1. Essay on Child Rights for Students in English [500+ Words]

    10 Lines on Child Rights. The declaration of Child's Right was established in the year 1924. The rights were formulated by saving the children founder, Eglantyne Jebb. The most important rights are- survival, developmental, protection and participation rights. It is an extension of human rights, especially for children below 18 years of age.

  2. Essay on Child Rights

    Find essays on child rights in 100, 250, and 500 words for school and college students. Learn about the definition, importance, pillars, challenges, and future of child rights.

  3. 75 Children's Rights Essay Topic Ideas & Examples

    Children's Rights Protection. Due to the risk factors exposed to children, it is necessary for the community to ensure that they protect the rights and wellbeing of children. Children's Rights: Global and Cultural View. This is one of the issues that are poorly addressed by the governments of various countries.

  4. The Future Of Childrens Rights: [Essay Example], 557 words

    The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, adopted in 1989, is a landmark document that has guided the global effort to ensure the well-being and rights of children. However, there are still numerous challenges that children face, including poverty, discrimination, violence, and lack of access to education and healthcare.

  5. Short and Long Paragraph on Child Rights in English for Students

    Find short and long paragraphs on child rights for students of different classes. Learn about the definition, importance, types and examples of child rights in India and the world.

  6. Children's Rights and the Means of Their Protection Essay

    Children's rights are at massive risk of violation because children lack independence from their parents and parental guardians. Therefore, children cannot fully represent their interests and often do not even acknowledge their rights. Thus, society's responsibility is to address the violations of the children's rights and ensure their ...

  7. Essay on Importance of Child Rights

    250 Words Essay on Importance of Child Rights Introduction. Child rights are fundamental freedoms and the inherent rights of all human beings below the age of 18. These rights apply to every child, regardless of their race, religion, or abilities. The importance of child rights cannot be understated as they ensure the holistic development of a ...

  8. The Effectiveness of The Convention on The Children's Rights

    As seen from this children's rights essay, despite those remarkable achievements and great signs of progress in adopting and implementing the core principles of the CRC, a key challenge stands still. That is a huge number of young people are being born to impoverished families and children of ethnic groups living in rural regions and those who ...

  9. Children's Human Rights

    Learn about the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and how it protects children from harm, empowers their participation and provides for their growth and development. See case studies of children who are fighting for their rights in Palestine and Thailand.

  10. Children's Rights: Global and Cultural View Essay

    Get a custom essay on Children's Rights: Global and Cultural View. For instance, in European or the United States, governments have been able to resolve such problems as exploitation or hazardous employment (Amnesty International, 2013). However, even in these countries, children can become victims of both sexual and physical abuse.

  11. Children's Rights

    DOI: 10.1057/9780230361843. Emphasizes the importance of cross-cultural understandings of children's rights and of examining the differing contexts in which children live. Each chapter is written by an expert in the field, and this book is a vital starting point for understanding children's rights in different parts of the world.

  12. Childrens' Rights of Protection and Participation

    They also have a right to be protected from neglect, abuse, discrimination and exploitation (CRC, 2006) Children also have a right to participation. They have a right to their own programs and services and to take part in them. This includes decision making and involvement in libraries. Some rights allow children to grow up healthy and free.

  13. Essay on Child Rights

    Encourage readers to take action to support children's rights in their own communities and advocate for policies that promote the well-being of all children. Essay on Child Rights in 10 Lines - Examples. 1. Child rights are the fundamental human rights that every child is entitled to, regardless of their race, religion, or nationality. 2.

  14. The Rights and Responsibilities of Children

    Save the Children. Format. pdf. Content type. Child Friendly Materials, Teaching Resources. Keywords. Child protection, Children's rights. This child friendly document presents, in a creative and clear manner, what children have a right to – and what they have as responsibilities.

  15. Violence Against Children and Children's Rights

    A web page that provides data and visualizations on how the protection of children's rights differs across countries and how common violence against children is. It covers key rights of children, such as the right to a safe environment, education, play, and to be heard.

  16. (PDF) Children's rights and power

    Children's rights tend to be defined in ways that are equally well covered by concepts of needs, welfare and best interests, and which miss the power of rights. The 3Ps are useful when analysing ...

  17. Children's Views on Children's Rights: A Systematic ...

    Abstract Children's rights are set out in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. This systematic literature review aimed to investigate children's views of children's rights, at a broad level. Nine papers were included, from a range of countries and contexts. They all accessed the views of children and young people (aged up to 18 years). A content analysis was carried ...

  18. Children's rights

    Learn about the concept, evolution, and classification of children's rights, a subset of human rights with particular attention to the rights of special protection and care afforded to minors. Find out the sources, principles, and examples of children's rights in international law and practice.

  19. (PDF) Children's Views on Children's Rights: A ...

    kevin.a.woods@manchester .ac.uk. Abstract. Children's rights ar e set out in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the. Child. This systematic literature r eview aimed to investigate ...