in case study 4 1 regarding the hamm kidnapping

• Skip to Main Content
• Skip to audio player to listen live

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

A verification code has been emailed to

90 years ago, Hamm's heir kidnapped in broad daylight in St. Paul

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Ninety years ago this week, a St. Paul brewery magnate was kidnapped in broad daylight — snatched by four men on his way home.

The dramatic kidnapping of 39-year-old Hamm’s brewery heir, William Hamm Jr., made regional and national headlines in 1933.

His kidnappers asked for $100,000 ransom — equivalent to over $2 million in today’s money.

The story paints a picture of 1930s St. Paul. The so-called “O’Connor System,” named after the city’s police chief John O’Connor, made the city a refuge for criminals, Paul Maccabee told MPR News host Cathy Wurzer.

Support Local News

When breaking news happens, MPR News provides the context you need. Help us meet the significant demands of these newsgathering efforts.

Maccabee is author of “John Dillinger Slept Here: A Crooks' Tour of Crime and Corruption in St. Paul. ”

“John Dillinger, Baby Face Nelson, any gangster could come to St. Paul. As long as they were on their good behavior,” he said. “They could go to Minneapolis and kill whoever they wanted to. They could go to Iowa and rob a bank. But when they came to St. Paul, they had to be on their best behavior.”

The Barker-Karpis gang were behind this crime. Fred Barker, Alvin Karpis and Arthur “Doc” Barker were known for robbing banks and trains, and they flocked to the city as a haven.

Folks in St. Paul didn’t mind — for a while. They bragged about rubbing elbows with famous gangsters. But Hamm’s kidnapping shook St. Paul, and cracks began to show in the O’Connor System.

“In four days, the ransom was paid. And the Barker-Karpis gang got away with it. The money has never been recovered,” Maccabee said. Hamm was released unharmed.

“And needless to say, the wealthy people, the people in the mansions on Summit Avenue, they were terrified that they would be next.”

At the time of the kidnapping, prohibition was winding down. The Theodore Hamm Brewing Company had already been operating for nearly 78 years, and its owners were wealthy, influential people in Minnesota.

The FBI got involved. They used then state-of-the-art technology to “dust” for fingerprints on the ransom note — tying the gang to the crime.

Months later, the same gang would kidnap wealthy banker Edward Bremmer, Jr., heir to the Schmidt brewery fortune. Then, things really started to fall apart with the “O’Connor System.”

“Ten families from St. Paul hired a private detective. He wiretapped the St. Paul Police Department,” Maccabee said. “It had the cops talking to the crooks, on on tape, as it were, that was published in the St. Paul Daily News. And the embarrassment, the humiliation in St. Paul, that they tolerated the crooks caused a clean house in St. Paul.”

The crooked cops of O’Connor’s era were driven out.

As for the gangsters in the kidnapping: Fred Barker was killed in a shootout with FBI agents in 1935. Doc Barker and Karpis were sent to Alcatraz, where Doc died shortly after an escape attempt in 1939.

Hamm died in 1970 at the age of 87.

Use the audio player above to listen to the full conversation. 

Subscribe to the Minnesota Now podcast on  Apple Podcasts ,  Google Podcasts ,  Spotify  or wherever you get your podcasts.    

We attempt to make transcripts for Minnesota Now available the next business day after a broadcast. When ready they will appear here.

Audio transcript

Download transcript (pdf).

Transcription services provided by 3Play Media .

Minnesota Good Age

The premier resource for active Minnesotans age 55 and older

Abducted in St. Paul!

In a city known as a gangster haven, bribes and ransoms helped bolster organized crime.

On June 15, 1933, a kidnapping shook St. Paul.

William Hamm Jr., the president of Hamm’s Brewing Co., was grabbed by the Barker-Karpis gang while walking home on his lunch break.

A $100,000 ransom secured Hamm’s release a few days later on June 19, but the case marked a new era in St. Paul crime.

St. Paul already had a well-established reputation as a gangster haven, due to an agreement instituted by Chief of Police John O’Connor in 1900.

The police would allow criminals to stay in St. Paul as long as they checked in when they arrived, paid bribes and agreed to commit no major crimes within city limits.

Over the years, everyone from John Dillinger to Bonnie and Clyde spent time in St. Paul, taking advantage of the deal.

The Barker-Karpis gang was well known for bank robberies, but in 1933, they turned to kidnapping and ransom as a new source of income.

While many breweries went under during Prohibition and the Great Depression, Hamm’s persisted. In 1933, it was one of the country’s most profitable breweries, making its president an attractive target.

The gang carefully planned Hamm’s kidnapping, even bringing in a strategist from Al Capone’s Chicago syndicate to help.

Fred Barker and Alvin Karpis frequently tailed Hamm to study his habits and case his Cable Avenue mansion.

They also offered a St. Paul officer $25,000 of the ransom money in exchange for keeping the gang a step ahead of the police.

At 12:45 p.m. on June 15, Hamm left his office and was stopped by a man who reached to shake his hand, asking,

“You are Mr. Hamm, are you not?”

Hamm was steered to the curb and pushed into a waiting car. The gang drove to a hideout in Bensenville, Ill.

When asked to name a trusted intermediary between the gang and his family, Hamm chose his brewery’s sales manager, William Dunn.

When the ransom demand came, Dunn, called the police, and the FBI quickly got involved as well.

The gang communicated their demands through typed ransom notes, and it soon became clear that they were anticipating the police’s moves.

When cops considered setting a trap at the ransom drop spot, the next note demanded Dunn remove his vehicle’s doors and hang a red light to prove no one was hiding inside.

On June 17, Dunn drove to the instructed drop spot on a highway outside of Pine City, waited for five headlight flashes and then placed $100,000 on the side of the road.

Two days later, Hamm was released in a farm field, 50 miles north of St. Paul.

Within a few months, the Barker- Karpis gang struck again in January 1934, kidnapping Edward Bremer, president of Commercial State Bank and heir to Schmidt Brewing Company. Bremer was released a few weeks later in exchange for $200,000.

Throughout the Hamm and Bremer cases, the FBI became increasingly suspicious that someone was leaking information.

The source?

The head of St. Paul’s kidnap squad, Thomas A. Brown, a former chief of police with a history of connections to organized crime.

He was ultimately dismissed from the force, but never prosecuted.

The Barker-Karpis gang managed to elude the FBI for a few more years.

Fred Barker died in a gun battle with FBI agents in 1935. (His brother, Doc, was eventually arrested in Chicago and found guilty of Bremer’s kidnapping.)

Alvin Karpis remained at large and became Public Enemy No. 1. When Karpis was finally caught, J. Edgar Hoover personally escorted him to St. Paul. He ultimately pled guilty to the Hamm and Bremer kidnappings and was sentenced to life in prison in 1936.

By then, after years of FBI work, many of the gang’s colleagues had also been caught or killed by police, and St. Paul’s gangster era was on its way out.

Lauren Peck is a media relations and social media associate for the Minnesota Historical Society .

Learn more about St. Paul’s gangster history in John Dillinger Slept Here: A Crooks’ Tour of Crime and Corruption in St. Paul, 1920-1936 by Paul Maccabee.

Beer aficionados can also delve into St. Paul’s alcohol-soaked past from Hamm’s to Summit — and sample some modern-day brews — on the Minnesota Historical Society’s Brewing History Bus Tour. See mnhs.org for details.

'Creepy' Karpis and His Gang of Kidnappers

The Hamm Kidnapping

On a warm summer evening in 1933, William A. Hamm, Jr., President of the Theodore Hamm Brewing Company, was working at his office in St. Paul, Minnesota. He had just exited the building when he was grabbed by four shadowed figures and pushed into the back of a car. What he didn't know was that he had been kidnapped by members of the Barker/Karpis gang, for a ransom of over $100,000.

Hamm was taken to Wisconsin, where he was forced to sign four ransom notes. Then he was moved to a hideout in Bensenville, Illinois, were he was held prisoner until the kidnappers had been paid. Once the money was handed over, Hamm was released near Wyoming, Minnesota. The plan was perfect and went off without a hitch...almost.

Related Articles

to submit an obituary

To place an obituary, please include the information from the obituary checklist below in an email to [email protected] . There is no option to place them through our website. Feel free to contact our obituary desk at 651-228-5263 with any questions.

General Information:

• Your full name,
• Address (City, State, Zip Code),
• Phone number,
• And an alternate phone number (if any)

Obituary Specification:

• Name of Deceased,
• Obituary Text,
• A photo in a JPEG or PDF file is preferable, TIF and other files are accepted, we will contact you if there are any issues with the photo.
• Ad Run dates
• There is a discount for running more than one day, but this must be scheduled on the first run date to apply.
• If a photo is used, it must be used for both days for the discount to apply, contact us for more information.

Verification of Death:

In order to publish obituaries a name and phone number of funeral home/cremation society is required. We must contact the funeral home/cremation society handling the arrangements during their business hours to verify the death. If the body of the deceased has been donated to the University of Minnesota Anatomy Bequest Program, or a similar program, their phone number is required for verification.

Please allow enough time to contact them especially during their limited weekend hours.

A death certificate is also acceptable for this purpose but only one of these two options are necessary.

Guestbook and Outside Websites:

We are not allowed to reference other media sources with a guestbook or an obituary placed elsewhere when placing an obituary in print and online. We may place a website for a funeral home or a family email for contact instead; contact us with any questions regarding this matter.

Obituary Process:

Once your submission is completed, we will fax or email a proof for review prior to publication in the newspaper. This proof includes price and days the notice is scheduled to appear.

Please review the proof carefully. We must be notified of errors or changes before the notice appears in the Pioneer Press based on each day’s deadlines.

After publication, we will not be responsible for errors that may occur after final proofing.

All obituaries appear on TwinCities.com with a permanent online guestbook presence. If you wish to have the online presence removed, you can contact us to remove the guestbook online. Changes to an online obituary can be handled through the obituary desk. Call us with further questions.

Payment Procedure:

Pre-payment is required for all obituary notices prior to publication by the deadline specified below in our deadline schedule. Please call 651-228-5263 with your payment information after you have received the proof and approved its contents.

Credit Card: Payment accepted by phone only due to PCI (Payment Card Industry) regulations

EFT: Check by phone. Please provide your routing number and account number.

Cash: Accepted at our FRONT COUNTER Monday – Friday from 8:00AM – 3:30PM

• The minimum charge is $162 for the first 10 lines.
• Every line after the first 10 is $12.20.
• If the ad is under 10 lines it will be charged the minimum rate of $162.
• On a second run date, the lines are $8.20 per line, starting w/ the first line.
• For example: if first run date was 20 lines the cost would be $164.
• Each photo published is $125 per day.
• For example: 2 photos in the paper on 2 days would be 4 photo charges at $500.

Please follow deadline times to ensure your obituary is published on the day requested.

MEMORIAM (NON-OBITUARY) REQUEST

Unlike an obituary, Memoriam submissions are remembrances of a loved one who has passed. The rates for a memoriam differ from obituaries.

Please call or email us for more memoriam information

Please call 651-228-5280 for more information.

HOURS: Monday – Friday 8:00AM – 5:00PM (CLOSED WEEKENDS and HOLIDAYS)

Please submit your memoriam ad to [email protected] or call 651-228-5280.

News | William Hamm kidnapped; $100,000 asked; pay or…

Share this:.

• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to print (Opens in new window)
• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
• Submit to Stumbleupon (Opens in new window)

Today's Paper

• Government & Politics
• Environment

News | William Hamm kidnapped; $100,000 asked; pay or we kill him, note says

Taxi driver identifies verne sankey as man who gave him ransom demand for return of st. paul brewer.

When it became evident such contact could not be made immediately, it was decided to make public the abduction and enlist the aid of the publica in apprehending the kidnappers.

Following identification of a picture of Verne Sankey, kidnapper of Haskell Bohn, 21-year-old St. Paul youth a year ago, police immediately renewed a search for the South Dakotan.

Sankey also is sought for the kidnapping of Charles Boettcher II from his Denver home and at one time was suspected of having a hand in the kidnapping of the Charles Lindbergh baby in the east. Mrs. Sankey recently was acquitted of complicity in the Bohn kidnapping, but one other member of the gang is in Stillwater prison. He is Ray Robinson.

Mr. Hamm is president and treasurer of the Theo. Hamm Brewing Co., 681 East Minnehaha street. He lives at the old family home at 671 Cable avenue.

First news of the kidnapping was received at 5 P.M. Thursday by William W. Dunn, 1916 Summit avenue, Hamm brewery manager. Mr. Dunn last saw Mr. Hamm at 12:20 P.M. the same day.

A telephone call to Mr. Dunn revealed the abduction.

“We have kidnapped Mr. Hamm,” said a voice. “You will hear from us later.”

RANSOM NOTE DELIVERED

The next morning Mr. Dunn received a note, which stated that Mr. Hamm was being held for $100,000 Ransom and that unless the money was paid Mr. Hamm would be killed. Attached to the bottom of the kidnappers note was a postscript signed by Mr. Hamm, in which he urged immediate payment of the money.

The note, which asked that the money be delivered in denominations of $5, $10 and $20, was delivered by a taxi driver, who told police he was approached by a man Thursday night.

“This man told me,” the driver related to the police, “that he would give me $2 if I would take the note to 1916 Summit Avenue, Mr. Dunn’s home. He added that his name was ‘Gordon’ and he lived in the Hotel Lowry. I took the note and delivered it.”

Subsequent investigation disclosed that the room number given by the so-called “Gordon” was that of a department manager of a loop store, who had lived in the hotel for years.

MAN IDENTIFIED AS SANKEY

Because of the recent Haskell Bohn case, in which Verne Sankey was sought, police displayed a picture of Sankey to the driver. He immediately identified it as “Gordon,” the man who gave him the note.

The note further stated that the payers of the ransom were to use a truck of the brewing company in contacting the abductors. One man was to drive the truck, which was to be entirely open, that is the sides or canvas covering removed so that the interior would be clearly visible from a passing automobile.

Police and county officials were forced to work with the utmost secrecy because of the fear they felt for Mr. Hamm’s life. The note cautioned Mr. Dunn not to disclose the fact that his employer had been abducted. At first Mr. Dunn was inclined to treat the telephone call as a joke. When he discovered that Mr. Hamm had not been home for lunch, he took the case to the police and the county attorney’s office.

Mr. Hamm is the son of the late William Hamm, who died June 11, 1931. He is the director of the First National Bank, First Bank Stock Corporation, president of the Emporium and receiver for the Minnesota Amusement Corp. He is also a member of the Athletic, Minnesota and Town & Country clubs.

More in News

SUBSCRIBER ONLY

Education | rochester charter school ordered closed by governing body after investigation.

World News | Russian missiles blast Ukrainian military academy and hospital, killing more than 50, officials say

Health | What to know about delta-8 and other common vape shop drugs

News | Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community provides emergency assistance amid food shortage

Local News | 2 Minnesota turkeys will head to the White House in November

Education | Students at St. Paul’s Hidden River Middle School relocate during $43 million renovation

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• J R Soc Med
• v.102(1); 2009 Jan 1

Kidnapping and hostage-taking: a review of effects, coping and resilience

Introduction.

Although the history of kidnapping and hostage-taking is a very long one, it is only relatively recently that there has been a systematic attempt to understand the effects, both long-term and short-term, on individuals and their families. This is an important issue for clinical and academic reasons. The advice of mental health professionals is sought with increasing frequency with regard to the strategic management of hostage incidents and the clinical management of those who have been abducted. There is evidence to suggest that how best to help those who have been taken hostage is a sensitive and complex matter, and those who deal with such individuals should be as well informed as possible since such events can have long-term adverse consequences, particularly on young children.

This paper addresses the following:

• the background in terms of the history of this phenomenon, the motives behind it and the authorities' responses thereto;
• the psychological and physical effects of being taken hostage;
• coping and survival strategies;
• issues which require further research.

Early texts refer to the kidnapping of Abram's nephew (Lot), Julius Caesar and Richard the Lionheart. In medieval times, knights displayed their noble heritage through heraldic devices in the hope that their higher perceived market value would increase their chances of being kept alive for ransom rather than being killed. In the 17th century, children were stolen from their families for ‘export’ to the North American colonies as servants and labourers. (Hence, ‘kid’ meaning ‘child’, and ‘nap’ or ‘nab’ meaning ‘to snatch’.) Press-ganging was a means of ensuring an adequate supply of personnel for the merchant fleet during the 19th century.

Certain high profile events, much due to the efforts of the media, highlighted the psychological impact of kidnapping. For example, one of the earliest was the kidnapping on 1 March 1932 by Bruno Hauptmann, a German carpenter, of Colonel Charles Lindbergh's son for ransom. 1 The suffering of the child's parents, and the difficulties of the police enquiry, were exacerbated by widespread speculation and misinformation, and serial random notes. The mutilated body of the child was found and the perpetrator was executed on 3 April 1936. This event caused public revulsion, and the revision of the authorities' bargaining and investigating methods, particularly by the FBI, and even the suicide of a waitress to the family, who was cleared in the enquiries.

In 1972, the ‘Black September’ group (an auxiliary faction of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation) took hostage the Israeli wrestling team at the Munich Olympics. The unsuccessful negotiations, and the tragic deaths of the whole team during an abortive rescue effort by the German Border Police, were relayed throughout the world by the international media. 2 Also, after this tragedy, many international authorities revised their strategies for dealing with hostage incidents and sieges.

Motives for taking hostages

Motives can be divided into ‘expressive’ (i.e. an effort to voice and/or publicize a grievance or express a frustrated emotion) and ‘instrumental’ (i.e. to obtain a particular outcome such as ransom). 3 In reality it is usually difficult to identify any single motive, particularly when the event is terrorist-inspired. Material motives (e.g. ransom) may be conveniently masked by alleged religious, political and moral ones. Moreover, ransoms may be used to fund political and religious activities. Also, some insurgency groups sell hostages on to other groups for their own purposes.

The taking of foreign hostages has become a particularly popular modus operandi for terrorists (who tend to be well-organized and selective in their ‘target’ hostages), particularly due to their cynical but generally effective use of extensive media coverage. Also, the frequency of kidnapping of overseas personnel has markedly increased in Afghanistan since the US invasion in 2001. Unfortunately, the death toll among hostages is high in Afghanistan and Iraq. A particularly distasteful feature of hostage-taking in these countries is the video-taped executions of hostages, such as those of Nick Berg (a US businessman) and Ronald Schultz (a US security consultant), and their broadcast by Al Jazeera or Al Arabia: such broadcasts represent, however, a powerful psychological weapon, which, as indicated by Pape, 4 runs the risk of losing public support and sympathy.

Other areas which have become high-risk ones for hostage-taking are Nigeria and Colombia. Most incidents in the former are carried out by criminal gangs for ransom, such as the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta – MEND. Ransoms in both countries are often on a modest scale to ensure they can be paid. This strategy is sometimes referred to as ‘Express Kidnapping’. The frequency of hostage incidents in Colombia has increased 1600% between 1987 and 2000. 5 The motives there appear to be largely criminal, for financial gain, rather than political. Sometimes such events are described as ‘Economic Extortive Kidnapping’. These events can have demoralizing effects on families, who may lose all faith in supportive agencies and organizations, according to a follow-up study by Navia and Ossa. 5

Authorities' responses

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the prevailing model of dealing with such incidents, particularly in the prisons of the USA, had been the ‘Suppression Model’ (i.e. the use of overwhelming physical force). 6 This approach can still be used successfully as was shown by the interventions of the Special Air Service in response to the Iranian Embassy Siege in 1980 in London. However, such successes are not common, and they require extremely careful planning and execution. Armed response has now generally yielded to the techniques of negotiation and conflict resolution in recognition of the risks that an armed response creates for hostages. Such risks were tragically demonstrated at the 1972 Munich Olympics. 2 More recently, the catastrophic failures by the Russian authorities to rescue the patrons of the Dubrovka theatre in Moscow in 2002 and the children and staff of the Beslan school in 2004, confirmed how risky armed intervention by the authorities can be. The last two incidents resulted in the deaths of 130 and 334 hostages, respectively.

From a psychological point of view, negotiation ‘buys time’ to enable:

• hostages, perpetrators and the authorities to ‘cool down’;
• the authorities to clarify the motives of the perpetrator(s);
• the authorities to gather intelligence;
• the authorities to formulate a rescue strategy (should negotiation fail).

Unfortunately, from the hostages' point of view progress may seem to be very slow, and they commonly wonder why the authorities do not ‘do something’, including effecting their rescue by force.

Psychological and physical effects of being a hostage

For ethical and practical reasons, particularly if children are involved, the follow-up of hostages on release is difficult. 7 Thus, the scientific and clinical database is relatively modest. Much reliance is therefore placed on autobiographical and biographical accounts of high profile hostages (e.g. Waite, 8 Slater, 9 Keenan 10 and Shaw 11 ).

Psychological effects

In general terms, the psychological impact of being taken hostage is similar to that of being exposed to other trauma, including terrorist incidents and disasters for adults 12 and children. 13

Typical adult reactions include:

• Cognitive : impaired memory and concentration; confusion and disorientation; intrusive thoughts (‘flashbacks’) and memories; denial (i.e. that the event has happened); hypervigilance and hyperarousal (a state of feeling too aroused, with a profound fear of another incident);
• Emotional : shock and numbness; fear and anxiety (but panic is not common); 14 helplessness and hopelessness; dissociation (feeling numb and ‘switched off’ emotionally); anger (at anybody – perpetrators, themselves and the authorities); anhedonia (loss of pleasure in doing that which was previously pleasurable); depression (a reaction to loss); guilt (e.g. at having survived if others died, and for being taken hostage);
• Social : withdrawal; irritability; avoidance (of reminders of the event).

Denial (i.e. a complete or partial failure to acknowledge what has really happened) has often been maligned as a response to extreme stress, but it has survival value (at least in the short term) by allowing the individual a delayed period during which he/she has time to adjust to a painful reality. For example, some hostages in the Moscow theatre siege initially believed that the appearance of the heavily armed Chechnyan rebels was part of the military musical performance. 15

Two extreme reactions have also been noted, namely, ‘frozen fright’ and ‘psychological infantilism’. 16 The former refers to a paralysis of the normal emotional reactivity of the individual, and the latter reaction is characterized by regressed behaviour such as clinging and excessive dependence on the captors.

Extended periods of captivity may also lead to ‘learned helplessness’ 17 in which individuals come to believe that no matter what they do to improve their circumstances, nothing is effective. This is reminiscent of the automaton-like state reported by concentration camp victims (‘walking corpses’). 18

Genuine psychopathology has also been noted. A follow-up study of ransom victims in Sardinia found that about 50% suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and about 30% experienced major depression. 19 The International Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders (ICD-10) 20 also recognizes the ‘Enduring personality change after a catastrophic experience’ (F62.0) as a possible chronic outcome after a hostage incident. This condition is characterized by:

• a hostile or mistrustful attitude;
• social withdrawal and estrangement;
• feelings of emptiness or hopelessness;
• a chronic feeling of being ‘on edge’ as if constantly threatened.

For the diagnosis to be made the symptoms must have endured for at least two years.

The severe and sustained impact on children is demonstrated by several abductions, including that of the children involved in the Chowchilla incident in San Francisco. Terr 21 confirmed, after that incident (in which 26 children and their driver were abducted and held in a vehicle underground) all the children displayed signs of PTSD, and some symptoms worsened over time (e.g. shame, pessimism and ‘death dreams’).

Denial, ‘frozen fright’, ‘psychological infantilism’ and ‘learned helplessness’ are not age-specific. Children may also display: school refusal, loss of interest in studies, dependent and regressed behaviour, preoccupation with the event, playing at being the ‘rescuer’, stubborn and oppositional behaviour, and risk-taking. The impact can be particularly serious if the children have been detained over an extended period and if the incident entailed a breach of trust. 22

Physical effects

Hostages are likely to have to endure, particularly during sustained periods of captivity, an exacerbation of pre-existent physical conditions, such as asthma and diabetes. Also, the detention itself may generate new conditions due to a lack of the basics of healthy living, such as a nutritious diet, warmth, exercise, fresh air and sleep.

At-risk and resilience factors

As yet there is no clear delineation of all factors which conduce to an adverse outcome following being taken hostage. However, there is evidence that women (especially younger women), more than men, are at risk of such an outcome, as are those of low educational level, and those exposed to an extended period of captivity. 23 An extensive review 24 also suggests that the following may contribute to a poorer post-release adjustment: passive-dependent traits; a belief that one's fate is exclusively in the hands of others; and a dogmatic-authoritarian attitude. Among children, younger age and pre-existent family problems, 15 and the loss of education and the need for post-incident medical care 25 may also contribute to adjustment problems.

In recent years, there has been a move in the trauma field from a ‘pathogenic’ model (which emphasizes illness and problems of adjustment) to a ‘resilience’ model (which emphasizes coping and ‘personal growth’ through adversity). While there are uncertainties as to how best to define and measure resilience, this perspective offers a more positive and optimistic approach. Certainly, it is worth emphasizing that many survivors do appear to cope over time, particularly if their family and social environment is supportive. Moreover, a number of high profile hostages (e.g. Terry Waite 8 ) have demonstrated how they have used their experiences constructively after their release. Adopting a ‘resilience’ approach to this kind of trauma may also enhance our understanding the best coping strategies for hostages during their captivity, and for the development of better post-incident care management for them.

Coping and survival strategies

Although it is usually regarded as an ‘effect’ of being taken hostage, the ‘Stockholm Syndrome’ will be regarded here as a means of coping and surviving since it certainly enables, on many occasions, hostages to deal with extreme and life-threatening circumstances. The term was first coined by criminologist, Nils Bejerot, to describe the unexpected reactions of hostages both during and after an armed bank raid in Sweden in 1973. 26 It was noted that, despite being subject to a life-threatening situation by the raiders, the hostages (three women and one man) forged positive relationships with their captors even to the point of helping to finance their defence after their apprehension. Conversely, the hostage-takers began to bond with their captives. This paradoxical reaction has been noted in many other incidents. The 10-year-old girl, Natascha Kampusch, who was held captive for eight years bonded with her abductor to such an extent that, on his suicide immediately after her escape, she blamed the police for his death and clearly grieved his death. 27

It is not clear why some individuals react in this fashion while others do not. Some merely seek to escape. For example, in Georgia, Peter Shaw, a British financial adviser, was detained in freezing underground conditions and regularly beaten. Fearing his imminent execution, he courageously sought escape. Others maintain hostility to their captors and refusal to accede to requests to convert to Islam (e.g. Yvonne Ridley, 28 a British journalist held for 11 days by the Taliban). However, certain conditions do increase the likelihood of the Stockholm reaction. These include:

• an extended and emotionally charged environment;
• an adverse environment shared by hostages and hostage-takers (e.g. poor diet and physical discomfort);
• when threats to life are not carried out (e.g. ‘mock executions’);
• when there has to be a marked dependence by the hostages on the hostage-takers for even the most basic needs;
• when there are opportunities for bonding between captives and their captors in circumstances in which the former have not been ‘dehumanized’. (Some hostage-takers aim to dehumanize hostages by hooding them, depriving them of their names, any identifying details and possessions, treating them as ‘animals’ and changing regularly their guards – as did Saddam Hussein with his ‘human shields’ in Kuwait.)

The disadvantages of this reaction are that the hostages after the incident may feel guilty and embarrassed about the way they have reacted. It means that the authorities cannot totally rely on hostages for accurate intelligence or expect them to contribute to any escape plan.

Although PTSD and the ‘Stockholm Syndrome’ reaction both reflect the severity of the experience, the former is more related to the level of physical violence displayed towards the hostage, whereas the latter reaction is correlated with the level of humiliation and deprivation. 21 For some individuals it may represent their hope for escape or a way of achieving a psychological separation between their previous ‘normal’ way of life and their new circumstances. The validity of the concept has been challenged by Namnyak et al. , 26 and they suggest that its features lack rigorous empirical evaluation, as well as validated diagnostic criteria, but owes much to the bias of personal and media reporting. Others, for example Cantor and Price, 29 view this concept through the prism of evolutionary theory in a fashion which casts light on this phenomenon as well as on other unequal power relationships, including ‘boy soldiers’ and their leaders, abused children and their parents, and cases of complex PTSD.

Other individual methods of coping with extended captivity include: use of distraction (e.g. mental arithmetic, reading and fantasy); regular discipline (e.g. with regard to personal hygiene and exercise); taking one day at a time; and trying to find something positive in the situation (e.g. Terry Waite 8 began preparing in his mind his autobiography). Jacobsen describes how a group of adolescents, following a skyjacking, viewed their experience initially with a sense of excitement and adventure and were particularly helpful to young mothers with children on the aircraft. 30

Issues which require further research

There are extensive but important gaps in the literature. For example, in relation to attachment theory, it is not clear whether children in particular are affected principally by the emotional stimulation or drive reduction, as the Stockholm Syndrome develops. What underpins this bonding, for different individuals in different crises, has yet to be determined. It is also unclear to what extent the apparent motives of the perpetrators influences the bonding between captor and captive (although it can be difficult to identify the true motives of, for example, terrorists who take hostages). We also need to know more about the interaction between terrorists (who characteristically create a ‘public’ event) and other external agencies, such as the authorities and the media, and the terrorists themselves whose motives, level of determination etc may not be identical. 31 With regard to psychological interventions, particularly in the case of children, we also lack much clarity.

This is a complex and delicate area of research; perpetrators may be inaccessible or unreliable witnesses, and there is the omnipresent risk of re-traumatizing survivors through rehearsal of deeply disturbing experiences. Our current database is however too narrow to fashion a better understanding of such events and how to devise strategies and associated training to deal with them.

This review is inevitably constrained by word length, and it is confined to articles cast in English. It is not able to address the impact of hostage-taking and kidnapping on the families of the victims or on those, such as therapists and police family liaison officers who have to respond to the psychological aftermath of such incidents. This review has however highlighted key issues relating to the motives underlying crimes of this kind and how individuals cope during them and subsequently react. While survivors of such experiences commonly demonstrate remarkable resilience, there is no doubt that those experiences can produce a legacy of chronic emotional disturbance and compromised relationships.

DECLARATIONS —

Competing interests DAA is a part-time police consultant, paid by honorarium to the Robert Gordon University, and an unpaid trainer in hostage negotiation at the Scottish Police College

Funding None

Ethical approval Not applicable

Guarantor DAA

Contributorship Both authors contributed equally with regard to the literature search and the drafting of the article

Acknowledgements

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

ABDUCTION ARRESTS GROW.; Hamm Kidnapping Charges Add to Long List of Recent Cases,

The arrests in the Hamm kidnapping case again draw attention to the rapidly increasing list of abductions which have been solved. Especially since the Federal Goveminent has taken an active part in running down kidnappers, the percentage of such criminals brought to justice hag mounted rapidly. View Full Article in Timesmachine »

• No category

Related documents

Add this document to collection(s)

You can add this document to your study collection(s)

Add this document to saved

You can add this document to your saved list

Suggest us how to improve StudyLib

(For complaints, use another form )

Input it if you want to receive answer