This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. Learn more about DOAJ’s privacy policy.
Hide this message
You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience and security.
The Directory of Open Access Journals
Quick search, polish polar research.
0138-0338 (Print) / 2081-8262 (Online)
- ISSN Portal
Publishing with this journal
There are no publication fees ( article processing charges or APCs ) to publish with this journal.
Look up the journal's:
- Aims & scope
- Instructions for authors
- Editorial Board
- Peer review
Expect on average 26 weeks from submission to publication.
Best practice
This journal began publishing in open access in 2010 . What does DOAJ define as Open Accesss?
This journal uses a CC BY-NC-ND license.
Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives
→ Look up their open access statement and their license terms .
The author does not retain unrestricted copyrights and publishing rights.
→ Learn more about their copyright policy .
Permanent article identifier:
Journal metadata
Publisher Polish Academy of Sciences , Poland Other organisation Committee on Polar Research of Polish Academy of Sciences Manuscripts accepted in English
LCC subjects Look up the Library of Congress Classification Outline Science: Geology Keywords arctic antarctic life sciences geosciences
WeChat QR code
Polish Polar Research
Subject Area and Category
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee on Polar Research
Publication type
01380338, 20818262
Information
How to publish in this journal
The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.
Category | Year | Quartile |
---|---|---|
Ecology | 1999 | Q3 |
Ecology | 2000 | Q3 |
Ecology | 2001 | Q4 |
Ecology | 2002 | Q3 |
Ecology | 2003 | Q3 |
Ecology | 2004 | Q2 |
Ecology | 2005 | Q3 |
Ecology | 2006 | Q2 |
Ecology | 2007 | Q3 |
Ecology | 2008 | Q2 |
Ecology | 2009 | Q2 |
Ecology | 2010 | Q2 |
Ecology | 2011 | Q3 |
Ecology | 2012 | Q2 |
Ecology | 2013 | Q3 |
Ecology | 2014 | Q2 |
Ecology | 2015 | Q2 |
Ecology | 2016 | Q3 |
Ecology | 2017 | Q3 |
Ecology | 2018 | Q2 |
Ecology | 2019 | Q2 |
Ecology | 2020 | Q3 |
Ecology | 2021 | Q3 |
Ecology | 2022 | Q3 |
Ecology | 2023 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 1999 | Q4 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2000 | Q4 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2001 | Q4 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2002 | Q4 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2003 | Q4 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2004 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2005 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2006 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2007 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2008 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2009 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2010 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2011 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2012 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2013 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2014 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2015 | Q2 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2016 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2017 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2018 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2019 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2020 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2021 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2022 | Q3 |
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | 2023 | Q4 |
The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.
Year | SJR |
---|---|
1999 | 0.251 |
2000 | 0.267 |
2001 | 0.197 |
2002 | 0.226 |
2003 | 0.196 |
2004 | 0.385 |
2005 | 0.302 |
2006 | 0.441 |
2007 | 0.310 |
2008 | 0.570 |
2009 | 0.519 |
2010 | 0.482 |
2011 | 0.318 |
2012 | 0.396 |
2013 | 0.345 |
2014 | 0.416 |
2015 | 0.595 |
2016 | 0.410 |
2017 | 0.297 |
2018 | 0.440 |
2019 | 0.436 |
2020 | 0.421 |
2021 | 0.323 |
2022 | 0.288 |
2023 | 0.227 |
Evolution of the number of published documents. All types of documents are considered, including citable and non citable documents.
Year | Documents |
---|---|
1999 | 25 |
2000 | 13 |
2001 | 16 |
2002 | 17 |
2003 | 16 |
2004 | 16 |
2005 | 20 |
2006 | 18 |
2007 | 18 |
2008 | 25 |
2009 | 21 |
2010 | 21 |
2011 | 26 |
2012 | 27 |
2013 | 25 |
2014 | 31 |
2015 | 25 |
2016 | 27 |
2017 | 24 |
2018 | 23 |
2019 | 18 |
2020 | 13 |
2021 | 17 |
2022 | 16 |
2023 | 18 |
This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.
Cites per document | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 1999 | 0.310 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2000 | 0.313 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2001 | 0.288 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2002 | 0.274 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2003 | 0.282 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2004 | 0.516 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2005 | 0.415 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2006 | 0.826 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2007 | 0.671 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2008 | 0.875 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2009 | 1.123 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2010 | 1.098 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2011 | 0.941 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2012 | 1.140 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2013 | 1.295 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2014 | 1.263 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2015 | 1.431 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2016 | 1.426 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2017 | 1.639 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2018 | 1.944 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2019 | 1.242 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2020 | 1.533 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2021 | 1.410 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2022 | 1.155 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2023 | 0.859 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 1999 | 0.310 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2000 | 0.321 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2001 | 0.281 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2002 | 0.333 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2003 | 0.239 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2004 | 0.592 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2005 | 0.449 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2006 | 0.712 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2007 | 0.667 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2008 | 0.893 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2009 | 1.082 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2010 | 0.969 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2011 | 0.881 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2012 | 1.088 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2013 | 1.054 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2014 | 1.256 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2015 | 1.422 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2016 | 1.309 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2017 | 1.265 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2018 | 1.434 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2019 | 1.243 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2020 | 1.631 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2021 | 1.222 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2022 | 1.313 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2023 | 0.891 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 1999 | 0.286 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2000 | 0.295 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2001 | 0.342 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2002 | 0.414 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2003 | 0.273 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2004 | 0.636 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2005 | 0.313 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2006 | 0.583 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2007 | 0.579 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2008 | 0.917 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2009 | 1.070 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2010 | 0.913 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2011 | 0.881 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2012 | 0.936 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2013 | 0.925 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2014 | 1.404 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2015 | 1.339 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2016 | 0.714 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2017 | 1.288 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2018 | 1.118 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2019 | 1.106 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2020 | 1.268 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2021 | 1.065 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2022 | 1.200 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2023 | 1.091 |
Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.
Cites | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Self Cites | 1999 | 7 |
Self Cites | 2000 | 8 |
Self Cites | 2001 | 5 |
Self Cites | 2002 | 5 |
Self Cites | 2003 | 7 |
Self Cites | 2004 | 7 |
Self Cites | 2005 | 10 |
Self Cites | 2006 | 10 |
Self Cites | 2007 | 3 |
Self Cites | 2008 | 10 |
Self Cites | 2009 | 10 |
Self Cites | 2010 | 8 |
Self Cites | 2011 | 15 |
Self Cites | 2012 | 16 |
Self Cites | 2013 | 13 |
Self Cites | 2014 | 13 |
Self Cites | 2015 | 15 |
Self Cites | 2016 | 12 |
Self Cites | 2017 | 8 |
Self Cites | 2018 | 8 |
Self Cites | 2019 | 17 |
Self Cites | 2020 | 10 |
Self Cites | 2021 | 6 |
Self Cites | 2022 | 5 |
Self Cites | 2023 | 3 |
Total Cites | 1999 | 13 |
Total Cites | 2000 | 17 |
Total Cites | 2001 | 16 |
Total Cites | 2002 | 18 |
Total Cites | 2003 | 11 |
Total Cites | 2004 | 29 |
Total Cites | 2005 | 22 |
Total Cites | 2006 | 37 |
Total Cites | 2007 | 36 |
Total Cites | 2008 | 50 |
Total Cites | 2009 | 66 |
Total Cites | 2010 | 62 |
Total Cites | 2011 | 59 |
Total Cites | 2012 | 74 |
Total Cites | 2013 | 78 |
Total Cites | 2014 | 98 |
Total Cites | 2015 | 118 |
Total Cites | 2016 | 106 |
Total Cites | 2017 | 105 |
Total Cites | 2018 | 109 |
Total Cites | 2019 | 92 |
Total Cites | 2020 | 106 |
Total Cites | 2021 | 66 |
Total Cites | 2022 | 63 |
Total Cites | 2023 | 41 |
Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.
Cites | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
External Cites per document | 1999 | 0.143 |
External Cites per document | 2000 | 0.170 |
External Cites per document | 2001 | 0.193 |
External Cites per document | 2002 | 0.241 |
External Cites per document | 2003 | 0.087 |
External Cites per document | 2004 | 0.449 |
External Cites per document | 2005 | 0.245 |
External Cites per document | 2006 | 0.519 |
External Cites per document | 2007 | 0.611 |
External Cites per document | 2008 | 0.714 |
External Cites per document | 2009 | 0.918 |
External Cites per document | 2010 | 0.844 |
External Cites per document | 2011 | 0.657 |
External Cites per document | 2012 | 0.853 |
External Cites per document | 2013 | 0.878 |
External Cites per document | 2014 | 1.090 |
External Cites per document | 2015 | 1.241 |
External Cites per document | 2016 | 1.160 |
External Cites per document | 2017 | 1.169 |
External Cites per document | 2018 | 1.329 |
External Cites per document | 2019 | 1.014 |
External Cites per document | 2020 | 1.477 |
External Cites per document | 2021 | 1.111 |
External Cites per document | 2022 | 1.208 |
External Cites per document | 2023 | 0.826 |
Cites per document | 1999 | 0.310 |
Cites per document | 2000 | 0.321 |
Cites per document | 2001 | 0.281 |
Cites per document | 2002 | 0.333 |
Cites per document | 2003 | 0.239 |
Cites per document | 2004 | 0.592 |
Cites per document | 2005 | 0.449 |
Cites per document | 2006 | 0.712 |
Cites per document | 2007 | 0.667 |
Cites per document | 2008 | 0.893 |
Cites per document | 2009 | 1.082 |
Cites per document | 2010 | 0.969 |
Cites per document | 2011 | 0.881 |
Cites per document | 2012 | 1.088 |
Cites per document | 2013 | 1.054 |
Cites per document | 2014 | 1.256 |
Cites per document | 2015 | 1.422 |
Cites per document | 2016 | 1.309 |
Cites per document | 2017 | 1.265 |
Cites per document | 2018 | 1.434 |
Cites per document | 2019 | 1.243 |
Cites per document | 2020 | 1.631 |
Cites per document | 2021 | 1.222 |
Cites per document | 2022 | 1.313 |
Cites per document | 2023 | 0.891 |
International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.
Year | International Collaboration |
---|---|
1999 | 20.00 |
2000 | 0.00 |
2001 | 6.25 |
2002 | 17.65 |
2003 | 12.50 |
2004 | 31.25 |
2005 | 30.00 |
2006 | 0.00 |
2007 | 33.33 |
2008 | 24.00 |
2009 | 19.05 |
2010 | 28.57 |
2011 | 42.31 |
2012 | 29.63 |
2013 | 40.00 |
2014 | 48.39 |
2015 | 28.00 |
2016 | 18.52 |
2017 | 25.00 |
2018 | 21.74 |
2019 | 11.11 |
2020 | 38.46 |
2021 | 17.65 |
2022 | 12.50 |
2023 | 5.56 |
Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Non-citable documents | 1999 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2000 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2001 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2002 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2003 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2004 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2005 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2006 | 1 |
Non-citable documents | 2007 | 1 |
Non-citable documents | 2008 | 1 |
Non-citable documents | 2009 | 1 |
Non-citable documents | 2010 | 1 |
Non-citable documents | 2011 | 1 |
Non-citable documents | 2012 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2013 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2014 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2015 | 1 |
Non-citable documents | 2016 | 1 |
Non-citable documents | 2017 | 1 |
Non-citable documents | 2018 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2019 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2020 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2021 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2022 | 0 |
Non-citable documents | 2023 | 0 |
Citable documents | 1999 | 42 |
Citable documents | 2000 | 53 |
Citable documents | 2001 | 57 |
Citable documents | 2002 | 54 |
Citable documents | 2003 | 46 |
Citable documents | 2004 | 49 |
Citable documents | 2005 | 49 |
Citable documents | 2006 | 51 |
Citable documents | 2007 | 53 |
Citable documents | 2008 | 55 |
Citable documents | 2009 | 60 |
Citable documents | 2010 | 63 |
Citable documents | 2011 | 66 |
Citable documents | 2012 | 68 |
Citable documents | 2013 | 74 |
Citable documents | 2014 | 78 |
Citable documents | 2015 | 82 |
Citable documents | 2016 | 80 |
Citable documents | 2017 | 82 |
Citable documents | 2018 | 76 |
Citable documents | 2019 | 74 |
Citable documents | 2020 | 65 |
Citable documents | 2021 | 54 |
Citable documents | 2022 | 48 |
Citable documents | 2023 | 46 |
Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Uncited documents | 1999 | 33 |
Uncited documents | 2000 | 39 |
Uncited documents | 2001 | 44 |
Uncited documents | 2002 | 38 |
Uncited documents | 2003 | 37 |
Uncited documents | 2004 | 28 |
Uncited documents | 2005 | 36 |
Uncited documents | 2006 | 29 |
Uncited documents | 2007 | 31 |
Uncited documents | 2008 | 28 |
Uncited documents | 2009 | 27 |
Uncited documents | 2010 | 35 |
Uncited documents | 2011 | 29 |
Uncited documents | 2012 | 35 |
Uncited documents | 2013 | 33 |
Uncited documents | 2014 | 24 |
Uncited documents | 2015 | 29 |
Uncited documents | 2016 | 39 |
Uncited documents | 2017 | 30 |
Uncited documents | 2018 | 27 |
Uncited documents | 2019 | 33 |
Uncited documents | 2020 | 23 |
Uncited documents | 2021 | 22 |
Uncited documents | 2022 | 19 |
Uncited documents | 2023 | 18 |
Cited documents | 1999 | 9 |
Cited documents | 2000 | 14 |
Cited documents | 2001 | 13 |
Cited documents | 2002 | 16 |
Cited documents | 2003 | 9 |
Cited documents | 2004 | 21 |
Cited documents | 2005 | 13 |
Cited documents | 2006 | 23 |
Cited documents | 2007 | 23 |
Cited documents | 2008 | 28 |
Cited documents | 2009 | 34 |
Cited documents | 2010 | 29 |
Cited documents | 2011 | 38 |
Cited documents | 2012 | 33 |
Cited documents | 2013 | 41 |
Cited documents | 2014 | 54 |
Cited documents | 2015 | 54 |
Cited documents | 2016 | 42 |
Cited documents | 2017 | 53 |
Cited documents | 2018 | 49 |
Cited documents | 2019 | 41 |
Cited documents | 2020 | 42 |
Cited documents | 2021 | 32 |
Cited documents | 2022 | 29 |
Cited documents | 2023 | 28 |
Evolution of the percentage of female authors.
Year | Female Percent |
---|---|
1999 | 28.89 |
2000 | 23.53 |
2001 | 25.81 |
2002 | 38.71 |
2003 | 36.67 |
2004 | 19.44 |
2005 | 43.59 |
2006 | 20.51 |
2007 | 31.82 |
2008 | 25.00 |
2009 | 33.33 |
2010 | 36.36 |
2011 | 45.45 |
2012 | 30.43 |
2013 | 23.26 |
2014 | 43.75 |
2015 | 35.80 |
2016 | 36.84 |
2017 | 48.81 |
2018 | 26.14 |
2019 | 29.85 |
2020 | 46.51 |
2021 | 44.07 |
2022 | 39.39 |
2023 | 45.90 |
Evolution of the number of documents cited by public policy documents according to Overton database.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Overton | 1999 | 0 |
Overton | 2000 | 0 |
Overton | 2001 | 0 |
Overton | 2002 | 0 |
Overton | 2003 | 0 |
Overton | 2004 | 0 |
Overton | 2005 | 0 |
Overton | 2006 | 0 |
Overton | 2007 | 0 |
Overton | 2008 | 0 |
Overton | 2009 | 3 |
Overton | 2010 | 2 |
Overton | 2011 | 5 |
Overton | 2012 | 6 |
Overton | 2013 | 6 |
Overton | 2014 | 2 |
Overton | 2015 | 2 |
Overton | 2016 | 0 |
Overton | 2017 | 2 |
Overton | 2018 | 1 |
Overton | 2019 | 0 |
Overton | 2020 | 0 |
Overton | 2021 | 0 |
Overton | 2022 | 0 |
Overton | 2023 | 0 |
Evoution of the number of documents related to Sustainable Development Goals defined by United Nations. Available from 2018 onwards.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
SDG | 2018 | 6 |
SDG | 2019 | 0 |
SDG | 2020 | 0 |
SDG | 2021 | 4 |
SDG | 2022 | 0 |
SDG | 2023 | 4 |
Leave a comment
Name * Required
Email (will not be published) * Required
* Required Cancel
The users of Scimago Journal & Country Rank have the possibility to dialogue through comments linked to a specific journal. The purpose is to have a forum in which general doubts about the processes of publication in the journal, experiences and other issues derived from the publication of papers are resolved. For topics on particular articles, maintain the dialogue through the usual channels with your editor.
Follow us on @ScimagoJR Scimago Lab , Copyright 2007-2024. Data Source: Scopus®
Cookie settings
Cookie Policy
Legal Notice
Privacy Policy
Strategy for Polish Polar Research
The committee on polar research, pas and the polish polar consortium, as representatives of the polish polar scientific community, recognize the need for creating a unified, coherent national program of polar research for the next decade..
“Strategy for Polish Polar Research – a concept for the years 2017-2027”
Download: pdf .
Facts & Figures
AC member since 1996
Active Polar Icebreakers
- Arctic Policy
- Recent Publications
Poland’s scientific presence in the Arctic region began during the Second International Polar Year in 1932 with a 12-month expedition to Bear Island (1932/1933). Since then, Poland has established a network of university research summer bases in Svalbard and the permanent Stanisław Siedlecki Polish Polar Station in Hornsund in the Svalbard Archipelago. Poland has a research vessel s/y Oceania that is used for research expeditions in the European Arctic. Furthermore, the Polish research community is involved in international Arctic science cooperation via various networks (such as IASC, SAON, EU-Polarnet, BOREAS) and research projects in many Arctic sciences and disciplines.
The Committee on Polar Research and Polish Academy of Sciences oversee Polish scientific activities in the region. In addition, in 2015, 18 major scientific institutions established the Polish Polar Consortium ; currently, 17 partner institutions are involved. The Consortium aims to enhance collaboration in conducting and managing polar research in order to gain a better understanding of the current environmental changes in the Arctic and Antarctic, and their influence on other parts of the Earth. The Consortium initiated the Polish Snow Research Programme on Svalbard, which aims to define the role of snow in the functioning of the present polar environment. In April 2013, Kraków hosted an Arctic Science Summit Week .
This page was last updated on 1 August 2022. If we have missed anything, please contact [email protected] .
In the economic sphere, Polish companies or their subsidiaries are involved in raw materials exploration and extraction activities in Canada and Greenland, hydrocarbon exploration on the Norwegian shelf, construction, shipbuilding and ship maintenance for vessels operating in Arctic conditions, and –to a limited extent – fisheries exploitation in the North Atlantic and Barents Sea. In addition, Poles form one of the largest groups of migrants in Iceland and Norway.
Polish engagement in the Arctic is founded primarily on multidisciplinary research and long-term involvement in the work of the Arctic Council, in which it was one of the first nations to gain observer status. Poland has also been involved in political cooperation in the Arctic region first as an observer in the AEPS and then in the Arctic Council . Poland is also an observer in the Barents Euro-Arctic Council, and is a party to the 1920 Spitsbergen (Svalbard) Treaty, Antarctic Treaty and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
Poland has worked to develop a pragmatic dialogue of the Arctic Council chairs with state observers – the so-called Warsaw Format Meetings – which took place in 2010, 2013, 2015 and 2018. The Warsaw Format is one of the few forums in which state observers have a chance to discuss problematic issues with each other and with the current leadership of the Arctic Council.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs established the Polar Task Force in 2011, which consists of representatives of government agencies, scientists, academics, experts and others. The Polar Task Force is a platform for exchanging information and coordinating measures by different actors. At the Polar Task Force meeting in December 2019, Deputy Minister Przydacz emphasized the importance of polar policy to Poland, and called for strengthened internal cooperation and a multidisciplinary approach to face emerging climatic threats.
In 2020, the government accepted the Resolution 129/2020 of the Council of Ministers of 11 September 2020, which introduced the Polish Polar Policy (the English version starts on page 92 of the pdf), which is based on the Strategy for Polish Polar Research – a concept for the years 2017–2027 and the Polish Polar Research: Green-and-White Paper .
On 28 January 2022, the Prime Minister Republic of Poland established the Governmental Committee for the National Polar Policy to implement a national polar strategy. The Government Committee held a constituent meeting on 22 March 2022 and set up two working groups for the Arctic and the Antarctic. Their tasks include the adoption and implementation of international and legal regulations relating to the environment and tourism traffic.
- Polish Polar Policy (2020)
- Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- Poland’s Policy towards the Arctic: Key Areas and Priority Actions
- Polish Polar Task Force
- Strategy for Polish Polar Research – a concept for the years 2017-2027
EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS
Editor-in-chief Prof. Dr. M. BŁAŻEWICZ, Poland Board Members A. BRANDT (Hamburg) C. DE BROYER (Bruxelles) P. CONVEY (Cambridge, UK) A. GAŹDZICKI (Warszawa) J. LÓPEZ-MARTINEZ (Madrid) W. SZCZUCIŃSKI (Poznań) Publisher Agent S. PASSCHIER
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
- View all journals
- Explore content
- About the journal
- Publish with us
- Sign up for alerts
- Published: 29 September 2017
Time capsule buried to preserve science for the ages
- Quirin Schiermeier
Nature ( 2017 ) Cite this article
10k Accesses
84 Altmetric
Metrics details
- Anthropology
Message in a bottle sums up state of research in 2017.
On an Arctic island, researchers have buried a stainless-steel tube stuffed with artefacts that they say sum up science and technology in 2017. The capsule, buried on 17 September, could remain in the ground for more than half a million years before it resurfaces as a result of geological uplift, sea-level rise and erosion.
Placed five metres deep in an out-of-use borehole near the Polish Polar Station in Hornsund, Svalbard, the 60-centimetre-long tube holds smaller containers with samples that include a fragment of a 4.5-billion-year-old meteorite, basaltic lava from an Icelandic volcano eruption and Namibian sand hiding particles of kimberlite and diamonds — all geared at informing a future discoverer of our present understanding of Earth’s geology.
To summarize biology, it includes dried DNA samples from humans, rats, salmon and potato, a bee in resin, seeds and around 300 tardigrades, the minuscule aquatic ‘water bears’ that can survive extreme radiation, drought and heat.
And to communicate to future historians the state of today’s technology, scientists packed into the tube silicon-based electronic devices, including accelerometers, a radiation detector and a mobile phone. They added a credit card, a wristwatch and a photograph, etched into porcelain for longevity, of Earth taken from space. Researchers also left their fingerprints on the inside of some of the container caps.
Polar anniversary
The message in a bottle was created to celebrate the sixtieth anniversary of Poland’s polar station, which was set up during the International Geophysical Year 1957-58, a research project that included a series of global geophysical activities.
“I wanted to create a memorial for the ages,” says Marek Lewandowski, a permafrost specialist with the Polish Academy of Sciences Institute of Geophysics in Warsaw, who selected the objects for the time capsule. Lewandowski, who thought up the idea in May, says that he consulted dozens of experts at Polish and foreign research institutes about the capsule’s inventory. The capsule is described in a manuscript published in the journal Gondwana Research 1 on 28 September.
It’s a bit of a balancing act between jocular and serious science,” Lewandowski says. “But I do think it’s a good way to capture what we know today about the natural history of our planet and the evolution of life on it.”
The objects are nicely, if quirkily, chosen, says Jan Zalasiewicz, a geologist at the University of Leicester, UK. “They have put together a thoughtful and ingenious message for the far future,” he says, “But the few things in the capsule will be a drop in the ocean among the huge diversity of ‘techno-fossils’ that humans will leave behind as geology.”
Zalasiewicz adds that he thinks the capsule might resurface well before the half-a-million year estimate, because the chosen burial place is just a few metres above sea level, and marine erosion from sea-level changes are difficult to predict.
It’s not the first time that humans have designed a time capsule for distant civilizations to unwrap and decode. The Voyager Golden Record — phonograph records (together with a cartridge and a needle) on board the two Voyager spacecrafts launched in 1977 — contains 115 images, musical selections, natural soundscapes and spoken greetings to any extraterrestrials that might pick up the messages.
But chances are slim that Voyager’s snapshot of twentieth-century human culture, selected by a NASA committee, will ever be delivered and understood, says Lewandowski.
“Our own time capsule is sure to be found one distant day, and its discoverers will be able to grasp the message,” he says. “If they look carefully inside — like we did into the Cheops pyramid and the tombs and artefacts inside it — they will understand who we were.”
Lewandoski, M. et al. Gondw. Res. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.09.005 (2017).
Download references
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Related links
Related links in nature research.
Anthropocene: The human age 2015-Mar-11
Voyager 1 has reached interstellar space 2013-Sep-12
International Polar Year: In from the Cold 2009-Feb-25
Related external links
Geology of Svalbard
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article.
Schiermeier, Q. Time capsule buried to preserve science for the ages. Nature (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2017.22657
Download citation
Published : 29 September 2017
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2017.22657
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Quick links
- Explore articles by subject
- Guide to authors
- Editorial policies
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Polish Polar Research is a quarterly journal edited by the Committee on Polar Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences. It publishes original research articles on various aspects of polar regions, such as geology, biology, meteorology, and glaciology.
The quarterly Polish Polar Research (ISSN: 0138-0338) is an international multidisciplinary scientific journal publishing original research articles presenting the results of studies carried out in various areas of science and technologies in all around the world and in Polar Regions. The journal publishes original, previously unpublished ...
The quarterly Polish Polar Research edited by the Committee on Polar Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences is an international journal publishing original research articles presenting the results of studies carried out in polar regions.. All papers are peer-reviewed and published in English. The Editorial Advisory Board includes renowned scientist from Poland and from abroad.
The Polish Polar Consortium is a network of 16 scientific institutions that conduct research in polar regions. Find out the latest news and opportunities for student and PhD candidates mobility within the HarSval project.
Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland Other organisation Committee on Polar Research of Polish Academy of Sciences Manuscripts accepted in English LCC subjects Look up the Library of Congress Classification Outline Science: Geology Keywords arctic antarctic life sciences geosciences. Added 12 October 2007 • Updated 16 June 2023 ...
The quarterly Polish Polar Research edited by the Committee on Polar Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences is an international journal publishing original research articles presenting the results of studies carried out in polar regions. All papers are peer-reviewed and published in English.
The Polish Polar Consortium currently consists of 16 scientific institutions: 11 higher education institutions and 5 research institutes. The Consortium functions in a close cooperation with the Committee on Polar Research, Polish Academy of Sciences which was a mentor of its formation.. The mission of the Polish Polar Consortium is to build a framework for an effective cooperation of the ...
Learn about the national program of polar research in Poland for the next decade, prepared by the Committee on Polar Research, PAS and the Polish Polar Consortium. The Strategy outlines the current state, main areas and future development of polar science in Poland and its international role.
Polish Polar Research. Published by Polish Academy of Sciences Chancellery. Online ISSN: 2081-8262. ·. Print ISSN: 0138-0338. Articles. +1. Glacier extent in a Novaya Zemlya fjord during the ...
Learn how to submit your paper to Polish Polar Research, a peer-reviewed journal on polar sciences. Follow the instructions on typeface, length, format, margins, and more.
AIMS AND SCOPE. The editorial main scope is to elect pioneer scientific research papers in any field which meet a high standard to promote the journal reputation and scientific reliance in international databases. Papers which interest readers from more than one discipline are mostly considered. In particular, we are keen to publish work with ...
Polish Polar Research 0138-0338 (Print) / 2081-8262 (Online) Website ISSN Portal About Articles Added 12 October 2007 • Updated 16 June 2023 WeChat QR code Close ...
Details. Committee on Polar Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences was established in 1977. It associates together a group of scientists, both experienced researchers and junior experts engaged in research of the polar regions of the Earth. Members of the Committee represent many disciplines of the natural sciences, social sciences and the ...
The quarterly Polish Polar Research edited by the Committee on Polar Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences is an international journal publishing original research articles presenting the results of studies carried out in polar regions. The Editorial Advisory Board includes renowned scientists from Poland and from abroad. Polish Polar Research is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded ...
The article describes Polish research and discoveries in the Arctic and the Antarctic since the 19th century. The author is a geologist and since 1956 has been engaged in scientific field research ...
The Consortium initiated the Polish Snow Research Programme on Svalbard, which aims to define the role of snow in the functioning of the present polar environment. In April 2013, Kraków hosted an Arctic Science Summit Week. This page was last updated on 1 August 2022. If we have missed anything, please contact [email protected].
POLISH POLAR RESEARCH. Home: About: Aims and scope: Submission guidelines : Editorial : Contact : EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS. Editor-in-chief Prof. Dr. M. BŁAŻEWICZ, Poland Board Members A. BRANDT (Hamburg) C. DE BROYER (Bruxelles) P. CONVEY (Cambridge, UK) A. GAŹDZICKI (Warszawa) J. LÓPEZ-MARTINEZ (Madrid) W. SZCZUCIŃSKI (Poznań) Publisher ...
Polish climatologists conducted research in both polar areas, but by far the greatest achievements and the most studies (including those published in high-IF magazines) concern Svalbard. 3.
The author is a geologist and since 1956 has been engaged in scientific field research on Spitsbergen, Greenland and Antarctica (23 expeditions). For many years chairman of the Committee on Polar Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, he is now its Honorary Chairman. Keywords. Polish research
The quarterly Polish Polar Research edited by the Committee on Polar Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences is an international journal publishing original research articles presenting the results of studies carried out in polar regions.. All papers are peer-reviewed and published in English. The Editorial Advisory Board includes renowned scientist from Poland and from abroad.
The message in a bottle was created to celebrate the sixtieth anniversary of Poland's polar station, which was set up during the International Geophysical Year 1957-58, a research project that ...
Search Your Desired Information Here:
Directory of Open Access Journals, JUFO Portal - Levels 1, 2, 3 (Federation of Finnish Learned Societies) x2. Diffusion. c2+m4+e7+x2. From 2022 onwards MIAR will not show the ICDS calculation. Instead we will only show the profile of the journals' presence in the sources analysed by MIAR: under the label 'Diffusion' the number of presences will ...