research on physical education

New Research Examines Physical Education in America

By Morgan Clennin, PhD, MPH, Kaiser Permanente of Colorado, University of South Carolina, and National Physical Activity Plan

School-based physical education (PE) is recommended by the Community Guide as an effective strategy to promote physical activity among youth. Unfortunately, many have speculated that PE exposure has declined precipitously among U.S. students in the past decade. Limited resources and budgets, prioritization of core academic subjects, and several other barriers have been cited as potential drivers of these claims. However, few large-scale studies have explored the merit of these claims – leaving the answers following questions unknown:

Has PE attendance decreased among U.S. students in the past decades?

What policies and practices are in place to support quality PE?

To answer these questions, the President’s Council on Sports, Fitness & Nutrition tasked the National Physical Activity Plan Alliance (NPAPA) to review the available evidence and summarize their findings. The primary objective of this effort was to better understand PE exposure over time to inform national recommendations and strategies for PE.

The NPAPA began by establishing a collaborative partnership with experts in the federal government, industry, and academia. The group analyzed existing national data sources that could be used to examine changes in PE attendance and current implementation of PE policies and practices. These efforts culminated in a final report and two peer-reviewed manuscripts. A summary of the group’s findings are outlined below.

Key Findings:

• 1/2 of U.S. high school students did not attend PE classes—which is consistent over the 24-year period studied (1991-2015).
• The percentage of U.S. high school students reporting PE attendance did not change significantly between 1991 and 2015 for the overall sample or across sex and race/ethnicity subgroup.
• Daily PE attendance did decrease 16% from 1991 to 1995 then attendance rates remained stable through 2015.
• > 65% of schools implemented 2-4 of the 7 essential PE policies
• Implementation of PE policies varied by region, metropolitan status, and school level.
• Data indicates minority students have been disproportionately affected by cuts to school PE programs during the past two decades.

Recommendations Based on Key Findings:

• Prioritize efforts to expand collection of surveillance data examining trends in PE attendance among elementary and middle school students.
• Develop policies to improve PE access for all students in order for PE to contribute to increased physical activity among youth.
• Adopt policies and programs that prioritize PE to maximize the benefits of PE.
• Utilize the findings of these efforts to target professional development and technical assistance for PE practitioners.

The Education sector of the NPAP provides evidence-based strategies and tactics that can guide efforts to support the provision of quality PE to all students. More information, and links to the respective manuscripts, can be found on the NPAPA website: http://physicalactivityplan.org/projects/physicaleducation.html

The Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (ODPHP) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.

Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by ODPHP or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.

You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.

Physical Activity and Health Through Physical Education

• First Online: 25 August 2024

Cite this chapter

• Adrià Muntaner-Mas 2 , 3  

66 Accesses

3 Altmetric

Physical education (PE) is an academic subject that provides the opportunity for students to learn the knowledge and skills needed to establish and maintain physically active lifestyles throughout their lifetime. Unequivocally, PE play a crucial role in augmenting physical activity (PA) daily levels, which are linked to a myriad of health benefits. One of the aims of this chapter is to provide an overview of findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have explored PE’s influence on youth health, highlighting its impact on physical fitness, academic performance, cognition, and obesity-related factors within the educational framework. Despite the necessity of additional research, PE via PA programs has revealed improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, and academic outcomes and has shown a positive effect on obesity-related factors. The chapter emphasizes that PE offer unique opportunities for enhancing health in the school environment, which are not offered by other academic subjects. The chapter concludes by highlighting the necessity for ongoing research to better understand and advocate for PE’s importance in both public health and educational contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Quennerstedt M. Healthying physical education—on the possibility of learning health. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog. 2019;24(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1539705 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Fernandez-Rio J. Health-based physical education: a model for educators. J Phys Educ Recreat Danc. 2016;87(8):5–7. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07303084.2016.1217123

Ladwig MA, Vazou S, Ekkekakis P. “My Best memory is when I was done with it”: PE memories are associated with adult sedentary behavior. Transl J Am Coll Sport Med. 2018;3(16):119–29. https://journals.lww.com/01933607-201808150-00001

Google Scholar  

Rhodes RE, Kates A. Can the affective response to exercise predict future motives and physical activity behavior? A systematic review of published evidence. Ann Behav Med. 2015;49(5):715–31. https://academic.oup.com/abm/article/49/5/715/4562772

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Quennerstedt M. Exploring the relation between physical activity and health—a salutogenic approach to physical education. Sport Educ Soc. 2008;13(3):267–83.

Cairney J, Dudley D, Kwan M, Bulten R, Kriellaars D. Physical literacy, physical activity and health: toward an evidence-informed conceptual model. Sport Med. 2019;49(3):371–83. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40279-019-01063-3

Sallis JF, McKenzie TL. Physical education’s role in public health. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1991;62(2):124–37. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02701367.1991.10608701

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Hills AP, Dengel DR, Lubans DR. Supporting public health priorities: recommendations for physical education and physical activity promotion in schools. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;57(4):368–74. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S003306201400142X

Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Beets MW, Beighle A, Erwin H, Lee S. Physical education’s role in public health. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2012;83(2):125–35. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02701367.2012.10599842

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Martins J, Marques A, Gouveia ÉR, Carvalho F, Sarmento H, Valeiro MG. Participation in physical education classes and health-related behaviours among adolescents from 67 countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(2):955. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/955

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Lister NB, Baur LA, Felix JF, Hill AJ, Marcus C, Reinehr T, et al. Child and adolescent obesity. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2023;9(1):24. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41572-023-00435-4

Corbin CB. Conceptual physical education: a course for the future. J Sport Heal Sci. 2021;10(3):308–22. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2095254620301435

Kingston Ú, Adamakis M, Lester D, Costa J. A scoping review on quality physical education programmes and their outcomes on primary-level pupils. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):3575. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3575

Ekblom-Bak E, Ekblom Ö, Andersson G, Wallin P, Ekblom B. Physical education and leisure-time physical activity in youth are both important for adulthood activity, physical performance, and health. J Phys Act Health. 2018;15(9):661–70. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jpah/15/9/article-p661.xml

Bandeira A da S, Ravagnani FC de P, Barbosa Filho VC, de Oliveira VJM, de Camargo EM, Tenório MCM, et al. Mapping recommended strategies to promote active and healthy lifestyles through physical education classes: a scoping review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022;19(1):36. https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-022-01278-0

Ramires VV, dos Santos PC, Barbosa Filho VC, Bandeira A da S, Marinho Tenório MC, de Camargo EM, et al. Physical education for health among school-aged children and adolescents: a scoping review of reviews. J Phys Act Heal. 2023;20(7):586–99. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jpah/20/7/article-p586.xml

Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126–31.

CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. World health. Organization. 2020:104.

Chaput JP, Willumsen J, Bull F, Chou R, Ekelund U, Firth J, et al. 2020 WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for children and adolescents aged 5–17 years: summary of the evidence. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):141. https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-020-01037-z

Tapia-Serrano MA, Sevil-Serrano J, Sánchez-Miguel PA, López-Gil JF, Tremblay MS, García-Hermoso A. Prevalence of meeting 24-hour movement guidelines from pre-school to adolescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis including 387,437 participants and 23 countries. J Sport Heal Sci. 2022;11(4):427–37. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2095254622000205

Aubert S, Barnes JD, Demchenko I, Hawthorne M, Abdeta C, Abi Nader P, et al. Global matrix 4.0 physical activity report card grades for children and adolescents: results and analyses from 57 countries. J Phys Act Health. 2022;19(11):700–28. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jpah/19/11/article-p700.xml

McKenzie TL, Lounsbery MAF. The pill not taken: revisiting physical education teacher effectiveness in a public health context. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2014;85(3):287–92. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02701367.2014.931203

United Nations Educational S and CO. Quality Physical Education (QPE): Guidelines for policy makers. 2015. 4–82 p. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/

World Health Organization. Promoting physical activity through schools: a toolkit. Geneva; 2021.

Ramirez Varela A, Salvo D, Pratt M, Milton K, Siefken K, Bauman A, et al. Worldwide use of the first set of physical activity country cards: the global Observatory for Physical Activity—GoPA! Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15(1):29. https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-018-0663-7

Martins J, Onofre M, Hallal PC. Launch of the Global Observatory for Physical Education (GoPE!). J Phys Act Health. 2023;20(7):573–4. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jpah/20/7/article-p573.xml

Cale L. Physical education’s journey on the road to health. Sport Educ Soc. 2021;26(5):486–99. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13573322.2020.1740979

Meyer U, Roth R, Zahner L, Gerber M, Puder JJ, Hebestreit H, et al. Contribution of physical education to overall physical activity. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013;23(5):600–6. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01425.x

da Silva DJ, Barbosa AO, Barbosa Filho VC, de Farias Júnior JC. Is participation in physical education classes related to physical activity and sedentary behavior? A systematic review. J Phys Act Health. 2022;19(11):786–808. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jpah/19/11/article-p786.xml

de Jesus GM, de Oliveira Araujo RH, Dias LA, Barros AKC, dos Santos Araujo LDM, de Assis MAA. Attendance in physical education classes, sedentary behavior, and different forms of physical activity among schoolchildren: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1461. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-022-13864-9

Uddin R, Salmon J, Islam SMS, Khan A. Physical education class participation is associated with physical activity among adolescents in 65 countries. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):22128. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-79100-9

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

García-Hermoso A, Ezzatvar Y, López-Gil JF. Association between daily physical education attendance and meeting 24-hour movement guidelines in adolescence and adulthood. J Adolesc Health. 2023;73(5):896–902. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1054139X23003245

Hobbs M, Daly-Smith A, McKenna J, Quarmby T, Morley D. Reconsidering current objectives for physical activity within physical education. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(19):1229–30. https://bjsm.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bjsports-2016-097328

Arenas D, Vidal-Conti J, Muntaner-Mas A. Gender differences in students’ moderate to vigorous physical activity levels during primary school physical education lessons: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Teach Phys Educ. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2024-0027

Iglesias D, Fernandez-Rio J, Rodríguez-González P. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in physical education: a review of reviews. J Teach Phys Educ. 2023;42(4):640–6. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jtpe/42/4/article-p640.xml

Hollis JL, Williams AJ, Sutherland R, Campbell E, Nathan N, Wolfenden L, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels in elementary school physical education lessons. Prev Med (Baltim). 2016;86:34–54. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S009174351500345X

Wang L, Zhou Y. A systematic review of correlates of the moderate-to-vigorous physical activity of students in elementary school physical education. J Teach Phys Educ. 2021:1–16. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jtpe/aop/article-10.1123-jtpe.2020-0197/article-10.1123-jtpe.2020-0197.xml

Hollis JL, Sutherland R, Williams AJ, Campbell E, Nathan N, Wolfenden L, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels in secondary school physical education lessons. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):52. http://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-017-0504-0

Kerr C, Smith L, Charman S, Harvey S, Savory L, Fairclough S, et al. Physical education contributes to total physical activity levels and predominantly in higher intensity physical activity categories. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2018;24(2):152–64. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1356336X16672127

Alderman BL, Benham-Deal T, Beighle A, Erwin HE, Olson RL. Physical education’s contribution to daily physical activity among middle school youth. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012;24(4):634–48. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/pes/24/4/article-p634.xml

Mayorga-Vega D, Martínez-Baena A, Viciana J. Does school physical education really contribute to accelerometer-measured daily physical activity and non sedentary behaviour in high school students? J Sports Sci. 2018;36(17):1913–22. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02640414.2018.1425967

Lonsdale C, Rosenkranz RR, Peralta LR, Bennie A, Fahey P, Lubans DR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions designed to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in school physical education lessons. Prev Med (Baltim). 2013;56(2):152–61. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0091743512006068

Wong LS, Gibson AM, Farooq A, Reilly JJ. Interventions to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in elementary school physical education lessons: systematic review. J Sch Health. 2021;91(10):836–45.

White RL, Bennie A, Vasconcellos D, Cinelli R, Hilland T, Owen KB, et al. Self-determination theory in physical education: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Teach Teach Educ. 2021;99:103247. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0742051X20314384

Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78. http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Prochaska JJ, Rodgers MW, Sallis JF. Association of parent and peer support with adolescent physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002;73(2):206–10. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02701367.2002.10609010

Sun H, Li W, Shen B. Learning in physical education: a self-determination theory perspective. J Teach Phys Educ. 2017;36(3):277–91. https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jtpe/36/3/article-p277.xml

Zhan X, Clark CCT, Bao R, Duncan M, Hong JT, Chen ST. Association between physical education classes and physical activity among 187,386 adolescents aged 13–17 years from 50 low- and middle-income countries. J Pediatr. 2021;97(5):571–8. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0021755721000231

Raghuveer G, Hartz J, Lubans DR, Takken T, Wiltz JL, Mietus-Snyder M, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness in youth: an important marker of health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142(7) https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000866

Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Castillo MJ, Sjöström M. Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. Int J Obes. 2008;32(1):1–11.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Ortega FB, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Lee D, Chul, Ruiz J, Blair S, Sui X. Fitness and fatness as health markers through the lifespan: an overview of current knowledge. Prog prev med. 2018;3(2):e0013. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=ovftt&NEWS=N&AN=01960908-201804000-00001

García-Hermoso A, Alonso-Martínez AM, Ramírez-Vélez R, Pérez-Sousa MÁ, Ramírez-Campillo R, Izquierdo M. Association of physical education with improvement of health-related physical fitness outcomes and fundamental motor skills among youths. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(6):e200223. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2763829

Peralta M, Henriques-Neto D, Gouveia ÉR, Sardinha LB, Marques A. Promoting health-related cardiorespiratory fitness in physical education: a systematic review. Clemente FM, editor. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237019. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237019

Lander N, Eather N, Morgan PJ, Salmon J, Barnett LM. Characteristics of teacher training in school-based physical education interventions to improve fundamental movement skills and/or physical activity: a systematic review. Sport Med. 2017;47(1):135–61. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40279-016-0561-6

Costigan SA Eather N, Plotnikoff RC, Taaffe DR, Lubans DR. High-intensity interval training for improving health-related fitness in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015; 2014(April):1–9. http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/early/2015/06/18/bjsports-2014-094490.full%5Cn ; http://bjsm.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bjsports-2014-094490

Jurić P, Dudley DA, Petocz P. Does incorporating high intensity interval training in physical education classes improve fitness outcomes of students? A cluster randomized controlled trial. Prev Med Reports. 2023:102127. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2211335523000189

Duncombe SL, Barker AR, Bond B, Earle R, Varley-Campbell J, Vlachopoulos D, et al. School-based high-intensity interval training programs in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Harnish C, editor. PLoS One. 2022;17(5):e0266427. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266427

Bauer N, Sperlich B, Holmberg HC, Engel FA. Effects of high-intensity interval training in school on the physical performance and health of children and adolescents: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sport Med—Open. 2022;8(1):50. https://sportsmedicine-open.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40798-022-00437-8

Lloyd RS, Oliver JL. The youth physical development model. Strength Cond J. 2012;34(3):61–72. https://journals.lww.com/00126548-201206000-00008

García-Hermoso A, Ramírez-Campillo R, Izquierdo M. Is muscular fitness associated with future health benefits in children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Sport Med. 2019;49(7):1079–94. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40279-019-01098-6

Faigenbaum AD, Ratamess NA, Kang J, Bush JA, Rebullido TR. May the force be with youth: Foundational strength for lifelong development. 2023;22(12):414–22.

Till K, Bruce A, Green T, Morris SJ, Boret S, Bishop CJ. Strength and conditioning in schools: a strategy to optimise health, fitness and physical activity in youths. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56(9):479–80. https://bjsm.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bjsports-2021-104509

Villa-González E, Barranco-Ruiz Y, García-Hermoso A, Faigenbaum AD. Efficacy of school-based interventions for improving muscular fitness outcomes in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Sport Sci. 2022:1–16. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17461391.2022.2029578

Cox A, Fairclough SJ, Kosteli MC, Noonan RJ. Efficacy of school-based interventions for improving muscular fitness outcomes in adolescent boys: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sport Med. 2020;50(3):543–60. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40279-019-01215-5

Stricker PR, Faigenbaum AD, McCambridge TM, LaBella CR, Brooks MA, Canty G, et al. Resistance training for children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2020;145(6) https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/145/6/e20201011/76942/Resistance-Training-for-Children-and-Adolescents

Smith JJ, Eather N, Morgan PJ, Plotnikoff RC, Faigenbaum AD, Lubans DR. The health benefits of muscular fitness for children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sport Med. 2014;44(9):1209–23. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40279-014-0196-4

Martin-Martinez C, Valenzuela PL, Martinez-Zamora M, Martinez-de-Quel Ó. School-based physical activity interventions and language skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Sci Med Sport. 2023;26(2):140–8. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1440244022005047

Masini A, Marini S, Gori D, Leoni E, Rochira A, Dallolio L. Evaluation of school-based interventions of active breaks in primary schools: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2020;23(4):377–84. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S144024401930800X

Sneck S, Viholainen H, Syväoja H, Kankaapää A, Hakonen H, Poikkeus AM, et al. Effects of school-based physical activity on mathematics performance in children: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):109. https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-019-0866-6

Watson A, Timperio A, Brown H, Best K, Hesketh KD. Effect of classroom-based physical activity interventions on academic and physical activity outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):114. http://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-017-0569-9

Norris E, van Steen T, Direito A, Stamatakis E. Physically active lessons in schools and their impact on physical activity, educational, health and cognition outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(14):826–38. https://bjsm.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bjsports-2018-100502

Visier-Alfonso ME, Sánchez-López M, Álvarez-Bueno C, Ruiz-Hermosa A, Nieto-López M, Martínez-Vizcaíno V. Mediators between physical activity and academic achievement: a systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sms.14107

Donnelly JE, Hillman CH, Castelli D, Etnier JL, Lee S, Tomporowski P, et al. Physical activity, fitness, cognitive function, and academic achievement in children. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2016;48(6):1197–222. http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00005768-201606000-00027

Erickson KI, Hillman C, Stillman CM, Ballard RM, Bloodgood B, Conroy DE, et al. Physical activity, cognition, and brain outcomes: a review of the 2018 physical activity guidelines. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2019;51(6):1242–51.

Singh AS, Saliasi E, van den Berg V, Uijtdewilligen L, de Groot RHM, Jolles J, et al. Effects of physical activity interventions on cognitive and academic performance in children and adolescents: a novel combination of a systematic review and recommendations from an expert panel. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(10):640–7. http://bjsm.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098136

Marqu es A, Santos DA, Hillman CH, Sardinha LB. How does academic achievement relate to cardiorespiratory fitness, self-reported physical activity and objectively reported physical activity: a systematic review in children and adolescents aged 6–18 years. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(16):1039–9. http://bjsm.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bjsports-2016-097361

Rasberry CN, Lee SM, Robin L, Laris BA, Russell LA, Coyle KK, et al. The association between school-based physical activity, including physical education, and academic performance: a systematic review of the literature. Prev Med (Baltim). 2011;52:S10–20. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0091743511000557

Dudley D, Burden R. What effect on learning does increasing the proportion of curriculum time allocated to physical education have? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2020;26(1):85–100. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1356336X19830113

Hattie J. Visible learning. Routledge; 2008.

Book   Google Scholar  

García-Hermoso A, Ramírez-Vélez R, Lubans DR, Izquierdo M. Effects of physical education interventions on cognition and academic performance outcomes in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(21):1224–32. https://bjsm.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bjsports-2021-104112

Cho O, Choi W, Shin Y. The effectiveness of school physical education on students’ cognitive competence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2022;62(4) https://www.minervamedica.it/index2.php?show=R40Y2022N04A0575

Zach S, Shoval E, Lidor R. Physical education and academic achievement—literature review 1997–2015. J Curric Stud. 2017;49(5):703–21. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00220272.2016.1234649

Trudeau F, Shephard RJ. Physical education, school physical activity, school sports and academic performance. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5(1):10. http://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1479-5868-5-10

Lambert K, Ford A, Jeanes R. The association between physical education and academic achievement in other curriculum learning areas: a review of literature. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog. 2024;29(1):51–81. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17408989.2022.2029385

García-Hermoso A, Ramírez-Vélez R, Saavedra JM. Exercise, health outcomes, and pædiatric obesity: a systematic review of meta-analyses. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22(1):76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2018.07.006 .

World Health Organization. Report of the commission on ending childhood obesity. World Health Organization; 2016. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/204176

UNICEF. UNICEF advocacy strategy guidance for the prevention of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents. New York: UNICEF; 2020.

Doak CM, Visscher TLS, Renders CM, Seidell JC. The prevention of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: a review of interventions and programmes. Obes Rev. 2006;7(1):111–36. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00234.x

Katz DL, O’Connell M, Njike VY, Yeh MC, Nawaz H. Strategies for the prevention and control of obesity in the school setting: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes. 2008;32(12):1780–9. https://www.nature.com/articles/ijo2008158

Khambalia AZ, Dickinson S, Hardy LL, Gill T, Baur LA. A synthesis of existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses of school-based behavioural interventions for controlling and preventing obesity. Obes Rev. 2012;13(3):214–33. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00947.x

Hodder RK, O’Brien KM, Lorien S, Wolfenden L, Moore THM, Hall A, et al. Interventions to prevent obesity in school-aged children 6-18 years: an update of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis including studies from 2015–2021. eClinicalMedicine. 2022;54:101635. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2589537022003650

Kirk D. The ‘obesity crisis’ and school physical education. Sport Educ Soc. 2006;11(2):121–33. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13573320600640660

Cale L, Harris J. ‘Every child (of every size) matters’ in physical education! Physical education’s role in childhood obesity. Sport Educ Soc. 2013;18(4):433–52. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13573322.2011.601734

Jacob CM, Hardy-Johnson PL, Inskip HM, Morris T, Parsons CM, Barrett M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions with health education to reduce body mass index in adolescents aged 10 to 19 years. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18(1):1–22.

Liu Z, Xu HM, Wen LM, Peng YZ, Lin LZ, Zhou S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the overall effects of school-based obesity prevention interventions and effect differences by intervention components. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):1–12.

Klakk H, Chinapaw M, Heidemann M, Andersen LB, Wedderkopp N. Effect of four additional physical education lessons on body composition in children aged 8–13 years—a prospective study during two school years. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13(1):170. http://bmcpediatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2431-13-170

Learmonth YC, Hebert JJ, Fairchild TJ, Møller NC, Klakk H, Wedderkopp N. Physical education and leisure-time sport reduce overweight and obesity: a number needed to treat analysis. Int J Obes. 2019;43(10):2076–84. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41366-018-0300-1

Menschik D, Ahmed S, Alexander MH, Blum RW. Adolescent physical activities as predictors of young adult weight. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(1):29. http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.14

Dabravolskaj J, Montemurro G, Ekwaru JP, Wu XY, Storey K, Campbell S, et al. Effectiveness of school-based health promotion interventions prioritized by stakeholders from health and education sectors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med Reports. 2020;19:101138. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221133552030098X

Jurić P, Jurak G, Morrison SA, Starc G, Sorić M. Effectiveness of a population-scaled, school-based physical activity intervention for the prevention of childhood obesity. Obesity. 2023;31(3):811–22. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.23695

Ekwaru JP, Ohinmaa A, Dabravolskaj J, Maximova K, Veugelers PJ. Cost-effectiveness and return on investment of school-based health promotion programmes for chronic disease prevention. Eur J Pub Health. 2021;31(6):1183–9. https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/31/6/1183/6342860

Kahan D, McKenzie TL. The potential and reality of physical education in controlling overweight and obesity. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(4):653–9. https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302355

Clark H, Coll-Seck AM, Banerjee A, Peterson S, Dalglish SL, Ameratunga S, et al. A future for the world’s children? A WHO–UNICEF–Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):605–58. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673619325401

Dudley D, Beighle A, Erwin H, Cairney J, Schaefer L, Murfay K. Physical education-based physical activity interventions. In: The Routledge handbook of youth physical activity. Routledge; 2020. p. 489–503. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781000050660/chapters/10.4324/9781003026426-30 .

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Corbin CB. Implications of physical literacy for research and practice: a commentary. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2016;87(1):14–27. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02701367.2016.1124722

Bailey R. Defining physical literacy: making sense of a promiscuous concept. Sport Soc. 2022;25(1):163–80. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17430437.2020.1777104

Edwards LC, Bryant AS, Keegan RJ, Morgan K, Jones AM. Definitions, foundations and associations of physical literacy: a systematic review. Sport Med. 2017;47(1):113–26. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40279-016-0560-7

Lundvall S. Physical literacy in the field of physical education—a challenge and a possibility. J Sport Heal Sci. 2015;4(2):113–8. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2095254615000228

Luan H, Geczy P, Lai H, Gobert J, Yang SJH, Ogata H, et al. Challenges and future directions of big data and artificial intelligence in education. Front Psychol. 2020:11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580820/full

Zhang B, Jin H, Duan X. Physical education movement and comprehensive health quality intervention under the background of artificial intelligence. Front Public Heal. 2022;10. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.947731/full

McKay H, Naylor PJ, Lau E, Gray SM, Wolfenden L, Milat A, et al. Implementation and scale-up of physical activity and behavioural nutrition interventions: an evaluation roadmap. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):102. https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-019-0868-4

Reis RS, Salvo D, Ogilvie D, Lambert EV, Goenka S, Brownson RC. Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1337–48. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673616307280

Lang JJ, Zhang K, Agostinis-Sobrinho C, Andersen LB, Basterfield L, Berglind D, et al. Top 10 international priorities for physical fitness research and surveillance among children and adolescents: a twin-panel Delphi study. Sport Med. 2023;53(2):549–64. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40279-022-01752-6

Hall A, Lane C, Wolfenden L, Wiggers J, Sutherland R, McCarthy N, et al. Evaluating the scaling up of an effective implementation intervention (PACE) to increase the delivery of a mandatory physical activity policy in primary schools. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023;20(1):106. https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-023-01498-y

Wiklander P, Fröberg A, Lundvall S. Searching for the alternative: a scoping review of empirical studies with holistic perspectives on health and implications for teaching physical education. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2023;29(3):351–68. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1356336X221147813

N. M, J T. Quality physical education (QPE): guidelines for policy makers. Paris: UNESCO Publishing; 2015.

Solmon MA. Optimizing the role of physical education in promoting physical activity: a social-ecological approach. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2015;86(4):329–37. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02701367.2015.1091712

Lewallen TC, Hunt H, Potts-Datema W, Zaza S, Giles W. The whole school, whole community, whole child model: a new approach for improving educational attainment and healthy development for students. J Sch Health. 2015;85(11):729–39. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4606766&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

Burns RD, Brusseau TA, Fu Y, Myrer RS, Hannon JC. Comprehensive school physical activity programming and classroom behavior. Am J Health Behav. 2016;40(1):100–7. http://openurl.ingenta.com/content/xref?genre=article&issn=1087-3244&volume=40&issue=1&spage=100

Brusseau TA, Hannon J, Burns R. The effect of a comprehensive school physical activity program on physical activity and health-related fitness in children from low-income families. J Phys Act Health. 2016;13(8):888–94.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

GICAFE “Physical Activity and Exercise Sciences Research Group,” Faculty of Education, University of Balearic Islands, Palma, Spain

Adrià Muntaner-Mas

PROFITH “PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity” Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrià Muntaner-Mas .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Navarrabiomed, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain

Antonio García-Hermoso

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Muntaner-Mas, A. (2024). Physical Activity and Health Through Physical Education. In: García-Hermoso, A. (eds) Promotion of Physical Activity and Health in the School Setting. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65595-1_7

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65595-1_7

Published : 25 August 2024

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-65594-4

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-65595-1

eBook Packages : Medicine Medicine (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Articles on Physical education

Displaying 1 - 20 of 37 articles.

Thanks to Paris 2024, my kid wants to be an Olympian. What do I do now?

Alberto Filgueiras , CQUniversity Australia

New government guidance for PE lets teachers and pupils down

David Grecic , University of Central Lancashire ; Alan Thomson , University of Central Lancashire , and Andrew Sprake , University of Central Lancashire

Is exercise really good for the brain? Here’s what the science says

Matthieu P. Boisgontier , L’Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa and Boris Cheval , Université de Genève

Girls should get the chance to play football at school – but PE needs a major rehaul for all students

Shrehan Lynch , University of East London

School playgrounds are getting squeezed: here are 8 ways to keep students active in small spaces

Brendon Hyndman , Charles Sturt University ; Jessica Amy Sears , Charles Sturt University , and Vaughan Cruickshank , University of Tasmania

Outdoor education has psychological, cognitive and physical health benefits for children

Jean-Philippe Ayotte-Beaudet , Université de Sherbrooke and Felix Berrigan , Université de Sherbrooke

London’s Olympic legacy: research reveals why £2.2 billion investment in primary school PE has failed teachers

Vicky Randall , University of Winchester and Gerald Griggs

How sport can help young people to become better citizens

Vaughan Cruickshank , University of Tasmania and Casey Peter Mainsbridge , University of Tasmania

Missing out on PE during lockdowns means students will be playing  catch-up

Jora Broerse , Victoria University ; Cameron Van der Smee , Federation University Australia , and Jaimie-Lee Maple , Victoria University

Disabled children still face exclusion in PE – here’s what needs to change

Tom Gibbons , Teesside University and Kevin Dixon , Northumbria University, Newcastle

Taking the circus to school: How kids benefit from learning trapeze, juggling and unicycle in gym class

Marion Cossin , Université de Montréal

Thinking of choosing a health or PE subject in years 11 and 12? Here’s what you need to know

Brendon Hyndman , Charles Sturt University and Vaughan Cruickshank , University of Tasmania

Aussie kids are some of the least active in the world. We developed a cheap school program that gets results

Taren Sanders , Australian Catholic University ; Chris Lonsdale , Australian Catholic University ; David Lubans , University of Newcastle ; Michael Noetel , The University of Queensland , and Philip D Parker , Australian Catholic University

When men started to obsess over  six-packs

Conor Heffernan , The University of Texas at Austin

PE can do much more than keep children fit – but its many benefits are often overlooked

David Grecic , University of Central Lancashire ; Andrew Sprake , University of Central Lancashire , and Robin Taylor , University of Central Lancashire

Distance learning makes it harder for kids to exercise, especially in low-income communities

Katelyn Esmonde , Johns Hopkins University and Keshia Pollack Porter , Johns Hopkins University

Kids need physical education – even when they can’t get it at school

Collin A. Webster , University of South Carolina

Learning through adventure: the many skills that can be taught outside the classroom

Gary Stidder , University of Brighton

Kids aren’t getting enough exercise, even in sporty Seattle

Julie McCleery , University of Washington

Bushwalking and bowls in schools: we need to teach kids activities they’ll go on to enjoy

Vaughan Cruickshank , University of Tasmania ; Brendon Hyndman , Charles Sturt University , and Shane Pill , Flinders University

Related Topics

• Child health
• Physical activity
• School sport

Top contributors

Senior Lecturer in Health and Physical Education, University of Tasmania

Lecturer in Physical Education & Sport / Course Leader MA in Physical Education and School Sport, University of Central Lancashire

Associate Professor of Health & Physical Education (Adj.), Charles Sturt University

Professor of Sport and Physical Education, University of Central Lancashire

Reader in Sports Science (Clinical Physiology), University of Essex

Assistant Professor of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science

Lecturer in Developmental Psychology, The University of Edinburgh

Senior University Lecturer in Dietary Public Health Research, University of Cambridge

Associate Professor in Physiology, Exercise and Nutrition, University of Stirling

Programme lead – Behavioural Epidemiology, University of Cambridge

Senior Lecturer, Motor Behaviour, University of Tasmania

Senior Lecturer in PE and Sports Studies, University of Central Lancashire

Senior Research and Evaluation Officer / Independent Research Consultant / PhD @ Swansea University, Swansea University

PhD Candidate in the Centre for Diet and Activity Research, University of Cambridge

Associate Professor, Bolte School of Business, Mount Saint Mary's University

• X (Twitter)
• Unfollow topic Follow topic

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 17 December 2020

Physical education class participation is associated with physical activity among adolescents in 65 countries

• Riaz Uddin 1 , 2 , 3 ,
• Jo Salmon 1 ,
• Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam 1 , 3 &
• Asaduzzaman Khan 2 , 3  

Scientific Reports volume  10 , Article number:  22128 ( 2020 ) Cite this article

13k Accesses

37 Citations

98 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Health services
• Paediatric research
• Public health

In this study we examined the associations of physical education class participation with physical activity among adolescents. We analysed the Global School-based Student Health Survey data from 65 countries (N = 206,417; 11–17 years; 49% girls) collected between 2007 and 2016. We defined sufficient physical activity as achieving physical activities ≥ 60 min/day, and grouped physical education classes as ‘0 day/week’, ‘1–2 days/week’, and ‘ ≥ 3 days/week’ participation. We used multivariable logistic regression to obtain country-level estimates, and meta-analysis to obtain pooled estimates. Compared to those who did not take any physical education classes, those who took classes ≥ 3 days/week had double the odds of being sufficiently active (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.84–2.28) with no apparent gender/age group differences. The association estimates decreased with higher levels of country’s income with OR 2.37 (1.51–3.73) for low-income and OR 1.85 (1.52–2.37) for high-income countries. Adolescents who participated in physical education classes 1–2 days/week had 26% higher odds of being sufficiently active with relatively higher odds for boys (30%) than girls (15%). Attending physical education classes was positively associated with physical activity among adolescents regardless of sex or age group. Quality physical education should be encouraged to promote physical activity of children and adolescents.

Similar content being viewed by others

Trends of low physical activity among Iranian adolescents across urban and rural areas during 2006–2011

Physical education teachers’ knowledge of physical activity recommendations for health promotion in children and adolescents

Changes in physical activity patterns of students from primary to secondary school: a 5-year longitudinal study

Introduction.

Physical activity is essential for health and wellbeing of children and adolescents 1 . Physical activity improves musculoskeletal, cardiac, metabolic, psychosocial, and cognitive health, and enhances cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness of children and adolescents 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 . Regular participation also decreases adiposity in those who are overweight 3 . For optimal health benefits, the current international guidelines (i.e., the World Health Organization [WHO]) recommends that those aged 5–17-years accumulate at least 60 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity daily 5 . Globally, four out of five (81%) adolescents aged 11–17 years do not meet this recommendation and are insufficiently active 6 . Such inactive behaviours during adolescence have both current and future ramifications on health and wellbeing as behaviours such as physical activity established during adolescence can carry over to adulthood 7 , 8 . Therefore, pragmatic strategies to promote physical activity during adolescence around the globe are of critical importance 9 .

Adolescent physical activity occurs in different settings and domains including at home, in the community, for transportation, and at school. Opportunities for physical activity at school include during recess and lunch breaks, school sport and physical education lessons. Physical education classes may provide resources and opportunities for students to accumulate the daily physical activity level and can contribute to daily energy expenditure 10 , 11 . Recent meta-analyses found that 41% of secondary school 12 and 45% of elementary school 13 physical education lessons comprised moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. In many countries, physical education provides children and adolescents the understanding and motivation for an active lifestyle and also creates an environment to acquire knowledge and skills for physical activity throughout life 14 , 15 . In addition, adolescents who may have limited access to space and equipment outside of school can benefit from attending physical education classes at school 10 , 11 . School-based physical education, therefore, can be an accessible source of physical activity for many adolescents and can help develop an active healthy lifestyle 16 . In addition to the number of physical education classes, access to high-quality physical education experience (e.g., teacher behaviours, learning outcomes), which forms the foundation for lifelong engagement in physical activity, is also important for children and adolescents 17 , 18 , 19 .

Available evidence suggest that participation in physical education classes are positively associated with higher levels of physical activity 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 . However, the evidence is mostly based on single-country studies from high-income countries with limited multi-country study and lack of representation of low- and lower-middle-income countries 25 . A recent multi-country study reported country- and regional-level differences in physical education class participation, which was also differed by sex, age, and country-income classification 26 . In addition, delivery, content and quality of physical education also vary within and between countries 27 , 28 . It is often provided infrequently in schools across countries, and therefore the potential impact on total moderate-to-vigorous physical activity among boys and girls may be limited 29 . In order to obtain a comprehensive global perspective on the relationship between physical education and physical activity, large multi-country studies with representative samples are essential. Given the context and the opportunities that exist in schools for physical activity promotion, in this study, we aimed to examine whether participation in physical education classes (i.e., number of physical education class attendance) is associated with sufficient level of physical activity among adolescents (overall, and by sex and age-group) from 65 countries around the globe. We hypothesised that higher number of physical education class participation would be positively associated with sufficient level of physical activity among adolescents.

Data source

Data for this study were from the Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS), a population-based survey of school-going children and adolescents around the world 30 . In all participating countries, the GSHS uses the same standardised sampling technique and study methodology. All participants completed a standardised self-administered anonymous questionnaire, which included, but was not limited to, questions on demographics (e.g., age, sex), participation in physical education classes and physical activity. GSHS adopted questionnaire items, including items to measure physical activity and physical education from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey of American Adolescents. Countries, where GSHS were implemented, were encouraged to use culturally appropriate examples, words, and phrases to ensure sociocultural adaptability of the items. Furthermore, using a rigorous translation and back-translation process with the assistance of WHO and US CDC, countries were allowed to translate the questionnaire into their local language 31 .

As of 8 December 2019, 98 countries/territories around the globe had at least one GSHS dataset publicly available with the surveys being conducted between 2007 and 2016. For countries with more than one GSHS dataset, we used the most recent one available. Of the 98 countries, 84 countries had data on PA, while 67 countries had data on physical education. Two countries (Niue and Tokelau) were excluded from the analyses due to their small sample size (n < 140). The analytical sample consists of 206,417 adolescents aged 11 or younger to 17 years from 65 countries. Only a small proportion of students (1.05%) were in the age group “11 years old or younger”, and for modelling purposes, they were considered as 11 years old for this analysis, as it was not possible to determine what proportion of 1.05% students were younger than 11 years old. All countries provided nationally representative samples.

The GSHS received ethics approval from the Ministry of Education or a relevant Institutional Ethics Review Committee, or both in each of the participating countries. Only those adolescents and their parents who provided written or verbal consent participated. As the current study used retrospective, de-identified, publicly available data, ethics approval was not required for this secondary analysis. Detailed methods of the GSHS have been described on both the US CDC and the WHO websites 30 , 32 .

Outcome measure—physical activity participation

Physical activity was assessed with one item: ‘During the past 7 days, on how many days were you physically active for a total of at least 60 min per day?’ The response options were 0–7 days. Consistent with the WHO recommendations 5 , we defined participants as ‘sufficiently active’ who did ≥ 60 min/day of physical activity on seven days of the week.

Study factor—physical education participation

Physical education class attendance was assessed with one item: ‘During this school year, on how many days did you go to physical education (PE) class each week?’ The responses were classified into three groups: ‘0 day/week’, ‘1–2 days/week’, and ‘≥ 3 days/week’ as used elsewhere 25 , 33 .

Adolescents self-reported age, sex, and daily hours of sitting (when not in school or doing homework) in the survey. Food insecurity was assessed by asking: ‘During the past 30 days, how often did you go hungry because there was not enough food in your home?’ with response options being never, rarely, sometimes, most of the time, and always. As the GSHS did not include any direct measure of socioeconomic status, this variable was used as a proxy measure of socioeconomic status 34 , 35 . Self-reported height and weight were used to compute body mass index (BMI), which was categorised as underweight (BMI < −2SD), overweight (BMI >  + 1SD), and obese (BMI >  + 2SD), relative to median BMI, by age and sex based on the WHO Child Growth Standards 36 .

Statistical analyses

Of the 65 countries with data on physical activity and physical education, nine countries were from Africa, 20 from the Americas, 15 from Eastern Mediterranean, five from South East Asia, and 16 from the Western Pacific region. Using the World Bank country classification, collected at the time of the survey for the respective countries, seven countries were classified as low‐income, 21 lower‐middle‐income, 18 upper‐middle‐income, and 18 high-income. Income classification information was not available for Cook Island. The prevalence estimates of physical activity and physical education were obtained by using a Stata command ‘svyset’ to take into account sampling weights and the clustered sampling design of the surveys.

In examining the country-level association of physical education with physical activity, a set of covariates was considered including age, sex, weight status (i.e., BMI), food insecurity, and sitting time. Sitting time was considered as an adjusting factor given its demonstrated association with physical activity in adolescents 37 . Given the binary nature of physical activity outcome, logistic regression analysis with robust standard errors was used to examine the association at the country level, by taking into account the sampling weight that was applied to each participant record to adjust for non-response and the varying probability of selection. This GSHS weighting factor was applied in an identical way to estimate the association in each participating country. Within the GSHS protocol, weighting accounted for the probability of selection of schools and classrooms, non-responding schools and students, and distribution of the population by sex and grade.

Random effects meta-analysis was used to generate pooled estimates of the association between physical education and physical activity for the overall sample, by country income category (e.g., low-income, lower-middle income, upper-middle income, and high-income), and by WHO region, stratified by sex and age groups (11–14 years vs 15–17 years). Two age groups (11–14 years [early adolescence] and 15–17 years [middle adolescence]) 38 were considered to stratify the analysis in order to examine whether the association estimates vary across phases of adolescence. This analysis used DerSimonian and Laird method 39 with the estimate of heterogeneity being taken from the Mantel–Haenszel model. As the GSHS were conducted across different cultural settings in 65 countries around the world over a long period of time (2007–2016), it was reasonable to assume that the association estimates across countries were likely to vary from survey to survey, which supports the use of random effects meta-analysis that can adjust heterogeneity among studies 40 . The percentage of variability in estimates across studies that is attributable to between study heterogeneity (I 2 ) in our analysis ranges from 54.3 to 80.2%, which suggests a strong presence of heterogeneity in the association estimates, and further supports the use of random effects meta-analysis. All adjusted estimates of the association parameters are presented in the form of odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). All analyses were conducted by StataSE V14.0.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The GSHS received ethics approval from both a national government administration and an institutional review board or ethics committee. Only adolescents and their parents who provided written/verbal consent participated. As the current study used retrospective publicly available data, we did not require ethics approval from any Institutional Ethics Review Committee for this secondary analysis.

The mean age of the participating adolescents (n = 206,417) was 14.35 (SD = 1.45) years, 54.4% aged 11–14 years, and 49.2% were girls. The prevalence of sufficient physical activity was 15.0%, with boys having higher prevalence (18.3%) than girls (11.5%). Over half (56.5%) of adolescents participated in physical education classes 1–2 days/week (boys 54.7%; girls 58.3%) and about a quarter (24.2%) participated in physical education classes ≥ 3 days/week (boys 26.8%; girls 21.6%). As shown in Fig.  1 , the overall percentage of adolescents being sufficiently active was greater for those who attended more physical education classes in both sexes.

Proportion of adolescents sufficiently physically active by participation in physical education classes, Global School-based Student Health Survey, 2007–2016.

Estimates of associations of physical education class participation with sufficient physical activity by country are shown in Table 1 . The country-level analysis shows that 50 out of 65 participating countries (77%) demonstrated significant and positive associations between attending physical education classes ≥ 3 days/week and being sufficiently active with 33 countries (51%) revealing at least double the odds (OR ≥ 2.0) of meeting physical activity guidelines. For example, Bolivian adolescents who attended physical education classes ≥ 3 days/week had threefold odds of reporting sufficient physical activity compared with their counterparts who attended no physical education class (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.93–4.67). In examining the association between attending physical education classes 1–2 days/week and being sufficiently active, 20 countries (31%) demonstrated significant positive associations. For example, Thai adolescents who attended physical education classes 1–2 days/week had double the odds to reporting sufficient physical activity compared with their counterparts who attended no physical education class (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.39–3.19). As shown in Table 1 , attending physical education classes ≥ 3 days/week was positively and strongly associated with physical activity in all WHO regions with South East Asia region showing the strongest association (OR 2.89, 2.11–3.97), followed by Africa (OR 2.45, 1.72–3.48) and Western Pacific region (OR 2.40, 1.92–3.00). The analysis also showed evidence of positive and moderate association between attending physical education classes 1–2 days/week and being sufficiently active in all WHO regions with the pooled association estimates ranging from OR 1.19 (1.01–1.41) in the Americas region to OR 1.86 (1.03–3.36) in South East Asia.

Overall, adolescents who took physical education classes ≥ 3 days/week, compared to those who did not take any physical education classes, had double the odds of being sufficiently active (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.84–2.28) with no apparent gender (OR 2.09, 1.88–2.33 for boys; and OR 1.95, 1.69–2.25 for girls) or age (OR 2.19, 1.93–2.48 for 11–14-year-old; and OR 2.03, 1.80–2.28 for 15–17-year-old adolescents) differences (Table 2 ). Adolescents who participated in physical education classes 1–2 days/week had 26% higher odds of being sufficiently active (OR 1.26, 1.15–1.37) with relatively higher odds for boys (OR 1.30, 1.17–1.46) than girls (OR 1.15, 1.03–1.29) and younger adolescents aged 11–14 years (OR 1.28, 1.16–1.42) that older adolescents aged 15–17 years (OR 1.19, 1.08–1.32).

The odds of attending physical education classes ≥ 3 days/week and being sufficiently active were lower in country with higher income (Table 2 ). In low-income countries, adolescents who participated in physical education classes ≥ 3 days/week had 137% higher odds of being sufficiently active (OR 2.37, 1.51–3.73) with comparable odds for boys (OR 2.51, 1.70–3.70) and girls (OR 2.36, 1.31–4.26) and slightly higher odds for younger (OR 2.94, 1.92–4.51) than older adolescents (OR 2.32, 1.36–3.96). In high-income countries, the odds of being sufficiently active was 85% higher for adolescents who attended physical education classes ≥ 3 days/week (OR 1.85; 1.52–2.25) with no apparent gender (boys OR 1.89, 1.50–2.37; girls OR 1.69, 1.36–2.10) or age (younger OR 1.83, 1.47–2.28; older OR 1.80 (1.48–2.19) differences. In lower-middle income countries, adolescents who attended physical education classes 1–2 days/week had 39% higher odds of being sufficiently active (OR 1.39, 1.19–1.62) compared to their counterparts who did not take any physical education classes, with relatively higher odds for boys (OR 1.46, 1.21–1.76) than girls (OR 1.30, 1.03–1.65), and similar odds for younger (OR 1.36, 1.09–1.68) and older adolescents (OR 1.33, 1.16–1.51).

Boys of South East Asian region who participated in physical education classes ≥ 3 days/week had the highest odds of being sufficiently active (OR 3.29, 1.97–5.47), followed by the boys of Africa region (OR 2.41, 1.74–3.33) (Supplementary Table S1 ). Girls of Western Pacific and Africa region who participated in physical education classes ≥ 3 days/week had the highest odds of being sufficiently active (OR 2.68, 1.89–3.77, and OR 2.63, 1.63–4.26, respectively). Even by attending physical education classes 1–2 days/week, boys of the Americas region and girls of Africa region can increase their odds, though not considerably, of being sufficiently active (OR 1.29, 1.06–1.58, and OR 1.41, 1.15–1.73, respectively).

Both younger and older adolescents in all WHO regions demonstrated positive association between ≥ 3 days/week physical education class attendance and meeting the physical activity recommendations (Supplementary Table S1 ). Younger adolescents in South East Asia (OR 3.03, 2.42–3.79) and Africa (OR 2.95, 2.07–4.20), and older adolescents in South East Asia (OR 3.24, 1.57–6.67) who participated in physical education classes ≥ 3 days/week had over three times higher odds of being sufficiently active. There were moderate positive associations between physical education class attendance for 1–2 days/week and meeting the physical activity recommendations for younger adolescents in Africa (OR 1.38, 1.03–1.84), the Americas (OR 1.29, 1.07–1.56), and Eastern Mediterranean regions (OR 1.24, 1.06–1.44), and for older adolescents in Africa (OR 1.24, 1.03–1.48), Eastern Mediterranean (OR 1.26, 1.07–1.49), and Western Pacific region (OR 1.19, 1.01–1.41).

To our knowledge, this is the most extensive global study to assess the association of physical education class attendance with physical activity of adolescents, based on nationally representative samples from 65 countries around the globe. The key finding of our study is that adolescents, irrespective of sex or age, who had a higher frequency (≥ 3 days/week) of physical education class attendance had significantly higher odds of meeting the WHO’s physical activity recommendations. The estimates of association between the frequency of attending physical education and meeting physical activity recommendations were lower among countries with higher income. We observed some regional differences with South East Asia having the highest associations and the Americas having the lowest. Our findings suggest that adolescents, especially girls and those aged 15–17 years, are mostly benefited from a higher frequency (i.e., ≥ 3 days/week) of physical education participation. Our study also found some benefits of less frequent participation in physical education classes (1–2 days/week) in meeting the physical activity guidelines, which is encouraging. About one-third of the countries demonstrated positive association between less frequent participation in physical education classes and meeting the physical activity recommendations, and such association was prominent in boys and younger adolescents in all but low-income countries. Our study thus argues that even less frequent participation in physical education classes can bring some benefits for some adolescents.

Our finding that a higher frequency of physical education class attendance was positively associated with meeting the physical activity recommendations is consistent with other studies in children and adolescents 20 , 21 , 24 , 25 . It has been argued that participation in physical education classes acts as a positive reinforcement to “keep young people going” by being more physically active with less time in sedentary behaviour throughout the day 25 . Physical education classes provide children with an opportunity to familiarise themselves with different types of physical activity, motivates them to be active within the school environment, and potentially also encourages more out-of-school physical activity 41 . Physical activity during physical education classes may reduce fatigue and improve mood by changing neurophysiological stimulation and the brain’s information processing function (i.e., cerebral cortex), which may improve children’s preparedness to move more throughout the day 25 . While the frequency of physical education class is important, it is also critical that children have access to quality physical education 18 , 19 . Previously, researchers have suggested that in spite of the traditional class-based and sports-centred physical education curriculum, physical education ought to be a health-centred dynamic learning experience for children 19 , 42 . Quality physical education is important for age-appropriate cognitive learning and to acquire fitness, develop motor skills and psychosocial and emotional skills, which can help children to lead an active lifestyle, inside and outside of the school environment, throughout their life course 18 , 19 , 42 . Given the role of physical education for active and healthy lifestyle, different stakeholders, including United Nations agencies (i.e., UNESCO) 19 , European Commission 17 , have recommended to ensure quality physical education for children and adolescents, and called for political commitments and actions from Governments and supports from the international communities.

In our study, adolescents boys and girls in low-income countries with ≥ 3 days/week physical education class attendance had the highest odds of meeting the physical activity recommendations, and the associations became smaller (yet significant) with a higher country income classification for both sexes. A previous 12-country study 25 reported similar findings for boys, but not for girls. Unlike our study that is based on self-reported data, the earlier study used a device-based physical activity measure and included Australia and other high-income countries of Europe and North America. In addition to high-income countries, our study included adolescents from low- and lower-middle-income countries. It is possible that for many children, regardless of sex or country income, schools provide the most pragmatic and readily accessible opportunities for various physical activity, while out-of-school physical activity options, logistics, and environments might be variable 10 , 11 . The environments, in general, may be more supportive of out of school physical activity for children in high-income countries than their counterparts in low-income countries; however, high-income countries may have other challenges including gender and socioeconomic disparities in physical activity. For example, children from high-poverty neighbourhood may have fewer opportunities for out of school physical activity in many high-income countries 43 , 44 . Appreciating the heterogeneity in resources for physical education within- and across countries, all governments should consider schools as the primary focus to promote an active and healthy lifestyle among children and adolescents, which is likely to be a cost-effective and opportunistic initiative to get them moving. Our findings also show that physical education is potentially more important in South East Asia than the Americas in promoting physical activity. In addition to environmental support, such variations could be a sign of the quality of the respective physical education programs, including time allocated for physical education across the countries. There is a large heterogeneity in weekly time allocated for physical education in countries around the globe. For example, weekly time for physical education of secondary school students in Bangladesh (180 min) is reportedly higher than in Peru (90 min) 28 . Research is needed to understand whether physical education classes are designed to facilitate physical activity and/or how much time students actually spend in physical activity during physical education classes. It is also important to understand how physical education lessons can help the students to develop skills so that they can be more active both inside and outside of school. This information can help in designing a physical education curriculum with balanced components of physical activity and physical education lessons on other health and wellbeing so that the students can develop a healthy lifestyle. Opportunities for quality physical education should be equitable and inclusive, and available for all children regardless their gender, disability status, socio-economic position, and cultural or religious backgrounds, and the delivery of physical education should be ensured for marginalised and vulnerable groups 19 .

The strengths of our study are the inclusion of a large number of countries around the globe, representing different world regions and income groups. All countries included in our study provided nationally representative data. We used the GSHS sample weighting to account for distribution of the population by age and sex in countries for whose data were analysed. Any potential skewness, by sex or age, in the observed data is unlikely to impact the weighted analysis results. All countries where GSHS was implemented, used a standardised data collection procedure. In all countries, a standardised questionnaire with the same survey items to assess physical activity and physical education class attendance was used, which facilitated our regional comparisons. We adjusted our estimates for several potential covariates to avoid possible confounding effects of these factors.

The findings of our study should be interpreted in light of its limitations. Data for our study were collected using self-reported questionnaire; these data are vulnerable to social desirability and recall bias. Unavailability of GSHS data from European and North American countries, some of the Latin/Central American and Asia and Pacific countries, limits the generalisability of the findings only to the GSHS participating countries. Although a standardised questionnaire was used in all participating countries, there is a lack of information on the reliability and validity of GSHS measures across different countries or cultures. Physical education classes can have different meanings and can constitute different components, including a knowledge-based curriculum component (i.e., lessons and discussions) and/or skill-based physical activity session, in different settings. We did not have any information on components of physical education classes across the participating countries. The cross‐sectional design of the study limits our ability to make any causal inferences from the association estimates. Some adolescents in our study may have had difficulties with understanding the questionnaire because of poor reading skills. In this study, we used data collected between 2007 and 2016, which may have biased the results because of the period effect.

Conclusions

Our study suggests a positive association between regular participation in physical education classes and meeting the physical activity guidelines among children and adolescents around the globe regardless of sex or age group. The odds were lower in high- than low-income countries. The benefits of regular participation in physical education classes to enhance physical activity are universal across all WHO regions, with the highest being observed among adolescents from South East Asian countries. Even less frequent participation in physical education classes (i.e., 1–2 days a week) was related to higher odds of being sufficiently active in all but low-income countries, especially in boys. Thus, the findings support the importance of physical education for ensuring sufficient physical activity among school-going children and adolescents around the globe. Countries must not miss the opportunity to ensure schools deliver a daily or at least 3 days per week of well-designed physical education classes, which can play a vital role in creating active nations around the world.

Poitras, V. J. et al. Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 41 , S197–S239. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2015-0663 (2016).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Rhodes, R. E., Janssen, I., Bredin, S. S. D., Warburton, D. E. R. & Bauman, A. Physical activity: health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychol. Health 32 , 942–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2017.1325486 (2017).

Whooten, R., Kerem, L. & Stanley, T. Physical activity in adolescents and children and relationship to metabolic health. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 26 , 25–31 (2019).

Article   Google Scholar  

Rodriguez-Ayllon, M. et al. Role of physical activity and sedentary behavior in the mental health of preschoolers, children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 49 , 1383–1410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01099-5 (2019).

World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health (World Health Organization, Geneva, 2010).

Google Scholar  

Guthold, R., Stevens, G. A., Riley, L. M. & Bull, F. C. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1.6 million participants. Lancet Child Adolescent Health https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2 (2019).

U. S. Department of Health Human Services. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report (2018).

Biddle, S. J. H., Gorely, T. & Stensel, D. J. Health-enhancing physical activity and sedentary behaviour in children and adolescents. J. Sports Sci. 22 , 679–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410410001712412 (2004).

Salomé, A. et al. Global Matrix 3.0 Physical Activity Report Card Grades for Children and Youth: results and analysis from 49 countries. J. Phys. Act. Health 15 , S251–S273. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2018-0472 (2018).

Hills, A. P., Dengel, D. R. & Lubans, D. R. Supporting public health priorities: recommendations for physical education and physical activity promotion in schools. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 57 , 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2014.09.010 (2015).

Sallis, J. F. et al. Physical education’s role in public health. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 83 , 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2012.10599842 (2012).

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Hollis, J. L. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels in secondary school physical education lessons. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 14 , 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0504-0 (2017).

Hollis, J. L. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels in elementary school physical education lessons. Prev. Med. 86 , 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.018 (2016).

Kohl, H. W. III. & Cook, H. D. Educating the Student Body: Taking Physical Activity and Physical Education to School (National Academies Press, Washington, 2013).

Society of Health and Physical Educators. National Standards & GRADE-Level Outcomes for K-12 Physical Education (Human Kinetics, 2014).

Lonsdale, C. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions designed to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in school physical education lessons. Prev. Med. 56 , 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.12.004 (2013).

Expert Group on Health-Enhancing Physical Activity. EU Work Plan for Sport 2014–2017 (Europen Commission, 2017).

Sallis, J. F. et al. Physical educations role in public health: steps forward and backward over 20 years and hope for the future. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 83 , 125–135 (2012).

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. Quality Physical Education: Guidelines for Policy-Makers (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris, 2015).

Chen, S., Kim, Y. & Gao, Z. The contributing role of physical education in youth’s daily physical activity and sedentary behavior. BMC Public Health 14 , 110. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-110 (2014).

Mooses, K. et al. Physical education increases daily moderate to vigorous physical activity and reduces sedentary time. J. Sch. Health 87 , 602–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12530 (2017).

Fröberg, A., Raustorp, A., Pagels, P., Larsson, C. & Boldemann, C. Levels of physical activity during physical education lessons in Sweden. Acta Paediatr. 106 , 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13551 (2017).

Sigmund, E., Sigmundová, D., Hamrik, Z. & Gecková, M. A. Does participation in physical education reduce sedentary behaviour in school and throughout the day among normal-weight and overweight-to-obese Czech children aged 9–11 years?. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11 , 1076–1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110101076 (2014).

Tassitano, R. M. et al. Enrollment in physical education is associated with health-related behavior among high school students. J. Sch. Health 80 , 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00476.x (2010).

Silva, D. A. S. et al. Physical education classes, physical activity, and sedentary behavior in children. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 50 , 995–1004 (2018).

Martin, A., Kelly, P., Boyle, J., Corlett, F. & Reilly, J. J. Contribution of walking to school to individual and population moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 28 , 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2015-0207 (2016).

Expert Group on Health-Enhancing Physical Activity. EU Work Plan for Sport: 2014–2017 (2014).

United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. World-Wide Survey of School Physical Education. Final Report 2013 (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris, 2014).

Owen, M. B., Curry, W. B., Kerner, C., Newson, L. & Fairclough, S. J. The effectiveness of school-based physical activity interventions for adolescent girls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev. Med. 105 , 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.09.018 (2017).

World Health Organization. Global School-Based Student Health Survey (GSHS) . https://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/gshs/en/ (n.d.). Accessed 11 Nov 2020.

World Health Organization. Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS) and Global School Health Policy and Practices Survey (SHPPS) . http://www.searo.who.int/entity/noncommunicable_diseases/events/2013-gshs-survey-implementation-english-updated.pdf (2012). Accessed 11 Nov 2020.

US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS) . https://www.cdc.gov/gshs/ (n.d.). Accessed 11 Nov 2020.

Silva, D. A. S., Chaput, J.-P. & Tremblay, M. S. Participation frequency in physical education classes and physical activity and sitting time in Brazilian adolescents. PLoS ONE 14 , e0213785. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213785 (2019).

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Ashdown-Franks, G. et al. Leisure-time sedentary behavior and obesity among 116,762 adolescents aged 12–15 years from 41 low- and middle-income countries. Obesity 27 , 830–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22424 (2019).

Uddin, R. & Khan, A. Sedentary behaviour is associated with overweight and obesity among adolescents: evidence from a population-based study. Acta Paediatr. 108 , 1545–1546. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14827 (2019).

World Health Organization. Growth reference data for 5–19 years. WHO Child Growth Standards. https://www.who.int/growthref/en/ (n.d.). Accessed 11 Nov 2020.

Uddin, R., Lee, E.-Y., Khan, S. R., Tremblay, M. S. & Khan, A. Clustering of lifestyle risk factors for non-communicable diseases in 304,779 adolescents from 89 countries: a global perspective. Prev. Med. 131 , 105955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105955 (2020).

Muyeed, A. Z. in Encyclopedia of Public Health (ed Wilhelm Kirch) 14–17 (Springer, 2008).

Sterne, J. A. C. Meta-analysis in Stata: an updated collection from the Stata Journal . (StataCorp LP, 2009).

Riley, R. D., Higgins, J. P. T. & Deeks, J. J. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ 342 , d549. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d549 (2011).

Palmer, S. E., Bycura, D. K. & Warren, M. A physical education intervention effects on correlates of physical activity and motivation. Health Promot. Pract. 19 , 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839917707740 (2017).

Martins, J. et al. A comparative study of participation in physical education classes among 170,347 adolescents from 54 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155579 (2020).

Bann, D., Scholes, S., Fluharty, M. & Shure, N. Adolescents’ physical activity: cross-national comparisons of levels, distributions and disparities across 52 countries. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 16 , 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0897-z (2019).

Clennin, M. N. et al. Secular changes in physical education attendance among U.S. high school students, 1991–2015. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 89 , 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2018.1502411 (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization for making the Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS) data publicly available for analysis. The authors thank the GSHS country coordinators and other staff members. R.U. is supported by Alfred Deakin Postdoctoral Research Fellowship. J.S. is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Leadership Level 2 Fellowship (APP 1176885). S.M.S.I. is supported by the Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University and a post doctorate fellowship from the National Heart Foundation of Australia (Award #102112).

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Science, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia

Riaz Uddin, Jo Salmon & Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam

School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Therapies Annex, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia

Riaz Uddin & Asaduzzaman Khan

Active Healthy Kids Bangladesh (AHKBD), Dhaka, Bangladesh

Riaz Uddin, Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam & Asaduzzaman Khan

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

R.U.: concept and design study, data analysis and interpretation, drafting manuscript, critical revision of manuscript, final approval; J.S.: data interpretation, critical revision of manuscript, final approval; S.M.S.I.: data interpretation, critical revision of manuscript, final approval; A.K.: concept and design study, data analysis and interpretation, statistical analysis, drafting manuscript, critical revision of manuscript, final approval.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asaduzzaman Khan .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary table s1., rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Uddin, R., Salmon, J., Islam, S.M.S. et al. Physical education class participation is associated with physical activity among adolescents in 65 countries. Sci Rep 10 , 22128 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79100-9

Download citation

Received : 08 June 2020

Accepted : 03 December 2020

Published : 17 December 2020

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79100-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

• Search Menu
• Sign in through your institution
• Advance Articles
• Editor's Choice
• Author Guidelines
• Submission Site
• Open Access
• Reasons to publish with us
• About Health Education Research
• Editorial Board
• Advertising and Corporate Services
• Journals Career Network
• Self-Archiving Policy
• Dispatch Dates
• Journals on Oxford Academic
• Books on Oxford Academic

Article Contents

Introduction.

• < Previous

‘Physical education makes you fit and healthy’. Physical education's contribution to young people's physical activity levels

• Article contents
• Figures & tables
• Supplementary Data

S. Fairclough, G. Stratton, ‘Physical education makes you fit and healthy’. Physical education's contribution to young people's physical activity levels, Health Education Research , Volume 20, Issue 1, February 2005, Pages 14–23, https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg101

• Permissions Icon Permissions

The purpose of this study was to assess physical activity levels during high school physical education lessons. The data were considered in relation to recommended levels of physical activity to ascertain whether or not physical education can be effective in helping young people meet health-related goals. Sixty-two boys and 60 girls (aged 11–14 years) wore heart rate telemeters during physical education lessons. Percentages of lesson time spent in moderate-and-vigorous (MVPA) and vigorous intensity physical activity (VPA) were recorded for each student. Students engaged in MVPA and VPA for 34.3 ± 21.8 and 8.3 ± 11.1% of lesson time, respectively. This equated to 17.5 ± 12.9 (MVPA) and 3.9 ± 5.3 (VPA) min. Boys participated in MVPA for 39.4 ± 19.1% of lesson time compared to the girls (29.1 ± 23.4%; P < 0.01). High-ability students were more active than the average- and low-ability students. Students participated in most MVPA during team games (43.2 ± 19.5%; P < 0.01), while the least MVPA was observed during movement activities (22.2 ± 20.0%). Physical education may make a more significant contribution to young people's regular physical activity participation if lessons are planned and delivered with MVPA goals in mind.

Regular physical activity participation throughout childhood provides immediate health benefits, by positively effecting body composition and musculo-skeletal development ( Malina and Bouchard, 1991 ), and reducing the presence of coronary heart disease risk factors ( Gutin et al. , 1994 ). In recognition of these health benefits, physical activity guidelines for children and youth have been developed by the Health Education Authority [now Health Development Agency (HDA)] ( Biddle et al. , 1998 ). The primary recommendation advocates the accumulation of 1 hour's physical activity per day of at least moderate intensity (i.e. the equivalent of brisk walking), through lifestyle, recreational and structured activity forms. A secondary recommendation is that children take part in activities that help develop and maintain musculo-skeletal health, on at least two occasions per week ( Biddle et al. , 1998 ). This target may be addressed through weight-bearing activities that focus on developing muscular strength, endurance and flexibility, and bone health.

School physical education (PE) provides a context for regular and structured physical activity participation. To this end a common justification for PE's place in the school curriculum is that it contributes to children's health and fitness ( Physical Education Association of the United Kingdom, 2004 ; Zeigler, 1994 ). The extent to which this rationale is accurate is arguable ( Koslow, 1988 ; Michaud and Andres, 1990 ) and has seldom been tested. However, there would appear to be some truth in the supposition because PE is commonly highlighted as a significant contributor to help young people achieve their daily volume of physical activity ( Biddle et al. , 1998 ; Corbin and Pangrazi, 1998 ). The important role that PE has in promoting health-enhancing physical activity is exemplified in the US ‘Health of the Nation’ targets. These include three PE-associated objectives, two of which relate to increasing the number of schools providing and students participating in daily PE classes. The third objective is to improve the number of students who are engaged in beneficial physical activity for at least 50% of lesson time ( US Department of Health and Human Services, 2000 ). However, research evidence suggests that this criterion is somewhat ambitious and, as a consequence, is rarely achieved during regular PE lessons ( Stratton, 1997 ; US Department of Health and Human Services, 2000 ; Levin et al. , 2001 ; Fairclough, 2003a ).

The potential difficulties of achieving such a target are associated with the diverse aims of PE. These aims are commonly accepted by physical educators throughout the world ( International Council of Sport Science and Physical Education, 1999 ), although their interpretation, emphasis and evaluation may differ between countries. According to Simons-Morton ( Simons-Morton, 1994 ), PE's overarching goals should be (1) for students to take part in appropriate amounts of physical activity during lessons, and (2) become educated with the knowledge and skills to be physically active outside school and throughout life. The emphasis of learning during PE might legitimately focus on motor, cognitive, social, spiritual, cultural or moral development ( Sallis and McKenzie, 1991 ; Department for Education and Employment/Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, 1999 ). These aspects may help cultivate students' behavioural and personal skills to enable them to become lifelong physical activity participants [(thus meeting PE goal number 2 ( Simons-Morton, 1994 )]. However, to achieve this, these aspects should be delivered within a curriculum which provides a diverse range of physical activity experiences so students can make informed decisions about which ones they enjoy and feel competent at. However, evidence suggests that team sports dominate English PE curricula, yet bear limited relation to the activities that young people participate in, out of school and after compulsory education ( Sport England, 2001 ; Fairclough et al. , 2002 ). In order to promote life-long physical activity a broader base of PE activities needs to be offered to reinforce the fact that it is not necessary for young people to be talented sportspeople to be active and healthy.

While motor, cognitive, social, spiritual, cultural and moral development are valid areas of learning, they can be inconsistent with maximizing participation in health-enhancing physical activity [i.e. PE goal number 1 ( Simons-Morton, 1994 )]. There is no guidance within the English National Curriculum for PE [NCPE ( Department for Education and Employment/Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, 1999 )] to inform teachers how they might best work towards achieving this goal. Moreover, it is possible that the lack of policy, curriculum development or teacher expertise in this area contributes to the considerable variation in physical activity levels during PE ( Stratton, 1996a ). However, objective research evidence suggests that this is mainly due to differences in pedagogical variables [i.e. class size, available space, organizational strategies, teaching approaches, lesson content, etc. ( Borys, 1983 ; Stratton, 1996a )]. Furthermore, PE activity participation may be influenced by inter-individual factors. For example, activity has been reported to be lower among students with greater body mass and body fat ( Brooke et al. , 1975 ; Fairclough, 2003c ), and higher as students get older ( Seliger et al. , 1980 ). In addition, highly skilled students are generally more active than their lesser skilled peers ( Li and Dunham, 1993 ; Stratton, 1996b ) and boys tend to engage in more PE activity than girls ( Stratton, 1996b ; McKenzie et al. , 2000 ). Such inter-individual factors are likely to have significant implications for pedagogical practice and therefore warrant further investigation.

In accordance with Simons-Morton's ( Simons-Morton, 1994 ) first proposed aim of PE, the purpose of this study was to assess English students' physical activity levels during high school PE. The data were considered in relation to recommended levels of physical activity ( Biddle et al. , 1998 ) to ascertain whether or not PE can be effective in helping children be ‘fit and healthy’. Specific attention was paid to differences between sex and ability groups, as well as during different PE activities.

Subjects and settings

One hundred and twenty-two students (62 boys and 60 girls) from five state high schools in Merseyside, England participated in this study. Stage sampling was used in each school to randomly select one boys' and one girls' PE class, in each of Years 7 (11–12 years), 8 (12–13 years) and 9 (13–14 years). Three students per class were randomly selected to take part. These students were categorized as ‘high’, ‘average’ and ‘low’ ability, based on their PE teachers' evaluation of their competence in specific PE activities. Written informed consent was completed prior to the study commencing. The schools taught the statutory programmes of study detailed in the NCPE, which is organized into six activity areas (i.e. athletic activities, dance, games, gymnastic activities, outdoor activities and swimming). The focus of learning is through four distinct aspects of knowledge, skills and understanding, which relate to; skill acquisition, skill application, evaluation of performance, and knowledge and understanding of fitness and health ( Department for Education and Employment/Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, 1999 ). The students attended two weekly PE classes in mixed ability, single-sex groups. Girls and boys were taught by male and female specialist physical educators, respectively.

Instruments and procedures

The investigation received ethical approval from the Liverpool John Moores Research Degrees Ethics Committee. The study involved the monitoring of heart rates (HRs) during PE using short-range radio telemetry (Vantage XL; Polar Electro, Kempele, Finland). Such systems measure the physiological load on the participants' cardiorespiratory systems, and allow analysis of the frequency, duration and intensity of physical activity. HR telemetry has been shown to be a valid and reliable measure of young people's physical activity ( Freedson and Miller, 2000 ) and has been used extensively in PE settings ( Stratton, 1996a ).

The students were fitted with the HR telemeters while changing into their PE uniforms. HR was recorded once every 5 s for the duration of the lessons. Telemeters were set to record when the teachers officially began the lessons, and stopped at the end of lessons. Total lesson ‘activity’ time was the equivalent of the total recorded time on the HR receiver. At the end of the lessons the telemeters were removed and data were downloaded for analyses. Resting HRs were obtained on non-PE days while the students lay in a supine position for a period of 10 min. The lowest mean value obtained over 1 min represented resting HR. Students achieved maximum HR values following completion of the Balke treadmill test to assess cardiorespiratory fitness ( Rowland, 1993 ). This data was not used in the present study, but was collated for another investigation assessing children's health and fitness status. Using the resting and maximum HR values, HR reserve (HRR, i.e. the difference between resting and maximum HR) at the 50% threshold was calculated for each student. HRR accounts for age and gender HR differences, and is recommended when using HR to assess physical activity in children ( Stratton, 1996a ). The 50% HRR threshold represents moderate intensity physical activity ( Stratton, 1996a ), which is the minimal intensity required to contribute to the recommended volume of health-related activity ( Biddle et al. , 1998 ). Percentage of lesson time spent in health enhancing moderate-and-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was calculated for each student by summing the time spent ≥50% HRR threshold. HRR values ≥75% corresponded to vigorous intensity physical activity (VPA). This threshold represents the intensity that may stimulate improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness ( Morrow and Freedson, 1994 ) and was used to indicate the proportion of lesson time that students were active at this higher level.

Sixty-six lessons were monitored over a 12-week period, covering a variety of group and individual activities ( Table I ). In order to allow statistically meaningful comparisons between different types of activities, students were classified as participants in activities that shared similar characteristics. These were, team games [i.e. invasion (e.g. football and hockey) and striking games (e.g. cricket and softball)], individual games (e.g. badminton, tennis and table tennis), movement activities (e.g. dance and gymnastics) and individual activities [e.g. athletics, fitness (circuit training and running activities) and swimming]. The intention was to monitor equal numbers of students during lessons in each of the four designated PE activity categories. However, timetable constraints and student absence meant that true equity was not possible, and so the number of boys and girls monitored in the different activities was unequal.

Number and type of monitored PE lessons

Student sex, ability level and PE activity category were the independent variables, with percent of lesson time spent in MVPA and VPA set as the dependent variables. Exploratory analyses were conducted to establish whether data met parametric assumptions. Shapiro–Wilk tests revealed that only boys' MVPA were normally distributed. Subsequent Levene's tests confirmed the data's homogeneity of variance, with the exception of VPA between the PE activities. Though much of the data violated the assumption of normality, the ANOVA is considered to be robust enough to produce valid results in this situation ( Vincent, 1999 ). Considering this, alongside the fact that the data had homogenous variability, it was decided to proceed with ANOVA for all analyses, with the exception of VPA between different PE activities.

Sex × ability level factorial ANOVAs compared the physical activity of boys and girls who differed in PE competence. A one-way ANOVA was used to identify differences in MVPA during the PE activities. Post-hoc analyses were performed using Hochberg's GT2 correction procedure, which is recommended when sample sizes are unequal ( Field, 2000 ). A non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA calculated differences in VPA during the different activities. Post-hoc Mann–Whitney U -tests determined where identified differences occurred. To control for type 1 error the Bonferroni correction procedure was applied to these tests, which resulted in an acceptable α level of 0.008. Although these data were ranked for the purposes of the statistical analysis, they were presented as means ± SD to allow comparison with the other results. All data were analyzed using SPSS version 11.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

The average duration of PE lessons was 50.6 ± 20.8 min, although girls' (52.6 ± 25.4 min) lessons generally lasted longer than boys' (48.7 ± 15.1 min). When all PE activities were considered together, students engaged in MVPA and VPA for 34.3 ± 21.8 and 8.3 ± 11.1% of PE time, respectively. This equated to 17.5 ± 12.9 (MVPA) and 3.9 ± 5.3 (VPA) min. The high-ability students were more active than the average- and low-ability students, who took part in similar amounts of activity. These trends were apparent in boys and girls ( Table II ).

Mean (±SD) MVPA and VPA of boys and girls of differing abilities

Boys > girls, P < 0.01.

Boys > girls, P < 0.05.

Boys engaged in MVPA for 39.4% ± 19.1 of lesson time compared to the girls' value of 29.1 ± 23.4 [ F (1, 122) = 7.2, P < 0.01]. When expressed as absolute units of time, these data were the equivalent of 18.9 ± 10.5 (boys) and 16.1 ± 14.9 (girls) min. Furthermore, a 4% difference in VPA was observed between the two sexes [ Table II ; F (1, 122) = 4.6, P < 0.05]. There were no significant sex × ability interactions for either MVPA or VPA.

Students participated in most MVPA during team games [43.2 ± 19.5%; F (3, 121) = 6.0, P < 0.01]. Individual games and individual activities provided a similar stimulus for activity, while the least MVPA was observed during movement activities (22.2 ± 20.0%; Figure 1 ). A smaller proportion of PE time was spent in VPA during all activities. Once more, team games (13.6 ± 11.3%) and individual activities (11.8 ± 14.0%) were best suited to promoting this higher intensity activity (χ 2 (3) =30.0, P < 0.01). Students produced small amounts of VPA during individual and movement activities, although this varied considerably in the latter activity ( Figure 2 ).

Mean (±SD) MVPA during different PE activities. ** Team games > movement activities ( P < 0.01). * Individual activities > movement activities ( P < 0.05).

Mean (±SD) VPA during different PE activities. ** Team games > movement activities ( Z (3) = −4.9, P < 0.008) and individual games ( Z (3) = −3.8, P < 0.008). † Individual activities > movement activities ( Z (3) = −3.3, P < 0.008). ‡ Individual game > movement activities ( Z (3) = −2.7, P < 0.008).

This study used HR telemetry to assess physical activity levels during a range of high school PE lessons. The data were considered in relation to recommended levels of physical activity ( Biddle et al. , 1998 ) to investigate whether or not PE can be effective in helping children be ‘fit and healthy’. Levels of MVPA were similar to those reported in previous studies ( Klausen et al. , 1986 ; Strand and Reeder, 1993 ; Fairclough, 2003b ) and did not meet the US Department of Health and Human Services ( US Department of Health and Human Services, 2000 ) 50% of lesson time criterion. Furthermore, the data were subject to considerable variance, which was exemplified by high standard deviation values ( Table II , and Figures 1 and 2 ). Such variation in activity levels reflects the influence of PE-specific contextual and pedagogical factors [i.e. lesson objectives, content, environment, teaching styles, etc. ( Stratton, 1996a )]. The superior physical activity levels of the high-ability students concurred with previous findings ( Li and Dunham, 1993 ; Stratton, 1996b ). However, the low-ability students engaged in more MVPA and VPA than the average-ability group. While it is possible that the teachers may have inaccurately assessed the low and average students' competence, it could have been that the low-ability group displayed more effort, either because they were being monitored or because they associated effort with perceived ability ( Lintunen, 1999 ). However, these suggestions are speculative and are not supported by the data. The differences in activity levels between the ability groups lend some support to the criticism that PE teachers sometimes teach the class as one and the same rather than planning for individual differences ( Metzler, 1989 ). If this were the case then undifferentiated activities may have been beyond the capability of the lesser skilled students. This highlights the importance of motor competence as an enabling factor for physical activity participation. If a student is unable to perform the requisite motor skills to competently engage in a given task or activity, then their opportunities for meaningful participation become compromised ( Rink, 1994 ). Over time this has serious consequences for the likelihood of a young person being able or motivated enough to get involved in physical activity which is dependent on a degree of fundamental motor competence.

Boys spent a greater proportion of lesson time involved in MVPA and VPA than girls. These differences are supported by other HR studies in PE ( Mota, 1994 ; Stratton, 1997 ). Boys' activity levels equated to 18.9 min of MVPA, compared to 16.1 min for the girls. It is possible that the characteristics and aims of some of the PE activities that the girls took part in did not predispose them to engage in whole body movement as much as the boys. Specifically, the girls participated in 10 more movement lessons and eight less team games lessons than the boys. The natures of these two activities are diverse, with whole body movement at differing speeds being the emphasis during team games, compared to aesthetic awareness and control during movement activities. The monitored lessons reflected typical boys' and girls' PE curricula, and the fact that girls do more dance and gymnastics than boys inevitably restricts their MVPA engagement. Although unrecorded contextual factors may have contributed to this difference, it is also possible that the girls were less motivated than the boys to physically exert themselves. This view is supported by negative correlations reported between girls' PE enjoyment and MVPA ( Fairclough, 2003b ). Moreover, there is evidence ( Dickenson and Sparkes, 1988 ; Goudas and Biddle, 1993 ) to suggest that some pupils, and girls in particular ( Cockburn, 2001 ), may dislike overly exerting themselves during PE. Although physical activity is what makes PE unique from other school subjects, some girls may not see it as such an integral part of their PE experience. It is important that this perception is clearly recognized if lessons are to be seen as enjoyable and relevant, whilst at the same time contributing meaningfully to physical activity levels. Girls tend to be habitually less active than boys and their levels of activity participation start to decline at an earlier age ( Armstrong and Welsman, 1997 ). Therefore, the importance of PE for girls as a means of them experiencing regular health-enhancing physical activity cannot be understated.

Team games promoted the highest levels of MVPA and VPA. This concurs with data from previous investigations ( Strand and Reeder, 1993 ; Stratton, 1996a , 1997 ; Fairclough, 2003a ). Because these activities require the use of a significant proportion of muscle mass, the heart must maintain the oxygen demand by beating faster and increasing stroke volume. Moreover, as team games account for the majority of PE curriculum time ( Fairclough and Stratton, 1997 ; Sport England, 2001 ), teachers may actually be more experienced and skilled at delivering quality lessons with minimal stationary waiting and instruction time. Similarly high levels of activity were observed during individual activities. With the exception of throwing and jumping themes during athletics lessons, the other individual activities (i.e. swimming, running, circuit/station work) involved simultaneous movement of the arms and legs over variable durations. MVPA and VPA were lowest during movement activities, which mirrored previous research involving dance and gymnastics ( Stratton, 1997 ; Fairclough, 2003a ). Furthermore, individual games provided less opportunity for activity than team games. The characteristics of movement activities and individual games respectively emphasize aesthetic appreciation and motor skill development. This can mean that opportunities to promote cardiorespiratory health may be less than in other activities. However, dance and gymnastics can develop flexibility, and muscular strength and endurance. Thus, these activities may be valuable to assist young people in meeting the HDA's secondary physical activity recommendation, which relates to musculo-skeletal health ( Biddle et al. , 1998 ).

The question of whether PE can solely contribute to young people's cardiorespiratory fitness was clearly answered. The students engaged in small amounts of VPA (4.5 and 3.3 min per lesson for boys and girls, respectively). Combined with the limited frequency of curricular PE, these were insufficient durations for gains in cardiorespiratory fitness to occur ( Armstrong and Welsman, 1997 ). Teachers who aim to increase students' cardiorespiratory fitness may deliver lessons focused exclusively on high intensity exercise, which can effectively increase HR ( Baquet et al. , 2002 ), but can sometimes be mundane and have questionable educational value. Such lessons may undermine other efforts to promote physical activity participation if they are not delivered within an enjoyable, educational and developmental context. It is clear that high intensity activity is not appropriate for all pupils, and so opportunities should be provided for them to be able to work at developmentally appropriate levels.

Students engaged in MVPA for around 18 min during the monitored PE lessons. This approximates a third of the recommended daily hour ( Biddle et al. , 1998 ). When PE activity is combined with other forms of physical activity support is lent to the premise that PE lessons can directly benefit young people's health status. Furthermore, for the very least active children who should initially aim to achieve 30 min of activity per day ( Biddle et al. , 1998 ), PE can provide the majority of this volume. However, a major limitation to PE's utility as a vehicle for physical activity participation is the limited time allocated to it. The government's aspiration is for all students to receive 2 hours of PE per week ( Department for Education and Employment/Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, 1999 ), through curricular and extra-curricular activities. While some schools provide this volume of weekly PE, others are unable to achieve it ( Sport England, 2001 ). The HDA recommend that young people strive to achieve 1 hour's physical activity each day through many forms, a prominent one of which is PE. The apparent disparity between recommended physical activity levels and limited curriculum PE time serves to highlight the complementary role that education, along with other agencies and voluntary organizations must play in providing young people with physical activity opportunities. Notwithstanding this, increasing the amount of PE curriculum time in schools would be a positive step in enabling the subject to meet its health-related goals. Furthermore, increased PE at the expense of time in more ‘academic’ subjects has been shown not to negatively affect academic performance ( Shephard, 1997 ; Sallis et al. , 1999 ; Dwyer et al. , 2001 ).

Physical educators are key personnel to help young people achieve physical activity goals. As well as their teaching role they are well placed to encourage out of school physical activity, help students become independent participants and inform them about initiatives in the community ( McKenzie et al. , 2000 ). Also, they can have a direct impact by promoting increased opportunities for physical activity within the school context. These could include activities before school ( Strand et al. , 1994 ), during recess ( Scruggs et al. , 2003 ), as well as more organized extra-curricular activities at lunchtime and after school. Using time in this way would complement PE's role by providing physical activity opportunities in a less structured and pedagogically constrained manner.

This research measured student activity levels during ‘typical’, non-intensified PE lessons. In this sense it provided a representative picture of the frequency, intensity and duration of students' physical activity engagement during curricular PE. However, some factors should be considered when interpreting the findings. First, the data were cross-sectional and collected over a relatively short time frame. Tracking students' activity levels over a number of PE activities may have allowed a more accurate account of how physical activity varies in different aspects of the curriculum. Second, monitoring a larger sample of students over more lessons may have enabled PE activities to be categorized into more homogenous groups. Third, monitoring lessons in schools from a wider geographical area may have enabled stronger generalization of the results. Fourth, it is possible that the PE lessons were taught differently, and that the students acted differently as a result of being monitored and having the researchers present during lessons. As this is impossible to determine, it is unknown how this might have affected the results. Fifth, HR telemetry does not provide any contextual information about the monitored lessons. Also, HR is subject to emotional and environmental factors when no physical activity is occurring. Future work should combine objective physical activity measurement with qualitative or quantitative methods of observation.

During PE, students took part in health-enhancing activity for around one third of the recommended 1-hour target ( Biddle et al. , 1998 ). PE obviously has potential to help meet this goal. However, on the basis of these data, combined with the weekly frequency of PE lessons, it is clear that PE can only do so much in supplementing young people's daily volume of physical activity. Students need to be taught appropriate skills, knowledge and understanding if they are to optimize their physical activity opportunities in PE. For improved MVPA levels to occur, health-enhancing activity needs to be recognized as an important element of lessons. PE may make a more significant contribution to young people's regular physical activity participation if lessons are planned and delivered with MVPA goals in mind.

Armstrong, N. and Welsman, J.R. ( 1997 ) Young People and Physical Activity , Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Baquet, G., Berthoin, S. and Van Praagh, E. ( 2002 ) Are intensified physical education sessions able to elicit heart rate at a sufficient level to promote aerobic fitness in adolescents? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport , 73 , 282 –288.

Biddle, S., Sallis, J.F. and Cavill, N. (eds) ( 1998 ) Young and Active? Young People and Health-Enhancing Physical Activity—Evidence and Implications. Health Education Authority, London.

Borys, A.H. ( 1983 ) Increasing pupil motor engagement time: case studies of student teachers. In Telema, R. (ed.), International Symposium on Research in School Physical Education. Foundation for Promotion of Physical Culture and Health, Jyvaskyla, pp. 351–358.

Brooke, J., Hardman, A. and Bottomly, F. ( 1975 ) The physiological load of a netball lesson. Bulletin of Physical Education , 11 , 37 –42.

Cockburn, C. ( 2001 ) Year 9 girls and physical education: a survey of pupil perceptions. Bulletin of Physical Education , 37 , 5 –24.

Corbin, C.B. and Pangrazi, R.P. ( 1998 ) Physical Activity for Children: A Statement of Guidelines. NASPE Publications, Reston, VA.

Department for Education and Employment/Qualifications and Curriculum Authority ( 1999 ) Physical Education—The National Curriculum for England. DFEE/QCA, London.

Dickenson, B. and Sparkes, A. ( 1988 ) Pupil definitions of physical education. British Journal of Physical Education Research Supplement , 2 , 6 –7.

Dwyer, T., Sallis, J.F., Blizzard, L., Lazarus, R. and Dean, K. ( 2001 ) Relation of academic performance to physical activity and fitness in children. Pediatric Exercise Science , 13 , 225 –237.

Fairclough, S. ( 2003 a) Physical activity levels during key stage 3 physical education. British Journal of Teaching Physical Education , 34 , 40 –45.

Fairclough, S. ( 2003 b) Physical activity, perceived competence and enjoyment during high school physical education. European Journal of Physical Education , 8 , 5 –18.

Fairclough, S. ( 2003 c) Girls' physical activity during high school physical education: influences of body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education , 22 , 382 –395.

Fairclough, S. and Stratton, G. ( 1997 ) Physical education curriculum and extra-curriculum time: a survey of secondary schools in the north-west of England. British Journal of Physical Education , 28 , 21 –24.

Fairclough, S., Stratton, G. and Baldwin, G. ( 2002 ) The contribution of secondary school physical education to lifetime physical activity. European Physical Education Review , 8 , 69 –84.

Field, A. ( 2000 ) Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows. Sage, London.

Freedson, P.S. and Miller, K. ( 2000 ) Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport , 71 (Suppl.), S21 –S29.

Goudas, M. and Biddle, S. ( 1993 ) Pupil perceptions of enjoyment in physical education. Physical Education Review , 16 , 145 –150.

Gutin, B., Islam, S., Manos, T., Cucuzzo, N., Smith, C. and Stachura, M.E. ( 1994 ) Relation of body fat and maximal aerobic capacity to risk factors for atherosclerosis and diabetes in black and white seven-to-eleven year old children. Journal of Pediatrics , 125 , 847 –852.

International Council of Sport Science and Physical Education ( 1999 ) Results and Recommendations of the World Summit on Physical Education , Berlin, November.

Klausen, K., Rasmussen, B. and Schibye, B. ( 1986 ) Evaluation of the physical activity of school children during a physical education lesson. In Rutenfranz, J., Mocellin, R. and Klint, F. (eds), Children and Exercise XII. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, pp. 93–102.

Koslow, R. ( 1988 ) Can physical fitness be a primary objective in a balanced PE program? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance , 59 , 75 –77.

Levin, S., McKenzie, T.L., Hussey, J., Kelder, S.H. and Lytle, L. ( 2001 ) Variability of physical activity during physical education lesson across school grades. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science , 5 , 207 –218.

Li, X. and Dunham, P. ( 1993 ) Fitness load and exercise time in secondary physical education classes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education , 12 , 180 –187.

Lintunen, T. ( 1999 ) Development of self-perceptions during the school years. In Vanden Auweele, Y., Bakker, F., Biddle, S., Durand, M. and Seiler, R. (eds), Psychology for Physical Educators. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, pp. 115–134.

Malina, R.M. and Bouchard, C. ( 1991 ) Growth , Maturation and Physical Activity . Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.

McKenzie, T.L., Marshall, S.J., Sallis, J.F. and Conway, T.L. ( 2000 ). Student activity levels, lesson context and teacher behavior during middle school physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport , 71 , 249 –259.

Metzler, M.W. ( 1989 ) A review of research on time in sport pedagogy. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education , 8 , 87 –103.

Michaud, T.J. and Andres, F.F. ( 1990 ) Should physical education programs be responsible for making our youth fit? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance , 61 , 32 –35.

Morrow, J. and Freedson, P. ( 1994 ) Relationship between habitual physical activity and aerobic fitness in adolescents. Pediatric Exercise Science , 6 , 315 –329.

Mota, J. ( 1994 ) Children's physical education activity, assessed by telemetry. Journal of Human Movement Studies , 27 , 245 –250.

Physical Education Association of the United Kingdom ( 2004 ) PEA UK Policy on the Physical Education Curriculum . Available: http://www.pea.uk.com/menu.html ; retrieved: 28 April, 2004.

Rink, J.E. ( 1994 ) Fitting fitness into the school curriculum. In Pate, R.R. and Hohn, R.C. (eds), Health and Fitness Through Physical Education. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, pp. 67–74.

Rowland, T.W. ( 1993 ) Pediatric Laboratory Exercise Testing . Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.

Sallis, J.F., McKenzie, R.D., Kolody, B., Lewis, S., Marshall, S.J. and Rosengard, P. ( 1999 ) Effects of health-related physical education on academic achievement: Project SPARK. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport , 70 , 127 –134.

Sallis, J.F. and McKenzie, T.L. ( 1991 ) Physical education's role in public health. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport , 62 , 124 –137.

Scruggs, P.W., Beveridge, S.K. and Watson, D.L. ( 2003 ) Increasing children's school time physical activity using structured fitness breaks. Pediatric Exercise Science , 15 , 156 –169.

Seliger, V., Heller, J., Zelenka, V., Sobolova, V., Pauer, M., Bartunek, Z. and Bartunkova, S. ( 1980 ) Functional demands of physical education lessons. In Berg, K. and Eriksson, B.O. (eds), Children and Exercise IX . University Park Press, Baltimore, MD, vol. 10, pp. 175–182.

Shephard, R.J. ( 1997 ) Curricular physical activity and academic performance. Pediatric Exercise Science , 9 , 113 –126.

Simons-Morton, B.G. ( 1994 ) Implementing health-related physical education. In Pate, R.R. and Hohn, R.C. (eds), Health and Fitness Through Physical Education. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, pp. 137–146.

Sport England ( 2001 ) Young People and Sport in England 1999 . Sport England, London.

Strand, B. and Reeder, S. ( 1993 ) Analysis of heart rate levels during middle school physical education activities. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance , 64 , 85 –91.

Strand, B., Quinn, P.B., Reeder, S. and Henke, R. ( 1994 ) Early bird specials and ten minute tickers. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance , 65 , 6 –9.

Stratton, G. ( 1996 a) Children's heart rates during physical education lessons: a review. Pediatric Exercise Science , 8 , 215 –233.

Stratton, G. ( 1996 b) Physical activity levels of 12–13 year old schoolchildren during European handball lessons: gender and ability group differences. European Physical Education Review , 2 , 165 –173.

Stratton, G. ( 1997 ) Children's heart rates during British physical education lessons, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education . 16 , 357 –367.

US Department of Health and Human Services ( 2000 ) Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health . USDHHS, Washington DC.

Vincent, W. ( 1999 ) Statistics in Kinesiology , Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.

Zeigler, E. ( 1994 ) Physical education's 13 principal principles. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance , 65 , 4 –5.

Author notes

1REACH Group and School of Physical Education, Sport and Dance, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L17 6BD and 2REACH Group and Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 2ET, UK

• physical activity
• valproic acid
• physical education
• high schools

Email alerts

Citing articles via.

• Recommend to your Library

Affiliations

• Online ISSN 1465-3648
• Print ISSN 0268-1153
• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Institutional account management
• Rights and permissions
• Get help with access
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Physical education for healthier, happier, longer and more productive living

The time children and adults all over the world spend engaging in physical activity is decreasing with dire consequences on their health, life expectancy, and ability to perform in the classroom, in society and at work.

In a new publication, Quality Physical Education, Guidelines for Policy Makers , UNESCO urges governments and educational planners to reverse this trend, described by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a pandemic that contributes to the death of 3.2 million people every year, more than twice as many as die of AIDS.

The Guidelines will be released on the occasion of a meeting of UNESCO’s Intergovernmental Committee for Physical Education and Sport (CIGEPS) in Lausanne, Switzerland, (28-30 January).*

UNESCO calls on governments to reverse the decline in physical education (PE) investment that has been observed in recent years in many parts of the world, including some of the wealthiest countries. According to European sources, for example, funding and time allocation for PE in schools has been declining progressively over more than half of the continent, and conditions are not better in North America.

The new publication on PE, produced in partnership with several international and intergovernmental organizations**, advocates quality physical education and training for PE teachers. It highlights the benefits of investing in PE versus the cost of not investing (cf self-explanatory infographics ).

“The stakes are high,” says UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova. “Public investment in physical education is far outweighed by high dividends in health savings and educational objectives. Participation in quality physical education has been shown to instil a positive attitude towards physical activity, to decrease the chances of young people engaging in risky behaviour and to impact positively on academic performance, while providing a platform for wider social inclusion.”

The Guidelines seek to address seven areas of particular concern identified last year in UNESCO’s global review of the state of physical education , namely: 1. Persistent gaps between PE policy and implementation; 2. Continuing deficiencies in curriculum time allocation; 3. Relevance and quality of the PE curriculum; 4. Quality of initial teacher training programmes; 5. Inadequacies in the quality and maintenance of facilities; 6. Continued barriers to equal provision and access for all; 7. Inadequate school-community coordination.

The recommendations to policy-makers and education stake-holders are matched by case studies about programmes, often led by community-based nongovernmental organizations. Success stories in Africa, North and Latin America, Asia and Europe illustrate what can be achieved by quality physical education: young people learn how to plan and monitor progress in reaching a goal they set themselves, with a direct impact on their self-confidence, social skills and ability to perform in the classroom.

While schools alone cannot provide the full daily hour of physical activity recommended for all young people, a well-planned policy should promote PE synergies between formal education and the community. Experiences such as Magic Bus (India) which uses physical activity to help bring school drop outs back to the classroom highlight the potential of such school-leisure coordination.

The publication promotes the concept of “physical literacy,” defined by Canada’s Passport for Life organization of physical and health educators as the ability to move “with competence and confidence in a wide variety of physical activities in multiple environments that benefit the healthy development of the whole person. Competent movers tend to be more successful academically and socially. They understand how to be active for life and are able to transfer competence from one area to another. Physically literate individuals have the skills and confidence to move any way they want. They can show their skills and confidence in lots of different physical activities and environments; and use their skills and confidence to be active and healthy.”

For society to reap the benefit of quality physical education, the guidelines argue, planners must ensure that it is made available as readily to girls as it is to boys, to young people in school and to those who are not.

The Guidelines were produced at the request of UNESCO’s Intergovernmental Committee for Physical Education and Sport (CIGEPS) and participants at the Fifth International Conference of Ministers and Senior Officials Responsible for Physical Education and Sport (Berlin 2013). UNESCO and project partners will proceed to work with a number of countries that will engage in a process of policy revision in this area, as part of UNESCO’s work to support national efforts to adapt their educational systems to today’s needs (see Quality physical education contributes to 21st century education ).

Media contact: Roni Amelan, UNESCO Press Service, r.amelan(at)unesco.org , +33 (0)1 45 68 16 50

Photos are available here: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/media-services/multimedia/photos/photo-gallery-quality-physical-education/

* More about the CIGEPS meeting

** The European Commission, the International Council of Sport Science and Physical Education (ICSSPE), the International Olympic Committee (IOC), UNDP, UNICEF, UNOSDP and WHO.

Related items

• Country page: Switzerland

More on this subject

Other recent news

Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Physical Education

Physical education is the foundation of a Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program. 1, 2 It is an academic subject characterized by a planned, sequential K–12 curriculum (course of study) that is based on the national standards for physical education. 2–4 Physical education provides cognitive content and instruction designed to develop motor skills, knowledge, and behaviors for physical activity and physical fitness. 2–4 Supporting schools to establish physical education daily can provide students with the ability and confidence to be physically active for a lifetime. 2–4

There are many benefits of physical education in schools. When students get physical education, they can 5-7 :

• Increase their level of physical activity.
• Improve their grades and standardized test scores.
• Stay on-task in the classroom.

Increased time spent in physical education does not negatively affect students’ academic achievement.

Strengthen Physical Education in Schools [PDF – 437 KB] —This data brief defines physical education, provides a snapshot of current physical education practices in the United States, and highlights ways to improve physical education through national guidance and practical strategies and resources. This was developed by Springboard to Active Schools in collaboration with CDC.

Secular Changes in Physical Education Attendance Among U.S. High School Students, YRBS 1991–2013

The Secular Changes in Physical Education Attendance Among U.S. High School Students report [PDF – 3 MB] explains the secular changes (long-term trends) in physical education attendance among US high school students over the past two decades. Between 1991 and 2013, US high school students’ participation in school-based physical education classes remained stable, but at a level much lower than the national recommendation of daily physical education. In order to maximize the benefits of physical education, the adoption of policies and programs aimed at increasing participation in physical education among all US students should be prioritized. Download the report for detailed, nationwide findings.

Physical Education Analysis Tool (PECAT)

The  Physical Education Curriculum Analysis Tool (PECAT) [PDF – 6 MB] is a self-assessment and planning guide developed by CDC. It is designed to help school districts and schools conduct clear, complete, and consistent analyses of physical education curricula, based upon national physical education standards.

Visit our PECAT page  to learn more about how schools can use this tool.

• CDC Monitoring Student Fitness Levels1 [PDF – 1.64 MB]
• CDC Ideas for Parents: Physical Education [PDF – 2 MB]
• SHAPE America: The Essential Components of Physical Education (2015) [PDF – 391 KB]
• SHAPE America: Appropriate Instructional Practice Guidelines for Elementary, Middle School, and High School Physical Education [PDF – 675 KB]
• SHAPE America: National Standards and Grade-Level Outcomes for K–12 Physical Education 2014
• SHAPE America: National Standards for K–12 Physical Education (2013)
• SHAPE America Resources
• Youth Compendium of Physical Activities for Physical Education Teachers (2018) [PDF – 145 KB]
• Social Emotional Learning Policies and Physical Education
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A Guide for Developing Comprehensive School Physical Activity Programs . Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2013.
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. School health guidelines to promote healthy eating and physical activity. MMWR . 2011;60(RR05):1–76.
• Institute of Medicine. Educating the Student Body: Taking Physical Activity and Physical Education to School . Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013. Retrieved from  http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=18314&page=R1 .
• SHAPE America. T he Essential Components of Physical Education . Reston, VA: SHAPE America; 2015. Retrieved from   http://www.shapeamerica.org/upload/TheEssentialComponentsOfPhysicalEducation.pdf  [PDF – 392 KB].
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Association Between School-Based Physical Activity, Including Physical Education, and Academic Performance . Atlanta, GA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2010.
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health and Academic Achievement. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
• Michael SL, Merlo C, Basch C, et al. Critical connections: health and academics . Journal of School Health . 2015;85(11):740–758.

Healthy Youth

To receive email updates about this page, enter your email address:

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess the implementation of physical education programs in Chinese junior high schools

Affiliations.

• 1 Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Jalan Universiti 1, Serdang, 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
• 2 Department of Science and Technical Education, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Jalan Universiti 1, Serdang, 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
• 3 Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Jalan Universiti 1, Serdang, 43400, Selangor, Malaysia. [email protected].
• PMID: 39223514
• DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19844-5

Background: Students' physical fitness has always been the focus of attention of the Chinese government, and the school as an important way to improve students' physical fitness, there are many studies on the current status of the implementation of physical education in schools, and there are many studies that use self-made questionnaires to investigate the implementation of physical education in schools, but most of the studies do not adequately validate the self-made questionnaires, so the purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire to assess the level of implementation of physical education programmes in Chinese junior secondary schools and to test its reliability and validity.

Method: The content of the questionnaire was developed based on the content of Annex 1 of the Assessment Measures for Physical Education in Primary and Secondary Schools issued by the Ministry of Education of China in 2014 and was modified based on feedback from the expert panel and pre-test participants. The questionnaire was initially tested for validity by 5 expert reviewers, and then we collected data information from 350 participants and conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to explore the factor structure of the initial version. One week later, 40 of the 350 participants were randomly selected to assess test-retest reliability.

Results: The I-CVI and KAPPA value analysis results of the expert review results show that the questionnaire has extremely high reliability and consistency among experts. EFA results indicate that the five dimensions of this questionnaire are highly reliable. In the test-retest reliability, the Pearson correlation coefficients of the initial test data and the retest data of each dimension are all greater than 0.7, and the significance probability values are all less than 0.05, reaching the significance level, the results show that the questionnaire has good stability.

Conclusions: This study concluded that the 5 dimensions and 38 items of this questionnaire had high reliability and validity and could be used as a preliminary tool to measure the implementation level of physical education programs in junior high schools in China. However, future research should explore the potential need for adjustment to suit different regions and cultures.

Keywords: Assessing Program Implementation; Junior High School; Physical Education Program.

© 2024. The Author(s).

PubMed Disclaimer

• Kohl HW II, Cook HD, editors. Educating the student body: taking physical activity and physical education to school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2013.
• Liu J, Ji M, Clarke CV, Liu R, Ma X, An R. Physical activity and Mental Health among Chinese adolescents. Am J Health Behav. 2021;45(2):309–22. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.45.2.10 . - DOI - PubMed
• Van den Berg V, Saliasi E, de Groot RHM, Jolles J, Chinapaw MJM, Singh AS. Physical activity in the school setting: cognitive performance is not affected by three different types of acute exercise. Front Psychol. 2016;7:723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00723 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
• Sun H, Du CR, Wei ZF. Physical education and student well-being: promoting health and fitness in schools. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296817 .
• Wu X, Liang J, Chen J, Dong W, Lu C. Physical activity and school adaptation among Chinese junior high school students: chain mediation of resilience and coping styles. Front Psychol. 2024;15:1376233. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1376233 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC

Publication types

• Search in MeSH
• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• HHS Author Manuscripts

Engaging Students in Physical Education

Sarah sliwa.

Health scientist in the Division of Population Health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, GA

Allison Nihiser

Health scientist in the Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity Prevention, at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, GA

Nathan McCaughtry

Assistant dean in the Division of Kinesiology, Health and Sport Studies at Wayne State University in Detroit, MI

Associate professor in the Department of Health Promotion and Physical Education at Kennesaw State University in Kennesaw, GA

Shannon Michael

A well-designed physical education (PE) program is inclusive, active, enjoyable and supportive (SHAPE America – Society of Health and Physical Educators, 2015 ). Irrespective of location, programs are affected by a host of issues in the midst of various school and community climates. Trends toward urbanization in the United States (U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 ) and worldwide ( World Health Organization, 2016 ) suggest that more and more PE teachers will be working in urban settings.

In October 2009, JOPERD published a special symposium about “Engaging Urban Youths in Physical Education and Physical Activity” (Murgia & McCullick, 2009). Seven years later, many of those considerations remain relevant, such as large class sizes ( Dyson, Coviello, DiCesare, & Dyson, 2009 ; Schmidlein, Vickers, & Chepyator-Thomson, 2014 ) and limited access to equipment ( Schmidlein et al., 2014 ), a dedicated gymnasium ( Fernandes & Sturm, 2010 ), or outdoor space ( Dyson et al., 2009 ; Hobin et al., 2013 ). These structural challenges matter. For example, some data suggest that larger class sizes and indoor lessons are associated with students spending significantly less time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and with teachers spending more time on classroom management ( Skala et al., 2012 ). In addition, high rates of teacher turnover ( Ingersoll, Merrill, & Stuckey, 2014 ), difficulties communicating with English language learners (ELLs; Kena et al., 2016 ), and low self-efficacy ( Fletcher, Mandigo, & Kosnik, 2013 ) affect teachers’ ability to engage students in PE in urban settings.

The purpose of this article is to identify attributes of urban settings that influence how PE is taught, and to provide action-oriented strategies for addressing challenges and making the most of available resources.

To start the process, the authors conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify journal articles about urban PE, published between 1980 and 2015 from CINAHL, PubMed, Sociological Abstracts, ERIC, PsycNET, SPORTDiscus, and Google Scholar. The search identified 135 articles on research that took place in the United States, Canada or the United Kingdom; that included urban settings; and that addressed PE. The research team reviewed and coded articles to identify recurrent themes. The authors then prioritized themes that they believed would be relevant and actionable for practitioners in urban settings and focused the review on actions that can be taken at the school level, where teachers have direct influence, as opposed to district-level strategies ( Tozer & Horsley, 2006 ).

The review was designed to look for articles featuring schools in urban areas. Still, some of these findings will likely resonate with readers who work outside of city spaces. For example, rural schools experience some of the same structural challenges (e.g., limited resources, shared space), demographic challenges (student mobility, ELL students), and contextual challenges (e.g., neighborhood safety, gang violence, high rates of child poverty) as many urban schools ( Hennessy et al., 2010 ; Hertz & Farrigan, 2016 ; Jacob, 2007 ; Moore et al., 2010 ). Similarly, teachers in all settings are likely to encounter disruptive behaviors ( Lavay, Henderson, French, & Guthrie, 2012 ).

The strategies discussed here highlight the importance of preservice training and ongoing professional development, reflective and responsive instructional practices, and partnerships with academic and community institutions.

Tailor Professional Development and Physical Education Teacher Education Training for Teachers in Urban Settings

Recent graduates of physical education teacher education (PETE) programs may be underprepared and overwhelmed when starting work in urban schools, especially new teachers who have had no prior professional experience in this setting ( O’Neill, 2009 ; Sato, Fisette, & Walton, 2013 ) and those whose sociodemographic and geographic backgrounds differ from those of their students ( Culp, 2011 ; O’Neill, 2009; Pope & O’Sullivan, 1998 ). Some research has suggested that veteran PE teachers may become frustrated when changing community demographics require adaptations to an established teaching approach ( Chen, 1999 ; Griffin, 1985 ). Several studies have described scenarios where white PE teachers in schools with a majority of minority students found it difficult to effectively connect with students ( Chen, 1999 ; Flory & McCaughtry, 2014 ; Griffin, 1985 ; O’Neill, 2009; Pope & O’Sullivan, 1998 ).

Increasing teachers’ cultural competency may help ease some, but not all, of this friction. Although PE teachers from communities of color may demonstrate greater cultural competency than their white counterparts ( Harrison, Carson, & Burden, 2010 ), starting work in a new school underprepared is challenging nonetheless ( Sato, et al., 2013 ). In one qualitative study, several black PE teacher candidates reported feeling unsure of how to navigate cultural norms and stereotypes, including students’ perceptions of “white” and “suburban” sports (e.g., lacrosse), after starting to work in urban areas without relevant preservice training ( Sato et al., 2013 ). Recognizing this reality, faculty at multiple institutions have called for more specialized training that better prepares preservice students and early-career teachers for working in urban settings by including coursework and readings that address sociocultural issues, by placing less emphasis on team sports, and by increasing preservice teachers’ exposure to schools in urban communities ( Chase et al., 2011 ; Flory & McCaughtry, 2014 ).

Enhance Participation by Communicating Relevance, Creating a Mastery Climate, and Connecting with Students

Identify relevant content and instructional practices.

Some PE teachers in urban settings have difficulty determining appropriate content to teach and have identified a tension between wanting to introduce students to a variety of ways to be active and deferring to games and sports that students identify with culturally and locally in order to maximize engagement and minimize conflict (i.e., “culture of basketball”; Culp, 2011 ; McCaughtry, Barnard, Martin, Shen, & Kulinna, 2006 ). Indeed, many students who do not perceive PE content to be personally relevant are inclined to disengage from the learning process, regardless of the setting. Finding the contextually appropriate balance between selecting PE content that resonates with student culture and exposing students to new movement opportunities can be challenging ( McCaughtry, Barnard, et al., 2006 ). Nevertheless, teachers should consider this seriously to maximize students’ connection and engagement with content ( McCaughtry, Barnard, et al., 2006 ).

As in many areas, especially those with large class sizes ( Bevans et al., 2010 ), urban PE teachers often spend large portions of PE classes on classroom management ( Dyson et al., 2009 ; Skala et al., 2012 ). Although PE teachers may be unable to directly address some of the underlying “outside of the classroom” challenges to student engagement (e.g., food insecurity, community violence; Borofsky, Kellerman, Baucom, Oliver, & Margolin, 2013 ; Culp, 2011 ; Lawson & Lawson, 2013 ), increasing teachers’ toolbox of pedagogical strategies and self-efficacy can assist teachers in maintaining a strong, learning-focused climate ( Martin, McCaughtry, Kulinna, & Cothran, 2009 ).

Some researchers have found that teacher interactions that support students’ personal and social responsibility and accountability are associated with fewer disruptions, increased participation, and greater enjoyment of PE ( Balderson & Sharpe, 2005 ; Garn, McCaughtry, Shen, Martin, & Fahlman, 2011 ; Li, Wright, Rukavina, & Pickering, 2008 ). In an effort to support active participation and to limit off-task activities, some teachers offer games over skills-based activities because students might enjoy games more than repetitive skill learning. However, students who seek attention from peers may see large-sided games as an opportunity to showcase disruptive behavior for a ready audience ( Garn et al., 2011 ; Rovegno, 2008 ). Reducing the visibility of any one child’s performance or skill via small-sided games or activities may reduce some disruptions when students feel less on display ( Garn et al., 2011 ). Researchers and teachers alike have also identified split-gym, smaller-group activities, and circuits as effective ways of increasing movement in a large class within limited outdoor or indoor space ( Chase et al., 2011 ). How teachers communicate with students and the kinds of feedback they give can further influence student engagement ( Kahan, 2013 ; Morgan & Kingston 2008 ).

Create a Mastery Climate

Previous reviews have highlighted the importance of a mastery-focused environment ( Rovegno, 2008 ) that supports student engagement, effort and enjoyment in PE ( Gutierrez & Ruiz, 2009 ; Martinek & Williams, 1997 ; Morgan & Kingston, 2008 ). Providing feedback and input regarding student progress is an important piece of creating a mastery climate, and PE teachers should be mindful of the kinds of comments they give in public and what attributes they emphasize (e.g., effort versus performance; Morgan & Kingston, 2008 ).

Other mastery-supportive practices include ( Kahan, 2013 ):

• providing students with opportunities to practice in small groups or with a partner;
• placing less importance on winning; and
• teaching activities that do not favor the most skilled students.

Connect with Students

Building a sense of relatedness, that is, students’ perceived connection to their PE teachers and classmates, can enhance motivation for physical activity in PE ( Cothran & Ennis, 1999 ; Shen, McCaughtry, Fahlman, & Garn, 2012 ). Showing interest in students can help build that sense of relatedness and also boost teachers’ own satisfaction ( Culp, 2011 ). Conversations with students can also help teachers gather information to increase the relevance of their lessons. For teachers with a large proportion of ELLs, learning a few phrases in students’ native languages can help foster a connection ( Flory & McCaughtry, 2011 ). Researchers have also called for increased cultural competency ( Harrison et al., 2010 ) and culturally relevant PE curricula in urban settings ( Flory & McCaughtry, 2014 ) and more generally ( Choi & Chepyator-Thomson, 2011 ; Culp, 2013 ), in recognition of the growing ethnic and racial diversity across the United States ( Colby & Ort-man, 2015 ; Johnson & Lichter, 2010 ). Cultural competency requires teachers to become knowledgeable about their students, and to continuously observe, reflect and adapt ( Flory & McCaughtry, 2014 ; Harrison et al., 2010 ). This process seems broadly relevant to increasing student engagement.

Actions to Support Student Engagement

Here are some actions PE teachers can take to support student engagement.

Ask your students! Do what you can to know your students and to become known by students, parents and the community ( Flory & McCaughtry, 2014 ). Learn about the activities that students like and want to learn and use this feedback to inform lesson plans ( Doolittle & Rukavina, 2014 ; Kahan, 2013 ; Stride, 2014 ). For example, when developing a coordinated school physical activity program in an urban middle school, one PE teacher offered volleyball and table tennis as sports early on due to strong interest from students, including many ethnic Chinese students, at the school ( Doolittle & Rukavina, 2014 ).

Increasing cultural competence involves becoming aware of one’s own assumptions, beliefs and biases ( Culp, 2013 ). Hidden biases may be influencing your performance expectations and interactions with students in ways you do not realize. Project Implicit ( https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/ ) provides validated assessments that have been widely used to test such hidden associations ( Nosek, Greenwald, & Banaji, 2005 ; Nosek & Smyth, 2007 ). These include no-cost assessments that are related to race, sex and weight.

Listen and “Bridge the Distance.”

Try to provide context for students’ comments and tie the conversation back to the curriculum ( Culp, 2011 ). Look for “teachable moments” that can both show respect for students’ experiences and advance understanding and learning ( Culp, 2013 ).

Brian Culp described how a teacher who taught in the southeastern United States, but who grew up playing ice hockey in Canada, reacted to his students when they laughed and said, “Black people don’t play hockey” ( Culp, 2011 ). Instead of ignoring the comment, the instructor came back to class with examples of black athletes in the National Hockey League and continued the planned lessons. He communicated relevance while providing an opportunity for students to develop skills related to a new sport ( Culp, 2011 ). Seeing someone who students believe is similar to them perform an action provides a “vicarious experience,” which can increase their confidence to perform that same action ( Bandura, 1977 ). Visual aids can be used to promote self-efficacy. As an example, teachers have reported greater participation among African-American girls in PE activities when presented with images/posters of black female athletes ( McCaughtry, Martin, Kulinna, & Cothran, 2006 ).

Address Challenges through Strategic Partnerships

Institutions of higher education are often an important asset in urban areas. Partnerships with these institutions can enhance PE by:

• training future leaders through PETE programs;
• providing professional development opportunities to current teachers and coordinating the development of professional learning communities ( Hemphill, Richards, Blankenship, Beck, & Keith, 2012 ; Tozer & Horsley, 2006 ) and teacher mentoring programs ( Cothran et al., 2009 ; Hemphill et al., 2012 ; Martin, McCaughtry, Kulinna, Cothran, & Faust, 2008 );
• piloting and evaluating new programs and curricula to help build the evidence base ( McCaughtry, Krause, McAuliffe, Miotke, & Price, 2012 ); and
• collaborating on competitive grant applications ( Hemphill et al., 2012 ; O’Sullivan, Tannehill, Knop, Pope, & Henninger, 1999 ).

Engaging preservice students in professional development opportunities with practicing urban PE teachers can yield mutual gains ( Hemphill et al., 2012 ; LaMaster, 2005 ). Through such partnerships, preservice students have gained more experience in school settings and have learned from veteran teachers who, in turn, were exposed to new activities and teaching approaches ( LaMaster, 2005 ). Similarly, school–university partnerships can enhance professional development opportunities.

One-day trainings risk overloading teachers with information ( Kulinna, McCaughtry, Cothran, & Martin, 2006 ). Additional supports and follow-up are needed to help teachers put into practice changes in curricula and assessments ( Kulinna et al., 2006 ; Kulinna, McCaughtry, Martin, & Cothran, 2011 ) or pedagogy (e.g., increase student-driven decision making; Ko, Wallhead, & Ward, 2006 ). Urban PE teacher–mentoring programs and peer learning opportunities can help fill the gap by providing support beyond inservice trainings ( Cothran et al., 2009 ; Martin et al., 2008 ).

Realistically, these collaborations take years to develop and multiple iterations to refine and troubleshoot ( Hemphill et al., 2012 ; LaMaster, 2005 ; McCaughtry et al., 2012 ; O’Sullivan et al., 1999 ). One example of an urban university–public school partnership is the Detroit Healthy Youth Initiative between faculty and staff at Wayne State University and the PE teachers and administrators at Detroit public schools. The initiative has been in action for about 15 years, and through this relationship a range of professional development opportunities and at-school support, including a mentor system, were created, and grant funding was secured to enhance teachers’ knowledge of wellness curricula, instructional technologies, and individualized lifetime-fitness activities ( McCaughtry et al., 2012 ). More information about this partnership and other successful university–school partnerships can be found in the JOPERD feature, “The Dynamics of Promoting Sustained School–University Partnerships” ( Patton, 2012 ).

The Carol M. White PEP Grant Program is one example of a funding mechanism that has been highlighted as a catalyst for collaboration between schools and universities ( Deglau & Barnes, 2009 ; Hemphill et al., 2012 ; Rovegno, 2008 ). This program is not currently authorized for funding under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), which means it lacks legal support to operate at this time. There are still opportunities to collaborate with academic partners on funding applications, as well as advocacy efforts and research initiatives to help make the case for dedicating more resources to PE.

Engage Community Partners to Address Structural Challenges

Schools located in urban settings are less likely to have a dedicated gymnasium or access to outdoor spaces ( Dyson et al., 2009 ; Fernandes & Sturm, 2010 ; Hobin et al., 2013 ). Just as joint-use agreements can extend the use of school facilities to parents and community members ( Jones & Wendel, 2015 ), agreements or permits with nearby community parks and playgrounds, universities, or recreation centers can support students’ use of facilities that are not available at school in order to connect students with community opportunities for physical activity to extend their learning in PE ( Chase et al., 2011 ; Doolittle & Rukavina, 2014 ). Applying for permits takes both time and knowledge of local government policies and personnel, yet this process can be taken on by a motivated teacher ( Doolittle & Rukavina, 2014 ).

It is not uncommon for PE teachers to purchase equipment with their own money ( McCaughtry, Barnard, et al., 2006 ). Though it may take time to establish them, partnerships with local businesses can secure in-kind donations or funding to support equipment purchases ( Chase et al., 2011 ). Similarly, university support on grant applications and funding requests can be leveraged to provide professional development and new equipment for PE ( Deglau & Barnes, 2009 ; McCaughtry et al., 2012 ). School fundraisers, organized through parent-led organizations or associations, can benefit PE programs ( Doolittle & Rukavina, 2014 ). Individual PE teachers or other school champions can apply to grant programs that are awarded at the school level ( Doolittle & Rukavina, 2014 ). These include national initiatives, such as Let’s Move! Active Schools, the Presidential Youth Fitness Program, Fuel Up to Play 60, state SHAPE/AHPERD organizations, and even private organizations that support causes related to physical activity, sport and children’s health (e.g., hospital networks, health insurance providers and their affiliated foundations).

Forming Partnerships with Institutions of Higher Education and Community Organizations

Much has been written about how successful university and K–12 school partnerships can develop and flourish ( Catelli, 1992 ; Hemphill et al., 2012 ; McCaughtry et al., 2012 ; O’Sullivan et al., 1999 ; VanSickle & Schaumleffel, 2015 ). School- and district-level administrators may already have relationships with university contacts. Teachers can approach school leaders with ideas for university collaborations to identify next steps.

Here are some dynamics to keep in mind:

• Before reaching out, assess your needs. What are you looking to gain through this partnership? Collect some information to back up your request. This could be as simple as reviewing your equipment and space, and then conducting a local inventory to identify nearby playgrounds, fields or recreation centers that could help meet needs through permits.
• Outline and agree to shared expectations. Create a memorandum of understanding before launching your work with a college or university. Consider what it would take to make the time investment worthwhile ( VanSickle & Schaumleffel, 2015 ). What outcomes does each organization expect will stem from this collaboration? Look for faculty members who have experience working in your community and a demonstrated interest in the goals and objectives of the proposed collaboration.
• Recognize the importance of different roles. Academic partners often bring knowledge of evaluation design and experience developing curricula and applying behavioral theories. Yet, school staff are experts on their school context, processes and interpersonal dynamics. It may take time to develop the relationships needed to communicate openly and to trust one another, but this is an essential step ( O’Sullivan et al., 1999 ).
• Make time to plan. Frequent meetings are seen as a valuable way to share and respond to successes and challenges ( LaMaster, 2005 ). Though time-intensive, retreats can be highly productive and can help to strengthen relationships and understanding ( O’Sullivan et al., 1999 ).

Looking Forward

It is clear from the literature that teachers in urban settings work within many of the same constraints as they did 30 years ago. Further, many of these challenges are similar to those faced by teachers in other contexts. Two features stand out.

First, to be effective, PE teachers in urban settings have to understand the unique dynamics of their communities, families and students, and take what they learn and incorporate it into their curriculum and pedagogy. Knowing students allows teachers to tailor their pedagogical approach so that students find the educational process relevant, engaging and motivating. After all, student engagement is an essential component of any educational effort ( Lawson & Lawson, 2013 ; Zepke & Leach, 2010 ).

Second, K–12 schools do not exist in isolation. They are part of a wider community and network of potential resources, including parks, universities, community recreation programs, and funding opportunities. The key is having teachers and administrators recognize the opportunities that exist in their area and seek out partnerships that can help advance their goal of teaching children to be active and healthy. The density of potential partners in urban settings is a tremendous asset. Collaborative efforts with school, community and academic partnerships are expected to help school districts secure and make the most of funding opportunities — including evaluations to identify what works and dissemination efforts to make findings accessible.

Contributor Information

Sarah Sliwa, Health scientist in the Division of Population Health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, GA.

Allison Nihiser, Health scientist in the Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity Prevention, at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, GA.

Sarah Lee, Health scientist in the Division of Population Health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, GA.

Nathan McCaughtry, Assistant dean in the Division of Kinesiology, Health and Sport Studies at Wayne State University in Detroit, MI.

Brian Culp, Associate professor in the Department of Health Promotion and Physical Education at Kennesaw State University in Kennesaw, GA.

Shannon Michael, Health scientist in the Division of Population Health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, GA.

• Balderson D, Sharpe T. The effects of personal accountability and personal responsibility instruction on select off-task and positive social behaviors. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2005; 24 :66–87. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 1977; 84 :191. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bevans KB, Fitzpatrick LA, Sanchez BM, Riley AW, Forrest C. Physical education resources, class management, and student physical activity levels: A structure-process-outcome approach to evaluating physical education effectiveness. Journal of School Health. 2010; 80 :573–580. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Borofsky LA, Kellerman I, Baucom B, Oliver PH, Margolin G. Community violence exposure and adolescents’ school engagement and academic achievement over time. Psychology of Violence. 2013; 3 :381. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Catelli LA. Against all odds: A holistic urban school/college partnership — Project SCOPE. Action in Teacher Education. 1992; 14 :42–51. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chase MC, Vollum M, Toebbe J, Clark GE, Magnotta J, Culp B, Ladda S. Ideas exchange: What are some suggestions for overcoming any unique challenges found in an urban physical education class? How might we better prepare physical educators for teaching in an urban setting? Strategies. 2011; 24 :6–9. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chen A. The impact of social change on inner-city high school physical education: An analysis of a teacher’s experiential account. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 1999; 18 :312–335. [ Google Scholar ]
• Choi W, Chepyator-Thomson R. Multiculturalism in teaching physical education: A review of U.S. based literature. ICHPER-SD Journal of Research in Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport & Dance. 2011; 6 :14. [ Google Scholar ]
• Colby SL, Ortman JM. (U.S. Census Bureau population estimates and projections). Projections of the size and composition of the US population: 2014 to 2060. 2015 Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/content/dam/census/library/publications/2015/demo/p25-1143.pdf .
• Cothran DJ, Ennis CD. Alone in a crowd: Meeting students’ needs for relevance and connection in urban high school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 1999; 18 :234. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cothran D, McCaughtry N, Faust R, Garn A, Kulinna PH, Martin J. E-mentoring in physical education: Promises and pitfalls. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2009; 80 :552–562. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Culp B. The archetypes and philosophical motivations of urban elementary physical educators. ICHPER-SD Journal of Research. 2011; 6 :40–47. [ Google Scholar ]
• Culp B. Eliminating barriers to physical activity: Using cultural negotiation and competence. Strategies. 2013; 26 :35–40. [ Google Scholar ]
• Deglau DA, Barnes D. Meeting the needs of urban youths in Columbus city schools. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2009; 80 (8):41–45. [ Google Scholar ]
• Doolittle SA, Rukavina PB. Case study of an institutionalized urban comprehensive school physical activity program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2014; 33 :528–557. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dyson B, Coviello N, DiCesare E, Dyson L. Students’ perspectives of urban middle school physical education programs. Middle Grades Research Journal. 2009; 4 :31–52. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fernandes M, Sturm R. Facility provision in elementary schools: Correlates with physical education, recess, and obesity. Preventive Medicine. 2010; 50 (Suppl. 1):S30–S35. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fletcher T, Mandigo J, Kosnik C. Elementary classroom teachers and physical education: Change in teacher-related factors during pre-service teacher education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2013; 18 :169–183. [ Google Scholar ]
• Flory SB, McCaughtry N. Culturally relevant physical education in urban schools: reflecting cultural knowledge. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2011; 82 :49–60. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Flory SB, McCaughtry N. The influences of pre-professional socialization on early career physical educators. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2014; 33 :93–111. [ Google Scholar ]
• Garn AC, McCaughtry N, Shen B, Martin JJ, Fahlman M. Social goals in urban physical education: Relationships with effort and disruptive behavior. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2011; 30 :410–423. [ Google Scholar ]
• Griffin PS. Teaching in an urban, multiracial physical education program: The power of context. Quest. 1985; 37 :154–165. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gutierrez M, Ruiz LM. Perceived motivational climate, sportsmanship, and students’ attitudes toward physical education classes and teachers. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2009; 108 :308–326. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Harrison L, Jr, Carson RL, Burden J., Jr Physical education teachers’ cultural competency. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2010; 29 :184–198. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hemphill MA, Richards AK, Blankenship BT, Beck S, Keith D. Making PALS through partnerships. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2012; 83 (9):23–236. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hennessy E, Kraak VI, Hyatt RR, Bloom J, Fenton M, Wagoner C, Economos CD. Active living for rural children: Community perspectives using PhotoVOICE. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2010; 39 :537–545. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hertz T, Farrigan T. Understanding the rise in rural child poverty, 2003–2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture; 2016. (Economic Research Service). Retrieved from https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=45543 . [ Google Scholar ]
• Hobin EP, Leatherdale S, Manske S, Dubin JA, Elliott S, Veugelers P. Are environmental influences on physical activity distinct for urban, suburban, and rural schools? A multilevel study among secondary school students in Ontario, Canada. Journal of School Health. 2013; 83 :357–367. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ingersoll R, Merrill L, Stuckey D. Seven trends: The transformation of the teaching force. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education; 2014. (CPRE research report #RR-80). [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jacob BA. The challenges of staffing urban schools with effective teachers. Future of Children. 2007; 17 (1):129–153. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Johnson KM, Lichter DT. Growing diversity among America’s children and youth: Spatial and temporal dimensions. Population and Development Review. 2010; 36 :151–176. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jones SE, Wendel AM. Characteristics of joint use agreements in school districts in the United States: Findings from the school health policies and practices study, 2012. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2015; 12 doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140560. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kahan D. Here is what interests us! Students’ reconceived physical education activity offerings in an inner-city middle school. Physical Educator. 2013; 70 :243. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kena G, Hussar W, McFarland J, de Brey C, Musu-Gillette L, Wang X, Dunlop Velez E. The condition of education 2016. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics; 2016. (NCES 2016–144). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016144.pdf . [ Google Scholar ]
• Ko B, Wallhead T, Ward P. Chapter 4: Professional development workshops —What do teachers learn and use? Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2006; 25 :397–412. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kulinna PH, McCaughtry N, Cothran D, Martin J. What do urban/inner-city physical education teachers teach? A contextual analysis of one elementary/primary school district. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2006; 11 :45–68. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kulinna PH, McCaughtry N, Martin J, Cothran D. Effects of continuing professional development on urban elementary students’ knowledge. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2011; 82 :580–4. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• LaMaster K. Collaboration in preservice physical education programs: Mutual gains. ICHPER — SD Journal. 2005; 41 :5–7. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lavay B, Henderson H, French R, Guthrie S. Behavior management instructional practices and content of college/university physical education teacher education (PETE) programs. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2012; 17 :195–210. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lawson MA, Lawson HA. New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research. 2013; 83 :432–479. [ Google Scholar ]
• Li W, Wright PM, Rukavina PB, Pickering M. Measuring students’ perceptions of personal and social responsibility and the relationship to intrinsic motivation in urban physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2008; 27 :167–178. [ Google Scholar ]
• Martin JJ, McCaughtry N, Kulinna PH, Cothran D. The impact of a social cognitive theory-based intervention on physical education teacher self-efficacy. Professional Development in Education. 2009; 35 :511–529. [ Google Scholar ]
• Martin JJ, McCaughtry N, Kulinna P, Cothran D, Faust R. The effectiveness of mentoring-based professional development on physical education teachers’ pedometer and computer efficacy and anxiety. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2008; 27 :68–82. [ Google Scholar ]
• Martinek TJ, Williams L. Goal orientation and task persistence in learned helpless and mastery oriented students in middle school physical education classes. International Sports Journal. 1997; 1 :63–76. [ Google Scholar ]
• McCaughtry N, Barnard S, Martin J, Shen B, Kulinna PH. Teachers’ perspectives on the challenges of teaching physical education in urban schools: The student emotional filter. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2006; 77 :486–497. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• McCaughtry N, Krause J, McAuliffe P, Miotke R, Price F. Detroit healthy youth initiative: Creating successful school–university partnerships. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2012; 83 (9):28–36. [ Google Scholar ]
• McCaughtry N, Martin J, Kulinna PH, Cothran D. What makes teacher professional development work? The influence of instructional resources on change in physical education. Journal of In-service Education. 2006; 32 (9):221–235. [ Google Scholar ]
• Moore JB, Jilcott SB, Shores KA, Evenson KR, Brownson RC, Novick LF. A qualitative examination of perceived barriers and facilitators of physical activity for urban and rural youth. Health Education Research. 2010; 25 :355–367. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Morgan K, Kingston K. Development of a self-observation mastery intervention programme for teacher education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2008; 13 :109–129. [ Google Scholar ]
• Murgia C, McCullick B, editors. Engaging urban youths in physical education and physical activity [Special symposium] Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2008; 80 (8) Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ujrd20/80/8 . [ Google Scholar ]
• Nosek BA, Greenwald AG, Banaji MR. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2005; 31 :166–180. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nosek BA, Smyth FL. A multitrait-multimethod validation of the implicit association test. Experimental Psychology. 2007; 54 :14–29. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• O’Neill A. Struggling to engage urban youths in meaningful physical education: A bailout plan to survive and thrive. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2009; 80 (8):43–45. [ Google Scholar ]
• O’Sullivan M, Tannehill D, Knop N, Pope C, Henninger M. A school–university collaborative journey toward relevance and meaning in an urban high school physical education program. Quest. 1999; 51 :225–243. [ Google Scholar ]
• Patton K. The dynamics of promoting sustained school–university partnerships [Special feature] Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2012; 83 (9) Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ujrd20/83/9 . [ Google Scholar ]
• Pope CC, O’Sullivan M. Culture, pedagogy and teacher change in an urban high school: How would you like your eggs done? Sport, Education & Society. 1998; 3 :201–226. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rovegno I. Learning and instruction in social, cultural environments: Promising research agendas. Quest. 2008; 60 :84–104. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sato T, Fisette J, Walton T. The experiences of African American physical education teacher candidates at secondary urban schools. Urban Review. 2013; 45 :611–631. [ Google Scholar ]
• Schmidlein R, Vickers B, Chepyator-Thomson R. Curricular issues in urban high school physical education. Physical Educator. 2014; 71 :273–302. [ Google Scholar ]
• Shen B, McCaughtry N, Martin J, Fahlman M, Garn AC. Urban high-school girls’ sense of relatedness and their engagement in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2012; 31 :231–245. [ Google Scholar ]
• Skala KA, Springer AE, Sharma SV, Hoelscher DM, Kelder SH. Environmental characteristics and student physical activity in PE class: Findings from two large urban areas of Texas. Journal of Physical Activity & Health. 2012; 9 :481–491. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Society of Health and Physical Educators. The essential components of physical education. Reston, VA: Author; 2015. (Guidance document). [ Google Scholar ]
• Stride A. Let US tell YOU! South Asian, Muslim girls tell tales about physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2014; 19 :398–417. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tozer S, Horsley H. Chapter 8: Professional development of teachers in physical education — Where are we now? Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2006; 25 :450–457. [ Google Scholar ]
• Census Bureau US. (Census Bureau reports). Growth in urban population outpaces rest of nation. 2012 Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/2010_census/cb12-50.html .
• VanSickle JL, Schaumleffel NA. Putting partnerships on paper: Creating service engagement opportunities in kinesiology and recreation. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2015; 86 (4):24–33. [ Google Scholar ]
• World Health Organization. Urban population growth. 2016 Retrieved from http://www.who.int/gho/urban_health/situation_trends/urban_population_growth_text/en/
• Zepke N, Leach L. Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education. 2010; 11 :167–177. [ Google Scholar ]

• Title & authors

Dulay, Malvin Q. "Implementation of Music, ARTS, Physical Education and Health (MAPEH) Program and Challenges Encountered: Basis for A Proposed Action Plan." International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research , vol. 3, no. 5, 2022, pp. 731-736, doi: 10.11594/ijmaber.03.05.01 .

Download citation file:

The study used the descriptive-survey method of research because it was most appropriate to use in determining the status of the MAPEH program in terms of its implementation and challenges. It used a survey-questionnaire as the main instrument to gather the data needed in the study. It involved 22 school administrators and 70 MAPEH teachers sourced from nine public junior high schools who served as respondents in the study. The data gathered were statistically treated using weighted mean, t-test, frequency count and ranking. The study generated the following findings: (1). The MAPEH program was implemented to a high extent in terms of the program's objectives, curriculum, learning resources, teachers' qualification, and competency, administrative support, funding, and community partnership. (2). There was no significant difference between the assessment of the two groups of respondents in the implementation of MAPEH program in terms of the aforementioned aspects. (3) The top five challenges encountered by the two groups of respondents in the implementation of the MAPEH program were: a) Fund for MAPEH program is not enough to finance its needs, b) Facilities for Music, Arts, P.E. and Health Education are not adequate c) Not all MAPEH teachers are competent in teaching all the components of the subject, d) Students' engagement in MAPEH activities was limited in this pandemic time and e) Online instruction for MAPEH activities was difficult to carry out. (4) An action plan was proposed based on the result of the study.

Table of contents

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS. A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

NSF selects David B. Berkowitz as new assistant director for the Mathematics and Physical Sciences Directorate

The U.S. National Science Foundation has selected David B. Berkowitz as assistant director for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS), starting September 9, 2024.   

Berkowitz will manage the NSF MPS team and oversee the investment portfolios for the divisions of Astronomical Sciences, Chemistry, Mathematical Sciences, Materials Research, Physics and the Office of Strategic Initiatives (OSI), with a total budget of approximately $1.7 billion.  

With exceptional leadership and team-building skills and a proven track record for supporting diverse talent and cutting-edge research, Berkowitz has fostered domestic and international partnerships with industry, academia and other government organizations. For example, in April, he helped launch the first NSF Chemistry-industry joint solicitation; namely the Molecular Foundations for Sustainability- Sustainable Polymers Enabled by Emerging Data Analytics program. This new partnership with industry is joint with the NSF Technology, Innovation and Partnerships Directorate and MPS-OSI and aims to support the development of sustainable polymers.  

"David Berkowitz's extensive knowledge and expertise at the interface of chemistry, biology and engineering are an invaluable addition to NSF's work to advancing the frontiers of science and research," said NSF Director Sethuraman Panchanathan. "His superior leadership capabilities, combined with his proven track record for supporting diverse talent and cutting-edge research, will help accelerate our nation's progress at the forefront of discovery and innovation. Dr. Berkowitz is not new to the agency. The experience he brings with him from his time as a division director and program director will put him on track to lead the way from day one. I eagerly await his insight and perspective."   

As division director (2020-2024), he guided the NSF Chemistry Division through the pandemic, while managing the division's investment portfolio, including multimillion-dollar grants aimed at tackling grand challenges in chemistry, such as the seven NSF Centers for Chemical Innovation, as well as key chemistry infrastructure at frontline facilities, like the Argonne National Lab and the NSF National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (NSF MagLab).  

Berkowitz has fostered domestic and international partnerships with industry, academia and other government organizations. Under his leadership, in 2021, the NSF Chemistry Division launched the Molecular Foundations for Biotechnology (MFB) program — a multi-divisional, multi-directorate partnership to fund high-risk, high-reward interdisciplinary research across the frontiers of biotechnology. In February, under his guidance, the MFB program announced an interagency partnership with the National Institutes of Health's National Human Genome Research Institute to develop RNA-based methods for biotech innovations. This is the first interagency partnership with NIH for the NSF Chemistry Division. His impressive career includes co-chairing (since 2021) the White House Office of Science Technology Policy's Sustainable Chemistry Strategy Team, and he spearheaded its Sustainable Chemistry Report in 2023. Berkowitz is a fellow of both the American Chemical Society, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, has served on the National Academies of Science Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology and Chemical Sciences Roundtable, and has been recognized as an Alfred P. Sloan research fellow.     

"I am truly honored to have been selected for this important leadership role for the MPS Directorate and its core fundamental science mission," said Berkowitz.  "I am eager to build on the strong leadership and scientific momentum at the agency today, with so many opportunities to bring the power of basic research and the promise of emerging technologies to bear on grand challenges in the mathematical and physical sciences." Berkowitz is the Elmer H. and Ruby M. Cordes professor of chemistry at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, where his lab explores solutions at the interface of chemistry and biology, particularly at the nexus of synthetic organic chemistry and mechanistic enzymology. He co-leads the Nebraska Drug Discovery and Development Pipeline, a collaboration to build team science around drug discovery and development, which has made a huge impact on biomedical science research in the state.  

Berkowitz also serves as a co-principal investigator on a Defense Health Agency-funded $24.5 million project to develop a first-of-its-kind prophylactic to help protect U.S. troops from radiation exposure.   

Berkowitz has a bachelor's degree from the University of Chicago, a doctoral degree from Harvard University, and he was a Merck Postdoctoral Fellow at Yale University.   

Research areas