research and development university ranking

• Academic Affairs
• Partnerships/Mergers
• Personnel and HR
• Policy and Legal Affairs
• Fundraising
• Crisis Management
• Access & Affordability
• Diversity, Equity, Inclusion
• Student Loans/Pell Grants
• International Students
• Online Learning
• Instructional Technology
• Edtech/Innovation
• Civil Dialogue
• Curricula/Majors
• Mental health
• Career Pathways
• Campus Safety
• Student Success and Retention
• Dining and Retail
• Athletics/Recreation
• Web Seminars – UB Ed Talks – Podcasts

The top 100 colleges and universities that spent on R&D in 2020

Though total research and development spending at higher education institutions grew more slowly than in any period since 2015 because of the COVID-19 pandemic, spending still increased by $2.7 billion in fiscal year 2020.

Of the $86.4 billion total noted in the National Science Foundation’s Higher Education Research and Development (HERD) Survey , nearly half went toward health sciences and biomedical sciences, far outpacing most other initiatives. The total was triple what was spent on engineering, for example.

Far and away the biggest recipient and spender of R&D funds was Johns Hopkins University, which had more than $3.1 billion in expenditures, including its Applied Physics Lab ($1.9 billion). Twenty other institutions spent more than $1 billion, including these others in the top five: the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor ($1.67B), the University of California at San Francisco ($1.65B), the University of Pennsylvania ($1.58B) and the University of Washington at Seattle ($1.46B).

One institution that saw a big boost to its R&D bottom line was the University of Arizona, which spent $27 million more in FY 2020 than in 2019 to move into No. 35 overall. It also maintained its hold on the top spot in expenditures related to astronomy and astrophysics and cracked the top 50 in engineering.

“The latest HERD data demonstrate the robustness and continual growth of our research enterprise, despite challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic that took hold in early 2020,” said Elizabeth Cantwell, senior vice president for research and innovation. “At the heart of this success are our faculty and researchers, whose creativity and determination drive discovery and innovation, creating positive real-world impacts and knowledge for a more resilient future.”

The University of Wisconsin-Madison came in at No. 8, increasing its overall total by more than $65 million from the previous fiscal year. Like many other research institutions, its team approach in addressing COVID-19-related needs has been a top priority, with 80 research grants going toward helping in the global crisis. “I’m especially proud that our campus research community provides a backbone to the Wisconsin Idea in areas such as timely and critical public health response,” said Steve Ackerman, vice chancellor for research and graduate education at UW. “We see this in the university’s research response to the COVID-19 pandemic, but also in our efforts to ensure significant continuing advances in STEM, the arts, education and the social sciences.”

Most dollars enjoyed by colleges and universities and their researchers in FY 2020 came from the federal government, though institutional funding accounted for around one-quarter of the total. Businesses ($5.8B), nonprofits ($5.8B) and state government also were key contributors to the overall pool in helping back academic studies and surveys in higher ed.

Other areas that ranged among the highest expenditures included agricultural sciences ($3.4B), geosciences ($3.19B), electrical engineering ($2.9B), social sciences ($2.8B), computer and information sciences ($2.64B), and physics ($2.3B).

Here is the rest of the top 100 from the 915 colleges and universities that spent more than $150,000 in research and development in FY 2020:

• University of California, San Diego, $1,403,735
• University of California, Los Angeles, $1,392,941
• University of Wisconsin-Madison, $1,363,931
• Harvard University, $1,239,983
• Stanford University, $1,203,950
• Duke University, $1,196,638
• Cornell University, $1,190,063
• University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, $1,159,725
• Texas A&M University, College Station, $1,130,803
• University of Pittsburgh, $1,105,532
• University of Maryland, $1,103,062
• Yale University, $1,094,135
• University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, $1,051,297
• Georgia Institute of Technology, $1,048,988
• University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, $1,042,382
• Columbia University, $1,032,909
• Pennsylvania State University, $991,923
• Massachusetts Institute of Technology, $987,968
• Ohio State University, $968,260
• New York University, $947,293
• University of Florida, $942,223
• University of Southern California, $941,198
• Washington University, Saint Louis, $920,215
• Northwestern University, $874,671
• University of California, Berkeley, $840,000
• Vanderbilt University, $824,803
• University of California, Davis, $816,693
• Emory University, $808,792
• University of Texas, Austin, $797,199
• University of Arizona, $760,975
• Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, $747,014
• Indiana University, Bloomington, $728,554
• Michigan State University, $713,197
• University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, $689,176
• Rutgers University, $688,077
• Purdue University, West Lafayette, $687,144
• Baylor College of Medicine, $685,641
• Arizona State University, $673,357
• University of Virginia, Charlottesville, $652,002
• University of Alabama, Birmingham, $618,226
• University of Utah, $607,061
• University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, $595,939
• Boston University, $583,267
• Virginia Tech University, $556,341
• University of Colorado, Denver, $554,643
• North Carolina State University, $546,290
• University of Iowa, $538,583
• University of Cincinnati, $530,138
• University of Colorado, Boulder, $525,674
• University of California, Irvine, $490,597
• University of Georgia, $482,786
• University of Chicago, $458,891
• California Institute of Technology, $449,651
• Oregon Health and Science University, $446,890
• Scripps Research Institute, $444,964
• Case Western Reserve University, $439,778
• SUNY-Buffalo, $422,038
• University of Kentucky, 417,674
• University of Illinois, Chicago, $412,147
• Colorado State University, Fort Collins, $407,302
• University of Rochester, $397,211
• Princeton University, $396,502
• Carnegie Mellon University, $386,996
• University of Miami, $381,410
• University of Kansas, $368,811
• Iowa State University, $363,107
• University of Oklahoma, Norman, $362,209
• Rockefeller University, $356,217
• SUNY Polytechnic Institute, $355,651
• Florida State University, $350,430
• Washington State University, $335,201
• University of South Florida, $333,344
• University of Missouri, Columbia, $332,180
• Dartmouth College, $326,349
• Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , $324,510
• University of Nebraska, Lincoln $320,463
• University of Tennessee, Knoxville $320,407
• Utah State University $304,256
• Temple University $299,707
• Albert Einstein College of Medicine $288,654
• Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge $286,733
• Virginia Commonwealth University, $283,874
• Mississippi State University, $280,485
• University of Connecticut, $280,131
• University of Massachusetts, Medical School, $279,096
• University of Hawaii, Manoa, $275,929
• University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, $273,862
• Medical University of South Carolina, $272,590
• George Washington University, $270,369
• Oregon State University, 268,385
• Brown University, $266,127
• Medical College of Wisconsin, $264,325
• SUNY-Stony Brook, $263,470
• Georgetown University, $258,659
• Auburn University, $255,281

Most Popular

President moves: 2 leaders serving 30+ years are calling it a..., how can an 8-week term improve community college student success rates, free speech, and other issues keeping these 11 college presidents up..., know this for next week: three-year degrees are advancing, president’s corner: how ‘presence’ unlocks a powerful enrollment strategy, report: adult online learners are money-motivated. are your programs supporting their....

• Share on twitter
• Share on facebook

World University Rankings 2023

The Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2023 include 1,799 universities across 104 countries and regions, making them the largest and most diverse university rankings to date.

The table is based on 13 carefully calibrated performance indicators that measure an institution’s performance across four areas: teaching, research, knowledge transfer and international outlook.

This year’s ranking analysed over 121 million citations across more than 15.5 million research publications and included survey responses from 40,000 scholars globally. Overall, we collected over 680,000 datapoints from more than 2,500 institutions that submitted data.

Trusted worldwide by students, teachers, governments and industry experts, this year’s league table reveals how the global higher education landscape is shifting.

View the World University Rankings 2023 methodology

The University of Oxford tops the ranking for the seventh consecutive year. Harvard University remains in second place, but the University of Cambridge jumps from joint fifth last year to joint third.

The highest new entry is Italy’s Humanitas University, ranked in the 201-250 bracket.

The US is the most-represented country overall, with 177 institutions, and also the most represented in the top 200 (58).

Mainland China now has the fourth-highest number of institutions in the top 200 (11, compared with 10 last year), having overtaken Australia, which has dropped to fifth (joint with the Netherlands).

Five countries enter the ranking for the first time – all of them in Africa (Zambia, Namibia, Mozambique, Zimbabwe and Mauritius).

Harvard tops the teaching pillar, while Oxford leads the research pillar. Atop the international pillar is the Macau University of Science and Technology.

Overall, 1,799 universities are ranked. A further 546 universities are listed with “reporter” status, meaning that they provided data but did not meet our eligibility criteria to receive a rank, and agreed to be displayed as a reporter in the final table.

Read our analysis of the World University Rankings 2023 results

Download a copy of the World University Rankings 2023 digital report

To raise your university’s global profile with Times Higher Education , contact [email protected]

To unlock the data behind THE ’s rankings and access a range of analytical and benchmarking tools, click here

• Share on linkedin
• Share on mail

Read more about the World University Rankings 2023

Student insights.

• Best universities in the world
• Best universities in the UK
• Best universities in the United States
• Best universities in Canada
• Best universities in Australia
• Best universities in Europe
• Best universities in the Netherlands
• Best universities in France
• Best universities in Germany
• Best universities in Malaysia
• Best universities in South Korea

Academic Insights

• World University Rankings 2023: results announced
• World University Rankings 2023: African sector improving rapidly
• World University Rankings 2023: US stagnating, Oceania rising, and a weak point for China
• World University Rankings 2023: the opportunities and threats ahead
• World University Rankings 2023: top marks for Australian sector
• Underfunding basic research is a recipe for disaster
• Society benefits from industry partnerships – but there are provisos
• Universities must innovate new kinds of learning for students of all ages
• The future of global research collaboration is rocky
• Talking Leadership 44: Alice Gast on championing ‘risk-taking’ foreign students
• The half-life of knowledge
• How can universities leverage their pandemic reputation boost?
• Our task for the future: global education for all
• World University Rankings 2023: trends in research
• World University Rankings 2023: trends in teaching
• World University Rankings 2023: trends in international outlook
• World University Rankings 2023: trends in working with industry
• Talking Leadership 45: Andrew Hamilton on the trajectory of higher education
• European universities tentatively embrace working with industry
• Talking leadership 46: Louise Richardson on academic precarity and elitism
• Rankings are changing: WUR 3.0 will be more robust and insightful
• Talking leadership 47: Stephen Toope on culture wars and collaboration

Methodology:

Featured jobs

Featured universities.

2023 Best National Research Uni­ver­si­ties Top 50 Consensus Ranked National Research Uni­ver­si­ties for 2023

Ready to start your journey.

Get a personalized list of degree programs that fit your needs.

Students who want a place at one of the best research universities are in the right place with College Consensus. With the Top Consensus Ranked National Research Universities for 2023, College Consensus brings prospective college students all they need to know about the best research universities nationwide. For future professionals, researchers, scientists, and scholars, College Consensus gathers data from national and international ranking agencies and verified student reviews for a complete view of their educational options.

How Did We Rank the Best Research Universities?

College Consensus rankings combine the results of the most respected college ranking systems with the averaged ratings of thousands of real student reviews from around the web to create a unique college meta-ranking. This approach offers a comprehensive and holistic perspective missing from other college rankings. Visit our about page for information on which rankings and review sites were included in this year’s consensus rankings.

The National Research Universities category is limited to schools with a national or international reach offering a broad range of undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral-level programs and a demonstrated commitment to research. These are schools designated Doctoral Universities by the Carnegie Classification.

The top research universities include some of the most prestigious and world-renowned names in higher education. We define national research universities as institutions that draw a student body from across the US and world, rather than a primarily regional population. These are universities that are classified by the Carnegie Foundation as research universities: R1 (Highest Research Activity), R2 (Higher Research Activity), or R3 (Moderate Research Activity). These designations include well over 300 universities nationwide. National research universities are dedicated not only to teaching, but on creating new knowledge through scientific, social scientific, and humanities research.

Recommended Online Colleges & Universities

Explore our featured online programs to find the right match for you today.

What’s Different About the College Consensus Ranking?

The difference between College Consensus and other ranking sites is the difference between Rotten Tomatoes and your favorite movie reviewer. College Consensus is comprehensive. It’s not just one voice stating an opinion – it’s many, many voices, computed objectively and equally. Students who are actually there day to day have as much say about their college as experts who have never visited. And all of those perspectives mean an even playing field for every college and university, from the richest and best-known university to the smallest and hardest-working regional college.

This ranking focuses on the best nationally-recognized, major research universities. For students who are interested in the more traditional atmosphere of a small college, College Consensus has also ranked the Best National Liberal Arts Colleges . For the full, comprehensive ranking of all American colleges and universities, regardless of size or class, see the Best Colleges and Universities . For online schools, see the Best Online Colleges & Universities .

The Top Consensus Ranked National Research Universities are listed in descending order by their Consensus score. In the event of ties, schools are ranked in alphabetical order with the same rank number.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA

Stanford university stanford, ca, yale university new haven, ct, princeton university princeton, nj, harvard university cambridge, ma, vanderbilt university nashville, tn, cornell university ithaca, ny, dartmouth college hanover, nh, brown university providence, ri, university of notre dame notre dame, in, recommended online colleges & universities.

Visit sites to learn more about enrollment, tuition, and aid

Duke University Durham, NC

Rice university houston, tx, university of pennsylvania philadelphia, pa, university of california-los angeles los angeles, ca, california institute of technology pasadena, ca, columbia university in the city of new york new york, ny, washington university in st louis saint louis, mo, university of california-berkeley berkeley, ca, university of chicago chicago, il, university of michigan-ann arbor ann arbor, mi, northwestern university evanston, il, university of north carolina at chapel hill chapel hill, nc, university of southern california los angeles, ca, university of california-davis davis, ca, georgetown university washington, dc, university of virginia-main campus charlottesville, va, university of florida gainesville, fl, johns hopkins university baltimore, md, carnegie mellon university pittsburgh, pa, emory university atlanta, ga, university of wisconsin-madison madison, wi, university of illinois urbana-champaign champaign, il, georgia institute of technology-main campus atlanta, ga, university of california-san diego la jolla, ca, wake forest university winston-salem, nc, university of california-irvine irvine, ca, university of washington-seattle campus seattle, wa, university of california-santa barbara santa barbara, ca, boston college chestnut hill, ma, the university of texas at austin austin, tx, tufts university medford, ma, virginia polytechnic institute and state university blacksburg, va, lehigh university bethlehem, pa, new york university new york, ny, purdue university-main campus west lafayette, in, brigham young university provo, ut, william & mary williamsburg, va, texas a & m university-college station college station, tx, tulane university of louisiana new orleans, la, university of maryland-college park college park, md.

Why choose a research university? The best research universities offer opportunities for students to engage with faculty who are expanding their fields. Because professors are making new breakthroughs all the time, the learning environment is charged with excitement and students are able to learn about the latest studies before the results make it into their textbooks.

In addition, attending a research university often affords students opportunities they would not have at other schools. For example, they may have access to internships and have opportunities to do research with experts in their fields. They may even be invited to networking events with well-known professors, which could introduce them to valuable contacts and mentors.

What Makes a University a Research University?

So what is the difference between a research university vs. a teaching university? A focus on research is what makes a university a research university. The definition of a research university is a university that is committed to furthering our collective body of knowledge through research. 

Unlike teaching universities, which put teaching above everything else, research universities place a higher importance on research. This does not mean that the teaching at a research university is sub-par, however. At the best research universities, professors who are excited about their research often carry their enthusiasm into the classroom. They ignite passion in their students by sharing the results of their research with their classes.

If you’re looking for the best research universities, look through our research university rankings. We have carefully considered each school’s strengths and weaknesses and compiled a list of the top research universities in the country. Our research university rankings will help you choose the right university for you.

What is the Relationship Between Government Funding and Research Universities?

Government funding to universities is currently around 60% of the total R&D budget. This is down from a high of 73% in the late 1960s. However, in inflation-adjusted dollars, the amount has actually increased from around $8 billion per year to over $30 billion in spite of the lower percentage. This indicates that, adjusted for inflation, R&D budgets at research universities have grown over the past few decades.

Still, federal research grants to universities account for over half of the R&D funding for these schools. However, since federal funding covers less of the costs than it has in the past, schools have had to cover a larger share of their R&D budgets themselves. The percentage paid by the schools was less than 10% in the late 60s, but has risen to more than 20% today.

Since government funding to universities now covers a smaller percentage of research costs, many universities have responded by charging higher tuition and fees to make up the difference. However, public outcry against the burgeoning student debt crisis is forcing research universities to come up with an alternative way to make up for the reduced federal research grants to universities.

Many research universities have come up with new ways to gain additional funding or reduce expenses. These include partnerships with corporations and cooperative agreements with other schools that allow for expanded research efforts at all of the partner schools. Some schools are also engaging in their own development projects in order to raise additional funding.

Top Research Universities by Funding

Looking at the top research universities by funding, Johns Hopkins University receives more than twice as much federal funding as the #2 school. Around $2 billion of Johns Hopkins’s $2.3 billion R&D budget comes from the federal government. The school is followed by the University of Washington in 2nd place ($960.6 million), the University of Michigan in 3rd ($756.1 million), Stanford University in 4th ($679.6 million), and the University of California, San Diego in 5th ($643.0 million).

Are Research Universities Only for STEM Majors?

Although the best undergraduate research universities include the best science colleges in the world, research universities are not just for STEM majors . In fact, a recent study by Drexel University found that non-STEM students are just as likely to benefit from undergrad research experiences as STEM students.

The results were based on a survey of students who participated in the STAR (Students Tackling Advanced Research) program at Drexel University, one of the best science colleges in the world. Students indicated that they felt that the research benefited them in all areas of study, not just in STEM subject areas.

Some of the benefits students reported included improvements in their ability to work independently, feeling more comfortable discussing concepts or explaining projects to people outside of their fields, and gaining hands-on experience that they feel will help enhance their resumes.

At the best research universities, students have plenty of opportunities to participate in research. Regardless of major, being involved in a research project increases the chances that the student will remain in the program and eventually graduate. This effect is stronger when the research is conducted earlier in the program.

• About the Hub
• Announcements
• Faculty Experts Guide
• Subscribe to the newsletter

Explore by Topic

• Arts+Culture
• Politics+Society
• Science+Technology
• Student Life
• University News
• Voices+Opinion
• About Hub at Work
• Gazette Archive
• Benefits+Perks
• Health+Well-Being
• Current Issue
• About the Magazine
• Past Issues
• Support Johns Hopkins Magazine
• Subscribe to the Magazine

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

Johns Hopkins leads nation in research spending for 41st consecutive year

University spent a record $2.917 billion in fiscal year 2019, a nearly 10% increase from 2018.

Credit: Will Kirk / Johns Hopkins University

By Katie Pearce

Johns Hopkins University led all U.S. universities in research and development spending for the 41st consecutive year in fiscal year 2019, spending a record $2.917 billion.

The university's total R&D expenditure for fiscal year 2019—the most recent year for which nationwide data is available—rose 9.6% from the previous year, according to the annual National Science Foundation report on higher education R&D .

"Johns Hopkins is proud to continue its decades-long legacy as the national leader in research funding," says Denis Wirtz , the university's vice provost for research and a professor of chemical and biomolecular engineering, pathology, and oncology. "The support makes it possible for researchers throughout the Johns Hopkins community—from the School of Medicine to the Applied Physics Laboratory to the Peabody Institute—to continue the work of addressing humanity's most pressing problems and advancing human knowledge."

Total R&D spending at U.S. academic institutions increased by $4.5 billion, or 5.7%, in fiscal year 2019, reaching $84 billion. The top 30 institutions accounted for 42% of the total spent, according to the survey, which ranked 913 institutions.

Image credit : Sasha Schaffer / Johns Hopkins University

The 9.6% increase in expenditures was the highest among the top 30 largest research universities. Johns Hopkins was followed by Washington University in St. Louis (8.7%) and Yale University (8.3%).

The University of Michigan remained in second place in the survey this year, with a total R&D expenditure of $1.676 billion, and the University of California, San Francisco remained in third with $1.595 billion.

Of Johns Hopkins' total R&D spending, $2.482 billion came from federal sources such as the NSF and the National Institutes of Health.

"For the first time in ten years, there was a modest increase in the federal government's share of higher education R&D expenditures," Wirtz adds. "However, this is still the second lowest share since the national survey began in 1953. We hope to see this trend upward continue as federal research funding is essential for sustaining a vibrant and innovative scientific community."

Johns Hopkins first crossed the $2 billion spending threshold in fiscal 2010 and remains the only university to have done so. Since 1979, the NSF's inclusion of the Applied Physics Laboratory spending in its accounting of Johns Hopkins expenditures has solidified the university's annual position at the top of the NSF rankings. In fiscal year 2019, APL spent $1.725 billion on R&D.

Posted in University News

Tagged applied physics laboratory , nsf , university rankings , research funding

Related Content

20 NSF Graduate Research Fellows to conduct research at Johns Hopkins

Demonstrating the importance of federal research funding

Hopkins again leads U.S. universities in R&D spending

You might also like, news network.

• Johns Hopkins Magazine
• Get Email Updates
• Submit an Announcement
• Submit an Event
• Privacy Statement
• Accessibility

Discover JHU

• About the University
• Schools & Divisions
• Academic Programs
• Plan a Visit
• my.JohnsHopkins.edu
• © 2024 Johns Hopkins University . All rights reserved.
• University Communications
• 3910 Keswick Rd., Suite N2600, Baltimore, MD
• X Facebook LinkedIn YouTube Instagram

• EN Action Another action
• Free Counselling

Thanks for visiting TopUniversities.com today! So that we can show you the most relevant information, please select the option that most closely relates to you.

• Looking for undergraduate studies
• Looking for postgraduate studies
• Student but not looking for further education at the moment
• Parent or Guardian
• University administrator
• Professional

Thanks for sending your response.

Your input will help us improve your experience. You can close this popup to continue using the website or choose an option below to register in or login.

Already have an account? Sign in

QS World University Rankings by Subject 2021: Development Studies

Discover where to study Development Studies with the QS World University Rankings by Subject 2021.

Out Now: QS World University Rankings for Development Studies 2022

The QS World University Rankings by Subject are based upon academic reputation, employer reputation and research impact. You can learn more by reading our methodology .

Use the interactive table below to filter the rankings by location, and click on individual universities for more information. You can also use our Course Matching Tool to identify the right degree for you. Simply answer a few simple questions about your academic record and what matters most to you when choosing a university and we’ll recommend the specific degree programs which suit you best.

Interested in more than one study area? The QS World University Rankings by Subject 2021 cover 51 different subjects. Click here to see the full list.

Following the compilation of our first release for this ranking, several corrections may have been made. You can learn more on our release summary page .

Register for free site membership to access direct university comparisons and more

Find your perfect program!

Answer a few questions and our program matching tool will do the rest!

Country/Territory

Unlock advanced filters by Registering for free!

Domestic 70% International 30%

Other subject rankings:

Published on:

Download the results in Excel format.

Filter Ranking Indicators

Want a closer look at your future course.

Join us in-person or online to network with master's and MBA admissions representatives.

Recommended articles

Get the latest student and graduate news straight to your inbox.

Use our tool to find your perfect course. Answer a few questions and we will do the rest!

Our expert teams are here to help start your academic journey by guiding you through the application process.

Discover top-ranked universities!

universities

events every year

Sign up to continue reading

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS. A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (SBE)

• Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (SBE) Home
• Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences (BCS)
• About NCSES
• Explore Data
• Surveys & Analysis
• Schedule of Release Dates
• Corrections
• Social and Economic Sciences (SES)
• SBE Office of Multidisciplinary Activities (SMA)
• Get NCSES Email Updates Get NCSES Email Updates Go
• NCSES RSS Feed What is RSS?
• Contact NCSES
• Research Areas
• Share on Twitter
• Share on Facebook
• Share on LinkedIn
• Send as Email

Higher Education Research and Development (HERD)

Most recent data year

• R&D Expenditures at U.S. Universities Increased by $8 Billion in FY 2022 InfoBriefs | NSF 24-307 | November 30, 2023
• Higher Education Research and Development: Fiscal Year 2022 Data Tables | NSF 24-308 | November 30, 2023
• Universities Report Largest Growth in Federally Funded R&D Expenditures Since FY 2011 InfoBriefs | NSF 23-303 | December 15, 2022
• Higher Education Research and Development: Fiscal Year 2021 Data Tables | NSF 23-304 | December 15, 2022
• Higher Education R&D Increase of 3.3% in FY 2020 Is the Lowest since FY 2015 InfoBriefs | NSF 22-312 | December 27, 2021
• Higher Education Research and Development: Fiscal Year 2020 Data Tables | NSF 22-311 | December 27, 2021
• Universities Report 5.7% Growth in R&D Spending in FY 2019, Reaching $84 Billion InfoBriefs | NSF 21-313 | January 29, 2021
• Higher Education Research and Development: Fiscal Year 2019 Data Tables | NSF 21-314 | January 29, 2021
• Higher Education R&D Funding from All Sources Increased for the Third Straight Year in FY 2018 InfoBriefs | NSF 20-302 | November 13, 2019
• Higher Education Research and Development: Fiscal Year 2018 Data Tables | November 13, 2019
• Higher Education R&D Expenditures Increased 4.7%, Exceeded $75 Billion in FY 2017 InfoBriefs | NSF 19-302 | November 20, 2018
• Higher Education Research and Development: Fiscal Year 2017 Data Tables | November 20, 2018
• Universities Report Increased Federal R&D Funding after 4-year Decline; R&D Fields Revised for FY 2016 InfoBriefs | NSF 18-303 | November 30, 2017
• Higher Education Research and Development: Fiscal Year 2016 Data Tables | November 30, 2017
• Universities Report Fourth Straight Year of Declining Federal R&D Funding in FY 2015 InfoBriefs | NSF 17-303 | November 17, 2016
• Higher Education Research and Development: Fiscal Year 2015 Data Tables | November 17, 2016
• Universities Report Continuing Decline in Federal R&D Funding in FY 2014 (A) InfoBriefs | NSF 16-302 | November 17, 2015
• Higher Education Research and Development Survey, Fiscal Year 2014 (A) Data Tables | November 17, 2015
• Higher Education R&D Expenditures Resume Slow Growth in FY 2013 (A) InfoBriefs | NSF 15-314 | February 4, 2015
• Higher Education Research and Development Survey, Fiscal Year 2013 (A) Data Tables | February 4, 2015
• Higher Education Research and Development Survey, Fiscal Year 2012 (A) Data Tables | March 12, 2014
• Higher Education R&D Expenditures Remain Flat in FY 2012 (A) InfoBriefs | NSF 14-303 | November 25, 2013
• Higher Education Research and Development: Fiscal Year 2011 (A) Detailed Statistical Tables | NSF 13-325 | July 11, 2013
• Universities Report Highest-Ever R&D Spending of $65 Billion in FY 2011 (A) InfoBriefs | NSF 13-305 | November 26, 2012
• Higher Education Research and Development: Fiscal Year 2010 (A) Detailed Statistical Tables | NSF 12-330 | September 6, 2012
• With Help from ARRA, Universities Report $61 Billion in FY 2010 Total R&D; New Details from Redesigned Survey (A) InfoBriefs | NSF 12-313 | March 28, 2012
• Higher Education Research and Development Survey (HERD)

Can't Find What You Are Looking For?

• Search NCSES to find data and reports or browse the Publication Index .
• See permissions for reuse of NCSES material.

Last Updated: June 05, 2013

Ohio State nav bar

The Ohio State University

• BuckeyeLink
• Find People
• Search Ohio State

Ohio State jumps 12 spots in national ranking of research universities

University now ranks 7th among public institutions, 12th overall, in research expenditures.

The Ohio State University’s record-breaking research and development expenditures in 2021 helped boost the university’s standing among research universities nationwide, according to a new survey by the National Science Foundation.

Ohio State is ranked 12th among all universities in overall research expenditures in fiscal year (FY) 2021, an increase of 12 positions from a previous ranking of 24th in FY2020.  The university ranking also increased among public colleges and universities, moving up from 15th in 2020 to 7th in 2021. 

The NSF’s annual Higher Education Research and Development (HERD) survey rankings show that Ohio State’s research and creative expression community conducted $1.236 billion in research and development expenditures in FY2021.

“Ohio State has an ambitious goal to double research and development expenditures over the next decade to address societal challenges and improve people’s lives. Our advancing rankings among our peer institutions are proof of the hard work and relentless innovation on the part of our faculty, students and staff,” said Peter Mohler, vice president for research at Ohio State.

“The university has long been committed to groundbreaking, convergent research to advance robotics, artificial intelligence, biomedical sciences and other fields of research and creative expression,” said Dorota Grejner-Brzezinska, Ohio State's vice president for knowledge enterprise. “While we are pleased to see this recognition, our effort to use science and discovery to solve large, complex societal challenges continues unabated.”

For industry-sponsored research, Ohio State is 6th among all universities, with $129.9 million in expenditures.

Overall, research and development spending by academic institutions in the United States totaled $89.9 billion in FY 2021, an increase of $3.4 billion (4%) from FY 2020.

The HERD survey is the primary source of information on research and development expenditures at U.S. colleges and universities. The survey collects information on research and development expenditures by field of research and source of funds and gathers information on types of research, expenses and personnel.

Year over year, federal research spending at Ohio State grew 7.7%, from $539 million in FY 2020 to $581 million in FY 2021. Ohio State’s institutional investment in research grew to $404 million in FY 2021, up from $152 million the previous fiscal year.

The university said that in addition to increased university investment in FY 2021, better alignment across colleges, units and affiliated entities allowed Ohio State to identify additional institutional investment that was previously not reported as part of the HERD survey.

More Ohio State News

Ohio state to open nexus facility to users with nsf funding.

A team of chemistry and physics researchers at The Ohio State University has received a $12 million award from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) to support the operation, maintenance and expansion of the NSF National Extreme Ultrafast Science Facility (NSF NeXUS) for the next five years.

Techstars Columbus and Ohio State announce new innovators cohort

Techstars Columbus Powered by The Ohio State University has announced the 12 new companies to join its program for early-stage entrepreneurs.

Ohio State students launch space technology ventures

Eight teams of Ohio State students presented business ideas that support space exploration during the 2024 Space BOSS pitch competition. 

Contact: Admissions | Webmaster | Page maintained by University Communications

Request an alternate format of this page | Web Services Status | Nondiscrimination notice

UD Ranks #26 In The Nation

New Wall Street Journal rankings recognize UD’s high graduation rates and graduates’ salaries

The University of Delaware ranks #26 overall among 500 colleges and universities nationwide and #10 out of 235 in best public universities, according to  The Wall Street Journal ’s 2025 WSJ/College Pulse   best colleges in the U.S. rankings . The 2025 rankings reflect immense growth in UD’s accomplishments and reputation, rising from  #86 overall in the nation in the 2024 survey .

“This prominent recognition by  The Wall Street Journal  of the University of Delaware’s excellence is a testament to the hard work and dedication of our outstanding faculty and staff to prepare our students for success in their careers and throughout their lives,” said President Dennis Assanis. “Student success has always been — and will continue to be — a critical focus for the University.”

According to  The Wall Street Journal,  the ranking “measures how well each college sets graduates up for financial success. We look at how much a school improves students’ chances of graduating and their future earnings, balancing these outcomes with feedback from students on college life.”

Over the past two years, the WSJ/College Pulse survey has increased its focus on the importance of student outcomes, primarily graduation rates and graduates’ salaries. The survey puts more emphasis on the value added by colleges and universities — not only students’ success but also the contribution the institution makes to that success.

Assanis noted that these metrics in the survey recognize the advancements that UD has made over the past several years.

“I’m extraordinarily proud of the investments we have made in strengthening our faculty ranks, providing accessible pathways for students to achieve their educational goals, expanding our research enterprise to propel discovery and innovation in so many critical fields, and engaging with people here in Delaware and around the world to help solve our most complex challenges,” Assanis said. “We will continue to build on these achievements to make an even greater impact on the future.”

In the WSJ/College Pulse survey, UD also ranked #48 for  best salaries  and #86 for  best value .

UD boasts a 73% four-year graduation rate, which is among the best in the nation, according to the National Center for Education Statistics IPEDS 2022-23 graduation rates survey. Additionally, 94% of students are employed or continuing their education within six months of their graduation from UD.

In August, UD also made  The Princeton Review ’s Best 390 Colleges  list for 2025. UD was listed among the top colleges for Best Value and Best Mid-Atlantic colleges. UD’s excellent entrepreneurship programs were also recognized as #3 in the Mid-Atlantic and in the top 50 nationally.

About UD rankings

A complete listing of UD’s high-profile rankings is available on   UD’s Institutional Research and Effectiveness Rankings webpage . Please note that programs and specialties used in rankings might vary slightly from the names of degree programs used by UD.

Read this article on UDaily .

• Undergraduate Majors & Minors
• Academic Advisement
• Graduate Programs
• Faculty Directory
• Faculty & Staff Resources
• CEHD Research
• Departments & Centers
• Disclosures
• Academic Calendar
• Social Media
• 106 Alison Hall West, Newark, DE 19716
• Phone: (302) 831-2394
• Fax: (302) 831-4605

Human Development, M.A.

December 3, 2024

June 30, 2025

• In-State - $12,540
• Out-of-State - $26,490

The Human Development, Master of Arts program equips you with the foundational knowledge and advanced research skills necessary to be competitive for admission to top-tier doctoral programs in Human Development and Psychology, or obtain employment in a variety of academic and professional settings. Under the guidance of nationally and internationally renowned faculty, you'll engage in rigorous coursework and research experiences that prepare you for success.

Key Features

• Dedicated Mentorship : Receive personalized guidance from faculty advisors who will assist in program design, mentor laboratory experiences, and provide career advice. Engage in weekly departmental seminars, colloquia, lab meetings, and other academic gatherings to interact and learn from fellow graduate students, faculty, and visiting professors.
• Diverse Perspectives : Embrace diversity and inclusivity, as we welcome applicants from various cultural and ethnic backgrounds, identities, and points of view, believing that diverse perspectives enrich our academic community and foster innovative research.
• Specialized Training : Choose from two specialized areas: Developmental Science or Educational Psychology. Tailor your program of study to focus on social, cognitive, emotional, and biological aspects of human development, or delve into processes involved in learning across the lifespan.
• Acquire advanced research skills in developmental science or educational psychology, preparing you for research careers in academia, applied settings, or doctoral studies.
• Develop expertise in specific areas such as cognitive development, language acquisition, social relationships, motivation, and neuroscience, through coursework, seminars, and research apprenticeships.
• Cultivate critical thinking and analytical skills to evaluate research literature, design empirical studies, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in human development and educational psychology.
• Engage in professional development activities, including seminars, colloquia and networking opportunities, to enhance your research skills, prepare for academic or applied careers, and build a strong professional network.

Information on admissions and application to this program can be found on the University Graduate Admissions website and the program handbook.

Admission Requirements           Guide to Applying

In addition to the Graduate School requirements, this program has the following mandatory and optional requirements.

• Letters of Recommendation (3): Recommendation letters may come from professors, school administrators, supervisors, and/or any other person who can effectively comment on your potential for success in a research-based MA program in Human Development with a focus on Developmental Science and Educational Psychology. We recommend that letters of recommendation be from those that know you/your work well and comment on what you have done so far.
• Graduate Record Examination (GRE) (optional)**
• Description of Research/Work Experience
• Open Response: In 200-300 words, describe your quantitative and/or analytical skills, knowledge and prior experience. These may include college and/or AP level mathematics and statistics courses, experience with mathematical and/or statistical software packages, quantitative experience in past research activities and/or work experience. The research-based MA program in Human Development is mathematically and statistically rigorous to facilitate students’ learning and use of advanced quantitative methodologies. Therefore, evidence of applicants’ quantitative proficiency is required.
• Writing Sample: Submit an article, report, or manuscript in which you were the primary author (e.g., peer-reviewed journal publication or conference presentation paper in which you were the primary author, or alternatively, a master’s or undergraduate thesis, or school report/literature review). We encourage you to submit something you have already written; though, you may write something new.

*All applicants should contact a potential faculty member(s) in the department regarding their availability, fit, and interest in serving as a mentor prior to submitting their application. Please indicate a faculty member of interest and if contact was made then applicants can state that in their Statement of Purpose.

**Graduate Record Examination (GRE) scores are not considered as a criterion for admission into the program. GRE scores that are submitted are made available to potential faculty advisors.

• Graduate Record Examination (GRE) scores are not considered as a criterion for admission into the program. GRE scores that are submitted are made available to potential faculty advisors.
• All applicants are recommended to seek advice from a faculty mentor or academic advisor for how to construct a strong admissions application.
• All applicants are strongly encouraged to contact a potential faculty member(s) in the department regarding their availability, fit, and interest in serving as a mentor in the graduate training program. Applicants may state that this contact was made in their application.

Francisco Munoz ’24 

This program is offered with and without a thesis requirement.

The non-thesis option is for those interested in an applied research or practice oriented setting. As a part of the degree, you will have a unique opportunity to complete an internship to gain hands-on experience in a community setting.

The thesis option is focused on training you to have a strong background in research in development, education and learning. The Master’s thesis will provide you with an in-depth opportunity to engage in research training with faculty mentors, along with coursework in core courses and advanced seminars.

Full program requirements are found in the handbook.

EDHD Masters Handbook

For more information, please contact:

Jannitta Graham ( [email protected] ) or [email protected]

Sep 17 Graduate Fair Expo Sep 17, 2024 4:00 – 6:00 pm

Sep 25 COE Open House Sep 25, 2024 11:00 am – 2:00 pm Benjamin Building Courtyard

More From Forbes

The top 20 american universities for r and d funding in engineering.

• Share to Facebook
• Share to Twitter
• Share to Linkedin

Seventeen of the 20 top universities for engineering R and D expenditures are public institutions.

Where is cutting-edge engineering research being conducted in the U.S.? What are our leading universities for sponsored research in engineering subfields such as chemical engineering, electrical engineering, and mechanical engineering?

One answer to those questions can be found in the Higher Education Research and Development (HERD) Survey , released in December by the National Science Foundation (NSF) . That survey measures the dollars spent annually on research and development (R and D) at American colleges and universities.

The latest HERD Survey, sponsored by the National Science Foundation’s National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, presents R&D expenditure data for fiscal year 2021, collected from 91o universities and colleges that grant a bachelor’s degree or higher and spent at least $150,000 in R&D in the prior fiscal year.

The HERD survey summarizes the federal, state, industry and other funds a university spends on all its research activities, and it also breaks those expenditures out by ten major fields: computer and information sciences; engineering; geosciences, atmospheric sciences, and ocean sciences; life sciences; mathematics and statistics; physical sciences; psychology; social sciences; other sciences; and non-science and engineering (fields like education, law and the humanities).

Total research and development (R and D) expenditures at American colleges and universities topped $89 billion in fiscal year 2021, an increase of more than $3.4 billion (4%) over FY 2020.

Of the total R and D expenditures in FY 21, $14.3 billion was in engineering, more than 60% of which came from federal agencies ($8.7 billion). The top 20 universities, ranked by total engineering R and D in FY 21 were:

Best Travel Insurance Companies

Best covid-19 travel insurance plans.

Johns Hopkins U . $1.238 billion

Georgia Institute of Technology $839.071 million

SUNY, Polytechnic Institute $462.562 million

Texas A&M U., College Station and Health Science Center $385.656 million

Massachusetts Institute of Technology $382.569 million

Pennsylvania State U., University Park and Hershey Medical Center $375.667 million

Purdue U. $255.469 million

U. Texas $279.730 million

U. Michigan $279.682 million

Utah State U . $247.332 million

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State U . $246.965 million

U. Illinois $216.233 million

U. California, Berkeley $199.711 million

U. Dayton $180.158 million

U. Colorado $177.604 million

U. California, San Diego $177.560 million

North Carolina State U. $172.900 million

Ohio State U. $163.509 million

U. Washington $157.622 million

Wichita State U . $157.43 million

Total university expenditures topped $1 billion in six of the eight engineering subfields that are reported. Here are those subfields and the top five universities for R and D spending in each:

Electrical, electronic, and communications engineering: $3.080 billion

• Johns Hopkins U. $549.9 million
• Georgia Tech $311.881 million
• U. of California, Berkeley $112.965 million
• Penn State U. $108.919
• U. of California, San Diego $81.213 million

Mechanical engineering: $1.882 billion

• Johns Hopkins U. $225.086 million
• Penn State U. $131.856 million
• Ohio State U . $66.784 million
• U. Texas $60.298 million
• Georgia Tech $56.376 million

Bioengineering and biomedical engineering: $1.56 billion

• MIT $100.911 million
• Johns Hopkins U. $69.477 million
• Harvard U. $60.912 million
• U.of California, San Diego $59.417 million
• Georgia Tech $53.59 million

Civil engineerin g: $1.482 billion

• Texas A & M U . $100.161 million
• U. North Dakota $49.227 million
• U. California, Davis $45.387 million
• U. Texas $37.375 million
• U. California, Berkeley $37.190 million

Aerospace, aeronautical, and astronautical engineering: $1.45 billion

• Georgia Tech $253.035 million
• Utah State U . $224.361 million
• Wichita State U . $153.492 million
• Johns Hopkins U . $148.593 million
• U. Colorado $107.85 million

Chemical engineering: $1.024 billion

• U. Delawar e $54.225 million
• MIT $45.797 million
• U. Texas $41.078 million
• North Carolina State U . $34.698 million
• Georgia Tech $26.064 million

Of the 20 top universities in total R and D engineering expenditures, 17 are public institutions (Hopkins, MIT and the U. of Dayton are private). That’s a very different distribution than is found in most college ranking systems where private institutions dominate. The leading institutions also show substantial geographic diversity, with universities from all the major regions of the country represented.

Seven universities ranked in the top five in two or more of the engineering subfields that had $1 billion or more in expenditures: Georgia Tech (5), Johns Hopkins (4), Texas (3), MIT (2), Penn State (2), U. California, Berkeley (2) and U. California, San Diego (2). Seventeen different institutions were represented in the top five schools across those six subfields.

The diversity of institutions represented is a healthy sign. The advantage to having a wide range of institutions carry out funded research is that it allows for broad views and new ideas to be tested and applied.

Of course, a university’s engineering impact can be measured by several other indicators - publications in refereed journals; the number of PhD’s awarded; citation counts; scholarly awards; patents, licenses and the commercialization of intellectual property; and the post-degree careers of students. All of those outcomes are important forms of impact.

However, research expenditures have a particular value in evaluating an institution’s overall contributions to a field of study. Because the largest share of funded grants are doled out only after a competitive process that involves peer review, R and D expenditures indicate a consensus about the value of the proposed research and a judgment about the work that’s most likely to advance fundamental understanding and useful applications.

• Editorial Standards
• Reprints & Permissions

Join The Conversation

One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts. 

Forbes Community Guidelines

Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.

In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's  Terms of Service.   We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.

Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:

• False or intentionally out-of-context or misleading information
• Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language or threats of any kind
• Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author
• Content that otherwise violates our site's  terms.

User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:

• Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected
• Racist, sexist, homophobic or other discriminatory comments
• Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk
• Actions that otherwise violate our site's  terms.

So, how can you be a power user?

• Stay on topic and share your insights
• Feel free to be clear and thoughtful to get your point across
• ‘Like’ or ‘Dislike’ to show your point of view.
• Protect your community.
• Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules.

Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's  Terms of Service.

• Skip to main content
• Skip to footer

AgriLife Today

Texas A&M AgriLife's digital magazine and newsroom

Texas A&M AgriLife home to world’s top animal science researchers, according to Research.com

Fuller bazer and guoyao wu ranked no. 1 and no. 2 in the world for animal science research.

September 11, 2024 - by Kay Ledbetter

Texas A&M College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Department of Animal Science and Texas A&M AgriLife Research faculty have secured the No. 1 and No. 2 spots in the most recent edition of Research.com ’s ranking of the best scientists in “Animal Science and Veterinary.”

Fuller Bazer , Ph.D., is highlighted as the top researcher in the world in the ranking with a D-index of 132. Ranking at spot No. 2 in the world is Guoyao Wu , Ph.D., with a D-index of 131. The two have independently and collaboratively led the way in determining how nutrients such as amino acids, metabolites like lactate and signaling proteins are essential for optimal growth, development and health in both animals and humans.

“Drs. Bazer and Wu are shining examples that the Texas A&M Department of Animal Science has world-class faculty,” said Jeffrey W. Savell, Ph.D . , vice chancellor and dean for Agriculture and Life Sciences. “I’ve had the fortune to work with these colleagues for decades. Their research endeavors help Texas A&M remain the preeminent leader in animal science education and research, nationally and internationally.”

AgriLife Research supports College of Agriculture and Life Sciences tenure and tenure-track faculty. G. Cliff Lamb, Ph.D., director of AgriLife Research, said the agency is glad to support Bazer and Wu’s research portfolios and is honored by this recognition, which is based on research outputs of high-impact publications and citations.

“Dr. Bazer’s research in pregnancy establishment of livestock species has had significant impacts on production efficiency of all livestock species,” Lamb said. “Dr. Wu’s work in amino acid nutrition has revolutionized dietary changes for livestock species that improve survival and productivity. We are proud of their contributions to science.”

Inspiring the future of animal science research

In releasing the list, Research.com states, “Our aim is to inspire researchers, businessmen and politicians worldwide to explore where top experts are heading and to give an opportunity for the whole research community to discover who the leading experts in specific disciplines, in various countries or even within research institutions are.”

Clay Mathis, Ph.D., head of the Department of Animal Science, said the department’s mission is to be the first choice of prospective undergraduate and graduate animal science students seeking the best animal science education, and of employers seeking the brightest and best-prepared animal science graduates.

“This is confirmation we are employing the best in our faculty researchers,” Mathis said. “We strive to deliver cutting-edge scientific tools and innovative solutions, not just for Texas producers but as a leader in animal science to the world. We are proud of our faculty for being recognized for their advancement of animal science.”

The listing is created using data consolidated from a wide range of data sources, including OpenAlex and CrossRef. The bibliometric data for estimating the citation-based metrics were collected on Nov. 11. Position in the ranking is based on a scholar’s discipline H-index or D-index, which only includes publications and citation values for an examined discipline.

Bazer’s discoveries change animal management during pregnancy

Bazer, a Regents Fellow, Distinguished Professor and the O.D. Butler Chair of Physiology and Reproduction, is an international leader among reproductive biologists in animal sciences and related disciplines.

He is credited with discovering uteroferrin, a phosphatase produced in response to progesterone that transfers iron to the developing embryo and stimulates blood cell and platelet development. This discovery clarified the biological mystery of signaling between embryo and mother to maintain pregnancy, with profound effects on the efficiency of animal production systems.

He also discovered estradiol as the pregnancy recognition signal from swine conceptuses and interferon tau as the pregnancy recognition signal from ruminant conceptuses. These and related discoveries have changed animal management to increase conceptus survival and pregnancy.

Bazer is a past recipient of the Morrison Award from the American Society of Animal Science, Hartman Award from the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Marshall Medal from the Society for Reproduction and Fertility, and the Wolf Prize in Agriculture for his Interferon tau discovery as well as other pregnancy-associated proteins.

He is also a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and a recipient of the L. E. Casida Award and the Animal Physiology and Endocrinology Award, both from the American Society of Animal Science, and awards for research, graduate education and service from the Society for the Study of Reproduction.

Wu connects amino acids and proteins to fetal and postnatal development

Wu, a University Distinguished Professor, University Faculty Fellow and AgriLife Research Faculty Fellow, also holds appointments with the Department of Nutrition , the Department of Medical Physiology and the Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences .

His animal science research focuses on amino acid biochemistry and nutrition, including the arginine-nitric oxide pathway, as well as the syntheses of the arginine family of amino acids and glycine in mammals, birds and fish.

His research in glutamine intersects with topics in cell signaling, gastroenterology, necrotizing enterocolitis, parenteral nutrition and taurine. His amino acid research incorporates elements of threonine, lactation and microbiology.

Wu discovered metabolic pathways for the synthesis of amino acids and polyamines that are essential for animal growth, development, reproduction and survival. He also proposed two seminal concepts in nutrition — functional amino acids and dietary requirements of animals for traditionally classified “nonessential” amino acids — that transformed the feeding of livestock, poultry and aquatic animals worldwide.   

Wu is the recipient of the Research.com Animal Science and Veterinary in U.S. Leader Award for the past two years, the Research.com Best Scientist Award, the Morrison Award from the American Society of Animal Science, and the Top Agri-food Pioneers award from the World Food Prize Foundation.

He is also a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and has received the American Feed Industry Association/Federation of Animal Science Societies New Frontiers in Animal Nutrition Award and the American Feed Industry Association Award in Nonruminant Nutrition Research.

Media Inquiries

Laura Muntean , media relations coordinator [email protected] 601.248.1891

Are you interested in this content, need high resolution photos or assistance getting connected with an expert to learn more? Please contact our media relations team at [email protected] .

You May Also Like

Texas A&M System Chancellor Sharp named ‘Man of the Year in Texas Agriculture’

Cow-calf producers weigh options for herd replacements

Computer-based model could mitigate cattle fever tick outbreaks

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service | Texas A&M AgriLife Research | Texas A&M Forest Service | Texas A&M Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Lab | College of Agriculture & Life Sciences

Texas A&M AgriLife

Phone: (979) 803-1287 [email protected]

More Information

• Resources for Press and Media
• Story Suggestion

Find Us on Social Media

About texas a&m university.

SCIENCE & ENGINEERING INDICATORS

Research and development: u.s. trends and international comparisons.

• Report PDF (1.8 MB)
• Report - All Formats .ZIP (7.7 MB)
• Supplemental Materials - All Formats .ZIP (2.0 MB)
• MORE DOWNLOADS OPTIONS
• Share on X/Twitter
• Share on Facebook
• Share on LinkedIn
• Send as Email

Executive Summary

Key takeaways:

• The U.S. research and experimental development (R&D) performance reached $667 billion in 2019 and an estimated $708 billion in 2020, reflecting increases in all sectors (business, higher education, the federal government, nonprofit organizations, and others) but mostly in the business sector.
• Adjusted for inflation, growth of the U.S. R&D total averaged 3.8% annually from 2010 to 2019, well above the 2.2% growth of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) over the same period.
• The U.S. national R&D intensity (R&D-to-GDP ratio)—a key measure of R&D investment—has also increased, from the highs of recent years of 2.79% in 2016 and 2.95% in 2018 to 3.12% in 2019 and then to an estimated 3.39% in 2020.
• The United States remains the global leader in R&D performance (28% of global R&D in 2019), followed by China ($526 billion, or 22% of global R&D). China’s current average annual rate of increase (2010–19), however, is almost double the U.S. rate.
• Global R&D performance is concentrated in a few countries. The United States, China, Japan, Germany, South Korea, France, India, and the United Kingdom jointly accounted for about 75% of global R&D performance in 2019. The global concentration of R&D performance continues to shift from the United States and Europe to East-Southeast and South Asia.
• Businesses are the predominant performers (75% in 2019) and funders (72%) of U.S. R&D. This sector performs most of U.S. R&D classified as experimental development, more than half of applied research, and a sizable (and increasing) share of basic research (32% in 2019).
• Higher education institutions (12% in 2019) and the federal government (9%) are the second- and third-largest performers of U.S. R&D. Higher education institutions are the largest performers of basic research. Both have experienced declines in their shares of the U.S. performance total since 2010.
• The federal government continues to be an important source of support for all R&D-performing sectors and remains the largest funder of basic research. The share of federally funded R&D, however, has been on a path of decline since 2010 (from 31% in 2010 to 20% in 2019), and the share of federally funded basic research has also consistently declined (from 52% in 2010 to 41% in 2019). These declines stem, in part, naturally from the large increases in R&D funding and performance by the business sector in recent years. This trend, however, indicates that federal funding has not kept up with the increases in other sectors.

Scientific discoveries, new technologies, and inventive applications of cutting-edge knowledge are essential for success in the competitive global economy and in addressing challenges and opportunities in diverse societal areas such as health, environment, and national security. Consequently, the strength of a country’s overall R&D enterprise—both the public and private sectors—is an important marker of current and future national economic advantage and of the prospects for societal improvements at the national and global levels.

The U.S. R&D enterprise comprises the R&D efforts of various sectors, including businesses, the federal government, nonfederal governments, higher education institutions, and nonprofit organizations. U.S. R&D performance totaled $667 billion in 2019 and an estimated $708 billion in 2020, compared to $407 billion in 2010. (All amounts are reported in current dollars, unless otherwise noted.) These most recent increases in the performance total ($50 billion or more each year in 2018 and 2019) are much larger than the average annual increases over the 2010–16 period ($19 billion each year). The main driver of these sizable increases is business R&D performance. Adjusted for inflation, average annual growth in the U.S. R&D total has outpaced average GDP growth for nearly two decades—3.8% compared to 2.2% average growth in GDP from 2010 to 2019, and 2.1% compared to 1.8% growth in GDP in the prior decade. As a result, the national R&D intensity has been on a rising path, from 2.79% in 2016 (a high point at the time) and 2.95% in 2018 to 3.12% in 2019 (the first time the U.S. exceeded 3.0%), and it is estimated to be 3.39% in 2020.

Globally, R&D expenditures have risen substantially since 2000 to an estimated $2.4 trillion in 2019—a more than threefold increase from $725 billion in 2000 (not adjusted for inflation). This expansion reflects the increasing importance of R&D in contributing to economic growth and competition as well as the significant role of R&D in addressing national and global challenges. Global R&D performance, however, is concentrated in a few countries. The United States leads the world’s nations in R&D performance with a 28% global share in 2019, followed by China (22%). Together with Japan (7%), Germany (6%), South Korea (4%), France (3%), India (2%), and the United Kingdom (2%), these top eight R&D-performing countries account for about 75% of the global total R&D. Other countries with sizable R&D performance are (in decreasing order) Russia, Taiwan, Italy, Brazil, Canada, Spain, Turkey, the Netherlands, and Australia.

In this report, a larger gap is evident between the U.S. and China R&D totals than reported in earlier editions. S cience and Engineering Indicators 2020 puts China’s R&D at 90% (and increasing) of the U.S. level in 2017. Updated data in this report show China’s 2019 R&D total at 79% of the U.S. level, and the 2017 comparison has been revised downward to 76%. These changes resulted primarily from a comprehensive update, released in May 2020, of the purchasing power parity ratios used to convert a country’s R&D expenditures to U.S. dollar expenditures as a common measure across all countries. These latest revisions had a more sizable effect on China than on other major R&D-performing countries.

Even so, the average annual rate of increase in China’s R&D total (10.6% from 2010–19) continues to greatly exceed that of the United States (5.6%) and the European Union (EU-27) (5.6%). China’s notable rise in R&D performance and the strong R&D performance by other Asian countries—Japan, South Korea, India, and Taiwan—are the drivers behind the sustained rise of R&D performance in East-Southeast and South Asia. The combined R&D performance across these Asian regions rose from 25% to 39% of the global total from 2000 to 2019, while the U.S. and EU-27 shares declined from 37% to 28% and from 22% to 18%, respectively. These broad trends in the global geography of R&D have been noted in earlier editions of this report and are reinforced by the latest data, indicating that the prospects for a further global shift remain strong.

In the United States, the business sector is the predominant force behind the R&D enterprise (75% of performance and 72% of funding of U.S. R&D in 2019). Since 2010, about 80% or more of the increase in the U.S. total R&D each year is attributable to businesses. Consequently, annual changes in business R&D greatly influence the overall U.S. R&D total. Business R&D performance is concentrated in five industries: chemicals manufacturing; computer and electronic products; transportation equipment; information services; and professional, scientific, and technical services. Businesses perform most of the R&D classified as experimental development (90% in 2019) and more than half of the applied research (58%). The business share of basic research has been increasing significantly in recent years (from 21% in 2010 to 32% in 2019).

The other sectors also make important contributions to the U.S. R&D enterprise but represent a fraction of the spending by the business sector. Higher education institutions and the federal government are the second- and third-largest performers of U.S. R&D. In 2019, higher education institutions performed 12% of the U.S. R&D total, over 60% of which was basic research. That same year, federal intramural R&D—through federal agencies and federally funded R&D centers—accounted for about 9% of the U.S. total R&D. Both, however, have experienced declines in their shares since 2010. (Higher education institutions performed 14%, and the federal government 13%, of U.S. total R&D in 2010.)

The federal government plays a larger role in R&D funding compared to performance and supports all sectors, particularly higher education institutions and federal intramural R&D. The federal government remains the largest source of support for the nation’s basic research, although the share has dropped from 52% in 2010 to 41% in 2019. The federal government is also a sizable supporter of the nation’s applied research—32% in 2019, compared to 56% of the support from the business sector. Despite its widespread role of funding, the share of federally funded R&D has been in decline for most of the past decade. In 2010, federal funding supported 31% of the total of U.S. R&D performance but dropped to 20% in 2019—and is estimated to drop further in 2020. This decline is, in part, a consequence of the large increases in R&D funding from the business sector in recent years, indicating that federal funding has not kept up with increases in other sectors.

Related Content

• Announcements
• About AOSIS

SA Journal of Human Resource Management

• Editorial Team
• Submission Procedures
• Submission Guidelines
• Submit and Track Manuscript
• Publication fees
• Make a payment
• Journal Information
• Journal Policies
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Reviewer Guidelines
• Article RSS
• Support Enquiry (Login required)
• Aosis Newsletter

Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management.

Open Journal Systems

Original research, administrative staffs’ training needs and talent development at a health sciences university, about the author(s).

Orientation:  Although administrative support staff are the glue that holds everything together in universities, they are often taken for granted when talent is identified and developed. Targeted training needs analysis and talent development interventions are often focused on elite academic staff, leaving a deficit in understanding how administrative support staff should be developed.

Research purpose:  To determine or investigate training needs analysis and talent development practices to support Health Sciences University (HSU) administrative staff.

Motivation for the study:  There is little empirical evidence and a lack of understanding of how to identify and address the specific training needs of administrative staff to increase universities’ organisational performance.

Research approach/design and method:  A deductive, quantitative approach, using a descriptive survey research design and census of the entire population (200) permanent administrative staff officers, secretaries or personal assistants in an HSU ( N  = 163), was employed. Statistical analysis included validity and reliability measures, correlations and exploratory factor analysis.

Main findings:  The results revealed a strong, significant, positive link between the perception of training needs analysis process and talent management practices of administrative staff with regard to demographic variables of age, gender, job title, educational level, job level and tenure.

Practical/managerial implications:  To reinforce the training needs analysis process and talent development for the entire staff or employees at the HSU.

Contribution/value-add:  This study offers evidence of and advocates for new ways of working, including all staff’s talents to maximise student support and organisational excellence.

Crossref Citations

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get specific, domain-collection newsletters detailing the latest CPD courses, scholarly research and call-for-papers in your field.

SA Journal of Human Resource Management    |    ISSN: 1683-7584 (PRINT)    |    ISSN: 2071-078X (ONLINE)

ISSN: 2071-078X