|
Videoconferencing Rubric
Criteria | Exemplary 6.0 pts. | Proficient 4.0 pts. | Developing 2.0 pts. | Unsatisfactory 0.0 pts | POINTS |
Introduction/ | The introduction provides students with an agenda, outline, and/or a list of questions. | ||||
Procedures for Asking Questions and Etiquette | |||||
Fostering Community | |||||
Speaking Skills | |||||
Criteria | Exemplary 6.0 pts. | Proficient 4.0 pts. | Developing 2.0 pts. | Unsatisfactory 0.0 pts | POINTS |
Technical Production | 1) Audio and video are of high quality. Technical disruptions do not impact the flow of the class. 2) The class background (in video frame) is not distracting. 3) Lighting is balanced and allows the student to clearly see the instructor's face, background, and teaching tools with no shine, shadows, or glare. | ||||
Visual Aids | |||||
Length of Presentation | |||||
Animoto Blog
Jul 25, 2022
Using video in the classroom helps to keep students engaged and add make your lessons more memorable. Students can even make their own videos to share what they've learned in a way that is exciting and fun . But what do you do when it comes to grading students’ video projects?
One of the easiest ways to show students what’s expected of them is to create a rubric breaking down the different elements of a video project. You may have already created rubrics for other class projects — ones that involved posters, labs, or group work. Rubrics for video projects are similar. The medium may be different, but the learning and thinking students do are still there for you to assess.
You can use video projects at many different levels. Some of the elements in your rubric are going to be the same, whether you’re assigning a video to a high school physics class or using Animoto for a fourth grade vocabulary project.
Here are some things to include when developing a video project rubric:
Content: Clearly state what information and how much of it students should include. For example, in a biography project, students might be expected to include five interesting facts about their person in order to get the highest number of points on the rubric.
Images: Make sure your rubric states how many images you expect in an excellent, good, average, and poor project. You might want to add that those images should be relevant to the topic (e.g. no skateboards in a butterfly video) and appropriate. If you want to emphasize research skills, you could also require they use public domain images or cite their image sources.
Sources While this may not be necessary for very young students, middle and high school student videos can and should include a text slide with their bibliography or an accompanying paper bibliography.
Length: Just as you would set a page limit for an essay, you should set limits on video length, especially if you want to share the videos with the class. That length depends on your project — a simple “About Me” video project can be a minute long, while a more involved science or English assignment could be two to three minutes.
The style and flair of the video itself should really take second place to the student’s process — how a student researched the project, chose images, and organized their information. When your rubric reflects that, you’re truly assessing what a student learned.
Creating Animoto accounts for you and your students is completely free! Once you have your free account set up, there are endless ways to strengthen your lessons using video. Here are some of our favorites.
Take your lessons outside of the classroom with a digital scavanger hunt ! Have your students find specific plants and animals, architectural landmarks, historical features, and even shapes in their real-world environments and photograph them as they go. Then, they can add them to an exciting video that can be shared with the class using our Educational Presentation template.
Have your students research important figures throughout history or even share their own life stories with a video ! The Self-Introduction template makes it easy to share the most important moments of one's life in a fun and engaging way.
Put new vocabulary into action with a video! You can teach students new vocabulary words and then have students find real-world examples of them in real life. Or, let students share all the new words they've learned over summer break using the Vocabulary Lesson template.
Book trailers are a great way to get the story across in just a few short minutes. Whether starting from scratch on a brand new book or creating a summary of a favorite book, the Book Trailer template makes it simple.
Video presentations are a great way to showcase your learnings without the anxiety of a traditional presentation. They can be used in virtual classrooms or shared "IRL" to supplement student presentations. The Educational Presentation template is versatile, engaging, and easy to customize and share.
Extracurricular activities are part of a well-rounded education. Celebrate wins or even analyze your game with the Sports Recap template! It's a great way to increase school spirit and show students that you care.
Hit your reading goals for the semester and make sure the lessons hit home with a book report! Rather than an extensive essay, the Book Report template hits on all the high-notes and most important elements of a particular book.
How are you grading your students’ Animoto videos? Let us know in our Facebook group, the Animoto Social Video Marketing Community .
© 2024 Animoto Inc. All Rights Reserved.
A rubric is a scoring tool that identifies the different criteria relevant to an assignment, assessment, or learning outcome and states the possible levels of achievement in a specific, clear, and objective way. Use rubrics to assess project-based student work including essays, group projects, creative endeavors, and oral presentations.
Rubrics can help instructors communicate expectations to students and assess student work fairly, consistently and efficiently. Rubrics can provide students with informative feedback on their strengths and weaknesses so that they can reflect on their performance and work on areas that need improvement.
Best practices, moodle how-to guides.
The first step in the rubric creation process is to analyze the assignment or assessment for which you are creating a rubric. To do this, consider the following questions:
Types of rubrics: holistic, analytic/descriptive, single-point
Holistic Rubric. A holistic rubric includes all the criteria (such as clarity, organization, mechanics, etc.) to be considered together and included in a single evaluation. With a holistic rubric, the rater or grader assigns a single score based on an overall judgment of the student’s work, using descriptions of each performance level to assign the score.
Advantages of holistic rubrics:
Disadvantages of holistic rubrics:
Analytic/Descriptive Rubric . An analytic or descriptive rubric often takes the form of a table with the criteria listed in the left column and with levels of performance listed across the top row. Each cell contains a description of what the specified criterion looks like at a given level of performance. Each of the criteria is scored individually.
Advantages of analytic rubrics:
Disadvantages of analytic rubrics:
Single-Point Rubric . A single-point rubric is breaks down the components of an assignment into different criteria, but instead of describing different levels of performance, only the “proficient” level is described. Feedback space is provided for instructors to give individualized comments to help students improve and/or show where they excelled beyond the proficiency descriptors.
Advantages of single-point rubrics:
Disadvantage of analytic rubrics: Requires more work for instructors writing feedback
You might Google, “Rubric for persuasive essay at the college level” and see if there are any publicly available examples to start from. Ask your colleagues if they have used a rubric for a similar assignment. Some examples are also available at the end of this article. These rubrics can be a great starting point for you, but consider steps 3, 4, and 5 below to ensure that the rubric matches your assignment description, learning objectives and expectations.
Make a list of the knowledge and skills are you measuring with the assignment/assessment Refer to your stated learning objectives, the assignment instructions, past examples of student work, etc. for help.
Helpful strategies for defining grading criteria:
Most ratings scales include between 3 and 5 levels. Consider the following questions when designing your rating scale:
Artificial Intelligence tools like Chat GPT have proven to be useful tools for creating a rubric. You will want to engineer your prompt that you provide the AI assistant to ensure you get what you want. For example, you might provide the assignment description, the criteria you feel are important, and the number of levels of performance you want in your prompt. Use the results as a starting point, and adjust the descriptions as needed.
For a single-point rubric , describe what would be considered “proficient,” i.e. B-level work, and provide that description. You might also include suggestions for students outside of the actual rubric about how they might surpass proficient-level work.
For analytic and holistic rubrics , c reate statements of expected performance at each level of the rubric.
Well-written descriptions:
Create your rubric in a table or spreadsheet in Word, Google Docs, Sheets, etc., and then transfer it by typing it into Moodle. You can also use online tools to create the rubric, but you will still have to type the criteria, indicators, levels, etc., into Moodle. Rubric creators: Rubistar , iRubric
Prior to implementing your rubric on a live course, obtain feedback from:
Try out your new rubric on a sample of student work. After you pilot-test your rubric, analyze the results to consider its effectiveness and revise accordingly.
Above Average (4) | Sufficient (3) | Developing (2) | Needs improvement (1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(Thesis supported by relevant information and ideas | The central purpose of the student work is clear and supporting ideas always are always well-focused. Details are relevant, enrich the work. | The central purpose of the student work is clear and ideas are almost always focused in a way that supports the thesis. Relevant details illustrate the author’s ideas. | The central purpose of the student work is identified. Ideas are mostly focused in a way that supports the thesis. | The purpose of the student work is not well-defined. A number of central ideas do not support the thesis. Thoughts appear disconnected. |
(Sequencing of elements/ ideas) | Information and ideas are presented in a logical sequence which flows naturally and is engaging to the audience. | Information and ideas are presented in a logical sequence which is followed by the reader with little or no difficulty. | Information and ideas are presented in an order that the audience can mostly follow. | Information and ideas are poorly sequenced. The audience has difficulty following the thread of thought. |
(Correctness of grammar and spelling) | Minimal to no distracting errors in grammar and spelling. | The readability of the work is only slightly interrupted by spelling and/or grammatical errors. | Grammatical and/or spelling errors distract from the work. | The readability of the work is seriously hampered by spelling and/or grammatical errors. |
The audience is able to easily identify the central message of the work and is engaged by the paper’s clear focus and relevant details. Information is presented logically and naturally. There are minimal to no distracting errors in grammar and spelling. : The audience is easily able to identify the focus of the student work which is supported by relevant ideas and supporting details. Information is presented in a logical manner that is easily followed. The readability of the work is only slightly interrupted by errors. : The audience can identify the central purpose of the student work without little difficulty and supporting ideas are present and clear. The information is presented in an orderly fashion that can be followed with little difficulty. Grammatical and spelling errors distract from the work. : The audience cannot clearly or easily identify the central ideas or purpose of the student work. Information is presented in a disorganized fashion causing the audience to have difficulty following the author’s ideas. The readability of the work is seriously hampered by errors. |
Advanced (evidence of exceeding standards) | Criteria described a proficient level | Concerns (things that need work) |
---|---|---|
Criteria #1: Description reflecting achievement of proficient level of performance | ||
Criteria #2: Description reflecting achievement of proficient level of performance | ||
Criteria #3: Description reflecting achievement of proficient level of performance | ||
Criteria #4: Description reflecting achievement of proficient level of performance | ||
90-100 points | 80-90 points | <80 points |
Get your free sample task today.
Ready to explore Exemplars rich performance tasks? Sign up for your free sample now.
Exemplars science material includes standards-based rubrics that define what work meets a standard, and allows teachers (and students) to distinguish between different levels of performance.
Our science rubrics have four levels of performance: Novice , Apprentice , Practitioner (meets the standard), and Expert .
Exemplars uses two types of rubrics:
Standards-based science rubric.
This rubric is based on science standards from the National Research Council and the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
This continuum was developed by an Exemplars workshop leader and task writer, Tracy Lavallee. It provides a framework for assessing the scientific thinking of young students.
Seed rubric.
This rubric is appropriate for use with younger children. It shows how a seed develops, from being planted to becoming a flowering plant. Each growth level represents a different level of performance.
While not exactly a rubric, this guide assists students in demonstrating what they have done to meet each criterion in the rubric. The student is asked in each criterion to describe what they need to do and the evidence of what they did.
Rubric Code: By Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Type: Grade Levels: 9-12 |
Science Demonstration | |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
|
Resource type.
Nowadays, lecturers are integrating numerous technologies in their classrooms due to the Covid-19 outbreak. Hence, it has allowed the widespread use of recorded videos in English classrooms. Thus, this study has been conducted to find out the students’ perceptions on the implementation of oral presentation through recorded video. 164 semester 1 Diploma students of Politeknik Kota Bharu were selected as respondents. The questionnaires were devised to collect data and tested for reliability with the result of Cronbach’s Alpha=0.896. The findings show the Recorded Oral Presentation helps to increase students’ confidence and eventually improves their speaking skills.
Aryadoust, V. (2015, August). Self- and Peer Assessments of Oral Presentations by First-Year University Students. Educational Assessment, 20(3), 199-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2015.1061989 .
Barron, B., et al. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from Research on the Problem and Project-Based Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7 (3/4), 271–311.
Botella, C., Hofmann, S. G., & Moscovitch, D. A. (2004, June 3). A Self-Applied, Internet-Based Intervention for Fear of Public Speaking. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(8), 821-830. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.2004 .
Curtis, D. B., Winsor, J. L., & Stephens, R. D. (1989 ). National Preferences in Business and Communication Education. Communication Education, 38(1), 614. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528909378736 .
Ekalestari, S., Azmi, M. N. L., & Putri, F. (2018). The Perception of Learning English By Undergraduate Students. KnE Social Sciences, 3(4), 891. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i4.1995 .
Fukkink, R. G., Trienekens, N., & Kramer, L. J. (2011, March). Video Feedback in Education and Training: Putting Learning in the Picture. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9144-5 .
Guo, X. R. (2013). The Use of Video Recordings as an Effective Tool to Improve Presentation Skills. Review of Polyglossia, 24, 92-101.
Hamilton, E. R. (2012). Video as a Metaphorical Eye: Images of Positionality, Pedagogy, and Practice. College Teaching, 60(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2011.604803 .
Huang, H. (2015). The Effects of Video Projects on EFL Learners ’ Language Learning and Motivation : An Evaluative Study. International Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 5 (March), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2015010104 .
Hung, C., Hwang, G., & Huang, I. (2012). A Project-Based Digital Storytelling Approach for Improving Students’ Learning Motivation, Problem-Solving Competence, and Learning Achievement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15 (4), 368–379.
Koc, Mustafa. (2011). Let's Make a Movie: Investigating Pre-Service Teachers' Reflections on Using Video-Recorded Role-Playing Cases In Turkey. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27 (1), pp. 95-106.
Kumar, R. (2010). Perception. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/25022575/The-Concept-of-Perception#scribd .
Maes, J. D., Weldy, T. G., & Icenogle, M. L. (1997, January). A Managerial Perspective: Oral Communications Competency Is Most Important for Business Students in the Workplace. Journal of Business Communication, 34(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002194369703400104 .
Maria Asuncion Rojas Encalada. (2018). Perceptions about Self-recording Videos to Develop EFL Speaking Skills in Two Ecuadorian Universities. Universidad Técnica de Machala, Machala, Ecuado.
McNulty, A., & Lazarevic, B. (2012). Best Practices in Using Video Technology to Promote Second Language Acquisition. Teaching English with Technology, 12(3), 49-6.
Murphy, K., & Barry, S. (2016). Feed-Forward: Students Gaining More from Assessment Via Deeper Engagement in Video-Recorded Presentations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 213-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.996206 .
Mofareh AlQahtani.2015. The Importance of Vocabulary in Language Learning and how to be Taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, Vol. III, No. 3 / 2015 DOI: 10.20472/TE.2015.3.3.002.
Nikolic, S., Stirling, D., & Ros, M. (2018). Formative Assessment to Develop Oral Communication Competency Using Youtube: Self and Peer Assessment in Engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(4), 538-551. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1298569 .
Norazrina Ag-Ahmad. (2017). Open and Distance Learning (ODL): Preferences, Issues and Challenges Amidst Covid-19 Pandemic. Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Sabah, Kampus Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT), Volume 8, Number 2, 2020.
Nursanti, Y. (2016). Students’ Perception of Teacher’s Bilingual Language Use in an English Classroom. Journal of English and Education, 4(1), 159–176.
Passey, D. (2006). Technology Enhancing Learning: Analyzing Uses of Information and Communications Technologies by Primary and Secondary Schools Pupils with Learning Frameworks. The Curriculum Journal, 17, no 2:139-166.
Paul, S., Dawson, K. P., Lanphear, J. H., & Cheema, M. Y. (1998, January 4). Video Recording Feedback: A Feasible and Effective Approach to Teaching History ‐ Taking and Physical Examination Skills in Undergraduate Paediatric Medicine. Medical Education, 32(3), 332-336. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00197 .
Ritchie, S. M. (2016, June 22). Self-Assessment of Video-Recorded Presentations: Does It Improve Skills?. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1469787416654807 .
Rukmini, D.& Saputri, L.A. (2017). The Authentic Assessment to Measure Students' English productive Skills Based on the 2013 Curriculum. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7 (2), pp. 263-273.
Shrosbree, M. (2008). Digital Video in the Language Classroom. The Jalt Call Journal, 4 (1), pp. 75-84.
Sumardi,(2020). Digital Video Project: An Authentic Assessment to Assess Students’ Speaking Skills. Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Copyright (c) 2024 Kamilah Zainuddin, Che’ Fadhilah Che’ Lah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .
Information.
EXTERNAL LINKS:
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Scoring Rubric for Video Presentations To be successful, submissions must achieve a 65% score in Section A and in Section B. Submissions that achieve an 'Insufficient' score in any category ... presentation. Stills and video footage are mostly not in focus and poorly composed. The movement of the camera is distracting. _____/3 Creativity ...
Some transitions are inappropriately placed. Sound quality is OK. Video is clear and in focus. Excellent sense of design. Excellent demonstration of creativity. Effective camera techniques used for the video and pictures. Video and focus are of good quality. Smooth transitions are appropriate and aid in the delivery of the presentation.
Media-Making Rubric: Slideshow/Video ideo . ... effective presentation and . enhance key points by contributing to the concept explanation. The graphics relate to the ... This resource is a component of the Media-Making Toolkit for Science Education, developed by KQED Education Network. The Toolkit includes instructions, worksheets and rubrics ...
Video Presentation Rubric Criteria 1 point 2 point 3 point 4 point Organization The presentation was difficult to follow due to disorganization of the utterances. The presentation was not easy to follow. The presentation was easy to follow. The presentation was very easy to follow. Accuracy of language use of vocabulary It was hard to
iRubric KX43X5B: Students will create a "Science video" that will be 3-5 minutes in length. The video must include professional concepts of your topic. You should act as a scientist making your video and as professional and interesting as possible. Members of the team will contribute and participate in the video.. Free rubric builder and assessment tools.
iRubric R243X6A: Highest Possible Score (HPS) = 15. Free rubric builder and assessment tools.
No citations are included. The storyboard illustrates the video presentation structure with thumbnail sketches of each scene. Notes of proposed transition, special effects, sound and title tracks include: text, background color, placement & size of graphic, fonts - color, size, type for text and headings.
Rubric possible points is 25. --->Built by eab621 using iRubric.com. Free rubric builder and assessment tools. iRubric: Unit 8 Science Video Presentation rubric - M2327B6: RCampus
Video includes only a small part of the setup and is not at all clearly explained. Video not completed or includes none of the required elements. Science Fair Day Of Presentation Rubric Name:_____ Title of Project: _____ Day Of Presentation Rubric _____/12 12 9 6 3 0
Project Description: Students work together to create a video that explains a specific concept or topic in the Texas Aquatic Science curriculum. Students plan the concept of their project, develop a script/storyboard, and create their video in a logical format which communicates their point. Video projects may include interviewing a ...
The goal of this rubric is to identify and assess elements of research presentations, including delivery strategies and slide design. • Self-assessment: Record yourself presenting your talk using your computer's pre-downloaded recording software or by using the coach in Microsoft PowerPoint. Then review your recording, fill in the rubric ...
1) Audio and video are of high quality. Technical disruptions do not impact the flow of the class. 2) The class background (in video frame) is not distracting. 3) Lighting is balanced and allows the student to clearly see the instructor's face, background, and teaching tools with no shine, shadows, or glare.
Here are some things to include when developing a video project rubric: Content: Clearly state what information and how much of it students should include. For example, in a biography project, students might be expected to include five interesting facts about their person in order to get the highest number of points on the rubric.
Scoring Rubric for Oral Scientific Presentations. Level of Achievement. Excellent 16-20 points. Good 11-15 points. Marginal 6-10 points. Inadequate 0-5 points. Organization. Well thought out with logical progression. Use of proper language.
Partial preview of the text. Download Rubrics for a Video Presentation and more Earth science Exercises in PDF only on Docsity! CATEGORY 4 3 2 1 Presentation The video clearly communicates the main idea, and is strongly persuasive. The video communicates some of the important ideas, and is slightly persuasive.
4.6. (8) FREE. Word Document File. This is a 4 scale, 20 point rubric for video presentations in science. The particular format is for a Environmental Chemistry video, but could be used for any science video presentation. The document includes a list of requirements that goes along with the rubric. Enjoy! Subjects:
Step 7: Create your rubric. Create your rubric in a table or spreadsheet in Word, Google Docs, Sheets, etc., and then transfer it by typing it into Moodle. You can also use online tools to create the rubric, but you will still have to type the criteria, indicators, levels, etc., into Moodle.
Exemplars science material includes standards-based rubrics that define what work meets a standard, and allows teachers (and students) to distinguish between different levels of performance. Our science rubrics have four levels of performance: Novice, Apprentice, Practitioner(meets the standard), and Expert. Exemplars uses two types of rubrics:
Lesson Plan in Science IV. BSED- Science. Lecture notes. 100% (47) 12. Detailed Lesson PLAN IN Grade 5 Science. BSED- Science. Lecture notes. 100% (29) ... Rubrics FOR Video Presentation. Course: BSED- Science. 454 Documents. Students shared 454 documents in this course. University: Bukidnon State University. Info More info. Download. AI Quiz.
This is a 4 scale, 20 point rubric for video presentations in science. The particular format is for a Environmental Chemistry video, but could be used for any science video presentation. The document includes a list of requirements that goes along with the rubric. Enjoy! Total Pages. 2 pages.
Rubric possible points is 20. --->Built by scmills using iRubric.com. Free rubric builder and assessment tools. iRubric: Science Demonstration Rubric - Y2CW45
SCIENCE: INQUIRY RESEARCH - CELLS - INTRODUCTION - ANIMAL CELLS - HUMAN CELLS - LANGUAGE - ORAL COMMUNICATION - CLARITY & COHERENCE - presentation prompts - digital editable Rapid Rubrics provides educators with timesaving tasks built on the Ontario Curriculum.***Best part of Rapid Rubrics products is EVERYTHING IS ONLY $1 (We aim to save you time & MONEY!)***Rapid Rubric's Presentation ...
Nowadays, lecturers are integrating numerous technologies in their classrooms due to the Covid-19 outbreak. Hence, it has allowed the widespread use of recorded videos in English classrooms. Thus, this study has been conducted to find out the students' perceptions on the implementation of oral presentation through recorded video. 164 semester 1 Diploma students of Politeknik Kota Bharu were ...