CPMG relaxation dispersion NMR experiments measuring glycine 1 H α and 13 C α chemical shifts in the ‘invisible’ excited states of proteins

  • Published: 25 March 2009
  • Volume 45 , pages 45–55, ( 2009 )

Cite this article

cpmg nmr experiment

  • Pramodh Vallurupalli 1 ,
  • D. Flemming Hansen 1 ,
  • Patrik Lundström 1 &
  • Lewis E. Kay 1  

3233 Accesses

40 Citations

Explore all metrics

Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) relaxation dispersion NMR experiments are extremely powerful for characterizing millisecond time-scale conformational exchange processes in biomolecules. A large number of such CPMG experiments have now emerged for measuring protein backbone chemical shifts of sparsely populated (>0.5%), excited state conformers that cannot be directly detected in NMR spectra and that are invisible to most other biophysical methods as well. A notable deficiency is, however, the absence of CPMG experiments for measurement of 1 H α and 13 C α chemical shifts of glycine residues in the excited state that reflects the fact that in this case the 1 H α , 13 C α spins form a three-spin system that is more complex than the AX 1 H α – 13 C α spin systems in the other amino acids. Here pulse sequences for recording 1 H α and 13 C α CPMG relaxation dispersion profiles derived from glycine residues are presented that provide information from which 1 H α , 13 C α chemical shifts can be obtained. The utility of these experiments is demonstrated by an application to a mutant of T4 lysozyme that undergoes a millisecond time-scale exchange process facilitating the binding of hydrophobic ligands to an internal cavity in the protein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime

Price excludes VAT (USA) Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

cpmg nmr experiment

Revisiting 1 H N CPMG relaxation dispersion experiments: a simple modification can eliminate large artifacts

cpmg nmr experiment

A methyl-TROSY based 13 C relaxation dispersion NMR experiment for studies of chemical exchange in proteins

Relaxation dispersion nmr spectroscopy for the study of protein allostery.

Austin RH, Beeson KW, Eisenstein L, Frauenfelder H, Gunsalus IC (1975) Dynamics of ligand binding to myoglobin. Biochemistry 14:5355–5373

Article   Google Scholar  

Bax A, Ikura M, Kay LE, Torchia DA, Tschudin R (1990) Comparison of different modes of 2-dimensional reverse-correlation NMR for the study of proteins. J Magn Reson 86:304–318

Google Scholar  

Boehr DD, McElheny D, Dyson HJ, Wright PE (2006) The dynamic energy landscape of dihydrofolate reductase catalysis. Science 313:1638–1642

Article   ADS   Google Scholar  

Burum DP, Ernst RR (1980) Net polarization transfer via a J-ordered state for signal enhancement of low-sensitivity nuclei. J Magn Reson 39:163–168

Carr HY, Purcell EM (1954) Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. Phys Rev 94:630–638

Cornilescu G, Delaglio F, Bax A (1999) Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology. J Biomol NMR 13:289–302

Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A (1995) NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR 6:277–293

Eriksson AE, Baase WA, Wozniak JA, Matthews BW (1992) A cavity-containing mutant of T4 lysozyme is stabilized by buried benzene. Nature 355:371–373

Feher VA, Baldwin EP, Dahlquist FW (1996) Access of ligands to cavities within the core of a protein is rapid. Nat Struct Biol 3:516–521

Geen H, Freeman R (1991) Band-selective radiofrequency pulses. J Magn Reson 93:93–141

Goddard TD, Kneller DG. SPARKY 3. University of California, San Francisco

Grey MJ, Wang C, Palmer AG III (2003) Disulfide bond isomerization in basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor: multisite chemical exchange quantified by CPMG relaxation dispersion and chemical shift modeling. J Am Chem Soc 125:14324–14335

Grey MJ, Tang Y, Alexov E, McKnight CJ, Raleigh DP, Palmer AG III (2006) Characterizing a partially folded intermediate of the villin headpiece domain under non-denaturing conditions: contribution of His41 to the pH-dependent stability of the N-terminal subdomain. J Mol Biol 355:1078–1094

Griffey RH, Redfield AG (1987) Proton-detected heteronuclear edited and correlated nuclear magnetic resonance and nuclear overhauser effect in solution. Q Rev Biophys 19:51–82

Grzesiek S, Bax A (1995) Spin-locked multiple quantum coherence for signal enhancement in heteronuclear multidimensional NMR experiments. J Biomol NMR 6:335–339

Hansen PE (2000) Isotope effects on chemical shifts of proteins and peptides. Magn Reson Chem 38:1–10

Hansen DF, Vallurupalli P, Kay LE (2008a) An improved 15N relaxation dispersion experiment for the measurement of millisecond time-scale dynamics in proteins. J Phys Chem B 112:5898–5904

Hansen DF, Vallurupalli P, Kay LE (2008b) Quantifying two-bond 1HN-13CO and one-bond 1H(alpha)-13C(alpha) dipolar couplings of invisible protein states by spin-state selective relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 130:8397–8405

Hansen DF, Vallurupalli P, Kay LE (2008c) Using relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy to determine structures of excited, invisible protein states. J Biomol NMR 41:113–120

Hansen DF, Vallurupalli P, Lundstrom P, Neudecker P, Kay LE (2008d) Probing chemical shifts of invisible states of proteins with relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy: How well can we do? J Am Chem Soc 130:2667–2675

Henzler-Wildman KA, Thai V, Lei M, Ott M, Wolf-Watz M, Fenn T, Pozharski E, Wilson MA, Petsko GA, Karplus M, Hubner CG, Kern D (2007) Intrinsic motions along an enzymatic reaction trajectory. Nature 450:838–844

Igumenova TI, Brath U, Akke M, Palmer AG III (2007) Characterization of chemical exchange using residual dipolar coupling. J Am Chem Soc 129:13396–13397

Ishima R, Torchia DA (2003) Extending the range of amide proton relaxation dispersion experiments in proteins using a constant-time relaxation-compensated CPMG approach. J Biomol NMR 25:243–248

Ishima R, Wingfield PT, Stahl SJ, Kaufman JD, Torchia DA (1998) Using amide H-1 and N-15 transverse relaxation to detect millisecond time-scale motions in perdeuterated proteins: application to HIV-1 protease. J Am Chem Soc 120:10534–10542

Karplus M (2000) Aspects of protein reaction dynamics: deviations from simple behavior. J Phys Chem B 104:11–27

Karplus M, Kuriyan J (2005) Molecular dynamics and protein function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:6679–6685

Korzhnev DM, Kay LE (2008) Probing invisible, low-populated states of protein molecules by relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy: an application to protein folding. Acc Chem Res 41:442–451

Korzhnev DM, Salvatella X, Vendruscolo M, Di Nardo AA, Davidson AR, Dobson CM, Kay LE (2004) Low-populated folding intermediates of Fyn SH3 characterized by relaxation dispersion NMR. Nature 430:586–590

Kupce E, Freeman R (1996) Optimized adiabatic pulses for wideband spin inversion. J Magn Reson A 118:299–303

Kushlan DM, Lemaster DM (1993) Resolution and sensitivity enhancement of heteronuclear correlation for methylene resonances via H-2-enrichment and decoupling. J Biomol NMR 3:701–708

Loria JP, Rance M, Palmer AG (1999) A relaxation-compensated Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill sequence for characterizing chemical exchange by NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 121:2331–2332

Lundstrom P, Hansen DF, Kay LE (2008) Measurement of carbonyl chemical shifts of excited protein states by relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy: comparison between uniformly and selectively (13)C labeled samples. J Biomol NMR 42:35–47

Lundstrom P, Hansen DF, Vallurupalli P, Kay LE (2009) Accurate measurement of alpha proton chemical shifts of excited protein states by relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 131:1915–1926

Marion D, Ikura M, Tschudin R, Bax A (1989) Rapid recording of 2D NMR spectra without phase cycling. Application to the study of hydrogen exchange in proteins. J Magn Reson 85:393–399

Meiboom S, Gill D (1958) Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times. Rev Sci Instrum 29:688–691

Miclet E, Williams DC, Clore GM, Bryce DL, Boisbouvier J, Bax A (2004) Relaxation-optimized NMR spectroscopy of methylene groups in proteins and nucleic acids. J Am Chem Soc 126:10560–10570

Mittermaier A, Kay LE (2006) New tools provide new insights in NMR studies of protein dynamics. Science 312:224–228

Mulder FA, Hon B, Muhandiram DR, Dahlquist FW, Kay LE (2000) Flexibility and ligand exchange in a buried cavity mutant of T4 lysozyme studied by multinuclear NMR. Biochemistry 39:12614–12622

Mulder FA, Mittermaier A, Hon B, Dahlquist FW, Kay LE (2001a) Studying excited states of proteins by NMR spectroscopy. Nat Struct Biol 8:932–935

Mulder FA, Skrynnikov NR, Hon B, Dahlquist FW, Kay LE (2001b) Measurement of slow (micros-ms) time scale dynamics in protein side chains by (15)N relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy: application to Asn and Gln residues in a cavity mutant of T4 lysozyme. J Am Chem Soc 123:967–975

Palmer AG (2004) NMR characterization of the dynamics of biomacromolecules. Chem Rev 104:3623–3640

Palmer AG, Cavanagh J, Wright PE, Rance M (1991) Sensitivity improvement in proton-detected 2-dimensional heteronuclear correlation Nmr-spectroscopy. J Magn Reson 93:151–170

Palmer AG III, Kroenke CD, Loria JP (2001) Nuclear magnetic resonance methods for quantifying microsecond-to-millisecond motions in biological macromolecules. Methods Enzymol 339:204–238

Ramakrishnan C, Ramachandran GN (1965) Stereochemical criteria for polypeptide and protein chain conformations.2. Allowed conformations for a pair of peptide units. Biophys J 5:909–933

Roy S, Papastavros MZ, Sanchez V, Redfield AG (1984) Nitrogen-15-labeled yeast tRNAPhe: double and two-dimensional heteronuclear NMR of guanosine and uracil ring NH groups. Biochemistry 23:4395–4400

Shaka AJ, Keeler J, Frenkiel T, Freeman R (1983) An improved sequence for broad-band decoupling-Waltz-16. J Magn Reson 52:335–338

Skrynnikov NR, Dahlquist FW, Kay LE (2002) Reconstructing NMR spectra of “invisible” excited protein states using HSQC and HMQC experiments. J Am Chem Soc 124:12352–12360

States DJ, Haberkorn RA, Ruben DJ (1982) A two-dimensional nuclear overhauser experiment with pure absorption phase in 4 quadrants. J Magn Reson 48:286–292

Sugase K, Dyson HJ, Wright PE (2007) Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein. Nature 447:1021–1025

Vallurupalli P, Kay LE (2006) Complementarity of ensemble and single-molecule measures of protein motion: a relaxation dispersion NMR study of an enzyme complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:11910–11915

Vallurupalli P, Hansen DF, Stollar E, Meirovitch E, Kay LE (2007a) Measurement of bond vector orientations in invisible excited states of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18473–18477

Vallurupalli P, Scott L, Williamson JR, Kay LE (2007b) Strong coupling effects during X-pulse CPMG experiments recorded on heteronuclear ABX spin systems: artifacts and a simple solution. J Biomol NMR 38:41–46

Vallurupalli P, Hansen DF, Kay LE (2008a) Probing structure in invisible protein states with anisotropic NMR chemical shifts. J Am Chem Soc 130:2734–2735

Vallurupalli P, Hansen DF, Kay LE (2008b) Structures of invisible, excited protein states by relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11766–11771

Watt ED, Shimada H, Kovrigin EL, Loria JP (2007) The mechanism of rate-limiting motions in enzyme function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:11981–11986

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by funds from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) in the form of a research grant to LEK and postdoctoral fellowships to DFH and PL (Protein Folding Training Grant). LEK holds a Canada Research Chair in Biochemistry.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Departments of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry and Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada

Pramodh Vallurupalli, D. Flemming Hansen, Patrik Lundström & Lewis E. Kay

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lewis E. Kay .

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 279 kb)

Rights and permissions.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Vallurupalli, P., Hansen, D.F., Lundström, P. et al. CPMG relaxation dispersion NMR experiments measuring glycine 1 H α and 13 C α chemical shifts in the ‘invisible’ excited states of proteins. J Biomol NMR 45 , 45–55 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-009-9310-6

Download citation

Received : 12 January 2009

Revised : 18 February 2009

Accepted : 26 February 2009

Published : 25 March 2009

Issue Date : September 2009

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-009-9310-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Relaxation dispersion
  • Excited protein states
  • T4 lysozyme
  • Millisecond dynamics
  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

AIP Publishing Logo

  • Previous Article
  • Next Article

Breakdown of Carr-Purcell Meiboom-Gill spin echoes in inhomogeneous fields

[email protected]

  • Split-Screen
  • Article contents
  • Figures & tables
  • Supplementary Data
  • Peer Review
  • Open the PDF for in another window
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Cite Icon Cite
  • Search Site

Nanette N. Jarenwattananon , Louis-S. Bouchard; Breakdown of Carr-Purcell Meiboom-Gill spin echoes in inhomogeneous fields. J. Chem. Phys. 28 August 2018; 149 (8): 084304. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5043495

Download citation file:

  • Ris (Zotero)
  • Reference Manager

The Carr-Purcell Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) experiment has been used for decades to measure nuclear-spin transverse ( T 2 ) relaxation times. In the presence of magnetic field inhomogeneities, the limit of short interpulse spacings yields the intrinsic T 2 time. Here, we show that the signal decay in such experiments exhibits fundamentally different behaviors between liquids and gases. In gases, the CPMG unexpectedly fails to eliminate the inhomogeneous broadening due to the non-Fickian nature of the motional averaging.

Previously, we found that the decay of nuclear induction signal in a magnetic field gradient differs fundamentally in gases compared with liquids, as manifested in the temperature dependence of the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) linewidth. 1,2 In the conventional description of NMR, the spectral lines should broaden in a gradient of the magnetic field as temperature increases, 3 which results in a larger diffusion coefficient. However, we found experimentally that in gases, the NMR linewidth instead decreases with temperature, which is consistent with a motional narrowing effect. The importance of this motional narrowing effect was not predicted by the conventional theory. 3,4 This conventional theory 4 was extended by Herzog and Hahn 5 by modeling of the random fluctuations in the resonance frequency (rather than the phase shift) as a Markovian process. An extensive discussion of the exponential time-cubed echo decays can be found in Ref. 6 . In the case of a liquid, the original Hahn result 4 is obtained as a special case. However, the Markovian approach yields an incorrect temperature dependence for gases. In Ref. 2 , we explain that the stochastic process describing the particle velocity process in gases must follow a generalized Langevin equation with memory kernel rather than a memoryless (Markovian) process.

In this article, we demonstrate that this difference in motional averaging between gases and liquids also manifests itself in the signal decay of Carr-Purcell Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) spin echoes. In liquids, a series of spin echoes in the limit of short interpulse spacings minimizes signal decay effects due to diffusion in a gradient (as expected from the conventional theory 3 ). For gases, however, we find that the CPMG is unable to eliminate this signal decay in the limit of short interpulse spacings. This result implies that any T 2 - or diffusion-weighted NMR measurements of gases made in the presence of magnetic susceptibility gradients or applied field gradients are potentially compromised.

In a 90° − τ − 180° − τ spin-echo experiment, the free induction signal in the presence of a magnetic field gradient is given by Hahn’s famous result, 3,4

in which 2 τ is the evolution time (total length of the spin-echo experiment), T 2 is the intrinsic spin-spin relaxation time, γ is the nuclear gyromagnetic ratio, D is the self-diffusion coefficient, and g is the magnetic field gradient ( g = ∂H z / ∂r , where r is a spatial direction). In the absence of a large magnetic field inhomogeneity and large diffusivity, the expression collapses to exp(−2 τ / T 2 ). The result (1) assumes that the Einstein-Fick limit holds, implying that we can make the approximation to the position autocorrelation function (PAF), ⟨ x ( t ) x (0)⟩ ≈ ⟨ x ( t ) x ( t )⟩ = 2 Dt ; i.e., the PAF is approximated by the mean square displacement.

According to the same conventional theory, the signal in the CPMG experiment, which features a train of n echoes (Fig. 1 ), decays according to 3,7,8

where n 2 τ is the total duration of the sequence, which is held fixed. In practice, an upper bound on 2 nτ is imposed by the relaxation time of the sample. In the limit of short echo spacing ( τ → 0, holding n 2 τ constant), the CPMG minimizes the effect of molecular self-diffusion on nuclear spin decoherence in inhomogeneous magnetic fields. Under these conditions, the contribution of the inhomogeneous term becomes negligible, recovering exp(− n 2 τ / T 2 ).

FIG. 1. Measurement of T2 in an inhomogeneous field (gradient, g) using a CPMG sequence. A 90° radio frequency (r.f.) pulse tips the magnetization, which is refocussed by a series of n 180° pulses at intervals of 2τ.

Measurement of T 2 in an inhomogeneous field (gradient, g ) using a CPMG sequence. A 90° radio frequency (r.f.) pulse tips the magnetization, which is refocussed by a series of n 180° pulses at intervals of 2 τ .

However, the expression (2) only holds for substances whose diffusional properties obey the Einstein-Fick limit, which mainly applies to liquids. Gases typically lie outside the Einstein-Fick limit. We have derived in prior work an expression for signal decay in gases, 1,2

where κ is a term that depends on the PAF of diffusing molecules. It depends, among other things, on temperature and viscosity. We note that the time dependence is τ , not τ 3 . This difference in exponents has important consequences. Namely, the application of a CPMG sequence with n echoes

no longer eliminates the second term describing inhomogeneous field decay in the limit of short interpulse spacing τ → 0 (2 nτ is fixed). Thus, any measurement of T 2 in a gas using a CPMG sequence will yield an apparent T 2 value that is affected by diffusivity effects in the inhomogeneous magnetic field. This could include, for example, unwanted weightings due to temperature, viscosity, external hardware, pulse sequence design, magnetic susceptibility, and pore geometry. This is in contrast to the case of liquids, where diffusion effects can be mitigated by extrapolation to extract the true (intrinsic) T 2 time.

Consider the CPMG experiment (Fig. 1 ) with a 90° broadband pulse and a series of 180° pulses to refocus the magnetization at intervals of 2 τ . The following phases were applied in the CPMG sequence: 90 ° x − τ − ( 180 ° y − τ − τ ) n ⁠ , where the 180° pulse is repeated n times. For each τ value, the echo envelope was acquired in a single-shot experiment. An external magnetic field gradient during the course of the experiment creates an inhomogeneous magnetic field. For gas-phase experiments, a sealable 5 mm diameter J. Young NMR tube was filled with liquid and freeze-pump-thawed to evacuate excess air. The NMR tube was heated by the NMR spectrometer’s variable temperature unit until the tube was vaporized. For liquid-phase experiments, a solution of 0.5% weight/volume tetramethylsilane (TMS) in acetone- d 6 was degassed and flame-sealed in an NMR tube. Measurements were performed on a 14.1 T vertical bore Bruker AV 600 MHz NMR spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm broadband probe with a z -gradient. The receiver was operated in qsim mode (forward Fourier transform, quadrature detection). The pulses were hard pulses whose lengths were 16 μ s and 32 μ s for the 90° and 180° pulses, respectively. The size of the sensitive RF region is less than 1 cm. All NMR signals were analyzed in magnitude mode and decay functions included baseline subtraction.

We take an explicit look at the time decay of the CPMG echo train, which, the theory [cf. Eqs. (1) and (3) ] predicts, should exhibit fundamentally different behavior ( t 3 vs t 1 , respectively). A direct verification is obtained by plotting the NMR signal in the CPMG experiment versus time along the echo train (see Fig. 2 ). The normalized NMR signal decay of the CPMG spin echo (with an interpulse spacing of 5 ms) for liquid-phase TMS is plotted in Fig. 2(a) . The normalized NMR signal decay of the CPMG spin echo (with an interpulse spacing of 5 ms) is plotted in Fig. 2(b) for gas-phase TMS. For gas, the normalized NMR signal decays exponentially, according to exp(− t / T 2 ) exp(− t / b ), in agreement with our revised theory of the NMR linewidth. We note that neither alteration of the phase cycling scheme to 90 ° x − ( 180 ° y − 180 ° − y ) n nor replacement of the 180° pulse with a 90° x /180° y /90° x composite pulse affected the results.

FIG. 2. Direct verification that signal decay in the presence of a magnetic field gradient follows a time dependence of the form exp(−t/T2) exp(−t/b) for the gas and exp(−t/T2)exp(−(t/b2)3) for the liquid (solid lines, fit; dots, data). Here, we show sample CPMG decay curves for τ = 5 ms and g = 0, 0.01, 0.05, and 0.5 G/cm. (a) Liquid-phase TMS (t1). Number of scans (ns) = 1. (b) Gas-phase TMS (t3). ns = 8. In both liquid and gas cases, we scanned multiple acquisitions (ns = 1 and 8 for liquid and gas, respectively), and a T2 value with experimental error bars was derived for Fig. 3. The fits to the respective models are excellent. Fits to the converse equation (t1 ↔ t3) do not yield acceptable fits (not shown here).

Direct verification that signal decay in the presence of a magnetic field gradient follows a time dependence of the form exp(− t / T 2 ) exp(− t / b ) for the gas and exp ( − t / T 2 ) exp ( − ( t / b 2 ) 3 ) for the liquid (solid lines, fit; dots, data). Here, we show sample CPMG decay curves for τ = 5 ms and g = 0, 0.01, 0.05, and 0.5 G/cm. (a) Liquid-phase TMS ( t 1 ). Number of scans (ns) = 1. (b) Gas-phase TMS ( t 3 ). ns = 8. In both liquid and gas cases, we scanned multiple acquisitions (ns = 1 and 8 for liquid and gas, respectively), and a T 2 value with experimental error bars was derived for Fig. 3 . The fits to the respective models are excellent. Fits to the converse equation ( t 1 ↔ t 3 ) do not yield acceptable fits (not shown here).

Measurements of the CPMG echo train signal decay as a function of interpulse spacing τ for TMS in the liquid phase are shown in Fig. 3(a) . Figure 3(b) shows the corresponding experiment in the gas phase. TMS is a liquid at room temperature but a gas at 26 °C; thus, a modest temperature increase enables comparison of the same substance in two different phases. TMS was also chosen due to its long relaxation times in both liquid and gas phases, enabling us to apply a large number of refocusing pulses even at long τ values. For liquids, as the interpulse spacing decreases, the measured T 2 value approaches a single value irrespective of the applied gradient strength g , as if there was no external gradient [Figs. 3(a) and 3(c) ]. This corresponds to the limit τ → 0 in Eq. (2) . Extrapolation of T 2 to the limit τ → 0 is the most commonly used method to extract true T 2 times in the presence of magnetic field inhomogeneities (from external or internal fields). For gases, however, the T 2 values in the limit τ → 0 do not approach a single value [Figs. 3(b) and 3(d) ] but instead converge to different values depending on the applied gradient strength g . This fundamentally different behavior implies that the inhomogeneous field decay term is still present, as predicted by Eq. (4) .

FIG. 3. T2 relaxation time of tetramethylsilane (TMS) vs interpulse spacing τ under conditions of magnetic field inhomogeneity (field gradient g, in G/cm). (a) Liquid-phase T2 values approach the limit of no applied gradient as τ → 0. T2 values shown range from 50 ms to 20 s. τ values shown range from 1 ms to 100 ms. Inset: Expansion of red boxed region. (b) Gas-phase T2 values do not converge to a single value as τ → 0. T2 values shown range from 18 ms to 1 s. τ values shown range from 1 ms to 100 ms. Inset: Expansion of red boxed region in A. (c) Data from (a) plotted on a linear scale. The straight lines are linear extrapolations as τ → 0. The g values are the same as in (a). (d) Data from (b) plotted on a linear scale. The straight lines are linear extrapolations as τ → 0. The g values are the same as in (b).

T 2 relaxation time of tetramethylsilane (TMS) vs interpulse spacing τ under conditions of magnetic field inhomogeneity (field gradient g , in G/cm). (a) Liquid-phase T 2 values approach the limit of no applied gradient as τ → 0. T 2 values shown range from 50 ms to 20 s. τ values shown range from 1 ms to 100 ms. Inset: Expansion of red boxed region. (b) Gas-phase T 2 values do not converge to a single value as τ → 0. T 2 values shown range from 18 ms to 1 s. τ values shown range from 1 ms to 100 ms. Inset: Expansion of red boxed region in A. (c) Data from (a) plotted on a linear scale. The straight lines are linear extrapolations as τ → 0. The g values are the same as in (a). (d) Data from (b) plotted on a linear scale. The straight lines are linear extrapolations as τ → 0. The g values are the same as in (b).

In this study, we have confirmed the t 1 dependence in the NMR signal decay function of gases in the presence of an external gradient [Eqs. (3) and (4) ]. In our prior work, we had verified the temperature dependence of the linewidth. 1 The verification of the t 1 time dependence can be considered the missing part of the puzzle, which now unambiguously confirms the validity of the revised linewidth theory presented in Ref. 1 . The g 2 dependence has already been verified in our previous paper. 1  

The fundamentally different motional averaging behavior of the NMR experiment in gases has important implications for several experiments. This behavior has previously led to the development of a novel non-invasive method for mapping temperatures of gases. 9 Gas-phase MRI experiments that utilize frequency-encoding gradients could be affected; gradients during readout affect measurements of T 2 or diffusion, introducing an apparent coupling between them. This means that a quantitative interpretation of these parameters would need to account for the non-Fickian nature of the diffusion. Dynamic decoupling schemes such as the Uhrig sequence, 10 which aim at generating the longest possible coherence times, are also expected to break down in the case of gases because short τ values no longer guarantee the elimination of environmental factors. Finally, the interpretation of restricted diffusion results 11–19 in porous media and other confined geometries may require new theoretical developments that model the signal decay in restricted environments in light of the new theory of signal decay.

This work was partially funded by a Beckman Young Investigator Award and the National Science Foundation through Grant Nos. CHE-1153159 and CHE-1508707.

Citing articles via

Submit your article.

cpmg nmr experiment

Sign up for alerts

cpmg nmr experiment

Related Content

  • Online ISSN 1089-7690
  • Print ISSN 0021-9606
  • For Researchers
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Our Publishing Partners  
  • Physics Today
  • Conference Proceedings
  • Special Topics

pubs.aip.org

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Connect with AIP Publishing

This feature is available to subscribers only.

Sign In or Create an Account