quantitative research methods google scholar

How To Do Quantitative Research Using Google Scholar

If you’re a researcher, you know that choosing the right research method is crucial to obtaining reliable results. In this blog post, we’ll discuss how to do quantitative research using Google Scholar and get the most relevant and accurate results

Firstly, we’ll define what quantitative research is and how it differs from qualitative research. We’ll examine when each approach is suitable to employ.

Next, we’ll dive into how to do quantitative research using Google Scholar, including data collection techniques such as surveys and experiments. We’ll also discuss the statistical analysis and interpretation of results.

Table of Contents

Introduction on How to do Quantitative Research using Google Scholar

Defining your topic area, using relevant keywords when searching, refining search results based on publication date range or specific journals, reviewing abstracts before downloading full articles, ensuring selected articles meet inclusion criteria such as relevance to your topic area, collecting data from selected articles using tools like excel spreadsheets, analyzing collected data using appropriate statistical methods, faqs in relation to how to do quantitative research using google scholar, how to do quantitative research using google scholar, what is quantitative research method google scholar.

Quantitative research is a powerful tool used by R&D, product development, and innovation teams to gain valuable insights into empirical phenomena. Google Scholar provides an invaluable resource for conducting quantitative research, allowing users to search through millions of scholarly articles with ease. This post will guide you on how to do quantitative research using Google Scholar.

When looking at how to do quantitative research using Google Scholar, it’s important to define your topic area clearly so that the results are relevant and useful. Use terms that accurately depict the topic of inquiry to limit results and guarantee they are applicable to your work. Refining searches further based on publication date range or specific journals can also help you find more accurate information faster.

Before obtaining entire articles from Google Scholar, it is advisable to look over their summaries first in order to get an understanding of what kind of information each article holds before devoting time and energy to examining them thoroughly. When reviewing abstracts make sure that selected articles meet any inclusion criteria such as relevance to your topic area or any other criteria set out by yourself or team members working on the same project.

Quantitative inquiry can be a potent instrument to penetrate intricate issues, and Google Scholar is capable of offering an efficient medium for performing such research. With the proper knowledge of how to do quantitative research using Google Scholar, one can unlock its potential as a reliable source of information. In the next heading, we will discuss ways in which you can define your topic area more specifically so that you may better utilize quantitative research methods with Google Scholar.

Key Takeaway:  Using Google Scholar for quantitative research is a great way to quickly and accurately access relevant information. When conducting queries, being precise can help to restrict the outcomes and guarantee they are pertinent. Before downloading, review the abstracts of articles from Google Scholar to ensure that their content is pertinent.

When conducting quantitative research, it is essential to define your topic area. This will help you identify the specific problem or question that needs answering and determine relevant keywords that can be used to narrow down search results on Google Scholar. By using keywords such as “innovation”, “research platform”, “R&D” and “time to insights” when conducting quantitative research, it is possible to narrow down the search results in order to identify a specific problem or question that needs answering.

By incorporating terms related to your topic, such as “development”, “engineering” and “commercialization”, you can further refine the search results. This can help guarantee that the search results will only contain articles pertinent to your investigation. Additionally, it may also be beneficial to refine search results based on publication date range or specific journals as this allows for more precise filtering of articles.

Before downloading full articles from Google Scholar it is important to review abstracts first. Abstracts are short summaries of articles that provide enough information to determine whether or not you want to download the full paper. It is advised to use specific search parameters like only including peer-reviewed articles and only selecting works by particular author names.

After collecting all the articles from relevant sources, data must be extracted and put into a spreadsheet to make the analysis process much easier. By following these steps, you should be able to quickly find relevant information, allowing you to focus on analyzing the data collected instead of wasting time searching the web.

Defining a clear and concise topic area is key to conducting successful research. Identifying pertinent terms when searching can help guarantee that the outcomes are suitable to your inquiry.

Key Takeaway:  After defining your research topic, utilize Google Scholar to narrow down search results using keywords and refine the query based on publication date range or specific journals. Review abstracts before downloading full articles from Google Scholar, ensuring they meet criteria such as relevance to the chosen topic area and any additional specifications set by researchers. Extract data from selected articles with tools like Excel spreadsheets for easier analysis later on – this way you can find reliable information quickly without having to spend too much time searching online.

When searching for relevant research on Google Scholar, it is important to use specific keywords that are related directly to the topic area. Generic terms will not provide exact outcomes and could direct one to an abundance of unimportant data. It is also important to consider synonyms when constructing your query in order to capture all possible relevant articles.

Once you have pinpointed possible documents, go over their summaries prior to downloading the full text in order to guarantee they satisfy your criteria. This saves a lot of time by letting you skip through documents that don’t fit the scope of your assignment. Take advantage of journals that offer previews of articles that will let you see if the article is relevant to your research before investing the time to download the entire article.

By searching online for peer-reviewed research, R&D managers can feel confident that the information they’re reading is up-to-date and accurate. This ensures only high-quality evidence is used in decision-making processes while avoiding bias due to poor methodology or data collection techniques utilized by some researchers during their investigations into various topics areas related to Cypris’ research platform.

Key Takeaway:  Using targeted keywords and taking advantage of preview features, R&D teams can quickly narrow down relevant research on Google Scholar to get the most up-to-date information with confidence. This helps them “hit the ground running” and ensures they have only high quality evidence for making decisions related to Cypris’ research platform.

Refining your search by date range or journal can help you zero in on the most pertinent data for your research topic. Narrowing the scope to a five-year span and focusing on only credible scientific journals such as Renewable Energy and Science Direct that are directly related to solar power can expedite the research process. By following these simple steps, you can ensure that your studies meet the quality standards of both these peer-reviewed journals as well as the criteria related to your topic.

Key Takeaway:  To hone in on the most relevant data for my research topic, I should refine my Google Scholar search by setting a publication window and filtering out only peer-reviewed journals that are related to renewable sources of power. This will help me ensure the quality and relevance of any articles included in my study.

Reviewing abstracts before downloading full articles is a critical step as it helps ensure that you are only downloading relevant material, saving time and resources. When reviewing an article’s abstract, consider if it meets your inclusion criteria such as relevance to your topic area. If it does not, then move on to the next one.

Pay attention to keywords in the abstract as they can help identify whether or not an article is suitable for your research needs. For example, if you are looking for quantitative studies related to a specific subject matter, look out for words like “quantitative” or “statistical analysis” which indicate that this particular study used those methods of data collection and analysis.

Similarly, when searching for qualitative studies use terms like “qualitative methods” or “interviews” which suggest that these were employed during the course of the study. This will help ensure reliable results from your search efforts.

By using inclusion criteria for selecting articles, such as relevance to a specific topic area, researchers can ensure they are collecting quality data and results.

Quantitative research made easier. Use keywords in abstracts to quickly identify relevant articles on Google Scholar. #quantitativeresearch #googlescholar Click to Tweet

To guarantee that chosen articles satisfy the required criteria, such as being pertinent to a specific subject area, it is essential for R&D and innovation teams to thoroughly examine each article. This includes looking for any possible biases or flaws in the study design which could affect its overall quality and reliability over time if not addressed properly.

When assessing an article’s relevance, teams should consider whether the methods used are appropriate for their particular research goals. For example, quantitative research methods may be better suited for measuring certain phenomena than qualitative ones.

Likewise, qualitative studies may be more useful when exploring subjective topics like customer experience or brand perception. Teams should also evaluate how reliable results will be over time by considering factors such as sample size and representativeness of data sources used in the study design.

To ensure the study design is complete and conclusions can be drawn accurately, it is essential to evaluate whether all relevant information has been included.

Have any confounding factors been considered that could affect the accuracy of our conclusions? Is there sufficient evidence provided within each study? Does this data support our hypothesis?

These considerations help identify potential issues with a given article before incorporating its findings into further research projects or product development efforts down the line.

By taking these steps during the initial stages of assessment, R&D and innovation teams can ensure they are using only high-quality resources which provide accurate insights into their chosen topic area. To further refine and analyze this data, tools like Excel spreadsheets can be used to collect data from the selected articles for a more comprehensive analysis.

Key Takeaway:  R&D and innovation teams should thoroughly vet any articles they use to ensure the methods are appropriate, the results reliable, and all relevant information has been taken into account. To guarantee success in future phases of product development it is essential for teams to do their due diligence when selecting research resources – leaving no stone unturned during assessment.

When it comes to collecting data from selected articles, tools like Excel spreadsheets can be a powerful ally. By using Excel, researchers can conveniently compile large amounts of data into one place, thus facilitating subsequent analysis.

One of the most important aspects of using an Excel spreadsheet is defining your columns in advance. It’s important that you clearly label each column so that when you look back at your work later on, you know what type of information was stored there.

For example, if you are looking at different studies related to cancer research, one column might be labeled “Study Title” while another could be labeled “Year Published” or “Author Name(s)” etc. Once these columns of data have been populated, they can then be sorted and analyzed to find correlations across your different articles and authors.

Collecting data from selected articles using tools like Excel spreadsheets can be a powerful tool to gain insights into the research topics. Moving forward, we will utilize suitable statistical techniques to examine the data that has been obtained from certain articles by utilizing tools such as Excel spreadsheets.

Key Takeaway:  Excel spreadsheets can be a powerful tool for researchers to quickly and easily store data from articles, such as study titles or authors. By clearly labeling each column, it becomes easier to sort through the information later on and find correlations between different studies. Researchers can also use this platform to jot down notes without taking up extra space in their document – making Excel an invaluable asset when collecting quantitative research using Google Scholar.

Once the data has been gathered from pertinent sources, it is essential to assess this material using suitable statistical processes. Regression analysis and ANOVA tests are two of the most commonly used techniques for analyzing quantitative research data.

Regression analysis allows researchers to identify relationships between independent and dependent variables. On the other hand, ANOVA tests compare means across multiple groups or conditions. Both of these methods can be used to draw meaningful conclusions about your research question with confidence.

When performing either type of analysis, it is important to ensure that any potential biases present within each study design are addressed appropriately throughout the entire process. This includes checking for outliers in the dataset and controlling for confounding variables when necessary. Before reaching any conclusions, researchers should always ensure that the sample size is sufficient to accurately reflect the population of interest.

Finally, it is important to remember that statistical analyses can only tell us so much; they cannot answer all questions posed by a research project alone. It is essential that researchers interpret their findings in correlation to pre-existing knowledge on the subject, as well as contextualizing them for use beyond scholarly environments.

Quantitative research using Google Scholar? Use regression analysis and ANOVA tests to analyze data, check for biases, control for confounding variables, & interpret results in light of existing literature. #DataAnalysis #GoogleScholar #ResearchMethods Click to Tweet

Begin by entering your query into the search bar on Google Scholar to uncover quantitative research articles. Then refine your results using the options in the left sidebar such as “Publication date” and “Article type” to narrow down to only scholarly articles with a focus on quantitative data. You can also use advanced search terms like “quantitative analysis” or “statistical methods”.

Quantitative research method Google Scholar is a powerful search engine that enables researchers to find, analyze and compare academic literature from around the world. It provides access to an extensive range of scholarly publications such as journal articles, books, conference proceedings, and technical reports.

The results are ranked by relevance and can be further refined using advanced search filters. With its user-friendly interface, it helps researchers save time in finding relevant information for their studies quickly and efficiently.

Mastering how to do quantitative research using Google Scholar can be a great way to get insights into your topic area. By narrowing down your search by date or journal, reading abstract before downloading the complete article, and ensuring that your selection meets your criteria, you can quickly and easily find data that are relevant to your study. Collecting and using data from a variety of sources, such as Excel and statistical analysis, will give you valuable insights into whatever subject you’re researching.

Unlock the power of quantitative research with Cypris . Our platform provides fast, comprehensive insights to help R&D and innovation teams succeed.

Similar insights you might enjoy

Revolutionizing Medical Devices: Innovations and Trends in 3D Printing

Digital Transformation in Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Report for R&D and Innovation Leaders

Innovations and New Technologies in Sustainable Packaging

New Scholar

• Tips for Publishing
• Publishing Process Overview
• Selecting a Journal Overview
• Conference Presentation or Poster Session Overview
• Predatory Publishers

Qualitative vs Quantitative Research

Types of empirical research, list of journals friendly to qualitative work.

• Understanding Research Impact This link opens in a new window

Reproducibility Librarian

Make an Appointment with Me

Do you want to meet with me in-person or online?

Quantitative Research is used to quantify the problem by way of generating numerical data or data that can be transformed into useable statistics. It is used to quantify attitudes, opinions, behaviors, and other defined variables – and generalize results from a larger sample population.

Qualitative Research is primarily exploratory research.  It is used to gain an understanding of underlying reasons, opinions, and motivations. This data is usually gathered using conversational methods such as interviews or focus groups.

Some journals and even some disciplines may have a preference as to what type of empirical research they wish to publish.  Some authors who have written an article that is primarily qualitative in nature, may seek out journals that are "qualitative research friendly." We have listed a few such journals below. 

• International Journal of Qualitative Methods
• Journal of Mixed Methods Research
• Quality & Quantity
• List of qualitative research journals compiled by Saint Louis University

You can also look through the last few issues of a journal to see if the articles they publish tend to be more qualitative or quantitative in nature.

• << Previous: Predatory Publishers
• Next: Understanding Research Impact >>
• Last Updated: Aug 13, 2024 11:53 AM
• URL: https://libguides.lib.rochester.edu/newscholar

Advertisement

Quantitative Vs qualitative research methods

• Symposium: Clinical Epidemiology and Research Methods—II
• Published: May 2000
• Volume 67 , pages 369–377, ( 2000 )

Cite this article

• M. Lakshman 1 ,
• Leena Sinha 1 ,
• Moumita Biswas 1 ,
• Maryann Charles 1 &
• N. K. Arora 1  

27k Accesses

26 Citations

Explore all metrics

Quantitative methods have been widely used because of the fact that things that can be measured or counted gain scientific credibility over the unmeasurable. But the extent of biological abnormality, severity, consequences and the impact of illness cannot be satisfactorily captured and answered by the quantitative research alone. In such situations qualitative methods take a holistic perspective preserving the complexities of human behavior by addressing the “why” and “how” questions. In this paper an attempt has been made to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of both the methods and also that a balanced mix of both qualitative as well as quantitative methods yield the most valid and reliable results.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Qualitative Research Methods

Quantitative Research

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Holman HR. Qualitative inquiry in medical research. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46(1): 29–36.

Article   PubMed   CAS   Google Scholar  

Black N. Why we need qualitative research. J Epidemiol Community Health 1994; 18: 125–126.

Google Scholar  

Koestler A, Smythies JR (eds). Beyond Reductionism, New Perspectives, in the Life Sciences . New York: Hutchinson 1969.

Blalock HM. Social Statistics . Second Edition Tokyo: McGraw-Hill, Kogakusha 1972.

Johnson, AW. Quantification in Cultural Anthropology: An Introduction to Research Design . Stanford: Stanford University Press 1978.

Chen K, Murray GF. Truths and untruths in village Haiti: An experiment in third world survey research. In: John F Marshal & Steven Polgar eds. Culture, Natality and Family Planning . Carolina Population Centre, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1976; pp 241–262.

Kleinman A. The Illness Narratives: Healing and the Human Condition . New York: Basic Books 1988.

Stehbens WE. Imprecision of the clincial diagnosis of coronary heart disease in epidemiology studies and atherogenesis. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 41: 999–1006.

Article   Google Scholar  

Burnaud B, Feinstein AR. The role of diagnostic inconsistency in changing rates of occurrence for coronary heart disease. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 42: 929–940.

Mitchell R. Survey materials collected in developing countries: Sampling, measurement and interviewing obstacles in into and international, comparisons. Intern Social Science Journal . 1965; 17: 665–685.

Campbell GJ, Shrestha R, Stone L. The Use and Missuse of Social Science Research in Nepal . Centre for Nepal and Asian studies. Kathmandu: His Majesty's Government Press 1979.

Stone L, Campbell GH. The use and missue of surveys in international development: An experiment from Nepal. Human Organization 1984; 43(1): 27–37.

Stone L. Cultural Repercussions of Childlessness and Low Fertility in Nepal . Contributions to Nepalese Studies 1978; 5: 7–36.

Bennett L. Sex and Motherhood Among the Brahmans and Chetries of East Central Nepal . Contributions to Nepalese Studies. 1976; 3: 1–52., (Special issue: Anthropology, Health and Development)

Smelser NJ. The methodology of comparative analysis. In: Warwick DP, Osherson S ( eds ) Comparative Research Methods . New Jersy: Prentice-Hall. 1973; 42–86.

Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods . Newbury Park: Sage Publications 1990.

Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research . Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1990.

Crabtree BJ, Miller WL. Doing Qualitative Research . Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1992.

Strong PM. The case for qualitative research. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 1992; 1: 185–486.

Black NA, Thompson E. Attitudes to medical audit: British doctors speak. Soc Sci Med 1993; 36: 849–856.

Good BJ, Good MD. The meaning of symptoms: A cultural hermeneutic model for clinical practice. In: Leon Eisenberg and Arthur Kleinman eds The Relevance of Social Science for Medicine Dordrecht: Rediel, 1981; 165–196.

Nichter M. Idioms of distress: Alternatives in the expression of psychological distress. A case study from South India. culture Med Psychiat 1981;5(4): 379–408.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Wicker AW. Getting out of our conceptual ruts. American Psychologist 1985; 40(10): 1094–1103.

Willms DG, Best JA, Taylor DW. A systematic approach for using qualitative methods in primary prevention research. Med Anthropol Quart 1990; 4:4(NS), 391–409.

Steckler A, McLeroy K, Goodman R, Bird S, McCormick L. Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: An Introduction. Health Educ Quart 1992; 19: 1–8.

CAS   Google Scholar  

Inui TS, Frankel RM. Evaluating the quality of qualitative research: A proposal pro tem. J Gen Intern Med 1991; 6: 485–486.

Lakshman M. Qualitative research methods in clinical research. In: Hand book of Clinical Epidemiology Christian Medical College & Hospital, Vellore, 1995; 110–118.

Greenhalgh T, Taylor R. How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) BMJ 1997; 315: 740–743.

PubMed   CAS   Google Scholar  

Williams A, Boulton M. Thinking prevention: Concepts and constructs in general practice. In: Margaret Lock and Deborah R Gordon eds Bio-medicine Examined . A. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988; 227–255.

Turkey JW. The future of data analysis Ann Math Stat 1962; 33: 1–67.

Knodel J. Conducting comparative focus group research: Cautionary comments from a coordinator. Health Transition Review. 1994; 4(1): 99–104.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Pediatrics, all India Institute of Medical Sciences, 110 029, New Delhi

M. Lakshman, Leena Sinha, Moumita Biswas, Maryann Charles & N. K. Arora ( Additional Professor )

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Lakshman, M., Sinha, L., Biswas, M. et al. Quantitative Vs qualitative research methods. Indian J Pediatr 67 , 369–377 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02820690

Download citation

Issue Date : May 2000

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02820690

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Qualitative research
• Quantitative research
• Limitations
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Organizing Academic Research Papers: Quantitative Methods

• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Academic Writing Style
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Executive Summary
• Background Information
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tertiary Sources
• What Is Scholarly vs. Popular?
• Qualitative Methods
• Quantitative Methods
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Annotated Bibliography
• Dealing with Nervousness
• Using Visual Aids
• Grading Someone Else's Paper
• How to Manage Group Projects
• Multiple Book Review Essay
• Reviewing Collected Essays
• About Informed Consent
• Writing Field Notes
• Writing a Policy Memo
• Writing a Research Proposal
• Acknowledgements

Quantitative methods emphasise on objective measurements and numerical analysis of data collected through polls, questionnaires or surveys. Quantitative research focuses on gathering numerical data and generalizing it across groups of people.

Babbie, Earl R. The Practice of Social Research . 12th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage, 2010.

Characteristics of Quantitative Research

In quantitative research, your goal is to determine the relationship between one thing (an independent variable) and another (a dependent or outcome variable) in a population. Quantitative research designs are either descriptive (subjects usually measured once) or experimental (subjects measured before and after a treatment). A descriptive study establishes only associations between variables. An experiment establishes causality.

Quantitative research deals in numbers, logic and the objective, focusing on logic, numbers, and unchanging static data and detailed, convergent reasoning rather than divergent reasoning.

Its main characteristics are :

• The data is usually gathered using more structured research instruments.
• The results are based on larger sample sizes that are representative of the population.
• The research study can usually be replicated or repeated, given its high reliability.
• Researcher has a clearly defined research question to which objective answers are sought.
• All aspects of the study are carefully designed before data is collected.
• Data are in the form of numbers and statistics.
• Project can be used to generalize concepts more widely, predict future results, or investigate causal relationships.
• Researcher uses tools, such as questionnaires or equipment to collect numerical data.

The overarching aim of a quantitative research study is to classify features, count them, and construct statistical models in an attempt to explain what is observed.

Things to keep in mind when reporting the results of a study using quantitative methods :

• Explain the data collected and their statistical treatment as well as all relevant results in relation to the research problem you are investigating. Interpretation of results is not appropriate in this section.
• Report unanticipated events that occurred during your data collection. Explain how the actual analysis differs from the planned analysis. Explain your handling of missing data.
• Explain the techniques you used to "clean" your data set.
• Choose a minimally sufficient statistical procedure ; provide a rationale for its use and a reference for it. Specify any computer programs used.
• Describe the assumptions for each procedure and the steps you took to ensure that they were not violated.
• When using inferential statistics , provide the descriptive statistics, confidence intervals, and sample sizes for each variable as well as the value of the test statistic, its direction, the degrees of freedom, and the significance level (report the actual p value).
• Avoid inferring causality , particularly in nonrandomized designs or without further experimentation.
• Use tables to provide exact values ; use figures to convey global effects. Keep figures small in size; include graphic representations of confidence intervals whenever possible.
• Always tell the reader what to look for in tables and figures .

Babbie, Earl R. The Practice of Social Research . 12th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage, 2010; Brians, Craig Leonard et al. Empirical Political Analysis: Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods . 8th ed. Boston, MA: Longman, 2011; McNabb, David E. Research Methods in Public Administration and Nonprofit Management: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches . 2nd ed. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2008; Quantitative Research Methods . Writing@CSU. Colorado State University; Singh, Kultar. Quantitative Social Research Methods . Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2007.

Basic Research Design for Quantitative Studies

Before designing a quantitative research study, you must decide whether it will be descriptive or experimental because this will dictate how you gather, analyze, and interpret the results. A descriptive study is governed by the following rules: subjects are generally measured once; the intention is to only establish associations between variables; and, the study may include a sample population of hundreds or thousands of subjects to ensure that a valid estimate of a generalized relationship between variables has been obtained. An experimental design includes subjects measured before and after a particular treatment, the sample population may be very small and purposefully chosen, and it is intended to establish causality between variables. Introduction The introduction to a quantitative study is usually written from the third person point of view and covers the following information:

• Identify the research problem -- as with any academic study, you must state clearly and concisely the research problem being investigated.
• Review the literature -- review scholarship on the topic, synthesizing key themes and, if necessary, noting studies that have used similar methods of inquiry and analysis. Note where key gaps exist and how your study helps to fill those gaps.
• Describe the theoretical framework -- provide an outline of the theory or hypothesis underpinning your study. If necessary, define unfamiliar or complex terms, concepts, or ideas and provide background information to place the research problem in proper context [e.g., historical, cultural, economic, etc.].

Methodology The methods section of a quantitative study should describe how each objective of your study  will be achieved. Be sure to provide enough detail to enable that the reader can make an informed assessment of the method being used to obtain results associated with the research problem.

• Study population and sampling -- where did the data come from; how robust is it; note where gaps exist or what was excluded. Note the procedures used for their selection;
• Data collection – describe the tools and methods used to collect information and identify the variables being measured; Describe the methods used to obtain the data; Note if the data was pre-existing [i.e., government data] or you gathered it yourself. If you gathered it, describe what type of instrument you used and why. Note that no data set is perfect--describe any limitations in methodology.
• Data analysis -- describe the procedures for processing and analyzing the data. If appropriate, describe the specific instruments of analysis used to study each research objective.

Results The finding of your study should be written objectively and in a succinct and precise format. In quantitative studies, it is common to use graphs, tables, charts and other non-textual elements to help the reader understand the data. Make sure that non-textual elements do not stand in isolation from the text but are used to supplement the overall description of the results and to help clarify key points being made. Further information about how to effectively present data using charts and graphs can be found here .

• Statistical analysis -- how did you analyze the data? What were the key findings from the data? The findings should be present in a logical, sequential order. Describe but do not interpret these trends or negative results; save that for the discussion section. The results should be presented in the past tense.

Discussion Discussions should be analytic, logical and comprehensive. The discussion should meld together your findings in relation to those identified in the literature review, and placed within the context of the theoretical framework underpinning the study.

• Interpretation of results -- reiterate the research problem being investigated and compare and contrast the findings with the research questions underlying the study. Did they affirm predicted outcomes or did the data refute it?
• Description of trends, comparison of groups, or relationships among variables -- describe any trends that emerged from your analysis and highlight all unanticipated and statistical insignificant findings.
• Discussion of implications – what is the meaning of your results? Highlight key findings based on the overall results and note you believe them to be important. How have the results helped fill gaps in understanding the research problem?
• Limitations -- describe any limitations or unavoidable bias in your study and, if necessary, note why these limitations did not inhibit effective interpretation of the results.

Conclusion End your study by to summarizing the topic and provide a final comment and assessment of the study.

• Summary of findings – synthesize the answers to your research questions. Do not report any statistical data here; just provide a narrative summary of the key findings and describe what learned that you did not know before conducting your study.
• Recommendations – if appropriate to the aim of the assignment, tie key findings with policy recommendations.
• Future research – note the need for future research linked to your study’s limitations or to any remaining gaps in the literature that were not addressed.

Black, Thomas R. Doing Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences: An Integrated Approach to Research Design, Measurement and Statistics . London: Sage, 1999; Gay,L. R. and Peter Airasain. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications . 7th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merril Prentice Hall, 2003; Hector, Anestine. An Overview of Quantitative Research in Compostion and TESOL. Department of English, Indiana University of Pennsylvania; Hopkins, Will G. “Quantitative Research Design.” Sportscience 4, 1 (2000); A Strategy for Writing Up Research Results . The Structure, Format, Content, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific Paper. Department of Biology. Bates College; Nenty, H. Johnson. "Writing a Quantitative Research Thesis." International Journal of Educational Science 1 (2009): 19-32; Ouyang, Ronghua (John). Basic Inquiry of Quantitative Research. Kennesaw State University.

Strengths of Using Quantitative Methods

Quantitative researchers try to recognize and isolate specific variables contained within the study framework, seek correlation, relationships and causality, and attempt to control the environment in which the data is collected to avoid the risk of variables, other than the one being study, accounting for the relationships identified.

Among the specific strengths of using quantitative methods to study social science research problems:

• Allows for a broader study, involving a greater number of subjects, and enhancing the generalization of the results;
• Allows for greater objectivity and accuracy of results. Generally, quantitative methods are designed to provide summaries of data that support generalizations about the phenomenon under study. In order to accomplish this, quantitative research usually involves few variables and many cases, and employs prescribed procedures to ensure validity and reliability;
• Applying well-established standards means that the research can be replicated, and then analyzed and compared with similar studies;
• You can summarize vast sources of information and make comparisons across categories and over time; and,
• Personal bias can be avoided by researchers by keeping a 'distance' from participating subjects and employing subjects unknown to them.

Babbie, Earl R. The Practice of Social Research . 12th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage, 2010; Brians, Craig Leonard et al. Empirical Political Analysis: Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods . 8th ed. Boston, MA: Longman, 2011; McNabb, David E. Research Methods in Public Administration and Nonprofit Management: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches . 2nd ed. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2008; Singh, Kultar. Quantitative Social Research Methods . Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2007.

Limitations of Using Quantiative Methods

Quantitative methods presume to have an objective approach to studying research problems, where data is controlled and measured, to address the accumulation of facts, and to determine the causes of behavior. As a consequence, the results of quantitative research may be statistically significant but are often humanly insignificant.

Some specific limitations associated with using quantitative methods to study research problems in the social sciences include:

• Quantitative data is more efficient and able to test hypotheses, but may miss contextual detail;
• Uses a static and rigid approach and so employs an inflexible process of discovery;
• The development of standard questions by researchers can lead to "structural bias" and false representation, where the data actually reflects the view of the researcher instead of the participating subject;
• Results provide less detail on behavior, attitudes, and motivation;
• Researcher may collect a much narrower and sometimes superficial dataset;
• Results are limited as they provide numerical descriptions rather than detailed narrative and generally provide less elaborate accounts of human perception;
• The research is often carried out in an unnatural, artificial environment so that a level of control can be applied to the exercise. This level of control might not normally be in place in the real world thus yielding "laboratory results" as opposed to "real world results"; and,
• Preset answers will not necessarily reflect how people really feel about a subject and in some cases might just be the closest match to preconceived hypothesis.
• << Previous: Qualitative Methods
• Next: 7. The Results >>
• Last Updated: Jul 18, 2023 11:58 AM
• URL: https://library.sacredheart.edu/c.php?g=29803
• QuickSearch
• Library Catalog
• Databases A-Z
• Publication Finder
• Course Reserves
• Citation Linker
• Digital Commons
• Our Website

Research Support

• Ask a Librarian
• Appointments
• Interlibrary Loan (ILL)
• Research Guides
• Databases by Subject
• Citation Help

Using the Library

• Reserve a Group Study Room
• Renew Books
• Honors Study Rooms
• Off-Campus Access
• Library Policies
• Library Technology

User Information

• Grad Students
• Online Students
• COVID-19 Updates
• Staff Directory
• News & Announcements
• Library Newsletter

My Accounts

• Interlibrary Loan
• Staff Site Login

FIND US ON  

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• J Korean Med Sci
• v.38(37); 2023 Sep 18
• PMC10506897

Conducting and Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research

Edward barroga.

1 Department of Medical Education, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Glafera Janet Matanguihan

2 Department of Biological Sciences, Messiah University, Mechanicsburg, PA, USA.

Atsuko Furuta

Makiko arima, shizuma tsuchiya, chikako kawahara, yusuke takamiya.

Comprehensive knowledge of quantitative and qualitative research systematizes scholarly research and enhances the quality of research output. Scientific researchers must be familiar with them and skilled to conduct their investigation within the frames of their chosen research type. When conducting quantitative research, scientific researchers should describe an existing theory, generate a hypothesis from the theory, test their hypothesis in novel research, and re-evaluate the theory. Thereafter, they should take a deductive approach in writing the testing of the established theory based on experiments. When conducting qualitative research, scientific researchers raise a question, answer the question by performing a novel study, and propose a new theory to clarify and interpret the obtained results. After which, they should take an inductive approach to writing the formulation of concepts based on collected data. When scientific researchers combine the whole spectrum of inductive and deductive research approaches using both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies, they apply mixed-method research. Familiarity and proficiency with these research aspects facilitate the construction of novel hypotheses, development of theories, or refinement of concepts.

Graphical Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Novel research studies are conceptualized by scientific researchers first by asking excellent research questions and developing hypotheses, then answering these questions by testing their hypotheses in ethical research. 1 , 2 , 3 Before they conduct novel research studies, scientific researchers must possess considerable knowledge of both quantitative and qualitative research. 2

In quantitative research, researchers describe existing theories, generate and test a hypothesis in novel research, and re-evaluate existing theories deductively based on their experimental results. 1 , 4 , 5 In qualitative research, scientific researchers raise and answer research questions by performing a novel study, then propose new theories by clarifying their results inductively. 1 , 6

RATIONALE OF THIS ARTICLE

When researchers have a limited knowledge of both research types and how to conduct them, this can result in substandard investigation. Researchers must be familiar with both types of research and skilled to conduct their investigations within the frames of their chosen type of research. Thus, meticulous care is needed when planning quantitative and qualitative research studies to avoid unethical research and poor outcomes.

Understanding the methodological and writing assumptions 7 , 8 underpinning quantitative and qualitative research, especially by non-Anglophone researchers, is essential for their successful conduct. Scientific researchers, especially in the academe, face pressure to publish in international journals 9 where English is the language of scientific communication. 10 , 11 In particular, non-Anglophone researchers face challenges related to linguistic, stylistic, and discourse differences. 11 , 12 Knowing the assumptions of the different types of research will help clarify research questions and methodologies, easing the challenge and help.

SEARCH FOR RELEVANT ARTICLES

To identify articles relevant to this topic, we adhered to the search strategy recommended by Gasparyan et al. 7 We searched through PubMed, Scopus, Directory of Open Access Journals, and Google Scholar databases using the following keywords: quantitative research, qualitative research, mixed-method research, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, study design, descriptive research, correlational research, experimental research, causal-comparative research, quasi-experimental research, historical research, ethnographic research, meta-analysis, narrative research, grounded theory, phenomenology, case study, and field research.

AIMS OF THIS ARTICLE

This article aims to provide a comparative appraisal of qualitative and quantitative research for scientific researchers. At present, there is still a need to define the scope of qualitative research, especially its essential elements. 13 Consensus on the critical appraisal tools to assess the methodological quality of qualitative research remains lacking. 14 Framing and testing research questions can be challenging in qualitative research. 2 In the healthcare system, it is essential that research questions address increasingly complex situations. Therefore, research has to be driven by the kinds of questions asked and the corresponding methodologies to answer these questions. 15 The mixed-method approach also needs to be clarified as this would appear to arise from different philosophical underpinnings. 16

This article also aims to discuss how particular types of research should be conducted and how they should be written in adherence to international standards. In the US, Europe, and other countries, responsible research and innovation was conceptualized and promoted with six key action points: engagement, gender equality, science education, open access, ethics and governance. 17 , 18 International ethics standards in research 19 as well as academic integrity during doctoral trainings are now integral to the research process. 20

POTENTIAL BENEFITS FROM THIS ARTICLE

This article would be beneficial for researchers in further enhancing their understanding of the theoretical, methodological, and writing aspects of qualitative and quantitative research, and their combination.

Moreover, this article reviews the basic features of both research types and overviews the rationale for their conduct. It imparts information on the most common forms of quantitative and qualitative research, and how they are carried out. These aspects would be helpful for selecting the optimal methodology to use for research based on the researcher’s objectives and topic.

This article also provides information on the strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research. Such information would help researchers appreciate the roles and applications of both research types and how to gain from each or their combination. As different research questions require different types of research and analyses, this article is anticipated to assist researchers better recognize the questions answered by quantitative and qualitative research.

Finally, this article would help researchers to have a balanced perspective of qualitative and quantitative research without considering one as superior to the other.

TYPES OF RESEARCH

Research can be classified into two general types, quantitative and qualitative. 21 Both types of research entail writing a research question and developing a hypothesis. 22 Quantitative research involves a deductive approach to prove or disprove the hypothesis that was developed, whereas qualitative research involves an inductive approach to create a hypothesis. 23 , 24 , 25 , 26

In quantitative research, the hypothesis is stated before testing. In qualitative research, the hypothesis is developed through inductive reasoning based on the data collected. 27 , 28 For types of data and their analysis, qualitative research usually includes data in the form of words instead of numbers more commonly used in quantitative research. 29

Quantitative research usually includes descriptive, correlational, causal-comparative / quasi-experimental, and experimental research. 21 On the other hand, qualitative research usually encompasses historical, ethnographic, meta-analysis, narrative, grounded theory, phenomenology, case study, and field research. 23 , 25 , 28 , 30 A summary of the features, writing approach, and examples of published articles for each type of qualitative and quantitative research is shown in Table 1 . 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43

QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Deductive approach.

The deductive approach is used to prove or disprove the hypothesis in quantitative research. 21 , 25 Using this approach, researchers 1) make observations about an unclear or new phenomenon, 2) investigate the current theory surrounding the phenomenon, and 3) hypothesize an explanation for the observations. Afterwards, researchers will 4) predict outcomes based on the hypotheses, 5) formulate a plan to test the prediction, and 6) collect and process the data (or revise the hypothesis if the original hypothesis was false). Finally, researchers will then 7) verify the results, 8) make the final conclusions, and 9) present and disseminate their findings ( Fig. 1A ).

Types of quantitative research

The common types of quantitative research include (a) descriptive, (b) correlational, c) experimental research, and (d) causal-comparative/quasi-experimental. 21

Descriptive research is conducted and written by describing the status of an identified variable to provide systematic information about a phenomenon. A hypothesis is developed and tested after data collection, analysis, and synthesis. This type of research attempts to factually present comparisons and interpretations of findings based on analyses of the characteristics, progression, or relationships of a certain phenomenon by manipulating the employed variables or controlling the involved conditions. 44 Here, the researcher examines, observes, and describes a situation, sample, or variable as it occurs without investigator interference. 31 , 45 To be meaningful, the systematic collection of information requires careful selection of study units by precise measurement of individual variables 21 often expressed as ranges, means, frequencies, and/or percentages. 31 , 45 Descriptive statistical analysis using ANOVA, Student’s t -test, or the Pearson coefficient method has been used to analyze descriptive research data. 46

Correlational research is performed by determining and interpreting the extent of a relationship between two or more variables using statistical data. This involves recognizing data trends and patterns without necessarily proving their causes. The researcher studies only the data, relationships, and distributions of variables in a natural setting, but does not manipulate them. 21 , 45 Afterwards, the researcher establishes reliability and validity, provides converging evidence, describes relationship, and makes predictions. 47

Experimental research is usually referred to as true experimentation. The researcher establishes the cause-effect relationship among a group of variables making up a study using the scientific method or process. This type of research attempts to identify the causal relationships between variables through experiments by arbitrarily controlling the conditions or manipulating the variables used. 44 The scientific manuscript would include an explanation of how the independent variable was manipulated to determine its effects on the dependent variables. The write-up would also describe the random assignments of subjects to experimental treatments. 21

Causal-comparative/quasi-experimental research closely resembles true experimentation but is conducted by establishing the cause-effect relationships among variables. It may also be conducted to establish the cause or consequences of differences that already exist between, or among groups of individuals. 48 This type of research compares outcomes between the intervention groups in which participants are not randomized to their respective interventions because of ethics- or feasibility-related reasons. 49 As in true experiments, the researcher identifies and measures the effects of the independent variable on the dependent variable. However, unlike true experiments, the researchers do not manipulate the independent variable.

In quasi-experimental research, naturally formed or pre-existing groups that are not randomly assigned are used, particularly when an ethical, randomized controlled trial is not feasible or logical. 50 The researcher identifies control groups as those which have been exposed to the treatment variable, and then compares these with the unexposed groups. The causes are determined and described after data analysis, after which conclusions are made. The known and unknown variables that could still affect the outcome are also included. 7

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Inductive approach.

Qualitative research involves an inductive approach to develop a hypothesis. 21 , 25 Using this approach, researchers answer research questions and develop new theories, but they do not test hypotheses or previous theories. The researcher seldom examines the effectiveness of an intervention, but rather explores the perceptions, actions, and feelings of participants using interviews, content analysis, observations, or focus groups. 25 , 45 , 51

Distinctive features of qualitative research

Qualitative research seeks to elucidate about the lives of people, including their lived experiences, behaviors, attitudes, beliefs, personality characteristics, emotions, and feelings. 27 , 30 It also explores societal, organizational, and cultural issues. 30 This type of research provides a good story mimicking an adventure which results in a “thick” description that puts readers in the research setting. 52

The qualitative research questions are open-ended, evolving, and non-directional. 26 The research design is usually flexible and iterative, commonly employing purposive sampling. The sample size depends on theoretical saturation, and data is collected using in-depth interviews, focus groups, and observations. 27

In various instances, excellent qualitative research may offer insights that quantitative research cannot. Moreover, qualitative research approaches can describe the ‘lived experience’ perspectives of patients, practitioners, and the public. 53 Interestingly, recent developments have looked into the use of technology in shaping qualitative research protocol development, data collection, and analysis phases. 54

Qualitative research employs various techniques, including conversational and discourse analysis, biographies, interviews, case-studies, oral history, surveys, documentary and archival research, audiovisual analysis, and participant observations. 26

Conducting qualitative research

To conduct qualitative research, investigators 1) identify a general research question, 2) choose the main methods, sites, and subjects, and 3) determine methods of data documentation access to subjects. Researchers also 4) decide on the various aspects for collecting data (e.g., questions, behaviors to observe, issues to look for in documents, how much (number of questions, interviews, or observations), 5) clarify researchers’ roles, and 6) evaluate the study’s ethical implications in terms of confidentiality and sensitivity. Afterwards, researchers 7) collect data until saturation, 8) interpret data by identifying concepts and theories, and 9) revise the research question if necessary and form hypotheses. In the final stages of the research, investigators 10) collect and verify data to address revisions, 11) complete the conceptual and theoretical framework to finalize their findings, and 12) present and disseminate findings ( Fig. 1B ).

Types of qualitative research

The different types of qualitative research include (a) historical research, (b) ethnographic research, (c) meta-analysis, (d) narrative research, (e) grounded theory, (f) phenomenology, (g) case study, and (h) field research. 23 , 25 , 28 , 30

Historical research is conducted by describing past events, problems, issues, and facts. The researcher gathers data from written or oral descriptions of past events and attempts to recreate the past without interpreting the events and their influence on the present. 6 Data is collected using documents, interviews, and surveys. 55 The researcher analyzes these data by describing the development of events and writes the research based on historical reports. 2

Ethnographic research is performed by observing everyday life details as they naturally unfold. 2 It can also be conducted by developing in-depth analytical descriptions of current systems, processes, and phenomena or by understanding the shared beliefs and practices of a particular group or culture. 21 The researcher collects extensive narrative non-numerical data based on many variables over an extended period, in a natural setting within a specific context. To do this, the researcher uses interviews, observations, and active participation. These data are analyzed by describing and interpreting them and developing themes. A detailed report of the interpreted data is then provided. 2 The researcher immerses himself/herself into the study population and describes the actions, behaviors, and events from the perspective of someone involved in the population. 23 As examples of its application, ethnographic research has helped to understand a cultural model of family and community nursing during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak. 56 It has also been used to observe the organization of people’s environment in relation to cardiovascular disease management in order to clarify people’s real expectations during follow-up consultations, possibly contributing to the development of innovative solutions in care practices. 57

Meta-analysis is carried out by accumulating experimental and correlational results across independent studies using a statistical method. 21 The report is written by specifying the topic and meta-analysis type. In the write-up, reporting guidelines are followed, which include description of inclusion criteria and key variables, explanation of the systematic search of databases, and details of data extraction. Meta-analysis offers in-depth data gathering and analysis to achieve deeper inner reflection and phenomenon examination. 58

Narrative research is performed by collecting stories for constructing a narrative about an individual’s experiences and the meanings attributed to them by the individual. 9 It aims to hear the voice of individuals through their account or experiences. 17 The researcher usually conducts interviews and analyzes data by storytelling, content review, and theme development. The report is written as an in-depth narration of events or situations focused on the participants. 2 , 59 Narrative research weaves together sequential events from one or two individuals to create a “thick” description of a cohesive story or narrative. 23 It facilitates understanding of individuals’ lives based on their own actions and interpretations. 60

Grounded theory is conducted by engaging in an inductive ground-up or bottom-up strategy of generating a theory from data. 24 The researcher incorporates deductive reasoning when using constant comparisons. Patterns are detected in observations and then a working hypothesis is created which directs the progression of inquiry. The researcher collects data using interviews and questionnaires. These data are analyzed by coding the data, categorizing themes, and describing implications. The research is written as a theory and theoretical models. 2 In the write-up, the researcher describes the data analysis procedure (i.e., theoretical coding used) for developing hypotheses based on what the participants say. 61 As an example, a qualitative approach has been used to understand the process of skill development of a nurse preceptor in clinical teaching. 62 A researcher can also develop a theory using the grounded theory approach to explain the phenomena of interest by observing a population. 23

Phenomenology is carried out by attempting to understand the subjects’ perspectives. This approach is pertinent in social work research where empathy and perspective are keys to success. 21 Phenomenology studies an individual’s lived experience in the world. 63 The researcher collects data by interviews, observations, and surveys. 16 These data are analyzed by describing experiences, examining meanings, and developing themes. The researcher writes the report by contextualizing and reporting the subjects’ experience. This research approach describes and explains an event or phenomenon from the perspective of those who have experienced it. 23 Phenomenology understands the participants’ experiences as conditioned by their worldviews. 52 It is suitable for a deeper understanding of non-measurable aspects related to the meanings and senses attributed by individuals’ lived experiences. 60

Case study is conducted by collecting data through interviews, observations, document content examination, and physical inspections. The researcher analyzes the data through a detailed identification of themes and the development of narratives. The report is written as an in-depth study of possible lessons learned from the case. 2

Field research is performed using a group of methodologies for undertaking qualitative inquiries. The researcher goes directly to the social phenomenon being studied and observes it extensively. In the write-up, the researcher describes the phenomenon under the natural environment over time with no implantation of controls or experimental conditions. 45

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Scientific researchers must be aware of the differences between quantitative and qualitative research in terms of their working mechanisms to better understand their specific applications. This knowledge will be of significant benefit to researchers, especially during the planning process, to ensure that the appropriate type of research is undertaken to fulfill the research aims.

In terms of quantitative research data evaluation, four well-established criteria are used: internal validity, external validity, reliability, and objectivity. 23 The respective correlating concepts in qualitative research data evaluation are credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. 30 Regarding write-up, quantitative research papers are usually shorter than their qualitative counterparts, which allows the latter to pursue a deeper understanding and thus producing the so-called “thick” description. 29

Interestingly, a major characteristic of qualitative research is that the research process is reversible and the research methods can be modified. This is in contrast to quantitative research in which hypothesis setting and testing take place unidirectionally. This means that in qualitative research, the research topic and question may change during literature analysis, and that the theoretical and analytical methods could be altered during data collection. 44

Quantitative research focuses on natural, quantitative, and objective phenomena, whereas qualitative research focuses on social, qualitative, and subjective phenomena. 26 Quantitative research answers the questions “what?” and “when?,” whereas qualitative research answers the questions “why?,” “how?,” and “how come?.” 64

Perhaps the most important distinction between quantitative and qualitative research lies in the nature of the data being investigated and analyzed. Quantitative research focuses on statistical, numerical, and quantitative aspects of phenomena, and employ the same data collection and analysis, whereas qualitative research focuses on the humanistic, descriptive, and qualitative aspects of phenomena. 26 , 28

Structured versus unstructured processes

The aims and types of inquiries determine the difference between quantitative and qualitative research. In quantitative research, statistical data and a structured process are usually employed by the researcher. Quantitative research usually suggests quantities (i.e., numbers). 65 On the other hand, researchers typically use opinions, reasons, verbal statements, and an unstructured process in qualitative research. 63 Qualitative research is more related to quality or kind. 65

In quantitative research, the researcher employs a structured process for collecting quantifiable data. Often, a close-ended questionnaire is used wherein the response categories for each question are designed in which values can be assigned and analyzed quantitatively using a common scale. 66 Quantitative research data is processed consecutively from data management, then data analysis, and finally to data interpretation. Data should be free from errors and missing values. In data management, variables are defined and coded. In data analysis, statistics (e.g., descriptive, inferential) as well as central tendency (i.e., mean, median, mode), spread (standard deviation), and parameter estimation (confidence intervals) measures are used. 67

In qualitative research, the researcher uses an unstructured process for collecting data. These non-statistical data may be in the form of statements, stories, or long explanations. Various responses according to respondents may not be easily quantified using a common scale. 66

Composing a qualitative research paper resembles writing a quantitative research paper. Both papers consist of a title, an abstract, an introduction, objectives, methods, findings, and discussion. However, a qualitative research paper is less regimented than a quantitative research paper. 27

Quantitative research as a deductive hypothesis-testing design

Quantitative research can be considered as a hypothesis-testing design as it involves quantification, statistics, and explanations. It flows from theory to data (i.e., deductive), focuses on objective data, and applies theories to address problems. 45 , 68 It collects numerical or statistical data; answers questions such as how many, how often, how much; uses questionnaires, structured interview schedules, or surveys 55 as data collection tools; analyzes quantitative data in terms of percentages, frequencies, statistical comparisons, graphs, and tables showing statistical values; and reports the final findings in the form of statistical information. 66 It uses variable-based models from individual cases and findings are stated in quantified sentences derived by deductive reasoning. 24

In quantitative research, a phenomenon is investigated in terms of the relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable which are numerically measurable. The research objective is to statistically test whether the hypothesized relationship is true. 68 Here, the researcher studies what others have performed, examines current theories of the phenomenon being investigated, and then tests hypotheses that emerge from those theories. 4

Quantitative hypothesis-testing research has certain limitations. These limitations include (a) problems with selection of meaningful independent and dependent variables, (b) the inability to reflect subjective experiences as variables since variables are usually defined numerically, and (c) the need to state a hypothesis before the investigation starts. 61

Qualitative research as an inductive hypothesis-generating design

Qualitative research can be considered as a hypothesis-generating design since it involves understanding and descriptions in terms of context. It flows from data to theory (i.e., inductive), focuses on observation, and examines what happens in specific situations with the aim of developing new theories based on the situation. 45 , 68 This type of research (a) collects qualitative data (e.g., ideas, statements, reasons, characteristics, qualities), (b) answers questions such as what, why, and how, (c) uses interviews, observations, or focused-group discussions as data collection tools, (d) analyzes data by discovering patterns of changes, causal relationships, or themes in the data; and (e) reports the final findings as descriptive information. 61 Qualitative research favors case-based models from individual characteristics, and findings are stated using context-dependent existential sentences that are justifiable by inductive reasoning. 24

In qualitative research, texts and interviews are analyzed and interpreted to discover meaningful patterns characteristic of a particular phenomenon. 61 Here, the researcher starts with a set of observations and then moves from particular experiences to a more general set of propositions about those experiences. 4

Qualitative hypothesis-generating research involves collecting interview data from study participants regarding a phenomenon of interest, and then using what they say to develop hypotheses. It involves the process of questioning more than obtaining measurements; it generates hypotheses using theoretical coding. 61 When using large interview teams, the key to promoting high-level qualitative research and cohesion in large team methods and successful research outcomes is the balance between autonomy and collaboration. 69

Qualitative data may also include observed behavior, participant observation, media accounts, and cultural artifacts. 61 Focus group interviews are usually conducted, audiotaped or videotaped, and transcribed. Afterwards, the transcript is analyzed by several researchers.

Qualitative research also involves scientific narratives and the analysis and interpretation of textual or numerical data (or both), mostly from conversations and discussions. Such approach uncovers meaningful patterns that describe a particular phenomenon. 2 Thus, qualitative research requires skills in grasping and contextualizing data, as well as communicating data analysis and results in a scientific manner. The reflective process of the inquiry underscores the strengths of a qualitative research approach. 2

Combination of quantitative and qualitative research

When both quantitative and qualitative research methods are used in the same research, mixed-method research is applied. 25 This combination provides a complete view of the research problem and achieves triangulation to corroborate findings, complementarity to clarify results, expansion to extend the study’s breadth, and explanation to elucidate unexpected results. 29

Moreover, quantitative and qualitative findings are integrated to address the weakness of both research methods 29 , 66 and to have a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon spectrum. 66

For data analysis in mixed-method research, real non-quantitized qualitative data and quantitative data must both be analyzed. 70 The data obtained from quantitative analysis can be further expanded and deepened by qualitative analysis. 23

In terms of assessment criteria, Hammersley 71 opined that qualitative and quantitative findings should be judged using the same standards of validity and value-relevance. Both approaches can be mutually supportive. 52

Quantitative and qualitative research must be carefully studied and conducted by scientific researchers to avoid unethical research and inadequate outcomes. Quantitative research involves a deductive process wherein a research question is answered with a hypothesis that describes the relationship between independent and dependent variables, and the testing of the hypothesis. This investigation can be aptly termed as hypothesis-testing research involving the analysis of hypothesis-driven experimental studies resulting in a test of significance. Qualitative research involves an inductive process wherein a research question is explored to generate a hypothesis, which then leads to the development of a theory. This investigation can be aptly termed as hypothesis-generating research. When the whole spectrum of inductive and deductive research approaches is combined using both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies, mixed-method research is applied, and this can facilitate the construction of novel hypotheses, development of theories, or refinement of concepts.

Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions:

• Conceptualization: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ.
• Data curation: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ, Furuta A, Arima M, Tsuchiya S, Kawahara C, Takamiya Y, Izumi M.
• Formal analysis: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ, Furuta A, Arima M, Tsuchiya S, Kawahara C.
• Investigation: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ, Takamiya Y, Izumi M.
• Methodology: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ, Furuta A, Arima M, Tsuchiya S, Kawahara C, Takamiya Y, Izumi M.
• Project administration: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ.
• Resources: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ, Furuta A, Arima M, Tsuchiya S, Kawahara C, Takamiya Y, Izumi M.
• Supervision: Barroga E.
• Validation: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ, Furuta A, Arima M, Tsuchiya S, Kawahara C, Takamiya Y, Izumi M.
• Visualization: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ.
• Writing - original draft: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ.
• Writing - review & editing: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ, Furuta A, Arima M, Tsuchiya S, Kawahara C, Takamiya Y, Izumi M.