phd exit seminar

Ph.D. Degree

Our ph.d. degree program.

Our GGCS doctoral degree prepares you to solve complex, long-term research problems. You can expect to graduate in four to five years and to work on a large research project, culminating in a dissertation. Our doctoral graduates join industries or go on to careers in academia, either as postdoctoral researchers or assistant professors.

Degree Requirements

• Admission Requirements

Prerequisites In addition to the admission requirements stated above, applicants are expected to demonstrate proficiency at the undergraduate level in four fundamental areas of computer science, and mathematics. The specified UC Davis courses exemplify the material:

♦   Computer Architecture --  ECS 154A (Computer Architecture) ♦   Operating Systems -- ECS 150 (Operating Systems and System Programming) ♦   Programming Languages --ECS 140A (Programming Languages) ♦   Theoretical Foundations --ECS 120 (Theory of Computation) and ECS 122A (Algorithm Design and Analysis) ♦   Mathematical Foundations -- ECS 132 (Probability and Statistical Modeling for Computer Science) or MAT 135A (Probability) or STA 131A (Introduction to Probability Theory), and one additional upper-division mathematics course These are referred to as the undergraduate proficiency requirements . A grade of B or higher is required for each course used to satisfy these requirements.

Deficiencies Students may be admitted with one or more deficiencies in the undergraduate proficiency requirements. It is expected that the student will complete the undergraduate proficiency requirements by the time they take their Qualifying Exam (QE).

• Dissertation Plan

GGCS offers Plan B as described under Section 520 in the UC Davis Division Academic Senate Regulations. Plan B specifies a three member (minimum) dissertation committee, an optional final oral examination (made on an individual student basis by the dissertation committee), and an exit seminar.

• Advanced Proficiency Requirements

All students who are in the Ph.D. program, or who expect to work toward a doctorate in computer science at UC Davis, are required to complete the Advanced Proficiency requirement. A student passes this requirement by a high level of achievement in graduate coursework and demonstrating “advanced” proficiency in the graduate breadth requirements. The GGCS breadth requirement includes demonstrated proficiency in four areas of computer science at the graduate level: Architecture, Systems, Theory and Applications.

The student can satisfy the above requirements in one of the following ways:

♦   Completion of a Core course with a grade of A- or better ♦   Demonstration that one has taken a similar graduate course at another institution with a grade of A- or better. A Graduate Advisor must approve this option. Core Courses ♦    Architecture Core   -- ECS 201A Advanced Computer Architecture; ECS 201C Parallel Architectures; EEC 270 Computer Architecture     ♦    Systems Core -- ECS 240 Programming Languages; ECS 251 Operating Systems; ECS 260 Software Engineering ♦    Theory Core -- ECS 220 Theory of Computation; ECS 222A Design and Analysis of Algorithms     ♦    Applications Core  -- ECS 230 Applied Numerical Linear Algebra; ECS 231 Large-scale Scientific Computation; ECS 234 Computational Functional Genomics; ECS 235A Computer and Information Security; ECS 236 Computer Security Intrusion Detection Based Approach; ECS 252 Computer Networks; ECS 256 Performance Evaluation; ECS 265 Distributed Database Systems; ECS 267 Wide-Area Distributed Information Systems; ECS 268 Scientific Data and Workflow Management; ECS 270 Artificial Intelligence; ECS 271 Machine Learning and Discovery; ECS 272 Information Visualization; ECS 274 Automated Deduction; ECS 275A Advanced Computer Graphics; ECS 276 Advanced Volume Visualization; ECS 277 Advanced Visualization; ECS 278 Computer-Aided Geometric Design; ECS 279 Topics in Character Animation Summary 45 units of upper division and graduate coursework are required. Full-time students must enroll for 12 units per quarter including research, academic and seminar units. Per UC regulations students cannot enroll in more than 12 units of graduate level courses (200) or more than 16 units of combined undergraduate and graduate level (100, 200, 300) courses per quarter.

• Special Requirements

The Graduate Group requires all Ph.D. candidates demonstrate at least one quarter of college level teaching experience. We strongly recommend that this includes lecturing or leading a discussion section. In addition, each student is required to participate in an exit seminar, in which the research is presented to the UC Davis academic community. This seminar will be administered by the dissertation committee, and will take place after all committee members have approved the dissertation, but before the dissertation has been filed with the Office of Graduate Studies.

Admissions Committee Completed applications are evaluated by the Admissions Committee, with the assistance of other faculty in the Graduate Group. The Admissions Committee consists of six Graduate Group faculty. Based on a review of the entire application, a recommendation is made to accept or decline the applicant’s request for admission. The recommendation is forwarded to the Dean of Graduate Studies for final approval of admission. Notification of admissions decisions will be sent by Graduate Studies. Applications are accepted from September (when the admission system opens) through January 15 for the next Fall-entering class.

Graduate Advisors Committee The Graduate Advisors Committee is composed of GGCS faculty members appointed by Graduate Studies. Every student who does not have a Thesis Advisor will be assigned a Graduate Advisor from the Graduate Advisors Committee. Until a student has a Thesis Advisor, the assigned Graduate Advisor will monitor the progress of the student and provide guidance on his/her academic program. Each GGCS graduate student is responsible for meeting with his or her Graduate Advisor at least once per quarter.

Qualifying Examination Committee The student, in consultation with his/her Thesis Advisor, nominate five faculty members to serve on the Examination Committee. The Thesis Advisor must be selected before the Qualifying Examination Committee is formed. The Thesis Advisor must be on the qualifying exam committee but cannot be chair of the committee. The membership of the Qualifying Exam Committee must satisfy the following conditions:

♦   The chair of the committee must be a member of the Academic Senate of UC Davis, and a GGCS member. ♦   At least three members of the committee must be members of the Academic Senate of the University of California and GGCS members. ♦   It is recommended (by the Academic Senate) that one member of the committee be a faculty member outside of the Graduate Group in Computer Science. These nominations are submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies for formal appointment in accordance with Graduate Council policy. The Qualifying Exam Committee conducts the exam and submits results to the Office of Graduate Studies.

Dissertation Committee The Dissertation Committee consists of three members who will guide the student in research. Graduate Studies must approve this committee. Guidelines for choosing the members of the dissertation committee are as follows:

♦   At least two of the members must be members of the Academic Senate of the University of California. ♦   At least two of these members must be members of the Graduate Group in Computer Science. ♦   The Chair of this committee must be a member of the Graduate Group in Computer Science. ♦   The Chair of the Dissertation Committee is the student’s Thesis Advisor. ♦   The composition of the dissertation committee is entered on the Advancement to Candidacy Form.

The role of the Dissertation Committee is to advise the doctoral student on the research topic and methods, and then to review the final completed dissertation for acceptance. The Committee Chairperson, the Thesis Advisor, should determine the desires of the individual members regarding assistance with the research and dissertation review at the time the Dissertation Committee is constituted.

Students are expected to meet with their Thesis Advisor at least quarterly . Dissertation committee members are expected to read and comment on a dissertation within four weeks from its submission. This time limit policy does not apply to summer periods for faculty holding nine-month appointments. The student and faculty will coordinate a timeline for the student to present the thesis to the dissertation committee. This timeline must allow all dissertation committee members enough time to fulfill their responsibilities within the four-week deadline.

• Advising Structure and Mentoring

A student’s Thesis Advisor supervises his/her thesis or project, and serves as Chair of the Dissertation Committee. A student’s Graduate Advisor serves as a resource for information on academic requirements, policies, and procedures in the absence of a Thesis Advisor. The Graduate Program Coordinator assists students with appointments, requirements, university policies, and in identifying a Thesis Advisor. Mentoring Guidelines can be found in the graduate student handbook.

• Advancement to Candidacy

Before advancing to candidacy for a doctoral degree, a student must have satisfied all requirements set by the graduate program, must have maintained a minimum GPA of 3.5 in all course work undertaken (except those courses graded S or U), and must have passed the Qualifying Examination before a committee appointed to administer it. Normally, students advance to candidacy by the end of their 9th quarter; students must pass their QE by the end of the ninth quarter in order to remain eligible for academic appointments (TA, GSR, AI, etc.). The student must file the appropriate paperwork with the Office of Graduate Studies and pay the candidacy fee in order to be officially promoted to PhD Candidacy. Refer to the Graduate Council website for additional details regarding the Doctoral Qualifying Examination.

• Qualifying Examination and Dissertation Requirements

Qualifying Examination General Information To be eligible for the Qualifying Examination, the student must have satisfied all course requirements, have removed all undergraduate deficiencies, and must have at least a 3.5 GPA in courses taken in the program of study. Passing this exam makes the student eligible for advancement to candidacy. The Qualifying Exam should be taken by the ninth quarter and no later than the end of the fifteenth quarter after admission to the PhD program.

The primary purpose of the Qualifying Examination is to validate that the student is academically qualified to conceptualize a research topic, undertake scholarly research, and successfully produce the dissertation required for a doctoral degree. The Qualifying Exam must evaluate the student’s command of the field, ensuring that the student has both breadth and depth of knowledge. It must not focus solely on the proposed dissertation research. In addition, the Qualifying Exam provides an opportunity for the committee to provide important guidance to the student regarding his or her chosen research topic. The Qualifying Examination is a formal, oral examination to ascertain the student’s readiness to conduct PhD-level research in the major area of study.

Written Portion of the Qualifying Exam: the Thesis Proposal Prior to the Qualifying Examination the student must prepare a Thesis Proposal containing a thorough discussion of a proposed thesis topic. This paper must be submitted to the Qualifying Examination Committee at least two weeks prior to the examination. The Thesis Proposal is an independently prepared proposal describing the student’s dissertation-specific research aims, hypotheses, progress to date, and experimental approach. Concepts within the research proposal can be discussed with others (such as the student’s Thesis Advisor and peers), but the writing of the proposal should be solely the student’s work, as the proposal will also serve as evidence of the student’s proficiency in scientific writing. The Qualifying Exam Committee is responsible for assessing that the student’s scholarly preparation and writing proficiency are satisfactory before advancement to candidacy. Furthermore, the Thesis Proposal will provide information that may be discussed during the oral exam.

Oral Portion of the Exam The oral portion of the qualifying exam will be 2-3 hours in length. The examinations differ in structure, depending on the area of research and the members of the examining committee. The student will be asked to give a formal presentation of the thesis proposal. The committee will question the student on this proposal, and will question the student to determine the student’s competence in both the major and minor areas of study.

The committee will evaluate the student’s general qualifications for a position in academia or in industry, the student’s preparation in his/her specific area of study, the student’s previous academic record, performance on specific parts of the examination, and the student’s potential for scholarly research as indicated during the examination and in the student’s publication history.

Outcome of the Exam The committee can issue any of the following grades for the examination:

♦    Pass -- In this case, the student can apply to the Graduate Studies for Advancement to Candidacy for the degree. At this time a dissertation committee is officially selected to direct the student in the research, and to guide the student in the preparation of the dissertation. The committee must be approved by Graduate Studies.

♦    Not Pass  -- In this case, the committee has two options:

     ♦   It can decide that the student’s Thesis Proposal is not sufficient and ask that it be re-thought or re-written. In this case, the committee will ask the student to remedy the problems in the proposal and retake the examination within a specified time frame.      ♦   It can decide that the student’s knowledge within the major and minor areas is not sufficient for continued progress for the PhD. In this case, the committee can ask the student to take some additional coursework and retake the examination within a specified time frame. ♦    Fail -- In this case, the student is not permitted to continue in the Ph.D. program.

The student can only retake the Qualifying Examination once. If a passing grade is not achieved by the second attempt, the student cannot continue in the PhD program. If a unanimous decision takes the form of “Not Pass” or “Fail”, the Chair of the Qualifying Exam Committee must include in its report a specific statement, agreed to by all members of the committee, explaining its decision, the Chair must inform the student of its decision. Having received a “Not Pass” the student may attempt the Qualifying Exam one additional time; the Qualifying Exam report must list the specific conditions and timing for the second exam. After a second examination, a vote of “Not Pass” is unacceptable; only “Pass” or “Fail” is recognized. Should the student receive a “Fail” on the first or second attempt at the exam, the student will be recommended for disqualification from the program to the Dean of Graduate Studies.

The Dissertation The Ph.D. dissertation demonstrates the ability of the student to carry out an independent original research project of high quality. It reflects a level of attainment in research, not the fulfillment of a list of requirements. An acceptable Ph.D. dissertation is not only an original contribution to the field, but is generally characterized by a broad scope of applicability.

The dissertation must be submitted to each member of the dissertation committee at least one month before the student expects to make requested revisions; committee members are expected to respond within four weeks, not including summer months for nine-month faculty. Informing committee members of progress as writing proceeds helps the members to plan to read the dissertation and provide feedback within this time frame. The dissertation must be approved and signed by all members of the Dissertation Committee before it is submitted to Graduate Studies for final approval.

Filing of the Dissertation with the Office of Graduate Studies is normally the last requirement satisfied by the candidate. The deadlines for completing this requirement are listed each quarter in the campus General Catalog (available online or from the Bookstore). A candidate must be a registered student or on Filing Fee status at the time of filing a dissertation, with the exception of the summer period between the end of the Spring Quarter and the beginning of Fall Quarter. The Dissertation will be prepared, submitted and filed according to regulations instituted by the Office of Graduate Studies. Satisfaction of this requirement must be verified by the Dissertation Committee Chair.

Exit Seminar Each student is required to participate in an Exit Seminar, in which the candidate’s research is presented to the UC Davis academic community. This seminar will be administered by the Dissertation Committee and will take place after all committee members have approved the dissertation, but before the dissertation has been filed with the Office of Graduate Studies. Adequate scheduling of the Exit Seminar is the responsibility of the student.

• Normative Time to Degree

It is expected that the student will complete the undergraduate proficiency requirements within the first four quarters of study, the Advanced Proficiency within the first six quarters of study, and the Qualifying Examination between the sixth and ninth quarters of study. Completion of all requirements is normally accomplished in fifteen quarters of study. The maximal time period allowed for completion of each requirement is as follows:

♦   A student’s Program of Study must be submitted and approved by the end of four quarters of study. ♦   The student must complete the Advanced Proficiency Requirements by the end of the sixth quarter of study. ♦   The student must complete the Qualifying Examination by the end of the ninth quarter of study. ♦   The student should complete all requirements for the PhD by the end of the 15th quarter of study. ♦   Students who fail to complete all the requirements within the “normal” time period are referred to the Educational Policy Committee of the Graduate Group. The Committee considers the student’s entire record, including examination scores and letters of support, particularly from the student’s Thesis Advisor. The Committee exercises wide discretion: it may decide that no action is necessary; that the student should be allowed more time in which to complete the requirement; that certain of the requirements should be waived; that certain remedial actions should be taken; or that the student should be advised to leave the program. The committee attaches great weight to the Thesis Advisor’s letter of support. It is therefore extremely important that students involve themselves in research under some faculty member early in the program—preferably by the end of their third quarter.

• Typical Timeline

♦    Year 1 -- Fall: ECS 201A, ECS 293A, ECS 390, ECS 299 -- Winter: ECS 240, ECS 252, ECS 299 -- Spring: ECS 222A, ECS 231, ECS 299 ♦    Year 2 -- Fall: ECS 260, ECS 289G, ECS 299 -- Winter: ECS 251, ECS 271, ECS 299 -- Spring: ECS 272, ECS 299; Advanced Proficiency Requirements completed ♦    Year 3 -- Fall: ECS 299; Program of Study submitted and approved; Application for Qualifying Exam -- Winter: ECS 299; Qualifying Examination; Advancement to Ph.D. Candidacy -- Spring: ECS 299 ♦    Years 4 - 6 -- ECS 299; Dissertation Research Completion; Exit Seminar Completion

• Sources of Funding

Financial assistance for graduate study comes in the form of fellowships, Teaching Assistantships (TA), and Graduate Student Research (GSR) positions. The standard form of Ph.D. graduate student support in a 50% TA position for the first three quarters and either a 50% TA or 45% GSR position for the remainder of a student’s academic career. The amount and type of aid that the department can offer varies from year to year depending on the number of TA and GSR positions that are available, the fellowships that the department is authorized to award, and the number of students requesting financial assistance. We strongly encourage all qualified applicants to apply for many external fellowships offered by both government and private agencies.nnn

• PELP, In Absentia and Filing Fee Status

Information about PELP (Planned Educational Leave), In Absentia (reduced fees when researching out of state) and Filing Fee status can be found in the UC Davis Graduate Studies website.

• Leaving the Program Prior to Completion of the Ph.D. Requirements

Should a student leave the program prior to completing the requirements for the Ph.D., he or she may still be eligible to receive the master’s degree if they have fulfilled all the requirements. Students use the Change of Degree Objective form available from the Office of the University Registrar.

Frequently Asked Ph.D. Questions

• How do I get a Ph.D. in computer science?

The requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy are the satisfactory completion of the advanced proficiency requirements, qualifying examination, completion of an approved program of study, and writing a dissertation approved by your thesis committee. The time frame varies but the following list shows the approximate time frame and sequence to follow:

♦   Typical Time to Degree: 4-5 Years ♦   Undergraduate Proficiency (UGP) Requirements ♦   optionally, Master’s Degree Requirements ♦   Major and Minor Area of Study ♦   10 Graduate Courses (includes Advanced Proficiency Requirements) ♦   optionally, get a Master’s degree along the way ♦   Qualifying Exam (taken when all coursework is complete: 6th-9th quarter of study) ♦   Approved Dissertation and Exit Seminar

• How many courses must I take?

At least ten graduate courses are required, exclusive of seminar (290, 290C, 298) and research (299) units. This may include all courses taken in the Master’s program if applicable. A grade of A- or better in the four core areas, and a grade of B or better must be obtained in all coursework used to satisfy degree requirements.

Can I take courses outside of Computer Science?

Yes, you can take courses outside of computer science. They must be graduate level (2XX) courses, that are 4 units each, related to computer science or your research, if you want them to count towards your degree requirements. Up to three courses (12-units) may be taken outside ECS and counted towards your degree requirements.

Are there any specific courses outside Computer Science that are recommended for a CS graduate student to take?

Yes, there are several courses that GGCS faculty suggest would be appropriate for CS graduate students:

• ♦   BST 227 - Machine Learning Genomics ♦   CMN 275Y - Computational Social Science
• ♦   DES 178 - Wearable Technologies ♦   EEC 244 - Intro to Neuroengineering ♦   EEC 270 - Computer Architecture ♦   EEC 273 - Networking Architecture & Resource Management ♦   MAE 207 - Engineering Experimentation & Uncertainty Analysis ♦   MAE 228 - Introduction to BioMEMS
• ♦   MAT 258A - Numerical Optimization 
• ♦   MAT 258B - Discrete and Mixed-Integer Optimization 

♦   STA 208 - Statistical Methods in Machine Learning ♦   STA 220 - Data & Web Technologies for Data Analysis ♦   STA 221 - Big Data & High Performance Statistical Computing

NOTE: Please keep in mind the following policies related to coursework counting towards the degree requirements:

• What is a Program of Study?

The student, in conjunction with the faculty/dissertation advisor, develops the program of study. The form is available from the graduate student service advisors. For a Ph.D. student, this includes both a major and minor area of study. The major area must include at least thirty units of coursework (six units of the 30 come from 299) that form a consistent program in a research area of Computer Science. The minor area must include at least fifteen units of coursework, including at least three graduate courses, and excludes any 299 units. No course with a grade less than a B can be used on the program of study. When complete, the student must submit the form to the graduate student service advisors for approval from the Educational Policy Committee.

• What is the teaching requirement?

The Graduate Group requires all Ph.D. candidates to demonstrate at least one quarter of college level teaching experience. We strongly recommend that at least one of these quarters includes lecturing or leading a discussion section.

• What is the process for setting up my Qualifying Exam?

At least two months before you plan to take your Examination, find a suitable time when your planned committee members can attend. Allow for approximately 2.5 – 3 hours. Next, coordinate a room reservation on COWS. Once the date is set, complete the Qualifying Examination Application. Submit it to the graduate student service advisors at least 5 weeks before your scheduled exam date, who will then get the signatures needed and forward it to the Office of Graduate Studies.

• What is Advancement to Candidacy?

Advancing to candidacy means completing all the prerequisites for doing research toward the degree. For the Ph.D. degree, this means completing all course requirements and passing the Qualifying Exam. Please submit the Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the graduate student service advisors.

• I have questions about preparing and filing my dissertation. Who do I talk to?

For assistance in the preparation of your dissertation, see the Office of Graduate Studies  website on filing your dissertation. You must make an appointment with the Student Affairs Coordinator in order to file your dissertation. 

You are responsible for observing the filing dates and for preparing the dissertation in the proper format. As part of the filing process, you will fill out the University Microfilms International (UMI) Doctoral Dissertation Agreement form on which you indicate your willingness either to have the University supply copies of your dissertation to interested persons immediately, or that such permission should be withheld for a period of time, up to a maximum of three years.

Filing your dissertation is the last step in the process leading to the awarding of your degree. The final copy of your dissertation, which is ultimately deposited in the University Library, becomes a permanent and official record. You have the choice of submitting either your entire manuscript, or only your dissertation abstract, to UMI Dissertation Publishing. Both options provide higher visibility of your achievements. If you submit your entire dissertation to UMI, it will be returned to Shields Library, where it will be bound and stored. The packet of information that was sent to you when we returned your approved candidacy form contained the forms you need to submit with your manuscript.

• What is the filing fee?

The Filing Fee Program is for students who have completed all requirements for degrees except filing theses or taking final examinations, and who are no longer using University facilities. The Filing Fee is a reduced fee, paid in lieu of registration fees. It is assessed only once. The Filing Fee option preserves your candidacy status with the University; however, you are no longer considered a full-time registered student by the University, and are not entitled to the same benefits and privileges as a registered student. You are allowed two quarters plus one extension of Filing Fee. To file, complete the Filing Fee Request and submit to the graduate student service advisors.

• What is the exit seminar?

In the exit seminar, the candidate’s research is presented to the UC Davis academic community. This seminar is administered by the dissertation committee, and takes place after all committee members have approved the dissertation, but (usually) before the dissertation has been filed with the Office of Graduate Studies.

• I am graduating. After I file my dissertation, is there any additional paperwork I need to complete?

Yes! Please see the graduate student service advisors to complete the Graduate Exit Checklist.

• Can I take classes outside Computer Science?

Yes , you may take up to 12-units (3 classes) of electives outside Computer Science in a related area, and they will count towards your Ph.D. degree requirements.

Exit seminar

Ph.D. students must present their major research findings in a research seminar prior to submitting their dissertation to Graduate Studies. Master's degree students are encouraged to do the same. The student should inform the graduate group administrator about the seminar at least four weeks in advance so it can be advertised to the group and the campus.

Get the Reddit app

The friendlier part of Reddit. Have a fun conversation about anything that is on your mind. Ask a question or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.

I'm preparing for my PhD exit seminar tomorrow

I'm really sick of looking at this presentation, but it still feels so far from done. In general I'm so sick of anything to do with this degree. I still need my advisor and her co-PI(/husband) to sign my dissertation so I can submit it and file by the end of next week (the hard deadline). It's been really frustrating with how slow they've been to look at and provide feedback and I'm pretty sure neither of them will get through the whole thing before I have to submit. Although, it's hard to imagine they won't sign it, it's really stressful.

Anyways, I'll be working on this presentation for the rest of the night. Songs to motivate me would be heavily appreciated.

Discover CALS

See how our current work and research is bringing new thinking and new solutions to some of today's biggest challenges.

• Agriculture
• Applied Economics
• Climate Change
• Communication
• Environment
• Global Development
• Health + Nutrition

Ph.D. Exit Seminar with Kristie LeBeau

Department of Global Development

Dissertation Title

Hitting the $40,000 Threshold: Analyzing Implementation of Indiana Teacher Pay Policy

Ph.D. Candidate

Kristie LeBeau

My dissertation examines the localized, community-wide implications of K-12 education policies. Across the US, there is a current push to improve teacher pay; however, most of these policies have a one-size-fits-all approach and assume the impact of the legislation will be equal across place. In my three-paper dissertation, I use mixed methodologies to study three questions about a teacher pay policy that took effect in Indiana in the 2022-23 school year (Ind. Code § 20-28-9-26). In my first paper, I use mapping in GIS and spatial regressions in Stata and GeoDa to show that the policy, while successful in raising minimum salaries, failed to address disparities in salaries across urban, suburban, and rural districts. In my second paper, I explore the intersection of demographic change and policy through interviews with rural school leaders that shed light on a disparity masked in the original quantitative salary analysis: population loss. Enrollment loss was cited as a barrier to raising salaries, and as many remote rural districts across the state are losing enrollment, rural district leaders are forced to strategically use their agency to navigate state, financial, and local pressures. In my last paper, I apply a method from economic development research to quantitatively estimate the impact of the increased teacher salaries on local economies and show how impact differs according to the consumer decisions of staff.

Student Bio

Kristie LeBeau is a PhD candidate in Development Sociology. She is an educational sociologist who examines the education system outside the four walls of a classroom. Her research explores the social and economic consequences of education policies across and within school-communities, with a particular focus on rural communities.

Date & Time

March 29, 2024 3:00 pm - 4:30 pm

More information about this event.

Contact Information

Rachel Bezner Kerr, Director of Graduate Studies, Graduate Field of Development Studies

• rbeznerkerr [at] cornell.edu

Departments

Related Events

• Field Crops
• Cornell Agritech

We openly share valuable knowledge.

Sign up for more insights, discoveries and solutions.

Santa Clara University

The jesuit university in silicon valley.

• Ph.D. Program
• School of Engineering
• Academic Programs
• Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

The Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) degree is conferred by the School of Engineering primarily in recognition of competence in the subject field and the ability to investigate engineering problems independently, resulting in a new contribution to knowledge in the field. The work for the degree consists of engineering research, the preparation of a thesis based on that research, and a program of advanced studies in engineering, mathematics, and related physical sciences.

Preliminary Examination

The preliminary examination shall be written and shall include subject matter deemed by the major department to represent sufficient preparation in depth and breadth for advanced study in the major. Only those who pass the written examination may take the oral qualifying examination.

Students currently studying at Santa Clara University for a master’s degree who are accepted for the Ph.D. program and who are at an advanced stage of the M.S. program may, with the approval of their academic advisor, take the preliminary examination before completing the M.S. degree requirements. Students who have completed the M.S. degree requirements and have been accepted for the Ph.D. program should take the preliminary examination as soon as possible but not more than two years after beginning the program.

Only those students who pass the preliminary examination shall be allowed to continue in the doctoral program. The preliminary examination may be repeated only once, and then only at the discretion of the thesis advisor.

General Requirements

Thesis Advisor

It is the student’s responsibility to obtain consent from a full-time faculty member in the student’s major department to serve as his/her prospective thesis advisor.

It is strongly recommended that Ph.D. students find a thesis advisor before taking the preliminary examination. After passing the preliminary examination, Ph.D. students should have a thesis advisor before the beginning of the next quarter following the preliminary examination. Students currently pursuing a master’s degree at the time of their preliminary examination should have a thesis advisor as soon as possible after being accepted as a Ph.D. student.

The student and the thesis advisor jointly develop a complete program of studies for research in a particular area. The complete program of studies (and any subsequent changes) must be filed with the Graduate Services Office and approved by the student’s doctoral committee. Until this approval is obtained, there is no guarantee that courses taken will be acceptable toward the Ph.D. course requirements.

Doctoral Committee

After passing the Ph.D. preliminary exam, a student requests his or her thesis advisor to form a doctoral committee. The committee consists of at least five members, each of which must have earned a doctoral degree in a field of engineering or a related discipline. This includes the student’s thesis advisor, at least two other current faculty members of the student’s major department at Santa Clara University, and at least one current faculty member from another appropriate academic department at Santa Clara University. The committee reviews the student’s program of study, conducts an oral comprehensive exam, conducts the dissertation defense, and reviews the thesis. Successful completion of the doctoral program requires that the student’s program of study, performance on the oral comprehensive examination, thesis defense, and thesis itself meet with the approval of all committee members.

The doctoral degree is granted on the basis of achievement, rather than on the accumulation of units of credit. However, the candidate is expected to complete a minimum of 72 quarter units of graduate credit beyond the master’s degree. Of these, 36 quarter units may be earned through coursework and independent study, and 36 through the thesis. All Ph.D. thesis units are graded on a Pass/No Pass basis. A maximum of 18 quarter units (12 semester units) may be transferred from other accredited institutions at the discretion of the student’s advisor.

Ph.D. students must undertake a minimum of four consecutive quarters of full-time study at the University; spring and fall quarters are considered consecutive. The residency time shall normally be any period between passing the preliminary examination and completion of the thesis. For this requirement, full-time study is interpreted as a minimum registration of eight units per quarter during the academic year and four units during summer session. Any variation from this requirement must be approved by the doctoral committee.

Comprehensive Examinations and Admission to Candidacy

After completion of the formal coursework approved by the doctoral committee, the student shall present his/her research proposal for comprehensive oral examinations on the coursework and the subject of his/her research work. The student should make arrangements for the comprehensive examinations through the doctoral committee. A student who passes the comprehensive examinations is considered a degree candidate. The comprehensive examinations normally must be completed within four years from the time the student is admitted to the doctoral program. Comprehensive examinations may be repeated once, in whole or in part, at the discretion of the doctoral committee.

Thesis Research and Defense

The period following the comprehensive examinations is devoted to research for the thesis, although such research may begin before the examinations are complete. After successfully completing the comprehensive examinations, the student must pass an oral examination on his/her research and thesis, conducted by the doctoral committee and whomever they appoint as examiners. The thesis must be made available to all examiners one month prior to the examination. The oral examination shall consist of a presentation of the results of the thesis and the defense. This examination is open to all faculty members of Santa Clara University, but only members of the doctoral committee have a vote.

Thesis and Publication

At least one month before the degree is to be conferred, the candidate must submit to the Office of the Dean of Engineering two copies of the final version of the thesis describing the research in its entirety. The thesis will not be considered as accepted until approved by the doctoral committee and one or more refereed articles based on it are accepted for publication in a first-tier professional or scientific journal approved by the doctoral committee. All doctoral theses must also be reproduced on microfilm by University Microfilms International, which keeps on deposit the master microfilm copy and responds to requests for copies by individuals and libraries.

Time Limit for Completing Degrees

All requirements for the doctoral degree must be completed within eight years following initial enrollment in the Ph.D. program. Extensions will be allowed only in unusual circumstances and must be recommended in writing by the student’s doctoral committee, and approved by the dean of engineering in consultation with the Graduate Program Leadership Council.

Additional Graduation Requirements

The requirements for the doctoral degree in the School of Engineering have been made to establish the structure in which the degree may be earned. Upon written approval of the provost, the dean of the School of Engineering, the doctoral committee, and the chair of the major department, other degree requirements may be established. The University reserves the right to evaluate the undertakings and the accomplishments of the degree candidate in total, and award or withhold the degree as a result of its deliberations.

The Departments of Electrical and Computer Engineering and the Department of Bioengineering are collaborating to offer a Ph.D. in interdisciplinary topics related to Bioengineering. Faculty from both departments will co-advise the Ph.D. students and the degree will be awarded by the Department of Electrical Engineering.

Chair:  Shoba Krishnan Department Manager: Leilani De Nieva

Electrical and Computer Engineering Santa Clara University 500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95053

Sobrato Discovery, Bldg. 402

National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health

• Current students

News & events

• Bachelor degrees & honours
• Master degrees
• PhD & MPhil
• Student projects
• Cancellation policy
• Frequently asked questions
• Professional short courses - expression of interest
• Scholarships
• Student profiles
• Centres & departments
• Research stories
• Tools & resources
• Visiting fellowships
• Professional staff
• How to give
• Communicating science
• Case studies
• Related links
• Publications
• Past events
• Distinguished Speaker Seminars
• Strategic planning
• Future students enquiries
• Current students enquiries
• General enquiries
• Search ANU web, staff & maps
• Search current site content

Discover our degree programs and courses.

• Professional short courses

More study information

• Campus Virtual Tour
• Accommodation

We strive to translate our research into effective health policy and practice.

Research story:

Living in a hot box »

Find our people contacts and read about their profiles.

Academic profile:

From Ebola to COVID-19: skilled locals key to outbreak response »

Donate to population health research.

The PHXchange is a national leading resource for research focused on population health transformation

Find out about the school's latest news and events.

Public health expert honoured in King’s Birthday honours list »

Read about the Centre's history, governance and structure.

Find our contact details.

You are here

PhD Exit Seminar: Exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in Australian communities affected by environmental contamination

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent, synthetic chemicals classified as emerging contaminants due to their potential to adversely affect the environment and human health. From 2013 to 2017, the Australian Government identified PFAS contamination affecting the environment surrounding the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) Bases at Tindal in Katherine, Northern Territory (NT) and Williamtown in New South Wales (NSW), and the Army Aviation Centre in Oakey in Queensland (Qld). Environmental investigations of PFAS in groundwater, surface water, sediment and soil showed the extent of contamination on the military bases and off-base areas, including residential properties. Understanding exposure to PFAS in areas affected by environmental contamination is vital to informing public health responses and addressing community concerns in areas affected by environmental contamination.

This thesis investigates PFAS exposure in the Katherine, Oakey, and Williamtown communities from qualitative and quantitative research perspectives. Broadly, this thesis aims to: measure and examine serum PFAS concentrations in residents and workers of Katherine, Oakey and Williamtown and compare exposure to residents of three similar communities without known environmental contamination; identify the main risk factors for elevated serum PFAS concentrations and changes in water use and produce consumption after notification of the environmental contamination; and examine the experiences and perceptions of PFAS blood testing among community members of the affected communities. The main findings of this thesis will be presented at this PhD Exit Seminar, following the release of the PFAS Health Study.

Dates & times

Online meeting via  Zoom

Meeting ID: 821 5375 9112 Password: 743640

We use cookies to improve your experience on our site and to show you personalised advertising. To find out more, read our privacy policy and cookie policy

Molecular Horizons - Oisin Shiels, PhD Exit Seminar

• Friday 16th Feb 2024 12:30 PM - 1:30 PM
• Wollongong 35-G20
• Contact Details [email protected]

Electrostatically Controlling Reactions with Distonic Radical Ions

Electrostatic catalysis is a rapidly expanding area of chemistry that promises to create greener, more atom-economic, processes that rely on electrostatic fields to enhance reactions. However, since molecules are typically unaligned in bulk conditions, the highly directional nature of electrostatic interactions currently prevents widespread application. Distonic radical ions – species with spatially separated charge and radical sites ¬– overcome this experimental challenge by locking the position of an internal electric field which influences the reactivity of the radical site. In principle, this internal field can be controlled synthetically by changing the charged functional group or introducing neutral substituents to fine-tune reactivity and select for desired major products. However, our understanding of how electrostatic fields influence these reactions is still superficial, and theoretical methods that accurately predict these effects are required before electrostatic catalysis can be reliably harnessed. This presentation outlines the range of mass spectrometry and theoretical techniques developed to measure, predict, and ultimately control the electrostatic catalysis of distonic radical ion–molecule reactions in the gas-phase, and beyond.

Electrical and Computer Engineering M.S. and Ph.D.

Why electrical and computer engineering.

The Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department at UC Santa Cruz aims to achieve engineering discoveries that benefit humankind through a combination of curiosity, open-mindedness, and inclusiveness. We aim to provide graduate students with inspiration and quality education, believing that rigor, creativity, and excitement should be part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering curriculum.

The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of California, Santa Cruz offers M.S. and Ph.D. degree programs in the following areas: 

Electronic Circuits and Energy Systems Photonics and Electronic Devices Robotics, Control, and Cyber-Physical Systems Signals, Image Processing, and Communications

Questions regarding the application process can be directed to the Graduate Advisor . Questions regarding the Electrical and Computer Engineering curriculum and research by faculty can be directed to the Graduate Director .

Please refer to the Division of Graduate Studies Admissions website for our current application due date .

*GRE requirement is no longer required for Electrical and Computer Engineering MS and PhD applications and will not be considered if submitted.

The Ohio State University

• BuckeyeLink
• Find People
• Search Ohio State

CFAES COVID-19 Resources:    Safe and Healthy Buckeyes   |   COVID-19 Hub   |   CFAES Calendar

School of Environment and Natural Resources

Search form

Graduate exit seminar - jen myers, breadcrumb menu.

Plan to join Jen Myers's graduate exit seminar on April 11, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. in Kottman Hall 333C. Jen will present, "Assessing occupancy and functional connectivity of eastern massasaugas ( Sistrurus catenatus ) across an agricultural-prairie landscape in northern Ohio."

Abstract:  The federally threatened eastern massasauga rattlesnake ( Sistrurus catenatu s) occurs across the Great Lakes region of the mid-western United States in increasingly small and fragmented populations. While massasaugas are relatively well-studied among snakes, much is still unknown about their baseline habitat requirements, as well as how they move across heterogeneous landscapes. One of the largest remaining populations outside the species strongholds of Michigan and Ontario is found at a wildlife area in northern Ohio. The objectives of my research were to: 1) identify the land use practices and habitat features that best predict massasauga occurrence at the wildlife area in northern Ohio; and 2) determine how the wildlife area is functionally connected for massasaugas given the amount of active agricultural production still taking place on the landscape and their limited dispersal tendencies. My results will facilitate effective and adaptive management for massasaugas in Ohio and will offer valuable insight into how massasaugas traverse heterogeneous landscapes across their range.

Advisor: Dr. Bill Peterman

• Commentaries

Effects of the California High School Exit Exam on Student Achievement and Graduation

This seminar will focus on the latest research from Sean Reardon, whose research focuses on the causes and consequences of educational and social inequality, and Michal Kurlaender, whose research focuses on education policy in K – 12 and higher education.

Student-level data from four large California school districts was used to examine the impact of the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) exam on student achievement and graduation rates.

In particular, Reardon and Kurlaender focus of the effects of failing vs. passing the CAHSEE in 10th grade on the subsequent achievement and graduation rate of students with relatively low math and ELA skills. 

Speakers include:

• Sean Reardon , Professor of Poverty and Inequality in Education, Stanford University
• Michal Kurlaender , Professor of Education Policy, University of California, Davis