Case Study: How does Japan live with earthquakes?
Japan lies within one of the most tectonically active zones in the world. It experiences over 400 earthquakes every day. The majority of these are not felt by humans and are only detected by instruments. Japan has been hit by a number of high-intensity earthquakes in the past. Since 2000 there are have been 16000 fatalities as the result of tectonic activity.
Japan is located on the Pacific Ring of Fire, where the North American, Pacific, Eurasian and Philippine plates come together. Northern Japan is on top of the western tip of the North American plate. Southern Japan sits mostly above the Eurasian plate. This leads to the formation of volcanoes such as Mount Unzen and Mount Fuji. Movements along these plate boundaries also present the risk of tsunamis to the island nation. The Pacific Coastal zone, on the east coast of Japan, is particularly vulnerable as it is very densely populated.
The 2011 Japan Earthquake: Tōhoku
Japan experienced one of its largest seismic events on March 11 2011. A magnitude 9.0 earthquake occurred 70km off the coast of the northern island of Honshu where the Pacific and North American plate meet. It is the largest recorded earthquake to hit Japan and is in the top five in the world since records began in 1900. The earthquake lasted for six minutes.
A map to show the location of the 2011 Japan Earthquake
The earthquake had a significant impact on the area. The force of the megathrust earthquake caused the island of Honshu to move east 2.4m. Parts of the Japanese coastline dr[[ed by 60cm. The seabed close to the focus of the earthquake rose by 7m and moved westwards between 40-50m. In addition to this, the earthquake shifted the Earth 10-15cm on its axis.
The earthquake triggered a tsunami which reached heights of 40m when it reached the coast. The tsunami wave reached 10km inland in some places.
What were the social impacts of the Japanese earthquake in 2011?
The tsunami in 2011 claimed the lives of 15,853 people and injured 6023. The majority of the victims were over the age of 60 (66%). 90% of the deaths was caused by drowning. The remaining 10% died as the result of being crushed in buildings or being burnt. 3282 people were reported missing, presumed dead.
Disposing of dead bodies proved to be very challenging because of the destruction to crematoriums, morgues and the power infrastructure. As the result of this many bodies were buried in mass graves to reduce the risk of disease spreading.
Many people were displaced as the result of the tsunami. According to Save the Children 100,000 children were separated from their families. The main reason for this was that children were at school when the earthquake struck. In one elementary school, 74 of 108 students and 10 out of 13 staff lost their lives.
More than 333000 people had to live in temporary accommodation. National Police Agency of Japan figures shows almost 300,000 buildings were destroyed and a further one million damaged, either by the quake, tsunami or resulting fires. Almost 4,000 roads, 78 bridges and 29 railways were also affected. Reconstruction is still taking place today. Some communities have had to be relocated from their original settlements.
What were the economic impacts of the Japanese earthquake in 2011?
The estimated cost of the earthquake, including reconstruction, is £181 billion. Japanese authorities estimate 25 million tonnes of debris were generated in the three worst-affected prefectures (counties). This is significantly more than the amount of debris created during the 2010 Haiti earthquake. 47,700 buildings were destroyed and 143,300 were damaged. 230,000 vehicles were destroyed or damaged. Four ports were destroyed and a further 11 were affected in the northeast of Japan.
There was a significant impact on power supplies in Japan. 4.4 million households and businesses lost electricity. 11 nuclear reactors were shut down when the earthquake occurred. The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant was decommissioned because all six of its reactors were severely damaged. Seawater disabled the plant’s cooling systems which caused the reactor cores to meltdown, leading to the release of radioactivity. Radioactive material continues to be released by the plant and vegetation and soil within the 30km evacuation zone is contaminated. Power cuts continued for several weeks after the earthquake and tsunami. Often, these lasted between 3-4 hours at a time. The earthquake also had a negative impact on the oil industry as two refineries were set on fire during the earthquake.
Transport was also negatively affected by the earthquake. Twenty-three train stations were swept away and others experienced damage. Many road bridges were damaged or destroyed.
Agriculture was affected as salt water contaminated soil and made it impossible to grow crops.
The stock market crashed and had a negative impact on companies such as Sony and Toyota as the cost of the earthquake was realised. Production was reduced due to power cuts and assembly of goods, such as cars overseas, were affected by the disruption in the supply of parts from Japan.
What were the political impacts of the Japanese earthquake in 2011?
Government debt was increased when it injects billions of yen into the economy. This was at a time when the government were attempting to reduce the national debt.
Several years before the disaster warnings had been made about the poor defences that existed at nuclear power plants in the event of a tsunami. A number of executives at the Fukushima power plant resigned in the aftermath of the disaster. A movement against nuclear power, which Japan heavily relies on, developed following the tsunami.
The disaster at Fukushima added political weight in European countries were anti-nuclear bodies used the event to reinforce their arguments against nuclear power.
Privacy Overview
Pin it on pinterest.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Tohoku Earthquake & Tsunami
Causes and impacts - tohoku earthquake and tsunami.
In March 2011, there was an earthquake and tsunami in Tohoku, Japan. This is an example of a developed country experiencing a disaster.
- There was a magnitude 9.0 earthquake east of Sendai, under the sea in the north-west Pacific Ocean.
- This earthquake took place on a subduction zone between the Pacific and Eurasian tectonic plates.
- Within 45 minutes, a tsunami between 10 and 20 m high struck the eastern coast of Japan.
- In some places, the tsunami was 40 m high and travelled up to 20 km inland.
- There were 16,000 known deaths, 3,000 missing and 6,000 injured.
- 130,000 buildings were destroyed and 145,000 damaged.
- There was massive damage to ports, factories and services in coastal areas – over 26 million tonnes of debris was created.
- Economic losses were US$300 billion.
- A major secondary issue arose when a nuclear power station at Fukushima was flooded and failed. There were fears of a nuclear meltdown and severe pollution.
Responses - Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami
Immediately after
- The immediate priority was search and rescue, and stabilisation and prevention of nuclear disaster from the failure of the affected nuclear plant at Fukushima.
- A huge amount of temporary housing was provided.
- The area around Fukushima was evacuated in the long-term because the effects of nuclear pollution on human health are severe for years after being exposed to it.
Long-term response
- In the aftermath, a government report was commissioned to establish principles for recovery.
- The report focused on future safety measures (e.g. a higher tsunami wall), greater environmental awareness for future planning (e.g. avoiding flat coastal areas) and long-term support for those who had lost relatives or been otherwise affected.
1 Tectonic Processes & Hazards
1.1 Tectonic Processes & Hazards
1.1.1 Tectonic Plates
1.1.2 Distribution of Tectonic Hazards
1.1.3 Theoretical Frameworks
1.1.4 Earthquakes
1.1.5 Earthquake Hazards
1.1.6 Volcanoes
1.1.7 Tsunamis
1.1.8 End of Topic Test - Tectonic Processes
1.1.9 Exam-Style Question - Earthquakes
1.2 Natural Disasters
1.2.1 Introduction to Natural Disasters
1.2.2 Impacts of Hazards
1.2.3 Comparing Hazards
1.2.4 Development & Governance
1.3 Natural Disaster Case Studies
1.3.1 Tohoku Earthquake & Tsunami
1.3.2 Gorkha Earthquake
1.3.3 Mount Merapi Eruption
1.4 Trends & Patterns
1.4.1 Disaster Trends
1.4.2 Prediction
1.5 Disaster Modification
1.5.1 Hazard Management
1.5.2 Modifications
1.5.3 End of Topic Test - Natural Disasters
1.5.4 Exam-Style Question - Disaster Modification
2 Option 2A: Glaciated Landscapes & Change
2.1 Glaciated Landscapes Over Time
2.1.1 Timeline of Glacial Change
2.1.2 Natural Causes
2.1.3 Ice Distributions
2.2 Periglacial Landscapes
2.2.1 Periglacial Processes
2.2.2 Periglacial Landforms
2.3 Glacial Processes
2.3.1 Mass Balance
2.3.2 Glacial Movement
2.4 Glacial Landforms
2.4.1 Landscapes
2.4.2 Erosional Landforms
2.4.3 Erosional Landforms 2
2.4.4 Erosional Landforms 3
2.4.5 Depositional Landforms
2.4.6 Fluvioglaciation
2.5 The Future of Glaciated Landscapes
2.5.1 The Value of Glaciated Landscapes
2.5.2 The Value of Glaciated Landscapes 2
2.5.3 Threats to Glaciated Landscapes
2.5.4 Managing the Threats to Glaciated Landscapes
3 Option 2B: Coastal Landscapes & Change
3.1 Coastal Landscapes
3.1.1 The Wider Coastal Landscape
3.1.2 Geological Structure
3.1.3 Lithology & Vegetation
3.2 Coastal Erosion & Deposition
3.2.1 Shaping Coastlines
3.2.2 Coastal Formations
3.2.3 Sediment Transportation
3.2.4 Subaerial Processes
3.3 Coastal Risks
3.3.1 Sea Level Change
3.3.2 Coastal Retreat
3.3.3 Coastal Flooding
3.4 Managing Coastlines
3.4.1 Consequences of Coastal Recession
3.4.2 Engineering Management Approaches
3.4.3 Governance Approaches
4 Globalisation
4.1 Globalisation
4.1.1 Intro to Globalisation
4.1.2 Development of Globalisation
4.1.3 Economic Policy & Globalisation
4.1.4 Government Policy & Globalisation
4.1.5 International Organisations & Globalisation
4.1.6 Measuring Globalisation
4.1.7 TNCs & Globalisation
4.1.8 TNCs - Aramco & Anglo-Iranian Oil
4.2 Negatives of Globalisation
4.2.1 'Switched Off' Places
4.3 Global Shift
4.3.1 Global Shift for Developing Nations
4.3.2 Global Shift for Developing Nations 2
4.3.3 Global Shift for Developed Nations
4.3.4 End of Topic Test - Globalisation
4.4 Migration
4.4.1 Megacities
4.4.2 International Migration
4.4.3 Country Interdependence
4.5 Culture
4.5.1 Global Culture
4.5.2 Cultural Erosion
4.6 Measuring Development
4.6.1 Measuring Development
4.7 Responses to Globalisation
4.7.1 Tensions Caused by Globalisation
4.7.2 Government Control of Globalisation
4.7.3 Ethical Responses to Globalisation
4.7.4 End of Topic Test - Migration, Culture, & Response
5 Option 4A: Regenerating Places
5.1 Types of Economies
5.1.1 Economic Activity
5.1.2 Employment
5.1.3 Economic Activity - Health & Life
5.1.4 Economic Activity - Education & Inequality
5.2 Function of Places
5.2.1 Characteristics of Places
5.2.2 Changes in Places
5.2.3 International Influences on Places
5.2.4 Historic Influences on Places
5.2.5 The Perception of Places
5.2.6 Lived Experience & Attachment
5.3 Regeneration
5.3.1 Migration & Capital
5.3.2 Success & Regeneration
5.3.3 Tensions & Conflict in Communities
5.3.4 Regeneration in the UK
5.3.5 Local Government Policies
5.3.6 Regeneration Strategies
5.3.7 Measuring Regeneration Success
5.4 Regeneration Case Studies
5.4.1 Stratford
5.4.2 Salford Quays
5.4.3 Croyde
6 Option 4B: Diverse Places
6.1 Population Structure
6.1.1 The UK
6.1.2 Population Characteristics
6.1.3 Government & Change
6.2 Past & Present Connections
6.2.1 International Influence on Places
6.2.2 Historic Influences on Places
6.2.3 The Perception of Places
6.2.4 Image & Identity
6.3 Urban & Rural Spaces
6.3.1 Perceptions of Urban Places
6.3.2 Perceptions of Rural Places
6.3.3 Evaluating Living Space
6.4 Diversity
6.4.1 UK Migrations
6.4.2 Challenges
6.4.3 Tensions & Conflict
6.4.4 Wider Outcomes of Tensions
6.4.5 Managing Tensions
6.5 Urban & Rural Case Studies
6.5.1 Stakeholders
6.6 Case Study - Tower Hamlets
6.6.1 Background
6.6.2 Characteristics
6.6.3 Issues
6.7 Case Study - Sturton-le-Steeple
6.7.1 Background
6.7.2 Characteristics
6.7.3 Issues
7 The Water Cycle & Water Insecurity (A2 only)
7.1 Hydrological Processes Global to Local
7.1.1 Global Hydrological Cycle
7.1.2 Drainage Basin Hydrological Cycle
7.1.3 Water Budgets
7.1.4 River Regimes
7.1.5 Storm Hydrographs
7.2 Influences on the Water Cycle
7.2.1 Causes of Drought
7.2.2 Impacts of Drought
7.2.3 Causes of Flooding
7.2.4 Impacts of Flooding
7.2.5 Climate Change & The Water Cycle
7.2.6 Impacts of Climate Change
7.2.7 End of Topic Test - The Water Cycle
7.3 Water Insecurity
7.3.1 Water Stress
7.3.2 Causes of Water Insecurity
7.3.3 Water Insecurity Risk
7.3.4 Conflict Over Water
7.4 Water Supply Management
7.4.1 Hard Engineering Schemes
7.4.2 Sustainable Management
7.4.3 Water Treaties & Framework
7.4.4 End of Topic Test - Water Insecurity & Management
8 The Carbon Cycle & Energy Security (A2 only)
8.1 The Carbon Cycle
8.1.1 Carbon Stores
8.1.2 Carbon Stores 2
8.1.3 Biological Carbon
8.1.4 Atmospheric Carbon
8.1.5 Burning Fossil Fuels
8.2 Energy Consumption
8.2.1 Consumption
8.2.2 Access to Energy
8.2.3 Energy Players
8.2.4 Supply & Demand
8.2.5 Pathways
8.2.6 End of Topic Test - Carbon & Consumption
8.3 Alternative Energy
8.3.1 Unconventional Fuels
8.3.2 Non-Fossil Fuels
8.3.3 Non-Fossil Fuels 2
8.4 Growing Demand for Resources
8.4.1 Deforestation
8.4.2 Water
8.4.3 Climate Change
8.5 The Future
8.5.1 Future Uncertainty
8.5.2 Adaptation Strategies
8.5.3 Mitigation Strategies
9 Superpowers (A2 only)
9.1 Superpowers
9.1.1 Introduction to Superpowers
9.1.2 Superpowers - Economic Power & Size
9.1.3 Superpowers - Political & Military Power
9.1.4 Superpowers - Culture, Demography & Resources
9.1.5 Geo-Strategic Location
9.2 Hard & Soft Power
9.2.1 Hard & Soft Power
9.2.2 Emerging Powers - China Rivalry
9.2.3 Emerging Powers - Chinese Sources of Power
9.2.4 Emerging Powers - Brazil
9.2.5 Emerging Powers - Russia
9.2.6 Emerging Powers - India
9.2.7 Theories of Development
9.2.8 Power Case Studies: Chinese One Belt One Road
9.2.9 Power Case Studies: Pakistan Nuclear Arms
9.2.10 Power Case Studies: OPEC
9.3 IGOs, TNCs & Alliances
9.3.1 Superpowers & IGOs
9.3.2 Superpowers & TNCs
9.3.3 Superpowers & Global Action
9.3.4 Superpowers & Alliances
9.3.5 Superpowers & the Environment
9.4 Changing Global Influence
9.4.1 Recent Tensions between Powers
9.4.2 China in Africa & Asia
9.4.3 Tensions in the Middle East
9.4.4 Economic Problems for Superpowers
9.4.5 Future Pattern of Power
10 Option 8A: Health & Human Rights (A2 only)
10.1 Human Development
10.1.1 Measuring Development
10.1.2 Factors Improving Development
10.1.3 Variations in Health
10.2 Role of Governments & IGOs
10.2.1 Targets & Attitudes
10.2.2 Financial IGOs
10.2.3 The United Nations (UN)
10.2.4 The UN's MDGs & SDGs
10.3 Human Rights
10.3.1 Human Rights
10.3.2 Differences Between Countries
10.3.3 Transitions to Democracy
10.3.4 Differences Within Countries
10.3.5 The Demand for Equality
10.4 Interventions
10.4.1 Geopolitical Interventions
10.4.2 International Intervention Players
10.4.3 Evaluating Geopolitical Intervention
10.4.4 Military Interventions
10.4.5 Evaluating Military Interventions
10.5 Development Aid
10.5.1 Forms
10.5.2 Successes
10.5.3 Criticisms
10.5.4 Development Aid & the Environment
10.5.5 Evaluating Development Aid
10.5.6 Economic Inequalities
11 Option 8B: Migration & Identity (A2 only)
11.1 Globalisation & Migration
11.1.1 Intro to Migration
11.1.2 Trends in Migration
11.1.3 Common Migration Patterns
11.1.4 Causes of Migration
11.1.5 Restrictions on Migration
11.2 Consequences of Migration
11.2.1 Intro to Culture
11.2.2 Social & Demographic Tensions of Migration
11.2.3 Political & Economic Tensions of Migration
11.3 Nation States
11.3.1 Intro to Nation States
11.3.2 Borders
11.3.3 Nationalism
11.4 Responses to Global Migration
11.4.1 Responses to Global Migration
11.4.2 Global Organisations
11.4.3 IGOs and World Trade
11.4.4 Financial IGOs
11.4.5 Environmental IGOs
11.5 Sovereignty & Identity
11.5.1 Sovereignty & Nationalism
11.5.2 Complex Identities
11.5.3 Challenges to National Identities
11.5.4 Tensions within Nations
11.5.5 Failed States
Jump to other topics
Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring
Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home
Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs
30+ school subjects covered
Development & Governance
Gorkha Earthquake
- High School
- You don't have any recent items yet.
- You don't have any modules yet.
- You don't have any books yet.
- You don't have any Studylists yet.
- Information
CASE Study Tohoku, Japan 2011
Physical geography, sixth form (a levels), high school - united kingdom, recommended for you, students also viewed.
- Coastal Erosion Case Studies
- Morpeth case study
- Victoria australia wildfire case study
- Sundarbans case study pdf
- Philippines multi hazard case study
- Amazon vs Tundra comparison table
Related documents
- Integrated Coastal Zone Management along the Odisha Coast
- Trends in Natural Disasters
- Lyme Regis Case Study
- Hazards case studies
- Indian Ocean Tsunami Case Study Outline WITH Answers
- Hazardous Environments pdf
Related Studylists
Preview text, tohoku, japan 2011.
● 11 March 2011 ● Magnitude of 9 earthquake ● Earthquake lasted for 6 minutes
Factors leading to the disaster
Physical human.
Epicentre was 12km East of Sendai Most of the community were living in disaster prone areas (coastline)
Focus was 25km below the Pacific Ocean
The economy was in a long-term economic stagnation (GDP/Capita → US$ 48,168)
Depth was 30km
Occurred 70km off the coast of the northern island of Honshu where the Pacific and North American tectonic plates meet
Planning & Preparation made BEFORE the disaster:
● Strident building regulation → prevented major damage in Tokyo ● Automatic Warning System triggered on the TV & mobile phones → gave people time to shelter ● Warning sirens of Tsunami → people could reach higher groups ● 10m seawalls on Japan’s coastline → prevents tsunami but it wasn't strong enough ● Regular EQ drills → knew how to protect themselves
Impacts of the Earthquakes
SOCIAL ECONOMICAL ENVIRONMENTAL
● 15,853 died ● 5,894 injured
● damage cost of US$30bn
● 400km of the coastline
● 3,375 missing ● 452,000 made homeless ● 100k children were separated from their families as when the earthquake struck the children were at school ● more than 333k had to live in temporary accommodation ● 300k buildings destroyed ● 4000 roads, 78 bridges, 29 railways affected ● Nuclear power plants - 200k evacuated
● Between Jan-March 2011, GDP shrank by 3% ● Important infrastructure destroyed → ports destroyed ● The agriculture region was devastated (3-4% of rice production) ● 5-10% value wiped of Japanese stock markers
dropped vertically by 0 ● led to tsunamis and flooding ● land fell from coastal areas ● plates shifted
IMMEDIATE LONG-TERM
● slow response by the Japanese Gov ● 70k temporary homes for 300k people ● 50k personnel from Japan's self-defence force, safety agencies and national police were mobilised ● Many countries such as the UK sent search and rescue teams to help search for survivors. ● NGOs and other Aid agencies helped too, with the Japanese Red Cross reporting $1 billion in donations ● aircraft surveyed devastation and identified priority areas for emergency aid
● higher tsunami barrier built ● took 11 months to establish a reconstruction agency in comparison to the other HIC countries ● after 6 days, a motorway was repaired ● in Nov 2011, 96% electric supply was restored, 98% water supply, 99% landline network ● Reconstruction Design Council - approx 4190bn ● special zones to attract investment and promote employment ● reconstruction of buildings - take into account the ageing population
- Multiple Choice
Subject : Physical Geography
This is a preview.
Access to all documents
Get Unlimited Downloads
Improve your grades
Get 30 days of free Premium
Share your documents to unlock
Why is this page out of focus?
- 0 Shopping Cart £ 0.00 -->
Japan Earthquake 2011
Japan earthquake 2011 case study.
An earthquake measuring 9.0 on the Richter Scale struck off Japan’s northeast coast, about 250 miles (400km) from Tokyo at a depth of 20 miles.
The magnitude 9.0 earthquake happened at 2:46 pm (local time) on Friday, March 11, 2011.
The earthquake occurred 250 miles off the North East Coast of Japan’s main island Honshu.
Japan 2011 Earthquake map
Japan is located on the eastern edge of the Eurasian Plate. The Eurasian plate, which is continental, is subducted by the Pacific Plate, an oceanic plate forming a subduction zone to the east of Japan. This type of plate margin is known as a destructive plate margin . The process of subduction is not smooth. Friction causes the Pacific Plate to stick. Pressure builds and is released as an earthquake.
Friction has built up over time, and when released, this caused a massive ‘megathrust’ earthquake.
The amount of energy released in this single earthquake was 600 million times the energy of the Hiroshima nuclear bomb.
Scientists drilled into the subduction zone soon after the earthquake and discovered a thin, slippery clay layer lining the fault. The researchers think this clay layer allowed the two plates to slide an incredible distance, some 164 feet (50 metres), facilitating the enormous earthquake and tsunami .
2011 Japan Earthquake Map
The earthquake occurred at a relatively shallow depth of 20 miles below the surface of the Pacific Ocean. This, combined with the high magnitude, caused a tsunami (find out more about how a tsunami is formed on the BBC website).
Areas affected by the 2011 Japanese earthquake.
What were the primary effects of the 2011 Japan earthquake?
Impacts on people
Death and injury – Some 15,894 people died, and 26,152 people were injured. 130,927 people were displaced, and 2,562 remain missing.
Damage – 332,395 buildings, 2,126 roads, 56 bridges and 26 railways were destroyed or damaged. 300 hospitals were damaged, and 11 were destroyed.
Blackouts – Over 4.4 million households were left without electricity in North-East Japan.
Transport – Japan’s transport network suffered huge disruptions.
Impacts on the environment
Landfall – some coastal areas experienced land subsidence as the earthquake dropped the beachfront in some places by more than 50 cm.
Land movement – due to tectonic shift, the quake moved parts of North East Japan 2.4 m closer to North America.
Plate shifts – It has been estimated by geologists that the Pacific plate has slipped westwards by between 20 and 40 m.
Seabed shift – The seabed near the epicentre shifted by 24 m, and the seabed off the coast of the Miyagi province has moved by 3 m.
Earth axis moves – The earthquake moved the earth’s axis between 10 and 25 cm, shortening the day by 1.8 microseconds.
Liquefaction occurred in many of the parts of Tokyo built on reclaimed land. 1,046 buildings were damaged
What were the secondary effects of the 2011 Japan earthquake?
Economy – The earthquake was the most expensive natural disaster in history, with an economic cost of US$235 billion.
Tsunami – Waves up to 40 m in high devastated entire coastal areas and resulted in the loss of thousands of lives. This caused a lot of damage and pollution up to 6 miles inland. The tsunami warnings in coastal areas were only followed by 58% who headed for higher ground. The wave hit 49% of those not following the warning.
Nuclear power – Seven reactors at the Fukushima nuclear power station experienced a meltdown. Levels of radiation were over eight times the normal levels.
Transport – Rural areas remained isolated for a long time because the tsunami destroyed major roads and local trains and buses. Sections of the Tohoku Expressway were damaged. Railway lines were damaged, and some trains were derailed.
Aftermath – The ‘Japan move forward committee’ thought that young adults and teenagers could help rebuild parts of Japan devastated by the earthquake.
Coastal changes – The tsunami was able to travel further inland due to a 250-mile stretch of coastline dropping by 0.6 m.
What were the immediate responses to the Japan 2011 earthquake?
- The Japan Meteorological Agency issued tsunami warnings three minutes after the earthquake.
- Scientists had been able to predict where the tsunami would hit after the earthquake using modelling and forecasting technology so that responses could be directed to the appropriate areas.
- Rescue workers and around 100,000 members of the Japan Self-Defence Force were dispatched to help with search and rescue operations within hours of the tsunami hitting the coast.
- Although many search and rescue teams focused on recovering bodies washing up on shore following the tsunami, some people were rescued from under the rubble with the help of sniffer dogs.
- The government declared a 20 km evacuation zone around the Fukushima nuclear power plant to reduce the threat of radiation exposure to local residents.
- Japan received international help from the US military, and search and rescue teams were sent from New Zealand, India, South Korea, China and Australia.
- Access to the affected areas was restricted because many were covered in debris and mud following the tsunami, so it was difficult to provide immediate support in some areas.
- Hundreds of thousands of people who had lost their homes were evacuated to temporary shelters in schools and other public buildings or relocated to other areas.
- Many evacuees came from the exclusion zone surrounding the Fukushima nuclear power plant. After the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear meltdown, those in the area had their radiation levels checked, and their health monitored to ensure they did not receive dangerous exposure to radiation. Many evacuated from the area around the nuclear power plant were given iodine tablets to reduce the risk of radiation poisoning.
What were the long-term responses to the Japan 2011 earthquake?
- In April 2011, one month after the event occurred, the central government established the Reconstruction Policy Council to develop a national recovery and reconstruction outlook for tsunami-resilient communities. The Japanese government has approved a budget of 23 trillion yen (approximately £190 billion) to be spent over ten years. Central to the New Growth Strategy is creating a ‘Special Zones for Reconstruction’ system. These aim to provide incentives to attract investment, both in terms of business and reconstruction, into the Tohoku region.
- Also, the central government decided on a coastal protection policy, such as seawalls and breakwaters which would be designed to ensure their performance to a potential tsunami level of up to the approximately 150-year recurrence interval.
- In December 2011, the central government enacted the ‘Act on the Development of Tsunami-resilient Communities’. According to the principle that ‘Human life is most important, this law promotes the development of tsunami-resistant communities based on the concept of multiple defences, which combines infrastructure development and other measures targeting the largest class tsunami.
- Japan’s economic growth after the Second World War was the world’s envy. However, over the last 20 years, the economy has stagnated and been in and out of recession. The 11 March earthquake wiped 5–10% off the value of Japanese stock markets, and there has been global concern over Japan’s ability to recover from the disaster. The priority for Japan’s long-term response is to rebuild the infrastructure in the affected regions and restore and improve the economy’s health as a whole.
- By the 24th of March 2011, 375 km of the Tohoku Expressway (which links the region to Tokyo) was repaired and reopened.
- The runway at Sendai Airport had been badly damaged. However, it was restored and reusable by the 29th of March due to a joint effort by the Japanese Defence Force and the US Army.
- Other important areas of reconstruction include the energy, water supply and telecommunications infrastructure. As of November 2011, 96% of the electricity supply had been restored, 98% of the water supply and 99% of the landline network.
Why do people live in high-risk areas in Japan?
There are several reasons why people live in areas of Japan at risk of tectonic hazards:
- They have lived there all their lives, are close to family and friends and have an attachment to the area.
- The northeast has fertile farmland and rich fishing waters.
- There are good services, schools and hospitals.
- 75% of Japan is mountainous and flat land is mainly found in coastal areas, which puts pressure on living space.
- They are confident about their safety due to the protective measures that have been taken, such as the construction of tsunami walls.
Japan’s worst previous earthquake was of 8.3 magnitude and killed 143,000 people in Kanto in 1923. A magnitude 7.2 quake in Kobe killed 6,400 people in 1995 .
Premium Resources
Please support internet geography.
If you've found the resources on this page useful please consider making a secure donation via PayPal to support the development of the site. The site is self-funded and your support is really appreciated.
Related Topics
Use the images below to explore related GeoTopics.
Previous Topic Page
Topic home, next topic page, share this:.
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
- Click to print (Opens in new window)
If you've found the resources on this site useful please consider making a secure donation via PayPal to support the development of the site. The site is self-funded and your support is really appreciated.
Search Internet Geography
Latest Blog Entries
Pin It on Pinterest
- Click to share
- Print Friendly
Skip to content
Get Revising
Join get revising, already a member.
japan 2011 tsunami and earthquake case study
- Created by: james baring
- Created on: 01-06-12 12:41
Quick Facts
Date: 11th March 2011.
Location: North east coast of Japan (250 miles from Tokyo). M.E.D.C
Tsunami Location: Sendai.
Magnitude:8.9 and lasted 6 minutes.
Aftershocks: at least 124 greater than 5 magnitude.
Death toll: 18,000
Economic damage: $250 billion to $309 billion
Physical Cause: Thrust faulting on or near the subduction zone- The Ocean Pacific Plate subducted the Eurasian Plate.
Physical Impacts
- Tsunami reached 6 miles inland
- Nuclear explosion at the Fukishima power plant damaged by floods
- Fires in the capital and oil refinery ablaze near Tokyo.
- Natural hazards
Report Sun 3rd June, 2012 @ 18:15
merci :-))))
Report Fri 28th December, 2012 @ 17:37
this is gr8 help, thanks :)
Report Fri 28th December, 2012 @ 17:45
btw people injured is primary not a secondary impact
Report Mon 2nd November, 2020 @ 21:22
Liked the sheet but disappointed that the title lacked capital letters in the correct places.
Similar Geography resources:
Geography Revision 3.0 / 5 based on 2 ratings
Case study: Japan tsunami 2011: Completed 5.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
Revision page on Earthquake 0.0 / 5
learning checklist 4.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
case study- the Tohoku Tsunami, japan 5.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
Tectonic Plate 0.0 / 5
Geography Case Study - Restless Earth 4.5 / 5 based on 2 ratings
restless earth 0.0 / 5
GCSE Geography- Unit 1A- The restless Earth 1.5 / 5 based on 3 ratings
Earthquakes 2.0 / 5 based on 1 rating
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Movements along these plate boundaries also present the risk of tsunamis to the island nation. The Pacific Coastal zone, on the east coast of Japan, is particularly vulnerable as it is very densely populated. The 2011 Japan Earthquake: Tōhoku. Japan experienced one of its largest seismic events on March 11 2011.
Tsunami: A giant tsunami wave resulted in widespread destruction along the coast. Fatalities : Around 16,000 deaths were reported, mainly resulting from the tsunami. Injuries : 26,152 were injured, mainly as a result of the tsunami.
within 2 metres of sea level. The tsunami Powerful as the earthquake's immediate impact was, its overwhelming effect was the creation of a devastating tsunami on Japan's north-east coast. A six metre upward surge of the seabed at the epicentre set up a wave that travelled at 800 km/h across the Pacific and westwards to Japan.
A Level. A Level Biology Revision; A Level Chemistry Revision; A Level Physics Revision; A Level Psychology Revision; ... 11.4.2 Case Study: Japan 2010 Tsunami. 11.5 Managing the Risk of Volcanoes & Earthquakes. 11.5.1 Coping With Earthquakes & Volcanoes. 11.5.2 End of Topic Test - Tectonics.
In March 2011, there was an earthquake and tsunami in Tohoku, Japan. This is an example of a developed country experiencing a disaster. ... Revision GCSE Physics Revision GCSE Geography Revision GCSE English Language Revision GCSE Computer Science Revision. A Level. ... 6.6 Case Study - Tower Hamlets. 6.6.1 Background. 6.6.2 Characteristics. 6. ...
Edexcel A-Level Geography Year 1 | Physical Geography | topic: Tectonic Processes and Hazards | CASE STUDY: Japan 2011 Earthquake tohoku, japan 2011 11 march ... gave people time to shelter Warning sirens of Tsunami → people could reach higher groups 10m seawalls on Japan's coastline → prevents tsunami but it wasn't strong enough Regular ...
What were the primary effects of the 2011 Japan earthquake? Impacts on people. Death and injury - Some 15,894 people died, and 26,152 people were injured. 130,927 people were displaced, and 2,562 remain missing.. Damage - 332,395 buildings, 2,126 roads, 56 bridges and 26 railways were destroyed or damaged. 300 hospitals were damaged, and 11 were destroyed.
A Level & IB; University; Study planner; Past papers; For teachers; Home > GCSE > Geography > japan 2011 tsunami and earthquake case study. japan 2011 tsunami and earthquake case study. 4.0 / 5 based on 13 ratings? Created by: james baring; Created on: 01-06-12 12:41; Fullscreen. Quick Facts. Date: 11th March 2011.
Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like What Was The Cause Of The Tohoku Tsunami?, What Were The Social Risks Of The Tohoku Tsunami?, What Were The Economic Risks Of The Tohoku Tsunami? and more.
Japan earthquake and nuclear crisis case study (MEDC) Learn with flashcards, games and more — for free. Scheduled maintenance: June 20, 2024 from 09:30 PM to 11:30 PM hello quizlet