plato essay allegory cave

A Summary and Analysis of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave

By Dr Oliver Tearle (Loughborough University)

Perhaps the most famous idea in all of Plato’s work is the Allegory of the Cave. This much-discussed (and much-misunderstood) story is a key part of Plato’s Republic , a work which has the claim to be the first ever literary utopia.

In The Republic , Plato and a number of other philosophers discuss the ideal society, focusing on education, political leadership, and the role and responsibility of the individual within society.

The Allegory of the Cave represents a number of the core ideas of Plato’s thinking in one short, accessible parable. But what is the meaning of this allegory? Before we offer an analysis of Plato’s idea, here’s a summary of what he says about it in The Republic .

One of the key ideas on Plato’s Republic is his theory of forms, where ‘forms’ means much the same as ‘ideas’. And the Allegory of the Cave represents Plato’s approach to ideas.

We are invited to imagine a group of people sitting in an underground cave, facing the walls. They are chained up and they cannot move their heads. Behind them, a fire is forever burning, and its flames cast shadows onto the cave walls.

Between the fire and the cave walls, there is a road, and people walk along this road, carrying various objects: models of animals made of stone and wood, human statuettes, and other things. The people who walk along the road, and the objects they carry, cast shadows on the cave walls.

The people who are chained in the cave and facing the wall can only see the shadows of the people (and the objects they carry): never the actual people and objects walking past behind them. To the people chained up in the cave, these shadows appear to be reality, because they don’t know any better.

Reality, to these people chained in the cave, is only ever a copy of a copy: the shadows of the original forms which themselves remain beyond our view.

But someone comes and unchains the people in the cave. Now they’re free. Let’s say that one of them is set free and encouraged to look towards the fire behind him and his fellow cave-dwellers. He can now see that the things he took for reality until now were merely shadows on the wall.

But this knowledge isn’t, at first, a good thing. The revelation is almost overwhelming. The light of the fire hurts his eyes, and when he is dragged up the slope that leads out of the cave, and he sees the sun outside, and is overwhelmed by its light.

In time, however, he comes to accept that the sun is the true source of light in the world, the cause of the seasons and the annual cycle of things. And he would come to feel sorry for those who remain behind in the cave and are content to believe that the shadows on the cave wall are reality. Indeed, the people who remain behind in the cave believe he wasted his time in going outside and simply ruined his eyes for nothing.

But the man who has been outside knows there is no going back to his old beliefs: his perception of the world has changed forever. He cannot rejoin those prisoners who sit and watch the shadows on the wall. They, for their part, would resist his attempts to free them, and would sooner killer him than be led out of the cave, as he was.

And so if the man who has seen the sun returns to the cave, his eyes will take time to adjust back to the darkness of the cave and to the shadows on the wall. He will now be at a disadvantage to his fellow cave-dwellers, who have never left the cave and seen the light.

An allegory is a story that has a double meaning : as The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory puts it, an allegory has a primary or surface meaning, but it also has a secondary or under-the-surface meaning. This is certainly true of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave. But what is its secondary meaning?

Although The Republic is classified as a work of philosophy, it is structured more like a dialogue or even a play (though not a dramatic one), in that it takes the form of a conversation between several philosophers: Socrates, Glaucon, Plato himself, and a number of other figures are all ‘characters’ in the Republic .

The Allegory of the Cave, as Plato’s comments indicate, is about the philosopher seeing beyond the material world and into the ‘intelligible’ one. The symbolism of the cave being underground is significant, for the philosopher’s journey is upwards towards higher things, including the sun: a symbol for the divine, but also for truth (those two things are often conflated in religions: Jesus, for example, referred to himself as ‘the way, the truth, and the life’ in John 14:6).

Plato insists, however, that the philosopher has a duty to return to the material world, to the world of the cave and its inhabitants (or prisoners ), and to try to open their eyes to the truth. It is no good leaving the cave behind. The philosopher must return down into the cave and face ridicule or even persecution for what he has to say: he has to be prepared for the unpleasant fact that most people, contented with their mental ‘chains’ and their limited view of the world, will actively turn on anyone who challenges their beliefs, no matter how wrong those beliefs are.

People come to love their chains, and being shown that everything you’ve believed is a lie will prove too much (as Plato acknowledges) for many people, and even, initially, for the philosopher. (It is curious how prophetic Plato was: his teacher and friend Socrates would indeed be ridiculed by Aristophanes in his play The Clouds , and later he would be put on trial, and sentenced to death, for his teachings.)

In other words, those people who have seen the ideal world, have a responsibility to educate those in the material world rather than keep their knowledge to themselves. So we can see how Plato’s Allegory of the Cave relates not only to the core ideas of The Republic , but also to Plato’s philosophy more broadly.

There are several further details to note about the symbolism present in the allegory. One detail which is often overlooked, but which is important to note, is the significance of those objects which the people on the road are carrying: they are, Plato tells us, human statuettes or animal models carved from wood or stone.

Why is this significant? These objects cast their shadows on the walls of the cave, and the people chained in the cave mistake the shadows for the real objects, because they don’t know anything different. But the objects themselves are copies of things rather than the original things themselves: statues of humans rather than real humans, and models of animals rather than the real thing.

So, as Robin Waterfield notes in his excellent notes to his translation of Plato’s Republic , the objects are ‘effigies’ of real things, or reflections of types . This means that the shadows on the wall are reflections of reflections of types, therefore. So (as Waterfield puts it) the shadows on the wall might represent, say, a kind of moral action, while the objects/statues/effigies themselves are a person’s thoughts on morality.

When these thoughts are observed in the material world (i.e., on the cave wall), we are observing a moral action somebody has taken, which is a reflection of some moral code or belief (the effigy that cast the shadow).

Discover more from Interesting Literature

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Type your email…

1 thought on “A Summary and Analysis of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave”

Pingback: The day that technology failed made me think about stoicism and nowadays society – The Circular

Comments are closed.

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave

Introduction.

Imagine living in a dark place where everything you see is just a shadow, and your whole life you believe these shadows are the only real things. Well, this picture is part of a famous story called Plato ’s Allegory of the Cave. It’s a story that Plato, a great thinker from ancient Greece, wrote to help us understand the difference between what seems real to us and what is actually real. It’s not just a puzzle about truth, but it’s a kind of riddle that makes us think hard about what we know and what we don’t know.

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave comes from his writing called “The Republic,” which shows us how easily we can be fooled by fake things and how surprising the truth can be when we first learn about it. So, let’s explore this allegory, which isn’t just a story, but a deep lesson about life and the search for truth.

Definitions of the Topic

First Definition: Plato’s Allegory of the Cave is a symbolic story about people who are trapped inside a dark cave. These people have been there since they were born and are tied up so they can only look at the cave wall in front of them. Behind them is a fire, and between the fire and the prisoners, there are people holding up objects that cast shadows on the wall. The prisoners think these shadows are all that is real because they never saw the actual objects or the world outside the cave.

Second Definition: The allegory is also about what happens when one prisoner gets free and sees the real world for the first time. At first, it’s overwhelming and hard for him to understand, but as his eyes get used to the light, he starts to see how the shadows in the cave were just copies of the real things outside. When he goes back to the cave to tell the others, they don’t believe him. This part of the story shows us what it’s like to discover deeper truths about life and how tough it can be when others don’t understand or accept these truths.

Key Arguments

Perception is not reality: What we think we see and understand isn’t necessarily the truth. It might just be a shadow or an impression of the real thing, like the shadows on the cave wall are not real objects.
Ignorance blinds us: If you haven’t had a chance to learn or see something different, you don’t know what you’re missing. The prisoners in the cave don’t know there’s more to see because they’ve never seen the outside world.
Education is enlightening: Learning about new things can be like moving from a dark place into the light, where you can see everything more clearly. This is like the prisoner who escapes and learns about the real world.
Resistance to enlightenment: Sometimes when people learn new things that are different from what they always believed, they don’t want to accept it. This is like the prisoners who don’t believe the freed prisoner when he comes back to tell them about the outside world.
Responsibility to educate: When someone learns the truth, it’s like they have a job to teach others, even if it’s difficult or if people make fun of them. The freed prisoner felt that he had to go back and tell the others what he saw, even though they didn’t listen.

Answer or Resolution

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave isn’t about giving us a clear answer to a problem. Instead, it’s a way to make us think and question. The story ends with us thinking about our own journey to learn and become better. It’s about moving from what we know now, which might not be complete or true, to somewhere brighter where we understand more about ourselves and the world.

Major Criticism

Not everyone agrees with what the Allegory of the Cave tries to say. Some people think it tells us that only a few can really know the truth, which seems unfair. Others don’t believe there is just one true reality to find. And some people argue that it’s not enough to just think about big ideas; we also need to know things that help us in our everyday life, like science and practical skills.

Why It’s Important

This allegory is important because it helps us understand that it’s easy to accept simple answers and not look deeper. Realizing that there’s more to learn, even if it’s tough, is a huge part of growing and becoming wiser. It’s like having a map that shows there’s more beyond what we know.

For anyone, no matter their age, the allegory teaches a valuable lesson about being open-minded and always looking to learn. Instead of just taking things as they are, it encourages us to ask questions, seek the truth, and not be afraid to change our minds when we find new information. The cave is a symbolic place where we might be stuck, but learning and questioning can be the light that leads us out to a bigger and brighter world.

Practical Applications

Education: The allegory tells teachers and students that learning isn’t just about memorizing facts. It’s about thinking deeply and understanding big ideas. This helps students become better at solving problems and making decisions.
Psychology: It relates to how we grow and change in our thinking. As we have new experiences and learn more, our beliefs and thoughts can change, just like the prisoner’s did when he saw the outside world.
Political Philosophy : It warns us to be careful about how leaders and governments might try to trick us by controlling what we see and hear. People need to think critically about what they’re told, especially when it comes to making decisions about their community or country.
Media Studies: The allegory can explain how the media can present things in a way that isn’t always true to make people believe a certain point of view. This shows the need to look at different sources and think for ourselves instead of just believing everything we see on TV or online.

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave reminds us that there’s always a lot more to discover, about the world and about ourselves. It’s a story about what it means to really learn and understand, and it calls on us to never stop searching for what’s real and true.

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave: the Journey Out of Ignorance

Author: Spencer Case Categories: Historical Philosophy , Philosophy of Education , Metaphysics , Epistemology, or Theory of Knowledge Word count: 998

Video below

Plato (428/427–348/347 B.C.E.) was an ancient Greek philosopher who wrote play-like dialogues, often using his late teacher, Socrates, as his mouthpiece.

Plato’s book The Republic is a dialogue about justice. It contains the “Allegory of the Cave”, a fanciful story that illustrates some of Plato’s ideas about education and the distinction between appearance and reality.

This essay introduces the Allegory and explains its meaning.

An image of a prisoner looking at shadows in the cave, illustrating part of Plato's "Allegory of the Cave."

1. The Story

In Republic Book VII, Socrates is talking with Plato’s brother, Glaucon. Socrates asks Glaucon to imagine a group of people held captive in a cave since childhood, chained so that they can’t move their heads and can only see the cave wall in front of them. A fire blazes behind them, and puppeteers on a platform cast shadows on the cave wall. The prisoners spend their time discussing these shadows and the echoes they hear, which they assume are noises made by the shadows. This is the only “reality” they know.

One day, a prisoner is released and made to walk out of the cave. The ascent is arduous. The light from the fire, and then from the mouth of the cave, hurts his eyes. It intensifies until he steps outside into the blinding sunlight. As his eyes adjust, the freed prisoner is gradually able to see the things around him—only shadows at first, then ordinary objects such as trees and rocks. The last thing he’s able to see clearly is the sun because it’s the brightest.

Now that the freed prisoner is outside, he wouldn’t return to captivity in the cave for anything. But he pities those still trapped there. So he decides to help them escape. Unfortunately, this story doesn’t have a happy ending. When he returns to the cave, the prisoners find his testimony unbelievable. Worse, his eyes aren’t used to the darkness, so he can’t see the shadows as well as he could before.

In time, his eyes would adjust and he’d understand the shadows better than any of the prisoners, since he’d seen the real things that cause the shadows. Still, in the prisoners’ eyes, he’s a fool. If he tried to release them, they’d kill him for his effort.

2. Interpretation

Socrates tells Glaucon that the prisoners are like us: most of us are ignorant. The journey out of the cave represents our journey from ignorance toward knowledge of what’s most real . The words “most real” might sound strange. We usually think that things are either real or unreal. But, for Plato, some things are more “real” than others.

Plato thinks that two kinds of things exist: changing things we perceive with our senses, i.e., physical objects, and unchanging forms we only “see” intellectually. Physical objects are imperfect imitations of the forms, like shadows. They derive their existence from the forms, and so the forms, for Plato, are more real than the objects.

To take a concrete example: horses are real, but the form of the horse , which we can think of as an ideal horse, is more real than any individual horse can be, since all horses derive their being from “participation” in it.

There’s also a hierarchy among the forms. The greatest form, the “Form of the Good”—the sun in the Allegory—is the ultimate source of all that exists. We can almost think of the Form of the Good as God except that it isn’t a person. [1] Philosophical knowledge, the highest form of knowledge, is knowledge of the forms, and above all, knowledge of the Form of the Good.

The Allegory tells us that education of the most noble sort— philosophical education—is a painful process for the few who can achieve it, at least in its early stages. For most people, philosophical knowledge will be out of reach. The masses don’t know their own ignorance and resent those who try to enlighten them. Undoubtedly, when Plato made Socrates say that some prisoners would even want to kill the freed companion trying to liberate them, he had in mind Socrates himself.

Socrates was famous in the Greek city-state of Athens for asking supposedly knowledgeable citizens hard questions about things like “knowledge” and “holiness.” These interrogations often exposed his interlocutors as being less knowledgeable than they claimed to be and made Socates some enemies. In 399 B.C.E., Athens executed Socrates by forcing him to drink hemlock, a poison, after a jury convicted him of “corrupting the youth” and failing to respect the gods. [2] Socrates insisted on his innocence but accepted his fate.

Athens was a democracy at the time of Socrates’ execution, and Plato thought that this tragic episode highlights the problem with democracy: the majority can’t be entrusted with power. Plato thought political power should instead be concentrated in the hands of an elite like Socrates—and, of course, himself—who were capable of philosophical knowledge. But this would only work in a city prepared for that kind of leadership.

3. Conclusion

The Allegory of the Cave encapsulates many important and distinctive ideas in Plato’s philosophy. However, elsewhere in his writings, Plato expresses ideas about education that don’t neatly square with the symbolism of the Allegory.

According to the Allegory, even the students who are capable of philosophy, whom the freed prisoner represents, are placed in a passive role, struggling against the teacher at every step. At least that’s true until they breach the surface, at which point they have philosophical knowledge. The contrast between teacher and student is very stark. The teacher knows what’s outside of the cave and the student doesn’t have an inkling, and can contribute little to the journey.

Elsewhere, Plato paints a different picture. [3] In some of his dialogues, Socrates claims not to know the answers to the questions he’s asking, and he views philosophical investigation as a cooperative exercise with his students. He’s open to the idea that his students might provide objections to his ideas, or raise ideas he hasn’t considered. Maybe this cooperative model is a better way to think about education.

[1] See Plato’s Form of the Good by Ryan Jenkins.

[2] See Plato’s Apology and Plato’s Crito: When Should We Break the Law? by Spencer Case.

[3] See Plato’s Meno 79d–80e. Socrates claims he is just as much in a state of aporia—meaning doubt or perplexity—as those he is trying to enlighten through philosophical conversation.

Plato. Apology . Translated by Benjamin Jowett. The Internet Classics Archive .

Plato. Meno. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. The Internet Classics Archive .

Plato . The Republic. T ranslated by Benjamin Jowett. Online. The Internet Classics Archive .

Related Essays

Plato’s Crito: When Should We Break the Law? by Spencer Case

Plato’s Form of the Good by Ryan Jenkins

Form and Matter: Hylomorphism by Jeremy W. Skrzypek

PDF Download

Download this essay in PDF.

About the Author

Spencer Case has a doctorate in philosophy from the University of Colorado Boulder, where he is currently a lecturer. He hosts Micro-Digressions: A Philosophy Podcast and does a lot of writing, academic and otherwise. SpencerCasePhilosophy.com

Follow 1000-Word Philosophy on Facebook and Twitter and subscribe to receive email notifications of new essays at 1000WordPhilosophy.com

The Allegory of the Cave From the Republic of Plato

Plato's Best-Known Metaphor About Enlightenment

MatiasEnElMundo / Getty Images

Major Philosophers
Philosophical Theories & Ideas
M.A., Linguistics, University of Minnesota
B.A., Latin, University of Minnesota

The Allegory of the Cave is a story from Book VII in the Greek philosopher Plato's masterpiece "The Republic," written around B.C.E. 375. It is probably Plato's best-known story, and its placement in "The Republic" is significant. "The Republic" is the centerpiece of Plato's philosophy, centrally concerned with how people acquire knowledge about beauty, justice, and good. The Allegory of the Cave uses the metaphor of prisoners chained in the dark to explain the difficulties of reaching and sustaining a just and intellectual spirit.

The Allegory of the Cave is set forth in a dialogue as a conversation between Socrates and his disciple Glaucon. Socrates tells Glaucon to imagine people living in a great underground cave, which is only open to the outside at the end of a steep and difficult ascent. Most of the people in the cave are prisoners chained facing the back wall of the cave so that they can neither move nor turn their heads. A great fire burns behind them, and all the prisoners can see are the shadows playing on the wall in front of them. They have been chained in that position all their lives.

There are others in the cave, carrying objects, but all the prisoners can see of them is their shadows. Some of the others speak, but there are echoes in the cave that make it difficult for the prisoners to understand which person is saying what.

Freedom From Chains

Socrates then describes the difficulties a prisoner might have adapting to being freed. When he sees that there are solid objects in the cave, not just shadows, he is confused. Instructors can tell him that what he saw before was an illusion, but at first, he'll assume his shadow life was the reality.

Eventually, he will be dragged out into the sun, be painfully dazzled by the brightness, and stunned by the beauty of the moon and the stars. Once he becomes accustomed to the light, he will pity the people in the cave and want to stay above and apart from them, but think of them and his own past no longer. The new arrivals will choose to remain in the light, but, says Socrates, they must not. Because for true enlightenment, to understand and apply what is goodness and justice, they must descend back into the darkness, join the men chained to the wall, and share that knowledge with them.

The Meaning of the Allegory of the Cave

In the next chapter of "The Republic," Socrates explains what he meant, that the cave represents the world, the region of life which is revealed to us only through the sense of sight. The ascent out of the cave is the journey of the soul into the region of the intelligible.

The path to enlightenment is painful and arduous, says Plato , and requires that we make four stages in our development.

Imprisonment in the cave (the imaginary world)
Release from chains (the real, sensual world)
Ascent out of the cave (the world of ideas)
The way back to help our fellows

Resources and Further Reading

Buckle, Stephen. “ Descartes, Plato and the Cave .” Philosophy , vol. 82, no. 320, Apr. 2007, pp. 301-337. JSTOR .
Juge, Carole. “ The Road to the Sun They Cannot See: Plato's Allegory of the Cave, Oblivion, and Guidance in Cormac McCarthy's ‘The Road' ." The Cormac McCarthy Journal , vol. 7, no. 1, 2009, pp. 16-30. JSTOR .
Ursic, Marko, and Andrew Louth. “ The Allegory of the Cave: Transcendence in Platonism and Christianity .” Hermathena , no. 165, 1998, pp. 85-107. JSTOR .
An Introduction to Plato and His Philosophical Ideas
Ancient Philosophers
Summary and Analysis of Meno by Plato
Plato and Aristotle on Women: Selected Quotes
Plato's 'Apology'
Plato and Aristotle on the Family: Selected Quotes
Summary and Analysis of Plato's 'Euthyphro'
Analysis of Plato's 'Crito'
Timeline of Greek and Roman Philosophers
Jean Paul Sartre's Short Story 'The Wall'
30 Quotes by Aristotle
Hippocrates - Physician Hippocrates and Greek Medicine
Nietzsche's "The Use And Abuse Of History"
Why Did Nietzsche Break With Wagner?
Niccolò Machiavelli's Life, Philosophy, & Influence
Machiavelli's Best Quotes

Is MasterClass right for me?

Take this quiz to find out.

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave Explained

Written by MasterClass

Last updated: Oct 24, 2022 • 5 min read

An Athenian philosopher living in ancient Greece, Plato is famous in part for penning the Socratic dialogue The Allegory of the Cave , one of the most significant pieces of work in literary history.

Allegory Of The Cave

34 pages • 1 hour read

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.

Essay Analysis

Key Figures

Symbols & Motifs

Literary Devices

Important Quotes

Essay Topics

Discussion Questions

Summary and Study Guide

Summary: "allegory of the cave".

Plato’s Republic takes the form of a series of dialogues between the first-person narrator ( Socrates , Plato's teacher) and various real-life figures. “The Allegory of the Cave ,” perhaps the most well-known section of The Republic , takes place as a conversation between Socrates and Plato’s brother, Glaucon . In this section, Socrates attempts to illustrate a point about how one can gain knowledge and wisdom and “perceive [...] the Essential Form of Goodness” (paragraph 31, line 10), via a parable .

He asks Glaucon to imagine a set of prisoners trapped in a cave since birth, shrouded in utter darkness , and chained so that they can neither move their bodies nor even their heads to look anywhere other than the wall in front of them, so that this wall is the only thing they know of life. Then, he asks Glaucon to imagine a fire lit behind them, with a sort of puppet stage in front of the fire, so that other people could project shadow figures onto the wall in front of the prisoners, recreating the forms of people and animals and objects from outside of the cave-prison in shadow form.

Rhetorically, he asks if the prisoners would not then take these shadows as the only true objects in existence, since they could not understand that they were mere shadows of objects. The shadows would be the only thing they knew, and thus would be more real than true objects, which they had never seen. Glaucon agrees that they must think this way. Socrates then asks what would happen if one of these prisoners were freed and made to turn, finally, toward the light . He would necessarily “be too dazzled to make out the objects whose shadows he had been used to see” (paragraph 15, line 5), and would believe the shadows he has seen all his life to be more real than the objects and figures themselves. He also would find the sight of the fire itself painful and would instinctually turn away, back toward the familiar darkness.

Socrates then draws this freedom a step further, hypothetically bringing the prisoner outside of the cave into broad daylight, which would be even more confusing. Instead, he suggests, it would be better to accustom the prisoner slowly, by degrees, first viewing “shadows, and then the images of men and things reflected in water, and later on the things themselves” (paragraph 21, line 3). Finally, he could look at the sun and come to the conclusions that the sun is the main source of light in the world and affects the seasons, and other scientific extrapolations. Socrates concludes the parable by imagining the prisoner re-entering the cave: were he to do so, “his eyes would be filled with darkness” (paragraph 29, line 3), and the other prisoners would not believe him, would think him blind, and would even try to kill him if he tried to free them.

The remainder of “The Allegory of the Cave” consists of Socrates’ explication of the preceding parable, while still in conversation with Glaucon. The darkness of the cave is like visual stimuli, the fire like the sun, and the outside world in the allegory corresponds to “the upward journey of the soul into the region of the intelligible” (paragraph 31, line 5). This, then, is the “world of knowledge,” and within that world, “the last thing to be perceived and only with great difficulty is the essential Form of Goodness ,” which corresponds to the wisdom necessary to govern (paragraph 31, line 9).

He continues, saying that the enlightened individual will then abhor ignorance and be unable to explain the justice he has seen through his wisdom to those who have never seen true justice, but only its shadow. He next explains that just as all the prisoners have eyes that could see the light of the outside world, so everyone has the capacity for gaining wisdom; it is merely a matter of training one’s gaze in the right direction, and coming to it gradually, by degrees.

Socrates then turns to the matter of rulers, saying that a good ruler can neither be ignorant of the “Form of Goodness,” nor can she or he remain solely in the enlightened state, divorced from the rest of unenlightened humanity, but instead has a responsibility to share that knowledge and attempt to enlighten their fellow citizens, for “the law is not concerned to make any one class especially happy, but to ensure the welfare of the commonwealth as a whole” (paragraph 47, line 1). Socrates ends the parable with the idea that good rulers must not only be wisebut must also find the act of ruling (descending from the plane of enlightenment ) to be something of a burden, since “access to power must not be confined to men who are in love with it” (paragraph 53, line 10).

Related Titles

The Last Days of Socrates

The Republic

Featured Collections

Ancient Greece

View Collection

Essays & Speeches

Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics

‘The Allegory of The Cave’ by Plato: Summary and Meaning

Helpful links for students, 122 thoughts on “‘the allegory of the cave’ by plato: summary and meaning”.

i beleive the idea of plato… the philosphers should be given the chance to manage the affirs of the state.

you put beleive its believe

I before E except after C. It is weird.

“i before e, except after c and, sometimes, y or w” i beleive (sic) is how we learned it. 🙂

But is it really believe, or is that just what you percieve it to be? Is that just the shadow you have seen cast on the wall? Or have you seen it in a mirror, reversing the i and the e from thier correct position? Have you ever truly seen believe in its true form to know that it is believe, instead of beleive??? Lol

My mind is blown

you put thier its their

Hilarious!!! You’ve got jokes, but you misspelled ‘perceive’!! Lol!!

I like that! Lol

Came here for a research to Alice in Wonderland & Alice through the looking glass. In the beginning of the second book she tries to read a poem about the Jabberwocky, but it’s mirrored because she is already on the other side of the “looking glass”, so she has to read it in front of it. And now here is also a comment of an Alice. Nice! Furthermore I think the dialogues here are somehow as confusing as the ones in the books – “You put “its”, it’s “it’s” – could be right out of the books!!

Could it be possible the cave is a metaphor for our daily lives some caves are nicer than others

but what distinguishes one cave from being nicer than the last

The cave is the metaphor of our life’s. It’s the life society tries to force down our minds making us believe that these things that hardly anybody understands is what the truth is and simply it’s not. I’ve been through so much in my life and wanted to give up and my prison of watching the world on the wall wasn’t working for me so I went out and lived my life recklessly and caused people harm if they caused it to me. I stole, I sinned, cheated, hurt , haven’t killed but just pretty much everything u can think of I did. I lived my life and I mean my Grammer is not of the best but it’s enough for being able to drop out of school and just watch the world as my day went by. I’m interested in people watching I like to call it. So crazy what everyone does including myself when the fire is put underneath them or when something food happens in their life. U get to understand the true beauty in life when u take the time to acknowledge it. When I was younger two males had sex with me and it confused me of why me I was a kid and did nothing wrong. Did I deserve that. Did I do something wrong. It scared me because I always heard that when something like this happens to someone they turn into that person. Well stelruggled with it my entire life and I’ve been addicted to drugs cuz of it. I have so many scars on my body from cutting myself I’ve tried hanging myself suicide by cop sitting out in the mountains with a gun to my head putting myself in situations where I should have been killed or not survived but still here. I see the world for how it truly is and I see the beauty in people where someone would just see o he is a loser. He is a drugy. She is a prostitute. Ya I cuss and ya I sin but I feel like I am more knowledgeable than most cuz of the stuff I’ve been thru that I’ve put people thru and that I just simply watched from people in my everyday life. I feel like people who claim to know this and that just because they read a book on how they think people might act or look when they wouldn’t know because they haven’t lived thru it or seen people live thru it. Idk they say o u can tell when someone is lying to you because they look away or they look in a certain direction if they are lying cuz the heart is on this side and bla bla bla. Na Maybe they look away cuz it’s uncomfortable to talk about it and they don’t know if they can trust u not to use things against them so their eyes wander. Idk everybody asks what’s wrong with the world now a days and blaming them or him or her when we should like into ourselfs and really think like is this the person I want to be when Jesus comes. I know I want to be better and I struggle with many things but I know my love is pure and I have such a heart that God himself filled with love and even tho it’s been broken so much it still loves feels compassion and forgives. I forgave the guys that did that cuz it was making me bitter I forgive the people breaking my heart or lying to me doing me wrong by cheating I still go out and search for love. I can’t give up because I know I’m here to save someone with my knowledge of trials and tribulations if I can just save one my life and purpose would bring glory to Jesus name. I’m ok with that but I’m scared of trying things in my life have been weird I definitely need some guidance but I feel my calling and just ready to dig in and move forward. Sorry I know I didn’t properly use my grammar because it’s just easier and faster to write the way I do but for someone dropping out of school his first year in high-school I feel like I ain’t doing to bad and have a greater understanding of life’s meaning and of others. I like to say I’m an old soul. Anyways sorry just wanted to say that.

It’s Television now,not the shadows.Fake News, politicians and world leaders we follow, and don’t listen if your not on Tv. Your just a crazy person who can read between the lines and know not be on a platform created by the media.

i really like the idea of Plato… we should trust philosophers!!!

The Gininus Plato!!

that is true we should not relie on our senses perception instead we should goes beyond these senses perception where we can attain the true knowledge

So true, we can only trust the one beyond our senses. Outside of time and space.

Do you mean GOD

The principle behind the thought is one I believe we all know, or at least can relate to but few ever have the courage to pursue. Oh we may begin to but when it gets too difficult to ponder, we retreat back to the safety of empirical reality.

your reality is a perception based on what you think you know, what do you really know. I now I can or I can not, I know I have a choice, I know that I am conscious. I can, I have, I am.

I still don’t understand this concept. Is this you only believe what you see or hear rather to go out and seek the truth?

the prisoners are scared of knowing the truth..funny innit?hehhe lmao

The shadows are religious beliefs. The other prisoners, the one who guessed what was next, and revered for his wisdom, is a symbol of religious “leaders.”. The prisoner who escapes is a free thinker. The prisoners who attack his message when he returns are bible thumping no-nothing’s who stick to the shadows as reality.

This isn’t about religion, it’s about seeking knowledge and being rejected for it. It’s basically a huge metaphor for what Socrates went through in the Apology when he was sentenced to death for asking questions that challenged the accepted believes of that time.

Plato’s allegory of the cave, is his epistemology nd view about reality. to him, dis world that is susceptible to sight nd sense experience is but an imperfect reflection of the perfect world of really real. The world of the cave nd the world of eventual reality can be akin to painting which imperfect ly copies the real one. standing on this projected fact, I think plato is right in his metaphysics.

Rather, it is the opposite. It is about how materialism, or modern atheism, is based on using observations of the shadows and not seeking the truth that has always been outside their realm of “knowledge.” I believe you are missing the entire point of the allegory.

Sorry, Dan, it is you who missed Plato’s point. Plato is not writing in his Cave Allegory about any divinity, per se. Instead, Plato uses symbolic reasoning and metaphor to demonstrate that, in order to be properly informed about the world around them, and to achieve true wisdom, human beings must look beyond the physical world to obtain “true” knowledge. The physical world for Plato is a pale imitation of the metaphysical world. We then, as wise human beings, should carefully examine the metaphysical world that Plato clearly delineates is a different one, from which it presupposes (the physical realm). We do this through careful and unceasing introspection and philosophical debate with others, employing The Socratic Method of Reasoning. We question reality, by not taking it at face value. Since Plato feels that the immaterial world is immune from the laws of nature and time, those things that then exist in it, are, hence, more real than their counterparts in the tangible (concrete) world of reality. You missed the point Dan. Plato’s Cave Allegory is much more concerned about generic epistemology and it has very little to do with theology.

This story can be interpreted in many ways. Whether you view it from a religious, philosophical, or other perspective, it can mean different things. Some people may relate this story to religious beliefs, while others may think of an entirely different circumstance, such as social problems. In the end, no matter how you perceive it or what you may relate it to, this story is representing enlightenment from the simplicity that was previously known and the ignorance and distrust of those who are still oblivious.

Yes this is the way I see it, it represents many different things, but ultimately knowledge.

Anonymous, It’s an allegory, so, yes, it is to be interpreted on a variety of levels. But Plato’s allusions to theology (in his Cave Allegory) are very subtle, if they do exist at all. This means that any such religious allusions are not impossible, but, rather, just not very likely.

You are exactly right! Everyone should read Any Rand then you will truly know what a great philosopher is! She believed that you must use only your senses (otherwise we are getting into otherworldly) aka (metaphysical) to rule your life.

Wow its clear describes

The bottom line is that the prisoners should never have committed a crime to begin with or else they would already have had a real normal reality instead of the demented one they have created for themselves by violating the law. Prisoners belong in prison (usually).

Ur an idiot, it says they were born there and never knew anything else

They were held captive because they were tied up, they just used prisoners to describe them because it’s more convenient.

The definition of prisoner is a person deprived of liberty and kept under involuntary restraint, confinement, or custody. They’re called that because it’s what they are, not because it’s more convenient. If they were guilty of a crime they would’ve either been called criminals or felons.

Ouch George! Is this your personal experience? Anything or anyone can be guilty of that. It could even be people who are told all their lives that they are their own masters and to look after their own selves/needs – suddenly they are exposed to something other than their own selfishness and bam … they are enlightened. Lots of things that keep people in the dark – I think.

George shut up ! You sound just like the prisoners .

The reason why dumb people do not trust philosophers is that they are too lazy to keep their minds working.

FYI, IMHO, “A Course in Miracles” has a much darker, more complex, and psychologically sophisticated version of this allegory.

Very insightful.

The contrast that Plato refers to is between empirical knowledge that has to be filtered through our subjective perception and philosophical argument that does not. For example; how can we be sure that your perception of the colour green is the same as mine? We cannot. However the philosophical observation that this is the case is a pure, ultimate piece of knowledge.

Socrates made it simple, our senses deceive and broke us from perceiving reality as it is. Thus, it is only logic and rational that is reliable. Thanks

THE THEORY IS UTMOSTLY IMPORTANT CONSIDERING THAT AT TIMES INDIVIDUALS LIVE IN SELF ENDORSED BONDAGE. UNTIL ONE COMES OUT OF THE CAVE THEN THEY MAY PICK REALITY AND HAVE SUBSTANTIATED PERCEPTIONS REGARDING MYSTERIES OF THE WORLD, AND THUS ATTAIN MENTAL LIBERATION WHICH WITH TIME UNFOLDS TO PHYSICAL AND TOTALLIBERATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL….

Mental liberation is a catchy phrase. What is the self that witnesses thought and emotion? Where is the self that witnesses seas of human time? It is more than mental.

The self the witnesses the seas of human time,,,what does that mean

Can you say ignorance is bliss no matter what stage you’re at the ones who are tied up the shadow guys and the guys on top of the fire all three stages are ignorant

I dont get what this book is suppposed to be about

Philosophy is life, to ignore the journey to search for the truth is equally to choose darkness or death. Senses deceives, its only logic/rational reasoning that yield knowledge. The truth will set you free …

that is a great idea from our father.it is my wish that all people will accept his theory and goes by it to the benefit of all ,thanks.

I remember a saying by a blind man, he extolled, “now I see the light,” hum! he still blind . . . .

Great post! Have nice day ! 🙂 gtogs

Perhaps it simply means that our minds are imprisioned by our life experiences, represented by the prisoners in the cave. The escaped prisoner represents an ‘epiphany ‘, or ‘enlightenment’. The prisoners who wouldn’t listen, represents the difficulty people have in opening their closed minds

How would you know that something is real if you are rationalist or empiricist ?

The persons in the cave are in their comfort zone. This is true of every group or community. They do not accept of believe in an other possibility.

Yeah this is true

The allegory can be a wake-up call to those already imprisoned by the parochialism of their own thinking; you can’t have an idea of the whole house, for example, if you just stay in a single room within that house; somebody that has being to all the rooms and veranda, living room, has more education about the house than you have. So for me the myth is also the effect of education, and the lack of it. Thanks

Everything is made up. The reality of our lives is that we should be all just animals looking for food and shelter and ultimately survive (just like Apes) Unfortunately (or fortunately) we figured out how to communicate verbally with one another and tried to put logic to our new world. So we made up the fact that words,god,money,governments,banks,schools,Royals etc etc actually exist. In realty none of our world has to exist. We only need to look for food and find shelter.

Of course our senses can deceive us. But if we were all born without senses, we would not be able to make logical statements either

What Plato proved with his cave allegory is that as soon as you deprive people from correctly perceiving the world, from as many different angles as possible, and with all the senses they have, they will make false statements about the world by using “logocal (philosophical) reasoning”. So , more or less the opposite of what he was claiming.

one would hope that the prisoner who escaped( the “philosopher”)was open minded enough to admit that his views were subjective just like those of the chained prisoners. What if what he was describing to them were holograms? Point is: Even from the “ignorant” there may be experience-derived “philosophy”.

maybe we can never leave our caves, and reality doesn’t exist in images – light after all is only a secondary reflection from an object – our dreams are the only truth

These comments were surprisingly fun to read. Now everyone back to guessing the next shadow- shape!…lol

I remember hearing that one would need a sense of absolute beauty , a sense of justice, an education, and go through a period of isolation in order to be freed and see the truth.

Look around you.. people in fear.. wearing masks, placing them in their children’s faces.. suffocating.. forgetting to smile, to laugh, to live.. Sitting compliantly on the front of their media, taking in it’s poison gulp by gulp.. worshipping censorship deep in the ignorance of their comfort.. when you bring the truth to them, they’ll cover you with all they’ve clogged inside. They’ll fact-check you for their own safety and for the “greater good”.. Turning into shadows.. in fear..

Thats ridiculous. There is a pandemic, of course the world is living in fear. It is clear you haven’t lost anyone to Covid yet.

I completely agree with you. People have been conditioned and indoctrinated to accept this false reality of the Scamdemic.

As for any pleb who thinks the pandemic is a conspiracy, or somehow fake- you are merely that prisoner chained to a rock in a cave, staring at a wall in the flickering light, and claiming you can see shapes in it (but the puppeteers left days ago because they cannot stand you).

“I” before “e”, except after “c” Or when sounding like “a” as in neighbor or weigh. And it is weird lol

Doesn’t necessarily always make sense though…. It is not the fault of those who believe what they see because it’s really all they know and they have not been given a chance. Not everyone in society has the chance to escape and learn the truths of things to become the Philosopher. Plato’s views are sort of corrupt in the sense where he believes that in the Just Polis the children not showing signs of being the “good children” or the Guardians simply deserve to die while the good children are catered to and prepared to be the leaders/philosophers. It’s like giving someone a handicap at birth and then expecting them to run a marathon. Just doesn’t make sense that people are ridiculed for something they don’t have the capacity to do…. Give everyone a chance to escape the cave and then society as a collective will be educated and know the truth of things. This is my perspective at least.

Plato’s Cave and the Stubborn Persistence of Ignorance

The most memorable image of ignorance occurs in what is probably the most famous passage of all philosophy: Plato’s Allegory of the Cave in “The Republic . ” Recall the scenario: human beings dwelling in the darkness of an underground cavern, bound at the legs and neck so that they cannot move, even to turn their heads. They have no other memory of life, since they have been imprisoned in this way since childhood. Before them, they see only moving shadows that are cast by objects unknown to them, illumined by a flickering fire that we are told lies somewhere behind them. They know nothing of this except the shadows and hear only echoes from the voices of their keepers, whom they have never seen. In such a benighted state, they pass their days.

This place of ignorance is not only a dark cave; it is a prison, a deprivation chamber. As we imagine this predicament, what we are likely to feel acutely is an epistemic claustrophobia, the absence of freedom in any meaningful sense, and the numbness and despair that would set in from such a deprived routine. Freedom is primordially the ability to move our body. Beyond being our basic capacity for meeting our needs, bodily movement, including change of place, leads us to new experiences, permits learning, and generates perspective. But confined in such profound ignorance, the world of experience is severely restricted. Plato regards such a plight as worse than imprisonment, worse than servitude, more like death: he says, quoting the “Odyssey,” “Better to be the humble servant of a poor master and to endure anything, than to live and believe as they do” — and the Homeric reference here is to the dead who dwell in Hades. As Plato expects, we feel deep sadness at the absence of any chance to understand anything, to achieve anything of value, or to experience anything of beauty. The horror of ignorance is incapacity.

As Plato expects, we feel deep sadness at the absence of any chance to understand anything, to achieve anything of value, or to experience anything of beauty.

This account of their predicament is not, of course, one that the prisoners themselves would — or could — offer. They do not and cannot understand their situation, since all of life’s experiences are but shifting shadows and echoes. Plato says that the “prisoners would in every way believe that the truth is nothing other than the shadows.” Indeed they would not suspect that the things they see are but shadows, nor even have the concept of a shadow. They pass the time in trivial games of shadow-prediction, unaware of their keepers, the fire, or the parade of objects behind them. Though they are troglodytes in extremis , they do not feel claustrophobic or deprived. The actual circumstances of their confinement in the dark cavern, the possibility of a way up and out, and indeed the notion that there may be an incandescent world of wonders to ascend to, are unknown and unsuspected. Life is what it is, what it has always been; they do what they do and feel what they feel because they know nothing else. They are ignorant. But we know … and it is terrifying. Because Plato has, through his narrative, given us privileged knowledge of their situation, we know what they do not; we can affirm their ignorance.

The Cave is a fiction, of course. With a shudder, we gratefully distance ourselves and our lives from that bizarre place and its “strange prisoners.” We breathe deeply the air of the sunlit world. But then, almost off-handedly, comes Plato’s stark and chilling statement: “They’re like us.”

Recognizing Ignorance

Are we like these cave dwellers? Is this gloomy cave the image of the womb from which we were all thrust unknowing into the light? But do we not then quickly overcome this primal oblivion — or do we all still dwell in a place of such abysmal ignorance? To think this through, I want to reverse Plato’s approach: Rather than describing how we may know the truth, let us consider how we recognize ignorance .

Obviously, no one is born educated; and every educated person is, at any given moment, ignorant about many things. Often, it is easy to pinpoint our ignorance quite precisely. Though you may have acquired considerable knowledge about a subject, say, automobiles, you may not know a particular arcane fact — for example, the number of carburetors that were standard in a 1955 Singer roadster. You simply lack a piece of information. In this common form of factual ignorance, should the question arise, you are able to specify exactly the datum you lack. Based on what you already know, you comprehend fully what you need to learn, even before you learn it — you know what to “look up” or to search for. And you even already know the sort of fact that will constitute the answer — “one” or “two,” for example, and not “one hundred” and certainly not “red” or “mammalian” carburetors.

Suppose, however, that you had never heard of the Singer automobile. Despite your familiarity with antique automobile manufacturers and models, you might be surprised to learn of a make or model that had escaped your notice. Or, imagine that you, somewhat less expert, only knew the names of a few sports car manufacturers. In either case, you would have some sense of what acquiring such new knowledge would be like; you could specify its parameters beforehand. You would grasp in a general way what learning about an unfamiliar automaker would entail; and given that possibility, you could identify what it is you do not know — albeit with less precision than in the first case. Such factual ignorance can be delineated in this way because you possess other general, relevant knowledge (in this case, knowledge about cars, their manufacturers, the meaning of “roadster,” and so on). In these ordinary situations, it is the knowledge we possess that serves to awaken and focus our sense of our own ignorance.

Our world is vast, however. There are whole realms of knowledge of which each of us is ignorant, though the list, if we could make one, is different for each person. You may be unusually well educated, perhaps possessing expertise in several fields, and yet, when it comes to, say, ichthyology or Chinese porcelain or deltiology or Sanskrit grammar, you are lost. In such cases, our sense of what we don’t know isn’t as sharp; we are less sure that we understand what it would mean to know such things. Nevertheless, if we know the meaning of the relevant terms, if we are familiar with parallel or related subjects, we may have some sense of what such missing knowledge would involve. (If you know English, Latin, and Greek grammar, for instance, you will have a clearer idea of what it would mean to learn Sanskrit grammar than if you had never studied any grammar.) Of course, you might really have no desire to learn about such facts or fields; indeed, you might ignore them, avoid them, or even resist attempts to be informed or taught about them. Or, you might decide to master them or to learn more about them. In these cases also, we can identify what we have not learned, at least to some level of specification.

So, let us pause to amend a fundamental point: ignorance may be recognized and ascribed only from the perspective of knowledge, and the knowledge we possess determines the degree of specificity of the ignorance we recognize and serves to characterize the ignorance and its importance. This is why we readers of Plato can recognize that cavern as a place of profound ignorance, lacking in truth and sustained by deception.

Utter ignorance, however, for which the dictionary offers the term ignoration , is yet more profound: The prisoners in Plato’s Cave do not know what they do not know; they do not even know that they do not know. They dwell in ignorance, but cannot recognize it. Ignoration is thus a predicament, a trap — one that is not comprehended by those who are caught in it and dwell there. In a sense, they are not in a place at all: Theirs is rather a placelessness in which one doesn’t even know one is lost.

Fortunately, this trap, like a Chinese finger puzzle, has a simple solution: learning. And yet, it is remarkable that an escape occurs — how does one come to learn what one does not know one does not know? After all, the prisoners have no ability to free themselves; more to the point, they have no motivation to escape, since even that desire would presuppose a sense of possibility they lack. Their bondage seems natural to them; it is their form of life; nothing better calls to them. They cannot see their ignorance as ignorance. As the influential Muslim philosopher Al-Ghazzali put it: “Heedlessness is an illness which the afflicted person cannot cure himself.”

In Plato’s account, the unenlightened must rely on accident or the beneficent intervention of others for the critical first step: A prisoner is released from his bonds by happenstance ( phusei ) or by an implied other — “one of them was freed.” What follows his release is not a swift and purposeful escape motivated by eager anticipation of the waiting outside world; it is only the slow, hesitant, gradual, painful process of learning itself. The newly released prisoner is hardly keen for enlightenment: He is “compelled to stand up, to turn his head,” and he is “pained and dazzled and unable to see the things whose shadows he’d seen before.” He is stupefied and wants to return to life as he knew it. Plato asks, “And if someone dragged him away from there by force, up the rough, steep path, and didn’t let him go until he had dragged him into the sunlight, wouldn’t he be pained and irritated at being treated that way?” Who the “someone” is doesn’t matter at this point (except that it cannot be another prisoner), but it is clear that this is an educational intervention: It is necessary for finding the truth, it is initiated from without, and it is initially coercive, requiring the forceful overcoming of the learner’s resistance. “He’d need time to get adjusted before he could see things in the world above,” Plato acknowledges. But eventually, as understanding flows into him, “he’d count himself happy for the change and pity the others.” He finally comes to know the sunlit world of wonders; and then he understands, with horror, what his condition was in the Cave. And, as we have heard, he would rather undergo anything than return to that place of ignorance.

Human beings tend to prefer cognitive comfort, the reinforcement of the familiar, to an encounter with the unknown.

Plato thus legitimates the claim of educational paternalism, the infamous, age-old dictum that parents say to their children and teachers repeat to their students regarding all sorts of coerced activities: “You will thank me for it one day, because then you will understand.” His justification rests on the distinctions between knowledge, mere belief, and ignorance, and on the transformation of the soul that learning can produce. Regardless of the likelihood of later gratitude, however, if accident or intervention or coercion is required to start one on the path of learning, then the escape from utter ignorance is not self-motivated. (In other dialogues, especially “Symposium,” Plato implies that eros provides the initial impulse and the sustaining motivation for pursuing the good, the true, and the beautiful.)And that does not seem surprising. Would it be reasonable to pursue a goal that one does not possess and cannot envision? A self-initiated escape would not be a reasonable decision or even a live option.

But that explains only why the prisoner would not seek to escape. What explains his resistance to freedom and the need for coercion? One factor is that, in general, human beings tend to prefer cognitive comfort, the reinforcement of the familiar, to an encounter with the unknown. Learning may disrupt our cognitive comfort; it dis places us. Education requires us to revise or abandon our routines, recipes, and rituals — life as we know it — and to do so we must overcome a kind of natural cognitive inertia. A place of ignorance can be a sturdy nest of cognitive comfort for those who dwell within.

Plato’s benighted cave dwellers believe they already know the important truths — “Then the prisoners would in every way believe that the truth is nothing other than the shadows of those artifacts.” We know, of course, that their “knowledge” is not worthy of the name; it is no more than pointless familiarity with contrived images. And when forced to widen their experience and confront their illusory situation, they are nonplussed, irritated, and even pained. We understand. It is painful for any of us to accept the revelation that our precious “knowledge” is false, that we have been deluded, and to confront the radical implications: assumptions discarded, insights misguided, principles betrayed, relationships undone, lives altered, and worlds shattered. False knowledge can be sticky; it is difficult to remove it and all it implies from our worldview — even when we acknowledge its falsity. Belief can be a bulwark against learning. The ignorance that hides in false knowledge is disguised as the very learning it defies.

These considerations may cause us to question whether Plato’s Cave is, after all, a place of utter ignorance. It may indeed be home to deep ignorance, but the prisoners have beliefs about the shadows, make cognitive claims, and seem confident that what they believe is true — however deluded they may be. Actually, some of their beliefs are confirmed by their experience — some prisoners are adept at identifying shadows and remembering the sequences of their appearance. Perhaps it is impossible to describe a human situation of complete and total ignorance, ignoration so abysmal that no thin shaft of understanding penetrates it. One wonders how beings in such a situation could survive without any knowledge, without a single belief that is true. And one wonders what a mental state of ignoration would be: a tabula rasa — the hypothetical blank slate of the mind before it receives outside impressions? Consciousness without memory? Awareness without conceptualization? Prenatal mind?

To ascribe ignorance as a mental state is to imply a capacity for learning, which in turn implies a capacity for knowing. A potential for knowledge is embedded in ignorance. Moreover, the ascription of ignorance is relational; it is made from the vantage point of someone’s knowledge about the lack of knowledge in an otherwise knowing creature. Ignorance and knowledge are concepts that cannot stand alone: They presuppose each other. It seems as convoluted to describe absolute and complete ignorance as is to describe absolute and complete knowledge. Ignoration and omniscience are comprehendible only as limiting concepts.

So, are we like Plato’s Cave dwellers — not just in infancy, but throughout our adult lives? It seems we are, at least in one important way: I refer to the unsettling fact that we too are haunted by things we do not know we do not know; and we cannot imagine how drastically those unknowns would alter our lives and our view of the world.

Daniel R. DeNicola is Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at Gettysburg College and the author of “ Learning to Flourish: A Philosophical Exploration of Liberal Education ” (Bloomsbury), Moral Philosophy: A Contemporary Introduction (Broadview), and “ Understanding Ignorance ,” from which this article is adapted.

	Dennett's classic story raises deep philosophical questions about identity and consciousness. \|
	One can undergo a sublime experience even in the face of a life-threatening force. \|
	Only when clinicians dispel stereotypes about psychosis and understand the complex ways hallucinations can offer meaning, comfort, and purpose to patients can they truly guide them toward recovery. \|
	Notes on my winter’s visit to Larung Gar, one of the largest academies of philosophy in history. \|

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

Scriptwriting

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave — Summary & Meaning Explained

P lato’s “Allegory of the Cave” is one of the most well-known philosophical concepts in history. As such, it only makes sense that numerous filmmakers would try to incorporate this philosophy into their movies. But what exactly is it? And why does it work so well in the context of filmmaking? We’ll look at this concept as well as several films that have incorporated it excellently. It’s time to find the sun.

Watch: Plato's Allegory of the Cave Explained

Subscribe for more filmmaking videos like this.

Plato's Cave Explained

Entering plato's allegorical cave.

Virtually all philosophy descends from Plato. And this particular piece of philosophy routinely comes up in discussions of how humans perceive reality and whether there is any higher truth to existence.

This is a concept pondered and considered for thousands of years and we're still nowhere closer to an answer. Naturally, this is great material for literature and film. We'll go through this allegory in detail with examples from movies that were clearly inspired by Plato's cave.

First things first — what is Plato's "Allegory of the Cave"?

Allegory of the Cave Meaning

What is the allegory of the cave.

Plato’s "Allegory of the Cave" is a concept devised by the philosopher to ruminate on the nature of belief versus knowledge. The allegory begins with prisoners who have lived their entire lives chained inside a cave. Behind the prisoners is a fire, and between the fire and the prisoners are people carrying puppets or other objects. These cast shadows on the opposite wall. The prisoners watch these shadows, believing this to be their reality as they've known nothing else.

Plato posits that one prisoner could become free. He finally sees the fire and realizes the shadows are fake. This prisoner could escape from the cave and discover there is a whole new world outside they were previously unaware of.

This prisoner would believe the outside world is so much more real than that in the cave. He would try to return to free the other prisoners. Upon his return, he is blinded because his eyes are not accustomed to actual sunlight. The chained prisoners would see this blindness and believe they will be harmed if they try to leave the cave.

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave Examples in Film

The Truman Show
The Conformist

Despite being centuries old, the allegory is appropriate for filmmaking. After all, the audience watches images on a screen. We’re meant to believe it to be real, but we know it’s false. Only when we step out of the theater back into reality can we take what we’ve learned in the cinema and apply it to our lives.

But don't just take our Allegory of the Cave summary at face value. You would greatly benefit from reading it yourself.

ALLEGORY OF THE CAVE SYMBOLISM

Read the allegory of the cave.

It may be thousands of years old, but there’s still much to learn from this text. You can download the PDF below to read about Plato’s cave in all of its details.

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave PDF Download

Click to view and download the entire Plato's Allegory of the Cave PDF below.

Click above to download Plato's Allegory of the Cave PDF

The text is formatted as a dialogue between Plato and his brother, Glaucon. Within this conversation, they discuss what would happen if a group of prisoners realized the world they were watching was a lie.

Plato uses this allegory as a way to discuss the deceptive appearances of things we see in the real world. Through it, he encourages people to instead focus on the abstract realm of ideas.

What is Plato's Allegory of the Cave?

In a literal sense, a movie is just a series of images. But digging deeper, they present unique ideas and themes that we can take with us into the real world.

Numerous movies utilize this concept in their plots and themes. You can likely think of plenty of films where a character believes one reality and then becomes exposed to another, greater reality and is never the same.

Let’s examine some very different films and how they all utilize this allegory. You can see how universal it is and how it can be applied to your own film.

PLATO’S ALLEGORY OF THE CAVE SUMMARY

Use the allegory to emphasize theme.

There’s something inherently haunting about Plato’s allegory. A person has to recognize everything up until this point in their life has been a lie. What if when they finally recognize the lie, they resort to violent revolution?

That’s the question Jordan Peele poses in his film Us , which is one of the most blatant Plato’s "Allegory of the Cave" examples in film history.

Watch this terrifying scene and see what similarities you can find between it and Plato's cave.

Meet the Tethered • Us

The scene holds many direct correlations with the "Allegory of the Cave." For starters, the tethered family stands in front of a fire, casting shadows on the room. This is a direct reference to the fire in the cave, casting shadows for the prisoners to view.

Red also makes several references to shadows. Specifically, how they are the shadows to the regular family. They have not been “real” for so long, but now, they have come to take their place in the sun.

Us could almost be viewed as an alternative version of the allegory. Namely, what if the prisoner returned to the cave and all of the other prisoners wanted to follow him out?

They saw other people living normal lives, making them angry.

This thought experiment plays nicely into the film’s themes of income inequality and how once the lower classes realize how they have been kept down, they will revolt.

There’s an interesting passage within Plato’s cave allegory about descending back down into the cave that we wouldn’t be surprised if it directly influenced Peele's film.

What-is-Platos-Allegory-of-the-Cave-Summary

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave Summary • Read the Full Allegory

Plato suggests that since the prisoners would likely react violently to someone coming back and telling them of the outside world that it wouldn’t be in one’s best interest to descend back into the cave.

It’s an intriguing concept in the context of a film about people who literally live underground and are prevented from living a rich, full life. Peele took an ancient concept and applied it to real world scenarios, proving there is still much society can learn from Plato’s cave.

PLATO’S ALLEGORY OF THE CAVE MEANING

Use the allegory to inspire hope.

In Us, knowledge is ultimately society’s downfall. The tethered hold hands in the sun, leaving destruction in their wake. It's a somewhat pessimistic view of the cave allegory, but what about a story that looked on it more positively.

Enter The Lego Movie . While there are a lot of zany hijinks throughout the film, we learn at the climax that none of this was happening from the Lego figures’ own accords. Emmet discovers they were just being played with by a boy and his dad.

Emmet vs. Lord President Business • The Lego Movie

The idea that there is something out there beyond our understanding is often framed as horrific. Movies like Us and The Matrix portray a group of people being subdued against their will while a dark truth remains hidden to most.

But knowledge doesn’t have to be scary. It can open whole new worlds and allow us to see existence from a different perspective. It’s this journey outside of Plato's cave that allows Emmet to finally communicate with Lord President Business and save the day.

Emmet starts the movie with the belief he is the Special. This is the prisoner who can only see shadows. The prisoner believes this is real.

By the end, Emmet recognizes that everyone is the Special. His beliefs have been replaced by knowledge. It’s a pretty philosophically-rich film for something based around toys.

PLATO’S ALLEGORY OF THE CAVE EXAMPLES

Use the allegory to affect change.

There’s an interesting aspect to the "Allegory of the Cave" that’s too often overlooked. It’s the third part of the story where the freed prisoner returns to the cave. But this time, the darkness blinds him since he’s become accustomed to the sunlight.

It’s the belief that once we’ve accumulated knowledge, we can’t go back to ignorance. For our last example, let’s look at The Truman Show .

It’s one of the clearest adaptations of the allegory. Truman Burbank lives in a false reality where people film his life to be broadcast into millions of households. Until one day, he discovers it’s all a lie.

A Light Falls • The Truman Show

It’s a simple act: a light falling from the sky. But Truman can’t let it go. He now possesses the knowledge that something isn’t right in this world, and he needs to investigate.

While The Truman Show is one of the most direct adaptations of the "Allegory of the Cave," many films, knowingly or not, utilize this idea. A character begins in a state of ignorance. They must then traverse out of this state into a field of knowledge.

Ultimately, Plato’s "Allegory of the Cave" meaning is to describe what it means to grow as a person, and any screenwriter can learn from that.

Talking to the Creator • The Truman Show

Plato’s cave, how to use allegory in your writing.

Much like The Hero’s Journey , as defined by Joseph Campbell, drawing inspiration from the "Allegory of the Cave" is often intrinsically linked to storytelling. Whether you like it or not, you’ve likely written pieces at least partially inspired from the allegory because you’ve watched so many films utilize this template.

It’s an ever-present allegory you’ve known about for a long time even if you didn’t know its name.

What is Real? • Wisecrack

So for you screenwriters, consider this allegory of Plato's cave another tool in your belt you can call in when you need some help figuring out what your characters should do next.

Why do they want to escape their state of ignorance? What do they find on the outside? What would happen if they returned? How might others react to the knowledge the character now possesses? All of these questions can help you create stronger, more compelling scripts.

Allegory defined with examples

The "Allegory of the Cave" is but one allegory filmmakers draw upon in their stories. There are plenty of others out there, and filmmakers should consider how impactful a movie can become when it assumes the label of an allegory. Read through our definition and examples to see how other filmmakers have handled this concept.

Up Next: Allegory explained →

Write and produce your scripts all in one place..

Write and collaborate on your scripts FREE . Create script breakdowns, sides, schedules, storyboards, call sheets and more.

Pricing & Plans
Featured On
StudioBinder Partners
Ultimate Guide to Call Sheets
How to Break Down a Script (with FREE Script Breakdown Sheet)
The Only Shot List Template You Need — with Free Download
Managing Your Film Budget Cashflow & PO Log (Free Template)
A Better Film Crew List Template Booking Sheet
Best Storyboard Softwares (with free Storyboard Templates)
Movie Magic Scheduling
Gorilla Software
Storyboard That

A visual medium requires visual methods. Master the art of visual storytelling with our FREE video series on directing and filmmaking techniques.

We’re in a golden age of TV writing and development. More and more people are flocking to the small screen to find daily entertainment. So how can you break put from the pack and get your idea onto the small screen? We’re here to help.

Making It: From Pre-Production to Screen
50+ Types of Camera Shots, Angles, and Techniques
What is Foreshadowing — Definition, Examples in Film and Lit.
What is a Biopic — Definition & Best Examples Explained
How Many Rocky Movies Are There — All Rocky Movies in Order
Storyboard Ideas, Examples, and Techniques Explained
298 Facebook
192 Pinterest
110 LinkedIn

To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”

Plato's Allegory of the Cave: Unveiling Truth and Enlightenment

Save to my list

Remove from my list

Introduction

Interpreting the allegory.

Society in Ignorance and the Role of Philosophers

The quest for real knowledge.

Plato's Allegory of the Cave: Unveiling Truth and Enlightenment. (2016, Mar 24). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/platos-the-allegory-of-the-cave-essay

"Plato's Allegory of the Cave: Unveiling Truth and Enlightenment." StudyMoose , 24 Mar 2016, https://studymoose.com/platos-the-allegory-of-the-cave-essay

StudyMoose. (2016). Plato's Allegory of the Cave: Unveiling Truth and Enlightenment . [Online]. Available at: https://studymoose.com/platos-the-allegory-of-the-cave-essay [Accessed: 25 Sep. 2024]

"Plato's Allegory of the Cave: Unveiling Truth and Enlightenment." StudyMoose, Mar 24, 2016. Accessed September 25, 2024. https://studymoose.com/platos-the-allegory-of-the-cave-essay

"Plato's Allegory of the Cave: Unveiling Truth and Enlightenment," StudyMoose , 24-Mar-2016. [Online]. Available: https://studymoose.com/platos-the-allegory-of-the-cave-essay. [Accessed: 25-Sep-2024]

StudyMoose. (2016). Plato's Allegory of the Cave: Unveiling Truth and Enlightenment . [Online]. Available at: https://studymoose.com/platos-the-allegory-of-the-cave-essay [Accessed: 25-Sep-2024]

The Path to Enlightenment: Plato's Allegory of the Cave Pages: 4 (995 words)
The Allegory of the Cave: A Journey to Enlightenment Pages: 5 (1443 words)
Oedipus Rex and Plato’s Allegory of the Cave: The Illusion of Reality Pages: 6 (1643 words)
Plato’s Allegory of the Cave and the Non-Material World Pages: 6 (1778 words)
The Matrix And Philosophy: Plato’s Allegory Of The Cave Pages: 8 (2224 words)
1984 by George Orwell and Allegory of the Cave by Plato: A Comparative Study Pages: 8 (2352 words)
A Question Of reality in Plato’s “The Allegory of the Cave” And Richard Wright’s “The Library Card” Pages: 6 (1510 words)
Plato's Allegory of the Cave: Life Lessons Pages: 2 (537 words)
The Difficult Journey Of Education in Plato’s "Allegory Of The Cave" Pages: 5 (1411 words)
Plato’s Allegory Of The Cave Analysis Pages: 4 (957 words)

Plato's Allegory of the Cave: Unveiling Truth and Enlightenment essay

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

“Allegory of the Cave” by Plato Essay

To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
As a template for you assignment

Introduction

The salvation, works cited.

As seen in the writings of Plato regarding Socrates, which some will argue is a blending of the two philosophers’ ideas, one of the requirements for a moral and ethical man is that he must first know “his spiritual self as it really is, including all its shortcomings, strengths and potentialities” (Sahakian, Sahakian 32). This is, ultimately, the journey being taken by the unnamed man and boy in Cormac McCarthy’s novel The Road (2006) as they travel from somewhere in the northern United States to the south in order to find a climate they can survive in the post-apocalyptic wasteland the country has become.

As Plato was a disciple of Socrates and the source of much of the information we have regarding much of what this man had to say, Socrates’ concept of ethics is relevant to an understanding of Plato’s views and the discoveries of the characters in Cormac McCarthy’s novel. According to Socrates, it is the man who does not know himself who cannot accurately judge his own capabilities and his own unique path to the greatest good based on accurate use of his strengths and knowledge of his weaknesses. Socrates takes this another step by suggesting that knowledge of oneself will instruct from within regarding those things which are good (moral and ethical) and those things which are not.

He suggests this by claiming that things that are good will make us feel happy inside while things that are bad will be immediately recognizable to the man who knows himself because these actions will cause “spiritual degradation and mental deterioration” (Sahakian, Sahakian 33) that will be immediately apparent.

As the man and boy travel through the barren landscape, it can be seen that the ethics of the boy have developed along different routes than the ethics of his father, leading them each to different paths of salvation. This progression can be most clearly seen by making a comparison between Plato’s Allegory of the Cave and the situation in which the man and boy find themselves within McCarthy’s novel, particularly in terms of the characteristics of the cave, the nature of the forms presented and the ultimate enlightenment each character receives.

Plato’s allegory begins with the placement of all humans within a dark cave, positioned in such a way that they can only see what their captors have elected to allow them to see. Within the primitive technology of his time, Plato described such a position. In the dialogue he presents, Socrates explains “here they [human beings] have been from their childhood, and have their legs and necks chained so that they cannot move, and can only see before them, being prevented by the chains from turning round their heads” (Kreis 2004).

From where they sit, the world is composed of the shadows of things that are passing behind them, illuminated by a light source that cannot be seen or guessed at. Within this world, there is no color or natural light. What the people know about their world is extremely limited and sharply defined by the simple and relatively concrete terms of dark, light, hot, cold, here and not here. It is two dimensional, defined by height and width but never provided depth or texture. There are no real conceptions for shades of grey, no need to make fine distinctions and no decisions that must be made that are not drastic, such as the decisions one might need to decide if one suddenly found oneself free of their constraints.

Within the dialogue, Socrates goes on to explain that when one of these individuals is released from the bonds that bind him, “he will suffer sharp pains; the glare will distress him, and he will be unable to see the realities of which in his former state he had seen the shadows” (Kreis 2004). Even when facing the true reality, these individuals will strive to reject what they see, still preferring to believe that what they once knew is still real.

However, Socrates continues the discussion by explaining that once this individual is forced to live in this newer light, the person will begin to understand their new perception as being the true reality by degrees: “… first he will see the shadows best, next the reflections of men and other objects in the water, and then the objects themselves; then he will gaze upon the light of the moon and the stars and the spangled heaven” (Kreis 2004). From this acceptance, Socrates theorized that the person would be very reluctant to return to the cave and would instead take pity on those he had left behind him in the cave.

The connection between Plato’s cave and the world introduced at the opening of McCarthy’s novel is almost impossible to miss. It is described as “nights dark beyond darkness and the days more gray each one than what had gone before. Like the onset of some cold glaucoma dimming away the world” (McCarthy 3). The people are required to wear anything they can find as screens over their mouths in order to breathe through the ash-filled air and the sun is permanently hidden behind the clouds, as are the moon and stars.

Everything, everywhere has been burned, turning the world into black and grey underneath a ‘sullen’ light that casts only feeble shadows at its peak. What colors that do exist are muted within this light and covered by the pall of ash and the biting cold. There are no animals, no plants and very few people.

Of these, most are rightly considered hostile. “The world shrinking down about a raw core of parsible entities. The names of things slowly following those things into oblivion. Colors. The names of birds. Things to eat. Finally the names of things one believed to be true. More fragile than he would have thought” (McCarthy 75). The reduction of the world into only a limited number of possibilities sounds very much like the reduced world of Plato’s cave.

The connection is made undeniable, though, with the description of the man’s dream in which “he had wandered in a cave where the child led him by the hand” (McCarthy 3) and the light source seems to have been their bodies symbolizing that both individuals are ‘enlightened’ beings. The man and boy are experiencing the same sort of pain and natural rejection of true reality that is described by Socrates as being felt by the man emerging from the cave.

The difference here is that the pain is the pain of a man being forced to re-enter the darkness of the cave despite all his conceptions of a better world. His reluctance to accept the reality before him forces him to feel pity for the young son who will never experience all the joys he’d once hoped to give him. This is obvious in the touching scene when he finds the can of Coke. “[H]e put his thumbnail under the aluminum clip on the top of the can and opened it.

He leaned his nose to the slight fizz coming from the can and then handed it to the boy. … You drink it … It’s because I won’t ever get to drink another one, isn’t it?” (McCarthy 20). As the man comes to realize, the world he remembers will never be anything more than a fantasy world to his son, a place of unrealizable possibilities for which the son must ultimately pity the father for having lost.

In the Allegory of the Cave, Plato sets forth the idea that mankind is only living in an illusion of life, that the reality is beyond the scope of our own senses and can only be reached through the intellect. As has been described, humans are locked within a specific position that only provides them with a two-dimensional, strictly limited understanding of the world around them. In this vision, Socrates explains that the human beings are watching a giant screen on which marionettes and other things dance, but the humans can only see the shadows of these moving things.

The actual colors and nature of these things cannot be perceived from such a perspective, but not having known anything else, Socrates argues that the humans don’t know there’s something to miss: “To them, I said, the truth would be literally nothing but the shadows of the images” (Sahakian, Sahakian 388). While the people understand that the shapes on the screen are triangular or circular, they are unaware of the significance of the pyramids or the rubber ball. Although this is their reality as they can see it, Plato indicates a sense of mystery must pervade everything as the light source itself must provoke a sense of inquiry.

This can be compared in a very material sense with the forms of the remaining world that are often recognizable to the father, but have no meaning for the son. The sharing of a can of Coke is only one instance where the father, because of his knowledge of the world before the cataclysm that occurred, is able to find safe food and water for them to drink. The son sees a round metal cylinder, which could be something good to eat or something poisonous or something to power a kind of useful machine.

Toy trucks are given sound only through the vocal chords of the father rather than having ever actually heard one and trains are, to the boy, only stationary creatures standing on tracks to rust away with the centuries. Again, though, the author introduces a particularly poignant symbol of the differences between the forms of the father and those of the son with the finding of the sextant. A sextant is a tool of navigation that utilizes the sun, moon or stars as a light source to find direction (Nova 2002).

The man “held it to his eye and turned the wheel. It was the first thing he’d seen in a long time that stirred him” (McCarthy 192). The reason he didn’t bring such a useful tool back for his son to use was because it no longer worked. The sun, permanently hidden behind clouds of ash, could only provide the earth with a diffuse light. Much like the hidden source of light in Plato’s cave, it is incapable of providing direction.

In Plato’s dialogue, Socrates explains that when one of the individuals from the cave is released from the bonds that bind him and “he is reluctantly dragged up a steep and rugged ascent, and held fast until he’s forced into the presence of the sun himself”, he has made an intellectual journey into a higher realm of understanding. Through this description, Plato introduces the imagery of a mountain, alluding to the depths of the cave, the ascent of the freed mind and then, finally, making the jump to the heavens by forcing his character into the presence of the sun.

With this imagery, one can easily understand how the person who stands higher on the mountain would be able to see things clearer than those standing in the valley, or the cave. Once his eyes become adjusted to the new light, this individual is able to more correctly assess the reality of the world he finds around him by degrees: “… first he will see the shadows best, next the reflections of men and other objects in the water, and then the objects themselves; then he will gaze upon the light of the moon and the stars and the spangled heaven” (Sahakian, Sahakian 388).

If that person returned to help the others find their way out of the cave and could make himself accepted as such, Socrates indicates the people would have a tendency to idolize him, but having only been ahead of them in seeing the true reality, this leader would be reluctant to take on such a role. However, if the person had returned to their imprisonment within the cave before their sight was adjusted, they would instead be ridiculed, considered crazy by the inhabitants of the cave who had never left and held as an example for why no one should try venturing out of the cave.

At the beginning of the book, the narrator tells the reader about the dream the man was having just before he woke up into the grey world of his present reality. In the dream, “he had wandered in a cave where the child led him by the hand” (McCarthy 3) and the light source seems to have been their bodies symbolizing that both individuals are ‘enlightened’ beings. However, the son was born just after the apocalyptic event occurred and has no memories of the world his father survived.

This is indicated through his incomprehension of the forms left over from his father’s world but doesn’t explain why he should be considered an enlightened being. Constant references to his blond hair and angelic look continue to reinforce the idea that the son is perhaps even more enlightened than the father. The reason for this relates back to Plato’s basic metaphor of adjusting one’s eyes to the light. While the man continues to hope for a better future for his son, he slowly begins to realize that the type of fire that once burned in him is useless in this new world. The discovery of an old coin forces the man to face reality. “The lettering was in Spanish.

He started to call to the boy where he trudged ahead and then he looked about at the gray country and the gray sky and he dropped the coin and hurried on to catch up” (McCarthy 173). As he realizes his survival skills and knowledge are based upon a world that no longer exists, the man’s fire can be seen to burn into ash and he dies, instructing his son to continue going south and to keep his fire burning.

The fire of the son, though, is enlightenment brought about by already having his eyes adjusted to the new light of the world. He is aware that he has lost much in losing the world of his father, but he is also aware that he must find a means of surviving in this world. Intuitively, he perceives that this salvation will only come from finding a way of joining up with other ‘good people’ and beginning the process of rebuilding society.

While his father’s goals are simply to keep the two of them alive, the boy realizes that the final destruction of humanity is the loss of kindness. He finds it increasingly difficult to obey the instructions of his father as they continue south, finally breaking down in tears to force his father to do the right thing for a man who had thought to steal everything they owned. Later that evening, the man tells the boy, “I wasn’t going to kill him” and the boy answers back “But we did kill him” (McCarthy 219).

The boy is the leader of the future because his eyes are already adjusted to the light of a world completely alien and incomprehensible to those of his father’s generation. Although he will require the help of the elder members of a group to interpret the forms of the previous generations, it will be his clear sight in identifying the unique value of the human being that will eventually push him to become the carrier of the light his father envisions.

Cormac McCarthy’s novel The Road is an interesting investigation of Plato’s allegory of the cave from the perspective of an enlightened society being forced to re-enter the darkness of a completely alien and hostile world. Both stories rely on a darkened, two-dimensional world in which options are few, environments are hostile and colorless and light is diffuse and mysterious. Within these worlds, there are items or forms that are equally mysterious and unidentifiable, such as the can of Coke and the flare gun that shoots fire to alert someone of a presence as compared to the marionettes and fire of Plato’s world.

While these are amazing things, they are things that just don’t exist and thus remain outside of the world of the child or the people in the cave. The man, having come from an enlightened world, introduces his son to those things that were missed as is predicted by Plato, but is unable to pass that enlightenment along because it no longer applies to this new world under this new light. Thus the man moves in a reverse direction from the enlightenment of Plato. However, the boy, also moving in this same direction, is moving into a new enlightenment. Like Plato’s enlightened leader, the boy understands the world as it is revealed under his new light and shows promise of finding humanity’s salvation in his mercy and kindness.

Kreis, Steven. “Plato: The Allegory of the Cave.” 2004. The History Guide. Web.

McCarthy, Cormac. The Road. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2006.

Nova. “How a Sextant Works.” Shackleton’s Voyage of Endurance. Nova Online. New York: PBS, (2002). Web.

Sahakian, W. and Sahakian, M. Ideas of the Great Philosophers. New York: Barnes and Noble Books, 1966. Web.

Claire's and Stafford's Works Comparison
Wordsworth & Coleridge About External Universe
Logic and Insight in Plato's "Allegory of the Cave"
Allegory of the Cave: Conception of Education in Plato’s The Republic
The Mind and Allegory of the Cave
Dress and Appearance in Beaton’s and Ellis’ Novels
Novels by Conrad and Forster Comparison
Hawthorne’s Concept of Evil in “Rappaccini’s Daughter” and “The Scarlet Letter”
Victorian Society in Wild's Play vs. Dickens' Novel
Cofer’s “Silent Dancing” and Sedaris’s “Ashes”
Chicago (A-D)
Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2021, October 15). “Allegory of the Cave” by Plato. https://ivypanda.com/essays/allegory-of-the-cave-by-plato/

"“Allegory of the Cave” by Plato." IvyPanda , 15 Oct. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/allegory-of-the-cave-by-plato/.

IvyPanda . (2021) '“Allegory of the Cave” by Plato'. 15 October.

IvyPanda . 2021. "“Allegory of the Cave” by Plato." October 15, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/allegory-of-the-cave-by-plato/.

1. IvyPanda . "“Allegory of the Cave” by Plato." October 15, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/allegory-of-the-cave-by-plato/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "“Allegory of the Cave” by Plato." October 15, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/allegory-of-the-cave-by-plato/.

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

Basic site functions
Ensuring secure, safe transactions
Secure account login
Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
Remembering privacy and security settings
Analyzing site traffic and usage
Personalized search, content, and recommendations
Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

Remembering general and regional preferences
Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy .

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy .

Allegory of the Cave: Unshackling the Chains of Perception

How it works

In philosophy, not many metaphors grab the human mind quite like Plato’s Allegory of the Cave. Found in “The Republic,” this story is huge when it comes to talking about knowledge, reality, and enlightenment. Plato paints a picture of prisoners stuck in a dark cave, thinking shadows are the real deal. It’s a strong image that shows how humans can be ignorant and how they can wake up intellectually. The allegory pushes us to think about what keeps our minds chained and to question what’s real.

1 The Shadows on the Wall
2 The Painful Liberation
3 Ascending to the Light
4 The Return to the Cave

The Shadows on the Wall

At the core of this story are prisoners who’ve been in a dark cave since they were born. They’re chained up so they can’t move their heads and can only look at the wall in front of them. Behind them, there’s a fire, and between the fire and the prisoners is a path where people walk, casting shadows on the wall. To the prisoners, these shadows are their entire reality. The sounds they hear are just echoes, and the figures they see are just simple shapes with no real substance.

This scene shows how limited human perception can be. The prisoners’ reality is shaped by their surroundings, which are misleading. Plato’s cave is a metaphor for the human condition, suggesting that what we perceive might just be shadows of a deeper truth. The prisoners’ lack of knowledge represents the chains that keep us stuck in a shallow understanding of life.

The Painful Liberation

The story takes a big turn when one prisoner gets freed. When he looks towards the fire, the light hurts his eyes and confuses him. At first, he doesn’t like this new reality and wants to go back to the familiar shadows. But as his eyes adjust, he starts to see where the shadows come from and realizes his old perceptions were wrong. This marks the start of his intellectual awakening.

Getting enlightened, as Plato shows, isn’t easy. It means letting go of old beliefs and being ready to face the harsh light of truth. The freed prisoner stands for the philosopher, who goes beyond appearances to understand the real principles of reality. This kind of intellectual freedom changes a person’s whole view of existence and knowledge.

Ascending to the Light

The freed prisoner’s journey doesn’t stop in the cave. Curious and driven, he climbs up to the cave’s mouth and steps outside. There, he faces the bright sunlight, which stands for the ultimate truth and knowledge. As his eyes get used to the light, he sees the real world, understanding the true forms and essences of things. In Plato’s story, the sun represents the Form of the Good, the highest principle that lights up and gives meaning to everything else.

Climbing out of the cave to the sun symbolizes the philosopher’s journey from ignorance to enlightenment. It’s a metaphor for chasing wisdom, a quest needing courage, persistence, and a willingness to think beyond normal limits. The philosopher, after grasping these core truths, reaches a higher state of awareness and becomes a beacon of knowledge and virtue.

The Return to the Cave

Plato’s allegory gets sadder when the enlightened prisoner goes back to the cave to free the others. But, they resist and even get hostile. The prisoners, used to their shadowy world, doubt his revelations and see him as a threat to their beliefs. This shows how hard it is to share deep truths with those stuck in ignorance and comfort.

Returning to the cave means the philosopher has a moral duty to share his knowledge and help others see the light. It reflects Plato’s belief in education’s power to change lives and the responsibility of the wise to better society. Even facing resistance, the philosopher keeps trying, showing wisdom, courage, and selflessness.

In the end, Plato’s Allegory of the Cave is a timeless, powerful metaphor about the human search for knowledge and enlightenment. It makes us question reality, recognize our perception limits, and take a tough but worthwhile journey to intellectual freedom. The allegory reminds us that seeking truth is challenging but essential. By breaking free from our mental chains, we can reach the light of knowledge and help create a more enlightened and fair society.

Cite this page

Allegory of the Cave: Unshackling the Chains of Perception. (2024, Sep 17). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/allegory-of-the-cave-unshackling-the-chains-of-perception/

"Allegory of the Cave: Unshackling the Chains of Perception." PapersOwl.com , 17 Sep 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/allegory-of-the-cave-unshackling-the-chains-of-perception/

PapersOwl.com. (2024). Allegory of the Cave: Unshackling the Chains of Perception . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/allegory-of-the-cave-unshackling-the-chains-of-perception/ [Accessed: 26 Sep. 2024]

"Allegory of the Cave: Unshackling the Chains of Perception." PapersOwl.com, Sep 17, 2024. Accessed September 26, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/allegory-of-the-cave-unshackling-the-chains-of-perception/

"Allegory of the Cave: Unshackling the Chains of Perception," PapersOwl.com , 17-Sep-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/allegory-of-the-cave-unshackling-the-chains-of-perception/. [Accessed: 26-Sep-2024]

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.

Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!

Please check your inbox.

You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.

Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

Home — Essay Samples — Philosophy — Plato — The Meaning Of The Allegory Of The Cave From Plato’s The Republic

The Meaning of The Allegory of The Cave from Plato’s The Republic

Categories: Allegory of The Cave Plato The Republic

About this sample

Words: 974 |

Published: Jun 17, 2020

Words: 974 | Pages: 2 | 5 min read

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Let us write you an essay from scratch

450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Prof Ernest (PhD)

Verified writer

Expert in: Philosophy

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

3 pages / 1433 words

5 pages / 2074 words

3.5 pages / 1553 words

4.5 pages / 1955 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Plato

In the search for a just society, philosophers have long debated the nature of justice and its role in shaping the ideal community. In his renowned work, "The Republic," Plato introduces the concept of Kallipolis, a hypothetical [...]

Plato was one of the most important philosophers in the Western tradition. He lived in the 4th century BCE and was a student of Socrates. Plato wrote extensively on many topics, including metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and [...]

Bertrand Russell, History of Western Philosophy, George Allen & Unwin Ltd., New York, Reprint 2017.Dr. J .C. Johari, Political Thought: Modern, Recent & Contemporary, Metropolitan Book Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 2012.Subrata [...]

Plato's "Apology" is a foundational text in Western philosophy, capturing the essence of Socratic thought and the dramatic events surrounding the trial of Socrates. More than just a historical account, "Apology" serves as a [...]

Philosophy dwells on ideas and theories that tend to surpass the thoughts of human perception and the nature of reality. An idea may be perceived idealistic rather than based on knowledge. The following quote, “And now, I said, [...]

A seemingly excited lad initiates Plato’s Meno. Meno appears to have learned what virtue is and is eager to share this knowledge with the renowned Socrates. Thus, Meno tactically lays out calculated questions to Socrates: [...]

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

Instructions Followed To The Letter
Deadlines Met At Every Stage
Unique And Plagiarism Free

COMMENTS

A Summary and Analysis of Plato's Allegory of the Cave
By Dr Oliver Tearle (Loughborough University) Perhaps the most famous idea in all of Plato's work is the Allegory of the Cave. This much-discussed (and much-misunderstood) story is a key part of Plato's Republic, a work which has the claim to be the first ever literary utopia.. In The Republic, Plato and a number of other philosophers discuss the ideal society, focusing on education ...
Plato's Allegory of the Cave
In the allegory, the idea that there is a truer reality outside the cave is a metaphysical idea. Socratic Method: Named after Socrates, Plato's teacher, the Socratic Method is a way of exploring ideas by asking lots of questions. This method gets us to think and learn, much like the story of the cave encourages us to ask what's really true.
Allegory of the cave
Plato's allegory of the cave is an allegory presented by the Greek philosopher Plato in his work Republic (514a-520a, Book VII) to compare "the effect of education (παιδεία) and the lack of it on our nature".It is written as a dialogue between Plato's brother Glaucon and his mentor Socrates and is narrated by the latter. The allegory is presented after the analogy of the Sun (508b ...
Plato's Allegory of the Cave: the Journey Out of Ignorance
It contains the "Allegory of the Cave", a fanciful story that illustrates some of Plato's ideas about education and the distinction between appearance and reality. This essay introduces the Allegory and explains its meaning. An image of a prisoner looking at shadows in the cave, illustrating part of Plato's "Allegory of the Cave." 1.
The Path to Enlightenment: Plato's Allegory of the Cave
The Allegory of the Cave is a story from Book VII in the Greek philosopher Plato's masterpiece "The Republic," written around B.C.E. 375. It is probably Plato's best-known story, and its placement in "The Republic" is significant. "The Republic" is the centerpiece of Plato's philosophy, centrally concerned with how people acquire knowledge ...
PDF eyer allegory of the cave translation TYPESET
Plato's famous allegory of the cave, written around 380 bce, is one of. the most important and influential passages of The Republic. It vividly. illustrates the concept of Idealism as it was taught in the Platonic. Academy, and provides a metaphor which philosophers have used.
Plato's Allegory of the Cave Explained
Written by MasterClass. Last updated: Oct 24, 2022 • 5 min read. An Athenian philosopher living in ancient Greece, Plato is famous in part for penning the Socratic dialogue The Allegory of the Cave, one of the most significant pieces of work in literary history. Explore. Articles.
Allegory of the Cave by Plato
One example of the allegory of the cave would be thinking that gossip about a person is the truth. This would be like thinking that the shadows on the cave are the real thing. In reality, the ...
Allegory Of The Cave Summary and Study Guide
Plato's Republic takes the form of a series of dialogues between the first-person narrator (Socrates, Plato's teacher) and various real-life figures."The Allegory of the Cave," perhaps the most well-known section of The Republic, takes place as a conversation between Socrates and Plato's brother, Glaucon.In this section, Socrates attempts to illustrate a point about how one can gain ...
Allegory of the Cave by Plato
In essays and exams, whoever is marking it expects you to have a deeper understanding of the meaning of the theory. ... Plato's Cave Allegory is much more concerned about generic epistemology and it has very little to do with theology. Reply. Anonymous. August 23, 2018 at 5:27 pm. This story can be interpreted in many ways. Whether you view ...
Plato's Cave and the Stubborn Persistence of Ignorance
The most memorable image of ignorance occurs in what is probably the most famous passage of all philosophy: Plato's Allegory of the Cave in "The Republic." Recall the scenario: human beings dwelling in the darkness of an underground cavern, bound at the legs and neck so that they cannot move, even to turn their heads.
Analysis of Plato's Allegory of the Cave Essay example
Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" presents a vision of humans as slaves chained in front of a fire observing the shadows of things on the cave wall in front of them. The shadows are the only "reality" the slaves know. Plato argues that there is a basic flaw in how we humans mistake our limited perceptions as reality, truth and goodness.
Analysis of Plato's The Allegory of The Cave
The Allegory of the Cave, also known as the Cave Analogy, is a thought-provoking metaphor that aims to shed light on the nature of human perception and the search for truth. By describing human beings as living in an underground den, Plato raises important questions about the purpose of existence and the limitations of our understanding.
The Real Life Implications of Plato's Allegory of The Cave
Implications for Society. The allegory of the cave holds significant implications for society as a whole. Plato argues that those who have gained knowledge and enlightenment have a responsibility to return to the cave and help liberate others. This duty highlights the importance of sharing knowledge and actively participating in the betterment ...
PDF The Allegory of the Cave
Taken from: 50 Essays: A Portable Anthology edited by Samuel Cohen "The Allegory of the Cave" By Plato . And now, I said, let me show in a figure how far our nature is enlightened or unenlightened: - Behold! human beings living in an underground den, which has a mouth open towards the light and reaching all along
Unveiling Reality: Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" Exploration
Palto's "Allegory of the Cave" Analysis Plato was,and still is, known as one of the first western philosophers that challenged the boundaries and limitations of human comprehension. He believed that philosophy was an extremely useful skill that should be taught, learned, and practiced in order to live a successful life. Unlike most early philosophers, Plato wrote down his beliefs and teachings ...
Plato's Allegory of the Cave
Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" is a concept devised by the philosopher to ruminate on the nature of belief versus knowledge. The allegory begins with prisoners who have lived their entire lives chained inside a cave. Behind the prisoners is a fire, and between the fire and the prisoners are people carrying puppets or other objects.
Plato's Allegory of the Cave: Unveiling Truth and Enlightenment
In conclusion, Plato's "The Allegory of the Cave" unfolds as a profound exploration of truth, enlightenment, and the complexities of human perception. The allegory, rich in symbolism and metaphors, serves as a timeless philosophical narrative that transcends its ancient origins. As we navigate the shadows and reflections of our own caves, Plato ...
"Allegory of the Cave" by Plato
The cave. Plato's allegory begins with the placement of all humans within a dark cave, positioned in such a way that they can only see what their captors have elected to allow them to see. Within the primitive technology of his time, Plato described such a position. In the dialogue he presents, Socrates explains "here they [human beings ...
Symbolism In Allegory Of The Cave: [Essay Example], 956 words
Published: Mar 14, 2024. In Plato's famous work "Allegory of the Cave," symbolism plays a crucial role in conveying deeper philosophical concepts. The allegory presents a powerful metaphor for the journey of enlightenment and the quest for truth. As readers delve into the shadowy confines of the cave and witness the prisoners chained to their ...
Allegory of the Cave: Unshackling the Chains of Perception
Essay Example: In philosophy, not many metaphors grab the human mind quite like Plato's Allegory of the Cave. Found in "The Republic," this story is huge when it comes to talking about knowledge, reality, and enlightenment. Plato paints a picture of prisoners stuck in a dark cave, thinking shadows
Allegory Of The Cave Reflection Essay
Plato's allegory of the cave is considered a good example of illustrating the way people think. It also explains the concepts of adapting people to different changes including things they don't know or are not familiar with. Plato explained that some prisoners were living in a dark cave in their whole life and it's isolated from the outer ...
The Meaning of The Allegory of The Cave from Plato's The Republic
Before a philosopher is born he or she is an unknowing prisoner in Plato's allegory of the cave. Beneath the surface there resides a cave with human beings, since birth, shackled by their necks and legs prohibiting movement. ... An Overview of its Influence and Criticisms Essay. Plato was one of the most important philosophers in the Western ...

	Dennett's classic story raises deep philosophical questions about identity and consciousness. \|
	One can undergo a sublime experience even in the face of a life-threatening force. \|
	Only when clinicians dispel stereotypes about psychosis and understand the complex ways hallucinations can offer meaning, comfort, and purpose to patients can they truly guide them toward recovery. \|
	Notes on my winter’s visit to Larung Gar, one of the largest academies of philosophy in history. \|

A Summary and Analysis of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave

Discover more from Interesting Literature

1 thought on “A Summary and Analysis of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave”

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave

Definitions of the Topic

Key Arguments

Answer or Resolution

Major Criticism

Why It’s Important

Practical Applications

Related Topics

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave: the Journey Out of Ignorance

1. The Story

2. Interpretation

3. Conclusion

Related Essays

PDF Download

About the Author

Follow 1000-Word Philosophy on Facebook and Twitter and subscribe to receive email notifications of new essays at 1000WordPhilosophy.com

The Allegory of the Cave From the Republic of Plato

Freedom From Chains

The Meaning of the Allegory of the Cave

Resources and Further Reading

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave Explained

Allegory Of The Cave

Summary and Study Guide

Related Titles

Featured Collections

‘The Allegory of The Cave’ by Plato: Summary and Meaning

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Plato’s Cave and the Stubborn Persistence of Ignorance

Recognizing Ignorance

Pardon Our Interruption

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave — Summary & Meaning Explained

Watch: Plato's Allegory of the Cave Explained

Plato's Cave Explained

Allegory of the Cave Meaning

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave Examples in Film

ALLEGORY OF THE CAVE SYMBOLISM

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave PDF Download

Click above to download Plato's Allegory of the Cave PDF

What is Plato's Allegory of the Cave?

PLATO’S ALLEGORY OF THE CAVE SUMMARY

Meet the Tethered • Us

Plato’s Allegory of the Cave Summary • Read the Full Allegory

PLATO’S ALLEGORY OF THE CAVE MEANING

Emmet vs. Lord President Business • The Lego Movie

PLATO’S ALLEGORY OF THE CAVE EXAMPLES

A Light Falls • The Truman Show

Talking to the Creator • The Truman Show

What is Real? • Wisecrack

Allegory defined with examples

Up Next: Allegory explained →

Plato's Allegory of the Cave: Unveiling Truth and Enlightenment

Introduction

Society in Ignorance and the Role of Philosophers

“Allegory of the Cave” by Plato Essay

Introduction

Allegory of the Cave: Unshackling the Chains of Perception

The Shadows on the Wall

The Painful Liberation

Ascending to the Light

The Return to the Cave

Cite this page

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

The Meaning of The Allegory of The Cave from Plato’s The Republic

Cite this Essay

Related Essays

Still can’t find what you need?

Related Essays on Plato

Related Topics

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

COMMENTS