experimental group definition environmental science

Experimental Group – Definition, Importance, Examples

What is experimental group, definition of experimental group.

The experimental group, in scientific research, refers to the group subjected to specific changes or treatments in a variable to observe and evaluate potential outcomes, in contrast to a control group which remains unaltered or standardized for comparison.

How Does an Experimental Group Work?

In essence, the experimental group serves as the primary focus of investigation in experimental research. By comparing its outcomes with a control group, researchers can isolate the effects of the treatment or intervention, thereby providing insights into cause-and-effect relationships.

Advantages of Experimental Group

In summary, the use of an experimental group in research provides a structured and controlled environment that facilitates the exploration of cause-and-effect relationships, ensuring the rigor, validity, and reliability of the findings.

Limitation of Experimental Group

In summary, while experimental groups provide invaluable insights in scientific research, it’s crucial to recognize and account for these limitations when designing studies, interpreting results, and drawing conclusions.

Importance of Experimental Group

In summary, the experimental group is indispensable in the scientific method, providing a structured framework for investigating hypotheses and drawing informed conclusions. Its role in isolating and examining the effects of specific variables ensures the rigor and robustness of empirical research.

Examples of Experimental Group

1. the influence of music on plant growth.

In a structured experiment designed to investigate the potential impact of music on plant growth, plants were systematically categorized into distinct groups. The primary division comprised the control group, which was maintained in an environment devoid of music, and the experimental group. This experimental group was further subdivided, with each subset being exposed to a unique genre of music. To ensure the reliability of the results, it was imperative that the plants used were genetically identical, ideally clones, and that they exhibited homozygosity across all genes. This minimizes genetic variability, which could otherwise confound the results. By meticulously controlling external factors such as temperature and humidity, the experiment aimed to ascertain that any observed differences in growth patterns were solely attributable to the musical variations.

2. Ecosystem Productivity and Organism Interactions

In essence, these examples underscore the pivotal role of experimental groups in scientific research. By introducing specific changes or treatments to these groups and juxtaposing their outcomes against control groups, scientists can glean invaluable insights into the variables under investigation.

What is the primary purpose of an experimental group in scientific research? a) To serve as a baseline for comparison b) To undergo specific treatments or interventions c) To ensure the study has high external validity d) To replicate the results of previous studies

In an experimental design, which group remains unaltered or is exposed to a baseline level of the variable for comparison? a) Dependent group b) Independent group c) Experimental group d) Control group

Which of the following is a potential limitation of using an experimental group? a) High internal validity b) Lack of generalizability to real-world settings c) Ability to establish causality d) Precision in measurements

The Hawthorne Effect is associated with which phenomenon? a) Participants altering their behavior due to the experimental treatment b) Participants behaving differently because they know they are being observed c) Participants responding positively to any intervention d) Participants showing no change regardless of the intervention

Why is random assignment important in experimental research? a) To ensure high external validity b) To reduce the likelihood of selection bias c) To increase the sample size d) To ensure all participants receive the treatment

Which of the following best describes the control group in an experimental design? a) It undergoes the primary treatment or intervention. b) It is exposed to multiple variables simultaneously. c) It remains unexposed or is exposed to a standard level of the variable. d) It determines the external validity of the study.

In experimental research, what is the primary goal of controlling extraneous variables? a) To increase the complexity of the study b) To ensure that observed effects are due to the manipulated variable c) To reduce the sample size d) To enhance external validity

Which of the following is NOT a typical characteristic of an experimental group? a) Undergoing a specific treatment or intervention b) Serving as a benchmark for comparison c) Being observed for outcomes post-treatment d) Being randomly selected from the larger sample

Experimental groups are essential for: a) Qualitative research only b) Establishing correlational relationships c) Establishing cause-and-effect relationships d) Observational studies

Which of the following scenarios best exemplifies the use of an experimental group? a) Observing the natural behavior of animals in the wild b) Conducting a survey on people’s dietary habits c) Administering a new drug to a group of patients to test its efficacy d) Interviewing individuals about their life experiences

What is an experimental group in scientific research?

How is an experimental group different from a control group.

While the experimental group undergoes the treatment or intervention, the control group remains unaltered or is exposed to a baseline level of the variable. The control group serves as a benchmark for comparison.

Why is random assignment important in creating an experimental group?

Random assignment ensures that each participant has an equal chance of being placed in any group, reducing potential biases and ensuring that the groups are comparable at the outset.

Can a study have multiple experimental groups?

What is the main purpose of using an experimental group.

The primary purpose is to determine the effects of a specific treatment or intervention by comparing the outcomes of the experimental group to those of a control group.

How do researchers ensure that results from the experimental group are valid?

Researchers control extraneous variables, use random assignment, and employ statistical tests to ensure that observed effects can be attributed to the treatment rather than other factors.

What are some limitations of using an experimental group?

Is the experimental group always exposed to positive interventions.

No, the experimental group can be exposed to any type of intervention, whether it’s believed to have positive, negative, or neutral effects.

How do researchers handle potential biases in experimental groups?

Through techniques like random assignment, blinding (where participants or researchers don’t know who is receiving the treatment), and controlling extraneous variables.

Can experimental groups be used in fields outside of medicine or biology?

Related posts, sterilization – physical and chemical methods, physical methods of sterilization, archaea – habitat, structure, characteristics, importance, examples, a- z microbiology terms with definitions – microbiology glossary, history of microbiology , history, branches, and career opportunities of microbiology, biosafety levels with their primary and secondary barriers., biosafety guidelines – biosafety guidelines and regulations, leave a comment cancel reply.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

The Difference Between Control Group and Experimental Group

• Chemical Laws
• Periodic Table
• Projects & Experiments
• Scientific Method
• Biochemistry
• Physical Chemistry
• Medical Chemistry
• Chemistry In Everyday Life
• Famous Chemists
• Activities for Kids
• Abbreviations & Acronyms
• Weather & Climate

In an experiment , data from an experimental group is compared with data from a control group. These two groups should be identical in every respect except one: the difference between a control group and an experimental group is that the independent variable is changed for the experimental group, but is held constant in the control group.

Key Takeaways: Control vs. Experimental Group

• The control group and experimental group are compared against each other in an experiment. The only difference between the two groups is that the independent variable is changed in the experimental group. The independent variable is "controlled", or held constant, in the control group.
• A single experiment may include multiple experimental groups, which may all be compared against the control group.
• The purpose of having a control is to rule out other factors which may influence the results of an experiment. Not all experiments include a control group, but those that do are called "controlled experiments."
• A placebo may also be used in an experiment. A placebo isn't a substitute for a control group because subjects exposed to a placebo may experience effects from the belief they are being tested; this itself is known as the placebo effect.

What Are Is an Experimental Group in Experiment Design?

An experimental group is a test sample or the group that receives an experimental procedure. This group is exposed to changes in the independent variable being tested. The values of the independent variable and the impact on the dependent variable are recorded. An experiment may include multiple experimental groups at one time.

A control group is a group separated from the rest of the experiment such that the independent variable being tested cannot influence the results. This isolates the independent variable's effects on the experiment and can help rule out alternative explanations of the experimental results.

While all experiments have an experimental group, not all experiments require a control group. Controls are extremely useful where the experimental conditions are complex and difficult to isolate. Experiments that use control groups are called controlled experiments .

A Simple Example of a Controlled Experiment

A simple example of a controlled experiment may be used to determine whether or not plants need to be watered to live. The control group would be plants that are not watered. The experimental group would consist of plants that receive water. A clever scientist would wonder whether too much watering might kill the plants and would set up several experimental groups, each receiving a different amount of water.

Sometimes setting up a controlled experiment can be confusing. For example, a scientist may wonder whether or not a species of bacteria needs oxygen in order to live. To test this, cultures of bacteria may be left in the air, while other cultures are placed in a sealed container of nitrogen (the most common component of air) or deoxygenated air (which likely contained extra carbon dioxide). Which container is the control? Which is the experimental group?

Control Groups and Placebos

The most common type of control group is one held at ordinary conditions so it doesn't experience a changing variable. For example, If you want to explore the effect of salt on plant growth, the control group would be a set of plants not exposed to salt, while the experimental group would receive the salt treatment. If you want to test whether the duration of light exposure affects fish reproduction, the control group would be exposed to a "normal" number of hours of light, while the duration would change for the experimental group.

Experiments involving human subjects can be much more complex. If you're testing whether a drug is effective or not, for example, members of a control group may expect they will not be unaffected. To prevent skewing the results, a placebo may be used. A placebo is a substance that doesn't contain an active therapeutic agent. If a control group takes a placebo, participants don't know whether they are being treated or not, so they have the same expectations as members of the experimental group.

However, there is also the placebo effect to consider. Here, the recipient of the placebo experiences an effect or improvement because she believes there should be an effect. Another concern with a placebo is that it's not always easy to formulate one that truly free of active ingredients. For example, if a sugar pill is given as a placebo, there's a chance the sugar will affect the outcome of the experiment.

Positive and Negative Controls

Positive and negative controls are two other types of control groups:

• Positive control groups are control groups in which the conditions guarantee a positive result. Positive control groups are effective to show the experiment is functioning as planned.
• Negative control groups are control groups in which conditions produce a negative outcome. Negative control groups help identify outside influences which may be present that were not unaccounted for, such as contaminants.
• Bailey, R. A. (2008). Design of Comparative Experiments . Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-68357-9.
• Chaplin, S. (2006). "The placebo response: an important part of treatment". Prescriber : 16–22. doi: 10.1002/psb.344
• Hinkelmann, Klaus; Kempthorne, Oscar (2008). Design and Analysis of Experiments, Volume I: Introduction to Experimental Design (2nd ed.). Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-72756-9.
• What is the Difference Between Molarity and Molality?
• The Difference Between Intensive and Extensive Properties
• The Difference Between Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Mixtures
• Examples of Polar and Nonpolar Molecules
• How to Draw a Lewis Structure
• Ionic vs. Covalent Bonds: How Are They Different?
• How to Calculate Density of a Gas
• What Is Alum and How Is It Used?
• The Visible Spectrum: Wavelengths and Colors
• Examples of Physical Changes
• Chemistry Glassware Types, Names and Uses
• Fun and Interesting Chemistry Facts
• Table of Electrical Resistivity and Conductivity
• Molarity Definition in Chemistry
• Chemical Properties of Matter
• Difference Between Independent and Dependent Variables

Experimental Group

• Reference work entry
• Cite this reference work entry

• J. Rick Turner 3  

46 Accesses

As noted in the Experimental Designs entry, experimental designs are those in which the influence(s) of interest are controlled by the research scientist. An experimental group is a group of subjects who receive a particular treatment or intervention. Experimental subjects are randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups so that many potential influences that cannot be controlled for (e.g., sex, height, and weight) are likely to be as frequent in one experimental group as they are in the other.

It should be noted that the term “treatment group” is related to the term “experimental group,” but they are not synonymous. Experimental groups can be thought of as a subset of treatment groups, i.e., groups formed by research scientists before administering the treatment or intervention of interest. Treatment groups can be formed retrospectively. For example, a research scientist may wish to collect follow-up data for patients who received two kinds of intervention for the same...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

Piantadosi, S. (2005). Clinical trials: A methodologic perspective (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Google Scholar  

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Cardiovascular Safety, Quintiles, Durham, NC, USA

Dr. J. Rick Turner

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Rick Turner .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Behavioral Medicine Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA

Marc D. Gellman

J. Rick Turner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, New York

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Turner, J.R. (2013). Experimental Group. In: Gellman, M.D., Turner, J.R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_1023

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_1023

Publisher Name : Springer, New York, NY

Print ISBN : 978-1-4419-1004-2

Online ISBN : 978-1-4419-1005-9

eBook Packages : Medicine Reference Module Medicine

Share this entry

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer
• QuestionPro

• Solutions Industries Gaming Automotive Sports and events Education Government Travel & Hospitality Financial Services Healthcare Cannabis Technology Use Case AskWhy Communities Audience Contactless surveys Mobile LivePolls Member Experience GDPR Positive People Science 360 Feedback Surveys
• Resources Blog eBooks Survey Templates Case Studies Training Help center

Home Market Research

Experimental vs Observational Studies: Differences & Examples

Understanding the differences between experimental vs observational studies is crucial for interpreting findings and drawing valid conclusions. Both methodologies are used extensively in various fields, including medicine, social sciences, and environmental studies. 

Researchers often use observational and experimental studies to gather comprehensive data and draw robust conclusions about their investigating phenomena. 

This blog post will explore what makes these two types of studies unique, their fundamental differences, and examples to illustrate their applications.

What is an Experimental Study?

An experimental study is a research design in which the investigator actively manipulates one or more variables to observe their effect on another variable. This type of study often takes place in a controlled environment, which allows researchers to establish cause-and-effect relationships.

Key Characteristics of Experimental Studies:

• Manipulation: Researchers manipulate the independent variable(s).
• Control: Other variables are kept constant to isolate the effect of the independent variable.
• Randomization: Subjects are randomly assigned to different groups to minimize bias.
• Replication: The study can be replicated to verify results.

Types of Experimental Study

• Laboratory Experiments: Conducted in a controlled environment where variables can be precisely controlled.
• Field Research : These are conducted in a natural setting but still involve manipulation and control of variables.
• Clinical Trials: Used in medical research and the healthcare industry to test the efficacy of new treatments or drugs.

Example of an Experimental Study:

Imagine a study to test the effectiveness of a new drug for reducing blood pressure. Researchers would:

• Randomly assign participants to two groups: receiving the drug and receiving a placebo.
• Ensure that participants do not know their group (double-blind procedure).
• Measure blood pressure before and after the intervention.
• Compare the changes in blood pressure between the two groups to determine the drug’s effectiveness.

What is an Observational Study?

An observational study is a research design in which the investigator observes subjects and measures variables without intervening or manipulating the study environment. This type of study is often used when manipulating impractical or unethical variables.

Key Characteristics of Observational Studies:

• No Manipulation: Researchers do not manipulate the independent variable.
• Natural Setting: Observations are made in a natural environment.
• Causation Limitations: It is difficult to establish cause-and-effect relationships due to the need for more control over variables.
• Descriptive: Often used to describe characteristics or outcomes.

Types of Observational Studies: 

• Cohort Studies : Follow a control group of people over time to observe the development of outcomes.
• Case-Control Studies: Compare individuals with a specific outcome (cases) to those without (controls) to identify factors that might contribute to the outcome.
• Cross-Sectional Studies : Collect data from a population at a single point to analyze the prevalence of an outcome or characteristic.

Example of an Observational Study:

Consider a study examining the relationship between smoking and lung cancer. Researchers would:

• Identify a cohort of smokers and non-smokers.
• Follow both groups over time to record incidences of lung cancer.
• Analyze the data to observe any differences in cancer rates between smokers and non-smokers.

Difference Between Experimental vs Observational Studies

Choosing Between Experimental and Observational Studies

The researchers relied on statistical analysis to interpret the results of randomized controlled trials, building upon the foundations established by prior research.

Use Experimental Studies When:

• Causality is Important: If determining a cause-and-effect relationship is crucial, experimental studies are the way to go.
• Variables Can Be Controlled: When you can manipulate and control the variables in a lab or controlled setting, experimental studies are suitable.
• Randomization is Possible: When random assignment of subjects is feasible and ethical, experimental designs are appropriate.

Use Observational Studies When:

• Ethical Concerns Exist: If manipulating variables is unethical, such as exposing individuals to harmful substances, observational studies are necessary.
• Practical Constraints Apply: When experimental studies are impractical due to cost or logistics, observational studies can be a viable alternative.
• Natural Settings Are Required: If studying phenomena in their natural environment is essential, observational studies are the right choice.

Strengths and Limitations

Experimental studies.

• Establish Causality: Experimental studies can establish causal relationships between variables by controlling and using randomization.
• Control Over Confounding Variables: The controlled environment allows researchers to minimize the influence of external variables that might skew results.
• Repeatability: Experiments can often be repeated to verify results and ensure consistency.

Limitations:

• Ethical Concerns: Manipulating variables may be unethical in certain situations, such as exposing individuals to harmful conditions.
• Artificial Environment: The controlled setting may not reflect real-world conditions, potentially affecting the generalizability of results.
• Cost and Complexity: Experimental studies can be costly and logistically complex, especially with large sample sizes.

Observational Studies

• Real-World Insights: Observational studies provide valuable insights into how variables interact in natural settings.
• Ethical and Practical: These studies avoid ethical concerns associated with manipulation and can be more practical regarding cost and time.
• Diverse Applications: Observational studies can be used in various fields and situations where experiments are not feasible.
• Lack of Causality: It’s easier to establish causation with manipulation, and results are limited to identifying correlations.
• Potential for Confounding: Uncontrolled external variables may influence the results, leading to biased conclusions.
• Observer Bias: Researchers may unintentionally influence outcomes through their expectations or interpretations of data.

Examples in Various Fields

• Experimental Study: Clinical trials testing the effectiveness of a new drug against a placebo to determine its impact on patient recovery.
• Observational Study: Studying the dietary habits of different populations to identify potential links between nutrition and disease prevalence.
• Experimental Study: Conducting a lab experiment to test the effect of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance by controlling sleep hours and measuring test scores.
• Observational Study: Observing social interactions in a public setting to explore natural communication patterns without intervention.

Environmental Science

• Experimental Study: Testing the impact of a specific pollutant on plant growth in a controlled greenhouse setting.
• Observational Study: Monitoring wildlife populations in a natural habitat to assess the effects of climate change on species distribution.

How QuestionPro Research Can Help in Experimental vs Observational Studies

Choosing between experimental and observational studies is a critical decision that can significantly impact the outcomes and interpretations of a study. QuestionPro Research offers powerful tools and features that can enhance both types of studies, giving researchers the flexibility and capability to gather, analyze, and interpret data effectively.

Enhancing Experimental Studies with QuestionPro

Experimental studies require a high degree of control over variables, randomization, and, often, repeated trials to establish causal relationships. QuestionPro excels in facilitating these requirements through several key features:

• Survey Design and Distribution: With QuestionPro, researchers can design intricate surveys tailored to their experimental needs. The platform supports random assignment of participants to different groups, ensuring unbiased distribution and enhancing the study’s validity.
• Data Collection and Management: Real-time data collection and management tools allow researchers to monitor responses as they come in. This is crucial for experimental studies where data collection timing and sequence can impact the results.
• Advanced Analytics: QuestionPro offers robust analytical tools that can handle complex data sets, enabling researchers to conduct in-depth statistical analyses to determine the effects of the experimental interventions.

Supporting Observational Studies with QuestionPro

Observational studies involve gathering data without manipulating variables, focusing on natural settings and real-world scenarios. QuestionPro’s capabilities are well-suited for these studies as well:

• Customizable Surveys: Researchers can create detailed surveys to capture a wide range of observational data. QuestionPro’s customizable templates and question types allow for flexibility in capturing nuanced information.
• Mobile Data Collection: For field research, QuestionPro’s mobile app enables data collection on the go, making it easier to conduct studies in diverse settings without internet connectivity.
• Longitudinal Data Tracking: Observational studies often require data collection over extended periods. QuestionPro’s platform supports longitudinal studies, allowing researchers to track changes and trends.

Experimental and observational studies are essential tools in the researcher’s toolkit. Each serves a unique purpose and offers distinct advantages and limitations. By understanding their differences, researchers can choose the most appropriate study design for their specific objectives, ensuring their findings are valid and applicable to real-world situations.

Whether establishing causality through experimental studies or exploring correlations with observational research designs, the insights gained from these methodologies continue to shape our understanding of the world around us. 

Whether conducting experimental or observational studies, QuestionPro Research provides a comprehensive suite of tools that enhance research efficiency, accuracy, and depth. By leveraging its advanced features, researchers can ensure that their studies are well-designed, their data is robustly analyzed, and their conclusions are reliable and impactful.

MORE LIKE THIS

Sep 5, 2024

Interactive Forms: Key Features, Benefits, Uses + Design Tips

Sep 4, 2024

Closed-Loop Management: The Key to Customer Centricity

Sep 3, 2024

Net Trust Score: Tool for Measuring Trust in Organization

Sep 2, 2024

Other categories

• Academic Research
• Artificial Intelligence
• Assessments
• Brand Awareness
• Case Studies
• Communities
• Consumer Insights
• Customer effort score
• Customer Engagement
• Customer Experience
• Customer Loyalty
• Customer Research
• Customer Satisfaction
• Employee Benefits
• Employee Engagement
• Employee Retention
• Friday Five
• General Data Protection Regulation
• Insights Hub
• Life@QuestionPro
• Market Research
• Mobile diaries
• Mobile Surveys
• New Features
• Online Communities
• Question Types
• Questionnaire
• QuestionPro Products
• Release Notes
• Research Tools and Apps
• Revenue at Risk
• Survey Templates
• Training Tips
• Tuesday CX Thoughts (TCXT)
• Uncategorized
• What’s Coming Up
• Workforce Intelligence

Control Group vs Experimental Group

Julia Simkus

Editor at Simply Psychology

BA (Hons) Psychology, Princeton University

Julia Simkus is a graduate of Princeton University with a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology. She is currently studying for a Master's Degree in Counseling for Mental Health and Wellness in September 2023. Julia's research has been published in peer reviewed journals.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Saul McLeod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

In a controlled experiment , scientists compare a control group, and an experimental group is identical in all respects except for one difference – experimental manipulation.

Differences

Unlike the experimental group, the control group is not exposed to the independent variable under investigation. So, it provides a baseline against which any changes in the experimental group can be compared.

Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to experimental manipulation rather than chance.

Almost all experimental studies are designed to include a control group and one or more experimental groups. In most cases, participants are randomly assigned to either a control or experimental group.

Because participants are randomly assigned to either group, we can assume that the groups are identical except for manipulating the independent variable in the experimental group.

It is important that every aspect of the experimental environment is the same and that the experimenters carry out the exact same procedures with both groups so researchers can confidently conclude that any differences between groups are actually due to the difference in treatments.

Control Group

A control group consists of participants who do not receive any experimental treatment. The control participants serve as a comparison group.

The control group is matched as closely as possible to the experimental group, including age, gender, social class, ethnicity, etc.

The difference between the control and experimental groups is that the control group is not exposed to the independent variable , which is thought to be the cause of the behavior being investigated.

Researchers will compare the individuals in the control group to those in the experimental group to isolate the independent variable and examine its impact.

The control group is important because it serves as a baseline, enabling researchers to see what impact changes to the independent variable produce and strengthening researchers’ ability to draw conclusions from a study.

Without the presence of a control group, a researcher cannot determine whether a particular treatment truly has an effect on an experimental group.

Control groups are critical to the scientific method as they help ensure the internal validity of a study.

Assume you want to test a new medication for ADHD . One group would receive the new medication, and the other group would receive a pill that looked exactly the same as the one that the others received, but it would be a placebo. The group that takes the placebo would be the control group.

Types of Control Groups

Positive control group.

• A positive control group is an experimental control that will produce a known response or the desired effect.
• A positive control is used to ensure a test’s success and confirm an experiment’s validity.
• For example, when testing for a new medication, an already commercially available medication could serve as the positive control.

Negative Control Group

• A negative control group is an experimental control that does not result in the desired outcome of the experiment.
• A negative control is used to ensure that there is no response to the treatment and help identify the influence of external factors on the test.
• An example of a negative control would be using a placebo when testing for a new medication.

Experimental Group

An experimental group consists of participants exposed to a particular manipulation of the independent variable. These are the participants who receive the treatment of interest.

Researchers will compare the responses of the experimental group to those of a control group to see if the independent variable impacted the participants.

An experiment must have at least one control group and one experimental group; however, a single experiment can include multiple experimental groups, which are all compared against the control group.

Having multiple experimental groups enables researchers to vary different levels of an experimental variable and compare the effects of these changes to the control group and among each other.

Assume you want to study to determine if listening to different types of music can help with focus while studying.

You randomly assign participants to one of three groups: one group that listens to music with lyrics, one group that listens to music without lyrics, and another group that listens to no music.

The group of participants listening to no music while studying is the control group, and the groups listening to music, whether with or without lyrics, are the two experimental groups.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. what is the difference between the control group and the experimental group in an experimental study.

Put simply; an experimental group is a group that receives the variable, or treatment, that the researchers are testing, whereas the control group does not. These two groups should be identical in all other aspects.

2. What is the purpose of a control group in an experiment

A control group is essential in experimental research because it:

Provides a baseline against which the effects of the manipulated variable (the independent variable) can be measured.

Helps to ensure that any changes observed in the experimental group are indeed due to the manipulation of the independent variable and not due to other extraneous or confounding factors.

Helps to account for the placebo effect, where participants’ beliefs about the treatment can influence their behavior or responses.

In essence, it increases the internal validity of the results and the confidence we can have in the conclusions.

3. Do experimental studies always need a control group?

Not all experiments require a control group, but a true “controlled experiment” does require at least one control group. For example, experiments that use a within-subjects design do not have a control group.

In  within-subjects designs , all participants experience every condition and are tested before and after being exposed to treatment.

These experimental designs tend to have weaker internal validity as it is more difficult for a researcher to be confident that the outcome was caused by the experimental treatment and not by a confounding variable.

4. Can a study include more than one control group?

Yes, studies can include multiple control groups. For example, if several distinct groups of subjects do not receive the treatment, these would be the control groups.

5. How is the control group treated differently from the experimental groups?

The control group and the experimental group(s) are treated identically except for one key difference: exposure to the independent variable, which is the factor being tested. The experimental group is subjected to the independent variable, whereas the control group is not.

This distinction allows researchers to measure the effect of the independent variable on the experimental group by comparing it to the control group, which serves as a baseline or standard.

Bailey, R. A. (2008). Design of Comparative Experiments. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-68357-9.

Hinkelmann, Klaus; Kempthorne, Oscar (2008). Design and Analysis of Experiments, Volume I: Introduction to Experimental Design (2nd ed.). Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-72756-9.

• Subscriber Services
• For Authors
• Publications
• Archaeology
• Art & Architecture
• Bilingual dictionaries
• Classical studies
• Encyclopedias
• English Dictionaries and Thesauri
• Language reference
• Linguistics
• Media studies
• Medicine and health
• Names studies
• Performing arts
• Science and technology
• Social sciences
• Society and culture
• Overview Pages
• Subject Reference
• English Dictionaries
• Bilingual Dictionaries

Recently viewed (0)

• Save Search
• Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Related Content

Related overviews.

independent variable

control group

experimental design

experimental hypothesis

See all related overviews in Oxford Reference »

More Like This

Show all results sharing these subjects:

• Clinical Medicine

experimental group

Quick reference.

In experimental design, a group of research participants or subjects exposed to an independent variable in order to examine the causal effect of that treatment on a dependent variable. Compare control group.

From:   experimental group   in  A Dictionary of Psychology »

Subjects: Medicine and health — Clinical Medicine

Related content in Oxford Reference

Reference entries, experimental group n..

View all related items in Oxford Reference »

Search for: 'experimental group' in Oxford Reference »

• Oxford University Press

PRINTED FROM OXFORD REFERENCE (www.oxfordreference.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2023. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single entry from a reference work in OR for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice ).

date: 07 September 2024

• Cookie Policy
• Privacy Policy
• Legal Notice
• Accessibility
• [162.248.224.4]
• 162.248.224.4

Character limit 500 /500

• Science Notes Posts
• Contact Science Notes
• Todd Helmenstine Biography
• Anne Helmenstine Biography
• Free Printable Periodic Tables (PDF and PNG)
• Periodic Table Wallpapers
• Interactive Periodic Table
• Periodic Table Posters
• Science Experiments for Kids
• How to Grow Crystals
• Chemistry Projects
• Fire and Flames Projects
• Holiday Science
• Chemistry Problems With Answers
• Physics Problems
• Unit Conversion Example Problems
• Chemistry Worksheets
• Biology Worksheets
• Periodic Table Worksheets
• Physical Science Worksheets
• Science Lab Worksheets
• My Amazon Books

Control Group Definition and Examples

The control group is the set of subjects that does not receive the treatment in a study. In other words, it is the group where the independent variable is held constant. This is important because the control group is a baseline for measuring the effects of a treatment in an experiment or study. A controlled experiment is one which includes one or more control groups.

• The experimental group experiences a treatment or change in the independent variable. In contrast, the independent variable is constant in the control group.
• A control group is important because it allows meaningful comparison. The researcher compares the experimental group to it to assess whether or not there is a relationship between the independent and dependent variable and the magnitude of the effect.
• There are different types of control groups. A controlled experiment has one more control group.

Control Group vs Experimental Group

The only difference between the control group and experimental group is that subjects in the experimental group receive the treatment being studied, while participants in the control group do not. Otherwise, all other variables between the two groups are the same.

Control Group vs Control Variable

A control group is not the same thing as a control variable. A control variable or controlled variable is any factor that is held constant during an experiment. Examples of common control variables include temperature, duration, and sample size. The control variables are the same for both the control and experimental groups.

Types of Control Groups

There are different types of control groups:

• Placebo group : A placebo group receives a placebo , which is a fake treatment that resembles the treatment in every respect except for the active ingredient. Both the placebo and treatment may contain inactive ingredients that produce side effects. Without a placebo group, these effects might be attributed to the treatment.
• Positive control group : A positive control group has conditions that guarantee a positive test result. The positive control group demonstrates an experiment is capable of producing a positive result. Positive controls help researchers identify problems with an experiment.
• Negative control group : A negative control group consists of subjects that are not exposed to a treatment. For example, in an experiment looking at the effect of fertilizer on plant growth, the negative control group receives no fertilizer.
• Natural control group : A natural control group usually is a set of subjects who naturally differ from the experimental group. For example, if you compare the effects of a treatment on women who have had children, the natural control group includes women who have not had children. Non-smokers are a natural control group in comparison to smokers.
• Randomized control group : The subjects in a randomized control group are randomly selected from a larger pool of subjects. Often, subjects are randomly assigned to either the control or experimental group. Randomization reduces bias in an experiment. There are different methods of randomly assigning test subjects.

Control Group Examples

Here are some examples of different control groups in action:

Negative Control and Placebo Group

For example, consider a study of a new cancer drug. The experimental group receives the drug. The placebo group receives a placebo, which contains the same ingredients as the drug formulation, minus the active ingredient. The negative control group receives no treatment. The reason for including the negative group is because the placebo group experiences some level of placebo effect, which is a response to experiencing some form of false treatment.

Positive and Negative Controls

For example, consider an experiment looking at whether a new drug kills bacteria. The experimental group exposes bacterial cultures to the drug. If the group survives, the drug is ineffective. If the group dies, the drug is effective.

The positive control group has a culture of bacteria that carry a drug resistance gene. If the bacteria survive drug exposure (as intended), then it shows the growth medium and conditions allow bacterial growth. If the positive control group dies, it indicates a problem with the experimental conditions. A negative control group of bacteria lacking drug resistance should die. If the negative control group survives, something is wrong with the experimental conditions.

• Bailey, R. A. (2008).  Design of Comparative Experiments . Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-68357-9.
• Chaplin, S. (2006). “The placebo response: an important part of treatment”.  Prescriber . 17 (5): 16–22. doi: 10.1002/psb.344
• Hinkelmann, Klaus; Kempthorne, Oscar (2008).  Design and Analysis of Experiments, Volume I: Introduction to Experimental Design  (2nd ed.). Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-72756-9.
• Pithon, M.M. (2013). “Importance of the control group in scientific research.” Dental Press J Orthod . 18 (6):13-14. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000600003
• Stigler, Stephen M. (1992). “A Historical View of Statistical Concepts in Psychology and Educational Research”. American Journal of Education . 101 (1): 60–70. doi: 10.1086/444032

Related Posts

• COVID-19 Tracker
• Biochemistry
• Anatomy & Physiology
• Microbiology
• Neuroscience
• Animal Kingdom
• NGSS High School
• Latest News
• Editors’ Picks
• Weekly Digest
• Quotes about Biology

Controlled Experiment

Reviewed by: BD Editors

Controlled Experiment Definition

A controlled experiment is a scientific test that is directly manipulated by a scientist, in order to test a single variable at a time. The variable being tested is the independent variable , and is adjusted to see the effects on the system being studied. The controlled variables are held constant to minimize or stabilize their effects on the subject. In biology, a controlled experiment often includes restricting the environment of the organism being studied. This is necessary to minimize the random effects of the environment and the many variables that exist in the wild.

In a controlled experiment, the study population is often divided into two groups. One group receives a change in a certain variable, while the other group receives a standard environment and conditions. This group is referred to as the control group , and allows for comparison with the other group, known as the experimental group . Many types of controls exist in various experiments, which are designed to ensure that the experiment worked, and to have a basis for comparison. In science, results are only accepted if it can be shown that they are statistically significant . Statisticians can use the difference between the control group and experimental group and the expected difference to determine if the experiment supports the hypothesis , or if the data was simply created by chance.

Examples of Controlled Experiment

Music preference in dogs.

Do dogs have a taste in music? You might have considered this, and science has too. Believe it or not, researchers have actually tested dog’s reactions to various music genres. To set up a controlled experiment like this, scientists had to consider the many variables that affect each dog during testing. The environment the dog is in when listening to music, the volume of the music, the presence of humans, and even the temperature were all variables that the researches had to consider.

In this case, the genre of the music was the independent variable. In other words, to see if dog’s change their behavior in response to different kinds of music, a controlled experiment had to limit the interaction of the other variables on the dogs. Usually, an experiment like this is carried out in the same location, with the same lighting, furniture, and conditions every time. This ensures that the dogs are not changing their behavior in response to the room. To make sure the dogs don’t react to humans or simply the noise of the music, no one else can be in the room and the music must be played at the same volume for each genre. Scientist will develop protocols for their experiment, which will ensure that many other variables are controlled.

This experiment could also split the dogs into two groups, only testing music on one group. The control group would be used to set a baseline behavior, and see how dogs behaved without music. The other group could then be observed and the differences in the group’s behavior could be analyzed. By rating behaviors on a quantitative scale, statistics can be used to analyze the difference in behavior, and see if it was large enough to be considered significant. This basic experiment was carried out on a large number of dogs, analyzing their behavior with a variety of different music genres. It was found that dogs do show more relaxed and calm behaviors when a specific type of music plays. Come to find out, dogs enjoy reggae the most.

Scurvy in Sailors

In the early 1700s, the world was a rapidly expanding place. Ships were being built and sent all over the world, carrying thousands and thousands of sailors. These sailors were mostly fed the cheapest diets possible, not only because it decreased the costs of goods, but also because fresh food is very hard to keep at sea. Today, we understand that lack of essential vitamins and nutrients can lead to severe deficiencies that manifest as disease. One of these diseases is scurvy.

Scurvy is caused by a simple vitamin C deficiency, but the effects can be brutal. Although early symptoms just include general feeling of weakness, the continued lack of vitamin C will lead to a breakdown of the blood cells and vessels that carry the blood. This results in blood leaking from the vessels. Eventually, people bleed to death internally and die. Before controlled experiments were commonplace, a simple physician decided to tackle the problem of scurvy. James Lind, of the Royal Navy, came up with a simple controlled experiment to find the best cure for scurvy.

He separated sailors with scurvy into various groups. He subjected them to the same controlled condition and gave them the same diet, except one item. Each group was subjected to a different treatment or remedy, taken with their food. Some of these remedies included barley water, cider and a regiment of oranges and lemons. This created the first clinical trial , or test of the effectiveness of certain treatments in a controlled experiment. Lind found that the oranges and lemons helped the sailors recover fast, and within a few years the Royal Navy had developed protocols for growing small leafy greens that contained high amounts of vitamin C to feed their sailors.

Related Biology Terms

• Field Experiment – An experiment conducted in nature, outside the bounds of total control.
• Independent Variable – The thing in an experiment being changed or manipulated by the experimenter to see effects on the subject.
• Controlled Variable – A thing that is normalized or standardized across an experiment, to remove it from having an effect on the subject being studied.
• Control Group – A group of subjects in an experiment that receive no independent variable, or a normalized amount, to provide comparison.

Cite This Article

Subscribe to our newsletter, privacy policy, terms of service, scholarship, latest posts, white blood cell, t cell immunity, satellite cells, embryonic stem cells, popular topics, photosynthesis, hydrochloric acid, endocrine system, mitochondria.

• History & Society
• Science & Tech
• Biographies
• Animals & Nature
• Geography & Travel
• Arts & Culture
• Games & Quizzes
• On This Day
• One Good Fact
• New Articles
• Lifestyles & Social Issues
• Philosophy & Religion
• Politics, Law & Government
• World History
• Health & Medicine
• Browse Biographies
• Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
• Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
• Environment
• Fossils & Geologic Time
• Entertainment & Pop Culture
• Sports & Recreation
• Visual Arts
• Demystified
• Image Galleries
• Infographics
• Top Questions
• Britannica Kids
• Saving Earth
• Space Next 50
• Student Center
• Introduction

Comparison with controlled study design

Natural experiments as quasi experiments, instrumental variables.

• When did science begin?
• Where was science invented?
• Is Internet technology "making us stupid"?
• What is the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) technology on society?

natural experiment

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

• Table Of Contents

natural experiment , observational study in which an event or a situation that allows for the random or seemingly random assignment of study subjects to different groups is exploited to answer a particular question. Natural experiments are often used to study situations in which controlled experimentation is not possible, such as when an exposure of interest cannot be practically or ethically assigned to research subjects. Situations that may create appropriate circumstances for a natural experiment include policy changes, weather events, and natural disasters. Natural experiments are used most commonly in the fields of epidemiology , political science , psychology , and social science .

Key features of experimental study design include manipulation and control. Manipulation, in this context , means that the experimenter can control which research subjects receive which exposures. For instance, subjects randomized to the treatment arm of an experiment typically receive treatment with the drug or therapy that is the focus of the experiment, while those in the control group receive no treatment or a different treatment. Control is most readily accomplished through random assignment, which means that the procedures by which participants are assigned to a treatment and control condition ensure that each has equal probability of assignment to either group. Random assignment ensures that individual characteristics or experiences that might confound the treatment results are, on average, evenly distributed between the two groups. In this way, at least one variable can be manipulated, and units are randomly assigned to the different levels or categories of the manipulated variables.

In epidemiology, the gold standard in research design generally is considered to be the randomized control trial (RCT). RCTs, however, can answer only certain types of epidemiologic questions, and they are not useful in the investigation of questions for which random assignment is either impracticable or unethical. The bulk of epidemiologic research relies on observational data, which raises issues in drawing causal inferences from the results. A core assumption for drawing causal inference is that the average outcome of the group exposed to one treatment regimen represents the average outcome the other group would have had if they had been exposed to the same treatment regimen. If treatment is not randomly assigned, as in the case of observational studies, the assumption that the two groups are exchangeable (on both known and unknown confounders) cannot be assumed to be true.

As an example, suppose that an investigator is interested in the effect of poor housing on health. Because it is neither practical nor ethical to randomize people to variable housing conditions, this subject is difficult to study using an experimental approach. However, if a housing policy change, such as a lottery for subsidized mortgages, was enacted that enabled some people to move to more desirable housing while leaving other similar people in their previous substandard housing, it might be possible to use that policy change to study the effect of housing change on health outcomes. In another example, a well-known natural experiment in Helena , Montana, smoking was banned from all public places for a six-month period. Investigators later reported a 60-percent drop in heart attacks for the study area during the time the ban was in effect.

Because natural experiments do not randomize participants into exposure groups, the assumptions and analytical techniques customarily applied to experimental designs are not valid for them. Rather, natural experiments are quasi experiments and must be thought about and analyzed as such. The lack of random assignment means multiple threats to causal inference , including attrition , history, testing, regression , instrumentation, and maturation, may influence observed study outcomes. For this reason, natural experiments will never unequivocally determine causation in a given situation. Nevertheless, they are a useful method for researchers, and if used with care they can provide additional data that may help with a research question and that may not be obtainable in any other way.

The major limitation in inferring causation from natural experiments is the presence of unmeasured confounding. One class of methods designed to control confounding and measurement error is based on instrumental variables (IV). While useful in a variety of applications, the validity and interpretation of IV estimates depend on strong assumptions, the plausibility of which must be considered with regard to the causal relation in question.

In particular, IV analyses depend on the assumption that subjects were effectively randomized, even if the randomization was accidental (in the case of an administrative policy change or exposure to a natural disaster) and adherence to random assignment was low. IV methods can be used to control for confounding in observational studies, to control for confounding due to noncompliance, and to correct for misclassification.

IV analysis, however, can produce serious biases in effect estimates. It can also be difficult to identify the particular subpopulation to which the causal effect IV estimate applies. Moreover, IV analysis can add considerable imprecision to causal effect estimates. Small sample size poses an additional challenge in applying IV methods.

All Subjects

Control group

In general biology i.

A control group is a group in an experiment that does not receive the treatment being tested, serving as a baseline to compare the effects of the treatment. It helps researchers determine if changes in the experimental group are due to the treatment or other factors.

Find Out More ( 1 )

• General Biology I - 1.1 The Science of Biology

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

• The control group is essential for establishing causality in an experiment.
• It should be as similar as possible to the experimental group except for the factor being tested.
• Control groups help eliminate alternative explanations by providing a comparison point.
• Sometimes placebos are used in control groups, especially in medical studies.
• Data from control groups can reveal natural variations and external influences on experimental results.

Review Questions

• Why is a control group important in an experiment?
• How does a control group differ from an experimental group?
• What role do placebos play in control groups?

Related terms

Experimental Group : one sentence definition

Placebo : one sentence definition

Variable : one sentence definition

" Control group " also found in:

Subjects ( 56 ).

• AP Psychology
• AP Statistics
• Advanced Communication Research Methods
• Advanced Design Strategy and Software
• Advertising Copywriting
• Advertising Strategy
• Applied Impact Evaluation
• Art Therapy
• Biostatistics
• Business Process Optimization
• Business Storytelling
• Causal Inference
• Cognitive Psychology
• College Introductory Statistics
• Communication Research Methods
• Computational Biology
• Computational Neuroscience
• Criminology
• Critical Thinking
• Customer Insights
• Data, Inference, and Decisions
• Design Strategy and Software
• Developmental Psychology
• E-commerce Strategies
• Educational Psychology
• Engineering Applications of Statistics
• Epidemiology
• Experimental Design
• Fundamentals of Ecology
• Game Theory
• Health Campaigns
• Honors Biology
• Honors Statistics
• Interactive Marketing Strategy
• Intro to Business Statistics
• Introduction to Biostatistics
• Introduction to Environmental Science
• Introduction to Epidemiology
• Introduction to Political Research
• Introductory Probability and Statistics for Business
• Machine Learning Engineering
• Market Research: Tools and Techniques for Data Collection and Analysis
• Media Effects
• Media Expression and Communication
• Methods of Mathematics: Calculus, Statistics, and Combinatorics
• Physical Science
• Physiology of Motivated Behaviors
• Predictive Analytics in Business
• Probability and Statistics
• Professionalism and Research in Nursing
• Public Policy Analysis
• Science Education
• Screen Language
• Social Psychology
• Strategic Improvisation in Business

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.

Ap® and sat® are trademarks registered by the college board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website..

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

The state-of-the-art of mycobacterium chimaera infections and the causal link with health settings: a systematic review.

1. Introduction

2. materials and methods, 4. discussion, 4.1. mycobacterium chimaera’s characteristics and ecosystem, 4.2. heater-cooler units, medical devices, water, and air-conditioned implants, 4.3. incubation period and symptoms presentation, 4.4. presence in the lung system, 4.5. modality of transmission, 4.6. detection, 4.7. disinfection, 4.8. causal link assessment, 5. limitations, 6. conclusions, supplementary materials, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest, abbreviations.

• Vendramin, I.; Peghin, M.; Tascini, C.; Livi, U. Longest Incubation Period of Mycobacterium chimaera Infection after Cardiac Surgery. Eur. J. Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2021 , 59 , 506–508. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Biswas, M.; Rahaman, S.; Biswas, T.K.; Haque, Z.; Ibrahim, B. Association of Sex, Age, and Comorbidities with Mortality in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Intervirology 2020 , 64 , 36–47. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Treglia, M.; Pallocci, M.; Passalacqua, P.; Sabatelli, G.; De Luca, L.; Zanovello, C.; Messineo, A.; Quintavalle, G.; Cisterna, A.M.; Marsella, L.T. Medico-Legal Aspects of Hospital-Acquired Infections: 5-Years of Judgements of the Civil Court of Rome. Healthcare 2022 , 10 , 1336. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Bolcato, V.; Tronconi, L.P.; Odone, A.; Blandi, L. Healthcare-Acquired Sars-Cov-2 Infection: A Viable Legal Category? Int. J. Risk Saf. Med. 2023 , 34 , 129–134. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tattoli, L.; Dell’erba, A.; Ferorelli, D.; Gasbarro, A.; Solarino, B. Sepsis and Nosocomial Infections: The Role of Medico-Legal Experts in Italy. Antibiotics 2019 , 8 , 199. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Barranco, R.; Caristo, I.; Spigno, F.; Ponzano, M.; Trevisan, A.; Signori, A.; Di Biagio, A.; Ventura, F. Management of the Medico-Legal Dispute of Healthcare-Related SARS-CoV-2 Infections: Evaluation Criteria and Case Study in a Large University Hospital in Northwest Italy from 2020 to 2021. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022 , 19 , 16764. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Goldenberg, S.D.; Volpé, H.; French, G.L. Clinical Negligence, Litigation and Healthcare-Associated Infections. J. Hosp. Infect. 2012 , 81 , 156–162. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rizzo, N. La Causalità Civile ; Jus Civile; Giappichelli Editore: Torino, Italy, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Riccardi, N.; Monticelli, J.; Antonello, R.M.; Luzzati, R.; Gabrielli, M.; Ferrarese, M.; Codecasa, L.; Di Bella, S.; Giacobbe, D.R. Mycobacterium chimaera Infections: An Update. J. Infect. Chemother. 2020 , 26 , 199–205. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Natanti, A.; Palpacelli, M.; Valsecchi, M.; Tagliabracci, A.; Pesaresi, M. Mycobacterium chimaera : A Report of 2 New Cases and Literature Review. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2021 , 135 , 2667–2679. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wetzstein, N.; Kohl, T.A.; Diricks, M.; Mas-Peiro, S.; Holubec, T.; Kessel, J.; Graf, C.; Koch, B.; Herrmann, E.; Vehreschild, M.J.G.T.; et al. Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Mycobacterium chimaera Infections after Cardiac Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 180 Heater-Cooler Unit-Associated Cases. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2023 , 29 , 1008–1014. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Desai, A.N.; Hurtado, R.M. Infections and Outbreaks of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Hospital Settings. Curr. Treat. Options Infect. Dis. 2018 , 10 , 169–181. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• van Ingen, J.; Kohl, T.A.; Kranzer, K.; Hasse, B.; Keller, P.M.; Katarzyna Szafrańska, A.; Hillemann, D.; Chand, M.; Schreiber, P.W.; Sommerstein, R.; et al. Global Outbreak of Severe Mycobacterium chimaera Disease after Cardiac Surgery: A Molecular Epidemiological Study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017 , 17 , 1033–1041. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Bisognin, F.; Messina, F.; Butera, O.; Nisii, C.; Mazzarelli, A.; Cristino, S.; Pascale, M.R.; Lombardi, G.; Cannas, A.; Dal Monte, P. Investigating the Origin of Mycobacterium chimaera Contamination in Heater-Cooler Units: Integrated Analysis with Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and Whole-Genome Sequencing. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022 , 10 , e0289322. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Pinzauti, D.; De Giorgi, S.; Fox, V.; Lazzeri, E.; Messina, G.; Santoro, F.; Iannelli, F.; Ricci, S.; Pozzi, G. Complete Genome Sequences of Mycobacterium chimaera Strains 850 and 852, Isolated from Heater-Cooler Unit Water. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2022 , 11 , e0102121. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Hasan, N.A.; Warren, R.L.; Elaine Epperson, L.; Malecha, A.; Alexander, D.C.; Turenne, C.Y.; MacMillan, D.; Birol, I.; Pleasance, S.; Coope, R.; et al. Complete Genome Sequence of Mycobacterium chimaera SJ42, a Nonoutbreak Strain from an Immunocompromised Patient with Pulmonary Disease. Genome Announc. 2017 , 5 , e00963-17. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wallace, R.J.; Iakhiaeva, E.; Williams, M.D.; Brown-Elliott, B.A.; Vasireddy, S.; Vasireddy, R.; Lande, L.; Peterson, D.D.; Sawicki, J.; Kwait, R.; et al. Absence of Mycobacterium Intracellulare and Presence of Mycobacterium chimaera in Household Water and Biofilm Samples of Patients in the United States with Mycobacterium avium Complex Respiratory Disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013 , 51 , 1747–1752. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Falkinham, J.O.; Hilborn, E.D.; Arduino, M.J.; Pruden, A.; Edwards, M.A. Epidemiology and Ecology of Opportunistic Premise Plumbing Pathogens: Legionella pneumophila , Mycobacterium avium , and Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Environ. Health Perspect. 2015 , 123 , 749–758. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. EU Protocol for Testing of M. chimaera Infections Potentially Associated with Heater-Cooler Units Environmental Microbiology Investigations ; Technical Document; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Solna, Sweden, 2015. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ministero della Salute. Raccomandazioni per Il Controllo Dell’infezione da Mycobacterium chimaera in Italia ; Ministero della Salute: Roma, Italy, 2019.
• Bolcato, M.; Rodriguez, D.; Aprile, A. Risk Management in the New Frontier of Professional Liability for Nosocomial Infection: Review of the Literature on Mycobacterium chimaera . Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 , 17 , 7328. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Achermann, Y.; Rössle, M.; Hoffmann, M.; Deggim, V.; Kuster, S.; Zimmermann, D.R.; Bloemberg, G.; Hombach, M.; Hasse, B. Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis and Bloodstream Infection Due to Mycobacterium chimaera . J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013 , 51 , 1769–1773. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zabost, A.T.; Szturmowicz, M.; Brzezińska, S.A.; Klatt, M.D.; Augustynowicz-Kopeć, E.M. Mycobacterium chimaera as an Underestimated Cause of NTM Lung Diseases in Patients Hospitalized in Pulmonary Wards. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2021 , 70 , 315–320. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Truden, S.; Žolnir-Dovč, M.; Sodja, E.; Starčič Erjavec, M. Nationwide Analysis of Mycobacterium chimaera and Mycobacterium intracellulare Isolates: Frequency, Clinical Importance, and Molecular and Phenotypic Resistance Profiles. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2020 , 82 , 104311. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021 , 372 , 71. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Bills, N.D.; Hinrichs, S.H.; Aden, T.A.; Wickert, R.S.; Iwen, P.C. Molecular Identification of Mycobacterium chimaera as a Cause of Infection in a Patient with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2009 , 63 , 292–295. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cohen-Bacrie, S.; David, M.; Stremler, N.; Dubus, J.-C.; Rolain, J.-M.; Drancourt, M. Mycobacterium chimaera Pulmonary Infection Complicating Cystic Fibrosis: A Case Report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2011 , 5 , 473. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Alhanna, J.; Purucker, M.; Steppert, C.; Grigull-Daborn, A.; Schiffel, G.; Gruber, H.; Borgmann, S. Mycobacterium chimaera Causes Tuberculosis-like Infection in a Male Patient with Anorexia Nervosa. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2012 , 45 , 450–452. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gunaydin, M.; Yanik, K.; Eroglu, C.; Sanic, A.; Ceyhan, I.; Erturan, Z.; Durmaz, R. Distribution of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Strains. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2013 , 12 , 33. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Boyle, D.P.; Zembower, T.R.; Reddy, S.; Qi, C. Comparison of Clinical Features, Virulence, and Relapse among Mycobacterium avium Complex Species. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015 , 191 , 1310–1317. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mwikuma, G.; Kwenda, G.; Hang’ombe, B.M.; Simulundu, E.; Kaile, T.; Nzala, S.; Siziya, S.; Suzuki, Y. Molecular Identification of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria Isolated from Clinical Specimens in Zambia. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2015 , 14 , 1. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Moon, S.M.; Kim, S.Y.; Jhun, B.W.; Lee, H.; Park, H.Y.; Jeon, K.; Huh, H.J.; Ki, C.S.; Lee, N.Y.; Shin, S.J.; et al. Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Pulmonary Disease Caused by Mycobacterium chimaera . Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016 , 86 , 382–384. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Moutsoglou, D.M.; Merritt, F.; Cumbler, E. Disseminated Mycobacterium chimaera Presenting as Vertebral Osteomyelitis. Case Rep. Infect. Dis. 2017 , 2017 , 9893743. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bursle, E.; Playford, E.G.; Coulter, C.; Griffin, P. First Australian Case of Disseminated Mycobacterium chimaera Infection Post-Cardiothoracic Surgery. Infect. Dis. Health 2017 , 22 , 1–5. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kim, S.-Y.; Shin, S.H.; Moon, S.M.; Yang, B.; Kim, H.; Kwon, O.J.; Huh, H.J.; Ki, C.-S.; Lee, N.Y.; Shin, S.J.; et al. Distribution and Clinical Significance of Mycobacterium avium Complex Species Isolated from Respiratory Specimens. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017 , 88 , 125–137. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Chand, M.; Lamagni, T.; Kranzer, K.; Hedge, J.; Moore, G.; Parks, S.; Collins, S.; Del Ojo Elias, C.; Ahmed, N.; Brown, T.; et al. Insidious Risk of Severe Mycobacterium chimaera Infection in Cardiac Surgery Patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017 , 64 , 335–342. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Truden, S.; Žolnir-Dovč, M.; Sodja, E.; Starčič Erjavec, M. Retrospective Analysis of Slovenian Mycobacterium avium Complex and Mycobacterium abscessus Complex Isolates and Molecular Resistance Profile. Russ. J. Infect. Immun. 2018 , 8 , 447–451. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Larcher, R.; Lounnas, M.; Dumont, Y.; Michon, A.L.; Bonzon, L.; Chiron, R.; Carriere, C.; Klouche, K.; Godreuil, S. Mycobacterium chimaera Pulmonary Disease in Cystic Fibrosis Patients, France, 2010–2017. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019 , 25 , 611–613. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shafizadeh, N.; Hale, G.; Bhatnagar, J.; Alshak, N.S.; Nomura, J. Mycobacterium chimaera Hepatitis: A New Disease Entity. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2019 , 43 , 244–250. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rosero, C.I.; Shams, W.E. Mycobacterium chimaera Infection Masquerading as a Lung Mass in a Healthcare Worker. IDCases 2019 , 15 , e00526. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Watanabe, R.; Seino, H.; Taniuchi, S.; Igusa, R. Mycobacterium chimaera -Induced Tenosynovitis in a Patient with Rheumatoid Arthritis. BMJ Case Rep. 2020 , 13 , e233868. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, L.C.; Huang, H.N.; Yu, C.J.; Chien, J.Y.; Hsueh, P.R. Clinical Features and Treatment Outcomes of Mycobacterium chimaera Lung Disease and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of the Mycobacterial Isolates. J. Infect. 2020 , 80 , 437–443. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Maalouly, C.; Devresse, A.; Martin, A.; Rodriguez-Villalobos, H.; Kanaan, N.; Belkhir, L. Coinfection of Mycobacterium malmoense and Mycobacterium chimaera in a Kidney Transplant Recipient: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2020 , 22 , e13241. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• de Melo Carvalho, R.; Nunes, A.L.; Sa, R.; Ramos, I.; Valente, C.; Saraiva da Cunha, J. Mycobacterium chimaera Disseminated Infection. J. Med. Cases 2020 , 11 , 35–36. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sharma, K.; Sharma, M.; Modi, M.; Joshi, H.; Goyal, M.; Sharma, A.; Ray, P.; Rowlinson, M.C. Mycobacterium chimaera and Chronic Meningitis. QJM Int. J. Med. 2020 , 113 , 563–564. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Kim, M.J.; Kim, K.M.; Shin, J.I.; Ha, J.H.; Lee, D.H.; Choi, J.G.; Park, J.S.; Byun, J.H.; Yoo, J.W.; Eum, S.; et al. Identification of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Patients with Pulmonary Diseases in Gyeongnam, Korea, Using Multiplex PCR and Multigene Sequence-Based Analysis. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2021 , 2021 , 8844306. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kavvalou, A.; Stehling, F.; Tschiedel, E.; Kehrmann, J.; Walkenfort, B.; Hasenberg, M.; Olivier, M.; Steindor, M. Biofilm Infection of a Central Venous Port-Catheter Caused by Mycobacterium avium Complex in an Immunocompetent Child with Cystic Fibrosis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2022 , 22 , 321. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Robinson, B.; Chaudhri, M.; Miskoff, J.A. A Case of Cavitary Mycobacterium chimaera . Cureus 2022 , 14 , e26984. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ahmad, M.; Yousaf, A.; Khan, H.M.W.; Munir, A.; Chandran, A. Mycobacterium chimaera Lung Infection and Empyema in a Patient without Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Bayl. Univ. Med. Cent. Proc. 2022 , 35 , 817–819. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• George, M.; Afra, T.P.; Santhosh, P.; Nandakumar, G.; Balagopalan, D.; Sreedharan, S. Ulcerating Nodules on the Face Due to Mycobacterium chimaera in a Patient with Diabetes. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2022 , 47 , 587–589. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Lin, Y.F.; Lee, T.F.; Wu, U.I.; Huang, C.F.; Cheng, A.; Lin, K.Y.; Hung, C.C. Disseminated Mycobacterium chimaera Infection in a Patient with Adult-Onset Immunodeficiency Syndrome: Case Report. BMC Infect. Dis. 2022 , 22 , 665. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Łyżwa, E.; Siemion-Szcześniak, I.; Sobiecka, M.; Lewandowska, K.; Zimna, K.; Bartosiewicz, M.; Jakubowska, L.; Augustynowicz-Kopeć, E.; Tomkowski, W. An Unfavorable Outcome of M. Chimaera Infection in Patient with Silicosis. Diagnostics 2022 , 12 , 1826. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McLaughlin, C.M.; Schade, M.; Cochran, E.; Taylor, K.F. A Case Report of a Novel Atypical Mycobacterial Infection: Mycobacterium chimaera Hand Tenosynovitis. JBJS Case Connect. 2022 , 12 , e22. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gross, J.E.; Teneback, C.C.; Sweet, J.G.; Caceres, S.M.; Poch, K.R.; Hasan, N.A.; Jia, F.; Epperson, L.E.; Lipner, E.M.; Vang, C.K.; et al. Molecular Epidemiologic Investigation of Mycobacterium intracellulare Subspecies Chimaera Lung Infections at an Adult Cystic Fibrosis Program. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2023 , 20 , 677–686. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Azzarà, C.; Lombardi, A.; Gramegna, A.; Ori, M.; Gori, A.; Blasi, F.; Bandera, A. Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria Lung Disease Due to Mycobacterium chimaera in a 67-Year-Old Man Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Lung Adenocarcinoma: Infection Due to Dysregulated Immunity? BMC Infect. Dis. 2023 , 23 , 573. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pradhan, A.; Martinez, E.; Sintchenko, V.; Post, J.; Overton, K. Case of Mycobacterium chimaera Vertebral Osteomyelitis Diagnosed 7 Years after Cardiac Surgery. Intern. Med. J. 2023 , 53 , 150–151. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Garcia-Prieto, F.; Rodríguez Perojo, A.; Río Ramírez, M.T. Endobronchial Fibroanthracosis Associated with Mycobacterium chimaera Infection: An Exceptional Case. Open Respir. Arch. 2024 , 6 , 100309. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Paul, S.; MacNair, A.; Lostarakos, V.; Capstick, R. Non-Tuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Infection Presenting in a Patient with Unilateral Pulmonary Artery Agenesis. BMJ Case Rep. 2024 , 17 , e259125. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Bittner, M.J.; Preheim, L.C. Other Slow-Growing Nontuberculous Mycobacteria. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016 , 4 , 767–776. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tortoli, E.; Rindi, L.; Garcia, M.J.; Chiaradonna, P.; Dei, R.; Garzelli, C.; Kroppenstedt, R.M.; Lari, N.; Mattei, R.; Mariottini, A.; et al. Proposal to Elevate the Genetic Variant MAC-A Included in the Mycobacterium avium Complex, to Species Rank as Mycobacterium chimaera sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004 , 54 , 1277–1285. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Turankar, R.P.; Singh, V.; Gupta, H.; Pathak, V.K.; Ahuja, M.; Singh, I.; Lavania, M.; Dinda, A.K.; Sengupta, U. Association of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria with Mycobacterium leprae in Environment of Leprosy Endemic Regions in India. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019 , 72 , 191–198. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Makovcova, J.; Slany, M.; Babak, V.; Slana, I.; Kralik, P. The Water Environment as a Source of Potentially Pathogenic Mycobacteria. J. Water Health 2014 , 12 , 254–263. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Falkinham, J.O. Ecology of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria-Where Do Human Infections Come From? Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013 , 34 , 95–102. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Norton, G.J.; Williams, M.; Falkinham, J.O., III; Honda, J.R. Physical Measures to Reduce Exposure to Tap Water-Associated Nontuberculous Mycobacteria. Front. Public Health 2020 , 8 , 190. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Durnez, L.; Eddyani, M.; Mgode, G.F.; Katakweba, A.; Katholi, C.R.; Machang’u, R.R.; Kazwala, R.R.; Portaels, F.; Leirs, H. First Detection of Mycobacteria in African Rodents and Insectivores, Using Stratified Pool Screening. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008 , 74 , 768. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sax, H.; Bloemberg, G.; Hasse, B.; Sommerstein, R.; Kohler, P.; Achermann, Y.; Rössle, M.; Falk, V.; Kuster, S.P.; Böttger, E.C.; et al. Prolonged Outbreak of Mycobacterium chimaera Infection after Open-Chest Heart Surgery. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015 , 61 , 67–75. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Falkinham, J.O.; Williams, M.D. Desiccation-Tolerance of Mycobacterium avium , Mycobacterium intracellulare , Mycobacterium chimaera , Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium chelonae . Pathogens 2022 , 11 , 463. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Gebert, M.J.; Delgado-Baquerizo, M.; Oliverio, A.M.; Webster, T.M.; Nichols, L.M.; Honda, J.R.; Chan, E.D.; Adjemian, J.; Dunn, R.R.; Fierer, N. Ecological Analyses of Mycobacteria in Showerhead Biofilms and Their Relevance to Human Health. mBio 2018 , 9 , e01614–e01618. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Cao, Y.; Yuan, S.; Pang, L.; Xie, J.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Yao, S. Study on Microbial Diversity of Washing Machines. Biodegradation 2024 , 1–13. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, H.; Jiao, P.; Guan, L.; Wang, C.; Zhang, X.X.; Ma, L. Functional Traits and Health Implications of the Global Household Drinking-Water Microbiome Retrieved Using an Integrative Genome-Centric Approach. Water Res. 2024 , 250 , 121094. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Choi, J.Y.; Sim, B.R.; Park, Y.; Yong, S.H.; Shin, S.J.; Kang, Y.A. Identification of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Isolated from Household Showerheads of Patients with Nontuberculous Mycobacteria. Sci. Rep. 2022 , 12 , 8648. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shen, Y.; Haig, S.J.; Prussin, A.J.; Lipuma, J.J.; Marr, L.C.; Raskin, L. Shower Water Contributes Viable Nontuberculous Mycobacteria to Indoor Air. PNAS Nexus 2022 , 1 , pgac145. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Struelens, M.J.; Plachouras, D. Mycobacterium chimaera Infections Associated with Heater-Cooler Units (HCU): Closing Another Loophole in Patient Safety. Eurosurveillance 2016 , 21 , 30397. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Trudzinski, F.C.; Schlotthauer, U.; Kamp, A.; Hennemann, K.; Muellenbach, R.M.; Reischl, U.; Gärtner, B.; Wilkens, H.; Bals, R.; Herrmann, M.; et al. Clinical Implications of Mycobacterium chimaera Detection in Thermoregulatory Devices Used for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO), Germany, 2015 to 2016. Eurosurveillance 2016 , 21 , 30398. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Schnetzinger, M.; Heger, F.; Indra, A.; Kimberger, O. Bacterial Contamination of Water Used as Thermal Transfer Fluid in Fluid-Warming Devices. J. Hosp. Infect. 2023 , 141 , 49–54. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Barker, T.A.; Dandekar, U.; Fraser, N.; Dawkin, L.; Sweeney, P.; Heron, F.; Simmons, J.; Parmar, J. Minimising the Risk of Mycobacterium chimaera Infection during Cardiopulmonary Bypass by the Removal of Heater-Cooler Units from the Operating Room. Perfusion 2018 , 33 , 264–269. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Barnes, S.; Twomey, C.; Carrico, R.; Murphy, C.; Warye, K. OR Air Quality: Is It Time to Consider Adjunctive Air Cleaning Technology? AORN J. 2018 , 108 , 503–515. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Walker, J.T.; Lamagni, T.; Chand, M. Evidence That Mycobacterium chimaera Aerosols Penetrate Laminar Airflow and Result in Infections at the Surgical Field. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017 , 17 , 1019. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schlotthauer, U.; Hennemann, K.; Gärtner, B.C.; Schäfers, H.-J.; Becker, S.L. Microbiological Surveillance of Heater-Cooler Units Used in Cardiothoracic Surgery for Detection of Mycobacterium chimaera . Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2022 , 72 , 59–62. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gross, J.E.; Caceres, S.; Poch, K.; Epperson, L.E.; Hasan, N.A.; Jia, F.; de Moura, V.C.N.; Strand, M.; Lipner, E.M.; Honda, J.R.; et al. Prospective Healthcare-Associated Links in Transmission of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria among People with Cystic Fibrosis (PHALT NTM) Study: Rationale and Study Design. PLoS ONE 2023 , 18 , e0291910. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nakamura, S.; Azuma, M.; Sato, M.; Fujiwara, N.; Nishino, S.; Wada, T.; Yoshida, S. Pseudo-Outbreak of Mycobacterium chimaera through Aerators of Hand-Washing Machines at a Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Center. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2019 , 40 , 1433–1435. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kanamori, H.; Weber, D.J.; Rutala, W.A. Healthcare-Associated Mycobacterium chimaera Transmission and Infection Prevention Challenges: Role of Heater-Cooler Units as a Water Source in Cardiac Surgery. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017 , 64 , 343–346. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rao, M.; Silveira, F.P. Non-Tuberculous Mycobacterial Infections in Thoracic Transplant Candidates and Recipients. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2018 , 20 , 14. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Walker, J.; Moore, G.; Collins, S.; Parks, S.; Garvey, M.I.; Lamagni, T.; Smith, G.; Dawkin, L.; Goldenberg, S.; Chand, M. Microbiological Problems and Biofilms Associated with Mycobacterium chimaera in Heater–Cooler Units Used for Cardiopulmonary Bypass. J. Hosp. Infect. 2017 , 96 , 209–220. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Born, F.; Wieser, A.; Oberbach, A.; Oberbach, A.; Ellgass, R.; Peterss, S.; Kur, F.; Grabein, B.; Hagl, C. Five Years without Mycobacterium chimaera . Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2020 , 68 , S1–S72. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Scriven, J.E.; Scobie, A.; Verlander, N.Q.; Houston, A.; Collyns, T.; Cajic, V.; Kon, O.M.; Mitchell, T.; Rahama, O.; Robinson, A.; et al. Mycobacterium chimaera Infection Following Cardiac Surgery in the United Kingdom: Clinical Features and Outcome of the First 30 Cases. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018 , 24 , 1164–1170. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Olatidoye, O.A.; Samat, S.H.; Yin, K.; Bates, M.J. Pulmonary Valve Infective Endocarditis Caused by Mycobacterium abscessus . J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2023 , 18 , 221. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ganatra, S.; Sharma, A.; D’Agostino, R.; Gage, T.; Kinnunen, P. Mycobacterium chimaera Mimicking Sarcoidosis. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc. J. 2018 , 14 , 301–302. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Buchanan, R.; Agarwal, A.; Mathai, E.; Cherian, B. Mycobacterium chimaera : A Novel Pathogen with Potential Risk to Cardiac Surgical Patients. Natl. Med. J. India 2020 , 33 , 284–287. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McHugh, J.; Saleh, O.A. Updates in Culture-Negative Endocarditis. Pathogens 2023 , 12 , 1027. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Delgado, V.; Ajmone Marsan, N.; De Waha, S.; Bonaros, N.; Brida, M.; Burri, H.; Caselli, S.; Doenst, T.; Ederhy, S.; Erba, P.A.; et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Endocarditis. Eur. Heart J. 2023 , 44 , 3948–4042. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kohler, P.; Kuster, S.P.; Bloemberg, G.; Schulthess, B.; Frank, M.; Tanner, F.C.; Rössle, M.; Böni, C.; Falk, V.; Wilhelm, M.J.; et al. Healthcare-Associated Prosthetic Heart Valve, Aortic Vascular Graft, and Disseminated Mycobacterium chimaera Infections Subsequent to Open Heart Surgery. Eur. Heart J. 2015 , 36 , 2745–2753. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wyrostkiewicz, D.; Opoka, L.; Filipczak, D.; Jankowska, E.; Skorupa, W.; Augustynowicz-Kopeć, E.; Szturmowicz, M. Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease in the Patients with Cystic Fibrosis—A Challenging Diagnostic Problem. Diagnostics 2022 , 12 , 1514. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Virdi, R.; Lowe, M.E.; Norton, G.J.; Dawrs, S.N.; Hasan, N.A.; Epperson, L.E.; Glickman, C.M.; Chan, E.D.; Strong, M.; Crooks, J.L.; et al. Lower Recovery of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria from Outdoor Hawai’i Environmental Water Biofilms Compared to Indoor Samples. Microorganisms 2021 , 9 , 224. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schweickert, B.; Goldenberg, O.; Richter, E.; Göbel, U.B.; Petrich, A.; Buchholz, P.; Moter, A. Occurrence and Clinical Relevance of Mycobacterium chimaera sp. nov., Germany. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2008 , 14 , 1443–1446. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Boyle, D.P.; Zembower, T.R.; Qi, C. Evaluation of Vitek MS for Rapid Classification of Clinical Isolates Belonging to Mycobacterium avium Complex. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2015 , 81 , 41–43. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sommerstein, R.; Rüegg, C.; Kohler, P.; Bloemberg, G.; Kuster, S.P.; Sax, H. Transmission of Mycobacterium chimaera from Heater-Cooler Units during Cardiac Surgery despite an Ultraclean Air Ventilation System. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2016 , 22 , 1008–1013. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Balsam, L.B.; Louie, E.; Hill, F.; Levine, J.; Phillips, M.S. Mycobacterium chimaera Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections. J. Card. Surg. 2017 , 32 , 402–404. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Sanchez-Nadales, A.; Diaz-Sierra, A.; Mocadie, M.; Asher, C.; Gordon, S.; Xu, B. Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging for the Diagnosis of Mycobacterium chimaera Prosthetic Valve Infective Endocarditis After Open-Heart Surgery: A Contemporary Systematic Review. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2022 , 47 , 101392. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cannas, A.; Campanale, A.; Minella, D.; Messina, F.; Butera, O.; Nisii, C.; Mazzarelli, A.; Fontana, C.; Lispi, L.; Maraglino, F.; et al. Epidemiological and Molecular Investigation of the Heater–Cooler Unit (HCU)-Related Outbreak of Invasive Mycobacterium chimaera Infection Occurred in Italy. Microorganisms 2023 , 11 , 2251. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schreiber, P.W.; Kohl, T.A.; Kuster, S.P.; Niemann, S.; Sax, H. The Global Outbreak of Mycobacterium chimaera Infections in Cardiac Surgery—A Systematic Review of Whole-Genome Sequencing Studies and Joint Analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021 , 27 , 1613–1620. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rubinstein, M.; Grossman, R.; Nissan, I.; Schwaber, M.J.; Carmeli, Y.; Kaidar-Shwartz, H.; Dveyrin, Z.; Rorman, E. Mycobacterium intracellulare Subsp. Chimaera from Cardio Surgery Heating-Cooling Units and from Clinical Samples in Israel Are Genetically Unrelated. Pathogens 2021 , 10 , 1392. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mercaldo, R.A.; Marshall, J.E.; Prevots, D.R.; Lipner, E.M.; French, J.P. Detecting Clusters of High Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infection Risk for Persons with Cystic Fibrosis—An Analysis of U.S. Counties. Tuberculosis 2023 , 138 , 102296. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Asadi, T.; Mullin, K.; Roselli, E.; Johnston, D.; Tan, C.D.; Rodriguez, E.R.; Gordon, S. Disseminated Mycobacterium chimaera Infection Associated with Heater-Cooler Units after Aortic Valve Surgery without Endocarditis. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2018 , 155 , 2369–2374. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Clemente, T.; Spagnuolo, V.; Bottanelli, M.; Ripa, M.; Del Forno, B.; Busnardo, E.; Di Lucca, G.; Castagna, A.; Danise, A. Disseminated Mycobacterium chimaera Infection Favoring the Development of Kaposi’s Sarcoma: A Case Report. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2022 , 21 , 57. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schaeffer, T.; Kuster, S.; Koechlin, L.; Khanna, N.; Eckstein, F.S.; Reuthebuch, O. Long-Term Follow-Up after Mycobacterium chimaera Infection Following Cardiac Surgery: Single-Center Experience. J. Clin. Med. 2023 , 12 , 948. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Trauth, J.; Matt, U.; Kohl, T.A.; Niemann, S.; Herold, S. Blind Spot in Endocarditis Guidelines: Mycobacterium chimaera Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis after Cardiac Surgery—A Case Series. Eur. Heart J. Case Rep. 2023 , 7 , ytad400. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sanavio, M.; Anna, A.; Bolcato, M. Mycobacterium chimaera : Clinical and Medico-Legal Considerations Starting from a Case of Sudden Acoustic Damage. Leg. Med. 2020 , 47 , 101747. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• van Ingen, J. Microbiological Diagnosis of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease. Clin. Chest Med. 2015 , 36 , 43–54. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Wang, H.; Bédard, E.; Prévost, M.; Camper, A.K.; Hill, V.R.; Pruden, A. Methodological Approaches for Monitoring Opportunistic Pathogens in Premise Plumbing: A Review. Water Res. 2017 , 117 , 68–86. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hasse, B.; Hannan, M.M.; Keller, P.M.; Maurer, F.P.; Sommerstein, R.; Mertz, D.; Wagner, D.; Fernández-Hidalgo, N.; Nomura, J.; Manfrin, V.; et al. International Society of Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Disseminated Mycobacterium chimaera Infection Following Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass. J. Hosp. Infect. 2020 , 104 , 214–235. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schreiber, P.W.; Köhler, N.; Cervera, R.; Hasse, B.; Sax, H.; Keller, P.M. Detection Limit of Mycobacterium chimaera in Water Samples for Monitoring Medical Device Safety: Insights from a Pilot Experimental Series. J. Hosp. Infect. 2018 , 99 , 284–289. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Daley, C.L.; Iaccarino, J.M.; Lange, C.; Cambau, E.; Wallace, R.J.; Andrejak, C.; Böttger, E.C.; Brozek, J.; Griffith, D.E.; Guglielmetti, L.; et al. Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease: An Official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020 , 71 , e1–e36. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lecorche, E.; Haenn, S.; Mougari, F.; Kumanski, S.; Veziris, N.; Benmansour, H.; Raskine, L.; Moulin, L.; Cambau, E.; Aubry, A.; et al. Comparison of Methods Available for Identification of Mycobacterium chimaera . Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018 , 24 , 409–413. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Lyamin, A.V.; Ereshchenko, A.A.; Gusyakova, O.A.; Yanchenko, A.V.; Kozlov, A.V.; Khaliulin, A.V. Comparison of Laboratory Methods for Identifying Members of the Family Mycobacteriaceae. Int. J. Mycobacteriol 2023 , 12 , 129–134. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Togawa, A.; Chikamatsu, K.; Takaki, A.; Matsumoto, Y.; Yoshimura, M.; Tsuchiya, S.; Nakamura, S.; Mitarai, S. Multiple Mutations of Mycobacterium ntracellulare Subsp. Chimaera Causing False-Negative Reaction to the Transcription-Reverse Transcription Concerted Method for Pathogen Detection. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2023 , 133 , 14–17. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kuehl, R.; Banderet, F.; Egli, A.; Keller, P.M.; Frei, R.; Döbele, T.; Eckstein, F.; Widmer, A.F. Different Types of Heater-Cooler Units and Their Risk of Transmission of Mycobacterium chimaera during Open-Heart Surgery: Clues from Device Design. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2018 , 39 , 834–840. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Quintás Viqueira, A.; Pérez Romero, C.; Toro Rueda, C.; Sánchez Calles, A.M.; Blázquez González, J.A.; Alejandre Leyva, M. Mycobacterium chimaera in Heater-Cooler Devices: An Experience in a Tertiary Hospital in Spain. New Microbes New Infect. 2021 , 39 , 100757. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Falkinham, J.O., III. Disinfection and Cleaning of Heater-Cooler Units: Suspension- and Biofilm-Killing. J. Hosp. Infect. 2020 , 105 , 552–557. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Hammer-Dedet, F.; Dupont, C.; Evrevin, M.; Jumas-Bilak, E.; Romano-Bertrand, S. Improved Detection of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria in Hospital Water Samples. Infect. Dis. Now 2021 , 51 , 488–491. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Romano-Bertrand, S.; Evrevin, M.; Dupont, C.; Frapier, J.M.; Sinquet, J.C.; Bousquet, E.; Albat, B.; Jumas-Bilak, E. Persistent Contamination of Heater-Cooler Units for Extracorporeal Circulation Cured by Chlorhexidine-Alcohol in Water Tanks. J. Hosp. Infect. 2018 , 99 , 290–294. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Colangelo, N.; Giambuzzi, I.; Moro, M.; Pasqualini, N.; Aina, A.; De Simone, F.; Blasio, A.; Alfieri, O.; Castiglioni, A.; De Bonis, M. Mycobacterium chimaera in Heater–Cooler Units: New Technical Approach for Treatment, Cleaning and Disinfection Protocol. Perfusion 2019 , 34 , 272–276. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ditommaso, S.; Giacomuzzi, M.; Memoli, G.; Garlasco, J.; Curtoni, A.; Iannaccone, M.; Zotti, C.M. Chemical Susceptibility Testing of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacterium strains and Other Aquatic Bacteria: Results of a Study for the Development of a More Sensitive and Simple Method for the Detection of NTM in Environmental Samples. J. Microbiol. Methods 2022 , 193 , 106405. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shrimpton, N.Y.R. Evaluation of Disinfection Processes for Water Heater Devices Used for Extracorporeal Life Support. Perfusion 2019 , 34 , 428–432. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Sarink, M.J.; van Cappellen, W.A.; Tielens, A.G.M.; van Dijk, A.; Bogers, A.J.J.C.; de Steenwinkel, J.E.M.; Vos, M.C.; Severin, J.A.; van Hellemond, J.J. Vermamoeba Vermiformis Resides in Water-Based Heater–Cooler Units and Can Enhance Mycobacterium chimaera Survival after Chlorine Exposure. J. Hosp. Infect. 2023 , 132 , 73–77. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Bengtsson, D.; Westerberg, M.; Nielsen, S.; Ridell, M.; Jönsson, B. Mycobacterium chimaera in Heater-Cooler Units Used during Cardiac Surgery–Growth and Decontamination. Infect. Dis. 2018 , 50 , 736–742. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Weitkemper, H.H.; Spilker, A.; Knobl, H.J.; Körfer, R. The Heater-Cooler Unit-A Conceivable Source of Infection. J. Extra Corpor. Technol. 2016 , 48 , 62–66. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Foltan, M.; Nikisch, A.; Dembianny, J.; Miano, A.L.; Heinze, J.; Klar, D.; Göbölös, L.; Lehle, K.; Schmid, C. A Solution for Global Hygienic Challenges Regarding the Application of Heater-Cooler Systems in Cardiac Surgery. Perfusion 2023 , 38 , 28–36. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pradal, I.; Esteban, J.; Mediero, A.; García-Coca, M.; Aguilera-Correa, J.J. Contact Effect of a Methylobacterium sp. Extract on Biofilm of a Mycobacterium chimaera Strain Isolated from a 3T Heater-Cooler System. Antibiotics 2020 , 9 , 474. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Masaka, E.; Reed, S.; Davidson, M.; Oosthuizen, J. Opportunistic Premise Plumbing Pathogens. A Potential Health Risk in Water Mist Systems Used as a Cooling Intervention. Pathogens 2021 , 10 , 462. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Treglia, M.; Pallocci, M.; Ricciardi Tenore, G.; Castellani, P.; Pizzuti, F.; Bianco, G.; Passalacqua, P.; De Luca, L.; Zanovello, C.; Mazzuca, D.; et al. Legionella and Air Transport: A Study of Environmental Contamination. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022 , 19 , 8069. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Glassmeyer, S.T.; Burns, E.E.; Focazio, M.J.; Furlong, E.T.; Gribble, M.O.; Jahne, M.A.; Keely, S.P.; Kennicutt, A.R.; Kolpin, D.W.; Medlock Kakaley, E.K.; et al. Water, Water Everywhere, but Every Drop Unique: Challenges in the Science to Understand the Role of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in the Management of Drinking Water Supplies. Geohealth 2023 , 7 , e2022GH000716. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ortiz-Martínez, Y. Mycobacterium chimaera : An under-Diagnosed Pathogen in Developing Countries? J. Hosp. Infect. 2017 , 97 , 125–126. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Becker, J.B.; Moisés, V.A.; Guerra-Martín, M.D.; Barbosa, D.A. Epidemiological Differences, Clinical Aspects, and Short-Term Prognosis of Patients with Healthcare-Associated and Community-Acquired Infective Endocarditis. Infect. Prev. Pract. 2024 , 6 , 100343. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ferrara, S.D.; Baccino, E.; Bajanowski, T.; Boscolo-Berto, R.; Castellano, M.; De Angel, R.; Pauliukevičius, A.; Ricci, P.; Vanezis, P.; Vieira, D.N.; et al. Malpractice and Medical Liability. European Guidelines on Methods of Ascertainment and Criteria of Evaluation. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2013 , 127 , 545–557. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Bolcato, V.; Bassetti, M.; Basile, G.; Bianco Prevot, L.; Speziale, G.; Tremoli, E.; Maffessanti, F.; Tronconi, L.P. The State-of-the-Art of Mycobacterium chimaera Infections and the Causal Link with Health Settings: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2024 , 12 , 1788. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12171788

Bolcato V, Bassetti M, Basile G, Bianco Prevot L, Speziale G, Tremoli E, Maffessanti F, Tronconi LP. The State-of-the-Art of Mycobacterium chimaera Infections and the Causal Link with Health Settings: A Systematic Review. Healthcare . 2024; 12(17):1788. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12171788

Bolcato, Vittorio, Matteo Bassetti, Giuseppe Basile, Luca Bianco Prevot, Giuseppe Speziale, Elena Tremoli, Francesco Maffessanti, and Livio Pietro Tronconi. 2024. "The State-of-the-Art of Mycobacterium chimaera Infections and the Causal Link with Health Settings: A Systematic Review" Healthcare 12, no. 17: 1788. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12171788

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, supplementary material.

ZIP-Document (ZIP, 83 KiB)

Further Information

Mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals