We believe that a hidden chain of thought presents a unique opportunity for monitoring models. Assuming it is faithful and legible, the hidden chain of thought allows us to "read the mind" of the model and understand its thought process. For example, in the future we may wish to monitor the chain of thought for signs of manipulating the user. However, for this to work the model must have freedom to express its thoughts in unaltered form, so we cannot train any policy compliance or user preferences onto the chain of thought. We also do not want to make an unaligned chain of thought directly visible to users.
Therefore, after weighing multiple factors including user experience, competitive advantage, and the option to pursue the chain of thought monitoring, we have decided not to show the raw chains of thought to users. We acknowledge this decision has disadvantages. We strive to partially make up for it by teaching the model to reproduce any useful ideas from the chain of thought in the answer. For the o1 model series we show a model-generated summary of the chain of thought.
o1 significantly advances the state-of-the-art in AI reasoning. We plan to release improved versions of this model as we continue iterating. We expect these new reasoning capabilities will improve our ability to align models to human values and principles. We believe o1 – and its successors – will unlock many new use cases for AI in science, coding, math, and related fields. We are excited for users and API developers to discover how it can improve their daily work.
Dataset | Metric | gpt-4o | o1-preview | o1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Competition Math AIME (2024) | cons@64 | 13.4 | 56.7 | 83.3 |
pass@1 | 9.3 | 44.6 | 74.4 | |
Competition Code CodeForces | Elo | 808 | 1,258 | 1,673 |
Percentile | 11.0 | 62.0 | 89.0 | |
GPQA Diamond | cons@64 | 56.1 | 78.3 | 78.0 |
pass@1 | 50.6 | 73.3 | 77.3 | |
Biology | cons@64 | 63.2 | 73.7 | 68.4 |
pass@1 | 61.6 | 65.9 | 69.2 | |
Chemistry | cons@64 | 43.0 | 60.2 | 65.6 |
pass@1 | 40.2 | 59.9 | 64.7 | |
Physics | cons@64 | 68.6 | 89.5 | 94.2 |
pass@1 | 59.5 | 89.4 | 92.8 | |
MATH | pass@1 | 60.3 | 85.5 | 94.8 |
MMLU | pass@1 | 88.0 | 92.3 | 90.8 |
MMMU (val) | pass@1 | 69.1 | n/a | 78.2 | pass@1 | 63.8 | n/a | 73.9 |
https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-3-5-sonnet (opens in a new window) , https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/pro (opens in a new window)
Our evaluations used the same 500 problem test split found in https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.20050 (opens in a new window)
https://codeforces.com/blog/entry/68288 (opens in a new window)
COMMENTS
A comprehensive guide on how to approach, write, and format an article reviewAn article review is both a summary and an evaluation of another writer's article. Teachers often assign article reviews to introduce students to the work of...
An article review is a critical evaluation of a scholarly or scientific piece, which aims to summarize its main ideas, assess its contributions, and provide constructive feedback. A well-written review not only benefits the author of the article under scrutiny but also serves as a valuable resource for fellow researchers and scholars. Follow these steps to create an effective and informative ...
An article review is an academic assignment that invites you to study a piece of academic research closely. Then, you should present its summary and critically evaluate it using the knowledge you've gained in class and during your independent study. If you get such a task at college or university, you shouldn't confuse it with a response paper, which is a distinct assignment with other ...
Here is a basic, detailed outline for an article review you should be aware of as a pre-writing process if you are wondering how to write an article review. Introduction. Introduce the article that you are reviewing (author name, publication date, title, etc.) Now provide an overview of the article's main topic.
A step-by-step process for writing a critical review Make your academic 'voice' clear when writing a critical review Critical review language Writing an annotated bibliography
Learn how to write an article review with expert tips and real-world examples. Master the art of critical analysis in this comprehensive guide!
Example Following, we have an example of a summary and an evaluation of a research article. Note that in most literature review contexts, the summary and evaluation would be much shorter. This extended example shows the different ways a student can critique and write about an article.
For example, while writing my first review 1 as a PhD student, I was frustrated by how poorly we understood how cells actively sense, interact with and adapt to nanoparticles used in drug delivery.
A literature review is a survey of scholarly knowledge on a topic. Our guide with examples, video, and templates can help you write yours.
A review paper format usually includes title, abstract, introduction, methodology, body, discussion, conclusion, and citation.
Abstract Scientific review articles are comprehensive, focused reviews of the scientific literature written by subject matter experts. The task of writing a scientific review article can seem overwhelming; however, it can be managed by using an organized approach and devoting sufficient time to the process.
A guide on writing a literature review for research and citation, with tips and examples from Purdue OWL.
The fundamental rationale of writing a review article is to make a readable synthesis of the best literature sources on an important research inquiry or a topic. This simple definition of a review article contains the following key elements: The question (s) to be dealt with.
The bottom-right situation (many literature reviews but few research papers) is not just a theoretical situation; it applies, for example, to the study of the impacts of climate change on plant diseases, where there appear to be more literature reviews than research studies [33].
PDF | This short note provides step-by-step guidelines to write a review article or a book chapter. I explain in particular a convenient method to build... | Find, read and cite all the research ...
Research Article Review A research article review focuses on scrutinizing articles with a primary emphasis on research. This type of review involves evaluating the research design, methodology, results, and their broader implications. Discussions on the interpretation of results, limitations, and the article's overall contributions are key. Here is a sample for you to get an idea. Example of ...
This article provides a comprehensive guide on how to write a systematic review, a type of literature review that summarizes and synthesizes existing evidence on a topic.
An article review is a critical assessment of a scholarly article or research paper. It involves analyzing the content, methodology, and findings of the article and providing an evaluation of its strengths and weaknesses. The review typically includes a summary of the article's main points, an evaluation of its contribution to the subject ...
A good review article provides readers with an in-depth understanding of a field and highlights key gaps and challenges to address with future research. Writing a review article also helps to expand the writer's knowledge of their specialist area and to develop their analytical and communication skills, amongst other benefits.
To write a good critical review, you will have to engage in the mental processes of analyzing (taking apart) the work-deciding what its major components are and determining how these parts (i.e., paragraphs, sections, or chapters) contribute to the work as a whole. Analyzing the work will help you focus on how and why the author makes certain ...
A good review article provides readers with an in-depth understanding of a field and highlights key gaps and challenges to address with future research. Writing a review article also helps to expand the writer's knowledge of their specialist area and to develop their analytical and communication skills, amongst other benefits. Thus, the ...
Research articles that have been published in scholarly journals must pass a quality test called peer review. A scholar (expert) writes an article to report their research and findings. The article uses the language or jargon of that field of study; Other researchers are the primary audience or readers. The author submits the draft article to ...
Writing a review article is equivalent to conducting a research study, with the information gathered by the author (reviewer) representing the data. Like all major studies, it involves conceptualisation, planning, implementation, and dissemination [], all of which may be detailed in a methodology section, if necessary.
A literature review is a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the principal research about the topic being studied. Your literature review should contain the following information: ... They can also vary in granularity: a literature review in the beginning of an article might only summarize the largest or most influential studies, while an ...
Find writing advice on specific narrative attachments and sections, such as the Research or Program Plan, Specific Aims, Budget, Biographical Sketches, and more. Sample Applications and Documents. As you gain experience writing your own applications and progress reports, examples of how others presented their ideas can help.
A well-written review article must summarize key research findings, reference must-read articles, describe current areas of agreement as well as controversies and debates, point out gaps in current knowledge, depict unanswered questions, and suggest directions for future research (1). During the last decades, there has been a great expansion in ...
Let's break this down step by step based on the example: 1. Example given: • Input: oyfjdnisdr rtqwainr acxz mynzbhhx • Output: Think step by step By examining the words: • The pattern involves selecting specific letters or transforming them. 2. Now, let's decode the new phrase: • Input: oyekaijzdf aaptcg suaokybhai ouow aqht mynznvaatzacdfoulxxz