nursing peer review comments

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Publications
Account settings
My Bibliography
Collections
Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

Create a new collection
Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

Search in PubMed
Search in NLM Catalog
Add to Search

Using the peer review process to educate and empower emerging nurse scholars

Affiliation.

1 University of North Dakota, United States of America. Electronic address: [email protected].
PMID: 33867109
DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.10.009

Peer review, in various forms, is fundamental to research-based fields and scholarly publication. The integrity of the publication process is necessary to advance nursing science and support clinical nursing practice. The peer review process undergirds publication and grant funding. In theory, peer review should occur in a process that is unbiased with results providing a fair assessment of the scientific merit and credibility of the work being reviewed. The purpose of peer review is lost if reviewer comments are unprofessional. Budding nurse scholars may be demoralized and discouraged to revise and resubmit their work after receiving review feedback they perceive unprofessional and lacking constructive recommendations on how to improve their work. This "incivility" in the peer review process may discourage nursing authors from revising and resubmitting their work, thus robbing nursing of potentially meaningful contributions to nursing science. Often beginning doctorate nursing students have little or no experience in having their scholarly works evaluated and receiving feedback via the peer review process. Peer review provides an opportunity to educate emerging nurse scholars on ways to improve their writing skills and ways to receive and respond to constructive, meaningful feedback. This article aims to discuss: 1) peer review process, 2) challenges with peer review, 3) impact of unprofessional peer review comments and incivility in nursing peer review process can have on a budding scientists and nurse scholars, 4) ways the peer review process can be used to educate and empower emerging nurse scholars, 5) implications for nursing scholarship, 6) recommendations to address bias and how to provide supportive and constructive feedback and 7) finally provide readers with available resources where they can learn more about how to conduct a peer review.

Keywords: Nurse scientists; Peer review; PhD student.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

Elsevier Science
Ovid Technologies, Inc.
W.B. Saunders
Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Peer Review Tip: Distinguishing the Difference Between Peer Review, Peer Evaluation, and Peer Feedback

Rhonda r. foster.

EdD, MPH, MS, RN, NEA-BC

Magnet ®

Energetic, visionary, authentic and insightful, Rhonda Foster is a published and highly sought-after hospital consultant with a penchant for driving change, quality and organizational improvement. Her consultation experience has allowed her to provide expertise in the United States in community hospitals, academic medical centers, and systems, as well as to organizations in Brazil, Abu Dhabi and Qatar. In addition to being a consultant, Foster has a wealth of nursing administration and leadership experience, having served as vice president for clinical services and CNO for Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, interim senior vice president and chief nursing and patient care services officer at City of Hope National Medical Center in Duarte, Calif.; interim CNO with St. Joseph Health—Sonoma County in Petaluma, Calif.; vice president of patient care services and CNO at Children’s Hospital of Michigan in Detroit; and assistant vice president of Women & Children’s Services at Mercy Health—St. Vincent Medical Center in Toledo, Ohio. She has earned a doctorate in education from Bowling Green State University, a Master of Public Health degree from the Northwest Ohio Consortium for Public Health, a Master of Science degree in nursing administration from Georgetown University, and a bachelor’s degree in nursing from the University of Toledo, where she was celebrated as the Outstanding Alumnus in Nursing. In addition, Foster was honored by the Los Angeles Business Journal as a 2021 Women of Influence in Healthcare. She also holds numerous certifications and board appointments and has authored more than a dozen publications on nursing, leadership, and quality improvement.

Energetic, visionary, and insightful, Dr. Rhonda Foster is a published and highly sought-after hospital consultant with a penchant for driving change, quality, and organizational improvement. While she served as the vice president of patient care services and chief nursing officer for the Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Dr. Foster’s collaborative and transformative leadership style led to innovative patient-care programs and the esteemed ANCC Magnet Recognition®. Dr. Foster now works full time as a consultant and educator. She is based in California and serves clients around the world.

An expert in a variety of Health care topics, Dr. Foster has been a featured presenter at American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) conferences and seminars, and over the course of her esteemed professional career, Dr. Foster has traveled the globe conducting lectures and seminars on quality Health care delivery, hospital administration, and leadership. During her tenure as chief nursing officer of the St. Joseph Health System of Sonoma County, Dr. Foster was considered an empathetic advocate and was lauded for her ability to inspire and motivate others toward a common vision.

Dr. Foster’s primary strength is her ability to put theory into practice. Understanding the benefits of technological advances in Health care administration, Dr. Foster, a catalyst and early adopter, led the implementation of an electronic medical record system that provided computerized physician order entry and ease in nursing documentation and medication administration. In addition, prior to its becoming a widely accepted practice, Dr. Foster implemented a nurse residency program for new graduate nurses that resulted in a 40% reduction in turnover.

Credible and scholarly, Dr. Foster’s work can be found in the Journal of Nursing Management , Oncology Nursing Society publications, and other reputable print and online resources. Dr. Foster has a master of science degree from Georgetown University, a master in public health degree from the Northwest Ohio Consortium, and a doctorate of education in leadership studies from Bowling Green State University.

Summary of Services

Conducts readiness assessments and provides strategies for success.
Develops customized education and training to support organizational needs.
Assists organizations with document development and review.
Submits electronic documents.
Conducts comprehensive on-site assessments in preparation for site visits.
Works with all stakeholders to achieve organizational goals and strategic alignment.
ADN – Michael J. Owens Technical College
BSN – University of Toledo
MSN – Nursing Administration in Health Services – Georgetown University
Master's in Public Health Administration – Northwest Consortium for Public Health
Doctorate of Education in Leadership Studies – Bowling Green State University

Certifications

American Nurses Credentialing Center – Certificate Holder in Fundamentals of Magnet®
American Nurses Credentialing Center – Nurse Executive, Advanced

Professional Memberships

American College of Health Care Executives
American Nurses Association
American Organization of Nurse Executives
National Association of Health Service Executives
Sigma Theta Tau International

It is not uncommon for me to have questions during a consultation about the "peer requirements." Before addressing what is required for the Organizational Overview or application documentation, it is important to distinguish the difference between peer feedback, peer evaluation, and peer review. Moreover, who is considered a peer?

A peer is someone of the same rank, education, clinical expertise, and level of licensure who performs similar roles. 1 The ANA Peer Review Guidelines position statement says, "As the professional association for nursing, ANA has a responsibility to the public and its members to facilitate the development of a quality assurance system including peer review." 2 Given that, each nurse must participate with other nurses in the decision-making process for evaluating nursing care; this process is called peer review . It is the process of peer review that stimulates professionalism through increased accountability and promotes the self-regulating nature of the nursing profession.

Peer review is defined as "an organized effort whereby practicing professionals review the quality and appropriateness of services ordered or performed by their professional peers." In nursing, it is the “process by which practicing registered nurses systematically assess, monitor, and make judgments about the quality of nursing care provided by peers as measured against professional standards of practice.” The focus of peer review is practice . It is the mechanism used to:

Evaluate the quality and quantity of nursing care based on practice standards.
Determine the strengths and weaknesses of nursing care based on practice standards.
Provide evidence for change in practice protocols to improve care.
Identify practice patterns that indicate a need for more knowledge. 3

Peer review is not intended to be punitive or anonymous. In addition to considering the rank of the nurse and nursing practice, it is intended to take into account the developmental stage of the nurse, to foster a continuous learning culture of patient safety and best practice, and to provide feedback that is continuous, timely, and routine.

Peer evaluation is an element of performance evaluation and is generally linked to professional goals, compensation, and consequences. Peer evaluation is always completed by a peer; but if it is done as a part of a 360-degree process, all members of the contributing team (some may or may not be peers) should complete the evaluation. Peer evaluation is voluntary; peer review is not. Conducting 360-degree evaluations is an option for the organization; peer review is NOT optional for a professional. 4

The Organizational Overview (OO-10) requires evidence of the following documents for nurses at all levels (staff nurses up to the CNO): 5

Self-appraisal tools.
Peer feedback tools.
Performance review tools.

The self-appraisal tool, sometimes referred to as the self-evaluation, is the tool that the individual utilizes to evaluate his or her own performance against specific standards, goals, and objectives. The peer feedback tool is the tool used by peers to evaluate their peer’s performance against specific organizational standards, goals, and objectives. It is designed to provide input based on observed performance and enables the receiver to have an understanding about personal and professional strengths and gaps in practice or performance. Peer feedback is a way for a staff member to gain additional insight about his or her performance and/or validate a personal perspective or point of view. 6 It should enable the receiver to walk away understanding exactly what he or she did and the impact.

Exemplary Professional Practice (EP15) states, "Nurses at all levels engage in periodic formal performance reviews that include a self-appraisal and peer feedback process for assurance of competence and continuous professional development."

Provide one example, with supporting evidence, of clinical nurses using periodic formal performance review that includes a self-appraisal and peer feedback process to enhance competence or professional development.
Provide one example, with supporting evidence, of nurse leaders using periodic formal performance review that includes a self-appraisal and peer feedback process to enhance competence or professional development.

Note: The CNO and nurse educators are included in "nurse leaders." 7

As you can see, the requirements are specific, and it is imperative that the terms not be confused, as the performance review, self-appraisal, and peer feedback processes are specifically designed in this source of evidence to enhance the competence or professional development of the clinical nurse or leader.

In conclusion, nurses are responsible for assessing their own competence. 8 Competence is a self-regulating duty. Nurses are responsible for both peer and self-assessments, and must strive for excellence in their nursing practice, whatever the role or setting.

Barbara Haag-Heitman and Vicki George; Nursing Peer Review: Principles and Practice; American Nurse Today; September 2011; Volume 6, Number 9; p 48-52.
Peer Review Guidelines; American Nurses Association; 1988.
Barbara Haag-Heitman and Vicki George; Peer Review in Nursing: Principles for Successful Practice; Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2011.
Jennifer M. Dupee, MBA, BSN, RN; Neysa P. Ernst, BSN, RN; and E. Kelly Caslin, BSN, RN; Does Multisource Feedback Influence Performance Appraisal Satisfaction?; Nursing Management; August 2014; p 10-20.
2014 Magnet® Application Manual.
Peer Feedback: Learning from College of Registered Nurses British Columbia; May 2006; p 1-4.
Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements; American Nurses Association; 2015; p 16 and 22.

This article was originally published in April 2015.

*Use of ANA Consultation Services does not guarantee you will achieve an ANCC credential. ANA consultants and staff cannot influence the actions of ANCC program staff nor decisions of the Commission on Magnet® Recognition, Commission on Pathway to Excellence®, or Commission on Accreditation in Practice Transition Programs and the Commission for Nursing Continuing Professional Development..

Item(s) added to cart

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Publications
Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

Advanced Search
Journal List
BMJ Health Care Inform
v.28(1); 2021

A step-by-step guide to peer review: a template for patients and novice reviewers

1 General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Charlotte Blease

2 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

3 Harvard Medical School

While relatively novel, patient peer review has the potential to change the healthcare publishing paradigm. It can do this by helping researchers enlarge the pool of people who are welcome to read, understand and participate in healthcare research. Academic journals who are early adopters of patient peer review have already committed to placing a priority on using person-centred language in publicly available abstracts and focusing on translational and practical research.

A wide body of literature has shown that including people with lived experiences in a truly meaningful way can improve the quality and efficiency of health research. Traditionally considered only as ‘subjects’ of research, over the last 10–15 years, patients and care partners have increasingly been invited to contribute to the design and conduct of studies. Established institutions are increasingly recognising the distinctive expertise patients possess—many patients have acquired deep insights about their conditions, symptoms, medical treatments and quality of healthcare delivery. Among some funders, including the views of patients is now a requirement to ensure research proposals are meaningful to persons with the lived experience of illness. Further illustrating these developments, patients are now involved in reviewing and making recommendations as part of funding institutions, setting research agendas and priorities, being funded for and leading their own research and leading or coauthoring scholarly publications, and are now participating in the peer review process for academic journals. 1–5 Patients offer an outsider’s perspective within mainstream healthcare: they have fewer institutional, professional or social allegiances and conflicts of interest—factors recognised as compromising the quality of research. Patient involvement is essential to move away from rhetorical commitments to embrace a truly patient-centred healthcare ecosystem where everyone has a place at the table.

As people with lived health experiences climb a ladder of engagement in patient–researcher partnerships, they may be asked to act as peer reviewers of academic manuscripts. However, many of these individuals do not hold professional training in medicine, healthcare or science and have never encountered the peer review process. Little guidance exists for patients and care partners tasked with reviewing and providing input on manuscripts in search of publication.

In conversation, however, even experienced researchers confess that learning how to peer review is part of a hidden curriculum in academia—a skill outlined by no formal means but rather learnt by mimicry. 6 As such, as they learn the process, novices may pick up bad habits. In the case of peer review, learning is the result of reading large numbers of academic papers, occasional conversations with mentors or commonly “trial by fire” experienced via reviewer comments to their own submissions. Patient reviewers are rarely exposed to these experiences and can be at a loss for where to begin. As a result, some may forgo opportunities to provide valuable and highly insightful feedback on research publications. Although some journals are highly specific about how reviewers should structure their feedback, many publications—including top-tier medical journals—assume that all reviewers will know how to construct responses. Only a few forward-thinking journals actively seeking peer review from people with lived health experiences currently point to review tips designed for experienced professionals. 7

As people with lived health experiences are increasingly invited to participate in peer review, it is essential that they be supported in this process. The peer review template for patients and novice reviewers ( table 1 ) is a series of steps designed to create a workflow for the main components of peer review. A structured workflow can help a reviewer organise their thoughts and create space to engage in critical thinking. The template is a starting point for anyone new to peer review, and it should be modified, adapted and built on for individual preferences and unique journal requirements. Peer reviews are commonly submitted via website portals, which vary widely in design and functionality; as such, reviewers are encouraged to decide how to best use the template on a case-by-case basis. Journals may require reviewers to copy and paste responses from the template into a journal website or upload a clean copy of the template as an attachment. Note: If uploading the review as an attachment, remember to remove the template examples and writing prompts .

Peer review template for patients and other novice reviewers

Name of journal	Insert the name of the journal here
	)






“This is an interview study of 53 people living with metastatic cancer about their perspective on physicians’ use of the computer during follow-up visits. The findings are similar to other studies the authors cite (basically, most patients don’t seem to mind when doctors are using the computer). The study question was developed in partnership with the hospital’s patient–family advisory council.”

2. Summarise your opinion of the manuscript and what the authors may need to address
“What makes this paper interesting is that it was conducted at a community hospital and not at a major cancer centre. Assuming the oncology clinic also serves people with many different types of cancer, my main suggestion is to pare down the paper and make THAT the thrust of the findings: for example, 53 patients’ attitudes towards computers in the examination room at community hospitals are similar to those of patients who receive care at major cancer centres. Beyond consulting the hospital PFAC at the outset, the authors did not mention working with patients on any other aspects of the study—please elaborate more on how else patient advisors may have been involved.”


Comments here will depend on the paper, and patient reviewers should feel comfortable knowing their most important insights might be reflective of their lived experiences—you are not expected to comment on methods or statistics. Things to think about here may include the following: Did the authors give enough background to justify why the research question was important? Were the authors clear about their objectives? Did you notice any problems with the results? Did the authors detail the strengths and limitations of the study? Were the conclusions supported by the research? Was anything missing from the paper? Were the figures and/or tables clearly laid out? Do you have any suggestions on how to make the paper more useful for patient readers?


Think about the following: Was the writing clear? Was the writing grammatically correct? Was the referencing complete? Detail any minor comments such as stylistic issues, missing references, typos or queries you think the reviewers need to address “The tone and writing style of this manuscript are chaotic; I suggest one of the authors review and edit it one more time so it reads like it is coming from one voice.”


Options may include the following: Be clear whether you recommend ’reject’ or ‘no revisions’. “To editor: The purpose and implementation of the study are incomprehensible. It’s not just the writing there is no discernible study design.”

( )
If there is a technical aspect of the manuscript in which you felt unprepared/unqualified to comment on, it is OK to be candid with the journal editor and/or authors. Adding a statement like this is uncommon, but such feedback is important for fair and honest review “To editor: Aspects of this manuscript I am unable to comment on include statistical analyses and medical ethics.”

It is important to point out that patient reviewers are not alone in facing challenges and a steep learning curve in performing peer review. Many health research agendas and, as a result, publications straddle disciplines, requiring peer reviewers with complementary expertise and training. Some experts may be highly equipped to critique particular aspects of research papers while unsuited to comment on other parts. Curiously, however, it is seldom a requirement that invited peer reviewers admit their own limitations to comment on different dimensions of papers. Relatedly, while we do not suggest that all patient peer reviewers will be equipped to critique every aspect of submitted manuscripts—though some may be fully competent to do so—we suggest that candour about limitations of expertise would also benefit the broader research community.

As novice reviewers gain experience, they may find themselves solicited for a growing number of reviews, much like their more experienced counterparts or mentors. 8 Serving as a patient or care partner reviewer can be a rewarding form of advocacy and will be crucial to harnessing the feedback and expertise of persons with lived health experiences. As we move into a future where online searches for information are a ubiquitous first step in searching for answers to health-related questions, patient and novice reviewers may become the much-needed link between academia and the lay public.

Acknowledgments

LS thanks the experienced and novice reviewers who encouraged her to publish this template.

Twitter: @TheLizArmy, @@crblease

Contributors: Both authors contributed substantially to the manuscript. LS conceived the idea and design and drafted the text. CB refined the idea and critically revised the text.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: The authors have read and understood the BMJ policy on declaration of interests and declare the following interests: LS is a member of the BMJ Patient Advisory Panel, serves as a BMJ patient reviewer and is an ad hoc patient reviewer for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; CB is a Keane OpenNotes scholar; both LS and CB work on OpenNotes, a philanthropically funded research initiative focused on improving transparency in healthcare.

Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication.

Not required.

When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open.

PLOS Biology
PLOS Climate
PLOS Complex Systems
PLOS Computational Biology
PLOS Digital Health
PLOS Genetics
PLOS Global Public Health
PLOS Medicine
PLOS Mental Health
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
PLOS Pathogens
PLOS Sustainability and Transformation
PLOS Collections

How to Write a Peer Review

When you write a peer review for a manuscript, what should you include in your comments? What should you leave out? And how should the review be formatted?

This guide provides quick tips for writing and organizing your reviewer report.

Review Outline

Use an outline for your reviewer report so it’s easy for the editors and author to follow. This will also help you keep your comments organized.

Think about structuring your review like an inverted pyramid. Put the most important information at the top, followed by details and examples in the center, and any additional points at the very bottom.

Here’s how your outline might look:

1. Summary of the research and your overall impression

In your own words, summarize what the manuscript claims to report. This shows the editor how you interpreted the manuscript and will highlight any major differences in perspective between you and the other reviewers. Give an overview of the manuscript’s strengths and weaknesses. Think about this as your “take-home” message for the editors. End this section with your recommended course of action.

2. Discussion of specific areas for improvement

It’s helpful to divide this section into two parts: one for major issues and one for minor issues. Within each section, you can talk about the biggest issues first or go systematically figure-by-figure or claim-by-claim. Number each item so that your points are easy to follow (this will also make it easier for the authors to respond to each point). Refer to specific lines, pages, sections, or figure and table numbers so the authors (and editors) know exactly what you’re talking about.

Major vs. minor issues

What’s the difference between a major and minor issue? Major issues should consist of the essential points the authors need to address before the manuscript can proceed. Make sure you focus on what is fundamental for the current study . In other words, it’s not helpful to recommend additional work that would be considered the “next step” in the study. Minor issues are still important but typically will not affect the overall conclusions of the manuscript. Here are some examples of what would might go in the “minor” category:

Missing references (but depending on what is missing, this could also be a major issue)
Technical clarifications (e.g., the authors should clarify how a reagent works)
Data presentation (e.g., the authors should present p-values differently)
Typos, spelling, grammar, and phrasing issues

3. Any other points

Confidential comments for the editors.

Some journals have a space for reviewers to enter confidential comments about the manuscript. Use this space to mention concerns about the submission that you’d want the editors to consider before sharing your feedback with the authors, such as concerns about ethical guidelines or language quality. Any serious issues should be raised directly and immediately with the journal as well.

This section is also where you will disclose any potentially competing interests, and mention whether you’re willing to look at a revised version of the manuscript.

Do not use this space to critique the manuscript, since comments entered here will not be passed along to the authors. If you’re not sure what should go in the confidential comments, read the reviewer instructions or check with the journal first before submitting your review. If you are reviewing for a journal that does not offer a space for confidential comments, consider writing to the editorial office directly with your concerns.

Get this outline in a template

Giving Feedback

Giving feedback is hard. Giving effective feedback can be even more challenging. Remember that your ultimate goal is to discuss what the authors would need to do in order to qualify for publication. The point is not to nitpick every piece of the manuscript. Your focus should be on providing constructive and critical feedback that the authors can use to improve their study.

If you’ve ever had your own work reviewed, you already know that it’s not always easy to receive feedback. Follow the golden rule: Write the type of review you’d want to receive if you were the author. Even if you decide not to identify yourself in the review, you should write comments that you would be comfortable signing your name to.

In your comments, use phrases like “ the authors’ discussion of X” instead of “ your discussion of X .” This will depersonalize the feedback and keep the focus on the manuscript instead of the authors.

General guidelines for effective feedback

Justify your recommendation with concrete evidence and specific examples.
Be specific so the authors know what they need to do to improve.
Be thorough. This might be the only time you read the manuscript.
Be professional and respectful. The authors will be reading these comments too.
Remember to say what you liked about the manuscript!

Don’t

Recommend additional experiments or unnecessary elements that are out of scope for the study or for the journal criteria.
Tell the authors exactly how to revise their manuscript—you don’t need to do their work for them.
Use the review to promote your own research or hypotheses.
Focus on typos and grammar. If the manuscript needs significant editing for language and writing quality, just mention this in your comments.
Submit your review without proofreading it and checking everything one more time.

Before and After: Sample Reviewer Comments

Keeping in mind the guidelines above, how do you put your thoughts into words? Here are some sample “before” and “after” reviewer comments

✗ Before

“The authors appear to have no idea what they are talking about. I don’t think they have read any of the literature on this topic.”

✓ After

“The study fails to address how the findings relate to previous research in this area. The authors should rewrite their Introduction and Discussion to reference the related literature, especially recently published work such as Darwin et al.”

“The writing is so bad, it is practically unreadable. I could barely bring myself to finish it.”

“While the study appears to be sound, the language is unclear, making it difficult to follow. I advise the authors work with a writing coach or copyeditor to improve the flow and readability of the text.”

“It’s obvious that this type of experiment should have been included. I have no idea why the authors didn’t use it. This is a big mistake.”

“The authors are off to a good start, however, this study requires additional experiments, particularly [type of experiment]. Alternatively, the authors should include more information that clarifies and justifies their choice of methods.”

Suggested Language for Tricky Situations

You might find yourself in a situation where you’re not sure how to explain the problem or provide feedback in a constructive and respectful way. Here is some suggested language for common issues you might experience.

What you think : The manuscript is fatally flawed. What you could say: “The study does not appear to be sound” or “the authors have missed something crucial”.

What you think : You don’t completely understand the manuscript. What you could say : “The authors should clarify the following sections to avoid confusion…”

What you think : The technical details don’t make sense. What you could say : “The technical details should be expanded and clarified to ensure that readers understand exactly what the researchers studied.”

What you think: The writing is terrible. What you could say : “The authors should revise the language to improve readability.”

What you think : The authors have over-interpreted the findings. What you could say : “The authors aim to demonstrate [XYZ], however, the data does not fully support this conclusion. Specifically…”

What does a good review look like?

Check out the peer review examples at F1000 Research to see how other reviewers write up their reports and give constructive feedback to authors.

Time to Submit the Review!

Be sure you turn in your report on time. Need an extension? Tell the journal so that they know what to expect. If you need a lot of extra time, the journal might need to contact other reviewers or notify the author about the delay.

Tip: Building a relationship with an editor

You’ll be more likely to be asked to review again if you provide high-quality feedback and if you turn in the review on time. Especially if it’s your first review for a journal, it’s important to show that you are reliable. Prove yourself once and you’ll get asked to review again!

Getting started as a reviewer
Responding to an invitation
Reading a manuscript
Writing a peer review

The contents of the Peer Review Center are also available as a live, interactive training session, complete with slides, talking points, and activities. …

The contents of the Writing Center are also available as a live, interactive training session, complete with slides, talking points, and activities. …

There’s a lot to consider when deciding where to submit your work. Learn how to choose a journal that will help your study reach its audience, while reflecting your values as a researcher…

American Nurse Journal Peer-Review Guidelines

American Nurse Journal (ANJ) peer reviewers use their expertise to help ensure the accuracy of manuscripts so that published content provides readers with practical, evidence-based information that will prove useful in bedside clinical care as well as in professional nurse development and well-being.

ANJ follows the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers , and requires that all peer reviewers be aware of and adhere to these guidelines, which can be accessed at publicationethics.org/files/ethical-guidelines-peer-reviewers-cope.pdf

The peer-review process

Quality peer reviews provide content guidance, evaluate clinical accuracy, and offer constructive comments that help the author improve their manuscript. Peer review does not involve editing for grammar, punctuation, or style. Peer reviewers should consider the following during their manuscript assessment:

Is the content relevant to nursing?
Is the information accurate and complete?
Does the information flow logically?
Are any key references missing?
Do illustrations, figures, tables add to the content?
Does the author provide nursing implications?
Are appropriate guidelines, standards, and research cited?
Is the manuscript free from stereotypes, offensive language, and bias?

ANJ uses double-anonymous (double-blind) peer review process—authors don’t know the identity of the reviewers and reviewers don’t know the identity of authors. We use this format to help eliminate bias and favoritism. The editorial staff shares reviewer feedback with authors, but the reviewer’s name remains confidential. We ask that reviewers refrain from sharing the manuscript and their review with others.

The ANJ executive editorial director oversees the peer-review process and makes final decisions about acceptance, revision, and rejection based on reviewer feedback.

Peer Review for American Nurse Journal

Download and share with colleagues

Peer reviewer expectations

The executive editorial director selects peer reviewers based on their areas of expertise, with the aim of matching reviewer knowledge with manuscript content. Prior experience as a peer reviewer or publication in a peer-review journal can prove helpful in understanding the process.

ANJ is committed to ensuring our editorial practices—including peer review—support diversity, equity, and inclusivity. With that goal in mind, we track our performance. If reviewers are willing to help us in this endeavor, we ask them to provide demographic information. This is not a requirement of selection to serve as a peer reviewer.

Are you interested in serving as a peer reviewer for American Nurse Journal (ANJ)?

Peer reviewers comment and provide feedback on manuscript submissions. If you’ve published in a peer-reviewed journal or have previous experience as a peer reviewer, please consider this opportunity. As a reviewer, you’ll be invited to evaluate manuscripts in your content area of expertise. For each manuscript you review, you’ll receive documents and instructions. ANJ peer review is double blinded, so you won’t know who the author is and the author won’t know you reviewed their manuscript. Quality peer reviews provide content guidance, feedback, and constructive comments that help the author improve their manuscript. Peer review doesn’t include editing for language and grammar, although suggestions to improve the content flow are welcome.

Read this blog for additional information about how peer review benefits reviewers and the profession.

To be considered as a peer reviewer, please provide the following information:

Peer Review

" * " indicates required fields

Lecturio Nursing

Cheat Sheets

Nursing Knowledge

Feedback in Nursing

RELATED STUDY SHEET

Get a concise overview of the leadership styles in nursing, leadership principles, and skills needed for your professional growth as a nurse.

Table of contents, the importance of feedback in nursing, types of feedback .

The 3 main purposes (or types) of performance feedback are:

Reinforcing good behavior
Correcting undesired behavior
Coach and improve upon behavior

Goals and benefits of nursing feedback

In a clinical setting, all team members continuously giving and receiving feedback plays a big role in ensuring high-quality patient care, professional growth, and a collaborative team environment. Examples of specific benefits include:

Patient safety and quality assurance (mistakes being addressed)
Refining skills and professional growth (lifelong learning through feedback, identify areas for improvement)
Encouraging accountability
Role clarity (feedback helps reflection on own scope of responsibility)
Improved teamwork (constructive feedback helps trust among team, promotes collaboration)

What is constructive feedback in nursing?

Nursing feedback channels .

In clinical nursing practice, feedback can flow in different directions:

Instructors or staff nurses give feedback to nursing students.
Nurses can give feedback to each other.
Interdisciplinary feedback (pharmacists/doctors/nurses giving each other feedback)
Patients and families to nurses
Quality improvement to nurses
Nurses to managers/leadership

How to give feedback constructively

To reinforce good behavior:

Don’t leave it at “nice job” – be specific about which behavior was well done, and why it had a positive impact.

To correct undesired behavior:

Always start with seeking understanding and asking genuine questions.
Then, discuss the exact nature and the impact or outcome of the undesired behavior.
Work with the receiver of the feedback on identifying an alternative behavior that would work better, again emphasizing the “why.”
Follow-up is essential.

To improve and coach:

This type of feedback should be given similarly to corrective feedback.
The suggested alternative actions build on the behavior that was already shown.

Best practice for providing feedback to a nursing student in the clinical setting

For nursing students, receiving constructive feedback in the clinical setting is vital for learning and professional development.

Here’s a selection of best practices to follow when giving feedback to students:

Give feedback promptly: as soon as possible after the event while it is still fresh in the student’s mind
Encourage questions and discussion: provide time for questions; student can self-evaluate first
Adjust feedback to student’s level: according to student’s stage in training and expected competencies, and fitting to learning objectives and performance standards
Be specific and objective: sticking with facts and direct observations with specific examples instead of vague generalizations
Be constructive: provide suggestions, show correct way, set concrete goals for improvement
Ensure student stays receptive: start and end conversation with positive reinforcement, choose suitable place for conversation, focus on behavior instead of personality

Tip: Documenting feedback given helps keep track of improvements and progressions and can be a reference for future evaluations.

What to do when feedback is not taken

When feedback does not enhance improvement, asking specific questions to understand the disconnect becomes even more important than when giving corrective feedback initially.

Check if the receiver understands the agreed upon behavior change or action step
Identify the reasons why that goal was not met
Clarify whatever is unclear

Tip: There are other ways of influencing someone toward better behavior outside of simply telling them. These include:

Offer help/working on tasks together
Spend some time to concretely map out how to do the action better

If resistance in accepting feedback is met with a team member, ask the nurse manager for assistance, or inquire to HR for help.

How to respond to bad patient feedback

Responding to negative patient feedback is important for maintaining trust, demonstrating commitment to quality care, and identifying areas for improvement.

Here’s a few tips for how to respond to bad patient feedback:

Listen. Allow the patient to share their feedback without interruption and ask for clarifications. (“Thank you for sharing.”)
Stay calm. Even if you feel defensive or upset, remain composed and avoid becoming confrontational or dismissive.
Express empathy. (“I understand why you’d be upset.”)
Validate and acknowledge the patient’s experience without being dismissive. (“I see how this could have been a negative experience for you.”)
Do not blame others. (“I apologize for the experience you had.”)
Offer solutions and follow through by implementing and/or sharing the feedback with the team and supervisors. (“I’ll share this with our team to ensure it doesn’t happen again.”)

Nursing peer review feedback: examples

Nursing peer review is a process by which nurses evaluate the performance and practice of their colleagues to ensure the standards of care are met and to promote continuous professional development. It is grounded in the principles of quality assurance, professional growth, and accountability.

Examples of positive feedback:

“I’ve noticed that you always maintain strict aseptic technique during wound dressing. It sets a great example for the team.”
“Your documentation is always thorough and timely, ensuring continuity of care.”
“Your collaboration with the physiotherapy team to ensure post-op patient mobility was exemplary. It led to a quicker recovery for the patient.”

Constructive feedback examples:

“I found some inconsistencies in your charting regarding pain assessment. Let’s review the standard pain assessment tools to ensure accuracy.”
“I’ve observed that you frequently check your phone during patient care activities. It might be perceived as inattentiveness by patients.”
“I’ve observed that sometimes during handovers, you speak very quickly, and important details might be missed. Slowing down a bit could ensure clearer communication.”

Leadership Styles in Nursing

FREE CHEAT SHEET

Free Download

Nursing Cheat Sheet

Master the topic with a unique study combination of a concise summary paired with video lectures.

Data Privacy
Terms and Conditions
Legal Information

USMLE™ is a joint program of the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB®) and National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME®). MCAT is a registered trademark of the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). NCLEX®, NCLEX-RN®, and NCLEX-PN® are registered trademarks of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc (NCSBN®). None of the trademark holders are endorsed by nor affiliated with Lecturio.

User Reviews

Get premium to test your knowledge.

Lecturio Premium gives you full access to all content & features

Get Premium to watch all videos

Verify your email now to get a free trial.

Create a free account to test your knowledge

Lecturio Premium gives you full access to all contents and features—including Lecturio’s Qbank with up-to-date board-style questions.

10 Peer Evaluation Examples for Nurses

As a nurse, peer evaluation is an important aspect of your job, used to ensure professional standards of care and patient safety. Peer evaluation examples for nurses can vary from verbal discussions, to written assessments or performance reviews. They are often conducted by supervisors, but may also be conducted by other nurses or even physicians.

No matter who is conducting the peer evaluation, the goal is the same—to provide an objective assessment of a peer’s work, strengths, and weaknesses. Peer evaluations can be used to recognize accomplishments, identify areas for improvement, and solidify relationships among colleagues.

This article will provide an overview of peer evaluation, including examples of peer evaluation in nursing, as well as strategies for improving your practice and increasing your professional growth.

Peer evaluation examples for nurses

What is peer evaluation.

Peer evaluation is the assessment of one colleague’s job performance, skills, and behavior by another colleague. It offers a way to ensure job performance meets the standards of the organization and helps to create a culture of professional, competent, and competent care. Through peer evaluations, nurses are able to easily locate and remedy issues that may arise in patient care.

Peer evaluations can occur in the context of a discussion, they can be done verbally or in written format, or an outside organization may administer the evaluation. No matter the specific method, peer evaluations are used to assess the performance of one colleague by another. There are many factors to consider when conducting any peer evaluation. These include:

Peer evaluation is an important part of professional development, enabling nurses and other colleagues to hold each other accountable, while also recognizing one another’s successes. Through peer evaluations, nurses can also recognize areas for improvement, which help to ensure professional standards of care are met.

One of the most common types of peer evaluations in nursing is the written performance review. Most of the time, these reviews are conducted by the nurse’s supervisor, however, some organizations will allow colleagues to provide feedback as well. In many cases, the supervisor will use the performance review to assess the objectives of the nursing staff and provide a yearly report on the nurse’s progress. The report may include data such as the individual’s level of patient care, team collaboration, and adherence to policy, as well as overall competence.

Strategies for Improving Your Practice

Peer evaluation is an important element of professional growth and development, so it is important that nurses take advantage of peer evaluation opportunities. To make the most of peer evaluations, consider the following strategies:

Peer Evaluations are an important part of the professional development of any nurse. These evaluations are used to assess colleagues’ job performance, skills, and behavior, and help to ensure professional standards of care. Examples of peer evaluations in nursing can vary widely, from written performance reviews, to verbal discussions and direct observation evaluations.

No matter the method of evaluation, nurses should take advantage of such opportunities, using them as a way to recognize achievements, identify areas for improvement, and foster a culture of learning and growth. By using the strategies outlined in this article, nurses can improve their practice and ensure an environment of professional excellence.

Peer Review Examples (300 Key Positive, Negative Phrases)

By Status.net Editorial Team on February 4, 2024 — 18 minutes to read

Peer review is a process that helps you evaluate your work and that of others. It can be a valuable tool in ensuring the quality and credibility of any project or piece of research. Engaging in peer review lets you take a fresh look at something you may have become familiar with. You’ll provide constructive criticism to your peers and receive the same in return, allowing everyone to learn and grow.

Finding the right words to provide meaningful feedback can be challenging. This article provides positive and negative phrases to help you conduct more effective peer reviews.

Crafting Positive Feedback

Praising professionalism.

Your punctuality is exceptional.
You always manage to stay focused under pressure.
I appreciate your respect for deadlines.
Your attention to detail is outstanding.
You exhibit great organizational skills.
Your dedication to the task at hand is commendable.
I love your professionalism in handling all situations.
Your ability to maintain a positive attitude is inspiring.
Your commitment to the project shows in the results.
I value your ability to think critically and come up with solutions.

Acknowledging Skills

Your technical expertise has greatly contributed to our team’s success.
Your creative problem-solving skills are impressive.
You have an exceptional way of explaining complex ideas.
I admire your ability to adapt to change quickly.
Your presentation skills are top-notch.
You have a unique flair for motivating others.
Your negotiation skills have led to wonderful outcomes.
Your skillful project management ensured smooth progress.
Your research skills have produced invaluable findings.
Your knack for diplomacy has fostered great relationships.

Encouraging Teamwork

Your ability to collaborate effectively is evident.
You consistently go above and beyond to help your teammates.
I appreciate your eagerness to support others.
You always bring out the best in your team members.
You have a gift for uniting people in pursuit of a goal.
Your clear communication makes collaboration a breeze.
You excel in creating a nurturing atmosphere for the team.
Your leadership qualities are incredibly valuable to our team.
I admire your respectful attitude towards team members.
You have a knack for creating a supportive and inclusive environment.

Highlighting Achievements

Your sales performance this quarter has been phenomenal.
Your cost-saving initiatives have positively impacted the budget.
Your customer satisfaction ratings have reached new heights.
Your successful marketing campaign has driven impressive results.
You’ve shown a strong improvement in meeting your performance goals.
Your efforts have led to a significant increase in our online presence.
The success of the event can be traced back to your careful planning.
Your project was executed with precision and efficiency.
Your innovative product ideas have provided a competitive edge.
You’ve made great strides in strengthening our company culture.

Formulating Constructive Criticism

Addressing areas for improvement.

When providing constructive criticism, try to be specific in your comments and avoid generalizing. Here are 30 example phrases:

You might consider revising this sentence for clarity.
This section could benefit from more detailed explanations.
It appears there may be a discrepancy in your data.
This paragraph might need more support from the literature.
I suggest reorganizing this section to improve coherence.
The introduction can be strengthened by adding context.
There may be some inconsistencies that need to be resolved.
This hypothesis needs clearer justification.
The methodology could benefit from additional details.
The conclusion may need a stronger synthesis of the findings.
You might want to consider adding examples to illustrate your point.
Some of the terminology used here could be clarified.
It would be helpful to see more information on your sources.
A summary might help tie this section together.
You may want to consider rephrasing this question.
An elaboration on your methods might help the reader understand your approach.
This image could be clearer if it were larger or had labels.
Try breaking down this complex idea into smaller parts.
You may want to revisit your tone to ensure consistency.
The transitions between topics could be smoother.
Consider adding citations to support your argument.
The tables and figures could benefit from clearer explanations.
It might be helpful to revisit your formatting for better readability.
This discussion would benefit from additional perspectives.
You may want to address any logical gaps in your argument.
The literature review might benefit from a more critical analysis.
You might want to expand on this point to strengthen your case.
The presentation of your results could be more organized.
It would be helpful if you elaborated on this connection in your analysis.
A more in-depth conclusion may better tie your ideas together.

Offering Specific Recommendations

You could revise this sentence to say…
To make this section more detailed, consider discussing…
To address the data discrepancy, double-check the data at this point.
You could add citations from these articles to strengthen your point.
To improve coherence, you could move this paragraph to…
To add context, consider mentioning…
To resolve these inconsistencies, check…
To justify your hypothesis, provide evidence from…
To add detail to your methodology, describe…
To synthesize your findings in the conclusion, mention…
To illustrate your point, consider giving an example of…
To clarify terminology, you could define…
To provide more information on sources, list…
To create a summary, touch upon these key points.
To rephrase this question, try asking…
To expand upon your methods, discuss…
To make this image clearer, increase its size or add labels for…
To break down this complex idea, consider explaining each part like…
To maintain a consistent tone, avoid using…
To smooth transitions between topics, use phrases such as…
To support your argument, cite sources like…
To explain tables and figures, add captions with…
To improve readability, use formatting elements like headings, bullet points, etc.
To include additional perspectives in your discussion, mention…
To address logical gaps, provide reasoning for…
To create a more critical analysis in your literature review, critique…
To expand on this point, add details about…
To present your results more organized, use subheadings, tables, or graphs.
To elaborate on connections in your analysis, show how x relates to y by…
To provide a more in-depth conclusion, tie together the major findings by…

Highlighting Positive Aspects

When offering constructive criticism, maintaining a friendly and positive tone is important. Encourage improvement by highlighting the positive aspects of the work. For example:

Great job on this section!
Your writing is clear and easy to follow.
I appreciate your attention to detail.
Your conclusions are well supported by your research.
Your argument is compelling and engaging.
I found your analysis to be insightful.
The organization of your paper is well thought out.
Your use of citations effectively strengthens your claims.
Your methodology is well explained and thorough.
I’m impressed with the depth of your literature review.
Your examples are relevant and informative.
You’ve made excellent connections throughout your analysis.
Your grasp of the subject matter is impressive.
The clarity of your images and figures is commendable.
Your transitions between topics are smooth and well-executed.
You’ve effectively communicated complex ideas.
Your writing style is engaging and appropriate for your target audience.
Your presentation of results is easy to understand.
Your tone is consistent and professional.
Your overall argument is persuasive.
Your use of formatting helps guide the reader.
Your tables, graphs, and illustrations enhance your argument.
Your interpretation of the data is insightful and well-reasoned.
Your discussion is balanced and well-rounded.
The connections you make throughout your paper are thought-provoking.
Your approach to the topic is fresh and innovative.
You’ve done a fantastic job synthesizing information from various sources.
Your attention to the needs of the reader is commendable.
The care you’ve taken in addressing counterarguments is impressive.
Your conclusions are well-drawn and thought-provoking.

Balancing Feedback

Combining positive and negative remarks.

When providing peer review feedback, it’s important to balance positive and negative comments: this approach allows the reviewer to maintain a friendly tone and helps the recipient feel reassured.

Examples of Positive Remarks:

Well-organized
Clear and concise
Excellent use of examples
Thorough research
Articulate argument
Engaging writing style
Thoughtful analysis
Strong grasp of the topic
Relevant citations
Logical structure
Smooth transitions
Compelling conclusion
Original ideas
Solid supporting evidence
Succinct summary

Examples of Negative Remarks:

Unclear thesis
Lacks focus
Insufficient evidence
Overgeneralization
Inconsistent argument
Redundant phrasing
Jargon-filled language
Poor formatting
Grammatical errors
Unconvincing argument
Confusing organization
Needs more examples
Weak citations
Unsupported claims
Ambiguous phrasing

Ensuring Objectivity

Avoid using emotionally charged language or personal opinions. Instead, base your feedback on facts and evidence.

For example, instead of saying, “I don’t like your choice of examples,” you could say, “Including more diverse examples would strengthen your argument.”

Personalizing Feedback

Tailor your feedback to the individual and their work, avoiding generic or blanket statements. Acknowledge the writer’s strengths and demonstrate an understanding of their perspective. Providing personalized, specific, and constructive comments will enable the recipient to grow and improve their work.

For instance, you might say, “Your writing style is engaging, but consider adding more examples to support your points,” or “I appreciate your thorough research, but be mindful of avoiding overgeneralizations.”

Phrases for Positive Feedback

Great job on the presentation, your research was comprehensive.
I appreciate your attention to detail in this project.
You showed excellent teamwork and communication skills.
Impressive progress on the task, keep it up!
Your creativity really shined in this project.
Thank you for your hard work and dedication.
Your problem-solving skills were crucial to the success of this task.
I am impressed by your ability to multitask.
Your time management in finishing this project was stellar.
Excellent initiative in solving the issue.
Your work showcases your exceptional analytical skills.
Your positive attitude is contagious!
You were successful in making a complex subject easier to grasp.
Your collaboration skills truly enhanced our team’s effectiveness.
You handled the pressure and deadlines admirably.
Your written communication is both thorough and concise.
Your responsiveness to feedback is commendable.
Your flexibility in adapting to new challenges is impressive.
Thank you for your consistently accurate work.
Your devotion to professional development is inspiring.
You display strong leadership qualities.
You demonstrate empathy and understanding in handling conflicts.
Your active listening skills contribute greatly to our discussions.
You consistently take ownership of your tasks.
Your resourcefulness was key in overcoming obstacles.
You consistently display a can-do attitude.
Your presentation skills are top-notch!
You are a valuable asset to our team.
Your positive energy boosts team morale.
Your work displays your tremendous growth in this area.
Your ability to stay organized is commendable.
You consistently meet or exceed expectations.
Your commitment to self-improvement is truly inspiring.
Your persistence in tackling challenges is admirable.
Your ability to grasp new concepts quickly is impressive.
Your critical thinking skills are a valuable contribution to our team.
You demonstrate impressive technical expertise in your work.
Your contributions make a noticeable difference.
You effectively balance multiple priorities.
You consistently take the initiative to improve our processes.
Your ability to mentor and support others is commendable.
You are perceptive and insightful in offering solutions to problems.
You actively engage in discussions and share your opinions constructively.
Your professionalism is a model for others.
Your ability to quickly adapt to changes is commendable.
Your work exemplifies your passion for excellence.
Your desire to learn and grow is inspirational.
Your excellent organizational skills are a valuable asset.
You actively seek opportunities to contribute to the team’s success.
Your willingness to help others is truly appreciated.
Your presentation was both informative and engaging.
You exhibit great patience and perseverance in your work.
Your ability to navigate complex situations is impressive.
Your strategic thinking has contributed to our success.
Your accountability in your work is commendable.
Your ability to motivate others is admirable.
Your reliability has contributed significantly to the team’s success.
Your enthusiasm for your work is contagious.
Your diplomatic approach to resolving conflict is commendable.
Your ability to persevere despite setbacks is truly inspiring.
Your ability to build strong relationships with clients is impressive.
Your ability to prioritize tasks is invaluable to our team.
Your work consistently demonstrates your commitment to quality.
Your ability to break down complex information is excellent.
Your ability to think on your feet is greatly appreciated.
You consistently go above and beyond your job responsibilities.
Your attention to detail consistently ensures the accuracy of your work.
Your commitment to our team’s success is truly inspiring.
Your ability to maintain composure under stress is commendable.
Your contributions have made our project a success.
Your confidence and conviction in your work is motivating.
Thank you for stepping up and taking the lead on this task.
Your willingness to learn from mistakes is encouraging.
Your decision-making skills contribute greatly to the success of our team.
Your communication skills are essential for our team’s effectiveness.
Your ability to juggle multiple tasks simultaneously is impressive.
Your passion for your work is infectious.
Your courage in addressing challenges head-on is remarkable.
Your ability to prioritize tasks and manage your own workload is commendable.
You consistently demonstrate strong problem-solving skills.
Your work reflects your dedication to continuous improvement.
Your sense of humor helps lighten the mood during stressful times.
Your ability to take constructive feedback on board is impressive.
You always find opportunities to learn and develop your skills.
Your attention to safety protocols is much appreciated.
Your respect for deadlines is commendable.
Your focused approach to work is motivating to others.
You always search for ways to optimize our processes.
Your commitment to maintaining a high standard of work is inspirational.
Your excellent customer service skills are a true asset.
You demonstrate strong initiative in finding solutions to problems.
Your adaptability to new situations is an inspiration.
Your ability to manage change effectively is commendable.
Your proactive communication is appreciated by the entire team.
Your drive for continuous improvement is infectious.
Your input consistently elevates the quality of our discussions.
Your ability to handle both big picture and detailed tasks is impressive.
Your integrity and honesty are commendable.
Your ability to take on new responsibilities is truly inspiring.
Your strong work ethic is setting a high standard for the entire team.

Phrases for Areas of Improvement

You might consider revisiting the structure of your argument.
You could work on clarifying your main point.
Your presentation would benefit from additional examples.
Perhaps try exploring alternative perspectives.
It would be helpful to provide more context for your readers.
You may want to focus on improving the flow of your writing.
Consider incorporating additional evidence to support your claims.
You could benefit from refining your writing style.
It would be useful to address potential counterarguments.
You might want to elaborate on your conclusion.
Perhaps consider revisiting your methodology.
Consider providing a more in-depth analysis.
You may want to strengthen your introduction.
Your paper could benefit from additional proofreading.
You could work on making your topic more accessible to your readers.
Consider tightening your focus on key points.
It might be helpful to add more visual aids to your presentation.
You could strive for more cohesion between your sections.
Your abstract would benefit from a more concise summary.
Perhaps try to engage your audience more actively.
You may want to improve the organization of your thoughts.
It would be useful to cite more reputable sources.
Consider emphasizing the relevance of your topic.
Your argument could benefit from stronger parallels.
You may want to add transitional phrases for improved readability.
It might be helpful to provide more concrete examples.
You could work on maintaining a consistent tone throughout.
Consider employing a more dynamic vocabulary.
Your project would benefit from a clearer roadmap.
Perhaps explore the limitations of your study.
It would be helpful to demonstrate the impact of your research.
You could work on the consistency of your formatting.
Consider refining your choice of images.
You may want to improve the pacing of your presentation.
Make an effort to maintain eye contact with your audience.
Perhaps adding humor or anecdotes would engage your listeners.
You could work on modulating your voice for emphasis.
It would be helpful to practice your timing.
Consider incorporating more interactive elements.
You might want to speak more slowly and clearly.
Your project could benefit from additional feedback from experts.
You might want to consider the practical implications of your findings.
It would be useful to provide a more user-friendly interface.
Consider incorporating a more diverse range of sources.
You may want to hone your presentation to a specific audience.
You could work on the visual design of your slides.
Your writing might benefit from improved grammatical accuracy.
It would be helpful to reduce jargon for clarity.
You might consider refining your data visualization.
Perhaps provide a summary of key points for easier comprehension.
You may want to develop your skills in a particular area.
Consider attending workshops or trainings for continued learning.
Your project could benefit from stronger collaboration.
It might be helpful to seek guidance from mentors or experts.
You could work on managing your time more effectively.
It would be useful to set goals and priorities for improvement.
You might want to identify areas where you can grow professionally.
Consider setting aside time for reflection and self-assessment.
Perhaps develop strategies for overcoming challenges.
You could work on increasing your confidence in public speaking.
Consider collaborating with others for fresh insights.
You may want to practice active listening during discussions.
Be open to feedback and constructive criticism.
It might be helpful to develop empathy for team members’ perspectives.
You could work on being more adaptable to change.
It would be useful to improve your problem-solving abilities.
Perhaps explore opportunities for networking and engagement.
You may want to set personal benchmarks for success.
You might benefit from being more proactive in seeking opportunities.
Consider refining your negotiation and persuasion skills.
It would be helpful to enhance your interpersonal communication.
You could work on being more organized and detail-oriented.
You may want to focus on strengthening leadership qualities.
Consider improving your ability to work effectively under pressure.
Encourage open dialogue among colleagues to promote a positive work environment.
It might be useful to develop a growth mindset.
Be open to trying new approaches and techniques.
Consider building stronger relationships with colleagues and peers.
It would be helpful to manage expectations more effectively.
You might want to delegate tasks more efficiently.
You could work on your ability to prioritize workload effectively.
It would be useful to review and update processes and procedures regularly.
Consider creating a more inclusive working environment.
You might want to seek opportunities to mentor and support others.
Recognize and celebrate the accomplishments of your team members.
Consider developing a more strategic approach to decision-making.
You may want to establish clear goals and objectives for your team.
It would be helpful to provide regular and timely feedback.
Consider enhancing your delegation and time-management skills.
Be open to learning from your team’s diverse skill sets.
You could work on cultivating a collaborative culture.
It would be useful to engage in continuous professional development.
Consider seeking regular feedback from colleagues and peers.
You may want to nurture your own personal resilience.
Reflect on areas of improvement and develop an action plan.
It might be helpful to share your progress with a mentor or accountability partner.
Encourage your team to support one another’s growth and development.
Consider celebrating and acknowledging small successes.
You could work on cultivating effective communication habits.
Be willing to take calculated risks and learn from any setbacks.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can i phrase constructive feedback in peer evaluations.

To give constructive feedback in peer evaluations, try focusing on specific actions or behaviors that can be improved. Use phrases like “I noticed that…” or “You might consider…” to gently introduce your observations. For example, “You might consider asking for help when handling multiple tasks to improve time management.”

What are some examples of positive comments in peer reviews?

“Your presentation was engaging and well-organized, making it easy for the team to understand.”
“You are a great team player, always willing to help others and contribute to the project’s success.”
“Your attention to detail in documentation has made it easier for the whole team to access information quickly.”

Can you suggest ways to highlight strengths in peer appraisals?

Highlighting strengths in peer appraisals can be done by mentioning specific examples of how the individual excelled or went above and beyond expectations. You can also point out how their strengths positively impacted the team. For instance:

“Your effective communication skills ensured that everyone was on the same page during the project.”
“Your creativity in problem-solving helped resolve a complex issue that benefited the entire team.”

What are helpful phrases to use when noting areas for improvement in a peer review?

When noting areas for improvement in a peer review, try using phrases that encourage growth and development. Some examples include:

“To enhance your time management skills, you might try prioritizing tasks or setting deadlines.”
“By seeking feedback more often, you can continue to grow and improve in your role.”
“Consider collaborating more with team members to benefit from their perspectives and expertise.”

How should I approach writing a peer review for a manager differently?

When writing a peer review for a manager, it’s important to focus on their leadership qualities and how they can better support their team. Some suggestions might include:

“Encouraging more open communication can help create a more collaborative team environment.”
“By providing clearer expectations or deadlines, you can help reduce confusion and promote productivity.”
“Consider offering recognition to team members for their hard work, as this can boost motivation and morale.”

What is a diplomatic way to discuss negative aspects in a peer review?

Discussing negative aspects in a peer review requires tact and empathy. Try focusing on behaviors and actions rather than personal attributes, and use phrases that suggest areas for growth. For example:

“While your dedication to the project is admirable, it might be beneficial to delegate some tasks to avoid burnout.”
“Improving communication with colleagues can lead to better alignment within the team.”
“By asking for feedback, you can identify potential blind spots and continue to grow professionally.”
Flexibility: 25 Performance Review Phrases Examples
Job Knowledge Performance Review Phrases (Examples)
Integrity: 25 Performance Review Phrases Examples
60 Smart Examples: Positive Feedback for Manager in a Review
30 Employee Feedback Examples (Positive & Negative)
Initiative: 25 Performance Review Phrases Examples

Subscribe to journal Subscribe
Get new issue alerts Get alerts

Secondary Logo

Journal logo.

Colleague's E-mail is Invalid

Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.

Save my selection

The Power of Nursing Peer Review

Spiva, Lee Anna PhD, RN; Jarrell, Nicole MSN, RN; Baio, Pamela MSN, RN

Author Affiliations: Director of the Center for Nursing Excellence (Dr Spiva), WellStar Health System, Atlanta; Nurse Manager (Mrs Jarrell), WellStar Windy Hill Hospital, Marietta; Clinical Nurse Leader (Mrs Baio), WellStar Kennestone Hospital, Marietta, Georgia.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Correspondence: Dr Spiva, WellStar Health System, Center for Nursing Excellence, 2000 South Park Place, Atlanta, GA 30339 ( [email protected] ).

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s Web site ( www.jonajournal.com ).

This article describes how an integrated healthcare system created a nursing peer-review structure to empower nurses to make practice changes and enhance professional accountability. A nursing peer-review committee and tools supporting the process were developed and implemented.

Full Text Access for Subscribers:

Individual subscribers.

Institutional Users

Not a subscriber.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

+ Favorites
View in Gallery

Readers Of this Article Also Read

Peer-to-peer feedback: a novel approach to nursing quality, collaboration, and..., a descriptive study of nursing peer-review programs in us magnet® hospitals, nursing peer review perceptions and practices: a survey of chief nurse..., peer review in nursing: essential components of a model supporting safety and..., nursing peer review: integrating a model in a shared governance environment.

Professional Nurse Performance Review Phrases Examples

Related Evaluation Phrases

Professional Nurse Sample Phrases To Write A Performance Appraisal Feedback

50 Great Peer Review Examples: Sample Phrases + Scenarios

by Emre Ok March 16, 2024, 10:48 am updated June 6, 2024, 10:27 pm 475 Views

Peer review is a concept that has multiple different applications and definitions. Depending on your field, the definition of peer review can change greatly.

In the workplace, the meaning of peer review or peer feedback is that it is simply the input of a peer or colleague on another peer’s performance, attitude, output, or any other performance metric .

While in the academic world peer review’s definition is the examination of an academic paper by another fellow scholar in the field.

Even in the American legal system , people are judged in front of a jury made up of their peers.

It is clear as day that peer feedback carries a lot of weight and power. The input from someone who has the same experience with you day in and day out is on occasion, more meaningful than the feedback from direct reports or feedback from managers .

So here are 50 peer review examples and sample peer feedback phrases that can help you practice peer-to-peer feedback more effectively!

Table of Contents

Peer Feedback Examples: Offering Peers Constructive Criticism

Peer review examples: constructive criticism

One of the most difficult types of feedback to offer is constructive criticism. Whether you are a chief people officer or a junior employee, offering someone constructive criticism is a tight rope to walk.

When you are offering constructive criticism to a peer? That difficulty level is doubled. People can take constructive criticism from above or below.

One place where criticism can really sting is when it comes from someone at their level. That is why the peer feedback phrases below can certainly be of help.

Below you will find 10 peer review example phrases that offer constructive feedback to peers:

“I really appreciate the effort you’ve put into this project, especially your attention to detail in the design phase. I wonder if considering alternative approaches to the user interface might enhance user engagement. Perhaps we could explore some user feedback or current trends in UI design to guide us.”
“Your presentation had some compelling points, particularly the data analysis section. However, I noticed a few instances where the connection between your arguments wasn’t entirely clear. For example, when transitioning from the market analysis to consumer trends, a clearer linkage could help the audience follow your thought process more effectively.”
“I see you’ve put a lot of work into developing this marketing strategy, and it shows promise. To address the issue with the target demographic, it might be beneficial to integrate more specific market research data. I can share a few resources on market analysis that could provide some valuable insights for this section.”
“You’ve done an excellent job balancing different aspects of the project, but I think there’s an opportunity to enhance the overall impact by integrating some feedback we received in the last review. For instance, incorporating more user testimonials could strengthen our case study section.”
“Your report is well-structured and informative. I would suggest revisiting the conclusions section to ensure that it aligns with the data presented earlier. Perhaps adding a summary of key findings before concluding would reinforce the report’s main takeaways.”
“In reviewing your work, I’m impressed by your analytical skills. I believe using ‘I’ statements could make your argument even stronger, as it would provide a personal perspective that could resonate more with the audience. For example, saying ‘I observed a notable trend…’ instead of ‘There is a notable trend…’ can add a personal touch.”
“Your project proposal is thought-provoking and innovative. To enhance it further, have you considered asking reflective questions at the end of each section? This could encourage the reader to engage more deeply with the material, fostering a more interactive and thought-provoking dialogue.”
“I can see the potential in your approach to solving this issue, and I believe with a bit more refinement, it could be very effective. Maybe a bit more focus on the scalability of the solution could highlight its long-term viability, which would be impressive to stakeholders.”
“I admire the dedication you’ve shown in tackling this challenging project. If you’re open to it, I would be happy to collaborate on some of the more complex aspects, especially the data analysis. Together, we might uncover some additional insights that could enhance our findings.”
“Your timely submission of the project draft is commendable. To make your work even more impactful, I suggest incorporating recent feedback we received on related projects. This could provide a fresh perspective and potentially uncover aspects we might not have considered.”

Sample Peer Review Phrases: Positive Reinforcement

Peer feedback examples: Positive reinforcement

Offering positive feedback to peers as opposed to constructive criticism is on the easier side when it comes to the feedback spectrum.

There are still questions that linger however, such as: “ How to offer positive feedback professionally? “

To help answer that question and make your life easier when offering positive reinforcements to peers, here are 10 positive peer review examples! Feel free to take any of the peer feedback phrases below and use them in your workplace in the right context!

“Your ability to distill complex information into easy-to-understand visuals is exceptional. It greatly enhances the clarity of our reports.”
“Congratulations on surpassing this quarter’s sales targets. Your dedication and strategic approach are truly commendable.”
“The innovative solution you proposed for our workflow issue was a game-changer. It’s impressive how you think outside the box.”
“I really appreciate the effort and enthusiasm you bring to our team meetings. It sets a positive tone that encourages everyone.”
“Your continuous improvement in client engagement has not gone unnoticed. Your approach to understanding and addressing their needs is exemplary.”
“I’ve noticed significant growth in your project management skills over the past few months. Your ability to keep things on track and communicate effectively is making a big difference.”
“Thank you for your proactive approach in the recent project. Your foresight in addressing potential issues was key to our success.”
“Your positive attitude, even when faced with challenges, is inspiring. It helps the team maintain momentum and focus.”
“Your detailed feedback in the peer review process was incredibly helpful. It’s clear you put a lot of thought into providing meaningful insights.”
“The way you facilitated the last workshop was outstanding. Your ability to engage and inspire participants sparked some great ideas.”

Peer Review Examples: Feedback Phrases On Skill Development

Sample Peer Review Phrases: Skill Development

Peer review examples on talent development are one of the most necessary forms of feedback in the workplace.

Feedback should always serve a purpose. Highlighting areas where a peer can improve their skills is a great use of peer review.

Peers have a unique perspective into each other’s daily life and aspirations and this can quite easily be used to guide each other to fresh avenues of skill development.

So here are 10 peer sample feedback phrases for peers about developing new skillsets at work:

“Considering your interest in data analysis, I think you’d benefit greatly from the advanced Excel course we have access to. It could really enhance your data visualization skills.”
“I’ve noticed your enthusiasm for graphic design. Setting a goal to master a new design tool each quarter could significantly expand your creative toolkit.”
“Your potential in project management is evident. How about we pair you with a senior project manager for a mentorship? It could be a great way to refine your skills.”
“I came across an online course on persuasive communication that seems like a perfect fit for you. It could really elevate your presentation skills.”
“Your technical skills are a strong asset to the team. To take it to the next level, how about leading a workshop to share your knowledge? It could be a great way to develop your leadership skills.”
“I think you have a knack for writing. Why not take on the challenge of contributing to our monthly newsletter? It would be a great way to hone your writing skills.”
“Your progress in learning the new software has been impressive. Continuing to build on this momentum will make you a go-to expert in our team.”
“Given your interest in market research, I’d recommend diving into analytics. Understanding data trends could provide valuable insights for our strategy discussions.”
“You have a good eye for design. Participating in a collaborative project with our design team could offer a deeper understanding and hands-on experience.”
“Your ability to resolve customer issues is commendable. Enhancing your conflict resolution skills could make you even more effective in these situations.”

Peer Review Phrase Examples: Goals And Achievements

Equally important as peer review and feedback is peer recognition . Being recognized and appreciated by one’s peers at work is one of the best sentiments someone can experience at work.

Peer feedback when it comes to one’s achievements often comes hand in hand with feedback about goals.

One of the best goal-setting techniques is to attach new goals to employee praise . That is why our next 10 peer review phrase examples are all about goals and achievements.

While these peer feedback examples may not directly align with your situation, customizing them according to context is simple enough!

“Your goal to increase client engagement has been impactful. Reviewing and aligning these goals quarterly could further enhance our outreach efforts.”
“Setting a goal to reduce project delivery times has been a great initiative. Breaking this down into smaller milestones could provide clearer pathways to success.”
“Your aim to improve team collaboration is commendable. Identifying specific collaboration tools and practices could make this goal even more attainable.”
“I’ve noticed your dedication to personal development. Establishing specific learning goals for each quarter could provide a structured path for your growth.”
“Celebrating your achievement in enhancing our customer satisfaction ratings is important. Let’s set new targets to maintain this positive trajectory.”
“Your goal to enhance our brand’s social media presence has yielded great results. Next, we could focus on increasing engagement rates to build deeper connections with our audience.”
“While striving to increase sales is crucial, ensuring we have measurable and realistic targets will help maintain team morale and focus.”
“Your efforts to improve internal communication are showing results. Setting specific objectives for team meetings and feedback sessions could further this progress.”
“Achieving certification in your field was a significant milestone. Now, setting a goal to apply this new knowledge in our projects could maximize its impact.”
“Your initiative to lead community engagement projects has been inspiring. Let’s set benchmarks to track the positive changes and plan our next steps in community involvement.”

Peer Evaluation Examples: Communication Skills

The last area of peer feedback we will be covering in this post today is peer review examples on communication skills.

Since the simple act of delivering peer review or peer feedback depends heavily on one’s communication skills, it goes without saying that this is a crucial area.

Below you will find 10 sample peer evaluation examples that you can apply to your workplace with ease.

Go over each peer review phrase and select the ones that best reflect the feedback you want to offer to your peers!

“Your ability to articulate complex ideas in simple terms has been a great asset. Continuously refining this skill can enhance our team’s understanding and collaboration.”
“The strategies you’ve implemented to improve team collaboration have been effective. Encouraging others to share their methods can foster a more collaborative environment.”
“Navigating the recent conflict with diplomacy and tact was impressive. Your approach could serve as a model for effective conflict resolution within the team.”
“Your active listening during meetings is commendable. It not only shows respect for colleagues but also ensures that all viewpoints are considered, enhancing our decision-making process.”
“Your adaptability in adjusting communication styles to different team members is key to our project’s success. This skill is crucial for maintaining effective collaboration across diverse teams.”
“The leadership you displayed in coordinating the team project was instrumental in its success. Your ability to align everyone’s efforts towards a common goal is a valuable skill.”
“Your presentation skills have significantly improved, effectively engaging and informing the team. Continued focus on this area can make your communication even more impactful.”
“Promoting inclusivity in your communication has positively influenced our team’s dynamics. This approach ensures that everyone feels valued and heard.”
“Your negotiation skills during the last project were key to reaching a consensus. Developing these skills further can enhance your effectiveness in future discussions.”
“The feedback culture you’re fostering is creating a more dynamic and responsive team environment. Encouraging continuous feedback can lead to ongoing improvements and innovation.”

Best Way To Offer Peer Feedback: Using Feedback Software!

If you are offering feedback to peers or conducting peer review, you need a performance management tool that lets you digitize, streamline, and structure those processes effectively.

To help you do just that let us show you just how you can use the best performance management software for Microsoft Teams , Teamflect, to deliver feedback to peers!

While this particular example approaches peer review in the form of direct feedback, Teamflect can also help implement peer reviews inside performance appraisals for a complete peer evaluation.

Step 1: Head over to Teamflect’s Feedback Module

While Teamflect users can exchange feedback without leaving Microsoft Teams chat with the help of customizable feedback templates, the feedback module itself serves as a hub for all the feedback given and received.

Once inside the feedback module, all you have to do is click the “New Feedback” button to start giving structured and effective feedback to your peers!

Step 2: Select a feedback template

Teamflect has an extensive library of customizable feedback templates. You can either directly pick a template that best fits the topic on which you would like to deliver feedback to your peer or create a custom feedback template specifically for peer evaluations.

Once you’ve chosen your template, you can start giving feedback right then and there!

Optional: 360-Degree Feedback

Why stop with peer review? Include all stakeholders around the performance cycle into the feedback process with one of the most intuitive 360-degree feedback systems out there.

Request feedback about yourself or about someone else from everyone involved in their performance, including managers, direct reports, peers, and external parties.

Optional: Summarize feedback with AI

If you have more feedback on your hands then you can go through, summarize that feedback with the help of Teamflect’s AI assistant!

What Are The Benefits of Implementing Peer Review Systems?

Peer reviews have plenty of benefits to the individuals delivering the peer review, the ones receiving the peer evaluation, as well as the organization itself. So here are the 5 benefits of implementing peer feedback programs organization-wide.

1. Enhanced Learning and Understanding Peer feedback promotes a deeper engagement with the material or project at hand. When individuals know they will be receiving and providing feedback, they have a brand new incentive to engage more thoroughly with the content.

2. Cultivation of Open Communication and Continuous Improvement Establishing a norm where feedback is regularly exchanged fosters an environment of open communication. People become more accustomed to giving and receiving constructive criticism, reducing defensiveness, and fostering a culture where continuous improvement is the norm.

3. Multiple Perspectives Enhance Quality Peer feedback introduces multiple viewpoints, which can significantly enhance the quality of work. Different perspectives can uncover blind spots, introduce new ideas, and challenge existing ones, leading to more refined and well-rounded outcomes.

4. Encouragement of Personal and Professional Development Feedback from peers can play a crucial role in personal and professional growth. It can highlight areas of strength and identify opportunities for development, guiding individuals toward their full potential.

Written by emre ok.

Emre is a content writer at Teamflect who aims to share fun and unique insight into the world of performance management.

15 Performance Review Competencies to Track in 2024

10 Best Employee Promotion Interview Questions & Answers!

70 samples of peer review examples for employees

Performance Management

Peer Review Examples: Powerful Phrases You Can Use

October 30, 2023

The blog is tailored for HR professionals looking to set up and improve peer review feedback within their organization. Share the article with your employees as a guide to help them understand how to craft insightful peer review feedback.

Peer review is a critical part of personal development, allowing colleagues to learn from each other and excel at their job. Crafting meaningful and impactful feedback for peers is an art. It’s not just about highlighting strengths and weaknesses; it’s about doing so in a way that motivates others.

In this blog post, we will explore some of the most common phrases you can use to give peer feedback. Whether you’re looking for a comment on a job well done, offer constructive criticism, or provide balanced and fair feedback, these peer review examples will help you communicate your feedback with clarity and empathy.

Peer review feedback is the practice of colleagues and co-workers assessing and providing meaningful feedback on each other’s performance. It is a valuable instrument that helps organizations foster professional development, teamwork, and continuous improvement.

Peoplebox lets you conduct effective peer reviews within minutes. You can customize feedback, use tailored surveys, and seamlessly integrate it with your collaboration tools. It’s a game-changer for boosting development and collaboration in your team.

Why are Peer Reviews Important?

Here are some compelling reasons why peer review feedback is so vital:

Broader Perspective: Peer feedback offers a well-rounded view of an employee’s performance. Colleagues witness their day-to-day efforts and interactions, providing a more comprehensive evaluation compared to just a supervisor’s perspective.

Skill Enhancement: It serves as a catalyst for skill enhancement. Constructive feedback from peers highlights areas of improvement and offers opportunities for skill development.

Encourages Accountability: Peer review fosters a culture of accountability . Knowing that one’s work is subject to review by peers can motivate individuals to perform at their best consistently.

Team Cohesion: It strengthens team cohesion by promoting open communication. and constructive communication. Teams that actively engage in peer feedback often develop a stronger sense of unity and shared purpose.

Fair and Unbiased Assessment: By involving colleagues, peer review helps ensure a fair and unbiased assessment. It mitigates the potential for supervisor bias and personal favoritism in performance evaluations .

Identifying Blind Spots: Peers can identify blind spots that supervisors may overlook. This means addressing issues at an early stage, preventing them from escalating.

Motivation and Recognition: Positive peer feedback can motivate employees and offer well-deserved recognition for their efforts. Acknowledgment from colleagues can be equally, if not more, rewarding than praise from higher-ups.

Now, let us look at the best practices for giving peer feedback in order to leverage its benefits effectively.

Best practices to follow while giving peer feedback

30 Positive Peer Feedback Examples

Now that we’ve established the importance of peer review feedback, the next step is understanding how to use powerful phrases to make the most of this evaluation process. In this section, we’ll equip you with various examples of phrases to use during peer reviews, making the journey more confident and effective for you and your team .

Must Read: 60+ Self-Evaluation Examples That Can Make You Shine

Peer Review Example on Work Quality

When it comes to recognizing excellence, quality work is often the first on the list. Here are some peer review examples highlighting the work quality:

“Kudos to Sarah for consistently delivering high-quality reports that never fail to impress both clients and colleagues. Her meticulous attention to detail and creative problem-solving truly set the bar high.”
“John’s attention to detail and unwavering commitment to excellence make his work a gold standard for the entire team. His consistently high-quality contributions ensure our projects shine.”
“Alexandra’s dedication to maintaining the project’s quality standards sets a commendable benchmark for the entire department. Her willingness to go the extra mile is a testament to her work ethic and quality focus.”
“Patrick’s dedication to producing error-free code is a testament to his commitment to work quality. His precise coding and knack for bug spotting make his work truly outstanding.”

Peer Review Examples on Competency and Job-Related Skills

Competency and job-related skills set the stage for excellence. Here’s how you can write a peer review highlighting this particular skill set:

“Michael’s extensive knowledge and problem-solving skills have been instrumental in overcoming some of our most challenging technical hurdles. His ability to analyze complex issues and find creative solutions is remarkable. Great job, Michael!”
“Emily’s ability to quickly grasp complex concepts and apply them to her work is truly commendable. Her knack for simplifying the intricate is a gift that benefits our entire team.”
“Daniel’s expertise in data analysis has significantly improved the efficiency of our decision-making processes. His ability to turn data into actionable insights is an invaluable asset to the team.”
“Sophie’s proficiency in graphic design has consistently elevated the visual appeal of our projects. Her creative skills and artistic touch add a unique, compelling dimension to our work.”

Peer Review Sample on Leadership Skills

Leadership ability extends beyond a mere title; it’s a living embodiment of vision and guidance, as seen through these exceptional examples:

“Under Lisa’s leadership, our team’s morale and productivity have soared, a testament to her exceptional leadership skills and hard work. Her ability to inspire, guide, and unite the team in the right direction is truly outstanding.”
“James’s ability to inspire and lead by example makes him a role model for anyone aspiring to be a great leader. His approachability and strong sense of ethics create an ideal leadership model.”
“Rebecca’s effective delegation and strategic vision have been the driving force behind our project’s success. Her ability to set clear objectives, give valuable feedback, and empower team members is truly commendable.”
“Victoria’s leadership style fosters an environment of trust and innovation, enabling our team to flourish in a great way. Her encouragement of creativity and openness to diverse ideas is truly inspiring.”

Feedback on Teamwork and Collaboration Skills

Teamwork is where individual brilliance becomes collective success. Here are some peer review examples highlighting teamwork:

“Mark’s ability to foster a collaborative environment is infectious; his team-building skills unite us all. His open-mindedness and willingness to listen to new ideas create a harmonious workspace.”
“Charles’s commitment to teamwork has a ripple effect on the entire department, promoting cooperation and synergy. His ability to bring out the best in the rest of the team is truly remarkable.”
“David’s talent for bringing diverse perspectives together enhances the creativity and effectiveness of our group projects. His ability to unite us under a common goal fosters a sense of belonging.”

Peer Review Examples on Professionalism and Work Ethics

Professionalism and ethical conduct define a thriving work culture. Here’s how you can write a peer review highlighting work ethics:

“Rachel’s unwavering commitment to deadlines and ethical work practices is a model for us all. Her dedication to punctuality and ethics contributes to a culture of accountability.”
“Timothy consistently exhibits the highest level of professionalism, ensuring our clients receive impeccable service. His courtesy and reliability set a standard of excellence.”
“Daniel’s punctuality and commitment to deadlines set a standard of professionalism we should all aspire to. His sense of responsibility is an example to us all.”
“Olivia’s unwavering dedication to ethical business practices makes her a trustworthy and reliable colleague. Her ethical principles create an atmosphere of trust and respect within our team, leading to a more positive work environment.”

Feedback on Mentoring and Support

Mentoring and support pave the way for future success. Check out these peer review examples focusing on mentoring:

“Ben’s dedication to mentoring new team members is commendable; his guidance is invaluable to our junior colleagues. His approachability and patience create an environment where learning flourishes.”
“David’s mentorship has been pivotal in nurturing the talents of several team members beyond his direct report, fostering a culture of continuous improvement. His ability to transfer knowledge is truly outstanding.”
“Laura’s patient mentorship and continuous support for her colleagues have helped elevate our team’s performance. Her constructive feedback and guidance have made a remarkable difference.”
“William’s dedication to knowledge sharing and mentoring is a driving force behind our team’s constant learning and growth. His commitment to others’ development is inspiring.”

Peer Review Examples on Communication Skills

Effective communication is the linchpin of harmonious collaboration. Here are some peer review examples to highlight your peer’s communication skills:

“Grace’s exceptional communication skills ensure clarity and cohesion in our team’s objectives. Her ability to articulate complex ideas in a straightforward manner is invaluable.”
“Oliver’s ability to convey complex ideas with simplicity greatly enhances our project’s success. His effective communication style fosters a productive exchange of ideas.”
“Aiden’s proficiency in cross-team communication ensures that our projects move forward efficiently. His ability to bridge gaps in understanding is truly commendable.”

Peer Review Examples on Time Management and Productivity

Time management and productivity are the engines that drive accomplishments. Here are some peer review examples highlighting time management:

“Ella’s time management is nothing short of exemplary; it sets a benchmark for us all. Her efficient task organization keeps our projects on track.”
“Robert’s ability to meet deadlines and manage time efficiently significantly contributes to our team’s overall productivity. His time management skills are truly remarkable.”
“Sophie’s time management skills are a cornerstone of her impressive productivity, inspiring us all to be more efficient. Her ability to juggle multiple tasks is impressive.”
“Liam’s time management skills are key to his consistently high productivity levels. His ability to organize work efficiently is an example for all of us to follow.”

Though these positive feedback examples are valuable, it’s important to recognize that there will be instances when your team needs to convey constructive or negative feedback. In the upcoming section, we’ll present 40 examples of constructive peer review feedback. Keep reading!

40 Constructive Peer Review Feedback

Receiving peer review feedback, whether positive or negative, presents a valuable chance for personal and professional development. Let’s explore some examples your team can employ to provide constructive feedback , even in situations where criticism is necessary, with a focus on maintaining a supportive and growth-oriented atmosphere.

Constructive Peer Review Feedback on Work Quality

“I appreciate John’s meticulous attention to detail, which enhances our projects. However, I noticed a few minor typos in his recent report. To maintain an impeccable standard, I’d suggest dedicating more effort to proofreading.”
“Sarah’s research is comprehensive, and her insights are invaluable. Nevertheless, for the sake of clarity and brevity, I recommend distilling her conclusions to their most essential points.”
“Michael’s coding skills are robust, but for the sake of team collaboration, I’d suggest that he provides more detailed comments within the code to enhance readability and consistency.”
“Emma’s creative design concepts are inspiring, yet consistency in her chosen color schemes across projects could further bolster brand recognition.”
“David’s analytical skills are thorough and robust, but it might be beneficial to present data in a more reader-friendly format to enhance overall comprehension.”
“I’ve observed Megan’s solid technical skills, which are highly proficient. To further her growth, I recommend taking on more challenging projects to expand her expertise.”
“Robert’s industry knowledge is extensive and impressive. To become a more well-rounded professional, I’d suggest he focuses on honing his client relationship and communication skills.”
“Alice’s project management abilities are impressive, and she’s demonstrated an aptitude for handling complexity. I’d recommend she refines her risk assessment skills to excel further in mitigating potential issues.”
“Daniel’s presentation skills are excellent, and his reports are consistently informative. Nevertheless, there is room for improvement in terms of interpreting data and distilling it into actionable insights.”
“Laura’s sales techniques are effective, and she consistently meets her targets. I encourage her to invest time in honing her negotiation skills for even greater success in securing deals and partnerships.”

Peer Review Examples on Leadership Skills

“I’ve noticed James’s commendable decision-making skills. However, to foster a more inclusive and collaborative environment, I’d suggest he be more open to input from team members during the decision-making process.”
“Sophia’s delegation is efficient, and her team trusts her leadership. To further inspire the team, I’d suggest she share credit more generously and acknowledge the collective effort.”
“Nathan’s vision and strategic thinking are clear and commendable. Enhancing his conflict resolution skills is suggested to promote a harmonious work environment and maintain team focus.”
“Olivia’s accountability is much appreciated. I’d encourage her to strengthen her mentoring approach to develop the team’s potential even further and secure a strong professional legacy.”
“Ethan’s adaptability is an asset that brings agility to the team. Cultivating a more motivational leadership style is recommended to uplift team morale and foster a dynamic work environment.”

Peer Review Examples on Teamwork and Collaboration

“Ava’s collaboration is essential to the team’s success. She should consider engaging more actively in group discussions to contribute her valuable insights.”
“Liam’s teamwork is exemplary, but he could motivate peers further by sharing credit more openly and recognizing their contributions.”
“Chloe’s flexibility in teamwork is invaluable. To become an even more effective team player, she might invest in honing her active listening skills.”
“William’s contributions to group projects are consistently valuable. To maximize his impact, I suggest participating in inter-departmental collaborations and fostering cross-functional teamwork.”
“Zoe’s conflict resolution abilities create a harmonious work environment. Expanding her ability to mediate conflicts and find mutually beneficial solutions is advised to enhance team cohesion.”
“Noah’s punctuality is an asset to the team. To maintain professionalism consistently, he should adhere to deadlines with unwavering dedication, setting a model example for peers.”
“Grace’s integrity and ethical standards are admirable. To enhance professionalism further, I’d recommend that she maintain a higher level of discretion in discussing sensitive matters.”
“Logan’s work ethics are strong, and his commitment is evident. Striving for better communication with colleagues regarding project updates is suggested, ensuring everyone remains well-informed.”
“Sophie’s reliability is appreciated. Maintaining a high level of attention to confidentiality when handling sensitive information would enhance her professionalism.”
“Jackson’s organizational skills are top-notch. Upholding professionalism by maintaining a tidy and organized workspace is recommended.”

Peer Review Feedback Examples on Mentoring and Support

“Aiden provides invaluable mentoring to junior team members. He should consider investing even more time in offering guidance and support to help them navigate their professional journeys effectively.”
“Harper’s commendable support to peers is noteworthy. She should develop coaching skills to maximize their growth, ensuring their development matches their potential.”
“Samuel’s patience in teaching is a valuable asset. He should tailor support to individual learning styles to enhance their understanding and retention of key concepts.”
“Ella’s mentorship plays a pivotal role in the growth of colleagues. She should expand her role in offering guidance for long-term career development, helping them set and achieve their professional goals.”
“Benjamin’s exceptional helpfulness fosters a more supportive atmosphere where everyone can thrive. He should encourage team members to seek assistance when needed.”
“Mia’s communication skills are clear and effective. To cater to different audience types, she should use more varied communication channels to convey her message more comprehensively.”
“Lucas’s ability to articulate ideas is commendable, and his verbal communication is strong. He should polish non-verbal communication to ensure that his body language aligns with his spoken message.”
“Evelyn’s appreciated active listening skills create strong relationships with colleagues. She should foster stronger negotiation skills for client interactions, ensuring both parties are satisfied with the outcomes.”
“Jack’s presentation skills are excellent. He should elevate written communication to match the quality of verbal presentations, offering more comprehensive and well-structured documentation.”
“Avery’s clarity in explaining complex concepts is valued by colleagues. She should develop persuasive communication skills to enhance her ability to secure project proposals and buy-in from stakeholders.”

Feedback on Time Management and Productivity

“Isabella’s efficient time management skills contribute to the team’s success. She should explore time-tracking tools to further optimize her workflow and maximize her efficiency.”
“Henry’s remarkable productivity sets a high standard. He should maintain a balanced approach to tasks to prevent burnout and ensure sustainable long-term performance.”
“Luna’s impressive task prioritization and strategic time allocation should be fine-tuned with goal-setting techniques to ensure consistent productivity aligned with objectives.”
“Leo’s great deadline adherence is commendable. He should incorporate short breaks into the schedule to enhance productivity and focus, allowing for the consistent meeting of high standards.”
“Mila’s multitasking abilities are a valuable skill. She should strive to implement regular time-blocking sessions into the daily routine to further enhance time management capabilities.”

Do’s and Don’t of Peer Review Feedback

Peer review feedback can be extremely helpful for intellectual growth and professional development. Engaging in this process with thoughtfulness and precision can have a profound impact on both the reviewer and the individual seeking feedback.

However, there are certain do’s and don’ts that must be observed to ensure that the feedback is not only constructive but also conducive to a positive and productive learning environment.

The Do’s of Peer Review Feedback:

Empathize and Relate : Put yourself in the shoes of the person receiving the feedback. Recognize the effort and intention behind their work, and frame your comments with sensitivity.

Ground Feedback in Data : Base your feedback on concrete evidence and specific examples from the work being reviewed. This not only adds credibility to your comments but also helps the recipient understand precisely where improvements are needed.

Clear and Concise Writing : Express your thoughts in a clear and straightforward manner. Avoid jargon or ambiguous language that may lead to misinterpretation.

Offer Constructive Criticism : Focus on providing feedback that can guide improvement. Instead of simply pointing out flaws, suggest potential solutions or alternatives.

Highlight Strength s: Acknowledge and commend the strengths in the work. Recognizing what’s done well can motivate the individual to build on their existing skills.

The Don’ts of Peer Review Feedback:

Avoid Ambiguity : Vague or overly general comments such as “It’s not good” do not provide actionable guidance. Be specific in your observations.

Refrain from Personal Attacks : Avoid making the feedback personal or overly critical. Concentrate on the work and its improvement, not on the individual.

Steer Clear of Subjective Opinions : Base your feedback on objective criteria and avoid opinions that may not be universally applicable.

Resist Overloading with Suggestions : While offering suggestions for improvement is important, overwhelming the recipient with a laundry list of changes can be counterproductive.

Don’t Skip Follow-Up : Once you’ve provided feedback, don’t leave the process incomplete. Follow up and engage in a constructive dialogue to ensure that the feedback is understood and applied effectively.

Remember that the art of giving peer review feedback is a valuable skill, and when done right, it can foster professional growth, foster collaboration, and inspire continuous improvement. This is where performance management software like Peoplebox come into play.

Start Collecting Peer Review Feedback On Peoplebox

In a world where the continuous improvement of your workforce is paramount, harnessing the potential of peer review feedback is a game-changer. Peoplebox offers a suite of powerful features that revolutionize performance management, simplifying the alignment of people with business goals and driving success. Want to experience it first hand? Take a quick tour of our product.

Through Peoplebox, you can effortlessly establish peer reviews, customizing key aspects such as:

Allowing the reviewee to select their peers
Seeking managerial approval for chosen peers to mitigate bias
Determining the number of peers eligible for review, and more.

Peoplebox lets you choose your peers to review

And the best part? Peoplebox lets you do all this from right within Slack.

Use Peoplebox to collect performance reviews on Slack

Peer Review Feedback Template That You Can Use Right Away

Still on the fence about using software for performance reviews? Here’s a quick ready-to-use peer review template you can use to kickstart the peer review process.

Free peer review template on Google form

Download the Free Peer Review Feedback Form here.

If you ever reconsider and are looking for a more streamlined approach to handle 360 feedback, give Peoplebox a shot!

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is peer review feedback important.

Peer review feedback provides a well-rounded view of employee performance, fosters skill enhancement, encourages accountability, strengthens team cohesion, ensures fair assessment, and identifies blind spots early on.

How does peer review feedback benefit employees?

Peer review feedback offers employees valuable insights for growth, helps them identify areas for improvement, provides recognition for their efforts, and fosters a culture of collaboration and continuous learning.

What are some best practices for giving constructive peer feedback?

Best practices include grounding feedback in specific examples, offering both praise and areas for improvement, focusing on actionable suggestions, maintaining professionalism, and ensuring feedback is clear and respectful.

What role does HR software like Peoplebox play in peer review feedback?

HR software like Peoplebox streamlines the peer review process by allowing customizable feedback, integration with collaboration tools like Slack, easy selection of reviewers, and providing templates and tools for effective feedback.

How can HR professionals promote a culture of feedback and openness in their organization?

HR professionals can promote a feedback culture by leading by example, providing training on giving and receiving feedback, recognizing and rewarding constructive feedback, creating safe spaces for communication, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement.

What’s Next?

Get Peoplebox Demo

Get a 30-min. personalized demo of our OKR, Performance Management and People Analytics Platform Schedule Now

Take Product Tour

Watch a product tour to see how Peoplebox makes goals alignment, performance management and people analytics seamless. Take a product tour

Subscribe to our blog & newsletter

Popular Categories

Employee Engagement
One on Ones
People Analytics
Strategy Execution
Remote Work

Recent Blogs

HR’s Guide to Effectively Dealing With Insubordination at Workplace

Constructive Criticism: How To Give & Receive It In Workplace Environment

The Power of Constructive Criticism in the Workplace

Best Performance Management Software in India

OKRs (Aligned Goals)
Performance Reviews
360 Degree Employee Reviews
Performance Reviews in Slack
1:1 Meetings
Business Reviews
Automated Engagement Survey
Anonymous Messaging
Engagement Insights
Integrations
Why Peoplebox
Our Customers
Customer Success Stories
Product Tours
Peoplebox Analytics Talk
The Peoplebox Pulse Newsletter
OKR Podcast
OKR Examples
One-on-one-meeting questions
Performance Review Templates
Request Demo
Help Center
Careers (🚀 We are hiring)
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
GDPR Compliance
Data Processing Addendum
Responsible Disclosure
Cookies Policy

Share this blog

Election latest: Farage urged to 'get a grip' of Reform UK amid racism row

John Healey, the shadow defence secretary, has urged Nigel Farage to "get a grip" of Reform UK after a racism row involving the prime minister. It comes as a Reform UK canvasser who used a racial slur against Rishi Sunak called himself a "total fool" and said he has learned his lesson.

Saturday 29 June 2024 12:10, UK

General Election 2024

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Farage urged to 'get a grip' of Reform UK
Reform canvasser in PM racism row says he was 'a total fool'
Faultlines: Eight-hour school runs and kids too hungry to sleep - the families caught up in housing 'social cleansing'
Politics at Jack and Sam's : The last weekend
Live reporting by Faith Ridler

Election essentials

Manifesto pledges: Conservatives | Greens | Labour | Lib Dems | Plaid | Reform | SNP
Trackers: Who's leading polls? | Is PM keeping promises?
Campaign Heritage: Memorable moments from elections gone by
Follow Sky's politics podcasts: Electoral Dysfunction | Politics At Jack And Sam's
Read more: Who is standing down? | Key seats to watch | What counts as voter ID? | Check if your constituency is changing | Guide to election lingo
How to watch election on Sky News

Our live poll tracker collates the results of opinion surveys carried out by all the main polling organisations - and allows you to see how the political parties are performing in the run-up to the general election.

With under a week to go, the Tories and Labour have taken a drop, while support for Reform UK and the Liberal Democrats is on the rise.

COMMENTS

Comprehensive nursing peer review: Our voice, our practice ...
Figure. A hallmark of professional practice, nursing peer review is the process by which practicing RNs systematically assess, monitor, and give feedback to peers about the quality of nursing care measured against professional standards of practice. 1 Nursing peer review supports self-regulation of clinical practice, personal empowerment, and a culture of accountability. 2 The purpose of ...
Nursing peer review: Principles and practice
Using the six peer-review practice principles below (which are based on the ANA Guidelines) helps ensure a consistent, evidence-based approach to peer review. A peer is someone of the same rank. Peer review is practice-focused. Feedback is timely, routine, and a continuous expectation. Peer review fosters a continuous learning culture of ...
PDF How to Phrase Feedback in Peer Reviews for Nurse Authors?
334. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal. There are many different styles, scopes, tra-ditions, emphasis, and expectations for the va-riety of nursing journals that exist currently. These scholarly journals rely on the process of honest peer review to meet the journals' aims and the needs of the contributing au-thors (Wurzbach, 2007).
How to Phrase Feedback in Peer Reviews for Nurse Authors?
Nursing journals that utilize peer review need expert reviewers to provide feedback to the editors to make publication decisions. The authors also benefit from the peer reviewers' feedback. However, the tone and wording of the critique should be honest and compassionate. Authors need to be guided and encouraged to improve their writing.
Crafting a meaningful nursing peer review
INTRODUCTION. Nursing peer review helps to ensure that significant and relevant high-quality works get published to advance the nursing discipline. 1-3 Peer reviewers in nursing provide input to journal editors and authors based on their expertise. In addition to ensuring accurate, useful, and timely pieces that fit with target journals and audiences get published, peer reviewers advance their ...
Using the peer review process to educate and empower emerging ...
Peer review provides an opportunity to educate emerging nurse scholars on ways to improve their writing skills and ways to receive and respond to constructive, meaningful feedback. This article aims to discuss: 1) peer review process, 2) challenges with peer review, 3) impact of unprofessional peer review comments and incivility in nursing peer ...
Peer Review Tip: Distinguishing the Difference
Peer review is defined as "an organized effort whereby practicing professionals review the quality and appropriateness of services ordered or performed by their professional peers." In nursing, it is the "process by which practicing registered nurses systematically assess, monitor, and make judgments about the quality of nursing care provided ...
A step-by-step guide to peer review: a template for patients and novice
The peer review template for patients and novice reviewers ( table 1) is a series of steps designed to create a workflow for the main components of peer review. A structured workflow can help a reviewer organise their thoughts and create space to engage in critical thinking. The template is a starting point for anyone new to peer review, and it ...
How to Write a Peer Review
Think about structuring your review like an inverted pyramid. Put the most important information at the top, followed by details and examples in the center, and any additional points at the very bottom. Here's how your outline might look: 1. Summary of the research and your overall impression. In your own words, summarize what the manuscript ...
The How and Why of Peer Review
Peer review and its sister role of editing require rigorous preparation in parallel with research education and training. Towards that end, I'm offering to do an online peer review workshop for up to 10 groups such as research teams, PhD programs or schools in nursing who would like one. Please email me with your requests for such a workshop.
Effective peer reviews in 3 easy steps
As the name conveys, in an open review, reviewers know the authors' identities, and authors know who the reviewers are. Those who advocate for open review believe it holds peer reviewers accountable for their review; in fact, some journals publish the peer review comments with the journal article. Currently, open review is rare in nursing ...
Writing for publication: responding to peer review feedback
Nursing journals provide up-to-date research evidence and knowledge to enable registered nurses to practise effectively (Ali and Watson, 2016).Peer review is an essential element of quality assurance to ensure the publication is reliable and that methodological rigour is maintained (Shattell et al, 2010).The peer review of a research article submitted to a journal is undertaken by experts in ...
Peer Reviewers
Quality peer reviews provide content guidance, evaluate clinical accuracy, and offer constructive comments that help the author improve their manuscript. Peer review does not involve editing for grammar, punctuation, or style. Peer reviewers should consider the following during their manuscript assessment: Is the content relevant to nursing?
Feedback in Nursing [+ Free Cheat Sheet]
Feedback in Nursing. Feedback is an essential part of collaboration in all work environments. In nursing, a productive feedback culture can uphold and enhance the standard of care, ensure patient safety, foster a collaborative care environment, and promote professional growth. Through mechanisms like peer reviews, patient input, and supervisor ...
Ethical Considerations for Nursing Peer Review
"In healthcare organizations, peer reviews are typically used to assure clinicians meet minimum clinical or professional ladder criteria, support ladder progression to the next level and provide a fuller picture of the previous year's performance during the annual review," says Sandra L. Siedlecki, PhD, RN, APRN-CNS, FAAN, Senior Nurse Scientist in the Office of Nursing Research and ...
10 Peer Evaluation Examples for Nurses • Eat, Sleep, Wander
As a nurse, peer evaluation is an important aspect of your job, used to ensure professional standards of care and patient safety. Peer evaluation examples for nurses can vary from verbal discussions, to written assessments or performance reviews. They are often conducted by supervisors, but may also be conducted by other nurses or even physicians.
Moving toward a more objective peer review process : Nursing ...
Moving toward a more objective peer review process. The concept of peer review can be interpreted very differently among nurses and healthcare professionals. Some think of a subject expert reviewing a manuscript for a journal's editorial staff. Others think of regulatory bodies requiring hospitals to have an internal process to ensure that ...
Nursing Peer Review 101
Nursing Peer Review 101. July 18, 2018 in [ Nursing & Healthcare ] The American Nurses Association created a set of Peer Review Guidelines in 1988. Since then, these guidelines have helped nurses around the country make sure they are following proper regulations for patient care and safety. When you earn your RN to BSN degree at Grand Canyon ...
Peer Review Examples (300 Key Positive, Negative Phrases)
When noting areas for improvement in a peer review, try using phrases that encourage growth and development. Some examples include: "To enhance your time management skills, you might try prioritizing tasks or setting deadlines.". "By seeking feedback more often, you can continue to grow and improve in your role.".
PDF Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved
Peer review guidelines originally developed by the American Nurses Association remain helpful to guide peer review prac-tices today.2 The incorporation of peer review in the profes-sional practice setting leads to improved staff clinical knowl-edge and skills. As noted by Haverhals: "The nursing profes-
PDF Peer Review for Annual Evaluation: RN
Peer review is a tool used to obtain objective, constructive feedback and comments in order to enhance and validate career growth. As a part of each employee's year end evaluation, this review will be completed by two peers. The manager will choose one peer reviewer and the employee will choose one peer reviewer. 1=Does not meet 2=Meets, 3 ...
The Power of Nursing Peer Review : JONA: The Journal of Nursing ...
Abstract. This article describes how an integrated healthcare system created a nursing peer-review structure to empower nurses to make practice changes and enhance professional accountability. A nursing peer-review committee and tools supporting the process were developed and implemented.
Professional Nurse Performance Review Phrases Examples
Always willing to help out and take care of his job professionally. John has exceeded at every professional position he has had while going to school at night to get him nursing degree. Professional Nurse performance review phrases examples to write an evaluation feedback about employee performance appraisal.
50 Great Peer Review Examples: Sample Phrases + Scenarios
Table of Contents. Peer Feedback Examples: Offering Peers Constructive Criticism. Sample Peer Review Phrases: Positive Reinforcement. Peer Review Examples: Feedback Phrases On Skill Development. Peer Review Phrase Examples: Goals And Achievements. Peer Evaluation Examples: Communication Skills. Best Way To Offer Peer Feedback: Using Feedback ...
Peer Review Examples: Powerful Phrases You Can Use
Peer Review Examples on Professionalism and Work Ethics. "Noah's punctuality is an asset to the team. To maintain professionalism consistently, he should adhere to deadlines with unwavering dedication, setting a model example for peers.". "Grace's integrity and ethical standards are admirable.
Election latest: Farage on defensive after supporters caught on camera
Rishi Sunak has spoken out after a Reform UK supporter was filmed making racist comments about him - with party leader Nigel Farage forced on to the defensive. Meanwhile, Sir Keir Starmer has ...

Save citation to file

Add to My Bibliography

Using the peer review process to educate and empower emerging nurse scholars

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources

Peer Review Tip: Distinguishing the Difference Between Peer Review, Peer Evaluation, and Peer Feedback

Summary of Services

Certifications

Professional Memberships

Item(s) added to cart

A step-by-step guide to peer review: a template for patients and novice reviewers

Charlotte Blease

Acknowledgments

Ethics statements

How to Write a Peer Review

Review Outline

1. Summary of the research and your overall impression

2. Discussion of specific areas for improvement

Major vs. minor issues

3. Any other points

Giving Feedback

General guidelines for effective feedback

Don’t

Before and After: Sample Reviewer Comments

Suggested Language for Tricky Situations

What does a good review look like?

Time to Submit the Review!

Tip: Building a relationship with an editor

American Nurse Journal Peer-Review Guidelines

The peer-review process

Peer Review for American Nurse Journal

Peer reviewer expectations

Are you interested in serving as a peer reviewer for American Nurse Journal (ANJ)?

Peer Review

Feedback in Nursing

Get a concise overview of the leadership styles in nursing, leadership principles, and skills needed for your professional growth as a nurse.

Goals and benefits of nursing feedback

What is constructive feedback in nursing?

How to give feedback constructively

Best practice for providing feedback to a nursing student in the clinical setting

What to do when feedback is not taken

Related videos

How to respond to bad patient feedback

Nursing peer review feedback: examples

Leadership Styles in Nursing

Nursing Cheat Sheet

User Reviews

Get Premium to watch all videos

Create a free account to test your knowledge

10 Peer Evaluation Examples for Nurses

Peer evaluation examples for nurses

Strategies for Improving Your Practice

Peer Review Examples (300 Key Positive, Negative Phrases)

Crafting Positive Feedback

Acknowledging Skills

Encouraging Teamwork

Highlighting Achievements

Formulating Constructive Criticism

Offering Specific Recommendations

Highlighting Positive Aspects

Balancing Feedback

Ensuring Objectivity

Personalizing Feedback

Phrases for Positive Feedback

Phrases for Areas of Improvement

Frequently Asked Questions

What are some examples of positive comments in peer reviews?

Can you suggest ways to highlight strengths in peer appraisals?

What are helpful phrases to use when noting areas for improvement in a peer review?

How should I approach writing a peer review for a manager differently?

What is a diplomatic way to discuss negative aspects in a peer review?

Secondary Logo

The Power of Nursing Peer Review

Full Text Access for Subscribers:

Institutional Users

Readers Of this Article Also Read

Professional Nurse Performance Review Phrases Examples

Professional Nurse Sample Phrases To Write A Performance Appraisal Feedback

50 Great Peer Review Examples: Sample Phrases + Scenarios

Peer Feedback Examples: Offering Peers Constructive Criticism