sample learner centered teaching philosophy essay

59 Teaching Philosophy Statement Examples

Chris Drew (PhD)

Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]

Learn about our Editorial Process

A statement of teaching philosophy is a requirement for all teachers.

This statement shows future employers, parents and colleagues what you value as an educator and what your teaching skills are .

Examples of things to emphasize in a teaching philosophy statement include:

• A student-centered approach to education.
• A focus on active learning.
• High expectations for yourself and your students.
• Your ideal learning environment.
• Your approach to technology in the classroom.
• How you motivate your students.
• Your approach to assessment.

Here are 57 teaching philosophy statement examples that you could get some ideas from.

Teaching Philosophy Statement Examples

1. you create a student-centered learning environment.

• “I aspire to create student-centered learning environments in which the student is in the driving seat of their own learning.”
• “My classrooms are always focused on the specific needs of my students. I work hard to differentiate learning so that each student’s unique skills are emphasized.”

“I always ensure that my lessons involve multiple learning modalities so that students learn through their preferred learning style.”

• “Central to my pedagogy is a focus on the needs of students. I embrace Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development as a key pedagogical tool to ensure all students are taught content that is achievable yet challenging.”
• “For me, the ideal classroom environment is student-centered. I strive to create learning scenarios where the students are undertaking group projects while I move between groups facilitating discussions.”

2. You have a Focus on Active Learning

• “I embrace a Constructivist pedagogy that emphasizes active discovery learning on the part of my students. All my lessons are designed to have students learning through doing: trial-and-error, solving problems, and creating new solutions.”
• “My classrooms are spaces for exploration and discovery. I favor practical lessons in which students get hands-on experience of the subjects under analysis.”

“Students learn best when they are actively engaged in their own learning. Passive approaches where students take notes and listen during teacher-centered lessons are not as conducive to deep learning as lessons in which students are learning through discovery.”

• “One example teaching strategy that I often employ is the guided practice or ‘I do, we do, you do’ method . This approach starts with teacher modelling a practice but involves the gradual release of responsibility to the student until the student can undertake tasks on their own.”

Read Also: 47 One-Sentence Teacher Vision Statements

3. You Set High Expectations

• “While I like to see students enjoying themselves in class, I also insist on hard work and focus on the task at hand.”
• “I set high standards and high expectations by promoting growth mindsets among my students. All my students know that I expect them to try their hardest and strive for improvement every day.”

“I always expect my students to come to class ready to focus and engage. I often ask my students to set their own goals and take steps toward achieving their goals every day.”

• “I encourage students to walk into the classroom with a positive attitude toward learning. The best classes occur when students know that they are expected to do their best each and every day.”
• “Students enter my classroom with the knowledge that I expect them to engage with the learning materials. I keep a strong focus on creating a serious learning environment. This starts with me insisting on focus and engagement from the minute students walk in the door.”

4. You are a Community Engaged Teacher

• “I strive to develop connections between students and the school community. When community members come into the classroom, students not only learn about people from various walks of life. They also get to see role models of different shapes and sizes around the community.”

“I like to invite parents into my classrooms so they can feel that they are a partner in teaching. I set myself goals to contact all parents throughout the school term to listen to them and learn from their deep knowledge of their own children.”

• “In this culturally diverse area, I make every effort to expose my students to community members from diverse cultural backgrounds. It is important to me that students feel a connection to the rich local community in which they learn.”

5. Learning Environment Statements

• “I aim to create learning environments that are rich in resources so that students can learn through practical learning scenarios.”

“I create classrooms that empower students to make decisions for themselves so that they develop self-confidence and thinking skills .”

• “I develop learning environments that have multiple workstations in which students can work in groups to solve problems. I find group-based classroom layouts (through table seating) help children to communicate and learn from one another while learning.”

6. You have a Holistic Approach

• “I follow a holistic approach to child development. Educators need to pay attention to students’ social, physical, emotional and cognitive development equally to help raise balanced children for the 21st Century.”

“I do my best to get to know my students so I can best meet their needs. I focus on not only their cognitive development but also their emotional and social wellbeing , which is equally necessary for learning to occur.”

• “My teaching philosophy is strongly influenced by Abraham Maslow’s humanist approach and in particular his Hierarchy of Needs. I aim to ensure students’ basic needs are met in the classroom so that they feel happy, comfortable, safe and welcomed into the classroom. When students’ basic needs are met, they can focus on learning and personal development.”

7. You Promote Critical Thinking

• “I write my lessons to target higher-order thinking skills from Bloom’s Taxonomy, for example ‘creating’, ‘inquiring’ and ‘critiquing’. I aim to have all my students think critically about themselves and the world around them.”
• “It is my goal to have my students think outside the box, critique the everyday assumptions they take for granted, and leave my classes with more questions than answers.”

“I aspire to be a teacher who instils a love of learning, analysis and critical thinking in all the students I encounter.”

• “I believe students of the 21st Century need more than just knowledge. Students need to have critical and creative thinking skills so that they can compete for the jobs of the future. To encourage a critical thinking approach, I consistently ask my students to analyse concepts that I teach from multiple competing perspectives.”
• “I help my students to develop metacognitive skills so they can reflect on their own learning and identify ways they can learn more effectively and efficiently.”

Read Also: Education Slogans, Taglines and Mottos that Pop!

8. You Support Authentic Learning Experiences

• “My credo is to prioritize authentic learning situations where students learn through solving real-world problems. In this way, I help my students understand the connection between what they’re learning and life beyond the four walls of the classroom.”

“I believe students learn best when they learn in authentic contexts. By learning through real-world problem solving, they discover the value in knowledge.”

• “To me, students should learn through experience. I aim to create experiences in the classroom that are as authentic as possible to mimic real-life application of knowledge.”

9. You Embrace Social Learning

• “I encourage students to learn in groups because I believe conversation with others helps students to express, challenge and refine their thought processes. By listening to peers, students can also hear new perspectives that may broaden their horizons and deepen their own knowledge.”

“I follow a sociocultural teaching philosophy inspired by Lev Vygotsky. This philosophy is heavily focused on having students communicate with “ more knowledgeable others ” and learn challenging but achievable tasks that are within their “Zone of Proximal Development”.

• “I embrace a situated learning theory approach to teaching. This theory emphasizes the importance of learning from experts in the contexts in which learning is applied. To this end, I encourage students to take up apprenticeships and go on many field trips so my students can learn by working with professionals.”

10. You Emphasize Communication Skills

• “In the 21st Century, it is more important than ever for students to develop effective communication skills. I help students develop communication skills such as teamwork, negotiation and self-expression in every lesson through the consistent use of guided group work lessons.”

“Students need to become clear and confident communicators of their knowledge. I often create assessments that require students to express themselves in written and verbal formats to help them develop their communication capacities.”

• “Communication skills are vital for students to become effective self-advocates. I aim to teach students to become confident communicators by giving ample opportunities to work in groups, report their research to their classmates, and perform in front of their families.”

11. You Create Inquiry and Problem Based Learning Lessons

• “I embrace an inquiry based learning approach whereby I start with a higher-order thinking question and students come up with hypotheses for answering the questions. Through this approach, students exercise skills like ‘predicting’ and ‘testing’ to seek knowledge.”

“I focus on problem based learning experiences where students are presented with a problem that they need to overcome. In overcoming the problems, students must use research skills to figure out solutions and apply them to their scenarios.”

• “I encourage students to use scientific methods to solve problems. Through scientific inquiry, students do not simply learn new information, but learn how to go about seeking truths through accurate and reliable testing methods.”

12. Mention your Assessment Style

• “I use creative assessment practices that go beyond standardized assessment. I like to assess students’ practical applications of knowledge rather than simply their written knowledge of information. When students are assessed on their practical skills, they focus on how to put knowledge into action and reaching mastery of their content.”

“I have a strong focus on formative assessment so that I have a finger on the pulse of my students’ progress. I do not shy away from altering my teaching following formative assessments to ensure my students do not fall through the gaps.”

• “Assessment is important to me as a teacher because it helps me to measure my own teaching efficacy. I often use students’ assessment results to reflect upon how I taught the content, what areas of weakness appeared across a cohort, and how to teach to those areas of weakness more effectively in years to come.”

13. You Motivate Your Students

• “I believe students learn best when they are intrinsically motivated . I therefore focus on creating lessons that are engaging, relevant to my students’ real lives, and encourage active discovery.”
• “To motivate my students, I aim to tie my lessons to their interests and hobbies. This requires me to build strong rapport and relationships with my students so I know how I can tailor my lessons for them.”

“Students who are motivated and inspired to learn will come to school with a positive mindset. I work hard to promote student self-motivation by giving them agency to explore areas of interest within the curriculum.”

• “I believe motivated students are engaged, spend more time on task, and cause less disruption to their peers. I therefore work hard to motivate students by modelling an inspired, positive outlook to education every day.

14. Education is Important to You

• “Education is the foundation for a child’s future. As a teacher, I take pride in my profession as someone who shepherds the future generations. To do this effectively, I strive to …”

“Teaching is one of the most important professions in the world. Teachers need to work hard to produce ethically and critically thinking leaders of tomorrow…”

• “It is a great pleasure to work every day to help raise confident future citizens who will solve the problems of the future. Education is incredibly important for all students’ futures. …”

15. You Promote Play-Based Learning

• “I use a play-based learning approach in my early years classroom. I follow Froebel’s approach that states “play is the highest form of learning”. Play help students learn through trial-and-error, discovery and exploration.”

“When students learn by doing rather than listening, they tend to store information in their minds more effectively. This is why I use a play-based learning approach. I create play-based learning situations where students can play in parallel , learn from one another, and make new discoveries through the use of all their senses.”

• “I encourage cooperative play in my classrooms so that my students can learn with and from one another. By playing together, young children develop important communication and group work skills. Furthermore, they can pick up new information and ways of playing from friends which can enhance their cognitive development.”

16. You Incorporate Educational Technologies

• “I am competent with 21st century technologies and use them regularly in my teaching. I believe technology is deeply important for students as it is a requirement for most jobs of the 21st Century.”

“Through the use of technology, I encourage students to learn from, research about and engage with the world around them. The internet, in particular, is an excellent pedagogical resource for students to learn.”

• “While I regularly use technology in the classroom, I first reflect on how to use technology to help extend learning. I see technology as a ‘ cognitive tool ’ that shouldn’t be used just as a gimmick. Rather, I use technology when it can help students to extend their thinking and learn more than if they hadn’t had technology in the lessons.”

17. Mention your Classroom Management Style

• “I believe classroom and behavior management is about ensuring students are focused on their learning materials. My first step for classroom management is to make my lessons engaging and motivating. I find that this is the best way to minimize disruptions and promote learning.”

“Following the assertive discipline theory, I believe strong classroom management skills are essential. Disruptive students violate the rights of other students to learn, so I ensure classes are controlled and ordered at all time to protect well-behaved students’ rights to a positive learning space.”

• “I employ an authoritative approach to classroom management. This authoritative style focuses on gaining respect and rapport from students by being firm but fair at all times and ensuring all students know I have their best interests at heart.”

To go deeper on this, see: List of Classroom Management Styles

Final Thoughts

Your teaching philosophy statement needs to be your own. It should reflect your own personality and approach to education.

The above teaching philosophy statement examples give you a good idea about the sorts of things you can start talking about in your teaching philosophy.

Follow-up your statements of beliefs with examples from your own practice.

You might also want to zoom-in on subject-specific approaches . If you are writing a teaching philosophy as a Mathematics teacher, for example, you will need to narrow down on specifically how you teach math.

Aim for your teaching philosophy statement to be a maximum of two pages long and ensure it shows both your personality and your knowledge of pedagogy skills or learning theories .

• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 10 Reasons you’re Perpetually Single
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 20 Montessori Toddler Bedrooms (Design Inspiration)
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 21 Montessori Homeschool Setups
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 101 Hidden Talents Examples

6 thoughts on “59 Teaching Philosophy Statement Examples”

This is very helpful. I appreciate the wide variety of examples as well as the final thoughts at the end. Yet, did you mean, “59 Teaching Philosophy Statement Examples” (rather than 57)?

Two bonus ones 🙂 I think you’re the first person to have counted the list! I updated the title to 59.

Thanks! Chris

Very inspiring and insightful. It really helped me a lot in my studies. Looking forward for more.

Thank you Chris.

Great insight, as a basketball coach and athletic director of my youth football program I agree with mostly all of your points. As an ELA teacher it is easy to implement a lot of my coaching qualities into my teaching. Just as in the classroom students are on different skill levels while also learning and comprehending information differently. Providing skills base learning within the lesson is a much better approach instead of continuing to drill skills over and over. A lot of students may lose interest in the activity due to that skills approach. Do you believe a skills-based approach would also benefit students in the classroom

Hi Chris, This is very informative indeed.Thank you. Regards, Chamila

Thank you for a very informative materials shared and it’s a very helpful to me, I learned and refreshed from this. I love to read , review and apply this in my classroom.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Home — Essay Samples — Education — Teaching Philosophy — My teaching philosophy

My Teaching Philosophy

• Categories: Teaching Philosophy

About this sample

Words: 673 |

Published: Mar 25, 2024

Words: 673 | Page: 1 | 4 min read

Teaching Philosophy: Fostering Lifelong Learning and Critical Thinking Skills

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Prof Ernest (PhD)

Verified writer

• Expert in: Education

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

4 pages / 2280 words

4 pages / 1847 words

2 pages / 802 words

1 pages / 468 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Teaching Philosophy

In the realm of education, fostering a strong and collaborative working relationship between teachers and parents is paramount to the holistic development of students. This essay explores various strategies that educators can [...]

Alarm, M. & Farid, S. (2011). 'Effect of Teacher Motivation on Students' Learning Experience in Pakistan.' International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(19), 150-156.Akanbi, A. (1982). 'Teacher Education in Ghana: [...]

Dewey, John. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Free Press, 1997.

Philosophy, often considered an abstract and esoteric discipline, plays a crucial role in shaping society and individual beliefs. By exploring fundamental questions, major movements, ethical and moral dilemmas, and the nature of [...]

There is a new crisis in modern society that has endured from skepticism about the legitimacy and importance of the discipline of philosophy itself when science can provide all the answers. Why should people even care about [...]

Throughout this class I have learned how much of a role psychology actually play in our lives. We are taught that there can be many different ways that we interact with others as well as how others interact with myself. This [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

• MyU : For Students, Faculty, and Staff
• Academic Leaders
• Faculty and Instructors
• Graduate Students and Postdocs

Center for Educational Innovation

Request a consultation

• Campus and Collegiate Liaisons
• Pedagogical Innovations Journal Club
• Teaching Enrichment Series
• Recorded Webinars
• Video Series
• All Services
• Teaching Consultations
• Student Feedback Facilitation
• Instructional Media Production
• Curricular and Educational Initiative Consultations
• Educational Research and Evaluation
• Thank a Teacher
• All Teaching Resources
• Teaching with GenAI
• Active Learning
• Active Learning Classrooms
• Aligned Course Design
• Assessments
• Documenting Growth in Teaching
• Early Term Feedback
• Inclusive Teaching at a Predominantly White Institution
• Leveraging the Learning Sciences
• Online Teaching and Design
• Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
• Strategies to Support Challenging Conversations in the Classroom
• Teaching During the Election Season
• Team Projects
• Writing Your Teaching Philosophy
• All Programs
• Assessment Deep Dive
• Designing and Delivering Online Learning
• Early Career Teaching and Learning Program
• Inclusive STEM Teaching Program
• International Teaching Assistant (ITA) Program
• Preparing Future Faculty Program
• Teaching with Access and Inclusion Program
• "Teaching with AI" Book Club
• Teaching for Student Well-Being Program
• Teaching Assistant and Postdoc Professional Development Program

Your teaching philosophy is a self-reflective statement of your beliefs about teaching and learning. It's a one to two page narrative that conveys your core ideas about being an effective teacher in the context of your discipline. It develops these ideas with specific, concrete examples of what the teacher and learners will do to achieve those goals. Importantly, your teaching philosophy statement also explains why you choose these options.

+ Getting Started

Your reasons for writing a teaching philosophy may vary. You might be writing it as an exercise in concisely documenting your beliefs so that you can easily articulate them to your students, peers, or a search committee. It might serve as the introduction to your teaching portfolio. Or, it can serve as a means of professional growth as it requires you to give examples of how you enact your philosophy, thus requiring you to consider the degree to which your teaching is congruent with your beliefs.

Generating ideas

Teaching philosophies express your values and beliefs about teaching. They are personal statements that introduce you, as a teacher, to your reader. As such, they are written in the first person and convey a confident, professional tone. When writing a teaching philosophy, use specific examples to illustrate your points. You should also discuss how your values and beliefs about teaching fit into the context of your discipline.

Below are categories you might address with prompts to help you begin generating ideas. Work through each category, spending time thinking about the prompts and writing your ideas down. These notes will comprise the material you’ll use to write the first draft of your teaching philosophy statement. It will help if you include both general ideas (‘I endeavor to create lifelong learners’) as well as specifics about how you will enact those goals. A teaching philosophy template is also available to help you get started.

Questions to prompt your thinking

Your concept of learning.

What do you mean by learning? What happens in a successful learning situation? Note what constitutes "learning" or "mastery" in your discipline.

Your concept of teaching

What are your values, beliefs, and aspirations as a teacher? Do you wish to encourage mastery, competency, transformational learning, lifelong learning, general transference of skills, critical thinking? What does a perfect teaching situation look like to you and why? How are the values and beliefs realized in classroom activities? You may discuss course materials, lesson plans, activities, assignments, and assessment instruments.

Your goals for students

What skills should students obtain as a result of your teaching? Think about your ideal student and what the outcomes of your teaching would be in terms of this student's knowledge or behavior. Address the goals you have for specific classes or curricula and that rational behind them (i.e., critical thinking, writing, or problem solving).

Your teaching methods

What methods will you consider to reach these goals and objectives? What are your beliefs regarding learning theory and specific strategies you would use, such as case studies, group work, simulations, interactive lectures? You might also want to include any new ideas or strategies you want to try.

Your interaction with students

What are you attitudes towards advising and mentoring students? How would an observer see you interact with students? Why do you want to work with students?

Assessing learning

How will you assess student growth and learning? What are your beliefs about grading? Do you grade students on a percentage scale (criterion referenced) or on a curve (norm referenced)? What different types of assessment will you use (i.e. traditional tests, projects, portfolios,  presentations) and why?

Professional growth

How will you continue growing as a teacher? What goals do you have for yourself and how will you reach them? How have your attitudes towards teaching and learning changed over time? How will you use student evaluations to improve your teaching? How might you learn new skills? How do you know when you've taught effectively?

+ Creating a Draft

Two ways of organizing your draft.

Now that you've written down your values, attitudes, and beliefs about teaching and learning, it's time to organize those thoughts into a coherent form. Perhaps the easiest way of organizing this material would be to write a paragraph covering each of the seven prompts you answered in the Getting Started section. These would then become the seven major sections of your teaching philosophy.

Another way of knitting your reflections together—and one that is more personal—is to read through your notes and underscore ideas or observations that come up more than once. Think of these as "themes" that might point you toward an organizational structure for the essay. For example, you read through your notes and realize that you spend a good deal of time writing about your interest in mentoring students. This might become one of the three or four major foci of your teaching philosophy. You should then discuss what it says about your attitudes toward teaching, learning, and what's important in your discipline.

No matter which style you choose, make sure to keep your writing succinct. Aim for two double-spaced pages. And don't forget to start with a "hook." Your job is to make your readers want to read more; their level of engagement is highest when they read your opening line. Hook your readers by beginning with a question, a statement, or even an event from your past.

Using specific examples

Remember to provide concrete examples from your teaching practice to illustrate the general claims you make in your teaching philosophy. The following general statements about teaching are intended as prompts to help you come up with examples to illustrate your claims about teaching. For each statement, how would you describe what happens in your classroom? Is your description specific enough to bring the scene to life in a teaching philosophy?

"I value helping my students understand difficult information. I am an expert, and my role is to model for them complex ways of thinking so that they can develop the same habits of mind as professionals in the medical field."

"I enjoy lecturing, and I'm good at it. I always make an effort to engage and motivate my students when I lecture."

"It is crucial for students of geology to learn the techniques of field research. An important part of my job as a professor of geology is to provide these opportunities."

"I believe that beginning physics students should be introduced to the principles of hypothesis generation, experimentation, data collection, and analysis. By learning the scientific method, they develop critical thinking skills they can apply to other areas of their lives. Small group work is a crucial tool for teaching the scientific method."

"As a teacher of writing, I am committed to using peer review in my classes. By reading and commenting on other students' work in small cooperative groups, my students learn to find their voice, to understand the important connection between writer and audience, and to hone their editing skills. Small group work is indispensible in the writing classroom."

Go back to the notes you made when getting started and underline the general statements you’ve made about teaching and learning. As you start drafting, make sure to note the specific approaches, methods, or products you use to realize those goals.

+ Assessing Your Draft

Assessing your draft teaching philosophy.

According to a survey of search committee chairs by the University of Michigan Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, there are five elements that are shared by strong teaching philosophy statements:

• They offer evidence of practice (specific examples)
• They are student-centered
• They demonstrate reflectiveness
• They demonstrate that the writer values teaching
• They are well written, clear, and readable

Now that you’ve completed an initial draft, ask whether your statement captures these elements and how well you articulate them.

You might find it useful to compare your draft to other teaching philosophies in your discipline. It can also be useful to have a colleague review your draft and offer recommendations for revision. Consider printing out a teaching philosophy rubric from our “Rubrics and Samples” tab to provide your reviewer with guidelines to assess your draft. These exercises will give you the critical distance necessary to see your teaching philosophy objectively and revise it accordingly.

+ Rubrics and Samples

Rubrics and sample teaching philosophies.

Here are links to three teaching philosophy rubrics to help you assess your statement. We have included four different rubrics for you to choose from. These rubrics cover similar elements, and one is not necessarily better than the other. Your choice of which to use should be guided by how comfortable you feel with the particular instrument and how usable you find it. 

• Teaching Philosophy Rubric 1   This rubric allows a reader to rate several elements of persuasiveness and format on a scale of 1 to 5.
• Teaching Philosophy Rubric 2   This rubric contains prompts for assessing purpose and audience, voice, beliefs and support, and conventions.
• Teaching Philosophy Rubric 3   This rubric contains prompts for assessing content, format, and writing quality.
• Rubric for Statements of Teaching Philosophy  This rubric was developed by Kaplan et. al. from the University of Michigan.
• Marisol Brito – philosophy 
• Benjamin Harrison – biology  
• Jamie Peterson – psychology
• The University of Michigan has a wide variety of  samples  organized by field of study.
• Caroline Hilk
• Why Use Active Learning?
• Successful Active Learning Implementation
• Addressing Active Learning Challenges
• Research and Resources
• Addressing Challenges
• Course Planning
• Align Assessments
• Multiple Low Stakes Assessments
• Authentic Assessments
• Formative and Summative Assessments
• Varied Forms of Assessments
• Cumulative Assessments
• Equitable Assessments
• Essay Exams
• Multiple Choice Exams and Quizzes
• Academic Paper
• Skill Observation
• Alternative Assessments
• Assessment Plan
• Grade Assessments
• Prepare Students
• Reduce Student Anxiety
• SRT Scores: Interpreting & Responding
• Student Feedback Question Prompts
• Definitions and PWI Focus
• A Flexible Framework
• Class Climate
• Course Content
• An Ongoing Endeavor
• Working memory
• Retrieval of information
• Spaced practice
• Active learning
• Metacognition
• Research Questions and Design
• Gathering data
• Publication
• Learn About Your Context
• Design Your Course to Support Challenging Conversations
• Design Your Challenging Conversations Class Session
• Use Effective Facilitation Strategies
• What to Do in a Challenging Moment
• Debrief and Reflect On Your Experience, and Try, Try Again
• Supplemental Resources
• Why Use Team Projects?
• Project Description Examples
• Project Description for Students
• Team Projects and Student Development Outcomes
• Forming Teams
• Team Output
• Individual Contributions to the Team
• Individual Student Understanding
• Supporting Students
• Wrapping up the Project
• GRAD 8101: Teaching in Higher Education
• Finding a Practicum Mentor
• GRAD 8200: Teaching for Learning
• Proficiency Rating & TA Eligibility
• Schedule a SETTA
• TAPD Webinars

• Grades 6-12
• School Leaders

Have you gotten your free poster delivered? ✨

40 Philosophy of Education Examples, Plus How To Write Your Own

Learn how to define and share your teaching philosophy.

These days, it’s become common for educators to be asked what their personal teaching philosophy is. Whether it’s for a job interview, a college class, or to share with your principal, crafting a philosophy of education can seem like a daunting task. So set aside some time to consider your own teaching philosophy (we’ll walk you through it), and be sure to look at philosophy of education examples from others (we’ve got those too!).

What is a philosophy of education?

Before we dive into the examples, it’s important to understand the purpose of a philosophy of education. This statement will provide an explanation of your teaching values and beliefs. Your teaching philosophy is ultimately a combination of the methods you studied in college and any professional experiences you’ve learned from since. It incorporates your own experiences (negative or positive) in education.

Many teachers have two versions of their teaching philosophy: a long form (a page or so of text) and a short form. The longer form is useful for job application cover letters or to include as part of your teacher portfolio. The short form distills the longer philosophy into a couple of succinct sentences that you can use to answer teacher job interview questions or even share with parents.

What’s the best teaching philosophy?

Here’s one key thing to remember: There’s no one right answer to “What’s your teaching philosophy?” Every teacher’s will be a little bit different, depending on their own teaching style, experiences, and expectations. And many teachers find that their philosophies change over time, as they learn and grow in their careers.

When someone asks for your philosophy of education, what they really want to know is that you’ve given thought to how you prepare lessons and interact with students in and out of the classroom. They’re interested in finding out what you expect from your students and from yourself, and how you’ll apply those expectations. And they want to hear examples of how you put your teaching philosophy into action.

What’s included in strong teaching philosophy examples?

Depending on who you ask, a philosophy of education statement can include a variety of values, beliefs, and information. As you build your own teaching philosophy statement, consider these aspects, and write down your answers to the questions.

Purpose of Education (Core Beliefs)

What do you believe is the purpose of teaching and learning? Why does education matter to today’s children? How will time spent in your classroom help prepare them for the future?

Use your answers to draft the opening statement of your philosophy of education, like these:

• Education isn’t just about what students learn, but about learning how to learn.
• A good education prepares students to be productive and empathetic members of society.
• Teachers help students embrace new information and new ways of seeing the world around them.
• A strong education with a focus on fundamentals ensures students can take on any challenges that come their way.
• I believe education is key to empowering today’s youth, so they’ll feel confident in their future careers, relationships, and duties as members of their community.
• Well-educated students are open-minded, welcoming the opinions of others and knowing how to evaluate information critically and carefully.

Teaching Style and Practices

Do you believe in student-led learning, or do you like to use the Socratic method instead? Is your classroom a place for quiet concentration or sociable collaboration? Do you focus on play-based learning, hands-on practice, debate and discussion, problem-solving, or project-based learning? All teachers use a mix of teaching practices and styles, of course, but there are some you’re likely more comfortable with than others. Possible examples:

• I frequently use project-based learning in my classrooms because I believe it helps make learning more relevant to my students. When students work together to address real-world problems, they use their [subject] knowledge and skills and develop communication and critical thinking abilities too.
• Play-based learning is a big part of my teaching philosophy. Kids who learn through play have more authentic experiences, exploring and discovering the world naturally in ways that make the process more engaging and likely to make a lasting impact.
• In my classroom, technology is key. I believe in teaching students how to use today’s technology in responsible ways, embracing new possibilities and using technology as a tool, not a crutch.
• While I believe in trying new teaching methods, I also find that traditional learning activities can still be effective. My teaching is mainly a mix of lecture, Socratic seminar, and small-group discussions.
• I’m a big believer in formative assessment , taking every opportunity to measure my students’ understanding and progress. I use tools like exit tickets and Kahoot! quizzes, and watch my students closely to see if they’re engaged and on track.
• Group work and discussions play a major role in my instructional style. Students who learn to work cooperatively at a young age are better equipped to succeed in school, in their future careers, and in their communities.

Students and Learning Styles

Why is it important to recognize all learning styles? How do you accommodate different learning styles in your classroom? What are your beliefs on diversity, equity, and inclusion? How do you ensure every student in your classroom receives the same opportunities to learn? How do you expect students to behave, and how do you measure success? ADVERTISEMENT

Sample teaching philosophy statements about students might sound like this:

• Every student has their own unique talents, skills, challenges, and background. By getting to know my students as individuals, I can help them find the learning styles that work best for them, now and throughout their education.
• I find that motivated students learn best. They’re more engaged in the classroom and more diligent when working alone. I work to motivate students by making learning relevant, meaningful, and enjoyable.
• We must give every student equal opportunities to learn and grow. Not all students have the same support outside the classroom. So as a teacher, I try to help bridge gaps when I see them and give struggling students a chance to succeed academically.
• I believe every student has their own story and deserves a chance to create and share it. I encourage my students to approach learning as individuals, and I know I’m succeeding when they show a real interest in showing up and learning more every day.
• In my classroom, students take responsibility for their own success. I help them craft their own learning goals, then encourage them to evaluate their progress honestly and ask for help when they need it.
• To me, the best classrooms are those that are the most diverse. Students learn to recognize and respect each other’s differences, celebrating what each brings to the community. They also have the opportunity to find common ground, sometimes in ways that surprise them.

How do I write my philosophy of education?

Think back to any essay you’ve ever written and follow a similar format. Write in the present tense; your philosophy isn’t aspirational, it’s something you already live and follow. This is true even if you’re applying for your first teaching job. Your philosophy is informed by your student teaching, internships, and other teaching experiences.

Lead with your core beliefs about teaching and learning. These beliefs should be reflected throughout the rest of your teaching philosophy statement.

Then, explain your teaching style and practices, being sure to include concrete examples of how you put those practices into action. Transition into your beliefs about students and learning styles, with more examples. Explain why you believe in these teaching and learning styles, and how you’ve seen them work in your experiences.

A long-form philosophy of education statement usually takes a few paragraphs (not generally more than a page or two). From that long-form philosophy, highlight a few key statements and phrases and use them to sum up your teaching philosophy in a couple of well-crafted sentences for your short-form teaching philosophy.

Still feeling overwhelmed? Try answering these three key questions:

• Why do you teach?
• What are your favorite, tried-and-true methods for teaching and learning?
• How do you help students of all abilities and backgrounds learn?

If you can answer those three questions, you can write your teaching philosophy!

Short Philosophy of Education Examples

We asked real educators in the We Are Teachers HELPLINE group on Facebook to share their teaching philosophy examples in a few sentences . Here’s what they had to say:

I am always trying to turn my students into self-sufficient learners who use their resources to figure it out instead of resorting to just asking someone for the answers. —Amy J.

My philosophy is that all students can learn. Good educators meet all students’ differentiated learning needs to help all students meet their maximum learning potential. —Lisa B.

I believe that all students are unique and need a teacher that caters to their individual needs in a safe and stimulating environment. I want to create a classroom where students can flourish and explore to reach their full potential. My goal is also to create a warm, loving environment, so students feel safe to take risks and express themselves. —Valerie T.

In my classroom, I like to focus on the student-teacher relationships/one-on-one interactions. Flexibility is a must, and I’ve learned that you do the best you can with the students you have for however long you have them in your class. —Elizabeth Y

I want to prepare my students to be able to get along without me and take ownership of their learning. I have implemented a growth mindset. —Kirk H.

My teaching philosophy is centered around seeing the whole student and allowing the student to use their whole self to direct their own learning. As a secondary teacher, I also believe strongly in exposing all students to the same core content of my subject so that they have equal opportunities for careers and other experiences dependent upon that content in the future. —Jacky B.

All children learn best when learning is hands-on. This works for the high students and the low students too, even the ones in between. I teach by creating experiences, not giving information. —Jessica R.

As teachers, it’s our job to foster creativity. In order to do that, it’s important for me to embrace the mistakes of my students, create a learning environment that allows them to feel comfortable enough to take chances, and try new methods. —Chelsie L.

I believe that every child can learn and deserves the best, well-trained teacher possible who has high expectations for them. I differentiate all my lessons and include all learning modalities. —Amy S.

All students can learn and want to learn. It is my job to meet them where they are and move them forward. —Holli A.

I believe learning comes from making sense of chaos. My job is to design work that will allow students to process, explore, and discuss concepts to own the learning. I need to be part of the process to guide and challenge perceptions. —Shelly G.

I want my students to know that they are valued members of our classroom community, and I want to teach each of them what they need to continue to grow in my classroom. —Doreen G.

Teach to every child’s passion and encourage a joy for and love of education and school. —Iris B.

I believe in creating a classroom culture of learning through mistakes and overcoming obstacles through teamwork. —Jenn B.

It’s our job to introduce our kids to many, many different things and help them find what they excel in and what they don’t. Then nurture their excellence and help them figure out how to compensate for their problem areas. That way, they will become happy, successful adults. —Haley T.

Longer Philosophy of Education Examples

Looking for longer teaching philosophy examples? Check out these selections from experienced teachers of all ages and grades.

• Learning To Wear the Big Shoes: One Step at a Time
• Nellie Edge: My Kindergarten Teaching Philosophy
• Faculty Focus: My Philosophy of Teaching
• Robinson Elementary School: My Teaching Philosophy
• David Orace Kelly: Philosophy of Education
• Explorations in Higher Education: My Teaching Philosophy Statement
• University of Washington Medical School Faculty Teaching Philosophy Statements

Do you have any philosophy of education examples? Share them in the We Are Teachers HELPLINE Group on Facebook!

Want more articles and tips like this be sure to subscribe to our newsletters to find out when they’re posted..

You Might Also Like

15 Inspiring Teaching Portfolio Examples (Plus How To Create Your Own)

Show them what you've got. Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved. 5335 Gate Parkway, Jacksonville, FL 32256

Academic Resources

• Academic Calendar
• Academic Catalog
• Academic Success
• BlueM@il (Email)
• Campus Connect
• Desire2Learn (D2L)

Campus Resources

• Campus Security
• Campus Maps

University Resources

• Technology Help Desk

Information For

• Alumni & Friends
• Current Students
• Faculty & Staff
• Teaching Guides
• How Students Learn
• Course Design
• Instructional Methods
• Assignment Design
• Feedback & Grading
• Learning Activities
• Flex Teaching
• Online Teaching
• Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
• Teaching Effectiveness
• Teaching Observations
• Teaching Philosophies
• Teaching Portfolios
• Inclusive Teaching
• Teaching at DePaul
• Support Services
• Technology Tools

Teaching Commons > Teaching Guides > Reflective Practice > Teaching Philosophies

The Teaching Philosophy

Teaching philosophies are frequently required for job applications and for tenure or promotion packets. They also serve as a central reflective document in teaching portfolios.

Depending on your audience and purpose, the length of your philosophy will vary. While most teaching philosophies are one to two pages, tenure applicants may be asked to expand their statement to five to eight pages.

General Guidelines

Offer concrete examples . Illustrate how you enact your beliefs about how people learn and what the role of a teacher is in promoting learning in the classroom by pointing to specific assignments, activities, and experiences.

Daniel Makagon (College of Communication) shows how an assignment he designed promotes dialogic learning:

"For example, an Intercultural Context assignment in Intercultural Communication exemplifies my desire to have students participate in a larger dialogue and debate about core issues raised in the class. This assignment asks students to present artifacts that highlight some aspect of historical or contemporary intercultural communication. A small sample of their presentations shows a range of issues that, taken together, reflect the diverse and complex matrix of intercultural communication: a video clip from a news broadcast about racist gangs in prisons and how racial tensions will affect prisoners when they are released, a song that used rap music to put forth Christian messages, an advertisement that presented intercultural relations as contexts for consumption [...] In short, the students were able to share a variety of artifacts that addressed issues big and small, exemplifying and extending the intercultural communication theories about race, gender, religion, and globalization (among others) that we analyzed in course materials.”

Make connections to your discipline . Define what it means to be teacher within your area(s) of expertise. As you write, remember that you are not only making a claim about issues related to teaching and learning, you are also supporting your point of view with personal experience and, if possible, outside scholarship. Show how your teaching, research, and professional activities inform one another. Draw specific connections between these areas in your teaching philosophy.

Anna Kathryn Grau (School of Music) makes a case for the importance of music in the humanities and in liberal arts education more generally:

 “Liberal arts education works to make students aware of other points of view, of otherness, both historical and contemporary. The study of music deserves a place in this context, alongside the other humanities. I believe musicology has a crucial, though often overlooked, place in expanding our understanding of how our culture evolved. In the study of music history, we demonstrate to students the historical and cultural contingencies of things often perceived as universal and transcendent. General liberal arts students benefit from incorporating thought about music and its history into their general course of study, while musicians can enrich their own experience and professionalism through better understanding not only of the technical elements of their material, but of its social and cultural role throughout history. For this reason, I am particularly interested in the opportunity to teach music in an interdisciplinary context. Especially in general curriculum courses, the engagement of students with music and listening skills often correlates closely with their ability to see music as part of a larger social-historical picture. "

Make it personal . Avoid making generalizations about all teachers and learners. The more specific your philosophy is to you and your practices, the more valid and compelling it will be because you are not asking your reader to agree to universal claims based on your anecdotal experiences.

Trent Engbers (School of Public Service) explains why grappling with ethical questions is central to his pedagogical goal of encouraging students to consider new ways of thinking:

“My favorite application activities are embedded with ethical questions about the world of public managers and elected officials. The controversial nature of ethical questions engages students in debate with each other and students find that despite their knowledge of 'truth' there is always someone who sees it differently. Following application, I set the context for the next lesson so that ideas build on each other and lead to higher levels of expertise.”

 Getting Started

Here are some questions to consider in your teaching philosophy:

• What attitudes do you feel you must hold (or avoid) to be a successful teacher? How have these attitudes impacted your teaching?
• What are your beliefs about learning? How do you think people learn best? What has informed your beliefs about learning (scholarship, experience, teaching mentors)? How are your beliefs about learning reflected in your teaching?
• What do you hope to accomplish when you teach? What are your learning goals for any given course? Are there some learning goals that exist in virtually all of your courses? Do you change learning goals depending on whether or not the course is for majors or non-majors, undergraduates, or graduate students?
• How do you assess what students need most from you as a teacher? How do you assess if students have fulfilled the course goals?
• Give an example of a particularly successful assignment, unit, or course. What made it successful? How does your example represent your beliefs and values about teaching and learning?
• Give an example of an assignment, unit, or course that didn't work. Why wasn’t it successful? What changes did you make based on that experience to turn it into a successful assignment, unit, or course?
• What type of feedback do you get from students? How has student feedback influenced your beliefs and practices about teaching?

More Examples 

• Paul Booth , associate professor of Media and Cinema Studies in the College of Communication, sets out a clear framework, provides examples in support of that framework, and articulates how the learning spaces he creates lead to concrete outcomes for students.
• Edward Evins does double duty as both a First-Year Writing Instructor and a University Center for Writing-based Learning tutor. His tutoring philosophy exemplifies the best practices of a philosophy statement and has an engaging design connected to an overarching metaphor. 
• Carolyn Martineau , Senior Instructor in Biological Sciences in the College of Science and Health, begins her philosophy with a clear list of key driving elements, and then she supports her mission statement with connected examples. 

Teaching Philosophy Statements

Why should you write a teaching philosophy statement?

A teaching philosophy statement is a brief document that summarizes your approach to teaching with both statements of general beliefs and descriptions of specific examples of how you teach. You may wish to write one for personal development, use in self-promotion, or to include in a job application. Here, we focus specifically on how to write a teaching philosophy statement that you include in an application for a faculty or other instructional position at a college or university. The following will be most useful if you are a graduate student or postdoc seeking this kind of position.

By including your teaching philosophy in an application package, you can:

• Communicate your beliefs about teaching and learning and your goals for students, showing how your philosophy aligns with that of the institution to which you are applying.
• Demonstrate your awareness of and commitment to reflecting on your teaching practice. 
• Provide a window into what your classes look like.

A common concern is that you may not have enough teaching experience to write an effective teaching philosophy statement: “How can I state my philosophy when I haven’t taught enough to really have one?”

There are many activities beyond what is commonly considered “teaching” that can inform your teaching philosophy, including:

• Teaching assistantships
• Mentoring undergraduate or junior researchers
• Conducting workshops or other training sessions
• Guest lecturing

We have compiled a list of on- and off-campus teaching opportunities that you might use to augment your current experience.

Moreover, you can also describe how you plan to teach. A thoughtful plan embedded in a broader, reflective philosophy can be just as compelling as a description of a class that has already happened.

In the “Get Started” section below, we provide exercises to identify how these diverse experiences have informed your teaching.

What to include

Your statement should be grounded in the following questions:

• How do I teach?
• Why do I teach the way that I do?
• What goals do I have for students?
• How do I know if students are achieving those goals?
• What is my teaching experience? What courses do I teach?

In answering these questions, you should foreground the impact and effect that your teaching has on students. Instead of describing why you enjoy teaching, describe why the way that you teach is effective for your students and how you know that it is effective.

Make your statement personal and authentic. Only include ideas or commitments in your teaching philosophy statement if you are committed to them. It is obvious when an author has included a teaching concept or buzzword because they think they are meant to and not because it is something they actually believe in or practice.

In addition to authenticity, you can let your personality shine through on a teaching philosophy statement. Unlike a cover letter or CV with relatively prescribed formats, the relative freedom of the teaching philosophy statement may be the only opportunity to show the search committee your personality: what you value and who you will be as a colleague.

Your statement may summarize your teaching experience, but you should not merely include a list of the classes you have taught (this information will be on your C.V.) or only a list of the classes you could teach. While references to your past and future plans can help to ground your philosophy, you should also explain what you learned from the classes you have taught or detail how you plan to teach courses in the future.

Tailor your teaching philosophy statement to each institution. If you refer to a class or department that the institution does not have—or does have, but by a different name—this will signal to the committee that you are not taking the application seriously.

Review any mission statements on the institution’s or department’s website. If available, look at the curriculum descriptions in their course catalog or department website. Identify places where your teaching philosophy overlaps and highlight this common ground in your statement.

If you are applying for many jobs in a cycle, it may help to write your statement modularly: standard sections that stay the same and custom sections that you tailor to each institution.

As you write, imagine your audience: the search committee for the job you are applying for. This group may be diverse, including faculty from outside your specialty or even outside of your discipline. You will want to write about your teaching so that it is accessible to a wide range of audiences.

It is also likely that your audience will be reading possibly hundreds of similar documents. Making your statement personal and unique will help catch the committee’s attention.

Structure and format guidelines

There are no official formatting rules for teaching philosophy statements. Still, we recommend that you adhere to the following writing guidelines:

• Limit your statemen to 1.5–2 pages (single-spaced) . Shorter is better. Remember that the faculty reviewing your statement may be reviewing hundreds of applicants.
• Write in the first person (“I” and “me” pronouns). This is a statement of personal philosophy, not an academic article.
• Use an opening “hook.” This could be an anecdote from an experience as a teacher or student, a story about how you became interested in teaching, or even an inspiring quote that motivates your teaching philosophy.
• Balance your ideals with specific descriptions. Your statement should be neither only examples nor only abstract ideals, but rather a mutually-supportive balance.
• Cite your sources. You do not necessarily need to cite pedagogical research in your teaching philosophy statement, although you may if it genuinely influences your teaching. If there are particular teachers who inspire you, mention this inspiration. The function of “citation” here is as much to show who and what motivates you as it is to accord credit.

Get started

Personal philosophy statements can be difficult to start from nothing. We recommend that you begin with some guided reflection questions to help identify your values and relevant experiences. This brainstorm template can help you gather the data you will in drafting your document. It has questions aimed at helping you reflect in more detail on the following questions:

• How do I know that my teaching is effective?

Don’t try to include all of your responses to the questions on the brainstorming document in the actual statement. Instead, review the document once it is complete and ask yourself:

• What stands out as particularly important or impressive?
• What themes or common threads are there that connect different areas of my teaching philosophy?

These can then be the central thesis of your teaching philosophy statement.

After you have drafted your teaching philosophy statement, return to it a few days later to edit. You may find it useful to use a rubric, like this one , as you review your statement. 

Get feedback on your statement

Peer feedback is an invaluable resource in revising and refining a teaching philosophy statement. Convene graduate students both inside and outside of your department to share teaching philosophy statements and provide feedback to one another. You will likely find that you gain as much from giving feedback as you do from receiving it.

We also host regular TPS peer review sessions. See our event calendar for the next scheduled session.

In addition to peer feedback, you can arrange for a consultation with the Teaching Development Fellow in your department or with our staff. It is expected that you have already participated in a peer-review session before signing up for a consultation with TLL staff.

Additional resources

The University of Minnesota Center for Educational Innovation included additional, self-paced exercises that guide you through the drafting process.

Kaplan, et. al. Have devised this rubric based based on a survey of 457 search chair committees in six disciplines. 

Related MIT offices

MIT School of Engineering Communication Lab : The Communication Lab is a discipline-specific peer-coaching program for MIT’s School of Engineering that helps graduate students with their scientific writing, speaking, and visual design.

MIT Writing and Communication Center : The Writing and Communication Center offers free one-on-one professional advice from communication experts. The WCC is staffed completely by MIT lecturers who are experienced college classroom teachers of communication as well as published writers. The WCC works with undergraduates, graduate students, post-doctoral scholars, faculty, and staff.

Kaplan, M., Meizlish, D. S., O’Neal, C., Wright, M. C. (2008). A Research-Based Rubric for Developing Statements of Teaching Philosophy. To Improve the academy (26). [https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.2008.tb00512.x]  

Goodyear, G. E., & Allchin, D. (1998). Statement of teaching philosophy. To Improve the Academy (17). 103-22. 

Distance Learning

Putting learners in charge: learner-centered teaching.

by Jessica Mansbach

The first paragraph of your course syllabus states, “Welcome to the course! In this course, we will cover many topics.” The first paragraph of your colleagues’ syllabus states, “Welcome to the course! In this course, you will learn about many topics.” Do you notice the difference? It may be subtle, but the phrases “we will cover” versus “you will learn” suggest differences in students’ role in learning. We will cover suggests that students play a passive role in class, learning what you decide to cover or teach. You will learn suggests that students will play an active role in the class, taking responsibility for their learning.

Learner-Centered Teaching Strategies: Why They Matter

Learner-centered teaching strategies help you design and teach a course in which students take responsibility for their learning. When students are in charge of their learning, they generate questions about course content, ask questions about how to learn and study, interact with their peers to solve problems, and practice critical thinking. Students’ motivation tends to increase since they have some control over their learning, and their retention of course content also tends to increase since they are questioning what they are learning and how they are learning it (Weimer, 2011).

However, many instructors believe that as subject matter experts, they are responsible for deciding what students should learn and how they should learn it. Many instructors with this belief think that they need to teach students the right answers to questions, decide what content to teach, and deliver content as efficiently as possible. This instructor-centered approach, though, puts students in a passive role and does not give them the opportunity to ask many questions, make choices about what content to learn, or understand why they are learning what they are learning. As passive learners, students’ motivation tends to decrease and they have little reason to interact with their peers (Peery & Veneruso, 2012).

In her article Changing the Way We Teach: Making the Case for Learner-Centered Teaching, Maryellen Weimer (2011), a scholar in learner-centered teaching, explains that using learner-centered teaching strategies may require that instructors alter the way they think about teaching and the strategies they use to teach. In a subsequent article, Five Characteristics of Learner-Centered Teaching , Weimer (2012) provides examples of how to shift from instructor centered-teaching to learner-centered teaching.

Examples Of Learner-Centered Teaching

1. teach students to think for themselves.

Asking students to generate discussion questions or summarize the weekly discussion are two ways you can ask students to think about what they are learning and what it means and to assume responsibility for their learning. Prior to asking students to generate discussion questions or summarize the week’s content, it is important that you model how to do both of those activities so that students get a sense of what they are supposed to do and how to do it. Using learner-centered teaching strategies, then, does not mean that you abdicate your duties as an instructor, since you should still be modeling what you want students to do and taking the time to construct meaningful discussion questions and other course content that aligns with course learning outcomes (Weimer, 2012).

2. Teach students vital skills they need to learn  

    Weimer (2012) explains “Learner-centered teachers teach students how to think, solve problems, evaluate evidence, analyze arguments, generate hypotheses—all those learning skills essential to mastering material in the discipline” (para. 3). Students do not necessarily know how to demonstrate these skills, so designing activities that allow students to practice is important. For example, after sharing a few lecture outlines or demonstrating in a short video how to evaluate evidence, you can ask your students to create their own lecture outlines or evidence summaries (Weimer, 2012).

3. Teach students to reflect on how and what they are learning

A key premise of learner-centered teaching is that students need to know how to learn and how to evaluate whether they are learning. To help students develop the skill of reflection, include questions in assignments and activities that ask students about the process they went through to complete the task or about how they addressed any learning challenges (Weimer, 2012).

4. Allow students to make decisions about what content to learn  

    When students can make choices about what they want to learn, you enhance their motivation to engage with course content since they can pursue their own interests related to the content (Weimer, 2012). For example, you can assign students a research paper and allow them to select from a variety of topics. Or, you can allow students to submit an assignment as a paper or video.

5. Promote student-to-student interaction  

Learner-centered teaching strategies emphasize student-to-student interaction since students will learn about course content and the learning process by seeing how their peers think. As the instructor, you help facilitate meaningful student-to-student interaction by teaching students how to collaborate (Weimer, 2012). For example, before you ask students to work in groups to demonstrate discussion content or summarize the week’s content, you can give them a few short articles to read about how to have a productive collaboration.

For more information on how to use learner-centered teaching strategies, peruse the resources below or talk with a Learning Designer.

Peery, T. & Veneruso, S. (2012). Balancing Act Managing Instructor Presence. Retrieved from http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/balancing-act-managing-instructor-presence-and-workload-when-creating-an-interactive-community-of-learners/

Weimer, M. (2012). Five Characteristics of Learner Centered Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/effective-teaching-strategies/five-characteristics-of-learner-centered-teaching/

Weimer, M. (2011).  Changing the Way We Teach: Making the Case for Learner Centered Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-professor-blog/changing-the-way-we-teach-making-the-case-for-learner-centered-teaching/

Bain, K. (2011). What the best college teachers do . Harvard University Press

Bart, M. (2010) The Benefits of Making The Shift To Student Centered Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/effective-teaching-strategies/the-benefits-of-making-the-shift-to-student-centered-teaching/

North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (2000). Critical issue: Working toward student self-direction and personal efficacy as educational goals. Retrieved from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues//learning/lr200.htm

McKeachie, W., & Svinicki, M. (2013). McKeachie’s teaching tips . Cengage Learning.

Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice . John Wiley & Sons.

Related Posts

Best Practices for Communicating With Students in Online Classes

Rubrics: A Clear Pathway to Success, Part 2

Using Game Concepts to Create a Gamified Online Course Template

All You Need is an Oven and a Knife

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

Professional e-portfolio to comply with requirements of transparency and university accreditation standards

Miguel Ángel Escotet

Scholarly Blog

My teaching philosophy: an intimate reflection.

• April 16, 2022
• Educational Philosophy , Essay , Ethics , Higher Education , Psychology , Social Philosophy

Education should prepare the human being for ongoing change and for the eventual crisis that might arise as a result of the transition.

I believe the aim of education should be to build in each student strong theoretical foundations, to help future teachers to be educated rather than trained, to be capable of understanding the complexities of the organic society — Gemeinschaft — rather than just the reduction of people to human material — Massenmensch . I have always been uncomfortable with labels, recipes, and linear models for preparing teachers at all levels. While I appreciate their need to develop and learn teaching methodologies, we must always remember the dependent relationship between theory and praxis; both should be interrelated. There is no applied scientific discipline if there is no discipline to apply. In teacher education programs we often emphasize the learning of methodologies, content information, and skills to the detriment of what constitutes the core of education which is learning to be . Very little learning is related to the dimensions which require an understanding of ourselves, of others, and of the world in which we live.

In addition to mastering knowledge, thinking critically, and being problem-solvers, teachers should learn tolerance, ethical behavior, aesthetic sensitivity, and moderation of superfluous elements. We must help future people to be free from prejudices, where learning to care, learning to share, learning to grasp the whole and act on the parts, learning to be, and learning to carry on learning should be some of the society’s main objectives. Such variables are my major concern. We must infuse these cognitive and affective dimensions into the core of all teacher education programs. Whether the future will be more humane than our past can be determined only by our future efforts. I try in my courses to educate for such a future by helping my students to develop knowledge and sensitivity about the complexity and the multiplicity of elements within the science of education and to understand their relationship to the “learning person” in constructive partnership.

Students belong to a diverse society in all respects. Students learn in many different ways; thus I try to help them in multiple ways in approaching new material. I do my best to be flexible and to provide them alternate routes to knowledge and understanding, even though not always with success because the burden of connecting does not rest entirely on the instructor. The choice of appropriate tools and techniques is dependent on the nature of the student and the specific aims of the course. For instance, readings and lectures can motivate and outline material; research, homework, and simulations can help students develop a deeper understanding; newsgroups, cooperative learning, and discussions can facilitate student interaction and awareness of the affective domains of learning; libraries, databases, and the Internet can provide access to current information, while student papers, exams, presentations, and projects can encourage critical thinking and effective communication.

However, not all students will respond to the same teaching techniques. Some may learn well from traditional lectures, while others may respond better to discussion groups, group projects, written exercises, creative tasks, or demonstrations. I believe that it is important to use a combination of these and other methods to guide different students towards subject proficiency in the way most natural for them. I offer myself to my students as an individual mentor, helper, and guide, especially with graduates. I am available to students in person, by phone, or Internet and I encourage them to share with me any issue, achievement, or failure that they experience during the learning process. Further, I believe that students need to feel confident gaining new information and making it their own. They learn when they are engaged. Teaching is the most effective when students are actively participating in the process.

I believe that being a teacher involves much more than just imparting facts and methodologies; my major challenge lies in inspiring students and facilitating their efforts to become self-educators. Learning as I said before, is a lifelong process that does not end when a class is over or a degree is conferred, particularly for future teachers. I do my best to motivate them towards such a goal. To this end I have developed different resources, such as an Internet site, to allow students to practice that experience of self-learning by interacting with other dimensions and then by teaching the teacher their newfound interpretations. These types of strategies help students foster the ability to search for information, as well as to select and interpret that information. Given the demand for quality education, I do not measure excellence in terms of the amount of knowledge accumulated, but rather the capacity to evaluate the possibilities and limitations of that knowledge. This is one of the reasons I use a wide range of evaluation techniques to reduce, as much as I can, the inevitable subjectivity of measuring learning and the most difficult task of formal teaching.

My several decades of teaching have encompassed everything from elementary education to graduate education, from a traditional system to distant or online learning and non-formal systems, and they have taught me what can be effective. I have pursued multiple techniques: guided research, live-in learning-work courses, guided didactic conversations, lectures, field seminars, negotiation games, individual or small group projects, distant and programmed techniques, and so on. But above all, I have learned that I need to evolve every single moment to keep innovation as part of my teaching; to practice research as a way of improving my strategies, being updated and searching for knowledge; to behave more as a learner than as a teacher; to help students develop objective criticism and search for new channels for a more enlightened future.  I strongly believe that to be a good teacher you must remain a student.

Thus, the best learning strategies that I have experienced are to teach interactively the search for knowledge, to practice the highest ethical standards, to treat students with respect and concern for their achievement, and to be dedicated to my profession with love and full commitment.  However, I am by no means satisfied and I am still searching for ways to improve my teacher-learner responsibility.

_________________

©2022 Miguel Angel Escotet. All rights reserved. Permission to reprint with appropriate citing. Based on my previous writing and teaching practices in all levels of education, from early childhood education to post-doctoral.

Quotes on Education

The highest result of education is tolerance –Helen Keller

The Guardian Higher Education

Neuroscience news, chronicle of higher education.

RSS Error: A feed could not be found at `http://chronicle.com/section/News/6/rss`; the status code is `403` and content-type is `text/html; charset=UTF-8`

Psychology News from APA

Scientific american.

Learning To Live Together

The emotions we have left to experience: between wisdom, hope and uncertainty · Las emociones que nos quedan por vivir: entre la sabiduría, la esperanza y la incertidumbre

Transparency and Social Regulation in Higher Education

Novedades del blog académico.

Del conductismo a la caja negra. Testimonios de aprendizaje

Cuatro factores que profundizan el envejecimiento de la universidad

Eirene et Horae. Decálogo para una educación de Paz

El ser humano como eje del desarrollo

Blog catchall- cajón de sastre.

Destapar el cielo. Una metáfora para el viaje de la vida

El desarrollo democrático y la virtual mentira

A Personal Selection of Nelson Mandela Best Quotes

La música y su dimensión afectiva

Copyright © 2008-2024 Miguel Ángel Escotet. All Rights Reserved.

Aligning Learner-Centered Design Philosophy, Theory, Research, and Practice

• Reference work entry
• First Online: 15 October 2023
• Cite this reference work entry

• Cliff Zintgraff 4 &
• Atsusi Hirumi 5  

Learner-centered approaches to teaching and learning are favored by many educators and instructional designers. However, even those who favor learner-centered design (LCD) recognize that there are multiple interpretations and applications, and that some designs work better than others. Why is there such variance in LCD? One reason is the lack of alignment in LCD philosophy, theory, research, and practice. Lack of alignment begins with confusion over the plethora of constructs associated with LCD. Then, as the LCD process unfolds, alignment can suffer in two ways, top-down and bottom-up. Alignment should flow down from philosophies, to theory and research, and into the practice of instructional design, curriculum development, and delivery. Alignment should also flow bottom-up, from the practical constraints of the classroom, to those of curriculum development and instructional design, and then further to inform research, theory, and educational philosophies. Within a course, the learning objectives, strategies, and assessments must also be aligned to ensure the kind of internal consistency that is fundamental to the design of effective, efficient, and engaging learning experiences. Finally, when different researchers examine evidence, multiple overlapping interpretations contribute to differing conclusions about the effectiveness of LCD and resulting implications. To facilitate the alignment of LCD philosophy, theory, research, and practice, the authors pursue a coherent framework that captures the key elements of LCD and their relationships. Building on the framework, a simple model is proposed for assessing the artifacts of LCD, including documentation of LCD techniques, methods, curricula, and implementations in online and classroom settings. The framework and related assessments can guide future LCD research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2004). User-centered design. In W. Bainbridge (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Google Scholar  

Albion, P., Jamieson-Proctor, R., & Finger, G. (2010, March). Auditing the TPACK competence and confidence of Australian teachers: The teaching with ICT audit survey (TWICTAS). In Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education Conference (SITE), San Diego, California .

Alexander, H. (2006). A view from somewhere: Explaining the paradigms of educational research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40 (2), 205–221.

Article   Google Scholar  

American Psychological Association. (1993). Learner-centered psychological principles (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED371994). ERIC Clearinghouse).

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2 , 89–195.

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 4 , 71–81. New York: Academic Press.

Bannon, L., Bardzell, J., & Bødker, S. (2019). Reimagining participatory design. ACM Interactions, 26 (1), 27–32. ACM.

Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (1), 1–14.

Barker, L., & Borko, H. (2011). Conclusion: Presence and the art of improvisational teaching. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 279–298). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Barrows, H. S. (1985). How to design a problem based curriculum for the preclinical years . New York, NY: Springer Publishing.

Bednar, A., Cunningham, D. J., Duffy, T., & Perry, D. (1995). Theory in practice: How do we link? In G. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (2nd ed., pp. 100–112). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2011). Teaching for creativity with disciplined improvisation. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 94–109). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Bernstein, R. J. (1995). The new constellation: The ethical-political horizons of modernity/postmodernity . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71 , 791–799.

Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 , 141–178.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32–42.

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31 , 21–32.

Burnard, P. (2011). Creativity, pedagogic partnerships, and the improvisatory space of teaching. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 51–72). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Bybee, R. W. (2002). Scientific inquiry, student learning, and the science curriculum. In R. W. Bybee (Ed.), Learning science and the science of learning (pp. 25–36). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (Vol. 1, pp. 39–64). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Christou, C., Eliophotou-Menon, M., & Philippou, G. (2004). Teachers’ concerns regarding the adoption of a new mathematics curriculum: An application of CBAM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57 (2), 157–176.

Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32 (1), 9–13.

Cochrane, T., & Narayan, V. (2017). Design considerations for mobile learning. In C. M. Reigeluth, B. J. Beatty, & R. D. Myers (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume IV: The learner-centered paradigm of education . New York, NY: Routledge.

Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1988). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 8 (1), 2–10.

Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility. (n.d.). Participatory design. Retrieved November 1, 2020, from http://cpsr.org/issues/pd/

Cross, K. P. (1991, June 12). Every teacher a researcher, every classroom a laboratory. The Chronicle of Higher Education , p. B2.

CTGV (Cognition & Technology Group at Vanderbilt). (1992). The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40 (1), 65–80.

Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920 . New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Reforming schools through technology, 1980–2000 . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

Book   Google Scholar  

Dewey, J. (1900). Psychology and social practice. The Psychological Review, VII (2), 105–124.

Dewey, J. (1997). My pedagogic creed. In The curriculum studies reader (pp. 17–23). New York, NY: Routledge.

DeZutter, S. (2011). Professional improvisation and teacher education: Opening the conversation. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 27–50). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Dodge, B. (1998). The WebQuest page . Retrieved April 3, 2000, from http://edweb.sdsu.edu/webquest/webquest.html

Driscoll, M. P. (1994). Psychology of learning for instruction . New York, NY: Wiley.

Duffy, T. M. (2009). Building lines of communication and a research agenda. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? New York, NY: Routledge.

Erickson, F. (1984). School literacy, reasoning, and civility: An anthropologist’s perspective. Review of Educational Research, 54 (4), 525–546.

Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53 (4), 25–39.

Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6 (4), 50–72.

Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. (1996). Students’ responses and approaches to case-based instruction: The role of reflective self-regulation. American Educational Research Journal, 33 (3), 719–752.

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology and Education, 42 (3), 255–284.

FIRST. (2016). Vision and mission. Retrieved April 24, 2016, from http://www.firstinspires.org/about/vision-and-mission

Francom, G. M. (2017). Principles for task-centered instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth, B. J. Beatty, & R. D. Myers (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume IV: The learner-centered paradigm of education . New York, NY: Routledge.

Gibbons, A. S., McConkie, M., Seo, K. K., & Wiley, D. A. (2009). Simulation approach to instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume III: Building a common knowledge base . New York, NY: Routledge.

Gibson, J. T. (2009). Discussion approach to instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume III: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. 3) [Kindle DX Version]. New York, NY: Routledge.

Grayling, A. C. (1998). Philosophy 1: A guide through the subject . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research (Vol. 2, No. 163–194, p. 105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). What is instructional design? In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (Vol. 1, pp. 16–25). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (Eds.). (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process . New York, NY: SUNY Press.

Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes . Boston, MA: Pearson.

Hannafin, M. J., Hannafin, K. M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1997). Grounded practice in the design of learning systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45 (3), 101–117.

Harris, K. S. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions of modular technology education laboratories. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 42 (4), 52–71.

Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41 (4), 393–416.

Hirumi, A. (2002). Student-centered, technology-rich, learning environments (SCenTRLE): Operationalizing constructivist approaches to teaching and learning. Journal for Technology and Teacher Education, 10 (4), 497–537.

Hirumi, A. (Ed.). (2014a). Grounded designs for online and hybrid learning: Practical guidelines for educators and instructional designers. Book I – Design fundamentals . Eugene, WA: International Society for Technology in Education.

Hirumi, A. (Ed.). (2014b). Grounded designs for online and hybrid learning: Practical guidelines for educators and instructional designers. Book II – Designs in action . Eugene, WA: International Society for Technology in Education.

Hirumi, A. (Ed.). (2014c). Grounded designs for online and hybrid learning: Practical guidelines for educators and instructional designers. Book III – Trends and technology . Eugene, WA: International Society for Technology in Education.

Hirumi, A., Johnson, K., Kleinsmith, A., Reyes, R., Rivera-Gutierrez, D., Kubovec, S., … Cendan, J. (2017). Advancing virtual patient simulations and experiential learning with InterPLAY: Examining how theory informs design and design informs theory. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 6 (1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.28990/jaid2017.061005 .

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42 , 99–107.

Holmes Group. (1990). Tomorrow’s schools: Principles for the design of professional development schools . East Lansing, MI: The H.G. Inc.

Hoy, W. K., & Adams, C. M. (2015). Quantitative research in education: A primer . Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Interaction Design Foundation. (n.d.). User-centered design. Retrieved November 1, 2020, from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/user-centered-design#:~:text=User%2Dcentered%20design%20(UCD),and%20accessible%20products%20for%20them

Jenlink, P. M. (2013). Situated cognition theory. In B. Irby, G. H. Brown, R. Lara-Alecio, & S. A. Jackson (Eds.), The handbook of educational theories (pp. 185–198). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215–239). Erlbaum.

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41 (2), 75–86.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., & Miller, S. M. (2003). Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context . New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Kuniavsky, M. (2010). Smart things: Ubiquitous computing user experience design . Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Learning-theories.com (2020a). Educational robotics and constructionism (Papert). Retrieved January 9, 2021 from https://www.learning-theories.com/educational-robotics-and-constructionism.html .

Learning-theories.com (2020b). Situated cognition (Brown, Collins, & Duguid). Retrieved January 9, 2021 from https://www.learning-theories.com/situated-cognition-brown-collins-duguid.html .

Lefrancois, G. R. (1997). Psychology for teachers (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Lexico. (2019). Practice. Retrieved July 30, 2019, from https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/practice

Lindsey, L., & Berger, N. (2009). Simulation approach to instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume III: Building a common knowledge base . New York, NY: Routledge.

Markham, T., Larmer, J., & Ravitz, J. (2003). Project based learning handbook: A guide to standards-focused project based learning for middle and high school teachers . Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.

Martin, L. C., & Towers, J. (2011). Improvisational understanding in the mathematics classroom. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 252–278). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

McKay, C. S., & Glazewski, K. D. (2017). Designing maker-based instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth, B. J. Beatty, & R. D. Myers (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume IV: The learner-centered paradigm of education . New York, NY: Routledge.

McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. (2018). Conducting educational design research: What, why and how . London, England: Taylor & Francis.

Melchior, A., Burack, C., Hoover, M., & Marcus, J. (2016). FIRST longitudinal study: Findings at follow-up (year 3 report) . Waltham, MA: The Center for Youth and Communities, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University.

Meyers, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017–1054.

Moos, D. C. (2011). Self-regulated learning and externally generated feedback with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44 (3), 265–297.

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kemp, J. E., & Kalman, H. (2010). Designing effective instruction . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Myers, R. D., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2017). Designing games for learning. In C. M. Reigeluth, B. J. Beatty, & R. D. Myers (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume IV: The learner-centered paradigm of education . New York, NY: Routledge.

Nix, R. K. (2012). Cultivating constructivist classrooms through evaluation of an integrated science learning environment. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1291–1303). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition . New York, NY: Basic Books.

Novak, G. M., & Beatty, B. J. (2017). Designing just-in-time instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth, B. J. Beatty, & R. D. Myers (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume IV: The learner-centered paradigm of education . New York, NY: Routledge.

Palincsar, A. S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21 , 261–277.

Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49 (1), 345–375.

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1 , 117–175.

Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. Constructionism, 36 , 1–11.

Peirce, C. S. (1878). How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly, 12 , 286–302.

Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95 (2), 123–138.

Project Lead the Way. (2014). PLTW . Retrieved November 25, 2014, from http://www.pltw.org

Reigeluth, C. M., Beatty, B. J., & Myers, R. D. (Eds.). (2017). Instructional-design theories and models, Volume IV: The learner-centered paradigm of education [Kindle DX Version]. New York, NY: Routledge.

Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (Eds.). (2009a). Instructional-design theories and models, Volume III: Building a common knowledge base . New York, NY: Routledge.

Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2009b). Understanding instructional theory. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume III: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. 3, pp. 3–26) [Kindle DX Version]. New York, NY: Routledge.

Reigeluth, C. M., Myers, R., & Lee, D. (2017). Chapter 1, The learner-centered paradigm of education. In C. M. Reigeluth, B. J. Beatty, & R. D. Myers. (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume IV: The learner-centered paradigm of education (Vol. 4) [Kindle DX Version]. New York, NY: Routledge.

Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. In Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows (pp. 5–15). Purdue University Press.

Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2011). Structure and improvisation in creative teaching . New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M. M., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2007). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42 , 91–97.

Schwartz, D. L., Lindgren, R., & Lewis, S. (2009). Constructivism in an age of non-constructivist assessments. In Constructivist instruction (pp. 46–73). New York, NY: Routledge.

Scott, C. (2012). An investigation of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) focused high schools in the US. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 13 (5), 30–39.

Siemens, G. (2014). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2 (1). Retrieved May 22, 2017, from http://www.itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm

Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

Spector, J. M. (2014). Program and project evaluation. In J. M. Spector (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 195–201). New York, NY: Springer.

Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The methodology of participatory design. Technical Communications, 52 (2), 163–174.

Strayer, J. F. (2017). Chapter 12, Designing instruction for flipped classrooms. In C. M. Reigeluth, B. J. Beatty, & R. D. Myers (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume IV: The learner-centered paradigm of education (Vol. 4). New York, NY: Routledge.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12 (2), 257–285.

Sweller, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Clark, R. E. (2007). Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: A reply to commentaries. Educational Psychologist, 42 (2), 115–121.

Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & White, L. R. (1994). CLES: An instrument for monitoring the development of constructivist learning environments. In Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association , New Orleans, LA.

Teichmann, J., & Evans, K. C. (1999). Philosophy: A beginner’s guide . Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

Texas Education Agency. (2014, August). TEA news releases online . Retrieved December 15, 2014, from http://tea.texas.gov/news_release.aspx?id=25769815392

Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (Eds.). (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? New York, NY: Routledge.

Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22 (3), 271–296.

Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1 (1), 3–14.

Verenikina, I. (2003). Understanding scaffolding and the ZPD in educational research. In Proceedings of the international education research conference (AARE – NZARE), 30 November–3 December 2003, Auckland, New Zealand.

Voorhees, R. A., & Voorhees, A. B. (2017). Principles for competency-based education. In C. M. Reigeluth, B. J. Beatty, & R. D. Myers (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models, Volume IV: The learner-centered paradigm of education . New York, NY: Routledge.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Waring, S. M. (2011). Conducting authentic historical investigations in the digital age. In A. Hirumi (Ed.), Grounded designs for online and hybrid learning: Practical guidelines for educators and instructional designers . Eugene, WA: International Society for Technology in Education.

Wiley, D. A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects . Bloomington, IN: Agency for Instructional Technology and Association for Educational Communications & Technology.

Wise, A. F., & O’Neill, K. (2009). Beyond more versus less: A reframing of the debate on instructional guidance. In Constructivist instruction (pp. 94–117). New York, NY: Routledge.

Zintgraff, A. C., Jr. (2016). STEM professional volunteers in K-12 competition programs: Educator practices and impact on pedagogy (Doctoral dissertation).

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the role of Dr. Michael Spector and the National Science Foundation-funded Cyberlearning Early Career Workshop-University of North Texas for organizing the activities that led to this publication.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

IC2 Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

Cliff Zintgraff

University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA

Atsusi Hirumi

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cliff Zintgraff .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Department of Learning Technologies, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA

J. Michael Spector

Instructional Design and Technology, Virginia Tech School of Education, Blacksburg, VA, USA

Barbara B. Lockee

Marcus D. Childress

Section Editor information

Department of Educational Technology, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, USA

Ross A. Perkins

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Zintgraff, C., Hirumi, A. (2023). Aligning Learner-Centered Design Philosophy, Theory, Research, and Practice. In: Spector, J.M., Lockee, B.B., Childress, M.D. (eds) Learning, Design, and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17461-7_119

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17461-7_119

Published : 15 October 2023

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-17460-0

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-17461-7

eBook Packages : Education Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Education

Share this entry

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

How to Write a Philosophy of Education for Elementary Teachers

• Becoming A Teacher
• Assessments & Tests
• Elementary Education
• Secondary Education
• Special Education
• Homeschooling
• M.S., Education, Buffalo State College
• B.S., Education, Buffalo State College

A philosophy of education statement, sometimes called a teaching statement, should be a staple in every teacher's portfolio. For elementary school teachers, the statement is an opportunity to define what teaching means to you and allows you to describe how and why you teach as you do at the early stages of learning. The following tips and philosophy of education examples for elementary teachers can help you write an essay that you'll be proud to have.

A philosophy of education statement is an opportunity to define what teaching means to you, and to describe how and why you teach as you do. Articulating this statement in the first person and using a traditional essay format (introduction, body, conclusion) will help you craft an enduring and inspiring personal statement.

Structure of a Teaching Philosophy

Unlike other kinds of writing, educational statements are frequently written in the first person because these are personal essays on your chosen profession. In general, they should be one to two pages long, though they can be longer if you've had an extensive career. Like other essays, a good educational philosophy should have an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. Here is a sample structure.

Introduction

Use this paragraph to describe your views on teaching in a general sense. State your thesis (for example, "My philosophy of education is that every child should have the right to learn and get a quality education.") and discuss your ideals. Be brief; you'll use the following paragraphs to explain the details. Think about aspects of early education that are unique to elementary teachers, and introduce these ideals into your writing.

Use the following three to five paragraphs (or more, if needed) to elaborate on your introductory statement. For example, you could discuss the ideal elementary classroom environment and how it makes you a better teacher, addresses student needs, and facilitates parent/child interactions.

Build on these ideals in the following paragraphs by discussing how you keep your classes aware and engaged, how you facilitate age-appropriate learning , and how you involve students in the assessment process . Whatever your approach, remember to focus on what you value most as an educator and to cite examples of how you've put these ​​ideals into practice.

Go beyond simply restating your educational philosophy in your closing. Instead, talk about your goals as a teacher, how you have been able to meet them in the past, and how you can build on these to meet future challenges. 

Philosophy of education documents for elementary teachers are very personal and unique to the individual. While some may have similarities, your own philosophy should focus on your personal approach to pedagogy and classroom management. Focus on what makes you unique as an educator, and how you wish to advance your career to further support elementary education.

Writing Prompts

As with any writing, take the time to outline your ideas before you begin. The following tips can help you craft your teaching philosophy statement:

• Brainstorm about  your educational philosophy and your views of education, making notes on those principles you value most. This can help you articulate your philosophy as you organize your essay.
• Demonstrate how you have put your educational philosophy into practice in the classroom by citing specific examples and outcomes with students, parents, or fellow teachers and administrators. 
• Reflect on your experience over your career. Most likely, your teaching philosophy has changed over time. Reflect on the opportunities and challenges that lie ahead, and how you intend to meet them.
• Connect with others and talk to your peers in the field, as well as mentors. Ask them about how they crafted their essays and ask them to review yours once you complete it. Having people who know you and your teaching style well review your work can help you craft a truly representative statement.
• Review a few sample essays to help you as you begin writing your own.

Career Advancement

Applying for a brand new job isn't the only time you need an educational philosophy. If you're seeking a promotion or are applying for tenure, you'll need to craft or update your educational philosophy statement. As time goes on, your approach to education and classroom management will likely evolve, and so will your beliefs. Updating your philosophy allows you to articulate your professional motivations and goals, as well as your approach to educating others so that observers can have a better sense of who you are, even without observing you in the classroom. Consider reviewing your philosophy every few years.

• What Requirements Are Needed to Be an Elementary School Teacher?
• 4 Teaching Philosophy Statement Examples
• What Is the Role of a Teacher?
• 9 Things to Know About Becoming a Teacher
• Top Tips for Acing a Teacher Interview
• Common Interview Questions in Education
• 8 Signs You Should Become a Teacher
• What Is Student Teaching Really Like?
• 7 Reasons to Become a Teacher
• Learning the Basics of a Student Teacher Resume
• A Short Guide to Microteaching
• Weighing the Decision: To Teach or Not to Teach
• Landing Your First Teaching Job
• 24 Simple Rules All Teachers Should Live By
• Student Teacher Evaluation Criteria
• 10 Useful Skills Modern Teachers Need

• Facebook Group
• Facebook Page
• e-SLM vesion2

National Mathematics Program (NMP)

• Grade 1 NMP Lesson Scripts
• Grade 10 NMP Lesson Scripts
• Grade 2 NMP Lesson Scripts
• Grade 3 NMP Lesson Scripts
• Grade 4 NMP Lesson Scripts
• Grade 5 NMP Lesson Scripts
• Grade 6 NMP Lesson Scripts
• Grade 7 NMP Lesson Scripts
• Grade 8 NMP Lesson Scripts
• Grade 9 NMP Lesson Scripts

Most Downloaded

• MATATAG Curriculum Guide SY 2024-2025
• Daily Time Record (eDTR)
• Electronic Class Record
• Enrollment Form (BEEF) SY 2024-2025
• Confirmation Slip SY 2024-2025
• Enrollment Guidelines 2024-2025
• Learning Activity Sheets
• New Sick Leave Form 6
• Self-Learning Modules (SLM)
• Teachers Guide 2021-22
• Your 700+ PowerPoint Templates

Reflection of a learner-centered teaching philosophy

Reflection journal entry in drrr: applying a learner-centered teaching philosophy  -  download here reflection journal entry in esp: applying a learner-centered teaching philosophy  -  download here reflection journal entry in media and information literacy: applying a learner-centered teaching philosophy  -  download here reflection journal entry in ucsp: applying a learner-centered teaching philosophy  -  download here journal entry of technology and livelihood education (tle) teacher: application of learner-centered teaching philosophy -   read/download journal entry of elementary filipino teacher: application of learner-centered teaching philosophy -   read/download journal entry of high school filipino teacher: application of learner-centered teaching philosophy -   read/download (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); journal entry of elementary english teacher: application of learner-centered teaching philosophy -   read/download journal entry of high school english teacher: application of learner-centered teaching philosophy -   read/download journal entry of elementary science teacher: application of learner-centered teaching philosophy -   read/download journal entry of high school science teacher: application of learner-centered teaching philosophy -   read/download journal entry of elementary mathematics teacher: application of learner-centered teaching philosophy -   read/download journal entry of high school mathematics teacher: application of learner-centered teaching philosophy -   read/download journal entry of elementary mapeh teacher: application of learner-centered teaching philosophy -   read/download journal entry of high school mapeh teacher: application of learner-centered teaching philosophy -   read/download journal entry of elementary araling panlipunan teacher: application of learner-centered teaching philosophy -   read/download journal entry of high school araling panlipunan: application of learner-centered teaching philosophy -   read/download.

No comments

Post a Comment

Social Counter

• facebook count=667 K Follow

Featured Post

Deped national mathematics program (nmp) lesson scripts free download.

DepEd National Mathematics Program (NMP) Lesson Scripts Free Download Empower your reading instruction with our FREE lesson scripts designed...

Popular Posts

• DepED to implement flexible scheduling for teachers
• Free Online Training for Teachers from NEAP! Earn up to 15 CPD Units
• President Marcos proclaims Special Non-Working Days for September 2024

DOWNLOADABLE RESOURCES

• Budget of Work
• Curriculum Guide
• Detailed Lesson Plan
• enhanced enrollment form
• Enhanced TIP Course Books
• learning activity sheet
• Modules with answer key
• Quarterly Assessment
• Reading Materials
• Remedial Reading
• RPMS Tools and Forms
• Rubric Assessment Tools
• school calendar 2021-2022
• school calendar 2022-2023
• Self-Learning Modules
• Summative Test

LATEST ISSUANCES

Deped updates, teacher resources.

Building a Student-Centered Classroom (with Examples)

A student-centered classroom is an educational approach that places students at the center of the learning experience. Unlike the traditional teacher-centered approach, where the teacher is the primary source of knowledge and students are passive recipients, a student-centered learning environment encourages students to take an active role in their education.

This shift is particularly beneficial for Generation Z and Generation Alpha students, who thrive in dynamic, interactive, and technology-rich settings. In these environments, students are empowered to explore their interests, engage in problem-solving activities, and collaborate with peers. This approach not only enhances academic achievement but also fosters critical thinking, creativity, and a lifelong love of learning, preparing students for success in an ever-evolving world.

The benefits of student-centered learning have been mounting over the past several years. Evidence shows that it significantly improves student engagement, enhances critical thinking skills, fosters a deeper understanding of the material, and better prepares students for real-world challenges by developing their problem-solving abilities and encouraging lifelong learning.

Enhancing the Learning Experience

In a student-centered classroom, the learning experience is tailored to meet the diverse needs of individual students . This personalized approach ensures that each student can learn at their own pace and follow their unique learning journeys. By focusing on the interests of the student, educators can foster a love of learning and help students develop critical thinking skills.

The emphasis on student choice and voice in the classroom empowers students to take charge of their own learning and explore new ideas. Choice boards are a powerful way to offer varied learning paths, allowing students to select activities that resonate with their learning preferences.

Promoting Student Engagement

Student engagement is a key component of student-centered instruction. By incorporating project-based learning and inquiry-based learning, educators can create a learning environment that is both stimulating and relevant to real-world challenges. These instructional approaches encourage students to work on ongoing projects and solve complex problems, making learning more meaningful and engaging.

The use of choice boards allows students to make decisions about their learning activities , further enhancing their engagement and motivation. Engaged students are more likely to retain information and develop a deeper understanding of the material, leading to better academic outcomes.

Developing Important Skills

A student-centered classroom helps students develop a wide range of important skills that are essential for success in the 21st century. Collaborative learning and group work promote communication skills and teamwork , while problem-based learning and case studies enhance problem-solving skills and critical thinking.

By participating in interactive activities and real-world projects, students become active participants in their education and develop self-directed learning skills. This approach prepares students to navigate complex problems and adapt to new situations, which are crucial skills in today’s fast-paced world .

Supporting Different Learning Needs

One of the key benefits of a student-centered classroom is its ability to accommodate the distinct learning needs of individual students. By using various instructional strategies and learner-centered teaching methods, educators can address the unique strengths and challenges of each student . This approach ensures that all students, regardless of their learning style or background, have the opportunity to reach their full potential.

Differentiation is a hallmark of student-centered methods, where instructional approaches are tailored to the individual needs of each student, promoting equity and inclusivity in the classroom.

Building Strong Relationships

A student-centered learning environment fosters strong relationships between students and teachers. By creating a classroom setting that is based on mutual respect and trust, educators can establish a positive and supportive learning space. This environment encourages students to feel comfortable expressing their thoughts and ideas , leading to a more collaborative and inclusive classroom culture.

Strong relationships between students and teachers enhance student motivation and engagement , as students feel valued and understood. Teachers act as facilitators and guides, supporting students as they navigate their learning journeys.

Leveraging Educational Technology

Generation Z and Generation Alpha students are digital natives who are comfortable using technology in their everyday lives. A student-centered classroom leverages educational technology to enhance learning and provide access to online resources. Free web tools and social media platforms can be integrated into the curriculum to support collaborative learning and provide additional opportunities for students to engage with the material.

Educational technology also allows for the use of innovative instructional approaches, such as flipped classrooms and blended learning , which can enhance the overall learning experience.

Fostering Lifelong Learning

The learner-centered approach in a student-centered classroom promotes lifelong learning by encouraging students to take an active role in their education. By developing self-directed learning skills and a love of learning , students are better prepared to adapt to new challenges and continue learning throughout their lives.

This approach aligns with the mission of organizations like the Nellie Mae Education Foundation, which advocates for student-centered learning as a way to prepare students for future success. Lifelong learning is critical in a rapidly changing world , where continuous learning and adaptability are essential for personal and professional growth.

Implementing Best Practices

Educators who adopt student-centered teaching methods are implementing best practices that have been shown to improve student outcomes. By focusing on the interests and needs of individual students, teachers can create a more engaging and effective learning environment.

The use of student-centered methods, such as project-based learning, inquiry-based learning, and problem-based learning, helps students develop the skills they need to succeed in high school, higher education, and beyond. These methods are supported by research and best practices in education, making them powerful tools for enhancing student learning.

Adapting to the Modern Classroom

The modern classroom is evolving, and student-centered approaches are at the forefront of this transformation. Rows of desks and traditional classroom setups are being replaced with flexible learning spaces that promote collaboration and active learning.

By embracing these changes, educators can create a more dynamic and responsive learning environment that meets the needs of Generation Z and Generation Alpha students . Flexible learning spaces allow for different configurations and setups, facilitating various instructional strategies and learning activities.

Real-World Applications

Student-centered classrooms prepare students to tackle real-world challenges by providing opportunities for them to engage in real-world projects and case studies. This type of learning helps students see the relevance of their education and develop the skills needed to succeed in a rapidly changing world.

By focusing on practical applications and hands-on learning, educators can help students connect their classroom experiences to their future careers and goals. Real-world learning experiences make education more meaningful and help students develop a sense of purpose and direction.

Encouraging Student Agency

Student agency is a central concept in student-centered learning. By giving students more control over their learning, educators can help them become more independent and self-motivated. This approach encourages students to take ownership of their education and develop the confidence to pursue their interests and goals.

By fostering a sense of agency, teachers can help students become more proactive and engaged learners. Student agency empowers students to make decisions about their learning and take responsibility for their educational outcomes.

A student-centered classroom offers numerous benefits for Generation Z and Generation Alpha students. By creating a learning environment that prioritizes student engagement, individual needs, and active participation, educators can help students develop important skills and a love of learning. The use of educational technology and innovative instructional approaches ensures that students are well-prepared to meet the challenges of the future.

By embracing student-centered methods, teachers can create a more dynamic, inclusive, and effective learning environment that supports the diverse needs of today’s students. This approach not only enhances academic achievement but also prepares students for lifelong learning and success in a rapidly changing world.

Stop Driving the Teacher Struggle Bus

Are you struggling with student engagement,  apathy , or keeping your class on track? 

💫💫  There’s hope!  💫💫

If you’re ready to take the first step towards reviving student engagement and transforming your classroom, I invite you to join me for my free workshop “ Reversing Student Apathy ” designed to equip educators with innovative strategies that work.

This  free teacher workshop  offers educators a valuable opportunity to explore and address student apathy. By examining its causes and discussing strategies, participants will learn how to make meaningful changes in their teaching methods  that are actually working . The sessions are engaging and collaborative, allowing educators to share experiences and develop a collective approach to improving student engagement.

Highlights include:

• Understanding the roots of  student apathy  and its impact.
• Strategies for enhancing classroom dynamics.
• The importance of educator-student relationships.
• Innovative teaching approaches for today’s students.

By the end of the workshop, you will not only understand what you need to accomplish to stabilize the  4 pillars of your classroom , but you will also walk away with 5 tangible ideas to try in the classroom the very next day.

Join today to be part of the solution to reigniting student enthusiasm and engagement.

About the Author: Jenn Breisacher

After moving from a teacher-dominated classroom to a truly student-centered one, Jenn found herself helping colleagues who wanted to follow her lead.  In 2018 she decided to expand outside of her school walls and help those out there who were also trying to figure out this fantastic method of instruction to ignite intrinsic motivation in their students.  Read more about her journey with Student-Centered World at studentcenteredworld.com/about

You May Also Like

Easy ways to score teaching grants in k-12, interactive learning activities for elementary students, 5 classroom organization ideas, tips, and tricks, leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Learner-centered pedagogy and preaching: a postmodern framework for transformation of preacher and listener.

1. Introduction

2. defining learner-centered teaching.

• Teaching that engages students in the hard, messy work of learning.
• Teaching that motivates and empowers students by giving them some control over learning processes.
• Teaching that encourages collaboration, acknowledging the classroom, be it virtual or real, as a community where everyone shares the learning agenda.
• Teaching that includes explicit learning ++.
• Teaching that promotes students’ reflection about what they are learning and how they are learning it. 6

3. Pedagogy and Preaching

4. context of learner-centered preaching, 5. learner-centered preaching.

• Listeners will make connections between the message and their life.
• Listeners will think critically about the text and ideas presented in the sermon.
• Listeners will gain value for and a sense of investment in what is being preached.
• Listeners will be self-motivated to comprehensively understand the message.
• Listeners will see themselves as active and essential to the preaching experience.
• Listeners will be transformed in the way they understand God, the world, and the self.

5.1. The Role of the Teacher

5.2. the balance of power, 5.3. the function of content, 5.4. the student’s responsibility for learning, 5.5. the process of evaluation, 6. conclusions.

• Considering the metaphors that foster a facilitating posture for the teacher–preacher.
• Adjusting the balance of power with humble, learner-influenced preaching.
• Reducing content to allow for practicing self-education.
• Using care and expert–learner modeling to increase learner responsibility.
• Practicing and encouraging self-assessment.

Data Availability Statement

Conflicts of interest.

• Allen, Ronald J. 2009. Preaching and the Other . St. Louis: Chalice Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Allen, Ronald J. 2017. Some Issues for Preaching in the Future. Encounter 77: 39–54. [ Google Scholar ]
• Allen, Ronald J., and Mary Alice Mulligan. 2009. Listening to Listeners: Five Years Later. Homiletic 34: 4–17. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Clark, E. Trey. 2024. Forming Preachers: An Examination of Four Homiletical Pedagogy Paradigms. Religions 15: 364. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Craddock, Fred. 1987. As One Without Authority , 3rd ed. Nashville: Parthenon Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gibson, Scott M. 2005. Defining the New Homiletic. Journal of the Evangelical Homiletics Society 5: 19–28. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gibson, Scott M. 2012. Preaching with a Plan: Sermon Strategies for Growing Mature Believers . Grand Rapids: Baker Books. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lowry, Eugene L. 2000. The Homiletical Plot, Expanded Edition: The Sermon as Narrative Art Form . Louisville: Presbyterian Publishing Corporation. [ Google Scholar ]
• McClure, John S. 1995. The Roundtable Pulpit: Where Leadership and Preaching Meet . Nashville: Abingdon Press. [ Google Scholar ]
• O’Lynn, Rob. 2024. Chapter 7: Crafting Sermon Illustrations that Stick. Preaching Guide to Sermon Application . Available online: https://www.preachingtoday.com/preaching-guides/sermon-application/introduction.html (accessed on 17 July 2024).
• Peel, Edwin. 2024. Pedagogy. Encyclopedia Britannica, Updated 26 July 2024. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/science/pedagogy (accessed on 15 August 2024).
• Robinson, Haddon W. 2014. Biblical Preaching: The Development and Delivery of Expository Messages , 3rd ed. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sigmon, Casey T. 2023. The Courage to Preach in a Digital Age. Religions 14: 551. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Trigwell, Keith, Michael Prosser, and Fiona Waterhouse. 1999. Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and student’s approaches to learning. Higher Education 37: 57–70. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Weimer, Maryellen. 2013. Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice , 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley and Sons Publishing. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wilson, Paul Scott. 2018. The Four Pages of the Sermon, Revised and Updated: A Guide to Biblical Preaching . Nashville: Abingdon Press, ProQuest Ebook Central. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wohlfarth, DeDe, Daniel Sheras, Jessica L. Bennett, Bethany Simon, Jody H. Pimentel, and Laura E. Gabel. 2008. Student Perceptions of Learner-Centered Teaching. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching 3: 67–74. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Share and Cite

Moore, B.J. Learner-Centered Pedagogy and Preaching: A Postmodern Framework for Transformation of Preacher and Listener. Religions 2024 , 15 , 1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091063

Moore BJ. Learner-Centered Pedagogy and Preaching: A Postmodern Framework for Transformation of Preacher and Listener. Religions . 2024; 15(9):1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091063

Moore, Bethany Joy. 2024. "Learner-Centered Pedagogy and Preaching: A Postmodern Framework for Transformation of Preacher and Listener" Religions 15, no. 9: 1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091063

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

A Guide to Implementing Student-Centered Learning Approaches

• Classroom Activities/Strategies/Guides

Student-centered learning (SCL) transforms traditional education by placing students at the heart of their learning experiences, allowing them to make decisions about what, when, and how they learn. This approach fosters active engagement through discussions, projects, and problem-solving tasks, guided by teachers who act as facilitators rather than sole content deliverers. SCL enhances student motivation, improves learning outcomes, and prepares students for real-world challenges by promoting independence and critical thinking. Successful implementation requires support from administrators, professional development for teachers, and a supportive school culture. Despite challenges, such as managing classroom dynamics and shifting responsibilities, SCL's benefits make it a valuable educational strategy.

What would education look like if every student had the opportunity to engage their knowledge and skills in a truly meaningful way? With ongoing discussions about effective teaching methods, it's evident that a one-size-fits-all approach falls short in accommodating the diverse ways in which students learn. This realization has led many educators to embrace student-centered learning—an approach that encourages students to actively participate in decisions about their education, including what, when, and how they learn. 

What is Student-Centered Learning?

Student-centered learning (SCL) is when students are given the chance to make choices and actively participate in learning activities. As the name implies, SCL puts students at the center of their own learning. 

This approach prioritizes students' active involvement and ownership of their learning experiences, where their interests and needs guide the direction and pace of learning activities. Rather than a passive role, students engage in meaningful learning through discussions, projects, experiments, and problem-solving tasks. This equips them with the knowledge and skills they'll need for future success.  

For SCL to thrive, students must have support from administrators and educators. Teachers serve as facilitators to provide guidance, feedback, and solutions, while administrators help by investing in training and solutions for their educators. Additionally, an SCL culture should be promoted and encouraged by the school. 

The Role of Teachers in Student-Centered Learning

In student-centered learning, teachers move away from being the sole deliverers of content to serving as facilitators, mentors, and guides. Instead of a traditional "Do as I say" approach, teachers create a personalized learning plan based on their student's unique needs. They begin to encourage their students to be actively involved in their learning. This shift in teaching involves empowering students to take ownership of their learning process while providing guidance and support along the way. 

A supportive learning environment is crucial for SCL to succeed. Educators must ensure all students feel valued, respected, and safe to participate. Teachers should consistently look for ways to create opportunities for collaborative learning, offer choices in learning activities, and provide regular feedback to empower students to continue growing and succeeding. 

The Impact of Student-Centered Learning on Decision-Making

When a student is interested in a topic, their engagement deepens because they are more willing to spend time thinking, discussing, and creating ideas. In SCL, teachers move away from direct instruction to actively involve students in decision-making regarding the why, what, and how of their learning:

The why is about relevance. Students want to know there is value in what they are learning. If a teacher simply says the curriculum is required or that it is important, it carries no substance to a child. However, when a teacher takes time to share a topic’s relevance, students are willing to invest more effort into understanding and learning. 

The what in SCL refers to allowing students to choose the focus and format of the content they engage with. For instance, when learning a science topic such as ecosystems, students might have various preferences for how they explore the content. While some students may prefer to read an informational article introducing the types of ecosystems, others might benefit from watching educational videos with visual explanations. 

The how is about providing students with multiple ways to demonstrate their understanding. By providing various options for learning, educators can accommodate diverse learning preferences. This may look like activities such as presentations, written essays, creative projects, or group work for students to choose from based on their strengths and interests. 

Students Learn to Lead in Student-Centered Learning

Student-centered learning gives students a chance to take the lead, even if they don’t have all the content skills. John Collins and Nancy Patricia O’Brien, coeditors of The Greenwood Dictionary of Education, state, “The instructor provides students with opportunities to learn independently and from one another and coaches them in the skills they need to do so effectively.” As teachers reduce direct instruction and increase student-led activities, learners become more confident and engaged in the process. 

Student-led activities may include task cards or learning centers that provide students with clear, structured tasks or questions to complete independently or in small groups. This encourages self-directed learning and allows students to work at their own pace. Students can also lead through student-led conferences and classroom discussions. 

Significance of Curriculum in Student-Centered Learning

Curriculum for SCL should be focused on activities that keep students engaged and allow them to choose their learning paths. To do this, teachers can offer choices in topics and assignments, allowing students to demonstrate their understanding through various learning opportunities (projects, debates, writing). While the curriculum doesn't change, the way that it’s implemented certainly can. 

The Challenges and Potential Solutions in Implementing Student-Centered Learning

While there are many benefits to SCL, it does pose potential challenges. It can be challenging if teachers are accustomed to teaching with traditional methods. However, with effective implementation, these challenges can be addressed: 

Challenge: The classroom will be noisier and more chaotic. Solution: Noise in classrooms during active learning periods can be a sign of engagement and productivity among students. It's important for teachers to set clear expectations and establish structured activities to guide students productively. With effective management strategies in place, teachers can embrace a lively classroom atmosphere. 

Challenge: Students may have a hard time shifting their mindset to self-directed learning.  Solution: Implementing SCL doesn't have to be an all-or-nothing approach. Teachers can introduce SCL strategies gradually, allowing students to develop independence and decision-making skills progressively. By scaffolding these skills over time, educators can support students in taking ownership of their learning. 

Challenge: The shift of power and responsibilities from teachers to students.  Solution: Some teachers may have resistance toward SCL as a result of fatigue, previous experiences, or a mindset rooted in traditional teaching methods. School leaders can help teachers transition to SCL by offering professional development sessions, providing ongoing coaching and support, and encouraging teachers to collaborate together to brainstorm ways to integrate it into the existing curriculum. 

Realizing the Benefits of the Student-Centered Approach

More and more schools are adopting a student-centered approach due to its positive learning outcomes. The most notable benefit of SCL is that its personalization positively benefits students of all abilities, but it doesn’t stop there. Some of the many benefits of SCL include: 

• Increased student engagement and motivation in learning activities
• Improved learning outcomes and higher academic achievement
• More decision-making opportunities for a hands-on approach to learning 
• The practice of learning to set their own goals and how to achieve them 
• Flexibility to accommodate diverse learning styles and preferences
• Continued increase of student interest in education and activities
• Positive relationships between students and educators
• Preparation for real-world challenges and lifelong learning 

Strategies for Implementing Student-Centered Learning Approaches

Student-centered learning can take place anywhere, at any time. The primary goal is that students be more active in how instruction takes place. Here are practical strategies for teachers to implement: 

• Inquiry-Based Learning: Teachers encourage curiosity, exploration, and critical thinking by posing open-ended questions and guiding students to investigate. In science class, students may explore the growth of different plants by creating a hypothesis, collecting data, and drawing conclusions.  
• Project-Based Learning (PBL): In PBL, students solve real-world challenges using their academic knowledge and critical thinking skills. For example, in a math class, students might engage in a "Build a Zoo" project. They have the freedom to select animals, create a blueprint for their zoo, utilize measurement skills to design exhibits, and practice concepts like money management and addition while planning animal habitats. This hands-on approach reinforces math concepts and is both engaging and meaningful. 
• Discussions: Discussions can happen in small groups or with the whole class. This time to talk gives students a chance to share ideas, ask questions, and collaborate on understanding concepts. For example, teachers may host a Socratic seminar in reading to discuss a story's themes, and characters, and assess comprehension. 
• Debates: Students come up with a list of topics to debate and then decide if they want to be on the pro or con side. For beginners, teachers can begin with issues students are passionate about, like "Should the school day be shorter?" This approach helps build confidence and understanding in debate techniques before transitioning to topics aligned with the curriculum.
• Flipped Classroom: In a flipped classroom, students engage with pre-recorded videos outside of class. This allows them to digest content at their own pace, freeing up valuable class time for interactive learning experiences. For instance, students might watch a video on the rain cycle at home and then, during class, apply their understanding by creating detailed diagrams or participating in group discussions and experiments.
• Learning Stations: Teachers can set up learning stations with different activities related to the lesson, allowing students to rotate on timers. In a reading class, stations may include reading comprehension tasks, writing prompts, vocabulary games, or peer discussions. 

Tying it Together: Voyager Sopris Learning and Student-Centered Learning Methods

Research-Based Reading Intervention (Grades K–5)

Targeted, Multisensory Math Intervention Curriculum (Grades 5–10)

Subscribe to EDVIEW360 to gain access to podcast episodes, webinars and blog posts where top education thought leaders discuss hot topics in the industry.