how does research help you in daily life

Jacks Of Science

Simple Answers to Scientific Questions

Importance Of Research In Daily Life

Whether we are students, professionals, or stay-at-home parents, we all need to do research on a daily basis.

The reason?

Research helps us make informed decisions.

It allows us to learn about new things, and it teaches us how to think critically.

There is an importance of research in daily life.

Let’s discuss the importance of research in our daily lives and how it can help us achieve our goals!

6 ways research plays an important role in our daily lives.

• It leads to new discoveries and innovations that improve our lives. Many of the technologies we rely on today are the result of research in fields like medicine, computer science, engineering, etc. Things like smartphones, wifi, GPS, and medical treatments were made possible by research.
• It informs policy making. Research provides data and evidence that allows policymakers to make more informed decisions on issues that impact society, whether it’s related to health, education, the economy, or other areas. Research gives insights into problems.
• It spreads knowledge and awareness. The research contributes new information and facts to various fields and disciplines. The sharing of research educates people on new topics, ideas, social issues, etc. It provides context for understanding the world.
• It drives progress and change. Research challenges existing notions, tests new theories and hypotheses, and pushes boundaries of what’s known. Pushing the frontiers of knowledge through research is key for advancement. Even when research invalidates ideas, it leads to progress.
• It develops critical thinking skills. The research process itself – asking questions, collecting data, analyzing results, drawing conclusions – builds logic, problem-solving, and cognitive skills that benefit individuals in their professional and personal lives.
• It fuels innovation and the economy. Research leads to the development of new products and services that create jobs and improve productivity in the marketplace. Private sector research drives economic growth.

So while not always visible, research underlies much of our technological, social, economic, and human progress. It’s a building block for society.

Conducting quality research and using it to maximum benefit is key.

Research is important in everyday life because it allows us to make informed decisions about the things that matter most to us.

Whether we’re researching a new car before making a purchase, studying for an important test, or looking into different treatment options for a health issue, research allows us to get the facts and make the best choices for ourselves and our families.

• In today’s world, there’s so much information available at our fingertips, and research is more accessible than ever.
• The internet has made it possible for anyone with an interest in doing research to access vast amounts of information in a short amount of time.

This is both a blessing and a curse; while it’s great that we have so much information available to us, it can be overwhelming to try to sort through everything and find the most reliable sources.

What is the importance of research in our daily life?

Research is essential to our daily lives.

• It helps us to make informed decisions about everything from the food we eat to the medicines we take.
• It also allows us to better understand the world around us and find solutions to problems.

In short, research is essential for our health, safety, and well-being. Without it, we would be living in a world of ignorance and misinformation.

What is the importance of research in our daily lives as a student?

As a student, research plays an important role in our daily life. It helps us to gain knowledge and understanding of the world around us.

• It also allows us to develop new skills and perspectives.
• In addition, research helps us to innovate and create new things. 
• Research is essential for students because it helps us to learn about the world around us. Without research, we would be limited to our own personal experiences and observations.
• Research allows us to go beyond our personal bubble and explore new ideas and concepts.
• It also gives us the opportunity to develop new skills and perspectives. 
• In addition, research is important because it helps us to innovate and create new things. When we conduct research , we are constantly learning new information that can be used to create something new.

This could be anything from a new product or service to a new way of doing things.

Research is essential for students because it allows us to be innovative and create new things that can make a difference in the world.

Consequently, while each person’s daily life routine might differ based on their unique circumstances, the role that research plays in our lives as students is an integral one nonetheless.

Different though our routines might be, the value of research in our lives shines through brightly regardless.  And that importance cannot be overstated .

How does research affect your daily life?

Every day, we benefit from the countless hours of research that have been conducted by scientists and scholars around the world.

• From the moment we wake up in the morning to the time we go to bed at night, we rely on research to improve our lives in a variety of ways.
• For instance, many of the items we use every day, such as our phones and laptops, are the result of years of research and development.
• And when we see a news story about a new medical breakthrough or a natural disaster, it is often the result of research that has been conducted over a long period of time.

In short, research affects our daily lives in countless ways, both big and small. Without it, we would be living in a very different world.

What are the purposes of research?

The word “research” is used in a variety of ways. In its broadest sense, research includes any gathering of data, information, and facts for the advancement of knowledge.

Whether you are looking for a new recipe or trying to find a cure for cancer, the process of research is the same.

You start with a question or an area of interest and then use different sources to find information that will help you answer that question or learn more about that topic.

“The purpose of research is to find answers to questions, solve problems, or develop new knowledge.”

It is an essential tool in business , education, science, and many other fields. By conducting research, we can learn about the world around us and make it a better place.

How to do effective research 

Research is a process of uncovering facts and information about a subject.

It is usually done when preparing for an assignment or project and can be either primary research, which involves collecting data yourself, or secondary research, which involves finding existing data.

Regardless of the type of research you do, there are some effective strategies that will help you get the most out of your efforts:

• First, start by clearly defining your topic and what you hope to learn. This will help you to focus your search and find relevant information more quickly.
• Once you know what you’re looking for, try using keyword searches to find websites, articles, and other resources that are relevant to your topic.
• When evaluating each source, be sure to consider its reliability and biases.
• Finally, take good notes as you read, and make sure to keep track of where each piece of information came from so that you can easily cite it later.

By following these steps, you can ensure that your research is both thorough and accurate.

How to use research to achieve your goals.

Achieving your goals requires careful planning and a lot of hard work.

But even the best-laid plans can sometimes go awry.

That’s where research comes in.

By taking the time to do your homework, you can increase your chances of success while also learning more about your topic of interest.

When it comes to goal-setting, research can help you to identify realistic targets and develop a roadmap for achieving them.

It can also provide valuable insights into potential obstacles and how to overcome them.

In short, research is an essential tool for anyone who wants to achieve their goals.

So if you’re serious about reaching your target, be sure to do your homework first.

So the next time you are faced with a decision, don’t forget to do your research!

It could very well be the most important thing you do all day.

Jacks of Science sources the most authoritative, trustworthy, and highly recognized institutions for our article research. Learn more about our Editorial Teams process and diligence in verifying the accuracy of every article we publish.

How does research impact your everyday life?

“Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else has thought.” – Albert Szent-Gyorgyi

What would the modern world look like without the bedrock of research?

First and foremost – without research, there’s no way you’d possibly be reading this right now, as the Internet was pioneered and developed (via a whole heap of exhaustive research…) by the European Organization for Nuclear Research , or CERN, the same association that produced the Large Hadron Collider.

Without research, we’d likely also be utterly defenceless to the brutal forces of nature. For example, without meteorology, we’d be unable to predict the path of violent storms, hurricanes and tornadoes, while a lack of volcanology research would leave a huge proportion of the world susceptible to the destruction of volcanic eruptions.

And it doesn’t end there.

Medical technology and discovery would be non-existent – no MRi , no anaesthetic, no birth control, no X-Ray machine, no insulin, no IVF, no penicillin, no germ theory, no DNA, and no smallpox vaccination – which, by the way would have wiped out one out of every nine babies had Jenner not researched and found a cure.

Source: University of Surrey

So not only is research an invaluable tool for building on crucial knowledge, it’s also the most reliable way we can begin to understand the complexities of various issues; to maintain our integrity as we disprove lies and uphold important truths; to serve as the seed for analysing convoluted sets of data; as well as to serve as ‘nourishment’, or exercise for the mind.

“…Aside from the pure pursuit of knowledge for its own sake, research is linked to problem solving,” John Armstrong, a respected global higher education and research professional, writes for The Conversation. “What this means is the solving of other people’s problems. That is, what other people experience as problems.

“It starts with a tenderness and ambition that is directed at the needs of others – as they recognise and acknowledge those needs,” he continues. “This is, in effect, entry into a market place. Much research, of course, is conducted in precisely this way beyond the walls of the academy.”

Ultimately, when we begin to look at research for what it truly is – a catalyst for solving complex issues – we begin to understand the impact it truly has on our everyday lives. The University of Surrey , set just a 10 minute walk from the centre of Guildford – ranked the 8 th best place to live in the UK in the Halifax Quality of Life Survey – is a prime example of a university producing high-impact research for the benefit of our global society.

Surrey’s experienced research team found that pollution levels inside cars were found to be up to 40 percent higher while sitting in queues, or at red lights, when compared to free-flowing traffic conditions. And with the World Health Organisation (WHO) placing outdoor air pollution among the top 10 health risks currently facing humans, linking to seven million premature deaths each year, Surrey took on the research challenge of finding an effective solution…

…And boy, did they get the results!

“Where possible and the weather conditional allowing, it is one of the best ways to limit your exposure by keeping windows shut, fans turned off and to try and increase the distance between you and the car in front while at traffic jams or stationary at traffic lights,” says Dr Prashant Kumar, Senior Author of the study. “If the fan or heater needs to be on, the best setting would be to have the air re-circulating within the car without drawing air from outdoors.”

Researchers actually found that closed windows or re-circulated air can reduce in-car pollutants by as much as 76 percent, highlighting how Surrey’s research outcomes could bring a wealth of invaluable global benefits.

As further testament to Surrey’s impactful research success, a study that uncovered high levels of Vitamin D inadequacy among UK adolescents has been published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition , and has now been used to inform crucial national guidance from Public Health England.

“The research has found that adolescence, the time when bone growth is most important in laying down the foundations for later life, is a time when Vitamin D levels are inadequate,” says Dr Taryn Smith, Lead Author of the study. The study forms part of a four-year, EU-funded project, ODIN, which aims to investigate safe and effective ways of boosting Vitamin D intake through food fortification and bio-fortification.

“The ODIN project is investigating ways of improving Vitamin D intake through diet,” continues Dr Smith, “and since it is difficult to obtain Vitamin D intakes of over 10ug/day from food sources alone, it is looking at ways of fortifying our food to improve the Vitamin D levels of the UK population as a whole.”

But the impact of Surrey’s research is broad and all-encompassing, with on-going projects into things like radiotherapy, dementia, blue light and human attentiveness, disaster monitoring, sustainable development, digital storytelling, and beyond. And benefits of research produced at the University of Surrey is not meant for the UK population alone; these are the issues that face us as an increasingly international and interconnected society, making research produced by world-class institutions like Surrey the tools to pave the way to bigger, brighter and healthier global future.

Find out more about studying for a postgraduate degree at Surrey by registering for one of Surrey’s Webinars .

Follow Surrey on Facebook , Twitter , Instagram , YouTube , Pinterest and LinkedIn

Feature image via Shutterstock

Liked this then you’ll love these….

The global knowledge economy

Why Study Sustainability and Environmental Sciences

Popular stories

How to get smarter: 10 best games for the brain.

Use of AI in education: Non-AI students can work in AI too — here’s how

Free therapy for the broke: 5 creative hobbies to try

The dark side of Russell Group universities

What Is the Importance of Research? 5 Reasons Why Research is Critical

by Logan Bessant | Nov 16, 2021 | Science

Most of us appreciate that research is a crucial part of medical advancement. But what exactly is the importance of research? In short, it is critical in the development of new medicines as well as ensuring that existing treatments are used to their full potential. 

Research can bridge knowledge gaps and change the way healthcare practitioners work by providing solutions to previously unknown questions.

In this post, we’ll discuss the importance of research and its impact on medical breakthroughs.  

The Importance Of Health Research

The purpose of studying is to gather information and evidence, inform actions, and contribute to the overall knowledge of a certain field. None of this is possible without research. 

Understanding how to conduct research and the importance of it may seem like a very simple idea to some, but in reality, it’s more than conducting a quick browser search and reading a few chapters in a textbook. 

No matter what career field you are in, there is always more to learn. Even for people who hold a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in their field of study, there is always some sort of unknown that can be researched. Delving into this unlocks the unknowns, letting you explore the world from different perspectives and fueling a deeper understanding of how the universe works.

To make things a little more specific, this concept can be clearly applied in any healthcare scenario. Health research has an incredibly high value to society as it provides important information about disease trends and risk factors, outcomes of treatments, patterns of care, and health care costs and use. All of these factors as well as many more are usually researched through a clinical trial. 

What Is The Importance Of Clinical Research?

Clinical trials are a type of research that provides information about a new test or treatment. They are usually carried out to find out what, or if, there are any effects of these procedures or drugs on the human body. 

All legitimate clinical trials are carefully designed, reviewed and completed, and need to be approved by professionals before they can begin. They also play a vital part in the advancement of medical research including:

• Providing new and good information on which types of drugs are more effective.  
• Bringing new treatments such as medicines, vaccines and devices into the field. 
• Testing the safety and efficacy of a new drug before it is brought to market and used in clinical practice.
• Giving the opportunity for more effective treatments to benefit millions of lives both now and in the future. 
• Enhancing health, lengthening life, and reducing the burdens of illness and disability. 

This all plays back to clinical research as it opens doors to advancing prevention, as well as providing treatments and cures for diseases and disabilities. Clinical trial volunteer participants are essential to this progress which further supports the need for the importance of research to be well-known amongst healthcare professionals, students and the general public. 

Five Reasons Why Research is Critical

Research is vital for almost everyone irrespective of their career field. From doctors to lawyers to students to scientists, research is the key to better work. 

• Increases quality of life

 Research is the backbone of any major scientific or medical breakthrough. None of the advanced treatments or life-saving discoveries used to treat patients today would be available if it wasn’t for the detailed and intricate work carried out by scientists, doctors and healthcare professionals over the past decade. 

This improves quality of life because it can help us find out important facts connected to the researched subject. For example, universities across the globe are now studying a wide variety of things from how technology can help breed healthier livestock, to how dance can provide long-term benefits to people living with Parkinson’s. 

For both of these studies, quality of life is improved. Farmers can use technology to breed healthier livestock which in turn provides them with a better turnover, and people who suffer from Parkinson’s disease can find a way to reduce their symptoms and ease their stress. 

Research is a catalyst for solving the world’s most pressing issues. Even though the complexity of these issues evolves over time, they always provide a glimmer of hope to improving lives and making processes simpler. 

• Builds up credibility 

People are willing to listen and trust someone with new information on one condition – it’s backed up. And that’s exactly where research comes in. Conducting studies on new and unfamiliar subjects, and achieving the desired or expected outcome, can help people accept the unknown.

However, this goes without saying that your research should be focused on the best sources. It is easy for people to poke holes in your findings if your studies have not been carried out correctly, or there is no reliable data to back them up. 

This way once you have done completed your research, you can speak with confidence about your findings within your field of study. 

• Drives progress forward 

It is with thanks to scientific research that many diseases once thought incurable, now have treatments. For example, before the 1930s, anyone who contracted a bacterial infection had a high probability of death. There simply was no treatment for even the mildest of infections as, at the time, it was thought that nothing could kill bacteria in the gut.

When antibiotics were discovered and researched in 1928, it was considered one of the biggest breakthroughs in the medical field. This goes to show how much research drives progress forward, and how it is also responsible for the evolution of technology . 

Today vaccines, diagnoses and treatments can all be simplified with the progression of medical research, making us question just what research can achieve in the future. 

• Engages curiosity 

The acts of searching for information and thinking critically serve as food for the brain, allowing our inherent creativity and logic to remain active. Aside from the fact that this curiosity plays such a huge part within research, it is also proven that exercising our minds can reduce anxiety and our chances of developing mental illnesses in the future. 

Without our natural thirst and our constant need to ask ‘why?’ and ‘how?’ many important theories would not have been put forward and life-changing discoveries would not have been made. The best part is that the research process itself rewards this curiosity. 

Research opens you up to different opinions and new ideas which can take a proposed question and turn into a real-life concept. It also builds discerning and analytical skills which are always beneficial in many career fields – not just scientific ones. 

• Increases awareness 

The main goal of any research study is to increase awareness, whether it’s contemplating new concepts with peers from work or attracting the attention of the general public surrounding a certain issue. 

Around the globe, research is used to help raise awareness of issues like climate change, racial discrimination, and gender inequality. Without consistent and reliable studies to back up these issues, it would be hard to convenience people that there is a problem that needs to be solved in the first place. 

The problem is that social media has become a place where fake news spreads like a wildfire, and with so many incorrect facts out there it can be hard to know who to trust. Assessing the integrity of the news source and checking for similar news on legitimate media outlets can help prove right from wrong. 

This can pinpoint fake research articles and raises awareness of just how important fact-checking can be. 

The Importance Of Research To Students

It is not a hidden fact that research can be mentally draining, which is why most students avoid it like the plague. But the matter of fact is that no matter which career path you choose to go down, research will inevitably be a part of it. 

But why is research so important to students ? The truth is without research, any intellectual growth is pretty much impossible. It acts as a knowledge-building tool that can guide you up to the different levels of learning. Even if you are an expert in your field, there is always more to uncover, or if you are studying an entirely new topic, research can help you build a unique perspective about it.

For example, if you are looking into a topic for the first time, it might be confusing knowing where to begin. Most of the time you have an overwhelming amount of information to sort through whether that be reading through scientific journals online or getting through a pile of textbooks. Research helps to narrow down to the most important points you need so you are able to find what you need to succeed quickly and easily. 

It can also open up great doors in the working world. Employers, especially those in the scientific and medical fields, are always looking for skilled people to hire. Undertaking research and completing studies within your academic phase can show just how multi-skilled you are and give you the resources to tackle any tasks given to you in the workplace. 

The Importance Of Research Methodology

There are many different types of research that can be done, each one with its unique methodology and features that have been designed to use in specific settings. 

When showing your research to others, they will want to be guaranteed that your proposed inquiry needs asking, and that your methodology is equipt to answer your inquiry and will convey the results you’re looking for.

That’s why it’s so important to choose the right methodology for your study. Knowing what the different types of research are and what each of them focuses on can allow you to plan your project to better utilise the most appropriate methodologies and techniques available. Here are some of the most common types:

• Theoretical Research: This attempts to answer a question based on the unknown. This could include studying phenomena or ideas whose conclusions may not have any immediate real-world application. Commonly used in physics and astronomy applications.
• Applied Research: Mainly for development purposes, this seeks to solve a practical problem that draws on theory to generate practical scientific knowledge. Commonly used in STEM and medical fields. 
• Exploratory Research: Used to investigate a problem that is not clearly defined, this type of research can be used to establish cause-and-effect relationships. It can be applied in a wide range of fields from business to literature. 
• Correlational Research: This identifies the relationship between two or more variables to see if and how they interact with each other. Very commonly used in psychological and statistical applications. 

The Importance Of Qualitative Research

This type of research is most commonly used in scientific and social applications. It collects, compares and interprets information to specifically address the “how” and “why” research questions. 

Qualitative research allows you to ask questions that cannot be easily put into numbers to understand human experience because you’re not limited by survey instruments with a fixed set of possible responses.

Information can be gathered in numerous ways including interviews, focus groups and ethnographic research which is then all reported in the language of the informant instead of statistical analyses. 

This type of research is important because they do not usually require a hypothesis to be carried out. Instead, it is an open-ended research approach that can be adapted and changed while the study is ongoing. This enhances the quality of the data and insights generated and creates a much more unique set of data to analyse. 

The Process Of Scientific Research

No matter the type of research completed, it will be shared and read by others. Whether this is with colleagues at work, peers at university, or whilst it’s being reviewed and repeated during secondary analysis.

A reliable procedure is necessary in order to obtain the best information which is why it’s important to have a plan. Here are the six basic steps that apply in any research process. 

• Observation and asking questions: Seeing a phenomenon and asking yourself ‘How, What, When, Who, Which, Why, or Where?’. It is best that these questions are measurable and answerable through experimentation. 
• Gathering information: Doing some background research to learn what is already known about the topic, and what you need to find out. 
• Forming a hypothesis: Constructing a tentative statement to study.
• Testing the hypothesis: Conducting an experiment to test the accuracy of your statement. This is a way to gather data about your predictions and should be easy to repeat. 
• Making conclusions: Analysing the data from the experiment(s) and drawing conclusions about whether they support or contradict your hypothesis. 
• Reporting: Presenting your findings in a clear way to communicate with others. This could include making a video, writing a report or giving a presentation to illustrate your findings. 

Although most scientists and researchers use this method, it may be tweaked between one study and another. Skipping or repeating steps is common within, however the core principles of the research process still apply.

By clearly explaining the steps and procedures used throughout the study, other researchers can then replicate the results. This is especially beneficial for peer reviews that try to replicate the results to ensure that the study is sound. 

What Is The Importance Of Research In Everyday Life?

Conducting a research study and comparing it to how important it is in everyday life are two very different things.

Carrying out research allows you to gain a deeper understanding of science and medicine by developing research questions and letting your curiosity blossom. You can experience what it is like to work in a lab and learn about the whole reasoning behind the scientific process. But how does that impact everyday life? 

Simply put, it allows us to disprove lies and support truths. This can help society to develop a confident attitude and not believe everything as easily, especially with the rise of fake news.

Research is the best and reliable way to understand and act on the complexities of various issues that we as humans are facing. From technology to healthcare to defence to climate change, carrying out studies is the only safe and reliable way to face our future.

Not only does research sharpen our brains, but also helps us to understand various issues of life in a much larger manner, always leaving us questioning everything and fuelling our need for answers. 

Logan Bessant is a dedicated science educator and the founder of Science Resource Online, launched in 2020. With a background in science education and a passion for accessible learning, Logan has built a platform that offers free, high-quality educational resources to learners of all ages and backgrounds.

Related Articles:

• What is STEM education?
• How Stem Education Improves Student Learning
• What Are the Three Domains for the Roles of Technology for Teaching and Learning?
• Why Is FIDO2 Secure?

Featured Articles

10 Practical Uses of Science in Our Daily Life

• Kristina C.
• August 2024
• 17 minutes read
• Correction policy

Science is a fascinating field that impacts our daily lives in countless ways. From the moment we wake up to the time we go to bed, science plays a crucial role in shaping our experiences. It is responsible for the technological advancements and innovations that surround us, making our lives easier, safer, and more enjoyable.

In our daily lives, science is used in various ways. It allows us to communicate instantly with loved ones across the globe, thanks to the wonders of technology. Science is behind the development of medicines and vaccines that help us stay healthy and fight diseases. It enables us to travel faster and more efficiently, whether by car, train, or airplane.

Moreover, science helps us understand and appreciate the world around us. It explains the natural phenomena we witness, such as the changing seasons or the movement of the stars. Science also fuels our curiosity, pushing us to explore the depths of the ocean or the vastness of outer space.

In essence, science is a constant companion in our daily lives, enhancing our experiences and providing us with endless possibilities. It is the driving force behind progress and innovation, making our lives more exciting and fulfilling. So the next time you marvel at the wonders of modern technology or experience the wonders of nature, remember that science is at the heart of it all.

People also ask

Science importance & use in our daily life - youtube (video).

Health and Medicine

Health and medicine are areas where the daily use of science is invaluable. From diagnosing illnesses to developing new treatments, science plays a vital role in improving our well-being. Medical advancements have led to the discovery of life-saving drugs, the development of surgical techniques, and the implementation of preventative measures.

In addition to treating diseases, science also helps us understand the human body better, aiding in the prevention of illnesses and the maintenance of good health. It allows us to gain insights into the intricacies of our biology, enabling us to make informed decisions about our lifestyles. Science has also contributed to the creation of innovative medical technologies, such as imaging machines, prosthetics, and telemedicine, which have revolutionized healthcare delivery.

Furthermore, scientific research has paved the way for the development of vaccines, which have eradicated or significantly reduced the prevalence of deadly diseases. Science's impact on health and medicine is far-reaching, improving the quality and longevity of our lives.

Communication and Technology

Communication and technology play a crucial role in our daily lives, thanks to science. From the moment we wake up to the moment we go to bed, we are constantly surrounded by various forms of communication and technology that have become an integral part of our routines. Whether it's using our smartphones to send text messages, checking emails on our laptops, or even watching television, science has made all of these activities possible.

Not only does science enable us to communicate with others effortlessly, but it also allows us to stay connected with the world around us. Through social media platforms, we can share our thoughts and experiences with friends and family, even if they are miles away. Science has revolutionized the way we communicate by introducing video calls and instant messaging services, making it easier than ever to connect with loved ones in real-time.

Technology has also greatly improved our productivity and efficiency. With the help of science, we now have access to a multitude of devices and gadgets that simplify our daily tasks. From smart home systems that allow us to control our appliances with a single command to navigation apps that guide us to our desired destinations, science has enhanced our lives in countless ways.

Moreover, science has transformed the way we access information and gain knowledge. With just a few taps on a screen, we can find answers to our questions, explore different topics, and educate ourselves on various subjects. The internet and search engines have become our go-to sources of information, empowering us to learn and grow every day.

Science has revolutionized communication and technology, making our lives more interconnected and convenient. With advancements in science, we can stay connected with loved ones, simplify daily tasks, and access a wealth of knowledge at our fingertips. The 10 uses of science in our daily lives encompass various aspects, from communication to productivity and beyond, shaping the way we live and interact with the world.

Transportation and Travel

Science plays a crucial role in transportation and travel, impacting our daily lives in numerous ways. Firstly, advancements in science have revolutionized the way we travel, with the invention of various modes of transportation such as cars, airplanes, and trains. These innovations have made it quicker and more convenient for people to commute and explore different parts of the world.

Science has also improved the safety and efficiency of transportation systems. Through the use of advanced technologies like GPS navigation and traffic control systems, science has helped in reducing accidents and congestion on roads, ensuring smoother and faster travel experiences.

Furthermore, science has contributed to the development of fuel-efficient engines and alternative energy sources, enabling us to reduce our carbon footprint and promote sustainable travel. Electric vehicles and hybrid cars are prime examples of how science is transforming the transportation industry to be more environmentally friendly.

In the realm of travel, science has provided us with tools and resources to explore and understand the world around us. From global positioning systems (GPS) to weather forecasting technologies, science has made it easier for travelers to navigate unfamiliar territories and plan their journeys effectively.

Science plays a vital role in shaping the transportation and travel sector. Through constant advancements and innovations, it has revolutionized the way we commute, improved safety measures, and promoted sustainability. Science continues to drive progress in this field, making travel more accessible, efficient, and enjoyable for everyone.

"Science is the key to unlocking the doors of the future and understanding the world we live in." - Neil deGrasse Tyson

Energy and Environment

Energy and the environment are closely interconnected, with science playing a crucial role in both areas. Science provides us with the knowledge and tools to understand and address the environmental challenges we face, while also helping us harness and utilize energy efficiently.

• Renewable Energy: Science has enabled us to tap into renewable sources of energy such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric power. These sustainable alternatives help reduce our dependence on fossil fuels, decrease greenhouse gas emissions, and mitigate climate change.
• Energy Conservation: Through scientific research, we have gained a deeper understanding of energy conservation techniques. This knowledge has led to the development of energy-efficient appliances, smart grids, and building design strategies that reduce energy consumption and promote sustainability.
• Environmental Monitoring: Science plays a vital role in monitoring and assessing the health of our environment. Scientific techniques and technologies, such as remote sensing and data analysis, allow us to study air and water quality, biodiversity, and the impacts of human activities on ecosystems. This information is crucial for making informed decisions and implementing effective environmental policies.
• Waste Management: Science helps us manage and minimize waste effectively. Scientific advancements have led to the development of recycling technologies, waste treatment methods, and strategies for reducing pollution. By applying scientific knowledge, we can reduce the environmental impact of waste and move towards a more sustainable approach to resource management.

Science is instrumental in addressing the energy and environmental challenges we face. It empowers us to adopt sustainable practices, develop cleaner energy sources, and protect our environment for future generations. By embracing scientific advancements, we can create a healthier, more sustainable world.

💡 Tip: Conserving energy is essential for both our environment and our wallets. Simple changes like turning off lights when not in use, using energy-efficient appliances, and reducing water consumption can make a significant impact. By being mindful of our energy usage, we can contribute to a more sustainable future.

Agriculture and Food

Science plays a crucial role in agriculture and food production, impacting nearly every aspect of our daily lives. Through scientific advancements, we have been able to increase crop yields, improve food quality, and develop sustainable farming practices.

One of the key uses of science in agriculture is the development of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Through genetic engineering, scientists have been able to enhance crop traits such as pest resistance and drought tolerance, resulting in higher yields and better crop productivity. This has been essential in feeding our growing global population.

Science also helps in the development of fertilizers and pesticides. Through scientific research, we are able to create fertilizers that provide the necessary nutrients for plant growth, improving crop yields. Similarly, pesticides help control pests and diseases, protecting crops and ensuring food security.

In addition, science plays a crucial role in soil management. Through soil testing and analysis, scientists can determine the nutrient content and pH levels of the soil, allowing farmers to make informed decisions about fertilization and irrigation. This helps optimize crop growth and reduces the risk of nutrient deficiencies.

Furthermore, science has revolutionized food preservation and storage. Through techniques such as canning, freezing, and drying, we can extend the shelf life of perishable foods, reducing food waste and ensuring a stable food supply.

Science also contributes to the development of sustainable farming practices. Through research on organic farming methods, crop rotation, and integrated pest management, we can minimize the use of harmful chemicals and promote environmentally friendly farming practices.

Science plays a vital role in agriculture and food production, helping us meet the demands of a growing population while ensuring sustainable and efficient farming practices. By harnessing scientific advancements, we can continue to improve crop yields, enhance food quality, and protect our environment for future generations.

Home and Household

Science plays a crucial role in our daily lives, even within the comfort of our own homes. From the moment we wake up to the time we go to sleep, science is at work, making our lives easier and more convenient.

In the kitchen, science allows us to cook our meals efficiently and safely. The principles of chemistry and physics help us understand how heat is transferred during cooking, ensuring that our food is cooked thoroughly and evenly. Science also helps us preserve our food through refrigeration and freezing, allowing us to enjoy fresh produce and prevent food waste.

In terms of cleaning, science provides us with a range of products and tools that make household chores easier. The chemistry behind detergents and cleaning agents helps us remove stains and sanitize our homes effectively. Science also plays a role in developing efficient appliances, such as vacuum cleaners and washing machines, that save us time and energy.

In home maintenance, science enables us to understand the structural integrity of our homes. Engineering principles guide architects and builders in constructing safe and sturdy houses. Science also helps us maintain our homes by providing knowledge about plumbing, electrical systems, and insulation, ensuring our comfort and safety.

Beyond the kitchen and maintenance, science is also present in our entertainment and relaxation. From television screens and audio systems to gaming consoles and streaming services, science fuels our entertainment devices, enhancing our leisure time.

Science is intertwined with our daily lives, even within the confines of our homes. From cooking and cleaning to home maintenance and entertainment, science contributes to our well-being and convenience. By understanding and appreciating the scientific principles behind these aspects, we can fully maximize the benefits that science brings into our everyday lives.

Education and Learning

Education and learning play a crucial role in our daily lives, and science is an integral part of this process. Science provides us with the tools and knowledge to explore and understand the world around us. It helps us develop critical thinking skills, enhances our problem-solving abilities, and fosters a sense of curiosity and wonder. One of the uses of science in education and learning is through practical experiments and hands-on activities.

By conducting experiments, students can apply scientific principles and theories to real-life situations, allowing them to see the practical applications of what they are learning. This not only helps to reinforce their understanding of scientific concepts but also encourages them to think creatively and develop their own ideas.

Science also plays a vital role in technological advancements, which have revolutionized the field of education. With the help of science, we now have access to online learning platforms, educational apps, and interactive simulations that make learning more engaging and accessible. These technologies provide students with a wealth of resources and opportunities for self-directed learning, allowing them to explore different topics and personalize their educational experiences.

Furthermore, science has contributed to the development of innovative teaching methods and instructional strategies. Educators can now incorporate multimedia materials, such as videos, animations, and virtual reality, into their lessons to enhance students' understanding and engagement. These interactive and visually stimulating resources help to cater to different learning styles and make complex concepts more accessible.

Science also plays a significant role in curriculum development. By integrating scientific principles into various subjects, such as mathematics, language arts, and social studies, students can see the interconnectedness of different disciplines. This interdisciplinary approach not only helps them develop a holistic understanding of the world but also encourages them to think critically and make connections between different concepts.

In addition to these uses, science also promotes lifelong learning. By cultivating a scientific mindset, individuals become lifelong learners who are constantly seeking new knowledge and information. Science encourages us to question the world around us, explore new ideas, and seek evidence-based answers. This mindset of curiosity and inquiry extends beyond the classroom and has numerous applications in our daily lives, from making informed decisions about our health to understanding complex societal issues.

Science plays a vital role in education and learning by providing practical applications, technological advancements, innovative teaching methods, interdisciplinary approaches, and a mindset of lifelong learning. Its impact goes beyond the classroom, empowering individuals to navigate the complexities of the world and make informed decisions. By incorporating science into education, we equip students with the tools and skills they need to thrive in an ever-changing society.

Entertainment and Recreation

Entertainment and recreation play a crucial role in our daily lives, providing us with much-needed relaxation and enjoyment. Science has revolutionized these aspects of our lives, making them more diverse, accessible, and immersive than ever before.

One of the most prominent uses of science in entertainment is the development of virtual reality (VR) technology. Through VR, we can transport ourselves to various virtual worlds, experiencing everything from thrilling adventures to peaceful getaways. This technology is made possible through scientific advancements in computer graphics, optics, and human-computer interaction.

Science has also brought us innovative forms of entertainment, such as 3D movies and augmented reality (AR) games. These technologies combine scientific principles with creative storytelling, allowing us to immerse ourselves in captivating visual experiences.

Beyond virtual realms, science has enhanced traditional forms of entertainment. The development of high-definition televisions and surround sound systems has elevated our movie-watching and gaming experiences, bringing us closer to the action and enhancing our enjoyment.

In the realm of recreational activities, science has provided us with various tools and equipment that enhance our performance and safety. Sports gear, such as advanced tennis rackets and golf clubs, are designed using scientific principles to optimize our performance. Scientific research has led to the development of protective equipment like helmets and padding, ensuring our safety during physical activities.

Science has even influenced the way we enjoy music. From the invention of musical instruments to the advancements in sound recording and production, scientific principles have shaped the way we create, listen, and appreciate music.

Science has revolutionized entertainment and recreation, providing us with immersive experiences, innovative technologies, and enhanced equipment. Through scientific advancements, we can enjoy a wide range of entertainment options and engage in recreational activities safely and with optimal performance. Embrace the wonders of science and let it enrich your daily life through entertainment and recreation.

Safety and Security

Safety and security are paramount in our daily lives, and science plays a crucial role in ensuring our well-being. From the moment we wake up to the time we go to sleep, science is at work, safeguarding us in various ways. One of the key uses of science in ensuring our safety and security is through advanced surveillance systems.

These systems utilize cutting-edge technology, such as facial recognition and motion sensors, to monitor and detect any potential threats or suspicious activities. This helps in preventing crime and protecting public spaces.

Science also contributes to our safety through advancements in the field of medicine. Medical researchers and scientists work tirelessly to develop vaccines, medicines, and treatments that safeguard us from diseases and ailments. From flu shots to life-saving surgeries, science enables us to live healthier and longer lives.

Furthermore, science plays a pivotal role in enhancing transportation safety. Through the development of innovative technologies, such as anti-lock braking systems and airbags, science has significantly reduced the risk of accidents and injuries on the road. Advancements in aviation technology have made air travel safer than ever before.

In the realm of cybersecurity, science is essential in protecting our personal information and digital assets. Scientists continuously innovate and develop robust encryption algorithms and security protocols to safeguard our data from cyber threats and hacking attempts.

Science is indispensable when it comes to ensuring our safety and security in various aspects of our lives. From surveillance systems to medical breakthroughs, transportation safety, and cybersecurity, science empowers us to live in a safer and more secure world.

Research and Innovation

Research and innovation are essential components of our daily lives, contributing to advancements in science that impact our world in numerous ways. Science plays a crucial role in improving technology, healthcare, communication, transportation, and much more. Through research and innovation, scientists and inventors continuously strive to enhance our daily lives.

In the field of medicine, research and innovation have led to the development of life-saving drugs and treatments, prolonging and improving the quality of life for countless individuals. Scientists constantly explore new avenues to combat diseases, inventing innovative techniques and therapies that have revolutionized healthcare.

Moreover, research and innovation have transformed the way we communicate and access information. Through scientific advancements, we now have instant access to vast amounts of knowledge through the internet and various technological devices. This has facilitated global connectivity, allowing us to connect with people from all corners of the world.

Transportation has also greatly benefited from research and innovation. From the invention of automobiles to the development of sustainable energy sources, science has enabled us to travel faster, more efficiently, and in a more environmentally friendly manner. Research in the field of aerospace has led to the exploration of space, expanding our understanding of the universe.

Research and innovation are vital in improving our daily lives. They drive progress in various fields, including medicine, technology, communication, and transportation. Through continuous scientific exploration, we can look forward to even more advancements that will shape the future of our world. So, let's embrace research and innovation as catalysts for a brighter and more prosperous tomorrow.

Given these points

Science is not just a subject taught in schools; it is a fundamental part of our daily lives. From the moment we wake up to the moment we go to bed, science influences and improves every aspect of our existence.

Whether it's the advancements in medicine that keep us healthy, the technology that connects us with the world, or the innovations that make our lives more comfortable, science is the driving force behind it all. By understanding and appreciating the practical uses of science in our daily life, we can fully embrace the incredible achievements of human knowledge and continue to push the boundaries of what is possible.

Comments (0)

Comments are currently closed. Subscribe to get notified when comments are open.

Join now our growing comunity!

Related articles

When Science Gets Romantic: Exploring the Chemistry of Love

Why Science Challenges Belief: Uncovering the Truth Behind Skepticism

Unveiling the Mysteries: Can Science Explain Gravity?

How Much Science Influences Engineering

Science and Faith: A Harmonious Coexistence

Are Science Fiction and Fantasy the Same? Exploring the Differences and Similarities

Science and Math: Unraveling the Intricate Relationship

Where Science Came From: Unraveling the Origins of Scientific Inquiry

Exploring the Fascinating World of Science in 12th Grade

Who is considered the Father of Science?

Can Science Be Proven: Unveiling the Truth Behind Scientific Certainty

Are Science and Technology the Same? Exploring the Differences and Connections

The Importance of Research in the Advancement of Society

Thanks to the internet and other technologies, life moves at a very fast pace. We’re constantly adapting and learning new ways to do things–as well as expecting and even demanding innovation from our scientists, executives, and leaders.

Without research, our demands would go completely unanswered!

Curiosity leads to research

Research is what propels humanity forward. It’s fueled by curiosity: we get curious, ask questions, and immerse ourselves in discovering everything there is to know. Learning is thriving. Without curiosity and research, progress would slow to a halt, and our lives as we know them would be completely different.

What would happen without research?

If early civilizations hadn’t been curious about the dark sky, we wouldn’t know anything about space. Decades of research have led us to where we are today: a civilized society with the knowledge and tools to move forward.

If that research slowed to a standstill, what would happen?

We’d become ignorant and unaware. We wouldn’t understand or go forward. Without research, we couldn’t say we were close to finding the cure for cancer or find the most eco-friendly way to light up our homes and offices. We wouldn’t know that, even though bees are not our favorites, they do a job that help us all.

Without research, we could not possibly have survived as long as we have.

And there are still millions of things that have yet to be discovered: diseases to cure, waters to explore, species to discover. All of that is possible with research.

The future of research

Thankfully, schools are becoming more concerned with science and technology, and research is finding its place in the minds of today’s students. Students are eager to make discoveries, create solutions to the world’s problems, and invent the next big thing. We’re going places, one research project at a time.

How do we enable researchers to spend their time on, well, research (instead of filling out forms)? Thankfully, there’s cloud-based software to make that easier. Researchers and research administrators can find funding faster , apply for it more easily, manage their funding once they get it, meet federal and local requirements for documentation, stay in compliance if research involves humans or animals, and make sure research facilities are safe .

All of that means they’re one step closer to tomorrow’s big discoveries.

Adapted from an essay by Cali Simboli

Ready for easier research administration?

Featured resource:.

6 ways to minimize risk in research administration

Get ebook >> 

• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services

• Virtual Tour
• Staff Directory
• En Español

You are here

Science, health, and public trust.

September 8, 2021

Explaining How Research Works

We’ve heard “follow the science” a lot during the pandemic. But it seems science has taken us on a long and winding road filled with twists and turns, even changing directions at times. That’s led some people to feel they can’t trust science. But when what we know changes, it often means science is working.

Explaining the scientific process may be one way that science communicators can help maintain public trust in science. Placing research in the bigger context of its field and where it fits into the scientific process can help people better understand and interpret new findings as they emerge. A single study usually uncovers only a piece of a larger puzzle.

Questions about how the world works are often investigated on many different levels. For example, scientists can look at the different atoms in a molecule, cells in a tissue, or how different tissues or systems affect each other. Researchers often must choose one or a finite number of ways to investigate a question. It can take many different studies using different approaches to start piecing the whole picture together.

Sometimes it might seem like research results contradict each other. But often, studies are just looking at different aspects of the same problem. Researchers can also investigate a question using different techniques or timeframes. That may lead them to arrive at different conclusions from the same data.

Using the data available at the time of their study, scientists develop different explanations, or models. New information may mean that a novel model needs to be developed to account for it. The models that prevail are those that can withstand the test of time and incorporate new information. Science is a constantly evolving and self-correcting process.

Scientists gain more confidence about a model through the scientific process. They replicate each other’s work. They present at conferences. And papers undergo peer review, in which experts in the field review the work before it can be published in scientific journals. This helps ensure that the study is up to current scientific standards and maintains a level of integrity. Peer reviewers may find problems with the experiments or think different experiments are needed to justify the conclusions. They might even offer new ways to interpret the data.

It’s important for science communicators to consider which stage a study is at in the scientific process when deciding whether to cover it. Some studies are posted on preprint servers for other scientists to start weighing in on and haven’t yet been fully vetted. Results that haven't yet been subjected to scientific scrutiny should be reported on with care and context to avoid confusion or frustration from readers.

We’ve developed a one-page guide, "How Research Works: Understanding the Process of Science" to help communicators put the process of science into perspective. We hope it can serve as a useful resource to help explain why science changes—and why it’s important to expect that change. Please take a look and share your thoughts with us by sending an email to  [email protected].

Below are some additional resources:

• Discoveries in Basic Science: A Perfectly Imperfect Process
• When Clinical Research Is in the News
• What is Basic Science and Why is it Important?
• ​ What is a Research Organism?
• What Are Clinical Trials and Studies?
• Basic Research – Digital Media Kit
• Decoding Science: How Does Science Know What It Knows? (NAS)
• Can Science Help People Make Decisions ? (NAS)

Connect with Us

• More Social Media from NIH

Improving Research Use in the World We Actually Live In

How to maximize research use in education policy and practice..

Posted September 20, 2021 | Reviewed by Devon Frye

• Why Education Is Important
• Take our ADHD Test
• Find a Child Therapist

Researchers often believe, or at least have the hope, that rigorous peer-reviewed work will find its way into practice. However, as Carrie Conaway , who is one of the rare people who has worked for years in an education policy or practice setting who understands what rigorous research is, explains :

"Research influences policy more often than much of the academic community thinks, and more frequently every day as we learn how to do this work better. But its influence is less linear than researchers expect, and it is driven as much by relationships and organizational capacity as by the actual information studies produce. Research use operates through conversations, not code; structures in organizations, not standard errors; relationships, not randomized controlled trials."

Carrie kindly replied to my questions about her work on maximizing research in the real world, how “research-practice partnerships” might be one useful way of linking practice and rigorous research, and how her book Common-Sense Evidence can be used by education leaders and scholars more broadly to improve the use of research in practice.

How can we maximize research use in the world we actually live in?

First, by recognizing that research use doesn’t always look how we expect it to. People often envision research use as a linear, one-directional process: An educator or policymaker is sitting at their desk, waiting to make a decision, when some research comes across their desk. They read it and then decide to implement whatever that research says. But the reality is a lot more complex.

The research on research use shows that it’s a process that extends over time, not an event or a single moment. It’s embedded in organizations, and it’s inherently social. And the most important way research matters for practice is probably its influence on how people frame problems, rather than how it informs any specific decision or choice.

If you think of research use that way, then it becomes obvious that the way to maximize research use isn’t just to get more research in front of practitioners. We need to create opportunities for practitioners to integrate research use into their daily work and make meaning together from data and evidence. Without attention to these social mechanisms, any effort to increase research use will fall flat.

What are research-practice partnerships and how do you think these are helpful for research to play a more influential role in practice?

A research-practice partnership is “a long-term collaboration aimed at educational improvement or equitable transformation through engagement with research” ( Farrell et al, 2021 ). Concretely, RPPs put researchers and practitioners into the same conversation, on equal footing when it comes to defining what research needs to be done and interpreting its meaning for practice. This is a radical shift from traditional research production models, which envision researchers developing and testing interventions and then “translating” them or scaling them up, with little or no interaction with practitioners in the process.

Practitioners benefit from RPPs because they create a structure for the social mechanisms that enable research use: regular interactions with researchers about individual research projects, larger events where findings can be shared and interpreted, and so on. These structures allow research use to flourish. But researchers benefit too, through a deeper understanding of the context and local priorities that influence their work and deeper relationships with the practitioners who can most directly benefit from their findings.

Why did you write the book Common-Sense Evidence ? Do you think this could be a useful book not only for education leaders but also researchers and practitioners from other disciplines?

My co-author Nora Gordon and I wrote the book because using evidence is an essential skill for educators, and because no other book helps educators learn that skill and apply it in a practical way. Few educators receive any training about how to use evidence effectively in practice—what kinds of questions to ask, how to know what type of evidence you need to answer a specific question, what makes for stronger or weaker evidence, how to know if a particular finding is relevant to their own context. Nora and I hope that our book empowers educators to use evidence to improve their own work, by helping them to cull the prior research findings that are most convincing and relevant for their own practice and giving them a structured way to learn from and improve their work over time. While the book is written with education leaders as the intended audience, the skills and techniques we describe are broadly applicable to anyone who wants to learn how to use evidence in a policy or practice setting.

Booker, L., Conaway, C., & Schwartz, N. (2019). Five ways RPPs can fail and how to avoid them: Applying conceptual frameworks to improve RPPs . William T. Grant Foundation .

Conaway, C. (2020). Maximizing research use in the world we actually live in: Relationships, organizations, and interpretation . Education Finance & Policy, 15 (1), 1-10.

Farrell, C. C., Penuel, W. R., Coburn, C. E., Daniel, J., & Steup, L. (2021). Research-practice partnerships in education: The state of the field . William T. Grant Foundation .

Gordon, N., & Conaway, C. (2020). Common sense evidence: The education leader’s guide to using data and research . Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Jonathan Wai, Ph.D. , is Assistant Professor of Education Policy and Psychology and the 21st Century Endowed Chair in Education Policy at the University of Arkansas.

• Find a Therapist
• Find a Treatment Center
• Find a Psychiatrist
• Find a Support Group
• Find Online Therapy
• United States
• Brooklyn, NY
• Chicago, IL
• Houston, TX
• Los Angeles, CA
• New York, NY
• Portland, OR
• San Diego, CA
• San Francisco, CA
• Seattle, WA
• Washington, DC
• Asperger's
• Bipolar Disorder
• Chronic Pain
• Eating Disorders
• Passive Aggression
• Personality
• Goal Setting
• Positive Psychology
• Stopping Smoking
• Low Sexual Desire
• Relationships
• Child Development
• Self Tests NEW
• Therapy Center
• Diagnosis Dictionary
• Types of Therapy

Sticking up for yourself is no easy task. But there are concrete skills you can use to hone your assertiveness and advocate for yourself.

• Emotional Intelligence
• Gaslighting
• Affective Forecasting
• Neuroscience

Science In Everyday Life: 50 Examples Showing How Science Impacts Our Daily Activities

Science plays a vital role in our daily lives, even if we don’t always realize it. From the alarm that wakes us up to the phones we scroll through before bed, advancements in science, technology, engineering, and math touch every aspect of our routines.

If you’re short on time, here’s a quick answer on examples of science in daily life: Science gives us technology like smartphones, WiFi, microwaves, and virtual assistants . It brings us medical treatments, weather forecasts, and green energy solutions.

Fields like chemistry, biology, and physics explain the world around us and advancements that enhance how we live.

This comprehensive guide provides over 50 examples demonstrating the many amazing ways science impacts our lives. We’ll cover common technologies, healthcare innovations, environmental applications, and insights science provides into the world around us.

Read on to gain appreciation for just how integral STEM is to our modern lives.

Technology Innovations from Science

Smartphones and wifi.

Smartphones have become an integral part of our lives, and we can thank science for their existence. These devices combine various technologies, such as wireless communication, touchscreen displays, and powerful processors, all made possible through scientific advancements.

With the advent of WiFi technology, we can now connect our smartphones to the internet seamlessly, allowing us to access information, communicate with others, and stay connected wherever we go. According to a report by Statista, there are over 3.8 billion smartphone users worldwide, highlighting the widespread impact of this technology.

Virtual Assistants and AI

Virtual assistants, like Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant, have become an integral part of our daily lives. These AI-powered technologies are the result of extensive research and development in the field of artificial intelligence.

They can perform a wide range of tasks, from answering questions and setting reminders to controlling smart home devices. Virtual assistants have revolutionized the way we interact with technology and have made our lives more convenient.

According to a study by Pew Research Center, around 46% of Americans use voice assistants, showcasing the widespread adoption of this technology.

Streaming Entertainment

Gone are the days when we had to wait for our favorite TV shows or movies to air on traditional television networks. Thanks to scientific advancements, we now have streaming platforms like Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime Video that allow us to enjoy a vast library of entertainment content on demand.

Streaming services rely on technologies like high-speed internet connections and video compression algorithms, which have made it possible to deliver high-quality content to our devices. According to a report by Conviva, global streaming hours increased by 57% in 2020, highlighting the growing popularity of streaming entertainment.

Kitchen Appliances

Science has also revolutionized our kitchens with innovative appliances that make cooking and food preparation easier and more efficient. From microwave ovens and induction cooktops to smart refrigerators and programmable coffee makers, these appliances utilize scientific principles to enhance our culinary experiences.

For example, microwave ovens use electromagnetic waves to heat food quickly, while induction cooktops use magnetic fields to generate heat directly in the cookware. These advancements have saved us time and energy in the kitchen, allowing us to focus on creating delicious meals.

Healthcare and Medicine

Medical treatments and drugs.

Science plays a crucial role in the development of medical treatments and drugs. Through extensive research and experimentation, scientists are able to discover new medications and therapies that help treat diseases and improve the quality of life for patients.

From antibiotics to cancer-fighting drugs, science has revolutionized the field of medicine. For instance, in recent years, breakthroughs in immunotherapy have provided hope for patients with previously untreatable cancers, offering them a chance at a longer and healthier life.

Medical Imaging and Scans

The advancement of medical imaging technology has greatly contributed to the field of healthcare. X-rays, CT scans, MRIs, and ultrasounds are all examples of medical imaging techniques that allow doctors to visualize the internal structures of the body without invasive procedures.

These imaging tools aid in the diagnosis and monitoring of various conditions, such as broken bones, tumors, and organ abnormalities. With the help of these technologies, doctors can make more accurate and timely diagnoses, leading to better treatment outcomes for patients.

Prosthetics and Implants

Science has also revolutionized the field of prosthetics and implants, providing individuals with enhanced mobility and improved quality of life. With advancements in materials science and robotics, prosthetic limbs have become increasingly sophisticated, allowing amputees to regain functionality and perform daily activities with greater ease.

Additionally, advancements in medical implants, such as pacemakers and artificial joints, have significantly improved the lives of individuals with chronic conditions, enabling them to live longer and more fulfilling lives.

Genetic Testing

Genetic testing is another area where science has had a significant impact on healthcare. With advancements in DNA sequencing technology, scientists are now able to analyze an individual’s genetic makeup and identify potential genetic disorders or predispositions to certain diseases.

This information can be used for early detection and prevention, allowing individuals to make informed decisions about their health. Genetic testing has also paved the way for personalized medicine, where treatments can be tailored to an individual’s specific genetic profile, leading to more effective and targeted therapies.

Energy and Environment

Renewable energy.

Renewable energy plays a crucial role in reducing our carbon footprint and preserving the environment. Solar power, for example, harnesses the energy from the sun and converts it into electricity, providing a sustainable and clean alternative to traditional fossil fuels.

Wind power is another example, where the kinetic energy of the wind is converted into electricity through wind turbines. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), renewable energy accounted for 26% of global electricity generation in 2018, and this number is expected to rise significantly in the coming years.

Harnessing the power of renewable energy sources not only reduces greenhouse gas emissions but also leads to economic growth and job creation in the renewable energy sector.

Water Filtration and Conservation

Science has greatly contributed to improving water filtration systems and promoting water conservation. Advanced technologies such as reverse osmosis and ultraviolet (UV) disinfection are used to remove impurities and pathogens from water, making it safe for consumption.

These filtration systems are essential in areas where access to clean drinking water is limited. Additionally, scientific research has led to the development of water-saving devices and techniques, such as low-flow showerheads and rainwater harvesting systems.

These innovations help conserve water resources and reduce water wastage, ultimately benefiting both the environment and our daily lives.

Weather Forecasting

Weather forecasting relies heavily on scientific advancements to accurately predict and analyze weather patterns. Meteorologists use a variety of tools and technologies, including satellites, radar systems, and computer models, to collect data and make predictions about future weather conditions.

By understanding atmospheric phenomena and analyzing historical data, scientists can provide crucial information regarding upcoming storms, hurricanes, and other weather events. Accurate weather forecasts not only help us plan our daily activities but also play a vital role in disaster preparedness and mitigation efforts, potentially saving lives and minimizing damage.

Recycling and Waste Management

In today’s world, proper waste management and recycling have become essential for the health of our environment. Science has played a significant role in developing efficient recycling processes and waste management systems.

Recycling helps reduce the amount of waste sent to landfills and conserves valuable resources. Through various scientific methods, materials such as paper, plastic, glass, and metal can be recycled and used for the production of new products.

Furthermore, advancements in waste management technologies, such as waste-to-energy systems, enable the conversion of waste materials into renewable energy sources. These innovations not only reduce the environmental impact of waste but also contribute to a more sustainable and circular economy.

Science continues to drive innovations and advancements in the energy and environmental sectors. By embracing renewable energy, implementing efficient water filtration and conservation methods, improving weather forecasting accuracy, and promoting recycling and waste management, we can create a more sustainable and environmentally friendly future.

Transportation Innovations

Aircraft technology.

Aircraft technology has come a long way since the Wright brothers’ first flight. Today, we have advanced and sophisticated airplanes that allow us to travel to any corner of the world in a matter of hours.

From the use of composite materials to improve fuel efficiency, to the development of quieter engines and advanced navigation systems, science has played a crucial role in revolutionizing air travel. The aerodynamic design of modern airplanes allows them to achieve incredible speeds while maintaining stability and safety.

This not only makes air travel more convenient for passengers but also reduces the environmental impact of aviation.

Automotive Engineering

The field of automotive engineering has witnessed tremendous advancements, making our cars safer, more efficient, and more comfortable. Science has enabled the development of innovative safety features such as airbags, ABS brakes, and collision avoidance systems, which have significantly reduced the number of accidents and saved countless lives.

The use of lightweight materials and aerodynamic designs has made cars more fuel-efficient, reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, the integration of GPS technology and smart infotainment systems has made navigation and entertainment more convenient for drivers and passengers alike.

Traffic Optimization Systems

With the increasing number of vehicles on the road, traffic congestion has become a major issue in many cities around the world. Science has played a vital role in developing traffic optimization systems that help manage and reduce congestion.

These systems use advanced algorithms and real-time data to analyze traffic patterns and suggest the most efficient routes for drivers. By optimizing traffic flow, these systems not only save time for commuters but also reduce fuel consumption and air pollution.

Examples of such systems include smart traffic lights, intelligent transportation systems, and traffic management apps.

Supply Chain Logistics

Supply chain logistics involves the management and coordination of the flow of goods and services from the point of origin to the point of consumption. Science has revolutionized this field by introducing innovative technologies and processes that improve efficiency and reduce costs.

For example, the use of barcode scanning, RFID tags, and GPS tracking has made inventory management more accurate and streamlined. Advanced analytics and predictive modeling help optimize routing and scheduling, ensuring timely delivery while minimizing transportation costs.

These innovations have transformed the way goods are transported, making supply chains more efficient and responsive to customer demands.

Insights into Our World

Science plays a fundamental role in our daily lives, often in ways we may not even realize. From the stars in the sky to the products we use, science provides us with valuable insights and understanding. Let’s explore some examples of how science impacts our everyday activities.

Astronomy and Space Science

Have you ever looked up at the night sky and marveled at the stars? Astronomy, the study of celestial objects and phenomena, helps us understand the vastness of the universe. Through telescopes and satellites, scientists have made groundbreaking discoveries about galaxies, planets, and even the origins of the universe itself.

Websites like NASA offer a wealth of information and breathtaking images that bring the wonders of space closer to us.

Physics Principles at Work

Physics is the study of matter and energy, and its principles can be found in many aspects of our daily lives. For example, the laws of motion explain why objects fall to the ground, why vehicles move, and why we can ride a bicycle.

Understanding these principles allows us to design safer cars, build sturdy bridges, and even enjoy thrilling roller coaster rides. Physics is not just for scientists in labs; it’s all around us!

Earth Sciences – Climate, Seismology

Earth sciences, such as climatology and seismology, provide us with valuable knowledge about our planet. Climate science helps us understand the changes happening in our environment and the impact of human activities on the Earth’s climate.

Seismology, the study of earthquakes, allows us to monitor and predict seismic activity, helping to save lives and minimize damage. Websites like climate.gov and USGS offer comprehensive information on these topics.

Chemistry in Everyday Products

Chemistry is present in countless products we use every day, from cleaning supplies to personal care items. For instance, the chemical reactions that occur in batteries power our smartphones and other electronic devices.

Additionally, the development of new materials and pharmaceuticals relies heavily on chemical research. Understanding the principles of chemistry allows us to create safer and more efficient products. Websites like American Chemical Society provide valuable resources on the role of chemistry in our daily lives.

Science is an integral part of our lives, providing us with knowledge and improving our understanding of the world around us. Whether it’s exploring the mysteries of space, harnessing the power of physics, studying our planet’s climate, or utilizing chemistry in everyday products, science impacts our daily activities in profound ways.

As this extensive list of examples shows, science fundamentally shapes our daily lives in modern society. Cutting-edge innovations that enhance how we live, work, communicate, travel, stay healthy, and understand the world all stem from scientific discovery.

Fields like physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and engineering create astounding technologies, life-saving medications, and solutions for sustainability. They also unlock deeper insights into our own bodies, the environment, and the universe around us.

So whether you’re video chatting on your phone, cooking dinner, driving your car, or just breathing – you have science to thank! Our modern world simply would not function without the dedicated work of scientists pushing boundaries every day.

Similar Posts

What Science Courses Are Taught In 12Th Grade? An In-Depth Look

As a high school senior, you’re so close to graduation! This final year is crucial for cementing your science knowledge and skills before college. Choosing the right science curriculum can also boost your applications if you plan to major in a science field. If you’re short on time, here’s a quick answer: Most 12th graders…

Nc State Computer Science Program Rankings: How Does It Measure Up?

As one of the top public universities in the country, NC State University has long been recognized for its excellence in education and research. But exactly where does the school’s computer science program rank among other top computer science schools and nationally? In this comprehensive guide, we dive into NC State’s computer science rankings, reputation,…

10 Reasons Why Psychology Is A Science

Psychology is a discipline that employs scientific methods. But some have questioned whether psychology is a true science like biology or physics. In this article, we’ll explore 10 reasons why psychology meets the criteria for being a scientific field. If you’re short on time, here’s a quick answer to your question: Psychology uses the scientific…

Is Psychology A Biological Science? Investigating The Role Of Biology

Psychology aims to understand mental processes, emotions, and human behavior using scientific research. But does it qualify as a “biological science”? Let’s look at the interplay between mind, brain, and biology within psychology. If you’re short on time, here’s a quick answer: While not solely a biological science, psychology has strong biological and physiological components,…

Albert Einstein On Science And Religion

Albert Einstein is regarded as one of the greatest scientists of all time. But what were his views on science and religion? Did he see them as complementary or in conflict? If you’re short on time, here’s a quick answer: Though grounded in science, Einstein saw room for faith. He criticized dogmatic religion but believed…

What Does Mantle Mean In Science? An In-Depth Explanation

The mantle is one of the major layers making up the interior of the Earth. If you’re short on time, here’s a quick answer: In science, the mantle refers to the very hot, viscous layer found between the Earth’s crust and core. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll explore the scientific meaning of the mantle in…

• Subject List
• Take a Tour
• For Authors
• Subscriber Services
• Publications
• African American Studies
• African Studies
• American Literature
• Anthropology
• Architecture Planning and Preservation
• Art History
• Atlantic History
• Biblical Studies
• British and Irish Literature
• Childhood Studies
• Chinese Studies
• Cinema and Media Studies
• Communication
• Criminology
• Environmental Science
• Evolutionary Biology
• International Law
• International Relations
• Islamic Studies
• Jewish Studies
• Latin American Studies
• Latino Studies
• Linguistics
• Literary and Critical Theory
• Medieval Studies
• Military History
• Political Science
• Public Health
• Renaissance and Reformation
• Social Work
• Urban Studies
• Victorian Literature
• Browse All Subjects

How to Subscribe

• Free Trials

In This Article Expand or collapse the "in this article" section Research Methods for Studying Daily Life

Introduction, general overviews.

• Study Designs and Sampling Methods
• Advantages and Limitations of Daily-Life Methods
• Sampling and Measurement Considerations
• Technology/Equipment for Daily Assessments
• Additional Considerations and Future Directions

Related Articles Expand or collapse the "related articles" section about

About related articles close popup.

Lorem Ipsum Sit Dolor Amet

Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Aliquam ligula odio, euismod ut aliquam et, vestibulum nec risus. Nulla viverra, arcu et iaculis consequat, justo diam ornare tellus, semper ultrices tellus nunc eu tellus.

• Action Research
• Ambulatory Assessment in Behavioral Science
• Item Response Theory
• Meta-Analysis
• Protocol Analysis
• Replication Initiatives in Psychology
• Research Methods
• Signal Detection Theory and its Applications
• Single-Case Experimental Designs

Other Subject Areas

Forthcoming articles expand or collapse the "forthcoming articles" section.

• Data Visualization
• Executive Functions in Childhood
• Remote Work
• Find more forthcoming articles...
• Export Citations
• Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Research Methods for Studying Daily Life by Carla Arredondo , Gloria Luong LAST REVIEWED: 24 April 2019 LAST MODIFIED: 24 April 2019 DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199828340-0243

Methods for studying daily life have blossomed since the 1980s. Although these methods have been around for years, their popularity is always increasing as technological innovations have made the use of these methods easier and more reliable to employ. Methods for studying daily life typically include taking repeated real-time assessments of individual behaviors, physiology, and/or psychological experiences, over the course of an individual’s everyday life. These methods include experience sampling methodology (ESM), ecological momentary assessments (EMA), ambulatory assessments (AA), and daily diary or day reconstruction methods. All of these methods include repeated or detailed assessments of daily- life experiences but vary in terms of the frequency of assessments, technological tools to administer assessments, and timing of assessments (e.g., real time assessments versus retrospective recall). Given that these methods are intended to capture observations of psychological experiences in daily life, they require careful consideration of study design, measurements, and assessment tools. This article will provide a general overview of daily-life methods, including discussions about the different study designs and sampling methods. Furthermore, it will describe the advantages and limitations of using these methods along with examples of empirical studies that illustrate the usefulness of these techniques. It will also provide information on important considerations for sampling and measuring experiences in daily life and provide examples of the technology available for daily-life assessments.

Mehl and Conner 2012 is an all-encompassing review that discusses theoretical, methodological, and statistical considerations for conducting daily-life studies. Conner and Lehman 2012 focuses on providing practical advice for designing and conducting daily-life studies, while Stone and Shiffman 2002 outlines standardized reporting guidelines for researchers and provides recommendations for the information that should be included in study reports. Broderick, et al. 2003 and Green, et al. 2006 discuss issues of participant compliance and provide examples of how to monitor and improve participant compliance in daily-life studies. Barta, et al. 2012 discusses issues of measurement reactivity, whereby measurements bring about changes in study participants, and Conner and Reid 2012 is an example of testing for measurement reactivity. Lastly, Bolger, et al. 2003 provides an outline of areas of research that will need further investigation as intensive longitudinal designs become more prevalent.

Barta, W. D., H. Tennen, and M. D. Litt. 2012. Measurement reactivity in diary research. In Handbook of research methods for studying daily life . Edited by M. R. Mehl and T. S. Conner, 89–107. New York: Guildford Press.

Reviews factors that can affect measurement of constructs in daily-life studies. Discusses some of the sources of measurement reactivity, such as social desirability of the construct under investigation and conditions that influence reactivity of self-monitoring, such as participant motivation. They conclude with a review of studies demonstrating mixed findings on measurement reactivity and recommend that more daily-life studies explicitly test for measurement reactivity.

Bolger, N., A. Davis, and E. Rafaeli. 2003. Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology 54:579–616.

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030

Discusses areas of research that will need further consideration as intensive longitudinal study designs become more common. The article also discusses using technology to monitor objective measurements, such as heart rate, in conjunction with subjective experiences (i.e., mood). Also covered is the need to develop and test measures that can capture within-person changes and ideas for formulating research questions to further understand how these processes unfold in everyday life.

Broderick, J., J. Schwartz, S. Shiffman, M. Hufford, and A. Stone. 2003. Signaling does not adequately improve diary compliance. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 26:139–148.

DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2602_06

Tested the extent to which signaling participants, via a programmed wristwatch, improved compliance in a twenty-four-day experience sampling study of individuals with chronic pain. The study used photo sensors to detect when diaries were opened and closed by participants to make an entry, and this information was cross-referenced with participant self-reports of compliance.

Conner, T. S., and B. Lehman. 2012. Getting started: Launching a study in daily life. In Handbook of research methods for studying daily life . Edited by M. R. Mehl and T. S. Conner, 89–107. New York: Guildford Press.

Provides an overview of important considerations for designing and conducting daily-life studies. It begins with preliminary considerations, such as participant characteristics, and moves into sampling strategies and platforms. Practical concerns, such as ethical considerations, are also discussed.

Conner, T. S., and K. A. Reid. 2012. Effects of intensive mobile happiness reporting in daily life. Social Psychology and Personality Science 3:315–323.

DOI: 10.1177/1948550611419677

An example of an experience sampling study that explicitly tested measurement reactivity. The study examined the extent to which there was measurement reactivity in a measure of happiness. Results demonstrate that overall the measure in question did not show reactivity. However, participant characteristics, such as depressive symptoms and trait neuroticism, contributed to measurement reactivity.

Green, A. S., E. Rafaeli, N. Bolger, P. E. Shrout, and H. T. Reis. 2006. Paper or plastic? Data equivalence in paper and electronic diaries. Psychological Methods 11:87–105.

DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.87

See this article for a brief review of concerns regarding participant compliance in diary studies (pp. 87–88). The article also discusses other issues such as important considerations for improving the data quality from diary studies, recommendations for defining compliance, and individual differences in compliance (pp. 102–104). The article concludes with recommendations for improving diary studies.

Mehl, M. R., and T. S. Conner, eds. 2012. Handbook of research methods for studying daily life . New York: Guildford Press.

This book provides an all-encompassing review for researchers conducting daily-life studies. It is a resource for conducting high-quality research and provides guidelines to select and implement methods for studying daily life. The book begins with fundamental theoretical and methodological considerations for conducting these studies and then reviews statistical techniques that can be used to analyze these data. The book concludes with examples of these methods and techniques across different sub-fields in psychology.

Stone, A. A., and S. Shiffman. 2002 Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines. Guidelines for Momentary Research 24:236–243.

Proposes criteria for collecting momentary data. Argues that strategies for sampling daily-life data should be based on theoretical, statistical, and practical considerations of the phenomena in question that allow researchers to adequately collect data for hypothesis testing. The article also provides recommendations on reporting guidelines to facilitate study replication.

back to top

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login .

Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here .

• About Psychology »
• Meet the Editorial Board »
• Abnormal Psychology
• Academic Assessment
• Acculturation and Health
• Action Regulation Theory
• Addictive Behavior
• Adolescence
• Adoption, Social, Psychological, and Evolutionary Perspect...
• Advanced Theory of Mind
• Affective Forecasting
• Affirmative Action
• Ageism at Work
• Allport, Gordon
• Alzheimer’s Disease
• Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)
• Animal Behavior
• Animal Learning
• Anxiety Disorders
• Art and Aesthetics, Psychology of
• Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Psychology
• Assessment and Clinical Applications of Individual Differe...
• Attachment in Social and Emotional Development across the ...
• Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Adults
• Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Childre...
• Attitudinal Ambivalence
• Attraction in Close Relationships
• Attribution Theory
• Authoritarian Personality
• Bayesian Statistical Methods in Psychology
• Behavior Therapy, Rational Emotive
• Behavioral Economics
• Behavioral Genetics
• Belief Perseverance
• Bereavement and Grief
• Biological Psychology
• Birth Order
• Body Image in Men and Women
• Bystander Effect
• Categorical Data Analysis in Psychology
• Childhood and Adolescence, Peer Victimization and Bullying...
• Clark, Mamie Phipps
• Clinical Neuropsychology
• Clinical Psychology
• Cognitive Consistency Theories
• Cognitive Dissonance Theory
• Cognitive Neuroscience
• Communication, Nonverbal Cues and
• Comparative Psychology
• Competence to Stand Trial: Restoration Services
• Competency to Stand Trial
• Computational Psychology
• Conflict Management in the Workplace
• Conformity, Compliance, and Obedience
• Consciousness
• Coping Processes
• Correspondence Analysis in Psychology
• Counseling Psychology
• Creativity at Work
• Critical Thinking
• Cross-Cultural Psychology
• Cultural Psychology
• Daily Life, Research Methods for Studying
• Data Science Methods for Psychology
• Data Sharing in Psychology
• Death and Dying
• Deceiving and Detecting Deceit
• Defensive Processes
• Depressive Disorders
• Development, Prenatal
• Developmental Psychology (Cognitive)
• Developmental Psychology (Social)
• Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM...
• Discrimination
• Dissociative Disorders
• Drugs and Behavior
• Eating Disorders
• Ecological Psychology
• Educational Settings, Assessment of Thinking in
• Effect Size
• Embodiment and Embodied Cognition
• Emerging Adulthood
• Emotional Intelligence
• Empathy and Altruism
• Employee Stress and Well-Being
• Environmental Neuroscience and Environmental Psychology
• Ethics in Psychological Practice
• Event Perception
• Evolutionary Psychology
• Expansive Posture
• Experimental Existential Psychology
• Exploratory Data Analysis
• Eyewitness Testimony
• Eysenck, Hans
• Factor Analysis
• Festinger, Leon
• Five-Factor Model of Personality
• Flynn Effect, The
• Forensic Psychology
• Forgiveness
• Friendships, Children's
• Fundamental Attribution Error/Correspondence Bias
• Gambler's Fallacy
• Game Theory and Psychology
• Geropsychology, Clinical
• Global Mental Health
• Habit Formation and Behavior Change
• Health Psychology
• Health Psychology Research and Practice, Measurement in
• Heider, Fritz
• Heuristics and Biases
• History of Psychology
• Human Factors
• Humanistic Psychology
• Implicit Association Test (IAT)
• Industrial and Organizational Psychology
• Inferential Statistics in Psychology
• Insanity Defense, The
• Intelligence
• Intelligence, Crystallized and Fluid
• Intercultural Psychology
• Intergroup Conflict
• International Classification of Diseases and Related Healt...
• International Psychology
• Interviewing in Forensic Settings
• Intimate Partner Violence, Psychological Perspectives on
• Introversion–Extraversion
• Law, Psychology and
• Lazarus, Richard
• Learned Helplessness
• Learning Theory
• Learning versus Performance
• LGBTQ+ Romantic Relationships
• Lie Detection in a Forensic Context
• Life-Span Development
• Locus of Control
• Loneliness and Health
• Mathematical Psychology
• Meaning in Life
• Mechanisms and Processes of Peer Contagion
• Media Violence, Psychological Perspectives on
• Mediation Analysis
• Memories, Autobiographical
• Memories, Flashbulb
• Memories, Repressed and Recovered
• Memory, False
• Memory, Human
• Memory, Implicit versus Explicit
• Memory in Educational Settings
• Memory, Semantic
• Metacognition
• Metaphor, Psychological Perspectives on
• Microaggressions
• Military Psychology
• Mindfulness
• Mindfulness and Education
• Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)
• Money, Psychology of
• Moral Conviction
• Moral Development
• Moral Psychology
• Moral Reasoning
• Nature versus Nurture Debate in Psychology
• Neuroscience of Associative Learning
• Nonergodicity in Psychology and Neuroscience
• Nonparametric Statistical Analysis in Psychology
• Observational (Non-Randomized) Studies
• Obsessive-Complusive Disorder (OCD)
• Occupational Health Psychology
• Olfaction, Human
• Operant Conditioning
• Optimism and Pessimism
• Organizational Justice
• Parenting Stress
• Parenting Styles
• Parents' Beliefs about Children
• Path Models
• Peace Psychology
• Perception, Person
• Performance Appraisal
• Personality and Health
• Personality Disorders
• Personality Psychology
• Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies: From Car...
• Phenomenological Psychology
• Placebo Effects in Psychology
• Play Behavior
• Positive Psychological Capital (PsyCap)
• Positive Psychology
• Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
• Prejudice and Stereotyping
• Pretrial Publicity
• Prisoner's Dilemma
• Problem Solving and Decision Making
• Procrastination
• Prosocial Behavior
• Prosocial Spending and Well-Being
• Psycholinguistics
• Psychological Literacy
• Psychological Perspectives on Food and Eating
• Psychology, Political
• Psychoneuroimmunology
• Psychophysics, Visual
• Psychotherapy
• Psychotic Disorders
• Publication Bias in Psychology
• Reasoning, Counterfactual
• Rehabilitation Psychology
• Relationships
• Reliability–Contemporary Psychometric Conceptions
• Religion, Psychology and
• Risk Taking
• Role of the Expert Witness in Forensic Psychology, The
• Sample Size Planning for Statistical Power and Accurate Es...
• Schizophrenic Disorders
• School Psychology
• School Psychology, Counseling Services in
• Self, Gender and
• Self, Psychology of the
• Self-Construal
• Self-Control
• Self-Deception
• Self-Determination Theory
• Self-Efficacy
• Self-Esteem
• Self-Monitoring
• Self-Regulation in Educational Settings
• Self-Report Tests, Measures, and Inventories in Clinical P...
• Sensation Seeking
• Sex and Gender
• Sexual Minority Parenting
• Sexual Orientation
• Simpson's Paradox in Psychology
• Single People
• Skinner, B.F.
• Sleep and Dreaming
• Small Groups
• Social Class and Social Status
• Social Cognition
• Social Neuroscience
• Social Support
• Social Touch and Massage Therapy Research
• Somatoform Disorders
• Spatial Attention
• Sports Psychology
• Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE): Icon and Controversy
• Stereotype Threat
• Stereotypes
• Stress and Coping, Psychology of
• Student Success in College
• Subjective Wellbeing Homeostasis
• Taste, Psychological Perspectives on
• Teaching of Psychology
• Terror Management Theory
• Testing and Assessment
• The Concept of Validity in Psychological Assessment
• The Neuroscience of Emotion Regulation
• The Reasoned Action Approach and the Theories of Reasoned ...
• The Weapon Focus Effect in Eyewitness Memory
• Theory of Mind
• Therapy, Cognitive-Behavioral
• Thinking Skills in Educational Settings
• Time Perception
• Trait Perspective
• Trauma Psychology
• Twin Studies
• Type A Behavior Pattern (Coronary Prone Personality)
• Unconscious Processes
• Video Games and Violent Content
• Virtues and Character Strengths
• Women and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM...
• Women, Psychology of
• Work Well-Being
• Workforce Training Evaluation
• Wundt, Wilhelm
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Legal Notice
• Accessibility

Powered by:

• [81.177.182.159]
• 81.177.182.159

RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here . You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/ . Click “accept” to agree.

Measuring everyday life: Talking about research and why it matters

Edited by Brian G. Southwell , Karen Keaton Jackson, Bridget Pittman-Blackwell.

February 02, 2022 Open Access Peer Reviewed

DOI: 10.3768/rtipress.2022.bk.0025.2201

• Share on Facebook
• Share on X.com
• Share on Linkedin
• Curated from interviews featured on the public radio show, The Measure of Everyday Life, this collection reveals ways that we can ask useful questions.
• The book also offers insights from behind the scenes of social science research, communication campaigns and interventions, and community engagement projects.
• A wide range of audiences—including anyone interested in applying academic research to practical projects, new graduate students, and undergraduate students learning about research—should find useful material in the collection.

“Asking questions, good questions asked the right way, is the basis for so much of the work I do. This book is a timely look at why those questions and the research that propels them matter. We are at precisely the moment when there are so many players in our public discourse that need to take lessons from inside these pages.”

Soledad O'Brien, CEO of SO'B Productions, host of Matter of Fact , and correspondent for HBO and Al Jazeera America

“ The Measure of Everyday Life is a wonderful resource that communicates public health topics and issues in a digestible and conversational way. As an adjunct professor, I have used the podcast episodes for homework and in-class exercises with graduate public health students. Not only do I get positive reviews from the students, but the episodes are a catalyst for a thought-provoking discussion among the class. During a time when misinformation is rampant, it is so great to have this resource (both the podcast episodes and this book) to show the breadth and depth of social science research and practice.”

Dr. Rachel Powell, CDC Foundation and Georgia State University

“This book invites you into truly wide-ranging—and highly accessible—conversations about how researchers work, how they sometimes surprise themselves as they dig into a topic, and what their work tells us about a whole host of pressing issues, ranging from artificial intelligence to end of life, to the language we use to talk to our kids about obesity, to the role of ‘back roads’ in rural Black communities in the south. Fascinating and thought-provoking.”

Joanne Kenen, Commonwealth Fund Journalist in Residence, Johns Hopkins University, and contributing editor for Politico

Download EPUB eBook

Download mobi ebook, purchase from amazon, https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/81a51eb2-64ae-3f93-87a8-2ed147060085/, watch video.

To contact an author or seek permission to use copyrighted content, contact our editorial team

• [email protected]
• +1 919 541 6490

Meet the Experts

Brian G. Southwell

Related publications, recent publications, how effective are healthy eating interventions delivered in early childhood education and care settings, ground-truthing social network analysis for universal health coverage advocacy networks in nigeria, calibration weighting with a blended (probability and nonprobability) sample, 2024 national institute of justice forensic science research and development symposium, adapting opioid misuse prevention programs during covid-19, trauma-informed approaches and community engagement, wearable sensors for service members and first responders, the opioid crisis and hospice care.

What Is Research, and Why Do People Do It?

• Open Access
• First Online: 03 December 2022

Cite this chapter

You have full access to this open access chapter

• James Hiebert 6 ,
• Jinfa Cai 7 ,
• Stephen Hwang 7 ,
• Anne K Morris 6 &
• Charles Hohensee 6  

Part of the book series: Research in Mathematics Education ((RME))

22k Accesses

Abstractspiepr Abs1

Every day people do research as they gather information to learn about something of interest. In the scientific world, however, research means something different than simply gathering information. Scientific research is characterized by its careful planning and observing, by its relentless efforts to understand and explain, and by its commitment to learn from everyone else seriously engaged in research. We call this kind of research scientific inquiry and define it as “formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses.” By “hypotheses” we do not mean the hypotheses you encounter in statistics courses. We mean predictions about what you expect to find and rationales for why you made these predictions. Throughout this and the remaining chapters we make clear that the process of scientific inquiry applies to all kinds of research studies and data, both qualitative and quantitative.

You have full access to this open access chapter,  Download chapter PDF

Part I. What Is Research?

Have you ever studied something carefully because you wanted to know more about it? Maybe you wanted to know more about your grandmother’s life when she was younger so you asked her to tell you stories from her childhood, or maybe you wanted to know more about a fertilizer you were about to use in your garden so you read the ingredients on the package and looked them up online. According to the dictionary definition, you were doing research.

Recall your high school assignments asking you to “research” a topic. The assignment likely included consulting a variety of sources that discussed the topic, perhaps including some “original” sources. Often, the teacher referred to your product as a “research paper.”

Were you conducting research when you interviewed your grandmother or wrote high school papers reviewing a particular topic? Our view is that you were engaged in part of the research process, but only a small part. In this book, we reserve the word “research” for what it means in the scientific world, that is, for scientific research or, more pointedly, for scientific inquiry .

Exercise 1.1

Before you read any further, write a definition of what you think scientific inquiry is. Keep it short—Two to three sentences. You will periodically update this definition as you read this chapter and the remainder of the book.

This book is about scientific inquiry—what it is and how to do it. For starters, scientific inquiry is a process, a particular way of finding out about something that involves a number of phases. Each phase of the process constitutes one aspect of scientific inquiry. You are doing scientific inquiry as you engage in each phase, but you have not done scientific inquiry until you complete the full process. Each phase is necessary but not sufficient.

In this chapter, we set the stage by defining scientific inquiry—describing what it is and what it is not—and by discussing what it is good for and why people do it. The remaining chapters build directly on the ideas presented in this chapter.

A first thing to know is that scientific inquiry is not all or nothing. “Scientificness” is a continuum. Inquiries can be more scientific or less scientific. What makes an inquiry more scientific? You might be surprised there is no universally agreed upon answer to this question. None of the descriptors we know of are sufficient by themselves to define scientific inquiry. But all of them give you a way of thinking about some aspects of the process of scientific inquiry. Each one gives you different insights.

Exercise 1.2

As you read about each descriptor below, think about what would make an inquiry more or less scientific. If you think a descriptor is important, use it to revise your definition of scientific inquiry.

Creating an Image of Scientific Inquiry

We will present three descriptors of scientific inquiry. Each provides a different perspective and emphasizes a different aspect of scientific inquiry. We will draw on all three descriptors to compose our definition of scientific inquiry.

Descriptor 1. Experience Carefully Planned in Advance

Sir Ronald Fisher, often called the father of modern statistical design, once referred to research as “experience carefully planned in advance” (1935, p. 8). He said that humans are always learning from experience, from interacting with the world around them. Usually, this learning is haphazard rather than the result of a deliberate process carried out over an extended period of time. Research, Fisher said, was learning from experience, but experience carefully planned in advance.

This phrase can be fully appreciated by looking at each word. The fact that scientific inquiry is based on experience means that it is based on interacting with the world. These interactions could be thought of as the stuff of scientific inquiry. In addition, it is not just any experience that counts. The experience must be carefully planned . The interactions with the world must be conducted with an explicit, describable purpose, and steps must be taken to make the intended learning as likely as possible. This planning is an integral part of scientific inquiry; it is not just a preparation phase. It is one of the things that distinguishes scientific inquiry from many everyday learning experiences. Finally, these steps must be taken beforehand and the purpose of the inquiry must be articulated in advance of the experience. Clearly, scientific inquiry does not happen by accident, by just stumbling into something. Stumbling into something unexpected and interesting can happen while engaged in scientific inquiry, but learning does not depend on it and serendipity does not make the inquiry scientific.

Descriptor 2. Observing Something and Trying to Explain Why It Is the Way It Is

When we were writing this chapter and googled “scientific inquiry,” the first entry was: “Scientific inquiry refers to the diverse ways in which scientists study the natural world and propose explanations based on the evidence derived from their work.” The emphasis is on studying, or observing, and then explaining . This descriptor takes the image of scientific inquiry beyond carefully planned experience and includes explaining what was experienced.

According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, “explain” means “(a) to make known, (b) to make plain or understandable, (c) to give the reason or cause of, and (d) to show the logical development or relations of” (Merriam-Webster, n.d. ). We will use all these definitions. Taken together, they suggest that to explain an observation means to understand it by finding reasons (or causes) for why it is as it is. In this sense of scientific inquiry, the following are synonyms: explaining why, understanding why, and reasoning about causes and effects. Our image of scientific inquiry now includes planning, observing, and explaining why.

We need to add a final note about this descriptor. We have phrased it in a way that suggests “observing something” means you are observing something in real time—observing the way things are or the way things are changing. This is often true. But, observing could mean observing data that already have been collected, maybe by someone else making the original observations (e.g., secondary analysis of NAEP data or analysis of existing video recordings of classroom instruction). We will address secondary analyses more fully in Chap. 4 . For now, what is important is that the process requires explaining why the data look like they do.

We must note that for us, the term “data” is not limited to numerical or quantitative data such as test scores. Data can also take many nonquantitative forms, including written survey responses, interview transcripts, journal entries, video recordings of students, teachers, and classrooms, text messages, and so forth.

Exercise 1.3

What are the implications of the statement that just “observing” is not enough to count as scientific inquiry? Does this mean that a detailed description of a phenomenon is not scientific inquiry?

Find sources that define research in education that differ with our position, that say description alone, without explanation, counts as scientific research. Identify the precise points where the opinions differ. What are the best arguments for each of the positions? Which do you prefer? Why?

Descriptor 3. Updating Everyone’s Thinking in Response to More and Better Information

This descriptor focuses on a third aspect of scientific inquiry: updating and advancing the field’s understanding of phenomena that are investigated. This descriptor foregrounds a powerful characteristic of scientific inquiry: the reliability (or trustworthiness) of what is learned and the ultimate inevitability of this learning to advance human understanding of phenomena. Humans might choose not to learn from scientific inquiry, but history suggests that scientific inquiry always has the potential to advance understanding and that, eventually, humans take advantage of these new understandings.

Before exploring these bold claims a bit further, note that this descriptor uses “information” in the same way the previous two descriptors used “experience” and “observations.” These are the stuff of scientific inquiry and we will use them often, sometimes interchangeably. Frequently, we will use the term “data” to stand for all these terms.

An overriding goal of scientific inquiry is for everyone to learn from what one scientist does. Much of this book is about the methods you need to use so others have faith in what you report and can learn the same things you learned. This aspect of scientific inquiry has many implications.

One implication is that scientific inquiry is not a private practice. It is a public practice available for others to see and learn from. Notice how different this is from everyday learning. When you happen to learn something from your everyday experience, often only you gain from the experience. The fact that research is a public practice means it is also a social one. It is best conducted by interacting with others along the way: soliciting feedback at each phase, taking opportunities to present work-in-progress, and benefitting from the advice of others.

A second implication is that you, as the researcher, must be committed to sharing what you are doing and what you are learning in an open and transparent way. This allows all phases of your work to be scrutinized and critiqued. This is what gives your work credibility. The reliability or trustworthiness of your findings depends on your colleagues recognizing that you have used all appropriate methods to maximize the chances that your claims are justified by the data.

A third implication of viewing scientific inquiry as a collective enterprise is the reverse of the second—you must be committed to receiving comments from others. You must treat your colleagues as fair and honest critics even though it might sometimes feel otherwise. You must appreciate their job, which is to remain skeptical while scrutinizing what you have done in considerable detail. To provide the best help to you, they must remain skeptical about your conclusions (when, for example, the data are difficult for them to interpret) until you offer a convincing logical argument based on the information you share. A rather harsh but good-to-remember statement of the role of your friendly critics was voiced by Karl Popper, a well-known twentieth century philosopher of science: “. . . if you are interested in the problem which I tried to solve by my tentative assertion, you may help me by criticizing it as severely as you can” (Popper, 1968, p. 27).

A final implication of this third descriptor is that, as someone engaged in scientific inquiry, you have no choice but to update your thinking when the data support a different conclusion. This applies to your own data as well as to those of others. When data clearly point to a specific claim, even one that is quite different than you expected, you must reconsider your position. If the outcome is replicated multiple times, you need to adjust your thinking accordingly. Scientific inquiry does not let you pick and choose which data to believe; it mandates that everyone update their thinking when the data warrant an update.

Doing Scientific Inquiry

We define scientific inquiry in an operational sense—what does it mean to do scientific inquiry? What kind of process would satisfy all three descriptors: carefully planning an experience in advance; observing and trying to explain what you see; and, contributing to updating everyone’s thinking about an important phenomenon?

We define scientific inquiry as formulating , testing , and revising hypotheses about phenomena of interest.

Of course, we are not the only ones who define it in this way. The definition for the scientific method posted by the editors of Britannica is: “a researcher develops a hypothesis, tests it through various means, and then modifies the hypothesis on the basis of the outcome of the tests and experiments” (Britannica, n.d. ).

Notice how defining scientific inquiry this way satisfies each of the descriptors. “Carefully planning an experience in advance” is exactly what happens when formulating a hypothesis about a phenomenon of interest and thinking about how to test it. “ Observing a phenomenon” occurs when testing a hypothesis, and “ explaining ” what is found is required when revising a hypothesis based on the data. Finally, “updating everyone’s thinking” comes from comparing publicly the original with the revised hypothesis.

Doing scientific inquiry, as we have defined it, underscores the value of accumulating knowledge rather than generating random bits of knowledge. Formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses is an ongoing process, with each revised hypothesis begging for another test, whether by the same researcher or by new researchers. The editors of Britannica signaled this cyclic process by adding the following phrase to their definition of the scientific method: “The modified hypothesis is then retested, further modified, and tested again.” Scientific inquiry creates a process that encourages each study to build on the studies that have gone before. Through collective engagement in this process of building study on top of study, the scientific community works together to update its thinking.

Before exploring more fully the meaning of “formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses,” we need to acknowledge that this is not the only way researchers define research. Some researchers prefer a less formal definition, one that includes more serendipity, less planning, less explanation. You might have come across more open definitions such as “research is finding out about something.” We prefer the tighter hypothesis formulation, testing, and revision definition because we believe it provides a single, coherent map for conducting research that addresses many of the thorny problems educational researchers encounter. We believe it is the most useful orientation toward research and the most helpful to learn as a beginning researcher.

A final clarification of our definition is that it applies equally to qualitative and quantitative research. This is a familiar distinction in education that has generated much discussion. You might think our definition favors quantitative methods over qualitative methods because the language of hypothesis formulation and testing is often associated with quantitative methods. In fact, we do not favor one method over another. In Chap. 4 , we will illustrate how our definition fits research using a range of quantitative and qualitative methods.

Exercise 1.4

Look for ways to extend what the field knows in an area that has already received attention by other researchers. Specifically, you can search for a program of research carried out by more experienced researchers that has some revised hypotheses that remain untested. Identify a revised hypothesis that you might like to test.

Unpacking the Terms Formulating, Testing, and Revising Hypotheses

To get a full sense of the definition of scientific inquiry we will use throughout this book, it is helpful to spend a little time with each of the key terms.

We first want to make clear that we use the term “hypothesis” as it is defined in most dictionaries and as it used in many scientific fields rather than as it is usually defined in educational statistics courses. By “hypothesis,” we do not mean a null hypothesis that is accepted or rejected by statistical analysis. Rather, we use “hypothesis” in the sense conveyed by the following definitions: “An idea or explanation for something that is based on known facts but has not yet been proved” (Cambridge University Press, n.d. ), and “An unproved theory, proposition, or supposition, tentatively accepted to explain certain facts and to provide a basis for further investigation or argument” (Agnes & Guralnik, 2008 ).

We distinguish two parts to “hypotheses.” Hypotheses consist of predictions and rationales . Predictions are statements about what you expect to find when you inquire about something. Rationales are explanations for why you made the predictions you did, why you believe your predictions are correct. So, for us “formulating hypotheses” means making explicit predictions and developing rationales for the predictions.

“Testing hypotheses” means making observations that allow you to assess in what ways your predictions were correct and in what ways they were incorrect. In education research, it is rarely useful to think of your predictions as either right or wrong. Because of the complexity of most issues you will investigate, most predictions will be right in some ways and wrong in others.

By studying the observations you make (data you collect) to test your hypotheses, you can revise your hypotheses to better align with the observations. This means revising your predictions plus revising your rationales to justify your adjusted predictions. Even though you might not run another test, formulating revised hypotheses is an essential part of conducting a research study. Comparing your original and revised hypotheses informs everyone of what you learned by conducting your study. In addition, a revised hypothesis sets the stage for you or someone else to extend your study and accumulate more knowledge of the phenomenon.

We should note that not everyone makes a clear distinction between predictions and rationales as two aspects of hypotheses. In fact, common, non-scientific uses of the word “hypothesis” may limit it to only a prediction or only an explanation (or rationale). We choose to explicitly include both prediction and rationale in our definition of hypothesis, not because we assert this should be the universal definition, but because we want to foreground the importance of both parts acting in concert. Using “hypothesis” to represent both prediction and rationale could hide the two aspects, but we make them explicit because they provide different kinds of information. It is usually easier to make predictions than develop rationales because predictions can be guesses, hunches, or gut feelings about which you have little confidence. Developing a compelling rationale requires careful thought plus reading what other researchers have found plus talking with your colleagues. Often, while you are developing your rationale you will find good reasons to change your predictions. Developing good rationales is the engine that drives scientific inquiry. Rationales are essentially descriptions of how much you know about the phenomenon you are studying. Throughout this guide, we will elaborate on how developing good rationales drives scientific inquiry. For now, we simply note that it can sharpen your predictions and help you to interpret your data as you test your hypotheses.

Hypotheses in education research take a variety of forms or types. This is because there are a variety of phenomena that can be investigated. Investigating educational phenomena is sometimes best done using qualitative methods, sometimes using quantitative methods, and most often using mixed methods (e.g., Hay, 2016 ; Weis et al. 2019a ; Weisner, 2005 ). This means that, given our definition, hypotheses are equally applicable to qualitative and quantitative investigations.

Hypotheses take different forms when they are used to investigate different kinds of phenomena. Two very different activities in education could be labeled conducting experiments and descriptions. In an experiment, a hypothesis makes a prediction about anticipated changes, say the changes that occur when a treatment or intervention is applied. You might investigate how students’ thinking changes during a particular kind of instruction.

A second type of hypothesis, relevant for descriptive research, makes a prediction about what you will find when you investigate and describe the nature of a situation. The goal is to understand a situation as it exists rather than to understand a change from one situation to another. In this case, your prediction is what you expect to observe. Your rationale is the set of reasons for making this prediction; it is your current explanation for why the situation will look like it does.

You will probably read, if you have not already, that some researchers say you do not need a prediction to conduct a descriptive study. We will discuss this point of view in Chap. 2 . For now, we simply claim that scientific inquiry, as we have defined it, applies to all kinds of research studies. Descriptive studies, like others, not only benefit from formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses, but also need hypothesis formulating, testing, and revising.

One reason we define research as formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses is that if you think of research in this way you are less likely to go wrong. It is a useful guide for the entire process, as we will describe in detail in the chapters ahead. For example, as you build the rationale for your predictions, you are constructing the theoretical framework for your study (Chap. 3 ). As you work out the methods you will use to test your hypothesis, every decision you make will be based on asking, “Will this help me formulate or test or revise my hypothesis?” (Chap. 4 ). As you interpret the results of testing your predictions, you will compare them to what you predicted and examine the differences, focusing on how you must revise your hypotheses (Chap. 5 ). By anchoring the process to formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses, you will make smart decisions that yield a coherent and well-designed study.

Exercise 1.5

Compare the concept of formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses with the descriptions of scientific inquiry contained in Scientific Research in Education (NRC, 2002 ). How are they similar or different?

Exercise 1.6

Provide an example to illustrate and emphasize the differences between everyday learning/thinking and scientific inquiry.

Learning from Doing Scientific Inquiry

We noted earlier that a measure of what you have learned by conducting a research study is found in the differences between your original hypothesis and your revised hypothesis based on the data you collected to test your hypothesis. We will elaborate this statement in later chapters, but we preview our argument here.

Even before collecting data, scientific inquiry requires cycles of making a prediction, developing a rationale, refining your predictions, reading and studying more to strengthen your rationale, refining your predictions again, and so forth. And, even if you have run through several such cycles, you still will likely find that when you test your prediction you will be partly right and partly wrong. The results will support some parts of your predictions but not others, or the results will “kind of” support your predictions. A critical part of scientific inquiry is making sense of your results by interpreting them against your predictions. Carefully describing what aspects of your data supported your predictions, what aspects did not, and what data fell outside of any predictions is not an easy task, but you cannot learn from your study without doing this analysis.

Analyzing the matches and mismatches between your predictions and your data allows you to formulate different rationales that would have accounted for more of the data. The best revised rationale is the one that accounts for the most data. Once you have revised your rationales, you can think about the predictions they best justify or explain. It is by comparing your original rationales to your new rationales that you can sort out what you learned from your study.

Suppose your study was an experiment. Maybe you were investigating the effects of a new instructional intervention on students’ learning. Your original rationale was your explanation for why the intervention would change the learning outcomes in a particular way. Your revised rationale explained why the changes that you observed occurred like they did and why your revised predictions are better. Maybe your original rationale focused on the potential of the activities if they were implemented in ideal ways and your revised rationale included the factors that are likely to affect how teachers implement them. By comparing the before and after rationales, you are describing what you learned—what you can explain now that you could not before. Another way of saying this is that you are describing how much more you understand now than before you conducted your study.

Revised predictions based on carefully planned and collected data usually exhibit some of the following features compared with the originals: more precision, more completeness, and broader scope. Revised rationales have more explanatory power and become more complete, more aligned with the new predictions, sharper, and overall more convincing.

Part II. Why Do Educators Do Research?

Doing scientific inquiry is a lot of work. Each phase of the process takes time, and you will often cycle back to improve earlier phases as you engage in later phases. Because of the significant effort required, you should make sure your study is worth it. So, from the beginning, you should think about the purpose of your study. Why do you want to do it? And, because research is a social practice, you should also think about whether the results of your study are likely to be important and significant to the education community.

If you are doing research in the way we have described—as scientific inquiry—then one purpose of your study is to understand , not just to describe or evaluate or report. As we noted earlier, when you formulate hypotheses, you are developing rationales that explain why things might be like they are. In our view, trying to understand and explain is what separates research from other kinds of activities, like evaluating or describing.

One reason understanding is so important is that it allows researchers to see how or why something works like it does. When you see how something works, you are better able to predict how it might work in other contexts, under other conditions. And, because conditions, or contextual factors, matter a lot in education, gaining insights into applying your findings to other contexts increases the contributions of your work and its importance to the broader education community.

Consequently, the purposes of research studies in education often include the more specific aim of identifying and understanding the conditions under which the phenomena being studied work like the observations suggest. A classic example of this kind of study in mathematics education was reported by William Brownell and Harold Moser in 1949 . They were trying to establish which method of subtracting whole numbers could be taught most effectively—the regrouping method or the equal additions method. However, they realized that effectiveness might depend on the conditions under which the methods were taught—“meaningfully” versus “mechanically.” So, they designed a study that crossed the two instructional approaches with the two different methods (regrouping and equal additions). Among other results, they found that these conditions did matter. The regrouping method was more effective under the meaningful condition than the mechanical condition, but the same was not true for the equal additions algorithm.

What do education researchers want to understand? In our view, the ultimate goal of education is to offer all students the best possible learning opportunities. So, we believe the ultimate purpose of scientific inquiry in education is to develop understanding that supports the improvement of learning opportunities for all students. We say “ultimate” because there are lots of issues that must be understood to improve learning opportunities for all students. Hypotheses about many aspects of education are connected, ultimately, to students’ learning. For example, formulating and testing a hypothesis that preservice teachers need to engage in particular kinds of activities in their coursework in order to teach particular topics well is, ultimately, connected to improving students’ learning opportunities. So is hypothesizing that school districts often devote relatively few resources to instructional leadership training or hypothesizing that positioning mathematics as a tool students can use to combat social injustice can help students see the relevance of mathematics to their lives.

We do not exclude the importance of research on educational issues more removed from improving students’ learning opportunities, but we do think the argument for their importance will be more difficult to make. If there is no way to imagine a connection between your hypothesis and improving learning opportunities for students, even a distant connection, we recommend you reconsider whether it is an important hypothesis within the education community.

Notice that we said the ultimate goal of education is to offer all students the best possible learning opportunities. For too long, educators have been satisfied with a goal of offering rich learning opportunities for lots of students, sometimes even for just the majority of students, but not necessarily for all students. Evaluations of success often are based on outcomes that show high averages. In other words, if many students have learned something, or even a smaller number have learned a lot, educators may have been satisfied. The problem is that there is usually a pattern in the groups of students who receive lower quality opportunities—students of color and students who live in poor areas, urban and rural. This is not acceptable. Consequently, we emphasize the premise that the purpose of education research is to offer rich learning opportunities to all students.

One way to make sure you will be able to convince others of the importance of your study is to consider investigating some aspect of teachers’ shared instructional problems. Historically, researchers in education have set their own research agendas, regardless of the problems teachers are facing in schools. It is increasingly recognized that teachers have had trouble applying to their own classrooms what researchers find. To address this problem, a researcher could partner with a teacher—better yet, a small group of teachers—and talk with them about instructional problems they all share. These discussions can create a rich pool of problems researchers can consider. If researchers pursued one of these problems (preferably alongside teachers), the connection to improving learning opportunities for all students could be direct and immediate. “Grounding a research question in instructional problems that are experienced across multiple teachers’ classrooms helps to ensure that the answer to the question will be of sufficient scope to be relevant and significant beyond the local context” (Cai et al., 2019b , p. 115).

As a beginning researcher, determining the relevance and importance of a research problem is especially challenging. We recommend talking with advisors, other experienced researchers, and peers to test the educational importance of possible research problems and topics of study. You will also learn much more about the issue of research importance when you read Chap. 5 .

Exercise 1.7

Identify a problem in education that is closely connected to improving learning opportunities and a problem that has a less close connection. For each problem, write a brief argument (like a logical sequence of if-then statements) that connects the problem to all students’ learning opportunities.

Part III. Conducting Research as a Practice of Failing Productively

Scientific inquiry involves formulating hypotheses about phenomena that are not fully understood—by you or anyone else. Even if you are able to inform your hypotheses with lots of knowledge that has already been accumulated, you are likely to find that your prediction is not entirely accurate. This is normal. Remember, scientific inquiry is a process of constantly updating your thinking. More and better information means revising your thinking, again, and again, and again. Because you never fully understand a complicated phenomenon and your hypotheses never produce completely accurate predictions, it is easy to believe you are somehow failing.

The trick is to fail upward, to fail to predict accurately in ways that inform your next hypothesis so you can make a better prediction. Some of the best-known researchers in education have been open and honest about the many times their predictions were wrong and, based on the results of their studies and those of others, they continuously updated their thinking and changed their hypotheses.

A striking example of publicly revising (actually reversing) hypotheses due to incorrect predictions is found in the work of Lee J. Cronbach, one of the most distinguished educational psychologists of the twentieth century. In 1955, Cronbach delivered his presidential address to the American Psychological Association. Titling it “Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology,” Cronbach proposed a rapprochement between two research approaches—correlational studies that focused on individual differences and experimental studies that focused on instructional treatments controlling for individual differences. (We will examine different research approaches in Chap. 4 ). If these approaches could be brought together, reasoned Cronbach ( 1957 ), researchers could find interactions between individual characteristics and treatments (aptitude-treatment interactions or ATIs), fitting the best treatments to different individuals.

In 1975, after years of research by many researchers looking for ATIs, Cronbach acknowledged the evidence for simple, useful ATIs had not been found. Even when trying to find interactions between a few variables that could provide instructional guidance, the analysis, said Cronbach, creates “a hall of mirrors that extends to infinity, tormenting even the boldest investigators and defeating even ambitious designs” (Cronbach, 1975 , p. 119).

As he was reflecting back on his work, Cronbach ( 1986 ) recommended moving away from documenting instructional effects through statistical inference (an approach he had championed for much of his career) and toward approaches that probe the reasons for these effects, approaches that provide a “full account of events in a time, place, and context” (Cronbach, 1986 , p. 104). This is a remarkable change in hypotheses, a change based on data and made fully transparent. Cronbach understood the value of failing productively.

Closer to home, in a less dramatic example, one of us began a line of scientific inquiry into how to prepare elementary preservice teachers to teach early algebra. Teaching early algebra meant engaging elementary students in early forms of algebraic reasoning. Such reasoning should help them transition from arithmetic to algebra. To begin this line of inquiry, a set of activities for preservice teachers were developed. Even though the activities were based on well-supported hypotheses, they largely failed to engage preservice teachers as predicted because of unanticipated challenges the preservice teachers faced. To capitalize on this failure, follow-up studies were conducted, first to better understand elementary preservice teachers’ challenges with preparing to teach early algebra, and then to better support preservice teachers in navigating these challenges. In this example, the initial failure was a necessary step in the researchers’ scientific inquiry and furthered the researchers’ understanding of this issue.

We present another example of failing productively in Chap. 2 . That example emerges from recounting the history of a well-known research program in mathematics education.

Making mistakes is an inherent part of doing scientific research. Conducting a study is rarely a smooth path from beginning to end. We recommend that you keep the following things in mind as you begin a career of conducting research in education.

First, do not get discouraged when you make mistakes; do not fall into the trap of feeling like you are not capable of doing research because you make too many errors.

Second, learn from your mistakes. Do not ignore your mistakes or treat them as errors that you simply need to forget and move past. Mistakes are rich sites for learning—in research just as in other fields of study.

Third, by reflecting on your mistakes, you can learn to make better mistakes, mistakes that inform you about a productive next step. You will not be able to eliminate your mistakes, but you can set a goal of making better and better mistakes.

Exercise 1.8

How does scientific inquiry differ from everyday learning in giving you the tools to fail upward? You may find helpful perspectives on this question in other resources on science and scientific inquiry (e.g., Failure: Why Science is So Successful by Firestein, 2015).

Exercise 1.9

Use what you have learned in this chapter to write a new definition of scientific inquiry. Compare this definition with the one you wrote before reading this chapter. If you are reading this book as part of a course, compare your definition with your colleagues’ definitions. Develop a consensus definition with everyone in the course.

Part IV. Preview of Chap. 2

Now that you have a good idea of what research is, at least of what we believe research is, the next step is to think about how to actually begin doing research. This means how to begin formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses. As for all phases of scientific inquiry, there are lots of things to think about. Because it is critical to start well, we devote Chap. 2 to getting started with formulating hypotheses.

Agnes, M., & Guralnik, D. B. (Eds.). (2008). Hypothesis. In Webster’s new world college dictionary (4th ed.). Wiley.

Google Scholar  

Britannica. (n.d.). Scientific method. In Encyclopaedia Britannica . Retrieved July 15, 2022 from https://www.britannica.com/science/scientific-method

Brownell, W. A., & Moser, H. E. (1949). Meaningful vs. mechanical learning: A study in grade III subtraction . Duke University Press..

Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V., Cirillo, M., Kramer, S. L., & Hiebert, J. (2019b). Posing significant research questions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50 (2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.50.2.0114

Article   Google Scholar  

Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Hypothesis. In Cambridge dictionary . Retrieved July 15, 2022 from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/hypothesis

Cronbach, J. L. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12 , 671–684.

Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30 , 116–127.

Cronbach, L. J. (1986). Social inquiry by and for earthlings. In D. W. Fiske & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Metatheory in social science: Pluralisms and subjectivities (pp. 83–107). University of Chicago Press.

Hay, C. M. (Ed.). (2016). Methods that matter: Integrating mixed methods for more effective social science research . University of Chicago Press.

Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Explain. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary . Retrieved July 15, 2022, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/explain

National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education . National Academy Press.

Weis, L., Eisenhart, M., Duncan, G. J., Albro, E., Bueschel, A. C., Cobb, P., Eccles, J., Mendenhall, R., Moss, P., Penuel, W., Ream, R. K., Rumbaut, R. G., Sloane, F., Weisner, T. S., & Wilson, J. (2019a). Mixed methods for studies that address broad and enduring issues in education research. Teachers College Record, 121 , 100307.

Weisner, T. S. (Ed.). (2005). Discovering successful pathways in children’s development: Mixed methods in the study of childhood and family life . University of Chicago Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Education, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA

James Hiebert, Anne K Morris & Charles Hohensee

Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA

Jinfa Cai & Stephen Hwang

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Hiebert, J., Cai, J., Hwang, S., Morris, A.K., Hohensee, C. (2023). What Is Research, and Why Do People Do It?. In: Doing Research: A New Researcher’s Guide. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19078-0_1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19078-0_1

Published : 03 December 2022

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-19077-3

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-19078-0

eBook Packages : Education Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Helping People Improve Their Lives

Psychology’s Impact

Psychologists use scientific research to better understand how people learn, interpret events and make decisions. They then translate that knowledge into techniques to help people make smarter choices in their daily lives.

Based on a deep knowledge of how lifestyles are affected by factors related to biology, mental processes, and social relationships and interactions, psychologists identify and help people overcome the obstacles that inhibit them from making better choices, from exercising more or working more efficiently to using technology safely. Psychologists use psychological science to help people tap into their potential and help them perform at an optimal level.

Brain science and cognitive psychology

Developmental psychology

Human factors and engineering psychology

Psychology of teaching and learning

Sport and performance psychology

Research and Its Importance for Daily Life Essay

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Introduction

Impact of research, qualities of effective research, role of beliefs and values.

Research plays an important role in science. This is normally done to obtain detailed knowledge about certain aspects before an invention. Scientific research involves the study of diseases and other parameters to invent medicine and vaccines. Therefore, without research, there will be no inventions and therefore a big blow to health. Essentially research fulfils purposes that are designed before the exercise. However, apart from that, research has other implications on reality and daily lives. As a result, the effects of research go beyond the purpose it is meant for. This paper aims to take an analytical look at the concept of research. The paper will begin with a detailed look at the concept of research. Thereafter, the several similarities between different aspects of research will be analyzed. The impact of research on our daily life will also be reviewed.

Research has a lot of impact on the daily functioning of life. First and foremost, research leads to a better life by producing results that can be used to make life better. Especially as far as scientific research is concerned, the invention of vaccines and medicines makes diseases to be less of a threat to society (Calderon & Slavin 2001). Therefore, through the process of research, various methods of handling life’s problems and making the world a better place to live in are facilitated. Secondly, the very process of research affects society in several ways. The impact of the process of research has two dimensions.

The first part is the negative part in which the process of research has certain consequences for society. Unethical practices harm society. Since research is done on people in society, the practices adopted by the researchers have a lot of impacts. Scientific research has left some people with serious illnesses and injuries sometimes; it is like experimenting with people’s life. However, the process of research also has positive effects on society (McGill 1981). This is mainly because of employment opportunities, awareness and education. Research offers vast opportunities to the members of society to learn and obtain understanding about certain issues. At the same time, the participants of the research are remunerated making them earn a living from the same.

Several factors denote effective and valid research. To conduct valid or effective research, therefore, several considerations must be in place. First is the aspect of ethics, for research to be valid it must be conducted ethically. This involves the practices adopted for the research (Cresswell 2003). If the research involves risks, this must be communicated to the participants in advance. At the same time plans must be in place to compensate all those that will be affected in the course of the research. The disbursing of information is necessary before the research. This is important to take care of deception which is rampant in research. In general, proper preparation and education of the participants is the key to successful research. Another crucial requirement is the availability of resources for research.

Several forms of research involve a different processes. As a result, not all forms of research involve vigour. For instance, scientific research on diseases is more demanding than research on recreational issues. This is due to the context of the studies and the parameters involved. For instance, scientific research involves several processes and procedures which tend to take more resources. Recreational issues, on the other hand, are less involved due to the nature of the subject. The research can therefore be conducted with much ease.

Beliefs and values have a lot of impact on the process of research. People’s beliefs, therefore, influence the outcome and process of research. This is due to the relevance that beliefs and values have on people’s perception and philosophy of life. For instance, certain topics are considered sacred and secret in certain societies (Bryant 2005). Their beliefs don’t allow them to discuss certain things. Therefore in the process of collecting information from such people, it becomes very difficult to deal with them. People’s values also play a huge role. Some people are flexible in certain areas than others. Therefore, when conducting research one must understand the values of all participants. This is because their values determine how they approach certain issues. Religion plays a great role in determining the beliefs and values of people.

Research is part and parcel of life, in fact without research life will not be as it is. To live better life research is necessary; this is because research leads to innovation and invention. As far as science is concerned research leads to the invention of vaccines and drugs. Other areas of research also lead to a better understanding of the concepts involved. However, it is not only the results of research that benefit society but also the process of research. Some several opportunities and benefits that come with the process of research. As a result, the role of research in society goes beyond its real purpose. For research to be effective and valid several factors must be considered. Chief among them is the aspect of ethics. Different forms of research involve different forms of approaches. As a result, certain forms of research are more demanding than others. The influence of values and beliefs is notable as far as research is concerned. The paper has discussed the concept of research in detail. The process and impact of research have also been discussed.

Bryant, M. (2005). Managing an Effective and Ethical Research Project . London: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Calderon, M. & Slavin, R. (2001). Effective programs for Latino students. New York: Routledge.

Cresswell, J. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method approaches. New York: SAGE.

McGill, N. (1981). Effective research: a handbook for health planners. Washington: Institute for Health Planning.

• Market Condition Survey and Grading
• School Counseling Study: Data Analysis
• Do Vaccines Cause Autism?
• The Companies Investing Heavily in Vaccine
• The Stages of Production of the H1N1 Influenza Vaccine
• Dynamic Nature of Discovery: Crystal Skulls
• The Indispensability Argument Putting Forward by Quine and Putnam
• Pressure in Work, University and Life
• Questionnaire for Character Education Program Evaluation
• Research Question Types: Advantages and Disadvantages
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2021, December 29). Research and Its Importance for Daily Life. https://ivypanda.com/essays/research-and-its-importance-for-daily-life/

"Research and Its Importance for Daily Life." IvyPanda , 29 Dec. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/research-and-its-importance-for-daily-life/.

IvyPanda . (2021) 'Research and Its Importance for Daily Life'. 29 December.

IvyPanda . 2021. "Research and Its Importance for Daily Life." December 29, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/research-and-its-importance-for-daily-life/.

1. IvyPanda . "Research and Its Importance for Daily Life." December 29, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/research-and-its-importance-for-daily-life/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Research and Its Importance for Daily Life." December 29, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/research-and-its-importance-for-daily-life/.

• Quick-Bytes
• Web Stories
• Success Stories

Shoolini Students Ace GPAT & NIPER Exams

CEDSA Conclave Highlights Innovations in Direct Selling

Talented Minds Innovate at Summer Patent School  

Students Get Career-Ready With SPRINT 

Unwind in Shimla: Top Things to See and Do

Yogananda Happiness & Wellness Centre Inaugurated

1,000 Students Unite for Swachhta Pakhwada

Shoolini Campus Wonders

Neharika’s Story: From Shoolini to Oxford… Unplugged!

Literary Odyssey: Rsvika Authors ‘Draupadi’s 13 Relations’

Shoolini helped me become a better person

A Grateful Alumini Reciprocates Gesture

Shoolini Student Lands ₹42-Lakh Job at Algo8

Placement Vision, Strategies and Goals for 2024 

From Shoolini to the Bank of America!

Cognizant Hires 13 Btech CSE & Food Tech Students | Shoolini

Creating Next-Gen Media Mavericks with Prof Pubby

Driving Innovation in Pharmaceutical Sciences at Shoolini

Innovating Liberal Arts for the Future at Shoolini

Guiding Law Students from Classroom to Courtroom

Shoolini Hosts Talk on ‘Academic Publishing with Springer’

Shoolini patents cast high-tech road safety net .

New Technique Promises Early Breast Cancer Detection

Patented! Game-Changing Tech to Detect Drunk Drivers

Why and How does Research Matter in a Student’s Life?

The essence of student life is lost in the quest to be a class topper. Unfortunately, the world only cares about a report card and top grades. Bereft of choice, students take the easy way out  they lose interest in going above and beyond the academic curriculum. Is a degree just a means to financial independence? What about the fire, the passion for exploring unchartered territory? What about innovations that can change the world?

Only a handful of students understand that research has the power to change the world, to change the very fabric of our being, and to create something innovative and novel.

Every student should go through the journey of research, see why?

Success comes from curiosity, concentration, perseverance and self-criticism  Albert Einstein

The irresistible desire to learn and know new things is the foundation of research. A curious student will observe, question, experiment, and then learn. This will lead him to discover and uncover new things, which may change the face of the world forever.

Research is critical for improving society, sustaining the economy, propelling innovation, and tackling problems that ordinary people confront daily. Studying, analysing, experimenting and discovering teach students about our rich history and help them understand our present context and plan their future.

The research component provides a comprehensive learning experience as students can investigate the impact of implementing new thought processes through research and testing. Discoveries are being made in numerous domains daily, particularly science-related, and research is at its centre.

Research keeps you from lagging or harbouring inaccurate information about a subject. You might utilise the most recent data to expand on ideas or speak eloquently about a topic. This brings us to the second point about establishing credibility.

Research enables us to tackle global challenges and make evidence-based decisions. It sheds light on issues that have remained buried for long and allows people to discuss concerns and answer questions that society does not address.

Let us discuss why and how research matters in a students life.

Research for self-sufficiency: Importance

The benefits of scholarly research in higher education are innumerable. With a more functional deep dive into the subject matter under investigation, students improve their capacity to analyse and discuss any topic. The educational journey of research helps students learn all about current discussions. Developing essential library skills is a huge benefit to becoming self-sufficient. Thus, research aids in evaluating other writing styles and improving one’s reading and writing skills. A thoroughly explained bibliography is often an essential initial step in performing scholarly research. Reviewing, assessing, and synthesising information from multiple sources helps students improve their critical thinking power. Research takes effort and time, but it can yield enormous benefits and help students grow personally & professionally.

Find, measure & grab opportunities

Research is a way to nurture students potential and diversify opportunities and goals. This includes obtaining work, receiving scholarships or grants, project funding, beginning a business relationship, or getting other minor victories. These opportunities can help broaden one’s social network, raise awareness or start a new business or a project. Its a way to help people make the right life-changing decisions. This helps in self-growth and productive living.

Industry & research

When in need, industries inadvertently turn to academics to solve vital issues. The need to share knowledge, explore, innovate, and create is paramount to industrial and research interdependency. Without academic research, it is impossible to plan, strategise, and discover solutions. Thus, global development is dependent on research in higher education institutions .

Encourages research-based practice & knowledge production

In-depth research during higher education motivates students to publish their journals, implement research activities in studies, etc. Thus, educational institutes, colleges, and universities should also understand the significance of research and design their academic curriculum accordingly. This can be achieved if individually assigned professors encourage and mentor students in researching and writing high-impact journal publications.

Start your research journey with Shoolini Universitys elite programs

In the modern age of dynamic globalisation, research cannot be conducted in isolation. As a result, the importance and demand for research-driven universities have grown exponentially.

Shoolini, India’s No.1 Research University , has always been at the forefront of research-based education. Shoolini University is ranked first in India and 9th in Asia for citations per paper by QS World University Rankings Asia 2023 .

The institution is located in the foothills of the Himalayas and is well-known for its treasure trove of herbs. The infrastructure is designed to foster cutting-edge research in various fields such as science , engineering , yoga , management , and liberal arts .

Shoolini University is also well-known for its elite research programs. To make these programs more impactful, students are given hands-on experience with cutting-edge research and are guided to create technical articles. Personal mentoring elevates the curriculum to a new level, transforming it into a research-based Shoolini University innovation.

Shoolini has maintained an H-index (index used to assess Research Output and Quality) of 100, the highest for any university created after 2009. The FWCI is 2.22, which is equivalent to the top 10 worldwide colleges. Students and professors have submitted over 1200+ patents , making it the top research institution in India.

Artificial intelligence, bioenergy, biofuels, ageing and nutrition, drug discovery for cancer, genomics, water purification, probiotics, and other fields are being researched broadly at Shoolini university.

Shoolini has been placed third in patent filings (2019), joining the ranks of research institutions such as IITs and IIMs.

Shoolini’s dedicated research centres aid in achieving these goals. These centres offer comprehensive research facilities for producing qualitative research findings. Recognition from major institutes such as SCIMAGO and QS Rankings validate that Shoolini Research Centres have performed splendidly.

Benefits of taking part in Shoolini research programs:

• You can work closely with a faculty mentor and have the opportunity to network with academic and student researchers in your field.
• You can earn academic credit, scholarships, stipends, and/or other awards for research efforts.
• You can hone leadership and teamwork skills.
• You can acquire academic credentials to build a well-rounded resume by publishing works and collaborating with a research team.
• You can learn essential skills, such as how to use online research tools.
• You can learn vital life and classroom skills (professionalism, time management, multi-tasking).
• You can learn how to effectively communicate thoughts while analysing and criticising the work of others.
• You can better grasp scientific processes as you design research questions, form hypotheses, and test them.
• You can learn to work in a lab, plan studies, write grants, and report findings.
• You may be compensated, sometimes as an employee, sometimes as a scholarship recipient.
• You have the option to publish your work. If you assist a faculty member, they may acknowledge your work, or you may mention your work.
• This is an excellent opportunity to meet faculty members who work in your field of interest and network with fellow researchers. After developing a solid working relationship with them, you can request a letter of recommendation from a faculty mentor.

Also read: Benefits of Conducting Research at Indias No.1 Research University

Realising the need to promote research that can develop solutions to world problems and issues, Shoolini University has risen to the top. Its support for researchers and sustained research activities have resulted in ground-breaking innovation and the filing of more than 1200 patents. No wonder Shoolini researchers have featured in the World’s Top 2% Scientists List released by Stanford University.

Impactful research that can change the world is in high demand. You can join this exclusive group of scholars by enrolling in any research program at Shoolini University!

Admissions Open. Apply Now!

• No. 1 research university
• No.1 Research University in India
• Research at Shoolini University
• Research focused university
• research programs
• Shoolini Research
• student research
• Top Research University
• Top Research University in India

Follow Us For Regular Updates:

Shoolini b tech innovator in global healthcare, daniel weaves ai magic with young data scientist award, shoolini mba stars score fully funded internships in taiwan, admissions 2024 open apply now, related stories, what makes a great manager debunking common beliefs, top weekend getaways for shoolini students near solan, add some zing to your life: join a university club.

© Copyright - Shoolini by Shoolini Team

This will close in 0 seconds

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Front Psychol

Life Crafting as a Way to Find Purpose and Meaning in Life

Having a purpose in life is one of the most fundamental human needs. However, for most people, finding their purpose in life is not obvious. Modern life has a way of distracting people from their true goals and many people find it hard to define their purpose in life. Especially at younger ages, people are searching for meaning in life, but this has been found to be unrelated to actually finding meaning. Oftentimes, people experience pressure to have a “perfect” life and show the world how well they are doing, instead of following up on their deep-felt values and passions. Consequently, people may need a more structured way of finding meaning, e.g., via an intervention. In this paper, we discuss evidence-based ways of finding purpose, via a process that we call “life crafting.” This process fits within positive psychology and the salutogenesis framework – an approach focusing on factors that support human health and well-being, instead of factors that cause disease. This process ideally starts with an intervention that entails a combination of reflecting on one’s values, passions and goals, best possible self, goal attainment plans, and other positive psychology intervention techniques. Important elements of such an intervention are: (1) discovering values and passion, (2) reflecting on current and desired competencies and habits, (3) reflecting on present and future social life, (4) reflecting on a possible future career, (5) writing about the ideal future, (6) writing down specific goal attainment and “if-then” plans, and (7) making public commitments to the goals set. Prior research has shown that personal goal setting and goal attainment plans help people gain a direction or a sense of purpose in life. Research findings from the field of positive psychology, such as salutogenesis, implementation intentions, value congruence, broaden-and-build, and goal-setting literature, can help in building a comprehensive evidence-based life-crafting intervention. This intervention can aid individuals to find a purpose in life, while at the same time ensuring that they make concrete plans to work toward this purpose. The idea is that life crafting enables individuals to take control of their life in order to optimize performance and happiness.

The best day of your life is the one on which you decide your life is your own. No apologies or excuses. No one to lean on, rely on, or blame. The gift is yours – it is an amazing journey – and you alone are responsible for the quality of it. This is the day your life really begins . —Bob Moawad

Introduction

Whether you love him or hate him, Arnold Schwarzenegger is an example of a person who has been planning his life and setting goals throughout. Given that he came from a small town in Austria, the chances of him becoming the person he is today were very slim. Although even his parents thought that his ideas of becoming a great body builder were outrageous and his fellow cadets made fun of him when he put in extra hours of training while he was in the military, holding on to his vision and dreams paid off in the end (see Schwarzenegger and Hall, 2012 ). So even though it was not obvious that he would achieve the goals he had set for himself, he made a plan and stuck to his plan to achieve his goals.

Now consider this story: Brian is CEO of a large bank, and seems by all standards to be living a fulfilling live. Although he is overseeing 1,200 employees, earns a good salary, has a nice house at the beach, and a wife and kids, he feels very unhappy with his current life. One day he decides that he does not want to live this life anymore and quits his job. He becomes a consultant (and his wife divorces him) but still struggles to find his passion. As he knows that the job he is doing is not his passion, he starts exploring what he would like to do. Unfortunately, having done things for so long that have not brought him satisfaction, only status and money, he seems to have trouble connecting to his “inner self.” In his search for why he has ended up this way, he realizes that he has been living the life his father had in mind for him. This leads him to think that, if it had not been for his father, he would probably have studied psychology instead of management.

These two, seemingly unrelated anecdotes, tell something very important: no matter how successful a person is in life, self-endorsed goals will enhance well-being while the pursuit of heteronomous goals will not (for a review see Ryan and Deci, 2001 ). This is an important statement and key to self-determination theory (SDT, Ryan and Deci, 2000 ), a macro-theory of human motivation, stressing the importance of self-motivated and self-determined goals to guide behavior for well-being and happiness. Goal attainment from self-concordant goals, or goals that fulfill basic needs and are aligned with one’s values and passions, has been related to greater subjective well-being ( Sheldon, 2002 ), higher vitality ( Nix et al., 1999 ), higher levels of meaningfulness ( McGregor and Little, 1998 ), and lower symptoms of depression ( Sheldon and Kasser, 1998 ). Self-concordant goals satisfy basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness, key attributes of SDT ( Ryan and Deci, 2001 ), and have been found to be important across cultures (see Sheldon et al., 2004 ). With an increasing number of young people experiencing mental health problems, increasing health care costs and an aging society, the interest in cost-effective behavioral interventions that can improve mental and physical health is burgeoning (e.g., Oettingen, 2012 ; Fulmer et al., 2018 ; Chan et al., 2019 ; Wilson et al., 2019 ; for reviews see Wilson, 2011 ; Walton, 2014 ). Especially promising is the research on the topic of meaning and purpose in life ( Steger, 2012 ). People with a purpose in life are less likely to experience conflict when making health-related decisions and are more likely to self-regulate when making these decisions and consequently experience better (mental) health outcomes ( Kang et al., 2019 ). Furthermore, having a purpose in life can aid in overcoming stress, depression, anxiety, and other psychological problems (see Kim et al., 2014 ; Freedland, 2019 ). Finally, purpose in life has been related to a decrease in mortality across all ages ( Hill and Turiano, 2014 ). It thus appears that many benefits may be gained by enhancing meaning and purpose in life. However, even if people realize they are in need of a purpose, the search for meaning does not automatically lead to its presence, and people searching for meaning are no more or less likely to plan for and anticipate their future ( Steger et al., 2008b ). This somewhat counterintuitive finding, showing that among undergraduate students the search for meaning is even inversely related to presence of meaning, points to the fact that the strategies people use to find meaning may not be very effective ( Steger et al., 2008b ). Early in life, the search for meaning is not negatively related to well-being, but the relationship between search for meaning and well-being becomes increasingly negative in later life stages ( Steger et al., 2009 ). This means that even if people search for meaning, they may not find it, unless they are prompted to do so in an evidence-based manner, e.g., via a positive psychology intervention. Especially adolescents and young adults should be stimulated to search for meaning in an organized manner in order to experience higher levels of well-being early in life so that they can be more likely to have an upward cycle of positive experiences. An intervention to bring about purpose in life may be a promising way to achieve this. Recent research suggests that interventions aimed at enhancing purpose in life can be particularly effective if they are done early on, during adolescence and/or as part of the curriculum in schools ( Morisano et al., 2010 ; Bundick, 2011 ; Schippers et al., 2015 ).

These interventions address an important contemporary problem, as illustrated by the two anecdotes above, namely that, many people drift aimlessly through life or keep changing their goals, running around chasing “happiness” ( Donaldson et al., 2015 ). Others, as in the example of Brian above, live the life that their parents or significant others have in mind for them ( Kahl, 1953 ). Several authors have indeed noted that the role of parents in students’ study and career choices has been under-researched ( Jodl et al., 2001 ; Taylor et al., 2004 ), but choosing one’s study and career path according to one’s own preferences is likely to be more satisfying than living the life that others have in mind for one. Recently, it has been noted that especially “socially prescribed” perfectionism where people try to live up to the standards of other and also seek their approval is related to burn-out, depression and a lack of experienced meaning ( Suh et al., 2017 ; Garratt-Reed et al., 2018 ; Curran and Hill, 2019 ). In our society, education is highly valued, but less emphasis is placed on structured reflection about values, goals, and plans for what people want in life. Oftentimes, education fosters maladaptive forms of perfectionism, instead of adaptive forms ( Suh et al., 2017 ). Even if parents and educators do ask children what they want to become when they grow up, this most important question is not addressed in a consistent way that helps them to make an informed choice ( Rojewski, 2005 ). Parents and educators tend to look at the children’s competences, rather than what they want to become and what competences they would need to develop in order to become that person ( Nurra and Oyserman, 2018 ). Consequently, many people only occupy themselves with the daily events in their lives, while others try to keep every aspect of their lives under control and live the life that others have in mind for them. Some have an idea of what they want but have not thought about it carefully. Others may have too many goals, or conflicting goals, which is also detrimental to health and well-being ( Kelly et al., 2015 ). Finally, parents and others with the best of intentions sometimes have goals in mind for children to pursue ( Williams et al., 2000 ; Tamis-LeMonda et al., 2008 ).

A study by Nurra and Oyserman (2018) showed that children that were guided to experience connection between their current and adult future self, worked more and attained better school grades than children guided to experience low connection. Importantly, this was moderated to the extent that children saw school as the path to one’s adult future self. It seems important that people formulate and think about their (ideal) future self and that the present and future self are connected, e.g., by means of a goal-setting intervention. Studies among students also showed the importance of goal congruence. For instance, Sheldon and Kasser (1998) found that although students with stronger social and self-regulatory skills made more progress in their goals, and goal progress predicted subjective well-being (SWB), while the increase in well-being depended on the level of goal-congruence. Similarly, Sheldon and Houser-Marko (2001) found that entering freshman students with self-concordant motivation had an upward spiral of goal-attainment, increased adjustment, self-concordance, higher ego development, and academic performance after the first year. This points to the importance of making sure people reflect on and develop self-concordant goals ( Locke and Schippers, 2018 ). If people have not formulated their own goals, there is a chance that they will lose contact with their core values and passions,” ( Seto and Schlegel, 2018 ) as was the case in the anecdote of Brian. It may even feel as if they are living someone else’s life. For several reasons, it is important that people take matters into their own hands and reflect on and formulate their own goals in important areas of life ( Williams et al., 2000 ). Indeed, people may have more influence on their own life than they think. Studies have already shown the beneficial effects of both job crafting—where employees actively reframe their work physically, cognitively, and socially (e.g., Wrzesniewski and Dutton, 2001 ; Demerouti, 2014 ; Vogt et al., 2016 ; Wessels et al., 2019 )—and leisure crafting ( Petrou and Bakker, 2016 ; Vogel et al., 2016 ; Petrou et al., 2017 ). A recent study by Demerouti et al. (2019) suggested that the beneficial implications of job crafting transcend life boundaries, which the authors state have also consequences in terms of experiencing meaning in life.

Building on the above, we suggest that the conscious process of “life crafting” could be similarly beneficial in helping people to find fulfillment and happiness (see Berg et al., 2010 ; Schippers, 2017 ). Importantly, life crafting is related to the most important areas of life, and thus allows for a more holistic approach in terms of shaping one’s life. We formally define life crafting as: a process in which people actively reflect on their present and future life, set goals for important areas of life—social, career, and leisure time—and, if required, make concrete plans and undertake actions to change these areas in a way that is more congruent with their values and wishes.

The process of life crafting fits with positive psychology and specifically the salutogenesis framework, which states that the extent to which people view their life as having positive influence on their health, explains why people in stressful situations stay well and may even be able to improve adaptive coping ( Antonovsky, 1996 ). Salutogenesis focuses on factors that can support health, well-being, and happiness, as opposed to factors that cause disease (pathogenesis). The salutogenetic model with its’ central element “sense of coherence” is concerned with relationships around health, stress, and coping ( Johnson, 2004 ). In his approach, Antonovsky views health and illness as a continuum, rather than a dichotomy ( Langeland et al., 2007 ). Importantly, the framework assumes that people have resources available (biological, material, and psychosocial) that enable them to construct coherent life experiences ( Mittelmark et al., 2017 ). The idea of salutogenesis is also closely tied to the literature on human flourishing that states that health defined as the absence of illness or disease does not do justice to what it means to be well and thriving ( Ryff and Singer, 2000 ). Broaden-and-build theory can be used to make sense of how this may work out in practice: if people imagine a better future, they will be on the lookout for resources, because they have developed a more positive and optimistic mindset ( Fredrickson, 2001 ; Meevissen et al., 2011 ). Over time, this broader mindset helps them to acquire more skills and resources and this may in turn lead to better health, happiness, and performance ( Garland et al., 2010 ). When people have a purpose in life and are more balanced, this may have positive ripple effects on the people around them ( Barsade, 2002 ; Quinn, 2005 ; Quinn and Quinn, 2009 ). Recent research suggests that health benefits of having stronger purpose in life are attributable to focused attention to and engagement in healthier behaviors ( Kang et al., 2019 ). Indeed, stronger purpose in life is associated with greater likelihood of using preventative health services and better health outcomes ( Kim et al., 2014 ). Importantly, the process through which purpose leads to health outcomes seems to be that people with a purpose in life are better able to respond positively to health messages. They showed reduced conflict-related neural activity during health decision-making relevant to longer-term lifestyle changes. Thus, having a purpose in life makes it easier for people to self-regulate ( Kang et al., 2019 ). These results are very promising, as it seems that having a purpose in life can have both mental and physical health benefits, and behavioral interventions to increase purpose in life have been shown to be very cost-effective (e.g., Wilson et al., 2019 ). Importantly, purpose in life by writing about personal goals has been associated with improved academic performance ( Morisano et al., 2010 ; Schippers et al., 2015 , 2019 ; Travers et al., 2015 ; Schippers, 2017 ; Locke and Schippers, 2018 ).

Even so, thinking about how to attain a purpose in life via a process of life crafting can raise many questions. These include: what is the best way to set personal, self-congruent goals and start the process of life crafting? How does it work? Does the type of goal matter? Does the act of writing the goals down make a difference? Does it increase resourcefulness, self-efficacy, and self-regulation?

Research suggests that reflecting on and writing down personal goals is especially important in helping people to find purpose and live a fulfilling life ( King and Pennebaker, 1996 ; King, 2001 ), and that in general writing sessions longer than 15 min have larger effects ( Frattaroli, 2006 ). Indeed, the research on writing about life goals has been noted by Edwin Locke as a very important future development of goal-setting theory ( Locke, 2019 ). Recent research shows that goals need not be specific, as long as plans are, and that writing about life goals and plans in a structured way is especially effective ( Locke and Schippers, 2018 ; for a review see Morisano et al., 2010 ; Morisano, 2013 ; Schippers et al., 2015 ; Travers et al., 2015 ). As goal-relevant actions may be encouraged by embodied cognition, and embodied cognition has been related to (dynamic) self-regulation, this may be the process through which written goals lead to action (see Balcetis and Cole, 2009 ). Specifically, through the link between cognition and behavior, it can be seen as beneficial to write down intended actions as this will lay the path to act out the intended actions. The processing of the language facilitates the actions, as it consolidates the imagined actions ( Addis et al., 2007 ; Balcetis and Cole, 2009 ; Peters et al., 2010 ; Meevissen et al., 2011 ). It has been suggested that goal-relevant actions may be encouraged by embodied cognition, through the process of self-regulation ( Balcetis and Cole, 2009 ). Writing about actions one wants to take and very detailed experience in how it would feel to reach those goals, may make it much more likely for people to subtly change their behavior and actions into goal-relevant ones (e.g., looking for opportunities to reach ones goal, thinking more clearly if one wants to spend time on certain activities or not, etc.). Also, the writing can make sure that people realize the gap between actual and desired states regarding goals, and act as a starting point for self-regulatory actions (see King and Pennebaker, 1996 ). According to Karoly (1993 , p. 25), “The processes of self-regulation are initiated when routinized activity is impeded or when goal-directedness is otherwise made salient (e.g., the appearance of a challenge, the failure of habitual action patterns, etc.). Self-regulation may be said to encompass up to five interrelated and iterative component phases of (1) goal selection, (2) goal cognition, (3) directional maintenance, (4) directional change or reprioritization, and (5) goal termination.” We believe that the process of writing about self-concordant goals makes (1) the necessity of goal-directed action salient, (2) starts a process of embodied cognition and dynamic self-regulation, and (3) starts an upward spiral of goal-congruence, goal attainment, and (academic) performance. Dynamic self-regulation is needed in the context of multiple goal pursuits where people manage competing demands on time and resources ( Iran-Nejad and Chissom, 1992 ; Neal et al., 2017 ). In short, although goals are an important part of any intervention involving life crafting, the intervention and its effects are much broader. Such an intervention may be especially beneficial for college students, as it has been shown that students have lower goal-autonomy than their parents and parents reported higher levels of positive affect, lower levels of negative affect, as well as greater life-satisfaction ( Sheldon et al., 2006 ).

In the interventions to date, which have been mainly conducted with students, individuals write about their envisioned future life and describe how they think they can achieve this life, including their plans for how to overcome obstacles and monitor their goals (i.e., goal attainment plans or GAP; e.g., Schippers et al., 2015 ). Both goal setting and goal attainment plans have been shown to help people gain a direction or a sense of purpose in life. Research in the area of positive psychology explains that people with a purpose in life live longer, have a better immune system, and perform better, even when one controls for things such as lifestyle, personality, and other factors relating to longevity (for a review see Schippers, 2017 ). At the same time, it has been suggested that relatively small interventions can have a huge impact on people’s lives ( Walton, 2014 ). Writing about values, passion, and goals is an example of such an intervention, and we claim that having a purpose in life is fundamental and has ripple effects to all areas of life, including health, longevity, self-regulation, engagement, happiness, and performance ( Schippers, 2017 ).

In order to provide a stronger theoretical foundation for this claim, we will describe the development of a comprehensive evidence-based life-crafting intervention that can help people find a purpose in life. The intervention shows very specific actions people can take to fulfill that meaning. We start by assessing existing interventions aimed at setting personal goals and will explore the theoretical and evidence-based foundation for those interventions. After that, we describe what a life-crafting intervention should ideally look like. We end with various recommendations for to how to ensure that many people can profit from this intervention (see also Schippers et al., 2015 ).

Ikigai, Meaning in Life, and Life Crafting

The meaning of life used to be an elusive concept for scientists, but in the last couple of years much progress has been made in this area. According to Buettner and Skemp (2016) , ikigai—a Japanese term for purpose in life—was one of the reasons why people in certain areas of the world, known as “longevity hotspots,” had such long lives (see also Buettner, 2017 ). As our medical knowledge of longevity is increasing (e.g., Oeppen and Vaupel, 2002 ; Menec, 2003 ; Kontis et al., 2017 ), so too is our understanding of the associated psychological factors. These days, we have more knowledge of how people can live a meaningful life. Research has shown that ikigai, or purpose in life is related to increases in health and longevity across cultures, sexes, and age groups ( Sone et al., 2008 ; Boyle et al., 2009 ). This relationship has been found even when things such as lifestyle, positive relationships with others, and general affect were controlled for in the analyses ( Hill and Turiano, 2014 ). Note that, although a purpose in life sounds rather unclear or undefinable, people can derive a purpose in life from many different activities. It has been found that these activities can range from volunteering to giving social support to the elderly or even taking care of pets, and all of these have been shown to be related to an increase in happiness, better health outcomes, and greater longevity (for a review see McKnight and Kashdan, 2009 ). Indeed, in a study of 43,391 Japanese adults, it was found that, over a seven-year follow-up period, mortality was lower among those subjects who indicated that they had found a sense of ikigai or purpose in life (see also Sone et al., 2008 ; Schippers, 2017 ). Research among Japanese students has shown that enjoyable and effortful leisure pursuits can enhance student’s perception of ikigai. Ikigai was defined by the authors as “the subjective perceptions that one’s daily life is worth living and that it is full of energy and motivation” ( Kono et al., 2019 ). They also found that leisure activity participation, general satisfaction with leisure activities, and the positive evaluation of leisure experiences were related to higher perception of ikigai ( Kono, 2018 ; Kono and Walker, 2019 ). ( Martela and Steger, 2016 ) suggested that meaning in life has three components: coherence, purpose, and significance. They state that “meaning in life necessarily involves (1) people feeling that their lives matter, (2) making sense of their lives, and (3) determining a broader purpose for their lives” ( Martela and Steger, 2016 ). Also, Heintzelman et al. (2013) note that there are numerous positive physical and mental outcomes associated with self-reported meaning in life, such as health, occupational adjustment, adaptive coping, lower incidence of psychological disorders, slower age-related cognitive decline, and decreased mortality. Both the theory of ikigai and salutogenesis stress the coherence and purpose part, and other researchers have also picked up on these important elements (e.g., Urry et al., 2004 ; Martela and Steger, 2016 ). A review by Martela and Steger (2016) distinguished coherence, purpose, and significance as defining elements of meaning in life. Relatedly, theorizing around ikigai has shown that a sense of coherence develops around three distinct mechanisms, (1) valued experiences, (2) authentic relationships, and (3) directionality ( Kono, 2018 ).

Practically, the importance of happiness to cultures and nations across the world has been indicated clearly by the value placed on it by the United Nations (UN). In 2012, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon commissioned the first World Happiness Report, ranking countries according to people’s level of happiness. The UN’s 2016 Sustainable Development Goals Report included the goal of ensuring sustainable social and economic progress worldwide. In the UN’s 2017 happiness report, “eudaimonia,” a sense of meaning or purpose in life similar to ikigai, is mentioned as an important factor. This is based on research showing the importance of eudaimonic well-being. Indeed a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being concluded that autonomy and the integration of goals are important predictors of vitality and health ( Ryan and Deci, 2001 ; Huppert et al., 2004 ) see also ( Ryff, 2014 ). Self-determination theory, a macro theory of human motivation and personality, proposes that only self-endorsed goals will enhance well-being ( Ryan and Deci, 2000 ). This pattern of findings is congruent with the examples we started with (i.e., the self-endorsed goals of Schwarzenegger and the heteronomous goals of Brian) and has also been supported in cross-cultural research, showing that the autonomy of goal pursuit matters in collectivistic and individualistic cultures, and for males and females ( Hayamizu, 1997 ; Vallerand et al., 1997 ; Chirkov and Ryan, 2001 ; Ryan and Deci, 2001 ). As Ryan and Deci (2001 , p. 161) conclude: “It is clear that, as individuals pursue aims they find satisfying or pleasurable, they may create conditions that make more formidable the attainment of well-being by others. An important issue, therefore, concerns the extent to which factors that foster individual well-being can be aligned or made congruent with factors that facilitate wellness at collective or global levels.”

The above shows that finding a purpose in life can have far-reaching consequences for individual happiness and performance but also for the well-being and happiness of people around them ( Ryan and Deci, 2001 ). However, finding a purpose in life often requires a lengthy search, and some people never manage to find purpose in life ( Schippers, 2017 ). The developments in terms of ensuring people find their true passion and at the same time help make the world a better place coincide with exciting developments in the area of social psychology. Positive psychology, or the scientific study of human flourishing that aims to optimize human functioning within communities and organizations, has become very influential both within and outside the scientific community ( Gable and Haidt, 2005 ; Donaldson et al., 2015 ; Al Taher, 2019 ). It should be noted, however, that this area of study has also faced some criticism, as positive psychology behaviors such as forgiveness may not be functional in all contexts and circumstances ( McNulty and Fincham, 2012 ). Nevertheless, several studies have shown that human flourishing is related to mental and physical health (e.g., Park et al., 2016 ), and reviews and meta-analyses have shown that positive psychology interventions work in terms of improving well-being and (academic) performance ( Sin and Lyubomirsky, 2009 ; Durlak et al., 2011 ; Mongrain and Anselmo-Matthews, 2012 ; Waters, 2012 ). Thus, making sure that people receive positive psychology interventions, especially those relating to purpose in life, seems a viable and inexpensive way to help millions of people to have a better and healthier life ( Menec, 2003 ; Seligman et al., 2005 ). Personal goal setting and life crafting seem the best way forward in this respect.

Values, Passion, and Personal Goal Setting

Life choices can be seen as crucial turning points in someone’s existence. Yet, most people find it difficult to make such important decisions. In particular, young adults struggle with the important life decisions they are expected to make as they move into early adulthood ( Sloan, 2018 ). Recent research has shown that people with a purpose in life are less likely to experience regulatory issues during health decision-making and find it easier to make positive health-related lifestyle decisions ( Kang et al., 2019 ), and it may be especially important to find a purpose in life for young adults ( Schippers, 2017 ). Without such a purpose in life, a lot of time and energy is often “fretted away” on social media and on “busyness,” for instance ( Bruch and Ghoshal, 2002 , 2004 ; for a review see Schippers and Hogenes, 2011 ). At the same time, many people complain of having a lack of time, and it seems that it is more and more important to make conscious decisions on what to spend time on ( Menzies, 2005 ). Life crafting using a personal goal setting intervention seems an important prerequisite in making these decisions. While in the past goal-setting theory has always stressed the importance of specific measurable goals ( Locke and Latham, 2002 ), the act of writing about personal goals seems to be effective by defining very broad goals and linking these to specific goal-attainment plans. Research on the act of writing about personal goals started with Pennebaker’s research on traumatic writing ( Pennebaker, 1997 ; Pennebaker and Chung, 2011 ). It was shown that writing about traumatic events was related to a decrease in depression and an increase in mental health ( Gortner et al., 2006 ; Pennebaker and Chung, 2011 ). King (2001) suggested that future-oriented writing about one’s “best possible self” has a similar positive effect on an individual’s well-being, without the short-lived negative effect on mood that occurred after writing about traumatic events. Indeed, it has been shown that imagining one’s best possible self increases optimism and lowers depression (for a meta-analysis see Peters et al., 2010 ; Malouff and Schutte, 2017 ). Oyserman et al. (2006) found that a brief intervention that connected the positive “academic possible selves” of low-income minority high-school students with specific goal-attainment strategies improved their grades, standardized test scores, and moods.

Viktor Frankl, an Austrian neurologist and psychiatrist who had survived the holocaust, used his experience to formulate a theory on the meaning of life. He concluded that life can have meaning even in the most impoverished circumstances ( Frankl, 1985 , 2014 ). This is interesting, since this also means that good conditions are not an absolute prerequisite for formulating a goal in life. In contrast, it seems that having a goal in life can make people more resilient in terms of surviving harsh conditions. Wong (2014) described the logotherapy developed by Frankl as consisting of five testable hypotheses, including the self-transcendence hypothesis, the ultimate meaning hypothesis, and the meaning mindset hypothesis. These predict among other things that belief in the intrinsic meaning and value of life, regardless of circumstances contributes to well-being, and that a “meaning mindset,” as compared to a “success mindset,” leads to greater eudaimonic happiness and resilience ( Wong, 2014 ). While this is important in terms of knowing what works for well-being and happiness, when people do not have a clear sense of purpose in life or know what they value in life and why, writing down their thoughts and formulating a strategy for their life is important. That does not have to be a lengthy process, but spending a few hours every couple of years might be enough (and is more than most people do).

People who keep searching for meaning without finding it, or who have conflicting goals, are often dissatisfied with themselves and their relationships ( Steger et al., 2009 ). It is quite natural that in earlier stages of their life, people are often still searching for a sense of purpose or meaning in life. However, as stated before, later in life the search for meaning is related to lower levels of well-being ( Steger et al., 2009 ). There is some evidence that having a sense of purpose is associated with organized goal structures and pursuit of goals and provides centrality in a person’s identity ( Emmons, 1999 ; McKnight and Kashdan, 2009 ). It is thus important that people start thinking about their purpose in life as early as possible and repeat this process at all stages of life when they feel they should readdress their goals, such as when going to college, starting a new job, etc.

Warding Off Anxiety and Having a Fulfilling Life—Two Side of the Same Coin?

Another line of research has focused on the role of purpose as a protective mechanism against various types of psychological threat, such as mortality salience, or the awareness of an individual that death is inevitable, causing existential anxiety (for a meta-analysis see Burke et al., 2010 ). These are anxiety-provoking experiences and are common for most people. Ways of coping include having a purpose in life and striving for and accomplishing goals as well as strengthening close relationships ( Pyszczynski et al., 2004 ; Hart, 2014 ). In line with this, research in the area of terror management has shown that self-esteem as well as a worldview that renders existence meaningful, coherent and permanent buffers against existential anxiety resulting from mortality salience ( Burke et al., 2010 ; Pyszczynski et al., 2015 ). Indeed, death reflection, a cognitive state in which people put their life in context and contemplate about meaning and purpose, as well as review how others will perceive them after they have passed ( Cozzolino et al., 2004 ), has been proposed as an important prerequisite for prosocial motivation sometimes influencing career decisions ( Grant and Wade-Benzoni, 2009 ). Reducing anxiety and living a fulfilling and meaningful life are two sides of the same coin, since having a purpose in life gives people the idea that their life will continue to have meaning, even after their death ( Ryan and Deci, 2004 ; McKnight and Kashdan, 2009 ).

The Science of Wise Interventions

Starting with the work of Kurt Lewin (e.g., Lewin, 1938 ), and after decades of research and testing, we now have a much better sense of what works and what does not in terms of psychological interventions. Most of these interventions aim to change behavior and improve people’s lives. In general, these work by changing people’s outlook on life: by giving them a sense of purpose. This is the basis of most interventions that also deal with coping with stressors and life transitions, for instance. Goal setting with the aim of formulating a purpose in life is one of the psychology’s most powerful interventions, and it has been shown that even a short and seemingly simple intervention can have profound effects ( Wilson, 2011 ; Walton, 2014 ). In his review, Walton (2014) describes the “new science of wise interventions”: precise interventions aimed at altering specific psychological processes that contribute to major social problems or prevent people from flourishing. These “wise” interventions are capable of producing significant benefits and do so over time ( Walton, 2014 ). These interventions are “psychologically precise, often brief, and often aim to alter self-reinforcing processes that unfold over time and, thus, to improve people’s outcomes in diverse circumstances and long into the future” ( Walton, 2014 , p. 74). Writing down personal goals in a guided writing exercise seems to constitute such an intervention.

How and Why Does It Work?

Narrative writing has been shown to help people in transition phases cope with life stressors ( Pennebaker et al., 1990 ). Students writing about their thoughts and feelings about entering college showed better health outcomes and improved their grades more significantly than students in a control condition. Also, the experimental group had less home-sickness and anxiety 2–3 months after the writing exercise.

Locke (2019) notes that “…writing about goals in an academic setting for two hours or more would connect with grade goals by implication even if the students did not mention them. The writing process would presumably have motivated them to generalize, to think about what they wanted to achieve in many aspects of their lives and encouraged commitment to purposeful action in more domains than were mentioned” (p. 3). On the same page, he also states that “The above issues could occupy interested researchers for many years.”

Broaden-and-build theory suggests that thinking about an idealized future will be associated with positive thoughts about this future, leading to increased levels of self-regulation, resilience, self-efficacy, and in turn engagement (e.g., Tugade et al., 2004 ; Tugade and Fredrickson, 2004 ; Ceja and Navarro, 2009 ; Fay and Sonnentag, 2012 ). Self-regulation is defined as “self-generated thoughts, feelings, and actions that are planned and cyclically related to the attainment of personal goals” ( Boekaerts et al., 2005 , p. 14). Many authors contend that goal setting enhances self-regulation and agree that this is the mechanism by which goals are related to action ( Latham and Locke, 1991 ; Oettingen et al., 2000 ; Hoyle and Sherrill, 2006 ).

Next to this, the intervention itself may be a form of embodied writing, an act of embodiment, entwining in words our senses with the senses of the world ( Anderson, 2001 ), stimulating what has been written down to act out in real life. However, theorizing around embodied writing and the act of writing as a form of embodied cognition is still in an embryonic stage. Especially research around the effect on writing on our daily actions is lacking in evidence. There is plenty of evidence that these small, written interventions have an effect and can even play a role in redirecting people (e.g., Wilson, 2011 ) and that these interventions can have a powerful effects in terms of behavioral change ( Yeager and Walton, 2011 ; Walton, 2014 ). At the same time, it should be noted that these psychological interventions are powerful but context-dependent tools that should not be seen as quick fixes ( Yeager and Walton, 2011 ). However, in the intervention described in the current paper, people are asked to think about their deepest feelings and motivations and write them down, and embodied cognition may very well play a role in the upward spiral resulting from such an intervention.

Goal Domain

An important discussion in the literature is whether having a self-serving purpose ( hedonistic , focused on attainment of pleasure and avoidance of pain) or one that is oriented toward helping others ( eudaimonic , focused on meaning and self-realization) is more beneficial for happiness ( Ryan and Deci, 2001 ; Keyes et al., 2002 ). Hedonistic and eudaimonic well-being seem to represent two different kinds of happiness ( Kashdan et al., 2008 ). Although recent research has confirmed that both are related to well-being ( Henderson et al., 2013 ), it is also conceivable that a purely hedonistic lifestyle may be unrelated to psychological well-being in the long run (see Huppert et al., 2004 ; Anić and Tončić, 2013 ; Baumeister et al., 2013 ). According to Schippers (2017 , p. 21), “prior research has shown that altruistic goals may be particularly helpful in terms of optimizing happiness. Studies on ‘random acts of kindness’—selfless acts to help or cheer up other people—have shown that these acts strengthen the well-being at least of the person performing that act ( Otake et al., 2006 ; Nelson et al., 2016 ).” Other research has shown that helping others is better for one’s well-being than giving oneself treats ( Nelson et al., 2016 ). A study by ( Steger et al., 2008a ) suggested that “doing good” may be an important avenue by which people create meaningful and satisfying lives. Also, it has been found that pursuing happiness through social engagement is related to higher well-being ( Ford et al., 2015 ).

Toward an Integrated Life-Crafting Intervention

The elements discussed above provide the context for developing a potentially effective life-crafting intervention. Although most agree that describing an ideal vision of the future would be a key element of such an intervention, below we identify other elements that should be included, whether the intervention is designed to improve well-being, happiness, performance, or all of these. According to McKnight and Kashdan (2009) , “the creation of goals consistent with one’s purpose may be critical to differentiating between real purpose and illusory purpose” (p. 249). Recent research also showed that it is better to have no calling than an unfulfilled calling (see Berg et al., 2010 ; Gazica and Spector, 2015 ), making it also a boundary condition that people follow through on this. The importance of following through was shown in a 15-week study aimed at finding out whether engaging in trait-typical behaviors predicted trait change ( Hudson et al., 2018 ). In this study, students provided self-report ratings of their personality and were required to complete weekly “challenges”—prewritten behavioral goals (e.g., “Before you go to bed, reflect on a positive social experience you had during the day and what you liked about it”). These challenges were aimed at aligning their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors with their desired traits (in case of the example this was extraversion). Importantly, results indicated that the mere acceptance of challenges was unrelated to trait changes. Only actually completing the challenges and performing these behaviors predicted trait change ( Hudson et al., 2018 ). This may also hold true for the intervention described below and may be an important boundary condition. Although we have not found any negative effects of the intervention so far, theoretically it is possible that students formulate an “unanswered calling” which may impact happiness, well-being, and performance negatively. So far, only one study did not find the positive effects of a goal-setting intervention on academic outcomes ( Dobronyi et al., 2019 ). This might indicate that for some groups (in this case economy students) the (brief) intervention is not effective in bringing about behavioral change and increasing academic achievement. Other studies showed a positive effect among management students ( Schippers et al., 2015 ) and self-nominated struggling students ( Morisano et al., 2010 ).

Below we provide broad outlines of one such evidence-based intervention, having first set out in brief the case for this particular intervention. Aligning itself to the UN’s sustainable development goals (SDGs), which relate to economic growth, social inclusion, and environmental protection ( Stafford-Smith et al., 2017 ), Rotterdam School of Management (RSM) changed its mission to being a force for positive change in the world ( Rood, 2019 ). As RSM is educating future leaders, in 2011, it introduced a goal-setting intervention so that first-year students could reflect on their personal goals and values. This is a three-stage intervention. In the first part, students write about their values and wishes as well as their ideal life and the life they wish to avoid, and in the second, they describe their specific goals and goal plans. The third part involves a photoshoot with a professional photographer, where students formulate a statement starting with “I WILL…,” (e.g., I WILL pursue my goal, I WILL inspire and facilitate sustainable development, I WILL create healthier businesses for a healthier world, and I WILL lead by example and inspire others to reach their goals). 1 This statement and the photo are then put on social media and displayed throughout the school.

The evidence-based goal-setting intervention has had a positive effect on study success, as has been shown by higher academic achievement and decreased dropout rates ( Locke et al., 2014 ; Locke and Schippers, 2018 ). This was particularly true for ethnic minority and male students, who had underperformed in previous years ( Schippers et al., 2015 ; for an elaborate description of the intervention see the supplementary material). In the meantime, plans have been made to make sure that the intervention is an integral part of the curriculum, so that students will develop skills for self-management and management of others and will consider what impact they can have on the world.

Elements of the Life-Crafting Intervention

Although developed for students, this intervention could also be useful for people who wish to discover a meaning in life and write down their goals. In the first part of this intervention, people discover what is important to them in all areas of life and write about what they feel passionate about. While this part is aimed at making sure they discover their values and passions, the second part is designed to enable them to put those values and passions into a number of goals and to ensure they formulate plans and back-up plans for achieving those goals ( Schippers et al., 2015 ). In terms of the intervention in this paper, the practical questions that address these issues are shown in section 3 of Table 1 .

Elements and description of a life-crafting intervention.

Discovering Values and Passion

Discovering one’s passion has two sides: Doing what you “like” is often said to be important, but it seems that discovering what you find “important” is more helpful in igniting passion, as this is more values-based and will contribute to self-concordance ( Sheldon and Houser-Marko, 2001 ; Ryff and Singer, 2008 ). Recent research (e.g., Jachimowicz et al., 2017 ) has shown that it is important that people pursue a career that is in line with what they find to be “important,” rather than engaging in activities that they “like”; it found that those who engaged in activities that they liked (feelings-oriented mindset) exhibited less passion than those who engaged in activities that they thought were important (values-oriented mindset). Thus, while it is important that people discover what they feel passionate about, ideally this passion should also be aligned with values that they hold dear, such as collaboration, equality, and honesty ( Sheldon, 2002 ).

There is, however, also a difference between harmonious and obsessive passion (for a meta-analysis, see Vallerand et al., 2003 ; Curran et al., 2015 ). People with an obsessive work passion experience more conflict between work and other areas of life, and work is more related to their self-worth ( Vallerand et al., 2003 ). Harmonious passion was shown to be related to positive outcomes such as flow and enhanced performance, whereas obsessive passion was related more to negative outcomes, such as excessive rumination and decreased vitality ( Curran et al., 2015 ). Discovering a (harmonious) passion is not always easy.

In a life-crafting intervention, questions on this area could be similar to those listed in section 1 of Table 1 , involving also life style choices. In particular, choosing a lifestyle that involves physical activity seems to be a powerful way not only to increase self-regulation and self-control (for a review see Baumeister et al., 2006 ; Oaten and Cheng, 2006 ), but also to prevent mental illness, foster positive emotions, buffer individuals against the stresses of life, and help people thrive when they have experienced adversity ( Faulkner et al., 2015 , p. 207).

Gap Between Current Versus Future State: Current and Desired Competencies and Habits

In order to achieve a match between values and passion, it is important to become aware of one’s current habits and competencies as a first step in changing/adapting (cf., Schippers et al., 2014 ). Being aware of the habits you would like to change is important in promoting positive behavioral change ( Holland et al., 2006 ; Graybiel and Smith, 2014 ). Since most of our daily behavior is habitual, and this is usually functional in that it allows us to perform many tasks with minimum cognitive effort, but this same mechanism also makes habits hard to break ( Jager, 2003 ). Being aware of our habits and reflecting on them can be a first step in breaking them ( Schippers and Hogenes, 2011 ; Schippers et al., 2014 ); implementation intentions (i.e., if-then plans: “If situation Y is encountered, then I will initiate goal-directed behavior X!”) have also been shown to help in breaking old habits and forming new ones ( Holland et al., 2006 ). Many people have habits they would like to change (relating, for example, to eating behaviors, physical health, or substance use). However, it has been shown that the effect of good intentions such as New Year’s resolutions is very minimal ( Marlatt and Kaplan, 1972 ; Pope et al., 2014 ) and that it is the extent to which people have self-concordant goals, coupled with implementation intentions, that leads to successful changes in behavior ( Mischel, 1996 ; Koestner et al., 2002 ). Self-concordant goals are personal goals that are pursued out of intrinsic interest and are also congruent with people’s identity. Research has shown that if people pursue goals because they align with their own values and interests, rather than because others urge them to pursue them, they typically exhibit greater well-being ( Sheldon and Houser-Marko, 2001 ). This was shown to be true across many cultures ( Sheldon et al., 2004 ). In a life-crafting intervention, questions on this area could be similar to those listed in section 2 of Table 1 .

Present and Future Social Life

Research shows that people with a strong social network live longer and are healthier and happier ( Demir et al., 2015 ; Haslam et al., 2016 ). This network does not necessarily have to be very big, and it seems that, as one grows older, the quality of the relationships in this network becomes more important than the quantity ( Carmichael et al., 2015 ). Recent research places more emphasis on the quality of relationships, specifically showing that quality in terms of the social and emotional dimensions of relationships is related to mental well-being ( Hyland et al., 2019 ). The quality of the network has also been shown to be helpful during a transition to college ( Pittman and Richmond, 2008 ). Although at first sight it may seem odd to think about what kind of acquaintances and friends one would like to have, it may pay off to think about this carefully. Certain kinds of relationships, so called high-maintenance relationships, require a lot of time and energy ( Schippers and Hogenes, 2011 ; Fedigan, 2017 ) and often are characterized by negative interactions that can even influence self-regulation ( Finkel et al., 2006 ). It seems important that in general people seek out interaction with others who are supportive and from which they receive energy rather than those that cost energy. In a life-crafting intervention, questions on this area could be similar to those listed in section 3 of Table 1 . Practical questions in the intervention in this respect could be: think about your current friends and acquaintances. What kind of relationships energize you? What kind of relationships require energy? Why is that? What kind of friends and acquaintances do you need? What kind of friends and acquaintances would you like to have in the future? What does your ideal family life and broader social life look like?

Future Life: Career

Work is an important part of life. For many it is important to have a job that suits them, and a job which they feel passionate about and from which they can get energy (see Werner et al., 2016 ; Downes et al., 2017 ). However, research on mental illness prevails the literature in occupational health psychology, despite a call for a shift toward more research into positive psychology as antipode for work-related health problems such as job burnout. Especially in times where employees are required to be proactive and responsible for their own professional development, and to commit to high quality performance standards, it is important to think about activities that energize people and make them feel engaged with their work ( Bakker et al., 2008 ; Schippers and Hogenes, 2011 ). Relatedly, research on job crafting shows that people can actively enhance the personal meaning of their work and make it more enjoyable by changing cognitive, task, or relational aspects to shape interactions and relationships with others at work ( Wrzesniewski and Dutton, 2001 ). Consequently, it is not always the job itself but the meaning you give to it that is important ( Demerouti et al., 2015 ). It is also important to think about when and where you do each particular task, in order to manage your daily energy ( Wessels et al., 2019 ).

It should be noted, however, that it is also important to see work in relation to other areas of life. Christensen (2010) noted that many of his contemporaries ended up working 70-h working weeks and also were often divorced and estranged from their children over time. They could not imagine that this end result was a deliberate choice, so it seems important to choose the kind of person you want to become not only in your career but also in other areas of life ( Christensen, 2010 ). This also means making strategic decisions about how to allocate your time and energy, instead of letting daily hassles make these decisions for you ( Christensen, 2017 ). In a life-crafting intervention, participants could be asked to think about what they would ideally like to do in their job, and what kinds of people they might be working with, either directly or indirectly. They could be asked to reflect on their education and their career, and to consider what they feel to be important in a job and what their ideal colleagues would be like. The questions would thus be similar in nature to those shown in section 4 of Table 1 .

Of course, some people choose a job that they do not necessarily like a lot but then make sure their leisure time is filled with meaningful activities ( Berg et al., 2010 ), and leisure crafting has been shown to make up to a certain extent for having few opportunities for job crafting. So weighing up the balance between work life and leisure activities and making conscious decisions in this respect seems very important.

Key Element: Ideal Future Versus Future If You Do Not Take Action

As people are able to think about and fantasize a future ( Oettingen et al., 2018 ), it is key that the future they envisage is one that is attractive to them. Likewise it is vital they formulate plans of how to achieve their desired future (implementation intentions) and contrast this in their minds with an undesired future ( Oettingen and Gollwitzer, 2010 ; Oettingen et al., 2013 ). In a university context, and more generally in order to stay engaged, it is important that people choose goals that are self-concordant. It has been shown that if people formulate such goals implicitly by visualizing their best possible self, this can be very powerful and has a stronger effect on well-being than exercises such as gratitude letters ( Sheldon and Lyubomirsky, 2006 ). Other research has shown that writing about the best possible self in three domains—personal, relational, and professional—leads to increased optimism ( Meevissen et al., 2011 ). A meta-analysis showed that best possible self was a particularly powerful intervention in terms of enhancing optimism ( Malouff and Schutte, 2017 ). If this optimism is also turned into concrete plans for the future, there is an increased chance that this positive envisioned future will become a reality (cf., Schippers et al., 2015 ).

Based on the theorizing above, it should be stressed that in the intervention students formulate goals that they find important, not ones that others (parents, peers, or friends) find important or that are pursued solely for reasons of status. In the instructions in the intervention, the students are advised to choose goals that they think are important and want to pursue and not to choose goals that others (parents, peers, and friends) think are important. Otherwise, they will live someone else’s life. In order to make sure that they do not choose goals that will be detrimental to themselves or others, they are also advised to not describe an ideal life that includes harming themselves or others.

Additionally, it is also important that people imagine the future they are likely to face if they do not do anything . This represents a goal-framing effect, or the finding that people are more likely to take action when they are confronted with the possible consequences of not doing so ( Tversky and Kahneman, 1981 ). It might be useful to ask participants to visualize both a desirable and an undesirable future and to get them to contrast the two (see Oettingen, 2012 ; Brodersen and Oettingen, 2017 ). This would be a form of “metacognitive self-regulatory strategy of goal pursuit” ( Duckworth et al., 2013 , p. 745; cf. Schippers et al., 2013 ; see also Schippers et al., 2015 ). Other research has shown that positive “deliberate mental time travel” (or MTT) was related to a significant increase in happiness but not when the MTT was negative or neutral. However, neutral MTT was related to a reduction in stress ( Quoidbach et al., 2009 ). In the intervention (see also Table 1 , section 5), participants are asked what their future would look like if they did not change anything. What would their life look like 5–10 years down the road?

Goal Attainment Plans

After finishing the elements as described above, it is important for intervention participants to formulate concrete goals and plans. In the meta-analysis undertaken by Koestner et al. (2002) , it was concluded that it is important for personal goal setting to be combined with if-then plans. Self-concordance—the feeling that people pursue goals because they fit with their own values and interests—and goal attainment plans are important for goal progress ( Locke and Schippers, 2018 ). Since the rewards that come from achieving a significant life goal are often attained in the future, it is important to formulate concrete goals and also to identify the small steps toward them (see Trope and Liberman, 2003 ). While the first part of the student intervention is aimed at discovering their passions and ideas about their ideal life, the second part is much more concrete and follows the steps set out in research on goal setting, SMART goals, and if-then plans ( Oettingen et al., 2013 , 2018 ). The idea is that by making concrete plans and identifying obstacles (if-then plans), people are better able to visualize their desired future and will be less tempted to engage in activities that distract them from their goal ( Mischel, 1996 ; Mischel and Ayduk, 2004 ).

In this part of the intervention, ideally any obstacles to the plans will also be identified. In addition to the research on mental contrasting, which generally indicates that one should visualize both the goal and the obstacles to it (e.g., Sevincer et al., 2017 ), it is important that one should also visualize a way of overcoming those obstacles. This may be a vital element, as research has shown that mental contrasting works best for people who are very confident about succeeding ( Sevincer et al., 2017 ). The elements are outlined in Table 1 , section 6. The idea is that, based on what participants write when describing their ideal future, they then identify a number of goals (usually about six to eight), which could be personal, career, and/or social goals (e.g., Morisano et al., 2010 ; Schippers et al., 2015 ; Locke and Schippers, 2018 ). As detailed implementation plans have been shown to aid progress toward goals ( Gollwitzer, 1996 ), it is vital for participants to set down a detailed strategy for how they will achieve their goals. This part of the intervention asks participants about their motivations for their goals and gets them to consider the personal and social impact of those goals. They should also be asked to identify potential obstacles and how to overcome them and monitor progress toward the goals they have set. Participants should be instructed to be specific and concrete—for instance, to write down things that they will do weekly or daily to further their goals ( Morisano et al., 2010 ; Schippers et al., 2015 ). It may also be useful to get participants to make a concrete plan of action for the upcoming week and to make them specify for each day the hours they will spend working on the goal they have in mind.

Public Commitment

In this part of the intervention, participants can either write down a number of goals and make them public (read them out to others) or have a photo taken to accompany a public (“I WILL…”) statement, as was the case in the RSM intervention (see the examples mentioned earlier). Prior research has found that public commitment can enhance goal attainment ( Hollenbeck et al., 1989 ). This part seems to be related to enhanced commitment to goals as a result of self-presentation ( Schienker et al., 1994 ). Shaun Tomson, a former surfing champion and inspirational speaker, invites audiences to come up with goals and 12 lines, all starting with: “I will…” These lines are spoken aloud in a group as a form of public commitment ( Tomson and Moser, 2013 ). This makes it more likely that people will be more self-regulating toward goal-attainment and will put more effort into reaching their goals, especially if they are highly committed to reaching this goal ( McCaul et al., 1987 ).

Formulating clear goals has been shown to contribute to student well-being and academic success ( Morisano et al., 2010 ; Schippers et al., 2015 , 2019 ; Locke and Schippers, 2018 ). However, this has been often neglected in education and work settings resulting in a lack of evidence based tools. The effects of goal setting on the well-being of students have hardly been tested. Recently, calls have been made for positive psychology interventions to be made part of the educational curriculum in order to teach students life skills and to combat the rising number of mental health problems such as depression (e.g., Clonan et al., 2004 ; Seligman et al., 2009 ; Schippers, 2017 ).

Informed by the theoretical frameworks of salutogenesis, embodied cognition, dynamic self-regulation, and goal-setting theory, in this paper, we outlined a life-crafting intervention in which participants complete a series of online writing exercises using expressive writing to shape their ideal future. Important elements of such an intervention that were covered are: (1) discovering values and passion, (2) reflecting on current and desired competencies and habits, (3) reflecting on present and future social life and (4) future career, (5) writing about the ideal future, (6) goal attainment plans, and finally (7) public commitment to goals.

The idea is to use the fantasized ideal future to deduce goals and formulate a strategy to reach these goals. Finally, participants commit to their intentions by having a photo taken to accompany their goal statement, which is then made public. We described the key elements of this intervention and outlined the theoretical rationale for each of these elements. As previous research has shown that developing life skills, such as being able to set goals and make plans to achieve them (i.e., goal setting), increases the resilience, well-being, and study success of students ( Schippers et al., 2015 , 2019 ; Locke and Schippers, 2018 ), it may be important to make this intervention available to a wider population.

Future Research and Developments

As research shows that students in higher education are increasingly experiencing psychological problems, such as depression, anxiety, and burn-out ( Gilchrist, 2003 ; Snyder et al., 2016 ), an add-on to the goal-setting program as described above is recommended. Rapid developments in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), especially areas such as emotion recognition, natural language processing, and machine learning have great potential to aid students experiencing study-related mental health problems ( Kavakli et al., 2012 ; Oh et al., 2017 ). For example, a goal-setting exercise could be enhanced by incorporating a digital coach in the form of a goal-setting chatbot. With this type of intervention, students are given immediate, personalized feedback after their writing assignments. After two longer writing assignments, which are part of the curriculum, the chatbot can help students to by asking questions on specific topics ( Fulmer et al., 2018 ). For instance, through personalized questions and feedback the chatbot could stimulate students to regularly reflect on their progress toward reaching a certain goal (“Did I invest enough time into my goals? What could I do to improve this? Which smaller sub-goals could help me to achieve my objective? What obstacles do I face? What ways do I see to overcome them?”). Depending on the answers the chatbot could also provide the students with different strategies. In addition, the chatbot can remind students of their goals and objectives during the year.

The expectation is that this addition to the intervention will allow students to reflect better on their own goals, so that a positive effect on student well-being can be expected and more serious problems can be prevented. What is also innovative is that the chatbot can ask additional questions about the students’ well-being. This gives the chatbot an important role in identifying possible problems. For students who have no problems or whose problems are minor, setting goals and receiving online feedback and coaching will be sufficient. In cases of more severe problems, the chatbot can offer more intensive coaching, or can refer them to the university’s psychological support or other professional services if necessary. In summary, the chatbot could provide a better connection between goal setting and the needs of the individual student and could help to integrate the life-crafting intervention into early stages of students’ academic career and can also deliver mental health care for students. Moreover, it could help integrate the life-crafting intervention with interactional forms of mental health care provided by the chatbot, thereby possibly increasing its effectiveness. In addition, goal diaries might form a way to provide insights into whether students are able to achieve important goals. Such diaries could also be used to assess their level of happiness and well-being and might be easily integrated into the interaction with the chatbot.

Next to examining how promising the intervention is in terms of its effects on students, future research could look at the effects of the life-crafting intervention in organizations. Prior research has shown that the effects from positive psychology interventions in organizations are promising ( Meyers et al., 2012 ). The relationship between different areas of life and decision making with regard to how to spend one’s time seems to be key ( Menzies, 2005 ; Schippers and Hogenes, 2011 ). Researchers could also examine what role life crafting might play at the team level.

Despite the obvious upside of experiencing meaning in life and having life goals as described in this paper, many people have difficulty choosing between the seemingly endless number of possibilities. The good news is that it is in principle never too late to find a purpose in life, although recent research suggests that it may be most beneficial to find a direction in life earlier rather than later (see Steger et al., 2009 ; Bundick, 2011 ; Hill and Turiano, 2014 ). It seems that interventions of the kind we have described above may be particularly helpful when one is entering into a new phase of life, such as when starting one’s study or just before entering the job market (see Kashdan and Steger, 2007 ).

The problem so far has been that most interventions are not easily taken to scale (for an exception see Schippers et al., 2015 ). Given the relatively low amount of costs and administrative work that the implementation of the outlined life crafting intervention entails, especially when compared to the potential benefits, we recommend its inclusion in student’s curriculums. Getting many (young) people to take part in an online life crafting intervention may be an important step in achieving not only higher academic performance, but also better well-being, happiness, health, and greater longevity (see Schippers et al., 2015 ). Using technology to assist with life crafting via a goal-setting intervention seems to be a particularly promising avenue as this is an approach that can be easily scaled up. Ideally then, these scalable and affordable interventions should not be regarded as an extra-curricular activity; it would be advisable to make them a formal part of the curriculum for all students. In a work context, employees could also benefit as this type of activity might be something that companies could easily offer. In short, life-crafting is about (1) finding out what you stand for (i.e., values and passions), (2) finding out how to make it happen (i.e., goal-attainment plans), and (3) telling someone about your plans (i.e., public commitment). Concluding, it seems that life crafting is about taking control of one’s life and finding purpose. Based on recent findings, it would be well-advised for many of us to carve out time to do an evidence-based life-crafting intervention.

Author Contributions

MS has written the draft of the manuscript. NZ provided important intellectual input at all stages and helped to develop, review, and revise the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the members of the Erasmus Centre for Study and Career Success ( https://www.erim.eur.nl/erasmus-centre-for-study-and-career-success/ ) and Christina Wessels for their useful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

1 see https://www.rsm.nl/iwilleveryone/ .

A student, participating in the intervention, described its effect on him as follows (see also Singeling, 2017 ).

“I studied, or at least I attempted to study, a lot of different things before I came here. But usually I stopped halfway through. And then I ended up here and I liked the courses well enough, but once again it was completely unplanned. I came here because, well, it was expected of me to finish some kind of university course.

When I got here, and all the “I WILL” stuff [life crafting/goal setting] happened, I thought it was a complete and utter joke. I thought: who needs this kind of stuff? Between the second and the third [trimester], so towards the end of the second really, I started to realize that: you know those silly goals I put down? I’m actually close to completing some of those. That got me inspired to apply for the position of mentor for the BA business skills course. And in the third year, for my minor, I took a teaching class. A few of my students who started off basically slacking through everything, they are taking their assignments more seriously. Instead of doing everything the evening beforehand, they are dedicating a week beforehand. It’s tiny steps, but they are tiny steps that would not have happened without the goal setting.

Quite simply, I’m proud of the things that I have been doing, such as teaching, and I’m proud that it came through goal setting. It’s why in the end I have changed my I WILL statement: “I will help the next generation to be better.”

From this extract, it can be seen that the intervention seemed to inspire the student to be clearer about his goals, to dedicate time to them, and also to use them to help other students. Furthermore, it serves to illustrate the concept of an upward spiral ( Sheldon and Houser-Marko, 2001 ; Sekerka et al., 2012 ), where trough tiny steps (starting to study for an exam earlier) goals are attained.

• Addis D. R., Wong A. T., Schacter D. L. (2007). Remembering the past and imagining the future: common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration . Neuropsychologia 45 , 1363–1377. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.016, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Al Taher R. (2019). The 5 founding fathers and a history of positive psychology . Available at: https://positivepsychology.com/founding-fathers/ (Accessed December 3, 2019).
• Anderson R. (2001). Embodied writing and reflections on embodiment . J. Transpers. Psychol. 33 , 83–98. [ Google Scholar ]
• Anić P., Tončić M. (2013). Orientations to happiness, subjective well-being and life goals . Psihologijske teme 22 , 135–153. https://hrcak.srce.hr/100702 [ Google Scholar ]
• Antonovsky A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion . Health Promot. Int. 11 , 11–18. 10.1093/heapro/11.1.11 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bakker A. B., Schaufeli W. B., Leiter M. P., Taris T. W. (2008). Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health psychology . Work Stress 22 , 187–200. 10.1080/02678370802393649 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Balcetis E., Cole S. (2009). Body in mind: the role of embodied cognition in self-regulation . Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 3 , 759–774. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00197.x [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Barsade S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior . Adm. Sci. Q. 47 , 644–675. 10.2307/3094912 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Baumeister R. F., Gailliot M., DeWall C. N., Oaten M. (2006). Self-regulation and personality: how interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior . J. Pers. 74 , 1773–1802. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00428.x, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Baumeister R. F., Vohs K. D., Aaker J. L., Garbinsky E. N. (2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life . J. Posit. Psychol. 8 , 505–516. 10.1080/17439760.2013.830764 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Berg J. M., Grant A. M., Johnson V. (2010). When callings are calling: crafting work and leisure in pursuit of unanswered occupational callings . Organ. Sci. 21 , 973–994. 10.1287/orsc.1090.0497 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Boekaerts M., Pintrich P. R., Zeidner M. (2005). Handbook of self-regulation . San Diego, California: Elsevier. [ Google Scholar ]
• Boyle P. A., Barnes L. L., Buchman A. S., Bennett D. A. (2009). Purpose in life is associated with mortality among community-dwelling older persons . Psychosom. Med. 71 , 574–579. 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181a5a7c0, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Brodersen G., Oettingen G. (2017). Mental contrasting of a negative future with a positive reality regulates state anxiety . Front. Psychol. 8 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01596 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bruch H., Ghoshal S. (2002). Beware the busy manager . Harv. Bus. Rev. 80 , 62–69. PMID: [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bruch H., Ghoshal S. (2004). A bias for action: How effective managers harness their willpower, achieve results, and stop wasting time . Boston: Harvard Business School Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Buettner D. (2017). The blue zones of happiness: Lessons from the world’s happiest people . Washington DC: National Geographic Books. [ Google Scholar ]
• Buettner D., Skemp S. (2016). Blue zones: lessons from the world’s longest lived . Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 10 , 318–321. 10.1177/1559827616637066, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bundick M. J. (2011). The benefits of reflecting on and discussing purpose in life in emerging adulthood . New Dir. Youth Dev. 2011 , 89–103. 10.1002/yd.430, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Burke B. L., Martens A., Faucher E. H. (2010). Two decades of terror management theory: a meta-analysis of mortality salience research . Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 14 , 155–195. 10.1177/1088868309352321, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Carmichael C. L., Reis H. T., Duberstein P. R. (2015). In your 20s it’s quantity, in your 30s it’s quality: the prognostic value of social activity across 30 years of adulthood . Psychol. Aging 30 , 95–105. 10.1037/pag0000014, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ceja L., Navarro J. (2009). Dynamics of flow: a nonlinear perspective . J. Happiness Stud. 10 , 665–684. 10.1007/s10902-008-9113-6 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chan J. S. Y., Liu G., Liang D., Deng K., Wu J., Yan J. H. (2019). Special issue – therapeutic benefits of physical activity for mood: a systematic review on the effects of exercise intensity, duration, and modality . J. Psychol. 153 , 102–125. 10.1080/00223980.2018.1470487, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chirkov V. I., Ryan R. M. (2001). Parent and teacher autonomy-support in Russian and U.S. adolescents: common effects on well-being and academic motivation . J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 32 , 618–635. 10.1177/0022022101032005006 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Christensen C. M. (2010). How will you measure your life . Harv. Bus. Rev. 88 , 46–51. [ Google Scholar ]
• Christensen C. M. (2017). How will you measure your life? (Harvard business review classics) . Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Clonan S. M., Chafouleas S. M., McDougal J. L., Riley-Tillman T. C. (2004). Positive psychology goes to school: are we there yet? Psychol. Sch. 41 , 101–110. 10.1002/pits.10142 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cozzolino P. J., Staples A. D., Meyers L. S., Samboceti J. (2004). Greed, death, and values: from terror management to transcendence management theory . Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 30 , 278–292. 10.1177/0146167203260716 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Curran T., Hill A. P. (2019). Perfectionism is increasing over time: a meta-analysis of birth cohort differences from 1989 to 2016 . Psychol. Bull. 145 , 410–429. 10.1037/bul0000138, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Curran T., Hill A. P., Appleton P. R., Vallerand R. J., Standage M. (2015). The psychology of passion: a meta-analytical review of a decade of research on intrapersonal outcomes . Motiv. Emot. 39 , 631–655. 10.1007/s11031-015-9503-0 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Demerouti E. (2014). Design your own job through job crafting . Eur. Psychol. 19 , 237–247. 10.1027/1016-9040/a000188 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Demerouti E., Bakker A. B., Gevers J. M. P. (2015). Job crafting and extra-role behavior: the role of work engagement and flourishing . J. Vocat. Behav. 91 , 87–96. 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.09.001 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Demerouti E., Hewett R., Haun V., De Gieter S., Rodríguez-Sánchez A., Skakon J. (2019). From job crafting to home crafting: a daily diary study among six European countries . Hum. Relat. 0 :0018726719848809. 10.1177/0018726719848809 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Demir M., Orthel-Clark H., Özdemir M., Özdemir S. (2015). “ Friendship and happiness among young adults ” in Friendship and happiness , ed. Demir M. (Dordrecht: Springer; ), 117–135. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dobronyi C. R., Oreopoulos P., Petronijevic U. (2019). Goal setting, academic reminders, and college success: a large-scale field experiment . J. Res. Educ. Effect. 12 , 38–66. 10.1080/19345747.2018.1517849 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Donaldson S. I., Dollwet M., Rao M. A. (2015). Happiness, excellence, and optimal human functioning revisited: examining the peer-reviewed literature linked to positive psychology . J. Posit. Psychol. 10 , 185–195. 10.1080/17439760.2014.943801 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Downes P. E., Kristof-Brown A. L., Judge T. A., Darnold T. C. (2017). Motivational mechanisms of self-concordance theory: goal-specific efficacy and person–organization fit . J. Bus. Psychol. 32 , 197–215. 10.1007/s10869-016-9444-y [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Duckworth A. L., Kirby T. A., Gollwitzer A., Oettingen G. (2013). From fantasy to action: mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) improves academic performance in children . Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 4 , 745–753. 10.1177/1948550613476307, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Durlak J. A., Weissberg R. P., Dymnicki A. B., Taylor R. D., Schellinger K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions . Child Dev. 82 , 405–432. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Emmons R. A. (1999). The psychology of ultimate concerns: Motivation and spirituality in personality . New York, NY, US: Guilford Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Faulkner G., Hefferon K., Mutrie N. (2015). “ Putting positive psychology into motion through physical activity ” in Positive psychology in practice: Promoting human flourishing in work, health, education, and everyday life . ed. Joseph S. (Hoboken: Wiley; ), 207–222. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fay D., Sonnentag S. (2012). Within-person fluctuations of proactive behavior: how affect and experienced competence regulate work behavior . Hum. Perform. 25 , 72–93. 10.1080/08959285.2011.631647 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fedigan S. K. (2017). High-maintenance friendships and adjustment in late adolescents and young adults in a college setting: A mixed methods analysis (Doctoral dissertation) Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I . Boston College. [ Google Scholar ]
• Finkel E. J., Campbell W. K., Brunell A. B., Dalton A. N., Scarbeck S. J., Chartrand T. L. (2006). High-maintenance interaction: inefficient social coordination impairs self-regulation . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91 , 456–475. 10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.456, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ford B. Q., Dmitrieva J. O., Heller D., Chentsova-Dutton Y., Grossmann I., Tamir M., et al.. (2015). Culture shapes whether the pursuit of happiness predicts higher or lower well-being . J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144 , 1053–1062. 10.1037/xge0000108, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Frankl V. E. (1985). Man’s search for meaning . Boston: Simon and Schuster. [ Google Scholar ]
• Frankl V. E. (2014). The will to meaning: Foundations and applications of logotherapy . New York, NY: Meridian. [ Google Scholar ]
• Frattaroli J. (2006). Experimental disclosure and its moderators: a meta-analysis . Psychol. Bull. 132 , 823–865. 10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.823, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fredrickson B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions . Am. Psychol. 56 , 218–226. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Freedland K. E. (2019). The behavioral medicine research council: its origins, mission, and methods . Health Psychol. 38 , 277–289. 10.1037/hea0000731, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fulmer R., Joerin A., Gentile B., Lakerink L., Rauws M. (2018). Using psychological artificial intelligence (Tess) to relieve symptoms of depression and anxiety: randomized controlled trial . JMIR Ment. Health 5 :e64. 10.2196/mental.9782, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gable S. L., Haidt J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Rev. Gen. Psychol. 9 , 103–110. 10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.103 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Garland E. L., Fredrickson B., Kring A. M., Johnson D. P., Meyer P. S., Penn D. L. (2010). Upward spirals of positive emotions counter downward spirals of negativity: insights from the broaden-and-build theory and affective neuroscience on the treatment of emotion dysfunctions and deficits in psychopathology . Clin. Psychol. Rev. 30 , 849–864. 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.002, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Garratt-Reed D., Howell J., Hayes L., Boyes M. (2018). Is perfectionism associated with academic burnout through repetitive negative thinking? PeerJ 6 :e5004. 10.7717/peerj.5004, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gazica M. W., Spector P. E. (2015). A comparison of individuals with unanswered callings to those with no calling at all . J. Vocat. Behav. 91 , 1–10. 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.08.008 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gilchrist L. (2003). “ Personal and psychological problems in college students ” in Encyclopedia of Education. 2nd edn. ed. Guthrie J. W. (New York: Macmillan Reference; ), 1871–1874. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gollwitzer G. M. (1996). “ The volitional benefits of planning ” in The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior . eds. Gollwitzer P. M., Bargh J. A. (New York: The Guilford Press; ), 287–312. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gortner E.-M., Rude S. S., Pennebaker J. W. (2006). Benefits of expressive writing in lowering rumination and depressive symptoms . Behav. Ther. 37 , 292–303. 10.1016/j.beth.2006.01.004, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Grant A. M., Wade-Benzoni K. A. (2009). The hot and cool of death awareness at work: mortality cues, aging, and self-protective and prosocial motivations . Acad. Manag. Rev. 34 , 600–622. 10.5465/amr.34.4.zok600 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Graybiel A. M., Smith K. S. (2014). Good habits, bad habits . Sci. Am. 310 , 38–43. 10.1038/scientificamerican0614-38 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hart J. (2014). Toward an integrative theory of psychological defense . Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 9 , 19–39. 10.1177/1745691613506018, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Haslam C., Cruwys T., Haslam S. A., Dingle G., Chang M. X.-L. (2016). Groups 4 health: evidence that a social-identity intervention that builds and strengthens social group membership improves mental health . J. Affect. Disord. 194 , 188–195. 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.010, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hayamizu T. (1997). Between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: examination of reasons for academic study based on the theory of internalization . Jpn. Psychol. Res. 39 , 98–108. 10.1111/1468-5884.00043 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Heintzelman S. J., Trent J., King L. A. (2013). Encounters with objective coherence and the experience of meaning in life . Psychol. Sci. 24 , 991–998. 10.1177/0956797612465878, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Henderson L. W., Knight T., Richardson B. (2013). An exploration of the well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic behaviour . J. Posit. Psychol. 8 , 322–336. 10.1080/17439760.2013.803596 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hill P. L., Turiano N. A. (2014). Purpose in life as a predictor of mortality across adulthood . Psychol. Sci. 25 , 1482–1486. 10.1177/0956797614531799, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Holland R. W., Aarts H., Langendam D. (2006). Breaking and creating habits on the working floor: a field-experiment on the power of implementation intentions . J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 42 , 776–783. 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.11.006 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hollenbeck J. R., Williams C. R., Klein H. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals . J. Appl. Psychol. 74 , 18–23. 10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.18 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hoyle R. H., Sherrill M. R. (2006). Future orientation in the self-system: possible selves, self-regulation, and behavior . J. Pers. 74 , 1673–1696. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00424.x, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hudson N. W., Briley D. A., Chopik W. J., Derringer J. (2018). You have to follow through: attaining behavioral change goals predicts volitional personality change . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 10.1037/pspp0000221 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Huppert F. A., Baylis N., Keverne B., Ryff Carol D., Singer Burton H., Dienberg Love G. (2004). Positive health: connecting well–being with biology . Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359 , 1383–1394. 10.1098/rstb.2004.1521, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hyland P., Shevlin M., Cloitre M., Karatzias T., Vallières F., McGinty G., et al. (2019). Quality not quantity: loneliness subtypes, psychological trauma, and mental health in the US adult population . Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 54 , 1089–1099. 10.1007/s00127-018-1597-8 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Iran-Nejad A., Chissom B. S. (1992). Contributions of active and dynamic self-regulation to learning . Innov. High. Educ. 17 , 125–136. 10.1007/BF00917134 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jachimowicz J., To C., Menges J., Akinola M. (2017). Igniting passion from within: how lay beliefs guide the pursuit of work passion and influence turnover [Preprint] . 10.31234/osf.io/qj6y9 [ CrossRef ]
• Jager W. (2003). “ Breaking bad habits: a dynamical perspective on habit formation and change ” in Human decision making and environmental perception. Understanding and assisting human decision making in real-life settings. Liber Amicorum for Charles Vlek . eds. Hendrickx L., Jager W., Steg L. (Groningen: University of Groningen; ) [ Google Scholar ]
• Jodl K. M., Michael A., Malanchuk O., Eccles J. S., Sameroff A. (2001). Parents’ roles in shaping early adolescents' occupational aspirations . Child Dev. 72 , 1247–1266. 10.1111/1467-8624.00345, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Johnson M. (2004). Approaching the salutogenesis of sense of coherence: the role of ‘active’ self-esteem and coping . Br. J. Health Psychol. 9 , 419–432. 10.1348/1359107041557057, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kahl J. A. (1953). Educational and occupational aspirations of “common man” boys . Harv. Educ. Rev. 23 , 186–203. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kang Y., Strecher V. J., Kim E., Falk E. B. (2019). Purpose in life and conflict-related neural responses during health decision-making . Health Psychol. 38 , 545–552. 10.1037/hea0000729, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Karoly P. (1993). Mechanisms of self-regulation: a systems view . Annu. Rev. Psychol. 44 , 23–52. 10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.000323 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kashdan T. B., Biswas-Diener R., King L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: the costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia . J. Posit. Psychol. 3 , 219–233. 10.1080/17439760802303044 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kashdan T. B., Steger M. F. (2007). Curiosity and pathways to well-being and meaning in life: traits, states, and everyday behaviors . Motiv. Emot. 31 , 159–173. 10.1007/s11031-007-9068-7 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kavakli M., Li M., Rudra T. (2012). Towards the development of a virtual counselor to tackle students’ exam stress . J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci. 16 , 5–26. 10.3233/jid-2012-0004 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kelly R. E., Mansell W., Wood A. M. (2015). Goal conflict and well-being: a review and hierarchical model of goal conflict, ambivalence, self-discrepancy and self-concordance . Personal. Individ. Differ. 85 , 212–229. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.011 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Keyes C. L., Shmotkin D., Ryff C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82 , 1007–1022. 10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.1007 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kim E. S., Strecher V. J., Ryff C. D. (2014). Purpose in life and use of preventive health care services . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111 , 16331–16336. 10.1073/pnas.1414826111, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• King L. A. (2001). The health benefits of writing about life goals . Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27 , 798–807. 10.1177/0146167201277003 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• King L. A., Pennebaker J. W. (1996). “ Thinking about goals, glue, and the meaning of life ” in Ruminative thoughts . Vol. 10 , ed. Wyer R. S. (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; ), 97–106. [ Google Scholar ]
• Koestner R., Lekes N., Powers T. A., Chicoine E. (2002). Attaining personal goals: self-concordance plus implementation intentions equals success . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83 , 231–244. 10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.231, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kono S. (2018). Theorizing linkages between ikigai (life worthiness) and leisure among Japanese university students: A mixed methods approach . (Doctor of philosophy). University of Alberta Alberta.
• Kono S., Walker G. J. (2019). Theorizing ikigai or life worth living among Japanese university students: a mixed-methods approach . J. Happiness Stud. 1–29. 10.1007/s10902-019-00086-x [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kono S., Walker G. J., Ito E., Hagi Y. (2019). Theorizing leisure's roles in the pursuit of ikigai (life worthiness): a mixed-methods approach . Leis. Sci. 41 , 237–259. 10.1080/01490400.2017.1356255 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kontis V., Bennett J. E., Mathers C. D., Li G., Foreman K., Ezzati M. (2017). Future life expectancy in 35 industrialised countries: projections with a Bayesian model ensemble . Lancet . 389 , 1323–1335. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32381-9, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Langeland E., Wahl A. K., Kristoffersen K., Hanestad B. R. (2007). Promoting coping: Salutogenesis among people with mental health problems . Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 28 , 275–295. 10.1080/01612840601172627 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Latham G. P., Locke E. A. (1991). Self-regulation through goal setting . Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50 , 212–247. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90021-K [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lewin K. (1938). The conceptual representation and the measurement of psychological forces . Durham, NC, US: Duke University Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Locke E. A. (2019). What Makes Writing about Goals Work? Acad. Manage. Discoveries 5 , 109–110. 10.5465/amd.2018.0187 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Locke E. A., Latham G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey . Am. Psychol. 57 , 705–717. 10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Locke E. A., Morisano D., Schippers M. C. (2014). Writing about goals enhances academic performance and aids personal development . Acad. Manag. Proc. 2014 :12781. 10.5465/ambpp.2014.12781symposium [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Locke E. A., Schippers M. C. (2018). Improving lives: personal goal setting boosts student performance and happiness . Acad. Manag. Proc. 2018 :16790. 10.5465/AMBPP.2018.16790symposium [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Malouff J. M., Schutte N. S. (2017). Can psychological interventions increase optimism? A meta-analysis . J. Posit. Psychol. 12 , 594–604. 10.1080/17439760.2016.1221122 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Marlatt G. A., Kaplan B. E. (1972). Self-initiated attempts to change behavior: a study of new year’s resolutions . Psychol. Rep. 30 , 123–131. 10.2466/pr0.1972.30.1.123 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Martela F., Steger M. F. (2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance . J. Posit. Psychol. 11 , 531–545. 10.1080/17439760.2015.1137623 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• McCaul K. D., Hinsz V. B., McCaul H. S. (1987). The effects of commitment to performance goals on effort . J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 17 , 437–452. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00323.x [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• McGregor I., Little B. R. (1998). Personal projects, happiness, and meaning: on doing well and being yourself . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74 , 494–512. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.494 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• McKnight P. E., Kashdan T. B. (2009). Purpose in life as a system that creates and sustains health and well-being: an integrative, testable theory . Rev. Gen. Psychol. 13 , 242–251. 10.1037/a0017152 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• McNulty J. K., Fincham F. D. (2012). Beyond positive psychology? Toward a contextual view of psychological processes and well-being . Am. Psychol. 67 , 101–110. 10.1037/a0024572, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Meevissen Y. M. C., Peters M. L., Alberts H. J. E. M. (2011). Become more optimistic by imagining a best possible self: effects of a two week intervention . J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 42 , 371–378. 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.02.012 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Menec V. H. (2003). The relation between everyday activities and successful aging: a 6-year longitudinal study . J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 58 , 74–82. 10.1093/geronb/58.2.s74 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Menzies H. (2005). No time: Stress and the crisis of modern life . Vancouver, CA: Douglas and McIntrye. [ Google Scholar ]
• Meyers M. C., van Woerkom M., Bakker A. B. (2012). The added value of the positive: a literature review of positive psychology interventions in organizations . Eur. J. Work Organ. Psy. 22 , 618–632. 10.1080/1359432x.2012.694689 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mischel W. (1996). “ From good intentions to willpower ” in The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (Vol. 197–218) . eds. Gollwitzer P. M., Bargh J. A. (New York: Guilford Press; ). [ Google Scholar ]
• Mischel W., Ayduk O. (2004). Willpower in a cognitive-affective processing system: The dynamics of delay of gratification.
• Mittelmark M. B., Sagy S., Eriksson M., Bauer G. F., Pelikan J. M., Lindström B., et al. (eds.) (2017). The handbook of salutogenesis . Cham (CH): Springer. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mongrain M., Anselmo-Matthews T. (2012). Do positive psychology exercises work? A replication of Seligman et al . J. Clin. Psychol. 68 , 382–389. 10.1002/jclp.21839, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Morisano D. (2013). “ Goal setting in the academic arena ” in New developments in goal setting and task performance . eds. Locke E. A., Latham G. (New York: Taylor and Francis Group; ), 495–506. [ Google Scholar ]
• Morisano D., Hirsh J. B., Peterson J. B., Pihl R. O., Shore B. M. (2010). Setting, elaborating, and reflecting on personal goals improves academic performance . J. Appl. Psychol. 95 , 255–264. 10.1037/a0018478, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Neal A., Ballard T., Vancouver J. B. (2017). Dynamic self-regulation and multiple-goal pursuit . Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 4 , 401–423. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113156 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nelson S., Layous K., Cole S., Lyubomirsky S. (2016). Do unto others or treat yourself? The effects of prosocial and self-focused behavior on psychological flourishing . Emotion 16 , 850–861. 10.1037/emo0000178, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nix G. A., Ryan R. M., Manly J. B., Deci L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: the effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality . J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35 , 266–284. 10.1006/jesp.1999.1382 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nurra C., Oyserman D. (2018). From future self to current action: an identity-based motivation perspective . Self Identity 17 , 343–364. 10.1080/15298868.2017.1375003 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Oaten M., Cheng K. (2006). Longitudinal gains in self-regulation from regular physical exercise . Br. J. Health Psychol. 11 , 717–733. 10.1348/135910706X96481, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Oeppen J., Vaupel J. W. (2002). Broken limits to life expectancy . Science 296 , 1029–1031. 10.1126/science.1069675, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Oettingen G. (2012). Future thought and behaviour change . Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 23 , 1–63. 10.1080/10463283.2011.643698 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Oettingen G., Gollwitzer P. M. (2010). “ Strategies of setting and implementing goals: mental contrasting and implementation intentions ” in Social psychological foundations of clinical psychology . eds. Maddox J. E., Tangney J. P. (New York: The Guilford Press; ), 114–135. [ Google Scholar ]
• Oettingen G., Hönig G., Gollwitzer P. M. (2000). Effective self-regulation of goal attainment . Int. J. Educ. Res. 33 , 705–732. 10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00046-X [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Oettingen G., Sevincer A. T., Gollwitzer P. M. (2018). The psychology of thinking about the future . New York, NY: The Guilford Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Oettingen G., Wittchen M., Gollwitzer P. M. (2013). “ Regulating goal pursuit through mental contrasting with implementation intentions ” in New developments in goal setting and task performance . eds. Locke E. A., Latham G. P. (New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; ), 523–548. [ Google Scholar ]
• Oh K., Lee D., Ko B., Choi H. (2017). A chatbot for psychiatric counseling in mental healthcare service based on emotional dialogue analysis and sentence generation . Paper presented at the 2017 18th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM).
• Otake K., Shimai S., Tanaka-Matsumi J., Otsui K., Fredrickson B. L. (2006). Happy people become happier through kindness: a counting kindnesses intervention . J. Happiness Stud. 7 , 361–375. 10.1007/s10902-005-3650-z, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Oyserman D., Bybee D., Terry K. (2006). Possible selves and academic outcomes: how and when possible selves impel action . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91 , 188–204. 10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.188, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Park N., Peterson C., Szvarca D., Vander Molen R. J., Kim E. S., Collon K. (2016). Positive psychology and physical health: research and applications . Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 10 , 200–206. 10.1177/1559827614550277 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pennebaker J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process . Psychol. Sci. 8 , 162–166. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00403.x [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pennebaker J. W., Chung C. K. (2011). “ Expressive writing: connections to physical and mental health ” in The Oxford handbook of health psychology . ed. Friendman H. S. (New York: Oxford University Press; ), 417–437. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pennebaker J. W., Colder M., Sharp L. K. (1990). Accelerating the coping process . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58 , 528–537. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.528, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Peters M. L., Flink I. K., Boersma K., Linton S. J. (2010). Manipulating optimism: can imagining a best possible self be used to increase positive future expectancies? J. Posit. Psychol. 5 , 204–211. 10.1080/17439761003790963 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Petrou P., Bakker A. B. (2016). Crafting one’s leisure time in response to high job strain . Hum. Relat. 69 , 507–529. 10.1177/0018726715590453 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Petrou P., Bakker A. B., van den Heuvel M. (2017). Weekly job crafting and leisure crafting: implications for meaning-making and work engagement . J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 90 , 129–152. 10.1111/joop.12160 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pittman L. D., Richmond A. (2008). University belonging, friendship quality, and psychological adjustment during the transition to college . J. Exp. Educ. 76 , 343–362. 10.3200/JEXE.76.4.343-362 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pope L., Hanks A. S., Just D. R., Wansink B. (2014). New year’s res-illusions: food shopping in the new year competes with healthy intentions . PLoS One 9 :e110561. 10.1371/journal.pone.0110561, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pyszczynski T., Greenberg J., Solomon S., Arndt J., Schimel J. (2004). Converging toward an integrated theory of self-esteem: reply to Crocker and Nuer (2004), Ryan and Deci (2004), and Leary (2004) . Psychol. Bull. 130 , 483–488. 10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.483 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pyszczynski T., Solomon S., Greenberg J. (2015). “ Thirty years of terror management theory: from genesis to revelation ” in Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 52 , eds. Olson J. M., Zanna M. P. (Academic Press; ), 1–70. [ Google Scholar ]
• Quinn R. E. (2005). Moments of greatness . Harv. Bus. Rev. 83 , 74–83. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Quinn R. W., Quinn R. E. (2009). Lift: Becoming a positive force in any situation . San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. [ Google Scholar ]
• Quoidbach J., Wood A. M., Hansenne M. (2009). Back to the future: the effect of daily practice of mental time travel into the future on happiness and anxiety . J. Posit. Psychol. 4 , 349–355. 10.1080/17439760902992365 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Rojewski J. W. (2005). “ Occupational aspirations: constructs, meanings, and application ” in Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work . (Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.), 131–154. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rood E. (2019). SDG video series 2019 Available at: https://www.rsm.nl/sdgs (Accessed March 7, 2019).
• Ryan R. M., Deci L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being . Am. Psychol. 55 , 68–78. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ryan R. M., Deci L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being . Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52 , 141–166. 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ryan R. M., Deci L. (2004). Avoiding death or engaging life as accounts of meaning and culture: comment on Pyszczynski et al. (2004) . Psychol. Bull. 130 , 473–477. 10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.473, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ryff C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia . Psychother. Psychosom. 83 , 10–28. 10.1159/000353263, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ryff C. D., Singer B. (2000). Interpersonal flourishing: a positive health agenda for the new millennium . Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 4 , 30–44. 10.1207/s15327957pspr0401_4 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ryff C. D., Singer B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: a eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being . J. Happiness Stud. 9 , 13–39. 10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Schienker B. R., Dlugolecki D. W., Doherty K. (1994). The impact of self-presentations on self-appraisals and behavior: the power of public commitment . Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 20 , 20–33. 10.1177/0146167294201002 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Schippers M. C. (2017). IKIGAI: reflection on life goals optimizes performance and happiness. ERIM inaugural address series research in management Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1765/100484 (Accessed March 1, 2019).
• Schippers M. C., Edmondson A. C., West M. A. (2014). Team reflexivity as an antidote to team information-processing failures . Small Group Res. 45 , 731–769. 10.1177/1046496414553473 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Schippers M. C., Hogenes R. (2011). Energy management of people in organizations: a review and research agenda . J. Bus. Psychol. 26 , 193–203. 10.1007/s10869-011-9217-6, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Schippers M. C., Homan A. C., van Knippenberg D. (2013). To reflect or not to reflect: prior team performance as a boundary condition of the effects of reflexivity on learning and final team performance . J. Organ. Behav. 34 , 6–23. 10.1002/job.1784 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Schippers M. C., Morisano D., Locke E. A., Scheepers A. W., Latham G., De Jong E. M. (2019). Conscious goal reflection boosts academic performance regardless of goal domain . Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101823 (in press). [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Schippers M. C., Scheepers A. W. A., Peterson J. B. (2015). A scalable goal-setting intervention closes both the gender and ethnic minority achievement gap . Palgrave Commun. 1 , 15014 Available at: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/articles/palcomms201514#supplementary-information [ Google Scholar ]
• Schwarzenegger A., Hall D. K. (2012). Arnold: The education of a bodybuilder . (New York: Simon and Schuster; ). [ Google Scholar ]
• Sekerka L. E., Vacharkulksemsuk T., Fredrickson B. L. (2012). “ Positive emotions: broadening and building upward spirals of sustainable development ” in The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship eds. Cameron K., Spreitzer G. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press; ), 168–177. [ Google Scholar ]
• Seligman M. E., Ernst R. M., Gillham J., Reivich K., Linkins M. (2009). Positive education: positive psychology and classroom interventions . Oxf. Rev. Educ. 35 , 293–311. 10.1080/03054980902934563 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Seligman M. E., Steen T. A., Park N., Peterson C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions . Am. Psychol. 60 , 410–421. 10.1037/0003-066x.60.5.410 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Seto E., Schlegel R. J. (2018). Becoming your true self: perceptions of authenticity across the lifespan . Self Identity 17 , 310–326. 10.1080/15298868.2017.1322530 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sevincer A. T., Mehl P. J., Oettingen G. (2017). Well self-regulated people use mental contrasting . Soc. Psychol. 48 , 348–364. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000322 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sheldon K. M. (2002). “ The self-concordance model of healthy goal striving: when personal goals correctly represent the person ” in Handbook of self-determination research . eds. Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press; ), 65–86. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sheldon K. M., Elliot A. J., Ryan R. M., Chirkov V., Kim Y., Wu C., et al. (2004). Self-concordance and subjective well-being in four cultures . J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 35 , 209–223. 10.1177/0022022103262245 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sheldon K. M., Houser-Marko L. (2001). Self-concordance, goal attainment, and the pursuit of happiness: can there be an upward spiral? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 80 , 152–165. 10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.152, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sheldon K. M., Houser-Marko L., Kasser T. (2006). Does autonomy increase with age? Comparing the goal motivations of college students and their parents . J. Res. Pers. 40 , 168–178. 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.10.004 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sheldon K. M., Kasser T. (1998). Pursuing personal goals: skills enable progress, but not all progress is beneficial . Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 24 , 1319–1331. 10.1177/01461672982412006 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sheldon K. M., Lyubomirsky S. (2006). How to increase and sustain positive emotion: the effects of expressing gratitude and visualizing best possible selves . J. Posit. Psychol. 1 , 73–82. 10.1080/17439760500510676 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sin N. L., Lyubomirsky S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: a practice-friendly meta-analysis . J. Clin. Psychol. 65 , 467–487. 10.1002/jclp.20593, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Singeling R. (2017). Goal-setting and the power of saying: I WILL.
• Sloan T. (2018). Life choices: Understanding dilemmas and decisions . New York: Routledge. [ Google Scholar ]
• Snyder T., de Brey C., Dillow S. (2016). Digest of Education Statistics 2014 . (NCES 2016-006) Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sone T., Nakaya N., Ohmori K., Shimazu T., Higashiguchi M., Kakizaki M., et al.. (2008). Sense of life worth living (Ikigai) and mortality in Japan: Ohsaki study . Psychosom. Med. 70 , 709–715. 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31817e7e64, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stafford-Smith M., Griggs D., Gaffney O., Ullah F., Reyers B., Kanie N., et al.. (2017). Integration: the key to implementing the sustainable development goals . Sustain. Sci. 12 , 911–919. 10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Steger M. F. (2012). Making meaning in life . Psychol. Inq. 23 , 381–385. 10.1080/1047840X.2012.720832 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Steger M. F., Kashdan T. B., Oishi S. (2008a). Being good by doing good: daily eudaimonic activity and well-being . J. Res. Pers. 42 , 22–42. 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.03.004 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Steger M. F., Kashdan T. B., Sullivan B. A., Lorentz D. (2008b). Understanding the search for meaning in life: personality, cognitive style, and the dynamic between seeking and experiencing meaning . J. Pers. 76 , 199–228. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00484.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Steger M. F., Oishi S., Kashdan T. B. (2009). Meaning in life across the life span: levels and correlates of meaning in life from emerging adulthood to older adulthood . J. Posit. Psychol. 4 , 43–52. 10.1080/17439760802303127 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Suh H., Gnilka P. B., Rice K. G. (2017). Perfectionism and well-being: a positive psychology framework . Personal. Individ. Differ. 111 , 25–30. 10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.041 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tamis-LeMonda C. S., Way N., Hughes D., Yoshikawa H., Kalman R. K., Niwa E. Y. (2008). Parents' goals for children: the dynamic coexistence of individualism and collectivism in cultures and individuals . Soc. Dev. 17 , 183–209. 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00419.x [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Taylor J., Harris M. B., Taylor S. (2004). Parents have their say… about their college-age children’s career decisions . NACE J. 64 , 15–21. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tomson S., Moser P. (2013). The code: The power of “I will” . Layton, Utah: Gibbs Smith. [ Google Scholar ]
• Travers C. J., Morisano D., Locke E. A. (2015). Self-reflection, growth goals, and academic outcomes: a qualitative study . Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 85 , 224–241. 10.1111/bjep.12059, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Trope Y., Liberman N. (2003). Temporal construal . Psychol. Rev. 110 , 403–421. 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tugade M. M., Fredrickson B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86 , 320–333. 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tugade M. M., Fredrickson B. L., Feldman Barrett L. (2004). Psychological resilience and positive emotional granularity: examining the benefits of positive emotions on coping and health . J. Pers. 72 , 1161–1190. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00294.x, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the rationality of choice . Science 211 , 453–458. 10.1126/science.7455683, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Urry H. L., Nitschke J. B., Dolski I., Jackson D. C., Dalton K. M., Mueller C. J., et al. (2004). Making a life worth living: neural correlates of well-being . Psychol. Sci. 15 , 367–372. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00686.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Vallerand R. J., Blanchard C., Mageau G. A., Koestner R., Ratelle C., Léonard M., et al.. (2003). Les passions de l’âme: on obsessive and harmonious passion . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85 , 756–767. 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Vallerand R. J., Fortier M. S., Guay F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: toward a motivational model of high school dropout . J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72 , 1161–1176. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1161, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Vogel R. M., Rodell J. B., Lynch J. W. (2016). Engaged and productive misfits: how job crafting and leisure activity mitigate the negative effects of value incongruence . Acad. Manag. J. 59 , 1561–1584. 10.5465/amj.2014.0850 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Vogt K., Hakanen J. J., Brauchli R., Jenny G. J., Bauer G. F. (2016). The consequences of job crafting: a three-wave study . Eur. J. Work Organ. Psy. 25 , 353–362. 10.1080/1359432X.2015.1072170 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Walton G. M. (2014). The new science of wise psychological interventions . Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23 , 73–82. 10.1177/0963721413512856 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Waters L. (2012). A review of school-based positive psychology interventions . Aust. Educ. Dev. Psychol. 28 , 75–90. 10.1375/aedp.28.2.75 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Werner K. M., Milyavskaya M., Foxen-Craft E., Koestner R. (2016). Some goals just feel easier: self-concordance leads to goal progress through subjective ease, not effort . Personal. Individ. Differ. 96 , 237–242. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.002 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wessels C., Schippers M. C., Stegmann S., Bakker A. B., van Baalen P. J., Proper K. I. (2019). Fostering flexibility in the new world of work: a model of time-spatial job crafting . Front. Psychol. 10 . 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00505, PMID: [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Williams G. C., Hedberg V. A., Cox E. M., Deci L. (2000). Extrinsic life goals and health-risk behaviors in adolescents . J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 30 , 1756–1771. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02466.x [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wilson T. D. (2011). Redirect: The surprising new science of psychological change . New York: Little, Brown. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wilson D. K., Lorig K., Klein W. M. P., Riley W., Sweeney A. M., Christensen A. (2019). Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of behavioral interventions in nonclinical settings for improving health outcomes . Health Psychol. 38 , 689–700. 10.1037/hea0000773, PMID: [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wong P. T. (2014). “ Viktor Frankl’s meaning-seeking model and positive psychology ” in Meaning in positive and existential psychology . ed. Russo-Netzer A. B. P. (New York, NY: Springer; ), 149–184. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wrzesniewski A., Dutton J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work . Acad. Manag. Rev. 26 , 179–201. 10.5465/amr.2001.4378011 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yeager D. S., Walton G. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: they’re not magic . Rev. Educ. Res. 81 , 267–301. 10.3102/0034654311405999 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]