What Happens When an Ordinary Person Suddenly Becomes the Target of a Public Controversy?
Amanda Jones was born and raised in the small, rural town of Watson in Livingston Parish in southern Louisiana, roughly 20 miles southeast of Baton Rouge. She still lives there with her husband and daughter in a house next door to her parents. Watson is a place of settled rhythms and few surprises, of family, church, and conservative tradition, where residents are very familiar with one another.
Employed for more than two decades as a middle school librarian at the same public school she attended, Jones was named the National Librarian of the Year by the School Library Journal in 2021. She adored her job, her students, and the place she occupied in her community. Her book, That Librarian , is the story of how her life was upended when she ran afoul of a local group called Citizens for a New Louisiana, which sounds benign enough, but is part of a far-right, nationwide ecosystem that targets individuals, books, and institutions it considers too liberal, permissive, and inclusive.
Too woke, in other words.
Apprehensive about threats to the Livingston Public Library system, Jones rose at a library Board of Control meeting on July 19, 2022 and voiced her concern that books by LGBTQIA authors or about reproductive health might be removed. “Once you start relocating and banning one topic, it becomes a slippery slope, and where does it end?” Although nothing in her remarks that evening was inflammatory or more radical than the standard guidance provided by the American Library Association, Jones quickly found herself the target of a fierce and vicious social media campaign. Accused of grooming and pedophilia, of encouraging children to engage in anal sex, Jones was assailed by people she had known for years and considered friends, parents of children she had taught, folks she encountered in the grocery store or the dry cleaners.
That the allegations were false didn’t matter. Amanda’s long record of dedicated public service, deep community ties, and Christian affiliation provided no protection, either. As with the hysterical witch trials of an earlier century, the notion that Amanda Jones was a purveyor of smut took on a life and momentum of its own. She was impure, woke, a danger to precious and impressionable children. Social media carried the story far beyond Livingston Parish.
What happens when an ordinary person suddenly becomes the target of a public controversy? What emotional toll is exacted? Jones experienced such anxiety, depression, and fear that she needed a leave of absence from the job she loved. Her family suffered. She received death threats. Had Jones retreated from public view and gone into hiding it would have been understandable, but she chose to defend her reputation, stand for the principles she believed in, and confront her accusers. While her detractors took the low road, Jones took the more difficult high road, upon which she discovered how much fortitude is required to do the right thing in the face of an organized, well-funded and unscrupulous opposition.
Along with filing a defamation lawsuit, Jones got busy organizing other librarians across the country, networking, agitating, and defending books and the value of information, free inquiry and libraries as essential institutions that provide a host of vital services, particularly in small communities. That Librarian is a full-throated defense of the freedom to read, to discover, and to think.
“We should ALL want the freedom to read what we want,” Jones writes, “and have access to reading materials from a variety of viewpoints. Protecting our libraries is exactly how we do that. The attack on librarians and libraries is shameful and something everyone should fear.”
This review originally appeared in the California Review of Books .
City abandons businesses, again, get news in your inbox.
Please note this login is to submit events or press releases. Use this page here to login for your Independent subscription
Username or Email Address
Remember Me
Not a member? Sign up here.
Advertisement
The first novel in elena ferrante’s neapolitan quartet was just voted the best book of the 21st century. we like it too..
This July, The New York Times Book Review published a list of The 100 Best Books of the 21st Century , chosen by 503 literary luminaries. The No. 1 book was “My Brilliant Friend,” by Elena Ferrante, translated by Ann Goldstein. And it wasn’t just critics and writers who loved the book; “My Brilliant Friend” came in at No. 8 in our readers’ choice list .
The book is the first novel in Ferrante’s so-called Neapolitan quartet, which tracks the lifelong friendship between Lenù and Lila, two women from a rough neighborhood in Naples, Italy, even as family, relationships and work pull their lives in different directions.
In this week’s episode, the Book Review’s MJ Franklin discusses the book with his colleagues Joumana Khatib, Emily Eakin and Gregory Cowles.
They also discuss comments and questions that readers submitted. If you’ve read “My Brilliant Friend” and want to join the conversation, we’d love to hear your reactions in the comments. We’ll get you started:
Emily Eakin: “I think one of the striking things about this book — which I found, on a second read, utterly engrossing, as engrossing as the first read, actually, I couldn’t put it down — is the efficiency of the world building.”
Joumana Khatib: “ One of the things that struck me when I was rereading this was just how easily Ferrante is able to access the mind and life of a child, like a really precocious child, and how wonderful it is to inhabit that. And also how frightening.”
Greg Cowles: “It is propulsive and fevered. It drives you forward with characterization and with plot. But the language itself — she falls back reliably on comma splices and run-on sentences in a way that pulls you right through. One sentence leads to the next without even a period to break them up. And it’s not elegant, but it’s very effective in creating this kind of hypnotic tone.”
We would love to hear your thoughts about this episode, and about the Book Review’s podcast in general. You can send them to [email protected] .
Related terms for review - synonyms, antonyms and sentences with review, similar meaning.
Proper usage in context.
Vice President Kamala Harris and the dozens of speakers that preceded her at Thursday's Democratic National Convention attacked former President Donald Trump on an array of fronts, including abortion, diplomacy and his litany of criminal charges.
Not all of it was true.
The USA TODAY Fact Check team followed along to sort fact from fiction and add context where it was missing.
More from the Fact-Check Team: How we pick and research claims | Email newsletter | Facebook page
Trump tariffs ‘"would raise prices on middle-class families by almost $4,000 a year ."
This overstates the impact economists project from Trump’s proposed 10% tariff on imported goods.
While Trump has described it as a way to raise revenue , economists say it would mostly be passed along to consumers , effectively making it a tax.
A study by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center found the tariff, along with a 60% tariff on Chinese goods also proposed by Trump, would lower the average post-tax incomes of American households by about $1,800.
That’s mostly in line with projections from the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a think tank that says the tariff would cost households roughly $1,700 each year , and the conservative American Action Forum, which projects additional household costs between $1,700 and $2,350.
– Joedy McCreary
We've fact-checked key speakers throughout the Republican and Democratic conventions. Catch up here on what was false, what was true and what was in between from Donald Trump, JD Vance, Tim Walz and a host of others.
What's true and what's false? Sign up for USA TODAY's Checking the Facts newsletter.
“Consider the power he will have, especially after the United States Supreme Court just ruled that he would be immune from criminal prosecution.”
In July, the Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision that presidents, including Trump, are at least partially immune from prosecution for crimes committed while in office. But the court’s decision isn’t as clear cut as Harris’ remarks make it seem. It declares that “official” acts by presidents are protected, but steps taken as a candidate are not.
The ruling also leaves room for presidents to be prosecuted under a narrow set of circumstances, related to responsibilities “within the outer perimeter” of presidential duties, or to unofficial acts, as USA TODAY previously reported .
“The parties before us do not dispute that a former President can be subject to criminal prosecution for unofficial acts committed while in office,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the 6-3 majority that divided along ideological lines. “They also agree that some of the conduct described in the indictment includes actions taken by Trump in his unofficial capacity.”
In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the court gave Trump “all the immunity he asked for and more.” Trump is the first president – former or current – to be criminally charged.
-Chris Mueller
“Kamala Harris has delivered more benefits to more veterans than ever before and has achieved the lowest veterans unemployment rate in history.”
The Department of Veterans Affairs said it has granted benefits to 1.1 million veterans and their survivors so far in fiscal year 2024, an all-time record.
The VA said it’s been able to deliver more care and benefits than ever before largely because of the PACT Act, which President Joe Biden signed into law in August 2022. The White House has described the law as the “most significant expansion of VA Health Care in 30 years.”
It helps deliver more timely health care benefits and services to over five million veterans who may have been exposed to toxic substances – such as through burn pits – while serving the country, the White House said.
But the claim overreaches by giving direct credit to Harris for actions taken by an administration led by Biden. In public remarks in 2022, Harris credited Biden’s leadership for the passage of the PACT Act.
The issue is close to Biden, who has drawn a connection between burn pits and his late son Beau’s fatal brain cancer.
The Department of Veterans Affairs website says the PACT Act is “is perhaps the largest health care and benefit expansion in VA history.” The Veterans of Foreign Wars , a nonprofit veterans service organization, considered the bill the most significant piece of veterans legislation in history.
On unemployment, the jobless rate among veterans fell to 2.1% in April 2023 – during the Biden-Harris administration – the lowest mark since 2000 when the Bureau of Labor Statistics began tracking monthly unemployment for the group, the Military Times reported . For all of 2023, the rate was 2.8%, the lowest rate since at least 2000 , the outlet reported.
The veterans unemployment rate was 3% in July, up from 2.9% the previous month, according to the Department of Labor .
But as with the veterans benefits, referring to this veterans unemployment rate as something Harris has “achieved” overstates her role in the process. USA TODAY found no record of Harris leading initiatives that would justify such a description.
-Andre Byik
“He plans to create a national anti-abortion coordinator and force states to report on women’s miscarriages and abortions.”
This claim does not appear to reference any plan or platform endorsed by Trump, but rather aspects of Project 2025 , a political playbook created by the Heritage Foundation and dozens of other conservative groups.
The project calls for increasing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s surveillance of abortion information by forcing states that don’t currently provide this information to the CDC, such as California, Maryland and New Hampshire, to do so.
Page 455 of the plan explains this would be done by allowing the Department of Health and Human Services to “use every available tool, including the cutting of funds, to ensure that every state reports exactly how many abortions take place within its borders, at what gestational age of the child for what reason, the mother’s state of residence, and by what method.” It also calls for information about miscarriages to be collected from the states.
As Harris alludes to, the plan also calls for appointing someone who is “unapologetically pro-life” as the “Senior Coordinator” of the “Office of Women, Children, and Families.”
While Democrats have insisted Project 2025 is Trump’s plan if elected president, he has attempted to distance himself from it. In a July 5 Truth Social post , Trump wrote that he disagrees with parts of the plan and has “no idea who is behind it.” Notably, Trump embraced many of the Heritage Foundation’s policy proposals during his first administration, and some of his allies were involved in Project 2025, as USA TODAY previously reported.
- Brad Sylvester
"Donald Trump tried to cut Social Security and Medicare."
This is a slightly softened version of a claim Harris’ campaign has made before , including a tweet from her campaign claiming Trump attempted to do this "every single year." It oversimplifies a series of budget maneuvers.
Trump didn’t attempt to cut general Social Security retirement benefits, but he attempted – and failed – to reduce spending for Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income, according to The Washington Pos t. About 8.5 million people receive such disability benefits, but that’s only a fraction of the number who receive retirement and survivor benefits.
Trump did propose cuts to Medicare in his budgets for the fiscal years 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, The Post noted. But an analysis by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found that 85% of his proposed Medicare savings would come from healthcare providers and would lower costs for seniors.
Trump’s last budget, released in February 2020, had about $500 billion in net Medicare spending reductions over 10 years, but most would come from reduced payments to hospitals and other healthcare providers, Forbes reported, citing the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities .
- Chris Mueller
“Trump on the other hand threatened to abandon NATO. He encouraged Putin to invade our allies. Said Russia could, quote, ‘Do whatever the hell they want.’”
This claim popped up earlier in the evening by Sen. Mark Kelly, and by President Joe Biden at his State of the Union . Here’s what we reported when Kelly said it:
The quote Harris cited here is technically accurate but significantly oversimplified.
Trump, speaking at a Feb. 10 campaign rally in Conway, South Carolina, suggested he might not come to the aid of NATO members attacked by Russia if they weren’t contributing enough money to the alliance, as USA TODAY previously reported .
“One of the presidents of a big country stood up and said, ‘Well sir, if we don’t pay and we’re attacked by Russia, will you protect us?’" Trump said . “I said, ‘You didn’t pay? You’re delinquent?’ He said, ‘Yes, let’s say that happened.’ No, I would not protect you.”
Then, Trump added, “In fact I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want.”
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said at the time that Trump's comments could endanger lives and undermine the security of NATO members, including the U.S.
- Chris Mueller and Andre Byik
“(I) delivered $20 billion for middle-class families who faced foreclosure.”
This refers to the settlement Harris, as California’s attorney general, negotiated with several large mortgage companies in 2012 to provide relief for struggling homeowners in her state following the foreclosure crisis.
The nation’s five largest mortgage servicers – Bank of America Corp., Wells Fargo & Co., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc. and Ally Bank/GMAC Mortgage – were accused of using illicit tactics to wrongfully foreclose on homeowners, the Los Angeles Times reported in 2016 . Harris pulled California out of nationwide mortgage settlement talks in September 2011 when it appeared her state’s share would be roughly $4 billion.
In announcing the deal in 2012, her office said it totaled $18 billion , of which more than $12 billion was to go toward reducing the principal on loans or offering short sales to roughly 250,000 homeowners who owed more than their homes were worth or were behind (or almost behind) on payments. There is a discrepancy in the specific dollar amount, however. While her office announced it as $18 billion, multiple media outlets through the years used the same $20 billion figure that Harris referenced during her address.
Ultimately, about $4.5 billion of that settlement went to lower debt on primary mortgages, the Wall Street Journal reported . The rest went to reduce debt on second mortgages and to short sales, in which banks agreed to allow homes to be sold for less than the mortgage value and wrote off the difference.
“(Trump) invited Russia to do – and these are his words, not mine – whatever the hell they want.”
As P resident Joe Biden did in his State of the Union , Kelly here cites a quote that is technically accurate but significantly oversimplified.
Trump, speaking at a Feb. 10 campaign rally in Conway, South Carolina, suggested he might not come to the aid of NATO members attacked by Russia if they weren’t contributing enough money to the alliance, as USA TODAY previously reported .
“One of the presidents of a big country stood up and said, ‘Well sir, if we don’t pay and we’re attacked by Russia, will you protect us?’" Trump said . “I said, ‘You didn’t pay? You’re delinquent?’ He said, ‘Yes, let’s say that happened.’ No, I would not protect you.”
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said at the time that Trump's comments could endanger lives and undermine the security of NATO members, including the U.S.
“(Trump) spent a small fortune on full-page ads calling for the execution of five innocent young teenagers.”
Sharpton is referring to the Central Park Five , a group of Black and Latino teenagers wrongly convicted of assaulting a white female jogger in Central Park in 1989.
Less than two weeks after the attack, Trump took out $85,000 worth of full-page ads in The New York Times, The Daily News, The New York Post and New York Newsday. The ads proclaimed in all caps, “Bring back the death penalty and bring back our police," going on to condemn a "dangerously permissive atmosphere which allows criminals of every age to beat and rape a helpless woman and then laugh at her family's anguish."
The ads did not, however, explicitly advocate for the Central Park Five to be executed .
In 2002, the group was exonerated after a convicted murder Matias Reyes confessed to assaulting the jogger, which was confirmed by DNA evidence.
Trump did not apologize for the ads when he was asked in 2019 whether he would apologize to the men.
“He started his career being sued for denying housing to Black families”
This lawsuit is real, though the quick mention leaves out how the case was resolved.
This claim from the former secretary of housing and urban development refers to a lawsuit filed more than half a century ago. Former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton made the same claim during a debate with Trump in 2016.
Trump was in his late 20s in 1973 when the Justice Department sued him , his father Fred and their management company over allegations of racial discrimination at their housing developments in New York. According to testers for New York City’s human rights division, a Black woman who attempted to rent an apartment at a Brooklyn complex managed by Trump’s firm was told nothing was available, but a white woman was offered a choice of two apartments shortly after.
The case was settled in 1975 after Trump countersued the Justice Department for $100 million for making false statements. That allegation was dismissed.
As noted by NPR , Trump responded in the 2016 debate by emphasizing there was no admission of guilt in the case. Indeed, NPR reports, the Trumps took a settlement offer that included no admission of guilt but required the Trumps to place newspaper ads saying their properties welcomed Black applicants.
"Yes, when I was very young, I went into my father's company — had a real estate company in Brooklyn and Queens," Trump said. "And we, along with many, many other companies throughout the country — it was a federal lawsuit — were sued. We settled the suit with zero, with no admission of guilt."
Ever wonder how fact-checkers do their work? We've got you covered.
Check out our process explainer to see how we pick claims, research them and edit them.
And if you've ever wondered who fact-checks the fact-checkers , you might want to read this op-ed explaining our emphasis on transparency. Becaus the answer is you! We use the format and approach precisely so that everyone has the ability to check our work.
-Eric Litke
The days following an assassination attempt that left Republican nominee Donald Trump with an injured ear were marked by widespread calls for unity and toned-down rhetoric.
Fewer than six weeks after the shooting, the temperature has gone right back up.
When Vice President Kamala Harris formally accepts the Democratic presidential nomination Thursday night, she also will have the opportunity to respond to Trump's vow that he’s “ not going to be nice ” while peppering Harris with a series of attacks.
It marks a return to the tone that appeared to shift – albeit only temporarily – in the wake of the July 13 shooting in Pennsylvania that left one dead and two others seriously injured. Trump said he rewrote his closing remarks at the Republican National Convention in July to “bring the whole country, even the whole world, together,” he told the Washington Examiner.
The FBI identified the gunman as 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks of Bethel Park, Pennsylvania , and said Secret Service agents killed him at the scene . But officials have been unable to determine his motive, one of the key unanswered questions sparking a significant amount of misinformation.
USA TODAY has debunked an array of false claims stemming from the assassination attempt.
The Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, and former President Donald Trump’s alleged role in the attack, has become a focal point at this week’s Democratic National Convention .
Aquilino Gonell, a former U.S. Capitol police officer, said in a convention speech that rioters beat him with a pole attached to an American flag, and he blamed Trump for summoning protesters to the Capitol.
Trump is accused in a federal indictment of directing his supporters to march on the Capitol in an effort to pressure former Vice President Mike Pence to reject the certification of Joe Biden’s election victory.
More than 1,200 defendants have been charged in the attack on the Capitol. Trump’s case was overseen by Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith . Trump has pleaded not guilty .
USA TODAY has debunked numerous claims about the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol:
– Andre Byik
Not long after the Democrats picked Vice President Kamala Harris to replace President Joe Biden at the top of their ticket, several false or misleading claims about her resurfaced.
Many of those originated four years earlier when Harris was picked as Biden’s running mate in 2020. Some question whether Harris – the daughter of an Indian mother and a Jamaican father – is eligible for the presidency . Others claim she was raised in Canada , is not African-American and as a prosecutor held Black inmates past their release dates.
USA TODAY has debunked several false claims that center on Harris’ background:
As the 2024 election draws closer, Democrats and Republicans continue to spar over concerns about the security and integrity of the voting process.
A bill passed in July by House Republicans and some Democrats would require proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections – even though data shows the problem of non-citizens voting is virtually nonexistent .
The measure advanced amid repeated, baseless claims from former President Donald Trump – the Republican presidential nominee – that the 2020 election was rigged against him . He referenced the claim in a video shown during his party’s convention in July. However, state-level recounts, reviews and audits of the 2022 midterm elections found no indication of systemic problems with voter fraud.
Trump’s campaign and the Republican National Committee led by his daughter-in-law have said they will mobilize 100,000 people in battleground states to ensure “transparency and fairness” in a move that has drawn criticism from opponents saying it has the potential to lead to voter intimidation .
USA TODAY has debunked numerous false claims about the integrity of the elections:
Vice President Kamala Harris has warned voters about what she describes as the dangers of Project 2025 in the weeks since she became the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.
The project is an effort by the Heritage Foundation and other conservative organizations that resulted in a 900-page playbook for the next Republican president. A full implementation of the guidance in the document would effectively overhaul the federal government .
A slew of Trump’s allies are involved in the project, though Trump has maintained that he is not.
He’s described its proposals as “extreme” and “ absolutely ridiculous ,” though he has not specified what he disagrees with.
Numerous Democratic leaders, including Rep. Jim Clyburn of South Carolina and Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta of Pennsylvania , attacked Project 2025 and attempted to connect it to Trump in their convention speeches. Some speakers, such as comedian Kenan Thompson, used an oversized physical copy of the playbook in condemning it on stage.
USA TODAY has debunked several claims about Project 2025:
-BrieAnna Frank
In 2021, President Joe Biden announced Harris would lead the administration's diplomatic efforts with Mexico and the Central American countries of Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador to slow migration to the U.S. southern border. At the time, Harris said the administration “must address the root causes that cause people to make the trek, as the president described, to come here.”
But Harris was never put in charge of the southern border or made "border czar," contrary to some posts on social media . Immigration has been a top issue for voters as encounters with migrants at the southern border have increased under Biden .
Trump, meanwhile, has promised the largest deportation effort in U.S. history if he is elected again. He also said he would reinstate strict immigration policies from his first term, limit asylum access at the U.S. southern border and eliminate automatic citizenship for people born in the U.S. to immigrant parents.
In February, Republican lawmakers blocked an immigration bill that would have revamped the country’s immigration and border policies. Biden blamed the bill's failure on opposition from Trump. Since then, Biden has issued executive orders to implement new restrictions on asylum access and speed up the process to get a green card for certain spouses and children of U.S. citizens.
- Chris Mueller
COMMENTS
Find 43 different ways to say BOOK REVIEW, along with antonyms, related words, and example sentences at Thesaurus.com.
Another way to say Book Review? Synonyms for Book Review (other words and phrases for Book Review).
Synonyms for book review include review, criticism, critique, notice, evaluation, commentary, assessment, write-up, judgement and rating. Find more similar words at ...
What's the definition of Book review in thesaurus? Most related words/phrases with sentence examples define Book review meaning and usage.
What is another word for book review? Synonyms for book review book re·view This thesaurus page is about all possible synonyms, equivalent, same meaning and similar words for the term book review. Princeton's WordNet. book review noun. a critical review of a book (usually a recently published book) Matched Categories.
Synonyms for Book Reviews (other words and phrases for Book Reviews). Synonyms for Book reviews. 18 other terms for book reviews- words and phrases with similar meaning. Lists. synonyms. antonyms. definitions. sentences. thesaurus. suggest new. book evaluations. literary critiques. novel appraisals.
More 100 Book review synonyms. What are another words for Book review? Criticism, comment, notice, judgment. Full list of synonyms for Book review is here.
Similar words for Book Review. Definition: verb. ['ˌriːvˈjuː'] look at again; examine again.
Book Review Synonyms. Meanings Synonyms Sentences Common Words Unique Words. A critical study ... blurb; Book Review Sentence Examples Spoilers have no place in a book review. Finally, the journal contains a book review section edited by a one-time edited by a one-time editor of the journal, Lucy Newton.
Synonyms for book review 193 results - account, review, assessment, write-up ... - 22 meanings and 193 other words for the word book review
108 Book review synonyms and 4 Book review antonyms on the online thesaurus dictionary. Good and short list of thesaurus for term Book review. Random . Book review. Book review antonyms. quiet . silence . ignorance . neglect . If you know antonyms for Book review, then you can share it.
How to write a book review. Note down the key points- This is an important step before writing a book review. Jot down your analysis about the characters, themes, plot, and your personal view. Also, note down the book title, author's name, and any relevant information about the book. Start with a strong introduction- Mention the author's ...
Find 140 different ways to say REVIEW, along with antonyms, related words, and example sentences at Thesaurus.com.
Synonyms for REVIEW: retrospect, retrospection, reconsideration, reexamination, reappraisal, recapitulation, recap, rehash; Antonyms of REVIEW: preview, stabilization ...
It is a fantasy, but the book draws inspiration from the Second Sino-Japanese War and the Rape of Nanking. Crime Fiction Lover reviews Jessica Barry's Freefall, a crime novel: In some crime novels, the wrongdoing hits you between the eyes from page one. With others it's a more subtle process, and that's OK too.
A critical appraisal of a book, play, film, etc. published in a newspaper or magazine. A reconsideration of a judgment, sentence, etc. by a higher court or authority. … more . Noun. . A formal assessment of something with the intention of instituting change if necessary. scrutiny. examination. analysis.
Step 1: Planning Your Book Review - The Art of Getting Started. You've decided to take the plunge and share your thoughts on a book that has captivated (or perhaps disappointed) you. Before you start book reviewing, let's take a step back and plan your approach.
Review definition: a critical article or report, as in a periodical, on a book, play, recital, or the like; critique; evaluation.. See examples of REVIEW used in a sentence.
Book review definition: a critical description, evaluation, or analysis of a book, especially one published in a newspaper or magazine.. See examples of BOOK REVIEW used in a sentence.
book review: [noun] a descriptive and critical or evaluative account of a book.
Review A Book synonyms - 19 Words and Phrases for Review A Book. discuss a book. analyze a book. assess a book. chat about a book. converse about a book. critique a book. debate a book. delve into a book.
100 Best Books of the 21st Century: As voted on by 503 novelists, nonfiction writers, poets, critics and other book lovers — with a little help from the staff of The New York Times Book Review ...
100 Best Books of the 21st Century: As voted on by 503 novelists, nonfiction writers, poets, critics and other book lovers — with a little help from the staff of The New York Times Book Review.
100 Best Books of the 21st Century: As voted on by 503 novelists, nonfiction writers, poets, critics and other book lovers — with a little help from the staff of The New York Times Book Review ...
Synonyms for book reviewer include reader, bibliophile, bookworm, bibliomaniac, booklover, peruser, browser, book lover, book reader and book collector. Find more similar words at wordhippo.com!
Her book, That Librarian, is the story of how her life was upended when she ran afoul of a local group called Citizens for a New Louisiana, which sounds benign enough, but is part of a far-right, nationwide ecosystem that targets individuals, books, and institutions it considers too liberal, permissive, and inclusive.
100 Best Books of the 21st Century: As voted on by 503 novelists, nonfiction writers, poets, critics and other book lovers — with a little help from the staff of The New York Times Book Review ...
Related terms for review- synonyms, antonyms and sentences with review. Lists. synonyms. antonyms. definitions. sentences. thesaurus. Parts of speech. verbs. nouns. adjectives. Synonyms Similar meaning. ... One cannot review a bad book without showing off. W. H. Auden. The review should cover all potential hazardous substances.
Who is Donald Harris, Kamala Harris' father? Donald Harris is a post-keynesian economist who has written on Marxist theory.He is a retired Stanford University professor who has served as an ...
However, state-level recounts, reviews and audits of the 2022 midterm elections found no indication of systemic problems with voter fraud. ... Project 2025 and that giant book.