immobilized enzymes experiment a level biology

Enzyme Immobilization Methods and Applications (Biotechnology Lecture Notes)

Methods & applications of enzyme & whole cell immobilization (advantages and disadvantages of enzyme immobilization; matrix/supports used in enzyme immobilization), what is enzyme immobilization.

Immobilization is defined as the imprisonment of cell or enzyme in a distinct support or matrix. The support or matrix on which the enzymes are immobilized allows the exchange of medium containing substrate or effector or inhibitor molecules. The practice of immobilization of cells is very old and the first immobilized enzyme was amino acylase of Aspergillus oryzae for the production of L-amino acids in Japan. 

Advantages of immobilized enzymes:

(1).     Increased functional efficiency of enzyme (2).     Enhanced reproducibility of the process they are undertaking (3).     Reuse of enzyme (4).     Continuous use of enzyme (5).     Less labour input in the processes (6).     Saving in capital cost and investment of the process (7).     Minimum reaction time (8).     Less chance of contamination in products (9).     More stability of products (10) .  Stable supply of products in the market (11) .  Improved process control (12). High enzyme substrate ratio

Disadvantages of enzyme immobilization:

(1).  Even though there are many advantages of immobilized enzymes, there are some disadvantages also. (2).  High cost for the isolation, purification and recovery of active enzyme (most important disadvantage) (3).  Industrial applications are limited and only very few industries are using immobilized enzymes or immobilized whole cells.

(4).  Catalytic properties of some enzymes are reduced or completely lost after their immobilization on support or carrier. (5).  Some enzymes become unstable after immobilization. (6).  Enzymes are inactivated by the heat generated in the system

Applications of enzyme immobilization:

(1). Industrial production: Industrial production of antibiotics, beverages, amino acids etc. uses immobilized enzymes or whole cells.

(2). Biomedical applications: Immobilized enzymes are widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. Immobilized enzymes can be used to overcome inborn metabolic disorders by the supply of immobilized enzymes. Immobilization techniques are effectively used in drug delivery systems especially to oncogenic sites. (3). Food industry: Enzymes like pectinases and cellulases immobilized on suitable carriers are successfully used in the production of jams, jellies and syrups from fruits and vegetables. (4). Research: A Research activity extensively uses many enzymes. The use of immobilized enzyme allow researcher to increase the efficiency of different enzymes such as Horse Radish Peroxidase (HRP) in blotting experiments and different Proteases for cell or organelle lysis.

(5). Production of bio-diesel from vegetable oils.

(6). Waste water management : treatment of sewage and industrial effluents.

(7). Textile industry: scouring, bio-polishing and desizing of fabrics.

(8). Detergent industry: immobilization of lipase enzyme for effective dirt removal from cloths.

Supports or Matrix used in immobilization technology:

The matrix or support immobilizes the enzyme by holding it permanently or temporarily for a brief period of time. There are a wide variety of matrixes or carriers or supports available for immobilization. The matrix used should be cheap and easily available. Their reaction with the components of the medium or with the enzyme should be minimum as possible. The matrixes or supports for immobilization of enzymes or whole cells are grouped into three major categories

(1).  Natural polymers

(2).  Synthetic polymers

(3).  Inorganic materials

(1). Natural polymers:

(a). Alginate: A natural polymer derived from the cell wall of some algae. Calcium or magnesium alginate is the most commonly used matrix. They are inert and have good water holding capacity.

(b). Chitosan and chitin: They are structural polysaccharides occurring naturally in the cell wall of fungi and the exoskeleton of Arthropods. The various functional groups in enzymes can bind to the – OH group of chitin and can form covalent bonds.  

(c). Collagen: It is the protenaceous support with good porosity and water holding capacity. The side chains of the amino acids in the collagen and that of enzyme can form covalent bonds to permanently hold the enzyme to the support.

(d). Carrageenan: It is a sulfated polysaccharide obtained from some red algae. Their good gelling properties together with its high protein holding capacity makes it good support for immobilizing enzymes.

(e). Gelatin: Gelatin is the partially hydrolyzed collagen with good water holding capacity.

(f). Cellulose: Most abundant polymer of nature and it is the cheapest support available as carrier of enzymes. The hydroxyl group of the monomer units (glucose) can form covalent bonds with that of the amino acids of enzyme.

(g). Starch: A natural polymer of amylose and amylo-pectin. It has good water holding capacity.

(h). Pectin: It is a structural polysaccharide of plants found in their primary cell wall and they also acts as the inter-cellular cementing material in plant tissues. Pectin is a gelling agent with good water holding capacity.

(2). Synthetic polymers:

They are ion exchange resins or polymers and are insoluble supports with porous surface. Their porous surface can trap and hold the enzymes or whole cells.  Example: Diethylaminoethyl cellulose (DEAE cellulose), Polyvinyl chloride (PVC), UV activated Polyethylene glycol (PEG)

(3). Inorganic materials:

(a). Zeolites: They are microporous, aluminosilicate minerals with good adsorbing properties and extensively used for immobilizing enzymes and whole cells.

(b). Ceramics: They are nonmetallic solids consisting of metal and nonmetal atoms held in ionic and covalent bonds. The composition and bonding pattern varies with different types.

(c). Diatomaceous earth: They are silicious sedimentary rocks formed by fossilized accumulations of the cell wall of diatoms. Celite is the trade name of diatomaceous earth. It is a good adsorbent and are resistant to high pH and temperature.

(d). Silica:

(e). Glass:

(f). Activated carbon

(g). Charcoal

Methods of Immobilization:

Based on support or matrix and the type of bonds involved, there are five different methods of immobilization of enzyme or whole cells.

(1).  Adsorption

(2).  Covalent bonding

(3).  Entrapment

(4).  Copolymerization

(5).  Encapsulation

Adsorption is the oldest and simplest method of enzyme immobilization. Nelson & Griffin used charcoal to adsorb invertase for the first time in 1916. In this method enzyme is adsorbed to external surface of the support. The support or carrier used may be of different types such as:

(1). Mineral suppor t (Eg. aluminum oxide, clay)

(2). Organic support (Eg. starch)

(3). Modified sepharose and ion exchange resins

There is no permanent bond formation between carrier and the enzyme in adsorption method. Only weak bonds stabilize the enzymes to the support or carrier. The weak bonds (low energy bonds) involved are mainly:

(a). Ionic interaction

(b). Hydrogen bonds

(c). Van der Waal forces

For significant surface bonding the carrier particle size must be small (500 Å to 1 mm diameter). The greatest advantage of adsorption method is that there will not be “pore diffusion limitations” since enzymes are immobilized externally on the support or the carrier.

Methods of adsorption:

(1). Static process: Immobilization to carrier by allowing the solution containing enzyme to contact the carrier without stirring. (2). Dynamic batch process: Carrier is placed in the enzyme solution and mixed by stirring or agitation. (3). Reactor loading process: Carrier is placed in the reactor, and then the enzyme solution is transferred to the reactor with continuous agitation. (4). Electrode position process: Carrier is placed near to an electrode in an enzyme bath and then the current is put on, under the electric field the enzyme migrates to the carrier and deposited on its surface.

Advantages of adsorption method:

 (a). No pore diffusion limitation

(b). Easy to carry out

(c). No reagents are required

(d). Minimum activation steps involved

(e). Comparatively cheap method of immobilization

(f). Less disruptive to enzyme than chemical methods

Disadvantages of adsorption method:

(a). Desorption of enzymes from the carrier

(b). Efficiency is less

(2). Covalent bonding:

Important functional groups of the enzyme that provide chemical groups to form covalent bonds with support or carrier are:

1. Alpha carboxyl group at ‘C’ terminal of enzyme

2. Alpha amino group at ‘N’ terminal of enzyme

3. Epsilon amino groups of Lysine and Arginine in the enzyme

4. β and γ carboxyl groups of Aspartate and Glutamate

5. Phenol ring of Tyrosine

6. Thiol group of Cysteine

7. Hydroxyl groups of Serine and Threonine

8. Imidazole group of Histidine

9. Indole ring of Tryptophan

Carriers or supports commonly used for covalent bonding are:

(a).  Carbohydrates: Eg. Cellulose, DEAE cellulose, Agarose

(b).  Synthetic agents: Eg. Polyacrylamide

(c).   Protein carriers: Collagen, Gelatin

(d).  Amino group bearing carriers:   Eg. amino benzyl cellulose

(e).  Inorganic carriers: Porous glass, silica

(f).   Cyanogen bromide (CNBr)-agarose and CNBr Sepharose

Methods of covalent bonding

(1). Diazoation: Bonding between amino group of support and tyrosil or histidyl group of enzyme. (2). Peptide bond: Bonding between amino or carboxyl groups of the support and that of the enzyme. (3). Poly functional reagents: Use of a bi-functional or multifunctional reagent (glutaraldehyde) which forms covalent bonds between the amino group of the support and amino group of the enzyme.

Advantages of covalent bonding:

(a).  Strong linkage of enzyme to the support

(b).  No leakage or desorption problem

(c).  Comparatively simple method

(d).  A variety of support with different functional groups available

(e) .  Wide applicability

Disadvantages of covalent bonding (major problem with covalent bonding):

(a). Chemical modification of enzyme leading to the loss of functional conformation of enzyme.

(b). Enzyme inactivation by changes in the conformation when undergoes reactions at the active site. This can be overcome through immobilization in the presence of enzyme’s substrate or a competitive inhibitor.

(3). Entrapment:

In this method enzymes are physically entrapped inside a porous matrix. Bonds involved in stabilizing the enzyme to the matrix may be covalent or non-covalent. The matrix used will be a water soluble polymer. The form and nature of matrix varies with different enzymes. Pore size of matrix is adjusted to prevent the loss of enzyme. Pore size of the matrix can be adjusted with the concentration of the polymer used.  Agar-agar and carrageenan have comparatively large pore sizes. The greatest disadvantage of this method is that there is a possibility of leakage of low molecular weight enzymes from the matrix.

Examples of commonly used matrixes for entrapment are:

(1).   Polyacrylamide gels

(2).  Cellulose triacetate

(4).  Gelatin

(5).  Carrageenan

(6).  Alginate

Methods of entrapment:

(a). Inclusion in the gels: enzymes trapped inside the gels.

(b). Inclusion in fibers: enzymes supported on fibers made of matrix material.

(c). Inclusion in microcapsules: Enzymes entrapped in microcapsules formed by monomer mixtures such as polyamine and calcium alginate.

Advantages of entrapment:

(a).   Fast method of immobilization

(b).   Cheap (low cost matrixes available)

(c).   Easy to practice at small scale

(d) .   Mild conditions are required

(e).   Less chance of conformational changes in enzyme

(f).   Can be used for sensing application

Disadvantages of entrapment:

(a).   Leakage of enzyme

(b) .   Pore diffusion limitation

(c).   Chance of microbial contamination

(d).   Not much success in industrial process

(4). Cross linking (copolymerization):

(5). Encapsulation:

This type of immobilization is done by enclosing the enzymes in a membrane capsule. The capsule will be made up of semi permeable membrane like nitro cellulose or nylon. In this method the effectiveness depends upon the stability of enzymes inside the capsule.

Advantages of encapsulation:

(a).  Cheap and simple method

(b).  Large quantity of enzymes can be immobilized by encapsulation

Disadvantages of encapsulation:

(a).   Pore size limitation

(c).  Only  small substrate molecule is able to cross the membrane

Immobilization of whole cells:

Immobilization of whole cells is an alternative to enzyme immobilization and it is a well-developed method for the utilization of enzymes from microbes. Immobilization of whole cells become particularly effective when the individual enzymes become inactive during direct immobilization, or the isolation and purification of enzyme is not cost effective. The greatest advantage of whole cell immobilization is that here the enzymes will be active and stable for long period of time since they are in their natural environment. Use of immobilized cells for fermentation is a very old practice. Bacteria or yeast cells are immobilized by adsorbing it on woodchips. This is practiced in many parts for different types of fermentations.

Advantages of whole cell immobilization:

(a).  Multiple enzymes can be introduced to a single step

(b).  Extraction and purification of enzymes are not required

(c).  Enzymes are stable for long time

(d).  Native conformation of enzyme is best maintained

(e).  Cell organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts can be immobilized

(f).  Cost effective method

Disadvantages of whole cell immobilization:

(a).  Concentration of enzymes will be less

(b).  Production of unwanted enzymes and unwanted products

(c).  Modification of end products by other enzymes produced by immobilized cells

Methods of immobilization of whole cells:

Methods of immobilization of whole cells are same as that described for enzyme immobilization and they include:

1.  Adsorption

2.  Covalent bonding

3.  Cell to cell cross linking

4.  Encapsulation

5.  Entrapment

Immobilization of cells: Methods, Support materials, Cells and Reaction:

Download the PPT of this Topic…

Enzyme Immobilization PPT

More Lecture Notes from Easy Biology Class…

Botany Zoology Biochemistry Genetics Molecular Biology Biotechnology Endocrinology Physiology Microbiology Immunology Embryology Ecology Evolution Biophysics Research Methodology Biostatistics Chemistry for Biologists Physics for Biologists

You may also like…

@. Applications of Restriction Enzymes in Biotechnology (Short Notes)

@. Industrial Fermentation Process

@. Difference between Batch and Continuous Fermentation

Related posts:

• Biochemistry of Plasma Membrane Lipids: Properties, Structure and Classification (Biochemistry Lecture Notes)
• Enzyme Specificity (Biochemistry Lecture Notes)
• Enzyme Regulation Mechanisms: The Molecular Methods to Regulate Enzymes and Enzymatic Acitvity
• Industrial Fermentation Process (Batch, Fed-batch and Continuous Fermentation)
• Applications of Restriction Endonucleases in Biotechnology (Short Notes)

Privacy Overview

Loading content

Boost content.

Immobilization of Enzyme

Definition : Immobilization can define as the enticement of an enzyme to a solid support. Enzyme immobilization is a process, which encloses the enzyme molecules to an absolute phase from a bulk phase. The bulk phase consists of substrates, effectors and inhibitors. Enzyme molecule impounds in or on some suitable matrix that is having a definite porosity.

The carrier or matrix allows the exchange of medium (contains substrate and product), to which an enzyme molecule can be confined. Immobilization restricts the movement of enzymes. It is a prevalent method, which is now used in many fields like industrial, medical, bioresearch, food science etc.

Therefore, the biocatalyst that gets confined to the inert material will be termed as an immobilized enzyme. The methods which facilitate the enzyme entrapment into or on the support matrix is called immobilization of an enzyme. Amino acylase was the first immobilized enzyme.

Here, we will look into some important topics related to the context like the discoveries behind the introduction of the immobilization technique, the components, physical and some chemical methods of immobilization. Besides, we will also discuss some of the advantages, disadvantages and applications of the immobilization technique.

Content: Immobilization of Enzyme

Encapsulation, covalent binding, cross linking, advantages of immobilization, disadvantages of immobilization, applications of immobilized enzymes.

History of enzyme immobilization includes three stages in the development of an immobilized enzyme.

• First stage : During 1815, immobilized enzymes were used empirically in industrial processes, such as the production of acetic acid and wastewater treatment.
• Second stage : During the 1960s, a single enzyme immobilization system was introduced. Then this system used in the production of L-amino acids, isomerization of glucose etc.
• Third stage : During 1970-1995, multiple enzyme immobilization methods, including co-factor regeneration and cell immobilization, were introduced.

Components of Enzyme Immobilization

It can define as a biomolecule, which accelerates many biochemical reactions. It acts as a biocatalyst, which mediates the conversion of a substrate into a product, but never used up by the substrate.

Support Matrix

It is a material, which facilitates the imprisonment of an enzyme. A support matrix must have the following properties that we have discussed below for the efficient immobilization.

Ideal Properties of Support Matrix

• Mechanical strength.
• Biocompatible
• Regenerability
• Ease of derivatization (transformation of the substrate into a product)
• Expansion of enzyme specificity
• Reduction in product inhibition
• Reduction of microbial contamination
• Cost-effective

Classification of a Matrix

Organic matrix:  It subdivides into natural and synthetic polymers.

• Natural polymers : It shows favourable compatibility with proteins. Polysaccharides (Cellulose, dextran, agar, agarose, chitin, alginate etc.), proteins (Collagen, albumin) and carbon are the natural polymers.
• Synthetic polymers : It shows high chemical and mechanical stability. Polystyrene, polyacrylate, polyacrylamide, polyamides etc. are examples of synthetic polymers.

Inorganic matrix:  It subdivides into Natural and Processed minerals.

• Natural minerals : E.g.Bentonite, celite, centolite, silica, charcoal etc.
• Processed materials : E.g.Porous glass, metals and metal oxides.

Physical Characteristics of the Matrices

• Mean particle size
• Hydrophilic character
• Mechanical strength

Mean particle size : It is the parameter, which decides the porosity of a carrier. Porous matrix prefers over the non-porous matrix because it increases the surface area, by which the loading capacity of an enzyme also increases. This property of the matrix determines the total surface area and also affect the binding ability of a catalyst. A porous material should have optimized pore distribution to optimize the flow of particles.

Hydrophilic character : It determines the level of activity by an immobilized enzyme.

Mechanical strength : It can define as the binding of an enzyme that is inversely related to the ease with which it gets entrapped.

Mode of attachment

The different modes of attachment between the enzyme and support matrix are explained below in the methods of enzyme immobilization. It generally involves physical and chemical methods for the immobilization of an enzyme.

Methods of  Enzyme Immobilization

It is the oldest and simplest method. In this type, enzyme adheres to the surface of the water-insoluble carrier matrix. The binding is nonspecific like electrostatic or hydrophobic affinity binding to a particular ligand. The binding between enzymes and the carrier matrix is usually firm, but it gets weakened by many factors like:

• Addition of substrate
• pH or ionic strength

• The matrix used : The matrix’s particle size must be small (500Å-1mm D).
• Mineral support (E.g. Aluminium oxide, clay)
• Organic support (E.g. Starch)
• Modified sepharose and ion exchange resins

Methods of Immobilization by Adsorption :

• Static method : It is an efficient but time-consuming method. It involves immobilization of enzyme and carrier molecule without agitation.
• Dynamic process : It involves the mixing of an enzyme with the carrier, under constant agitation.
• Reactor loading : It involves transferring of both enzyme and carrier in the reactor with the agitation of the whole content. It is widely used for the commercial production of the immobilized enzyme.
• Electro-deposition : Here, a carrier is kept proximal to the electrode in an enzyme bath, after which an electric current is passed through it. It results in the movement of an enzyme towards the carrier. At last, the enzyme gets deposited on the surface.

Advantages of Adsorption :

• It has no pore diffusion limitation.
• It is a simple and economical method to conduct.
• No reagents are required in this method.
• There is a limited loss of enzyme activity.
• It causes less disruption to an enzyme.
• It requires minimum activation steps.
• The adsorped enzyme can be recycled, regenerated and reused.
• It has a high loading efficiency of an enzyme.

Disadvantages of Adsorption :

• It provides low surface area for the enzyme binding.
• Desorption of an enzyme from the carrier usually occurs.
• Also, the yield is low.

An enzyme traps inside a porous polymer or gel matrix during this method. It is also called lattice entrapment . The bonding between an enzyme and matrix can be covalent or non-covalent.

• The matrix used : It is water-soluble, and nature varies with different enzymes.
• Examples : It makes the use of the following carrier materials like polyacrylamide gels, cellulose triacetate, agar, gelatine, alginate etc.

Methods of enzyme entrapment : It involves the inclusion of an enzyme into the following matrices:

• Gels : Involves entrapment of an enzyme inside the gel matrix.
• Fibres : Entrapment of an enzyme inside the fibre matrix.
• Microcapsules : Involves entrapment inside a microcapsule.

Advantages of Entrapment Method :

• Its enzyme loading capacity is high.
• It’s a rapid method.
• Here, the enzyme distortion is low.
• It is easy to practice.

Disadvantages of Entrapment Method :

• The diffusion of substrate and product create difficulties.
• It causes leakage of low molecular weight enzymes.
• There might some chances of microbial contamination.
• It also causes enzyme inactivation and sometimes loss of enzyme activity.
• It has limited industrial use.

It is the membrane confinement method. An enzyme confines within the semipermeable membrane of a capsule in an aqueous solution. This process allows the exchange of medium (substrate & product), but not an enzyme. The effectiveness of encapsulation relies upon the enzyme stability.

• The matrix used : The capsule is made of a semi-permeable membrane, and it can be polymeric, lipoid, non-ionic etc. in nature.
• Examples : It includes nitrocellulose, nylon semi-permeable matrix etc.

Methods of encapsulation : It can be achieved by the following ways:

• Encapsulation in a reaction vessel : It involves the partitioning of a chamber by a semipermeable membrane. One chamber contains enzymes, whereas the other contains substrate and product.
• Encapsulation by hollow fibre membrane : It involves entrapment of an enzyme inside a semipermeable matrix (cellulose, triacetate etc.). Here, an enzyme traps inside the space of the matrix.
• Microencapsulation : By chemical polymerization, the enzyme molecules enclose inside a microcapsule by the use of 1-6-diaminohexane.
• Encapsulation by liposomes : Here, an enzyme binds to the concentric lipoidal membrane of the liposome by the use of phospholipid.

Advantages of Encapsulation :

• There is no enzyme leakage.
• It does not affect enzyme activity.
• It’s a simple method to conduct.
• It possesses a high loading efficiency of an enzyme.

Disadvantages of Encapsulation :

• It makes the use of a carrier that has a pore size limitation.
• It is not so cost-effective.

It is a widely used method. An enzyme molecule binds to the carrier by a covalent bond during this process. Here, the binding strength is powerful or a complex form through this bonding is stable. Also, there is no enzyme loss during the process. Covalent binding occurs between the active part, i.e. the functional group of an enzyme and the carrier molecule.

The functional group that are participating in the binding process are -NH 2 , -NH 3, -COO, -OH, -SH, -O, -S etc. The order of reactivity of these functional groups to the carrier depends upon their charged status: -S – > -SH > -O – > -NH 2 > -COO – > -OH >> -NH 3 +

Examples of a polymeric carrier used in covalent binding are as follows:

• Carboxylic acid and related groups of polyglutamic acid
• Amide group of a polypeptide
• Amino and related groups of polysaccharides
• Some most commonly used polymers are the polysaccharide (celluloses, agarose, sepharose, etc.), polyvinyl alcohol, silica and porous glasses.

Methods used for Covalent Binding : It involves the following methods that are given below.

• By polyfunctional reagents : This process involves bonding between the amino group of the matrix and amino group of an enzyme. Example: Glutaraldehyde (Bi-functional reagent).

Advantages of Covalent Binding :

• It provides a high binding strength between an enzyme and a carrier.
• It’s a simple and widely used method.
• The process is not affected by the pH or ionic strength.

Disadvantages of Covalent Binding :

• Denaturation of the enzyme occurs during the immobilization.
• Only a small amount of enzyme can be immobilized.

It is also called “ Copolymerization “. Here, the immobilized enzymes covalently link to the various groups of an enzyme via polyfunctional reagents. It does not require a support matrix. Cross-linking leads to the formation of 3D crosslinked aggregates. The most commonly used polyfunctional agents are glutaraldehyde and diazonium salts etc.

Advantages of Cross Linking Method :

• There is little or no enzyme leakage.
• It yields a highly stabilized enzyme.
• It’s a simple and cheap method to carry out.
• It has wide applicability in the commercial production of the enzyme.

Disadvantages of Cross Linking Method :

• It causes enzyme inactivation.
• The polyfunctional reagents used in this process generally cause enzyme denaturation.

• The enzyme can be reused.
• The immobilization method minimizes the labour input.
• It increases the enzyme and substrate ratio.
• It requires a minimum activation time.
• Its industrial use is limited.
• The enzymes may lose their catalytic property and stability.
• The enzymes get inactivated by the heat generation.
• It is expensive to conduct this method.
• Industrial use : E.g. Production of antibiotics, amino acids etc.
• Biomedical use : E.g. For the treatment, diagnosis and drug delivery.
• In the food industry : E.g. Production of jams, jellies, syrups etc.
• Sewage treatment : E.g. In the treatment of sewage and industrial effluent for wastewater management.
• In the detergent industry : E.g. Immobilization of lipases to digest lipid present in stains or dirt.
• Textile industry : E.g. Scouring, bio-polishing etc.

Thus immobilization process is widely used in various fields, in which an enzyme can be immobilized to the particular phase after which it can be reused and stabilized to carry out many reactions.

Related Topics:

• Tikka Disease of Groundnut
• Acetic Acid Production
• Activated Sludge Treatment
• Maintenance and Preservation of Pure Culture

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Start typing and press enter to search

Practical Biology

A collection of experiments that demonstrate biological concepts and processes.

Observing earthworm locomotion

Practical Work for Learning

Published experiments

Working with immobilised enzymes or microscopic organisms, class practical.

Enzymes are essential catalysts for the chemical processes of life. We exploit the properties of enzymes in research and industry, using them to catalyse chemical reactions or to synthesize products. Sometimes we catalyse a reaction by using entire microscopic organisms (algae, yeast or bacteria) rather than a purified enzyme.

Immobilising enzymes or microscopic organisms involves trapping them in a matrix of an inert material or binding them to its surface. This makes it easier to remove the active catalysts from the reaction mixture, and so makes it easier to purify the products. It also allows us to set up systems for continuous processing, packing the immobilised catalysts in a vessel through which a steady stream of reactants can flow – collecting useful products at the outlet.

This procedure describes how to make alginate beads containing yeast. These are used to catalyse the fermentation of glucose to ethanol. The method can be applied to other catalysts in other reactions, or to more sophisticated investigations of enzyme action. See links below.

Lesson organisation

Students will probably find making alginate beads quite entertaining, at least the first time. Allow each group to make some beads. Set up a flask containing free yeast as a demonstration. Each group could either set up the beads in a conical flask with glucose solution, or pack a column with beads and try to set glucose flowing through suitably slowly.

Apparatus and Chemicals

For each group of students:.

Clamp stand, 1

Boss and clamp, 1

Syringe barrel, 1

Pasteur pipette tip, 1 ( Note 4 )

Other reagents and glassware relevant to the specific practical to be followed (see teaching notes).

For the class – set up by technician/ teacher:

Calcium chloride solution, 1.5%, 50 cm 3 per group ( Note 2 )

Sodium alginate solution, 4% about 100 cm 3

Yeast suspension 10%, about 100 cm 3 ( Note 3 )

Glucose solution, 8%, 200 cm 3 per group

Health & Safety and Technical notes

Avoid skin contact with enzymes in solution and with calcium chloride solution.

Avoid exposure to enzyme as dry powder – by using a fume cupboard if preparing enzyme solutions, or by wiping up spills of enzyme solutions so they do not dry out.

Read our standard health & safety guidance

1 Preparing solutions to make alginate beads (See CLEAPSS Recipe card): Dissolve sodium alginate in 100 cm 3 of cold, distilled or deionised water. Warm gently if it does not dissolve readily, or start again with warm water. Stir with a spatula every half hour or so. Leave overnight and stir again in the morning. There are variations in alginate from different suppliers and in different batches. It is worth carrying out a trial run, and adjusting the concentration of alginate if necessary. If the alginate gel is too dense, the substrate cannot enter the bead. Use 4% alginate to mix with equal volumes of yeast suspension. Use 2% alginate to mix 4:1 with enzyme solution.

2 Calcium chloride solution: Dissolve 4 g of calcium chloride-2-water in 200 cm 3 of pure water in a 250 cm 3 beaker. The CLEAPSS Hazcard describes calcium chloride as an IRRITANT, so wear eye protection when making up solution. Once made, this 4% solution is LOW HAZARD. Anhydrous calcium chloride (only 3 g in 200 cm 3 ) could be used, but take care as it could make the water boil. The calcium ions need to be in excess for this to work well. They form cross-links of calcium alginate in the gel, trapping the enzyme or yeast within the matrix.

3 Enzymes: the CLEAPSS Hazcard suggests that many enzymes are harmful as powders. Solutions at a concentration of 1% and above are an IRRITANT, but below 1% enzyme solutions are LOW HAZARD.

4 If your Pasteur pipette tip produces beads that are too big, use instead a drawn-out glass capillary tube, attached to the syringe with about 2 cm of flexible rubber or plastic tubing.

SAFETY: Take care handling the calcium chloride. Do not consume any of the products of a reaction carried out in a laboratory where chemical or biological contamination could occur, or using non-food-grade reagents, or apparatus that has been used for other chemicals or biological materials.

a Make up the alginate solution and the calcium chloride solution. (See Notes 1 and 2 .)

b As close to the time of use as possible, make up the yeast suspension or enzyme solution with distilled water.

c Set up the apparatus as shown in the diagram to the right. Put calcium chloride solution in the beaker. A Pasteur pipette tip is attached to a syringe supported in a clamp, so that the tip of the pipette is 5 cm above the surface of the calcium chloride.

Investigation

d Mix equal volumes of alginate solution and yeast suspension to give a final concentration of 2% alginate. ( Note 1 .)

e Pour the mixture into the syringe barrel and allow it to drip through into the calcium chloride solution as in the diagram above.

f Separate the alginate beads from the calcium chloride solution using a small sieve or tea-strainer and rinse with a little distilled water.

g Use the beads as a source of catalytic enzyme in a batch fermentation process. Alternatively, pack the beads into a column and run the solution of reactants slowly past the beads to demonstrate a continuous reaction process. You can use a syringe barrel or a longer burette to make a column. A useful tip is to place some nylon mesh in the bottom of the syringe barrel; otherwise the alginate beads will block the outlet.

h Collect the products of the reaction.

Teaching notes

You could run this practical in a variety of ways.

Set up batch fermentation of glucose with yeast using free yeast in some vessels and immobilised yeast in others

Quantify the rate of fermentation using a bubble logger as described by NCBE . After a few days, separate the yeast from the reactants and products – by filtration, centrifugation, or simply straining out the beads.

Compare the ease of removal of yeast in each process. Evaluate the process in terms of how long it takes, how clear the final mixture is, and how easy it would be to use the yeast again.

Quantifying the success of the reaction in terms of production: extract the ethanol by distillation to estimate yield, or compare the specific gravity (density) of the resulting solution with that of 8% glucose to estimate yield. Density should change from 1008 g per litre to 1004 g per litre. The hydrometer from a home brewing/ wine-making kit would be most appropriate for measuring this quantity.

Co-entrap brewer’s yeast ( Saccharomyces cerevisiae ) and the enzyme ? galactosidase (lactase)

The yeast can ferment sugars such as glucose and sucrose to produce ethanol and carbon dioxide, but it cannot usually ferment lactose. If it is entrapped with lactase, it will be able to ferment the sugars produced by the action of the lactase.

Compare the rate of fermentation of lactose by yeast immobilised in alginate beads with and without lactase. More details of this NCBE procedure .

Immobilise an enzyme to change one chemical into another

Milk contains significant quantities of the carbohydrate lactose, a disaccharide made from linked glucose and galactose. Adult humans and cats often like drinking milk, but many of them do not produce enough active lactase in their digestive systems to process the lactose. Non-digestion or mal-digestion of lactose can cause  digestive upsets.

Treating milk with the enzyme lactase removes the lactose and makes the carbohydrates digestible. This can be done by adding lactose to milk or by running the milk through a column containing immobilised lactose and collecting the 'improved' (lactose-reduced) milk at the outlet.

In this case, use 8 cm 3 of 2% sodium alginate solution, mixed with 2 cm 3 of lactase (?-galactosidase) such as Novozymes lactozym ® from NCBE. More details of this NCBE procedure .

Health & Safety checked, May 2009

www.ncbe.reading.ac.uk The National Centre for Biotechnology Education has a huge number of protocols for practical biotechnology activities and some associated biology practicals. They also supply enzymes and consumables for biotechnology practical work. There are several useful practicals on fermentation downloadable from the NCBE website at www.ncbe.reading.ac.uk/NCBE/PROTOCOLS/fermentation.html . This booklet includes details of logging bubble rate.

NCBE protocol for immobilised yeast: http://www.eurovolvox.org/Protocols/immobilisedyeast.html

NCBE protocol for immobilised ?-galactosidase: http://www.eurovolvox.org/Protocols/catmilk.html

http://www.nationaldairycouncil.org/Pages/Home.aspx Information about lactose intolerance and the nutritional value of dairy foods.

www.lsbu.ac.uk/biology/enztech/ London South Bank University site with more information about the use of immobilised enzymes in industry. Includes Enzyme technology by Martin Chaplin and Christopher Bucke (Cambridge University Press, 1990). The book is out of print, but the text is available here. 'Methods of immobilization' in Chapter 3 includes diagrams of the different ways an inert matrix can contain or simply bind an enzyme. Chapter 5 includes more technical information about the design of enzyme reactors and examples of enzymes used in industry – particularly the food industry.

(Websites accessed October 2011)

• International
• Education Jobs
• Schools directory
• Resources Education Jobs Schools directory News Search

Immobilising an enzyme (CIE A-level Biology)

Subject: Biology

Age range: 16+

Resource type: Lesson (complete)

Last updated

13 August 2021

• Share through email
• Share through twitter
• Share through linkedin
• Share through facebook
• Share through pinterest

This lesson describes how enzymes can be immobilised in calcium alginate and compares their activity against enzymes that are free in solution. The PowerPoint and the accompanying resources have been designed to cover point 3.2 (d) of the CIE A-level Biology specification.

The lesson has been planned to challenge the students on their ability to apply knowledge to a potentially unfamiliar situation. A series of exam-style questions which include “suggest” and “describe and explain” questions are used throughout the lesson and these will allow the students to recognise the advantages and disadvantages of a particular method. Although the alginate method is the only one referenced in this specification point, the adsorption and covalent bonding methods are introduced and then briefly analysed to allow students to understand that a matrix doesn’t involve these bonds which could disrupt the active site. The remainder of the lesson introduces some actual examples of the use of immobilised enzymes with the aim of increasing the relevance.

Please note that this lesson has been written to explain the effect of immobilisation on enzyme activity. The practical element of carrying out the investigation is described in a separate lesson.

Tes paid licence How can I reuse this?

Get this resource as part of a bundle and save up to 33%

A bundle is a package of resources grouped together to teach a particular topic, or a series of lessons, in one place.

Topic 3.2: Factors that affect enzyme action (CIE A-level Biology)

This bundle of 5 lessons covers the majority of the content in topic 3.2 of the CIE A-level Biology specification. Each lesson consists of an engaging Powerpoint with accompanying resources that cover the following points: * Explain the effects of temperature on the rate of an enzyme-catalysed reaction * Explain the effects of pH on the rate of an enzyme-catalysed reaction * Explain the effects of enzyme and substrate concentration on the rate of an enzyme-catalysed reaction * Explain the effects of inhibitor concentration on the rate of an enzyme-catalysed reaction * Explain the effects of inhibitors, both competitive and non-competitive, on the rate of enzyme activity * Explain the effect of immobilising an enzyme in alginate on its activity as compared with its activity when free in solution

Topic 3: Enzymes (CIE A-level Biology)

This lesson bundle contains 6 fully-resourced lessons which have been designed to engage and motivate the students whilst covering the detailed content of topic 3 (Enzymes) in the CIE A-level Biology specification. These globular proteins catalyse biological reactions throughout living organisms so a deep understanding of this topic is important for all of the other 18 topics in this course. The wide range of activities that are included within the lesson PowerPoints and accompanying resources will cover the following specification points: * Enzymes are globular proteins that catalyse reactions * The mode of action of enzymes * The lock and key hypothesis and the induced-fit model * The effect of temperature on the rate of an enzyme-catalysed reaction * The effect of pH on the rate of an enzyme-catalysed reaction * The effect of enzyme and substrate concentration on the rate of an enzyme-catalysed reaction * The effect of inhibitor concentration on the rate of an enzyme-catalysed reaction * The effect of competitive and non-competitive inhibitors on enzyme activity * Immobilising an enzyme in alginate

Your rating is required to reflect your happiness.

It's good to leave some feedback.

Something went wrong, please try again later.

This resource hasn't been reviewed yet

To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it

Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.

Not quite what you were looking for? Search by keyword to find the right resource:

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

The PMC website is updating on October 15, 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• J Chem Biol
• v.6(4); 2013 Oct

Enzyme immobilization: an update

Ahmad abolpour homaei.

Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Hormozgan, Bandarabbas, Iran

Reyhaneh Sariri

Reyhaneh Sariri, Department of Microbiology, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran

Fabio Vianello

Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Padua, Italy

Roberto Stevanato

Department of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, University of Venice, Venice, Italy

Compared to free enzymes in solution, immobilized enzymes are more robust and more resistant to environmental changes. More importantly, the heterogeneity of the immo-bilized enzyme systems allows an easy recovery of both enzymes and products, multiple re-use of enzymes, continuous operation of enzymatic processes, rapid termination of reactions, and greater variety of bioreactor designs. This paper is a review of the recent literatures on enzyme immobilization by various techniques, the need for immobilization and different applications in industry, covering the last two decades. The most recent papers, patents, and reviews on immobilization strategies and application are reviewed.

Structural abstract. A summary of enzyme immobilization techniques investigated in this review work showing their advantage, disadvantages, and various applications.

Introduction

The relationship between humans and enzymes has evolved over time. Even during historical times, where there was no concept of enzymes, ancient Egypt people produced beer and wine by enzymatic fermentation. After several thousand years, enzymatic studies have significantly progressed. Enzymes are proteins that accelerate many biochemical and chemical reactions. They are natural catalysts and are ubiquitous, in plants, animals, and microorganisms, where they catalyze processes that are vital to living organisms. The growing knowledge and technique improvement about protein extraction and purification lead to the production of many enzymes at an analytical grade purity for research and biotechnological applications. Enzymes are intimately involved in a wide variety of traditional food processes, such as cheese making, beer brewing, and wine industry. Recent advances in biotechnology, particularly in protein engineering, have provided the basis for the efficient development of enzymes with improved properties. This has led to establishment of novel, tailor-made enzymes for completely new applications, where enzymes were not previously used.

Application of enzymes in different industries is continuously increasing, especially during the last two decades. Applications of enzymes in food industries include baking [ 1 ], dairy products [ 2 , 3 ], starch conversion [ 4 ] and beverage processing (beer, wine, fruit and vegetable juices). In textiles industries, enzymes have found a special place due to their effect on end products [ 5 ]. In industries such as pulp and paper making [ 6 ] and detergents [ 7 ], the use of enzymes has become an inevitable processing strategy when a perfect end product is desired. Application of enzymes in more modern industries including biosensors is improving rapidly due to the specificity of enzymes which is of prime importance in biosensor [ 8 ]. Many other important industries including health care and pharmaceuticals [ 9 ] and chemical [ 10 ] manufacture are increasingly taking advantages of these natures amazing catalysts. During the last few years, enzymes have widely been used in biofuels, such as biodiesel and ethanol [ 11 ].One of the best use of enzymes in the modern life is their application in treatment of wastes in general [ 12 ] and especially for solid wastes treatment [ 13 ] and waste water purification [ 14 ].

In some cases, industrial applications of enzymes in organic solvents are also developed [ 15 ]. Moreover, enzymes are produced from renewable raw materials and are completely biodegradable. In addition, the mild operating conditions of enzymatic processes mean that they can be operated in relatively simple and totally controlled equipment. In short, they reduce environmental drawbacks of manufacturing by reducing the consumption of energy and chemicals and concomitant generation of wastes.

However, all these desirable characteristics of enzymes and their widespread industrial applications are often hampered by their lack of long-term operational stability and shelf-storage life and by their cumbersome recovery and re-use. These drawbacks can generally be overcome by immobilization of enzymes. In fact, a major challenge in industrial bio-catalysis is the development of stable, robust, and preferably insoluble biocatalysts.

Historical background

The first scientific observation that led to the discovery of immobilized enzymes was made in 1916 [ 1 ]. It was demonstrated that invertase exhibited the same activity when absorbed on a solid, such as charcoal or aluminum hydroxide, at the bottom of the reaction vessel as when uniformly distributed throughout the solution. This discovery was later developed to the currently available enzyme immobilization techniques.

Early immobilization techniques provided very low enzyme loadings, relative to available surface areas. During 1950s and 1960s, different covalent methods of enzyme immobilization were developed. Continuing from 1960s, to date more than 5,000 publications and patents have been published on enzyme immobilization techniques. Several hundred enzymes have been immobilized in different forms and more than a dozen immobilized enzymes; for example, penicillin G acylase, invertase, lipases, proteases, etc. have been used as catalysts in various large-scale processes. While enzyme immobilization has been studied for a number of years, the appearance of recent published research and review papers indicates a continued interest in this area [ 16 – 18 ]. According to PubMed database only in the first 6 months of 2010, many hundreds papers on enzyme immobilization have been published.

Today, in many cases immobilized enzymes have revealed highly efficient for commercial uses. They offer many advantages over enzymes in solution, including economic convenience, higher stability, and the possibility to be easily removed from the reaction mixture leading to pure product isolation. An immobilized enzyme is, therefore, attached to an inert, organic, or inorganic or insoluble material, such as calcium alginate or silica. Furthermore, the attachment of an enzyme to a solid support can increase its resistance to various environmental changes such as pH or temperature [ 19 ].

Immobilization strategies

Despite of many advantages in the use of enzymes compared to traditional catalysts, there are few practical problems associated with their utilization in industrial applications. Enzymes are generally expensive, which means that the cost of their isolation and purification is many times higher than that of ordinary catalysts. Being protein in structure, they are also highly sensitive to various denaturing conditions when isolated from their natural environments. Their sensitivity to process conditions, such as temperature, pH, and substances at trace levels, can act as inhibitors which add to their costs. On the other hand, unlike conventional heterogeneous chemical catalysts, most enzymes operate dissolved in water in homogeneous catalysis systems, leading to product contamination and ruling out their recovery, for reuse, in the active form from most of the reaction mixtures.

One of the most successful methods proposed to overcome these limitations is the use of an immobilization strategy (van de Velde 2002). Immobilization is a technical process in which enzymes are fixed to or within solid supports, creating a heterogeneous immobilized enzyme system. Immobilized form of enzymes mimic their natural mode in living cells, where most of them are attached to cellular cytoskeleton, membrane, and organelle structures. The solid support systems generally stabilize the structure of the enzymes and, as a consequence, maintain their activities. Thus, as compared to free enzymes in solution, immobilized enzymes are more robust and more resistant to environmental changes. In addition, heterogeneous immobilized enzymes systems allow the easy recovery of both enzymes and products, multiple reuse of enzymes, continuous operation of enzymatic processes, rapid termination of reactions, and greater variety of bioreactor designs. On the other hand, compared with free enzymes, most commonly immobilized enzymes show lower activity and, generally, higher apparent Michaelis constants because of a relative difficulty in accessing the substrate [ 20 ].

In recent years, a wide range of interest and high attention has been directed toward exploring the potential of immobilized enzymes [ 21 ]. Compared to their free forms, immobilized enzymes are generally more stable and easier to handle. In addition, the reaction products are not contaminated with the enzyme (especially useful in the food and pharmaceutical industries), and in the case of proteases, the rate of the autolysis process can be dramatically reduced upon immobilization [ 22 ].

These alterations result from structural changes introduced into the enzyme molecule by the applied immobilization procedure and from the creation of a microenvironment in which the enzyme works, different from the bulk solution. The result would be a pure product not contaminated with other environmental ingredients and easy to be isolated from the solution. The attached enzyme is then ready for the subsequent reactions without the need for repeated, time-consuming, and costly extraction and purification procedures. Enzymes may be immobilized by a variety of methods, which may be broadly classified as physical, where weak interactions between support and enzyme exist, and chemical, where covalent bonds are formed between the support and the enzyme.

In particular, the development and applications of site-selective protein immobilization have undergone significant advances in recent years. Notably, advances in organic chemistry and molecular biology have resulted in the development of some very powerful, efficient, site-specific, and important applications of anchoring proteins onto supports. These have been followed by the development of functional protein microarrays, biosensors, and continuous flow reactor systems. The advent of high-density array printing technology and improved methods for high-throughput production and purification of large numbers of proteins have, in recent years, allowed the preparation and exploitation of protein microarrays. However, many of the applications reported have relied on protein attachment methods that result in non-specific immobilization, either covalently through amine, aldehyde, and epoxy-derivatized surfaces or through adsorption on nitrocellulose-, hydrogel-, or polylysine-coated slides. A number of more selective approaches have been demonstrated employing affinity reagents that bind specific epitopes or tags on proteins and expose them in a correctly orientated manner, such as nickel nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA)-coated slides, which are used to bind histidine-tagged proteins and streptavidin (or avidin). Figure  1 schematically explains the mechanism by which a protein is first tagged by two molecules of histidine followed by interaction with a Ni-NTA nanogold. It can be seen in this figure that this type of interaction can only provide non-covalent attachment [ 3 ].

Selective approaches employing affinity reagents

Bioconjugation is an important aspect of the biological sciences and critical to the applications discussed above; as a result, many methods have been described through recent years. Of these, a small number have become widely applied due to their ease of use, flexibility, and reagent commercial availability. In general, these methods rely on physicochemical adsorption phenomena or on functional groups that are naturally present in proteins. They are, therefore, extremely straightforward to employ and applicable to all proteins, both native and modified.

Modes of immobilization

Traditionally, four methods are used for enzyme immobilization, namely (1) non-covalent adsorption and deposition, (2) physical entrapment, (3) covalent attachment, and (4) bio-conjugation (Fig.  2 ). Support binding can be physical or chemical, involving weak or covalent bonds. In general, physical bonding is comparatively weak and is hardly able to keep the enzyme fixed to the carrier under industrial conditions. The support can be a synthetic resin, an inorganic polymer such as zeolite or silica, or a biopolymer. Entrapment involves inclusion of an enzyme in a polymer network (gel lattice) such as an organic polymer or a silica sol–gel, or a membrane device such as a hollow fiber or a microcapsule. Entrapment requires the synthesis of the polymeric network in the presence of the enzyme. The last category involves cross-linking of enzyme aggregates or crystals, using a bifunctional reagent, to prepare carrier-free macroparticles [ 23 ].

Some methods used for enzyme immobilization

Many other methods, which are either original combinations of the ones listed, sometimes specific for a given support or enzyme have been developed. However, no single method and support is the best for all enzymes and their various applications. This is because of the widely different chemical characteristics and composition of enzymes, the different properties of substrates and products, and the various uses of the product. However, all of the methods may present a number of advantages and drawbacks. Adsorption is simple, cheap, and effective but frequently reversible; covalent attachment and cross-linking are effective and durable, but expensive and easily worsening the enzyme performance; diffusional problems are inherent in membrane reactor-confinement, entrapment, and micro-encapsulations.

Protein adsorption

Non-covalent methods of protein immobilization are widely employed and involve either passive adsorption onto hydrophobic surfaces or electrostatic interactions with charged surfaces. The use of nitrocellulose membranes or polylysine-coated slides for electrostatic binding is perhaps the most widely familiar. As noted above, the major advantage of this kind of immobilization is that neither additional coupling reagents nor modification of the protein of interest is required. However, non-covalent immobilization typically involves relatively weak and reversible interactions. As a result, proteins can leach out from the support, which in turn results in loss of activity with time and contamination of the surrounding media. This has implications in the overall robustness and recyclability of systems, particularly when used in analytical assays and sensor devices. It is also well-known that absorption of protein onto surfaces often results in conformational changes and denaturation of proteins that can lead to massive losses of protein activity. Furthermore, since there is no control over the packing density of the immobilized proteins, their activity may be further reduced by excessive crowding.

Protein immobilization by absorption on mesoporous silicates

In the past decade, much work has been undertaken in the synthesis of mesoporous silicates and in the immobilization of enzymes onto these supports. In 1992, the Mobil research group [ 24 ] discovered a family of mesoporous silicates which had a narrow pore size distribution, amorphous silica surfaces, and pore sizes in the range of 20–300 Å. These new regular repeating mesoporous structures offered the possibility of adsorbing or entrapping large molecules within their pores. Since their development, these materials have promised an improvement about catalytic research of immobilized enzymes. It was anticipated that mesoporous silicates would provide a sheltered protected environment in which reactions with selected substrates could proceed. Following their initial discovery, mesoporous structures have been synthesized using cationic, neutral, and block copolymer surfactants. These copolymers contain organic functional groups and metals located within their framework or grafted onto their surface and have been used as a scaffold to develop mesoporous carbon materials [ 2 ].

Mesoporous silicates possess a number of additional attributes which make them attractive candidates for the immobilization of proteins. It is possible to chemically modify their surfaces with various functional groups, enabling electrostatic attraction or repulsion between the mesoporous silicate support and the biological molecule of interest. As a result of their silicate inorganic framework, mesoporous silicates are chemically and mechanically stable and are resistant to microbial attack.

Materials, such as silica sol–gels, display similar stability to mesoporous silicates and have been used to encapsulate proteins for the development of biosensors. However, sol–gels suffer from the disadvantage of possessing a highly variable pore size distribution (10–400 Å). More importantly, their preparation can involve the use of harsh conditions or reagents, which can cause denaturation of proteins and are detrimental to enzyme activity. Using mesoporous silicates, protein encapsulation occurs after the synthesis of the support, avoiding this difficulty [ 25 ].

Protein immobilization on polyketone polymer by hydrogen bonds

An innovative immobilization process has been recently proposed [ 46 ] which utilizes polyketone polymer, a completely new support. Polyketone polymer –[–CO-CH 2 CH 2 –] n –, obtained by copolymerization of ethane and carbon monoxide, has been utilized for immobilization of three different enzymes, one peroxidase from horseradish and two amine oxidases from bovine serum and lentil seedlings. The easy immobilization procedure was carried out in diluted aqueous buffer, gently mixing the proteins with the polymer. No bi-functional agents or spacer arms are required for the immobilization, which occurs exclusively via a large number of hydrogen bonds between the carbonyl groups of the polymer and the –NH groups of the polypeptidic chain (Fig.  3 ).

Hydrogen bonds between carbonyl groups and the –NH groups of the polypeptidic chain

Experiments demonstrate a high binding capacity and extraordinary stable immobilization, at least for amine oxidases. Moreover, activity measurements demonstrate that immo-bilized enzymes retain their fully catalytic characteristics, where only a small increase of K M value is observed. The peroxidase activated polymer was used as active packed bed of an enzymatic reactor for continuous flow conversion and flow injection analysis of hydrogen peroxide containing solutions.

Classical covalent immobilization methods

For more stable attachment, the formation of covalent bonds is required, and these are generally formed through reaction with functional groups present on the protein surface. In common with non-covalent adsorption, these methods can be used on unmodified proteins since they rely only on naturally present functional groups. For example, the exposed amine groups of lysine residues readily react with supports bearing active esters, with the most common being N -hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) esters, to form stable amide bonds. However, one disadvantage of using NHS esters is that they are unstable in aqueous conditions, and thus, the attachment of proteins in aqueous buffers will compete with ester hydrolysis, possibly resulting in a modest immobilization yield. As an alternative, aldehyde groups can be coupled with exposed amino groups followed by reduction using sodium cyanoborohydride, or other reagent, to form a stable secondary amine linkage.

The nucleophilicity of the amine group also allows reaction with epoxide-functionalized materials (diglycidyl ethers). These epoxides have the advantage of being relatively stable to hydrolysis at neutral pH, which allows easy handling of the materials but can result in slow or incomplete coupling. Moreover, it is necessary to have supports with the highest degree of epoxy groups, in conditions where they may be very stable to permit long enzyme–support reactions and having the shortest possible spacer arms (mainly in the third generation of epoxy supports) to effectively freeze the enzyme structure. New heterofunctional supports or new uses of the above-described supports may speed up the implementation of many industrial bioprocesses, at present hampered by the lack of suitable biocatalysts [ 4 , 5 ].

Cysteine residues, bearing the thiol group, are also often employed for protein immobilization and readily undergo conjugate addition with unsaturated carbonyls (e.g., maleimides) to form stable thioether bonds. It has been shown that maleimide groups strongly favor conjugate addition with thiols at physiological pH (6.5–7.5) since under these conditions amines are predominantly protonated and un-reactive (Fig.  4 ). As proteins generally have very few surface-exposed cysteine residues, it is possible to achieve site-selective immobilization, especially if the protein of interest can be engineered to remove all but one surface cysteine residue or to insert a single cysteine on the surface where none previously existed. The nucleophilicity of the thiol group also means that it can react with epoxides and NHS esters, although in practical terms this latter reaction is relatively slow and the resultant thioester moiety is susceptible to hydrolysis.

Reaction of maleimide forming chemical conjugation to a sulfhydryl

As regard aspartic and glutamic acid residues, the generic method in which they can be used for immobilization is by conversion to their corresponding active esters in situ with a carbodiimide coupling agent and an auxiliary nucleophile. The most commonly used example of the former is 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide, while NHS is widely used to generate the NHS ester on the protein. This active ester can then react with amine-bearing supports. The advantage of this combination of reagents is that both are water-soluble and may be used in aqueous media, although the instability of carbodiimides and the subsequently generated active esters under these conditions means that the reaction yields are often rather low. There is also the risk that the NHS esters formed on the protein molecule may then couple to other protein molecules to give poorly defined polymers.

Oxidative cleavage of the 1,2-diols on the oligosaccharides (usually with periodate) generates aldehyde moieties that can then be used for attachment in a semispecific manner to hydrazine or hydroxylamine functionalized supports via their respective hydrazone or oxime. In addition to antibodies, this strategy has also been applied to a range of other proteins that feature post-translational glycosylation, including several protease and oxidase enzymes [ 26 ]. However, it should be noted that, apart from the multiple potential attachment points on a polysaccharide chain, random orientation may also occur if the desired protein has more than one site of glycosylation on its surface.

In recent years, several selective immobilization methods able to proceed under mild physiological conditions have received increasing attention. Typically these methods rely on the labeling of the protein of interest with an azide moiety. In the Staudinger ligation, the reaction of an azide with a phosphine forms an intermediate iminophosphorane (aza-ylide) that can then react with electrophiles to give a variety of products [ 27 , 28 ]. The generation of an iminophosphorane is typically followed by reaction with an ester to form a stable amide bond. In the first version of this approach, the electrophilic ester is incorporated into the phosphine to give a final product with the phosphine oxide attached to the linkage. The Staudinger ligation has been exploited in a large number of applications from the labeling of proteins and cell-surface glycans to the chemical synthesis of proteins. More recently, the Staudinger ligation has also been applied for the immobilization of peptides and proteins [ 29 ]. In all cases, a two-step process was required: labeling of the protein of interest with the azide followed by the immobilization reaction. Thus, in order to achieve site-selective immobilization, a method for selectively introducing the required azide moiety must first be employed, such as an enzymatic reaction that recognizes specific protein sequences. The general strategy is, therefore, first to introduce the DNA sequence coding for the tag adjacent to the gene encoding for the protein of interest. Subsequently, expression of the engineered synthetic gene then yields a fusion protein of the original protein of interest attached to the tagging protein or peptide containing the attachment site. This fusion protein is then used for the immobilization procedure.

Another method of selective immobilization is derived from the Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of azides with an alkyne, where the covalent link is formed through the formation of a 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazole [ 30 ]. This reaction has been popularized as “click” chemistry [ 31 ], and in the most well-known version, a terminal alkyne and azide are reacted with Cu(I) catalysts to give near-quantitative conversions to the triazole. The alkyne moiety is also rarely present in biological pathways and adds further versatility to this reaction since the alkyne may be introduced to the biomolecule instead of the azide. This type of “click” chemistry has been used in a variety of applications to enable the attachment of biomolecules bearing either the azide or alkyne with various polymers, fluorophores, or biochemical labels functionalized with their counterpart moieties [ 32 ]. Similar to the Staudinger chemistry, the site-selective attachment of proteins also requires its use in tandem with an enzymatic site-selective labeling method.

Another related family of reactions is “photoclick chemistry,” which relies on photoirradiation to trigger pyrazoline formation between tetrazoles and alkenes [ 33 ]. An added advantage of this method is that the newly formed heterocycle is fluorescent, enabling the monitoring of the reaction progress. Although these are interesting developments, at the moment these have not yet been applied for the purpose of protein immobilization (Figs.  5 and ​ and6 6 ).

The “click” chemistry reaction of alkyne ( 1 ) with azide ( 2 ) to form a 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazol

The “photoclick chemistry” between tetrazoles and alkenes to form pyrazoline

Physical entrapment

The best means of avoiding any negative influence on the structure of an enzyme is to encapsulate it. Proteins or enzymes can be extremely fragile and easily aggressed by external agent such as proteases. Encapsulation of these fragile macromolecules is a possible strategy for preventing their aggression and denaturation. A well-established technique to encapsulate biological species such as enzymes, antibodies, and other proteins in a functional state is based on the sol–gel chemistry method.

Sol–gels are silica materials that are highly porous and readily prepared. The sol–gel is a chemically inert glass that can be shaped in any desired way. It can be designed to be thermally and mechanically very stable, but the standard sol–gel is brittle. Sol–gels have been used extensively in the immobilization of proteins and in particular for the development of biosensors. Although sol–gels are porous, diffusion of substrate to the enzyme can be restricted and care has to be taken to minimize this effect. The synthesis of sol–gels is relatively mild for enzymes. In the first step, a tetra-alkoxysilane is hydrolyzed via acid catalysis. Hydrolysis is followed by condensation where the sol is formed. This is a mixture of partially hydrolyzed and partially condensed. All the pores of this gel are filled with water and alcohol; it is therefore known as aquagel. When the aquagel is dried by evaporation, a xerogel is obtained. Due to the action of capillary forces during the evaporation process, the aquagel shrinks and part of the structure collapses. The xerogel consequently does not have the same structure as the aquagel. To avoid such capillary action, the water in the aquagel can be exchanged with acetone and then with supercritical carbon dioxide. On evaporation of the carbon dioxide, the structure of the aquagel is maintained and a brittle aerogel is obtained. In this manner, hydrophilic aqua-, xero-, and aerogels are made. By adding alkyltrialkoxysilanes to the synthesis mixture, sol–gels with a hydrophobic surface can be obtained. Overall the sol–gel method can generate gels with very different properties [ 6 ].

Many encapsulation methods have been developed, and this task can be achieved with lipid vesicles (also called liposomes ), which are polymolecular aggregates formed in aqueous solution on the dispersion of certain bilayer-forming amphiphilic molecules, such as phospholipids. Under osmotically balanced conditions, the vesicles are spherical in shape and contain one or more (concentric) lamellae that are composed of amphiphilic molecules. These shells are curved and self-closed molecular bilayers in which the hydrophobic part of the amphiphiles forms the hydrophobic interior of the bilayer and the hydrophilic part (the polar head group) is in contact with the aqueous phase. The interior of the lipid vesicles is an aqueous core, the chemical composition of which corresponds in a first approximation to the chemical composition of the aqueous solution in which the vesicles are prepared. Depending on the method of preparation, lipid vesicles can be multi-, oligo-, or unilamellar, containing many, a few, or one bilayer shell(s), respectively. The diameter of the lipid vesicles may vary between about 20 nm and a few hundred micrometers. Lipid vesicles are generally not a thermodynamically stable state of amphiphiles and do not form “spontaneously” (without input of external energy); they are only kinetically stable, kinetically trapped systems. The physical properties of lipid vesicles depend on how and under which conditions lipid vesicles of a certain amphiphile (or of a mixture of amphiphiles) are prepared. The mean size, the lamellarity, and the physical stability of the vesicles not only depend on the chemical structure of the amphiphiles used, but in general particularly on the method of vesicle preparation. Physical instabilities of lipid vesicle systems involve vesicle aggregation and fusion, possibly leading to vesicle precipitation and flat bilayer formation.

The basic principles for the preparation of enzyme-containing lipid vesicles in general do not so depend on the chemical structure of the amphiphiles used. Care should be taken to that all mechanical treatments used during vesicle preparation, such as lipid dispersion, sonication, or filtration through polycarbonate membranes, have to be carried out above the transition temperature ( T m ). Below T m , the saturated hydrophobic chains exist predominately in a rigid, extended all trans conformation, similar to their crystalline state. Above T m , the chains are rather disordered, making the bilayer fluid (mechanically treatable), characterized by increased lateral and rotational lipid diffusion rather similar to a liquid. It is this fluid state of the lipids in biological membranes which represents a fluid matrix for membrane proteins.

The involvement of the highly reproducible extrusion technique, particularly with polycarbonate membranes containing pores with a mean diameter of tenth of nanometers, results in homogenous and mainly unilamellar vesicles. In addition to the high degree of reproducibility of the preparation, one advantage of the extrusion technique is certainly the fact that no organic solvent is involved. One possible disadvantage is the shear force present when the vesicles are squeezed through the approximately cylindrical pores, which can inactivate the enzyme. The encapsulation yield at a fixed lipid concentration may also be dependent on the enzyme concentration and on the nature and ionic strength of the buffer used. In comparison with liposomes prepared by the extrusion technique, vesicles prepared by dehydration–rehydration are generally not unilamellar and not monodisperse, which may be an advantage or a disadvantage, depending on the type of application on the enzyme-containing vesicles. One should also consider that the dehydration–rehydration cycle may inactivate the enzyme. It certainly depends on the type of applications and on the cost of the enzyme, whether achieving high encapsulation efficiencies is important or not. In the case of drug delivery, e.g., high EE values are usually desired.

From all these considerations on interactions of water-soluble enzymes with the vesicle membrane, it is clear that this aspect is important to be taken into account if one likes to understand the behavior of the entrapped enzymes. There are two main areas of applications of enzyme-containing lipid vesicles: (a) in the medical or biomedical field, particularly for the enzyme-replacement therapy, or (b) in the cheese ripening process (acceleration of the process and control over flavor development). For both of these types of applications, the lipid vesicles are just carriers for the enzymes, containers which protect the enzymes from getting in immediate contact with the medium to which they are added, the blood circulation. In the case of the enzyme-containing lipid vesicle-assisted cheese ripening process, the entrapped enzyme is gradually released, allowing catalyzing degradation and modification reactions in the cheese matrix during the ripening period. In the medical applications, the vesicles are used as the drug delivery system, the drug being the entrapped enzyme. In most cases, the vesicles carry enzyme molecules with the aim of replacing- or supporting-endogenous enzymes in the treatment of particular diseases (enzyme-replacement therapy). The entrapped enzyme molecules have to be released at a particular site in the body where they are needed [ 8 ].

Biodegradable polymers nanosystems are an attractive alternative to liposomes since they have the advantages of longer circulation in the blood stream and generally higher drug carrying capacity. Polymers such as poly(lactic acid) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) have been extensively investigated for their biocompatibility and potential capability of releasing therapeutically proteins in a controlled way even over a prolonged period of time. These polymers are degradable by bulk erosion through hydrolysis of the ester bonds. The hydrolysis rate depends on several nanoparticles physicochemical parameters and can be tailored according to the desired release pattern of the protein to be incorporated. These two polymers were approved by FDA as excipients to achieve controlled release of the active ingredient. However, their application in protein delivery systems is often characterized by low entrapment efficiencies, burst release, instability of encapsulated hydrophilic protein, and partial protein release. To improve the performance of these polymer nanoparticles, polysaccharides such as alginate (ALG) and chitosan (CS) could be applied. CS and its derivatives have been intensively studied as carriers for proteins and drugs. More specifically these nanoparticles can be totally made by CS or used in several copolymer combinations. Copolymers made by the combination of CS/ALG are able to generate a more “friendly” environment which protects peptides and proteins from stressing conditions and allows their stabilization during encapsulation, storage, and release.

Kinetics properties of enzymes can be also altered during the entrapment process allowing potential change of the protein specificity to its substrate. Gaining a clear picture of these basics knowledge will definitely lead to a change of object design to increase the protein load, to control the protein release, and to retain the protein integrity and efficacy [ 9 ].

Bioaffinity interactions

Over the years, a number of protein–protein and protein–small molecule binding interactions have been harnessed for immobilization. These strategies exploit the selectivity of such interactions and are, therefore, highly specific with respect to the identity of binding partners as well as the location on the molecules at which binding occurs. Historically, many of the tags that have been described were developed for protein purification by affinity chromatography, but few have been widely co-opted for immobilization in other applications. Perhaps the most well-known genetically encoded affinity tag is the polyhistidine tag. This small tag, usually consisting of six sequential histidine residues, chelates transition metals including Cu(II), Co(II), Zn(II), or Ni(II), although the latter is most commonly employed. Here, a support bearing a chelating moiety such as nitrilotriacetic acid or imino-diacetic acid is treated with a solution of the relevant metal salt to produce a support presenting the metal ions. This metal-activated support is then used for protein immobilization through chelation with the histidine residues of the tag. This method of immobilization is widely used for the temporary capture of proteins during purification and is often termed immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) [ 7 ].

However, the general level of selectivity of this method is relatively low since several endogenous proteins have been identified that are also able to bind to metal ions, thus competing with the desired histidine-fused protein. As a result, for most applications the desired histidine-fusion protein must be purified prior to use. The strength of the binding interaction is also relatively weak ( K d  ≈ 1–10 μM), although proteins bearing tags with 10–12 His residues or two separate histidine tags have been shown to give improvements of up to 1 order of magnitude, enabling in situ immobilization of the target protein on Ni-NTA slides directly from cell lysates [ 34 ].

Antibodies, apart from being the target of immobilization for use in microarrays and biosensors, may also be used as a means of immobilizing other proteins due to the selectivity of their binding interactions. This concept is regularly applied for purification through the use of columns with immobilized antibodies acting to trap their epitope target and is known as immunoaffinity chromatography. The method is, however, rarely used for other applications for several reasons. In order to achieve uniform immobilization, a well-defined monoclonal antibody is needed; polyclonal antibodies are unsuitable since they are not a single species but a heterogeneous population of antibodies that bind their epitope in a variety of conformations. Indeed, without in-depth structural knowledge of the binding interaction, it is impossible to determine strength of the binding or if the binding may block the active site of the protein of interest. Furthermore, the relatively weak nature of the binding means that it is often unsuitable for many applications that require longer-term or more robust immobilization of proteins.

Undoubtedly the most well-known and extensively researched protein-mediated immobilization technique relies on the non-covalent interaction of either avidin or streptavidin to proteins functionalized with biotin [ 35 ]. The interaction between biotin and (strept) avidin is extremely strong ( K d  ≈ 10 −15  M), and this combined with the fact that these proteins are unusually stable to heat, denaturants, extremes of pH, and proteolysis means that the binding is essentially irreversible. The widespread availability of supports such as microtiter plates, microarray substrates, and magnetic particles that are coated with these proteins has also greatly contributed to the popularity of this method as a means of protein immobilization. However, in order to exploit this attachment for protein immobilization, the protein of interest must first be labeled with biotin. Classically, this can be achieved with a number of nonselective chemical biotinylation reagents such as biotin NHS ester [ 36 ].

One conceptually straightforward method of protein immobilization is through the use of enzymatically active fusion proteins. In this case, a protein of interest is fused to an enzyme (capture protein) that reacts selectively with an immobilized substrate analogue or inhibitor. This reaction forms a covalent bond between the enzyme and the substrate on the surface. This strategy was reported in 2002 by Mrksich, using the serine esterase cutinase from the filamentous fungus Fusarium solani pisi [ 37 ]. Cutinase is selectively inhibited by alkylphosphonate para -nitrophenol esters through esterification of the active site serine residue, resulting in the formation of a covalent bond. This protein and ligand were chosen because they possessed a number of desirable characteristics for an immobilization technique. The enzyme was relatively small (210 amino acid residues), globular, and monomeric, which would minimize any steric interactions with the fused protein. Both the termini are opposite to the active site and hence would be amenable to the generation of both N - and C -terminal fusions in which the fused protein would be oriented away from the support surface. Furthermore, the phosphonate diester inhibitor was relatively stable toward hydrolysis, and when bound in the cutinase active site, the alkyl tail of the phosphonate protruded out of the enzyme and offered an accessible location for attachment to the support.

There are also a number of other site-selective immobilization methods that do not require enzymatically mediated attachment. These rely on the recognition of specific functional groups present on amino acids in the protein or an associated peptide tag. One example of this employs phenolic oxidative cross-linking, a phenomenon that is widely observed in nature, which includes protein cross-linking through tyrosine residues [ 38 ]. Such dityrosine crosslinks occur in structural proteins such as elastin and silk and are catalyzed by metalloenzymes, although a simple complex of Ni(II) with the tripeptide glycine–glycine–histidine can also catalyze these reactions. Since IMAC and immobilization with Ni(II) via six-histidine tags and NTA-functionalized supports are already widely used, it was rationalized that this complex could be used as the cross-linking catalyst instead [ 39 ]. By bringing two tyrosine residues, one from the protein to be immobilized and another from the support, into close proximity to the Ni(II) complex, it would be possible to cross-link the two and form a covalent bond between the support and a specific location on the protein. Once the cross-linking had been achieved, the nickel was removed. The extent of dityrosine cross-linkage could also be easily determined since this moiety displays a characteristic fluorescence emission at 420 nm.

A wide range of biologically mediated methods are available for site-specific protein immobilization. This area of research is notable because it is the culmination of a major multidisciplinary research effort spanning molecular biology, protein engineering, organic chemistry, and materials science. The more recent introduction of biologically mediated methods for site-specific, particularly enzyme-mediated, immobilization of proteins from cell lysates should enable the future fabrication of more highly sensitive protein microarrays and biosensors as wells as finding new applications in nanotechnology and single molecule enzymology.

Support materials

The properties of supported enzyme preparations are governed by the properties of both the enzyme and the carrier material. The interaction between the two provides an immobilized enzyme with specific chemical, biochemical, mechanical, and kinetic properties. The support (carrier) can be a synthetic organic polymer, a biopolymer, or an inorganic solid [ 40 , 41 ]. A variety of matrixes have been used as support materials for enzyme immobilization [ 42 ].

Materials proposed in many examples are not suitable for industrial processing procedures due to their low mechanical strength [ 43 ]. This type of supporting matrixes is sometimes called soft gel.

Synthetic polymers

The most common and widely used synthetic polymers used as support for enzyme immobilization are represented by acrylic resins, such as Eupergit®-C (Evonik Industries). They are macroporous copolymers of N , N ′-methylene-bi-(methacrylamide), glycidyl methacrylate, allyl glycidyl ether, and methacrylamide with average particle size around 170 mm and a pore diameter of about 20–30 nm (Fig.  7 ). They are highly hydrophilic and stable, both chemically and mechanically, over a pH range from 0 to 14, and does not swell or shrink even upon drastic pH changes. A major drawback of hydrophilic resins is diffusion limitations, the effects of which, as would be expected, are more pronounced in kinetically controlled processes. Immobilization by covalent attachment to acrylic resins has been successfully applied to a variety of enzymes for industrial application [ 44 , 45 ].

Structure of polyacrylamide gel matrix

As above reported, polyketone polymers –[–CO-CH 2 CH 2 –] n – appear promising supports for protein immobilization for their mechanical properties, high immobilization capacity, simplicity of the immobilization procedure by simple reactant mixing, and absence of bi-functional reagents or spacer arms. Polyketone polymers are obtained by palladium-catalyzed copolymerization of ethane and carbon monoxide [ 46 ]. Due to the close presence of polar keto groups, the polymers present a high liquid volume value (8.2 ml/g for a polymer not exceeding 25,000 Da), larger than twice than that shown by commercial sepharose, because the high possibility of hydrogen bonds between the keto groups and the water molecules and no restriction due to cross linking are present. Water accessible carbonyl groups were quantified in about 10 meq/g polymer, and the apparent concentration of the immobilized enzyme on the polyketone was more than 2.36 mg/ml [ 46 ].

Biopolymers

A variety of biopolymers, mainly water-insoluble polysaccharides such as cellulose, starch, agarose, carragenans, and chitosan, have been widely used as supports for immobilizing enzymes (Fig.  8 ). These matrixes form very inert aqueous gels, characterized by high gel strength, even at low concentration [ 47 ]. Moreover, due to their chemical structure, which can be easily activated, they may be prepared to bind proteins and enzymes in a reversible or irreversible way. Likewise, with the use of bi-functional reagents, it is possible to form cross-links which strengthen their structure increasing their mechanical and thermal resistance. Due to these particular characteristics, biopolymers are resins which are almost ideal to be used in purification (reversible binding) and in immobilization processes (irreversible binding) of biomolecules. Current techniques to conjugate polysaccharides to proteins include aldehyde, carbodiimide, epoxide, hydrazide, active ester, radical, and addition reactions, some of which are suitable for in situ conjugation of materials, while others are better suited for ex situ conjugation and purification.

Chemical structures of cellulose and its amino derivatives

Enzymes can also be immobilized in natural or synthetic hydrogels or cryogels in non-aqueous media. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) cryogels formed by the freeze-thawing method, for example, have been widely used for immobilization of whole cells [ 48 ]. However, free enzymes, owing to their smaller size, can diffuse out of the gel matrix and are, consequently, leached in an aqueous medium. In order to entrap free enzymes, the size of the enzyme must be increased, e.g., by crosslinking. An alternative method to increase the size of the enzyme is to form a complex with a polyelectrolyte. Owing to their ampholytic character, proteins exist as polycations or polyanions, depending on the pH of the medium. Hence, they can often form complexes with oppositely charged polyelectrolytes.

Inorganic supports

On the other hand, rigid supports may be preferable. A variety of inorganic solids can be used for the immobilization of enzymes, e.g., alumina, silica, zeolites, and mesoporous silicas [ 49 ]. Silica-based supports are the most suitable matrices for enzyme immobilization in industrial manufacturing of enzyme-processed products [ 18 , 50 , 51 ], as well as for research purposes [ 52 ]. The most important advantages of silica gels compared to soft gels are their higher mechanical strength that allow their utilization for a much wider range of operating pressures and experimental conditions, as evidenced by their preferential use in the preparation of high performance liquid chromatography media [ 53 – 55 ]. Additionally, the surface of silica gel can be readily modified by chemical methods to provide various types of functional groups for facilitated ligand attachment. It has been shown that an extremely high loading of invertase was achieved by chemical modification of gel surface using amino group [ 56 ]. The overall surface area offered by silica gel matrixes is unparalleled. Furthermore, the silica gel can be easily fabricated to provide desirable morphology, pore structures, and micro-channels to allow substrate–ligand interaction. Furthermore, silica gel is mechanically stable and chemically inert, and it is therefore environmental- and solvent-friendly for industrial manufacturing and processing.

One of the simplest and most inexpensive methods to immobilize an enzyme on silica is by simple absorption. It is used, for example, to formulate enzymes for detergent powders which release the enzyme into the washing liquid during washing.

Smart polymers

A novel approach to immobilize enzymes is via covalent attachment to stimulus-responsive or mart polymer, which undergo dramatic conformational changes in response to small changes in their environment, e.g., temperature, pH, and ionic strength [ 57 ]. The most studied example is the thermo-responsive and biocompatible polymer, poly- N -isopropylacrylamide (polyNIPAM) [ 58 ]. Aqueous solutions of polyNIPAM exhibit a critical solution temperature (LCST) around 32 °C, below which the polymer readily dissolves in water while, above the LCST it becomes insoluble owing to expulsion of water molecules from the polymer network. Hence, the biotransformation can be performed under conditions where the enzyme is soluble, thereby minimizing diffusional limitations and loss of activity owing to protein conformational changes on the surface of a support. Subsequently, raising the temperature above the LCST leads to precipitation of the immobilized enzyme, thus facilitating its recovery and reuse. An additional advantage of using such thermo-responsive immobilized enzymes is that runaway conditions are avoided because when the reaction temperature exceeds the LCST, the catalyst precipitates and the reaction shuts down. Two methods are generally used to prepare the enzyme–polyNIPAM conjugates: (a) introduction of polymerizable vinyl groups into the enzyme followed by copolymerization with NIPAM or (b) reaction of NH 2 groups on the surface of the enzyme with a copolymer of NIPAM containing reactive ester groups or the homopolymer containing an N -succinimide ester function as the end group. More recently, an alternative thermo-responsive polymer has been described [ 59 – 61 ]. It consists of random copolymers derived from 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethyl methacrylate and oligo(ethylene glycol) methacrylate and combines the positive features of poly(ethylene glycol), non-toxicity, and anti-immunogenicity, with thermo-responsive properties similar to polyNIPAM. The LCST could be varied between 26 and 90 °C depending on the relative amounts of OEGMA used. These properties make this a potentially interesting support for biocatalysts.

Conducting polymers

Polymers that exhibit electrical conductivity have now been successfully synthesized, and the past two decades have witnessed unending interest in the synthesis and characterization of such conducting polymers due to the potential technological applications of these materials. Conducting polymers also receive a great interest in biotechnology. A large number of organic compounds, which effectively transport charge, are roughly divided into three groups, i.e., charge transfer complexes/ion radical salts, organometallic species, and conjugated organic polymers. A new class of polymers known as intrinsically conducting polymers or electroactive conjugated polymers has recently emerged. Such materials exhibit interesting electrical and optical properties previously found only in inorganic systems. Electronically conducting polymers differ from all the familiar inorganic crystalline semiconductors, e.g., silicon in two important features that polymers are molecular in nature and lack long range order. A key requirement for a polymer to become intrinsically electrically conducting is that there should be an overlap of molecular orbitals to allow the formation of delocalized molecular wave function. Besides this, molecular orbitals must be partially filled so that there is a free movement of electrons throughout the lattice. Enzyme immobilization and biosensor construction are some of these applications [ 62 ].

Various conducting polymers have been considered for immobilization of enzymes. Of these, polypyrrole has gained most interest for the entrapment of protein molecules due to its low oxidation potential. This unique characteristic enables the growth of film from aqueous solutions that are compatible with most biological systems. This approach is usually based on entrapment of an enzyme into the structure of polypyrrole film by potentiostatic or galvanostatic polymerization of pyrrole in enzyme solution, which contains a supporting electrolyte.

Conducting polymers can be prepared by chemical or electrochemical polymerization. Although the chemical method offers mass production at a reasonable cost, the electrochemical method involves the direct formation of conducting polymer thin films with better control of thickness and morphology, which are more suitable for direct application. It is established that the conducting properties of the polymer films greatly depend on the mode of synthesis and also on the number of parameters, such as type of counter-ion, the type of electrolyte and its concentration, synthesis temperature, electrochemical voltage, pH of the electrolyte, etc. Thus, in order to improve the properties of polymer films suitable for a desired application, it is necessary to critically control and optimize the various synthesis parameters [ 63 ].

The other electrochemically prepared conducting polymers used for the biomolecule immobilization are polyacetylene, polythiophene, polyindole, and polyaniline. Also few biosensors based on insulating electropolymerized films polyphenol, poly( o -phenylenediamine), polydichlorophenolindophenol, and overoxidized polypyrrole have also been elaborated [ 64 ]. Many theoretical models have also been coupled with the electrochemical entrapment of enzyme for the evaluation of the role of the thickness of polymeric layers, enzyme location, enzyme loading, etc. on the biosensor functioning [ 65 ].

Gold nanoparticles

The progress of nanotechnology in the 1990s was followed by the rapid growth of nanobiotechnology. “Nanobiocatalysis” is one typical example. In the early approaches to nanobio-catalysis, enzymes were immobilized on various nanostructured materials using conventional approaches, such as simple adsorption and covalent attachment. This approach gathered attention by immobilizing enzymes onto a high surface area of nanostructured materials, such as nanoporous materials, electrospun nanofibers, and magnetic nanoparticles. This large surface area resulted in improved enzyme loading, which in turn increased the apparent enzyme activity per unit mass or volume compared to that of enzyme systems immobilized onto conventional materials. One of the particularly advantageous features of nanostructured materials is the control over size at the nanometer scale, such as the pore size in nanopores, thickness of nanofibers or nanotubes, and the particle size of nanoparticles. The uniform size distribution of nanomaterials and their similarity in size with enzyme molecules, together with other advantageous nanomaterial properties such as conductivity and magnetism, have revolutionized nanobiocatalytic approaches in various areas of enzyme technology and led to improved enzyme properties in nanobio-catalytic systems, particularly with regard to enzyme stability and activity. Recently, nanobiocatalytic approaches have evolved beyond simple enzyme immobilization strategies to include enzyme stabilization, wired enzymes, the use of enzymes in sensitive biomolecular detection, artificial enzymes, nanofabrication, and nanopatterning [ 66 ].

Nanosized particles of noble metals, especially gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), have received great interests due to their attractive electronic, optical, and thermal properties as well as catalytic properties and potential applications in the fields of physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, and material science. Therefore, the synthesis and characterization of AuNPs have attracted considerable attention from both a fundamental and a practical point of view. A variety of methods have been developed to prepare AuNPs [ 67 ]. However, the high surface energy of AuNPs makes them extremely reactive, and most systems undergo aggregation without protection or passivation of their surfaces. Thus, special precautions have to be taken to avoid their aggregation or precipitation. Typically, AuNPs are prepared by chemical reduction of the corresponding transition metal salts in the presence of a stabilizer which binds to their surface to impart high stability and a desirable linking chemistry and provide the desired charge and solubility properties. Some of the commonly used methods for surface passivation include protection by self-assembled monolayers, the most popular being citrate and thiol-functionalized organics; encapsulation in the H 2 O pools of reverse microemulsions; and dispersion in polymeric matrixes (Fig.  9 ). Although the synthesis of AuNPs makes great progress, the control of size, monodispersion, morphology, and surface chemistry of AuNPs is still a great challenge. Recently, designing novel protectors for AuNPs have been the focus of intense research because surface chemistry of AuNPs will play a key role in future application fields such as nanosensor, biosensor, catalysis, nanodevice, and nanoelectrochemistry.

Porphyrin–gold nanoparticle (AuNP)

Magnetic nanoparticles

In recent years, substantial progress has been made in developing technologies in the field of magnetic carriers. Magnetic separation is an emerging technology that uses magnetism for the efficient separation of micro- and nanometer para- and ferro-magnetic particles from different chemical and biological samples.

With the rapid development of nanotechnology, magnetic nanoparticles are currently being widely studied. It has long been known that the physicochemical properties of magnetic nanoparticles can be vastly different from those of the corresponding bulk material. For example, magnetic anisotropy, which keeps a particle magnetized in a specific direction, is generally proportional to the volume of a particle [ 68 ]. Magnetic nanoparticles will display superparamagnetism, which means that the particles are attracted by a magnetic field, but retain no residual magnetism after the field is removed. Therefore, suspended superparamagnetic particles can be removed from solution using an external magnet, but they do not agglomerate (i.e., they stay suspended) after removal of the external magnetic field.

Among magnetic carriers, nano-sized magnetic particles possess many advantageous properties. Particles such as crosslinked iron oxide [ 69 , 70 ], ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide [ 71 , 72 ], and monocrystalline iron oxide nano-particles [ 73 , 74 ] had all been developed as imaging agents in magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic particles have been used to immobilize enzymes in order to enhance bioelement stability, ease separation from the reaction mixture, and increase catalyst stability, and they have been proposed for biotechnological applications [ 75 ] or for analytical devices, such as biosensors [ 76 , 77 ]. Furthermore, nanomedicine is an emerging field that uses nanoparticles to facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Iron nanoparticles were used in tumor treatment relying on tumor vessel leakiness for preferential accumulation in cancer tissues. Specific targeting of magnetic nanoparticles to tumors has been accomplished in various experimental systems [ 78 ].

There have been various methods developed for the preparation of paramagnetic nanoparticles [ 79 ]. The most commonly used protocol involves co-precipitation of ferrous and ferric ions in basic solutions. The development of uniform nanometer sized particles has been intensively pursued because of their technological and fundamental scientific importance. These nanoparticular materials often exhibit very interesting electrical, optical, magnetic, and chemical properties, which cannot be achieved by their bulk counterparts. In literature, polymers such as dextran, PVA, and DEAE-starch were added to coat the particles for better stability, before or after the formation of iron oxide particles [ 80 , 81 ]. Otherwise, magnetic nanoparticles can be coated with silica containing a high coverage of silanol groups, which can easily be anchored with defined and generic surface chemistries [ 82 , 83 ]. As a result, magnetic nanoparticles coated with an ultrathin layer of silica would be more useful as magnetic nanocarrier [ 84 ].

Cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs)

Cross-linked enzyme crystals (CLECs) are highly active immobilized enzymes of controllable particle size, varying from 1 to 100 μm. Their operational stability and ease of recycling, coupled with their high catalyst and volumetric productivities, renders them ideally suited for industrial biotransformations. However, CLECs have an inherent disadvantage: Enzyme crystallization is a laborious procedure requiring enzyme of high purity, leading to their high costs. The more recently developed cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs), on the other hand, are produced by simple precipitation of the enzyme from aqueous solution, as physical aggregates of protein molecules, by the addition of salts, or water miscible organic solvents or non-ionic polymers [ 40 , 41 , 85 ]. These physical aggregates are held together by non-covalent bonding without perturbation of their tertiary structure that is without denaturation. Subsequent cross-linking of these physical aggregates renders them permanently insoluble while maintaining their pre-organized superstructure and hence their catalytic activity. This discovery led to the development of a new family of immobilized enzymes: CLEAs. This type of immobilized enzyme is very effective biocatalysts as they can be produced by inexpensive and effective method. CLEAs can readily be reused and exhibit satisfactory stability and performance for selected applications. The methodology is applicable to essentially any enzyme, including cofactor dependent oxidoreductases [ 40 , 41 ]. The use of CLEAs to penicillin acylase used in antibiotic synthesis has shown large improvements over other type of biocatalysts [ 86 ].

Selected applications of immobilized enzymes

Various applications of immobilized enzymes can be found in industry, medicine, and research. Table  1 has gathered a selection of currently used immobilized-enzyme processes. In any commercial application, the choice of a specific immobilized enzyme or mode of immobilization must be based on a specific compromise about all advantages and disadvantages between free and immobilized enzyme. Other industrial applications of immobilized enzymes include laboratory-scale organic synthesis and analytical and medical applications [ 87 , 88 ]. Furthermore, since enzymes are able to catalyze reactions not only in aqueous solutions but also in organic media, immobilized enzymes can catalyze organic synthesis [ 89 ].

Some important industrial applications of immobilized enzyme systems

In recent analytical applications, immobilized enzymes are used mainly in biosensors [ 90 ] and in diagnostic test strips. Biosensors are constructed by integrating biological sensing systems, e.g., enzyme (s), with a transducer. Enzymes for the most cases are immobilized either directly on a transducer’s working tip or using a polymer membrane tightly wrapping it up. In principle, due to enzyme specificity and sensitivity, biosensors can be tailored for nearly any target analyte [ 91 – 94 ], and these can be both enzyme substrates and enzyme inhibitors. Advantageously, their determination is performed without special preparation of the sample. The most extensively studied enzymes for the application in enzyme-based biosensors are presented in Table  2 . Practically, four of the sensors listed, namely glucose, lactate, urea, and glutamate, have been widely used and commercialized [ 90 ]. Recent advances were reviewed [ 95 – 97 ].

Some of the most frequently studied enzymes for enzyme-based biosensors

Enzyme biosensors are made by immobilization of enzymes on the sensing surface [ 98 – 100 ]. Due to the presence of reactive functional groups, organic polymeric carriers such as poly(2-glucosyloxyethyl methacrylate)-concanavalin [ 101 ], polyethylenimine [ 102 ], and polyvinylferrocenium [ 103 ] are used for this purpose. However, inorganic materials provide a better stability because of their thermal and mechanical stability and non-toxicity [ 104 ]. Various enzymes have been immobilized on inorganic materials, such as clay [ 105 ], porous silica, and alumina powder [ 106 ]. It is well-known that porous alumina membranes with various dimensions could be easily fabricated via electrical anodization of high purity aluminum. These membranes have been used to prepare nanoarrays and nanowires [ 107 – 109 ] and biosensors [ 110 – 112 ] .

Medical applications of immobilized enzymes include diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Offering a great potential in this area, real application of immobilized enzymes has as yet suffered from serious problems from their toxicity to the human organism, allergenic and immunological reactions, as well as from their limited stability in vivo. Examples of potential medical uses of immobilized enzyme systems are listed in Table  3 .

Selected potential medical uses of immobilized enzymes

Immobilization of digestive enzymes onto solid supports

The use of immobilized enzymes finds particular advantages using proteolytic enzymes. Papain, a thiol protease, present in the latex of Carica papaya exhibits a broad proteolytic activity and is an enzyme of industrial use and of high research interest. Papain has a variety of industrial applications, especially in food industry. It is used to tenderize meat and meat products, in the manufacture of protein hydrolysate, in brewing industry for clarifying juice and beer, in dairy industry for cheese, in backing industry, and in the extraction of flavor and color compounds from plants. Papain can also be used in forage industry to increase the utilization and transformation rate of proteins and in resolving plant and animal protein to make high health products [ 113 , 114 ]. The potential uses of papain include amino acid esters and peptide synthesis, treatment of acute destructive lactation mastitis, treatment of red blood cells prior to use in antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity assays with lymphocytes, and enzyme inhibition-based biosensors for food safety and environmental monitoring [ 115 – 117 ].

Inorganic immobilization supports such as particulate aluminum oxides (alumina) have also been examined for immobilization of the proteolytic enzyme, papain [ 118 ]. In this research, organic phosphate linkers have been used for creation of free carboxyl groups in a two-step process. Papain binding to these alumina derivatives was performed using the water soluble carbodiimide 1-ethyl-3-(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide. It has been shown that immobilized papain had similar kinetic constants compared to papain in solution. By fluorescence measurements, it was concluded that the hydrophobic environment of the active site remained unchanged, while the structure of the rest of the protein was perturbed by its association with the negatively charged surface [ 118 ].

Identification of proteins by liquid chromatography followed by mass spectrometry (LC–MS) is normally used as a suitable analytical method. In practice, proteins are subjected to proteolytic cleavage, and a complex mixture of peptides is produced. The peptide mixture is then separated by high-resolution LC–MS [ 119 – 121 ]. Protein digestion is normally performed in a homogeneous aqueous solution containing the proteolytic enzyme and the sample (enzyme-to-protein ratio, 1:50). However, this method suffers from several problems that may interfere with identification of sample proteins. Some of these problems include long digestion times (up to 24 h), auto-digestion by-products, and limited enzyme-to-substrate ratio.

Enzyme immobilization onto solid supports is a possible alternative to in-solution digestion. Different reactive groups of the supporting material (–OH, –NH 2 , and –COOH) can be utilized for covalent protein binding using relatively simple coupling strategies [ 122 ]. These approaches include co-polymerization with polyacrylamide gels [ 123 ], binding onto microbeads [ 124 ], silica-based substrates [ 125 , 126 ], synthetic polymers [ 127 ], and the inner walls of open capillaries or microchannels in microfluidics [ 128 , 129 ].

Textile industry

Another application of immobilized enzyme systems is found in textile industry where the main advantage is their low cost. The industrial plant size needed for continuous process is two orders of magnitude smaller than that required for batch process using free enzymes. The total costs are, therefore, considerably much lower. Immobilized enzymes offer greatly increased productivity on the basis of enzyme weight and also often provide process advantages [ 130 ].

Although oxidation reactions are essential in several industries, most of the conventional oxidation technologies have the following drawbacks: non-specific or undesirable side-reactions and use of environmentally hazardous chemicals. This has impelled the search for new oxidation technologies based on biological systems such as enzymatic oxidation. These systems show the following advantages over chemical oxidation: Enzymes are specific and biodegradable catalysts and enzyme reactions are carried out under mild conditions.

Enzymatic oxidation techniques have been proposed in a great variety of industrial fields including pulp and paper, textile, and food industries. Recycling oxidizing enzymes on molecular oxygen as electron acceptor are the most interesting ones. Thus, laccases (benzenediol: oxygen oxidoreductase; EC 1.10.3.2) belong to a particularly promising class of enzymes for the above-mentioned purposes [ 131 ]. The laccase molecule is a dimeric or tetrameric glycoprotein, which usually contains four copper atoms per monomer distributed in three redox sites. This enzyme catalyzes the oxidation of ortho- and paradiphenols, aminophenols, polyphenols, polyamines, lignins, and aryl diamines as well as some inorganic ions coupled to the reduction of molecular dioxygen to water [ 132 ].

A wide variety of supports and methods are constantly used for the immobilization of various industrial enzymes, and several applications of laccases have been proposed. Specifically, the direct substrate oxidation of phenol derivatives has been investigated in bioremediation efforts to decontaminate industrial wastewaters. The polymeric polyphenolic derivatives that result from the laccase-catalyzed oxidative couplings are usually insoluble and can be separated, easily, by filtration or sedimentation Additionally, a laccase has been commercialized, recently, for preparing cork stoppers for wine bottles, whereby the enzyme oxidatively diminishes the characteristic cork taint and/or astringency that is frequently imparted to aged bottled wine [ 133 ].

At present, the main technological applications of laccases are in the textile, in processes related to decolorization of dyes and in the pulp and paper industries for the delignification of woody fibers, particularly during the bleaching process [ 134 ]. In most of these applications, laccases are used together with a chemical mediator [ 135 ]. Currently, all marketed laccases are of fungal origin, but the recent identification and structure determination of a bacterial laccase may eventually broaden the horizon for this enzyme class. It remains to be seen whether bacterial enzymes can be expressed at levels sufficient for their commercialization.

Conclusions

The technology of immobilized enzymes is still going through a phase of evolution and maturation. Evolution is reflected in the ever-broadening range of applications of immobilized enzymes. Maturation is mirrored in the development of the theory of how immobilized enzymes function and how the technique of immobilization is related to their primary structure through the formation and configuration of their three dimensional structure. There still remains much room for the development of useful processes and materials based on this hard-won understanding. Immobilized enzymes will clearly be more widely used in the future. This is just the beginning of the immobilized enzyme technology era.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the financial support by Hormozgan Science and Technology Park.

Abbreviations

Contributor Information

Ahmad Abolpour Homaei, Email: [email protected] .

Reyhaneh Sariri, Email: ri.ca.naliug@iriras .

Roberto Stevanato, Email: ti.evinu@vetsr .