Adult learning online education:
Adult learning online education:
Adult learning online education:
About the example: Boolean searches were conducted on November 4, 2019; result numbers may vary at a later date. No additional database limiters were set to further narrow search returns.
Database strategies for targeted search results.
Most databases include limiters, or additional parameters, you may use to strategically focus search results. EBSCO databases, such as Education Research Complete & Academic Search Complete provide options to:
Keep in mind that these tools are defined as limiters for a reason; adding them to a search will limit the number of results returned. This can be a double-edged sword. How?
Use limiters with care. When starting a search, consider opting out of limiters until the initial literature screening is complete. The second or third time through your research may be the ideal time to focus on specific time periods or material (scholarly vs newspaper).
Expanding your search term at the root.
Truncating is often referred to as 'wildcard' searching. Databases may have their own specific wildcard elements however, the most commonly used are the asterisk (*) or question mark (?). When used within your search. they will expand returned results.
Using the asterisk wildcard will return varied spellings of the truncated word. In the following example, the search term education was truncated after the letter "t."
Original Search | |
adult education | adult educat* |
Results included: educate, education, educator, educators'/educators, educating, & educational |
Explore these database help pages for additional information on crafting search terms.
Tips for saving research directly to Google drive.
It is possible to save articles (PDF and HTML) and abstracts in EBSCOhost databases directly to Google drive. Select the Google Drive icon, authenticate using a Google account, and an EBSCO folder will be created in your account. This is a great option for managing your research. If documenting your research in a Google Doc, consider linking the information to actual articles saved in drive.
EBSCOHost Databases & Google Drive: Managing your Research
This video features an overview of how to use Google Drive with EBSCO databases to help manage your research. It presents information for connecting an active Google account to EBSCO and steps needed to provide permission for EBSCO to manage a folder in Drive.
About the Video: Closed captioning is available, select CC from the video menu. If you need to review a specific area on the video, view on YouTube and expand the video description for access to topic time stamps. A video transcript is provided below.
What is a literature review.
A definition from the Online Dictionary for Library and Information Sciences .
A literature review is "a comprehensive survey of the works published in a particular field of study or line of research, usually over a specific period of time, in the form of an in-depth, critical bibliographic essay or annotated list in which attention is drawn to the most significant works" (Reitz, 2014).
A systemic review is "a literature review focused on a specific research question, which uses explicit methods to minimize bias in the identification, appraisal, selection, and synthesis of all the high-quality evidence pertinent to the question" (Reitz, 2014).
EBSCO Connect [Discovery and Search]. (2022). Searching with boolean operators. Retrieved May, 3, 2022 from https://connect.ebsco.com/s/?language=en_US
EBSCO Connect [Discover and Search]. (2022). Searching with wildcards and truncation symbols. Retrieved May 3, 2022; https://connect.ebsco.com/s/?language=en_US
Machi, L.A. & McEvoy, B.T. (2009). The literature review . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press:
Reitz, J.M. (2014). Online dictionary for library and information science. ABC-CLIO, Libraries Unlimited . Retrieved from https://www.abc-clio.com/ODLIS/odlis_A.aspx
Ridley, D. (2008). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Schedule an appointment.
Contact a librarian directly (email), or submit a request form. If you have worked with someone before, you can request them on the form.
Research output : Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Original language | Indonesian |
---|---|
Journal | |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
T1 - Penggunaan Literatur Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif
AU - Afiyanti, Yati
N2 - Either in quantitative research or in qualitative research, using the literature is critical. It is conducted to generate a picture of what is known and not known about a particular situation. Searching and reviewing of the relevant literature of the study could be conducted before, during, and after the data collection and analysis of the study. In qualitative research particularly the purpose conducting the literature review varies, based on the type of study to be conducted. In general, to keep the scientific nature of data, using the extensive literature should be conducted after the study has been conducted.
AB - Either in quantitative research or in qualitative research, using the literature is critical. It is conducted to generate a picture of what is known and not known about a particular situation. Searching and reviewing of the relevant literature of the study could be conducted before, during, and after the data collection and analysis of the study. In qualitative research particularly the purpose conducting the literature review varies, based on the type of study to be conducted. In general, to keep the scientific nature of data, using the extensive literature should be conducted after the study has been conducted.
UR - http://jki.ui.ac.id/index.php/jki/article/view/157
U2 - 10.7454/jki.v9i1.157
DO - 10.7454/jki.v9i1.157
M3 - Article
SN - 2354-9203
JO - Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia
JF - Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia
Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 466))
Included in the following conference series:
551 Accesses
3 Citations
Usually, a literature review takes time and becomes a demanding step in any research project. The proposal presented in this article intends to structure this work in an organised and transparent way for all project participants and the structured elaboration of its report. Integrating qualitative and quantitative analysis provides opportunities to carry out a solid, practical, and in-depth literature review. The purpose of this article is to present a guide that explores the potentials of qualitative and quantitative analysis integration to develop a solid and replicable literature review. The paper proposes an integrative approach comprising six steps: 1) research design; 2) Data Collection for bibliometric analysis; 3) Search string refinement; 4) Bibliometric analysis; 5) qualitative analysis; and 6) report and dissemination of research results. These guidelines can facilitate the bibliographic analysis process and relevant article sample selection. Once the sample of publications is defined, it is possible to conduct a deep analysis through Content Analysis. Software tools, such as R Bibliometrix, VOSviewer, Gephi, yEd and webQDA, can be used for practical work during all collection, analysis, and reporting processes. From a large amount of data, selecting a sample of relevant literature is facilitated by interpreting bibliometric results. The specification of the methodology allows the replication and updating of the literature review in an interactive, systematic, and collaborative way giving a more transparent and organised approach to improving the literature review.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Pritchard, A.: Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? J. Doc. 25 (4), 348–349 (1969)
Google Scholar
Nalimov, V., Mulcjenko, B.: Measurement of Science: Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process. Foreign Technology Division, Washington DC (1971)
Hugar, J.G., Bachlapur, M.M., Gavisiddappa, A.: Research contribution of bibliometric studies as reflected in web of science from 2013 to 2017. Libr. Philos. Pract. (e-journal), 1–13 (2019). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2319
Verma, M.K., Shukla, R.: Library herald-2008–2017: a bibliometric study. Libr. Philos. Pract. (e-journal), 2–12 (2018). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1762
Pandita, R.: Annals of library and information studies (ALIS) journal: a bibliometric study (2002–2012). DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol. 33 (6), 493–497 (2013)
Article Google Scholar
Kannan, P., Thanuskodi, S.: Bibliometric analysis of library philosophy and practice: a study based on scopus database. Libr. Philos. Pract. (e-journal), 1–13 (2019). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2300/
Marín-Marín, J.-A., Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., Dúo-Terrón, P., López-Belmonte, J.: STEAM in education: a bibliometric analysis of performance and co-words in Web of Science. Int. J. STEM Educ. 8 (1) (2021). Article number 41
Khalife, M.A., Dunay, A., Illés, C.B.: Bibliometric analysis of articles on project management research. Periodica Polytechnica Soc. Manag. Sci. 29 (1), 70–83 (2021)
Pech, G., Delgado, C.: Screening the most highly cited papers in longitudinal bibliometric studies and systematic literature reviews of a research field or journal: widespread used metrics vs a percentile citation-based approach. J. Informet. 15 (3), 101161 (2021)
Das, D.: Journal of informetrics: a bibliometric study. Libr. Philos. Pract. (e-journal), 1–15 (2021). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5495/
Schmidt, F.: Meta-analysis: a constantly evolving research integration tool. Organ. Res. Methods 11 (1), 96–113 (2008)
Zupic, I., Cater, T.: Bibliometric methods in management organisation. Organ. Res. Methods 18 (3), 429–472 (2014)
Noyons, E., Moed, H., Luwel, M.: Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: a bibliometric study. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 50 , 115–131 (1999)
van Rann, A.: Measuring science. Capita selecta of current main issues. In: Moed, H., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (eds.) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, pp. 19–50. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2004)
Chapter Google Scholar
Garfield, E.: Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178 , 417–479 (1972)
Hirsch, J.: An index to quantify an individuals scientific research output. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 102, pp. 16569–1657. National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC (2005)
Cobo, M., López-Herrera, A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F.: Science mapping software tools: review, analysis and cooperative study among tools. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 62 , 1382–1402 (2011)
Noyons, E., Moed, H., van Rann, A.: Integrating research perfomance analysis and science mapping. Scientometrics 46 , 591–604 (1999)
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., Lim, W.M.: How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 133 , 285–296 (2021)
Aria, M., Cuccurullo, C.: Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informet. 11 (4), 959–975 (2017)
Aria, M., Cuccurullo, C.: Package ‘bibliometrix’. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/bibliometrix/bibliometrix.pdf . Accessed 10 July 2021
Börner, K., Chen, C., Boyack, K.: Visualisingg knowledge domains. Ann. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 37 , 179–255 (2003)
Morris, S., van der Veer Martens, B.: Mapping research specialities. Ann. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 42 , 213–295 (2008)
Zitt, M., Ramanana-Rahary, S., Bassecoulard, E.: Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: from cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation. Scientometrics 63 (2), 373–401 (2005)
Li, L.L., Ding, G., Feng, N., Wang, M.-H., Ho, Y.-S.: Global stem cell research trend: bibliometric analysis as a tool for mapping trends from 1991 to 2006. Scientometrics 80 (1), 9–58 (2009)
Ebrahim, A.N., Salehi, H., Embi, M.A., Tanha, F.H., Gholizadeh, H., Motahar, S.M.: Visibility and citation impact. Int. Educ. Stud. 7 (4), 120–125 (2014)
Canas-Guerrero, I., Mazarrón, F.R., Calleja-Perucho, C., Pou-Merina, A.: Bibliometric analysis in the international context of the “construction & building technology” category from the web of science database. Constr. Build. Mater. 53 , 13–25 (2014)
Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J.M., Baier-Fuentes, H.: Knowledge management: a global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 140 , 194–220 (2019)
Heradio, R., Perez-Morago, H., Fernandez-Amoros, D., Javier Cabrerizo, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A bibliometric analysis of 20 years of research on software product lines. Inf. Softw. Technol. 72 , 1–15 (2016)
Furstenau, L.B., et al.: Link between sustainability and industry 4.0: trends, challenges and new perspectives. IEEE Access 8 , 140079–140096 (2020). Article 9151934
van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L.: VOSviewer manual. Universiteit Leiden, Leiden (2021)
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., Jacomy, M.: Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: Proceedings of the Third International ICWSM Conference, pp. 361–362. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, San Jose CA (2009)
Chen, C.: How to use CiteSpace. Leanpub, Victoria, British Columbia, CA (2019)
yWorks.: yEd Graph Editor Manual. https://yed.yworks.com/support/manual/index.html . Accessed 13 July 2020
Moresi, E.A.D., Pierozzi Júnior, I.: Representação do conhecimento para ciência e tecnologia: construindo uma sistematização metodológica. In: 16th International Conference on Information Systems and Technology Management, TECSI, São Paulo SP (2019). Article 6275
Moresi, E.A.D., Pinho, I.: Proposta de abordagem para refinamento de pesquisa bibliográfica. New Trends Qual. Res. 9 , 11–20 (2021)
Moresi, E.A.D., Pinho, I.: Como identificar os tópicos emergentes de um tema de investigação? New Trends Qual. Res. 9 , 46–55 (2021)
Chen, Y.H., Chen, C.Y., Lee, S.C.: Technology forecasting of new clean energy: the example of hydrogen energy and fuel cell. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 4 (7), 1372–1380 (2010)
Ernst, H.: The use of patent data for technological forecasting: the diffusion of CNC-technology in the machine tool industry. Small Bus. Econ. 9 (4), 361–381 (1997)
Chen, C.: Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. J. Data Inf. Sci. 2 (2), 1–40 (2017)
Prabhakaran, T., Lathabai, H.H., Changat, M.: Detection of paradigm shifts and emerging fields using scientific network: a case study of information technology for engineering. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 91 , 124–145 (2015)
Klavans, R., Boyack, K.W.: Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 57 (2), 251–263 (2006)
Kauffman, J., Kittas, A., Bennett, L., Tsoka, S.: DyCoNet: a Gephi plugin for community detection in dynamic complex networks. PLoS ONE 9 (7), e101357 (2014)
Grant, M.J., Booth, A.: A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info. Libr. J. 26 (2), 91–108 (2009)
Costa, A.P., Soares, C.B., Fornari, L., Pinho, I.: Revisão da Literatura com Apoio de Software - Contribuição da Pesquisa Qualitativa. Ludomedia, Aveiro Portugal (2019)
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., Smart, P.: Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 14 (3), 207–222 (2003)
Costa, A.P., Amado, J.: Content Analysis Supported by Software. Ludomedia, Oliveira de Azeméis - Aveiro - Portugal (2018)
Pinho, I., Leite, D.: Doing a literature review using content analysis - research networks review. In: Atas CIAIQ 2014 - Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais, vol. 3, pp. 377–378. Ludomedia, Aveiro Portugal (2014)
White, M.D., Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis: a flexible methodology. Libr. Trends 55 (1), 22–45 (2006)
Souza, F.N., Neri, D., Costa, A.P.: Asking questions in the qualitative research context. Qual. Rep. 21 (13), 6–18 (2016)
Pinho, I., Pinho, C., Rosa, M.J.: Research evaluation: mapping the field structure. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas) 25 , 546–574 (2020)
Costa, A., Moreira, A. de Souza, F.: webQDA - Qualitative Data Analysis (2019). www.webqda.net
Download references
Authors and affiliations.
Catholic University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, 71966-700, Brazil
Eduardo Amadeu Dutra Moresi
University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal
Isabel Pinho & António Pedro Costa
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Eduardo Amadeu Dutra Moresi .
Editors and affiliations.
Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
António Pedro Costa
António Moreira
Department Didactics, Organization and Research Methods, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
Maria Cruz Sánchez‑Gómez
Adventist University of Africa, Nairobi, Kenya
Safary Wa-Mbaleka
Reprints and permissions
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Cite this paper.
Moresi, E.A.D., Pinho, I., Costa, A.P. (2022). How to Operate Literature Review Through Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Integration?. In: Costa, A.P., Moreira, A., Sánchez‑Gómez, M.C., Wa-Mbaleka, S. (eds) Computer Supported Qualitative Research. WCQR 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 466. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04680-3_13
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04680-3_13
Published : 05 May 2022
Publisher Name : Springer, Cham
Print ISBN : 978-3-031-04679-7
Online ISBN : 978-3-031-04680-3
eBook Packages : Intelligent Technologies and Robotics Intelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Policies and ethics
What is a Literature Review? A literature review is a critical analysis of existing research related to a specific topic or research question. Rather than simply summarizing the sources, a literature review evaluates, compares, and synthesizes the literature to highlight trends, gaps, and insights that inform your research.
Purpose and Importance: Literature reviews serve multiple key functions:
Difference Between a Literature Review and an Annotated Bibliography: While both a literature review and an annotated bibliography involve analyzing sources, they serve different purposes. An annotated bibliography focuses on summarizing and evaluating individual sources in isolation. In contrast, a literature review synthesizes multiple sources to form a cohesive narrative, identifying patterns, themes, and debates within the literature. The literature review also typically organizes the information thematically or methodologically rather than listing sources one by one.
Q: What is the main difference between a literature review and a systematic review? A: A literature review provides a broad overview of existing research on a topic, while a systematic review follows a structured methodology to identify, evaluate, and synthesize all relevant studies on a specific question.
Q: How do I choose the best type of literature review for my research? A: Consider your research question and objectives. A narrative review is suitable for broad overviews, while a systematic review is best for comprehensive analyses. A scoping review helps map out the existing literature, and a meta-analysis combines quantitative results from multiple studies.
Q: How many sources should I include in my literature review? A: The number of sources depends on your topic and the scope of your review. Generally, aim to include a comprehensive selection that represents the current state of research. Ensure sources are relevant and contribute to answering your research question.
Q: Can I include unpublished sources in my literature review? A: Yes, including unpublished sources such as dissertations, theses, or reports can provide valuable insights and fill gaps in the published literature. Ensure these sources are credible and relevant.
Q: How do I ensure my literature review is critical and not just descriptive? A: Focus on evaluating and synthesizing the sources rather than just summarizing them. Analyze the strengths, weaknesses, and contributions of each study. Highlight trends, debates, and gaps in the literature.
Gain valuable insights on how to write an impactful literature review with this comprehensive guide!
Explore practical tips and strategies for structuring a literature review in this detailed tutorial.
To illustrate how a literature review is structured and written, here's a simplified example based on a hypothetical research topic: The Impact of Social Media on Adolescent Mental Health.
Introduction: The introduction provides an overview of the research topic and its significance.
Social media has become an integral part of adolescents' lives, raising concerns about its impact on mental health. This literature review examines existing research on how social media use affects adolescent well-being, focusing on both positive and negative outcomes.
Body: The body of the review is organized thematically or methodologically.
Positive Impacts of Social Media:
Negative Impacts of Social Media:
Mixed Findings:
Discussion: The discussion synthesizes the findings, identifies trends, and highlights gaps:
The reviewed literature reveals a complex relationship between social media and adolescent mental health. While social media can offer support and educational benefits, its negative impacts—particularly related to mental health issues and cyberbullying—are significant. Further research is needed to understand how different variables affect these outcomes and to develop strategies for mitigating negative effects.
Conclusion: The conclusion summarizes the key findings and suggests areas for future research:
In summary, social media has both positive and negative effects on adolescent mental health. Addressing these impacts requires a nuanced understanding of the various factors involved and targeted interventions to support healthy social media use. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to better assess the long-term effects of social media on mental health.
This example provides a framework for how a literature review should be structured and the type of content that should be included. It demonstrates the synthesis of various sources to present a cohesive narrative on the research topic.
A Literature Review Matrix is a powerful tool that helps you organize and evaluate the sources you've gathered for your literature review. Think of it as a structured table that allows you to visually track key details from each source, helping you compare and contrast research findings, methods, and relevance to your work.
The primary goal of a Literature Review Matrix is to provide a clear and organized way to view your sources side-by-side. This makes it easier to spot patterns, identify gaps in the literature, and see how different studies connect or diverge. By using this matrix, you can:
When crafting your literature review, the matrix becomes a valuable reference. It offers a concise summary of each source, facilitating the synthesis of information and revealing connections between works. This organized approach helps ensure you cover all important themes and insights.
A typical Literature Review Matrix includes:
A Literature Review Matrix establishes a solid foundation for a well-organized literature review, ensuring you capture all critical insights and connections between sources.
To make the most of your Literature Review Matrix, follow these steps to complete each category:
Author(s) & Date : Record the author(s) of the study and the publication date. This helps track contributions and the relevance of the research over time.
Theoretical/Conceptual Framework : Note the theories or concepts guiding the study. This provides insight into the foundation of the research and its theoretical background.
Research Question(s)/Hypotheses : Summarize the main research questions or hypotheses the study addresses. This clarifies the focus and objectives of the research.
Methodology : Describe the research design and methods used. This includes the type of study, data collection methods, and analysis techniques.
Analysis & Results : Outline the main findings and how the data was analyzed. This section highlights the key discoveries of the research.
Conclusions : Record the study’s conclusions and implications. This provides a summary of the research outcomes and their significance.
Implications for Future Research : Identify suggestions for further research proposed by the study. This helps in understanding how the research contributes to ongoing scholarly conversation.
Implications for Practice : Note any practical applications or recommendations made. This connects the research findings to real-world applications.
Accurately filling in each category of the Literature Review Matrix ensures a comprehensive and organized overview of your sources, making it easier to synthesize and integrate information into your literature review.
A Literature Review Matrix is not just a tool but a strategic aid in organizing and synthesizing your research. Here’s why it’s invaluable:
Enhanced Clarity : By laying out your sources in a matrix format, you gain a clear, visual representation of the key components of each study. This clarity helps in quickly identifying patterns, contradictions, and gaps in the literature.
Streamlined Synthesis : The matrix allows you to compare and contrast findings across multiple sources efficiently. This makes synthesizing information from different studies simpler, leading to a more cohesive and comprehensive literature review.
Efficient Writing : With all essential information organized in one place, writing your literature review becomes more straightforward. The matrix provides a structured reference that helps in drafting sections and ensuring that all relevant points are addressed.
Identification of Trends and Gaps : The matrix helps in spotting trends in research and identifying areas where further investigation is needed. This insight is crucial for framing your research questions and shaping your own study.
Improved Organization : It facilitates a systematic approach to managing your sources, reducing the risk of overlooking important details and ensuring that your review is well-organized and thorough.
Using a Literature Review Matrix enhances the efficiency and quality of your literature review process. It’s a powerful tool that supports clarity, synthesis, and effective writing, ultimately contributing to a more insightful and organized review.
1.1: definisi literature review.
Literature review, atau yang dikenal juga dengan review literatur, adalah suatu proses sistematis dalam mengkaji literatur yang telah ada terkait dengan topik atau masalah penelitian tertentu. Ini bukan hanya sekedar ringkasan dari sumber-sumber literatur, melainkan analisis kritis yang menunjukkan hubungan antara literatur yang satu dengan yang lainnya serta posisi penelitian Anda dalam konteks literatur yang ada.
Melakukan literature review memiliki beberapa tujuan dan manfaat, di antaranya:
Meskipun keduanya melibatkan proses review, literature review dan review jurnal memiliki perbedaan mendasar:
2.1: memilih topik penelitian.
Sebelum memulai literature review, tentukan terlebih dahulu topik penelitian Anda. Topik harus spesifik dan relevan dengan bidang studi Anda. Pertimbangkan pertanyaan-pertanyaan berikut saat memilih topik:
Setelah menentukan topik, langkah selanjutnya adalah mencari sumber literatur yang relevan. Beberapa metode pencarian literatur meliputi:
Tidak semua sumber literatur yang Anda temukan akan relevan atau berkualitas. Oleh karena itu, Anda perlu mengevaluasi dan memilih sumber-sumber yang paling sesuai. Beberapa kriteria evaluasi meliputi:
Sebelum mulai menulis, buatlah kerangka kerja untuk literature review Anda. Kerangka kerja ini akan membantu Anda mengorganisir ide dan informasi dari sumber-sumber yang telah Anda kumpulkan. Beberapa langkah dalam menyusun kerangka kerja meliputi:
Dengan kerangka kerja yang telah Anda susun, Anda siap untuk mulai menulis. Beberapa tips dalam menulis literature review meliputi:
Baca Juga: Statistik Deskriptif dan Inferensial
3.1: struktur umum literature review.
Literature review memiliki struktur tertentu yang memudahkan pembaca untuk mengikuti alur pemikiran penulis. Struktur umum literature review meliputi:
Mengutip sumber literatur dengan benar adalah aspek penting dalam literature review. Hal ini tidak hanya menunjukkan integritas akademik tetapi juga memungkinkan pembaca untuk merujuk kembali ke sumber asli. Beberapa hal yang perlu diperhatikan dalam penulisan kutipan dan referensi:
Jika Anda berencana untuk menerbitkan literature review Anda di sebuah jurnal, ada beberapa format khusus yang perlu Anda perhatikan:
4.1: contoh literature review dari berbagai bidang studi.
Literature review dapat ditemukan di berbagai bidang studi, mulai dari ilmu sosial hingga ilmu alam. Berikut adalah beberapa contoh literature review berdasarkan bidang studi:
Banyak jurnal yang mempublikasikan literature review sebagai salah satu jenis artikelnya. Berikut adalah contoh-contoh literature review yang diterbitkan dalam jurnal:
Dalam konteks penelitian, literature review seringkali menjadi bagian dari proposal atau laporan penelitian. Berikut adalah contoh bagaimana literature review disajikan dalam konteks penelitian:
Baca Juga: Ketahui Tingkatan dan Urutan Jurnal SINTA, Cek Disini
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
A literature review is a critical analysis and synthesis of existing research on a particular topic. It provides an overview of the current state of knowledge, identifies gaps, and highlights key findings in the literature. 1 The purpose of a literature review is to situate your own research within the context of existing scholarship, demonstrating your understanding of the topic and showing how your work contributes to the ongoing conversation in the field. Learning how to write a literature review is a critical tool for successful research. Your ability to summarize and synthesize prior research pertaining to a certain topic demonstrates your grasp on the topic of study, and assists in the learning process.
What is the purpose of literature review , a. habitat loss and species extinction: , b. range shifts and phenological changes: , c. ocean acidification and coral reefs: , d. adaptive strategies and conservation efforts: .
What is a literature review .
A well-conducted literature review demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with the existing literature, establishes the context for their own research, and contributes to scholarly conversations on the topic. One of the purposes of a literature review is also to help researchers avoid duplicating previous work and ensure that their research is informed by and builds upon the existing body of knowledge.
A literature review serves several important purposes within academic and research contexts. Here are some key objectives and functions of a literature review: 2
1. Contextualizing the Research Problem: The literature review provides a background and context for the research problem under investigation. It helps to situate the study within the existing body of knowledge.
2. Identifying Gaps in Knowledge: By identifying gaps, contradictions, or areas requiring further research, the researcher can shape the research question and justify the significance of the study. This is crucial for ensuring that the new research contributes something novel to the field.
Find academic papers related to your research topic faster. Try Research on Paperpal
3. Understanding Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks: Literature reviews help researchers gain an understanding of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks used in previous studies. This aids in the development of a theoretical framework for the current research.
4. Providing Methodological Insights: Another purpose of literature reviews is that it allows researchers to learn about the methodologies employed in previous studies. This can help in choosing appropriate research methods for the current study and avoiding pitfalls that others may have encountered.
5. Establishing Credibility: A well-conducted literature review demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with existing scholarship, establishing their credibility and expertise in the field. It also helps in building a solid foundation for the new research.
6. Informing Hypotheses or Research Questions: The literature review guides the formulation of hypotheses or research questions by highlighting relevant findings and areas of uncertainty in existing literature.
Let’s delve deeper with a literature review example: Let’s say your literature review is about the impact of climate change on biodiversity. You might format your literature review into sections such as the effects of climate change on habitat loss and species extinction, phenological changes, and marine biodiversity. Each section would then summarize and analyze relevant studies in those areas, highlighting key findings and identifying gaps in the research. The review would conclude by emphasizing the need for further research on specific aspects of the relationship between climate change and biodiversity. The following literature review template provides a glimpse into the recommended literature review structure and content, demonstrating how research findings are organized around specific themes within a broader topic.
Climate change is a global phenomenon with far-reaching consequences, including significant impacts on biodiversity. This literature review synthesizes key findings from various studies:
Climate change-induced alterations in temperature and precipitation patterns contribute to habitat loss, affecting numerous species (Thomas et al., 2004). The review discusses how these changes increase the risk of extinction, particularly for species with specific habitat requirements.
Observations of range shifts and changes in the timing of biological events (phenology) are documented in response to changing climatic conditions (Parmesan & Yohe, 2003). These shifts affect ecosystems and may lead to mismatches between species and their resources.
The review explores the impact of climate change on marine biodiversity, emphasizing ocean acidification’s threat to coral reefs (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2007). Changes in pH levels negatively affect coral calcification, disrupting the delicate balance of marine ecosystems.
Recognizing the urgency of the situation, the literature review discusses various adaptive strategies adopted by species and conservation efforts aimed at mitigating the impacts of climate change on biodiversity (Hannah et al., 2007). It emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary approaches for effective conservation planning.
Strengthen your literature review with factual insights. Try Research on Paperpal for free!
Writing a literature review involves summarizing and synthesizing existing research on a particular topic. A good literature review format should include the following elements.
Introduction: The introduction sets the stage for your literature review, providing context and introducing the main focus of your review.
Body: The body of the literature review is where you provide a comprehensive analysis of existing literature, grouping studies based on themes, methodologies, or other relevant criteria.
Write and Cite as yo u go with Paperpal Research. Start now for free!
Conclusion: The conclusion of your literature review should summarize the main findings, highlight the contributions of the review, and suggest avenues for future research.
Conducting a literature review is an essential step in research that involves reviewing and analyzing existing literature on a specific topic. It’s important to know how to do a literature review effectively, so here are the steps to follow: 1
Whether you’re exploring a new research field or finding new angles to develop an existing topic, sifting through hundreds of papers can take more time than you have to spare. But what if you could find science-backed insights with verified citations in seconds? That’s the power of Paperpal’s new Research feature!
Paperpal, an AI writing assistant, integrates powerful academic search capabilities within its writing platform. With the Research | Cite feature, you get 100% factual insights, with citations backed by 250M+ verified research articles, directly within your writing interface. It also allows you auto-cite references in 10,000+ styles and save relevant references in your Citation Library. By eliminating the need to switch tabs to find answers to all your research questions, Paperpal saves time and helps you stay focused on your writing.
Here’s how to use the Research feature:
The literature review sample and detailed advice on writing and conducting a review will help you produce a well-structured report. But remember that a good literature review is an ongoing process, and it may be necessary to revisit and update it as your research progresses. By combining effortless research with an easy citation process, Paperpal Research streamlines the literature review process and empowers you to write faster and with more confidence. Try Paperpal Research now and see for yourself.
A literature review is a critical and comprehensive analysis of existing literature (published and unpublished works) on a specific topic or research question and provides a synthesis of the current state of knowledge in a particular field. A well-conducted literature review is crucial for researchers to build upon existing knowledge, avoid duplication of efforts, and contribute to the advancement of their field. It also helps researchers situate their work within a broader context and facilitates the development of a sound theoretical and conceptual framework for their studies.
Literature review is a crucial component of research writing, providing a solid background for a research paper’s investigation. The aim is to keep professionals up to date by providing an understanding of ongoing developments within a specific field, including research methods, and experimental techniques used in that field, and present that knowledge in the form of a written report. Also, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the scholar in his or her field.
Before writing a literature review, it’s essential to undertake several preparatory steps to ensure that your review is well-researched, organized, and focused. This includes choosing a topic of general interest to you and doing exploratory research on that topic, writing an annotated bibliography, and noting major points, especially those that relate to the position you have taken on the topic.
Literature reviews and academic research papers are essential components of scholarly work but serve different purposes within the academic realm. 3 A literature review aims to provide a foundation for understanding the current state of research on a particular topic, identify gaps or controversies, and lay the groundwork for future research. Therefore, it draws heavily from existing academic sources, including books, journal articles, and other scholarly publications. In contrast, an academic research paper aims to present new knowledge, contribute to the academic discourse, and advance the understanding of a specific research question. Therefore, it involves a mix of existing literature (in the introduction and literature review sections) and original data or findings obtained through research methods.
Literature reviews are essential components of academic and research papers, and various strategies can be employed to conduct them effectively. If you want to know how to write a literature review for a research paper, here are four common approaches that are often used by researchers. Chronological Review: This strategy involves organizing the literature based on the chronological order of publication. It helps to trace the development of a topic over time, showing how ideas, theories, and research have evolved. Thematic Review: Thematic reviews focus on identifying and analyzing themes or topics that cut across different studies. Instead of organizing the literature chronologically, it is grouped by key themes or concepts, allowing for a comprehensive exploration of various aspects of the topic. Methodological Review: This strategy involves organizing the literature based on the research methods employed in different studies. It helps to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of various methodologies and allows the reader to evaluate the reliability and validity of the research findings. Theoretical Review: A theoretical review examines the literature based on the theoretical frameworks used in different studies. This approach helps to identify the key theories that have been applied to the topic and assess their contributions to the understanding of the subject. It’s important to note that these strategies are not mutually exclusive, and a literature review may combine elements of more than one approach. The choice of strategy depends on the research question, the nature of the literature available, and the goals of the review. Additionally, other strategies, such as integrative reviews or systematic reviews, may be employed depending on the specific requirements of the research.
The literature review format can vary depending on the specific publication guidelines. However, there are some common elements and structures that are often followed. Here is a general guideline for the format of a literature review: Introduction: Provide an overview of the topic. Define the scope and purpose of the literature review. State the research question or objective. Body: Organize the literature by themes, concepts, or chronology. Critically analyze and evaluate each source. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the studies. Highlight any methodological limitations or biases. Identify patterns, connections, or contradictions in the existing research. Conclusion: Summarize the key points discussed in the literature review. Highlight the research gap. Address the research question or objective stated in the introduction. Highlight the contributions of the review and suggest directions for future research.
Both annotated bibliographies and literature reviews involve the examination of scholarly sources. While annotated bibliographies focus on individual sources with brief annotations, literature reviews provide a more in-depth, integrated, and comprehensive analysis of existing literature on a specific topic. The key differences are as follows:
Annotated Bibliography | Literature Review | |
Purpose | List of citations of books, articles, and other sources with a brief description (annotation) of each source. | Comprehensive and critical analysis of existing literature on a specific topic. |
Focus | Summary and evaluation of each source, including its relevance, methodology, and key findings. | Provides an overview of the current state of knowledge on a particular subject and identifies gaps, trends, and patterns in existing literature. |
Structure | Each citation is followed by a concise paragraph (annotation) that describes the source’s content, methodology, and its contribution to the topic. | The literature review is organized thematically or chronologically and involves a synthesis of the findings from different sources to build a narrative or argument. |
Length | Typically 100-200 words | Length of literature review ranges from a few pages to several chapters |
Independence | Each source is treated separately, with less emphasis on synthesizing the information across sources. | The writer synthesizes information from multiple sources to present a cohesive overview of the topic. |
References
Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 22+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster.
Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$19 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed.
Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!
Self-plagiarism in research: what it is and how to avoid it, you may also like, machine translation vs human translation: which is reliable..., how to make a graphical abstract, academic integrity vs academic dishonesty: types & examples, dissertation printing and binding | types & comparison , what is a dissertation preface definition and examples , the ai revolution: authors’ role in upholding academic..., the future of academia: how ai tools are..., how to write a research proposal: (with examples..., how to write your research paper in apa..., how to choose a dissertation topic.
What is a literature review.
A literature review is an overview of the available research for a specific scholarly topic. Literature reviews summarize existing research to answer a review question, provide context for new research, or identify important gaps in the existing body of literature.
An incredible amount of academic literature is published each year; by some estimates nearly three million articles .
Sorting through and reviewing that literature can be complicated, so this Research Guide provides a structured approach to make the process more manageable.
A literature search is a systematic search of the scholarly sources in a particular discipline. A literature review is the analysis, critical evaluation and synthesis of the results of that search. During this process you will move from a review of the literature to a review for your research. Your synthesis of the literature is your unique contribution to research.
— those new to reviewing the literature
— those that need a refresher or a deeper understanding of writing literature reviews
You may need to do a literature review as a part of a course assignment, a capstone project, a master's thesis, a dissertation, or as part of a journal article. No matter the context, a literature review is an essential part of the research process.
What is the purpose of a literature review.
A literature review is typically performed for a specific reason. Even when assigned as an assignment, the goal of the literature review will be one or more of the following:
Reviewing the literature helps you understand a research topic and develop your own perspective.
Thanks to Librarian Jamie Niehof at the University of Michigan for providing permission to reuse and remix this Literature Reviews guide.
Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts
This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.
Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.
A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. You will often see the terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably.
There are a number of different situations where you might write a literature review, each with slightly different expectations; different disciplines, too, have field-specific expectations for what a literature review is and does. For instance, in the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in scholarship. You should always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as for any other genre.
A literature review can be a part of a research paper or scholarly article, usually falling after the introduction and before the research methods sections. In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research methodology.
Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments in a class or as publications. In a class, a lit review may be assigned to help students familiarize themselves with a topic and with scholarship in their field, get an idea of the other researchers working on the topic they’re interested in, find gaps in existing research in order to propose new projects, and/or develop a theoretical framework and methodology for later research. As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on a topic. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered.
Most lit reviews use a basic introduction-body-conclusion structure; if your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction and conclusion pieces may be just a few sentences while you focus most of your attention on the body. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself.
Introduction:
Conclusion:
Lit reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to accomplish with the review. Here are some examples:
Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. Don’t be afraid to do more research if you discover a new thread as you’re writing. More info on the research process is available in our "Conducting Research" resources .
As you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this type of document ). Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic.
Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than just summarizing it. This means drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a topic over time. Many student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you:
The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations). Often, the literature review is where you can establish your research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. You have some chance to do this in your introduction in an article, but the literature review section gives a more extended opportunity to establish the conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as well). In addressing these points, you argue for your place in the conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple reporting of other sources.
Dalam dunia penelitian terutama karya ilmiah, tidak bisa dilepaskan dari literature atau dalam bahasa Indonesia literatur. Literatur merupakan sumber atau referensi atau acuan bagi para peneliti karya ilmiah, sehingga tidak bisa dilepaskan begitu saja. Dengan kata lain, melalui literatur, seseorang atau peneliti bisa memperoleh informasi serta data-data yang valid dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan yang kemudian dijadikan sebagai rujukan untuk membuat karya tulis ilmiah. Salah satu penelitian yang berkaitan dengan literatur adalah literature review.
Literatur yang sering dijadikan sebagai rujukan atau referensi dalam membuat karya tulis ilmiah, sehingga literatur sangat sulit dilepaskan dari dunia pendidikan. Oleh karena itu, literatur seringkali digunakan oleh mahasiswa untuk menyelesaikan tugas akhirnya atau skripsi. Bahkan, literatur juga dibutuhkan oleh para dosen yang sedang melakukan penelitian atau membuat jurnal.
Literatur ini bentuknya sangatlah beragam atau bisa dibilang bukan hanya buku saja, tetapi juga ada yang dalam bentuk jurnal ilmiah, disertasi, tesis, dan sebagainya. Semakin banyak literatur yang dijadikan sebagai referensi atau rujukan untuk membuat karya tulis ilmiah, maka karya tulis ilmiah yang dihasilkan menjadi optimal. Karya tulis ilmiah yang dikerjakan dengan optimal, biasanya isinya akan lebih kompleks dan tetap mudah dipahami.
Meskipun banyak literatur yang digunakan, tetapi tidak bisa menjamin akan menghasilkan karya ilmiah yang berkualitas. Oleh karena itu, dalam membuat karya ilmiah, sebaiknya pilih data yang berkualitas atau pilihlah data yang berkaitan langsung dengan topik karya ilmiah yang sedang dibuat.
Untuk bisa mendapatkan data-data yang valid dari literatur, maka pembuat karya ilmiah, sebaiknya melakukan kegiatan literature review terlebih dahulu. Hal ini perlu dilakukan agar penulis karya ilmiah mengetahui data penelitian yang sudah dilakukan sebelumnya dan bisa dijadikan sebagai referensi. Selain itu, literature review bisa juga digunakan untuk mengetahui pendekatan apa yang sudah dipilih oleh peneliti sebelumnya.
Literature review terdiri dari dua kata, yang pertama literature dan kata kedua yaitu review. Oleh karena itu, sebelum membahas lebih jauh tentang literature review, maka dalam artikel ini akan membahas pengertian literature dan pengertian review.
Literature adalah semua karya tulis yang bisa dijadikan sebagai bahan rujukan atau referensi dalam melakukan berbagai macam bidang penelitian atau karya tulis ilmiah. Dalam bahasa Indonesia, literature lebih dikenal dengan sebutan literatur. Dalam Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, (KBBI), literatur adalah bahan bacaan yang digunakan dalam berbagai aktivitas, baik secara intelektual maupun rekreasi.
Cairan Ajaib yang Bisa Menjadi Padat! Non Newton Fluid #GramediaScienceDay
Literature dijadikan sebagai referensi dikarenakan dianggap bahwa dalam literature terdapat banyak sekali data-data yang valid. Selain itu, literatur juga dianggap mempunyai banyak sekali manfaat yang sifatnya abadi. Dengan kata lain, literature tidak akan pernah mati dan akan terus ada dan akan terus berkembang.
Dalam hal ini, berbagai macam karya tulis termasuk dalam bagian literature selama masih berkaitan dengan topik pembahasan yang akan digunakan dalam membuat karya tulis ilmiah. Meskipun bisa digunakan untuk bahan referensi dalam membuat karya ilmiah, tetapi data-data yang ada pada literature harus dicek terlebih dahulu, apakah data-datanya valid atau tidak. Selain itu, bisa juga dicek melalui penulis literature, editor, hingga siapa yang menerbitkan literature tersebut.
Seperti yang sudah dijelaskan sebelumnya bahwa literature review terdiri dari dua kata, setelah membahas pengertian literature, maka pengertian review adalah suatu ringkasan atau juga ulasan yang berasal dari beberapa sumber, seperti film, buku, berita, dan jurnal. Selain itu, review bisa juga berasal dari beberapa produk yang biasanya kita lakukan setelah selesai belanja online .
Review yang dilakukan setelah menyelesaikan belanja online sangat bermanfaat bagi tokonya karena bisa mengetahui hal-hal apa yang perlu ditingkatkan dan hal-hal apa yang perlu dipertahankan. Oleh karena itu, toko online sangat mengharapkan review dari para pembelinya. Dengan begitu, pemilik toko bisa memperbaiki kualitas pelayanan atau kualitas dari produk itu sendiri, sehingga bisa meningkatkan omset penjualan.
Pada dasarnya, hampir sama dengan review produk, arti kata review pada literature review berarti suatu penilaian seseorang terhadap kualitas dari sebuah karya tulis. Dalam hal ini, karya tulis yang dimaksud sangatlah beragam, seperti karya tulis jurnal, novel, buku, dan lain-lain.
Dengan adanya literature review, maka sebuah seseorang akan mengetahui apakah karya tulis tersebut bisa dijadikan referensi untuk penelitian (karya ilmiah) atau tidak. Literature review juga bermanfaat bagi pembuat karya tulisnya karena mengetahui hal-hal yang perlu dilakukan untuk meningkatkan kualitas karya tulisnya.
Tidak hanya itu, literature review bisa juga bermanfaat bagi orang lain dalam membantu untuk menemukan karya tulis yang memiliki kualitas bagus dan bisa dijadikan sebagai rujukan dalam melakukan penelitian. Dikarenakan cakupan review sangatlah luas, maka review itu sendiri dibagi menjadi beberapa jenis, seperti review jurnal, review, buku, review, artikel, dan masih banyak lagi.
Meskipun literature review terdiri dari dua kata, tetapi sebenarnya arti dari literature review berbeda tidak sama dengan arti gabungan dua kata tersebut. Dalam bidang penelitian terutama pembuatan karya ilmiah, literature review lebih dikenal dengan istilah tinjauan Pustaka. Oleh karena itu, dapat dikatakan bahwa literature review adalah suatu kegiatan menganalisis yang dapat berupa kritikan dari suatu penelitian yang sedang dilakukan terhadap suatu topik khusus yang merupakan bagian dari bidang keilmuan.
Isi yang ada di dalam literature review ini berupa penjelasan atau pembahasan tentang teori dari suatu temuan atau topik penelitian. Dari penjelasan teori-teori tersebut dapat dijadikan sebagai landasan teori dalam membuat karya ilmiah atau dalam melakukan kegiatan penelitian. Selain itu, penelitian yang sedang melakukan ini bisa berupa pengembangan dari penelitian sebelumnya atau bisa juga penelitian yang baru pertama kali dilakukan.
Untuk membuat literature review ini, seseorang perlu melakukan beberapa hal terlebih dahulu, seperti membaca sekaligus memahami karya tulis yang ingin dianalisis, mengkritik karya tulis tersebut, dan memberikan ulasan atau tanggapan terhadap karya tulis atau literature tersebut. Maka dari itu, kegiatan literature review ini sangat identik dengan mahasiswa atau dosen. Hal ini dikarenakan mahasiswa atau dosen biasanya akan mendapatkan pekerjaan untuk melakukan literature review.
Pada umumnya, kegiatan membuat literature review ini memang sering dilakukan oleh mahasiswa atau dosen. Adapun beberapa jenis literatur yang sering dikaji ketika melakukan kegiatan literature review, seperti artikel ilmiah yang berasal dari jurnal ilmiah, tesis, disertasi, paper atau makalah yang berasal dari seminal, buku teks (novel, cerpen, buku non fiksi, dan sebagainya), dan laporan dari suatu organisasi yang memiliki tingkat kepercayaan cukup tinggi.
Ketika ingin melakukan atau membuat literature review bisa menggunakan beberapa metode, yaitu metode systematic mapping study , systematic literature review, dan traditional review.
Systematic mapping study adalah jenis metode literature review yang di mana dalam penulisannya dilakukan secara sistematis dan memakai langkah-langkah yang sudah ditentukan sebelumnya. Dengan metode literature review ini, maka dalam memilih karya tulis yang akan diteliti tidak bisa dilakukan secara subjektif, sehingga harus dilakukan secara objektif.
Systematic mapping study lebih kompleks dan karya tulis yang dapat digunakan lebih banyak bila dibandingkan dengan traditional review . Selain itu, peneliti yang ingin membuat literature review dengan metode ini biasanya sudah memiliki standar tertentu. Dalam hal ini, standar yang dimaksud adalah standar dalam memilih judul dan jenis karya tulis yang akan digunakan.
Maka dari itu, peneliti yang menggunakan metode ini dalam membuat literature review, biasanya akan mengumpulkan berbagai macam karya tulis. Setelah mengumpulkan karya tulis, maka peneliti akan membaca satu per satu karya tulis tersebut yang kemudikan diulas atau dianalisis dan disesuaikan dengan topik pembahasan yang akan diteliti.
Systematic literature review biasa disingkat menjadi SLR. Systematic literature review adalah sebuah cara yang secara sistematis yang bertujuan untuk mengumpulkan, kemudian menganalisis secara kritis dengan menyajikan data-data serta temuan yang berasal dari berbagai macam penelitian lainnya.
Membuat literature review dengan metode systematic literature review biasanya dilakukan secara berurutan atau secara sistematis. Dengan kata lain, literature review dibuat mulai dari hal-hal yang paling mendasar kemudian baru mengerjakan hal-hal yang kompleks.
Tahapan-tahapan yang perlu dilalui dengan metode ini memang bisa dibilang cukup panjang. Akan tetapi, literature review yang akan dihasilkan menjadi lebih detail, akurat, dan lebih kompleks. Oleh karena itu, ketika melakukan literature review dengan metode ini, maka penulis bisa memperoleh suatu landasan teori yang lebih tajam dan berkualitas.
Metode kedua yang digunakan dalam membuat literature review adalah traditional review. Traditional review adalah suatu metode yang biasa digunakan untuk membuat literature review oleh para peneliti. Hasil dengan metode traditional review yang biasa digunakan untuk membuat tinjauan pustaka ini sering kita temukan pada survey paper. Oleh karena itu, literature review yang dihasilkan melalui metode ini lebih dikhususkan fokus terhadap satu topik saja. Selain itu, karya tulis yang dipilih sudah diketahui pembuatnya terlebih dahulu.
Dengan metode traditional review ini, maka karya tulis yang dijadikan referensi masih dalam topik pembahasan yang sama dengan penelitian yang sedang dilakukan. Metode ini memang bisa membuat literature review menjadi lebih khusus, tetapi karya tulis yang dapat dijadikan sebagai referensi menjadi terbatas. Padahal tidak menutup kemungkinan kalau bisa jadi data atau sumber yang bisa digunakan bisa diperoleh dari topik pembahasan yang berbeda.
Bukan hanya terbatas dari segi data dan sumber saja, tetapi metode traditional review juga terbatas pada wawasan dan tingkat pemahaman peneliti. Dengan kata lain, semakin luas wawasan peneliti, maka semakin banyak juga karya tulis atau literatur yang sudah dibaca serta diteliti atau dianalisis oleh peneliti.
Banyaknya peneliti yang menggunakan literature review bukan tanpa alasan, karena literature review itu sendiri memiliki beberapa manfaat diantaranya:
Manfaat pertama yang bisa diperoleh dengan membuat literature review adalah mengetahui perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan bidang tertentu. Dengan manfaat ini, seorang peneliti bisa terus mendalami ilmu pengetahuan tersebut, bahkan bisa ikut andil dalam perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan tersebut.
Manfaat kedua dari membuat literature review adalah mengetahui metode atau teknik dalam membuat karya ilmiah. Manfaat ini dapat terjadi karena dalam membuat literature review, langkah-langkahnya hampir sama dengan membuat karya ilmiah. Selain itu, dengan membuat literature review, peneliti bisa juga mengetahui teknik-teknik dalam menyelesaikan suatu permasalahan, sehingga solusi dari permasalahan tersebut bisa digunakan oleh pembaca lainnya.
Selain mengetahui perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan, membuat literature review bisa juga bermanfaat untuk menambah ilmu pengetahuan. Dengan ilmu pengetahuan yang semakin bertambah, maka wawasannya juga akan ikut bertambah. Hal ini dapat terjadi karena ketika melakukan kegiatan literature review, peneliti akan membaca dan memahami berbagai macam karya tulis, baik yang relevan topik pembahasan atau tidak.
Ketika melakukan kegiatan literature review, maka kita akan membaca dan memahami karya tulis yang berupa hasil penelitian sebelumnya. Oleh sebab itu, dengan melakukan literature review, maka peneliti akan mengetahui hasil penelitian yang saling berhubungan dengan topik pembahasan yang akan diteliti.
Manfaat kelima dari membuat literature review adalah dapat menentukan suatu topik pembahasan dan permasalahan yang akan diteliti. Hal ini dapat terjadi karena ketika membuat literature review, peneliti akan dengan mudah mencari permasalahan atau topik pembahasan yang dekat dengan kehidupan sehari-hari. Selain itu, literature review bisa juga bermanfaat bagi peneliti agar penelitian yang dilakukan tidak melenceng kemana-mana.
Setiap manfaat literature review umumnya berhubungan dengan kegiatan penelitian atau membuat karya ilmiah karena membuat literature review itu sendiri termasuk bagian dari membuat karya ilmiah.
Di bawah ini akan dijelaskan beberapa langkah dalam membuat literature review, antara lain:
Dalam membuat literature review, maka peneliti harus mencari karya tulis yang akan digunakan pada penelitian nanti. Bukan hanya dicari saja, tetapi juga harus dibaca, dan dipahami agar bisa mendapatkan sumber data yang relevan dengan topik pembahasan.
Langkah kedua dari membuat literature review adalah memilih sumber data yang jelas. Hal ini perlu dilakukan agar proses penelitian tidak melenceng dan menghasilkan literature review yang detail dan spesifik.
Langkah selanjutnya adalah melakukan identifikasi secara mendalam. Dalam hal ini yang diidentifikasi adalah semua karya tulis yang akan dijadikan sebagai rujukan dalam membuat literature review. Semakin dalam identifikasi yang dilakukan, maka sumber data yang diperoleh akan semakin bagus.
Sebelum membuat langsung literature review, sebaiknya buatlah kerangka literature review terlebih dahulu. Dengan membuat kerangka literature review, maka peneliti akan mengetahui hal-hal yang perlu diperbaiki dan ditambahkan dalam membuat literature review. Dengan begitu, dapat mengurangi kesalahan dalam membuat literature review dan bisa menghasilkan literature review yang berkualitas.
Langkah terakhir, yaitu buatlah literature review dengan sumber data yang sudah diperoleh sebelumnya.
Setelah mengetahui cara membuat literature review, apakah kamu tertarik untuk langsung mencoba membuat literature review?
Literature review sering dikenal dengan sebutan tinjauan pustaka yang sering kita ditemukan oleh mahasiswa dan dosen yang sedang menyelesaikan tugas akhirnya, seperti skripsi, tesis atau disertasi. Dengan literature review, maka peneliti akan lebih mudah dalam menemukan karya tulis yang jenisnya sama dengan topik pembahasan yang akan diteliti.
Meotode literature review ada, tiga yaitu systematic mapping study , systematic literature review , dan traditional review . Setiap metode itu memiliki kelebihan dan kekurangannya masing-masing. Oleh karena itu, sebaiknya gunakanlah metode yang sesuai dengan literature review yang akan dibuat, sehingga bisa menghasilkan literature review yang optimal dan berkualitas.
About the author.
Saya menulis sekian banyak tulisan untuk menuangkan apa yang ada di pikiran–tentunya setelah diolah dan diracik sedemikian rupa agar menjadi menarik. Saya pikir, setiap orang bisa menulis tentang apa saja, selama mau belajar memahami.
Literature reviews, what is a literature review, learning more about how to do a literature review.
A literature review is a review and synthesis of existing research on a topic or research question. A literature review is meant to analyze the scholarly literature, make connections across writings and identify strengths, weaknesses, trends, and missing conversations. A literature review should address different aspects of a topic as it relates to your research question. A literature review goes beyond a description or summary of the literature you have read.
Advertisement
By J. D. Biersdorfer Sept. 23, 2024
Welcome to Lit Trivia, the Book Review’s regular quiz about literary culture. This week’s installment takes you back to the British Fiction 101 syllabus and challenges you to match up memorable villains with their novels and authors. In the five multiple-choice questions below, tap or click on the answer you think is correct. After the last question, you’ll find links to the books if you’d like to do some further reading.
In “David Copperfield,” an 1850 novel by Charles Dickens, David is antagonized by a clerk who blackmails his way into becoming a partner in a law firm. This villain’s memorable name was also used by a rock band whose 1973 album “Sweet Freedom” was one of its best-selling recordings. Who is it?
Jethro Tull
Wackford Squeers
Edgar Broughton
Professor James Moriarty is a criminal mastermind and a villain who recurs to bedevil which character?
Harry Flashman
Allan Quatermain
Sherlock Holmes
Cloris Leachman’s ominous Frau Blücher character from the 1974 film “Young Frankenstein” (a Mel Brooks movie that was later adapted for the stage) is said to have been inspired by Judith Anderson’s 1940 screen portrayal of this sinister housekeeper in Daphne du Maurier’s 1938 gothic novel “Rebecca.” Who is it?
Mrs. Rochester
Mrs. Danvers
Mrs. Coulter
Mrs. Lovett
The novella “The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” tells the story of a scientist who develops a serum that lets him physically transform the good and bad parts of his personality into the respected Dr. Jekyll and the evil Mr. Hyde. Who wrote the book?
Robert Louis Stevenson
Sir Walter Scott
Elizabeth Hamilton
Robert Burns
Becky Sharp, the charming, cynical social-climber and antihero of William Makepeace Thackeray’s popular 1848 novel is considered one of literature’s greatest survivors — no matter the damage to other people. What is the title of the book?
“Middlemarch”
“Persuasion”
“The Importance of Being Earnest”
“Vanity Fair”
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
A literature review is a comprehensive summary of previous research on a topic. It includes both articles and books—and in some cases reports—relevant to a particular area of research. Ideally, one's research question follows from the reading of what has already been produced. For example, you are interested in studying sports injuries ...
Examples of literature reviews. Step 1 - Search for relevant literature. Step 2 - Evaluate and select sources. Step 3 - Identify themes, debates, and gaps. Step 4 - Outline your literature review's structure. Step 5 - Write your literature review.
As mentioned previously, there are a number of existing guidelines for literature reviews. Depending on the methodology needed to achieve the purpose of the review, all types can be helpful and appropriate to reach a specific goal (for examples, please see Table 1).These approaches can be qualitative, quantitative, or have a mixed design depending on the phase of the review.
Kata kunci: penelitian kualitatif, literatur. Abstract Either in quantitative research or in qualitative research, using the literature is critical. It is conducted to generate a picture of what is known and not known about a particular situation. Searching and reviewing of the relevant literature of the study could be
No. 02. Desember 2016. 27. Menulis Kajian Literatur. Amri Marzali. Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR.HAMKA. [email protected]. Abstract. This article is part of lecture notes presented in the ...
Therefore, this paper discusses the purposes of LRs in dissertations and theses. Second, the paper considers five steps for developing a review: defining the main topic, searching the literature, analyzing the results, writing the review and reflecting on the writing. Ultimately, this study proposes a twelve-item LR checklist.
In The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students, Ridley presents that literature reviews serve several purposes (2008, p. 16-17). Included are the following points: Historical background for the research; Overview of current field provided by "contemporary debates, issues, and questions;" Theories and concepts related to your research;
Writing a literature review requires a range of skills to gather, sort, evaluate and summarise peer-reviewed published data into a relevant and informative unbiased narrative. Digital access to research papers, academic texts, review articles, reference databases and public data sets are all sources of information that are available to enrich ...
T1 - Penggunaan Literatur Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. AU - Afiyanti, Yati. PY - 2005. ... In qualitative research particularly the purpose conducting the literature review varies, based on the type of study to be conducted. In general, to keep the scientific nature of data, using the extensive literature should be conducted after the study has ...
The literature review is an essential part of the research process. There are several types of the literature review [44, 45]. However, in general, the literature review is a process of questioning. It is intended to answer some questions about a particular topic: What are the primary literature sources? What are the main theories, concepts ...
A Literature Review Matrix is a powerful tool that helps you organize and evaluate the sources you've gathered for your literature review. Think of it as a structured table that allows you to visually track key details from each source, helping you compare and contrast research findings, methods, and relevance to your work. ...
literature review in academia, at this point it might be useful to state what a literature review is not, before looking at what it is. It is not: § A list or annotated bibliography of the sources you have read § A simple summary of those sources or paraphrasing of the conclusions § Confined to description of the studies and their findings
1.2 1.2: Tujuan dan Manfaat Melakukan Literature Review. 1.3 1.3: Perbedaan Antara Literature Review dengan Review Jurnal. 2 Cara Membuat Literature Review. 2.1 2.1: Memilih Topik Penelitian. 2.2 2.2: Mencari dan Mengumpulkan Sumber Literatur. 2.3 2.3: Evaluasi dan Seleksi Sumber Literatur.
After reviewing evidence on literature review methodology (Grant & Booth, 2009; Noble & Smith, 2018) and relevant guidelines, such as the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist (Page et al., 2021), we adapted each step to the pedagogical context of our program. This included considering each step ...
BAB IIIMETODE PENELITIAN3.1 Penelitian Studi LiteraturPenelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian studi literatur (literature review) engan model review yang dipilih adalah narrative review. Studi yang dilakukan pada model narrative review yaitu membandingkan data dari beberapa jurnal international yang telah dianalisis serta dirangkum ...
A literature review is a critical analysis and synthesis of existing research on a particular topic. It provides an overview of the current state of knowledge, identifies gaps, and highlights key findings in the literature. 1 The purpose of a literature review is to situate your own research within the context of existing scholarship, demonstrating your understanding of the topic and showing ...
BAB III METODE PENELITIAN3.1 Tinjauan Literatur Sebagai Metode PenelitianHannah Snyder (2019, hlm. 333) menganggap bahwa, "a literature review can broadly be described as a more or less systematic way of collecting and synthesizing previous research" (secara umum, sebuah tinjauan literatur dapat digambarkan sebagai suatu cara - kurang l.
A literature review is an overview of the available research for a specific scholarly topic. Literature reviews summarize existing research to answer a review question, provide context for new research, or identify important gaps in the existing body of literature.. An incredible amount of academic literature is published each year; by some estimates nearly three million articles.
Writing a Literature Review. A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and ...
2. Mengetahui Metode atau Teknik dalam Membuat Karya Ilmiah. Manfaat kedua dari membuat literature review adalah mengetahui metode atau teknik dalam membuat karya ilmiah. Manfaat ini dapat terjadi karena dalam membuat literature review, langkah-langkahnya hampir sama dengan membuat karya ilmiah.
A literature review is a review and synthesis of existing research on a topic or research question. A literature review is meant to analyze the scholarly literature, make connections across writings and identify strengths, weaknesses, trends, and missing conversations. A literature review should address different aspects of a topic as it ...
BAB III METODOLOGI PENELITIAN3.1 Metode Systematic Literature ReviewS. lah satu ciri dari penelitian meta-analisis adalah datanya sudah ada. Data yang diambil dari hasil penelitian- penelitian yang relevan yang sudah ada dan sudah diuji sebelumnya, terpublikasi secara ilmiah terhadap suatu to. ik terterntu dan te.
3. Buat peta literatur (literature map) utk mengelompokkan & memfisualkan gambaran literatur. 4. Buatlah ringkasan dari literatur-literatur tsb, untuk bisa dikutip dalam kajian pustaka. 5. Baru setelah itu buat rangkaian penelitian terdahulu yang relevan dengan tulisan Anda. VI. LITERATURE REVIEW & KERANGKA PIKIR DALAM PENELITIAN KUALITATIF
Smallholder farmers in South Africa are increasingly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change, posing significant threats to their livelihoods and food security. This systematic literature review investigates the several impacts of climate change on smallholder farmers across the country. The literature review used a systematic approach to search for relevant research across three ...
Welcome to Lit Trivia, the Book Review's regular quiz about literary culture. This week's installment takes you back to the British Fiction 101 syllabus and challenges you to match up ...