[ ]
The Philippine Congress, through the Bayanihan to Heal as One Act, allocates US$ 5.37 billion for the COVID-19 pandemic, where US$ 3.9 billion is allotted for the implementation of the emergency subsidy program, and US$ 1.4 for funding health requirements and other services [ 53 ]). The emergency subsidy program for two months covers the basic needs of the 18 million Filipino families [ 57 ]. The strict quarantine measures have put off public and private establishments that generate more than two-thirds of the overall GDP [ 58 ]). The inflation is expected to reach 2.2% in 2020, subsequently 2.4% in 2021 [ 58 ]. has projected GDP growth at 2% this year, with a strong recovery forecast of 6.5% growth in 2021 with the assumption that the pandemic will be curbed in June 2020. The Philippine government has been granted a loan of US$ 100 million from the World Bank to fund the emergency response project in addressing the healthcare needs for the COVID-19 pandemic, and improve public health preparedness [ 59 ]. Furthermore, the US government has also provided US$ 15.2 million in assistance to the country [ 60 ]. The Department of Labor and Employment highlighted that there are more than one million employees in the formal sector that were affected by temporary closures of businesses or flexible work arrangements (CNN Philippines, 2020). Employees in the manufacturing, hotel, restaurants, and tourism industry absorbed most of the impact [ 61 ]. [ 62 ] reported that the economy might lose between US$ 5.4 billion (best case) and US$ 49.5 billion (worse case) due to COVID-19 based on a Leontief input-output model. Specifically, the losses would come from transportation, storage, and communication sector (US$ 232.1–2.4 billion), manufacturing (US$ 1.6–16.9 billion), wholesale and retail (US$ 1.8–14.3 billion), and other services (US$ 823.2 million to 7 billion) [ 62 ].
As of April 2020, seventeen (17) testing centers for COVID-19 were constructed [ 63 ]. With the population of 109 million with a rapid increase of confirmed cases, the healthcare facilities are collapsing with just 89,000 hospital beds, of which 8,779 are isolation beds, 2,546 are ward beds, and only 1,249 are ICU beds, and 1,937 mechanical ventilators [ 64 ]). Currently, the Philippines has 129,000 doctors, of which only 50% are considered active [ 62 ]. As reported by Ref. [ 62 ]; the average age with COVID-19 cases in the Philippines is 53 years old, and the average age of mortality is 65 years old, 70% of which are male. 56% of the confirmed cases and 62% of reported deaths are concentrated in Metro Manila. On 24 April, the Philippine government decided to slowly lift the strict measures by announcing that lower risk community areas would be placed under GCQ [ 55 ]. The set of guidelines proposed on 7 May details the transition protocols from ECQ to GCQ. As long as an effective antiviral drug or vaccine remains unavailable, the government is looking at a future where provinces or cities are observing GCQ protocols. Table 2 summarizes the protocols issued by the IATF on 7 May. For easier recall, a code is assigned to each protocol. These protocols have inherent interrelationships, and redundancies are apparent to some extent. Each protocol requires resources and control measures that may overwhelm the government. Additionally, some protocols may be relaxed for economic and socio-economic purposes without undermining public health concerns over the pandemic. Thus, carefully identifying these protocols is a crucial task that requires attention.
The GCQ protocols with their corresponding codes.
Codes | GCQ Protocols |
---|---|
P1 | compliance of minimum public health standards |
P2 | limited movement of persons |
P3 | 24-hr curfew of minors and senior citizens |
P4 | work in government at full operational capacity |
P5 | limited operational capacity of diplomatic missions and international organizations |
P6a | full operational capacity of category I industries |
P6b | minimum of 50% operational capacity of category II industries |
P6c | maximum of 50% operational capacity of category III industries |
P7 | limited operations of malls and shopping centers |
P8 | allowed operation of essential public and private construction projects |
P9 | non-operation of category IV industries |
P10 | non-operation of hotels or similar establishments |
P11 | suspension of physical classes |
P12 | prohibition of mass gatherings |
P13 | reduced capacity of public transportation |
3.1. intuitionistic fuzzy set (ifs) theory.
[ 35 ] proposed the fuzzy set theory (FST) in handling vagueness and uncertainty in computing information. An extension of the FST is the intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) theory, which was introduced by Ref. [ 34 ]. IFS is characterized by a membership function, a non-membership function, and a hesitancy degree which express support, opposition, and neutrality in eliciting information [ 38 ]. This is an advantage over the FST as it can better handle the decision-maker's vagueness in the elicitation process, particularly when eliciting judgment [ 39 ]. Detailed three main advantages of the IFS theory. First, it offers the ability to model unknown information via the degree of hesitation. In the practical application (e.g., COVID-19 pandemic) where decision-makers are unsure about their preferences, IFS theory is more suitable in extracting opinion than the FST. Second, it is characterized by three grades of information that can better capture uncertainty comprehensively. Finally, the traditional FST only handles the degree of “agreement” but fails to represent the degree of “disagreement” which is often depicted in eliciting opinion. The following provides some fundamental concepts of the IFS relevant in this work.
[ 65 ]: Suppose X is a finite, non-empty set, and A ⊆ X . A is a standard fuzzy set if ∃ a membership function μ A ( x ) such that μ A ( x ) : X → [ 0,1 ] . The set of 2-tuple A = { x , μ A ( x ) : x ∈ X , μ A ( x ) ∈ [ 0,1 ] } is a fuzzy set where μ A ( x ) is a membership function of x in A .
[ 65 ]: A triangular fuzzy number can be defined as a triplet A = ( l , m , u ) and the membership function μ A ( x ) is as follows:
[ 34 ]: Suppose X is a finite, non-empty set. Then an IFS A in X is defined as
where μ A ( x ) : X → [ 0,1 ] and v A ( x ) : X → [ 0,1 ] such that 0 ≤ μ A ( x ) + v A ( x ) ≤ 1 , x ∈ X . μ A ( x ) and v A ( x ) represent the membership function and the non-membership function, respectively, of x ∈ X to A . π A ( x ) expresses the degree of lack of knowledge of every x ∈ X to A , and 0 ≤ π A ( x ) ≤ 1 . μ A ( x ) , v A ( x ) , and π A ( x ) follow Equation (3)
[ 66 ]: For a fixed universe E , the IFS A can be interpreted as a mapping E → [ 0,1 ] × [ 0,1 ] , and it can be defined by a 2-tuple μ A ( x ) , v A ( x ) where for x ∈ E , μ A ( x ) denotes the degree of membership of x and v A ( x ) denotes the degree of non-membership of x to A ; and μ A ( x ) and v A ( x ) satisfy the condition μ A ( x ) + v A ( x ) ≤ 1 . The set B is a standard fuzzy subset when μ A ( x ) + v A ( x ) = 1 . The crispification operation as a map [ 0,1 ] × [ 0,1 ] → R is introduced. Here, E = R for IFS.
[ 67 ]: Let A be an IFS. By Definition 4 , let D λ be a crispification operator defined by D λ : [ 0,1 ] × [ 0,1 ] → R . The procedure is described in two steps:
For (i), the operator D λ is defined as
with λ ∈ [ 0,1 ] . Note that D λ ( A ) is a standard fuzzy subset with a membership function
In particular, λ = 0.5 is a solution of the minimization problem
where d denotes the Euclidean distance. With λ = 0.5 , the fuzzy set D 0.5 ( A ) is characterized by a membership function
For (ii), any defuzzification process can be adopted. The center of gravity (COG) method is a candidate.
Developed between 1972 and 1976 by Battelle Memorial Institute of Geneva for a Science and Human Affairs Program, the DEMATEL method is a graph theoretic tool for analyzing a structural model or system characterized by elements (as vertices) and causal relationships among elements (as edges). It divides all elements into two categories: cause and effect. This categorization leads to superior understanding and better realization of the system's elements, which may offer solutions in convoluted problems [ 32 , 33 ]. Using concepts of graph theory and linear algebra, the following describes the computational process of the DEMATEL:
The ( D + R T ) vector (i.e., also known as the “prominence’ vector) represents the relative importance of each element. Those elements in the ( D − R T ) (i.e., also known as the “relation” vector) having t i − t j > 0 , i = j belong to the net cause group, while those elements with t i − t j < 0 , i = j belong to the net effect group.
The prominence-relation map.
The IF-DEMATEL approach in this work consists of the following steps:
The lockdown relaxation protocols in transitioning from ECQ to GCQ were extracted Executive Order No. 112 [ 31 ] of the Philippine government. They are considered the elements of the system in the DEMATEL approach. The summary of these protocols, along with their corresponding codes, is shown in Table 2 . Note that there are 15 relaxation protocols identified in Table 2 .
The matrix was completed by a group of two academics and one infectious disease and public health expert with rich knowledge on the dynamics of systems, public health protocols, and local culture and conditions in the Philippines. In a focus group discussion, the group elicited x i j values in IFS on consensus. Open discussions and careful deliberations were made to ensure that those judgments in the initial-direct relation matrix are not whimsical. The group was asked to provide the μ A ( x ) and v A ( x ) values of x i j on the causal influence of p i on p j . The π A ( x ) values of x i j are computed using Equation (3) . Table 3 presents the initial direct-relation matrix in IFS. Each element is represented as a 2-tuple (as in Definition 4 ), i.e., x i j = μ A ( x ) , v A ( x ) .
The initial direct-relation matrix in IFS.
P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6a | P6b | P6c | P7 | P8 | P9 | P10 | P11 | P12 | P13 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | 0 | <0.7,0> | <0.9,0> | <0.7,0.1> | <0.6,0.1> | <0.3,0.2> | <0.15,0.7> | <0.1,0.2> | <0.1,0.3> | <0.5,0.1> | <0.9,0> | <0.7,0.1> | <0.9,0> | <0.9,0> | <0.4,0.3> |
P2 | <0.8,0> | 0 | <0.4,0> | <0.4,0.2> | <0.3,0.2> | <0.7,0.3> | <0.1,0.6> | <0.3,0.1> | <0.4,0.4> | <0.6,0.3> | <0.9,0> | <0.6,0> | <0.9,0> | <1,0> | <0.6,0.3> |
P3 | <0.5,0> | <0.9,0> | 0 | <0,0.1> | <0,0.1> | <0,0.3> | <0.1,0.3> | <0.3,0.1> | <0,0.1> | <0,0.2> | <0,0> | <0,0> | <0.3,0> | <0,0> | <0.4,0> |
P4 | <0.2,0.6> | <0.5,0.4> | <0.1,0.3> | 0 | <0.3,0> | <0.3,0 | <0.2,0> | <0.1,0> | <0.1,0.1> | <0.3,0> | <0,0> | <0.2,0.1> | <0.4,0> | <0,0.6> | <0,0.5> |
P5 | <0.1,0.1> | <0.7,0.2> | <0,0.1> | <0.05,0.05> | 0 | <0,0> | <0,0> | <0,0> | <0,0.05> | <0,0> | <0,0> | <0,0> | <0.1,0> | <0.1,0.3> | <0.4,0.2> |
P6a | <0.3,0.3> | <0.1,0.7> | <0.3,0.2> | <0.2,0> | <0,0> | 0 | <0.2,0> | <0.2,0> | <0.5,0.1> | <0.1,0> | <0,0.1> | <0,0.3> | <0,0> | <0,0.9> | <0,0.7> |
P6b | <0.1,0.2> | <0.05,0.6> | <0.1,0.1> | <0.1,0> | <0,0> | <0.6,0> | 0 | <0.1,0> | <0.2,0.1> | <0.5,0.1> | <0,0> | <0,0.1> | <0,0> | <0,0.8> | <0.3,0.6> |
P6c | <0.1,0.1> | <0.3,0.4> | <0,0> | <0.1,0> | <0,0> | <0,0> | <0.1,0> | 0 | <0.6,0.05> | <0,0.05> | <0,0> | <0,0.5> | <0,0> | <0.3,0.5> | <0.5,0.2> |
P7 | <0.3,0.6> | <0.5,0.5> | <0.7,0> | <0.2,0> | <0,0> | <0.3,0.5> | <0.2,0.3> | <0.1,0.3> | 0 | <0,0.1> | <0,0.2> | <0,0> | <0,0> | <0.4,0.6> | <0.3,0.5> |
P8 | <0.1,0.4> | <0.3,0.3> | <0,0> | <0.4,0> | <0,0> | <0.1,0> | <0.1,0> | <0,0> | <0.1,0> | 0 | <0,0.2> | <0,0.2> | <0,0> | <0.05,0.3> | <0.1,0.2> |
P9 | <1,0> | <0.9,0> | <0.2,0> | <0.2,0.2> | <0,0> | <0,0.7> | <0,0.2> | <0,0.1> | <0.8,0> | <0,0.4> | 0 | <0.7,0> | <0,0> | <1,0> | <0.7,0> |
P10 | <0.8,0.2> | <0.9,0.1> | <0.2,0> | <0.4,0.2> | <0,0.1> | <0.1,0.5> | <0.1,0.4> | <0,0.3> | <0,0> | <0,0.2> | <0.9,0> | 0 | <0,0> | <0.8,0.1> | <0.6,0.05> |
P11 | <1,0> | <1,0> | <0.5,0> | <0.3,0> | <0.05,0.1> | <0,0> | <0,0> | <0,0> | <0,0> | <0,0> | <0,0> | <0,0> | 0 | <1,0> | <1,0> |
P12 | <1,0> | <1,0> | <0.4,0> | <0,0.7> | <0,0.1> | <0,0.7> | <0,0.7> | <0.3,0.2> | <0.7,0.1> | <0,0.3> | <0.9,0> | <0.9,0> | <1,0> | 0 | <0.6,0> |
P13 | <0.7,0.3> | <0.6,0.1> | <0.2,0> | <0,0.4> | <0.05,0.05> | <0,0.7> | <0.2,0.5> | <0.5,0.4> | <0.6,0.2> | <0.1,0.3> | <0,0> | <0,0> | <0.6,0> | <0.7,0.2> | 0 |
From Table 3 , the next step is to deffuzify the IFS values. We adopted the two-step defuzzification process of [ 67 ]. The first step is to convert the IFS into corresponding standard fuzzy subsets using Equation (7) . For instance,
Table 4 shows the initial-direct relation matrix in standard fuzzy subsets.
The initial direct-relation matrix in standard fuzzy subsets.
P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6a | P6b | P6c | P7 | P8 | P9 | P10 | P11 | P12 | P13 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | 0 | 0.850 | 0.950 | 0.800 | 0.750 | 0.550 | 0.225 | 0.450 | 0.400 | 0.700 | 0.950 | 0.800 | 0.950 | 0.950 | 0.550 |
P2 | 0.900 | 0 | 0.700 | 0.600 | 0.550 | 0.700 | 0.250 | 0.600 | 0.500 | 0.650 | 0.950 | 0.800 | 0.950 | 1.000 | 0.650 |
P3 | 0.750 | 0.950 | 0 | 0.450 | 0.450 | 0.350 | 0.400 | 0.600 | 0.450 | 0.400 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.650 | 0.500 | 0.700 |
P4 | 0.300 | 0.550 | 0.400 | 0 | 0.650 | 0.650 | 0.600 | 0.550 | 0.500 | 0.650 | 0.500 | 0.550 | 0.700 | 0.200 | 0.250 |
P5 | 0.500 | 0.750 | 0.450 | 0.500 | 0 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.475 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.550 | 0.400 | 0.600 |
P6a | 0.500 | 0.200 | 0.550 | 0.600 | 0.500 | 0 | 0.600 | 0.600 | 0.700 | 0.550 | 0.450 | 0.350 | 0.500 | 0.050 | 0.150 |
P6b | 0.450 | 0.225 | 0.500 | 0.550 | 0.500 | 0.800 | 0 | 0.550 | 0.550 | 0.700 | 0.500 | 0.450 | 0.500 | 0.100 | 0.350 |
P6c | 0.500 | 0.450 | 0.500 | 0.550 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.550 | 0 | 0.775 | 0.475 | 0.500 | 0.250 | 0.500 | 0.400 | 0.650 |
P7 | 0.350 | 0.500 | 0.550 | 0.600 | 0.500 | 0.400 | 0.450 | 0.400 | 0 | 0.450 | 0.400 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.400 | 0.400 |
P8 | 0.350 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.700 | 0.500 | 0.550 | 0.550 | 0.500 | 0.550 | 0 | 0.400 | 0.400 | 0.500 | 0.375 | 0.450 |
P9 | 1.000 | 0.950 | 0.600 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.150 | 0.400 | 0.450 | 0.900 | 0.300 | 0 | 0.850 | 0.500 | 1.000 | 0.850 |
P10 | 0.800 | 0.900 | 0.600 | 0.600 | 0.450 | 0.300 | 0.350 | 0.350 | 0.500 | 0.400 | 0.950 | 0 | 0.500 | 0.850 | 0.775 |
P11 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.750 | 0.650 | 0.475 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
P12 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.700 | 0.150 | 0.450 | 0.150 | 0.150 | 0.550 | 0.800 | 0.350 | 0.950 | 0.950 | 1.000 | 0 | 0.800 |
P13 | 0.700 | 0.750 | 0.600 | 0.300 | 0.500 | 0.150 | 0.350 | 0.550 | 0.700 | 0.400 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.800 | 0.750 | 0 |
The final step of the defuzzification process of [ 67 ] is to adopt a defuzzification function f that would map f : μ ( x ) → R . To carry out this step, the membership function values in Table 4 are assigned to a triangular fuzzy number = ( 0,4,4 ) . See Definition 2 . Using Equation (1) with l = 0 , m = 4 , u = 4 , the following equation can be set up. Analogous to Equation (1) , we have
where μ ( x ˜ ) is the membership function value shown in Table 4 , l , m , u are parameters of a triangular fuzzy number and the x ˜ is the corresponding crisp or defuzzified value. As an example,
The initial-direct relation matrix in crisp values is presented in Table 5 .
The initial direct-relation matrix in crisp values.
P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6a | P6b | P6c | P7 | P8 | P9 | P10 | P11 | P12 | P13 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | 0 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 2.2 |
P2 | 3.6 | 0 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 3.8 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 2.6 |
P3 | 3.0 | 3.8 | 0 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 2.8 |
P4 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 0 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
P5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 2.4 |
P6a | 2.0 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 0 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
P6b | 1.8 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 0 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 1.4 |
P6c | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 0 | 3.1 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 2.6 |
P7 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 0 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
P8 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 0 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
P9 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 0 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 3.4 |
P10 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 3.8 | 0 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 3.1 |
P11 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
P12 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 0 | 3.2 |
P13 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 0 |
Using Equation (9) and Equation (10) , the normalized direct-relation matrix is computed with g = 39.5 . It is shown in Table 6 .
Normalized direct-relation matrix.
P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6a | P6b | P6c | P7 | P8 | P9 | P10 | P11 | P12 | P13 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | 0 | 0.08608 | 0.09620 | 0.08101 | 0.07595 | 0.05570 | 0.02278 | 0.04557 | 0.04051 | 0.07089 | 0.09620 | 0.08101 | 0.09620 | 0.09620 | 0.05570 |
P2 | 0.09114 | 0 | 0.07089 | 0.06076 | 0.05570 | 0.07089 | 0.02532 | 0.06076 | 0.05063 | 0.06582 | 0.09620 | 0.08101 | 0.09620 | 0.10127 | 0.06582 |
P3 | 0.07595 | 0.09620 | 0 | 0.04557 | 0.04557 | 0.03544 | 0.04051 | 0.06076 | 0.04557 | 0.04051 | 0.05063 | 0.05063 | 0.06582 | 0.05063 | 0.07089 |
P4 | 0.03038 | 0.05570 | 0.04051 | 0 | 0.06582 | 0.06582 | 0.06076 | 0.05570 | 0.05063 | 0.06582 | 0.05063 | 0.05570 | 0.07089 | 0.02025 | 0.02532 |
P5 | 0.05063 | 0.07595 | 0.04557 | 0.05063 | 0 | 0.05063 | 0.05063 | 0.05063 | 0.04810 | 0.05063 | 0.05063 | 0.05063 | 0.05570 | 0.04051 | 0.06076 |
P6a | 0.05063 | 0.02025 | 0.05570 | 0.06076 | 0.05063 | 0 | 0.06076 | 0.06076 | 0.07089 | 0.05570 | 0.04557 | 0.03544 | 0.05063 | 0.00506 | 0.01519 |
P6b | 0.04557 | 0.02278 | 0.05063 | 0.05570 | 0.05063 | 0.08101 | 0 | 0.05570 | 0.05570 | 0.07089 | 0.05063 | 0.04557 | 0.05063 | 0.01013 | 0.03544 |
P6c | 0.05063 | 0.04557 | 0.05063 | 0.05570 | 0.05063 | 0.05063 | 0.05570 | 0 | 0.07848 | 0.04810 | 0.05063 | 0.02532 | 0.05063 | 0.04051 | 0.06582 |
P7 | 0.03544 | 0.05063 | 0.05570 | 0.06076 | 0.05063 | 0.04051 | 0.04557 | 0.04051 | 0 | 0.04557 | 0.04051 | 0.05063 | 0.05063 | 0.04051 | 0.04051 |
P8 | 0.03544 | 0.05063 | 0.05063 | 0.07089 | 0.05063 | 0.05570 | 0.05570 | 0.05063 | 0.05570 | 0 | 0.04051 | 0.04051 | 0.05063 | 0.03797 | 0.04557 |
P9 | 0.10127 | 0.09620 | 0.06076 | 0.05063 | 0.05063 | 0.01519 | 0.04051 | 0.04557 | 0.09114 | 0.03038 | 0 | 0.08608 | 0.05063 | 0.10127 | 0.08608 |
P10 | 0.08101 | 0.09114 | 0.06076 | 0.06076 | 0.04557 | 0.03038 | 0.03544 | 0.03544 | 0.05063 | 0.04051 | 0.09620 | 0 | 0.05063 | 0.08608 | 0.07848 |
P11 | 0.10127 | 0.10127 | 0.07595 | 0.06582 | 0.04810 | 0.05063 | 0.05063 | 0.05063 | 0.05063 | 0.05063 | 0.05063 | 0.05063 | 0 | 0.10127 | 0.10127 |
P12 | 0.10127 | 0.10127 | 0.07089 | 0.01519 | 0.04557 | 0.01519 | 0.01519 | 0.05570 | 0.08101 | 0.03544 | 0.09620 | 0.09620 | 0.10127 | 0 | 0.08101 |
P13 | 0.07089 | 0.07595 | 0.06076 | 0.03038 | 0.05063 | 0.01519 | 0.03544 | 0.05570 | 0.07089 | 0.04051 | 0.05063 | 0.05063 | 0.08101 | 0.07595 | 0 |
The total relation matrix is obtained using Equation (11) and is shown in Table 7 . The corresponding ( D + R T ) and ( D − R T ) vectors are presented in Table 8 . Likewise, the categorization of protocols according to net cause or net effect is shown in Table 8 . These vectors were computed following Equation (12) and Equation (13) .
Total relation matrix.
P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6a | P6b | P6c | P7 | P8 | P9 | P10 | P11 | P12 | P13 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | 0.34211 | 0.44113 | 0.39759 | 0.34902 | 0.33677 | 0.27659 | 0.23325 | 0.30408 | 0.33857 | 0.32014 | 0.40713 | 0.37274 | 0.42513 | 0.40042 | 0.36184 |
P2 | 0.42360 | 0.35816 | 0.37401 | 0.32945 | 0.31709 | 0.28780 | 0.23369 | 0.31533 | 0.34639 | 0.31378 | 0.40520 | 0.37046 | 0.42276 | 0.40298 | 0.36826 |
P3 | 0.33828 | 0.37019 | 0.24351 | 0.25971 | 0.25329 | 0.21227 | 0.20361 | 0.26207 | 0.27841 | 0.24009 | 0.29878 | 0.28102 | 0.32714 | 0.29362 | 0.30792 |
P4 | 0.26312 | 0.29756 | 0.25221 | 0.19336 | 0.24728 | 0.22213 | 0.20716 | 0.23427 | 0.25635 | 0.24077 | 0.26611 | 0.25534 | 0.29670 | 0.23158 | 0.23660 |
P5 | 0.29411 | 0.32929 | 0.26794 | 0.24875 | 0.19409 | 0.21373 | 0.20231 | 0.23806 | 0.26382 | 0.23469 | 0.27855 | 0.26252 | 0.29677 | 0.26306 | 0.27931 |
P6a | 0.25155 | 0.23656 | 0.24092 | 0.22919 | 0.21279 | 0.14226 | 0.19068 | 0.21768 | 0.25007 | 0.21142 | 0.23471 | 0.21269 | 0.25111 | 0.19111 | 0.20140 |
P6b | 0.26069 | 0.25235 | 0.24834 | 0.23501 | 0.22289 | 0.22585 | 0.14169 | 0.22347 | 0.24877 | 0.23467 | 0.25157 | 0.23300 | 0.26409 | 0.20757 | 0.23110 |
P6c | 0.28332 | 0.29186 | 0.26402 | 0.24612 | 0.23561 | 0.20776 | 0.20240 | 0.18323 | 0.28389 | 0.22579 | 0.26811 | 0.23124 | 0.28285 | 0.25236 | 0.27457 |
P7 | 0.25088 | 0.27666 | 0.25006 | 0.23428 | 0.21943 | 0.18524 | 0.18027 | 0.20662 | 0.19200 | 0.20811 | 0.24175 | 0.23699 | 0.26297 | 0.23511 | 0.23483 |
P8 | 0.26016 | 0.28597 | 0.25481 | 0.25252 | 0.22814 | 0.20719 | 0.19720 | 0.22443 | 0.25468 | 0.17324 | 0.25063 | 0.23626 | 0.27311 | 0.24043 | 0.24757 |
P9 | 0.40736 | 0.42097 | 0.34297 | 0.29926 | 0.29331 | 0.22136 | 0.22910 | 0.28205 | 0.35908 | 0.26381 | 0.29588 | 0.35527 | 0.36023 | 0.38246 | 0.36361 |
P10 | 0.36980 | 0.39478 | 0.32379 | 0.29187 | 0.27282 | 0.22153 | 0.21303 | 0.25805 | 0.30619 | 0.25745 | 0.36431 | 0.25777 | 0.33935 | 0.35004 | 0.33833 |
P11 | 0.41743 | 0.43481 | 0.36622 | 0.32195 | 0.30009 | 0.26237 | 0.24660 | 0.29672 | 0.33299 | 0.29153 | 0.35267 | 0.33175 | 0.32333 | 0.38934 | 0.38519 |
P12 | 0.41729 | 0.43525 | 0.35923 | 0.27447 | 0.29350 | 0.22468 | 0.21065 | 0.29569 | 0.35597 | 0.27226 | 0.39045 | 0.36971 | 0.41038 | 0.30080 | 0.36887 |
P13 | 0.33277 | 0.35220 | 0.29930 | 0.24360 | 0.25564 | 0.19113 | 0.19696 | 0.25530 | 0.29931 | 0.23738 | 0.29696 | 0.28005 | 0.33859 | 0.31533 | 0.24164 |
The prominence and relation vectors.
Codes | GCQ Protocols | Rank | Rank | Category | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | compliance of minimum public health standards | 5.30651 | 4.91247 | 10.21898 | 2 | 0.39403 | 2 | net cause |
P2 | limited movement of persons | 5.26895 | 5.17773 | 10.44669 | 1 | 0.09122 | 7 | net cause |
P3 | 24-hr curfew of minors and senior citizens | 4.16989 | 4.48491 | 8.65480 | 7 | −0.31502 | 14 | net effect |
P4 | work in government at full operational capacity | 3.70056 | 4.00857 | 7.70912 | 11 | −0.30801 | 13 | net effect |
P5 | limited operational capacity of diplomatic missions and international organizations | 3.86700 | 3.88275 | 7.74975 | 10 | −0.01574 | 8 | net effect |
P6a | full operational capacity of category I industries | 3.27413 | 3.30188 | 6.57601 | 14 | −0.02775 | 9 | net effect |
P6b | minimum of 50% operational capacity of category II industries | 3.48107 | 3.08861 | 6.56968 | 15 | 0.39246 | 3 | net cause |
P6c | maximum of 50% operational capacity of category III industries | 3.73314 | 3.79703 | 7.53017 | 12 | −0.06389 | 10 | net effect |
P7 | limited operations of malls and shopping centers | 3.41520 | 4.36649 | 7.78169 | 9 | −0.95129 | 15 | net effect |
P8 | allowed operation of essential public and private construction projects | 3.58635 | 3.72513 | 7.31147 | 13 | −0.13878 | 11 | net effect |
P9 | non-operation of category IV industries | 4.87670 | 4.60281 | 9.47951 | 4 | 0.27389 | 4 | net cause |
P10 | non-operation of hotels or similar establishments | 4.55911 | 4.28682 | 8.84593 | 6 | 0.27229 | 5 | net cause |
P11 | suspension of physical classes | 5.05299 | 4.87451 | 9.92750 | 3 | 0.17848 | 6 | net cause |
P12 | prohibition of mass gatherings | 4.97918 | 4.45620 | 9.43539 | 5 | 0.52298 | 1 | net cause |
P13 | reduced capacity of public transportation | 4.13615 | 4.44102 | 8.57716 | 8 | −0.30487 | 12 | net effect |
The prominence-relation map, similar to Fig. 1 , is constructed based on ( D + R T , D − R T ) coordinates. This map is illustrated in Fig. 2 .
The prominence-relation map of lockdown relaxation protocols for Philippine COVID-19 response.
The results show that compliance of minimum public health standards (P1), limited movement of persons (P2), minimum of 50% operational capacity of category II industries (P6b), non-operation of category IV industries (P9), non-operation of hotels or similar establishments (P10), suspension of physical classes (P11), and prohibition of mass gatherings (P12) are categorized into a net cause group. They impact the entire set of guidelines, and their attainment or non-attainment affects the balance of public health and socio-economic performance. Thus, they should be given more attention by the IATF. These protocols in the net cause group have a more influential impact ( D ) than influenced impact ( R ). On the other hand, the net effect group contains the 24-hr curfew of minors and senior citizens (P3), work in government at full operational capacity (P4), limited operational capacity of diplomatic missions and international organizations (P5), full operational capacity of category I industries (P6a), maximum of 50% operational capacity of category III industries (P6c), limited operations of malls and shopping centers (P7), allowed operation of essential public and private construction projects (P8), and reduced capacity of public transportation (P13). They tend to be easily influenced by other protocols as their ( D − R T ) values are negative, which implies that the influential impact ( D ) of these protocols are lower than their influenced impact ( R ).
The ( D + R T ) scores describe the relative significance or prominence of the protocols. In this work, the limited movement of persons (P2) yields the highest ( D + R T ) score; thus, it must be considered as a relatively important for the lockdown exit strategy. This finding also implies that this protocol possesses the highest impact, both received and given. This protocol is central to the set of guidelines by the IAFT. Also, this result is supported by the insights of [ 7 , 68 ] on how China curb the disease spread. Most countries (e.g., South Korea) who have suppressed the first wave of cases found themselves in a situation where a spike of a new wave of cases emerges just days after they ease down the lockdown measures, particularly allowing people to move around on purpose beyond non-essential things such as leisure, going out to parks, restaurants, malls, bars, and opening of schools. The ranking of protocols according to the ( D + R T ) scores is described as follows: P 2 ≻ P 1 ≻ P 11 ≻ P 9 ≻ P 12 ≻ P 10 ≻ P 3 ≻ P 13 ≻ P 7 ≻ P 5 ≻ P 4 ≻ P 6 c ≻ P 8 ≻ P 6 a ≻ P 6 b . The ( D + R T ) scores yield the following ranking: P 12 ≻ P 1 ≻ P 6 b ≻ P 9 ≻ P 10 ≻ P 11 ≻ P 2 ≻ P 5 ≻ P 6 a ≻ P 6 c ≻ P 8 ≻ P 13 ≻ P 4 ≻ P 3 ≻ P 7 .
Overall, identifying the critical protocols must simultaneously consider both ( D + R T ) and ( D − R T ) vectors. To achieve this, we refer to Fig. 1 and categorize all protocols into four distinct categories: minor key factors (low prominence, high relation), key factors (high prominence, high relation, indirect factors (high prominence, low relation), and independent factors (low prominence, low relation. Based on Fig. 2 , the minor key factors comprise limited operational capacity of diplomatic missions and international organizations (P5), minimum of 50% operational capacity of category II industries (P6b), limited operations of malls and shopping centers (P7), allowed operation of essential public and private construction projects (P8). The key factors include compliance of minimum public health standards (P1), limited movement of persons (P2), non-operation of category IV industries (P9), non-operation of hotels or similar establishments (P10), suspension of physical classes (P11), and prohibition of mass gatherings (P12). The indirect factors category is composed of 24-hr curfew of minors and senior citizens (P3) and reduced capacity of public transportation (P13). The independent factors consist of work in government at full operational capacity (P4), full operational capacity of category I industries (P6a), and maximum of 50% operational capacity of category III industries (P6c). We focus our attention on the key factors category and identify the most crucial protocols. In this category, the minimum public health standards protocol (P1) yields the most important one. Thus, the IATF must concentrate its resources and efforts to ensure that minimum public health standards are strictly observed during the GCQ. This finding is consistent with the observations of [ 3 ] on how China responded to the disease spread. Although those drastic lockdown measures are relaxed and people start to move around, relaxing public health standards (e.g., proper hygiene, wearing of masks, disinfecting public spaces, physical distancing) would stimulate a new surge of cases. The rank order of the key factors is as follows: P 1 ≻ P 2 ≻ P 11 ≻ P 12 ≻ P 9 ≻ P 10 .
The Philippine government has become more efficient and transparent with the release of guidelines and protocols to curb the spread of COVID-19. The key factors in Fig. 2 represent the most crucial lockdown exit protocols, which would provide a balance between public health and economic restart. The government should allocate its resources and plan and implement strict control and monitoring mechanisms on these priority protocols as they impact other protocols for the successful attainment of GCQ's purpose. This work provides better insights to further streamline the lockdown exit strategy of the Philippine government.
The protocol on ensuring minimum public health standards (P1) yields the most critical protocol for implementing the GCQ. This protocol enforces social distancing, wearing of face masks, body temperature checks, provision of sanitation stations, immune system boosting, and disinfecting public spaces at all times. While the GCQ allows movements of people to restart the economy and the society, observing public health standards shields the general health of the community from such movements. It is straightforward to note that compliance to minimum health standards impacts most protocols and serves as a precursor in observing other protocols in the list. Thus, the IATF must establish control measures in those socio-economic activities allowed in the GCQ guidelines so that public health standards appropriate in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic are maintained. For instance, the DOH of the Philippine government has issued “Guidelines on the Risk-Based Public Health Standards for COVID-19 Mitigation” on 27 April [ 69 ] that guides the roles of various stakeholders in maintaining risk-based public health standards. Control measures must be heightened to ensure its strict implementation in the GCQ.
Closely linked to maintaining public health standards is the protocol that there must be limited movement of persons (P2). While P2 supports economic restart through cross-border movements, it also ensures that those movements are just related to essential activities to support the economy. P2 implies that public transportation is reduced, mall operations are limited, suspension of classes, and flexible work arrangements, among others. Managing food capacity and demand at a scale supports P2 by limiting the number of customers through booking and reservations to avoid long queues in supermarkets, retail stores, and food establishments. Establishments may venture into online platforms and delivery service as part of their augmented product. This protocol must be upheld and strictly monitored in GCQ by imposing measures that limit the movement of people. Note that people in lockdowns became impatient in responding to government measures that disrupt their daily lives. This stimulates people to go back to their pre-COVID-19 normal, which would drastically increase movements. Experiences in Hong Kong, Singapore, and South Korea reveal that after easing lockdown measures, the number of new cases surge in just a matter of days as the movement of people became uncontrollable.
The education sector absorbs a massive impact for these draconian measures. Suspension of physical classes (P11) has driven all academic institutions to shift towards online classes, distance learning, flexible learning, and other alternative modes of learning to cushion the disruption amidst the pandemic. With these platforms, some fundamental challenges become apparent for all stakeholders, including students, teachers, and administrators. Poor yet expensive internet connection in the Philippines, limited access to the internet in most rural communities, inadequate skills and experience of both teachers and students in such platforms, and the unavailability of those platforms on a school-wide basis are some of those challenges. Despite these challenges, suspension of physical classes must be maintained as a crucial protocol under GCQ conditions. As an augmentation, the government must support the establishment of necessary infrastructure to enable schools to venture for digital platforms in education as the new normal. The government, along with the academic institutions, must respond to these changes by promptly planning support services for all stakeholders, since personal interaction may not be possible without the availability of the COVID-19 vaccine. Issues in developing countries like the Philippines, such as Internet connectivity, availability of technologies (gadgets), and the technical capacity to go digital must be promptly addressed.
Gatherings such as conferences, festivals, concerts, sports events, and weddings, among others, would discourage social distancing, as huge crowds become uncontrollable. Thus, the prohibition of mass gatherings (P12) must be central to the lockdown exit strategy. To balance economic underpinnings, the government must implement a critical assessment on a per event basis. Permits to event organizers must be secured for proper response whether to suspend, cancel, or consider reducing the number of attendees. Recreation and leisure activities contribute to the overall mental and physical well-being of people under lockdowns [ 23 , 24 ]. However, the non-operation of category IV industries (P9) protocol discourages engagement of leisure activities, which induce sharing or touching of equipment that can spread the disease. To balance with economic goals, Category IV industries may work closely with the government to establish a comprehensive and robust risk assessment and management of activities during GCQ. With the travel restrictions imposed on global destinations beginning in January 2020, the tourism industry has been on a sore end, worsen with the uncertainty and stigma of tourists out of fear for safety. In support of the category IV industries, it can gradually operate some of the establishments such as museums, sightseeing, and some sports activities that do not involve sharing or touching of equipment and where social distancing can be easily implemented and monitored. Furthermore, the government must allocate subsidies toward destination promotion and may invest in virtual tourism during post-lockdown.
The non-operation of category IV industries (P9) is supported by the non-operation of hotels or similar establishments (P10) with the limited operation of the accommodation establishments due to travel restrictions and stigma. Hotels may position their core products in response to the GCQ conditions. For instance, hotels may shift towards highlighting their in-house restaurants through offering deliveries, take-out services, and catering bulk order delivery for small household gatherings. In the case of reopening hotels, content marketing can be adopted through the creation of initiatives that would build strong and profitable relationships with the market. For instance, hygiene standards in hotels and the safety measures of the hotel in response to the pandemic may be highlighted in the promotion campaign, as this is one of the major concerns of the traveling public. Moreover, the government must still strictly impose social distancing measures in hotels and monitor hygiene practices of these establishments as part of the new normal.
As economic shutdowns were implemented and the mental and physical well-being of people under lockdowns in response to the COVID-19 pandemic becomes increasingly evident, governments around the world are already planning, if not implementing, relaxation efforts of those drastic measures implemented early this year. However, the emerging literature, as well as practical experiences of those countries who are already lifting those harsh measures, cautions the resurgence of a new wave of cases that may burden (again) the healthcare systems. Thus, a careful lockdown exit strategy is crucial for governments in order to balance the two conflicting objectives: (1) keep mortality at minimum, and (2) initiate an economic restart. Nevertheless, without controlled experiments and documented experience on such a massive scale, governments resort to trial-and-error approach on designing effectively a post-lockdown strategy. In this work, we demonstrate how network modeling helps in providing insights into the relaxation approach. To address those two objectives, as mentioned above, an intuitionistic fuzzy DEMATEL (IF-DEMATEL) approach is highlighted in this work. A case study in modeling the Philippine relaxation protocols is provided here to demonstrate the applicability of the IF-DEMATEL.
Transitioning from an ECQ (lockdown) status to a more relaxed GCQ status has been initiated by the Philippine government, and 15 GCQ protocols were introduced. This work aims to identify key protocols for the government to invest its resources and provide strict control measures to ensure its implementation. Results suggest that compliance of minimum public health standards, limited movement of persons, minimum of 50% operational capacity of category II industries, non-operation of category IV industries, non-operation of hotels or similar establishments, suspension of physical classes, and prohibition of mass gatherings protocols are part of the cause group which implies that they impact the rest of the guideline protocols, and they are influential in attaining the GCQ objectives. Findings also reveal that six important protocols must be given more attention, and more control measures are necessary. They include, according to priority degree of importance, compliance of minimum public health standards, limited movement of persons, suspension of physical classes, the prohibition of mass gatherings, non-operation of category IV industries, and non-operation of hotels or similar establishments. The Philippine government, through its pandemic task force, must ensure that these six protocols must receive more resources (e.g., funds, workforce) and strict measures must be put in place for their implementation, as well as for developing mitigation efforts to cushion their impacts on the economy and the society. These insights are crucial in resource allocation decisions and policy formulation for the government. Finally, this work reveals that the use of network modeling under uncertainty, specifically IF-DEMATEL, has considerable potential for public health studies in bringing in systemic insights for decision- and policymaking. This work, along with its use of the IF-DEMATEL, is the first of its kind in addressing the emerging COVID-19 pandemic.
Nevertheless, this work is not free from limitations. First, the limited number of experts sets a stage for future research which could handle a significant number of stakeholders, and decision- and policymakers. Future research may explore the same methodological approach to justify the validity of the findings of this work. Second, the proposed method is flexible if new protocols are introduced or removed from the current set of guideline protocols. Future work could address the sensitivity and the implications in the number and kind of protocols when changes are introduced to better respond to the evolving pandemic. Third, the application of the proposed approach is limited to a Philippine case with different culture, geography, political settings, and environment. The findings may not be extended directly to other countries or regions. Thus, future work could also adopt the proposed approach to other countries in developing their lockdown exit protocols. Fourth, the use of other fuzzy DEMATEL extensions (e.g., hesitant fuzzy sets, type-2 fuzzy sets, neutrosophic sets) could be explored and compared to the findings of this work. Fifth, other network modeling techniques such as system dynamics modeling, interpretative structural modeling technique, among others, could also be adopted in future works. Sixth, some predictive modeling techniques for assessing the impact of lockdown exit protocols, such as the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system [ 70 , 71 ], can be explored in future work. Finally, the use of multi-attribute decision-making techniques in prioritization problems along the domains of public health or the emerging COVID-19 pandemic is an interesting platform for future research.
Lanndon Ocampo: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Kafferine Yamagishi: Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing - original draft.
Lanndon Ocampo is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial Engineering at Cebu Technological University (Philippines). He received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from De La Salle University (Philippines) and his MEng and BSc (cum laude) degrees in Industrial Engineering as well as MSc in Mathematics from the University of San Carlos (Philippines). He has authored over 90 international peer-reviewed journal papers and has presented papers at over 30 research conferences. His research interests include optimization, multi-attribute decision-making, decision science, systemic risk analysis, and sustainable manufacturing. He is currently the Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering (IGI-Global). He is a 2017 Outstanding Young Scientist awardee by the National Academy of Science and Technology, Philippines (NAST PH), and a 2018 Outstanding Cebuano awardee in the field of Science and Technology. He is named as one of 2018 THE ASIAN SCIENTIST 100 – an annual listing of the region's top researchers, academics, and innovators. Most recently, he is conferred as the 2019 Achievement Awardee of the National Research Council of the Philippines (NRCP) under the Division of Engineering and Industrial Research.
Kafferine Yamagishi is an Assistant Professor, and currently the Chair of the Department of Tourism Management, College of Management and Entrepreneurship at Cebu Technological University, Philippines. She attained her Master of Management major in Tourism Management at the University of San Carlos (Philippines), where she is currently taking up her Doctor of Philosophy degree in Business Administration. She received her Certification in Professional Education and attained her Master of Arts in Education major in Administration and Supervision at Cebu Technological University. She graduated Bachelor of Science in Tourism (cum laude) at the University of San Jose-Recoletos, Philippines. Before joining academia, she worked both in the hospitality and tourism industry. She currently has four published articles in Scopus-indexed journals. Also, she has presented papers to research conferences throughout her academic career. Her research interests include tourism management, destination planning, tourism marketing, and events management.
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
Advancements in fish vaccination: current innovations and future horizons in aquaculture health management.
2. fish immune system, 3. bacterial, viral, and parasitic diseases in fish, 4. current licensed vaccines for bacterial diseases, 4.1. edwardsiellosis in fish, 4.2. enteric septicemia of catfish, 4.3. bacterial kidney disease, 4.4. flavobacteriosis/columnaris disease, 4.5. furunculosis, 4.6. piscine streptococcosis, 4.7. enteric red mouth disease/yersiniosis, 4.8. lactococcosis, 5. current licensed vaccines for viral diseases, 5.1. current licensed vaccines for parasitic diseases, 5.2. challenges and limitations in developing vaccines for fish, 6. summary and conclusions, conflicts of interest.
Click here to enlarge figure
Name of the Diseases | Causative Agent | Fish It Affects |
---|---|---|
Bacterial | ||
Atypical furunculosis | Aeromonas salmonicida | Salmonids, spotted wolfish, Atlantic cod |
Motile aeromonid septicemia | Aeromonas hydrophila, A. caviae, A. veronii biovar sobria | Freshwater fish species, including catfish and brass |
Vibriosis | Vibrio spp., including V. harveyi, V. vulnificus, V. alginolyticus, and V. parahaemolyticus | Marine fish including salmonids, yellowtail, halibut, amberjack |
Enteric septicemia | Edwardsiella ictaluri | Catfish |
Edwardsiellosis | Edwardsiella tarda | Catfish, striped bass, tilapia, sea bream |
Tuberculosis | Mycobacterium marinum, M. fortuitum, M. chelonae | Marine, brackish, and freshwater fish, including sea bass, tropical aquarium fish |
Rainbow trout fry syndrome/Bacterial Cold-Water Disease | Flavobacterium psychrophilum | Salmonids, freshwater fish |
Columnaris | Flavobacterium columnare | Cyprinids, trout, tilapia |
Streptococcosis | Streptococcus agalactiae | Tilapia, bass, rainbow trout |
Streptococcosis | Streptococcus parauberis | Olive flounder, rainbow trout, tilapia, bass |
Streptococcosis | Streptococcusiniae | Atlantic salmon, rainbow trout, and tilapia |
Enteric redmouth disease/Yersiniosis | Yersinia ruckeri | Salmonids, rainbow trout, eel, minnows, sturgeon, and crustaceans |
Lactococcosis | Lactococcus garvieae | Rainbow trout, yellowtail, catfish, olive flounder, greytail mullet, amberjack, kingfish |
Viral | ||
Tilapia Lake Virus | Tilapia Tilapinevirus | Tilapia and hybrid tilapia fish |
Infectious Hemorrhagic necrosis virus | Novirhabdovirus | Trout and salmon |
Infectious salmon anemia | Orthomyxovirus | Atlantic salmon, rainbow trout, coho salmon |
Infectious pancreatic necrosis | Birnavirus | Salmonids, sea brass, sea bream, Pacific cod |
Koi Herpes Virus | Herpesvirus | Cyprinus carpio |
Red Sea Bream Iridovirus | Iridovirus | Marine fish species including red sea bream, japanese seabass, and striped jack |
Salmonid Alphavirus | Alphavirus | Atlantic salmon, rainbow trout |
Iridoviral disease | Iridovirus | Amberjack, yellowtail, red sea bream |
Parasites | ||
Costiasis | Ichthyobodo necotor | Several freshwater and saltwater fish |
Salmon Poisoning disease | Nanophyetus salmincola | Salmon, several freshwater fish |
White Spot | Ichthyophthirius mulifiliis | Freshwater fish |
Sea Lice | Lepeophtheirus solmonis | Marine salmonids |
Whirling Disease | Myxobolus cerebralis | Trout, salmon, whitefish |
Myxosporeans | Myxobolus genera | Freshwater and marine fish |
Microsporean | Pleistophora genera | Freshwater and marine fish |
Disease | Pathogen | Host | Type of Vaccine | Route of Delivery | Trade Name | Country |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Enteric septicaemia of catfish (ESC) | Edwardsiella ictaluri | catfish | Live attenuated | Immersion | Aquavac-ESC | US |
Bacterial Kidney Disease (BKD) | Renibacterium salmoninarum | salmonids | Live attenuated | IP | Renogen | US Canada Chile |
Flavobacteriosis/Columnaris | Flavobacterium columnare Flavobacterium maritimus | cyprinids, salmonids, catfish | Live attenuated | Immersion | Aquavac-Col | US Canada Chile |
Inactivated | IP | Alpha Ject IPNVFlevo 0.025 | Chile | |||
Killed bacterin | Immersion | FryVacc 1 | US Canada | |||
FryVacc 2 | Chile | |||||
Furunculosis | Aeromonas salmonicida | Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout | Inactivated, oil-based | IP | AlphaJect 3000 | Denmark Finland Iceland Ireland Norway Sweden |
Alpha Ject 2.2 | UK | |||||
Alpha Ject 4-1, Alpha Ject 5-1 | Chile | |||||
Alpha Ject 6-2 | Norway The Faroe Islands | |||||
Alpha Ject micro 7 ILA | Norway The Faroe Islands | |||||
Subunit vaccine | IP | Norvax Minova 6 | Norway | |||
Inactivated bacterin | IP | AquaVac-FNM | UK Ireland Spain France | |||
Killed bacterin | IP | Lipogen Forte, Furogen Dip, Forte VI | US Canada | |||
Streptococcosis | Streptococcus iniae | tilapia and seabass | Inactivated | IP or Bath | Norvax Strep Si, Aquavac Strep Sa | Vietnam Honduras Indonesia |
tilapia | Killed | IP | Aquavac-Garvetil | Honduras Venezuela Ecuador The Philippines Indonesia | ||
Streptococcus agalactiae | tilapia | Inactivated | IP | AlphaJect micro1 TiLa | Brazil Colombia Honduras Indonesia Panama | |
Streptococcusparauberis | turbot | Inactivated | IP | Icthiovac-STR | Spain | |
Vibriosis | V. anguillarum V. ordalii | Atlantic salmon | Inactivated, oil-based | IP | Alpha Ject micro 7 ILA, Alpha Ject 6-2 | Norway The Faroe Islands |
Inactivated, oil-based | IP | Alpha Ject 5-1, Alpha Ject 4-1, | Chile | |||
Inactivated, oil-based | IP | Alpha Ject Micro-4 | Canada | |||
Subunit vaccine | IP | Norvax Minova 6 | Norway | |||
Inactivated, oil-based | IP | Alpha Ject micro 6 | Ireland UK The Faroe Islands Norway | |||
sea bass | Inactivated, oil-based | IP | Alpha Ject micro 2000 | Croatia Spain Greece France | ||
Atlantic salmon | Inactivated, oil-based | IP | Alpha Ject Micro-3 | Chile | ||
Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout | Inactivated, oil-based | IP | Alpha Ject 5-3 | Iceland Norway | ||
Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout | Inactivated, oil-based | IP | AlphaJect 3000 | Denmark Finland Iceland Ireland Norway Sweden | ||
Sea bass | Inactivated, oil-based | Dip | ALPHA DIP Vib | Croatia Cyprus Greece Italy Portugal Spain | ||
Sea bass | Inactivated, oil-based | Bath/ Immersion | ALPHA DIP Vibrio | Turkey | ||
Atlantic salmon | Inactivated, oil-based | IP | Alpha Ject 2-2 | UK | ||
salmonids | Killed bacterin | IP | Furogen Dip, Forte VI, Lipogen Forte | US Canada | ||
salmonids | Killed bacterin | Bath/ Immersion | Vibrogen-2 | US Canada | ||
European sea bass | Inactivated bacterin | IP | AquaVac Vibrio Pasteurella | Greece Middle East | ||
rainbow trout | Inactivated bacterin | Oral/ Immersion | AquaVac Vibrio, AquaVac Vibrio Oral Boost | Finland UK Ireland Spain Greece |
Virus | Type of Virus (RNA/DNA) | Fish Host | Trade Name (If Applicable) | Type of Vaccine | Delivery Method | Licensed for Use in the Following Countries | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAV | RNA | Atlantic salmon | Norvax Compact PD | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Norway Chile UK | A monovalent vaccine which contains an inactivated strain of SAV subtype 1. |
SAV | RNA | Atlantic salmon | Aquavac PD7 | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Norway | A polyvalent vaccine which contains seven strains to protect against pancreatic disease, infectious pancreatic necrosis, furunculosis, cold-water vibriosis, vibriosis and winter ulcers. Specifically, to protect against SAV, it contains an inactivated strain of SAV subtype 1. |
SAV | RNA | Atlantic salmon | Aquavac PD3 | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | UK | A polyvalent vaccine which contains an inactivated strain of SAV subtype 1, as well as infectious pancreatic necrosis and furunculosis. |
SAV | RNA | Atlantic salmon | Alphaject Micro 1 PD | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | UK Norway | A monovalent vaccine which contains the inactivated SAV subtype 3, the SAV strain most dominant in Norway. |
IPNV | RNA | Atlantic salmon, rainbow trout | AlphaJect 1000 | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Chile Norway UK | A monovalent vaccine containing an inactivated form of the virus. |
IPNV | RNA | Atlantic salmon | Birnagen Forte | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Canada UK | A monovalent vaccine containing inactivated bacterins and virulins. |
IPNV | RNA | Atlantic salmon | Aquavac IPN Oral | Recombinant | Oral | US Canada Chile Middle East | A monovalent vaccine containing capsid proteins VP2 and VP3. |
IPNV | RNA | Atlantic salmon, Pacific salmon, chinook salmon, rainbow trout | Blueguard IPNV Oral | Inactivated | Oral | Chile | A monovalent vaccine containing two inactivated strains of IPNV. |
IPNV | RNA | Rainbow trout, Atlantic salmon, Pacific Salmon, chinook salmon | Blueguard IPN Inyectable | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Chile | A monovalent vaccine containing two strains of inactivated IPNV. |
IPNV | RNA | Atlantic salmon | AlphaJect IPNV-Flavo 0.025 | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Chile | A bivalent vaccine protecting against IPNV and Flavobacteriosis. |
IPNV | RNA | Atlantic salmon, Pacific salmon, rainbow trout | AlphaJect Micro 2 | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Chile | A bivalent vaccine protecting against IPNV and SRS. |
IPNV | RNA | Atlantic salmon | AlphaJect 2-2 | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | UK | A bivalent vaccine protecting against IPNV and Furunculosis. |
IPNV | RNA | Atlantic salmon | AlphaJect Micro 3 | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Chile | A trivalent vaccine protecting against IPNV, SRS, and Vibriosis. |
IPNV | RNA | Atlantic salmon, rainbow trout | blueguard SRS+IPN+Vibrio | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Chile | A trivalent vaccine which includes two strains of inactivated IPNV and inactivated bacterins to protect against SRS and Vibrio. |
IPNV | RNA | Atlantic salmon | AlphaJect 4-1 | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Chile | A polyvalent vaccine protecting against Furunculosis, SRS, Vibriosis, and IPNV. |
IPNV | RNA | Atlantic salmon | Pentium Forte Plus | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Norway | Contains inactivated whole virus of IPNV, and also protects against Furunculosis, Classical Vibriosis, coldwater vibriosis, and Winter Ulcer. |
IPNV | RNA | Atlantic Salmon | Norvax Minova 6 | Subunit, inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | UK Norway | A multivalent vaccine which protects against Furunculosis, classical vibriosis, coldwater vibriosis, wound disease and IPNV. It contains a subunit VP2 capsid protein. |
IPNV | RNA | Atlantic salmon | AlphaJect Micro 6 | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Norway United Kingdom The Faroe Islands Ireland | A multivalent vaccine protecting against Furunculosis, Vibriosis, cold-water vibriosis, Winter sore, and IPNV. |
IPNV | RNA | Atlantic Salmon | AlphaJect 6-2 | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Norway The Faroe Islands | A polyvalent vaccine protecting against Furunculosis, Vibriosis. Coldwater vibriosis, Winter sore, and IPNV. |
IPNV and ISA | RNA | Atlantic salmon | AlphaJect Micro 4-2 | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Chile | A multivalent vaccine protecting against IPNV, Infectious Salmon Anemia (ISA), Vibriosis, and Furunculosis. |
IPNV and ISA | RNA | Atlantic salmon | AlphaJect 5-1 | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Chile | A polyvalent vaccine protecting against Furunculosis, SRS, Vibriosis, ISA, and IPNV. |
IPNV and ISA | RNA | Atlantic salmon | AlphaJect Micro 7 | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Norway The Faroe Islands | A multivalent vaccine protecting against, Furunculosis, Vibriosis, Coldwater vibriosis, Winter sore, IPNV, and (ISA). |
IPNV and ISA | RNA | Atlantic salmon | Blueguard SRS+IPN+VO+ISA | Subunit and Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Chile | A polyvalent vaccine containing subunit ISA, inactivated IPNV strain, and bacterins. It protects against ISA, IPNV, SRS, and Vibriosis. |
IPNV and ISA | RNA | Atlantic salmon | Blueguard IPN+SRS+AS+VO+ISA inyectable | Subunit and Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Chile | A polyvalent vaccine containing subunit ISA, inactivated IPNV strain, and bacterins. It protects against ISA, IPN, SRS, vibriosis, and furunculosis. |
ISA | RNA | Atlantic salmon | AlphaJect Micro 1 ISA | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Chile | A monovalent vaccine that includes an inactivated strain of ISA. |
ISA | RNA | Salmonids | Forte VII | Inactivated | Intraperitoneal Injection | Canada | A polyvalent vaccine which contains inactivated ISA and bacterin. It protects against ISA, Furunculosis, and Vibriosis. |
RSIV | DNA | Red sea bream, yellowtail and sea brass | n.a | Formalin | Intraperitoneal | Japan | A monovalent formalin-based vaccine that fights against RSIV. This was the first vaccine made against the virus. |
RSIV | DNA | Red sea bream, yellowtail and sea brass | AQUAVAC IridoV | Formalin, oil-adjuvant | Intraperitoneal | Singapore | A monovalent vaccine with an inactivated strain of RSIV which targets tilapia and Asian sea bass. |
IHNV | RNA | Salmonids including rainbow trout, steelhead trout and Atlantic salmon | Apex-IHN | DNA | Intramuscular Injection | Canada, USA | A DNA plasmid vaccine targeting IHNV in salmonids. |
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Rathor, G.S.; Swain, B. Advancements in Fish Vaccination: Current Innovations and Future Horizons in Aquaculture Health Management. Appl. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 5672. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135672
Rathor GS, Swain B. Advancements in Fish Vaccination: Current Innovations and Future Horizons in Aquaculture Health Management. Applied Sciences . 2024; 14(13):5672. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135672
Rathor, Garima S., and Banikalyan Swain. 2024. "Advancements in Fish Vaccination: Current Innovations and Future Horizons in Aquaculture Health Management" Applied Sciences 14, no. 13: 5672. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135672
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
COMMENTS
The Philippine response to COVID-19 has been described as being one of the longest and strictest lockdowns in the world. Entire provinces and cities were put into lockdown, mobility was restricted, and the wearing of masks and social distancing were strictly enforced.
Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with weak health systems are especially vulnerable during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this paper, we describe the challenges and early response of the Philippine Government, focusing on travel restrictions, community interventions, risk communication and testing, from 30 January 2020 when the first case was reported, to 21 March 2020.
COVID-19 Response in the Philippines. 20 January 2022 The Philippines has been severely affected by COVID-19. According to latest WHO figures, as of 17 January 2022, the Philippines had recorded over 3 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 with over 52,700 deaths.Since March 2020, the country has taken strict measures to halt the spread of the virus, including lockdowns such as Enhanced ...
Atienza ML., Arugay AA., Encinas-Franco J (2020) Constitutional Performance Assessment in the Time of a Pandemic: The 1987 Constitution and the Philippines' Covid-19 Response. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance and University of the Philippines Center for Integrative and Development Studies.
COVID-19 dynamics in the Philippines are driven by age, contact structure, mobility, and MHS adherence. Continued compliance with low-cost MHS should help the Philippines control the epidemic until vaccines are widely distributed, but disease resurgence may be occurring due to a combination of low population immunity and detection rates and new variants of concern.
Responses of subnational government units are crucial in the containment of the spread of pathogens in a country. To mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Philippine national government through its Inter-Agency Task Force on Emerging Infectious Diseases outlined different quarantine measures wherein each level has a corresponding degree of rigidity from keeping only the essential ...
Abstract. Like many others across the globe, Filipinos continue to suffer from the COVID-19 pandemic. To shed light on how the Philippines initially managed the disease, our paper analyzed the early phase of the government's pandemic response. Using machine learning, we compiled the official press releases issued by the Department of Health ...
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2) has spread globally since its first report in Wuhan, China on December 31, 2019. On January 30, the Philippines reported its first two imported cases of COVID-19 in a couple from Wuhan. One of them died on February 1st, becoming the first COVID-19 death outside China.
ARLY RESPONSE TO COVID-19Travel restrictionsTravel restrictions in the Philippines were imposed as early as 28 January, before the first confirmed case was reported on 30 January (Fig. 1a).9 After the first few COVID-19 cases and deaths, the Government conducted contact tracing and imposed additional travel restrictions,10 with arrivals from ...
The Philippines is contending with one of the worst COVID-19 outbreaks in southeast Asia. As of April 18, 2021, there were 926 052 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection and 15 810 deaths recorded. WHO has warned that the country's health-care system risks being overwhelmed. From March 29, 2021, a new round of lockdown was implemented in Manila and four ...
The Philippines is contending with one of the worst COVID-19 outbreaks in southeast Asia. As of April 18, 2021, there were 926 052 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection and 15 810 deaths recorded. WHO has warned that the country's health-care system risks being overwhelmed. From March 29, 2021, a new round of lockdown was implemented in Manila and four surrounding provinces to suppress the new surge ...
Learn from the COVID-19 Pandemic 10 S.V. Siar National and Local Government's Fiscal Response and Role in Recovery 11 C.J. Diokno-Sicat ABOUT THE BOOK | 6 BACKGROUND PAPERS Inequality and Human Development in the Philippines 06 A.M. Navarro The Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Filipino Migrant Workers A.D. Tabuga and C.C. Cabaero 05
The Philippines reported its first Covid-19 case on January 30, 2020, and confirmed its first coronavirus-related fatality three days later. The country was officially placed under a state of calamity for a period of six months on March 17, mandating that national and local authorities mobilise the resources needed to respond to the health crisis.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic hit the Philippine economy and society unprecedentedly. To protect the people, the government had to act decisively and identify solutions to contain the rapid spread of the virus and the devastating economic and social disruption caused by the pandemic. This book compiles papers assessing the ...
Abstract. In this essay, we engage with the call for Extraordinary Issue: Coronavirus, Crisis and Communication. Situated in the Philippines, we reflect on how COVID-19 has made visible the often-overlooked relationship between journalism and public health. In covering the pandemic, journalists struggle with the shrinking space for press ...
Some LGUs have demonstrated a remarkable response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study is to identify notable non-pharmaceutical interventions of these outlying LGUs in the country using quantitative methods. Methods: Data were taken from public databases such as Philippine Department of Health, Philippine Statistics Authority ...
The Philippine government's response to the current pandemic received various criticisms, questions, and feedback. For example, Amnesty International warned about the government's possible human rights violations due to the concentration of power on President Rodrigo Duterte to manage the disease [5].This concentration of power was made possible through the passage of the Bayanihan to Heal as ...
The World Health Organization (WHO) has been working with Ministries of Health worldwide to prepare and respond to COVID-19. In the Philippines, WHO country office in the Philippines and its partners have been working with the Department of Health and subnational authorities to respond to the pandemic. The country level response is done with support from the WHO regional office and headquarters.
Abstract. Like many others across the globe, Filipinos continue to suffer from the COVID-19 pandemic. To shed light on how the Philippines initially managed the disease, our paper analyzed the early phase of the government's pandemic response. Using machine learning, we compiled the official press releases issued by the Department of Health ...
Beyond the human costs, COVID-19 has affected everyoneʼs economic, social, and political lives (Bonotti & Zech, 2021). In the Philippines context, mini-public participants highlighted not only the pandemicʼs devastating public health outcomes but also the severe economic hardships experienced by households and broader communities.
In the past six months, UNHCR has mobilized quickly to support the government-led response to COVID-19 in the Philippines. Help us continue to deliver sustainable & vital services including health ...
The Philippine Congress, through the Bayanihan to Heal as One Act, allocates US$ 5.37 billion for the COVID-19 pandemic, where US$ 3.9 billion is allotted for the implementation of the emergency subsidy program, and US$ 1.4 for funding health requirements and other services []).The emergency subsidy program for two months covers the basic needs of the 18 million Filipino families [].
ZIENYAANYE UPPER WEST
Aquaculture is rapidly becoming one of the pivotal sectors in the farming economy, driven by the increasing demand for high-quality animal protein at an affordable cost, especially with the escalating human population. However, the expansion of high-density fish populations also brings forth a challenge—the rapid transmission and spread of infectious disease agents among them. To combat this ...