1 page essay on why vaping is bad

Essay Service Examples Health Smoking

Essay on Why Is Vaping Bad

Table of contents

Vaping and the health risks behind it, introduction.

• Proper editing and formatting
• Free revision, title page, and bibliography
• Flexible prices and money-back guarantee

• Breland, Alison, et al. “Electronic Cigarettes: What Are They and What Do They Do?” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1394, no. 1, 2016, pp.530.,doi:10.1111/nyas.12977.
• “E-Cigarettes: The Health Risks of Vaping.” NBCNews.com, NBCUniversal News Group, www.nbcnews.com/better/health/better-cigarettes-vaping-comes-its-own-set-health-risks-ncna819716.
• “Is Vaping Bad for You? Learn the Truth about the Side Effects Here.” Best Vape Deals - Cheap Vape Mods, Tanks & EJuice | Vaping Cheap, 10 Oct. 2018, vapingcheap.com/vaping-side-effects/.
• Palazzolo, and Dominic L. “Electronic Cigarettes and Vaping: A New Challenge in Clinical Medicine and Public Health. A Literature Review.” Frontiers, Frontiers, 1 Nov. 2013, www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2013.00056/full.
• “The Different Types of Vapes You Need to Know.” Vaping360, vaping360.com/vaping-101/different-types-of-vapes/.
• “10 Shocking Dangers of Vaping | Health Risks Of Vaping And E-Cigarettes.” The Authentic Gay, 30 Jan. 2019, www.theauthenticgay.com/10-vaping-health-risks/

Our writers will provide you with an essay sample written from scratch: any topic, any deadline, any instructions.

Cite this paper

Related essay topics.

Get your paper done in as fast as 3 hours, 24/7.

Related articles

Most popular essays

• Perspective

Should smoking be raised to the age of 21? I believe so, did you know that 95 per cent of all...

These days smoking has become more of a serious problem in New Zealand. People are getting more...

Electronic cigars, also known as vape pens, are battery-driven and deliver nicotine through a...

Smoking is like murder; it’s risky. In the beginning, it might seem fun and exhilarating, but...

The period of adolescence is exciting yet evolutionary part of every individual’s life. Young...

• Adolescence

Of late an issue has happened with youngster smoking. The number of youngsters who smoke has...

• Smoking Ban

Did you know smoking is one of the biggest contributors to illness and death in the uk? It is hard...

This report aims to discuss the purpose of Public Health England (PHE) and the short- and...

People do not understand exactly how dangerous vaping is to their bodies. Some believe it is...

Join our 150k of happy users

• Get original paper written according to your instructions
• Save time for what matters most

Fair Use Policy

EduBirdie considers academic integrity to be the essential part of the learning process and does not support any violation of the academic standards. Should you have any questions regarding our Fair Use Policy or become aware of any violations, please do not hesitate to contact us via [email protected].

We are here 24/7 to write your paper in as fast as 3 hours.

Provide your email, and we'll send you this sample!

By providing your email, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Say goodbye to copy-pasting!

Get custom-crafted papers for you.

Enter your email, and we'll promptly send you the full essay. No need to copy piece by piece. It's in your inbox!

How bad is vaping and should it be banned?

Professor at the National Drug Research Institute (Melbourne), Curtin University

PhD Candidate (Psychiatry) & Research Assistant, University of Newcastle

Disclosure statement

Nicole Lee works as a consultant in the health sector and a psychologist in private practice. She has previously received funding by Australian and state governments, NHMRC and other bodies for evaluation and research into alcohol and other drug prevention and treatment.

Brigid Clancy is an Associate at 360Edge, a drug and alcohol consultancy company.

University of Newcastle and Curtin University provide funding as members of The Conversation AU.

View all partners

Vaping regularly makes headlines, with some campaigning to make e-cigarettes more available to help smokers quit, while others are keen to see vaping products banned, citing dangers, especially for teens.

So just how dangerous is it? We have undertaken an evidence check of vaping research . This included more than 100 sources on tobacco harm reduction, vaping prevalence and health effects, and what other countries are doing in response. Here’s what we found.

How does vaping compare to smoking?

Smoking is harmful. It’s the leading preventable cause of death in Australia. It causes 13% of all deaths , including from lung, mouth, throat and bladder cancer, emphysema, heart attack and stroke, to name just a few. People who smoke regularly and don’t quit lose about ten years of life compared with non-smokers.

Nicotine, a mild stimulant, is the active ingredient in both cigarettes and nicotine vaping products. It’s addictive but isn’t the cause of cancer or the other diseases related to smoking.

Ideally, people wouldn’t be addicted to nicotine, but having a safe supply without the deadly chemicals, for instance by using nicotine patches or gum, is safer than smoking. Making these other sources available is known as “harm reduction”.

Vaping is not risk-free, but several detailed reviews of the evidence plus a consensus of experts have all estimated it’s at least 95% safer to vape nicotine than to smoke tobacco. The risk of cancer from vaping, for example, has been estimated at less than 1%.

These reviews looked at the known dangerous chemicals in cigarettes, and found there were very few and in very small quantities in nicotine vapes. So the argument that we won’t see major health effects for a few more decades is causing more alarm than is necessary.

Is ‘everyone’ vaping these days?

Some are concerned about the use of vaping products by teens, but currently available statistics show very few teens vape regularly. Depending on the study, between 9.6% and 32% of 14-17-year-olds have tried vaping at some point in their lives.

But less than 2% of 14-17-year-olds say they have used vapes in the past year. This number doubled between 2016 and 2019, but is still much lower than the rates of teen smoking (3.2%) and teen alcohol use (32%).

It’s the same pattern we see with drugs other than alcohol: a proportion of people try them but only a very small proportion of those go on to use regularly or for a long time. Nearly 60% of people who try vaping only use once or twice .

Smoking rates in Australia have declined from 24% in 1991 to 11% in 2019 because we have introduced a number of very successful measures such as restricting sales and where people can smoke, putting up prices, introducing plain packaging, and improving education and access to treatment programs.

But it’s getting harder to encourage the remaining smokers to quit with the methods that have worked in the past. Those still smoking tend to be older , more socially disadvantaged , or have mental health problems.

Read more: My teen's vaping. What should I say? 3 expert tips on how to approach 'the talk'

Should we ban vapes?

So we have a bit of a dilemma. Vaping is much safer than smoking, so it would be helpful for adults to have access to it as an alternative to cigarettes. That means we need to make them more available and accessible.

But ideally we don’t want teens who don’t already smoke to start regular vaping. This has led some to call for a “ crackdown ” on vaping.

But we know from a long history of drug prohibition - like alcohol prohibition in the 1920s - that banning or restricting vaping could actually do more harm than good.

Banning drugs doesn’t stop people using them - more than 43% of Australians have tried an illicit drug at least once. And it has very little impact on the availability of drugs.

But prohibition does have a number of unintended consequences, including driving drugs underground and creating a black market or increasing harms as people switch to other drugs, which are often more dangerous.

The black market makes drugs more dangerous because there is no way to control quality. And it makes it easier, not harder, for teens to access them, because there are no restrictions on who can sell or buy them.

Read more: Learning about the health risks of vaping can encourage young vapers to rethink their habit

Are our current laws working?

In 2021, Australia made it illegal to possess and use nicotine vaping products without a prescription. We are the only country in the world to take this path.

The problem is even after more than a year of this law, only 8.6% of people vaping nicotine have a prescription, meaning more than 90% buy them illegally.

Anecdotal reports even suggest an increase in popularity of vaping among teens since these laws were introduced. At best, they are not helping.

It may seem counterintuitive, but the way to reduce the black market is to make quality-controlled vapes and liquids more widely available, but restricted to adults. If people could access vaping products legally they wouldn’t buy them on the black market and the black market would decline.

We also know from many studies on drug education in schools that when kids get accurate, non-sensationalised information about drugs they tend to make healthier decisions. Sensationalised information can have the opposite effect and increase interest in drugs . So better education in schools and for parents and teachers is also needed, so they know how to talk to kids about vaping and what to do if they know someone is vaping.

What have other countries done?

Other countries allow vapes to be legally sold without a prescription, but impose strict quality controls and do not allow the sale of products to people under a minimum age. This is similar to our regulation of cigarettes and alcohol.

The United Kingdom has minimum standards on manufacturing, as well as restrictions on purchase age and where people can vape.

Aotearoa New Zealand introduced a unique plan to reduce smoking rates by imposing a lifetime ban on buying cigarettes. Anyone born after January 1 2009 will never be able to buy cigarettes, so the minimum age you can legally smoke keeps increasing. At the same time, NZ increased access to vaping products under strict regulations on manufacture, purchase and use.

As of late last year, all US states require sellers to have a retail licence, and sales to people under 21 are banned. There are also restrictions on where people can vape.

A recent study modelled the impact of increasing access to nicotine vaping products in Australia. It found it’s likely there would be significant public health benefits by relaxing the current restrictive policies and increasing access to nicotine vaping products for adults.

The question is not whether we should discourage teens from using vaping products or whether we should allow wider accessibility to vaping products for adults as an alternative to smoking. The answer to both those questions is yes.

The key question is how do we do both effectively without one policy jeopardising the outcomes of the other?

If we took a pragmatic harm-reduction approach, as other countries have done, we could use our very successful model of regulation of tobacco products as a template to achieve both outcomes.

Read more: It's safest to avoid e-cigarettes altogether – unless vaping is helping you quit smoking

• Tobacco control

Senior Research Fellow - Curtin Institute for Energy Transition (CIET)

Social Media Producer

Post Doctoral Research Fellow, Generative AI

Dean (Head of School), Indigenous Knowledges

Laboratory Head - RNA Biology

A monthly newsletter from the National Institutes of Health, part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Search form

Print this issue

The Risks of Vaping

A Look at Safety

You’ve probably heard a lot about vaping lately. You might also know about the recent outbreak of lung injuries and deaths linked to vaping in the U.S. But those aren’t the only risks that come with vaping. Here’s what you need to know.

Vaping devices, also known as e-cigarettes, vape pens, and e-hookahs among other terms, come in many shapes and sizes. Some look like traditional cigarettes, cigars, or pipes. Others are shaped like every-day objects, such as pens or USB memory sticks.

While they may look different, most vaping devices work in a similar way. Puffing activates a battery-powered heating device. This heats the liquid in a cartridge, turning it into vapors that are inhaled.

Vaping exposes the lungs to a variety of chemicals. These may include the main active chemicals in tobacco (nicotine) or marijuana (THC), flavorants, and other ingredients that are added to vaping liquids. Plus, other chemicals can be produced during the vaporizing process.

“If the liquid has nicotine in it, then the user is inhaling nicotine along with the other ingredients in the liquid,” explains Dr. Thomas Eissenberg, an expert on tobacco research at Virginia Commonwealth University.

While vaping devices work similarly, some are more powerful than others. They create more vapor and deliver more chemicals.

So how safe is vaping? Studies suggest nicotine vaping may be less harmful than traditional cigarettes when people who regularly smoke switch to them as a complete replacement. But nicotine vaping could still damage your health.

“Your lungs aren’t meant to deal with the constant challenge of non-air that people are putting into them—sometimes as many as 200 puffs a day—day after day, week after week, year after year,” Eissenberg says.

“You’re inhaling propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, flavorants that were meant to be eaten but not inhaled, and nicotine,” he explains. “And all of those are heated up in this little reactor, which is an e-cigarette. When they get heated up, those components can turn into other potentially dangerous chemicals.”

One harmful chemical may be a thickening agent called Vitamin E acetate, which is sometimes used as an additive in THC-containing vape products. The CDC identified it as a “chemical of concern” among people with vaping-associated lung injuries. They recommend avoiding any vaping product containing Vitamin E acetate or THC, particularly those from informal sources like friends, family, or in-person or online dealers.

Vaping is now more popular among teens than smoking traditional cigarettes. One in four high school seniors say they vaped nicotine in the past month. And studies have found that teens who vape nicotine may be more likely to go on to smoke traditional cigarettes.

Marijuana vaping has also increased dramatically among teens. About 20% of high school seniors vaped marijuana in the past year. The rates have more than doubled in the past two years.

New laws are aimed at curbing vaping among teens. People must now be 21 to buy any tobacco product, including vaping products. And companies can no longer produce and sell flavors that appeal to children like fruit and mint.

If you’ve already started vaping or smoking cigarettes, it’s never too late to quit. See the Wise Choices box for tips on stopping.

Related Stories

Stop Smoking Early To Improve Cancer Survival

Lung Health and Our Environment

Staying Safe in the Water

Parent Smoking Linked to Rheumatoid Arthritis

NIH Office of Communications and Public Liaison Building 31, Room 5B52 Bethesda, MD 20892-2094 [email protected] Tel: 301-451-8224

Editor: Harrison Wein, Ph.D. Managing Editor: Tianna Hicklin, Ph.D. Illustrator: Alan Defibaugh

Attention Editors: Reprint our articles and illustrations in your own publication. Our material is not copyrighted. Please acknowledge NIH News in Health as the source and send us a copy.

For more consumer health news and information, visit health.nih.gov .

For wellness toolkits, visit www.nih.gov/wellnesstoolkits .

Teen Vaping: The New Wave of Nicotine Addiction Essay

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Over the years, the utilization of vaping products has dramatically increased, particularly among youth. With at least 12 deaths and close to 1,000 sickened, vaping, the enormously fashionable alternative for consuming nicotine or perhaps flavorful substances, has unexpectedly been riskier than predicted (Dinardo & Rome, 2019). The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimates that more than 2 million young people smoked e-cigarettes in 2021 (Dinardo & Rome, 2019).

It might have a significant effect if state officials asked the region’s health authority to ban all flavored vape goods in reaction to this issue to safeguard the youth’s well-being (Domenico et al., 2021). A state does have other options in addition to that. The best way to overcome this difficulty is for nations to incorporate free science-based application innovations. While enforcing an immediate ban benefits many parents, incorporating an app is preferable since it immediately communicates with the youth by showing them the negative impacts and ultimately nullifies any possibility of teenagers smoking.

Banning commodities, especially which bring some preconceived pleasures increases the demand for those who want them instead of cutting them. It is correct that banning vapes will have a slight effect as parents will majorly appreciate it, but it would only make the youth go to more extraordinary lengths seeking the vapes, hence imposing a threat more. This solution would work in the short term and involve many state officers and laws to force the action.

Alternatively, using scientifically constructed applications that are freely accessible in any state would have a significant positive effect as it directly communicates with youth. Showcasing the adverse effects of vaping and providing statistical facts in the form of notifications on youth’s phones will, by a majority, cut vape users as they are spoken to intellectually and emotionally. On the other hand, this would work over the long term, which is more profitable for the future generation and the nation’s government.

Therefore, incorporating a scientifically created application solution is the best overall solution and should be integrated into states where vaping is prone. A significant drop will be evident as soon as the government spreads awareness of the new freely accessible application. As many people work now not for themselves but the betterment of future generations, this solution would pose the best course of action in entirely eradicating vaping for the youth soon, with no possibility of newly developing again.

Dinardo, P., & Rome, E. S. (2019). Vaping: The new wave of Nicotine Addiction . Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 86 (12), 789–798. Web.

Domenico, L., DeRemer, C. E., Nichols, K. L., Campbell, C., Moreau, J. R., Childs, G. S., & Merlo, L. J. (2021). Combatting the epidemic of e-cigarette use and vaping among students and transitional-age youth. Current Psychopharmacology, 10 (1), 5–16. Web.

• Discussion: Vaping and E-Cigarettes
• Laws Regarding Vaping and E-Cigarettes
• The Vaping Ages 13 and Up
• Drug and Alcohol Abuse Among Teenagers
• Alcohol and Drug Abuse in Canada
• Misconceptions About Addiction
• Why Are Cigarettes Tightly Regulated?
• Episodes of The Business of Drugs Series
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2023, November 22). Teen Vaping: The New Wave of Nicotine Addiction. https://ivypanda.com/essays/teen-vaping-the-new-wave-of-nicotine-addiction/

"Teen Vaping: The New Wave of Nicotine Addiction." IvyPanda , 22 Nov. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/teen-vaping-the-new-wave-of-nicotine-addiction/.

IvyPanda . (2023) 'Teen Vaping: The New Wave of Nicotine Addiction'. 22 November.

IvyPanda . 2023. "Teen Vaping: The New Wave of Nicotine Addiction." November 22, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/teen-vaping-the-new-wave-of-nicotine-addiction/.

1. IvyPanda . "Teen Vaping: The New Wave of Nicotine Addiction." November 22, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/teen-vaping-the-new-wave-of-nicotine-addiction/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Teen Vaping: The New Wave of Nicotine Addiction." November 22, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/teen-vaping-the-new-wave-of-nicotine-addiction/.

• Entertainment
• Environment
• Information Science and Technology
• Social Issues

Home Essay Samples Sociology Rogerian Argument

An Unbiased Overview on Vaping

*minimum deadline

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below

• Adaptability
• African American
• American Dream

Related Essays

Need writing help?

You can always rely on us no matter what type of paper you need

*No hidden charges

100% Unique Essays

Absolutely Confidential

Money Back Guarantee

By clicking “Send Essay”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails

You can also get a UNIQUE essay on this or any other topic

Thank you! We’ll contact you as soon as possible.

Persuasive Essay on Vaping and E-cigarettes Should Be Banned

Nicotine is a highly addictive substance which is as hard to give up as heroin.  2.06 million teens are using nicotine on a daily basis across America. Nicotine is commonly used in vaping and e-cigarettes, and the dosage is either lower or the same as in cigarettes and tobacco products.Some believe vapes lead to drug addictions, while others say they do nothing wrong and have no effect. Vaping and E-cigarettes should be banned. Vaping is unbenefictial to a person’s health and rather targets their packaging towards young children and gives them a higher risk of developing a nicotine addiction. 

The number of kids who vape is increasing, addicting new generations to nicotine and cigarettes, and introducing them to smoking. The percentage of kids who vape has gone up throughout the years, For example, "As of 2020, 19.6% of high school students used e-cigarettes, the most-used tobacco product among the age group, followed by cigars (5%)" (ProCon 1). 19.6% of high school students rely on nicotine. The nicotine in the vapes is the same as the one in cigarettes that can lead to them turning to cigarettes. Many of the students can get their friends addicted to nicotine as well, increasing the number of students who use e-cigarettes. The site also mentions that "One JUULpod contains as much nicotine as a pack of cigarettes, both of which last for about 200 puffs" (ProCon 1). Vaping can be just as bad and addictive as cigarettes. It may take longer to use the whole vape rather than a pack of cigarettes, but it's still the same amount of nicotine consumed. It is not a healthier option if it's not as different as cigarettes.   Matthew Myers, who campaigns against tobacco, stated, "Like cigarette companies, e-cigarette makers claim they don’t market to kids. But they’re using the same themes and tactics tobacco companies have long used to market regular cigarettes to kids (Exploring Issues 1). E-cigarettes and vape companies tend to rely on the same marketing used to get kids into cigarettes. They use the same techniques as tobacco companies that try to get kids to buy their products. They use a confident and good looking person to say vaping is cool and desirable. Vaping attracts many new people into smoking and opens many opportunities for health issues. 

Nicotine can lead to many problems regarding health.  Nicotine is a very addictive substance and can damage a person's body. One way it can affect a person is "Nicotine used by young people may increase the risk of addiction to other drugs and impair prefrontal brain development, which can lead to ADD and disrupt impulse control"(ProCon 1).  Nicotine can cause cravings and cause impulsive behavior if a person becomes addicted. Nicotine can lead to more drugs and can cause brain damage to a person.  Brain damage can lead to disorders like ADD. Not only does it lead to brain disorders, but also long-term diseases and strokes. The article states, "People who use e-cigarettes have a 71% increased risk of stroke and a 40% higher risk of heart disease, as compared to nonusers" (ProCon 1). People who use e-cigarettes or vapes have a higher chance of having a stroke or heart disease, which could kill them. The chemicals in the products can expose a person to life-long struggles because of a stroke. Heart disease is a long-term disease that can result from vaping and is the leading cause of death in America. A main contributor to these injuries and illnesses is the chemicals inside the vape. An example of what the chemicals can do is "Some ingredients in the liquids used in e-cigarettes change composition when they are heated, leading to inhalation of harmful compounds such as formaldehyde, which is carcinogenic" (ProCon 1). The liquids can change when heated, changing the compounds in the liquid. The liquid compounds could become dangerous and turn into chemicals like formaldehyde, which can lead to irritations all over the body and sometimes even cancer. Some health conditions and problems can cause problems for the rest of a person's life, but some argue it helps people with smoking.

E-cigarettes help people stop smoking. Studies have been done many times on this topic. One study states, "A July 2019 study found that cigarette smokers who picked up vaping were 67% more likely to quit smoking" (ProCon 1). That may be true, but people can still face health issues and still ingest an equal amount of nicotine found in a pack of cigarettes. Vapes can be safer than cigarettes because of the fact that they use vapor, not smoke. The website says, "However, most scientists agree that ESDs are much less harmful to health than tobacco cigarettes" (Exploring Issues). Vapes can be much safer than tobacco with items inside, but they can also expose a person to the same health problems as tobacco. Vaping can even heat up and change the liquid compound inside of it, creating formaldehyde, which can lead to cancer and irritations. The heat in the vapes can burn holes in the lungs as well, just like cigarettes. 

Vaping can cause many problems regarding health and contributes to attracting more children to turn to vaping. Vapes can be marketed the same as cigarettes and can be just as harmful. Vaping can lead to a gateway of health issues like strokes, heart attacks, ADD, nausea, and more. The liquid in the vapes can create dangerous compounds when heated up and can burn holes into the lungs.  It may be different than smoking and a healthier option, but the risks are still present.

Related Samples

• The History of Syphilis Essay Example
• Argumentative Essay on Why Healthcare Should Be Free
• Essay on Mental Disorder and Society
• Research Paper about Rheumatoid Arthritis
• Why we must work together in ending COVID-19 and curbing racism?
• Correlation of Neonatal Respiratory Failure and Gestational Diabetes on Neonates
• The Influence Of Sports In My Life
• Research Paper on Wireless Brain Sensors
• Research Paper: Physical Therapist as a Career
• Essay Sample about COVID-19

Didn't find the perfect sample?

You can order a custom paper by our expert writers

24/7 writing help on your phone

To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”

Why Vaping Is Bad - Free Essay Examples and Topic Ideas

Vaping is bad because of the chemicals in e-cigarettes, including nicotine and other harmful substances. These chemicals can cause damage to the lungs and other organs, leading to serious health problems. Additionally, vaping can be addictive and lead to long-term dependency on nicotine. Vaping has also been linked to an increased risk of heart disease, COPD, and other respiratory illnesses.

• 📘 Free essay examples for your ideas about Why Vaping Is Bad
• 🏆 Best Essay Topics on Why Vaping Is Bad
• ⚡ Simple & Why Vaping Is Bad Easy Topics
• 🎓 Good Research Topics about Why Vaping Is Bad
• 📖 Essay guide on Why Vaping Is Bad
• ❓ Questions and Answers

Essay examples

Essay topic.

Save to my list

Remove from my list

• Cause and Effect Essay (Smoking Cigarettes)
• Causes and Effects of Smoking Cigarettes
• Vaping is dangerous to your health
• Vaping is addictive
• Vaping is a gateway to smoking
• Vaping is expensive
• Concerns about Youth Vaping
• Effect of Vaping and Smoking on Health
• I believe that tobacco and cigarettes should be banned from the United
• Vaping is harmful to the environment
• Juuling and Teenagers: Why Vaping is a Dangerous Trend
• Vaping is harmful to others
• Vaping is a fire hazard
• Opposition to S.78 and the tobacco industry
• Vaping is illegal in some places
• Respiratory Assessment
• Should Cigarettes Be Banned
• Teen Vaping And Its Consequences
• The Negative Effects of Marijuana
• Vaping can be a distraction
• Vaping can be disruptive
• The Pros And the Cons Vaping Devices, also Called E-cigarettes
• The Solution to Vaping Problem
• Vaping can be smelly
• Why Are People Still Smoking?
• Why People Should Stop Smoking?
• Vaping can be messy
• Vaping can be dangerous to children
• Vaping can be dangerous to pets
• Vaping can be dangerous to your home

How to Write An Perfect Essay About Why Vaping Is Bad

Are you looking for tips on how to write an essay about why vaping is bad? Well, look no further! Here are some suggestions that will help you write a great paper:

• First, pick your topic. If you’re writing a paper on why vaping is bad then the first thing you need to do is find out what makes it bad.
• Next, come up with some ideas for your essay. You can brainstorm some topics and then narrow them down until you have one final idea for your paper.
• Now that you have an idea, start writing! You can start by outlining what you will be writing about in each section of your paper so that it’s easier for you when it comes time to actually start writing those sections later on down the road when things get busy around here at home (or wherever else).
• Finally, make sure everything flows smoothly together so that people who read your paper won’t feel like something doesn’t quite add up or make sense within their own minds as well as others around them who may want to read this type of information too.

What is a vape?

A vape is an electronic cigarette that produces vapor from a chemical liquid. It consists of a mouthpiece, a battery, a heating element, and a special refill. Inhaling and exhaling vapor from a vape resembles the process of smoking a regular cigarette, so it is often seen as an alternative. The difference is that tobacco products produce smoke with a pungent odor, while a vape produces vapor similar to water vapor, but with a dash of flavorings and toxic substances.

The electronic cigarette can look like a pen, a rectangular box or a flash drive. It is not conspicuous and easy to cover with your hand. Also, the vape for smoking does not leave an unpleasant odor on clothing, skin and hair. It is because of these reasons it is especially popular among teenagers and young adults.

Why smoking is so dangerous?

How is a vape harmful?

Because of the unsafe composition of vaping fluid, vaping increases the risks of heart, vascular, and respiratory system problems. In September 2019, there was an outbreak of severe lung disease in the United States. Health authorities conducted a study and proved that smoking electronic cigarettes caused the problem.

Scientists from the U.S. National Academies have published 47 conclusions about vaping, most of which are negative. The few positive points suggest that quitting regular cigarettes reduces the effects of carcinogenic particles in the smoke.

The main negative effects of vaping are:

• the occurrence of addiction;
• Inhaling vapors of liquids that can be toxic and deadly;
• Low quality devices may explode and burn your skin;
• The material used to make the device may release toxins.

The harm from a vape doesn’t stop there. The effects that occur after years of e-cigarette use remain unknown. This is because vaping is a relatively new product and researchers have not had a chance to study the long-term effects.

What happens when you stop smoking?

What is dangerous for lung and heart health?

A 2019 medical study proved that vaping affects the heart, lungs, and worsens circulation. There is a link between smoking e-cigarettes and an increased risk of heart attack, stroke or angina. And the risks increase regardless of a person’s lifestyle or other habits. A 2018 experiment on rats confirmed that long-term exposure to vaping can damage the lungs in the same way that tobacco smoke does.

There are also studies that have not found a direct link between vaping and lung or heart disease. They do, however, put smokers of all cigarettes at higher risk.

All reputable studies agree that vaping is less harmful than cigarettes, but it is impossible to call it safe.

Essay on Why Vaping Is Bad: Structure

Thesis Statement: Vaping is bad for you and for the environment because it causes health problems and pollutes the air.

Introduction: Vaping has become a popular alternative to smoking cigarettes, but there are many reasons why it’s not a good idea.

Body Paragraph 1: The first reason is that vaping is bad for your health.

Body Paragraph 2: Second, vaping can harm the environment by releasing toxic chemicals into the air.

Conclusion: In conclusion, vaping should be avoided at all costs because it causes health problems and pollutes the air.

6 signs that your child may be vaping

Need Help To Write Your Why Vaping Is Bad Essay?

We have a team of professional writers who specialize in writing essays and other academic papers like research papers , term papers and dissertations. Our writers are native English speakers, they are well-educated and have had at least 5 years of experience in writing essays and other academic papers.

We have many satisfied customers who have already used our services and we would be glad to help you too. If you need help with your essay, please contact us.

Related video to Why Vaping Is Bad

• Why Vaping Is Bad For You

FAQ about Why Vaping Is Bad

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

Essay on Vaping

Students are often asked to write an essay on Vaping in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Vaping

Introduction.

Vaping is a modern trend where people inhale vapor from e-cigarettes. These devices heat a liquid into vapor, which users then inhale.

Popularity of Vaping

Vaping has become popular, especially among teenagers. It’s often seen as a safer alternative to traditional smoking.

Vaping and Health

However, vaping can still harm health. It can lead to lung damage and addiction, as e-cigarettes often contain nicotine.

While vaping is popular and often seen as less harmful than smoking, it’s important to know it can still pose health risks.

250 Words Essay on Vaping

The emergence of vaping.

Vaping, the act of inhaling vapor produced by electronic cigarettes or similar devices, has emerged as a popular alternative to traditional smoking. These devices, often marketed as safer alternatives to cigarettes, have gained significant traction, especially among younger demographics.

Perceived Benefits and Risks

The perceived benefits of vaping include reduced exposure to harmful chemicals compared to traditional smoking and potential assistance in smoking cessation. However, these benefits are contested. The long-term health impacts are still largely unknown, and there’s evidence suggesting that vaping may serve as a gateway to traditional smoking for young people.

Regulation and Public Health

The regulation of vaping products is a contentious issue. Some advocate for stricter regulations to prevent youth access, while others argue for more lenient policies to promote harm reduction among adult smokers. Public health officials grapple with these complexities, striving to balance harm reduction, prevention of youth initiation, and the potential risks of unknown long-term health effects.

Future Implications

The future of vaping is uncertain, with scientific research and policy debates ongoing. It’s clear, however, that the conversation surrounding vaping is a microcosm of larger public health discussions about harm reduction, individual freedom, and the role of regulation in protecting public health. As such, the discourse on vaping serves as an important case study for students of public health, policy, and ethics.

500 Words Essay on Vaping

Vaping, a contemporary phenomenon, has rapidly gained popularity, particularly among young adults and adolescents. It involves inhaling vapor created by an electronic cigarette or other vaping devices. The trend has sparked significant debate due to its potential health implications, societal impact, and its role in nicotine addiction.

Understanding Vaping and Its Appeal

Health implications of vaping.

The health effects of vaping are a significant concern. While e-cigarettes are often marketed as safer alternatives to traditional cigarettes, research suggests that they are not without risks. The aerosol users inhale and exhale from e-cigarettes can expose both themselves and bystanders to harmful substances, including heavy metals, volatile organic compounds, and other harmful ingredients.

Furthermore, nicotine, a primary ingredient in most e-cigarettes, is highly addictive and can harm adolescent brain development, which continues into the early to mid-20s. Long-term health effects of vaping remain uncertain due to its relatively recent emergence, but early research indicates potential risks to respiratory and cardiovascular health.

The Societal Impact of Vaping

Moreover, there is a concern that vaping serves as a gateway to traditional smoking, particularly among young people. While some argue that e-cigarettes can aid in smoking cessation, others contend that they may encourage nicotine addiction and transition to more harmful tobacco products.

Regulatory Challenges and Future Directions

Regulating vaping poses significant challenges. The rapid evolution of vaping devices, the variety of substances they can deliver, and their widespread accessibility and appeal to youth make regulatory efforts complex.

In conclusion, while vaping is often perceived as a safer alternative to traditional smoking, it is not without risks. The potential health implications, coupled with its societal impact and regulatory challenges, make it a complex and critical public health issue. As such, it is essential for ongoing research, public discourse, and effective policy measures to address this contemporary phenomenon.

If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Second Essay

Third essay, request another, follow class ace :.

The Point Conversations and insights about the moment.

• Share full article

Frank Bruni

Contributing Opinion Writer

The Election of Magical Thinking

There’s a simple way to reconcile voters’ concerns about President Biden’s age with his desire to continue his work in a second term: He demotes himself to vice president. Runs as a running mate. Someone younger tops the Democratic ticket. For the next four years, he taps his experience without exhausting his energy.

Likely? Ha. There’s as good a chance I’ll win a gold in gymnastics at the Paris Olympics.

But that hasn’t stopped the Biden-as-veep chatter not only on byways of the internet but also in an actual poll by SurveyUSA , which asked Americans whether they’d support that scenario. A majority said yes, suggesting that they didn’t recognize its ludicrousness. A politician doesn’t trade Air Force One for Air Force Two any more than someone with a flatbed seat in first class asks for the last row of coach. And Biden already played second fiddle under President Barack Obama. He’s not itching for an encore.

So let’s junk that bunk — and with it, other fantasies that treat a profoundly serious presidential contest in deeply unserious ways.

This is an election of magical thinking beyond the usual. That’s no accident. It reflects how frustrated many Americans are with the reality of two major-party candidates who don’t appeal to them. How desperate Donald Trump’s opponents are for some grand assurance of — or secret incantation for — his defeat. How susceptible not only to elaborate conspiracy theories but also to milder fictions Trump’s supporters can be.

No, you keen-eyed MAGA sleuths, Biden’s aides didn’t schedule an early debate so that they could replace him after he flails. Nor did they engineer Hunter Biden’s conviction just to look virtuous.

Democrats, it is not the case that if journalists just stop talking about Biden’s age, many Americans miraculously won’t notice it. Nor are there tea leaves auguring a revolt against Trump at the Republican convention. A respected public intellectual privately promoted that idea to me.

And Michelle Obama will not — abracadabra! — be riding to the rescue. She has never signaled any interest in elected office and has been clear about her distaste for the muck of politics.

Indulging such illusions is dangerous. Those of us who believe that Trump’s return to the White House would be ruinous must prosaically and persistently make the case for Biden’s superiority, flaws and all. We must plan, plod, slog. No sorcery will save us.

Farah Stockman

Editorial Board Member

Biden Courts Some Liberal Love on Immigration

Two weeks after President Biden abruptly cracked down on asylum seekers at the southern border — angering some progressives — he announced a new program on Tuesday to protect from deportation the undocumented spouses and stepchildren of American citizens.

In a certain way, it is a no-brainer. The undocumented spouses of American citizens are already eligible for citizenship, but were required to leave the country to apply for a green card, a process that can take years. That’s especially true for people who slipped across the border — rather than overstayed a visa — since they could be barred from re-entry for up to 10 years . Now they will be able to apply from the United States and work legally while they wait.

For about half a million American families, this is a game changer. It is being compared to DACA , which created a special legal status for people who were brought into the United States by their parents. But it is not quite the clear case that DACA was. Kids who were brought into the country illegally by their parents committed no crime and shouldn’t have to face the same consequences as adults who came by their own volition.

You don’t have to be a raging ideologue to believe that there should be consequences for breaking the law. Plenty of Democrats feel that people who sneak across the border or overstay a visa should be required to make amends, even if that just means paying a civil fine. That’s one reason Biden’s permissive policies on immigration are endangering his bid for re-election.

But the move to protect undocumented spouses is politically savvy. It’s a family-oriented policy that makes a priority of the needs of American citizens, unlike those of his policies that allowed nearly two million asylum seekers into the country in recent years.

Despite the fever dream of conspiracy theorists, they can’t cast a ballot to thank him.

Advertisement

Paul Krugman

Opinion Columnist

The Paranoid Style in Tariff Policy

A few days ago Donald Trump floated a truly terrible, indeed unworkable economic proposal. I’m aware that many readers will say, “So what else is new?” But in so doing, you’re letting Trump benefit from the soft bigotry of rock-bottom expectations, not holding him to the standards that should apply to any presidential candidate. A politician shouldn’t be given a pass on nonsense because he talks nonsense all the time.

But in a way the most interesting thing about Trump’s latest awful policy idea is the way his party responded, with the kind of obsequiousness and paranoia you normally expect in places like North Korea.

What Trump reportedly proposed was an “ all tariff policy ” in which taxes on imports replace income taxes. Why is that a bad idea?

First, the math doesn’t work. Annual income tax receipts are around $2.4 trillion ; imports are around $3.9 trillion . On the face of it, this might seem to suggest that Trump’s idea would require an average tariff rate of around 60 percent. But high tariffs would reduce imports, so tariff rates would have to go even higher to realize the same amount of revenue, which would reduce imports even more, and so on. How high would tariffs have to go in the end? I did a back-of-the-envelope calculation using highly Trump-favorable assumptions and came up with a tariff rate of 133 percent; in reality, there’s probably no tariff rate high enough to replace the income tax.

And to the extent that we did replace income taxes with tariffs, we’d in effect sharply raise taxes on working-class Americans while giving the rich a big tax cut — because the income tax is fairly progressive, falling most heavily on affluent taxpayers , while tariffs are de facto a kind of sales tax that falls most heavily on the working class.

So this is a really bad idea that would be highly unpopular if voters knew about it.

But here’s the kicker: How did the Republican National Committee respond when asked about it? By having its representative declare , “The notion that tariffs are a tax on U.S. consumers is a lie pushed by outsourcers and the Chinese Communist Party.”

Now, economists have been saying that tariffs are a tax on domestic consumers for the past two centuries or so; I guess they’ve been working for China all along. Yes, there are exceptions and qualifications, but if you imagine that Trump is thinking about optimal tariff theory , I have a degree from Trump University you might want to buy.

Anyway, look at how the R.N.C. responded to a substantive policy question: by insisting not just that Dear Leader’s nonsense is true, but that anyone who disagrees is part of a sinister conspiracy.

Don’t brush this off. It’s one more piece of evidence that MAGA has become a dangerous cult.

Serge Schmemann

Better to Close the Israeli War Cabinet Than Let the Extremists In

By all accounts, the real reason Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel dissolved his “war cabinet” — the small decision-making body he established soon after the Hamas attacks that led Israel to go to war in Gaza — was to prevent the far-right hawks in his government from getting close to strategic military decisions.

Keeping Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich as far away from military operations as possible is good. They are dangerous nationalists and would do what they could to make the war even more horrific. How things came to this is a sad reflection of the way political maneuvering has played into this extraordinarily cruel war.

The war cabinet was effectively finished before Netanyahu announced its formal dissolution on Monday. The two centrist opposition leaders he brought in to broaden support for the war effort, Benny Gantz and Gadi Eisenkot — both former military chiefs of staff with solid security credentials — had quit a week earlier, angry that crucial decisions were being blocked by “political considerations.” That brought the extremists knocking at the door, compelling Netanyahu to close down the war cabinet rather than let them in, and to rely on a clutch of close advisers in handling the war.

The problem is that Netanyahu’s idea of handling the war is to juggle pressures for a cease-fire from Israeli centrists and the Biden administration against threats from the far-right zealots to quit his government if he calls a cease-fire. Without the right his government would fall, probably pushing Netanyahu out of office — a development that would satisfy a majority of Israelis but leave Netanyahu exposed to the corruption charges that have been dogging him for years.

The specific issue that drove Gantz and Eisenkot to quit the war cabinet was procrastination on the cease-fire proposal that President Biden announced on May 31. Biden had presented the three-stage plan, which included release of all remaining Israeli hostages, as an Israeli proposal, which required only agreement from Hamas to go into effect. But Netanyahu never publicly acknowledged ownership or agreement, and Hamas came back with conditions that Israel rejected. The Biden administration then upped the ante by taking the plan to the U.N. Security Council, where it passed with only Russia abstaining.

The administration remains outwardly sanguine about the cease-fire. But aside from the political hurdles on the Israeli side, predicting or obtaining a response from Hamas has been onerous. Negotiations for the movement are handled by Hamas political operatives in Doha, Qatar, but the final word is with the Hamas chief in Gaza, Yahya Sinwar, the author of the murderous raid on Israel on Oct. 7. Communications with Sinwar are painfully slow, as he takes huge precautions not to give away his whereabouts in Gaza. He also knows that the remaining Israeli hostages are his only bargaining chip, and he is in no rush to cash them in.

That is the maddening reality of this war: Leaders on both sides keep it going even when the best interests of their people so clearly demand its immediate end.

Patrick Healy

Deputy Opinion Editor

The Tony Award I Wish I Could Give

I first saw the director Maria Friedman’s production of “Merrily We Roll Along” in London in 2013 and felt I was witnessing some kind of miracle. Here was a revival of an unusual kind of Broadway legend — a musical regarded as brilliant and ambitious but, ultimately, perhaps fatally flawed because of an unsympathetic central character and a plot whose reverse chronology kept you from being swept up and away by the heart of the show (the friendship of the three core characters).

What Friedman pulled off was extraordinary. Nothing a director does is more important than choosing the right cast, and Friedman’s work with the actor Mark Umbers turned the selfish, shallow Franklin Shepard Jr. into a man who craved connection but ended in heartbreak — an achievement that owed much to her casting of Damian Humbley and Jenna Russell as Frank’s friends Charley and Mary and the intimacy and chemistry among the three performers.

Friedman, who is an acclaimed actress in her own right, stayed with “Merrily” for years, mounting a version in Boston and then, to enormous acclaim, an Off Broadway production in 2023 that moved to Broadway last fall, 42 years after the initial Broadway production closed after only 16 regular performances. Her “Merrily” won the Tony Award for best musical revival on Sunday night, as well as Tonys for two of its sensational stars, Jonathan Groff as Frank and Daniel Radcliffe as Charley.

Groff, Radcliffe and their co-star Lindsay Mendez created a bond of such affection and understanding that their trio of performances will stay in my memory for a long time.

In a surprise, Friedman didn’t win the Tony for best director of a musical on Sunday; that honor went to Danya Taymor, who did excellent work on “The Outsiders.”

Yet later in the Tony ceremony, when “Merrily” won for best musical revival, one of the show’s lead producers, Sonia Friedman — who is the director’s sister and a legend in her own right — heaped praise on her sibling and tried to hand her Tony to her. Maria Friedman gently pushed the Tony away and then gave a loving tribute to the show and its creators, Stephen Sondheim and George Furth.

“Well, Steve and George, ‘Merrily’s’ popular,” she said.

It was a class-act performance. If I could come up with a new Tony category and give the award, it would be to an artist who kept working and working on a puzzle of a show and its casting until she created a version for the ages, and that award would go to Maria Friedman for “Merrily.”

Pamela Paul

A Warning on Social Media Is the Very Least We Can Do

You’re in the middle of a public health emergency involving a dangerously addictive substance — let’s say an epidemic of fentanyl or vaping among teens. Which of the following is the best response?

1. Issue a warning. Tell everyone, “Hey, watch out — this stuff isn’t good for you.”

2. Regulate the dangerous substance so that it causes the least amount of harm.

3. Ban the substance and penalize anyone who distributes it.

In the midst of a well-documented mental health crisis among children and teenagers, with social media use a clear contributing factor, the surgeon general, Dr. Vivek Murthy, recommends choice one. As he wrote in a Times Opinion guest essay on Monday, “It is time to require a surgeon general’s warning label on social media platforms, stating that social media is associated with significant mental health harms for adolescents.”

It’s an excellent first step, but it’s a mere Band-Aid on a suppurating wound. Telling teenagers something is bad for them may work for some kids, but for others it’s practically an open invitation to abuse. To add muscle to a mere label, we need to prohibit its sale to people under 18 and enforce the law on sellers. We need to strongly regulate social media , as Europe has begun to do, and ban it for kids under 16. Murthy urges Congress to take similar steps .

Free-speech absolutists (or those who play the role when a law restricts something that earns them lots of money) will say that requiring age verification systems is an unconstitutional limit on free speech . Nonsense. We don’t allow children to freely attend PG-13 or R-rated movies. We don’t allow hard liquor to be advertised during children’s programming.

Other objections to regulation are that it’s difficult to carry out (so are many things) and that there’s only a correlative link between social media and adverse mental health rather than one of causation .

Complacency is easy. The hard truth is that many people are too addicted to social media themselves to fight for laws that would unstick their kids. Big Tech, with Congress in its pocket, is only too happy for everyone to keep their heads in the sand and reap the benefits. But a combination of Options 2 and 3 are the only ones that will bring real results.

An earlier version of this article misspelled the surname of the surgeon general. He is Dr. Vivek Murthy, not Murphy.

How we handle corrections

Why the Election Is Slipping Away From President Biden Right Now

Every Monday morning on The Point, we kick off the week with a tipsheet on the latest in the presidential campaign. Here’s what we’re looking at this week:

The spring campaign season ends this week, and the political landscape is tough for President Biden: He isn’t winning over enough voters in the battleground states. In the springtime of re-election years, many voters decide whether they’re open or closed to another term for the guy in office. Call it the incumbent threshold decision. In previous cycles, many voters gave up on Donald Trump, George H.W. Bush and Jimmy Carter by this time during re-election — those incumbents never held sustained leads in the polls after that.

When this spring began, on March 19, Trump had a polling average lead of 2 percentage points over Biden nationally, according to Real Clear Politics . As spring ends, Trump leads by about 1 percent. I think a successful spring for Biden would have had him ahead. Even more worrisome for Biden: Trump began the spring with leads in the six key swing states: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada. After months of Democratic campaigning in those states, Biden hasn’t taken the lead in any of them. Trump’s lead has held pretty steady in Nevada , Arizona and Georgia . Biden has made up enough ground in Michigan and Wisconsin to be razor-close to Trump. There hasn’t been polling recently in Pennsylvania ; the late-May polling average had Trump ahead by 2.3 points.

Some important context: The race is clearly tight, Biden has solid fund-raising, and he would win if he prevails in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. But I think the spring is ending as a missed opportunity for Biden to gain more ground on Trump, especially with Trump’s felony conviction. Based on Times polling and Times Opinion focus groups , many undecided and independent voters see Biden as ineffective on the economy, immigration and foreign wars, and too old for a second term.

That’s why, this week, Biden plans to spend a lot of time in debate prep. The reason he agreed to this unusually early debate against Trump, on June 27, is because he needs it: Look at his springtime performance and the swing state polls, and the election is slipping away from Biden right now. He needs to start persuading more people to want him for another four years — and that he’s up to the job. He has a lot to lose in this debate, but I think he was smart to take the gamble.

As for Trump, he’ll be campaigning in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania this week. Pennsylvania is shaping up to be the whole ballgame this fall: If Trump holds his lead in the Sun Belt states, all he needs is Pennsylvania to win. Trump isn’t doing much debate prep , according to my colleagues Shane Goldmacher and Reid J. Epstein, but the expectations for him are lower than for Biden. Many voters expect Trump to be the same unhinged guy he was in the 2020 debates, ranting and talking over Biden. Trump can afford to spend time in must-win Pennsylvania while Biden tries to ensure his summer is better than his spring.

Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Vaping — Should Vaping be Banned

Should Vaping Be Banned

• Categories: Vaping

About this sample

Words: 1175 |

Published: Feb 13, 2024

Words: 1175 | Pages: 3 | 6 min read

Table of contents

What are vapes.

• Vaping doesn’t have a bad smell to it where as smoking has a horrible odor that sticks to you clothes, hair and fingers and usually perfume and soap can’t cover the smell of this on your hair, clothes and hands until you have a shower. This is because it has an ashy smell that tends to linger when you smoke. This is because ciagarettes contain products like tar and oil. One cigarette can cause all of this and ever a taste and smell of your breath. When you change to Vaping all these smells and tastes go away due to different scents and flavors which make the experience a lot more pleasuring for you and people around you
• It makes your personal view change on various things. A lot of smokers think that they can’t quit and are stuck with smoking, so there isn't really any bother with exercise because smoking makes it harder, or eating healthy, or make better life choices because smoking is already bad for the,. Why start exercising if smoking makes it hard to exercise in the first place? Vaping changes the perspective. Many who switch from smoking to vaping have improvement with depression, obesity, and other chronic issues that they didn’t bother to fix because they thought there was no point.
• It saves you money Vaping is very a lot cheaper in comparison to the cost of cigarettes. Your able to get a starter kit for vaping for around half the price of half a box of cigarettes. After you invest into a good vape, they only thing you will have to pay for is a new coil and the juice you prefer when you begin to run out. According to NerdWallet, if you smoke a pack of cigarettes per day, vaping an equivalent amount will save you almost $1,200
• The experience of vaping is not as harsh as smoking. Vaping is the preferred way to consume medical cannabis because the experience is smoother than it is when smoking. The heat from smoking can be just as bothersome to a person’s air passageways as the chemicals in a cigarette. Because vaping allows you to customize the temperature, you can dial your product to the correct temperature for a more pleasurable experience.
• Vaping will still cause a dry mouth. Nicotine is a stimulant. It will cause your body to get rid of fluids when you use it. That means you still end up with a dry mouth when you’re vaping. But the dry mouth might be so bothering that it might cause someone to switch back to smoking. Usually tho if you have a bottle of water on the ready it will be okay.
• There is a higher risk of an allergic reaction. Many of the different juices that are used in vaping products are based on real food items. If you have a juice that is flavored like walnuts, for example, then there will be walnut products contained in the aerosol produced. If you’re allergic to walnuts, then you could experience an allergic reaction that is similar to what you’d experience if you consumed the actual food. For people with severe allergies to certain food products, it is necessary to avoid flavors that could trigger a food allergy.
• Vaping may come with its own dangers If you choose vaping over smoking, then you’re eliminating the hundreds of chemicals that are present in each cigarette and the smoke it produces. That makes vaping a healthier choice for current smokers. You may, however, be trading one set of problems for another. When using e-cigs, there is evidence of lead, nitrosamines, and formaldehyde exposure, which are known neurotoxins and carcinogens. These toxic items have been found to be equal, if not higher, to what is found in cigarettes.
• Vaping also has an issue with the battery being safe. Vapes usually have rechargeable batteries. These batteries can overheat when used and create contact injuries. In May 2018, The Washington Post reported that an exploding vape pen caused a 38-year-old man from Florida to die because it sent projectiles into his head. The man also suffered burns over 80% of his body in the incident. When you choose your vape make sure it’s the best one even tho thies incidents happen rarely it’s better to be safe then sorry.

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Prof Ernest (PhD)

Verified writer

• Expert in: Social Issues

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

5 pages / 2356 words

1 pages / 642 words

2 pages / 1057 words

1 pages / 540 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Vaping

Vaping has become a popular trend in recent years, especially among young adults and teenagers. It involves inhaling and exhaling an aerosol, commonly referred to as vapor, produced by an electronic cigarette or other vaping [...]

The rise of vaping has prompted significant debates and discussions surrounding its potential harms and benefits. This essay delves into the complex issue of banning vaping, exploring the reasons behind calls for prohibition, [...]

Vaping is a growing problem throughout the world, and it continues to grow as time goes on, especially in teens and youth. This effects their abilities to be one hundred percent when its necessary for their growing up stages. [...]

Many maintain that the new solution to prevent smoking are some things called Vaping. Yet it's something that has become even as much of a life-threatening epidemic as cigarette smoking. per the New York times, “With mysterious [...]

In recent years, the rise of vaping among young people has sparked intense debate and controversy. As the popularity of e-cigarettes continues to grow, so do concerns about the potential health risks and societal implications [...]

Introduction to child labor as a significant issue Mention of childhood as an important period of learning and development Introduction to the argumentative essay on child labor Prevalence of child labor in [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free