| by an entity is usually evidenced in one or more of the following ways: (a) | representation on the board of directors or equivalent governing body of the investee; | (b) | participation in policy-making processes, including participation in decisions about dividends or other distributions; | (c) | material transactions between the entity and its investee; | (d) | interchange of managerial personnel; or | (e) | provision of essential technical information. |
| ] The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible, including potential voting rights held by other entities, are considered when assessing whether an entity has . Potential voting rights are not currently exercisable or convertible when, for example, they cannot be exercised or converted until a future date or until the occurrence of a future event. |
| , the entity examines all facts and circumstances (including the terms of exercise of the potential voting rights and any other contractual arrangements whether considered individually or in combination) that affect potential rights, except the intentions of management and the financial ability to exercise or convert those potential rights. |
| over an investee when it loses the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of that investee. The loss of significant influence can occur with or without a change in absolute or relative ownership levels. It could occur, for example, when an becomes subject to the control of a government, court, administrator or regulator. It could also occur as a result of a contractual arrangement. |
Equity method | The investor’s share of the investee’s profit or loss is recognised in the investor’s profit or loss. Distributions received from an investee reduce the carrying amount of the investment. Adjustments to the carrying amount may also be necessary for changes in the investor’s proportionate interest in the investee arising from changes in the investee’s other comprehensive income. Such changes include those arising from the revaluation of property, plant and equipment [Refer: ] and from foreign exchange translation differences [Refer: , , , and ]. The investor’s share of those changes is recognised in the investor’s other comprehensive income (see IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements). |
E2 | , July 2009, Agenda Decision, ‘IAS 28 Investments in Associates—Potential effect of IFRS 3 Business Combinations (as revised in 2008) and IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements (as amended in 2008) on equity method accounting’ . EITF 08-6 addresses several issues resulting from the joint project by the IASB and FASB on accounting for business combinations and accounting and reporting for non-controlling interest that culminated in the issue of IFRS 3 (as revised in 2008) and IAS 27 (as amended in 2008) and SFAS 141(R) and SFAS 160. At its meeting in May 2009, the IFRIC deliberated two of the issues considered in EITF 08-6: The IFRIC noted that IFRSs consistently require assets not measured at fair value through profit or loss to be measured at initial recognition at cost. Generally stated, cost includes the purchase price and other costs directly attributable to the acquisition or issuance of the asset such as professional fees for legal services, transfer taxes and other transaction costs. Therefore, the cost of an investment in an associate at initial recognition determined in accordance with paragraph 11 of IAS 28 [The equivalent requirement is now in paragraph 10] comprises its purchase price and any directly attributable expenditures necessary to obtain it. ... The IFRIC concluded that the agenda criteria were not met mainly because, given the guidance in IFRSs, it did not expect divergent interpretations in practice. Therefore, the IFRIC decided not to add these issues to its agenda.] |
E3 | , January 2019, Agenda Decision, ‘IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements—Investment in a subsidiary accounted for at cost: Step acquisition’ In the fact pattern described in the request, the entity preparing separate financial statements: Financial Instruments: Presentation. The investee is not an associate, joint venture or subsidiary of the entity and, accordingly, the entity applies IFRS 9 Financial Instruments in accounting for its initial investment (initial interest). The request asked: a. | whether the entity determines the cost of its investment in the subsidiary as the sum of: i. | the fair value of the initial interest at the date of obtaining control of the subsidiary, plus any consideration paid for the additional interest (fair value as deemed cost approach); or | i. | the consideration paid for the initial interest (original consideration), plus any consideration paid for the additional interest (accumulated cost approach) (Question A). |
Question A IAS 27 does not define ‘cost’, nor does it specify how an entity determines the cost of an investment acquired in stages. The Committee noted that cost is defined in other IFRS Standards (for example, paragraph 6 of IAS 16 Property Plant and Equipment , paragraph 8 of IAS 38 Intangible Assets and paragraph 5 of IAS 40 Investment Property ). The Committee observed that the two approaches outlined in the request arise from different views of whether the step acquisition transaction involves: a. | the entity exchanging its initial interest (plus consideration paid for the additional interest) for a controlling interest in the investee, or | b. | purchasing the additional interest while retaining the initial interest. |
Based on its analysis, the Committee concluded that a reasonable reading of the requirements in IFRS Standards could result in the application of either one of the two approaches outlined in this agenda decision (ie fair value as deemed cost approach or accumulated cost approach). The Committee observed that an entity would apply its reading of the requirements consistently to step acquisition transactions. An entity would also disclose the selected approach applying paragraphs 117–124 of IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements if that disclosure would assist users of financial statements in understanding how step acquisition transactions are reflected in reporting financial performance and financial position. For Question A, the Committee considered whether to develop a narrow-scope amendment to address how an entity determines the cost of an investment acquired in stages. The Committee observed that: a. | it did not have evidence to assess whether the application of the two acceptable approaches to determining cost, outlined in this agenda decision, would have a material effect on those affected. | b. | the matter could not be resolved without also considering the requirements in paragraph 10 of IAS 28 to initially measure an investment in an associate or joint venture at cost. The Committee did not obtain information to suggest that the Board should reconsider this aspect of IAS 28 at this stage, rather than as part of its wider consideration of IAS 28 within its research project on the Equity Method. |
On balance, the Committee decided not to undertake standard-setting to address Question A. Consequently, the Committee decided not to add these matters to its standard-setting agenda. [The full text of the agenda decision is reproduced after paragraph 10(a) of IAS 27 .]] | or joint venture. Because the investor has of, or over, the investee, the investor has an interest in the associate’s or joint venture’s performance and, as a result, the return on its investment. The investor accounts for this interest by extending the scope of its financial statements to include its share of the profit or loss of such an investee. As a result, application of the equity method provides more informative reporting of the investor’s net assets and profit or loss. |
| or a joint venture is determined solely on the basis of existing ownership interests and does not reflect the possible exercise or conversion of potential voting rights and other derivative instruments, unless paragraph 13 applies. |
| does not apply to interests in and joint ventures that are accounted for using the . When instruments containing potential voting rights in substance currently give access to the returns associated with an ownership interest in an associate or a joint venture, the instruments are not subject to IFRS 9. In all other cases, instruments containing potential voting rights in an associate or a joint venture are accounted for in accordance with IFRS 9. |
| to other financial instruments in an or to which the is not applied. [Refer: ] These include long-term interests that, in substance, form part of the entity’s net investment in an associate or joint venture (see ). An entity applies IFRS 9 to such long-term interests before it applies paragraph 38 and of this Standard. In applying IFRS 9, the entity does not take account of any adjustments to the carrying amount of long-term interests that arise from applying this Standard. ] (Amendments to IAS 28) in October 2017] |
| or a joint venture is classified as held for sale in accordance with , [Refer: ] the investment, or any retained interest in the investment not classified as held for sale, shall be classified as a non-current asset. |
Application of the equity method E4E4 | , March 2009, Agenda Decision, ‘IAS 28 Investments in Associates—Potential effect of IFRS 3 Business Combinations and IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements (as amended in 2008) on equity method accounting’ The IFRIC noted that IAS 28 provides explicit guidance on two issues: (i) | How an impairment assessment of an underlying indefinite-lived intangible asset of an equity method investment should be performed | (ii) | How to account for a change in an investment from the equity method to the cost method. |
Therefore, the IFRIC did not expect divergence in practice and decided not to add these issues to its agenda.] | of, or over, an investee shall account for its investment in an or a joint venture using the except when that investment qualifies for exemption in accordance with . |
Exemptions from applying the equity method | to its investment in an or a joint venture if the entity is a parent that is exempt from preparing by the scope exception in or if all the following apply: (a) | The entity is a wholly-owned , or is a partially-owned subsidiary of another entity and its other owners, including those not otherwise entitled to vote, have been informed about, and do not object to, the entity not applying the equity method. | (b) | The entity’s debt or equity instruments are not traded in a public market (a domestic or foreign stock exchange or an over-the-counter market, including local and regional markets). | (c) | The entity did not file, nor is it in the process of filing, its financial statements with a securities commission or other regulatory organisation, for the purpose of issuing any class of instruments in a public market. | (d) | The ultimate or any intermediate of the entity produces financial statements available for public use that comply with IFRSs, in which subsidiaries are consolidated or are measured at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with IFRS 10. [Refer: ] |
| or a is held by, or is held indirectly through, an entity that is a venture capital organisation, or a mutual fund, unit trust and similar entities including investment-linked insurance funds, the entity may elect to measure that investment at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with . An example of an investment-linked insurance fund is a fund held by an entity as the underlying items for a group of insurance contracts with direct participation features. For the purposes of this election, insurance contracts include investment contracts with discretionary participation features. An entity shall make this election separately for each associate or joint venture, at initial recognition of the associate or joint venture. [Refer: ] (See for terms used in this paragraph that are defined in that Standard.) |
| , a portion of which is held indirectly through a venture capital organisation, or a mutual fund, unit trust and similar entities including investment-linked insurance funds, the entity may elect to measure that portion of the investment in the associate at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with regardless of whether the venture capital organisation, or the mutual fund, unit trust and similar entities including investment-linked insurance funds, has significant influence over that portion of the investment. If the entity makes that election, the entity shall apply the equity method to any remaining portion of its investment in an associate that is not held through a venture capital organisation, or a mutual fund, unit trust and similar entities including investment-linked insurance funds. ] |
Classification as held for sale | or a joint venture that meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale. [Refer: ] Any retained portion of an investment in an associate or a joint venture that has not been classified as held for sale shall be accounted for using the until disposal of the portion that is classified as held for sale takes place. After the disposal takes place, an entity shall account for any retained interest in the associate or joint venture in accordance with unless the retained interest continues to be an associate or a joint venture, in which case the entity uses the equity method. |
| or a joint venture previously classified as held for sale no longer meets the criteria to be so classified, it shall be accounted for using the equity method retrospectively as from the date of its classification as held for sale. Financial statements for the periods since classification as held for sale shall be amended accordingly. |
Discontinuing the use of the equity method | from the date when its investment ceases to be an or a joint venture as follows: (a) | If the investment becomes a , the entity shall account for its investment in accordance with and . | (b) | If the retained interest in the former associate or joint venture is a financial asset, the entity shall measure the retained interest at fair value [Refer: ]. The fair value of the retained interest shall be regarded as its fair value on initial recognition as a financial asset in accordance with . The entity shall recognise in profit or loss any difference between: (i) | the fair value of any retained interest and any proceeds from disposing of a part interest in the associate or joint venture; and | (ii) | the carrying amount of the investment at the date the equity method was discontinued. |
When an entity discontinues the use of the equity method, the entity shall account for all amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income in relation to that investment on the same basis as would have been required if the investee had directly disposed of the related assets or liabilities. | is discontinued. For example, if an or a joint venture has cumulative exchange differences relating to a foreign operation and the entity discontinues the use of the equity method, the entity shall reclassify to profit or loss the gain or loss that had previously been recognised in other comprehensive income in relation to the foreign operation. |
| becomes an investment in a joint venture or an investment in a joint venture becomes an investment in an associate, the entity continues to apply the and does not remeasure the retained interest. |
Changes in ownership interest | or a joint venture is reduced, but the investment continues to be classified either as an associate or a joint venture respectively, the entity shall reclassify to profit or loss the proportion of the gain or loss that had previously been recognised in other comprehensive income relating to that reduction in ownership interest if that gain or loss would be required to be reclassified to profit or loss on the disposal of the related assets or liabilities. |
E5 | , July 2009, Agenda Decision, ‘IAS 28 Investments in Associates—Potential effect of IFRS 3 Business Combinations (as revised in 2008) and IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements (as amended in 2008) on equity method accounting’ . EITF 08-6 addresses several issues resulting from the joint project by the IASB and FASB on accounting for business combinations and accounting and reporting for non-controlling interest that culminated in the issue of IFRS 3 (as revised in 2008) and IAS 27 (as amended in 2008) and SFAS 141(R) and SFAS 160. At its meeting in May 2009, the IFRIC deliberated two of the issues considered in EITF 08-6: ... The IFRIC noted that paragraph 19A of IAS 28 [The equivalent requirement is now in paragraph 25] provides guidance on the accounting for amounts recognised in other comprehensive income when the investor’s ownership interest is reduced, but the entity retains significant influence. The IFRIC noted that there is no specific guidance on the recognition of a gain or loss resulting from a reduction in the investor’s ownership interest resulting from the issue of shares by the associate. However, the IFRIC also noted that reclassification of amounts to profit or loss from other comprehensive income is generally required as part of determining the gain or loss on a disposal. Paragraph 19A of IAS 28 applies to all reductions in the investor’s ownership interest, no matter the cause. The IFRIC concluded that the agenda criteria were not met mainly because, given the guidance in IFRSs, it did not expect divergent interpretations in practice. Therefore, the IFRIC decided not to add these issues to its agenda.] |
Equity method procedures | are similar to the consolidation procedures described in . Furthermore, the concepts underlying the procedures used in accounting for the acquisition of a are also adopted in accounting for the acquisition of an investment in an or a . |
E6 | [IFRIC® , August 2002/April 2003, Agenda Decision, ‘Reciprocal interests’ The IFRIC considered circumstances in which A owns an interest in B, and B concurrently owns an interest in A. Those investments are known as reciprocal interests (or ‘cross-holdings’). The IFRIC discussed whether it should provide guidance on the appropriate accounting when the cross-holdings are accounted for using the equity method under IAS 28. The IFRIC decided not to develop an Interpretation on this issue because paragraph 20 of IAS 28 (revised 2003) requires elimination of reciprocal interests (through application of consolidation concepts). The IFRIC was expected to reconsider these issues once the Business Combinations phase II project was finalised.] |
| or a is the aggregate of the holdings in that associate or joint venture by the and its . The holdings of the other associates or joint ventures are ignored for this purpose. When an associate or a joint venture has subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures, the profit or loss, other comprehensive income and net assets taken into account in applying the are those recognised in the associate’s or joint venture’s financial statements (including the associate’s or joint venture’s share of the profit or loss, other comprehensive income and net assets of its associates and joint ventures), after any adjustments necessary to give effect to uniform accounting policies (see ). |
| ) and its or are recognised in the entity’s financial statements only to the extent of unrelated [Note: )’ which is reproduced after paragraph 30 of IAS 28.] investors’ interests in the associate or joint venture. ‘Upstream’ transactions are, for example, sales of assets from an associate or a joint venture to the investor. The entity’s share in the associate’s or the joint venture’s gains or losses resulting from these transactions is eliminated. [Refer: ] ‘Downstream’ transactions are, for example, sales or contributions of assets from the investor to its associate or its joint venture. and for deferral of effective date] |
| or a in exchange for an equity interest in that associate or joint venture shall be accounted for in accordance with , [Refer: ] except when the contribution lacks commercial substance, as that term is described in . If such a contribution lacks commercial substance, the gain or loss is regarded as unrealised and is not recognised unless also applies. Such unrealised gains and losses shall be eliminated against the investment accounted for using the and shall not be presented as deferred gains or losses in the entity’s consolidated statement of financial position or in the entity’s statement of financial position in which investments are accounted for using the equity method. ] |
E7 | , January 2018, Agenda Decision, ‘Contributing property, plant and equipment to an associate (IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures)’ In the fact pattern described in the request: a. | three entities, collectively referred to as investors, set up a new entity. The investors are all controlled by the same government—ie they are under common control. | b. | the investors each contribute items of PPE to the new entity in exchange for shares in that entity. The PPE contributed by the investors is not a business (as defined in IFRS 3 Business Combinations). | c. | each investor has significant influence over the new entity. Accordingly, the new entity is an associate of each of the investors. The investors do not have control or joint control of the entity. | d. | the transaction is carried out on terms equivalent to those that would prevail in an orderly transaction between market participants. |
The request asked: a. | about the application of IFRS Standards to transactions involving entities under common control (common control transactions)—ie whether IFRS Standards provide a general exception or exemption from applying the requirements in a particular Standard to common control transactions (Question A). | b. | whether an investor recognises any gain or loss on contributing PPE to the associate to the extent of other investors’ interests in the associate (Question B). | c. | how an investor determines the gain or loss on contributing PPE to the associate and the cost of its investment in the associate. In particular, the request asked whether the cost of each investor’s investment in the associate is based on the fair value of the PPE contributed or the fair value of the acquired interest in the associate (Question C). |
In analysing the request, the Committee assumed the contribution of PPE to the associate has commercial substance as described in paragraph 25 of IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment . Paragraph 7 of IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors requires an entity to apply an IFRS Standard to a transaction when that Standard applies specifically to the transaction. The Committee observed, therefore, that unless a Standard specifically excludes common control transactions from its scope, an entity applies the applicable requirements in the Standard to common control transactions. Question B Paragraph 28 of IAS 28 requires an entity to recognise gains and losses resulting from upstream and downstream transactions with an associate only to the extent of unrelated investors’ interests in the associate. Paragraph 28 includes as an example of a downstream transaction the contribution of assets from an entity to its associate. The Committee observed that the term ‘unrelated investors’ in paragraph 28 of IAS 28 refers to investors other than the entity (including its consolidated subsidiaries)—ie the word ‘unrelated’ does not mean the opposite of ‘related’ as it is used in the definition of a related party in IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures . This is consistent with the premise that financial statements are prepared from the perspective of the reporting entity, which in the fact pattern described in the request is each of the investors. Accordingly, the Committee concluded that an entity recognises any gain or loss on contributing PPE to an associate to the extent of other investors’ interests in the associate. Question C This question has an effect only if the fair value of the PPE contributed differs from the fair value of the equity interest in the associate received in exchange for that PPE. The Committee observed that in the fact pattern described in the request, it would generally expect the fair value of PPE contributed to be the same as the fair value of the equity interest in the associate that an entity receives in exchange. If there is initially any indication that the fair value of the PPE contributed might differ from the fair value of the acquired equity interest, the investor first assesses the reasons for this difference and reviews the procedures and assumptions it has used to determine fair value. The Committee observed that applying the requirements in IFRS Standards, an entity recognises a gain or loss on contributing PPE and a carrying amount for the investment in the associate that reflects the determination of those amounts based on the fair value of the PPE contributed—unless the transaction provides objective evidence that the entity’s interest in the associate might be impaired. If this is the case, the investor also considers the impairment requirements in IAS 36 Impairment of Assets . If, having reviewed the procedures and assumptions used to determine fair value, the fair value of the PPE is more than the fair value of the acquired interest in the associate, this would provide objective evidence that the entity’s interest in the associate might be impaired. For all three questions, the Committee concluded that the principles and requirements in IFRS Standards provide an adequate basis for an entity to account for the contribution of PPE to an associate in the fact pattern described in the request. Consequently, the Committee decided not to add this matter to its standard-setting agenda.] | or a , an entity receives monetary or non-monetary assets, the entity recognises in full in profit or loss the portion of the gain or loss on the non-monetary contribution relating to the monetary or non-monetary assets received. ] |
| or is recognised in full in the investor’s financial statements. and, for deferral of effective date, and ] |
| and for deferral of effective date] |
| from the date on which it becomes an or a joint venture. On acquisition of the investment, any difference between the cost of the investment and the entity’s share of the net fair value [Refer: ] of the investee’s identifiable assets and liabilities is accounted for as follows: (a) | Goodwill relating to an associate or a joint venture is included in the carrying amount of the investment. of that goodwill is not permitted. | (b) | Any excess of the entity’s share of the net fair value of the investee’s identifiable assets and liabilities over the cost of the investment is included as income in the determination of the entity’s share of the associate or joint venture’s profit or loss in the period in which the investment is acquired. |
Appropriate adjustments to the entity’s share of the associate’s or joint venture’s profit or loss after acquisition are made in order to account, for example, for depreciation of the depreciable assets based on their fair values at the acquisition date. Similarly, appropriate adjustments to the entity’s share of the associate’s or joint venture’s profit or loss after acquisition are made for impairment losses such as for goodwill or property, plant and equipment. | or joint venture are used by the entity in applying the . When the end of the reporting period of the entity is different from that of the associate or joint venture, the associate or joint venture prepares, for the use of the entity, financial statements as of the same date as the financial statements of the entity unless it is impracticable to do so. ] |
| , the financial statements of an or a joint venture used in applying the are prepared as of a date different from that used by the entity, adjustments shall be made for the effects of significant transactions or events that occur between that date and the date of the entity’s financial statements. In any case, the difference between the end of the reporting period of the associate or joint venture and that of the entity shall be no more than three months. The length of the reporting periods and any difference between the ends of the reporting periods shall be the same from period to period. |
| or a uses accounting policies other than those of the entity for like transactions and events in similar circumstances, adjustments shall be made to make the associate’s or joint venture’s accounting policies conform to those of the entity when the associate’s or joint venture’s financial statements are used by the entity in applying the . |
| or that is an investment entity, the entity may, when applying the , elect to retain the fair value measurement applied by that investment entity associate or joint venture to the investment entity associate’s or joint venture’s interests in subsidiaries. [Refer: ] This election is made separately for each investment entity associate or joint venture, at the later of the date on which (a) the investment entity associate or joint venture is initially recognised; (b) the associate or joint venture becomes an investment entity; and (c) the investment entity associate or joint venture first becomes a . [Refer: ] |
| or a joint venture equals or exceeds its interest in the associate or joint venture, the entity discontinues recognising its share of further losses. The interest in an associate or a joint venture is the carrying amount of the investment in the associate or joint venture determined using the together with any long-term interests that, in substance, form part of the entity’s net investment in the associate or joint venture. For example, an item for which settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future is, in substance, an extension of the entity’s investment in that associate or joint venture. Such items may include preference shares and long-term receivables or loans, but do not include trade receivables, trade payables or any long-term receivables for which adequate collateral exists, such as secured loans. [Refer: ] Losses recognised using the equity method in excess of the entity’s investment in ordinary shares are applied to the other components of the entity’s interest in an associate or a joint venture in the reverse order of their seniority (ie priority in liquidation). (Amendments to IAS 28) in October 2017] |
| or joint venture. If the associate or joint venture subsequently reports profits, the entity resumes recognising its share of those profits only after its share of the profits equals the share of losses not recognised. ] |
Impairment losses | or losses in accordance with , the entity applies paragraphs 41A–41C to determine whether there is any objective evidence that its net investment in the associate or joint venture is impaired. |
| (a) | significant financial difficulty of the associate or joint venture; | (b) | a breach of contract, such as a default or delinquency in payments by the associate or joint venture; | (c) | the entity, for economic or legal reasons relating to its associate’s or joint venture’s financial difficulty, granting to the associate or joint venture a concession that the entity would not otherwise consider; | (d) | it becoming probable that the associate or joint venture will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganisation; or | (e) | the disappearance of an active market for the net investment because of financial difficulties of the associate or joint venture. |
E8 | , June 2005, Agenda Decision, ‘IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement— Impairment of an Equity Security’ The IFRIC considered whether to develop guidance on how to determine whether under paragraph 61 of IAS 39 (as revised in March 2004) [now paragraph 41C of IAS 28] there has been a ‘significant or prolonged decline’ in the fair value of an equity instrument below its cost in the situation when an impairment loss has previously been recognised for an investment classified as available for sale. The IFRIC decided not to develop any guidance on this issue. The IFRIC noted that IAS 39 referred to original cost on initial recognition and did not regard a prior impairment as having established a new cost basis. The IFRIC also noted that IAS 39 Implementation Guidance E.4.9 states that further declines in value after an impairment loss is recognised in profit or loss are also recognised in profit or loss. Therefore, for an equity instrument for which a prior impairment loss has been recognised, ‘significant’ should be evaluated against the original cost at initial recognition and ‘prolonged’ should be evaluated against the period in which the fair value of the investment has been below original cost at initial recognition. The IFRIC was of the view that IAS 39 is clear on these points when all of the evidence in the requirements and the implementation guidance of IAS 39 are viewed together.] |
E9 | , July 2009, Agenda Decision, ‘IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement—Meaning of "significant or prolonged"’ were added to IAS 28 as a consequential amendment when the Board issued IFRS 9. The requirements in paragraphs 41A-41C are similar to those in paragraphs 59–61 of IAS 39.] The IFRIC received a request to provide guidance on the meaning of ‘significant or prolonged’ (as described in paragraph 61 [now ]) in recognising impairment on available-for-sale equity instruments in accordance with IAS 39. The IFRIC agreed with the submission that significant diversity exists in practice on this issue. The IFRIC concluded that some of this diversity is the result of differing ways the requirements of IAS 39 are being implemented, some of which were identified in the submission. The IFRIC noted some applications in particular that are not in accordance with the requirements of IAS 39. For example: prolonged. Thus, either a significant or a prolonged decline is sufficient to require the recognition of an impairment loss. The IFRIC noted that in finalising the 2003 amendments to IAS 39, the Board deliberately changed the word from ‘and’ to ‘or’. also objective evidence of impairment.’ [emphasis added] Consequently, the IFRIC concluded that when such a decline exists, recognition of an impairment loss is required. The IFRIC noted that the applications that are not in accordance with the requirements of IAS 39 it discussed were examples only and were unlikely to be an exhaustive list of all the inconsistencies with the standard that might exist in practice. The IFRIC also noted that the determination of what constitutes a significant or prolonged decline is a matter of fact that requires the application of judgement. The IFRIC noted that this is true even though an entity may develop internal guidance to assist it in applying that judgement consistently. The IFRIC further noted that an entity would provide disclosure about the judgements it made in determining the existence of objective evidence and the amounts of impairment in accordance with paragraphs 122 and 123 of IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements and paragraph 20 of IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures [IFRS 7 is not applicable to interests in associates and joint ventures accounted for in accordance with IAS 28]. Although the IFRIC recognised that significant diversity exists in practice, it noted that the Board has accelerated its project to develop a replacement for IAS 39 and expects to issue a new standard soon. Therefore, the IFRIC decided not to add this issue to its agenda.] |
| ] that forms part of the carrying amount of the net investment in an associate or a joint venture is not separately recognised, it is not tested for impairment separately by applying the requirements for impairment testing goodwill in IAS 36 Impairment of Assets. Instead, the entire carrying amount of the investment is tested for impairment in accordance with IAS 36 as a single asset, by comparing its recoverable amount (higher of value in use and fair value less costs of disposal) with its carrying amount whenever application of paragraphs 41A–41C indicates that the net investment may be impaired. An impairment loss recognised in those circumstances is not allocated to any asset, including goodwill, that forms part of the carrying amount of the net investment in the associate or joint venture. [Refer: ] Accordingly, any reversal of that impairment loss is recognised in accordance with IAS 36 to the extent that the recoverable amount of the net investment subsequently increases. [Refer: ] In determining the value in use of the net investment, an entity estimates: (a) | its share of the present value of the estimated future cash flows expected to be generated by the associate or joint venture, including the cash flows from the operations of the associate or joint venture and the proceeds from the ultimate disposal of the investment; or | (b) | the present value of the estimated future cash flows expected to arise from dividends to be received from the investment and from its ultimate disposal. |
Using appropriate assumptions, both methods give the same result. | or a joint venture shall be assessed for each associate or joint venture, unless the associate or joint venture does not generate cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of those from other assets of the entity. |
Separate financial statements | or a joint venture shall be accounted for in the entity’s separate financial statements in accordance with (as amended in 2011). |
Effective date and transition | , , and (as amended in 2011) at the same time. ] |
| , as issued in July 2014, amended paragraphs 40–42 and added paragraphs 41A–41C. An entity shall apply those amendments when it applies IFRS 9. |
| (Amendments to IAS 27), issued in August 2014, amended paragraph 25. An entity shall apply that amendment for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2016 retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors [Refer: and ]. Earlier application is permitted. If an entity applies that amendment for an earlier period, it shall disclose that fact. |
| (Amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28), issued in September 2014, amended paragraphs 28 and 30 and added paragraphs 31A–31B. An entity shall apply those amendments prospectively to the sale or contribution of assets occurring in annual periods beginning on or after a date to be determined by the IASB. Earlier application is permitted. If an entity applies those amendments earlier, it shall disclose that fact. ] |
| (Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 28), issued in December 2014, amended paragraphs 17, 27 and 36 and added paragraph 36A. An entity shall apply those amendments for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2016. Earlier application is permitted. If an entity applies those amendments for an earlier period, it shall disclose that fact. ] |
| , issued in December 2016, amended and . An entity shall apply those amendments retrospectively in accordance with [Refer: and ] for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. Earlier application is permitted. If an entity applies those amendments for an earlier period, it shall disclose that fact. ] |
| , issued in May 2017, amended paragraph 18. An entity shall apply that amendment when it applies IFRS 17. |
| , issued in October 2017, added and deleted paragraph 41. An entity shall apply those amendments retrospectively in accordance with [Refer: ] for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019, except as specified in . Earlier application is permitted. If an entity applies those amendments earlier, it shall disclose that fact. ] |
| at the same time it first applies shall apply the transition requirements in IFRS 9 to the long-term interests described in . ] |
| after it first applies shall apply the transition requirements in IFRS 9 necessary for applying the requirements set out in to long-term interests. For that purpose, references to the date of initial application in IFRS 9 [Refer: ] shall be read as referring to the beginning of the annual reporting period in which the entity first applies the amendments (the date of initial application of the amendments). [Refer: ] The entity is not required to restate prior periods to reflect the application of the amendments. The entity may restate prior periods only if it is possible without the use of hindsight. [Refer: ] |
| , an entity that applies the temporary exemption from IFRS 9 in accordance with IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts is not required to restate prior periods to reflect the application of the amendments. [Refer: ] The entity may restate prior periods only if it is possible without the use of hindsight. [Refer: ] |
| or , at the date of initial application of the amendments [Refer: (second sentence) and (final sentence) regarding the date of initial application of the amendments] it shall recognise in the opening retained earnings (or other component of equity, as appropriate) any difference between: (a) | the previous carrying amount of long-term interests described in at that date; and | (b) | the carrying amount of those long-term interests at that date. |
References to IFRS 9 | , any reference to IFRS 9 shall be read as a reference to . |
Withdrawal of IAS 28 (2003)Board ApprovalsApproval by the board of ias 28 issued in december 2003. International Accounting Standard 28 Investments in Associates (as revised in 2003) was approved for issue by the fourteen members of the International Accounting Standards Board. Sir David Tweedie | Chairman | Thomas E Jones | Vice-Chairman | Mary E Barth | | Hans-Georg Bruns | | Anthony T Cope | | Robert P Garnett | | Gilbert Gélard | | James J Leisenring | | Warren J McGregor | | Patricia L O’Malley | | Harry K Schmid | | John T Smith | | Geoffrey Whittington | | Tatsumi Yamada | | Approval by the Board of Sale or Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its Associate or Joint Venture (Amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28) issued in September 2014Sale or Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its Associate or Joint Venture was approved for issue by eleven of the fourteen members of the International Accounting Standards Board. Mr Kabureck, Ms Lloyd and Mr Ochi dissented 1 from the issue of the amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28. Their dissenting opinions are set out after the Basis for Conclusions. Hans Hoogervorst | Chairman | Ian Mackintosh | Vice-Chairman | Stephen Cooper | | Philippe Danjou | | Martin Edelmann | | Patrick Finnegan | | Amaro Luiz de Oliveira Gomes | | Gary Kabureck | | Suzanne Lloyd | | Takatsugu Ochi | | Darrel Scott | | Chungwoo Suh | | Mary Tokar | | Wei-Guo Zhang | | Approval by the Board of Investment Entities: Applying the Consolidation Exception (Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 28) issued in December 2014Investment Entities: Applying the Consolidation Exception was approved for issue by the fourteen members of the International Accounting Standards Board. Hans Hoogervorst | Chairman | Ian Mackintosh | Vice-Chairman | Stephen Cooper | | Philippe Danjou | | Amaro Luiz De Oliveira Gomes | | Martin Edelmann | | Patrick Finnegan | | Gary Kabureck | | Suzanne Lloyd | | Takatsugu Ochi | | Darrel Scott | | Chungwoo Suh | | Mary Tokar | | Wei-Guo Zhang | | Approval by the Board of Effective Date of Amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28 issued in December 2015Effective Date of Amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28 was approved for publication by the fourteen members of the International Accounting Standards Board. Hans Hoogervorst | Chairman | Ian Mackintosh | Vice-Chairman | Stephen Cooper | | Philippe Danjou | | Martin Edelmann | | Patrick Finnegan | | Amaro Gomes | | Gary Kabureck | | Suzanne Lloyd | | Takatsugu Ochi | | Darrel Scott | | Chungwoo Suh | | Mary Tokar | | Wei-Guo Zhang | | Approval by the Board of Long-term Interests in Associates and Joint Ventures (Amendments to IAS 28) issued in October 2017Long-term Interests in Associates and Joint Ventures (Amendments to IAS 28) was approved for issue by 10 of 14 members of the International Accounting Standards Board (Board). Mr Ochi dissented. His dissenting opinion is set out after the Basis for Conclusions. Messrs Anderson and Lu and Ms Tarca abstained in view of their recent appointments to the Board. Hans Hoogervorst | Chairman | Suzanne Lloyd | Vice-Chair | Nick Anderson | | Martin Edelmann | | Françoise Flores | | Amaro Luiz de Oliveira Gomes | | Gary Kabureck | | Jianqiao Lu | | Takatsugu Ochi | | Darrel Scott | | Thomas Scott | | Chungwoo Suh | | Ann Tarca | | Mary Tokar | | 1 | Ms Patricia McConnell (former IASB member) intended to dissent from the issue of the amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28 for the same reasons as Ms Lloyd and Mr Ochi. Her dissenting opinion is not included in these amendments, because her term as an IASB member expired on 30 June 2014. |
Investment in associatesInvestment in associates journal entries, acquisition of associate journal entry. Account | Debit | Credit |
---|
Investment in associates | 000 | | Cash | | 000 |
Income or loss on investment in associates journal entryIncome from investment in associates Account | Debit | Credit |
---|
Investment in associates | 000 | | Income from investments | | 000 |
Loss on investment in associates Account | Debit | Credit |
---|
Loss on investments | 000 | | Investment in associates | | 000 |
Dividend received from associatesAccount | Debit | Credit |
---|
Cash | 000 | | Investment in associates | | 000 |
Investment in associates exampleFor example, on January 1, 2020, the company ABC acquires 30% shares of the common stock of the XYZ corporation for $240,000. At the end of 2020, XZY corporation reports a net income of $150,000. And at the same time, it also declares and pays the cash dividend of $60,000 to its shareholders. Account | Debit | Credit |
---|
Investment in associates | 240,000 | | Cash | | 240,000 |
Account | Debit | Credit |
---|
Investment in associates | 45,000 | | Income from investments | | 45,000 |
Account | Debit | Credit |
---|
Cash | 18,000 | | Investment in associates | | 18,000 |
Related posts:- Today's news
- Reviews and deals
- Climate change
- 2024 election
- Newsletters
- Fall allergies
- Health news
- Mental health
- Sexual health
- Family health
- So mini ways
- Unapologetically
- Buying guides
Entertainment- How to Watch
- My Portfolio
- Latest News
- Stock Market
- Biden Economy
- Stocks: Most Actives
- Stocks: Gainers
- Stocks: Losers
- Trending Tickers
- World Indices
- US Treasury Bonds Rates
- Top Mutual Funds
- Options: Highest Open Interest
- Options: Highest Implied Volatility
- Basic Materials
- Communication Services
- Consumer Cyclical
- Consumer Defensive
- Financial Services
- Industrials
- Real Estate
- Stock Comparison
- Advanced Chart
- Currency Converter
- Credit Cards
- Balance Transfer Cards
- Cash-back Cards
- Rewards Cards
- Travel Cards
- Credit Card Offers
- Best Free Checking
- Student Loans
- Personal Loans
- Car insurance
- Mortgage Refinancing
- Mortgage Calculator
- Morning Brief
- Market Domination
- Market Domination Overtime
- Asking for a Trend
- Opening Bid
- Stocks in Translation
- Lead This Way
- Good Buy or Goodbye?
- Financial Freestyle
- Capitol Gains
- Living Not So Fabulously
- Decoding Retirement
- Fantasy football
- Pro Pick 'Em
- College Pick 'Em
- Fantasy baseball
- Fantasy hockey
- Fantasy basketball
- Download the app
- Daily fantasy
- Scores and schedules
- GameChannel
- World Baseball Classic
- Premier League
- CONCACAF League
- Champions League
- Motorsports
- Horse racing
New on YahooYahoo FinanceSIT Investment Associates Inc's Strategic Acquisition in Putnam Premier Income TrustIn this article:, overview of the recent transaction. On September 6, 2024, SIT Investment Associates Inc made a significant addition to its portfolio by acquiring 1,138,295 shares of Putnam Premier Income Trust ( NYSE:PPT ). This transaction, priced at $3.70 per share, increased the firm's total holdings in PPT to 20,168,565 shares, marking a substantial influence on its investment strategy with a portfolio position of 1.72% and a holding percentage of 20.95% in the traded stock. Profile of SIT Investment Associates IncWarning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with CEV. Founded in 1981 by Eugene C. Sit, SIT Investment Associates Inc has grown from a modest beginning to managing over $6.6 billion in assets. The firm, headquartered in Minneapolis, employs a mix of quantitative and fundamental analysis across its diversified investment portfolio, primarily focusing on the financial services and technology sectors. With a strong emphasis on fixed income and public equity markets globally, SIT Investment Associates caters to a varied clientele, including high net worth individuals and institutional investors. Details of the Trade ActionThe recent acquisition by SIT Investment Associates Inc not only reflects a strategic addition of 1,138,295 shares but also demonstrates the firm's confidence in Putnam Premier Income Trust's potential. This move has a modest impact of 0.1% on the firm's portfolio, consolidating its position in the asset management industry. Financial Overview of Putnam Premier Income TrustPutnam Premier Income Trust, a Massachusetts-based investment company, focuses on high current income consistent with capital preservation, primarily through investments in the U.S. government sector. Despite a challenging market, evidenced by a 63.1% decline since its IPO and a modest year-to-date gain of 1.65%, PPT maintains a market capitalization of approximately $355.23 million with a PE ratio of 18.27. Market Position and Performance MetricsPutnam Premier Income Trust's market position is reflected in its GF Score of 34/100, indicating potential challenges in future performance. The stock's financial strength and Profitability Rank are areas of concern, with scores of 7/10 and 3/10, respectively. Additionally, its Growth Rank and GF Value Rank stand at 0/10, highlighting significant hurdles in these areas. Sector and Industry AnalysisThe asset management industry, where Putnam Premier Income Trust operates, is highly competitive and sensitive to market fluctuations. SIT Investment Associates Inc's focus on this sector aligns with its largest allocations, primarily in financial services and technology, indicating a strategic alignment with its core investment philosophy. Implications of the TradeThe decision by SIT Investment Associates Inc to increase its stake in Putnam Premier Income Trust may be driven by the firm's long-term income generation strategy and its expertise in fixed income investments. This move is expected to bolster the firm's position in the asset management sector, potentially benefiting its diverse clientele through enhanced portfolio diversification and income opportunities. This acquisition by SIT Investment Associates Inc underscores its strategic investment approach and belief in the potential of Putnam Premier Income Trust. By increasing its stake, the firm not only reinforces its presence in the asset management industry but also aligns its portfolio to benefit from potential future income streams, reflecting a well-calculated move in its broader investment strategy. This article, generated by GuruFocus, is designed to provide general insights and is not tailored financial advice. Our commentary is rooted in historical data and analyst projections, utilizing an impartial methodology, and is not intended to serve as specific investment guidance. It does not formulate a recommendation to purchase or divest any stock and does not consider individual investment objectives or financial circumstances. Our objective is to deliver long-term, fundamental data-driven analysis. Be aware that our analysis might not incorporate the most recent, price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative information. GuruFocus holds no position in the stocks mentioned herein. This article first appeared on GuruFocus . Recommended Stories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
IAS 28 outlines the accounting for investments in associates. An associate is an entity over which an investor has significant influence, being the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee (but not control or joint control), and investments in associates are, with limited exceptions, required to be accounted for using the equity method.
Overview. IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (as amended in 2011) outlines how to apply, with certain limited exceptions, the equity method to investments in associates and joint ventures. The standard also defines an associate by reference to the concept of "significant influence", which requires power to participate in financial and operating policy decisions of an investee ...
including the full text of Section 14 Investments in Associates of the IFRS for SMEs Standard issued by the International Accounting Standards Board in October 2015. with extensive explanations, self-assessment questions and case studies. IFRS® Foundation Columbus Building 7 Westferry Circus Canary Wharf London E14 4HD United Kingdom.
In May 2011 the Board issued a revised IAS 28 with a new title— Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures. In September 2014 IAS 28 was amended by Sale or Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its Associate or Joint Venture (Amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28). These amendments addressed the conflicting accounting requirements for ...
Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures. (IAS 28) is set out in paragraphs 1-47. All the paragraphs have equal authority but retain the IASC format of the Standard when it was adopted by the IASB. IAS 28 should be read in the context of its objective and the Basis for Conclusions, the. Preface to IFRS Standards.
The objective of IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures is: To set out the requirements for the application of the equity method when accounting for investments in associates and joint ventures. Let me remind you a couple of terms: An associate is an entity over which an investor has significant influence.
Library and Information Service. Expert help with research and access to trustworthy, professional sources. +44 (0)20 7920 8620. [email protected]. IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures prescribes the accounting for investments in associates and sets out the requirements for the application of the equity method when accounting for ...
Upon completion of this module you will be able to identify investments that must be accounted for using the equity method under IAS 28, calculate the carrying value of the investment and share of the profit or loss of associate or joint venture applying the equity method and define disclosure requirements. Topics covered in the e-learning:
investor's other comprehensive income (see IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements). ... 18 When an investment in an associate or a joint venture is held by, or is held indirectly through, an entity that is a venture capital organisation, or a mutual fund, unit trust and similar entities including investment-linked ...
Practical Example - Nestle's Investment in Associates. Nestle is a Swiss multinational company headquartered in Switzerland. Nestle, the largest food company, globally had around CHF 91.43 billion in revenue in 2018. Below is the income statement of Nestle as per the 2018 annual report. Source: www.nestle.com.
IPSAS 36 explains the application of the equity method of accounting, which is used to account for investments in associates and joint ventures. The requirements are very similar to the current guidance in IPSAS 7, Investment in Associates. Because equity accounting must now be used when accounting for joint ventures, the title of the standard now also refers to joint ventures.In contrast with ...
The equity method, governed by IAS 28, is a simplified form of consolidation used to account for investments in associates and joint ventures, with one key distinction: investee's financials are not incorporated line-by-line into the investor's financial statements. Instead, a solitary asset, representative of the equity-accounted ...
investor's other comprehensive income (see AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements). 11 The recognition of income on the basis of distributions received may not be an adequate measure of the income earned by an investor on an investment in an associate or a joint venture because the distributions
Approval by the Board of Long-term Interests in Associates and Joint Ventures (Amendments to IAS 28) issued in October 2017. Long-term Interests in Associates and Joint Ventures (Amendments to IAS 28) was approved for issue by 10 of 14 members of the International Accounting Standards Board (Board). Mr Ochi dissented.
17 - Investment-in Associate (Basic Principles) - Free download as Powerpoint Presentation (.ppt / .pptx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. The document discusses accounting for investments in associates under the equity method. Key points include: 1. An associate is an entity over which an investor has significant influence, generally presumed between 20 ...
Investment in Associate - Free download as Powerpoint Presentation (.ppt / .pptx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. The document discusses investment in associates and the equity method of accounting. It defines an associate as an entity over which an investor has significant influence, usually through 20% or more ownership.
1a. Investment in Associate - Lecture - Free download as Powerpoint Presentation (.ppt / .pptx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. The document discusses accounting for investments in associates using the equity method. It defines an associate as an investment where an entity has significant influence, generally meaning 20-50% voting rights.
Solution: On January 1, 2020. As the 30% share of the common stock of XZY corporation represents the investment in associates, the company ABC can make the journal entry for the acquisition of associate for $240,000 on January 1, 2020, as below: Account. Debit.
of the entity.Separate financial statements44 An investment in an associate or a joint venture shall be accounted for in the entity's separate financial statements in accordance with pa. ed in 2011). Effective date and transition45 An entity shall apply this Standard for annual. eriods beginning on or after 1 Ja.
On September 6, 2024, SIT Investment Associates Inc made a significant addition to its portfolio by acquiring 1,138,295 shares of Putnam Premier Income Trust (NYSE:PPT). This transaction, priced ...
IAS 28 outlines the accounting for investments in associates. An associate is an entity over which an investor has significant influence, being the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee (but not control or joint control), and investments in associates are, with limited exceptions, required to be accounted for using the equity method.
Presentation of Financial Statements). 11 The recognition of income on the basis of distributions received may not be an adequate ... 18 When an investment in an associate or a joint venture is held by, or is held indirectly through, an entity that is a venture capital organisation, or a mutual fund, unit trust and ...
Chapter 13 Investment in Associates - Free download as Powerpoint Presentation (.ppt / .pptx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. The document discusses accounting for investments in associates under PAS 28. It defines an associate as an entity over which an investor has significant influence, which is presumed to exist if the investor holds 20% or more of ...