Follow Eater online:
- Follow Eater on Twitter
- Follow Eater on Facebook
- Follow Eater on Youtube
- Follow Eater on Instagram
Site search
- Los Angeles
- New Orleans
- Philadelphia
- Portland, OR
- San Francisco
- Twin Cities
- Washington DC
Filed under:
Liquid Smoke: The History Behind a Divisive Culinary Shortcut
Barbecue's love/hate relationship with the manufactured flavor
If you buy something from an Eater link, Vox Media may earn a commission. See our ethics policy .
Share this story
- Share this on Facebook
- Share this on Twitter
- Share All sharing options
Share All sharing options for: Liquid Smoke: The History Behind a Divisive Culinary Shortcut
Biting into the blackened crust of a slice of fatty brisket, one's taste buds are inundated with saltiness, a slight peppery spiciness, and, of course, smoke. At at any god-honest barbecue joint, pitmasters dedicate hours babysitting their smokers, routinely feeding the iron apparatus chips of hickory or applewood and eyeing the timer like a hawk. For these barbecue heads, obtaining such rich, smoky essence doesn't come easy. But not everyone's willing to do things the hard way.
The advent of liquid smoke — literally, smoke condensed into a liquid form — has allowed folks to cut down smoking time from hours to, well, mere seconds (mirroring if not the texture of slow-smoked meat, then at least its principal flavor). Its usage causes barbecue purists ( like the late Josh Ozersky ) to roll their eyes, and health groups have consistently voiced concern over possible health effects.
But the growing popularity of liquid smoke can be seen almost everywhere. A variety of liquid smoke-branded bottles stock the grocery shelves, and products like "smoked" bacon reveal their true nature on the packages' ingredient labels. In the gastronomy realm, where ingredients like " smoked-infused lettuce " aren't so outlandish, liquid smoke enjoys a recurring role as a flavor additive. So how did this divisive ingredient become so popular?
A New York smokehouse, 1923. Eugene L. Armbruster/The New York Historical Society/Getty Images
Leave it to science to butt heads with tradition. Ernest H. Wright, a Kansas City, Missouri pharmacist, created the ingredient in 1895. According to a 1923 edition of The Rotarian , Wright's inspiration for liquid smoke was the memory of "a drop of liquid trickling down the stove-pipe" in the print shop he worked at as a teenager. The pharmacist realized a decade later that smoke condenses when it comes into contact with the cold air. By running smoke from burning hickory wood through a condenser, Wright collected the droplets containing the chemicals from the hot vapors. The collected liquid could then be used as a delicious, cheap alternative to literally smoking meat .
Liquid smoke's early use was less as a flavoring agent and more as a preservative. At the time, farmers in the South — where Wright was selling his initial batch of product — smoked salt-cured ham and pork bellies largely for preservation reasons. Bugs, however, apparently love the taste of pork as much as humans, and flies oftentimes would lay their eggs in the hunks of flesh hanging in the smokehouse. As a result , the ham and pork bellies were frequently ruined, unable to be sold. While Wright's liquid smoke did capture that savory carnal essence, the new-age smokemaster made his fortune by marketing his product as a cheap preservative. (Contemporary studies have confirmed that Wright wasn't selling junk science: Liquid smoke does have some anti-microbacterial properties, and brining or topically applying liquid smoke to meat can extend its shelf life.)
Contemporary studies have confirmed that Wright wasn’t selling junk science.
Competition quickly cracked Wright's code, and other liquid smoke brands cropped up. Figaro (founded in 1904, now owned by the Louisiana-based Baumer Foods, which is also behind Crystal Hot Sauce) and Colgin (founded in Dallas in 1945) also began selling their products as preservatives.
By the 1950s and '60s, the advent of suburbia and those idyllic backyard cookouts prompted the growing consumer appetite for smokier, carnal flavors. This, coupled with the powdered-this-canned-that-no-fuss-tuna-casserole attitude of at-home cooking, provided the perfect storm for liquid smoke to enter the American kitchen . With the American Food and Drug Administration giving the product its safety blessing in 1960, according to the Handbook of Meat, Poultry and Seafood Quality , by the ‘70s, liquid smoke was in full swing as a flavoring agent for home use as well as commercial brands' ketchups, barbecue sauces, cheeses, oysters, and — yes — bacon. Nowadays, liquid smoke brands are unabashed in advertising their products' main use as quick, cheap flavoring agents.
Photo: Raymond Schobe/ Flickr
Is it safe?
On the whole, liquid smoke's ingredients list was intended by Wright to be equal to real smoke. To this day, many brands of liquid smoke follow a similar "recipe" in condensing the hot vapors, although it's not surprising to find additional flavor additives like molasses, salt, or vinegar mixed in at the end of the process.
"This isn’t something we’re pouring over our breakfast cereal."
In more recent years, however, several health experts, scientists, and dietitians all have voiced health concerns over the safety of liquid smoke used in meats, barbecue sauce, and a number of other food products. The European Food Safety Authority, the health arm of the European Union, has conducted a series of investigations to determine the safety of liquid smoke flavorings derived from different types of hardwood.
A large driver in these investigations lies in the fact that liquid smoke contains polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), a family of chemical compounds. A handful of its members been linked to carcinogenic effects and DNA damage. For example, Primary Product AM 01 , a flavoring derived from burning beechwood, is considered a safety concern due to findings that it might cause DNA mutations when consumed. The type and amount of PAHs present in a particular type of liquid smoke, however, depends on the type of hardwood used and the temperature at which it's burned. But many nutritionists, including Monica Reinagel, a licensed nutritionist and author of the blog Nutrition Over Easy , believe the concentrations of these molecules in liquid smoke are far too low for any genuine health concern.
Reinagel describes the health concern over the presence of the PAHs in liquid smoke as a " tempest in a teapot ." "This isn't something we're pouring over our breakfast cereal," Reinagel says, adding that PAHs found in liquid smoke are no different than those you'd find in traditionally smoked meats or fish. As a result, she believes that wolfing down on meat brined with a few drops of liquid smoke can't be any worse than pigging out on smoked sausage links.
Photo: Denis Vrublevski/ Shutterstock
A Controversial Condiment
In the culinary world's mass-market sector, liquid smoke provides a convenient shortcut to achieving the familiar "barbecue" flavor. Ingredients labels typically refer to liquid smoke as "natural smoke flavoring" or "natural smoke source." One can find these often listed on the ingredients label for McDonald's cultishly beloved McRib sauce , as well as typical barbecue-flavored snacks like Lay's potato chips. In a report published this past April by Future Market Insights, a market intelligence and consulting firm, the global liquid smoke market was valued at $65 million in 2015. FMI predicts that liquid smoke's market value will increase at a compound annual growth rate of 8.1 percent over the next decade, citing drivers like "rising disposable income, growing pet ownership, increasing consumption of meat products and lowered total production cost."
Liquid smoke's sales may have increased, but that hasn't necessarily translated into a warm embrace by the cooking world. Several barbecue purists like Daniel Vaughn, barbecue editor of Texas Monthly , are up front in their antagonism towards incorporating the condiment in any barbecue-related recipes. " I cringe every time I taste it ," Vaughn says, comparing the taste of meat coated with liquid smoke to that of instant coffee. Furthermore, he believes slathering smoked meat with barbecue sauces that incorporate liquid smoke ruins the meat's flavor.
Of course, not everyone — even in the barbecue world — holds such fundamentalist stances towards usage of this ingredient. Steven Raichlen, author of several barbecue books like The Barbecue Bible and Planet Barbecue! , explains that while directly applying liquid smoke to his meat is verboten, he's content with incorporating it in his barbecue sauces. And when diving into the realms of popular food science and gastronomy food channels, the witch hunt dwindles. ChefSteps, a cooking channel started by alumni of the creative team that produced Modernist Cuisine , includes several recipes utilizing liquid smoke, including the aptly titled " Apartment Ribs ."
"Flavor-wise, there’s no reason you can’t make good smoky food using liquid smoke."
Similarly, Serious Eats's Kenji López-Alt is unapologetic in featuring liquid smoke in several of his sous vide barbecue recipes for his Food Lab column. "The stuff that goes into the bottle, minus a couple of chemical components that are not water soluble, is almost identical to meat when it's smoking," says López-Alt, who explained that a lot of the problems with liquid smoke comes from beginners not understanding the less-is-more philosophy. "Flavor-wise, there's no reason you can't make good smoky food using liquid smoke."
Although liquid smoke offers such perks as quick cooking time and a sense of measured control in preparing barbecue-style meats, culinary experimenters like López-Alt aren't oblivious to the fact that liquid smoke leaves out a lot of the elements integral to barbecue . He claims that a large part of experiencing barbecue includes factors like the pit master's time and effort required for preparing and smoking the meat. As a result, he understands why using liquid smoke might be considered akin to "bringing a laser-guided basketball player to a basketball game." For the toughest of barbecue heads like Vaughn, this concession regarding liquid smoke's limitations might be the closest thing to agreement.
"I never would use liquid smoke, but I'm not gonna tell people not to use it," says Vaughn. "Just don't use it on meat and then call it 'barbecue.'"
Matthew Sedacca is a freelance writer based in New York. Editor: Erin DeJesus
More From Eater
Sign up for the sign up for eater's newsletter.
The freshest news from the food world every day
Thanks for signing up!
Check your inbox for a welcome email.
Oops. Something went wrong. Please enter a valid email and try again.
‘Tofayo’ Is the Only Condiment You Need
Discounted Kitchen Gear to Buy this Labor Day, According to Eater Staff
Capri Sun Introducing Bottles Would Completely Miss the Point of Capri Sun
Buy Yourself One Fancy Little Plate
A Shortcut to Dishoom’s Buttery Black Dal in Under an Hour
Which Zucchini Bread Recipe Makes the Most Out of Summer Abundance?
Zucchini bread is a great way to use up an excess of summer squash, but not all recipes are created equal
Do-It-Yourself Liquid Smoke, and Other Kitchen Hacks
16:48 minutes
- Read Transcript
- Listen on SoundCloud
- More from this episode
The “maker movement” doesn’t end with arduino—that same DIY philosophy can also be applied in the kitchen. Jeff Potter, author of Cooking for Geeks: Real Science, Great Cooks, and Good Food – Second Edition , talks about how to make sour cream, chocolate bars, rolled oats—and even liquid smoke—from scratch. And, if you happen to have a mass spectrometer handy, there’s a bonus: how to tell the origin of your tomatoes. Read an excerpt .
Segment Guests
Jeff Potter is the author of Cooking for Geeks: Real Science, Great Cooks, and Good Food — Second Edition (O’Reilly, 2015) and a software engineer in New York, New York.
Segment Transcript
IRA FLATOW: This is “Science Friday. I am Ira Flatow. You know, there are a lot of kitchen experiments you, as an amateur scientist, can do at home. For example, ever shaken a jar of heavy whipping cream until it separates into butter? It’s pretty easy. They even do it in kindergarten. Right?
But it’s also kind of mind-blowing, the realization that, hey, you can actually make this stuff, real butter, it’s not just something that comes prewrapped in the refrigerator aisle. And it tastes a lot better too. So you walk around the supermarket these days, and you’ll see, there’s a lot of stuff, there’s a lot of stuff. They’re products people use to make themselves, but they don’t do that anymore. Here’s looking at you, sour cream.
My next guest is a ninja of those lost culinary arts. And he’s here with a few tricks to get more out of your cooking by doing it yourself. Jeff Potter, author of Cooking For Geeks, Real Science, Great Cooks, and Good Food. He’s out with a new edition with new experiments you’re going to want to try. And you can find a few at sciencefriday.com/cookingforgeeks. Jeff, good to have you back.
JEFF POTTER: Thanks for having me.
IRA FLATOW: All right. If you’ve got any kitchen hacks of your own, or maybe a little science to improve your made-from-scratch recipes, you can give us a call. 844-724-8255. You can also tweet us @scifri.
Jeff, there’s a lot of stuff in your kitchen these days. There’s one or two steps removed from their natural state. It’s almost there. Right? Minimally processed. I’m thinking like vanilla extract. But we’ve sort of forgotten how to make all this stuff. When did we lose that ability to make all this stuff?
JEFF POTTER: I think a lot of that happened post World War II when we kind of got to two people in the family, both in the workplace and convenience of buying things from home. And there was that space age excitement of the modern go to the store and buy something. And you know, it’s actually amazing how much science contributed to the ability for us to make food.
But here we are, 50 years after that point, and we’ve forgotten some things. So one of the great things I’ve had fun this last year doing is digging into, well, what happens? How can we do these things ourselves?
IRA FLATOW: And well, vanilla is–
JEFF POTTER: Well, vanilla is easy.
IRA FLATOW: –an easy one. How do you make the extract.
JEFF POTTER: You can just literally take vanilla bean, slice it open, and drop it into a small jar with a little bit of vodka. Vodka, being ethanol, is a great solvent. And this is how you make vanilla extract.
IRA FLATOW: People would love to try that one.
JEFF POTTER: It’s easy, I tell you. Especially if you’re cooking with the vanilla bean. Don’t throw it away. Drop it in a little small container with some vodka, and put it in the fridge or keep it for a week or two. And then you’ll have vanilla extract.
IRA FLATOW: That’s great. There’s one condiment that people don’t use too often, but a really fun project to make. And that is liquid smoke.
JEFF POTTER: Liquid smoke is fascinating. This is one of those ones that demonstrates some really great chemistry. It’s made fundamentally by taking whatever your smoke source is,– hickory chips, say– putting them inside a container that you then heat. And you take the smoke from that container, a closed container. We’re not talking about combustion. There’s no oxygen here. You heat it up.
And that smoke you then direct through water. And that water will actually dissolve some of the smoke compounds into it. And that water ends up being what we call liquid smoke. And it’s got all the flavor compounds. And that begins to give you a little insight that sometimes these things that come in a bottle are actually very simple. Sometimes they’re not though.
IRA FLATOW: Is it safer than actually grilling?
JEFF POTTER: There is some thinking that, in fact, the liquid smoke should be safer, because a lot of the carcinogenic compounds end up either precipitating out or floating out and not being in suspension inside that liquid.
IRA FLATOW: All right. I can’t hold back myself anymore, because I’m looking at some wonderful pieces of chocolate and other things that you’ve brought in.
JEFF POTTER: Chocolate was another one of those fun ones to look into. And who could resist chocolate?
IRA FLATOW: Not me, that’s for sure.
JEFF POTTER: In this case, chocolate, as we think about it, that nice bar of chocolate that you see Charlie and the Chocolate Factory opening up, goes through a process called conching. And that process was invented in the 1870s by a guy whose last name was Lindt. Quite familiar to those of us who like chocolate these days. And that process really takes the cocoa fat, the cocoa butter, and sugar, and really grinds them together and away.
But before Lindt came up with that process, chocolate was unconched. It had this texture that wasn’t smooth. It wasn’t really for eating.
So you can kind of approximate this at home if you grab some cocoa fat, which is the same thing as cocoa butter, about 30%, 35% by weight, some cocoa powder, also 30% to 35% by weight, and the rest sugar. Melt the cocoa butter. Throw in the cocoa solids– the cocoa powder, that is– and the sugar and mix it up. And you’ll get something that looks a bit like that piece that you are looking at.
IRA FLATOW: This round one?
JEFF POTTER: That round one. So take a bite now. Keep in mind that before we had conching, chocolate was not really a great thing for eating. It was gritty. It didn’t have that fine texture. I mean, the flavor is interesting. And it’s a fun thing to try.
IRA FLATOW: It’s good, because it’s not too sweet.
JEFF POTTER: Well, in this case, that’s because there’s not too much sugar in there.
IRA FLATOW: Not too much sugar. And it’s delicious.
JEFF POTTER: I always know that bringing food into the studio is a great thing.
IRA FLATOW: Now, when you see the cocoa content– you go out and you want to get these bars. They say 75%, 80%. What are they talking about there?
JEFF POTTER: They’re talking about the percent of cacao product in there, which is a combination of the cocoa fat and the cocoa powder. They’re not telling you the ratio of those two different ingredients.
So the other thing I brought in for you, you can see some little white pellets there. Those white pellets are just cocoa fat. I’m going to warn you, they’re not particularly delicious. They’re not white chocolate. It’s just the fat. How would you describe that?
IRA FLATOW: No flavor.
JEFF POTTER: No flavor.
IRA FLATOW: But I can feel the texture of chocolate.
JEFF POTTER: Yeah, it’s got the texture.
IRA FLATOW: It’s got that mouth feel.
JEFF POTTER: And the fats in chocolate are actually really fascinating. There’s a whole thing about polymorphism, the way they crystallize, the ratios of triglycerides in there. And it’s actually somewhat similar to butter, but not quite. So at 70% or 75%, when you see it on the bar, if you’ve got two different bars that both say 70% from different manufacturers, one might be higher cocoa powder, cocoa solid content. The other one might have less.
IRA FLATOW: Is there any way to know that when you’re looking?
JEFF POTTER: You might be able to be clever by backing out the fat concentration. I haven’t actually checked that one. I don’t think you can really do it realistically though at home. Maybe if you had some lab equipment.
IRA FLATOW: And what happens when the chocolate hangs around a long time and it gets a little like a white film on it?
JEFF POTTER: White film. So that’s called blooming. And there’s actually two different kinds of blooming that can happen with chocolate. There’s either fat blooming or sugar blooming. Most of the time, when you see white stuff, it’s fat blooming. That’s the migration of those cocoa butter, cocoa fat through the actual solid matter.
If you look at a bar of chocolate, it’s actually a really complicated physical structure. You’ve got cocoa solids, which are particulate, suspended inside fat, which– most of us think about bars being solid. But the fats in there are a mixture of different triglycerides. And some of those fats are actually liquid at room temperature, not so much that you notice it. But they do migrate.
IRA FLATOW: So it’s not unsafe to eat that.
JEFF POTTER: It’s not unsafe to eat. It’s just going to have a texture that won’t be as enjoyable, because it impacts the texture. Melt it down, or use it in something to cook with.
IRA FLATOW: As you know, we love to talk about microbes and fermentation on this show. So let’s talk about sour cream. Is that fermented?
JEFF POTTER: Yeah.
IRA FLATOW: Sour cream is fermented.
JEFF POTTER: Sour cream, that’s what makes it sour. It’s bacteria. If you know how to make yogurt, you know how to make sour cream. Just use cream instead of milk.
Mind-blowing. It’s one of those things, where–
IRA FLATOW: My mind is just– it’s a mushroom cloud here. So can you turn regular cream into sour cream?
JEFF POTTER: Yes. You take a regular container of sour cream. The easiest place to get the starter bacteria is from yogurt. So just get some live active cultured yogurt. Throw a teaspoon into the container, stir it up. And basically, let it, quote, unquote, go bad. You can let it sit on the counter overnight. If you happen to have a yogurt maker or a slow cooker that’s got a yogurt mode, that’s better.
And the culture from the yogurt will chow down on the lactose and the other stuff that’s present in the cream. There shouldn’t be too much lactose in cream. But it’ll chow down on the stuff in the cream to actually make it into sour cream.
IRA FLATOW: Will it get that gloppy consistency?
JEFF POTTER: It won’t get quite as thick as maybe some of the sour cream you’re used to, because a lot of commercial stuff sometimes includes thickeners– corn starch or carrageen or guar gum. But you’ll look and go, oh, this is sour cream.
IRA FLATOW: Our number, 844-724-8255, if you have questions about food science, which we’re talking with Jeff Potter, author of Cooking For Geeks, Real Science, Great Cooks, Good Food, out with a new edition with no experiments. What new things did you put in the book? Were there things that people asked you for?
JEFF POTTER: Well, there’s a lot of different things. The second edition’s got over 150 pages of brand new material. So there’s a bunch of new interviews with folks, like Jacques Pepin, Deborah Madison, Bridget Lancaster, a number of chefs, who it was really a pleasure to speak with.
There’s a whole section actually– we were talking about fats here. There’s a whole section I added in about fats. What are trans fats? How is that compared to what’s called a cis fat? What’s the breakdown of different fat sources?
There’s new experiments. So if you’ve got a middle-aged kid, and you want to do a few things in the kitchen, you can do everything from calibrate your oven to calibrating your freezer, just using the physical properties of things like sugar or salt water. It was so much fun to go back and dig into it.
IRA FLATOW: I’ll bet. This really is. And this is a really interesting section in your book. It’s not a do-it-yourself opportunity unless you happen to have a mass spectrometer lying around. But you have a section in the book that talks about how Sherlock Holmes would determine where a tomato was grown.
JEFF POTTER: This one was really fun. We think of water as just being H2O. Maybe if you’ve got a glass of water, OK, there’s some air dissolved in there, and maybe some solids, some minerals. But even if you just look at the H2O, there are differences between different molecules. And these are called isotopomers.
So if you think about oxygen, it’s oxygen 16, as in eight neutrons and eight protons. But you can actually have additional neutrons in there. So you can have oxygen 17 and oxygen 18. And that’ll change. Those isotopes will change the actual molecule of water.
And those changes change the weight of the water. And that change in the weight changes the rate of evaporation. So the water that has the heavier isotopes will end up not evaporating as quickly.
So if you’re in a climate, in an environment, where you have a high amount of evaporation, your soil water will skew towards the heavier isotope. So you can take that tomato, and take a sample of the liquid from it and run it through a mass spectrometer, and go, OK, wait a second. This is coming from somewhere that’s got this ratio of these isotopomers. And if you factor in about a dozen different trace elements, you can pinpoint pretty accurately where something comes from.
IRA FLATOW: Wow. So you can rule out the tomato came from this part of the world versus if it was a warmer climate versus–
JEFF POTTER: Warmer climate. Then factoring in a few of the other things, like magnesium or various trace elements, you can begin to get country of origin. That’s a huge thing for actually food fraud and food traceability. If you’ve got honey that’s being imported, how do you know where it’s coming from?
IRA FLATOW: Well, let’s go to the phones to Savannah, Georgia, one of my favorite cities to Greg. Hi, welcome to “Science Friday.”
GREG: Hi. How are you doing?
IRA FLATOW: Hi there.
GREG: Well, I just wanted to tell you about some things that I’ve been doing. I’ve been on a fermentation craze. My wife likes to say I didn’t buy a sports car. I started fermenting things.
And one of the things I’ve been doing is– I used to brew beer years ago. And I’ve started doing it again. And I decided these spent grains ought to be useful for something.
So I ground them up, pulverized them, and decided I would substitute a cup of the spent grains in a sourdough bread instead of a cup of the flour. And it’s worked out really well.
IRA FLATOW: Wow. Let me get a comment. Let me remind everybody first that this is “Science Friday” from PRI, Public Radio International. In case you joined us, we’re talking with Jeff Potter, author of Cooking For Geeks, Real Science, Great Cooks, Good Food. So he’s now made double use of his.
JEFF POTTER: That’s fantastic and clever and actually sounds delicious. There’s a lot of things with our cooking, where we have something that’s left over, that we then kind of just throw away. We were talking just a few minutes ago about the vanilla extract idea. You’ve got a vanilla bean left over from making a vanilla custard for the holidays or something. The idea of reusing something is fantastic.
Apple peels. If you’re peeling apples, those peels can be used in a salad, for example. There’s lots of cases where you can be clever if you think about the ratio of, what is this thing? Is this carbohydrate? Is this protein? Is this sugar? What is the actual thing you’re working with?
In the case of the grains that are left over from making the beer, there will be a fair amount of starches and cellulose and stuff in there that you can use as part of your bread. It will be a toothier, denser bread. But it will still taste delicious.
IRA FLATOW: You answered, in your book, a question I’ve been wondering about for years. Being a watery person, loving the ocean, having gone around the world, seeing salt evaporation ponds, and I would say to myself, hey, I could do this at home. I could just get a cup of water from the ocean and make my own sea salt. But you go, uh oh. Watch out.
JEFF POTTER: You can definitely do it yourself with the sea salt. But you’re also going to do it yourself with the mercury potentially. Because unlike that liquid smoke example, where you’re actually separating out something, with the do-it-yourself sea salt, you’re concentrating everything. There’s not a separation process there. It’s just a concentrations. So anything else that happens to be in the water that doesn’t evaporate away is going to be there. So I don’t know if I’d want a do-it-yourself sea salt.
IRA FLATOW: No. You talked me out of that one. But you can roll your own oats, it says in the book.
JEFF POTTER: This one was fun too. We think about those Quaker oats you might see that are rolled out and flat. And you might also have a container of steel cut oats and not realize that these two things are very closely related. If you get that steel cut oat wet enough and then you flatten out, you can take the back of a spoon and just press one. And it’s going to look like that instant–
IRA FLATOW: Because my wife loves the steel cut oats. And I like the flat oats. So I can now make one out of the other.
JEFF POTTER: You can try to do it. It’s a little bit messy. The starches end up sticking that pressed oat to whatever you roll it on pretty good. The commercial manufacturing process is a little bit easier. I think probably in your case just buy two containers.
IRA FLATOW: A little time consuming.
JEFF POTTER: But still really cool to see where your food comes from, to understand that process, and kind of pull back the curtain one layer, and go, how is my food being made? How can I make it? How can I dig into the science behind this a bit more?
IRA FLATOW: Anything for the holiday season that you might suggest for us? Some cooking trick? I know you always say, and maybe we’ll bring this up again, you always say the best thing that you can buy, the number one thing that you can buy in the holidays, is what?
JEFF POTTER: Well, besides a copy of my book.
IRA FLATOW: Well, you’re talking about the thermometer.
JEFF POTTER: Thermometer. The probe thermometer–
IRA FLATOW: Get a thermometer.
JEFF POTTER: The number one thing I can tell anybody is get a probe thermometer because when it comes to something like a holiday roast or something cooking in the oven, it’s not about the time. It’s about the temperature.
So if you take a piece of fish– and when I cook salmon, I cook it to 103 degrees Fahrenheit. And I stick a probe thermometer with a long lead. And I set the little unit to go beep, beep, beep when it hits 130. So instead of a timer telling me time to check it, it just tells me it’s done.
IRA FLATOW: There you go. Thank you, Jeff. Good luck with the book. It’s great, as always. Cooking For Geeks, Real Science, Great Cooks, Good Food, now in its second edition with a lot of new tips and tricks. Give it a look. He’s also a software engineer in his spare time. I don’t know when you get that time. Thanks for joining us today.
JEFF POTTER: Thanks for having me. Happy Holidays.
IRA FLATOW: You too. And did you know that today is national cookie day? Just in time for the holidays. We had Jeff on the show last year to talk about his patent violating cookie recipe and for the perfect chocolate chip cookie, gooey in the center, crisp on the outside, how do you do it? Well, the secret is up there in our website, sciencefriday.com/chocolatechipcookie.
Copyright © 2015 Science Friday Initiative. All rights reserved. Science Friday transcripts are produced on a tight deadline by 3Play Media. Fidelity to the original aired/published audio or video file might vary, and text might be updated or amended in the future. For the authoritative record of ScienceFriday’s programming, please visit the original aired/published recording. For terms of use and more information, visit our polices pages at http://www.sciencefriday.com/about/policies .
Meet the Producer
About christopher intagliata.
Christopher Intagliata was Science Friday’s senior producer. He once served as a prop in an optical illusion and speaks passable Ira Flatowese.
Explore More
Make your own sour cream and bittersweet chocolate.
Peel back the layers of how-it's-made with these recipes from Jeff Potter.
Recipe: Jeff Potter’s Patent-Violating* Chocolate Chip Cookies
How to make cookies that stay chewy on the inside with crispy outer edges.
Privacy Overview
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
_abck | 1 year | This cookie is used to detect and defend when a client attempt to replay a cookie.This cookie manages the interaction with online bots and takes the appropriate actions. |
ASP.NET_SessionId | session | Issued by Microsoft's ASP.NET Application, this cookie stores session data during a user's website visit. |
AWSALBCORS | 7 days | This cookie is managed by Amazon Web Services and is used for load balancing. |
bm_sz | 4 hours | This cookie is set by the provider Akamai Bot Manager. This cookie is used to manage the interaction with the online bots. It also helps in fraud preventions |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement | 1 year | Set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category . |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
csrftoken | past | This cookie is associated with Django web development platform for python. Used to help protect the website against Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks |
JSESSIONID | session | The JSESSIONID cookie is used by New Relic to store a session identifier so that New Relic can monitor session counts for an application. |
nlbi_972453 | session | A load balancing cookie set to ensure requests by a client are sent to the same origin server. |
PHPSESSID | session | This cookie is native to PHP applications. The cookie is used to store and identify a users' unique session ID for the purpose of managing user session on the website. The cookie is a session cookies and is deleted when all the browser windows are closed. |
TiPMix | 1 hour | The TiPMix cookie is set by Azure to determine which web server the users must be directed to. |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
visid_incap_972453 | 1 year | SiteLock sets this cookie to provide cloud-based website security services. |
X-Mapping-fjhppofk | session | This cookie is used for load balancing purposes. The cookie does not store any personally identifiable data. |
x-ms-routing-name | 1 hour | Azure sets this cookie for routing production traffic by specifying the production slot. |
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
__cf_bm | 30 minutes | This cookie, set by Cloudflare, is used to support Cloudflare Bot Management. |
bcookie | 2 years | LinkedIn sets this cookie from LinkedIn share buttons and ad tags to recognize browser ID. |
bscookie | 2 years | LinkedIn sets this cookie to store performed actions on the website. |
lang | session | LinkedIn sets this cookie to remember a user's language setting. |
lidc | 1 day | LinkedIn sets the lidc cookie to facilitate data center selection. |
S | 1 hour | Used by Yahoo to provide ads, content or analytics. |
sp_landing | 1 day | The sp_landing is set by Spotify to implement audio content from Spotify on the website and also registers information on user interaction related to the audio content. |
sp_t | 1 year | The sp_t cookie is set by Spotify to implement audio content from Spotify on the website and also registers information on user interaction related to the audio content. |
UserMatchHistory | 1 month | LinkedIn sets this cookie for LinkedIn Ads ID syncing. |
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
__jid | 30 minutes | Cookie used to remember the user's Disqus login credentials across websites that use Disqus. |
_gat | 1 minute | This cookie is installed by Google Universal Analytics to restrain request rate and thus limit the collection of data on high traffic sites. |
_gat_UA-28243511-22 | 1 minute | A variation of the _gat cookie set by Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager to allow website owners to track visitor behaviour and measure site performance. The pattern element in the name contains the unique identity number of the account or website it relates to. |
AWSALB | 7 days | AWSALB is an application load balancer cookie set by Amazon Web Services to map the session to the target. |
countryCode | session | This cookie is used for storing country code selected from country selector. |
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
_fbp | 3 months | This cookie is set by Facebook to display advertisements when either on Facebook or on a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising, after visiting the website. |
fr | 3 months | Facebook sets this cookie to show relevant advertisements to users by tracking user behaviour across the web, on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin. |
IDE | 1 year 24 days | Google DoubleClick IDE cookies are used to store information about how the user uses the website to present them with relevant ads and according to the user profile. |
NID | 6 months | NID cookie, set by Google, is used for advertising purposes; to limit the number of times the user sees an ad, to mute unwanted ads, and to measure the effectiveness of ads. |
personalization_id | 2 years | Twitter sets this cookie to integrate and share features for social media and also store information about how the user uses the website, for tracking and targeting. |
test_cookie | 15 minutes | The test_cookie is set by doubleclick.net and is used to determine if the user's browser supports cookies. |
vglnk.Agent.p | 1 year | VigLink sets this cookie to track the user behaviour and also limit the ads displayed, in order to ensure relevant advertising. |
vglnk.PartnerRfsh.p | 1 year | VigLink sets this cookie to show users relevant advertisements and also limit the number of adverts that are shown to them. |
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE | 5 months 27 days | A cookie set by YouTube to measure bandwidth that determines whether the user gets the new or old player interface. |
YSC | session | YSC cookie is set by Youtube and is used to track the views of embedded videos on Youtube pages. |
yt-remote-connected-devices | never | YouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video. |
yt-remote-device-id | never | YouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video. |
yt.innertube::nextId | never | This cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen. |
yt.innertube::requests | never | This cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen. |
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
_dc_gtm_UA-28243511-20 | 1 minute | No description |
abtest-identifier | 1 year | No description |
AnalyticsSyncHistory | 1 month | No description |
ARRAffinityCU | session | No description available. |
ccc | 1 month | No description |
COMPASS | 1 hour | No description |
cookies.js_dtest | session | No description |
debug | never | No description available. |
donation-identifier | 1 year | No description |
f | never | No description available. |
GFE_RTT | 5 minutes | No description available. |
incap_ses_1185_2233503 | session | No description |
incap_ses_1185_823975 | session | No description |
incap_ses_1185_972453 | session | No description |
incap_ses_1319_2233503 | session | No description |
incap_ses_1319_823975 | session | No description |
incap_ses_1319_972453 | session | No description |
incap_ses_1364_2233503 | session | No description |
incap_ses_1364_823975 | session | No description |
incap_ses_1364_972453 | session | No description |
incap_ses_1580_2233503 | session | No description |
incap_ses_1580_823975 | session | No description |
incap_ses_1580_972453 | session | No description |
incap_ses_198_2233503 | session | No description |
incap_ses_198_823975 | session | No description |
incap_ses_198_972453 | session | No description |
incap_ses_340_2233503 | session | No description |
incap_ses_340_823975 | session | No description |
incap_ses_340_972453 | session | No description |
incap_ses_374_2233503 | session | No description |
incap_ses_374_823975 | session | No description |
incap_ses_374_972453 | session | No description |
incap_ses_375_2233503 | session | No description |
incap_ses_375_823975 | session | No description |
incap_ses_375_972453 | session | No description |
incap_ses_455_2233503 | session | No description |
incap_ses_455_823975 | session | No description |
incap_ses_455_972453 | session | No description |
incap_ses_8076_2233503 | session | No description |
incap_ses_8076_823975 | session | No description |
incap_ses_8076_972453 | session | No description |
incap_ses_867_2233503 | session | No description |
incap_ses_867_823975 | session | No description |
incap_ses_867_972453 | session | No description |
incap_ses_9117_2233503 | session | No description |
incap_ses_9117_823975 | session | No description |
incap_ses_9117_972453 | session | No description |
li_gc | 2 years | No description |
loglevel | never | No description available. |
msToken | 10 days | No description |
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Pour a small volume of hydrochloric acid into one of the jars. Swirl it around to coat the jar, and pour the excess back into its container. Place a square of cardboard over the jar to cover it. Fill the second jar with ammonia. Cover it with the square of cardboard, which will now be separating the contents of the two containers.
Cool Smoke tricks compilation - Awesome Science Experiments for kids to do at home.Smoke Waterfall, How To Make Smoke Rings, How to do Smoking Fingers Magic ...
In this video, we're going to show you an amazing liquid smoke experiment. By making liquid smoke, we're going to create a smoke that looks like liquid!This ...
Set up a safe fire location. Fill your large bucket with water and place it outside. Make sure it is not located near wood, paper, dry grass, or other flammable material. For example, a driveway, parking lot, or gravel alley may be the most fire-safe place to complete this experiment. 3. Roll up the paper into a tube.
The white smoke demonstration is a simple, visually appealing chemistry project. Pour a clear liquid into a seemingly empty and watch clouds of white vapor appear. It makes a nice science magic trick and is a great introduction to a discussion of acid-base and synthesis reactions. Materials. This is a simple reaction that only requires two ...
Usually, smoke tend to go up. In this video you will see an opposite result, the smoke can stay still in one glass. For this experiment, you will need two co...
Ernest H. Wright, a Kansas City, Missouri pharmacist, created the ingredient in 1895. According to a 1923 edition of The Rotarian, Wright's inspiration for liquid smoke was the memory of "a drop ...
For the experiment, we'll need 3 flasks, joined by gas pipes. Into flask №1 we pour 20 ml of a concentrated solution of hydrochloric acid (HCl) and firmly seal it with a stopper with a gas pipe. Into flask №3, we pour a 25% ammonia solution (NH₃), and firmly seal it with a stopper with a gas pipe.
And that is liquid smoke. JEFF POTTER: Liquid smoke is fascinating. This is one of those ones that demonstrates some really great chemistry. It's made fundamentally by taking whatever your smoke source is,- hickory chips, say- putting them inside a container that you then heat. And you take the smoke from that container, a closed container.
Most often, the body's own weight is greater than that of the displaced liquid or gas - that is, it has a higher density, and then it sinks. This is the case with the smoke in this demonstration. It has a higher density than the surrounding air and thus it sinks. This is a bit unusual, as we are used to smoke being hot and thus having a low ...
Cool Smoke tricks compilation - Awesome Science Experiments for kids to do at home. Smoke Waterfall, How To Make Smoke Rings, How to do Smoking Fingers Magic Trick, Potassium Permanganate + Hydrogen Peroxide, Liquid Smoke - pouring , Put out a candle with Smoke and more.
10. Figaro Hickory Liquid Smoke Sauce. Check Current Price On Amazon. The Figaro Hickory Liquid Smoke Sauce has a slow-roasted hickory flavor, which is perfectly suited for hamburgers, ribs, chicken, vegetables and more. You can use it straight on food, or use it to make a BBQ sauce or marinade of your own.
This fun smoke-without-fire experiment demonstrates an awesome chemical reaction that creates smoke using a combination of concentrated hydrochloric acid and ammonia. ... Liquid Layer Density Tower. Density towers, or density columns, are a great way to show and explain the density levels of different liquids.
You can conduct this experiment at home if you're careful. All you need is a piece of paper, a firelighter or match, a cup of water, and a fork! Please use c...
Ernest conducted experiments to recreate the liquid via wood combustion and condensation of the fire's exhaust, and thus liquid smoke was born. Wright's Liquid Smoke was first produced in 1895 and is still sold in stores today.
When you blow the candle out, vaporized wax briefly remains in the air. If you apply a heat source quickly enough, you can ignite the wax and use that reaction to relight the wick of the candle. Although it looks like you're lighting the candle with smoke, it's really just the wax vapor that ignites. Soot and other debris from the flame aren't ...
Pour about 3 parts potassium nitrate to 2 parts sugar into the skillet (5:3 ratio is also good). Measurements don't need to be exact, but you want more KNO 3 than sugar. For example, you can use 1-1/2 cups KNO 3 and 1 cup sugar. As you approach the 5:3 KNO 3:sugar ratio, you get a smoke bomb that burns more quickly.
Create large bubbles filled with dry ice smoke for a fun experiment. Put 1-2 teaspoons (4.9-9.9 ml) of liquid dish soap in a bowl filled with 1 US quart (0.95 L) of water and mix it together to create suds. Put your dry ice in another bowl and submerge it in water so it starts creating smoke. Dip a towel in the soapy water and wring it out ...
For the experiment, we'll need 3 flasks, joined by gas pipes. Into flask №1 we pour 20 ml of a concentrated solution of hydrochloric acid (HCl) and firmly seal it with a stopper with a gas pipe. Into flask №3, we pour a 25% ammonia solution (NH₃), and firmly seal it with a stopper with a gas pipe.
6 AMAZING SCIENCE EXPERIMENTS | SMOKE EXPERIMENTS#Experiements #Science_Experiments0:00 Make a cloud in a bottleWhat you see is condensation. The air inside ...
Boo Bubbles Bouncing Smoke Bubbles Experiment. ... Once liquid CO 2 is formed, the CO 2 is sent through an expansion valve and enters a pressure chamber. This pressure change causes the liquid to flash into a solid and causes the temperature to drop quickly. About 46% of the gas will freeze into "dry ice snow."
The particulate and soluble matter present in aerosols from combustible cigarettes (CCs) and Heated Tobacco Products (HTPs) was collected in liquid water. These liquids, yellowish in the experiments with cigarettes and colourless after using HTPs, were analysed by Laser Diffraction (LD) and by Trans …
Liquid Smoke Experiment - An Amazing Experiment. Simple experiment that can be tried with careful handling.Hope all enjoyed watching this .Try and share your...
Amazing Smoke Tricks | Liquid Smoke | Easy Science Experiment Your Queries:-smoke tricks sciencesmoke tricks shortssmoke tricks in telugusmoke tricks in tami...