Check out this cool science experiment video that focuses on the process of diffusion.
Diffusion involves molecules moving from areas of higher concentration to areas of lower concentration. In this experiment the diffusion of food coloring in hot and cold water shows how temperature effects the rate of diffusion, with the process being much faster in hot water than in cold water.
|
Associate Professor in Biology, University of Limerick
Audrey O'Grady receives funding from Science Foundation Ireland. She is affiliated with Department of Biological Sciences, University of Limerick.
University of Limerick provides funding as a member of The Conversation UK.
View all partners
Many people think science is difficult and needs special equipment, but that’s not true.
Science can be explored at home using everyday materials. Everyone, especially children, naturally ask questions about the world around them, and science offers a structured way to find answers.
Misconceptions about the difficulty of science often stem from a lack of exposure to its fun and engaging side. Science can be as simple as observing nature, mixing ingredients or exploring the properties of objects. It’s not just for experts in white coats, but for everyone.
Don’t take my word for it. Below are three experiments that can be done at home with children who are primary school age and older.
DNA is all the genetic information inside cells. Every living thing has DNA, including bananas.
Did you know you can extract DNA from banana cells?
What you need: ¼ ripe banana, Ziploc bag, salt, water, washing-up liquid, rubbing alcohol (from a pharmacy), coffee filter paper, stirrer.
What you do:
Place a pinch of salt into about 20ml of water in a cup.
Add the salty water to the Ziploc bag with a quarter of a banana and mash the banana up with the salty water inside the bag, using your hands. Mashing the banana separates out the banana cells. The salty water helps clump the DNA together.
Once the banana is mashed up well, pour the banana and salty water into a coffee filter (you can lay the filter in the cup you used to make the salty water). Filtering removes the big clumps of banana cells.
Once a few ml have filtered out, add a drop of washing-up liquid and swirl gently. Washing-up liquid breaks down the fats in the cell membranes which makes the DNA separate from the other parts of the cell.
Slowly add some rubbing alcohol (about 10ml) to the filtered solution. DNA is insoluble in alcohol, therefore the DNA will clump together away from the alcohol and float, making it easy to see.
DNA will start to precipitate out looking slightly cloudy and stringy. What you’re seeing is thousands of DNA strands – the strands are too small to be seen even with a normal microscope. Scientists use powerful equipment to see individual strands.
What you need: celery stalks (with their leaves), glass or clear cup, water, food dye, camera.
What happens and why?
All plants, such as celery, have vertical tubes that act like a transport system. These narrow tubes draw up water using a phenomenon known as capillarity.
Imagine you have a thin straw and you dip it into a glass of water. Have you ever noticed how the water climbs up the straw a little bit, even though you didn’t suck on it? This is because of capillarity.
In plants, capillarity helps move water from the roots to the leaves. Plants have tiny tubes inside them, like thin straws, called capillaries. The water sticks to the sides of these tubes and climbs up. In your experiment, you will see the food dye in the water make its way to the leaves.
What you need: tape, scissors, two skewers, cardboard, four bottle caps, one straw, one balloon.
The inflated balloon stores potential energy when blown up. When the air is released, Newton’s third law of motion kicks into gear: for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
As the air rushes out of the balloon (action), it pushes the car in the opposite direction (reaction). The escaping air propels the car forward, making it move across the surface.
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dousing the skin and clothes with water is one cost-effective way to protect the body from overheating. Credit: Rehman Asad/NurPhoto/Getty
This story is part of special report on science and extreme heat. Read about the effects that extreme heat has on the body , how climate change is intensifying health problems and the record-breaking warming at the Great Barrier Reef .
In 2019, physiologist Ollie Jay started designing a chamber that could simulate the heatwaves of today and of the future. Eighteen months later, the Aus$2-million (US$1.3-million) structure was built, packed up in Brisbane, Australia, and driven 1,000 kilometres to the University of Sydney, where it was lifted to the top floor of a shiny glass building. Now, researchers including Jay are using it to test the limits of human survival in extreme heat , which are surprisingly poorly understood.
Cities must protect people from extreme heat
“The trouble is that, today, you have these conditions that can sound hot, but we don’t really know what it’s going to do to people,” says Jay, who directs the heat and health laboratory at the University of Sydney. “By simulating those conditions and exposing people to them, under careful medical supervision, we can better understand the physiology of how people will respond,” he says. Jay’s team is also exploring which cooling strategies work best to reduce the health risks of heat exposure.
As climate change heats Earth, blistering days have become a regular feature of weather reports worldwide. Last month, the record for the world’s hottest day was broken twice, and the United Nations made a global call for action on extreme heat, to help vulnerable people, workers and economies to cope using science. Around 70% of the global workforce — 2.4 billion people — are now at high risk of extreme heat, it said.
Despite this, public advice on how to cope with high temperatures is poor, and ways that people can effectively cool themselves have not been well studied. “If you look at heat advisories from well-respected organizations like the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Health Organization, they’re fraught with errors when it comes to human physiology,” says Larry Kenney, a physiologist at Pennsylvania State University in University Park.
Researchers at the University of Sydney monitor how heat is affecting a pregnant woman in their climate chamber. Credit: University of Sydney/Stefanie Zingsheim
Jay’s team is using its state-of-the-art climate chamber to investigate the conditions under which heat threatens life, how, and what practical, evidence-based ways there are to stay cool.
The chamber is a room 4 metres by 5 metres. Researchers can dial the temperature up or down by 1 °C every minute — from 5 °C to a searing 55 °C — control windspeed and simulate sunlight using infrared lamps. They can also fine-tune humidity, a key variable that influences heat’s effects on the body. “It’s quite the engineering feat,” says Jay.
Extreme heat harms health — what is the human body’s limit?
Trial participants can eat, sleep and exercise inside the chamber; researchers pass food and other items to them through a hatch. Sensors attached to them send information to the adjacent control room, which processes data on variables including heart rate, breathing, sweating and body temperature.
Heat thresholds for humans have been poorly defined in part because public-health bodies have over-relied on a theoretical study published 1 in 2010, says Jay. In that paper, researchers used mathematical models to define the ‘wet-bulb temperature’ (WBT) at which a young, healthy person would die after six hours. WBT is a measure that scientists use when studying heat stress because it accounts for the effects of heat and humidity.
The models churned out a WBT of 35 °C as the limit of human survival. At that threshold, the body’s core temperature would rise uncontrollably. But the model treated the human body as an unclothed object that doesn’t sweat or move, making the result less applicable to the real world.
Ollie Jay’s lab is studying how heat affects people who are exercising to mimic everyday activities. Credit: University of Sydney/Stefanie Zingsheim
Despite this, countless public-health bodies adopted it — even the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — reducing the motivation to obtain a more relevant number, says Jay. “It’s a basic physical model with many limitations — but nearly everyone’s using this.”
In a 2021 study, Kenney and his colleagues provided a better estimate: a WBT survival limit of around 31 °C. They calculated it by tracking the core body temperature of young, healthy people under different combinations of temperature and humidity while they were cycling.
“You do still see the 35 °C wet-bulb temperature tossed around, but people are starting to come around to the limit defined by Kenney’s lab,” says Robert Meade, a heat and health researcher at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Kenney’s group also works with a climate chamber, and there are dozens worldwide, many dedicated to sports science. But Kenney says that just a few groups, including Jay’s, are at the forefront of using them to better understand how people cope in extreme heat.
Jay’s team is now testing a mathematical model of how the body copes in extreme heat, which it published 3 last year. The model uses data from studies that have measured sweating capacity in older and younger people, and it follows physical laws to predict how heat is transferred between the body and environment.
“The fact that they incorporated physiology, which very few models do, and do well — I think this makes it the best model right now out there,” says Kenney, who has collaborated with Jay on other research.
Most models of the body’s response to heat focus on young, healthy people in the shade. But Jay and his team’s model estimated the limits of survival in the shade and sunlight across ages and while people were resting or exercising. Among their results, they estimated WBT survival limits of between 26 °C and 34 °C for young people and 21 °C to 34 °C for older people.
“The flexibility and the ability to very easily assess these different scenarios is the key advance of the model,” says Meade.
Workers in a garment factory in Bangladesh, where long hours and hot weather can affect employees’ health. Credit: Kazi Salahuddin Razu/NurPhoto/Getty
Unsurprisingly, the model suggests that survival limits are lower when people are exposed to the Sun versus in the shade, and for people over 65 years old compared with those aged 18–40. The team also used the model to define livability limits — conditions in which older and younger people could safely carry out tasks such as desk-work, walking, climbing stairs, dancing and heavy lifting. Despite its strengths, the model still needs to be tested further in people, says Meade.
To do this, Jay’s team is first exposing young, healthy people in the climate chamber to combinations of temperature and humidity while monitoring variables such as their core body temperature, heart rate and sweating up to a temperature threshold above which it would be unsafe.
Read the paper: Extreme escalation of heat failure rates in ectotherms with global warming
In future trials, the researchers plan to test the body’s response to heat in shady and sunlit conditions, across ages and during exercise. They will use data from these trials to improve the model, which, in turn, can be used to develop better health advice for people most at risk in high heat.
The lab’s other focus — finding effective cooling strategies — involves mimicking the conditions of environments where heat can affect workers’ health. In one trial, Jay’s team is testing cooling strategies that could help garment-factory workers in Bangladesh, where people typically work long hours in hot climates, with little access to air conditioning.
The researchers previously measured the heat and humidity across three floors of a clothing factory in the capital, Dhaka. “We recreated those conditions in the chamber, and the work that people did — the women did sewing and the men did ironing,” he says. The trial participants wore clothing that workers would typically wear in the factory.
Participants in Jay’s lab have recreated the conditions of a garment factory in their climate chamber to investigate effective cooling methods. Credit: University of Sydney/Stefanie Zingsheim
Across some 240 climate-chamber trials, the team measured people’s body functions and their work productivity, says Jay, “because one of the problems is that people slow down when they get hot”. The scientists tested cooling methods such as using fans and regularly drinking water, and simulated the effects of changing the colour of the factory roof. The researchers plan to submit their results to a journal.
Jay’s team has also explored how electric fans and skin-wetting affect heart strain in older people, across different combinations of heat and humidity. The researchers found that, in humid conditions, fan use reduced heart strain up to an air temperature of at least 38 ˚C. But in dry heat, fan use increased heart strain. Wetting the skin was beneficial in both dry and humid heat.
“Identifying the situations in which common cooling strategies, such as fan use and dousing the skin with water, work best is essential to protect public health,” says Meade.
Jay and his colleagues have already popularized a method for cooling babies in prams. “On a hot day, people are covering their baby strollers with these white muslin cloths — but there’s all this contention as to whether it’s a good or bad thing,” he says. In a 2023 study 4 , the team found that a dry, white muslin cloth can heat up prams by more than 2.5 °C, but a damp one had the best cooling effect. “It extracts the latent heat energy from inside the pram and keeps it cooler by about 5 °C,” he says.
A man is treated for heatstroke in Varanasi, India, which has been experiencing periods of severe heat since May.
The study drew media attention. “What was pretty cool is, two weeks later, I’m walking around where I live and I start seeing parents pushing along their white muslin cloths with a spray bottle,” he says.
The team has also helped to shape a global heat-alert system released by the Google Chrome browser for its users worldwide. “If it knows where you are, and the heat exceeds a certain threshold, then you get an extreme-heat warning,” he says. The alert provides cooling tips such as to drink one cup of water per hour and to wet skin and clothing.
Next year, Jay’s lab will track how heat affects birth outcomes and maternal health in pregnant women in Bangladesh. He’s seeking funding to conduct a randomized controlled trial of cooling strategies in India during the hot season.
Jay’s ultimate goal is to protect people’s health in a world that’s becoming ever more hostile. “When I first came over to Sydney, I basically took a big demotion — there was an old chamber that wasn’t really working well, and I had about Aus$16,500 of start-up funding,” says Jay. “We have been lucky and fortunate to be able to bring in some good funding, and make some good traction in this area.”
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02422-5
Sherwood, S. C. & Huber, M. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107 , 9552–9555 (2010).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Vecellio. D. J., Wolf, S. T., Cottle, R. M. & Kenney, W. L. J. Appl. Physiol. 132 , 340–345 (2022).
Vanos, J. et al. Nature Commun. 14 , 7653 (2023).
Bin Maideen, M. F. et al. Ergonomics 66 , 1935–1949 (2023).
Download references
Reprints and permissions
Remodelling of the translatome controls diet and its impact on tumorigenesis
Article 14 AUG 24
PTER is a N-acetyltaurine hydrolase that regulates feeding and obesity
Article 07 AUG 24
Gut microbiota carcinogen metabolism causes distal tissue tumours
Article 31 JUL 24
How I’m looking to medicine’s past to heal hurt and support peace in the Middle East
World View 15 AUG 24
‘Unacceptable’: a staggering 4.4 billion people lack safe drinking water, study finds
News 15 AUG 24
Growing mpox outbreak prompts WHO to declare global health emergency
News 13 AUG 24
Who is legally responsible for climate harms? The world’s top court will now decide
Editorial 13 AUG 24
‘Who will protect us from seeing the world’s largest rainforest burn?’ The mental exhaustion faced by climate scientists
Career Feature 12 AUG 24
The time to act is now: the world’s highest court must weigh in strongly on climate and nature
World View 08 AUG 24
SLS invites applications for multiple tenure-track/tenured faculty positions at all academic ranks.
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
School of Life Sciences, Westlake University
Applicants with expertise in aging and neurodegeneration and related areas are particularly encouraged to apply.
Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine (WLLSB)
We are seeking outstanding scientists to lead vigorous independent research programs focusing on all aspects of chemical biology including...
The Lewis-Sigler Institute at Princeton University invites applications for a tenure-track faculty position in Genomics.
Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, US
The Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics at Princeton University
Job Title: Associate or Senior Editor, BMC Medical Education Locations: New York or Heidelberg (Hybrid Working Model) Application Deadline: August ...
New York City, New York (US)
Springer Nature Ltd
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
To revisit this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories .
The original version of this story appeared in Quanta Magazine .
Once upon a time, long ago, the world was encased in ice. That’s the tale told by sedimentary rock in the tropics, many geologists believe. Hundreds of millions of years ago, glaciers and sea ice covered the globe. The most extreme scenarios suggest a layer of ice several meters thick even at the equator.
This event has been called Snowball Earth, and you’d think it would be a terrible time to be alive—and maybe, for some organisms, it was. However, in a warmer period between glaciations, the first evidence of multicellular animals appears, according to some interpretations of the geological record. Life had taken a leap. How could the seeming desolation of a Snowball Earth line up with this burst of biological innovation?
A series of papers from the lab of Carl Simpson proposes an answer linked to a fundamental physical fact: As seawater gets colder, it gets more viscous, and therefore more difficult for very small organisms to navigate. Imagine swimming through honey rather than water. If microscopic organisms struggled to get enough food to survive under these conditions, as Simpson’s modeling work has implied, they would be placed under pressure to change—perhaps by developing ways to hang on to each other, form larger groups, and move through the water with greater force. Maybe some of these changes contributed to the beginning of multicellular animal life.
To test the idea, Simpson, a paleobiologist at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and his team conducted an experiment designed to see what a modern single-celled organism does when confronted with higher viscosity. Over the course of a month, he and his graduate student Andrea Halling watched how a type of green algae—members of a lab-friendly species that swims with a tail-like flagellum—formed larger, more coordinated groups as they encountered thicker gel. The algae collectively motored through the fluid to keep up their feeding pace. And, intriguingly, the groups of cells remained stuck together for 100 generations after the experiment ended.
The research offers a novel take on the emergence of multicellular life, said Phoebe Cohen , a paleontologist at Williams College who has spoken with Simpson about his idea over the years but was otherwise uninvolved with the work. The field is overflowing with papers about triggers for the evolution of animal multicellularity that draw on geochemical measurements, she said, but few consider the biology of individual organisms.
To re-create Snowball Earth conditions in the lab, biologists placed swimming algal cells into gel of varying viscosity. The cells that made it to the thickest, outer layer displayed signs of collective behavior—a potential step toward multicellularity.
“I’m very charmed by the idea, by the experimental setup as well,” Cohen said. “It’s really wonderful to see work saying: What’s actually going on here? How are these early organisms actually experiencing their environment?”
The experiment comes with a few caveats, and the paper has yet to be peer-reviewed; Simpson posted a preprint on biorxiv.org earlier this year. But it suggests that if Snowball Earth did act as a trigger for the evolution of complex life, it might be due to the physics of cold water.
“Snowball Earth” was on everyone’s lips when Simpson was an undergraduate in the late 1990s. In 1992, the geochemist Joseph Kirschvink had pointed out that there was good geological evidence for a global glaciation event in the ancient past; crucially, he provided a model for how all that ice might have been coerced to melt again. Then, in 1998, the Harvard geologist Paul Hoffman and colleagues published a landmark paper that applied these ideas to observations of sedimentary deposits in Namibia. They agreed: The rocks indicated the presence of glaciers in the warmest parts of the world around 700 million years ago.
Even back then, the timing of Snowball Earth troubled Simpson. “That was a total paradox for me,” he said. “There’s no way Snowball Earth was real, given how much interesting evolution was happening at the time.” Before Snowball Earth, fossils are tiny, he said. Afterward, they are big and complicated.
It is difficult to precisely date when animals arose, but an estimate from molecular clocks—which use mutation rates to estimate the passage of time—suggests that the last common ancestor of multicellular animals emerged during the era known as the Sturtian Snowball Earth, sometime between 717 million and 660 million years ago. Large, unmistakably multicellular animals appear in the fossil record tens of millions of years after the Earth melted following another, shorter Snowball Earth period around 635 million years ago.
The paradox—a planet seemingly hostile to life giving evolution a major push—continued to perplex Simpson throughout his schooling and into his professional life. In 2018, as an assistant professor, he had an insight: As seawater gets colder, it grows thicker. It’s basic physics—the density and viscosity of water molecules rises as the temperature drops. Under the conditions of Snowball Earth, the ocean would have been twice or even four times as viscous as it was before the planet froze over.
Simpson wondered what it would have been like to be a microscopic organism in the ocean during Snowball Earth. Maybe the whole thing wasn’t so paradoxical after all.
To very small single-celled creatures, thick seawater would have posed some big problems. Bacteria feed by diffusion—the movement of nutrients through water from areas of high concentration to low concentration—and tend to wait for food to come to them. However, at low temperatures, diffusion slows down. Nutrients don’t travel as quickly or as far. For cells, living in a cold and more viscous fluid means getting less to eat. Even very small organisms that can propel themselves, such as cells with flagella, move more slowly in cold water. As a result, they encounter food less frequently.
A bigger organism, on the other hand, can navigate thicker waters without much trouble. A cluster of cells has the benefit of inertia: Their combined mass is large enough to allow them to build up steam and barrel through thicker fluid. “At some point, you are too big for this to matter,” Simpson said.
In 2021, he published his hypothesis that Snowball Earth viscosities would have put a significant strain on organisms’ ability to feed themselves and could have spurred some to evolve multicellularity. Then, with collaborators at the Santa Fe Institute, he designed mathematical models of small creatures—single cells that fed by diffusion and self-propelling cells that fed by moving around—living in thicker and thicker fluids. In the models, posted to biorxiv.org at the end of 2023 and recently published in the peer-reviewed Proceedings of the Royal Society B , the diffusion feeders responded to thicker fluids by shrinking in size. The self-propelling cells, equipped by the equations with the ability to cling together if needed, formed larger and larger multicellular groups. This suggested that if there were already multicellular organisms when Snowball Earth occurred—or at least organisms with the ability to take on multicellular forms—the thicker fluid could have given them a reason to get bigger.
Paleobiologist Carl Simpson has led a body of work—computer modeling and experiments with living organisms—to study whether the physics of cold water causes cells to act collectively like a multicellular creature.
The results were intriguing, but they were only computer models. Simpson thought: Well, what if they did this with real organisms?
The geologist Boswell Wing, a colleague at the University of Colorado, Boulder, had a colony of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in his lab. These algae have twirling flagella that allow them to move under their own power. They are usually unicellular. But they can switch into a multicellular form under certain stressful conditions. Would higher viscosity, like that of the oceans during Snowball Earth, prove to be one of them?
There’s no way for biologists to travel back in time to test the real conditions of Snowball Earth, but they can try to re-create aspects of them in the lab. In an enormous, custom-made petri dish, Halling and Simpson created a bull’s-eye target of agar gel—their own experimental gauntlet of viscosity. At the center, it was the standard viscosity used for growing these algae in the lab. Moving outward, each concentric ring had higher and higher viscosity, finally reaching a medium with four times the standard level. The scientists placed the algae in the middle, turned on a camera, and left them alone for 30 days—enough time for about 70 generations of algae to live, swim around for nutrients and die.
Andrea Halling led experiments with living creatures to see how life might have responded to evolutionary pressures 600 million years ago.
Halling and Simpson suspected that as the algae reproduced and crowded the center circle of normal viscosity, any algal cells that could handle the thicker medium would spread outward. Perhaps those that reached the outermost ring would look and behave differently from those that remained in the center.
Simpson was particularly curious as to whether algae that made it into the highest viscosity ring would find ways to increase their swimming speed. The algae are photosynthetic, so they get energy from the sun. But they need to pick up nutrients such as phosphorus from the environment, so movement is still important to their survival. Maintaining the same level of nutrients in high-viscosity surroundings would require them to find a way to keep up their speed.
After 30 days, the algae in the middle were still unicellular. As the scientists put algae from thicker and thicker rings under the microscope, however, they found larger clumps of cells. The very largest were wads of hundreds. But what interested Simpson the most were mobile clusters of four to 16 cells, arranged so that their flagella were all on the outside. These clusters moved around by coordinating the movement of their flagella, the ones at the back of the cluster holding still, the ones at the front wriggling.
Comparing the speed of these clusters to the single cells in the middle revealed something interesting. “They all swim at the same speed,” Simpson said. By working together as a collective, the algae could preserve their mobility. “I was really pleased,” he said. “With the coarse mathematical framework, there were a few predictions I could make. To actually see it empirically means there’s something to this idea.”
Intriguingly, when the scientists took these little clusters from the high-viscosity gel and put them back at low viscosity, the cells stuck together. They remained this way, in fact, for as long as the scientists continued to watch them, about 100 more generations. Clearly, whatever changes they underwent to survive at high viscosity were hard to reverse, Simpson said—perhaps a move toward evolution rather than a short-term shift.
ILLUSTRATION Caption: In gel as viscous as ancient oceans, algal cells began working together. They clumped up and coordinated the movements of their tail-like flagella to swim more quickly. When placed back in normal viscosity, they remained together. Credit: Andrea Halling
Modern-day algae are not early animals. But the fact that these physical pressures forced a unicellular creature into an alternate way of life that was hard to reverse feels quite powerful, Simpson said. He suspects that if scientists explore the idea that when organisms are very small, viscosity dominates their existence, we could learn something about conditions that might have led to the explosion of large forms of life.
As large creatures, we don’t think much about the thickness of the fluids around us. It’s not a part of our daily lived experience, and we are so big that viscosity doesn’t impinge on us very much. The ability to move easily—relatively speaking—is something we take for granted. From the time Simpson first realized that such limits on movement could be a monumental obstacle to microscopic life, he hasn’t been able to stop thinking about it. Viscosity may have mattered quite a lot in the origins of complex life, whenever that was.
“[This perspective] allows us to think about the deep-time history of this transition,” Simpson said, “and what was going on in Earth’s history when all the obligately complicated multicellular groups evolved, which is relatively close to each other, we think.”
Other researchers find Simpson’s ideas quite novel. Before Simpson, no one seems to have thought very much about organisms’ physical experience of being in the ocean during Snowball Earth, said Nick Butterfield of the University of Cambridge, who studies the evolution of early life. He cheerfully noted, however, that “Carl’s idea is fringe.” That’s because the vast majority of theories about Snowball Earth’s influence on the evolution of multicellular animals, plants, and algae focus on how levels of oxygen, inferred from isotope levels in rocks, could have tipped the scales in one way or another, he said.
That novelty is a strength, said the geobiologist Jochen Brocks of the Australian National University. However, in his assessment, Simpson’s hypothesis makes a few logical leaps that don’t hold up. It’s not clear that the earliest animals would have been swimming freely in water, Brocks said. Some of the first fossils that can be confidently called “animals” were anchored on the ocean floor.
Perhaps more importantly, the timeline of animal origins is very uncertain. Some estimates suggest that the Snowball Earth period might line up with the last common ancestor of animals. But these are based on molecular inferences from DNA that are hard to confirm, Brocks said. In his opinion, it’s difficult to say how much importance to assign to this era. Butterfield also remarked on this uncertainty: “There’s no evidence of anything getting large until quite a bit after [Snowball Earth].”
That said, Brocks found Simpson’s experiment quite clever and beautiful. The fact that organisms might respond to high viscosity by developing collective behavior deserves to be better understood, he said—whether Snowball Earth led to the evolution of complex animal life or not.
“Putting this into our repertoire of thinking about why these things evolved—that is the value of the entire thing,” he said. “It doesn’t matter if it was Snowball Earth. It doesn’t matter if it happened before or after. Just the idea that it can happen, and happen quickly.”
Brocks is curious about what would happen if a similar experiment were performed with choanoflagellates, little creatures that are more closely related to animals than algae are. They rely entirely on hunting to get food—they can’t photosynthesize—so they would be especially vulnerable to slowdowns caused by high viscosity. If they started to take on multicellular forms under those conditions, that would suggest that Simpson’s results represent a more general truth about how life responds to its environment. “It would be absolutely ultra-exciting,” he said.
Simpson is, in fact, currently working with choanoflagellates. Right now, he is trying to understand how they live .
“They’re really beautiful and complicated creatures,” he said. They can take on many different forms: There are fast swimmers with long flagella, slow swimmers that meander, ones that stick to a surface to grow. “They can grow these little tendrils off the tip and walk around like on stilts; they have sex, and they fuse, and they form chain colonies and rosette colonies … and if you squeeze them, apparently they’ll lose their flagella and turn into an amoeba,” he said. When it comes to responding to the challenges of a radical new environment, he reflected, “they’ve got a lot to work with.”
Original story reprinted with permission from Quanta Magazine , an editorially independent publication of the Simons Foundation whose mission is to enhance public understanding of science by covering research developments and trends in mathematics and the physical and life sciences.
In your inbox: Our biggest stories , handpicked for you each day
How one bad CrowdStrike update crashed the world’s computers
The Big Story: How soon might the Atlantic Ocean break ?
Welcome to the internet's hyper-consumption era
IMAGES
COMMENTS
1 Jar of hot water. 1 Plastic card. 1 Spoon. 1 Large dish or a baking pan. Red and blue food coloring. Steps to follow. Add a few drops of red food color into the hot water jar and stir it cautiously with a spoon. Similarly, add a few drops of blue food color into the cold water jar and stir it with a spoon.
Water Temperature Science Experiment Instructions. Step 1 - Begin by preparing three identical jars of water. Fill one jar with cold water, one jar with room temperature water, and one jar with hot water. Helpful Tip: For cold water, fill the jar and put it in the fridge for an hour or two. For the room temperature water, fill the jar and ...
The demonstration works as cold water is more dense than hot water so the hot water sits on top of the cold. When water is heated, water molecules move around faster, bounce off each other and move further apart. As there's more space between the water molecules the density of warmer water is less than the same volume of cooler water.
First, do the experiment with the cold water on the bottom. Place the index card over the mouth of the hot water jar. Press slightly to make a seal. Flip the jar over and place it on top of the cold water jar (make sure it's a color combo that will make a secondary color). Line up the lip of the jars and carefully pull the card out.
The cold water is more dense than the hot water. The red and blue coloring will stay separated until the water temperatures start to even out. This will actually take quite a while if the very hot and reasonably cold water is used for the experiment. The experiment cannot really be performed with the hot water starting on the bottom. The hot ...
Make sure the bottle is empty before you attach the Balloon to it. Repeat the same method and prepare another set of water bottle and Balloon using the other empty bottle. Step-4: In this step, keep the ballon attached bottle inside the container, which consists of hot water.
Fill a pitcher with water and add drops of blue food coloring. Fill an ice tray with the blue water and put it in the freezer until the ice is solid. Fill a container with room temperature water and place the blue ice inside. The ice should float and the blue water that melts from the ice cube should sink.
In this experiment, you can visualize the difference in density between hot and cold water. Using the food coloring and a thermal infrared camera you can re...
This simple density science experiment starts with placing two glasses with yellow water on top of two glasses with blue water. When we remove cards that se...
2 Amazing Hot and Cold Water Density ExperimentsThe science will amaze you if you just look close enough to things that surround you. What do you think would...
This experiment by HooplaKidzLab demonstrates how the more dense cold water sinks — those molecules are closer together — pushing the slightly less dense hot water to float on top. Air behaves in the same way… think of hot air balloons as an example, or a multi-story house on a hot day, where the top floors are warmer than the bottom ...
In one glass, pour the cold water and in the other hot water. As we mentioned, near-boiling water for hot and regular temperature water from the pipe will be good to demonstrate the diffusion. Drop a few drops of food coloring in each cup. 3-4 drops are enough and you should not put too much food color.
Fill one jar with cold water and the other with hot water. Pour blue food coloring into the cold water and red food coloring into the hot water. Make sure both jars are completely filled with water. To avoid spills, place them in the shallow plate. Tap the card gently on top of the hot water jar. The card should completely cover the jar's mouth.
Hot and Cold Water Experiment Supply List. Hot water. Cold water. 2 tumbler glasses. Food coloring. Small sheet of plexiglass or other hard plastic. Don't forget your safety gear! Lab coat . Safety goggles.
Place the index card over the opening of the color water jar. While holding the index card in place flip the jar over and on top of the jar of hot water. Quickly remove the index card and watch what happens. Redo the experiment but instead placing the jar of hot water on top. Scroll down to find a printable version of the directions.
In cold water, the water molecules are closer together. Coldwater is, therefore, denser. That means that cold water weighs more than hot water. The water molecules in hot water are further apart. So hot water is less dense than cold water. For the same volume of liquid, hot water will be lighter.
EXPERIMENT STEPS. Step 1: Fill 3 small containers with water. Each container must have about the same amount of water. Do not fill the containers too full because they will need to be moved. Place a thermometer in one of the water containers and take a reading of the plain water termperature. The three liquid containers will all have the same ...
Hot And Cold Water Science Experiment. Instructions for a fun experiment to teach kids the difference between the density of hot water and the density of col...
Experiment. Watch this portion of my video below to check out this fun science experiment! Directions: Fill up one of the bottles with cold water and dye it blue. You can also use any color you want. Fill up the other bottle with hot water and dye it yellow. You can also use any color you want. Make sure you have an adult help you with the warm ...
Hot water (not too hot) Optional: a small stone or rock; How to Do the Science Experiment for preschoolers: Before this experiment, we read the story Fireflies in the Night as part of our Summertime Activity Plans. The story talks about how hot and cold affect the firefly's light, so it provides the perfect opportunity to then talk about hot ...
Sugar cubes. Cold water in a clear glass. Hot water in a clear glass (be careful with the hot water) Spoon for stirring. Instructions: Make sure the glasses have an equal amount of water. Put a sugar cube into the cold water and stir with the spoon until the sugar disappears. Repeat this process (remembering to count the amount of sugar cubes ...
Diffusion of Food Coloring. Check out this cool science experiment video that focuses on the process of diffusion. Diffusion involves molecules moving from areas of higher concentration to areas of lower concentration. In this experiment the diffusion of food coloring in hot and cold water shows how temperature effects the rate of diffusion ...
In your experiment, you will see the food dye in the water make its way to the leaves. Build a balloon-powered racecar What you need: tape, scissors, two skewers, cardboard, four bottle caps, one ...
"The trouble is that, today, you have these conditions that can sound hot, but we don't really know what it's going to do to people," says Jay, who directs the heat and health laboratory ...
What is the transfer of energy? Visualize the transfer of energy and movement of molecules in this easy science experiment for kids! Enjoy this simple experi...
NASA's Cold Atom Lab on board the ISS. NASA/JPL-Caltech NASA is experimenting with the use of quantum technology to measure gravity, magnetic fields, and other forces in space. The space agency ...
Paleobiologist Carl Simpson has led a body of work—computer modeling and experiments with living organisms—to study whether the physics of cold water causes cells to act collectively like a ...