essay test vs objective test

• New Freshmen
• New International Students
• Info about COMPOSITION
• Info about MATH
• Info about SCIENCE
• LOTE for Non-Native Speakers
• Log-in Instructions
• ALEKS PPL Math Placement Exam
• Advanced Placement (AP) Credit
• What is IB?
• Advanced Level (A-Levels) Credit
• Departmental Proficiency Exams
• Departmental Proficiency Exams in LOTE ("Languages Other Than English")
• Testing in Less Commonly Studied Languages
• FAQ on placement testing
• FAQ on proficiency testing
• Legislation FAQ
• 2024 Cutoff Scores Math
• 2024 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2024 Cutoff Scores IMR-Biology
• 2024 Cutoff Scores MCB
• 2024 Cutoff Scores Physics
• 2024 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2024 Cutoff Scores ESL
• 2024 Cutoff Scores Chinese
• 2024 Cutoff Scores French
• 2024 Cutoff Scores German
• 2024 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2024 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2024 Advanced Placement Program
• 2024 International Baccalaureate Program
• 2024 Advanced Level Exams
• 2023 Cutoff Scores Math
• 2023 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2023 Cutoff Scores IMR-Biology
• 2023 Cutoff Scores MCB
• 2023 Cutoff Scores Physics
• 2023 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2023 Cutoff Scores ESL
• 2023 Cutoff Scores Chinese
• 2023 Cutoff Scores French
• 2023 Cutoff Scores German
• 2023 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2023 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2023 Advanced Placement Program
• 2023 International Baccalaureate Program
• 2023 Advanced Level Exams
• 2022 Cutoff Scores Math
• 2022 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2022 Cutoff Scores IMR-Biology
• 2022 Cutoff Scores MCB
• 2022 Cutoff Scores Physics
• 2022 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2022 Cutoff Scores ESL
• 2022 Cutoff Scores Chinese
• 2022 Cutoff Scores French
• 2022 Cutoff Scores German
• 2022 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2022 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2022 Advanced Placement Program
• 2022 International Baccalaureate Program
• 2022 Advanced Level Exams
• 2021 Cutoff Scores Math
• 2021 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2021 Cutoff Scores IMR-Biology
• 2021 Cutoff Scores MCB
• 2021 Cutoff Scores Physics
• 2021 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2021 Cutoff Scores ESL
• 2021 Cutoff Scores Chinese
• 2021 Cutoff Scores French
• 2021 Cutoff Scores German
• 2021 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2021 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2021 Advanced Placement Program
• 2021 International Baccalaureate Program
• 2021 Advanced Level Exams
• 2020 Cutoff Scores Math
• 2020 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2020 Cutoff Scores MCB
• 2020 Cutoff Scores Physics
• 2020 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2020 Cutoff Scores ESL
• 2020 Cutoff Scores Chinese
• 2020 Cutoff Scores French
• 2020 Cutoff Scores German
• 2020 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2020 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2020 Advanced Placement Program
• 2020 International Baccalaureate Program
• 2020 Advanced Level Exams
• 2019 Cutoff Scores Math
• 2019 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2019 Cutoff Scores MCB
• 2019 Cutoff Scores Physics
• 2019 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2019 Cutoff Scores Chinese
• 2019 Cutoff Scores ESL
• 2019 Cutoff Scores French
• 2019 Cutoff Scores German
• 2019 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2019 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2019 Advanced Placement Program
• 2019 International Baccalaureate Program
• 2019 Advanced Level Exams
• 2018 Cutoff Scores Math
• 2018 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2018 Cutoff Scores MCB
• 2018 Cutoff Scores Physics
• 2018 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2018 Cutoff Scores ESL
• 2018 Cutoff Scores French
• 2018 Cutoff Scores German
• 2018 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2018 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2018 Advanced Placement Program
• 2018 International Baccalaureate Program
• 2018 Advanced Level Exams
• 2017 Cutoff Scores Math
• 2017 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2017 Cutoff Scores MCB
• 2017 Cutoff Scores Physics
• 2017 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2017 Cutoff Scores ESL
• 2017 Cutoff Scores French
• 2017 Cutoff Scores German
• 2017 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2017 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2017 Advanced Placement Program
• 2017 International Baccalaureate Program
• 2017 Advanced Level Exams
• 2016 Cutoff Scores Math
• 2016 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2016 Cutoff Scores Physics
• 2016 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2016 Cutoff Scores ESL
• 2016 Cutoff Scores French
• 2016 Cutoff Scores German
• 2016 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2016 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2016 Advanced Placement Program
• 2016 International Baccalaureate Program
• 2016 Advanced Level Exams
• 2015 Fall Cutoff Scores Math
• 2016 Spring Cutoff Scores Math
• 2015 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2015 Cutoff Scores Physics
• 2015 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2015 Cutoff Scores ESL
• 2015 Cutoff Scores French
• 2015 Cutoff Scores German
• 2015 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2015 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2015 Advanced Placement Program
• 2015 International Baccalaureate (IB) Program
• 2015 Advanced Level Exams
• 2014 Cutoff Scores Math
• 2014 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2014 Cutoff Scores Physics
• 2014 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2014 Cutoff Scores ESL
• 2014 Cutoff Scores French
• 2014 Cutoff Scores German
• 2014 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2014 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2014 Advanced Placement (AP) Program
• 2014 International Baccalaureate (IB) Program
• 2014 Advanced Level Examinations (A Levels)
• 2013 Cutoff Scores Math
• 2013 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2013 Cutoff Scores Physics
• 2013 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2013 Cutoff Scores ESL
• 2013 Cutoff Scores French
• 2013 Cutoff Scores German
• 2013 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2013 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2013 Advanced Placement (AP) Program
• 2013 International Baccalaureate (IB) Program
• 2013 Advanced Level Exams (A Levels)
• 2012 Cutoff Scores Math
• 2012 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2012 Cutoff Scores Physics
• 2012 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2012 Cutoff Scores ESL
• 2012 Cutoff Scores French
• 2012 Cutoff Scores German
• 2012 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2012 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2012 Advanced Placement (AP) Program
• 2012 International Baccalaureate (IB) Program
• 2012 Advanced Level Exams (A Levels)
• 2011 Cutoff Scores Math
• 2011 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2011 Cutoff Scores Physics
• 2011 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2011 Cutoff Scores French
• 2011 Cutoff Scores German
• 2011 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2011 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2011 Advanced Placement (AP) Program
• 2011 International Baccalaureate (IB) Program
• 2010 Cutoff Scores Math
• 2010 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2010 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2010 Cutoff Scores French
• 2010 Cutoff Scores German
• 2010 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2010 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2010 Advanced Placement (AP) Program
• 2010 International Baccalaureate (IB) Program
• 2009 Cutoff Scores Math
• 2009 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2009 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2009 Cutoff Scores French
• 2009 Cutoff Scores German
• 2009 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2009 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2009 Advanced Placement (AP) Program
• 2009 International Baccalaureate (IB) Program
• 2008 Cutoff Scores Math
• 2008 Cutoff Scores Chemistry
• 2008 Cutoff Scores Rhetoric
• 2008 Cutoff Scores French
• 2008 Cutoff Scores German
• 2008 Cutoff Scores Latin
• 2008 Cutoff Scores Spanish
• 2008 Advanced Placement (AP) Program
• 2008 International Baccalaureate (IB) Program
• Log in & Interpret Student Profiles
• Mobius View
• Classroom Test Analysis: The Total Report
• Item Analysis
• Error Report
• Omitted or Multiple Correct Answers
• QUEST Analysis
• Assigning Course Grades

Improving Your Test Questions

• ICES Online
• Myths & Misperceptions
• Longitudinal Profiles
• List of Teachers Ranked as Excellent by Their Students
• Focus Groups
• IEF Question Bank

For questions or information:

• Choosing between Objective and Subjective Test Items

Multiple-Choice Test Items

True-false test items, matching test items, completion test items, essay test items, problem solving test items, performance test items.

• Two Methods for Assessing Test Item Quality
• Assistance Offered by The Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning (CITL)
• References for Further Reading

I. Choosing Between Objective and Subjective Test Items

There are two general categories of test items: (1) objective items which require students to select the correct response from several alternatives or to supply a word or short phrase to answer a question or complete a statement; and (2) subjective or essay items which permit the student to organize and present an original answer. Objective items include multiple-choice, true-false, matching and completion, while subjective items include short-answer essay, extended-response essay, problem solving and performance test items. For some instructional purposes one or the other item types may prove more efficient and appropriate. To begin out discussion of the relative merits of each type of test item, test your knowledge of these two item types by answering the following questions.

Quiz Answers

1 Sax, G., & Collet, L. S. (1968). An empirical comparison of the effects of recall and multiple-choice tests on student achievement. J ournal of Educational Measurement, 5 (2), 169–173. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1968.tb00622.x

Paterson, D. G. (1926). Do new and old type examinations measure different mental functions? School and Society, 24 , 246–248.

When to Use Essay or Objective Tests

Essay tests are especially appropriate when:

• the group to be tested is small and the test is not to be reused.
• you wish to encourage and reward the development of student skill in writing.
• you are more interested in exploring the student's attitudes than in measuring his/her achievement.
• you are more confident of your ability as a critical and fair reader than as an imaginative writer of good objective test items.

Objective tests are especially appropriate when:

• the group to be tested is large and the test may be reused.
• highly reliable test scores must be obtained as efficiently as possible.
• impartiality of evaluation, absolute fairness, and freedom from possible test scoring influences (e.g., fatigue, lack of anonymity) are essential.
• you are more confident of your ability to express objective test items clearly than of your ability to judge essay test answers correctly.
• there is more pressure for speedy reporting of scores than for speedy test preparation.

Either essay or objective tests can be used to:

• measure almost any important educational achievement a written test can measure.
• test understanding and ability to apply principles.
• test ability to think critically.
• test ability to solve problems.
• test ability to select relevant facts and principles and to integrate them toward the solution of complex problems. 

In addition to the preceding suggestions, it is important to realize that certain item types are  better suited  than others for measuring particular learning objectives. For example, learning objectives requiring the student  to demonstrate  or  to show , may be better measured by performance test items, whereas objectives requiring the student  to explain  or  to describe  may be better measured by essay test items. The matching of learning objective expectations with certain item types can help you select an appropriate kind of test item for your classroom exam as well as provide a higher degree of test validity (i.e., testing what is supposed to be tested). To further illustrate, several sample learning objectives and appropriate test items are provided on the following page.

After you have decided to use either an objective, essay or both objective and essay exam, the next step is to select the kind(s) of objective or essay item that you wish to include on the exam. To help you make such a choice, the different kinds of objective and essay items are presented in the following section. The various kinds of items are briefly described and compared to one another in terms of their advantages and limitations for use. Also presented is a set of general suggestions for the construction of each item variation. 

II. Suggestions for Using and Writing Test Items

The multiple-choice item consists of two parts: (a) the stem, which identifies the question or problem and (b) the response alternatives. Students are asked to select the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. For example:

Sample Multiple-Choice Item

*correct response

Advantages in Using Multiple-Choice Items

Multiple-choice items can provide...

• versatility in measuring all levels of cognitive ability.
• highly reliable test scores.
• scoring efficiency and accuracy.
• objective measurement of student achievement or ability.
• a wide sampling of content or objectives.
• a reduced guessing factor when compared to true-false items.
• different response alternatives which can provide diagnostic feedback.

Limitations in Using Multiple-Choice Items

Multiple-choice items...

• are difficult and time consuming to construct.
• lead an instructor to favor simple recall of facts.
• place a high degree of dependence on the student's reading ability and instructor's writing ability.

Suggestions For Writing Multiple-Choice Test Items

Item alternatives.

13. Use at least four alternatives for each item to lower the probability of getting the item correct by guessing.

14. Randomly distribute the correct response among the alternative positions throughout the test having approximately the same proportion of alternatives a, b, c, d and e as the correct response.

15. Use the alternatives "none of the above" and "all of the above" sparingly. When used, such alternatives should occasionally be used as the correct response.

A true-false item can be written in one of three forms: simple, complex, or compound. Answers can consist of only two choices (simple), more than two choices (complex), or two choices plus a conditional completion response (compound). An example of each type of true-false item follows:

Sample True-False Item: Simple

Sample true-false item: complex, sample true-false item: compound, advantages in using true-false items.

True-False items can provide...

• the widest sampling of content or objectives per unit of testing time.
• an objective measurement of student achievement or ability.

Limitations In Using True-False Items

True-false items...

• incorporate an extremely high guessing factor. For simple true-false items, each student has a 50/50 chance of correctly answering the item without any knowledge of the item's content.
• can often lead an instructor to write ambiguous statements due to the difficulty of writing statements which are unequivocally true or false.
• do not discriminate between students of varying ability as well as other item types.
• can often include more irrelevant clues than do other item types.
• can often lead an instructor to favor testing of trivial knowledge.

Suggestions For Writing True-False Test Items

In general, matching items consist of a column of stimuli presented on the left side of the exam page and a column of responses placed on the right side of the page. Students are required to match the response associated with a given stimulus. For example:

Sample Matching Test Item

Advantages in using matching items.

Matching items...

• require short periods of reading and response time, allowing you to cover more content.
• provide objective measurement of student achievement or ability.
• provide highly reliable test scores.
• provide scoring efficiency and accuracy.

Limitations in Using Matching Items

• have difficulty measuring learning objectives requiring more than simple recall of information.
• are difficult to construct due to the problem of selecting a common set of stimuli and responses.

Suggestions for Writing Matching Test Items

5.  Keep matching items brief, limiting the list of stimuli to under 10.

6.  Include more responses than stimuli to help prevent answering through the process of elimination.

7.  When possible, reduce the amount of reading time by including only short phrases or single words in the response list.

The completion item requires the student to answer a question or to finish an incomplete statement by filling in a blank with the correct word or phrase. For example,

Sample Completion Item

According to Freud, personality is made up of three major systems, the _________, the ________ and the ________.

Advantages in Using Completion Items

Completion items...

• can provide a wide sampling of content.
• can efficiently measure lower levels of cognitive ability.
• can minimize guessing as compared to multiple-choice or true-false items.
• can usually provide an objective measure of student achievement or ability.

Limitations of Using Completion Items

• are difficult to construct so that the desired response is clearly indicated.
• are more time consuming to score when compared to multiple-choice or true-false items.
• are more difficult to score since more than one answer may have to be considered correct if the item was not properly prepared.

Suggestions for Writing Completion Test Items

7.  Avoid lifting statements directly from the text, lecture or other sources.

8.  Limit the required response to a single word or phrase.

The essay test is probably the most popular of all types of teacher-made tests. In general, a classroom essay test consists of a small number of questions to which the student is expected to demonstrate his/her ability to (a) recall factual knowledge, (b) organize this knowledge and (c) present the knowledge in a logical, integrated answer to the question. An essay test item can be classified as either an extended-response essay item or a short-answer essay item. The latter calls for a more restricted or limited answer in terms of form or scope. An example of each type of essay item follows.

Sample Extended-Response Essay Item

Explain the difference between the S-R (Stimulus-Response) and the S-O-R (Stimulus-Organism-Response) theories of personality. Include in your answer (a) brief descriptions of both theories, (b) supporters of both theories and (c) research methods used to study each of the two theories. (10 pts.  20 minutes)

Sample Short-Answer Essay Item

Identify research methods used to study the S-R (Stimulus-Response) and S-O-R (Stimulus-Organism-Response) theories of personality. (5 pts.  10 minutes)

Advantages In Using Essay Items

Essay items...

• are easier and less time consuming to construct than are most other item types.
• provide a means for testing student's ability to compose an answer and present it in a logical manner.
• can efficiently measure higher order cognitive objectives (e.g., analysis, synthesis, evaluation).

Limitations In Using Essay Items

• cannot measure a large amount of content or objectives.
• generally provide low test and test scorer reliability.
• require an extensive amount of instructor's time to read and grade.
• generally do not provide an objective measure of student achievement or ability (subject to bias on the part of the grader).

Suggestions for Writing Essay Test Items

4.  Ask questions that will elicit responses on which experts could agree that one answer is better than another.

5.  Avoid giving the student a choice among optional items as this greatly reduces the reliability of the test.

6.  It is generally recommended for classroom examinations to administer several short-answer items rather than only one or two extended-response items.

Suggestions for Scoring Essay Items

Examples essay item and grading models.

"Americans are a mixed-up people with no sense of ethical values. Everyone knows that baseball is far less necessary than food and steel, yet they pay ball players a lot more than farmers and steelworkers."

WHY? Use 3-4 sentences to indicate how an economist would explain the above situation.

Analytical Scoring

Global quality.

Assign scores or grades on the overall quality of the written response as compared to an ideal answer. Or, compare the overall quality of a response to other student responses by sorting the papers into three stacks:

Read and sort each stack again divide into three more stacks

In total, nine discriminations can be used to assign test grades in this manner. The number of stacks or discriminations can vary to meet your needs.

• Try not to allow factors which are irrelevant to the learning outcomes being measured affect your grading (i.e., handwriting, spelling, neatness).
• Read and grade all class answers to one item before going on to the next item.
• Read and grade the answers without looking at the students' names to avoid possible preferential treatment.
• Occasionally shuffle papers during the reading of answers to help avoid any systematic order effects (i.e., Sally's "B" work always followed Jim's "A" work thus it looked more like "C" work).
• When possible, ask another instructor to read and grade your students' responses.

Another form of a subjective test item is the problem solving or computational exam question. Such items present the student with a problem situation or task and require a demonstration of work procedures and a correct solution, or just a correct solution. This kind of test item is classified as a subjective type of item due to the procedures used to score item responses. Instructors can assign full or partial credit to either correct or incorrect solutions depending on the quality and kind of work procedures presented. An example of a problem solving test item follows.

Example Problem Solving Test Item

It was calculated that 75 men could complete a strip on a new highway in 70 days. When work was scheduled to commence, it was found necessary to send 25 men on another road project. How many days longer will it take to complete the strip? Show your work for full or partial credit.

Advantages In Using Problem Solving Items

Problem solving items...

• minimize guessing by requiring the students to provide an original response rather than to select from several alternatives.
• are easier to construct than are multiple-choice or matching items.
• can most appropriately measure learning objectives which focus on the ability to apply skills or knowledge in the solution of problems.
• can measure an extensive amount of content or objectives.

Limitations in Using Problem Solving Items

• require an extensive amount of instructor time to read and grade.
• generally do not provide an objective measure of student achievement or ability (subject to bias on the part of the grader when partial credit is given).

Suggestions For Writing Problem Solving Test Items

6.  Ask questions that elicit responses on which experts could agree that one solution and one or more work procedures are better than others.

7.  Work through each problem before classroom administration to double-check accuracy.

A performance test item is designed to assess the ability of a student to perform correctly in a simulated situation (i.e., a situation in which the student will be ultimately expected to apply his/her learning). The concept of simulation is central in performance testing; a performance test will simulate to some degree a real life situation to accomplish the assessment. In theory, a performance test could be constructed for any skill and real life situation. In practice, most performance tests have been developed for the assessment of vocational, managerial, administrative, leadership, communication, interpersonal and physical education skills in various simulated situations. An illustrative example of a performance test item is provided below.

Sample Performance Test Item

Assume that some of the instructional objectives of an urban planning course include the development of the student's ability to effectively use the principles covered in the course in various "real life" situations common for an urban planning professional. A performance test item could measure this development by presenting the student with a specific situation which represents a "real life" situation. For example,

An urban planning board makes a last minute request for the professional to act as consultant and critique a written proposal which is to be considered in a board meeting that very evening. The professional arrives before the meeting and has one hour to analyze the written proposal and prepare his critique. The critique presentation is then made verbally during the board meeting; reactions of members of the board or the audience include requests for explanation of specific points or informed attacks on the positions taken by the professional.

The performance test designed to simulate this situation would require that the student to be tested role play the professional's part, while students or faculty act the other roles in the situation. Various aspects of the "professional's" performance would then be observed and rated by several judges with the necessary background. The ratings could then be used both to provide the student with a diagnosis of his/her strengths and weaknesses and to contribute to an overall summary evaluation of the student's abilities.

Advantages In Using Performance Test Items

Performance test items...

• can most appropriately measure learning objectives which focus on the ability of the students to apply skills or knowledge in real life situations.
• usually provide a degree of test validity not possible with standard paper and pencil test items.
• are useful for measuring learning objectives in the psychomotor domain.

Limitations In Using Performance Test Items

• are difficult and time consuming to construct.
• are primarily used for testing students individually and not for testing groups. Consequently, they are relatively costly, time consuming, and inconvenient forms of testing.
• generally do not provide an objective measure of student achievement or ability (subject to bias on the part of the observer/grader).

Suggestions For Writing Performance Test Items

• Prepare items that elicit the type of behavior you want to measure.
• Clearly identify and explain the simulated situation to the student.
• Make the simulated situation as "life-like" as possible.
• Provide directions which clearly inform the students of the type of response called for.
• When appropriate, clearly state time and activity limitations in the directions.
• Adequately train the observer(s)/scorer(s) to ensure that they are fair in scoring the appropriate behaviors.

III. TWO METHODS FOR ASSESSING TEST ITEM QUALITY

This section presents two methods for collecting feedback on the quality of your test items. The two methods include using self-review checklists and student evaluation of test item quality. You can use the information gathered from either method to identify strengths and weaknesses in your item writing. 

Checklist for Evaluating Test Items

EVALUATE YOUR TEST ITEMS BY CHECKING THE SUGGESTIONS WHICH YOU FEEL YOU HAVE FOLLOWED.  

Grading Essay Test Items

Student evaluation of test item quality , using ices questionnaire items to assess your test item quality .

The following set of ICES (Instructor and Course Evaluation System) questionnaire items can be used to assess the quality of your test items. The items are presented with their original ICES catalogue number. You are encouraged to include one or more of the items on the ICES evaluation form in order to collect student opinion of your item writing quality.

IV. ASSISTANCE OFFERED BY THE CENTER FOR INNOVATION IN TEACHING AND LEARNING (CITL)

The information on this page is intended for self-instruction. However, CITL staff members will consult with faculty who wish to analyze and improve their test item writing. The staff can also consult with faculty about other instructional problems. Instructors wishing to acquire CITL assistance can contact [email protected] . 

V. REFERENCES FOR FURTHER READING

Ebel, R. L. (1965). Measuring educational achievement . Prentice-Hall. Ebel, R. L. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement . Prentice-Hall. Gronlund, N. E. (1976). Measurement and evaluation in teaching (3rd ed.). Macmillan. Mehrens W. A. & Lehmann I. J. (1973). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology . Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Nelson, C. H. (1970). Measurement and evaluation in the classroom . Macmillan. Payne, D. A. (1974).  The assessment of learning: Cognitive and affective . D.C. Heath & Co. Scannell, D. P., & Tracy D. B. (1975). Testing and measurement in the classroom . Houghton Mifflin. Thorndike, R. L. (1971). Educational measurement (2nd ed.). American Council on Education.

Center for Innovation in Teaching & Learning

249 Armory Building 505 East Armory Avenue Champaign, IL 61820

217 333-1462

Email: [email protected]

Office of the Provost