Experimental Psychology: 10 Examples & Definition
Dave Cornell (PhD)
Dr. Cornell has worked in education for more than 20 years. His work has involved designing teacher certification for Trinity College in London and in-service training for state governments in the United States. He has trained kindergarten teachers in 8 countries and helped businessmen and women open baby centers and kindergartens in 3 countries.
Learn about our Editorial Process
Chris Drew (PhD)
This article was peer-reviewed and edited by Chris Drew (PhD). The review process on Helpful Professor involves having a PhD level expert fact check, edit, and contribute to articles. Reviewers ensure all content reflects expert academic consensus and is backed up with reference to academic studies. Dr. Drew has published over 20 academic articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education and holds a PhD in Education from ACU.
Experimental psychology refers to studying psychological phenomena using scientific methods. Originally, the primary scientific method involved manipulating one variable and observing systematic changes in another variable.
Today, psychologists utilize several types of scientific methodologies.
Experimental psychology examines a wide range of psychological phenomena, including: memory, sensation and perception, cognitive processes, motivation, emotion, developmental processes, in addition to the neurophysiological concomitants of each of these subjects.
Studies are conducted on both animal and human participants, and must comply with stringent requirements and controls regarding the ethical treatment of both.
Definition of Experimental Psychology
Experimental psychology is a branch of psychology that utilizes scientific methods to investigate the mind and behavior.
It involves the systematic and controlled study of human and animal behavior through observation and experimentation .
Experimental psychologists design and conduct experiments to understand cognitive processes, perception, learning, memory, emotion, and many other aspects of psychology. They often manipulate variables ( independent variables ) to see how this affects behavior or mental processes (dependent variables).
The findings from experimental psychology research are often used to better understand human behavior and can be applied in a range of contexts, such as education, health, business, and more.
Experimental Psychology Examples
1. The Puzzle Box Studies (Thorndike, 1898) Placing different cats in a box that can only be escaped by pulling a cord, and then taking detailed notes on how long it took for them to escape allowed Edward Thorndike to derive the Law of Effect: actions followed by positive consequences are more likely to occur again, and actions followed by negative consequences are less likely to occur again (Thorndike, 1898).
2. Reinforcement Schedules (Skinner, 1956) By placing rats in a Skinner Box and changing when and how often the rats are rewarded for pressing a lever, it is possible to identify how each schedule results in different behavior patterns (Skinner, 1956). This led to a wide range of theoretical ideas around how rewards and consequences can shape the behaviors of both animals and humans.
3. Observational Learning (Bandura, 1980) Some children watch a video of an adult punching and kicking a Bobo doll. Other children watch a video in which the adult plays nicely with the doll. By carefully observing the children’s behavior later when in a room with a Bobo doll, researchers can determine if television violence affects children’s behavior (Bandura, 1980).
4. The Fallibility of Memory (Loftus & Palmer, 1974) A group of participants watch the same video of two cars having an accident. Two weeks later, some are asked to estimate the rate of speed the cars were going when they “smashed” into each other. Some participants are asked to estimate the rate of speed the cars were going when they “bumped” into each other. Changing the phrasing of the question changes the memory of the eyewitness.
5. Intrinsic Motivation in the Classroom (Dweck, 1990) To investigate the role of autonomy on intrinsic motivation, half of the students are told they are “free to choose” which tasks to complete. The other half of the students are told they “must choose” some of the tasks. Researchers then carefully observe how long the students engage in the tasks and later ask them some questions about if they enjoyed doing the tasks or not.
6. Systematic Desensitization (Wolpe, 1958) A clinical psychologist carefully documents his treatment of a patient’s social phobia with progressive relaxation. At first, the patient is trained to monitor, tense, and relax various muscle groups while viewing photos of parties. Weeks later, they approach a stranger to ask for directions, initiate a conversation on a crowded bus, and attend a small social gathering. The therapist’s notes are transcribed into a scientific report and published in a peer-reviewed journal.
7. Study of Remembering (Bartlett, 1932) Bartlett’s work is a seminal study in the field of memory, where he used the concept of “schema” to describe an organized pattern of thought or behavior. He conducted a series of experiments using folk tales to show that memory recall is influenced by cultural schemas and personal experiences.
8. Study of Obedience (Milgram, 1963) This famous study explored the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. Milgram found that a majority of participants were willing to administer what they believed were harmful electric shocks to a stranger when instructed by an authority figure, highlighting the power of authority and situational factors in driving behavior.
9. Pavlov’s Dog Study (Pavlov, 1927) Ivan Pavlov, a Russian physiologist, conducted a series of experiments that became a cornerstone in the field of experimental psychology. Pavlov noticed that dogs would salivate when they saw food. He then began to ring a bell each time he presented the food to the dogs. After a while, the dogs began to salivate merely at the sound of the bell. This experiment demonstrated the principle of “classical conditioning.”
10, Piaget’s Stages of Development (Piaget, 1958) Jean Piaget proposed a theory of cognitive development in children that consists of four distinct stages: the sensorimotor stage (birth to 2 years), where children learn about the world through their senses and motor activities, through to the the formal operational stage (12 years and beyond), where abstract reasoning and hypothetical thinking develop. Piaget’s theory is an example of experimental psychology as it was developed through systematic observation and experimentation on children’s problem-solving behaviors .
Types of Research Methodologies in Experimental Psychology
Researchers utilize several different types of research methodologies since the early days of Wundt (1832-1920).
1. The Experiment
The experiment involves the researcher manipulating the level of one variable, called the Independent Variable (IV), and then observing changes in another variable, called the Dependent Variable (DV).
The researcher is interested in determining if the IV causes changes in the DV. For example, does television violence make children more aggressive?
So, some children in the study, called research participants, will watch a show with TV violence, called the treatment group. Others will watch a show with no TV violence, called the control group.
So, there are two levels of the IV: violence and no violence. Next, children will be observed to see if they act more aggressively. This is the DV.
If TV violence makes children more aggressive, then the children that watched the violent show will me more aggressive than the children that watched the non-violent show.
A key requirement of the experiment is random assignment . Each research participant is assigned to one of the two groups in a way that makes it a completely random process. This means that each group will have a mix of children: different personality types, diverse family backgrounds, and range of intelligence levels.
2. The Longitudinal Study
A longitudinal study involves selecting a sample of participants and then following them for years, or decades, periodically collecting data on the variables of interest.
For example, a researcher might be interested in determining if parenting style affects academic performance of children. Parenting style is called the predictor variable , and academic performance is called the outcome variable .
Researchers will begin by randomly selecting a group of children to be in the study. Then, they will identify the type of parenting practices used when the children are 4 and 5 years old.
A few years later, perhaps when the children are 8 and 9, the researchers will collect data on their grades. This process can be repeated over the next 10 years, including through college.
If parenting style has an effect on academic performance, then the researchers will see a connection between the predictor variable and outcome variable.
Children raised with parenting style X will have higher grades than children raised with parenting style Y.
3. The Case Study
The case study is an in-depth study of one individual. This is a research methodology often used early in the examination of a psychological phenomenon or therapeutic treatment.
For example, in the early days of treating phobias, a clinical psychologist may try teaching one of their patients how to relax every time they see the object that creates so much fear and anxiety, such as a large spider.
The therapist would take very detailed notes on how the teaching process was implemented and the reactions of the patient. When the treatment had been completed, those notes would be written in a scientific form and submitted for publication in a scientific journal for other therapists to learn from.
There are several other types of methodologies available which vary different aspects of the three described above. The researcher will select a methodology that is most appropriate to the phenomenon they want to examine.
They also must take into account various practical considerations such as how much time and resources are needed to complete the study. Conducting research always costs money.
People and equipment are needed to carry-out every study, so researchers often try to obtain funding from their university or a government agency.
Origins and Key Developments in Experimental Psychology
Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt (1832-1920) is considered one of the fathers of modern psychology. He was a physiologist and philosopher and helped establish psychology as a distinct discipline (Khaleefa, 1999).
In 1879 he established the world’s first psychology research lab at the University of Leipzig. This is considered a key milestone for establishing psychology as a scientific discipline. In addition to being the first person to use the term “psychologist,” to describe himself, he also founded the discipline’s first scientific journal Philosphische Studien in 1883.
Another notable figure in the development of experimental psychology is Ernest Weber . Trained as a physician, Weber studied sensation and perception and created the first quantitative law in psychology.
The equation denotes how judgments of sensory differences are relative to previous levels of sensation, referred to as the just-noticeable difference (jnd). This is known today as Weber’s Law (Hergenhahn, 2009).
Gustav Fechner , one of Weber’s students, published the first book on experimental psychology in 1860, titled Elemente der Psychophysik. His worked centered on the measurement of psychophysical facets of sensation and perception, with many of his methods still in use today.
The first American textbook on experimental psychology was Elements of Physiological Psychology, published in 1887 by George Trumball Ladd .
Ladd also established a psychology lab at Yale University, while Stanley Hall and Charles Sanders continued Wundt’s work at a lab at Johns Hopkins University.
In the late 1800s, Charles Pierce’s contribution to experimental psychology is especially noteworthy because he invented the concept of random assignment (Stigler, 1992; Dehue, 1997).
Go Deeper: 15 Random Assignment Examples
This procedure ensures that each participant has an equal chance of being placed in any of the experimental groups (e.g., treatment or control group). This eliminates the influence of confounding factors related to inherent characteristics of the participants.
Random assignment is a fundamental criterion for a study to be considered a valid experiment.
From there, experimental psychology flourished in the 20th century as a science and transformed into an approach utilized in cognitive psychology, developmental psychology, and social psychology .
Today, the term experimental psychology refers to the study of a wide range of phenomena and involves methodologies not limited to the manipulation of variables.
The Scientific Process and Experimental Psychology
The one thing that makes psychology a science and distinguishes it from its roots in philosophy is the reliance upon the scientific process to answer questions. This makes psychology a science was the main goal of its earliest founders such as Wilhelm Wundt.
There are numerous steps in the scientific process, outlined in the graphic below.
1. Observation
First, the scientist observes an interesting phenomenon that sparks a question. For example, are the memories of eyewitnesses really reliable, or are they subject to bias or unintentional manipulation?
2. Hypothesize
Next, this question is converted into a testable hypothesis. For instance: the words used to question a witness can influence what they think they remember.
3. Devise a Study
Then the researcher(s) select a methodology that will allow them to test that hypothesis. In this case, the researchers choose the experiment, which will involve randomly assigning some participants to different conditions.
In one condition, participants are asked a question that implies a certain memory (treatment group), while other participants are asked a question which is phrased neutrally and does not imply a certain memory (control group).
The researchers then write a proposal that describes in detail the procedures they want to use, how participants will be selected, and the safeguards they will employ to ensure the rights of the participants.
That proposal is submitted to an Institutional Review Board (IRB). The IRB is comprised of a panel of researchers, community representatives, and other professionals that are responsible for reviewing all studies involving human participants.
4. Conduct the Study
If the IRB accepts the proposal, then the researchers may begin collecting data. After the data has been collected, it is analyzed using a software program such as SPSS.
Those analyses will either support or reject the hypothesis. That is, either the participants’ memories were affected by the wording of the question, or not.
5. Publish the study
Finally, the researchers write a paper detailing their procedures and results of the statistical analyses. That paper is then submitted to a scientific journal.
The lead editor of that journal will then send copies of the paper to 3-5 experts in that subject. Each of those experts will read the paper and basically try to find as many things wrong with it as possible. Because they are experts, they are very good at this task.
After reading those critiques, most likely, the editor will send the paper back to the researchers and require that they respond to the criticisms, collect more data, or reject the paper outright.
In some cases, the study was so well-done that the criticisms were minimal and the editor accepts the paper. It then gets published in the scientific journal several months later.
That entire process can easily take 2 years, usually more. But, the findings of that study went through a very rigorous process. This means that we can have substantial confidence that the conclusions of the study are valid.
Experimental psychology refers to utilizing a scientific process to investigate psychological phenomenon.
There are a variety of methods employed today. They are used to study a wide range of subjects, including memory, cognitive processes, emotions and the neurophysiological basis of each.
The history of psychology as a science began in the 1800s primarily in Germany. As interest grew, the field expanded to the United States where several influential research labs were established.
As more methodologies were developed, the field of psychology as a science evolved into a prolific scientific discipline that has provided invaluable insights into human behavior.
Bartlett, F. C., & Bartlett, F. C. (1995). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology . Cambridge university press.
Dehue, T. (1997). Deception, efficiency, and random groups: Psychology and the gradual origination of the random group design. Isis , 88 (4), 653-673.
Ebbinghaus, H. (2013). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Annals of neurosciences , 20 (4), 155.
Hergenhahn, B. R. (2009). An introduction to the history of psychology. Belmont. CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning .
Khaleefa, O. (1999). Who is the founder of psychophysics and experimental psychology? American Journal of Islam and Society , 16 (2), 1-26.
Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of auto-mobile destruction : An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal behavior , 13, 585-589.
Pavlov, I.P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes . Dover, New York.
Piaget, J. (1959). The language and thought of the child (Vol. 5). Psychology Press.
Piaget, J., Fraisse, P., & Reuchlin, M. (2014). Experimental psychology its scope and method: Volume I (Psychology Revivals): History and method . Psychology Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1956). A case history in scientlfic method. American Psychologist, 11 , 221-233
Stigler, S. M. (1992). A historical view of statistical concepts in psychology and educational research. American Journal of Education , 101 (1), 60-70.
Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Review Monograph Supplement 2 .
Wolpe, J. (1958). Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Appendix: Images reproduced as Text
Definition: Experimental psychology is a branch of psychology that focuses on conducting systematic and controlled experiments to study human behavior and cognition.
Overview: Experimental psychology aims to gather empirical evidence and explore cause-and-effect relationships between variables. Experimental psychologists utilize various research methods, including laboratory experiments, surveys, and observations, to investigate topics such as perception, memory, learning, motivation, and social behavior .
Example: The Pavlov’s Dog experimental psychology experiment used scientific methods to develop a theory about how learning and association occur in animals. The same concepts were subsequently used in the study of humans, wherein psychology-based ideas about learning were developed. Pavlov’s use of the empirical evidence was foundational to the study’s success.
Experimental Psychology Milestones:
1890: William James publishes “The Principles of Psychology”, a foundational text in the field of psychology.
1896: Lightner Witmer opens the first psychological clinic at the University of Pennsylvania, marking the beginning of clinical psychology.
1913: John B. Watson publishes “Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It”, marking the beginning of Behaviorism.
1920: Hermann Rorschach introduces the Rorschach inkblot test.
1938: B.F. Skinner introduces the concept of operant conditioning .
1967: Ulric Neisser publishes “Cognitive Psychology” , marking the beginning of the cognitive revolution.
1980: The third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) is published, introducing a new classification system for mental disorders.
The Scientific Process
- Observe an interesting phenomenon
- Formulate testable hypothesis
- Select methodology and design study
- Submit research proposal to IRB
- Collect and analyzed data; write paper
- Submit paper for critical reviews
- Dave Cornell (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/dave-cornell-phd/ 23 Achieved Status Examples
- Dave Cornell (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/dave-cornell-phd/ 25 Defense Mechanisms Examples
- Dave Cornell (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/dave-cornell-phd/ 15 Theory of Planned Behavior Examples
- Dave Cornell (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/dave-cornell-phd/ 18 Adaptive Behavior Examples
- Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 23 Achieved Status Examples
- Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 15 Ableism Examples
- Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 25 Defense Mechanisms Examples
- Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 15 Theory of Planned Behavior Examples
Leave a Comment Cancel Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
B.A. in Psychology
What Is Experimental Psychology?
The science of psychology spans several fields. There are dozens of disciplines in psychology, including abnormal psychology, cognitive psychology and social psychology.
One way to view these fields is to separate them into two types: applied vs. experimental psychology. These groups describe virtually any type of work in psychology.
The following sections explore what experimental psychology is and some examples of what it covers.
Experimental psychology seeks to explore and better understand behavior through empirical research methods. This work allows findings to be employed in real-world applications (applied psychology) across fields such as clinical psychology, educational psychology, forensic psychology, sports psychology, and social psychology. Experimental psychology is able to shed light on people’s personalities and life experiences by examining what the way people behave and how behavior is shaped throughout life, along with other theoretical questions. The field looks at a wide range of behavioral topics including sensation, perception, attention, memory, cognition, and emotion, according to the American Psychological Association (APA).
Research is the focus of experimental psychology. Using scientific methods to collect data and perform research, experimental psychology focuses on certain questions, and, one study at a time, reveals information that contributes to larger findings or a conclusion. Due to the breadth and depth of certain areas of study, researchers can spend their entire careers looking at a complex research question.
Experimental Psychology in Action
The APA writes about one experimental psychologist, Robert McCann, who is now retired after 19 years working at NASA. During his time at NASA, his work focused on the user experience — on land and in space — where he applied his expertise to cockpit system displays, navigation systems, and safety displays used by astronauts in NASA spacecraft. McCann’s knowledge of human information processing allowed him to help NASA design shuttle displays that can increase the safety of shuttle missions. He looked at human limitations of attention and display processing to gauge what people can reliably see and correctly interpret on an instrument panel. McCann played a key role in helping determining the features of cockpit displays without overloading the pilot or taxing their attention span.
“One of the purposes of the display was to alert the astronauts to the presence of a failure that interrupted power in a specific region,” McCann said, “The most obvious way to depict this interruption was to simply remove (or dim) the white line(s) connecting the affected components. Basic research on visual attention has shown that humans do not notice the removal of a display feature very easily when the display is highly cluttered. We are much better at noticing a feature or object that is suddenly added to a display.” McCann utilized his knowledge in experimental psychology to research and develop this very important development for NASA.
Valve Corporation
Another experimental psychologist, Mike Ambinder, uses his expertise to help design video games. He is a senior experimental psychologist at Valve Corporation, a video game developer and developer of the software distribution platform Steam. Ambinder told Orlando Weekly that his career working on gaming hits such as Portal 2 and Left 4 Dead “epitomizes the intersection between scientific innovation and electronic entertainment.” His career started when he gave a presentation to Valve on applying psychology to game design; this occurred while he was finishing his PhD in experimental design. “I’m very lucky to have landed at a company where freedom and autonomy and analytical decision-making are prized,” he said. “I realized how fortunate I was to work for a company that would encourage someone with a background in psychology to see what they could contribute in a field where they had no prior experience.”
Ambinder spends his time on data analysis, hardware research, play-testing methodologies, and on any aspect of games where knowledge of human behavior could be useful. Ambinder described Valve’s process for refining a product as straightforward. “We come up with a game design (our hypothesis), and we place it in front of people external to the company (our play-test or experiment). We gather their feedback, and then iterate and improve the design (refining the theory). It’s essentially the scientific method applied to game design, and the end result is the consequence of many hours of applying this process.” To gather play-test data, Ambinder is engaged in the newer field of biofeedback technology, which can quantify gamers’ enjoyment. His research looks at unobtrusive measurements of facial expressions that can achieve such goals. Ambinder is also examining eye-tracking as a next-generation input method.
Pursue Your Career Goals in Psychology
Develop a greater understanding of psychology concepts and applications with Concordia St. Paul’s online bachelor’s in psychology . Enjoy small class sizes with a personal learning environment geared toward your success, and learn from knowledgeable faculty who have industry experience.
- History & Society
- Science & Tech
- Biographies
- Animals & Nature
- Geography & Travel
- Arts & Culture
- Games & Quizzes
- On This Day
- One Good Fact
- New Articles
- Lifestyles & Social Issues
- Philosophy & Religion
- Politics, Law & Government
- World History
- Health & Medicine
- Browse Biographies
- Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
- Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
- Environment
- Fossils & Geologic Time
- Entertainment & Pop Culture
- Sports & Recreation
- Visual Arts
- Demystified
- Image Galleries
- Infographics
- Top Questions
- Britannica Kids
- Saving Earth
- Space Next 50
- Student Center
experimental psychology
Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.
- Verywell Mind - How Does Experimental Psychology Study Behavior?
experimental psychology , a method of studying psychological phenomena and processes. The experimental method in psychology attempts to account for the activities of animals (including humans) and the functional organization of mental processes by manipulating variables that may give rise to behaviour; it is primarily concerned with discovering laws that describe manipulable relationships. The term generally connotes all areas of psychology that use the experimental method.
These areas include the study of sensation and perception , learning and memory , motivation , and biological psychology . There are experimental branches in many other areas, however, including child psychology , clinical psychology , educational psychology , and social psychology . Usually the experimental psychologist deals with normal, intact organisms; in biological psychology, however, studies are often conducted with organisms modified by surgery, radiation, drug treatment, or long-standing deprivations of various kinds or with organisms that naturally present organic abnormalities or emotional disorders. See also psychophysics .
- Bipolar Disorder
- Therapy Center
- When To See a Therapist
- Types of Therapy
- Best Online Therapy
- Best Couples Therapy
- Managing Stress
- Sleep and Dreaming
- Understanding Emotions
- Self-Improvement
- Healthy Relationships
- Student Resources
- Personality Types
- Guided Meditations
- Verywell Mind Insights
- 2024 Verywell Mind 25
- Mental Health in the Classroom
- Editorial Process
- Meet Our Review Board
- Crisis Support
How the Experimental Method Works in Psychology
sturti/Getty Images
The Experimental Process
Types of experiments, potential pitfalls of the experimental method.
The experimental method is a type of research procedure that involves manipulating variables to determine if there is a cause-and-effect relationship. The results obtained through the experimental method are useful but do not prove with 100% certainty that a singular cause always creates a specific effect. Instead, they show the probability that a cause will or will not lead to a particular effect.
At a Glance
While there are many different research techniques available, the experimental method allows researchers to look at cause-and-effect relationships. Using the experimental method, researchers randomly assign participants to a control or experimental group and manipulate levels of an independent variable. If changes in the independent variable lead to changes in the dependent variable, it indicates there is likely a causal relationship between them.
What Is the Experimental Method in Psychology?
The experimental method involves manipulating one variable to determine if this causes changes in another variable. This method relies on controlled research methods and random assignment of study subjects to test a hypothesis.
For example, researchers may want to learn how different visual patterns may impact our perception. Or they might wonder whether certain actions can improve memory . Experiments are conducted on many behavioral topics, including:
The scientific method forms the basis of the experimental method. This is a process used to determine the relationship between two variables—in this case, to explain human behavior .
Positivism is also important in the experimental method. It refers to factual knowledge that is obtained through observation, which is considered to be trustworthy.
When using the experimental method, researchers first identify and define key variables. Then they formulate a hypothesis, manipulate the variables, and collect data on the results. Unrelated or irrelevant variables are carefully controlled to minimize the potential impact on the experiment outcome.
History of the Experimental Method
The idea of using experiments to better understand human psychology began toward the end of the nineteenth century. Wilhelm Wundt established the first formal laboratory in 1879.
Wundt is often called the father of experimental psychology. He believed that experiments could help explain how psychology works, and used this approach to study consciousness .
Wundt coined the term "physiological psychology." This is a hybrid of physiology and psychology, or how the body affects the brain.
Other early contributors to the development and evolution of experimental psychology as we know it today include:
- Gustav Fechner (1801-1887), who helped develop procedures for measuring sensations according to the size of the stimulus
- Hermann von Helmholtz (1821-1894), who analyzed philosophical assumptions through research in an attempt to arrive at scientific conclusions
- Franz Brentano (1838-1917), who called for a combination of first-person and third-person research methods when studying psychology
- Georg Elias Müller (1850-1934), who performed an early experiment on attitude which involved the sensory discrimination of weights and revealed how anticipation can affect this discrimination
Key Terms to Know
To understand how the experimental method works, it is important to know some key terms.
Dependent Variable
The dependent variable is the effect that the experimenter is measuring. If a researcher was investigating how sleep influences test scores, for example, the test scores would be the dependent variable.
Independent Variable
The independent variable is the variable that the experimenter manipulates. In the previous example, the amount of sleep an individual gets would be the independent variable.
A hypothesis is a tentative statement or a guess about the possible relationship between two or more variables. In looking at how sleep influences test scores, the researcher might hypothesize that people who get more sleep will perform better on a math test the following day. The purpose of the experiment, then, is to either support or reject this hypothesis.
Operational definitions are necessary when performing an experiment. When we say that something is an independent or dependent variable, we must have a very clear and specific definition of the meaning and scope of that variable.
Extraneous Variables
Extraneous variables are other variables that may also affect the outcome of an experiment. Types of extraneous variables include participant variables, situational variables, demand characteristics, and experimenter effects. In some cases, researchers can take steps to control for extraneous variables.
Demand Characteristics
Demand characteristics are subtle hints that indicate what an experimenter is hoping to find in a psychology experiment. This can sometimes cause participants to alter their behavior, which can affect the results of the experiment.
Intervening Variables
Intervening variables are factors that can affect the relationship between two other variables.
Confounding Variables
Confounding variables are variables that can affect the dependent variable, but that experimenters cannot control for. Confounding variables can make it difficult to determine if the effect was due to changes in the independent variable or if the confounding variable may have played a role.
Psychologists, like other scientists, use the scientific method when conducting an experiment. The scientific method is a set of procedures and principles that guide how scientists develop research questions, collect data, and come to conclusions.
The five basic steps of the experimental process are:
- Identifying a problem to study
- Devising the research protocol
- Conducting the experiment
- Analyzing the data collected
- Sharing the findings (usually in writing or via presentation)
Most psychology students are expected to use the experimental method at some point in their academic careers. Learning how to conduct an experiment is important to understanding how psychologists prove and disprove theories in this field.
There are a few different types of experiments that researchers might use when studying psychology. Each has pros and cons depending on the participants being studied, the hypothesis, and the resources available to conduct the research.
Lab Experiments
Lab experiments are common in psychology because they allow experimenters more control over the variables. These experiments can also be easier for other researchers to replicate. The drawback of this research type is that what takes place in a lab is not always what takes place in the real world.
Field Experiments
Sometimes researchers opt to conduct their experiments in the field. For example, a social psychologist interested in researching prosocial behavior might have a person pretend to faint and observe how long it takes onlookers to respond.
This type of experiment can be a great way to see behavioral responses in realistic settings. But it is more difficult for researchers to control the many variables existing in these settings that could potentially influence the experiment's results.
Quasi-Experiments
While lab experiments are known as true experiments, researchers can also utilize a quasi-experiment. Quasi-experiments are often referred to as natural experiments because the researchers do not have true control over the independent variable.
A researcher looking at personality differences and birth order, for example, is not able to manipulate the independent variable in the situation (personality traits). Participants also cannot be randomly assigned because they naturally fall into pre-existing groups based on their birth order.
So why would a researcher use a quasi-experiment? This is a good choice in situations where scientists are interested in studying phenomena in natural, real-world settings. It's also beneficial if there are limits on research funds or time.
Field experiments can be either quasi-experiments or true experiments.
Examples of the Experimental Method in Use
The experimental method can provide insight into human thoughts and behaviors, Researchers use experiments to study many aspects of psychology.
A 2019 study investigated whether splitting attention between electronic devices and classroom lectures had an effect on college students' learning abilities. It found that dividing attention between these two mediums did not affect lecture comprehension. However, it did impact long-term retention of the lecture information, which affected students' exam performance.
An experiment used participants' eye movements and electroencephalogram (EEG) data to better understand cognitive processing differences between experts and novices. It found that experts had higher power in their theta brain waves than novices, suggesting that they also had a higher cognitive load.
A study looked at whether chatting online with a computer via a chatbot changed the positive effects of emotional disclosure often received when talking with an actual human. It found that the effects were the same in both cases.
One experimental study evaluated whether exercise timing impacts information recall. It found that engaging in exercise prior to performing a memory task helped improve participants' short-term memory abilities.
Sometimes researchers use the experimental method to get a bigger-picture view of psychological behaviors and impacts. For example, one 2018 study examined several lab experiments to learn more about the impact of various environmental factors on building occupant perceptions.
A 2020 study set out to determine the role that sensation-seeking plays in political violence. This research found that sensation-seeking individuals have a higher propensity for engaging in political violence. It also found that providing access to a more peaceful, yet still exciting political group helps reduce this effect.
While the experimental method can be a valuable tool for learning more about psychology and its impacts, it also comes with a few pitfalls.
Experiments may produce artificial results, which are difficult to apply to real-world situations. Similarly, researcher bias can impact the data collected. Results may not be able to be reproduced, meaning the results have low reliability .
Since humans are unpredictable and their behavior can be subjective, it can be hard to measure responses in an experiment. In addition, political pressure may alter the results. The subjects may not be a good representation of the population, or groups used may not be comparable.
And finally, since researchers are human too, results may be degraded due to human error.
What This Means For You
Every psychological research method has its pros and cons. The experimental method can help establish cause and effect, and it's also beneficial when research funds are limited or time is of the essence.
At the same time, it's essential to be aware of this method's pitfalls, such as how biases can affect the results or the potential for low reliability. Keeping these in mind can help you review and assess research studies more accurately, giving you a better idea of whether the results can be trusted or have limitations.
Colorado State University. Experimental and quasi-experimental research .
American Psychological Association. Experimental psychology studies human and animals .
Mayrhofer R, Kuhbandner C, Lindner C. The practice of experimental psychology: An inevitably postmodern endeavor . Front Psychol . 2021;11:612805. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612805
Mandler G. A History of Modern Experimental Psychology .
Stanford University. Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt . Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Britannica. Gustav Fechner .
Britannica. Hermann von Helmholtz .
Meyer A, Hackert B, Weger U. Franz Brentano and the beginning of experimental psychology: implications for the study of psychological phenomena today . Psychol Res . 2018;82:245-254. doi:10.1007/s00426-016-0825-7
Britannica. Georg Elias Müller .
McCambridge J, de Bruin M, Witton J. The effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings: A systematic review . PLoS ONE . 2012;7(6):e39116. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039116
Laboratory experiments . In: The Sage Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Allen M, ed. SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:10.4135/9781483381411.n287
Schweizer M, Braun B, Milstone A. Research methods in healthcare epidemiology and antimicrobial stewardship — quasi-experimental designs . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol . 2016;37(10):1135-1140. doi:10.1017/ice.2016.117
Glass A, Kang M. Dividing attention in the classroom reduces exam performance . Educ Psychol . 2019;39(3):395-408. doi:10.1080/01443410.2018.1489046
Keskin M, Ooms K, Dogru AO, De Maeyer P. Exploring the cognitive load of expert and novice map users using EEG and eye tracking . ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf . 2020;9(7):429. doi:10.3390.ijgi9070429
Ho A, Hancock J, Miner A. Psychological, relational, and emotional effects of self-disclosure after conversations with a chatbot . J Commun . 2018;68(4):712-733. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy026
Haynes IV J, Frith E, Sng E, Loprinzi P. Experimental effects of acute exercise on episodic memory function: Considerations for the timing of exercise . Psychol Rep . 2018;122(5):1744-1754. doi:10.1177/0033294118786688
Torresin S, Pernigotto G, Cappelletti F, Gasparella A. Combined effects of environmental factors on human perception and objective performance: A review of experimental laboratory works . Indoor Air . 2018;28(4):525-538. doi:10.1111/ina.12457
Schumpe BM, Belanger JJ, Moyano M, Nisa CF. The role of sensation seeking in political violence: An extension of the significance quest theory . J Personal Social Psychol . 2020;118(4):743-761. doi:10.1037/pspp0000223
By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."
Experimental Psychology Studies Humans and Animals
Understanding Experimental Psychology
Our personalities, and to some degree our life experiences, are defined by the way we behave. But what influences the way we behave in the first place? How does our behavior shape our experiences throughout our lives?
Experimental psychologists are interested in exploring theoretical questions, often by creating a hypothesis and then setting out to prove or disprove it through experimentation. They study a wide range of behavioral topics among humans and animals, including sensation, perception, attention, memory, cognition and emotion.
Experimental Psychology Applied
Experimental psychologists use scientific methods to collect data and perform research. Often, their work builds, one study at a time, to a larger finding or conclusion. Some researchers have devoted their entire career to answering one complex research question.
These psychologists work in a variety of settings, including universities, research centers, government agencies and private businesses. The focus of their research is as varied as the settings in which they work. Often, personal interest and educational background will influence the research questions they choose to explore.
In a sense, all psychologists can be considered experimental psychologists since research is the foundation of the discipline, and many psychologists split their professional focus among research, patient care, teaching or program administration. Experimental psychologists, however, often devote their full attention to research — its design, execution, analysis and dissemination.
Those focusing their careers specifically on experimental psychology contribute work across subfields . For example, they use scientific research to provide insights that improve teaching and learning, create safer workplaces and transportation systems, improve substance abuse treatment programs and promote healthy child development.
Related books
Deliberate Practice in Interpersonal Psychotherapy
Psychological Assessment of Emotional ...
APA Handbook of Health Psychology
Methodological Issues and Strategies, 5e
Essentials of Constructivist Critical Incident ...
Psychology subfields
Experimental Psychology
Definition:
Experimental psychology is a subfield of psychology that focuses on scientific investigation and research methods to study human behavior and mental processes. It involves conducting controlled experiments to examine hypotheses and gather empirical data.
Subfields of Experimental Psychology:
Sensory processes:.
Sensory processes in experimental psychology involve understanding how humans perceive and process information through their senses, such as vision, hearing, taste, smell, and touch.
Learning and Memory:
This subfield explores how individuals acquire and retain knowledge and skills, including the study of different types of memory, learning strategies, and factors that influence memory processes.
Cognitive Psychology:
Cognitive psychology examines mental processes, including attention, perception, problem-solving, decision-making, language, and thinking. It investigates how individuals process information, solve problems, and make decisions.
Developmental Psychology:
Developmental psychology focuses on the study of human development across the lifespan, from infancy to old age. It investigates how individuals change physically, cognitively, and emotionally as they grow and mature.
Social Psychology:
Social psychology studies how individuals’ thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are influenced by social interactions and social environments. It examines topics such as conformity, persuasion, group dynamics, and intergroup relations.
Personality Psychology:
Personality psychology aims to understand individual differences in behavior, thoughts, and emotions. It investigates various personality traits, their development, and how they influence behavior and well-being.
Psychopathology:
This subfield focuses on the study of mental disorders, their causes, symptoms, and treatments. Psychopathology research is often conducted using experimental methods to examine the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.
Psychopharmacology:
Psychopharmacology involves studying the effects of drugs on behavior, cognition, and emotions. It examines how different medications impact mental processes and aims to develop effective pharmacological treatments for psychological disorders.
Neuropsychology:
Neuropsychology investigates the relationship between brain function and behavior. It examines how brain damage, genetics, and neurological disorders affect cognitive abilities, emotions, and behavior.
- Daily Crossword
- Word Puzzle
- Word Finder
- Word of the Day
- Synonym of the Day
- Word of the Year
- Language stories
- All featured
- Gender and sexuality
- All pop culture
- Writing hub
- Grammar essentials
- Commonly confused
- All writing tips
- Pop culture
- Writing tips
Advertisement
experimental psychology
- the branch of psychology dealing with the study of emotional and mental activity, as learning, in humans and other animals by means of experimental methods.
- the scientific study of the individual behaviour of man and other animals, esp of perception, learning, memory, motor skills, and thinking
Word History and Origins
Origin of experimental psychology 1
Example Sentences
Although experimental psychology originated in Germany in 1879, Watson’s notorious study foreshadowed a messy, contentious approach to the “science of us” that has played out over the last 100 years.
The effect’s existence has since become one of the most robust findings in all of experimental psychology.
Experimental psychology began about twenty-five years ago; at that time there existed one psychological laboratory.
Experimental psychology is but a half-century old; educational psychology, less than a quarter-century old.
His demonstrations were conducted along lines familiar to all students of experimental psychology.
The early history of experimental psychology in America once occasioned discussion.
So experimental psychology needs as its starting point an exact definition of the technique to be used in making the experiment.
Experimental Design: Types, Examples & Methods
Saul McLeod, PhD
Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester
Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Learn about our Editorial Process
Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc
Associate Editor for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education
Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.
On This Page:
Experimental design refers to how participants are allocated to different groups in an experiment. Types of design include repeated measures, independent groups, and matched pairs designs.
Probably the most common way to design an experiment in psychology is to divide the participants into two groups, the experimental group and the control group, and then introduce a change to the experimental group, not the control group.
The researcher must decide how he/she will allocate their sample to the different experimental groups. For example, if there are 10 participants, will all 10 participants participate in both groups (e.g., repeated measures), or will the participants be split in half and take part in only one group each?
Three types of experimental designs are commonly used:
1. Independent Measures
Independent measures design, also known as between-groups , is an experimental design where different participants are used in each condition of the independent variable. This means that each condition of the experiment includes a different group of participants.
This should be done by random allocation, ensuring that each participant has an equal chance of being assigned to one group.
Independent measures involve using two separate groups of participants, one in each condition. For example:
- Con : More people are needed than with the repeated measures design (i.e., more time-consuming).
- Pro : Avoids order effects (such as practice or fatigue) as people participate in one condition only. If a person is involved in several conditions, they may become bored, tired, and fed up by the time they come to the second condition or become wise to the requirements of the experiment!
- Con : Differences between participants in the groups may affect results, for example, variations in age, gender, or social background. These differences are known as participant variables (i.e., a type of extraneous variable ).
- Control : After the participants have been recruited, they should be randomly assigned to their groups. This should ensure the groups are similar, on average (reducing participant variables).
2. Repeated Measures Design
Repeated Measures design is an experimental design where the same participants participate in each independent variable condition. This means that each experiment condition includes the same group of participants.
Repeated Measures design is also known as within-groups or within-subjects design .
- Pro : As the same participants are used in each condition, participant variables (i.e., individual differences) are reduced.
- Con : There may be order effects. Order effects refer to the order of the conditions affecting the participants’ behavior. Performance in the second condition may be better because the participants know what to do (i.e., practice effect). Or their performance might be worse in the second condition because they are tired (i.e., fatigue effect). This limitation can be controlled using counterbalancing.
- Pro : Fewer people are needed as they participate in all conditions (i.e., saves time).
- Control : To combat order effects, the researcher counter-balances the order of the conditions for the participants. Alternating the order in which participants perform in different conditions of an experiment.
Counterbalancing
Suppose we used a repeated measures design in which all of the participants first learned words in “loud noise” and then learned them in “no noise.”
We expect the participants to learn better in “no noise” because of order effects, such as practice. However, a researcher can control for order effects using counterbalancing.
The sample would be split into two groups: experimental (A) and control (B). For example, group 1 does ‘A’ then ‘B,’ and group 2 does ‘B’ then ‘A.’ This is to eliminate order effects.
Although order effects occur for each participant, they balance each other out in the results because they occur equally in both groups.
3. Matched Pairs Design
A matched pairs design is an experimental design where pairs of participants are matched in terms of key variables, such as age or socioeconomic status. One member of each pair is then placed into the experimental group and the other member into the control group .
One member of each matched pair must be randomly assigned to the experimental group and the other to the control group.
- Con : If one participant drops out, you lose 2 PPs’ data.
- Pro : Reduces participant variables because the researcher has tried to pair up the participants so that each condition has people with similar abilities and characteristics.
- Con : Very time-consuming trying to find closely matched pairs.
- Pro : It avoids order effects, so counterbalancing is not necessary.
- Con : Impossible to match people exactly unless they are identical twins!
- Control : Members of each pair should be randomly assigned to conditions. However, this does not solve all these problems.
Experimental design refers to how participants are allocated to an experiment’s different conditions (or IV levels). There are three types:
1. Independent measures / between-groups : Different participants are used in each condition of the independent variable.
2. Repeated measures /within groups : The same participants take part in each condition of the independent variable.
3. Matched pairs : Each condition uses different participants, but they are matched in terms of important characteristics, e.g., gender, age, intelligence, etc.
Learning Check
Read about each of the experiments below. For each experiment, identify (1) which experimental design was used; and (2) why the researcher might have used that design.
1 . To compare the effectiveness of two different types of therapy for depression, depressed patients were assigned to receive either cognitive therapy or behavior therapy for a 12-week period.
The researchers attempted to ensure that the patients in the two groups had similar severity of depressed symptoms by administering a standardized test of depression to each participant, then pairing them according to the severity of their symptoms.
2 . To assess the difference in reading comprehension between 7 and 9-year-olds, a researcher recruited each group from a local primary school. They were given the same passage of text to read and then asked a series of questions to assess their understanding.
3 . To assess the effectiveness of two different ways of teaching reading, a group of 5-year-olds was recruited from a primary school. Their level of reading ability was assessed, and then they were taught using scheme one for 20 weeks.
At the end of this period, their reading was reassessed, and a reading improvement score was calculated. They were then taught using scheme two for a further 20 weeks, and another reading improvement score for this period was calculated. The reading improvement scores for each child were then compared.
4 . To assess the effect of the organization on recall, a researcher randomly assigned student volunteers to two conditions.
Condition one attempted to recall a list of words that were organized into meaningful categories; condition two attempted to recall the same words, randomly grouped on the page.
Experiment Terminology
Ecological validity.
The degree to which an investigation represents real-life experiences.
Experimenter effects
These are the ways that the experimenter can accidentally influence the participant through their appearance or behavior.
Demand characteristics
The clues in an experiment lead the participants to think they know what the researcher is looking for (e.g., the experimenter’s body language).
Independent variable (IV)
The variable the experimenter manipulates (i.e., changes) is assumed to have a direct effect on the dependent variable.
Dependent variable (DV)
Variable the experimenter measures. This is the outcome (i.e., the result) of a study.
Extraneous variables (EV)
All variables which are not independent variables but could affect the results (DV) of the experiment. Extraneous variables should be controlled where possible.
Confounding variables
Variable(s) that have affected the results (DV), apart from the IV. A confounding variable could be an extraneous variable that has not been controlled.
Random Allocation
Randomly allocating participants to independent variable conditions means that all participants should have an equal chance of taking part in each condition.
The principle of random allocation is to avoid bias in how the experiment is carried out and limit the effects of participant variables.
Order effects
Changes in participants’ performance due to their repeating the same or similar test more than once. Examples of order effects include:
(i) practice effect: an improvement in performance on a task due to repetition, for example, because of familiarity with the task;
(ii) fatigue effect: a decrease in performance of a task due to repetition, for example, because of boredom or tiredness.
Psychological Experimental Design
- Living reference work entry
- First Online: 15 February 2024
- Cite this living reference work entry
- Zhang Houcan 2 &
- He Dongjun 3
18 Accesses
Psychological experimental design refers to the experimental design and methodological approaches devised by researchers before conducting an experiment based on the research objectives. It can be broadly or narrowly defined. Broadly, psychological experimental design refers to the general procedure of scientific research, including problem formulation, hypothesis development, selection of variables, manipulation, and control, as well as statistical analysis of results and paper writing, among other series of activities. Narrowly, psychological experimental design refers to the specific experimental plan or model that researchers develop for arranging variables and procedures, along with the related statistical analysis. The main components of psychological experimental design include how to reasonably arrange the experimental procedures and how to perform statistical analysis on the experimental data. The main steps can be summarized as follows: (1) formulate hypotheses based on...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Institutional subscriptions
Further Reading
Kantowitz BH, Roediger HL, Elmes DG (2015) Experimental psychology, 10th edn. Cengage Learning, Boston
Google Scholar
Zhang X-M, Hua S (2014) Experimental psychology. Beijing Normal University Publishing Group, Beijing
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
Zhang Houcan
School of Psychology, Chengdu Medical University, Chengdu, China
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to He Dongjun .
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 Encyclopedia of China Publishing House
About this entry
Cite this entry.
Houcan, Z., Dongjun, H. (2024). Psychological Experimental Design. In: The ECPH Encyclopedia of Psychology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6000-2_490-1
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6000-2_490-1
Received : 04 January 2024
Accepted : 05 January 2024
Published : 15 February 2024
Publisher Name : Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN : 978-981-99-6000-2
Online ISBN : 978-981-99-6000-2
eBook Packages : Springer Reference Behavioral Science and Psychology Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
Experimental Group in Psychology: Definition, Purpose, and Examples
Experimental groups, the backbone of psychological research, hold the key to unraveling the complexities of the human mind and behavior. As we delve into the fascinating world of psychological experiments, we’ll discover how these carefully crafted groups help researchers unlock the secrets of our thoughts, emotions, and actions.
Picture yourself in a dimly lit laboratory, surrounded by an array of mysterious equipment and eager participants. This is where the magic of experimental psychology unfolds. But what exactly are experimental groups, and why are they so crucial to our understanding of the human psyche?
At its core, experimental research in psychology is all about uncovering cause-and-effect relationships. It’s like being a detective, but instead of solving crimes, you’re solving the mysteries of the mind. Experimental groups are the protagonists in this scientific story, playing a vital role in helping researchers test their hypotheses and draw meaningful conclusions.
The Building Blocks of Psychological Experiments
Before we dive deeper into the nitty-gritty of experimental groups, let’s take a moment to appreciate the key components that make up a psychological experiment. It’s like assembling a puzzle, where each piece is essential for creating a complete picture.
First, we have the researcher – the mastermind behind the experiment. They’re the ones who come up with the brilliant (or sometimes not-so-brilliant) ideas that drive scientific progress. Next, we have the participants, the brave souls who volunteer to be part of these studies. Without them, we’d be left with nothing but theories and hunches.
Then there’s the independent variable – the factor that the researcher manipulates to see its effect on behavior. Think of it as the “cause” in our cause-and-effect equation. On the flip side, we have the dependent variable, which is the behavior or outcome that the researcher measures. It’s the “effect” we’re looking for.
Last but not least, we have our star players: the experimental and control groups. These groups are like two sides of the same coin, each serving a unique purpose in the grand scheme of things.
Experimental Group: The Scientific Spotlight
Now, let’s shine a spotlight on the experimental group. In the world of psychology, an experimental group is a group of participants who receive the treatment or manipulation that the researcher is interested in studying. It’s like being the lead actor in a play – all eyes are on you!
The AP Psychology definition of an experimental group is pretty straightforward: it’s the group that is exposed to the independent variable. But don’t let this simplicity fool you – experimental groups are the workhorses of psychological research, carrying the weight of scientific inquiry on their shoulders.
What sets experimental groups apart from their control group counterparts? Well, it’s all about that special treatment. While the control group goes about its business as usual, the experimental group gets to experience something new and potentially exciting (or, let’s be honest, sometimes boring or even mildly unpleasant – all in the name of science, of course!).
The role of experimental groups in hypothesis testing is crucial. They’re like the guinea pigs of the research world, helping scientists determine whether their predictions about human behavior hold water. Without experimental groups, we’d be left with a lot of questions and very few answers.
Control Groups: The Unsung Heroes
While experimental groups bask in the limelight, let’s not forget about their equally important counterparts – the control groups. These unsung heroes of psychological research deserve some recognition too!
So, what exactly is a control group in psychology? Simply put, it’s a group of participants who do not receive the treatment or manipulation being studied. They serve as a baseline, allowing researchers to compare the results of the experimental group against a standard.
The purpose of control groups is twofold. First, they help researchers determine whether any changes in the dependent variable are actually due to the independent variable, rather than some other factor. Second, they provide a point of comparison, making it possible to measure the effect of the treatment.
There are different types of control groups, each with its own flavor:
1. Placebo groups: These participants receive a fake treatment that looks and feels like the real deal but has no active ingredients. It’s like giving someone a sugar pill and telling them it’s a powerful medication.
2. No-treatment groups: As the name suggests, these folks don’t receive any treatment at all. They’re the “business as usual” crowd.
3. Wait-list groups: These participants are told they’ll receive the treatment later, after the study is complete. It’s like being in line for a rollercoaster – you know the excitement is coming, but you have to wait your turn.
Control group psychology examples are everywhere. For instance, in a study on the effectiveness of a new therapy for depression, the control group might receive standard talk therapy while the experimental group tries out the new approach. Or in a study on the effects of caffeine on memory, the control group might drink decaf coffee while the experimental group gets the real deal.
Designing Experiments: A Delicate Balance
Creating experimental and control groups isn’t just a matter of flipping a coin and dividing people up. It’s a delicate process that requires careful planning and execution. Let’s walk through the steps, shall we?
1. Define your research question: What burning question about human behavior are you dying to answer?
2. Identify your variables: What will you manipulate (independent variable) and what will you measure (dependent variable)?
3. Choose your participants: Who will be the stars of your research show?
4. Randomly assign participants: This is where the magic of random assignment comes in. It’s like a scientific lottery, ensuring that each participant has an equal chance of ending up in either the experimental or control group.
5. Control for confounding variables: These sneaky factors can mess up your results if you’re not careful. It’s like trying to bake a cake while someone keeps adding random ingredients when you’re not looking.
Random assignment is the secret sauce that gives experiments their power. By randomly assigning participants to groups, researchers can be more confident that any differences between the groups are due to the treatment and not some pre-existing characteristic of the participants.
Ensuring internal and external validity is another crucial aspect of experimental design. Internal validity is all about making sure your experiment actually measures what you think it’s measuring. External validity, on the other hand, is about how well your results can be generalized to the real world. It’s a balancing act that keeps researchers on their toes!
Experimental Groups in Action: Real-World Applications
Now that we’ve covered the basics, let’s see how experimental groups are put to work in various areas of psychology. It’s like watching a Swiss Army knife in action – versatile and always ready for the job at hand!
In clinical psychology, experimental groups help researchers test the effectiveness of new treatments for mental health disorders. For example, a study might use an experimental group to try out a new form of cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety, while the control group receives standard treatment.
Social psychology research often uses experimental groups to explore how people interact with each other. The famous Minimal Group Paradigm studies, for instance, use experimental groups to investigate how easily people form in-groups and out-groups, even based on arbitrary criteria.
Cognitive psychology studies frequently employ experimental groups to investigate mental processes like attention, memory, and decision-making. A researcher might use an experimental group to test the effects of different study techniques on memory retention, while the control group uses their usual study methods.
In developmental psychology, experimental groups help us understand how children grow and change over time. A study might use an experimental group to test the impact of a new educational program on children’s language development, while the control group follows the standard curriculum.
The Flip Side: Limitations and Ethical Considerations
As much as we love experimental groups, it’s important to acknowledge that they’re not perfect. Like any scientific tool, they come with their own set of limitations and ethical considerations.
One potential issue is bias. Despite our best efforts, sometimes researchers or participants can inadvertently influence the results. It’s like trying to be completely objective while judging a bake-off – your personal preferences might sneak in without you even realizing it.
Ethical concerns are another big deal in human subject research. We can’t just go around manipulating people’s behavior willy-nilly! Researchers have to carefully consider the potential risks and benefits of their studies, ensuring that participants are protected and informed.
Balancing scientific rigor with participant well-being is a constant challenge. It’s like walking a tightrope – lean too far in either direction, and you risk compromising either the validity of your research or the welfare of your participants.
Sometimes, traditional experimental designs just aren’t feasible or ethical. That’s where alternatives like quasi-experimental designs come in handy. These approaches allow researchers to study real-world phenomena without the strict control of a true experiment. It’s like studying animals in their natural habitat instead of a zoo – you might sacrifice some control, but you gain ecological validity.
Wrapping It Up: The Power of Experimental Groups
As we come to the end of our journey through the world of experimental groups in psychology, let’s take a moment to reflect on what we’ve learned. Experimental groups are the workhorses of psychological research, helping us uncover the mysteries of the human mind and behavior.
From testing new therapies for mental health disorders to exploring the intricacies of social interaction, experimental groups are at the forefront of psychological discovery. They’re like the explorers of the scientific world, venturing into uncharted territory and bringing back valuable insights.
Understanding experimental and control groups is crucial for anyone interested in psychology, whether you’re a student, a professional, or just a curious mind. It’s like having a backstage pass to the scientific process – you get to see how knowledge is created and tested.
As we look to the future, experimental psychology research continues to evolve. New technologies and methodologies are opening up exciting possibilities for studying the mind in ways we never thought possible. Who knows what groundbreaking discoveries are just around the corner?
So the next time you hear about a psychological study, remember the unsung heroes behind the scenes – the experimental groups that make it all possible. They’re the true stars of the show, helping us understand ourselves and the world around us, one experiment at a time.
References:
1. Coolican, H. (2018). Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology. Routledge.
2. Goodwin, C. J., & Goodwin, K. A. (2016). Research in Psychology: Methods and Design. John Wiley & Sons.
3. Kazdin, A. E. (2017). Research Design in Clinical Psychology. Pearson.
4. Leary, M. R. (2011). Introduction to Behavioral Research Methods. Pearson.
5. Shaughnessy, J. J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2015). Research Methods in Psychology. McGraw-Hill Education.
6. Smith, R. A., & Davis, S. F. (2013). The Psychologist as Detective: An Introduction to Conducting Research in Psychology. Pearson.
7. Stangor, C. (2014). Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences. Cengage Learning.
8. Weathington, B. L., Cunningham, C. J., & Pittenger, D. J. (2012). Understanding Business Research. John Wiley & Sons.
9. American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
10. National Institutes of Health. (2018). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html
Similar Posts
Universal Grammar in Psychology: Defining Chomsky’s Controversial Theory
Noam Chomsky’s revolutionary theory of Universal Grammar has sparked fierce debates and reshaped our understanding of the human mind’s innate capacity for language acquisition. This groundbreaking concept, introduced by the renowned linguist and cognitive scientist, has left an indelible mark on the fields of psychology and linguistics, challenging long-held beliefs about how we learn and…
LP Psychology: Unveiling the Mind of Lasting Power
A master key to unlocking your full potential and building unbreakable bonds lies within the transformative principles of LP Psychology – a groundbreaking field that delves into the intricate workings of the resilient, adaptable, and growth-oriented mind. This fascinating discipline has been quietly revolutionizing the way we approach personal development, relationships, and professional success. But…
Weber’s Law in Psychology: Understanding Sensory Perception and Discrimination
Our ability to detect the subtle changes in our environment relies on a fascinating psychological principle known as Weber’s Law, which has intrigued scientists and shaped our understanding of sensory perception for nearly two centuries. This fundamental concept, named after the German physiologist Ernst Heinrich Weber, has become a cornerstone in the field of psychophysics…
Focus Group Psychology: Unveiling Group Dynamics in Market Research
Amidst the chatter and laughter, a single question holds the power to unlock the secrets of the consumer’s mind – welcome to the fascinating world of focus group psychology. It’s a realm where opinions collide, ideas spark, and insights emerge from the most unexpected places. But what exactly makes these gatherings tick? Focus groups, those…
Psychology of Why and What Questions: Exploring Human Curiosity and Cognition
From the curious mind of a toddler to the inquisitive nature of a seasoned scientist, the simple yet profound questions of “why” and “what” have the power to unlock the mysteries of the human psyche and propel us towards new frontiers of knowledge. These seemingly basic inquiries serve as the building blocks of human understanding,…
Psychology of Repeating Someone’s Name: The Power Behind This Social Technique
From Beyoncé to your barista, the simple act of repeating someone’s name holds a surprising psychological power that can transform everyday interactions. It’s a technique that’s been used by charismatic leaders, successful salespeople, and even your favorite celebrities to create instant connections and leave lasting impressions. But what’s the real magic behind this seemingly simple…
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
Studying behaviour, motive, cognition in a laboratory or experimental setting. See empirical pstchology.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Latest Posts
What Happens At An ADHD Assessment
A Quick Look at the History Behind Hypnosis
A Brief History of Brainwashing: The Science of Thought Control
A Deep Dive into the Social Psychology of Leadership
Counseling Approaches to Client Care: Theories to Apply in Practice
The Future Of Education: Can You Earn A Psychology Degree Online?
Insomnia & Mental Illness: What is the Correlation?
Stop Guessing: Here Are 3 Steps to Data-Driven Psychological Decisions
Getting Help with Grief: Understanding Therapy & How It Can Help
Exploring the Psychology of Risk and Reward
Understanding ADHD in Women: Symptoms, Treatment & Support
Meeting the Milestones: A Guide to Piaget's Child Developmental Stages
Popular psychology terms, medical model, hypermnesia, affirmation, brainwashing, backup reinforcer, message-learning approach, affiliative behavior, contrast effect, behavioral sequence.
COMMENTS
experimental psychology. the scientific study of behavior, motives, or cognition in a laboratory or other controlled setting in order to predict, explain, or influence behavior or other psychological phenomena. Experimental psychology aims at establishing quantified relationships and explanatory theory through the analysis of responses under ...
There are three types of experiments you need to know: 1. Lab Experiment. A laboratory experiment in psychology is a research method in which the experimenter manipulates one or more independent variables and measures the effects on the dependent variable under controlled conditions. A laboratory experiment is conducted under highly controlled ...
Definition: Experimental psychology is a branch of psychology that focuses on conducting systematic and controlled experiments to study human behavior and cognition. Overview: Experimental psychology aims to gather empirical evidence and explore cause-and-effect relationships between variables.
Experimental psychology refers to work done by those who apply experimental methods to psychological study and the underlying processes. Experimental psychologists employ human participants and animal subjects to study a great many topics, including (among others) sensation, perception, memory, cognition, learning, motivation, emotion; developmental processes, social psychology, and the neural ...
Experimental psychology is able to shed light on people's personalities and life experiences by examining what the way people behave and how behavior is shaped throughout life, along with other theoretical questions. The field looks at a wide range of behavioral topics including sensation, perception, attention, memory, cognition, and emotion ...
The experimental method in psychology attempts to account for the activities of animals (including humans) and the functional organization of mental processes by manipulating variables that may give rise to behaviour; it is primarily concerned with discovering laws that describe manipulable relationships. The term generally connotes all areas ...
The experimental method in psychology helps us learn more about how people think and why they behave the way they do. Experimental psychologists can research a variety of topics using many different experimental methods. Each one contributes to what we know about the mind and human behavior. 4 Sources.
The experimental method involves manipulating one variable to determine if this causes changes in another variable. This method relies on controlled research methods and random assignment of study subjects to test a hypothesis. For example, researchers may want to learn how different visual patterns may impact our perception.
n. a series of observations conducted under controlled conditions to study a relationship with the purpose of drawing causal inferences about that relationship. An experiment involves the manipulation of an independent variable, the measurement of a dependent variable, and the exposure of various participants to one or more of the conditions being studied.
Experimental psychologists are interested in exploring theoretical questions, often by creating a hypothesis and then setting out to prove or disprove it through experimentation. They study a wide range of behavioral topics among humans and animals, including sensation, perception, attention, memory, cognition and emotion.
The experimental methods used by Wundt and his student Titchener were inseparable from the psychological subjects they identified. They believe that psychology should study the direct experience of human beings, and that psychology seeks to decompose consciousness into its simplest and most basic elements.
Experimental Psychology. Definition: Experimental psychology is a subfield of psychology that focuses on scientific investigation and research methods to study human behavior and mental processes. It involves conducting controlled experiments to examine hypotheses and gather empirical data.
Experimental psychology definition: the branch of psychology dealing with the study of emotional and mental activity, as learning, in humans and other animals by means of experimental methods.. See examples of EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY used in a sentence.
Three types of experimental designs are commonly used: 1. Independent Measures. Independent measures design, also known as between-groups, is an experimental design where different participants are used in each condition of the independent variable. This means that each condition of the experiment includes a different group of participants.
Psychology is the discipline that studies the human mind. Experimental psychology does so through carefully constructed experiments, usually involving humans but sometimes involving animals ...
Experimental design in psychology is a focal point of psychological research, as a well-structured experimental design serves not only as the foundation of the experimental process but also as a prerequisite for processing results. It is also a crucial assurance for obtaining the anticipated outcomes in scientific research.
This chapter introduces the topic of experimental psychology, and provides both beginning and veteran instructors with concrete, practical guidance to engage students in experimental methods in a range of courses including introductory psychology, traditional experimental psychology courses, as well as in topical methods courses (e.g., research methods in social psychology, research methods in ...
Experimental research is a scientific method of gathering data whereby the one conducting the research is able to manipulate the independent variable. Experimental research psychology is the act ...
The AP Psychology definition of an experimental group is pretty straightforward: it's the group that is exposed to the independent variable. But don't let this simplicity fool you - experimental groups are the workhorses of psychological research, carrying the weight of scientific inquiry on their shoulders. ...
A trusted reference in the field of psychology, offering more than 25,000 clear and authoritative entries. ... experimental research. Share button. Updated on 04/19/2018. research utilizing randomized assignment of participants to conditions and systematic manipulation of variables with the objective of drawing causal inference.
Experimental Psychology is a branch of psychology focused on using experimental and empirical methods to research behaviors and the minds of humans and animals. Components of experimental psychology are used in most fields of psychology through research but experimental psychologists are solely focused on research designs and methodologies. The ...
Psychology Definition of EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: Studying behaviour, motive, cognition in a laboratory or experimental setting. See empirical pstchology.
a level of the independent variable that is manipulated by the researcher in order to assess the effect on a dependent variable.Participants in an experimental condition receive some form of treatment or experience whereas those in a control condition do not. For example, patients in an experimental condition may receive a new drug, whereas those in a control condition may receive a pill that ...