Manual chamber counting | XN-350 | Pearson's correlation | Passing-Bablok regression | Bland-Altman regression | |
Median | Median | r | Equation | Absolute bias | |
95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI of slope | 95% CI of bias | ||
Range | Range | 95% CI of intercept | |||
Total cell | 16 | 35 | .84 | y = 1.16x + 0.84 | −17 |
(/μL) | 7 to 40 | 10 to 49 | < .001 | −0.48 to 1.00 | −36 to 2 |
0–587 | 0–604 | −0.48 to 1.00 | |||
WBC | 16 | 33 | .84 | y = 1.15x + 0.00 | −16 |
(/μL) | 7 to 40 | 10 to 45 | <.001 | 1.05 to 1.35 | −35 to 3 |
0–587 | 0–597 | −0.46 to 1.00 | |||
RBC | 160 | 1000 | .95 | y = 1.08x + 0.00 | −7192 |
(/μL) | 5 to 1050 | 0 to 2000 | <.001 | 1.04 to 1.25 | −13804 to −579 |
0–551250 | 0–576000 | 0.00 to 0.00 | |||
PMN | 4 | 41 | .50 | y = 1.02x + 0.00 | −16 |
(%) | 0 to 23 | 24 to 56 | <.001 | 0.98 to 1.17 | −24 to −8 |
0–89 | 0–100 | 0.00 to 1.22 | |||
MN | 12 | 50 | .33 | y = 1.01x + 3.80 | −27 |
(%) | 0 to 37 | 42 to 65 | <.001 | 0.94 to 1.39 | −36 to −17 |
0–99 | 0–100 | 0.00 to 6.72 | |||
Neutrophil | 4 | 41 | .56 | y = 1.00x + 0.00 | −14 |
(%) | 0 to 33 | 23 to 54 | <.001 | 0.95 to 1.09 | −21 to −6 |
0–89 | 0–100 | 0.00 to 2.96 | |||
Lymphocyte | 8 | 37 | .44 | y = 1.04x + 0.00 | −18 |
(%) | 0 to 20 | 24 to 49 | <.001 | 0.99 to 1.54 | −26 to −10 |
0–97 | 0–100 | 0.00 to 1.14 | |||
Monocyte | 2 | 8 | .26 | y = 1.23x + 0.00 | −8 |
(%) | 0 to 5 | 6 to 12 | <.001 | 1.04 to 2.08 | −12 to −3 |
0–50 | 0–100 | 0.00 to 0.00 |
Manual chamber counting | XN-350 | Pearson's correlation | Passing-Bablok regression | Bland-Altman regression | |
Median | Median | r | Equation | Absolute bias | |
95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI of slope | 95% CI of bias | ||
Range | Range | 95% CI of intercept | |||
Total cell | 280 | 292 | 1.00 | y = 1.05x + 10.85 | −241 |
(/μL) | 161 to 400 | 218 to 448 | < .001 | 1.01 to 1.12 | −548 to 67 |
14 to 76000 | 12 to 76201 | −0.62 to 18.04 | |||
WBC | 280 | 266 | 1.00 | y = 1.00x + 3.70 | −38 |
(/μL) | 161 to 400 | 189 to 422 | < .001 | 1.00 to 1.02 | −86 to 11 |
14 to 76000 | 12 to 76153 | 0.00 to 5.44 | |||
RBC | 900 | 1000 | .98 | y = 1.06x + 43.38 | −1559 |
(/μL) | 457 to 1647 | 1000 to 3000 | <.001 | 1.00 to 1.12 | −10956 to 7838 |
0 to 1200000 | 0 to 1056000 | 0.00 to 148.70 | |||
PMN | 10 | 13 | .98 | y = 1.00x–0.01 | 0 |
(%) | 8 to 25 | 8 to 26 | <.001 | 0.97 to 1.04 | −2 to 1 |
1 to 90 | 2 to 93 | −0.60 to 0.65 | |||
MN | 90 | 87 | .98 | y = 1.00x–0.43 | 0 |
(%) | 75 to 92 | 74 to 92 | <.001 | 0.97 to 1.04 | −1 to 2 |
10 to 99 | 7 to 98 | −3.05 to 2.35 | |||
Neutrophil | 10 | 12 | .98 | y = 1.00x–0.19 | 1 |
(%) | 8 to 25 | 6 to 26 | <.001 | 0.96 to 1.03 | −1 to 2 |
1–90 | 2–92 | −1.34 to 0.21 | |||
Lymphocyte | 43 | 43 | .97 | y = 0.99x + 0.51 | −2 |
(%) | 30 to 55 | 34 to 56 | < .001 | 0.95 to 1.03 | −3 to 0 |
2–90 | 1–90 | −0.90 to 2.51 | |||
Monocyte | 28 | 29 | .95 | y = 0.96x + 0.91 | 2 |
(%) | 24 to 32 | 23 to 35 | <.001 | 0.90 to 1.00 | 0 to 4 |
2–87 | 2–88 | −0.01 to 2.30 |
Manual chamber counting | XN-350 | Pearson's correlation | Passing-Bablok regression | Bland-Altman regression | |
Median | Median | Equation | Absolute bias | ||
95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI of slope | 95% CI of bias | ||
Range | Range | 95% CI of intercept | |||
Total cell | 580 | 1181 | 0.50 | y = 1.08x–0.22 | −7494 |
(/μL) | 361 to 1595 | 748 to 1821 | < .001 | 1.00 to 1.19 | −21596 to 6607 |
0 to 72500 | 96 to 387172 | −43.63 to 61.69 | |||
WBC | 580 | 1106 | .50 | y = 1.06x–8.60 | −7396 |
(/μL) | 361 to 1595 | 426 to 1664 | < .001 | 0.99 to 1.18 | −21485 to 6694 |
0 to 72500 | 75 to 386773 | −58.60 to 9.54 | |||
RBC | 2850 | 5000 | 1.00 | y = 1.02x + 395.35 | −6081 |
(/μL) | 1112 to 7193 | 2000 to 12898 | < .001 | 1.00 to 1.19 | −12856 to 693 |
0 to 1600000 | 0 to 1576000 | 0.00 to 549.48 | |||
PMN | 40 | 38 | .96 | y = 1.07x + 0.23 | −1 |
(%) | 23 to 75 | 23 to 81 | < .001 | 0.97 to 1.04 | −3 to 2 |
0 to 97 | 3 to 99 | −0.74 to 1.74 | |||
MN | 54 | 62 | .96 | y = 1.01x–0.58 | −1 |
(%) | 20 to 71 | 19 to 77 | < .001 | 0.97 to 1.04 | −4 to 2 |
0–97 | 1 to 97 | −3.16 to 1.16 | |||
Neutrophil | 40 | 38 | .96 | y = 1.01x–0.37 | 0 |
(%) | 23 to 75 | 23 to 81 | < .001 | 0.98 to 1.04 | −3 to 3 |
0–97 | 3–99 | −1.83 to 0.82 | |||
Lymphocyte | 24 | 33 | .97 | y = 1.01x–0.56 | −1 |
(%) | 10 to 48 | 11 to 47 | < .001 | 0.99 to 1.05 | −3 to 1 |
0–96 | 0–96 | −2.26 to 0.29 | |||
Monocyte | 10 | 10 | .89 | y = 0.99x–0.09 | 0 |
(%) | 7 to 15 | 8 to 19 | < .001 | 0.89 to 1.08 | −2 to 2 |
0–68 | 0–53 | −0.87 to 0.67 |
Overall, the XN-350 showed very strong or strong correlations with manual chamber counting in terms of most cell enumeration and differential counting parameters with a few exceptions. Specifically, TC-BF, WBC-BF, and RBC-BF showed very strong or strong correlations with their corresponding manual chamber counting parameters in CSF samples. PMN-BF and MN-BF showed moderate and weak correlations, respectively, with their corresponding manual chamber counting parameters in CSF samples. The research parameters including NE-BF, LY-BF, and MO-BF, which comprise PMN-BF and MN-BF, also showed moderate, weak, and very weak correlations, respectively, with their corresponding manual chamber counting parameters. In particular, MO-BF showed a proportional difference and significant difference in the Passing-Bablok and Bland-Altman analyses. In AF samples, all the cell enumeration and differential counting XN-350 parameters showed very strong correlations with their corresponding manual chamber counting counterparts. In PF samples, RBC-BF and all the differential counting parameters obtained via manual chamber counting and the XN-350 were very strongly correlated. TC-BF and WBC-BF showed moderate correlations with their corresponding manual chamber counting parameters; however, they did not show any statistically significant difference according to either Passing-Bablok or Bland-Altman analysis.
A comparison between analyses performed by Cytospin (accompanied by light microscopy) and the XN-350 was performed on 30 of the 51 PF samples based on sample availability ( Table 5 ). None of the samples in the Cytospin analysis contained malignant cells. NE-BF, LY-BF, and MO-BF showed very strong or strong correlations with corresponding Cytospin analysis parameters. EO-BF failed to show any statistically significant correlation with Cytospin analysis; however it also did not show any significant difference in either the Passing-Bablok analysis or the Bland-Altman analysis.
Cytospin analysis | XN-350 | Pearson's correlation | Passing-Bablok regression | Bland-Altman regression | |
Median | Median | r | Equation | Absolute bias | |
95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI of slope | 95% CI of bias | ||
Range | Range | 95% CI of intercept | |||
Neutrophil | 36 | 36 | .93 | y = 0.91x + 5.66 | −2 |
(%) | 20 to 55 | 22 to 73 | < .001 | 0.77 to 1.07 | −7 to 3 |
0 to 99 | 3 to 97 | −1.74 to 9.77 | |||
Lymphocyte | 41 | 43 | .65 | y = 1.03x–2.33 | 2 |
(%) | 23 to 53 | 11 to 57 | < .001 | 0.88 to 1.21 | −4 to 7 |
0 to 96 | 0 to 96 | −8.53 to 3.64 | |||
Monocyte | 14 | 11 | .89 | y = 0.94x + 0.27 | 0 |
(%) | 5 to 22 | 8 to 21 | <.001 | 0.66 to 1.45 | −5 to 4 |
0 to 55 | 0 to 48 | −4.07 to 3.75 | |||
Eosinophil | 0.5 | 0 | .07 | y = 0.40x + 0.00 | 1 |
(%) | 0 to 2 | 0 to 1 | .723 | 0.15 to 2.20 | 0 to 1 |
0 to 11 | 0 to 7 | 0.00 to 0.10 |
We evaluated the basic performance of the XN-350 and its correlation with manual chamber counting/Cytospin analysis using 3 different types of BF. The XN-350 showed acceptable precision, carry-over, LOB, and linearity. The LOD and LOQ of the WBC and RBC were not suitable for measuring CSF samples with low cell counts (i.e., near the reference limit). The XN-350 showed strong or very strong correlations with manual chamber counting for most cell enumeration parameters, as well as for 2-part and 4-part differential counting except in CSF samples. The correlations in WBC and RBC cell enumeration with manual chamber counting in PF samples were moderate, with no significant differences. The XN-350 also correlated well with Cytospin analysis results of PF samples for the differential counting of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes. Differential counting of eosinophils did not show any significant correlation between XN-350 and Cytospin analysis, although the difference was also not significant.
The performance of the XN-350 was acceptable in terms of precision, carry-over, LOB, and linearity. Even though manual chamber counting is the gold standard method for cell enumeration, it is hampered by its high imprecision given that CVs can reach 45% [S56]. Additionally, a major concern with respect to the BF mode in AHAs is poor reproducibility and high background counts, which may lead to falsely elevated cell counts among samples with low cellularity. [25] In our study, the XN-350 showed excellent precision and LOB while carry-over was negligible; the latter could be attributable to the technical aspects of the instrument since it performs a rinse cycle after each run followed by a background check. [6] The linearity was also competent.
The LOD and LOQ values were suitable for the analysis of AF and PF, but were not sufficiently sensitive for the analysis of CSF samples with low cellularity. The LOD and LOQ for WBCs were 1/μL and 5/μL, respectively. AF and PF samples are classified into transudates and exudates, with the cut-off value for the WBC count generally being 1000/μL. [25] CSF samples commonly show low cellularity; therefore, the upper limits of TC and WBC are much lower than those of AF and PF samples. The WBC counts and differentials in CSF samples determine the patient's diagnosis and/or type of meningitis. The upper limits of the TC count reference ranges in CSF are 7/μL in children and 5/μL in adults, [26] whereas WBC counts in CSF range from 0 to 5/μL in adults and up to 30/μL in neonates. [25] The LOD and LOQ of RBCs were 1000/μL and 2000/μL, respectively; these were too high when considering that the upper limits of the reference ranges of RBC in CSF are 50/μL in neonates and 5/μL in adults, [26] whereas RBC counts (particularly in the range of 0–1000/μL) are of little significance in PF and AF. [26] Furthermore, the unit of RBC measurement used by the XN-350 is “ × 10 3 /μL,” which is not sufficiently sensitive for estimating small values.
In light of these data, each laboratory needs to evaluate the basic performance of the XN-350, including LOD and LOQ, when using this instrument for BF analysis and to establish a protocol for how to handle samples with low cellularity around the LOQ. Samples with low cell counts around the LOQ could either be evaluated via manual chamber counting, with the results provided accordingly, or could otherwise be labeled “Below LOQ” (such as <5/μL for WBCs) if the value is not critical for clinical decision-making. At the same time, the manufacturer of the XN-350 instrument should improve the LOD and LOQ of RBCs and provide a unit of measurement that is clinically relevant.
The XN-350 showed strong or very strong correlations with manual chamber counting or Cytospin analysis in most cell enumeration parameters and differential counting. One exception was the parameters related to both 2-part and 4-part differential counting in CSF samples using the XN-350, which showed moderate, weak, or even very weak correlations with manual chamber counting. In particular, differential counting for parameters involving monocytes (MN-BF and MO-BF) showed weak correlations with their corresponding manual chamber counting parameters ( r = 0.33 and r = 0.26, respectively), which might also have weakened the correlation with LO-BF ( r = 0.44). The MO-BF also differed significantly from the corresponding manual chamber counting parameters according to both Passing-Bablok and Bland-Altman analyses. This could be partly due to the low cellularity of the CSF samples as well as the low proportion of monocytes, which often results in poor correlations between the manual methods and AHA or between different AHAs in studies of whole blood with much higher WBC counts than BF samples. [14,27,28] This limitation was not observed in AF or PF samples, which had higher cell numbers in our study. This indirectly indicates that our results may be attributed to the low cell numbers in our CSF samples, and implies that each laboratory ought to establish a threshold value for manual differential counting of samples with low cellularity such as CSF. Nevertheless, the strong correlations between differential counting via the XN-350 and manual chamber counting in AF and PF samples as well as Cytospin analysis in PF samples demonstrate that differential counting using the XN-350 is reliable and can replace manual methods.
Another discrepancy was observed in the enumeration of cells in PF samples. TC-BF and WBC-BF showed only moderate correlations with their corresponding manual chamber counting parameters ( r = 0.50 and r = 0.50, respectively). Both parameters also showed a negative absolute bias compared to manual chamber counting (i.e., higher values on XN-350 analysis), even though the difference was not statistically significant. Similar phenomena were consistently observed in previous studies, particularly for WBC counting; [21,29,30] this could be attributed to the presence of cell debris or interfering fragments that may be counted as WBCs, particularly PMNs. [3] Therefore, some investigators established reference values for AHAs that were separate from (and slightly higher than) those used for the manual method. [21,24,31] This phenomenon was only observed in PF samples; it was not present in AF, which had lower median TC and WBC counts in our study. It remains unclear if this was attributable to sample characteristics or to the cell number range; therefore, further verification is required with a greater number of samples that encompass different ranges of TC and WBC counts across different sample types. Simultaneously, this finding suggests that laboratories should consider separate reference intervals for AHAs in BF mode when using these instruments in routine practice.
The strength of our study was that we evaluated the XN-350 using CSF, AF, and PF, which are the 3 most commonly requested BF samples. By evaluating the similarities and differences in 3 types of samples separately, we were able to assess the applicability of the XN-350 in BF mode to each sample type. A limitation of our study was that our samples did not include any malignant cells; therefore, we were unable to establish reliable criteria for Cytospin analysis reflex testing or for second-level testing such as flow cytometry. Further studies that include samples with malignant cells would be helpful for setting XN-350 reflex testing rules.
Our data showed that the performance of the XN-350 was excellent, although there were notable exceptions: the LOD and LOQ were not sensitive enough for CSF samples with very low cellularity, and the WBC differential counting results in CSF samples (particularly parameters involving monocytes) obtained using the XN-350 and manual method were weakly correlated. Taken together, the XN-350 may be regarded as a sensitive and reliable alternative to the manual method for routine BF analysis and could contribute to the timely management of patients. A thorough evaluation of the performance of AHAs for each type of BF, as well as devising policies for managing and reporting samples with low cellularity, are required before their deployment in clinical practice. Separate reference intervals for BF samples measured by AHAs that are independent of those obtained by manual methods should be considered when necessary.
J Lee collected the data, performed the statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript. Y Cho performed the statistical analysis. H-S Kim and HJ Kang collected the data, reviewed the statistical analysis, and provided expert opinions. M Kim and YK Lee designed and supervised the study.
Conceptualization: Miyoung Kim, Young Kyung Lee.
Data curation: Jiwon Lee, Han-Sung Kim, Hee Jung Kang.
Formal analysis: Jiwon Lee, Younggeun Cho, Han-Sung Kim, Hee Jung Kang.
Project administration: Miyoung Kim.
Supervision: Han-Sung Kim, Hee Jung Kang, Miyoung Kim, Young Kyung Lee.
Writing – original draft: Jiwon Lee, Young Kyung Lee.
Writing – review & editing: Miyoung Kim, Young Kyung Lee.
automated hematology analyzer; body fluid; chamber counting; correlation; cytospin; performance; XN-350
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
A special issue of Biosensors (ISSN 2079-6374). This special issue belongs to the section " Biosensor and Bioelectronic Devices ".
Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2021) | Viewed by 16908
Special issue editor.
Dear Colleagues,
I am pleased to introduce this Special Issue focused on biosensors for the analysis of different body fluids.
Biosensors are becoming an important avenue of biomedical research. From a simple thermometer, aimed to detect changes in body temperature, to the development of the first glucometer in 1962, these fascinating devices have gradually been incorporated into clinical practice.
Biosensors are generally small, fast, selective, sensitive, and easy-to-use devices. Their use may speed up test results, allowing early clinical decisions to be taken and benefit the patient. A person’s health status can be continuously monitored (e.g., blood oxygen monitors). Other biosensors are so common that they are used at home, such as the pregnancy test or the aforementioned glucometer.
In places where health facilities are not easily accessible, the introduction of rapid tests becomes even more relevant. Simple tests to detect infectious diseases such as HIV or HVC can make a great difference. In addition, coupling new technologies to biosensors would make health tests more affordable and portable.
In this Special Issue, we aim to gather the most recent research in the field of biosensors that may directly be applied to biofluids (saliva, urine, synovial fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, etc.) without sample pretreatment.
Dr. Esther Serrano-Pertierra Guest Editor
Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website . Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form . Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.
Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Biosensors is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.
Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.
Mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
Body fluid analysis is a diagnostic procedure used to examine fluid samples extracted from a person's body. This type of analysis enables medical professionals to diagnose illnesses, identify changes in the body's chemistry, and evaluate the progress of treatment. It can also be used to detect pregnancy and determine genetic markers for inherited conditions. By analyzing the physical and chemical properties of a body fluid sample, such as blood, urine, or saliva, healthcare practitioners are able to gain insight into the patient's health. Body fluid analysis is an important tool for improving patient care, as it helps physicians diagnose diseases and monitor treatment plans.
Body Fluid Management
About (113) results
Full-text HTML
Download as PDF
Download as XML
There are many options for what to drink , but water is the best choice for most people who have access to safe drinking water. It is calorie-free and as easy to find as the nearest tap.
Water helps to restore fluids lost through metabolism, breathing, sweating, and the removal of waste. It helps to keep you from overheating, lubricates the joints and tissues, maintains healthy skin, and is necessary for proper digestion. It’s the perfect zero-calorie beverage for quenching thirst and rehydrating your body.
Water is an essential nutrient at every age, so optimal hydration is a key component for good health. Water accounts for about 60% of an adult’s body weight. We drink fluids when we feel thirst, the major signal alerting us when our body runs low on water. We also customarily drink beverages with meals to help with digestion. But sometimes we drink not based on these factors but on how much we think we should be drinking. One of the most familiar sayings is to aim for “8 glasses a day,” but this may not be appropriate for every person.
Keep in mind that about 20% of our total water intake comes not from beverages but from water-rich foods like lettuce, leafy greens, cucumbers, bell peppers, summer squash, celery, berries, and melons.
Aside from including water-rich foods, the following chart is a guide for daily water intake based on age group from the National Academy of Medicine:
1-3 years | 4 cups, or 32 ounces |
4-8 years | 5 cups, or 40 ounces |
9-13 years | 7-8 cups, or 56-64 ounces |
14-18 years | 8-11 cups, or 64-88 ounces |
men, 19 and older | 13 cups, or 104 ounces |
women, 19 and older | 9 cups, or 72 ounces |
pregnant women | 10 cups, or 80 ounces |
breastfeeding women | 13 cups, or 104 ounces |
As we age, however, the body’s regulation of fluid intake and thirst decline. Research has shown that both of these factors are impaired in the elderly. A Cochrane review found that commonly used indicators of dehydration in older adults (e.g., urine color and volume, feeling thirsty) are not effective and should not be solely used. [3] Certain conditions that impair mental ability and cognition, such as a stroke or dementia, can also impair thirst. People may also voluntarily limit drinking due to incontinence or difficulty getting to a bathroom. In addition to these situations, research has found that athletes, people who are ill, and infants may not have an adequate sense of thirst to replete their fluid needs. [2] Even mild dehydration may produce negative symptoms, so people who cannot rely on thirst or other usual measures may wish to use other strategies. For example, aim to fill a 20-ounce water bottle four times daily and sip throughout the day, or drink a large glass of water with each meal and snack.
Symptoms of dehydration that may occur with as little as a 2% water deficit:
Dehydration can increase the risk of certain medical conditions:
Like most trends of the moment, alkaline water has become popular through celebrity backing with claims ranging from weight loss to curing cancer. The theory behind alkaline water is the same as that touting the benefits of eating alkaline foods, which purportedly counterbalances the health detriments caused by eating acid-producing foods like meat, sugar, and some grains.
From a scale of 0-14, a higher pH number is alkaline; a lower pH is acidic. The body tightly regulates blood pH levels to about 7.4 because veering away from this number to either extreme can cause negative side effects and even be life-threatening. However, diet alone cannot cause these extremes; they most commonly occur with conditions like uncontrolled diabetes, kidney disease, chronic lung disease, or alcohol abuse.
Alkaline water has a higher pH of about 8-9 than tap water of about 7, due to a higher mineral or salt content. Some water sources can be naturally alkaline if the water picks up minerals as it passes over rocks. However, most commercial brands of alkaline water have been manufactured using an ionizer that reportedly separates out the alkaline components and filters out the acid components, raising the pH. Some people add an alkaline substance like baking soda to regular water.
Scientific evidence is not conclusive on the acid-alkaline theory, also called the acid-ash theory, stating that eating a high amount of certain foods can slightly lower the pH of blood especially in the absence of eating foods supporting a higher alkaline blood pH like fruits, vegetables, and legumes. Controlled clinical trials have not shown that diet alone can significantly change the blood pH of healthy people. Moreover, a direct connection of blood pH in the low-normal range and chronic disease in humans has not been established.
BOTTOM LINE: If the idea of alkaline water encourages you to drink more, then go for it! But it’s likely that drinking plain regular water will provide similar health benefits from simply being well-hydrated—improved energy, mood, and digestive health
There is no Tolerable Upper Intake Level for water because the body can usually excrete extra water through urine or sweat. However, a condition called water toxicity is possible in rare cases, in which a large amount of fluids is taken in a short amount of time, which is faster than the kidney’s ability to excrete it. This leads to a dangerous condition called hyponatremia in which blood levels of sodium fall too low as too much water is taken. The excess total body water dilutes blood sodium levels, which can cause symptoms like confusion, nausea, seizures, and muscle spasms. Hyponatremia is usually only seen in ill people whose kidneys are not functioning properly or under conditions of extreme heat stress or prolonged strenuous exercise where the body cannot excrete the extra water. Very physically active people such as triathletes and marathon runners are at risk for this condition as they tend to drink large amounts of water, while simultaneously losing sodium through their sweat. Women and children are also more susceptible to hyponatremia because of their smaller body size.
Instead of purchasing expensive flavored waters in the grocery store, you can easily make your own at home. Try adding any of the following to a cold glass or pitcher of water:
Sparkling juices may have as many calories as sugary soda. Instead, make your own sparkling juice at home with 12 ounces of sparkling water and just an ounce or two of juice. For additional flavor, add sliced citrus or fresh herbs like mint.
TIP: To reduce waste, reconsider relying on single-use plastic water bottles and purchase a colorful 20-32 ounce refillable water thermos that is easy to wash and tote with you during the day.
BOTTOM LINE: Carbonated waters, if unsweetened, are safe to drink and a good beverage choice. They are not associated with health problems that are linked with sweetened, carbonated beverages like soda.
The contents of this website are for educational purposes and are not intended to offer personal medical advice. You should seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this website. The Nutrition Source does not recommend or endorse any products.
Loading metrics
Open Access
Peer-reviewed
Research Article
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
* E-mail: [email protected]
Affiliation Unit Medical Anthropology and Global Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
Roles Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation WHO country office Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone
Roles Investigation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing
Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Against the background of the international public health emergency related to the Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo, in addition to other recent large Ebola epidemics, the issue of transmission due to viral persistence from survivors’ body fluids is becoming increasingly urgent. Clinical research in which body fluids play a role is critical and semen testing programs are part of the suggested response to the outbreak. Broad acceptance and understanding of testing programs and research, often in resource poor settings, is essential for the success and sustainability of clinical studies and an accurate epidemic response. Study participants’ perceptions on the collection of body fluids are therefore relevant for the programmatic planning and implementation of clinical studies.
In this qualitative study we aimed to explore the perceptions on bio-sampling in the Sierra Leone Ebola Virus Persistence Study (SLEVP study). We were interested to understand how norms on gender and sexuality related to perceptions and experiences of study participants and staff, specifically, in what way perceptions of the body, on intimacy and on body fluids related to the study process. We purposively sampled former study participants for in-depth interviews and focus-group discussions. We conducted 56 in-depth interviews and eight focus group discussions with 93 participants. In a participatory approach we included study participants in the analysis of data.
Overall the SLEVP study was well perceived by study participants and study staff. Study participants conceived the testing of their body fluids positively and saw it as a useful means to know their status. However, some study participants were ambivalent and sometimes reluctant towards sampling of certain body fluids (especially semen, blood and vaginal fluid) due to religious or cultural reasons. Self-sampling was described by study participants as a highly unusual phenomenon. Several narratives were related to the loss of body fluids (especially semen) that would make men weak and powerless, or women dizzy and sick (especially blood). Some rumors indicated mistrust related to study aims that may have been expressions of broader societal challenges and historical circumstances. These reservations could eventually be overcome by guaranteeing confidentiality and privacy and by comprehensive professional counseling.
In the course of the sampling exercise, study participants were often obliged to transgress cultural and intimate boundaries. It is therefore important to understand the potential importance some of these perceptions have on the recruitment of study participants and the acceptability of studies, on a symbolic as well as a structural level. In order to capture any reservations it is necessary to provide plenty of possibilities of information sharing and follow-up of continuous consent.
Recent studies have shown that the Ebola Virus might persist in body fluids of survivors of the disease. Clinical research in which body fluids (semen, vaginal fluids, blood, sweat, tears, breast milk and rectal fluids) are sampled play an increasingly important role, specifically in light of growing EVD epidemics. The success of these studies, e.g. how many participants are recruited in a study and how many are staying until the end of a study, is highly dependent on the participants’ cooperation and understanding of testing programs. However, until now there has been only little research on how studies and testing programs in which body fluids are sampled are perceived and understood by study participants. In this study we were therefore interested to understand how study participants perceived the sampling and collection of body fluids and how their cultural or religious background may influence the willingness to participate and stay in a clinical study. We conducted one-to-one interviews and focus-group discussions with 93 former study participants of a viral persistence study. We found that overall study participants conceived the testing of their body fluids positively and saw it as a useful means to know their status. However, some study participants were ambivalent and sometimes reluctant towards sampling of certain body fluids (especially semen, blood and vaginal fluid) due to religious or cultural reasons. Self-sampling was described by study participants as a highly unusual phenomenon. Participants explained that the collection of certain body fluids would make men weak and powerless (especially the sampling of semen), or women dizzy and sick (especially blood). Rumors indicated that some participants mistrusted the study aims. In the course of the sampling exercise, study participants often felt that they had to transgress cultural and intimate boundaries. We conclude that it is important to understand the potential importance some of these perceptions have on the recruitment of study participants and the acceptability of studies. The understanding of the socio-cultural context of clinical research is relevant for the programmatic planning of such research.
Citation: Kutalek R, Baingana F, Sevalie S, Broutet N, Thorson A (2020) Perceptions on the collection of body fluids for research on persistence of Ebola virus: A qualitative study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 14(5): e0008327. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008327
Editor: Abdallah M. Samy, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University (ASU), EGYPT
Received: August 23, 2019; Accepted: April 27, 2020; Published: May 14, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Kutalek et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: Data cannot be made publicly available for ethical reasons (public availability would compromise study participants' privacy). Date can be accessed upon request at [email protected] .
Funding: This work was funded by Paul Allen Foundation and the UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), a cosponsored programme executed by the World Health Organization (WHO). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Sierra Leone was one of the countries most heavily impacted by the West African Ebola Virus Disease epidemic which saw an unprecedented number of survivors. By March 2016, when the WHO Director-General declared the end of the Public Health Emergency of International Concern, there had been 14,124 confirmed, probable and suspected cases and 3,956 deaths [ 1 ].
During and after the outbreak there have been several studies on the persistence of Ebola Virus (EBOV) in body fluids, especially in semen [ 2 – 4 ] suggesting sexual transmission of the virus from male survivors [ 5 , 6 ] or other forms of viral persistence-derived transmission [ 7 – 9 ].
In studies on viral persistence body fluids are sampled from male and female EVD survivors, often in resource poor settings. Broad acceptance and understanding of testing programs and research is essential for the success and sustainability of clinical studies, specifically for the enrolment and retention of study participants. It has been shown, for instance, that perceptions of blood sampling significantly influenced study uptake and loss to follow-up [ 10 – 12 ]. In many cultural contexts body fluids such as blood, menstrual blood, semen, urine, feces, or sweat are not “neutral substances” but endowed with meaning [ 13 , 14 ]. They may be considered as pure or polluted, as powerful substances, inflicting harm or as curative agents. From anthropological research we know that Muslim men may be especially conflicted about delivering semen samples in a clinical setting [ 15 ]. For female study participants it is important to understand how notions of purity and shame across different socio-economic, ethnic and religious groups might influence perceptions and acceptability e.g. of vaginal self-sampling [ 16 , 17 ]. These aspects, however, have so far rarely been considered in studies on viral persistence.
As we are faced with a growing number of EVD outbreaks (e.g. the current outbreak in DRC, as of 25 Feb 2020 3444 cases reported [ 18 ]) evidence on viral persistence e.g. of Zika virus is also increasing [ 19 ]. Clinical research in which body fluids play a role is becoming more important. Study participants’ perceptions on the collection of body fluids will therefore become more relevant for the programmatic planning and implementation of clinical studies.
In this qualitative study we aimed to explore the perceptions on bio-sampling in the Sierra Leone Ebola Virus Persistence Study (SLEVP study). The SLEVP study was established to investigate persistence of Ebola Virus (EBOV) in body fluids (semen, vaginal fluid, menstrual blood, urine, rectal fluid, sweat, tears, saliva, and breast milk when applicable) of 120 male and 120 female EVD survivors, and is described in detail in Deen et al. [ 20 ]. Participants received counseling prior to the sampling process, as well as two weeks later when they received their test results, described in detail in Abad et al. [ 21 ].
In this process evaluation we wanted to explore perceptions of study participants and study staff in the Sierra Leone Ebola Virus Persistence Study (SLEVP study) regarding the implementation of the study and the specimen process itself. Employing a meaning centered and critical approach, we were interested to understand how norms on gender and sexuality related to perceptions and experiences of study participants and staff, specifically, in what way perceptions of the body, on intimacy and on body fluids related to the study process. Furthermore we sought to explore how experiences of the Ebola epidemic impacted on the implementation of the study as well as on the perception of the sampling process.
The study was conducted between April and June 2017 at the two SLEVP study sites 34 Military Hospital (MH34) and Lungi Government Hospital (LGH). We invited all four counselors (2 from each site) and 13 purposively selected staff from all professions that were part of the SLEVP study, such as medical doctors, study nurses, lab technicians, cleaning personnel and security personnel for an interview. The selection took place in cooperation with WHO staff who were involved in the SLEVP study.
We purposively sampled former study participants with diverse religious background, age and marital status for in-depth interviews and focus-group discussions. By selecting participants with diverse social characteristic we expected to get a broader spectrum of perceptions regarding our research questions. For each study site four FGDs were conducted, one with older men, one with older women, one with younger men, and one with younger women. We aimed at homogenous groups in terms of gender and age so that group members would feel comfortable to answer our often intimate questions in the group. The FGDs were an important complement to in-depth interviews as some of the participants felt more at ease to talk in groups and/or were encouraged to tell their own perspective after having listened to their colleagues. Former study participants and study staff were informed about the evaluation study by the study receptionists and community liaison persons. Participants already knew them from the SLEVP study and trusted them.
Overall we conducted in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with 93 participants. We conducted in-depth interviews with all four counselors and 13 SLEVP study staff (doctors, nurses, lab technicians, community liaison persons, cleaning and security) ( Table 1 ) and 31 SLEVP study participants. Additionally we conducted eight focus group discussions with 45 SLEVP study participants ( Table 2 ).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008327.t001
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008327.t002
All interviews were carried out by experienced interviewers who were undergraduate university students in social work or social sciences. All interviewers spoke English and Krio, two also spoke Temne. The three male and one female interviewers had formerly been trained in and conducted qualitative health studies in Sierra Leone and were competent in qualitative interviewing. They received an additional two-day training by the study lead (RK) on principles of qualitative research, in-depth interviews, focus-group discussions and medical ethics. The training also entailed the use of the specific interview guidelines and the informed consent. The study lead closely supervised the interviewers in the field and gave them constant professional feedback on interview techniques and non-verbal communication skills.
The interview guides were co-developed by all five authors in a discursive process, guided by the research questions. They were translated into Krio by the interviewers, under close supervision of SS, FB and RK, and extensively discussed. They were then re-translated into English for quality control. The duration of the in-depth interviews was between 30–50 minutes. Focus group discussions lasted about 1.5 to 2 hours each and were carried out by 1–2 interviewers, depending on the availability of interviewers. All male groups were interviewed by male interviewers, the female groups were interviewed by our female interviewer. Most interviews with former study participants were conducted in Krio, some in English and two in Temne. In two of the focus groups one or two participants only spoke Temne; these FGDs were conducted bilingually by the Temne-Krio-speaking interviewers. Some of the fellow participants who were also bilingual supported with the translation. Most interviews with study staff were conducted in English. All interviews were voice-recorded with the consent of the interview partners.
Most transcriptions were conducted by a specifically hired research assistant who also translated the interviews from Krio to English. The Temne interviews were transcribed and translated into English by the Temne speaking interviewer. The other three interviewers transcribed two interviews each. All interviews were checked for completeness and accuracy and imported into the software atlas.ti for qualitative content analysis. Instead of names we used unique ID codes.
In a first phase we read through around one third of the transcribed interviews and assigned preliminary codes that emerged from the data to catch important concepts and categories. Then a very broad analysis was performed that summed up the main themes. With this preliminary analysis in hand we invited all study participants again and asked them on their feedback on these first results. As ownership and confidentiality of study participants is most important, we asked each interview partner how he or she would like to be informed about the preliminary results of the study and most agreed to be called again and informed in groups. At each study site we therefore held three separate dissemination meetings: one for the group of former study staff, one for female participants and one for male participants. We communicated these first results of the study and encouraged participants to discuss them with us. In this participatory approach we wanted to identify the most important themes for the participants, to clarify issues that may have been understood differently and to give participants the opportunity to air any concerns they had. The results of these meetings informed the second phase of analysis of the data and allowed a better definition and refinement of the codes and grouping in categories. Throughout the study ideas about the data were documented in theoretical memos. In an iterative and reflexive process of data immersion we searched for meaning and insightful findings [ 22 ].
In line with the analytical emphasis of this paper we identified three major themes: the understanding of the study and the recruitment process, the perceptions on and experiences of intimate sampling (semen, vaginal and rectal fluids) and the perceptions on and experiences of the sampling of blood and other body fluids.
The research protocol was approved by the Sierra Leone Ethical Review Board and the WHO Ethical Review Committee. All data produced in the project are strictly confidential. We did not mention any real names, either in the transcriptions or in the publication. Prior to the interview all participants have been informed about the project and its objectives, the purpose of the interviews, and the use of the data for scientific purposes. Interviewers and the research assistant signed a confidentiality agreement.
The informed consent was read to them carefully in their preferred language and after agreeing to it participants and interviewers signed (or thumb marked) the informed consent form. All participants were informed about the voluntary character of this study and guaranteed strict confidentiality. They all consented that the interviews were being voice recorded. Study participants were compensated for their travel costs and time spent during the interview.
Participants related to us how they were first informed of the study through information meetings, where aims and bio-sampling were explained. In the beginning of the recruitment process potential participants were concerned about confidentiality. There were also fears and rumors among survivors that study participants would be infected with EVD or that they would be used as guinea pigs in the study. Moreover there were rumors that the blood drawn in the study would be sold by the government, used during elections or as a treatment in case of another epidemic.
We never wanted to come. We were afraid. We just thought that because they missed to kill us at the [treatment] centers, it was through the test [study] they were going to get rid of us. (…) At first we were afraid, but thereafter we became confident. Onto the end I had no problem. Former SLEVP study participant IDI, male They said the blood they collected from us was going to be kept and used during elections. Some said they kept the blood perhaps another disease will come so that they could use it to treat the other patients. Those were some of the things they said. Former SLEVP study participant IDI, female
Several participants mentioned rumors they heard on the study that the blood collected would be sold, that they “would make money out of our fluids” or that body fluids would be kept for a future epidemic. Some said that they were afraid that “the white people wanted to use us” and “sell our lives”. Not all believed in these rumors but clearly there was quite some anxiety among the participants initially. Study staff related that they employed different strategies to overcome those concerns: they talked to the survivors, the community elders and other representatives and tried to convince them on the good intentions of the study and that they would themselves profit from knowing their status. Moreover, the very fact that several study participants knew the staff involved in the study from the EVD Treatment Unit (ETU) in which they were treated opened many doors. Study staff also mentioned that the very fact that survivors were employed as liaison officers was a trust building measure.
Staff as well as participants highly appreciated the confidentiality and privacy of the project which was realized at different levels. Participants received a unique ID number and were addressed only with this number instead of their names. On several occasions participants related to this measure as trust building. The study sites were separated from the main clinic buildings and according to our interview partners no one except study staff and participants had access. Moreover, care was taken not to disclose persons as participants in front of family or community. Several participants and staff mentioned that when they met accidentally outside the study compound they would not take notice of each other, or when participants were called and did not answer the call personally the reason for the call would not be disclosed. Furthermore, informing the public about the project, especially the detailed procedures of the project, e.g. what kind of samples were provided and in what way, was kept to a minimum; more information was only provided at the meetings where the recruitment took place and details were disclosed in the individual counseling sessions. Participants often stressed that the study “was a secret” or “like a secret society”. Many participants related that little was known about the study outside the survivor community, because they were asked to “keep the information to themselves”.
They told us earlier that we should not disclose any information to the community people and there is no need for us to explain to them that we are engaged in dry jack [masturbation], given out semen, and body water [body fluids] for test to be conducted. We felt the entire process should be a secret that we should not disclose to them. Former SLEVP study participant FGD, male group They told me that those of us registered for the study must not tell other people about it. When I returned home from the study, I was always with my children and I explained nothing to them. Former SLEVP study participant IDI, female
Participants greatly appreciated the friendly and cordial atmosphere of the project and that staff treated them in a kind and respectful manner. They also appreciated the free medical care and the reimbursements they received during the project.
From our interviews it became clear that counselors and nurses, but also lab technicians, doctors and liaison persons were important to inform the participants on the sampling of body fluids. For several reasons participants were sometimes reluctant or not able to provide a sample (the most problematic were semen, vaginal and blood samples) and staff negotiated their cooperation. Study staff were available to assist participants with providing samples and doing the self-swabs, especially when the participant did so for the first time. Inside the sampling tent posters explained the detailed procedures for each sample in pictographs. Our interview partners related that at the beginning of the study, staff would help with the sampling of vaginal and rectal fluid, saliva, tears, sweat and urine. At subsequent visits participants were more confident and often did the sampling without help. For providing the semen sample all staff would leave the tent after having instructed the male participant.
Specifically for the intimate sampling, privacy and confidentiality were of outmost importance. Overall study staff thought that most participants were fine with the sample taking and that participants were rather concerned about their health and knowing their status than with personal feelings of shame and fear. Most participants agreed on the principal necessity to test body fluids. However, there were certain sampling procedures of body fluids, such as the sampling of semen through masturbation or the sampling of vaginal fluids during menstruation, many participants felt very strongly about. They were unusual for most of the participants and initially led to fear, shame, reluctance and open opposition of some.
Almost all the study staff acknowledged that the sampling procedure for semen was a challenge for most male participants. Staff mentioned several reasons why participants were not able to produce a semen sample. Some argued that it was because of religious reasons, some said that it was due to the sickness that made them impotent. Others argued that participants related to them that they would need their wives in the process. Staff occasionally also mentioned that contrary to what they had been advised, participants would often not abstain from sex before they were scheduled to come for the sampling.
Majority of the things went well except for the men, some will come and give all other body sample but when it comes to the semen, they will give an excuse that they are religious and don’t do such thing, especially the Muslims a lot of them were refusing to give a sample even when you booked an appointment with them. Former SLEVP study staff, female … some participants even when we advised them to abstain three days before sample collection they won’t adhere to that advice. They would have sexual intercourse the night before sample collection. When they came for the sample collection they won’t be able to give the sample. Former SLEVP study staff, female
For the participants religion was considered an important issue for the provision of semen samples in several aspects. Some men were highly uncomfortable to masturbate and considered it indecent and against their religion. Furthermore, especially during Ramadan, sexual intercourse and more so masturbation is considered haram (religiously forbidden). While many participants thought that the pornographic film greatly helped them during masturbation, some said they would not have needed it or that they didn’t want it for religious reasons. Some Muslim men openly objected to having pornographic movies shown.
Just as my brother has said, it [masturbation] is understandable in the urban centers a bit, but in the rural areas it is highly prohibited. In the village, they refer to anybody who does that as unreligious. Former SLEVP study participant FGD, male group We were not feeling fine because God does not permit us to take out [semen], without a woman, it is not decent at all, and we are just doing it because of our health and our status. Everything we were doing, we say it is confidential but it was painful. Former SLEVP study participant FGD, male group
Even though Muslims generally do not approve of masturbation, several staff and participants argued that it would be tolerated if it were done for a medical reason.
Normally especially the elderly people and the Muslims were not comfortable with it. Some people were saying it is forbidden but we had meetings with the Islamic council before we started the study. We asked them what Islam will tolerate. They told us that yes during Ramadan Islam will not tolerate such. But if it is not in Ramadan and it’s for your well being you are permitted to do it. And that was settled. Former SLEVP study staff, female For me, as long as it is for my health, (…) I just think God can understand because it is not something intentional, we were doing it for our health. To our people it is really something bad. Former SLEVP study participant FGD, male group
Participants often related that they are “not used” to masturbate and on several occasions they talked about loosing power or even becoming sick through masturbation, because they perceived masturbation as fundamentally different to having sexual intercourse. They said that in their communities people would not talk about it openly and they would consider it a sin. Three persons also explicitly mentioned that persons engaging in manual ejaculation are considered homosexuals by their communities.
For example, when we come and give the semen I will have to buy some drinks when I get home to replace what I have lost, that was how I used the money. Former SLEVP study participant IDI, male We were just doing but it weakened your system because when you jack your penis [masturbate] … when you engage in sex with a woman you feel relaxed on top of the lady the penis is controllable but when you ejaculate the penis gets weak. Former SLEVP study participant FGD, male group People who do masturbation are perceived badly by the community people, they will always class such person as unserious and being homosexual. Former SLEVP study staff, male
Reservations of participants towards providing semen samples on some occasions also led to open resistance. Staff argued that the withholding of semen samples was in some instances done deliberately because this did not only happen in the beginning of the study but also later, when participants were already accustomed to the procedures. They related that some patients realized they would still get reimbursed even when no sample was provided. In the view of staff resistance took different, more or less subtle forms, from the understandable rejection to give a sample e.g. due to religious reasons, to a coordinated collective form of resistance.
… some of them would say I would give blood but would not give the semen. Former SLEVP study staff, male Some followed their colleague who refused to give sample while others who were hesitating also joined their colleagues (…). In such cases when we noticed that some were only coming for the cash and not to give sample, we started withholding their cash and demanded they give the sample first because if such continues we cannot get the actual outcome of the research. With these methods we were able to solve some of the challenges. Former SLEVP study staff, female
Some male participants who were either not able or not willing to produce a semen sample were suspected to put gel or similar looking substances into the test tubes or bring a semen sample from outside. However, participants never said that they deliberately deceived study staff, but they knew that at least at the beginning of the study there would be no consequences when they were not able to produce a semen sample. This strategy, as also mentioned in the previous citation, was later changed.
(…) if you are not careful they bring the semen from home because they said unless there is a woman they can’t produce semen. Former SLEVP study staff, male We understood that some men because they were not ejaculating they were ashamed to come out without the semen sample. So, we speculated that they were putting the hand sanitizer in the test tube. Former SLEVP study staff, female If you could not produce for this week, they would encourage you; perhaps you could produce in another week. They gave the same transport refund even if you could not produce, or even if you produce only one fluid they would appreciate. Former SLEVP study participant FGD, male group
Compared to the male participants, staff considered female participants to be unproblematic and cooperative in terms of intimate sampling (vaginal and rectal swabs). When relating to sampling in general, staff would usually highlight the challenges they had with male participants to collect semen. Some staff acknowledged that there was initial fear and shyness but overall staff were more occupied with male concerns, even though strong reservations towards intimate sampling were present in both sexes.
For the women there was no problem, they were so cooperative. Former SLEVP study staff, male For the eye water and breast milk there was no problem except for the vaginal fluid. Especially, for the aged women, they were a little bit shy. (…) They agreed when they understood the procedure. Initially, they thought that there will be a man present. Also we told them that they could even do it alone, and they would only be assisted by a nurse if they need it. We were not having any problems with the women. Former SLEVP study staff, female Some of them were afraid except when I explained to them that is so tiny like the feather of a chicken and this gave them confidence. (…) it was a mixed reaction, some accepted it whilst others rejected. Former SLEVP study staff, female
However, several female participants described their concerns quite differently. Many did not express their reluctance with sampling procedures openly but rather talked of having experienced fear, shame and embarrassment. One woman related that she did not want to disappoint the elders. Others were quite frank and described their struggle with the staff.
After the whole process was explained to us and what they will be taking from us I really felt bad and I didn’t want to reject my elders that’s why I participated in the study. And until it finished I did not encounter any problem. Former SLEVP study participant IDI, female The first time I came on this study I did not feel good especially the woman side. To be honest with you I was so much adamant with the nurse, but she encouraged me and even removed her pant for me as a way to give me more courage. I gave them the different samples they needed from me. Also the second time again when I came I was still adamant to give the samples. They still counseled me and I gave them the sample. The last time there was no problem between us because I realized that they were trying to help me know my status. Former SLEVP study participant FGD, female group
Some study participants were specifically concerned about the inclusion of elderly ladies into the study.
For instance a young nurse ordering an old woman to remove her pant is somehow embarrassing. Former SLEVP study participant FGD, female group
Some women considered the collection of menstrual fluids specifically difficult. Menstrual blood is considered unclean and participants on several occasions indicated that they were concerned what was done with the sample. One important strategy to overcome shame and embarrassment of the participants was to counsel and talk to the female participants, to treat them in a respectful way and by showing one’s own vulnerability and nakedness.
It was only for the collection of menstrual fluid I know that it was not fine because some women considered it as unclean. Former SLEVP study staff, female Part [A] As for me what I hate in the whole study process is the vaginal swabbing especially the menstruation. I always ask myself what they are going to do (with) it. (…) Part [B]: As my colleague said menstruation and the blood is the problem. We really want to know the reason for taken them. Because women find it very difficult to give it out especially to foreign people you don’t know. Former SLEVP study participant FGD, female group To do the menstruation test was the greatest difficulty I faced in the room. The nurse asked me to remove my pant in order to do the test I told her that I am ashamed to do it. Fortunately, for me the nurse also was on her menstruation period so as a result she removed her pant and shows me how to do the test. Former SLEVP study participant FGD, female group
Many women, especially the younger generation, had no problem whatsoever, either with the collection of menstrual blood or with the vaginal swabbing in general. At the second or third appointment most of them also got used to the procedures and did not need assistance from the nurses any more.
On the first day somebody did it for me and the second the third and forth I did it for myself. Former SLEVP study participant IDI, female When we come they will tell us not to me ashamed, they are female and am also a female so let me not be ashamed, so whatever they asked me to, let me do. They talk to us fine and encourage us, and we do what they told us, they gave us hot water to drink for us to sweat, so all that. Former SLEVP study participant IDI, female
Female and male participants likewise frequently mentioned the blood draw as a highly uncomfortable event, the experience of which clearly went beyond the mere pain–the drawing of blood was often related to the loss of strength and power. Participants not only mentioned the frequency of the blood draw but also the amount that they often considered “too much”. Female participants were specifically concerned about the “blood loss” that in their perception would cause headache and dizziness. Some male participants also felt that the blood draw would influence the semen sampling.
The only thing as I told you was the too much blood they removed from me. That gave me headache. They said if they did not remove enough blood from people they would not do the sample test, so they removed enough blood from people. That was the only problem I had with them. Former SLEVP study participant IDI, female When they remove their blood some men complain of shortage of blood which makes their heads spin it [and makes] dry jack [difficult]. We keep on telling them that the 1ml blood does not do anything to their health. Former SLEVP study staff, female
Participants often narrated that they had to replace the blood that was drawn with other substances such as ORS, “blood tonic”, “blood syrup” or some special drinks that are considered blood building.
There was a time I was seriously affected after donating my blood. There was a time I donated blood I felt a pain in such a way that I had to buy blood syrup. As for me, I drank raw eggs for three days before I came to normal, because I felt dizzy when I donated Former SLEVP study participant FGD, male group What we do not want is the removal of blood for test. If they come again and say blood test we will not take part. All of them mean the same. The blood test made us dizzy. Former SLEVP study participant FGD, female group
Staff also mentioned that even though participants had been informed of and had agreed to the blood draw (e.g. by signing the informed consent), when it came to the actual procedure many participants were reluctant and even resisted to undergo it. Some were quite firm in their opinion that if they were invited for another study they would not join if regular blood draws were a part of it.
They really do give us tough time. They lament to us after they have gone through and agreed to all what they have been told; when they reach to us to collect the specimen especially the blood then they start to grumble and say had I known I would not have come. Former SLEVP study staff, male They were afraid, they thought we were going to draw huge amount of blood from them except when we told them that we were going to take 5 ml of blood and that it would not exceed. We also show them the sample and they accepted it. Former SLEVP study staff, female
Staff and participants rarely mentioned challenges in collecting or self-swabbing of other body fluids. Only the sampling of tears was described as difficult to some of the staff and the participants. Uneasiness about the rectal swab was explicitly mentioned by three participants and one staff. Several participants were highly concerned where their samples would be taken. Most of these anxieties related to venous blood but three participants also mentioned other body fluids such as menstrual blood and semen.
What I want to say is about the blood collection. It is number one because every time we came was blood, every time we came was blood. Some of us were afraid because we did not know where our blood was taken to. (…) We were getting rumors that a ship was taking our blood away. For some of us we prayed that wherever our blood was taken to with negative intent let our blood be dark. Former SLEVP study participant FGD, female group I was thinking before when they came and collect our sperm, what are they doing with it? That what I was thinking. Where are they going with them? Because we are knowing the result but where are they going with them? Former SLEVP study participant IDI, male
This is the first study that analyzes perceptions on the collection of bio-samples in medical research on Ebola virus disease. It shows how important it is to understand broader socio-cultural contexts in which medical research is taking place. Perceptions of the body and on sexuality are socially and culturally constructed. They are deeply influenced by historical realities, by ethnic affiliation, power relations, gender roles, concepts of morality, education and religion. Moreover, medical studies that take place in or shortly after epidemics have to consider the specific governance dynamics of the response (or post-response efforts), as well as psychosocial implications of (post-)emergencies.
A study investigating Ebola viral persistence in body fluids is bound to be faced with many challenges. Sierra Leone experienced two years of a devastating epidemic, the impact of which has been disastrous economically and socially, resulting in significantly higher unemployment, lower schooling and less food consumption [ 23 ]. A fragile health system and the challenges related to the EVD response created fear and mistrust in many people [ 24 , 25 ]. This mistrust extended to everything that had to do with “Ebola” and could be clearly observed throughout our study. Moreover, the participants in the SLEVP study had recently survived a deadly disease and many had to deal with its psycho-social and economic consequences. It is well established that EVD survivors are more vulnerable to psychological distress caused by the disease experience as well as by stigmatization and social rejection [ 26 ].
The SLEVP study team, as reflected in our interviews with study staff and study participants, overall showed high professionalism, high work ethics and excellent problem solving capacity, all of which generated an atmosphere of enthusiasm, respect and friendship and contributed to the success of the study. Study participants were especially fond of the respectful atmosphere and the strict confidentiality, study staff mentioned the good quality of the training which prepared them to tackle challenging situations and guided them through the sometimes difficult process of the project. Moreover, the very fact that some of the study staff were already known to the participants and that survivors were employed as liaison officers was an important trust-building measure. The success of these strategies can be seen in the overwhelmingly positive feedback we received from study participants on the study staff, and in the extremely low losses to follow-up [ 2 ]. Overall SLEVP study participants conceived the testing of their body fluids positively and saw it as a useful means to know their status and to be able to communicate the results to their partners or to the community, if they wished to. They were also glad for the financial remunerations they received and for the free medical care they were entitled during the study.
Nevertheless, as shown from our results, some study participants were ambivalent and sometimes reluctant towards sampling of certain body fluids (especially semen, blood and vaginal fluid). These reservations could eventually be overcome by guaranteeing confidentiality and privacy, by comprehensive professional counseling and arguments that stressed the benefits for the study participants. Moreover, many of the national SLEVP staff where either themselves survivors or were well acquainted with the clinical treatment of survivors. Still, there seemed to have been a cognitive gap between the signing of the informed consent and the actual sample taking, and between the understanding and perceptions of the study participants and the SLEVP study staff on the study process. To some study participants, the implications of sample taking were not completely clear and it seems that the way the informed consent was explained to the study participants could be improved upon.
The ambivalence and reluctance that were expressed by some of the study participants–the initial rumors that participants would be harmed in the study and that blood would be sold or used during political campaigning–revealed concerns that were present before the actual study process started and when informational meetings with key stakeholders were held. These rumors are indicative of the atmosphere in which the study was started, and, as mentioned above, the mistrust that was felt towards everything that had to do with “Ebola”. On a deeper level, these rumors may have been expressions of broader societal challenges and historical circumstances. They may have revealed uncertainties of who would really profit from the sampling of the body fluids, an issue that is broadly discussed within the scientific community as well. Ethical considerations of biobanking, especially in the context of disease outbreaks and under conditions of socioeconomic inequities, are hotly debated and the ethical adequacy of material transfer questioned [ 27 ]. The ownership of samples collected during the West African EVD outbreak is still unclear and an inventory on the location of samples lacking [ 28 ].
Ambivalences were expressed throughout the study process, in relation to male and female intimate sampling and to the sampling of blood. Self sampling and masturbation was described by study participants as unusual practices and the latter as prohibited. In the course of the sampling exercise, study participants were obliged to transgress cultural and intimate boundaries, exchanging “indecent” behavior for, in the eyes of the participants, useful health information. Initial consultations with the Islamic council did settle the concerns from the perspective of the study staff but not necessarily for the study participants. Intimate sampling remained deeply concerning for male and female participants alike. Reservations were expressed as fear and anger but also in feelings of loss or becoming sick. Several narratives were related to the loss of semen that would make men weak and powerless, or that the taking of blood would make especially pregnant and elderly women dizzy and sick. Participants were not only worried about the frequency of the blood draw but also of the amount which they often considered “too much”. The study added blood sampling relatively late in the study process and did only draw serum for serological analyses, which may in contrast be less than in other clinical studies. The „removal”narrative clearly goes beyond the simple drawing of a body fluid, creating an illness experience over something being taken away, albeit by consenting. It entangles the deeper meanings and symbolism of „too much blood”and „blood loss”as “blood being stolen”. Similar perceptions are well documented from anthropological research of clinical trials. Saethre and Stadler [ 29 ] call them “narratives of harm”. They are “a vehicle through which gender, cash, social reproduction, morality, and medicine were articulated” (p. 104). In their study on negotiating social relations during an HIV trial in South Africa, the authors also describe a similar cognitive gap between the informed consent which in detail explained procedures of taking blood and the feelings of trial participants that the blood taken was excessive and harmful. They contextualize these perceptions within postcolonial relationships of post-apartheid South Africa but clearly, unequal relationships between the global south and the global north, the researched and the researcher, can be observed in many African countries.
While females were depicted by staff as unproblematic and cooperative during intimate sampling, study participants themselves often felt fear, shame and embarrassment. This was overcome in often surprising ways, e.g. in that female staff showed their own nakedness and vulnerability. This gesture is also symbolic of the ambivalence of the study staff who advocated for a western biomedical conception of the naked human body as something natural in a medical encounter, often building a counter-narrative to the female participants who perceived nakedness as being indecent and immoral, the more so when being asked to put a swab into their vagina while menstruating. The discrepancy between staff perceptions of women as being “unproblematic and cooperative” and the women’s reported feelings of fear and shame seem to reflect larger societal gender dynamics. In the study, men may have been more successful to negotiate their position and articulate their needs than women. Even though gender sensitive trainings were part of the study protocol it seems that staff were not able to pick up on these issues in the counseling sessions.
Participants had very creative ways in re-gaining “control” over their body fluids and showing agency. Some male participants were not able or, on rare occasions, not willing to provide intimate sampling on several occasions. This was interpreted by study staff as either post-EVD related impotency or as a form of social resistance. In some instances staff suspected several male study participants to put gel into test tubes. The behavior was said by staff to have caused disturbances during the study process and was seen by some as abusing a system that was built on mutual trust. Still, the actual circumstances seem to tell another story, where missing samples for this reason was uncommon. Again, on a symbolic level very similar accusations are known from Saethre and Stadler [ 29 ], when women during the study were requested to apply microbicide gel vaginally. Some who were called “gel-dumpers” were suspected to only pretend the vaginal application in order to receive the remuneration. Gel dumping was considered “irresponsible because it endangered the scientific process” (p. 110).
It is important to understand the potential importance some of these perceptions have on the recruitment of study participants and the acceptability of studies, first on the symbolic level: Body fluids may be considered as pure or polluted, as powerful substances, inflicting harm or as curative agents. Though not explicitly mentioned by the female participants themselves, female staff confirmed that some of the women considered menstrual blood as “unclean”. Several female participants were especially concerned where their menstrual blood samples would be taken, a worry that was also expressed for other body fluids in male and female participants, such as venous blood and semen. This could indicate a spiritual belief that body substances are generally considered as potentially powerful and able to inflict harm, and used against the person when in the wrong hands. These perceptions are wide-spread in many parts of Africa and have been described e.g. for blood donation in Sub-Saharan Africa [ 30 , 31 ], for blood draw in clinical research [ 10 ] and for semen collection in HIV studies [ 13 ].
On a structural level, reservations towards biomedical research in low-resourced settings in Sub-Saharan Africa that involves sample taking (usually blood) are not new and have been reported from several studies [ 10 , 32 , 33 ]. In a study by Newton et al. [ 12 ] blood drawn from infants in Ghana led to rumors that it would be used for transfusions for elderly people. These perceptions led to substantial loss to follow up. Similarly, in a study by Nchito et al. [ 11 ] in Zambia loss to follow up was partly attributed to the fear of a rumor of blood thefts. Perceptions on body fluids and sample taking can influence decisions of participants to take part in studies and to retain in a study. Yet in the specific cohort study here evaluated, study retention was close to 100%, meaning that especially for some men they remained over a long follow-up time (approaching two years). Factors that have influenced the high retention in the cohort, based on our findings, seem to have been the perceptions of a very high level of trust in the confidential handling of all results, the interest and engagement in knowing ones status as body fluid/semen positive or negative, and the professionalism paired with in-depth community belonging of staff involved. The targeted pre- and post- test counseling offered, as well as the fact that actual sampling of blood was reduced to a minimum, can also have influenced retention positively.
Rumors on medical research or public health interventions in low-income countries can also be seen as an expression of a potentially problematic relationship rooted in history between affected communities and researchers who are often from high-income countries [ 34 – 36 ]. Kovacic et al. [ 37 ] for instance found that in Uganda community experience with control programs on sleeping sickness remains in the memories of people for decades and may influence perceptions on medical research today. Feldman-Savelsberg et al. [ 35 ] in their research analyzed how colonial history, inter-country political conflicts, insensitive behavior of public health staff and not considering gender issues led to a disastrous chain reaction with rumors and subsequent resistance of girls and their parents towards a vaccination campaign against neonatal tetanus. The question how medical research is perceived in a particular socio-cultural setting has implications for the sustainability of research involving power dynamics between co-researchers and communities under study [ 34 ]. However, it is important to neither over- nor underestimate the power of rumors for medical research. While many of our study participants for instance articulated that they did not believe in the rumors, it is nevertheless important to not ignore them as they may pose a threat to medical research [ 36 ].
In our evaluation of a cohort study implemented during an EVD emergency, we found that attention to a very high level of confidentiality offered (ID, location of study, staff integrity etc.) as well as the attention to training and involvement of local staff and survivors’ representatives have contributed to the high retention in study and in general positive attitudes of participants. Further we identified challenges such as the need of continued attention to information and consent procedures, where in this study the purposive recruitment in the cohort was facilitated by information meetings and survivors’ liaison officers. Still, some participants felt they had initial doubts of study aims, which were overall resolved during the actual recruitment and consent processes.
It is important to conceive possible concerns towards sampling of body fluids early in the planning phases of a project and have these perspectives broadly discussed. In order to capture any reservations it is necessary to provide plenty of possibilities of information sharing and follow-up of continuous consent.
This study evaluation was conducted in a post-emergency. For data collection we had to follow a very strict and constrained time format. Interviews and focus group discussions at the two study sites had to take place in parallel, and interviewers sometimes had to conduct 2–3 interviews a day. This rapid study design did not allow for an in-depth ethnographic data collection and we may have missed important information, especially on such sensitive issues the study focused on. However, judging from the sometimes very personal and intimate information we received from our study participants, we got the overall impression that many interviewees were very open and frank when relating their opinions and stories.
Because study participants were invited to the same study site and by the same liaison officers as the viral persistence study, some study participants initially confused our process evaluation with the latter and thought we had come back to do a follow up. These confusions could be resolved by explaining that our study was a separate one and that we wanted to hear their opinion on the viral persistence study. Moreover, we also had different staff employed to do the interviews so as not create any biases regarding confidentiality.
For reasons of practicality, some interviews with female study participants had to be conducted by male interviewers. However, we specifically trained the male interviewers in gender sensitive questioning and RK supervised them closely in the field. All focus group discussions with female participants were conducted by a female interviewer and all focus group discussions with male participants were conducted by a male interviewer.
In clinical studies that involve the sampling of body fluids it should be part of the program to engage local communities, religious leaders and survivors. It is essential to take into account cultural and religious implications of the collection process and to understand underlying gender dynamics and vulnerabilities. All study staff should be trained in cultural and gender sensitive issues and it should be considered to include social science expertise in all phases of the study process.
We would like to thank Antoine Coursier, Philippe Gaillard and Gibrilla Fadlu Deen for helping with the design of this study and Elin Roos for valuable insights during the reflection process. We would also like to thank our research assistants Henry Gbettu, Samuel Harding, Miriam Hinton, Issa Kamara and Jacob Saad Kargbo.
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official positions, decisions, policy or views of the Government of Sierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Ministry of Defense or the World Health Organization.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
On this page:
How do my kidneys work, how does blood flow through my kidneys, clinical trials.
The kidneys are two bean-shaped organs, each about the size of a fist. They are located just below the rib cage, one on each side of your spine.
Healthy kidneys filter about a half cup of blood every minute, removing wastes and extra water to make urine . The urine flows from the kidneys to the bladder through two thin tubes of muscle called ureters, one on each side of your bladder. Your bladder stores urine. Your kidneys, ureters, and bladder are part of your urinary tract .
Your kidneys remove wastes and extra fluid from your body. Your kidneys also remove acid that is produced by the cells of your body and maintain a healthy balance of water, salts, and minerals—such as sodium , calcium , phosphorus , and potassium —in your blood.
Without this balance, nerves, muscles, and other tissues in your body may not work normally.
Your kidneys also make hormones that help
Watch a video about what the kidneys do .
Each of your kidneys is made up of about a million filtering units called nephrons. Each nephron includes a filter, called the glomerulus , and a tubule . The nephrons work through a two-step process: the glomerulus filters your blood, and the tubule returns needed substances to your blood and removes wastes.
As blood flows into each nephron, it enters a cluster of tiny blood vessels—the glomerulus. The thin walls of the glomerulus allow smaller molecules, wastes, and fluid—mostly water—to pass into the tubule. Larger molecules, such as proteins and blood cells, stay in the blood vessel.
A blood vessel runs alongside the tubule. As the filtered fluid moves along the tubule, the blood vessel reabsorbs almost all of the water, along with minerals and nutrients your body needs. The tubule helps remove excess acid from the blood. The remaining fluid and wastes in the tubule become urine.
Blood flows into your kidney through the renal artery . This large blood vessel branches into smaller and smaller blood vessels until the blood reaches the nephrons. In the nephron, your blood is filtered by the tiny blood vessels of the glomeruli and then flows out of your kidney through the renal vein.
Your blood circulates through your kidneys many times a day. In a single day, your kidneys filter about 150 quarts of blood. Most of the water and other substances that filter through your glomeruli are returned to your blood by the tubules. Only 1 to 2 quarts become urine. Children produce less urine than adults, and the amount produced depends on their age.
The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and other components of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) conduct and support research into many diseases and conditions.
Clinical trials are part of clinical research and at the heart of all medical advances. Clinical trials look at new ways to prevent, detect, or treat disease. Researchers also use clinical trials to look at other aspects of care, such as improving the quality of life for people with chronic illnesses. Find out if clinical trials are right for you .
Clinical trials that are currently open and are recruiting can be viewed at www.ClinicalTrials.gov .
This content is provided as a service of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), part of the National Institutes of Health. NIDDK translates and disseminates research findings to increase knowledge and understanding about health and disease among patients, health professionals, and the public. Content produced by NIDDK is carefully reviewed by NIDDK scientists and other experts.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Email citation, add to collections.
Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.
Affiliation.
Women expel fluids of various quantities and compositions from the urethra during sexual arousal and orgasm. These are classified as either female ejaculation (FE) or squirting (SQ). The aim of our analysis was to present evidence that FE and SQ are similar but etiologically different phenomena. A review of studies was performed on fluids expelled from the urogenital tract during female sexual activities using the Web of Knowledge™ (Web of Science Core Collection) and MEDLINE (Ovid) databases from 1946 to 2021. Until 2011, all female orgasmic expulsions of fluids were referred to as FE. The fluid was known to be either from the paraurethral glands or as a result of coital incontinence. At present, SQ is considered as a transurethral expulsion of approximately 10 milliliters or more of transparent fluid, while FE is considered as a secretion of a few milliliters of thick fluid. The fluid in SQ is similar to urine and is expelled by the urinary bladder. The secretion in FE originates from the paraurethral glands and contains a high concentration of prostate-specific antigen. Both phenomena can occur simultaneously. The mechanisms underlying SQ and FE are entirely different. SQ is a massive transurethral orgasmic expulsion from the urinary bladder, while FE is the secretion of a very small amount of fluid from the paraurethral glands.
Keywords: female ejaculation; female prostate; orgasm; paraurethral glands; sexual arousal; squirting; urinary bladder.
© 2022 American Association for Clinical Anatomists and the British Association for Clinical Anatomists.
PubMed Disclaimer
Full text sources.
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
Shih-bin su.
1 Department of Occupational Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710, Taiwan
2 Department of Paediatrics, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
3 Medical Proteomics Unit, Office for Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, and Center for Research in Complex Systems Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Human body fluids are considered as attractive sources for clinical markers. As for disease diagnosis and prognosis, advantages of body fluid testing include low invasiveness, low cost, and rapid sample collection and processing. Besides, altered protein expression profiles in body fluids reflect the change of physiological states and cellular networks of the diseased tissue/organ. Thus, analysis of human body fluid has become one of the most promising approaches to discover biomarkers or reveal pathophysiological mechanisms for human diseases. Human body fluid analysis is inherently challenging due to their unique characteristics such as protein complexity and the wide dynamic range of protein abundances. With the remarkable advances in the methods for sample preparation, proteomics technology, and quantitation, it is now possible to analyze body fluids with higher sensitivity and robust experimental design. As the recognition of the importance of “Translational Medicine” which is the process of turning appropriate biological discoveries into drugs and medical devices that can be used in the diagnosis and/or treatment of patients, a great quantity of researches were focusing on the human sample including human body fluids. Thus, it is conceivable that the new insight unveiled by human body fluid analysis will attract a wide audience abroad including researchers from the field of basic sciences, bioinformatics, analytical chemistry, molecular biology, and hospital.
In the study of H. Y. Wu et al., authors performed the first differential proteomic profiling between peritoneal dialysates from chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN) patients at the early and middle stage of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) treatment. The changed proteins provide clues to the PD-induced loss of proteins from the peritoneum and assist the identification of potential biomarkers for noninvasive monitoring of peritoneal damage.
M. H. Yang et al. also characterized the peritoneal dialysate proteins from diabetes mellitus (DM) by proteomic tools. CGN peritoneal dialysate was used as control. Differentially expressed proteins in DM samples may indicate a situation for possible drug treatment and predictors of peritonitis for a validation study in the future.
P. Badiee reviewed the evaluation of different human body fluids, pleural Effusion, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, peritoneal fluid, urine, pericardial effusion, blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), synovial fluid, and saliva, for diagnosing fungal infections. Routine laboratory tests for the diagnosis of FI include urinalysis and blood analysis while analyses of both CSF and serum can improve the accuracy of the diagnosis.
K. Bořecká et al. studied the use of Coefficient of Energy Balance (CEB) values in a large CSF samples ( n = 8183) to demonstrate that CEB enables more exact assessment of actual energy state in the CSF compartment than glucose and lactate alone. This study suggested that CEB combined with CSF cytology has a great importance for diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and early therapy of CNS diseases.
H. C. Yen et al. discussed potential interferences on the analysis of F 2 -IsoPs and F 4 -NPs in CSF by GC/NICI-MS by present analytical methods. Proper TLC purification for obtaining reliable chromatograms for F 2 -IsoPs quantification in CSF is suggested as well as the necessity of adding additional holding of the column at 280°C for a period of time following data acquisition during F 2 -IsoPs and F 4 -NPs analysis to avoid potential interferences on subsequent F 4 -NPs quantification in CSF.
The guest editors of this special issue thank the reviewers and all authors for providing important contributions in this issue. The contributions in this issue discuss novel insights, advanced assessment as well as diagnosis. Of course, the selected topics and papers are not a comprehensive representation of the area of this special issue. Nonetheless, they represent the rich knowledge that we have the pleasure of sharing with the readers.
Shih-Bin Su Terence Chuen Wai Poon Visith Thongboonkerd
On this page, risk factors, complications.
Dehydration occurs when you use or lose more fluid than you take in, and your body doesn't have enough water and other fluids to carry out its normal functions. If you don't replace lost fluids, you will get dehydrated.
Anyone may become dehydrated, but the condition is especially dangerous for young children and older adults.
The most common cause of dehydration in young children is severe diarrhea and vomiting. Older adults naturally have a lower volume of water in their bodies, and may have conditions or take medications that increase the risk of dehydration.
This means that even minor illnesses, such as infections affecting the lungs or bladder, can result in dehydration in older adults.
Dehydration also can occur in any age group if you don't drink enough water during hot weather — especially if you are exercising vigorously.
You can usually reverse mild to moderate dehydration by drinking more fluids, but severe dehydration needs immediate medical treatment.
Thirst isn't always a reliable early indicator of the body's need for water. Many people, particularly older adults, don't feel thirsty until they're already dehydrated. That's why it's important to increase water intake during hot weather or when you're ill.
The signs and symptoms of dehydration also may differ by age.
Call your family doctor if you or a loved one:
Sometimes dehydration occurs for simple reasons: You don't drink enough because you're sick or busy, or because you lack access to safe drinking water when you're traveling, hiking or camping.
Other dehydration causes include:
Anyone can become dehydrated, but certain people are at greater risk:
Dehydration can lead to serious complications, including:
To prevent dehydration, drink plenty of fluids and eat foods high in water such as fruits and vegetables. Letting thirst be your guide is an adequate daily guideline for most healthy people.
People may need to take in more fluids if they are experiencing conditions such as:
Oct 14, 2021
CON-XXXXXXXX
Make a gift now and help create new and better solutions for more than 1.3 million patients who turn to Mayo Clinic each year.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The regulation of body fluid balance is a key concern in health and disease and comprises three concepts. The first concept pertains to the relationship between total body water (TBW) and total effective solute and is expressed in terms of the tonicity of the body fluids. ... Henshel A, editors. National Academy of Sciences/National Research ...
Human beings are creatures that are primarily composed of water. It is the essence of life and the aqueous base solution in which all essential biochemical processes occur that produce life. Humans are approximately 75% water by mass as infants and 50% to 60% water by mass as adults. Furthermore, fluid is always in flux through a variety of regulatory mechanisms to maintain appropriate ...
Body fluid tests that show promise and those that are losing (or lost long ago) value are also reviewed. Summary: The total testing process from collection to result interpretation can be complicated and easily overlooked by the clinical laboratory. This review aims to improve the understanding and awareness of collections, validation, result ...
The critical adaptations cross an array of species, including man. Without water, humans can survive only for days. Water comprises from 75% body weight in infants to 55% in elderly and is essential for cellular homeostasis and life. 1 Nevertheless there are many unanswered questions about this most essential component of our body and our diet ...
Abstract. Maintenance of fluid and electrolyte balance is essential to healthy living as dehydration and fluid overload are associated with morbidity and mortality. This review presents the current evidence for the impact of hydration status on health. The Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases were searched using ...
Introduction. The restoration of fluid balance plays an important role in the management and recovery of critically ill adult patients. It is important to determine the body fluid status of patients so that after initial resuscitation measures have been implemented, adequate circulatory volume can be maintained through additional fluid administration, or restriction or removal to avoid fluid ...
Homeostasis of body fluid is a key component for maintaining health. An imbalance of body sodium and water causes various pathological states, such as dehydration, volume overload, hypertension, cardiovascular and renal diseases, and metabolic disorders. Conventional concepts regarding physiology and pathophysiology of body sodium and water ...
Liquid components of living organisms. | Explore the latest full-text research PDFs, articles, conference papers, preprints and more on BODY FLUIDS. Find methods information, sources, references ...
In this article, we review the published data to evaluate the clinical utility of testing for numerous analytes in body fluid specimens. We also highlight the pre-analytic and analytic variables that need to be considered when reviewing published studies in body fluid testing.
We evaluated the capacity of the XN-350 instrument to analyze 3 different types of body fluid samples under "body fluid mode.". The performance of XN-350 was evaluated in terms of precision, carryover, limit of blank, limit of detection, limit of quantification, and linearity. Cell enumeration and differential data produced by the XN-350 were compared to manual chamber counting results in ...
Typically blood and semen are the body fluids of most significance with saliva, urine and faeces being corroborative evidence or used to identify areas for DNA. For example, saliva can be identified in sexual assaults where oral intercourse has taken place or more commonly it can be used to identify potential sources of DNA, such as from the ...
During exercise in the heat, sweat output often exceeds water intake, resulting in a body water deficit (hypohydration) and electrolyte losses. Because daily water losses can be substantial, persons need to emphasize drinking during exercise as well as at meals. For persons consuming a normal diet, electrolyte supplementation is not warranted except perhaps during the first few days of heat ...
In addition, coupling new technologies to biosensors would make health tests more affordable and portable. In this Special Issue, we aim to gather the most recent research in the field of biosensors that may directly be applied to biofluids (saliva, urine, synovial fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, etc.) without sample pretreatment.
The Journal of Body Fluids (JBF) is an open access, fully peer-reviewed international journal that publishes research articles and review articles in all aspects of body fluids, including their secretion, composition, physical and chemical properties as well as their roles in health and disease. JBF provides an authoritative source of ...
A simulated body fluid (SBF) with ion concentrations approximately equal to those of human blood plasma has been used widely for in vitro assessment of the bioactivity of artificial materials and for the formation of bone-like apatite on various substrates. The ion concentrations of a conventional SBF (c-SBF) are, however, not exactly equal to those of blood plasma.
Archaeological and volcanological site evidence show that Vesuvius tends to have a major (Plinian) eruption at least every 2,000 years [ 2 - 4 ]. In AD 79 a sudden Plinian event with subsequent volcanic pumice fallout and ash-avalanches affected an extensive area, causing total devastation and thousands of victims [ 5 ].
Clinical research in which body fluids play a role is critical and semen testing programs are part of the suggested response to the outbreak. Broad acceptance and understanding of testing programs and research, often in resource poor settings, is essential for the success and sustainability of clinical studies and an accurate epidemic response. ...
About The Journal . The Journal of Body Fluids (JBF) provides a valuable platform for the dissemination of research related to body fluid science. It is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that is dedicated to publishing research findings of the highest quality. By offering unrestricted access to its content, JBF allows for accelerated scientific development and greater public awareness of ...
Body fluid analysis is a diagnostic procedure used to examine fluid samples extracted from a person's body. This type of analysis enables medical professionals to diagnose illnesses, identify changes in the body's chemistry, and evaluate the progress of treatment. It can also be used to detect pregnancy and determine genetic markers for ...
A healthy body is designed to send thirst signals when the body becomes depleted of fluids. Thirst is the desire to drink, and is not only driven by physiological cues but behavioral cues. [2] An example of a behavioral prompt is water temperature; research suggests that people tend to drink the most water when it is served at room temperature ...
The main objective of this study is to standardize a simple and rapid FCM test for the detection of malignant epithelial cells in body fluids. Materials and Methods. Body fluids that had been processed for cytology/cytology and FCM were enrolled in this prospective study. We developed a fluorescent-labelled, monoclonal antibody panel composed ...
Back in 1945, the U.S. Food and Nutrition Board advised people to consume 2.5 liters, or 84.5 fluid ounces (fl oz), of water per day, including fluid from prepared foods.Today, the Centers for ...
This supports healthy fluid levels in your body. Your lymphatic system also filters out waste products and abnormal cells from this fluid. Helping your body absorb fats. Most nutrients can travel through tiny openings (pores) in the walls of your capillaries, and your body can then absorb and use them. But certain fats and other molecules are ...
Author summary Recent studies have shown that the Ebola Virus might persist in body fluids of survivors of the disease. Clinical research in which body fluids (semen, vaginal fluids, blood, sweat, tears, breast milk and rectal fluids) are sampled play an increasingly important role, specifically in light of growing EVD epidemics. The success of these studies, e.g. how many participants are ...
You can also use the body weight formula: take one-third of your body's weight and drink that number of ounces in fluids. For example, if you weigh 150 pounds, aim to drink 50 ounces of water each day. When you feel thirsty (if not before), drink. Make it a point to drink a big glass of water with every meal.
Your kidneys remove wastes and extra fluid from your body. Your kidneys also remove acid that is produced by the cells of your body and maintain a healthy balance of water, salts, ... Clinical trials are part of clinical research and at the heart of all medical advances. Clinical trials look at new ways to prevent, detect, or treat disease. ...
Women expel fluids of various quantities and compositions from the urethra during sexual arousal and orgasm. These are classified as either female ejaculation (FE) or squirting (SQ). The aim of our analysis was to present evidence that FE and SQ are similar but etiologically different phenomena. A r …
Human Body Fluid. Human body fluids are considered as attractive sources for clinical markers. As for disease diagnosis and prognosis, advantages of body fluid testing include low invasiveness, low cost, and rapid sample collection and processing. Besides, altered protein expression profiles in body fluids reflect the change of physiological ...
Dehydration occurs when you use or lose more fluid than you take in, and your body doesn't have enough water and other fluids to carry out its normal functions. If you don't replace lost fluids, you will get dehydrated. Anyone may become dehydrated, but the condition is especially dangerous for young children and older adults.
Changing from a carbohydrate diet to various protein-rich diets may lead to weight loss, reduced body fat, and rapid changes in gut microbiome composition, a study in mice indicates.