Show that you understand the current state of research on your topic.
The length of a research proposal can vary quite a bit. A bachelor’s or master’s thesis proposal can be just a few pages, while proposals for PhD dissertations or research funding are usually much longer and more detailed. Your supervisor can help you determine the best length for your work.
One trick to get started is to think of your proposal’s structure as a shorter version of your thesis or dissertation , only without the results , conclusion and discussion sections.
Download our research proposal template
Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We’ve included a few for you below.
Like your dissertation or thesis, the proposal will usually have a title page that includes:
The first part of your proposal is the initial pitch for your project. Make sure it succinctly explains what you want to do and why.
Your introduction should:
To guide your introduction , include information about:
Discover proofreading & editing
As you get started, it’s important to demonstrate that you’re familiar with the most important research on your topic. A strong literature review shows your reader that your project has a solid foundation in existing knowledge or theory. It also shows that you’re not simply repeating what other people have already done or said, but rather using existing research as a jumping-off point for your own.
In this section, share exactly how your project will contribute to ongoing conversations in the field by:
Following the literature review, restate your main objectives . This brings the focus back to your own project. Next, your research design or methodology section will describe your overall approach, and the practical steps you will take to answer your research questions.
? or ? , , or research design? | |
, )? ? | |
, , , )? | |
? |
To finish your proposal on a strong note, explore the potential implications of your research for your field. Emphasize again what you aim to contribute and why it matters.
For example, your results might have implications for:
Last but not least, your research proposal must include correct citations for every source you have used, compiled in a reference list . To create citations quickly and easily, you can use our free APA citation generator .
Some institutions or funders require a detailed timeline of the project, asking you to forecast what you will do at each stage and how long it may take. While not always required, be sure to check the requirements of your project.
Here’s an example schedule to help you get started. You can also download a template at the button below.
Download our research schedule template
Research phase | Objectives | Deadline |
---|---|---|
1. Background research and literature review | 20th January | |
2. Research design planning | and data analysis methods | 13th February |
3. Data collection and preparation | with selected participants and code interviews | 24th March |
4. Data analysis | of interview transcripts | 22nd April |
5. Writing | 17th June | |
6. Revision | final work | 28th July |
If you are applying for research funding, chances are you will have to include a detailed budget. This shows your estimates of how much each part of your project will cost.
Make sure to check what type of costs the funding body will agree to cover. For each item, include:
To determine your budget, think about:
If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
Methodology
Statistics
Research bias
Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement .
Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.
I will compare …
A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.
Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.
A PhD, which is short for philosophiae doctor (doctor of philosophy in Latin), is the highest university degree that can be obtained. In a PhD, students spend 3–5 years writing a dissertation , which aims to make a significant, original contribution to current knowledge.
A PhD is intended to prepare students for a career as a researcher, whether that be in academia, the public sector, or the private sector.
A master’s is a 1- or 2-year graduate degree that can prepare you for a variety of careers.
All master’s involve graduate-level coursework. Some are research-intensive and intend to prepare students for further study in a PhD; these usually require their students to write a master’s thesis . Others focus on professional training for a specific career.
Critical thinking refers to the ability to evaluate information and to be aware of biases or assumptions, including your own.
Like information literacy , it involves evaluating arguments, identifying and solving problems in an objective and systematic way, and clearly communicating your ideas.
The best way to remember the difference between a research plan and a research proposal is that they have fundamentally different audiences. A research plan helps you, the researcher, organize your thoughts. On the other hand, a dissertation proposal or research proposal aims to convince others (e.g., a supervisor, a funding body, or a dissertation committee) that your research topic is relevant and worthy of being conducted.
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
McCombes, S. & George, T. (2023, November 21). How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved August 18, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/research-process/research-proposal/
Other students also liked, how to write a problem statement | guide & examples, writing strong research questions | criteria & examples, how to write a literature review | guide, examples, & templates, get unlimited documents corrected.
✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts
We use essential cookies to make Venngage work. By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
Manage Cookies
Cookies and similar technologies collect certain information about how you’re using our website. Some of them are essential, and without them you wouldn’t be able to use Venngage. But others are optional, and you get to choose whether we use them or not.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
These cookies are always on, as they’re essential for making Venngage work, and making it safe. Without these cookies, services you’ve asked for can’t be provided.
Show cookie providers
Functionality Cookies
These cookies help us provide enhanced functionality and personalisation, and remember your settings. They may be set by us or by third party providers.
Performance Cookies
These cookies help us analyze how many people are using Venngage, where they come from and how they're using it. If you opt out of these cookies, we can’t get feedback to make Venngage better for you and all our users.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies are set by our advertising partners to track your activity and show you relevant Venngage ads on other sites as you browse the internet.
Blog Business How to Write a Research Proposal: A Step-by-Step
Written by: Danesh Ramuthi Nov 29, 2023
A research proposal is a structured outline for a planned study on a specific topic. It serves as a roadmap, guiding researchers through the process of converting their research idea into a feasible project.
The aim of a research proposal is multifold: it articulates the research problem, establishes a theoretical framework, outlines the research methodology and highlights the potential significance of the study. Importantly, it’s a critical tool for scholars seeking grant funding or approval for their research projects.
Crafting a good research proposal requires not only understanding your research topic and methodological approaches but also the ability to present your ideas clearly and persuasively. Explore Venngage’s Proposal Maker and Research Proposals Templates to begin your journey in writing a compelling research proposal.
In a research proposal, include a clear statement of your research question or problem, along with an explanation of its significance. This should be followed by a literature review that situates your proposed study within the context of existing research.
Your proposal should also outline the research methodology, detailing how you plan to conduct your study, including data collection and analysis methods.
Additionally, include a theoretical framework that guides your research approach, a timeline or research schedule, and a budget if applicable. It’s important to also address the anticipated outcomes and potential implications of your study. A well-structured research proposal will clearly communicate your research objectives, methods and significance to the readers.
Formatting a research proposal involves adhering to a structured outline to ensure clarity and coherence. While specific requirements may vary, a standard research proposal typically includes the following elements:
Writing a research proposal template in structured steps ensures a comprehensive and coherent presentation of your research project. Let’s look at the explanation for each of the steps here:
Step 1: title and abstract.
Select a concise, descriptive title and write an abstract summarizing your research question, objectives, methodology and expected outcomes. The abstract should include your research question, the objectives you aim to achieve, the methodology you plan to employ and the anticipated outcomes.
In this section, introduce the topic of your research, emphasizing its significance and relevance to the field. Articulate the research problem or question in clear terms and provide background context, which should include an overview of previous research in the field.
Here, you’ll need to outline specific, clear and achievable objectives that align with your research problem. These objectives should be well-defined, focused and measurable, serving as the guiding pillars for your study. They help in establishing what you intend to accomplish through your research and provide a clear direction for your investigation.
In this part, conduct a thorough review of existing literature related to your research topic. This involves a detailed summary of key findings and major contributions from previous research. Identify existing gaps in the literature and articulate how your research aims to fill these gaps. The literature review not only shows your grasp of the subject matter but also how your research will contribute new insights or perspectives to the field.
Describe the design of your research and the methodologies you will employ. This should include detailed information on data collection methods, instruments to be used and analysis techniques. Justify the appropriateness of these methods for your research.
Construct a detailed timeline that maps out the major milestones and activities of your research project. Break the entire research process into smaller, manageable tasks and assign realistic time frames to each. This timeline should cover everything from the initial research phase to the final submission, including periods for data collection, analysis and report writing.
It helps in ensuring your project stays on track and demonstrates to reviewers that you have a well-thought-out plan for completing your research efficiently.
Identify all the resources that will be required for your research, such as specific databases, laboratory equipment, software or funding. Provide details on how these resources will be accessed or acquired.
If your research requires funding, explain how it will be utilized effectively to support various aspects of the project.
Address any ethical issues that may arise during your research. This is particularly important for research involving human subjects. Describe the measures you will take to ensure ethical standards are maintained, such as obtaining informed consent, ensuring participant privacy, and adhering to data protection regulations.
Here, in this section you should reassure reviewers that you are committed to conducting your research responsibly and ethically.
Articulate the expected outcomes or results of your research. Explain the potential impact and significance of these outcomes, whether in advancing academic knowledge, influencing policy or addressing specific societal or practical issues.
Compile a comprehensive list of all the references cited in your proposal. Adhere to a consistent citation style (like APA or MLA) throughout your document. The reference section not only gives credit to the original authors of your sourced information but also strengthens the credibility of your proposal.
Include additional supporting materials that are pertinent to your research proposal. This can be survey questionnaires, interview guides, detailed data analysis plans or any supplementary information that supports the main text.
Appendices provide further depth to your proposal, showcasing the thoroughness of your preparation.
1. how long should a research proposal be.
The length of a research proposal can vary depending on the requirements of the academic institution, funding body or specific guidelines provided. Generally, research proposals range from 500 to 1500 words or about one to a few pages long. It’s important to provide enough detail to clearly convey your research idea, objectives and methodology, while being concise. Always check
The research plan is pivotal to a research project because it acts as a blueprint, guiding every phase of the study. It outlines the objectives, methodology, timeline and expected outcomes, providing a structured approach and ensuring that the research is systematically conducted.
A well-crafted plan helps in identifying potential challenges, allocating resources efficiently and maintaining focus on the research goals. It is also essential for communicating the project’s feasibility and importance to stakeholders, such as funding bodies or academic supervisors.
Mastering how to write a research proposal is an essential skill for any scholar, whether in social and behavioral sciences, academic writing or any field requiring scholarly research. From this article, you have learned key components, from the literature review to the research design, helping you develop a persuasive and well-structured proposal.
Remember, a good research proposal not only highlights your proposed research and methodology but also demonstrates its relevance and potential impact.
For additional support, consider utilizing Venngage’s Proposal Maker and Research Proposals Templates , valuable tools in crafting a compelling proposal that stands out.
Whether it’s for grant funding, a research paper or a dissertation proposal, these resources can assist in transforming your research idea into a successful submission.
Discover popular designs
Infographic maker
Brochure maker
White paper online
Newsletter creator
Flyer maker
Timeline maker
Letterhead maker
Mind map maker
Ebook maker
Home » How To Write A Research Proposal – Step-by-Step [Template]
Table of Contents
Writing a Research proposal involves several steps to ensure a well-structured and comprehensive document. Here is an explanation of each step:
4. Literature Review:
The format of a research proposal may vary depending on the specific requirements of the institution or funding agency. However, the following is a commonly used format for a research proposal:
1. Title Page:
2. Abstract:
3. Introduction:
5. Research Objectives:
6. Methodology:
7. Timeline:
8. Resources:
9. Ethical Considerations:
10. Expected Outcomes and Significance:
11. References:
12. Appendices:
Here’s a template for a research proposal:
1. Introduction:
2. Literature Review:
3. Research Objectives:
4. Methodology:
5. Timeline:
6. Resources:
7. Ethical Considerations:
8. Expected Outcomes and Significance:
9. References:
10. Appendices:
Title: The Impact of Online Education on Student Learning Outcomes: A Comparative Study
1. Introduction
Online education has gained significant prominence in recent years, especially due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This research proposal aims to investigate the impact of online education on student learning outcomes by comparing them with traditional face-to-face instruction. The study will explore various aspects of online education, such as instructional methods, student engagement, and academic performance, to provide insights into the effectiveness of online learning.
2. Objectives
The main objectives of this research are as follows:
3. Methodology
3.1 Study Design
This research will utilize a mixed-methods approach to gather both quantitative and qualitative data. The study will include the following components:
3.2 Participants
The research will involve undergraduate students from two universities, one offering online education and the other providing face-to-face instruction. A total of 500 students (250 from each university) will be selected randomly to participate in the study.
3.3 Data Collection
The research will employ the following data collection methods:
3.4 Data Analysis
Quantitative data will be analyzed using statistical software, employing descriptive statistics, t-tests, and regression analysis. Qualitative data will be transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically to identify recurring patterns and themes.
4. Ethical Considerations
The study will adhere to ethical guidelines, ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of participants. Informed consent will be obtained, and participants will have the right to withdraw from the study at any time.
5. Significance and Expected Outcomes
This research will contribute to the existing literature by providing empirical evidence on the impact of online education on student learning outcomes. The findings will help educational institutions and policymakers make informed decisions about incorporating online learning methods and improving the quality of online education. Moreover, the study will identify potential challenges and opportunities related to online education and offer recommendations for enhancing student engagement and overall learning outcomes.
6. Timeline
The proposed research will be conducted over a period of 12 months, including data collection, analysis, and report writing.
The estimated budget for this research includes expenses related to data collection, software licenses, participant compensation, and research assistance. A detailed budget breakdown will be provided in the final research plan.
8. Conclusion
This research proposal aims to investigate the impact of online education on student learning outcomes through a comparative study with traditional face-to-face instruction. By exploring various dimensions of online education, this research will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and challenges associated with online learning. The findings will contribute to the ongoing discourse on educational practices and help shape future strategies for maximizing student learning outcomes in online education settings.
Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer
Guidelines on writing a research proposal.
This is a work in progress, intended to organize my thoughts on the process of formulating a proposal. If you have any thoughts on the contents, or on the notion of making this available to students, please share them with me. Thanks.
Proposal writing, different theses, similar proposals, a couple of models for proposals, a two page (preliminary proposal) model, the (longer) standard model.
The two outlines below are intended to show both what are the standard parts of a proposal and of a science paper. Notice that the only real difference is that you change "expected results" to "results" in the paper, and usually leave the budget out, of the paper.
Another outline (maybe from Gary Fuller?).
The introduction, literature review, research questions in detail, methodology, expected results, bibliography, tips and tricks, useful references:.
Proposal Template AI
Free proposal templates in word, powerpoint, pdf and more
How to write expected outcomes and impact in a proposal template.
When writing a proposal , the “ expected outcomes and impact” section is crucial for clearly articulating the potential results of your project or initiative. This section helps reviewers understand the significance and potential benefits of your proposal. Whether you’re writing a grant proposal , project proposal, or business proposal , effectively conveying the expected outcomes and impact is essential. Here’s a guide on how to write this section effectively:
Be Specific: Clearly outline the specific results or changes that you expect to achieve as a result of your proposal. Quantifiable outcomes are particularly impactful.
Connect to Goals: Tie the expected outcomes back to the overarching goals and objectives of the proposal. This demonstrates alignment and purpose.
Consider Stakeholders: Highlight how the expected outcomes will impact relevant stakeholders, whether they are beneficiaries, investors, or the community at large.
Use Evidence: If possible, provide evidence or data to support your projected outcomes . This lends credibility to your projections.
Be Realistic: While it’s important to aim high, ensure that your expected outcomes are realistic and achievable within the proposed timeframe and resources.
Highlight Impact: Explain not only what the outcomes will be, but also the broader impact they will have. This might include societal, economic, or environmental implications.
Q: What type of proposals should include an “expected outcomes and impact” section? A: This section is commonly found in grant proposals, project proposals, research proposals , and business development proposals.
Q: How far into the future should the expected outcomes extend? A: The timeline for expected outcomes should align with the duration of the proposed project or initiative. This could range from months to years, depending on the scope of the proposal.
Q: Should I include potential challenges or risks in this section? A: While the emphasis should be on positive outcomes, acknowledging potential challenges and risks in achieving these outcomes can demonstrate a thoughtful and thorough approach.
When crafting the “expected outcomes and impact” section of a proposal, it’s important to be comprehensive, yet concise. This section should leave reviewers with a clear understanding of the potential benefits and significance of your proposal. By following these tips and guidelines, you can effectively communicate the expected outcomes and impact of your project or initiative.
Remember to be realistic and evidence-based in your projections, and to clearly articulate how these outcomes align with the broader goals of your proposal. This will strengthen your case and increase the likelihood of your proposal’s success.
In academia, especially in social and behavioral sciences, writing a research proposal is an essential first step while planning a new research project. A research proposal is an initial pitch, or theoretical framework that serves to introduce the topic and anticipated results of a project, provide an overview of the methods to be used, and convince the reader that the proposed research can be conducted successfully. It is very essential to know how to write a research proposal, whether you are a student trying to fulfill course requirements or a researcher looking for funding for scholarly research. But writing a well-structured proposal is easier said than done.
To make things simpler for you, In this article, I explained the fundamentals of a research proposal, its structure, the steps involved in writing a research proposal, and common mistakes to avoid. Continue reading to gain a thorough understanding of the concept and purpose of a research proposal. This blog will also enable you to write the research proposal quickly, reducing the likelihood of rejection.
In simpler terms, A research proposal is a document written to explain and justify your chosen research topic and the necessity to carry out that particular research by addressing the research problem. Likewise, a good research proposal should carry the proposed research's results and benefits, backed by convincing evidence.
Always keep your audience in mind while writing your research proposal. Your audience expects a concise summary and a detailed research methodology from you in the research proposal.
To begin, you must understand the purpose of a research proposal in order to effectively write a research proposal and also to receive swift approvals.
A research proposal's purpose is to provide a detailed outline of the process that will be used to answer a specific research problem. Whereas the goal of the research proposal varies from person to person. In some cases, it may be to secure funding, while in others, it may be to obtain a meager approval from the committee or the supervisor to proceed with the research project. Regardless of your research proposal's end goal, you are supposed to write a research proposal that fulfills its intended purpose of presenting the best plan for your research.
While writing a research proposal, you should demonstrate how and why your proposed research is crucial for the domain, especially if it is social and behavioral sciences. It would help if you showed how your work is necessary by addressing some key points like:
Furthermore, your research proposal must demonstrate that you, as an author, are capable of conducting the research and that the results will significantly contribute to the field of knowledge. To do so, include and explain your academic background and significance along with your previous accolades to demonstrate that you and your idea have academic merit.
There are no hard and fast rules about how long a research proposal should be, and it varies dramatically from different institutions and publishers. However, as a standard domain practice, a research proposal is generally between 3000- 4000 words. A majority of globally reputed institutions follow the 3000- 3500 word limit.
Since the research proposal is written well before the research is conducted, you need to outline all the necessary elements your research will entail and accomplish. Once completed, your research proposal must resemble a concise version of a thesis or dissertation without results and a discussion section.
When you recognize a gap in the existing books of knowledge, you will address it by developing a research problem. A research problem is a question that researchers want to answer. It is the starting point for any research project, and it can be broad or narrow, depending on your objectives. Once you have a problem, it is followed by articulating a research question. After that, you can embark on the process of writing a research proposal.
Whether your goal is to secure funding or just approval, nevertheless, your research proposal needs to follow the basic outline of a research paper, containing all the necessary sections. Therefore, the structure of a research proposal closely resembles and follows a thesis or dissertation or any research paper. It should contain the following sections:
As is well known, the first thing that catches the reader's attention is a catchy title. Therefore, you should try to come up with a catchy yet informative title for your research proposal. Additionally, it should be concise and clear to reflect enough information about your research question.
To create a good research proposal, try writing the title to induce interest and information in your readers. Pro-Tip: Avoid using phrases such as “An investigation of …” or “A review of …” etc. . These have been overused for ages and may reflect your research title as a regular entry. On the other hand, concise and well-defined titles are always something readers like and stand higher chances for a proposal approval.
Write your abstract in a brief yet very informative way. It should summarize the research you intend to conduct. Put an emphasis on the research question, research hypothesis , research design and methods, and the key findings of your proposed research.
If you wish to create a detailed proposal, try including a table of contents. It will help readers navigate easily and catch a glance at your entire proposal writing. Check out this guide if you want to learn more about how to write a research abstract for your scholarly research.
All papers need a striking introduction to set the context of the research question. While framing your research proposal, ensure that the introduction provides rich background and relevant information about the research question.
Your entire research proposal hinges upon your research question. Thus, fit should come out clearly in the intro. Provide a general introduction without clear explanations, and it might render your research proposal insignificant.
Start your research proposal with the research problem, engage your audience with elements that relate to the problem, and then shed some light on the research question. Then, proceed with your study's evidence-based justification, and you'll find that the audience is sticking with your proposal narrative.
While writing your research proposal, ensure that you have covered the following:
Writing a literature review is an important part of the research process. It provides the researcher with a summary of previous studies that have been conducted on a subject, and it helps the researcher determine what areas might need additional investigation in the existing research. Guidelines for the literature review vary for different institutions.
To effectively conduct and write a literature review check this guide . You can also use tools like SciSpace Copilot , our AI research assistant that makes reading academic papers a much easier task. You can use it to get simple explanations for complex text, maths, or tables. Copilot can be particularly helpful when you’re sifting through papers as you can quickly understand the abstract, get some context around the study, and identify if the paper is relevant to your project or not.
The literature review can either be kept as a separate section or incorporated into the introduction section. A separate section is always favorable and vital in gaining the research proposal approval. Additionally, a separate section for a literature review offers in-depth background data and demonstrates the relevance of your research question by emphasizing the gaps that have remained since the previous study.
Your research proposal’s literature review must contain and serve the following:
Need help you with your literature review? Try SciSpace Discover and get barrier-free access to scientific knowledge.
Discover millions of peer-reviewed research articles and their full-text PDFs here. The articles can be compiled in one place and saved for later use to conduct a Hassel-free literature review.
Research design and methods is the section where you explain how you will be conducting the proposed research. Ensure that you provide and include a sufficient explanation for the chosen methods. Additionally, include some points explaining how your chosen methods will help you get the desired or expected results.
Provide ample information to the readers about your research procedures so that they can easily comprehend the methodology and its expected results. Through your research methodology, you can easily show your audience whether the results you are promising can be achieved or not.
Most importantly, make sure the methodology you choose—whether qualitative or quantitative—is the best fit for your research. You should also be able to justify your choice.
Additionally, you should properly explain both the quantitative and qualitative components of your research if they are both used. For a qualitative approach, you must offer more elaborate and in-depth theoretical-based evidence. On the other hand, for the quantitative approach, you must describe the survey or lab setup, sample size, tools, and data collection methods.
Make sure you have plenty of explanations for the research methodology to support how you approached the research problem.
The expected research results section is where the researcher states what they expect to find in their research. The purpose of this section is to provide a summary of the study's goals, as well as give an overview of what the researcher expects will be found out. These results must orient the reader in sync with the methodology section and provide the answers to the research questions.
The limitations section of an academic research paper is a section in which the writers of the paper discuss the weaknesses of their study. They do this by identifying problems with their methods, design, and implementation. This section should also discuss any other factors that may have affected the results or accuracy of the study. This section allows readers to understand how much confidence they can place in the findings, and how applicable they are to other contexts.
Furthermore, it will also showcase your honesty and complete understanding of the topic. Your research proposal’s limitations can include:
If you don’t want your efforts to be tagged as plagiarized, ensure that you include the reference section at the end of the research proposal and follow the appropriate citation guidelines while citing different scholarly sources and various other researchers’ work.
For references, use both the in-text and footnote citations. List all the literature you have used to gather the information. However, in the bibliography, apart from including the references you have cited, you should include the sources that you didn't cite.
Research proposals often get rejected due to the smallest of mistakes. To keep the chances of getting your research proposal rejection at bay or a minimum, you should be aware of what grounds committees or supervisors often decide on rejection.
Follow through to understand the common reasons why research papers get rejected:
You must stay aware of the research proposal guidelines and best writing manners. To maximize the approval chances of your research proposal, you should try to avoid some common pitfalls like:
Try explaining the various sections of the research proposal economically. Ideally, you should strive to keep your writing as a concise, brief, and to the point as possible. The more concisely you explain the purpose and goal of your research proposal, the better.
While writing the research proposal, you may feel every issue is important, and you should provide an explanatory note for that. However, stay wiser while selecting the importance of issues. Avoid falling into the trap of trivial issues, as it may distract your readers from the core issues.
The easiest way your readers can undermine your research proposal is by stating it is far more subjective and sounds unrealistic. A potent research argument describing the gaps in the current field, its importance, significance, and contributions to your research is the foremost requirement of a good research proposal.
Remember, even though you are proposing the objective, academic way, the goal is to persuade the audience to provide you with the required research approval.
Understand that when you are going for some research, its outcome will contribute to the existing pool of knowledge. Therefore, always cite some landmark works of your chosen research domain and connect your proposed work with it.
Providing such intricate details will establish your research's importance, relevance, and familiarity with the domain knowledge.
You might also like.
Chris Drew (PhD)
Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]
Learn about our Editorial Process
A research proposal systematically and transparently outlines a proposed research project.
The purpose of a research proposal is to demonstrate a project’s viability and the researcher’s preparedness to conduct an academic study. It serves as a roadmap for the researcher.
The process holds value both externally (for accountability purposes and often as a requirement for a grant application) and intrinsic value (for helping the researcher to clarify the mechanics, purpose, and potential signficance of the study).
Key sections of a research proposal include: the title, abstract, introduction, literature review, research design and methods, timeline, budget, outcomes and implications, references, and appendix. Each is briefly explained below.
Watch my Guide: How to Write a Research Proposal
Get your Template for Writing your Research Proposal Here (With AI Prompts!)
Title: The title should present a concise and descriptive statement that clearly conveys the core idea of the research projects. Make it as specific as possible. The reader should immediately be able to grasp the core idea of the intended research project. Often, the title is left too vague and does not help give an understanding of what exactly the study looks at.
Abstract: Abstracts are usually around 250-300 words and provide an overview of what is to follow – including the research problem , objectives, methods, expected outcomes, and significance of the study. Use it as a roadmap and ensure that, if the abstract is the only thing someone reads, they’ll get a good fly-by of what will be discussed in the peice.
Introduction: Introductions are all about contextualization. They often set the background information with a statement of the problem. At the end of the introduction, the reader should understand what the rationale for the study truly is. I like to see the research questions or hypotheses included in the introduction and I like to get a good understanding of what the significance of the research will be. It’s often easiest to write the introduction last
Literature Review: The literature review dives deep into the existing literature on the topic, demosntrating your thorough understanding of the existing literature including themes, strengths, weaknesses, and gaps in the literature. It serves both to demonstrate your knowledge of the field and, to demonstrate how the proposed study will fit alongside the literature on the topic. A good literature review concludes by clearly demonstrating how your research will contribute something new and innovative to the conversation in the literature.
Research Design and Methods: This section needs to clearly demonstrate how the data will be gathered and analyzed in a systematic and academically sound manner. Here, you need to demonstrate that the conclusions of your research will be both valid and reliable. Common points discussed in the research design and methods section include highlighting the research paradigm, methodologies, intended population or sample to be studied, data collection techniques, and data analysis procedures . Toward the end of this section, you are encouraged to also address ethical considerations and limitations of the research process , but also to explain why you chose your research design and how you are mitigating the identified risks and limitations.
Timeline: Provide an outline of the anticipated timeline for the study. Break it down into its various stages (including data collection, data analysis, and report writing). The goal of this section is firstly to establish a reasonable breakdown of steps for you to follow and secondly to demonstrate to the assessors that your project is practicable and feasible.
Budget: Estimate the costs associated with the research project and include evidence for your estimations. Typical costs include staffing costs, equipment, travel, and data collection tools. When applying for a scholarship, the budget should demonstrate that you are being responsible with your expensive and that your funding application is reasonable.
Expected Outcomes and Implications: A discussion of the anticipated findings or results of the research, as well as the potential contributions to the existing knowledge, theory, or practice in the field. This section should also address the potential impact of the research on relevant stakeholders and any broader implications for policy or practice.
References: A complete list of all the sources cited in the research proposal, formatted according to the required citation style. This demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with the relevant literature and ensures proper attribution of ideas and information.
Appendices (if applicable): Any additional materials, such as questionnaires, interview guides, or consent forms, that provide further information or support for the research proposal. These materials should be included as appendices at the end of the document.
Research proposals often extend anywhere between 2,000 and 15,000 words in length. The following snippets are samples designed to briefly demonstrate what might be discussed in each section.
See some real sample pieces:
Consider this hypothetical education research proposal:
The Impact of Game-Based Learning on Student Engagement and Academic Performance in Middle School Mathematics
Abstract: The proposed study will explore multiplayer game-based learning techniques in middle school mathematics curricula and their effects on student engagement. The study aims to contribute to the current literature on game-based learning by examining the effects of multiplayer gaming in learning.
Introduction: Digital game-based learning has long been shunned within mathematics education for fears that it may distract students or lower the academic integrity of the classrooms. However, there is emerging evidence that digital games in math have emerging benefits not only for engagement but also academic skill development. Contributing to this discourse, this study seeks to explore the potential benefits of multiplayer digital game-based learning by examining its impact on middle school students’ engagement and academic performance in a mathematics class.
Literature Review: The literature review has identified gaps in the current knowledge, namely, while game-based learning has been extensively explored, the role of multiplayer games in supporting learning has not been studied.
Research Design and Methods: This study will employ a mixed-methods research design based upon action research in the classroom. A quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control group design will first be used to compare the academic performance and engagement of middle school students exposed to game-based learning techniques with those in a control group receiving instruction without the aid of technology. Students will also be observed and interviewed in regard to the effect of communication and collaboration during gameplay on their learning.
Timeline: The study will take place across the second term of the school year with a pre-test taking place on the first day of the term and the post-test taking place on Wednesday in Week 10.
Budget: The key budgetary requirements will be the technologies required, including the subscription cost for the identified games and computers.
Expected Outcomes and Implications: It is expected that the findings will contribute to the current literature on game-based learning and inform educational practices, providing educators and policymakers with insights into how to better support student achievement in mathematics.
See some real examples:
Consider this hypothetical psychology research proposal:
The Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Stress Reduction in College Students
Abstract: This research proposal examines the impact of mindfulness-based interventions on stress reduction among college students, using a pre-test/post-test experimental design with both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods .
Introduction: College students face heightened stress levels during exam weeks. This can affect both mental health and test performance. This study explores the potential benefits of mindfulness-based interventions such as meditation as a way to mediate stress levels in the weeks leading up to exam time.
Literature Review: Existing research on mindfulness-based meditation has shown the ability for mindfulness to increase metacognition, decrease anxiety levels, and decrease stress. Existing literature has looked at workplace, high school and general college-level applications. This study will contribute to the corpus of literature by exploring the effects of mindfulness directly in the context of exam weeks.
Research Design and Methods: Participants ( n= 234 ) will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group, receiving 5 days per week of 10-minute mindfulness-based interventions, or a control group, receiving no intervention. Data will be collected through self-report questionnaires, measuring stress levels, semi-structured interviews exploring participants’ experiences, and students’ test scores.
Timeline: The study will begin three weeks before the students’ exam week and conclude after each student’s final exam. Data collection will occur at the beginning (pre-test of self-reported stress levels) and end (post-test) of the three weeks.
Expected Outcomes and Implications: The study aims to provide evidence supporting the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions in reducing stress among college students in the lead up to exams, with potential implications for mental health support and stress management programs on college campuses.
Consider this hypothetical sociology research proposal:
The Impact of Social Media Usage on Interpersonal Relationships among Young Adults
Abstract: This research proposal investigates the effects of social media usage on interpersonal relationships among young adults, using a longitudinal mixed-methods approach with ongoing semi-structured interviews to collect qualitative data.
Introduction: Social media platforms have become a key medium for the development of interpersonal relationships, particularly for young adults. This study examines the potential positive and negative effects of social media usage on young adults’ relationships and development over time.
Literature Review: A preliminary review of relevant literature has demonstrated that social media usage is central to development of a personal identity and relationships with others with similar subcultural interests. However, it has also been accompanied by data on mental health deline and deteriorating off-screen relationships. The literature is to-date lacking important longitudinal data on these topics.
Research Design and Methods: Participants ( n = 454 ) will be young adults aged 18-24. Ongoing self-report surveys will assess participants’ social media usage, relationship satisfaction, and communication patterns. A subset of participants will be selected for longitudinal in-depth interviews starting at age 18 and continuing for 5 years.
Timeline: The study will be conducted over a period of five years, including recruitment, data collection, analysis, and report writing.
Expected Outcomes and Implications: This study aims to provide insights into the complex relationship between social media usage and interpersonal relationships among young adults, potentially informing social policies and mental health support related to social media use.
Consider this hypothetical nursing research proposal:
The Influence of Nurse-Patient Communication on Patient Satisfaction and Health Outcomes following Emergency Cesarians
Abstract: This research will examines the impact of effective nurse-patient communication on patient satisfaction and health outcomes for women following c-sections, utilizing a mixed-methods approach with patient surveys and semi-structured interviews.
Introduction: It has long been known that effective communication between nurses and patients is crucial for quality care. However, additional complications arise following emergency c-sections due to the interaction between new mother’s changing roles and recovery from surgery.
Literature Review: A review of the literature demonstrates the importance of nurse-patient communication, its impact on patient satisfaction, and potential links to health outcomes. However, communication between nurses and new mothers is less examined, and the specific experiences of those who have given birth via emergency c-section are to date unexamined.
Research Design and Methods: Participants will be patients in a hospital setting who have recently had an emergency c-section. A self-report survey will assess their satisfaction with nurse-patient communication and perceived health outcomes. A subset of participants will be selected for in-depth interviews to explore their experiences and perceptions of the communication with their nurses.
Timeline: The study will be conducted over a period of six months, including rolling recruitment, data collection, analysis, and report writing within the hospital.
Expected Outcomes and Implications: This study aims to provide evidence for the significance of nurse-patient communication in supporting new mothers who have had an emergency c-section. Recommendations will be presented for supporting nurses and midwives in improving outcomes for new mothers who had complications during birth.
Consider this hypothetical social work research proposal:
The Role of a Family-Centered Intervention in Preventing Homelessness Among At-Risk Youthin a working-class town in Northern England
Abstract: This research proposal investigates the effectiveness of a family-centered intervention provided by a local council area in preventing homelessness among at-risk youth. This case study will use a mixed-methods approach with program evaluation data and semi-structured interviews to collect quantitative and qualitative data .
Introduction: Homelessness among youth remains a significant social issue. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of family-centered interventions in addressing this problem and identify factors that contribute to successful prevention strategies.
Literature Review: A review of the literature has demonstrated several key factors contributing to youth homelessness including lack of parental support, lack of social support, and low levels of family involvement. It also demonstrates the important role of family-centered interventions in addressing this issue. Drawing on current evidence, this study explores the effectiveness of one such intervention in preventing homelessness among at-risk youth in a working-class town in Northern England.
Research Design and Methods: The study will evaluate a new family-centered intervention program targeting at-risk youth and their families. Quantitative data on program outcomes, including housing stability and family functioning, will be collected through program records and evaluation reports. Semi-structured interviews with program staff, participants, and relevant stakeholders will provide qualitative insights into the factors contributing to program success or failure.
Timeline: The study will be conducted over a period of six months, including recruitment, data collection, analysis, and report writing.
Budget: Expenses include access to program evaluation data, interview materials, data analysis software, and any related travel costs for in-person interviews.
Expected Outcomes and Implications: This study aims to provide evidence for the effectiveness of family-centered interventions in preventing youth homelessness, potentially informing the expansion of or necessary changes to social work practices in Northern England.
Get your Detailed Template for Writing your Research Proposal Here (With AI Prompts!)
This is a template for a 2500-word research proposal. You may find it difficult to squeeze everything into this wordcount, but it’s a common wordcount for Honors and MA-level dissertations.
Section | Checklist |
---|---|
Title | – Ensure the single-sentence title clearly states the study’s focus |
Abstract (Words: 200) | – Briefly describe the research topicSummarize the research problem or question – Outline the research design and methods – Mention the expected outcomes and implications |
Introduction (Words: 300) | – Introduce the research topic and its significance – Clearly state the research problem or question – Explain the purpose and objectives of the study – Provide a brief overview of |
Literature Review (Words: 800) | – Gather the existing literature into themes and ket ideas – the themes and key ideas in the literature – Identify gaps or inconsistencies in the literature – Explain how the current study will contribute to the literature |
Research Design and Methods (Words; 800) | – Describe the research paradigm (generally: positivism and interpretivism) – Describe the research design (e.g., qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods) – Explain the data collection methods (e.g., surveys, interviews, observations) – Detail the sampling strategy and target population – Outline the data analysis techniques (e.g., statistical analysis, thematic analysis) – Outline your validity and reliability procedures – Outline your intended ethics procedures – Explain the study design’s limitations and justify your decisions |
Timeline (Single page table) | – Provide an overview of the research timeline – Break down the study into stages with specific timeframes (e.g., data collection, analysis, report writing) – Include any relevant deadlines or milestones |
Budget (200 words) | – Estimate the costs associated with the research project – Detail specific expenses (e.g., materials, participant incentives, travel costs) – Include any necessary justifications for the budget items – Mention any funding sources or grant applications |
Expected Outcomes and Implications (200 words) | – Summarize the anticipated findings or results of the study – Discuss the potential implications of the findings for theory, practice, or policy – Describe any possible limitations of the study |
Your research proposal is where you really get going with your study. I’d strongly recommend working closely with your teacher in developing a research proposal that’s consistent with the requirements and culture of your institution, as in my experience it varies considerably. The above template is from my own courses that walk students through research proposals in a British School of Education.
Very excellent research proposals
very helpful
Very helpful
Dear Sir, I need some help to write an educational research proposal. Thank you.
Hi Levi, use the site search bar to ask a question and I’ll likely have a guide already written for your specific question. Thanks for reading!
very good research proposal
Thank you so much sir! ❤️
Very helpful 👌
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Before conducting a study, a research proposal should be created that outlines researchers’ plans and methodology and is submitted to the concerned evaluating organization or person. Creating a research proposal is an important step to ensure that researchers are on track and are moving forward as intended. A research proposal can be defined as a detailed plan or blueprint for the proposed research that you intend to undertake. It provides readers with a snapshot of your project by describing what you will investigate, why it is needed, and how you will conduct the research.
Your research proposal should aim to explain to the readers why your research is relevant and original, that you understand the context and current scenario in the field, have the appropriate resources to conduct the research, and that the research is feasible given the usual constraints.
This article will describe in detail the purpose and typical structure of a research proposal , along with examples and templates to help you ace this step in your research journey.
A research proposal¹ ,² can be defined as a formal report that describes your proposed research, its objectives, methodology, implications, and other important details. Research proposals are the framework of your research and are used to obtain approvals or grants to conduct the study from various committees or organizations. Consequently, research proposals should convince readers of your study’s credibility, accuracy, achievability, practicality, and reproducibility.
With research proposals , researchers usually aim to persuade the readers, funding agencies, educational institutions, and supervisors to approve the proposal. To achieve this, the report should be well structured with the objectives written in clear, understandable language devoid of jargon. A well-organized research proposal conveys to the readers or evaluators that the writer has thought out the research plan meticulously and has the resources to ensure timely completion.
A research proposal is a sales pitch and therefore should be detailed enough to convince your readers, who could be supervisors, ethics committees, universities, etc., that what you’re proposing has merit and is feasible . Research proposals can help students discuss their dissertation with their faculty or fulfill course requirements and also help researchers obtain funding. A well-structured proposal instills confidence among readers about your ability to conduct and complete the study as proposed.
Research proposals can be written for several reasons:³
Research proposals should aim to answer the three basic questions—what, why, and how.
The What question should be answered by describing the specific subject being researched. It should typically include the objectives, the cohort details, and the location or setting.
The Why question should be answered by describing the existing scenario of the subject, listing unanswered questions, identifying gaps in the existing research, and describing how your study can address these gaps, along with the implications and significance.
The How question should be answered by describing the proposed research methodology, data analysis tools expected to be used, and other details to describe your proposed methodology.
Here is a research proposal sample template (with examples) from the University of Rochester Medical Center. 4 The sections in all research proposals are essentially the same although different terminology and other specific sections may be used depending on the subject.
If you want to know how to make a research proposal impactful, include the following components:¹
1. Introduction
This section provides a background of the study, including the research topic, what is already known about it and the gaps, and the significance of the proposed research.
2. Literature review
This section contains descriptions of all the previous relevant studies pertaining to the research topic. Every study cited should be described in a few sentences, starting with the general studies to the more specific ones. This section builds on the understanding gained by readers in the Introduction section and supports it by citing relevant prior literature, indicating to readers that you have thoroughly researched your subject.
3. Objectives
Once the background and gaps in the research topic have been established, authors must now state the aims of the research clearly. Hypotheses should be mentioned here. This section further helps readers understand what your study’s specific goals are.
4. Research design and methodology
Here, authors should clearly describe the methods they intend to use to achieve their proposed objectives. Important components of this section include the population and sample size, data collection and analysis methods and duration, statistical analysis software, measures to avoid bias (randomization, blinding), etc.
5. Ethical considerations
This refers to the protection of participants’ rights, such as the right to privacy, right to confidentiality, etc. Researchers need to obtain informed consent and institutional review approval by the required authorities and mention this clearly for transparency.
6. Budget/funding
Researchers should prepare their budget and include all expected expenditures. An additional allowance for contingencies such as delays should also be factored in.
7. Appendices
This section typically includes information that supports the research proposal and may include informed consent forms, questionnaires, participant information, measurement tools, etc.
8. Citations
Writing a research proposal begins much before the actual task of writing. Planning the research proposal structure and content is an important stage, which if done efficiently, can help you seamlessly transition into the writing stage. 3,5
Key Takeaways
Here’s a summary of the main points about research proposals discussed in the previous sections:
Q1. How is a research proposal evaluated?
A1. In general, most evaluators, including universities, broadly use the following criteria to evaluate research proposals . 6
Q2. What is the difference between the Introduction and Literature Review sections in a research proposal ?
A2. The Introduction or Background section in a research proposal sets the context of the study by describing the current scenario of the subject and identifying the gaps and need for the research. A Literature Review, on the other hand, provides references to all prior relevant literature to help corroborate the gaps identified and the research need.
Q3. How long should a research proposal be?
A3. Research proposal lengths vary with the evaluating authority like universities or committees and also the subject. Here’s a table that lists the typical research proposal lengths for a few universities.
Arts programs | 1,000-1,500 | |
University of Birmingham | Law School programs | 2,500 |
PhD | 2,500 | |
2,000 | ||
Research degrees | 2,000-3,500 |
Q4. What are the common mistakes to avoid in a research proposal ?
A4. Here are a few common mistakes that you must avoid while writing a research proposal . 7
Thus, a research proposal is an essential document that can help you promote your research and secure funds and grants for conducting your research. Consequently, it should be well written in clear language and include all essential details to convince the evaluators of your ability to conduct the research as proposed.
This article has described all the important components of a research proposal and has also provided tips to improve your writing style. We hope all these tips will help you write a well-structured research proposal to ensure receipt of grants or any other purpose.
References
Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 21+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster.
Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$19 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed.
Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!
How to write a phd research proposal.
The future of academia: how ai tools are changing the way we do research, you may also like, dissertation printing and binding | types & comparison , what is a dissertation preface definition and examples , how to write your research paper in apa..., how to choose a dissertation topic, how to write an academic paragraph (step-by-step guide), maintaining academic integrity with paperpal’s generative ai writing..., research funding basics: what should a grant proposal..., how to write an abstract in research papers..., how to write dissertation acknowledgements.
Some of the researchers will find difficult to write the expected outcome in their research proposal. It is not easy to give an assurance about something before we experience it.
Writing the expected outcome shall be done by clearly understanding about the research topic that we are working and we have to think about how we are able to provide the solution for this research.
The expected outcome should be written with the valuable solutions for the problem that we are working in our research. We should be able to write the exact solution that our research will be providing.
In order to write about the exact solution of our research in the expected outcome we need to have a wide knowledge and understanding in the research process.
To write the expected outcome considers the following features:
1) Depending on the problem statement:
We used to consider a research as the good research only when the research work is for the much needed solution.
We used to choose the topic for the research by analyzing the existing research. Likewise, the research is done by analyzing one specific problem to work in our research.
We need to read and to deeply analyses the missing gaps in the recent year’s existing journals. The missing gap from our analysis is considered as the problem of the existing research.
We have to choose that kind of problem that shall be worked in our research to provide the solution. The solution will be the expected outcome in the research that we process.
The better problem statement will provide the better solution in the research. So the selection of appropriate problem from the existing research is very much important to provide the expected solution for sure in the research proposal.
2) Bringing a better solution.
As we have discussed in the previous section the better problem statement will provide the better solution. The solution is considered as the better solution when there is more weight age for the problem that we have chosen.
Much needed results for the society and for the surroundings is found only when we work for the unresolved problem of the existing research.
The analyzing of problem statement is the important part of the research work and so this is considered as the seed for the research work.
The seed called as the problem shall be germinated by producing any minimal solution but the seed has to produce a big tree and so the problem has to provide the wide solution stating the major unsaid problem of the research field.
The effective solution from the existing research problem statement is considered as the expected outcome.
The solution that we consider as the expected solution should identify the exact expected solution in the final outcome of the project end stage and so with that much proper knowledge and confidence we have to write the expected solution.
3) Unique problem and unique solution.
The problem statement that we mentioned in our research proposal should explore the minds of the readers and in such a way we need to analyses the problem from the existing research.
The problem statement that we have considered has to be in a unique way where there should not be any repetition.
The unique problem denotes the finding of new problem from the existing researches that is needed to be worked and once the problem is worked to provide the solution we must have huge possible changes in the research field.
There will be many possible solutions the research problem will be providing in the research field but we need to work by thriving to get one important solution.
That solution that we extract from the conducting of research has to be unique and become more essential for the problem that we analyzed.
The unique solution must rectify the analyzed problem and should provide the benefits in the field of research.
One unique problem will provide the unique solution so as to fulfill the requirements of the problem that we have analyzed while doing the research to bring the expected outcome.
We have to work on the problem that should be able to provide the solution by understanding the purpose of the research so as to provide the expected solution for the research work.
4) Benefits of the research.
The solution that we are going to provide for the problem that we are working in our research gives lot of new changes in the research field.
The new changes are considered as the benefits that are produced by the solution for the problem we conducted research.
Expected solution of the research must have enormous advantages in the research field and also we should be able to utilize the solution to some sectors that is in relevant to the research field.
The benefits of the research that we are going to conduct have to create the futuristic scope in the research field. By analyzing the scope of our research many researches should come forward to conduct research in our research field.
The research benefit should create some impact in the field of research. We have to bring out the idea on the expected outcome in our research proposal by highlighting the possible benefits that we are able to get from the research solution.
5) Novel information produced.
By referring all the previously existing research journals we have to gather the required information that are needed for our research work to provide the solution for the addressed problem.
The referred information should be cited with the reference journal from where we had gathered the information needed.
We need to produce some novel information in our research work and contribute that novel information to the research field.
As we contribute the new findings of our research in the research field the future researchers will make use of them for their future endeavors in conducting research.
So we must have the thought of bringing some innovation in the field that we conduct our research work and so we have to write the expected outcomes by considering the factors of providing innovation.
The original meta-analysis included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational trials. We combined the 20 RCTs from the original review with the 25 RCTs from the updated search.
Weights are from random-effects model. Risk of bias categories included: A, random sequence generation; B, allocation concealment; C, masking of participants and personnel; D, incomplete outcome bias; E, selective reporting. DL indicates DerSimonian-Laird random effects meta-analysis; HR, hazard ratio; PROM, patient-reported outcome measures; SOC, standard of care.
Weights are from random-effects model. Risk of bias categories included: A, random sequence generation; B, allocation concealment; C, masking of participants and personnel; D, incomplete outcome bias; E, selective reporting. DL indicates ; PROM, patient-reported outcome measures; QLQ-C30, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life questionnaire; SOC, standard of care; WMD, weighted mean difference.
Weights are from random-effects model. Risk of bias categories included: A, random sequence generation; B, allocation concealment; C, masking of participants and personnel; D, incomplete outcome bias; E, selective reporting. DL indicates ; OR, odds ratio; PROM, patient-reported outcome measures; SOC, standard of care.
eAppendix 1. Initial Search Strategy
eAppendix 2. Second Search Strategy
eFigure 1. Forest Plot and Risk of Bias of EQ5D at 24 Weeks
eTable 1. Study Characteristics for Included Trials
eTable 2. Summary of the HRQoL Outcomes With Questionnaire Specific Properties Such as Range of Score and Minimal Important Difference
eTable 3. Overall Risk of Bias for Each Outcome
eFigure 2. Forest Plot of Sensitivity Analysis for Overall Survival
eFigure 3. Forest Plot of Sensitivity Analysis for EORTC-QLQC30 at 12 Weeks
eFigure 4. Forest Plot of Sensitivity Analysis for EORTC-QLQC30 at 24 Weeks
eFigure 5. Forest Plot of Sensitivity Analysis for Hospitalizations
eReferences.
Data Sharing Statement
Sign up for emails based on your interests, select your interests.
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Others also liked.
Balitsky AK , Rayner D , Britto J, et al. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cancer Care : An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis . JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(8):e2424793. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24793
© 2024
Question How does the integration of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) affect outcomes of cancer care?
Findings In this update to a systematic review and meta-analysis of 45 randomized clinical trials examining the use of PROMs for patients receiving anticancer treatment, the integration of PROMs into cancer care likely improved overall survival and HRQoL with moderate certainty. Results for reductions in emergency department visits and hospitalizations were not significant.
Meaning These results suggest that integrating the patient perspective into cancer care can improve patient outcomes and health resource utilization.
Importance Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) come directly from the patient, without clinician interpretation, to provide a patient-centered perspective.
Objective To understand the association of PROM integration into cancer care with patient-related, therapy-related, and health care utilization outcomes.
Data Sources Searches included MEDLINE and MEDLINE Epub ahead of print, in-process, and other nonindexed citations; Embase databases (OvidSP); PsychINFO; CENTRAL; and CINAHL from January 1, 2012 to September 26, 2022.
Study Selection Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that enrolled adult patients (ages 18 years and older) with active cancer receiving anticancer therapy using a PROM as an intervention.
Data Extraction and Synthesis Pairs of review authors, using prepiloted forms, independently extracted trial characteristics, disease characteristics, and intervention details. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline was followed. Random-effects analyses were conducted.
Main Outcomes and Measures Overall mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures, and hospital utilization outcomes.
Results From 1996 to 2022, 45 RCTs including 13 661 participants addressed the association of PROMs with outcomes considered important to patients. The addition of a PROM likely reduced the risk of overall mortality (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98; moderate certainty), improved HRQoL (range 0-100) at 12 weeks (mean difference [MD], 2.45; 95% CI, 0.42-4.48; moderate certainty). Improvements of HRQoL at 24 weeks were not significant (MD, 1.87; 95% CI, −1.21 to 4.96; low certainty). There was no association between the addition of a PROM and HRQoL at 48 weeks. The addition of a PROM was not associated with reduced ED visits (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.54-1.02; low certainty) or hospital admissions (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73-1.02; low certainty).
Conclusion and Relevance The findings of this study suggest that the integration of PROMs into cancer care may improve overall survival and quality of life.
Symptoms, many of which go largely undetected by clinicians, 1 - 4 are common among individuals with cancer. 5 Even in a tightly controlled clinical trial comparing physician and patient reporting of symptoms, physician reporting was neither sensitive nor specific in detecting common chemotherapy toxic effects. 4 In addition, clinician-to-clinician agreement when reporting symptoms is moderate at best. 6 The discrepancy between clinician-reported and patient-reported outcomes suggests that accurate assessment of symptoms and consequent health-related quality of life (HRQoL) requires direct measurement from patients.
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are measures of symptom burden and HRQoL that come directly from the patient, without clinician interpretation. PROMs can be the intervention and/or the outcome in a trial. In this study, our focus is on the integration of PROMs into oncology care as the intervention.
Possibly due to differences in choice of PROM, population diversity, different selected outcomes, and the different methodologies, previous systematic reviews measuring the association of PROMs with the quality of care across different disease populations have proved inconclusive. 7 - 13 A previous systematic review published in 2014 14 included 26 studies (randomized clinical trials [RCTs] and non-RCTs) that focused on a PROM as an intervention in cancer care. Authors did not perform a meta-analysis due to the variability in previously noted factors.
Since 2014, the impact of PROMs has come to the forefront of cancer care. The integration of PROMs into cancer care can improve HRQoL and survival, which is potentially attributable to improved symptom management and tolerance of treatment regimens. 15 , 16 Given the potential survival benefit of including PROMs into oncology care, we performed an updated systematic review addressing the impact of integrating PROMs into oncology care for patients with cancer undergoing active therapy, focusing not only on survival but also on other patient-valued outcomes, including HRQoL and measures of health care resource utilization like number of emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions.
We followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses ( PRISMA ) reporting guideline. The systematic review was submitted to the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) ( ID266577 ).
We began by running the search from a previous systematic review published in 2014 (eAppendices 1 and 2 in Supplement 1 ). 14 Twenty of the 26 articles from the previous search were RCTs and included in our full-text eligibility evaluation. An experienced information specialist then conducted a comprehensive search in MEDLINE and MEDLINE Epub ahead of print, in-process, and other nonindexed citations; Embase databases (OvidSP); PsycINFO; CENTRAL; and CINAHL from 2012 to September 26, 2022. There were no language or publication status restrictions. To identify other potentially relevant trials, we reviewed reference lists of included trials and relevant review articles.
We included RCTs that enrolled adult patients (ages 18 years or older) with active cancer and receiving anticancer therapy. The intervention was the administration of a PROM compared with standard care without PROM administration. In the intervention group, the results of the PROM had to be shared with the patient’s health care professional. We excluded studies that included survivors of cancer (ie, not on cancer-directed therapy) or included PROMs only as an outcome measure.
Pairs of review authors (J.B., L.G., W.C., N.H., A.W., H.S., N.C., and A.L.) independently screened titles and abstracts for possible inclusion. The team of review authors conducted full-text review of any possibly relevant trials. Review authors resolved discrepancies through adjudication (A.B.).
We categorized outcomes used to evaluate PROMs as an intervention into 3 categories: patient-reported, clinician-reported, and health care utilization. Patient-reported outcomes included: HRQoL measures, symptom burden measures, and psychological measures. Clinician-reported outcomes included mortality, therapy completion, and therapy complications. Health care utilization outcomes included number of unscheduled clinic visits, number of hospital admissions, and number of emergency department visits.
Pairs of review authors, using prepiloted forms, independently extracted the following data: trial characteristics, including study design, country, trial setting (eg, clinic, hospital); disease characteristics such as type of cancer and stage of cancer; and intervention details, including type of PROM, timing of administration, and method of administration (eg, paper or electronic). Pairs of review authors independently assessed all eligible studies for their risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. 17 Overall risk of bias for each trial was defined as high risk of bias if there were some concerns in 2 or more domains. Certainty of pooled effect estimates for each outcome were assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. 18 - 21 We rated certainty in a nonzero effect.
A meta-analysis was performed for each outcome included in at least 2 studies. Results were pooled in DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analyses using the inverse variance method. Dichotomous outcome data were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs and continuous outcomes were expressed as mean differences (MD). We assessed statistical heterogeneity using a combination of visual inspection of the forest plots along with consideration of the χ 2 test and the I 2 statistic. 22 The STATA SE version 18 (Stata Inc) metan function provided the software for all statistical analyses.
To explore the impact of including trials with high risk of bias, we removed studies with overall high risk of bias and repeated the meta-analysis without those studies. We conducted a test of interaction between the results of low and high risk of bias groups. The threshold for significance was P < .10; if results were significant, we applied ICEMAN (Instrument to Assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses) criteria. 23
We retrieved 9662 citations, of which 482 were duplicates ( Figure 1 ). One additional study, found in a reference list review, proved eligible. The initial search included RCTs and observational trials. Given that there was a sufficient number of RCTs, we limited inclusion to RCTs only. There were 45 RCTs, 20 from the original search and 25 from the new search. 16 , 24 - 68
Sample size for included RCTs varied from 32 to 2095 with a total of 13 661 participants representing patients from North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia with both solid and hematologic malignant neoplasms ( Table ). The most frequent treatment was chemotherapy (27 patients [60%]). The meta-analyses and GRADE for available outcomes are in eTable 1 in Supplement 1 .
Of the 45 RCTs, 4 studies 15 , 57 , 69 , 70 reported overall mortality; however, only 3 (1289 patients) included data for meta-analyses. The pooled meta-analysis for overall mortality demonstrated that the addition of a PROM likely improves overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98; I 2 = 0%; P for heterogeneity = .55) (moderate certainty) ( Figure 2 ).
Of the 45 RCTs, 25 studies 16 , 24 - 30 , 36 - 38 , 41 , 50 , 51 , 57 - 60 , 62 - 65 , 68 - 70 reported HRQoL outcomes, using different measures at different time points (eTable 2 in Supplement 1 ). Six studies 24 - 26 , 64 , 65 , 70 (2073 participants) measured HRQoL using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) at 12 weeks and were included in the pooled meta-analysis. The addition of a PROM was likely to improve HRQoL at 12 weeks (mean difference [MD], 2.45; 95% CI, 0.42-4.48; I 2 = 57.3%; P for heterogeneity = .04) (moderate certainty) ( Figure 3 A).
Nine studies 24 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 30 - 33 , 68 (1957 participants) measured HRQoL using QLQ-C30 at 24 weeks. One study did not include baseline scores. Eight studies 24 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 30 - 33 were included in the pooled meta-analysis. Improvements in HRQoL with the addition of a PROM were not significant at 24 weeks (MD, 1.87; 95% CI, −1.21 to 4.96; I 2 = 0%; P for heterogeneity = .55) (low certainty) ( Figure 3 B).
Three studies 27 , 30 , 33 (807 participants) measured HRQoL using QLQ-C30 at 48 weeks and were included in the pooled meta-analysis. The evidence was very uncertain about the outcomes associated with the addition of a PROM at 48 weeks (MD, 0.35; 95% CI, −6.31 to 7.02; I 2 = 76.0%; P for heterogeneity = .02) (very low certainty) ( Figure 3 C).
Three studies 16 , 63 , 69 (674 participants) measured HRQoL using EuroQol Group 5 Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) at 24 weeks and were included in the pooled meta-analysis. The evidence is very uncertain about the outcomes associated with the addition of a PROM using the EQ5D measure (MD, 2.58; 95% CI, −2.65 to 7.81; I 2 = 36.5%; P for heterogeneity = .21) (very low certainty) (eFigure 1 in Supplement 1 ).
Of the 45 RCTs, 6 studies 16 , 30 , 31 , 64 , 69 , 70 reported ED visits and number of hospitalizations. Four studies 16 , 30 , 69 , 70 (2064 participants) were included in the pooled ED visits meta-analysis. The addition of a PROM was not associated with a reduction in ED visits (odds ratio [OR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.54-1.02; I 2 = 53.2%; P = .09) (low certainty) ( Figure 4 A).
Five studies 16 , 30 , 31 , 64 , 69 (2954 participants) were included in the pooled hospitalization meta-analysis. The addition of a PROM was not associated with a reduction in hospital admissions (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73-1.02; I 2 = 0%; P = .79) (low certainty) ( Figure 4 B).
We removed studies with overall high risk of bias (eTable 3 in Supplement 1 ) and repeated the meta-analysis for those with low risk and high risk of bias. Subgroup analyses based on risk of bias were not applicable for EORTC 48 weeks, EQ-5D 24 weeks, and ED visits. Subgroup analyses for risk of bias did not change overall mortality, HRQoL or health care resource utilization outcomes. No analysis met the threshold ( P < .10) to apply ICEMAN.
The meta-analysis for studies with low risk included: 2 studies 16 , 70 were included in the pooled meta-analysis for overall mortality (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.97; I 2 = 0%; P = .37) (eFigure 2 in Supplement 1 ). Five studies 25 , 26 , 64 , 65 , 70 were included in the pooled meta-analysis for EORTC-QLQC30 at 12 weeks (HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 0.33 to 4.99; I 2 = 62.4%; P = .03) (eFigure 3 in Supplement 1 ). Seven studies 26 - 29 , 65 , 69 were included in the pooled meta-analysis for EORTC-QLQC30 at 24 weeks (HR, 2.30; 95% CI, −1.20 to 5.80; I 2 = 68.8%; P = .002) (eFigure 4 in Supplement 1 ). Four studies 16 , 30 , 64 , 69 were included in the pooled hospitalization meta-analysis (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.03; I 2 = 0%; P = .65) (eFigure 5 in Supplement 1 ).
In our updated systematic review of 45 RCTs, with a total of 13 661 participants, we were able to conduct a meta-analysis from a proportion of the RCTs for patient-reported outcomes (HRQoL), clinician-reported outcomes (mortality), and health care resource utilization outcomes (ED visits and hospitalizations). We found that the integration of a PROM into cancer care was associated with improved all-cause mortality (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98) and HRQoL at 12 weeks (MD, 2.45; 95% CI, 0.42-4.48), but was not associated with HRQoL at 24 weeks (MD, 1.87; 95% CI, −1.21 to 4.96; low certainty). There was no association between the addition of a PROM and HRQoL at 48 weeks. The addition of a PROM was not associated with a reduction in ED visits (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.54-1.02) or hospital admissions (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73-1.02).
We included many studies but were only able to perform a proper meta-analysis of a limited number of trials because of the heterogeneity of their outcomes. Of the 45 RCTs, only 4 studies measured survival. The improvement in overall mortality with the addition of a PROM is largely influenced by 2 studies. 15 , 69 In the Basch study, 16 patients with cancer receiving active cancer therapy were asked to use an app to report the 12 most common symptoms associated with cancer and its therapy. In the Geerse study, 69 patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer reported symptom distress using a validated instrument (Distress Thermometer and Problem List). These 2 studies support the concept that using a PROM, specifically on patient-reported symptoms, may assist health care professionals to identify patients’ needs and address issues early thereby preventing poor outcomes. If one is considering implementing PROMs in routine practice, patient-reported symptoms might be a good place to start.
HRQoL, an outcome identified as important to patients, was one of the most common outcomes reported. Of the 45 RCTs, 25 reported HRQoL 16 , 24 - 30 , 36 - 38 , 41 , 50 , 51 , 57 - 60 , 62 - 65 , 68 - 70 as an outcome. However, there was marked variability in the questionnaires used and timing of their administration. Because of the variability, we were only able to conduct meta-analyses on a proportion of HRQoL outcomes. Three studies 64 , 65 , 70 contributed the most to the associations with HRQoL, specifically EORTC measured at 12 weeks. They all used patient-reported symptom monitoring as the intervention, 64 , 65 , 70 again suggesting that asking patients to report their symptoms may lead to an earlier response to symptoms and improvements in HRQoL.
The addition of a PROM may result in a reduction in ED visits and hospital admissions. Only 6 of the 45 RCTs reported ED and hospitalization outcomes. 16 , 30 , 31 , 64 , 69 , 70 There was considerable variability in the timeframe of data collection in these studies, perhaps limiting the certainty of the evidence. In addition to the toxic effects of cancer therapy, there is a burden associated with therapy, requiring multiple scheduled and unscheduled visits to hospital, a burden to patients and their caregivers that has been referred to as time toxicity. 71 In a health care system with finite resources, hospital resource utilization is also an important outcome for hospital administration.
Multiple studies in this systematic review collected PROMs electronically. This lends itself to the potential for the integration of digital health tools into oncology care. Patient-reported symptoms and other PROMs are an integral component of remote patient monitoring, which can also include vital sign monitoring. Remote patient-monitoring in addition to clinician interactive care, could help anticipate and reduce toxic effects and therapy-related sequalae, improve patient well-being, and potentially reduce hospital resource utilization and treatment burden.
This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted with rigor using GRADE methodology to assess the certainty of the evidence. In our initial search, we included observational studies in addition to RCTs. Given the large number of available RCTs providing sufficient data for robust meta-analyses, in addition to the advantages of RCTs in terms of internal validity and control over confounding variables, we focused on RCTs only.
This review focused on objectively measured outcomes of integrating PROMS into the clinical care of patients with cancer. When patients systematically report their symptoms and those symptoms are shared with their clinicians, it helps facilitate discussion. In a 2018 review on the use of PROMs, Greenhalgh et al 72 suggested that in addition to facilitating clinician discussions, the act of completing PROMs prompts the patient to self-reflect on and feel open to discussing their symptoms with a clinician. They also identified that although oncology clinicians are comfortable with managing symptoms, they are not as comfortable with managing issues related to HRQoL or mental health. There is an important role for PROM integration, specifically patient-reported symptoms into oncology care. Studies have demonstrated feasibility in implementing patient-reported symptom reporting in patients on active anticancer therapy, 73 , 74 further evidence that PROMs should be adopted into routine oncology care with quality initiatives for standardized implantation and outcome measurements.
Despite the strengths of this study, there are limitations. Similar to the prior review, due to the variability of data collection, measures used, and how results are reported, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis for other common outcomes, such as patient-reported symptoms and patient-reported psychological symptoms. In addition, due to the size of the review, granular data about every study is not reported. A major limitation of the available data is the small number of studies that evaluate the associations of PROM integration with important outcomes, such as survival and hospital resource utilization. Due to the heterogeneity of the PROM interventions used, our study does not provide evidence on the optimal strategy to collect PROs in active oncology care.
The integration of PROMs into cancer care was associated with overall survival and short-term HRQoL but not reductions in ED visits and hospitalizations. In the 45 RCTs measuring the impact of integrating PROMs into cancer care, there was marked variability in the outcomes selected and the timing of their measurement, limiting our ability to comment on the impact on mental health. There is a role to standardize research methodology utilizing PROMs to ensure consistency, comparability, and reliability in evaluating outcomes.
Accepted for Publication: May 13, 2024.
Published: August 13, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24793
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License . © 2024 Balitsky AK et al. JAMA Network Open .
Corresponding Author: Amaris K. Balitsky, MD, MSc, Department of Oncology, Division of Malignant Hematology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, 699 Concession St, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada ( [email protected] ).
Author Contributions: Dr Balitsky had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: Balitsky, Mian, Levine.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Balitsky, Rayner, Britto, Lionel, Ginsberg, Cho, Wilfred, Sardar, Cantor, Guyatt.
Drafting of the manuscript: Balitsky, Ginsberg, Cantor, Levine.
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Balitsky, Rayner, Britto, Lionel, Cho, Wilfred, Sardar, Mian, Guyatt.
Statistical analysis: Rayner, Lionel, Cantor, Levine.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Ginsberg, Wilfred, Cantor.
Supervision: Balitsky, Guyatt.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Mian reported grants from Janssen, Pfizer, and Takeda outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: Dr Mian is supported by an early career award from Hamilton Health Sciences.
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 2 .
Additional Contributions: We would like to thank Rachel Couban, MIS, information specialist, for her help with developing and running the search strategy.
The Expected Outcome section serves to articulate the anticipated results and findings of the proposed research study. It provides a detailed preview of what you expect to achieve, contributing to the overall understanding and significance of the research. This clarity is crucial for reviewers to understand the potential impact of your study.
Key Takeaways. A clear Expected Outcomes section makes a research proposal stronger and more convincing. Expected outcomes help readers understand the potential impact and importance of the research. Well-defined outcomes show that the researcher has thought carefully about the study's future effects.
The Expected Outcomes Section contains these features. 1. An explanation of how the proposal will address the needs shown in the Statement of the Problem; 2. An explanation of the benefits that will be realized if the proposal is accepted; 3. Clear information about WHO will benefit and HOW they will benefit from the proposal; 4.
Writing about the expected results of your study in your proposal is a good idea as it can help to establish the significance of your study. On the basis of the problems you have identified and your proposed methodology, you can describe what results can be expected from your research. It's not possible for you to predict the exact outcome of ...
Research proposal examples. Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We've included a few for you below. Example research proposal #1: "A Conceptual Framework for Scheduling Constraint Management".
Step 1: Title and Abstract. Select a concise, descriptive title and write an abstract summarizing your research question, objectives, methodology and expected outcomes . The abstract should include your research question, the objectives you aim to achieve, the methodology you plan to employ and the anticipated outcomes.
Here is an explanation of each step: 1. Title and Abstract. Choose a concise and descriptive title that reflects the essence of your research. Write an abstract summarizing your research question, objectives, methodology, and expected outcomes. It should provide a brief overview of your proposal. 2.
current academic research. Finally, the proposal should indicate what the expected outcomes of the research are. It may be, for example, a solution to a problem or a new methodology. Providing expected outcomes creates a more focused approach to the research. A sample research proposal has been attached for your reference. References:
Guidelines on writing a research proposal by Matthew McGranaghan This is a work in progress, intended to organize my thoughts on the process of formulating a proposal. ... Very early on, generate the research question, critical observation, interpretations of the possible outcomes, and the expected results. These are the core of the project and ...
The process: Identify prospective supervisors and discuss your idea with them. Avoid blanket general e-mails to several prospective supervisors. Allow plenty of time - a rushed proposal will show. Get feedback from your prospective supervisor and be prepared to take their comments on board.
Tips for Writing Expected Outcomes and Impact. Be Specific: Clearly outline the specific results or changes that you expect to achieve as a result of your proposal. Quantifiable outcomes are particularly impactful. Connect to Goals: Tie the expected outcomes back to the overarching goals and objectives of the proposal.
A quality example of a research proposal shows one's above-average analytical skills, including the ability to coherently synthesize ideas and integrate lateral and vertical thinking. Communication skills. The proposal also demonstrates your proficiency to communicate your thoughts in concise and precise language.
4. Literature Review. Writing a literature review is an important part of the research process. It provides the researcher with a summary of previous studies that have been conducted on a subject, and it helps the researcher determine what areas might need additional investigation in the existing research.
pated outcomes to answer the research question. It is extremely beneficial to an-ticipate the range of outcomes from your analysis, and for each, know what it will mean in terms of the answer to your ques-tion. 05 EXPECTED OUTCOMES Show what you expect to get out of the research. Link the data analysis and possible outcomes to
A well-constructed Expected Outcome section enhances the overall quality of the research proposal, making a compelling case for the significance and feasibility of the proposed study.
The Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Stress Reduction in College Students. Abstract: This research proposal examines the impact of mindfulness-based interventions on stress reduction among college students, using a pre-test/post-test experimental design with both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. Introduction: College students face heightened stress levels ...
What are the outputs, how will they be used, by who? Skip to Main Content. Access to Excellence. Louisiana State University; Research Guides; LSU Libraries; ENVS 7700 ; Step 5: Expected Outcomes, Contributions of the Project ; Search this Guide Search. ENVS 7700 : Step 5: Expected Outcomes, Contributions of the Project ... How to write about ...
Outcomes • Qualitative research is often undertaken when little is known about a topic. This means a qualitative research proposal cannot be as clear in the detail as a quantitative one. Qualitative research is often exploratory and develops iteratively. It may be hard to specify what your outcomes are likely to be, beforehand.
Before conducting a study, a research proposal should be created that outlines researchers' plans and methodology and is submitted to the concerned evaluating organization or person. Creating a research proposal is an important step to ensure that researchers are on track and are moving forward as intended. A research proposal can be defined as a detailed plan or blueprint for the proposed ...
Answer: Welcome to the Editage Insights Q&A Forum, and thanks for your question. We have quite a few resources on writing the expected results for a research proposal on the Q&A forum. We have linked a few of these below. For more, you can search the forum/site using the relevant keywords.
To write the expected outcome considers the following features: 1) Depending on the problem statement: We used to consider a research as the good research only when the research work is for the much needed solution. We used to choose the topic for the research by analyzing the existing research. Likewise, the research is done by analyzing one ...
Coherence is the key to a successful European innovation proposal. Therefore we believe that having tools and methodologies to identify 1) Objectives, 2) Activities, 3) Expected Results, 4) Outcomes and 5) Expected Impacts, can help to clearly improve the quality of our proposal. Below we show you the methodology that we follow in IDConsortium ...
This systematic review and meta-analysis is an update to a previous review of randomized clinical trials examining the association of patient-reported outcome measures used in cancer treatment with overall mortality risk, health-related quality of life, and hospital utilization.
Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World
Read our research on:
Full Topic List
Read Our Research On:
What teachers, teens and the u.s. public say about current curriculum debates, table of contents.
Pew Research Center conducted this study to better understand how public K-12 teachers, teens and the American public see topics related to race, sexual orientation and gender identity playing out in the classroom.
The bulk of the analysis in this report is based on an online survey of 2,531 U.S. public K-12 teachers conducted from Oct. 17 to Nov. 14, 2023. The teachers surveyed are members of RAND’s American Teacher Panel, a nationally representative panel of public school K-12 teachers recruited through MDR Education. Survey data is weighted to state and national teacher characteristics to account for differences in sampling and response to ensure they are representative of the target population.
For the questions for the general public, we surveyed 5,029 U.S. adults from Nov. 9 to Nov. 16, 2023. The adults surveyed are members of the Ipsos KnowledgePanel, a nationally representative online survey panel. Panel members are randomly recruited through probability-based sampling, and households are provided with access to the Internet and hardware if needed. To ensure that the results of this survey reflect a balanced cross section of the nation, the data is weighted to match the U.S. adult population by gender, age, education, race and ethnicity and other categories.
For questions for teens, we conducted an online survey of 1,453 U.S. teens from Sept. 26 to Oct. 23, 2023, through Ipsos. Ipsos recruited the teens via their parents, who were part of its KnowledgePanel. The survey was weighted to be representative of U.S. teens ages 13 to 17 who live with their parents by age, gender, race and ethnicity, household income, and other categories. The survey on teens was reviewed and approved by an external institutional review board (IRB), Advarra, an independent committee of experts specializing in helping to protect the rights of research participants.
Here are the questions used for this report , along with responses, and the survey methodology .
Throughout the report, references to White, Black and Asian adults include those who are not Hispanic and identify as only one race. Hispanics are of any race. The views and experiences of teachers and teens who are Asian American or part of other racial and ethnic groups are not analyzed separately in this report due to sample limitations. Data for these groups is incorporated into the general population figures throughout the report.
All references to party affiliation include those who lean toward that party. Republicans include those who identify as Republicans and those who say they lean toward the Republican Party. Democrats include those who identify as Democrats and those who say they lean toward the Democratic Party.
Political leaning of school districts is based on whether the majority of those residing in the school district voted for Republican Donald Trump or Democrat Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election.
Amid national debates about what schools are teaching , we asked public K-12 teachers, teens and the American public how they see topics related to race, sexual orientation and gender identity playing out in the classroom.
A sizeable share of teachers (41%) say these debates have had a negative impact on their ability to do their job. Just 4% say these debates have had a positive impact, while 53% say the impact has been neither positive nor negative or that these debates have had no impact.
And 71% of teachers say teachers themselves don’t have enough influence over what’s taught in public schools in their area.
In turn, a majority of teachers (58%) say their state government has too much influence over this. And more say the federal government, the local school board and parents have too much influence than say they don’t have enough.
Most of the findings in this report come from a survey of 2,531 U.S. public K-12 teachers conducted Oct. 17-Nov. 14, 2023, using the RAND American Teacher Panel. 1 The survey looks at teachers’ views on:
It follows a fall 2022 survey of K-12 parents that explored similar topics.
This report also includes some findings from a survey of U.S. teens ages 13 to 17 ( Chapter 3 ) and a survey of U.S. adults ( Chapter 4 ). For details about these surveys, refer to the Methodology section of this report. Among the key findings:
We asked public K-12 teachers what they think students should learn in school about two topics in particular:
For these questions, elementary, middle and high school teachers were asked about elementary, middle and high school students, respectively.
Most teachers (64%) say students should learn that the legacy of slavery still affects the position of Black people in American society today.
About a quarter (23%) say students should learn that slavery is part of American history but no longer affects the position of Black people in American society. Just 8% say students shouldn’t learn about this topic in school at all.
Majorities of elementary, middle and high school teachers say students should learn that the legacy of slavery still has an impact on the lives of Black Americans.
When it comes to teaching about gender identity – specifically whether a person’s gender can be different from or is determined by their sex assigned at birth – half of public K-12 teachers say students shouldn’t learn about this in school.
A third of teachers think students should learn that someone can be a boy or a girl even if that is different from the sex they were assigned at birth.
A smaller share (14%) say students should learn that whether someone is a boy or a girl is determined by their sex at birth.
Views differ among elementary, middle and high school teachers. But teachers across the three levels are more likely to say students should learn that a person’s gender can be different from their sex at birth than to say students should learn gender is determined by sex at birth.
Most elementary school teachers (62%) say students shouldn’t learn about gender identity in school. This is much larger than the shares of middle and high school teachers who say the same (45% and 35%).
Parents of K-12 students are more divided on what their children should learn in school about these topics.
In the 2022 survey , 49% of parents said they’d rather their children learn that the legacy of slavery still affects the position of Black people in American society today, while 42% said they’d rather their children learn that slavery no longer affects Black Americans.
When it comes to gender identity, 31% of parents said they’d rather their children learn that gender can be different from sex at birth. An identical share said they would rather their children learn gender is determined by sex at birth. Another 37% of parents said their children shouldn’t learn about gender identity in school.
Teens, like parents, are more divided than teachers on these questions. About half of teens (48%) say they’d rather learn that the legacy of slavery still affects the position of Black Americans today. Four-in-ten would prefer to learn that slavery no longer affects Black Americans.
And teens are about evenly divided when it comes to what they prefer to learn about gender identity. A quarter say they’d rather learn that a person’s gender can be different from their sex at birth; 26% would prefer to learn that gender is determined by sex at birth. About half (48%) say they shouldn’t learn about gender identity in school.
For more on teens’ views about what they prefer to learn in school about each of these topics, read Chapter 3 of this report.
Most public K-12 teachers (60%) say parents should not be able to opt their children out of learning about racism or racial inequality in school, even if the way these topics are taught conflicts with the parents’ beliefs. A quarter say parents should be able to opt their children out of learning about these topics.
In contrast, more say parents should be able to opt their children out of learning about sexual orientation or gender identity (48%) than say parents should not be able to do this (33%).
On topics related to both race and LGBTQ issues, elementary and middle school teachers are more likely than high school teachers to say parents should be able to opt their children out.
Like teachers, Americans overall are more likely to say parents should be able to opt their children out of learning about sexual orientation or gender identity (54%) than to say they should be able to opt their children out of learning about racism or racial inequality (34%).
Across both issues, Americans overall are somewhat more likely than teachers to say parents should be able to opt their children out.
For more on the public’s views, read Chapter 4 of this report.
Most teachers who’ve been teaching for more than a year (68%) say the topics of sexual orientation and gender identity rarely or never came up in their classroom in the 2022-23 school year. About one-in-five (21%) say these topics came up sometimes, and 8% say they came up often or extremely often.
Topics related to racism or racial inequality come up more frequently. A majority of teachers (56%) say these topics came up at least sometimes in their classroom, with 21% saying they came up often or extremely often.
These topics are more likely to come up in secondary school than in elementary school classrooms.
As is the case among parents of K-12 students and the general public, teachers’ views on how topics related to race and LGBTQ issues should play out in the classroom differ by political affiliation.
A majority of public K-12 teachers (58%) identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party. About a third (35%) identify with or lean toward the GOP. Americans overall are more evenly divided: 47% are Democrats or Democratic leaners, and 45% are Republicans or Republican leaners .
Fresh data delivery Saturday mornings
Weekly updates on the world of news & information
Facts about the u.s. black population, 22 states have ever elected a black woman to congress, trust in america: do americans trust the police, black americans have made gains in u.s. political leadership, but gaps remain, most popular, report materials.
901 E St. NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20004 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 | Media Inquiries
ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts .
© 2024 Pew Research Center
The Internet Crime Complaint Center, or IC3, is the Nation’s central hub for reporting cyber crime. It is run by the FBI, the lead federal agency for investigating cyber crime. Here on our website, you can take two vital steps to protecting cyberspace and your own online security.
First, if you believe you have fallen victim to cyber crime, file a complaint or report. Your information is invaluable to helping the FBI and its partners bring cybercriminals to justice.
Second, get educated about the latest and most harmful cyber threats and scams. By doing so, you will be better able to protect yourself, your family, and your place of work.
Anyone can become a victim of internet crime. Take action for yourself and others by reporting it. Reporting internet crimes can help bring criminals to justice and make the internet a safer place for us all.
With your help, the FBI can respond faster, better defend cyber networks, and more effectively protect our nation.
Read about recent trends and announcements that may affect you.
Knowledge is the key to prevention. Educate yourself about threats to individuals and business and ways to protect yourself.
Between staying connected with family and friends, shopping and banking online, and working remotely, we all depend on security in our interconnected digital world. Criminals from every corner of the globe attack our digital systems on a near constant basis. They strike targets large and small—from corporate networks to personal smart phones. No one—and no device—is immune from the threat. The only way forward is together. In cyber security, where a single compromise can impact millions of people, there can be no weak links. Every organization and every individual needs to take smart, reasonable steps to protect their own devices and systems and to learn how to spot and avoid scams.
Combined with other data, it allows the FBI to investigate reported crimes, track trends and threats, and, in some cases, even freeze stolen funds. Just as importantly, IC3 shares reports of crime throughout its vast network of FBI field offices and law enforcement partners, strengthening our nation’s collective response both locally and nationally.
Due to the massive number of complaints we receive each year, IC3 cannot respond directly to every submission, but please know we take each report seriously. With your help, we can and will respond faster, defend cyber networks better, and more effectively protect our nation.
Chart includes yearly and aggregate data for complaints and losses over the years 2018 to 2022. Over that time, IC3 received a total of 3.26 million complaints, reporting a loss of $27.6 billion.
Fri, 16 Aug 2024
Fri, 2 Aug 2024
Thu, 1 Aug 2024
Wed, 31 Jul 2024
Tue, 25 Jun 2024
Thu, 22 Aug 2024
Wed, 07 Aug 2024
Tue, 06 Aug 2024
Thu, 25 Jul 2024
Wed, 10 Jul 2024
Your loyalty strategy needs to consider four ways people value points.
Do consumers treat loyalty points the same way that they treat traditional money? And, how do they choose to spend one versus the other? The authors of this article present research findings from their analysis of data describing over 29,000 unique loyalty points earning and spending transactions made during two recent years by 500 airline loyalty program consumers. They found that points users fell into four distinct categories: 1) Money advocates, who prefer cash over points, even when their value is identical in terms of purchasing power; 2) Currency impartialists, who regard points and cash interchangeably, valuing them equally based on their financial worth; 3) Point gamers, who actively seek out the most advantageous point redemption opportunities, opting to spend points particularly when their value significantly surpasses that of cash; and 4) Point lovers, who value points more than money even if their purchase power is the same or lower. This article explores the strategic implications of these findings for companies that manage loyalty programs.
In the years since The Economist spotlighted the astonishing scale of loyalty points — particularly frequent-flyer miles — as a potential global currency rivaling traditional money in 2005, usage has grown rapidly in size and scope. For example, the number of flight redemptions at Southwest Airlines doubled from 5.4 million in 2013 (representing 9.5% of revenue passenger miles) to 10.9 million in 2023 (representing 16.3% of revenue passenger miles).
Most people — up to 94% of U.S. adults — experience at least some dulling of their senses with age, finding themselves squinting at screens, craving stronger flavors, and missing snatches of conversations more and more frequently. Researchers at the University of Chicago Medicine are looking into how these changes can go beyond mere inconvenience and actually worsen overall mental health in older adults.
“When your senses decline, you can't experience the world as well,” said Jayant Pinto, MD , a physician and expert in olfactory dysfunction at UChicago Medicine. “You can't hear colleagues or friends at the dinner table; you can't discern what's going on in your environment; you may have a hard time reading or making things out when you’re in your neighborhood. It makes all your cognitive burdens a little harder, and that probably wears you down over time and causes mental health problems.”
Along with Alexander Wang, a medical student at the UChicago Pritzker School of Medicine , Pinto recently led a study examining the prevalence and impact of sensory impairments among older adults. They found that people with sensory disabilities tend to have worse mental health, and that different types of sensory disability were associated with different aspects of mental health.
Revealing associations between perception and emotion
The UChicago researchers analyzed data on sensory function (vision, hearing and sense of smell) and self-reported mental health from nearly 4,000 older adults, collected over 10 years of follow-up as part of the National Social Life, Health & Aging Project . They found that people who had multiple senses impaired experienced more loneliness and had significantly worse self-reported mental health overall, and people with three sensory disabilities were more likely to experience frequent depressive episodes. In analyses that differentiated between the senses, vision impairment was most strongly associated with both loneliness and poor self-rated mental health.
Scientists are still exploring how changes in all five senses can impact people, but the UChicago researchers can already point to many ways sensory decline contributes directly to feelings of loneliness, sadness and boredom.
Older people with vision impairment may have trouble getting out of the house or seeing the faces of their friends and family, and hearing loss can make conversations stilted and frustrating. Even loss of smell can affect someone’s ability to find joy in familiar scents — like a favorite home-cooked meal or a loved one’s signature perfume — and perceive pheromones, which (though not registered consciously) contribute to social dynamics.
“We saw that hearing and vision disability tended to be associated with lower self-rated mental health and feelings of loneliness, but olfactory disability had a weaker association,” Wang said. “This stood out to me because hearing and vision disabilities tend to be much more stigmatized than olfactory disability. This made me reflect on the ways in which social stigma may be driving this worse mental health.”
Caring for one another in an aging society
In the face of that stigma, the researchers say their results highlight the importance of improving access to mental health services and increasing awareness of the connection between sensory loss and mental distress. In particular, understanding how different sensory disabilities impact the long-term mental health of older adults could help healthcare professionals — especially primary care providers, otolaryngologists and ophthalmologists — screen for mental health conditions when they identify sensory loss in their patients, providing opportunities for personalized and timely interventions.
In addition to proactively treating older adults’ mental health, the researchers pointed to steps that can be taken to directly lessen the day-to-day effects of sensory difficulties, which would in turn lessen their negative mental health implications.
“We have an aging society; everybody has a relative who's getting older and having a harder time in life. It’s a burden for us all to share,” Pinto said. “Lessening the burdens of your aging relatives and friends can have a huge impact on people's lives, their productivity and their quality of life.”
On a personal level, family members and friends can help by being patient and finding ways to communicate more effectively, such as speaking clearly or using written notes. On a societal level, public policies and community programs can ensure accessibility in public spaces and provide resources that improve quality of life.
Pinto also highlighted a wide range of technologies and medical interventions are available that can help compensate for sensory impairment. For hearing loss, there are cochlear implants, hearing aids and other hearing-assistive devices — which research has indicated could slow cognitive decline in addition to improving quality of life. For vision loss, there are glasses, contacts, cataract surgery and LASIK surgery, along with accommodations like text-to-speech computer programs. Even for the sense of smell, health experts can sometimes help by reducing sinus inflammation or conducting smell training exercises.
“In many cases, we can mitigate sensory difficulties in ways that might actually improve people's lives, mental health and sense of loneliness — which is a huge epidemic,” Pinto said. “These are simple ways we can intervene to help people and potentially have a huge impact on society.”
Recognizing and destigmatizing sensory disability
The researchers said they intentionally used the word “disability” throughout the paper to underscore the significant impact of sensory impairments on individuals' lives. This terminology also aligns with efforts to destigmatize these conditions and promote a more inclusive approach to healthcare.
“To some extent, our society already considers decreased sensory function to be a disability: think of the blind and d/Deaf communities,” Wang said. “Like many marginalized communities, the disabled community has historically had a very contentious relationship with the medical field, which can cause distress and limit access to mental health services. With better understanding and compassion, we can strive to improve the care we provide to older adults and disabled patients.”
He said that by framing the data this way, he hopes to encourage more healthcare providers to move away from thinking in terms of the Medical Model of Disability and move towards the Social Model of Disability.
“My understanding is that the Medical Model characterizes disability as something that is ‘deficient’ with a person, thus requiring some sort of ‘fixing’ of the individual,” he explained. “The Social Model characterizes disability as more of an identity, so limitations relating to disability stem from a society’s lack of accessibility and accommodation for disabled people.”
Recognizing sensory impairments as disabilities and acknowledging their impact on mental health are important steps toward more comprehensive and compassionate care. By addressing the medical, social and environmental barriers that exacerbate these impairments, clinicians — and society as a whole — can better support older adults in maintaining their independence
Jayant Pinto, MD, is a specialist in sinus and nasal diseases, including chronic sinusitis, allergic rhinitis and olfactory dysfunction. He serves as UChicago Medicine's Director of Rhinology and Allergy and Director of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Research.
Rio grande valley, texas news station highlights uc research.
Rio Grande Valley, Texas news station KRGV-TV highlighted University of Cincinnati Cancer Center researcher Andrew Frankart's new trial testing lattice therapy to provide more targeted radiation for patients with large tumors.
Lattice therapy is a technique where certain parts of tumors are preferentially targeted with higher doses of radiation compared to other areas.
"Right now, with radiation, we're more restricted to moderate doses that can help relieve symptoms and provide a temporary effect, but may not be sufficient dosing to provide a lasting impact or to control the tumor itself," Frankart, MD, a Cancer Center physician researcher and assistant professor of radiation oncology in UC’s College of Medicine, told KRGV. "The difference with lattice therapy is it's still using that arc to generate a plan, but we're purposefully making spheres or circles of higher dose within the target."
A five-year, $729,000 American Cancer Society/American Society for Radiation Oncology Clinician Scientist Development Grant is supporting the translation of Frankart’s initial findings into clinical practice through the clinical trial, which is expected to enroll 37 adult patients and analyze the underlying biology of tumor and immune responses to lattice therapy radiation.
“We’re focusing on patients who have large or bulky tumors. The approach is more based upon where it’s located and how large it is, and those are things that have previously prevented radiation from being as effective,” Frankart said. “Using this new approach to overcome some of those barriers hopefully means it can benefit more patients because we’re broadly including multiple disease sites.”
Read or watch the KRGV-TV story.
Read more about the trial.
Featured photo at top of Frankart in a radiation treatment room. Photo/Andrew Higley/UC Marketing + Brand.
August 19, 2024
Rio Grande Valley, Texas news station KRGV-TV highlighted University of Cincinnati Cancer Center researcher Andrew Frankart's new trial testing lattice therapy to provide more targeted radiation for patients with large tumors.
December 8, 2022
Physics World recognized the University of Cincinnati's first-in-human trial of FLASH radiotherapy as one of the Top 10 Breakthroughs of the Year for 2022.
October 25, 2022
National media outlets highlighted the results of the first-in-human trial of FLASH radiotherapy, led by University of Cincinnati Cancer Center researchers.
share this!
August 23, 2024
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies . Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
trusted source
by Rob Mitchum, University of Illinois at Chicago
Children's exposure to food and drink ads during kids' TV shows has dropped substantially since food and beverage makers pledged to stop advertising unhealthy fare during children's TV shows. Yet, according to research from the University of Illinois Chicago, children under 12 still see more than 1,000 food-related ads a year, most of them for unhealthy products.
For the study , published in JAMA Network Open , researchers analyzed television ratings and advertising data from 2013 through 2022. The study authors found that a dramatic decline in food and drink advertisements during kids' shows did not fully eliminate children's exposure to ads for products high in saturated fat, trans fat, total sugars and sodium.
"Kids are still seeing about a thousand ads per year on other programs, and the majority of ads that kids see are still for unhealthy products," said Lisa Powell, distinguished professor and director of health policy and administration in the UIC School of Public Health. "This is important as the World Health Organization has recognized that reducing children's exposure to unhealthy food and beverage advertisements is a key strategy for improving both children's diets and health."
In 2006, a group of food, beverage and restaurant companies pledged to only advertise healthy products on children's television programming, defined as shows where at least 35% of viewers are under the age of 12. Later revisions in 2014 and 2020 established nutritional criteria for what qualifies as unhealthy and therefore should not be advertised to young audiences.
Using television ratings data from The Nielsen Company, UIC researchers found that following changes in companies' self-regulation, the number of general food and beverage commercials seen during children's programs fell by over 95%. However, they found that 60% of the remaining food and beverage ads were still for unhealthy products.
And overall, kids under the age of 12 still saw more than 1,000 food-related advertisements per year, on average. Because of the steep decline in food and beverage ads during children's shows, as much as 90% of this exposure came from watching shows with lower child-audience shares.
That shift suggests that regulations against advertising unhealthy food and beverages during hours when children are likely to watch television would be more effective than focusing restrictions specifically on children's shows, the authors write.
The researchers also found a persistent racial difference in exposure to food-related advertisements. While the number of these ads seen by both Black and white children declined from 2013 to 2022, Black children saw significantly more advertisements than their white counterparts, due in part to more time spent watching television.
In general, children's time watching television has declined, indicating the need for research on their exposure to advertising on other media. Powell's group is in the early stages of launching a new project to measure the ads children encounter through social media platforms and digital entertainment.
"We know that the media kids consume is changing. They're spending more time on their mobile devices, whether it be a tablet or a phone, and they're seeing a lot of ads," Powell said. "We really need to understand where else the food companies target kids and what they're seeing."
In addition to Powell, UIC co-authors include Julien Leider, Rebecca Schermbeck and Aline Vandenbroeck, along with University of Connecticut co-author Jennifer Harris. The study was supported by grants from Bloomberg Philanthropies and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Explore further
Feedback to editors
9 hours ago
21 hours ago
22 hours ago
23 hours ago
Aug 23, 2024
Related stories.
May 15, 2019
Nov 6, 2017
Jun 17, 2021
Jul 12, 2024
Apr 5, 2022
Jul 21, 2021
Aug 22, 2024
Aug 21, 2024
Let us know if there is a problem with our content.
Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form . For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines ).
Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request
Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.
Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.
Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Medical Xpress in any form.
Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties.
More information Privacy policy
We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X's mission by getting a premium account.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Organizations should focus on five areas in 2023 to ensure their networks can enable the business. 1. Network automation and AIOps. The increase in corporate locations, devices and remote workers has led to an overwhelming number of devices that need to be configured, deployed and managed. Many organizations are already using network automation ...
Explore a curated list of 15 research topics covering the networking field with their respective possible methodology, research questions, and objectives. ... 2023). This research can be based on designing and implementing an IoT-enabled smart home/office network using Cisco Packet Tracer software. Logical workspace, all network devices ...
Here are eight network technologies you will want to pay particularly close attention to. 1. Unified SASE: Addresses hybrid workforce, hybrid clouds. Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE ...
The results provide the foundation for the 2023 Global Networking Trends Report, compiled in February 2023, which also includes executive perspectives and insights to provide guidance to help IT organizations evolve their networking models in support of dynamic business needs. Any use of the data in this document or in the report itself for any ...
Read this list of trends to learn more about the top networking trends impacting IT leaders. 1. Security and Budget Concerns Drive Adoption of NaaS. IT departments are continually looking for agility, resiliency, and the ability to quickly adapt to new technologies. For many organizations, cost, and scalability stand in the way of these goals.
A number of key trends are pervasive across the IT networking landscape in 2023, according to global analyst firm Forrester research. In a recent report, the analyst firm outlines the top trends ...
Here are Computer Weekly's top 10 networking stories of 2023. 1. Expereo on tap for Carlsberg to deliver connectivity in 40 countries. The Carlsberg Group, the world's third-largest brewer ...
September 18, 2023. 1 Min Read. Andriy Popov via Alamy. DOWNLOAD NOW. This year's State of Enterprise Networking Report examines how network management has changed over the last 12 months and where it might be headed in the future. With COVID-19 on the wane, most networking pros and the teams they support are back in the office at least part ...
A final word about 2023 network trends. These network trends for 2023 and beyond offer a lot to ponder. Vendors have typically been slow to implement cloud-native principles, but more advances are expected that will simplify operations across service domains and improve end-user experience.
The 2023 ACM / IRTF Applied Networking Research Workshop ( ANRW '23) was co-located with the IETF 117 meeting in San Francisco on 24 July 2023. The program included novel research work taking inspiration from topics and open problems discussed in the Internet Engineering Task Force ( IETF ), along with a keynote presentation, a panel, and ...
Below, I look at several networking areas and associated trends to see where might networking head in the new year. I'll try to keep my attempt grounded in reality and cover topics that can help you with planning for the new calendar year. 1. IT Security. Malware, data theft, ransomware, and similar security topics have seen significant ...
Topic 1: An evaluation of the network security during machine to machine communication in IoT. Research Aim: The research aims to evaluate the network security issues associated with M2M communication in IoT. Objectives: To evaluate the factors affecting the network security of IoT devices. To determine the methods for increasing data integrity ...
The ACM/IRTF Applied Networking Research Workshop 2023 (ANRW'23) is an academic workshop that provides a forum for researchers, vendors, network operators, and the Internet standards community to present and discuss emerging results in applied networking research, and to find inspiration from topics and open problems discussed at the IETF.The workshop will consist of a mix of invited talks ...
November 2023. Read More. 2023 Proceeding. Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery; New York; NY; United States; Conference: HotNets '23: The 22nd ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks Cambridge MA USA November 28 - 29, 2023. ISBN: 979-8-4007-0415-4. Published: 28 November 2023 ... While many network research papers address issues of ...
Overview. The Twenty-second ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets 2023) will bring together researchers in computer networks and systems to engage in a lively debate on the theory and practice of networking. HotNets provides a venue for discussing innovative ideas and for debating future research agendas in networking.
This survey paper provides a comprehensive overview of emerging technologies in networking, focusing on caching in Information-Centric Networking (ICN), context-aware radio access technology (RAT) selection in 5G ultra-dense networks, cryptocurrency adoption, and mobility support for routing in Low Power and Lossy Networks (LLNs). Adaptive RAT selection mechanisms are stressed in 5G context ...
Prior to joining F5, MacVittie was an award-winning Senior Technology Editor at Network Computing Magazine, where she authored articles on a variety of topics aimed at IT professionals. She holds a B.S. in Information and Computing Science from the University of Wisconsin at Green Bay, and an M.S. in Computer Science from Nova Southeastern ...
ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions.
Check out these 11 conferences throughout 2023 to learn the latest in computer networking. 1. Data Center World. When: May 8-11. Where: Austin, Texas. Cost: $199-$3,299. Where to register: https://datacenterworld.com. Data Center World is an IT infrastructure conference for innovators, technology business leaders and data center professionals ...
By. Bradley Mitchell. Updated on January 23, 2024. Computer network technology continues to develop in new and interesting ways. Here are five of the most important areas and trends to watch in the year ahead. 01. of 05. AI Will Continue to Expand. Nicolas Kovarik/IP3/Getty Images.
The report proposes new research directions to advance research. This paper discusses network security for secure data communication. ... March 2023 · Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and ...
Criminal Law. Cyber Security Future Research Topics. Developing more effective methods for detecting and responding to cyber attacks. Investigating the role of social media in cyber security. Examining the impact of cloud computing on cyber security. Investigating the security implications of the Internet of Things.
Services We Provide. Resources We Provide. Login / Register. 15 Latest Networking Research Topics for Students; Research Topics; Comparative analysis between snort and suricata ID
Amid national debates about what schools are teaching, we asked public K-12 teachers, teens and the American public how they see topics related to race, sexual orientation and gender identity playing out in the classroom.. A sizeable share of teachers (41%) say these debates have had a negative impact on their ability to do their job. Just 4% say these debates have had a positive impact, while ...
2023 5INTERNET CRIME REPORT THE IC3'S ROLE IN COMBATTING CYBER CRIME1 1 Accessibility description: Image lists the I 3's primary functions including partnering with private sector and with local, state, federal, and international agencies: hosting a reporting portal at www.ic3.gov; providing a central hub to
For example, the number of flight redemptions at Southwest Airlines doubled from 5.4 million in 2013 (representing 9.5% of revenue passenger miles) to 10.9 million in 2023 (representing 16.3% of ...
Most people — up to 94% of U.S. adults — experience at least some dulling of their senses with age, finding themselves squinting at screens, craving stronger flavors, and missing snatches of conversations more and more frequently. Researchers at the University of Chicago Medicine are looking into how these changes can go beyond mere inconvenience and actually worsen overall mental health ...
APA's 89 journals published more than 5,500 articles in 2023. Here are the top 10 most read. ... Topics in Psychology. Explore how scientific research by psychologists can inform our professional lives, family and community relationships, emotional wellness, and more. ... this research in Psychology of Popular Media (Vol. 12, ...
Lattice therapy can help target tumors August 19, 2024. Rio Grande Valley, Texas news station KRGV-TV highlighted University of Cincinnati Cancer Center researcher Andrew Frankart's new trial testing lattice therapy to provide more targeted radiation for patients with large tumors.
For the study, published in JAMA Network Open, researchers analyzed television ratings and advertising data from 2013 through 2022.The study authors found that a dramatic decline in food and drink ...