john dalton water experiment

John Dalton

(1766-1844)

Who Was John Dalton?

During John Dalton's early career, he identified the hereditary nature of red-green color blindness. In 1803 he revealed the concept of Dalton’s Law of Partial Pressures. Also in the 1800s, he was the first scientist to explain the behavior of atoms in terms of the measurement of weight.

Early Life and Career

Dalton was born in Eaglesfield, England, on September 6, 1766, to a Quaker family. He had two surviving siblings. Both he and his brother were born color-blind. Dalton's father earned a modest income as a handloom weaver. As a child, Dalton longed for formal education, but his family was very poor. It was clear that he would need to help out with the family finances from a young age.

After attending a Quaker school in his village in Cumberland, when Dalton was just 12 years old he started teaching there. When he was 14, he spent a year working as a farmhand but decided to return to teaching — this time as an assistant at a Quaker boarding school in Kendal. Within four years, the shy young man was made principal of the school. He remained there until 1793, at which time he became a math and philosophy tutor at the New College in Manchester.

While at New College, Dalton joined the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society. Membership granted Dalton access to laboratory facilities. For one of his first research projects, Dalton pursued his avid interest in meteorology. He started keeping daily logs of the weather, paying special attention to details such as wind velocity and barometric pressure—a habit Dalton would continue all of his life. His research findings on atmospheric pressure were published in his first book, Meteorological Findings , the year he arrived in Manchester.

During his early career as a scientist, Dalton also researched color blindness—a topic with which he was familiar through firsthand experience. Since the condition had affected both him and his brother since birth, Dalton theorized that it must be hereditary. He proved his theory to be true when genetic analysis of his own eye tissue revealed that he was missing the photoreceptor for perceiving the color green. As a result of his contributions to the understanding of red-green color blindness, the condition is still often referred to as "Daltonism."

Dalton's Law

Dalton's interest in atmospheric pressures eventually led him to a closer examination of gases. While studying the nature and chemical makeup of air in the early 1800s, Dalton learned that it was not a chemical solvent, as other scientists had believed. Instead, it was a mechanical system composed of small individual particles that used pressure applied by each gas independently.

Dalton's experiments on gases led to his discovery that the total pressure of a mixture of gases amounted to the sum of the partial pressures that each individual gas exerted while occupying the same space. In 1803 this scientific principle officially came to be known as Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures. Dalton's Law primarily applies to ideal gases rather than real gases, due to the elasticity and low particle volume of molecules in ideal gases. Chemist Humphry Davy was skeptical about Dalton's Law until Dalton explained that the repelling forces previously believed to create pressure only acted between atoms of the same sort and that the atoms within a mixture varied in weight and complexity.

The principle of Dalton's Law can be demonstrated using a simple experiment involving a glass bottle and large bowl of water. When the bottle is submerged under water, the water it contains is displaced, but the bottle isn't empty; it's filled with the invisible gas hydrogen instead. The amount of pressure exerted by the hydrogen can be identified using a chart that lists the pressure of water vapors at different temperatures, also thanks to Dalton's discoveries. This knowledge has many useful practical applications today. For instance, scuba divers use Dalton's principles to gauge how pressure levels at different depths of the ocean will affect the air and nitrogen in their tanks.

During the early 1800s, Dalton also postulated a law of thermal expansion that illustrated the heating and cooling reaction of gases to expansion and compression. He garnered international fame for his additional study using a crudely fashioned dew point hygrometer to determine how temperature impacts the level of atmospheric water vapor.

Atomic Theory

Dalton's fascination with gases gradually led him to formally assert that every form of matter (whether solid, liquid or gas) was also made up of small individual particles. He referred to the Greek philosopher Democritus of Abdera's more abstract theory of matter, which had centuries ago fallen out of fashion, and borrowed the term "atomos" or "atoms" to label the particles. In an article he wrote for the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society in 1803, Dalton created the first chart of atomic weights.

Seeking to expand on his theory, he readdressed the subject of atomic weight in his book A New System of Chemical Philosophy , published in 1808. In A New System of Chemical Philosophy , Dalton introduced his belief that atoms of different elements could be universally distinguished based on their varying atomic weights. In so doing, he became the first scientist to explain the behavior of atoms in terms of the measurement of weight. He also uncovered the fact that atoms couldn't be created or destroyed.

Dalton's theory additionally examined the compositions of compounds, explaining that the tiny particles (atoms) in a compound were compound atoms. Twenty years later, chemist Amedeo Avogadro would further detail the difference between atoms and compound atoms.

In A New System of Chemical Philosophy , Dalton also wrote about his experiments proving that atoms consistently combine in simple ratios. What that meant was that the molecules of an element are always made up of the same proportions, with the exception of water molecules.

In 1810 Dalton published an appendix to A New System of Chemical Philosophy . In it he elaborated on some of the practical details of his theory: that the atoms within a given element are all exactly the same size and weight, while the atoms of different elements look—and are—different from one other. Dalton eventually composed a table listing the atomic weights of all known elements.

His atomic theories were quickly adopted by the scientific community at large with few objections. "Dalton made atoms scientifically useful," asserted Rajkumari Williamson Jones, a science historian at the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology. Nobel Laureate Professor Sir Harry Kroto, noted for co-discovering spherical carbon fullerenes, identified the revolutionary impact of Dalton's discoveries on the field of chemistry: "The crucial step was to write down elements in terms of their atoms...I don't know how they could do chemistry beforehand, it didn't make any sense."

From 1817 to the day he died, Dalton served as president of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, the organization that first granted him access to a laboratory. A practitioner of Quaker modesty, he resisted public recognition; in 1822 he turned down elected membership to the Royal Society. In 1832 he did, however, begrudgingly accept an honorary Doctorate of Science degree from the prestigious Oxford University. Ironically, his graduation gown was red, a color he could not see. Fortunately for him, his color blindness was a convenient excuse for him to override the Quaker rule forbidding its subscribers to wear red.

In 1833 the government granted him a pension, which was doubled in 1836. Dalton was offered another degree, this time a Doctorate of Laws, by Edinburgh University in 1834. As if those honors were insufficient tribute to the revolutionary chemist, in London, a statue was erected in Dalton's honor--also in 1834. "Dalton was very much an icon for Manchester," said Rajkumari Williams Jones. "He is probably the only scientist who got a statue in his lifetime."

In his later life, Dalton continued to teach and lecture at universities throughout the United Kingdom, although it is said that the scientist was an awkward lecturer with a gruff and jarring voice. Throughout his lifetime, Dalton managed to maintain his nearly impeccable reputation as a devout Quaker. He lived a humble, uncomplicated life focusing on his fascination with science, and never married.

In 1837 Dalton had a stroke. He had trouble with his speech for the next year.

Death and Legacy

After suffering a second stroke, Dalton died quietly on the evening of July 26, 1844, at his home in Manchester, England. He was provided a civic funeral and granted full honors. A reported 40,000 people attended the procession, honoring his contributions to science, manufacturing and the nation's commerce.

By finding a way to "weigh atoms," John Dalton's research not only changed the face of chemistry but also initiated its progression into a modern science. The splitting of the atom in the 20th century could most likely not have been accomplished without Dalton laying the foundation of knowledge about the atomic makeup of simple and complex molecules. Dalton's discoveries also allowed for the cost-efficient manufacturing of chemical compounds, since they essentially give manufacturers a recipe for determining the correct chemical proportions in a given compound.

The majority of conclusions that made up Dalton's atomic theory still stand today.

"Now with nanotechnology, atoms are the centerpiece," said Nottingham University Professor of Chemistry David Garner. "Atoms are manipulated directly to make new medicines, semiconductors and plastics." He went on to further explain, "He gave us the first understanding of the nature of materials. Now we can design molecules with a pretty good idea of their properties."

In 2003, on the bicentennial of Dalton's public announcement of his atomic theory, the Manchester Museum held a tribute to the man, his life and his groundbreaking scientific discoveries.

QUICK FACTS

• Name: John Dalton
• Birth Year: 1766
• Birth date: September 6, 1766
• Birth City: Eaglesfield
• Birth Country: United Kingdom
• Gender: Male
• Best Known For: Chemist John Dalton is credited with pioneering modern atomic theory. He was also the first to study color blindness.
• Journalism and Nonfiction
• Science and Medicine
• Education and Academia
• Astrological Sign: Virgo
• John Fletcher's Quaker grammar school
• Death Year: 1844
• Death date: July 26, 1844
• Death City: Manchester
• Death Country: United Kingdom

CITATION INFORMATION

• Article Title: John Dalton Biography
• Author: Biography.com Editors
• Website Name: The Biography.com website
• Url: https://www.biography.com/scientists/john-dalton
• Access Date:
• Publisher: A&E; Television Networks
• Last Updated: May 21, 2021
• Original Published Date: April 2, 2014
• Berzelius' symbols are horrifying. A young student in chemistry might as soon learn Hebrew as make himself acquainted with them.
• We might as well attempt to introduce a new planet into the solar system, or to annihilate one already in existence, as to create or destroy a particle of hydrogen.
• The principal failing in [Sir Humphrey Davy's] character as a philosopher is that he does not smoke.
• I can now enter the lecture room with as little emotion nearly as I can smoke a pipe with you on Sunday or Wednesday evenings.
• Matter, though divisible in an extreme degree, is nevertheless not infinitely divisible. That is, there must be some point beyond which we cannot go in the division of matter... I have chosen the word 'atom' to signify these ultimate particles.
• Will it not be thought remarkable that in 1836 the British chemists are ignorant whether attraction, repulsion or indifference is marked when a mixture of any proportions of azote and oxygen are made.
• In short, [London] is a most surprising place, and worth one's while to see once; but the most disagreeable place on earth for one of a contemplative turn to reside in constantly.
• To ascertain the exact quantity of water in a given quantity of air is, I presume, an object not yet fully attained.
• The cause of rain is now, I consider, no longer an object of doubt.

Famous British People

Kiefer Sutherland

Amy Winehouse

Mick Jagger

Agatha Christie

Alexander McQueen

The Real Royal Scheme Depicted in ‘Mary & George’

William Shakespeare

Anya Taylor-Joy

Kate Middleton, Princess of Wales

We will be closed on Thursday, July 4 for Independence Day. See Hours & Admission to plan your visit.

Distillations magazine

John dalton and the scientific method.

Dalton proposed atomic theory in 1808; an additional century passed before the theory was universally accepted by scientists.

Many consider 2008 the 200th anniversary of atomic theory, John Dalton’s momentous theory of the nature of matter. Dalton (1766–1844) proposed that all matter in the universe is made of indestructible, unchangeable atoms—each type characterized by a constant mass—that undergo chemical reactions by joining with and separating from each other. But anniversaries can be deceptive. It was 1808 when Dalton published the first volume of New Systems of Chemical Philosophy , which presented his atomic theory in full, but his ideas were in fact already known, as he had been talking and writing about them for at least five years. Yet, an additional century would pass before atomic theory became universally accepted. 

The theory certainly had its early fans, including Swedish chemist Jöns Jakob Berzelius (1779–1848). There was hard evidence in its favor; conceiving of atoms in this way explained the stoichiometry of reactions, which posited that combined elements retained their proportions before, during, and after reacting with each other. However, not everyone found this fact compelling. Humphry Davy (British, 1748–1829) and Claude-Louis Berthollet (French, 1748–1822) were not convinced. Because atoms could not be seen, Dalton could not base his theory on direct observation, and this was a major stumbling block for many scientists. 

Nevertheless atomic theory was useful, whether proven or not. It was easier to express stoichiometric proportions in terms of atoms than in terms of absolute mass. It is simpler to say that 1 atom of hydrogen joins with 1 atom of chlorine to form 1 molecule of hydrogen chloride than it is to say that 1 gram of hydrogen reacts with 35.45 grams of chlorine to make 36.45 grams of hydrogen chloride. Many chemists found themselves using atomic theory, even if they held their noses all the while. 

Acceptance grew slowly over the next hundred years as the concept of the atom became useful for explaining a variety of things from molecular structure in organic chemistry to the spacing and movement of molecules in gas physics. By 1905 there were still some holdouts, including Marcellin Berthelot and the founding father of physical chemistry, Wilhelm Ostwald, but most chemists had accepted the existence of atoms. That year a young Albert Einstein penned a paper that doesn’t receive nearly as much attention as his work on the photoelectric effect and his special theory of relativity. This work used the concept of the atom to explore the phenomenon of Brownian motion. 

When minute particles are suspended in a liquid, they move in a seemingly random, ever-changing course, each one only slowly moving in any direction. Earlier scientists had proposed that the particles moved because the liquid molecules were constantly in motion and collided with the suspended particles, jostling them in an erratic manner. Einstein took this idea further, building on the observation of Jacobus Henricus van’t Hoff that solute molecules move in the same manner as gas molecules and their behavior can be described using the gas laws. In his 1905 paper Einstein treated suspended particles as if they were giant molecules and went on to predict how they should behave according to the gas laws. For example, he stated that the average speed of the suspended particles should reflect the average kinetic energy of the moving molecules of the liquid in which the particles were suspended. He also predicted that, in a vertical cylinder of an aqueous suspension, gravitational pull would cause a greater density of particles toward the bottom of the cylinder and a lower density near the top, just as the earth’s atmosphere becomes thinner at higher altitudes. 

Three years later, in 1908, Dalton’s New System of Chemical Philosophy turned 100 years old. Berthelot had died the previous year, rejecting atoms until the end. Ostwald still did not accept the existence of atoms. French scientist Jean Perrin took up Einstein’s challenge and began studying Brownian motion in great detail. Perrin carried out incredibly meticulous observations, plotting the paths of protein particles in aqueous suspensions. He studied their variations in distribution as a function of the tiniest variations in vertical height. He was able to show that their behavior matched Einstein’s predictions for particles that are being constantly rammed by unseen molecules. Once and for all the particulate nature of matter had been demonstrated in an unequivocal manner. A final crowning validation came in 1926 when Perrin received the Nobel Prize in Physics for his work. 

Later scientists would use atomic force microscopy and scanning tunneling microscopy to give us even clearer observations of the particulate nature of matter. Today atomic theory is covered in the first chapters of most general chemistry textbooks. Most of us have grown accustomed to seeing it in this exalted place, and it can be easy to forget that it has not been there all along since 1808.

Mark Michalovic was consultant for educational services at the Science History Institute.

More from our magazine

Controversy, Control, and Cosmetics in Early Modern Italy

In a society that damned women for both plainness and adornment, wearing makeup became a defiant act of survival.

Joe Hin Tjio Counts Chromosomes

A basic scientific error hid in plain sight for decades until an Indonesian geneticist spent Christmas break on a lab bender.

Everyday Monsoons

Washes and other gaps in the Sonoran Desert.

Copy the above HTML to republish this content. We have formatted the material to follow our guidelines, which include our credit requirements. Please review our full list of guidelines for more information. By republishing this content, you agree to our republication requirements.

John Dalton

Modern Atomic Theory (John Dalton)

Experiments with gases that first became possible at the turn of the nineteenth century led John Dalton in 1803 to propose a modern theory of the atom based on the following assumptions.

1. Matter is made up of atoms that are indivisible and indestructible.

2. All atoms of an element are identical.

3. Atoms of different elements have different weights and different chemical properties.

4. Atoms of different elements combine in simple whole numbers to form compounds.

5. Atoms cannot be created or destroyed. When a compound decomposes, the atoms are recovered unchanged.

Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures (John Dalton)

John Dalton was the first to recognize that the total pressure of a mixture of gases is the sum of the contributions of the individual components of the mixture. By convention, the part of the total pressure of a mixture that results from one component is called the partial pressure of that component. Dalton's law of partial pressures states that the total pressure of a mixture of gases is the sum of the partial pressures of the various components.

P T = P 1 + P 2 + P 3 + ...

Dalton derived the law of partial pressures from his work on the amount of water vapor that could be absorbed by air at different temperatures. It is therefore fitting that this law is used most often to correct for the amount of water vapor picked up when a gas is collected by displacing water.

Origins of Stoichiometry (John Dalton)

John Dalton was not familiar with Richter's work when he developed his atomic theory in 1803. By 1807, however, references to this work appeared in Dalton's notebooks, and Dalton's contemporaries viewed his atomic theory as a way of explaining why compounds combine in definite proportions.

Consider water, for example. In his famous textbook, Trait lmentaire de Chimie , which was published in 1789, Lavoisier reported that water was roughly 85% oxygen and 15% hydrogen by weight. Water therefore seemed to contain 5.6 times more oxygen by weight than hydrogen. Dalton assumed that water contains one atom of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen, as shown below, and concluded that an oxygen atom must weigh 5.6 times more than a hydrogen atom. On the basis of such reasoning, Dalton constructed a table of the relative atomic weights of a handful of elements.

John Dalton's Atomic Theory

• Famous Chemists
• Chemical Laws
• Periodic Table
• Projects & Experiments
• Scientific Method
• Biochemistry
• Physical Chemistry
• Medical Chemistry
• Chemistry In Everyday Life
• Activities for Kids
• Abbreviations & Acronyms
• Weather & Climate
• Ph.D., Biomedical Sciences, University of Tennessee at Knoxville
• B.A., Physics and Mathematics, Hastings College

You may take it for granted that matter is made up of atoms , but what we consider common knowledge was unknown until relatively recently in human history. Most science historians credit John Dalton , a British physicist, chemist, and meteorologist, with the development of modern atomic theory.

Early Theories 

While the ancient Greeks believed atoms made matter, they disagreed on what atoms were. Democritus recorded that Leucippus believed atoms to be small, indestructible bodies that could combine to change properties of matter. Aristotle believed elements each had their own special "essence," but he did not think the properties extended down to tiny, invisible particles. No one really questioned Aristotle's theory, since tools did not exist to examine matter in detail.

Along Comes Dalton

So, it wasn't until the 19th century that scientists conducted experiments on the nature of matter. Dalton's experiments focused on gases -- their properties, what happened when they were combined, and the similarities and differences between different types of gases. What he learned led him to propose several laws, which are known collectively as Dalton's Atomic Theory or Dalton's Laws:

• Atoms are small, chemically indestructible particles of matter. Elements consist of atoms.
• Atoms of an element share common properties.
• Atoms of different elements have different properties and different atomic weights.
• Atoms that interact with each other obey the Law of Conservation of Mass . Essentially, this law states the number and kinds of atoms that react are equal to the number and kinds of atoms in the products of a chemical reaction.
• Atoms that combine with each other obey the Law of Multiple Proportions . In other words, when elements combine, the ratio in which the atoms combine can be expressed as a ratio of whole numbers.

Dalton is also known for proposing gas laws ( Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures ) and explaining color blindness. Not all of his scientific experiments could be called successful. For example, some believe the stroke he suffered might have resulted from research using himself as a subject, in which he poked himself in the ear with a sharp stick to “investigate the humours that move inside of my cranium.”

• Grossman, M. I. (2014). "John Dalton and the London atomists: William and Bryan Higgins, William Austin, and new Daltonian doubts about the origin of the atomic theory." Notes and Records . 68 (4): 339–356. doi: 10.1098/rsnr.2014.0025
• Levere, Trevor (2001). Transforming Matter: A History of Chemistry from Alchemy to the Buckyball . Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 84–86. ISBN 978-0-8018-6610-4.
• Rocke, Alan J. (2005). "In Search of El Dorado: John Dalton and the Origins of the Atomic Theory." Social Research. 72 (1): 125–158. JSTOR 40972005
• A to Z Chemistry Dictionary
• A Brief History of Atomic Theory
• What Are the States of Matter?
• What Are the First 20 Elements?
• Examples of Solids, Liquids, and Gases
• Biography of John Dalton, the 'Father of Chemistry'
• Law of Multiple Proportions Example Problem
• Law of Constant Composition in Chemistry
• Law of Definite Proportions Definition
• Basic Model of the Atom and Atomic Theory
• Atoms and Atomic Theory - Study Guide
• The Major Laws of Chemistry
• Gases - General Properties of Gases
• J.J. Thomson Atomic Theory and Biography
• What Is Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures?
• Biography of Amedeo Avogadro, Influential Italian Scientist

Reset password New user? Sign up

Existing user? Log in

Dalton's Atomic Model

Already have an account? Log in here.

• Josh Silverman
• Silas Hundt

Dalton's atomic model sets up the building blocks for others to improve on. Though some of his conclusions were incorrect, his contributions were vital. He defined an atom as the smallest indivisible particle .

John Dalton

Though we know today that they can be further divided into protons, neutrons, and electrons, his explanation was revolutionary for that period of time. Here's how he defined the atom:

"Matter, though divisible in an extreme degree, is nevertheless not infinitely divisible. That is, there must be some point beyond which we cannot go in the division of matter. I have chosen the word “atom” to signify these ultimate particles." -John Dalton

Basic Laws of Atomic Theory

Dalton's atomic theory, dalton's model of an atom.

Let's review the three basic laws before we get into Dalton's theory.

1. Law of conservation of mass The law of conservation of mass states that the net change in mass of the reactants and products before and after a chemical reaction is zero. This means mass can neither be created nor destroyed. In other words, the total mass in a chemical reaction remains constant. This law was formulated by Antoine Lavoisier in 1789. It was later found to be slightly inaccurate, as in the course of chemical reactions mass can interconvert with heat and bond energy. However, these losses are very small, several orders of magnitude smaller than the mass of the reactants, so that this law is an excellent approximation.

Does the following chemical reaction obey the law of conservation of mass? \[\ce{Ca(OH)2 + CO2 -> CaCO3 + H2O}\] The mass of \(\ce{Ca}\), \(\ce O\), \(\ce H,\) and \(\ce C\) are 40u, 16u, 1u, and 12u, respectively. Yes, they obey the law of conservation of mass. Let's verify it. The molecular mass of \[\begin{align} \ce{Ca(OH)2}&= 40+32+2\\&=74 \\ \\ \ce{CO2}&=12+32\\&=44 \\ \\ \ce{CaCO3}&=40+12+48\\&=100\\ \\ \ce{H2O}&=2+16\\&=18. \end{align}\] Substituting these values in the equation, \[\begin{align}74+44 & = 100+18\\118 & =118.\ _\square \end{align}\]

Does the following chemical reaction obey the law of conservation of mass?

\[\ce{Fe + H_2SO_4 -> FeSO_4 + H_2}\]

\(\) Take \(\text{Fe=55u, H=1u, S=32u, O=16u}\).

2. Law of constant proportions The law of constant proportions states that when a compound is broken, the masses of the constituent elements remain in the same proportion. Or, in a chemical compound, the elements are always present in definite proportions by mass. It means each compound has the same elements in the same proportions, irrespective of where the compound was obtained, who prepared the compound, or the mass of the compound. This law was formulated and proven by Joseph Louis Proust in 1799.

When 1.375 g of cupric oxide is reduced on heating in a current of hydrogen, the weight of copper remaining is 1.098 g. In another experiment, 1.179 g of copper is dissolved in nitric acid and the resulting copper nitrate is converted into cupric oxide by ignition. The weight of cupric oxide formed is 1.476 g.

Does this situation verify law of constant proportions?

A person living in Australia sent a \(100\text{ ml}\) sample of \(\ce{CaCO3}\)(calcium carbonate) to a person living in India. The person living in India made his own sample of \(200\text{ ml}\) and compared it to his friend's. Which of the two compounds has a greater ratio of \(\ce{Ca}:\ce C?\) Both contain equal ratio of \(\ce{Ca}\) and \(\ce C\). This is guaranteed by the law of constant proportions. \(_\square\)

3. Law of multiple proportions The law of multiple proportions states that when two elements form two or more compounds between them, the ratio of the masses of the second element in each compound can be expressed in the form of small whole numbers. This law was proposed by John Dalton, and it is a combination of the previous laws.

Carbon combines with oxygen to form two different compounds (under different circumstances); one is the most common gas \(\ce{CO2}\) and the other is \(\ce{CO}\). Do they obey the law of multiple proportions? Yes, they do obey the law of multiple proportions. Let's verify it. We know that the mass of carbon is \(12\text{ u}\) and that of oxygen is \(16\text{ u}\). So, we can say that \(12\text{ g}\) of carbon combines with \(32\text{ g}\) of oxygen to form \(\ce{CO2}\). Similarly, \(12\text{ g}\) of carbon combines with \(16\text{ g}\) of oxygen to form \(\ce{CO}\). So, the ratio of oxygen in the first and second compound is \(\frac{32}{16}=\frac21=2,\) which is a whole number. \(_\square\)

Two different compounds are formed by the elements carbon and oxygen. The first compound contains 42.9% by mass carbon and 57.1% by mass oxygen. The second compound contains 27.3% by mass carbon and 72.7% by mass oxygen.

Does this obey the law of multiple proportions?

There is one other law which was proposed to find the relation between two different compounds.

4. Law of reciprocal proportions The law of reciprocal proportions states that when two different elements combine with the same quantity of a third element, the ratio in which they do so will be the same or a multiple of the proportion in which they combine with each other. This law was proposed by Jeremias Ritcher in 1792.

Dalton picked up the idea of divisibility of matter to explain the nature of atoms. He studied the laws of chemical combinations (the laws we discussed in the previous section) carefully and came to a conclusion about the characteristics of atoms.

His statements were based on the three laws we'd discussed earlier. He stated the following postulates (not all of them are true) about his atomic theory.

• Matter is made of very tiny particles called atoms .
• Atoms are indivisible structures , which can neither be created nor destroyed during a chemical reaction (based on the law of conservation of mass).
• All atoms of a particular element are similar in all respects , be it their physical or chemical properties.
• Inversely, atoms of different elements show different properties , and they have different masses and different chemical properties.
• Atoms combine in the ratio of small whole numbers to form stable compounds, which is how they exist in nature.
• The relative number and the kinds of atoms in a given compound are always in a fixed ratio (based on the law of constant proportions).

As said earlier, all the postulates weren't correct. Let us discuss the drawbacks of Dalton's atomic theory.

• The first part of the second postulate was not accepted. Bohr's model proposed that the atoms could be further divided into protons, neutrons, and electrons.
• The third postulate was also proven to be wrong because of the existence of isotopes , which are atoms of the same element but of different masses.
• The fourth postulate was also proven to be wrong because of the existence of isobars , which are atoms of different elements but of the same mass.

Nonetheless, to propose the idea of an atom (considering the time period) is a great achievement, and we must appreciate Dalton's work.

Based on all his observations, Dalton proposed his model of an atom. It is often referred to as the billiard ball model . He defined an atom to be a ball-like structure, as the concepts of atomic nucleus and electrons were unknown at the time. If you asked Dalton to draw the diagram of an atom, he would've simply drawn a circle!

Later, he tried to symbolize atoms, and he became one of the first scientists to assign such symbols. He gave a specific symbol to each atom (see below).

It was only after J. J. Thompson proposed his model that the true concepts had come into existence. Later, Rutherford worked on Dalton's and Thompson's models and brought out a roughly correct shape of the concept. Finally, Bohr's model and the quantum mechanical model gave a complete model which we know of today.

Atoms, Molecules, Elements, Compounds

Bohr's Model

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Javascript is disabled

• What's on
• Accessibility
• Travel information
• Food and drink
• Frequently asked questions
• We are changing
• Objects and stories
• The world's first industrial city
• The first railways
• Engineering and mass production
• City of ideas
• Manchester Science Festival
• Researchers
• Press office
• Community partnerships
• Support the museum
• Corporate partnerships
• Gifts in wills
• Trusts, foundations and government
• Volunteering

Science and Industry Museum Liverpool Road Manchester M3 4FP

Open daily,  book your free museum admission tickets now . Schools and groups can book tickets  here . Find out about our ongoing restoration project .

John Dalton: atoms, eyesight and auroras

Published: 16 April 2019

John Dalton (1766–1844) was a Manchester-based scientist whose pioneering work greatly advanced our understanding in multiple fields of research. His surviving apparatus and personal items are now in the Science Museum Group collection.

Who was John Dalton?

Early years and the move to manchester.

Dalton was born in what is now Cumbria in 1766. He became principal at a local Quaker school and taught there until 1793, at which time he moved to Manchester to tutor in natural philosophy and science at the Manchester Academy, a Presbyterian college. 

However, his teaching duties left him with too little time to pursue his own scientific interests, so he became a private tutor, including to a budding young scientist called James Prescott Joule (more on whom later).

Joining the 'Lit & Phil'

Soon after moving to Manchester, Dalton joined the Literary & Philosophical Society , which was at the centre of the city's scientific and business community. It was a discussion group set up to share scientific ideas at a time when science had yet to become a profession.

The Society gave him a room for teaching and research at its premises on George Street. Through this, he gained access to a well-equipped research laboratory, where his scientific output flourished.

Though sometimes criticised for the quality of his experiments, Dalton was an enthusiastic investigator who worked late most evenings. He read over 100 papers to the Society, and became its Secretary, Vice-President and, ultimately, President.

Through his experimentation, Dalton not only formulated a new atomic theory to explain chemical reactions, upon which much of modern chemistry and physics is based, but he also developed a theory to explain colour vision deficiency, from which he himself suffered. He was also a figurehead in the world of meteorology.

Atomic theory

Dalton was interested in the composition of the atmosphere and, by extension, in how components mix together to form gases. He formulated the Law of Partial Pressures in 1801, according to which the pressure of a mixed gas is the sum of the pressures that each of its components would exert if occupying the same space. He also developed the law of the thermal expansion of gases. 

Henry Roscoe, a later Manchester chemist, suggested that Dalton was trying to explain why the constituents of a gaseous mixture remain homogeneously mixed instead of separating into layers according to their density, the understanding of which is particularly important in atmospheric studies.

At the end of an 1803 paper on the absorption of gases by liquids, Dalton rather casually set out the first table of atomic weights. Encouraged by the favourable reception this paper received, he developed his theory further, in lectures to the Royal Society in 1803–04 and later in his New System of Chemical Philosophy:

Every particle of water is like every other particle of water; every particle of hydrogen is like every other particle of hydrogen... Chemical analysis and synthesis go no farther than to the separation of particles one from another, and to their reunion. No new creation or destruction of matter is within the reach of chemical agency. John Dalton (1808)

Dalton's theory was based on the concept that each element consists of its own unique brand of indivisible atom; atoms of one element are all alike but they differ from atoms of other elements. Importantly, Dalton assigned atomic weights to the atoms of the 20 elements he knew of at the time. This was a revolutionary concept for the day, which would contribute to the development of the periodic table of the elements later in the 19th century.

The below images are reproductions of drawings of atomic formulae by John Dalton, copied from original lent to the Science Museum Group by Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society.

More information about collection object

Why was dalton's work in atomic theory so pioneering.

This concept, that atoms of different elements are distinguished by differences in their weights, opened up new fields of experimentation. Each aspect of Dalton's theory has since been amended or refined, but its overall picture remains as the basis of modern chemistry and physics.

Through his work, Dalton also pioneered the use of ball-and-stick models to illustrate the three-dimensional structure of molecules, which are often used in teaching to this day.

We know when and why Dalton had these models made, because he describes their production and use in a letter written in 1842, two years before his death:

My friend Mr Ewart, at my suggestion, made me a number of equal balls, about an inch in diameter, about 30 years ago; they have been in use ever since, I occasionally show them to my pupils… I had no idea at the time that the atoms were all of a bulk, but for the sake of illustration I had them made alike. From 'Memoirs of the life and scientific researches of John Dalton' by William Charles Henry (1854)

Contemporary critics doubted Dalton's atomic theory and his structural, three-dimensional thinking, as it was far beyond the perceived wisdom of the time. However, his ideas ultimately became fundamental to modern chemistry.

If more chemists had been playing with balls and sticks in the same way as Dalton, the world would not have had to wait so long for the theory of structure. From 'Dalton and Structural Chemistry' by W.V. Farrar (1968)

Colour blindness and 'Daltonism'

In addition to his work with atoms, Dalton also developed a theory to explain colour vision deficiency (or colour blindness), from which he himself suffered. He suggested that the colour of the fluid in the eyes, known as the vitreous humour, acted as a filter to certain colours in the spectrum.

Dalton’s ideas were met with resistance from some of his contemporaries at the time, so to test his theory, Dalton donated his eyes for examination after death. On 28 July 1844, the day after he died, local doctor Joseph Ransome performed the autopsy. 'Perfectly colourless' was the result, proving his theory to be incorrect. 

DNA analysis carried out in 1995 and published in the journal Science , 150 years after his death, revealed that Dalton lacked the gene for the receptor sensitive to medium wavelength (green) light, and in fact suffered from deuteranopia, or red-green colour blindness—a condition still referred to as Daltonism.

The eyes were retained by the Literary & Philosophical Society and donated to the museum in 1997.   

Watching the weather

In addition to transforming our understanding of chemistry and colour blindness, Dalton was also a fervent weather watcher, becoming an important figure in the field of meteorology. He kept a daily weather diary, producing a detailed record of local weather conditions over 57 years—over 200,000 entries in total. Even in poor health, he continued to journal about the weather, and made his final entry mere hours before his death on 27 July 1844.

As well as the classic Mancunian wind and rain, he also documented sightings of the aurora borealis, becoming enthralled by the 'glowing canopy' of light that occasionally appeared in the skies above the Lake District and Manchester.

You can read more about Dalton's obsession with the weather, particularly his work around the aurora borealis and its causes, on the Science and Industry Museum blog, and more on how space weather affects the Earth over on the website of our sister museum, the Science Museum:

John Dalton and the aurora borealis

The Northern Lights, or aurora borealis, are one of nature's most spectacular phenomena, and have inspired countless artists, explorers, philosophers and scientists over the centuries, including Manchester's own John Dalton.

How does space weather affect the Earth?

In 1859, the largest geomagnetic solar storm on record happened. The impact of this storm, millions of miles away, disrupted the global communications of the day—the telegraph—and showed how the Earth is affected by the activity on the Sun.

What happened to Dalton?

John Dalton was widely honoured in his lifetime. He was elected one of the eight foreign associates of the French Academie des Sciences, a Fellow of the Royal Society and their first Royal Medallist. Oxford and Cambridge Universities both gave him honorary degrees. 

Dalton was especially loved by the people of Manchester, so much so that the city paid for a life-size statue to be erected during his lifetime, which can be found in the Town Hall. Upon his death, 40,000 people filed past his coffin as he lay in state, and there were 100 carriages in his funeral procession. 

Dalton is now regarded as a rather poor experimenter. However, he had a powerful and vivid pictorial imagination that often gave him profound insights, as exemplified in his work.

Dalton’s scientific connections

Dalton was extremely dedicated to his work and as a result became rather reclusive, remaining unmarried throughout his life and with few friends to speak of. He did, however, have a lasting impact on another 19th-century scientific pioneer: James Joule.

James Prescott Joule (1818–89) is revered as one of the greatest scientists in the history of physics, due to his groundbreaking work in thermodynamics. He was the son of a renowned local brewer and grew up fascinated by all things scientific, and was fortunate enough to be tutored by John Dalton. 

Find out more about Joule and his own work here .

Suggestions for further research

• DSL Cardwell (ed.),  John Dalton and the progress of science  (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1968)
• F Greenaway, John Dalton and the Atom  (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1966)
• WC Henry,  Memoirs of the life and scientific researches of John Dalton  (London: Cavendish Society, 1854)
• RF Hess, LT Sharpe et al.  Night Vision: Basic, Clinical and Applied Aspects  (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)
• AL Smyth (ed.),  John Dalton, 1766–1844: a bibliography of works by and about him  (Manchester: Manchester Literary and Philosophical Publications, 1998)
• A Thackray,  John Dalton: Critical Assessments of His Life and Science  (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972)
• Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, Vol. V Part I  (Manchester: Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, 1798)

You may also like

Developing a modern periodic table

The periodic table is one of the most iconic images in science, a guide to the chemistry of our world. But it's only one among many visual ways to classify the elements.

John Dalton in the SMG Collection

Browse all John Dalton-related items in the Science Museum Group collection, from his laboratory equipment and notes to the actual remains of his eyes.

SMG Journal

The Journal presents the global research community with peer-reviewed papers relevant to the work of the Science Museum Group.

• Part of the Science Museum Group
• Terms and conditions
• Privacy and cookies
• Modern Slavery Statement
• Web accessibility

Trending →

Chipko movement: embracing trees and environmental conservation in india, stephanie kwolek: the chemist who revolutionized protective gear, conquest of the west: history of the american pioneers, second vatican council: summary of the 1962 council, 1962 assassination attempt on charles de gaulle, john dalton: atomic theory, model, experiments, and discoveries.

“If I have succeeded better than many who surround me, it has been chiefly – may I say almost solely – from universal assiduity.” John Dalton

The history of modern atomic theory begins with an unexpected person, a young school principal, and a member of the Quaker cult named John Dalton. In his article for the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society in 1803, Dalton presented the relative atomic weights of some of the most important chemical elements known to that day. Within a decade, many leading chemists adopted Dalton’s atomic theory in one way or another, and within a generation, chemistry was all about atoms.

Who Was John Dalton?

Dalton’s father was Cockermouth, a poor weaver who lived in Cumberland, on the northwest tip of England. He spent his first years working on the family’s small farm, but on the other hand, he had a passion for education and became self-educated with the help of local elite Quakers. Even among their peers, the Cumberland Quakers stood out for the importance they placed on education and mental pursuits. Dalton started teaching at the village school at the age of 12. Three years later, he joined his older brother, who runs a boarding school in the nearby town of Kendal. In his spare time, he continued his education by studying classical and modern languages, mathematics, and the natural sciences.

John Dalton’s favorite pursuit at that time was meteorology; he specialized in this field later and continued his research with passion until the end of his life. In 1793, his first book, Meteorological Observations and Essays, was published. In the same year, he accepted a teaching position in nature philosophy at New College in Manchester. The school was “ opposed to the Anglican Church, ” and in 1800 it started to face financial difficulties and failed to pay wages. Dalton resigned from his position but stayed in Manchester. He made his living by giving private math and chemistry lessons. When he left New College, he was elected secretary of the Literary and Philosophical Society. He was assigned a chassis study room and a laboratory in the lodgings.

John Dalton lived a quiet life in this vibrant and rising British industrial city. He never married but had a certain number of close friends who deeply appreciated his gentle personality and simplistic and philosophical approach as a Quaker. Although he was not highly blessed in mathematics, his mind was extremely prone to numbers and mathematical concepts, which he applied to nature through intuition. However, he had a very lively scientific imagination. Keeping his conversations lean, away from controversy or falsehood, Dalton continued his research quietly, with intellectual courage and mental brilliance, which he never emphasized.

John Dalton: Heavy Elements

Due to his scientific interest,  John Dalton  turned to a more general examination of mixed gases and water-dissolved gases. He believed that the only way to fully understand these substances was to first deduce how heavy the absolute particles of the chemicals were. It was not possible to measure the  atoms  of various elements directly. Because they were too small to be measured and detected. However, he thought that there could be a way to find their relative weight. For this purpose, he assigned the weight of 1 to the lightest atom, namely  hydrogen,  and tried to determine the weight of each element’s atoms relative to 1. In Dalton’s ingenious method, the first step was to visualize how simple compounds such as water are formed if they could be observed at the invisible level of the particles. He knew that liquid water was composed of gaseous hydrogen  and oxygen elements, but what would a single molecule of this substance look like?

He thought that the most likely answer would be to connect a single oxygen atom to a single hydrogen atom to form water. In today’s language, Dalton thought the water  formula  was HO at that time. The second step was to analyze the composition (or make use of the analysis of other chemists). Weight analysis of the water at that time indicated that it was composed of 7/8 oxygen and 1/8 hydrogen. Therefore, the  oxygen  atom must have been 7/8 of the weight of the water molecule.

In summary, if the hydrogen atom is the  H1  weight unit and the water molecule is  HO , and if it is seven-eighths oxygen, then it should be O=7. (We now know that this ratio is eight to nine.) He applied the same process to carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus compositions. These were the  six atom weights  from his first article that he read to the audience on the stage in October 1803. However, as the excerpt below shows, he mentioned nothing to the audience about how he arrived at these figures. We know this because of the notepad discovered in his lab (the notebook itself was destroyed by an airstrike in 1944, but the photostatic copy of the important pages was separately printed in 1896). The first atomic calculations in the document appear to have been entered on September 6, 1803. He maintained the computations in the months that followed.

The study of the relative weights of the particles is, to my knowledge, completely new; I have recently continued this review with remarkable success. In this article, the principle will not be mentioned; only the results will be presented, as far as they have been determined in my experiments. From John Dalton’s 1803 oral presentation

The First True Atomic Theory

John Dalton’s method  also had weaknesses; most notably, the only way to start the process was to guess how many atoms of each element were present in the molecules of these simple chemicals. This was certainly one reason why Dalton was concerned about revealing the details of his technique. These details were first published in 1807, in the chemistry book of Dalton’s  friend Thomas Thomson,  with proper reference to Dalton. Dalton later evaluated this theory in his new book, The  New System of Chemical Philosophy , published in 1808–1810. He put forward the thesis that each element consists of a single, unique type of atom. The atoms in each element are different from those of other elements and thus have a different mass. They could not be altered or destroyed, but the atoms of different elements could combine in certain ways to form components of varying complexity. It was the first  true scientific atomic theory derived from empirical experiments and analysis.

Some chemists refused to approve Dalton’s work, claiming that it was built on a hypothesis alone.  Critics  asked what reason Dalton had to assume that the water molecule was only  HO and  not HO2, H2O, or any other possibility.

Although John Dalton and his supporters acknowledged that a specific molecular formula recommendation should not be made blindly, they pointed out that the atomic weights determined by inference are derived from more than one formula and have a multi-faceted accuracy. Furthermore, the existence of some stable numerical regularity (compounds made up of the same elements always had a proportionate and integer number of atoms) ensured that chemicals are formed by the combining of atoms to create molecules.

The Molecular Formula of Water

Other chemists offered various versions of the atomic theory many years after Dalton’s ideas were published. Some, such as the British Humphry Davy and the Swedish Jöns Jacob Berzelius, believed that the water molecule was more likely made up of two hydrogen atoms since the two gases were united in an exact volume of one-to-two ratio to make water; water was H2O for them. However, for these scientists, this meant that the atomic weight of oxygen was 16 times that of hydrogen.

There were other conflicts; the history of atomic theory in the first half of the 19th century is very complex and controversial. However, despite these  complexities , there is no doubt Dalton’s atomic theory has transformed science. Elements and compounds started to be represented with useful, clear acronyms. Chemical reactions were truly understandable at a level that was never possible before. Despite the ongoing weaknesses, the  theory  has become a powerful tool for other chemical discoveries.

Convinced of the correctness of his atomic weights,  John Dalton kept his stance despite all objections to it. Even though no one else uses the weird notation system in which atoms are shown in different circles, he kept using it. 

40.000 People at John Dalton’s Funeral

Because of John Dalton’s modest personality, his value was not fully understood by his contemporaries. Everything aside, he came from a poor family. He lacked the educational and religious affiliation that leading European intellectuals deemed appropriate . With his behavior and speaking style, it was obvious that he was from the northern countryside. And the fact that he did not fully follow the rapid  scientific developments  in the 1820s and 1830s made the situation more difficult.

But  Dalton’s real value  has become increasingly apparent in the European scientific environment. In 1822, he traveled to Paris on his only trip abroad and was welcomed by a group of very famous scientists, including Laplace, Berthollet, Gay-Lussac, Cuvier, and Humboldt. He became a participating member of the French Academy of Sciences just by letter, and it was a great honor. Four years later, he received the first Royal Medal awarded by the Royal Society of London, of which he was a member. In 1833, the  British government  started to pay him 150 pounds per month for life. The amount doubled after four years.

John Dalton died in 1844 . His body was placed in Manchester Town Hall and visited by 40.000 people who wanted to pay their respects for the last time; at the funeral the next day, the cortege was almost 2 km long.

John Dalton Quotes

• If I have succeeded better than many who surround me, it has been chiefly – may I say almost solely – from universal assiduity.
• Matter, though divisible in an extreme degree, is nevertheless not infinitely divisible. That is, there must be some point beyond which we cannot go in the division of matter. … I have chosen the word “atom” to signify these ultimate particles.
• No new creation or destruction of matter is within the reach of chemical agency. We might as well attempt to introduce a new planet into the solar system, or to annihilate one already in existence, as to create or destroy a particle of hydrogen.
• Reconsidering Happiness captures all the contradictory impulses of falling in and out of love-the lust and wanderlust, the contentment and restlessness, the secret loyalties, the hard compromises. Sherrie Flick has written a wise and elegant novel.
• Roscoe, Henry E. (1895).  John Dalton and the Rise of Modern Chemistry . London: Macmillan. ISBN  9780608325361 .
• Roscoe, Henry E. & Harden, Arthur (1896).  A New View of the Origin of Dalton’s Atomic Theory . London: Macmillan. ISBN  978-1-4369-2630-0 .
• Smith, R. Angus (1856).  Memoir of John Dalton and History of the Atomic Theory . London: H. Bailliere. ISBN  978-1-4021-6437-8 .
• Smyth, A. L. (1998).  John Dalton, 1766–1844: A Bibliography of Works by and About Him, With an Annotated List of His Surviving Apparatus and Personal Effects . ISBN  978-1-85928-438-4 .- Original edition published by Manchester University Press in 1966
• Thackray, Arnold (1972).  John Dalton: Critical Assessments of His Life and Science . Harvard University Press. ISBN  978-0-674-47525-0 .

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Published: 03 September 1966

John Dalton the Atomist

• J. ROSE 1  

Nature volume  211 ,  pages 1015–1016 ( 1966 ) Cite this article

54 Accesses

Metrics details

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

185,98 € per year

only 3,65 € per issue

Buy this article

• Purchase on Springer Link
• Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Lavoisier, A. L., Traité de Chimie , i, 31 (1789).

Partington, J. R., A History of Chemistry , 3 , 771 (Macmillan, London, 1962).

Book   Google Scholar  

Dalton, J., A New System of Chemical Philosophy , Part 1, 187 (S. Russell (for R. Bickerstaff), London and Manchester, 1808).

Google Scholar  

Dalton, J. (ref. 3), 70–71.

Partington, J. R. (ref. 2), 778–782.

Partington, J. R., Scientia , 49 , 221 (1955).

Higgins, W., Comparative View , 46, 48, 192 and 262 (J. Murray, London, 1789).

Meldrum, A. N., Chemical News , 102 , 1 (1910).

CAS   Google Scholar  

Greenaway, F., Endeavour , 25 , 73 (1966).

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Nash, L. K., Isis , 47 , 101 (1956).

Dalton, J. (ref. 3), 213.

Dalton, J., A New System of Chemical Philosophy , Part 1, 2 , 351 (G. Wilson, London, 1827).

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Blackburn College of Technology and Design,

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

ROSE, J. John Dalton the Atomist. Nature 211 , 1015–1016 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1038/2111015a0

Download citation

Issue Date : 03 September 1966

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/2111015a0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

John Dalton

John Dalton – Meteorologist in History; Written by: Jenna Hans

Many of us know John Dalton for his Law of Partial Pressures, or maybe his work with the blind. Dalton is responsible for introducing atomic theory and the idea that everything is made up of little particles (atoms), and he even put together the first chart of atomic weights! However, what people might not know is that he was an active meteorologist, weather enthusiast, and that meteorology led Dalton to a lot of these theories and conclusions.

Growing up near the Lake District in northwest England, young John Dalton was among one of the most beautiful and mountainous regions in the UK, making it a great place for him to make meteorological observations. He used various instruments to take measurements of things like temperature, pressure, air circulation, and cloud formation. These measurements along with his observations were recorded in his book Meteorological Observations and Essays that was published in 1793. The book contains more than 200,00 entries, many of which we use in meteorological and climate records today 2 . In the book he also included guides for students, his thoughts on the composition of the atmosphere, and experiments he conducted.

Throughout the book Dalton outlines many different theories and conclusions he made through his observations, experimentation and research. This led him to publish ground breaking papers on evaporation and its role in the hydrological cycle. He made the statement that rain and dew are equal to the amount of water evaporated, something that was questioned at the time. Not only that, but he developed the evaporation equation (E=K(e s -e a )) that is still used today 3 . He developed his law of partial pressures from atmospheric observations and even developed his 5-part atomic theory from his interest in atmospheric gasses 1 .For over 50 years Dalton went out to record his weather observations and even made entries from the day before his death in Manchester in 1844 3 . Although his work was barely discussed, he continued to publish papers and books relating to meteorology and chemistry many of which have has stood the tests of time, proving his work to be accurate and ground breaking 3 . The amazing things that Dalton accomplished prove the importance of studying the natural world and how maybe us weather fanatics and storm chasers have a method to our madness!

• Christopher S.W. Koehler, The Atom Man , Chemistry Chronicles, 2003, 51-53
• John Dalton: Atoms, Weather, and Vision , SciHistory, 2012
• Howard and Sylvia Oliver, Meteorologists Profile-John Dalton, Weather Vol. 58,2003, 206-211

• Games & Quizzes
• History & Society
• Science & Tech
• Biographies
• Animals & Nature
• Geography & Travel
• Arts & Culture
• On This Day
• One Good Fact
• New Articles
• Lifestyles & Social Issues
• Philosophy & Religion
• Politics, Law & Government
• World History
• Health & Medicine
• Browse Biographies
• Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
• Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
• Environment
• Fossils & Geologic Time
• Entertainment & Pop Culture
• Sports & Recreation
• Visual Arts
• Demystified
• Image Galleries
• Infographics
• Top Questions
• Britannica Kids
• Saving Earth
• Space Next 50
• Student Center
• Introduction & Top Questions
• Atomic number
• Atomic mass and isotopes
• Charge, mass, and spin
• Orbits and energy levels
• Electron shells
• Atomic bonds
• Conductors and insulators
• Magnetic properties
• Nuclear forces
• Nuclear shell model
• Radioactive decay
• Nuclear energy
• The atomic philosophy of the early Greeks
• The emergence of experimental science

Experimental foundation of atomic chemistry

Atomic weights and the periodic table.

• Kinetic theory of gases
• Size of atoms
• Electric properties of atoms
• Light and spectral lines
• Discovery of electrons
• Identification of positive ions
• Discovery of radioactivity
• Rutherford’s nuclear model
• Moseley’s X-ray studies
• Bohr’s shell model
• The laws of quantum mechanics
• Schrödinger’s wave equation
• Antiparticles and the electron’s spin
• Structure of the nucleus
• Quantum field theory and the standard model

• How is the atomic number of an atom defined?
• What is the periodic table?
• Where does the periodic table come from?
• Why does the periodic table split?
• When are isotopes stable?

The beginnings of modern atomic theory

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

• Khan Academy - Introduction to the atom
• Space.com - Atoms: What are they and how do they build the elements?
• Annenberg Learner - The Behavior of Atoms: Phases of Matter and the Properties of Gases
• UEN Digital Press with Pressbooks - The Structure of the Atom
• Energy Education - Atom
• Open Oregon Educational Resources - Elements and Atoms: The Building Blocks of Matter
• Projects at Harvard - Atomic Structure & Chemical Bonding
• Chemistry LibreTexts - The Atom
• Live Science - What Is an Atom? Facts About the Building Blocks of the Universe
• atom - Children's Encyclopedia (Ages 8-11)
• atom - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)
• Table Of Contents

Trusted Britannica articles, summarized using artificial intelligence, to provide a quicker and simpler reading experience. This is a beta feature. Please verify important information in our full article.

This summary was created from our Britannica article using AI. Please verify important information in our full article.

English chemist and physicist John Dalton extended Proust’s work and converted the atomic philosophy of the Greeks into a scientific theory between 1803 and 1808. His book A New System of Chemical Philosophy ( Part I , 1808; Part II , 1810) was the first application of atomic theory to chemistry . It provided a physical picture of how elements combine to form compounds and a phenomenological reason for believing that atoms exist. His work, together with that of Joseph-Louis Gay-Lussac of France and Amedeo Avogadro of Italy, provided the experimental foundation of atomic chemistry.

On the basis of the law of definite proportions , Dalton deduced the law of multiple proportions , which stated that when two elements form more than one compound by combining in more than one proportion by weight, the weight of one element in one of the compounds is in simple, integer ratios to its weights in the other compounds. For example, Dalton knew that oxygen and carbon can combine to form two different compounds and that carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) contains twice as much oxygen by weight as carbon monoxide (CO). In this case the ratio of oxygen in one compound to the amount of oxygen in the other is the simple integer ratio 2:1. Although Dalton called his theory “modern” to differentiate it from Democritus’s philosophy, he retained the Greek term atom to honour the ancients.

Dalton had begun his atomic studies by wondering why the different gases in the atmosphere do not separate, with the heaviest on the bottom and the lightest on the top. He decided that atoms are not infinite in variety as had been supposed and that they are limited to one of a kind for each element. Proposing that all the atoms of a given element have the same fixed mass, he concluded that elements react in definite proportions to form compounds because their constituent atoms react in definite proportion to produce compounds. He then tried to figure out the masses for well-known compounds. To do so, Dalton made a faulty but understandable assumption that the simplest hypothesis about atomic combinations was true. He maintained that the molecules of an element would always be single atoms. Thus, if two elements form only one compound, he believed that one atom of one element combined with one atom of another element. For example, describing the formation of water , he said that one atom of hydrogen and one of oxygen would combine to form HO instead of H 2 O. Dalton’s mistaken belief that atoms join together by attractive forces was accepted and formed the basis of most of 19th-century chemistry. As long as scientists worked with masses as ratios, a consistent chemistry could be developed because they did not need to know whether the atoms were separate or joined together as molecules.

Gay-Lussac soon took the relationship between chemical masses implied by Dalton’s atomic theory and expanded it to volumetric relationships of gases. In 1809 he published two observations about gases that have come to be known as Gay-Lussac’s law of combining gases. The first part of the law says that when gases combine chemically, they do so in numerically simple volume ratios. Gay-Lussac illustrated this part of his law with three oxides of nitrogen . The compound NO has equal parts of nitrogen and oxygen by volume. Similarly, in the compound N 2 O the two parts by volume of nitrogen combine with one part of oxygen. He found corresponding volumes of nitrogen and oxygen in NO 2 . Thus, Gay-Lussac’s law relates volumes of the chemical constituents within a compound, unlike Dalton’s law of multiple proportions, which relates only one constituent of a compound with the same constituent in other compounds.

The second part of Gay-Lussac’s law states that if gases combine to form gases, the volumes of the products are also in simple numerical ratios to the volume of the original gases. This part of the law was illustrated by the combination of carbon monoxide and oxygen to form carbon dioxide. Gay-Lussac noted that the volume of the carbon dioxide is equal to the volume of carbon monoxide and is twice the volume of oxygen. He did not realize, however, that the reason that only half as much oxygen is needed is because the oxygen molecule splits in two to give a single atom to each molecule of carbon monoxide. In his “Mémoire sur la combinaison des substances gazeuses, les unes avec les autres” (1809; “Memoir on the Combination of Gaseous Substances with Each Other”), Gay-Lussac wrote:

Thus it appears evident to me that gases always combine in the simplest proportions when they act on one another; and we have seen in reality in all the preceding examples that the ratio of combination is 1 to 1, 1 to 2 or 1 to 3.…Gases…in whatever proportions they may combine, always give rise to compounds whose elements by volume are multiples of each other.…Not only, however, do gases combine in very simple proportions, as we have just seen, but the apparent contraction of volume which they experience on combination has also a simple relation to the volume of the gases, or at least to one of them.

Gay-Lussac’s work raised the question of whether atoms differ from molecules and, if so, how many atoms and molecules are in a volume of gas . Amedeo Avogadro , building on Dalton’s efforts, solved the puzzle, but his work was ignored for 50 years. In 1811 Avogadro proposed two hypotheses : (1) The atoms of elemental gases may be joined together in molecules rather than existing as separate atoms, as Dalton believed. (2) Equal volumes of gases contain equal numbers of molecules. These hypotheses explained why only half a volume of oxygen is necessary to combine with a volume of carbon monoxide to form carbon dioxide. Each oxygen molecule has two atoms, and each atom of oxygen joins one molecule of carbon monoxide.

Until the early 1860s, however, the allegiance of chemists to another concept espoused by eminent Swedish chemist Jöns Jacob Berzelius blocked acceptance of Avogadro’s ideas. (Berzelius was influential among chemists because he had determined the atomic weights of many elements extremely accurately.) Berzelius contended incorrectly that all atoms of a similar element repel each other because they have the same electric charge . He thought that only atoms with opposite charges could combine to form molecules.

Because early chemists did not know how many atoms were in a molecule, their chemical notation systems were in a state of chaos by the mid-19th century. Berzelius and his followers, for example, used the general formula MO for the chief metallic oxides, while others assigned the formula used today, M 2 O. A single formula stood for different substances, depending on the chemist: H 2 O 2 was water or hydrogen peroxide ; C 2 H 4 was methane or ethylene . Proponents of the system used today based their chemical notation on an empirical law formulated in 1819 by the French scientists Pierre-Louis Dulong and Alexis-Thérèse Petit concerning the specific heat of elements. According to the Dulong-Petit law , the specific heat of all elements is the same on a per atom basis. This law, however, was found to have many exceptions and was not fully understood until the development of quantum theory in the 20th century.

To resolve such problems of chemical notation, Sicilian chemist Stanislao Cannizzaro revived Avogadro’s ideas in 1858 and expounded them at the First International Chemical Congress, which met in Karlsruhe, Germany, in 1860. Lothar Meyer , a noted German chemistry professor, wrote later that when he heard Avogadro’s theory at the congress, “It was as though scales fell from my eyes, doubt vanished, and was replaced by a feeling of peaceful certainty.” Within a few years, Avogadro’s hypotheses were widely accepted in the world of chemistry.

As more and more elements were discovered during the 19th century, scientists began to wonder how the physical properties of the elements were related to their atomic weights. During the 1860s several schemes were suggested. Russian chemist Dmitry Ivanovich Mendeleyev based his system on the atomic weights of the elements as determined by Avogadro’s theory of diatomic molecules. In his paper of 1869 introducing the periodic law , he credited Cannizzaro for using “unshakeable and indubitable” methods to determine atomic weights.

The elements, if arranged according to their atomic weights, show a distinct periodicity of their properties.…Elements exhibiting similarities in their chemical behavior have atomic weights which are approximately equal (as in the case of Pt, Ir, Os) or they possess atomic weights which increase in a uniform manner (as in the case of K, Rb, Cs).

Skipping hydrogen because it is anomalous, Mendeleyev arranged the 63 elements known to exist at the time into six groups according to valence . Valence, which is the combining power of an element, determines the proportions of the elements in a compound. For example, H 2 O combines oxygen with a valence of 2 and hydrogen with a valence of 1. Recognizing that chemical qualities change gradually as atomic weight increases, Mendeleyev predicted that a new element must exist wherever there was a gap in atomic weights between adjacent elements. His system was thus a research tool and not merely a system of classification. Mendeleyev’s periodic table raised an important question, however, for future atomic theory to answer: Where does the pattern of atomic weights come from?

• Skip to content
• Skip to secondary menu
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer

Health and Medical Blog

John Dalton’s Atomic Theory Experiment

John Dalton’s atomic theory experiment was the first attempt to describe all matter by way of atoms and their properties in a way that was complete. His theory was based on two verified scientific laws: the law of conservation of mass and the law of constant composition.

The law of conservation of mass says that within a closed system, no matter can be created or destroyed. This means if a chemical reaction happens to create something new, then the amount of each element must come from the same starting materials. It is for this reason that mathematics seeks to create equality and balance.

The law of constant composition says that pure compounds will always have the same proportion of the same elements. That means if you were to look at salt crystals, then you would have the same proportions of the base elements, chlorine and salt, no matter how much salt you had or where you got the salt. Now other items could be added to the salt to change it, but the core atoms of salt are always the same.

The Four Principles of Dalton’s Atomic Theory

When Dalton proposed his atomic theory, it was based on ideas, assumptions, and principles more than facts that were directly observable. This means that there are five components to the atomic theory that are offered by Dalton.

• All matter is made up of atoms. This means that everything that is made of matter is composed of atoms, which are indivisible by design.
• All atoms can be identified by mass and properties. This means that any given element has atoms that must be identical in properties, including their mass. It also means that an element can be identified because its atoms will act like a fingerprint to identify it.
• All compounds are made up of atom combinations. For a compound to form, Dalton suggested with his atomic theory that it would have to be composed of at least two different types of atoms. A combination may also include more than two.
• All chemical reactions are a rearrangement of atoms. This indicates that when a chemical reaction occurs, it is because the atoms are being rearranged in such a way that they form a different combination. It is a whole-number ratio.
• If an element reacts, their atoms may sometimes combine into more than one simple whole-number ratio. This would help to explain why weight ratios in various gases were simple multiples of each other.

Dalton had another postulate that he included with his initial atomic theory that, unfortunately, made it difficult for the scientific community to accept his ideas in their entirety. He believed that when atoms combined in only one ratio, then it needed to be assumed that it would be a binary ratio. This caused him to believe that the formula for water was HO instead of H2O and ammonia was NH instead of NH3.

Dalton had made the same mistake that many had before. Based on his own work, he made an assumption that turned out to not be true. This is why experimentation is so critical to the scientific process.

The Atomic Theory, Experimentations, and Its Modern View

When we look at an atomic theory experiment, what we’re trying to do is either prove that Dalton’s theory is correct or prove that it is incorrect. Evidence must be obtained in order for this to occur, which can only be done through experimentation and observation. Since the theory was first proposed, we have learned quite a lot about atoms and can prove that components of Dalton’s theory are categorically incorrect.

For example: in Principle #1, Dalton stated that atoms were indivisible by design. We know that this is not the case. Atoms are actually made of positive components called protons, negative components called electrons, and neutral components that are called neutrons. Instead of being units that are made up of great mass, atomic theory experiments were able to prove that a vast majority of atoms are basically just empty space.

There are more experiments that have helped to disprove other elements of Dalton’s atomic theory as well, though it would take several generations for scientists to realize that there was a greater truth to find.

The Issue of Neutrons and Isotopes with the Atomic Theory

In Principle #2 of Dalton’s atomic theory, we have found that the idea of atoms having the same mass within a specific element is also incorrect. This is because the number of neutrons that may be present within an atom can vary based on the different isotopes which exist for the same element.

This means Dalton was partially correct, but also partially incorrect. Here’s why.

Let’s take carbon as an example. At the time of this writing, there are 15 known types of carbon that currently exist. Some are natural, while others are artificial. The most stable carbon isotope has a half-life of 5,700 years, while the most stable artificial carbon isotope has a half-life of just 20 minutes. There are actually 3 different occurring isotopes of carbon that occur in nature.

Each isotope is assigned a number. Using the naturally occurring isotopes as an example, they are Carbon-12, Carbon-13, and Carbon-14. These numbers are assigned in such a way not because of the order in which they were discovered, but because each one has a specific isotopic mass.

This means Carbon-8 has an isotopic mass that is close to 8u exactly. Carbon-12 would be 12u. And so forth.

So what the atomic theory experiments regarding atomic number, mass number, and isotopes has been able to determine is this: elements can have different masses. The specific isotopes, however, do not have a different mass. So Dalton was partially correct because you’re not going to find Carbon-14 atoms when you’re looking at Carbon-12. He was partially incorrect because at the time, it was not known that elements could have these different isotope masses.

Dalton’s Atomic Theory and It’s One Missing Item

Maybe you’ve heard of a Quark. No – not the Ferengi bartender on the show Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. Quarks are subatomic particles that carry a fractional electrical charge. They have not been directly observed, but their existence has been predicted and confirmed through experimentation. It is considered to be an elementary particle.

Quarks are considered to be the very building blocks of each atom. They are a primary constituent of neutrons and protons, which means they are part of all ordinary matter. We can determine if an atom will be composing a proton or a neutron because of the number of “up” and “down” quarks that are found.

Two up quarks with one down quark make up a proton. Two down quarks with one up quark make up a neutron.

But these aren’t the only quarks that have been found since Dalton first proposed the atomic theory. Here are some of the other quarks that have been determined to exist.

• Strange Quark. Discovered with the lambda particle, the quark was deemed to be strange because it gave the nucleus of the particle a longer half-life than expected. A lambda particle is a different baryon formation than what creates protons and neutrons. The lambda consists of one up quark, one down quark, and one strange quark.
• Charm Quark. This quark was discovered through experimentation in 1974 and can be transformed into a charm quark.
• Top Quark. Evidence of a third quark was reported in 1995, found through the collision of protons and antiprotons in a collider. Little is known about this quark, other than its mass is quite large compared to other quarks that are believed to exist.

When Dalton was conducting atomic theory experiments, he conducted meteorology experiments because he wanted to prove that evaporated water could exist in the atmosphere as an independent gas. Instead of water molecules and air molecules mixing together, what would happen if it could be proven that they were actually separated?

This caused him to perform experiments on a series of gas mixtures to determine what effect each individual gas may have on the other. Through his observations, he was able to come up with what would become the first version of the atomic theory. It is a process that is still being evaluated to this day.

What Does Dalton’s Atomic Theory Mean Today?

When Dalton first proposed his atomic theory, there was no way to even predict the existence of protons, electrons, and neutrons – much less the existence of quarks or other subatomic particles. Yet when one looks at the entirety of the theory that was offered, many components of it are still considered to be true. It even provides much of the framework that is used in modern chemistry efforts.

Through experimentation, parts of the theory have been modified because of new knowledge. The principles, however, have offered multiple generations of scientists and researchers to know more about the smallest components of our universe. With future experimentation, we can continue to use Dalton’s atomic theory as a foundation for new discoveries.

• 13 ANC Nails Pros and Cons
• 15 Artificial Sphincter Pros and Cons
• 14 Hysterectomy for Fibroids Pros and Cons
• 15 Monovision Lasik Pros and Cons
• 12 Pros and Cons of the Da Vinci Robotic Surgery
• 14 Peritoneal Dialysis Pros and Cons
• 14 Pros and Cons of the Cataract Surgery Multifocal Lens
• 19 Dermaplaning Pros and Cons
• 15 Mirena IUD Pros and Cons
• 11 Pros and Cons of Monovision Cataract Surgery
• Calories Burned
• Cancer Articles and Infographics
• Definitions and Examples of Theory
• Definitions for Kids
• Dental Articles and Infographics
• Elder Care Articles and Infographics
• Environmental
• Health Research Funding
• Healthcare Articles and Infographics
• ICD 9 Codes
• Major Accomplishments
• Medical Articles and Infographics
• Nutrition Articles and Infographics
• Pharmaceutical Articles and Infographics
• Psychological Articles and Infographics
• Skin Articles and Infographics
• Surgery Articles and Infographics
• Theories and Models
• Uncategorized
• Videos on How to Get Research Funding